US20130253919A1 - Method and System for Enrolling a Voiceprint in a Fraudster Database - Google Patents
Method and System for Enrolling a Voiceprint in a Fraudster Database Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20130253919A1 US20130253919A1 US13/898,679 US201313898679A US2013253919A1 US 20130253919 A1 US20130253919 A1 US 20130253919A1 US 201313898679 A US201313898679 A US 201313898679A US 2013253919 A1 US2013253919 A1 US 2013253919A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- transactions
- audio data
- fraud
- caller
- voiceprint
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L17/00—Speaker identification or verification
- G10L17/04—Training, enrolment or model building
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/22—Payment schemes or models
- G06Q20/24—Credit schemes, i.e. "pay after"
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/38—Payment protocols; Details thereof
- G06Q20/40—Authorisation, e.g. identification of payer or payee, verification of customer or shop credentials; Review and approval of payers, e.g. check credit lines or negative lists
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/38—Payment protocols; Details thereof
- G06Q20/40—Authorisation, e.g. identification of payer or payee, verification of customer or shop credentials; Review and approval of payers, e.g. check credit lines or negative lists
- G06Q20/401—Transaction verification
- G06Q20/4014—Identity check for transactions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/38—Payment protocols; Details thereof
- G06Q20/40—Authorisation, e.g. identification of payer or payee, verification of customer or shop credentials; Review and approval of payers, e.g. check credit lines or negative lists
- G06Q20/401—Transaction verification
- G06Q20/4014—Identity check for transactions
- G06Q20/40145—Biometric identity checks
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/38—Payment protocols; Details thereof
- G06Q20/40—Authorisation, e.g. identification of payer or payee, verification of customer or shop credentials; Review and approval of payers, e.g. check credit lines or negative lists
- G06Q20/401—Transaction verification
- G06Q20/4016—Transaction verification involving fraud or risk level assessment in transaction processing
Definitions
- Embodiments of the disclosure relate to a method and system to detect fraud such as credit card fraud.
- Modern enterprises such as merchants, banks, insurance companies, telecommunications companies, and payments companies are susceptible to many forms of fraud.
- fraud that is particularly pernicious is credit card fraud.
- a fraudster fraudulently uses a credit card or credit card credentials (name, expiration, etc.) of another to enter into a transaction for goods or services with a merchant.
- the merchant provides the goods or services, but since the transaction is with the fraudster the merchant runs the risk of not getting paid.
- the process of detecting an instance of credit card fraud committed with a particular credit card may take months after the date of transaction. For example, the credit card holder must detect the fraudulent transaction and notify the credit card company that issued the credit card. The credit card company must then process the notification and report that the credit card in question is compromised by sending a fraud report to merchants. During that time a fraudster may perpetrate further instances of credit card fraud with said credit card.
- an employee can be terminated for say theft at one location, but then rehired under a different identity at another location.
- the employee represents a grave security risk to the company particularly since the employee, being familiar with the company's systems and internal procedures will be able to engage in further conduct injurious to the company.
- the present disclosure provides a method for enrolling a voiceprint in a fraudster database, the method comprising: a) defining a fraud model comprising at least one hypothesis indicative of a fraudulent transaction; b) processing, audio data based on the fraud model to identify at least one suspect voiceprint in the audio data suspected of belonging to a fraudster; and c) enrolling the at least one suspect voiceprint in the fraudster database.
- the present disclosure provides a system for enrolling a voiceprint in a fraudster database, the system comprising: a) a memory device capable of storing a fraud model comprising at least one hypothesis indicative of a fraudulent transaction; b) a voice processing engine capable of processing audio data based on the fraud model to identify at least one suspect voiceprint in the audio data suspected of belonging to a fraudster; and c) an enrollment engine capable of enrolling the at least one suspect voiceprint in the fraudster database.
- the present disclosure provides computer-implemented methods, computer systems and a computer readable medium containing a computer program product for enrolling a voiceprint in a fraudster database
- the computer program product comprising: a) program code for defining a fraud model comprising at least one hypothesis indicative of a fraudulent transaction; b) program code for processing audio data based on the fraud model to identify at least one suspect voiceprint in the audio data suspected of belonging to a fraudster; and c) program code for enrolling the at least one suspect voiceprint in the fraudster database.
- FIG. 1 shows a pictorial representation of a system used for early fraud detection and early enrollment of a fraud voiceprint into a fraudster database, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure
- FIG. 2 shows a high level block diagram of an Early Fraud Detection system, in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure
- FIG. 3 shows a high level flowchart of a method to determine whether a suspect voiceprint belongs to a fraudster, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure
- FIG. 4 shows a flowchart of a method to determine whether an individual from audio data called multiple times, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure
- FIG. 5 shows a flowchart of a method to determine whether an individual from audio data called multiple times, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure
- FIG. 6 shows a flowchart of a method for early fraud detection and enrolling a voiceprint into a fraudster database, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 7 shows hardware to implement the method disclosed herein, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- embodiments of the present disclosure at least reduce losses due to fraudulent transactions, for example, credit card transactions by using voice data to identify fraudsters.
- the method and system disclosed herein help modern enterprises such as merchants, banks, insurance companies, telecommunications companies, and payments companies by checking whether a caller is a fraudster by checking call audios.
- the detected audio is enrolled into a fraudster database which may then be used to stop future fraudulent transactions in the manner described in the specifications of U.S. Ser. No. 11/404,342, U.S. Ser. No. 11/754,974, U.S. Ser. No. 11/754,975, and U.S. Ser. No. 12/352,530, each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
- frauds are first detected by the credit card companies and are then enrolled into the fraudster database.
- frauds are detected at the merchant's end and are then enrolled into the fraudster database i.e. there is an early/advance enrollment of the frauds into the fraudster database.
- a fraud is enrolled into the fraudster database at an early stage i.e. before receiving a fraud report from a credit card company. Therefore, the early/advance enrollment of frauds into the fraudster database may save merchants from getting duped by alerting them at an early stage.
- the present disclosure explains the method and the system in context of a credit card fraud, the method and system may be used in a similar manner for other types of frauds such as loan fraud, insurance fraud, all types of identity fraud, employment fraud, etc.
- a caller 2 may call a modern enterprise 4 using a suitable telephone network such as PSTN/Mobile/VOIP 6 for placing an order for goods or services.
- a Private Branch Exchange (PBX) 8 may be used to receive the call.
- the PBX 8 may send the call audio to an audio recording device 10 which may record the call audio.
- a call-center ‘X’ may receive and record the call on behalf of the modern enterprise 4 , however, in another embodiment, the modern enterprise 4 may employ an agent (in house or outsourced) or any other third party to receive and record the call.
- the audio recording device 10 may be configured to transmit the recorded call to a transaction database 12 , hereinafter database 12 .
- the database 12 includes phone details of all possible calls received at the modern enterprise 4 .
- the phone details may include at least one of an audio conversation between the modern enterprise 4 and the callers, an amount of the transaction, type of goods or services ordered for (in case of a credit card transaction), a time of call, quantity of goods, reason for the call like placing an order or checking status, credit card credentials, a recipient of the goods, a place of shipment, billing address, caller identity such as a name and/or a social security number of the caller or agent ID (in case of an agent) or an employee ID number, a phone number from which the call is made, a phone number to which the call is made, and other transaction information.
- the database 12 may include an audio database 14 and an order database 16 .
- the audio database 14 is capable of storing call audios and the order database 16 is capable of storing order details.
- the modern enterprise 4 may also include a fraudster database 18 .
- the fraudster database 18 includes voice signatures or voice prints of known fraudsters. Essentially, a voice signature or voice print includes a set of voice characteristics that uniquely identify a person's voice.
- each voice signature in the fraudster database 18 is assigned a unique identifier (ID), which in accordance with one embodiment may include one or more incident details such as a social security number used, a name used, credit card credentials used, date and time of fraud, an amount of the fraud, a type of fraud, enterprise impacted, and other details associated with the fraud incident.
- ID unique identifier
- the phone details of certain callers may be transmitted to an Early Fraud Detection (EFD) system 20 via a file transfer server 22 using Internet/LAN 24 .
- the EFD system 20 helps in early enrollment of a suspect voiceprint into the fraudster database 18 .
- the EFD system 20 processes the phone details of the callers to identify suspect voice prints present in the database 12 to enroll certain suspect voiceprints into the fraudster database 18 .
- the suspect voice prints are enrolled into the fraudster database 18 which may then be used to stop future fraudulent transactions in the manner described in the specifications of U.S. Ser. No. 11/404,342, U.S. Ser. No. 11/754,974, U.S. Ser. No. 11/754,975, and U.S. Ser. No.
- the EFD system 20 may be a distributed system that includes components that are not all located at a single location, but instead are distributed over multiple locations.
- the EFD system 20 may include software to facilitate communications with the modern enterprise 4 or the call-center ‘X’ to access the database 12 .
- the software may include a browser which is an application that facilitates communications via the Internet with the modern enterprise 4 or the call center ‘X’ using networking protocols such as for example the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)/the Internet Protocol (IP), the Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP), etc.
- HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol
- IP Internet Protocol
- SOAP Simple Object Access Protocol
- the EFD may be integrated in the modern enterprise 4 , thereby alleviating the need of transferring the phone details of callers.
- the EFD system 20 includes a selection engine 26 , a memory device 28 , a voice processing engine 30 , and an enrollment engine 32 .
- Each of the components 26 to 32 may be implemented in hardware or in software or as a combination of both hardware and software. Further, it is to be understood that while the components 26 to 32 are shown as separate components based on function, some or all the components may be integrated.
- the EFD system 20 may use the selection engine 26 to select or choose certain audio data from the database 12 .
- the audio data may include phone details of some callers. Selecting audio data from the database 12 is important because the database 12 includes a high volume of data and will consume a lot of time if analyzed completely. Therefore, to save time and computations, a part of the database 12 is selected for analysis. This also helps in maintaining a good speed of the EFD system 20 .
- the selection engine 26 may stream audio data via the file transfer server 22 in real time or after the call or on demand using Internet/LAN 24 .
- the selection engine 26 may request for audio data in a batch using transmitting techniques such as Email/Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP)/HTTP/Service Control Point (SCP)/Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) via the Internet/LAN 24 .
- VOIP Email/Voice Over Internet Protocol
- SCP HTTP/Service Control Point
- SIP Session Initiation Protocol
- the audio data may be selected based on selection criteria.
- the selection criteria may help in filtering the database 12 to select the audio data in a way such that a maximum probability of identifying a fraudster is achieved.
- the selection criteria may be defined considering a pattern which may be followed by fraudsters. In other words, the selection criteria may help in segregating high risk audio data from the database 12 .
- the audio data of last two weeks may be selected for analysis. This may be done because when a fraudster hacks certain credit cards, they generally have less time to do as many transactions as possible before the credit card stops working. Therefore, selecting the audio data of the last two weeks may be helpful to identify a fraudster.
- the selection criteria may also include multiple calls made from a same phone number. This may be helpful to identify a fraudster because a fraudster may use a same phone line to place orders.
- Selection criteria may include multiple calls made from a specific phone number pattern. This may be helpful because the fraudster can use different public telephone booths in a same town to place orders.
- Specific phone number pattern may belong to a specific geographic location.
- the selection criteria may also include specific out-of-pattern orders such as an order for five LCD TVs within two days from a specific phone number pattern.
- the selection criteria may also include transaction profile similarities, for example all orders for a specific number and/or type of product, all wire transfers made before 9:00 A.M., similar transactions including transactions related to a specific geographic location and transactions related to a specific action such as change of address on an account, all calls for same account, random sampling, all orders that exceed a certain dollar value, all calls that have been call forwarded (all calls with similar telephony characteristics), all calls from a specific service provider (Skype or VOIP, landline, or mobile), calls for which an expected channel (landline, wireless, or VOIP) that phone number is associated with (based on phone data records) is different from a channel detected (e.g. by channel detection determined by analyzing audio signal' characteristics), all calls from Automatic Number Identifications (ANIs) frequently used, etc. Therefore, based on these selection criteria, the audio data may be selected for the purpose of identifying a fraudster in the audio data.
- transaction profile similarities for example all orders for a specific number and/or type of product, all wire transfers made before 9:00
- the audio data may be processed using the voice processing engine 30 .
- the voice processing engine 30 processes the audio data to uniquely identify individuals who called multiple times. More specifically, the voice processing engine 30 uses voice biometrics to identify individuals in the audio data who called multiple times. With the help of voice biometrics, the voice processing engine 30 scans each voice sample in the audio data to identify individuals who called multiple times. Subsequently, the voice processing engine 30 determines whether the individuals who called multiple times used multiple caller identities. This may be done by checking the phone details which include caller identity information of all the callers. A person who called multiple times using multiple caller identities may be a fraudster.
- a fraudster when a fraudster uses a certain number of credit cards, he may also use the identity of the actual credit holder to place an order for goods or services over the phone. When the fraudster uses more than one credit card, he may use more than one caller identity. Therefore, a person who called multiple times using multiple caller identities may be a fraudster. In another embodiment, when an employee, who was fired by a merchant at one location, may use a different identity to get a job with the same merchant at a different location. Therefore, the employee who called multiple times using multiple caller identities may be a fraudster.
- a fraud model may be defined. Specifically, the fraud model may be based on a fraudster who called multiple times using multiple identities. In one embodiment, the fraud model may be stored in the memory device 28 . Further, the fraud model may include at least one hypothesis indicative of a fraudulent transaction. In the present embodiment, the hypothesis includes a single voiceprint being matched to multiple caller identities. The hypothesis may be manually coded into the memory device 28 .
- the voice processing engine 30 processes the audio data based on the fraud model to identify at least one suspect voiceprint in the audio data suspected of belonging to a fraudster. More specifically, the voice processing engine 30 checks the audio data to determine whether the individuals who called multiple times used multiple caller identities. In other words, the voice processing engine 30 checks the phone details of individuals who called multiple times to determine whether the hypothesis is true or not. If the hypothesis is true, i.e. if an individual is found to have called multiple times using multiple caller identities, the enrollment engine 32 enrolls the suspect voiceprint into the fraudster database 18 . Otherwise, a next set of audios in the audio data is checked.
- the EFD system 20 may periodically check the database 12 to proactively enroll a suspect voiceprint into the fraudster database 18 prior to receiving a fraud report from a credit card company or from the merchant. In another embodiment, the EFD system 20 may perform such a check on demand by a modern enterprise. Therefore, with each such check, the EFD system 20 may shrink the window between the fraud event and the modern enterprise realization that a fraud has occurred.
- a high level flowchart of a method to determine whether a suspect voiceprint belongs to a fraudster is shown, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- a set of audios of the audio data having suspect voiceprints is processed.
- individuals who called multiple times are identified.
- FIG. 4 a flowchart of a method to determine whether an individual from the audio data called multiple times is shown, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the number of audios in the audio data are ‘N’ i.e. from a 1 to a n and the number of callers who called multiple times are Y i.e. from F 1 to F y , where Y ⁇ N.
- a first person is chosen.
- an unassigned audio a n is picked up.
- a voice print model F y is generated for a n .
- all the remaining audios of the set a 1 to a n are screened against the voice print F y and it is determined which audios from the a 1 to a n match voice print F y .
- all the audios from the set of a 1 to a n that match the voiceprint F y are marked.
- it is determined whether all audios i.e. a n are assigned. If no, then a next person is chosen to run the flowchart on. If yes, then at 412 it is determined that Y y. This means that the corresponding individuals called multiple times.
- FIG. 5 a flowchart of a method to determine whether an individual from the audio data called multiple times is shown, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the number of audios in the audio data are ‘N’ i.e. from a 1 to a n and the number of callers who called multiple times are Y i.e. from F 1 to F y , where Y ⁇ N.
- each a n is screened against Vp i (i ⁇ n) to generate N*(N ⁇ 1) scores representing likelihood that an and Vp i are same individual.
- similar audios are grouped resulting in Y groups, each group representing a unique individual.
- a voiceprint F y is generated for each group.
- Y individuals are identified.
- audio data may be selected based on selection criteria.
- a fraud model is defined.
- the fraud model includes at least one hypothesis indicative of a fraudulent transaction.
- the hypothesis indicative of the fraudulent transaction includes a single voiceprint being matched to multiple caller identities.
- the audio data is processed based on the fraud model to identify at least one suspect voiceprint in the audio data suspected of belonging to a fraudster. The suspect voiceprint is considered identified when the hypothesis is true.
- the EFD system 20 and the server system have, thus far, been described in terms of their respective functions.
- each of the EFD system 20 and server system of the present disclosure may be implemented using the system 70 of FIG. 7 .
- the system 70 typically includes at least one processor 72 coupled to a memory 74 .
- the processor 72 may represent one or more processors (e.g., microprocessors), and the memory 74 may represent random access memory (RAM) devices comprising a main storage of the system 70 , as well as any supplemental levels of memory e.g., cache memories, non-volatile or back-up memories (e.g.
- the memory 74 may be considered to include memory storage physically located elsewhere in the system 70 , e.g. any cache memory in the processor 72 , as well as any storage capacity used as a virtual memory, e.g., as stored on a mass storage device 80 .
- the system 70 also typically receives a number of inputs and outputs for communicating information externally.
- the system 70 may include one or more user input devices 76 (e.g.; a keyboard, a mouse, etc.) and a display 78 (e.g., a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) panel).
- user input devices 76 e.g.; a keyboard, a mouse, etc.
- display 78 e.g., a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) panel
- the system 70 may also include one or more mass storage devices 80 , e.g., a floppy or other removable disk drive, a hard disk drive, a Direct Access Storage Device (DASD), an optical drive (e.g. a Compact Disk (CD) drive, a Digital Versatile Disk (DVD) drive, etc.) and/or a tape drive, among others.
- mass storage devices 80 e.g., a floppy or other removable disk drive, a hard disk drive, a Direct Access Storage Device (DASD), an optical drive (e.g. a Compact Disk (CD) drive, a Digital Versatile Disk (DVD) drive, etc.) and/or a tape drive, among others.
- the system 70 may include an interface with one or more networks 82 (e.g., a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a wireless network, and/or the Internet among others) to permit the communication of information with other computers coupled to the networks.
- networks 82 e.g.
- the system 70 operates under the control of an operating system 84 , and executes various computer software applications, components, programs, objects, modules, etc. to perform the respective functions of the EFD system 20 and server system of the present disclosure. Moreover, various applications, components, programs, objects, etc. may also execute on one or more processors in another computer coupled to the system 70 via a network 82 , e.g. in a distributed computing environment, whereby the processing required to implement the functions of a computer program may be allocated to multiple computers over a network.
- routines executed to implement the embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented as part of an operating system or a specific applications component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions referred to as “computer programs.”
- the computer programs typically comprise one or more instructions set at various times in various memory and storage devices in a computer, and that, when read and executed by one or more processors in a computer, cause the computer to perform operations necessary to execute elements involving the various aspects of the present disclosure.
- the disclosure has been described in the context of fully functioning computers and computer systems, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments of the present disclosure are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that the present disclosure applies equally regardless of the particular type of machine or computer-readable media used to actually effect the distribution.
- Examples of computer-readable media include but are not limited to recordable type media such as volatile and non-volatile memory devices, floppy and other removable disks, hard disk drives, optical disks (e.g., Compact Disk Read-Only Memory (CD ROMS), Digital Versatile Disks, (DVDs), etc.), among others, and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links.
- recordable type media such as volatile and non-volatile memory devices, floppy and other removable disks, hard disk drives, optical disks (e.g., Compact Disk Read-Only Memory (CD ROMS), Digital Versatile Disks, (DVDs), etc.
- CD ROMS Compact Disk Read-Only Memory
- DVDs Digital Versatile Disks
- transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links.
- One advantage of the techniques and systems described herein is that fraud detection is based on a fraudster's voice, which being biometric in nature is linked to the fraudster. Further, the method and system enables a person to detect fraud much before a confirmed fraud report is issued by a credit card company thereby minimizing the amount of damage that could be caused.
Abstract
Description
- This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/856,037, titled “Method and System for Enrolling a Voiceprint in a Fraudster Database” and filed Aug. 13, 2010 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/404,342, titled “Method and System to Detect Fraud Using Voice Data” and filed Apr. 14, 2006, which in turn claims priority benefit to U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/673,472, titled “Detecting fraudulent use of financial account numbers using voiceprints” and filed Apr. 21, 2005. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/856,037 also claims priority benefit to the U.S. 61/335,677, titled “Method for Correlating Fraud Audio to Textual Fraud Reports Using Word Spotting” and filed Jan. 11, 2010.
- Embodiments of the disclosure relate to a method and system to detect fraud such as credit card fraud.
- Modern enterprises such as merchants, banks, insurance companies, telecommunications companies, and payments companies are susceptible to many forms of fraud. One example of fraud that is particularly pernicious is credit card fraud. With credit card fraud, a fraudster fraudulently uses a credit card or credit card credentials (name, expiration, etc.) of another to enter into a transaction for goods or services with a merchant. The merchant provides the goods or services, but since the transaction is with the fraudster the merchant runs the risk of not getting paid.
- Unfortunately, the process of detecting an instance of credit card fraud committed with a particular credit card may take months after the date of transaction. For example, the credit card holder must detect the fraudulent transaction and notify the credit card company that issued the credit card. The credit card company must then process the notification and report that the credit card in question is compromised by sending a fraud report to merchants. During that time a fraudster may perpetrate further instances of credit card fraud with said credit card.
- Another example of fraud that is very difficult for merchants, particularly large merchants, to detect, if at all, occurs in the job application process where an applicant has been designated as undesirable in the past—perhaps as a result of having been fired from the employ of the merchant at one location or for failing a criminal background check—fraudulently assumes a different identity and then applies for a job with the same merchant at a different location. In such cases, failure to detect the fraud could result in the rehiring of the fraudster to the detriment of the merchant. If the fraudster has assumed a new identity, background checks based on identity factors such as names or social security numbers become essentially useless. For example consider that case of a large chain store, such as, for example, Walmart. In this case, an employee can be terminated for say theft at one location, but then rehired under a different identity at another location. The employee represents a grave security risk to the company particularly since the employee, being familiar with the company's systems and internal procedures will be able to engage in further conduct injurious to the company.
- In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for enrolling a voiceprint in a fraudster database, the method comprising: a) defining a fraud model comprising at least one hypothesis indicative of a fraudulent transaction; b) processing, audio data based on the fraud model to identify at least one suspect voiceprint in the audio data suspected of belonging to a fraudster; and c) enrolling the at least one suspect voiceprint in the fraudster database.
- In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a system for enrolling a voiceprint in a fraudster database, the system comprising: a) a memory device capable of storing a fraud model comprising at least one hypothesis indicative of a fraudulent transaction; b) a voice processing engine capable of processing audio data based on the fraud model to identify at least one suspect voiceprint in the audio data suspected of belonging to a fraudster; and c) an enrollment engine capable of enrolling the at least one suspect voiceprint in the fraudster database.
- In yet another aspect of the present disclosure, the present disclosure provides computer-implemented methods, computer systems and a computer readable medium containing a computer program product for enrolling a voiceprint in a fraudster database, the computer program product comprising: a) program code for defining a fraud model comprising at least one hypothesis indicative of a fraudulent transaction; b) program code for processing audio data based on the fraud model to identify at least one suspect voiceprint in the audio data suspected of belonging to a fraudster; and c) program code for enrolling the at least one suspect voiceprint in the fraudster database.
- The accompanying drawings, where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views, together with the detailed description below, are incorporated in and form part of the specification, and serve to further illustrate embodiments of concepts that include the claimed disclosure, and explain various principles and advantages of those embodiments.
-
FIG. 1 shows a pictorial representation of a system used for early fraud detection and early enrollment of a fraud voiceprint into a fraudster database, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure; -
FIG. 2 shows a high level block diagram of an Early Fraud Detection system, in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure; -
FIG. 3 shows a high level flowchart of a method to determine whether a suspect voiceprint belongs to a fraudster, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure; -
FIG. 4 shows a flowchart of a method to determine whether an individual from audio data called multiple times, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure; -
FIG. 5 shows a flowchart of a method to determine whether an individual from audio data called multiple times, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure; -
FIG. 6 shows a flowchart of a method for early fraud detection and enrolling a voiceprint into a fraudster database, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure; and -
FIG. 7 shows hardware to implement the method disclosed herein, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. - The method and system have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present disclosure so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
- In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosure. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art, that the disclosure may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, structures and devices are shown at block diagram form only in order to avoid obscuring the disclosure.
- Reference in this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the disclosure. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. Moreover, various features are described which may be exhibited by some embodiments and not by others. Similarly, various requirements are described which may be requirements for some embodiments but not other embodiments.
- Broadly, embodiments of the present disclosure at least reduce losses due to fraudulent transactions, for example, credit card transactions by using voice data to identify fraudsters. Specifically, the method and system disclosed herein help modern enterprises such as merchants, banks, insurance companies, telecommunications companies, and payments companies by checking whether a caller is a fraudster by checking call audios. The detected audio is enrolled into a fraudster database which may then be used to stop future fraudulent transactions in the manner described in the specifications of U.S. Ser. No. 11/404,342, U.S. Ser. No. 11/754,974, U.S. Ser. No. 11/754,975, and U.S. Ser. No. 12/352,530, each of which is incorporated herein by reference. In case of a credit card fraud, as described in the patent applications incorporated herein by reference, frauds are first detected by the credit card companies and are then enrolled into the fraudster database. However, in the present disclosure, frauds are detected at the merchant's end and are then enrolled into the fraudster database i.e. there is an early/advance enrollment of the frauds into the fraudster database. Specifically, a fraud is enrolled into the fraudster database at an early stage i.e. before receiving a fraud report from a credit card company. Therefore, the early/advance enrollment of frauds into the fraudster database may save merchants from getting duped by alerting them at an early stage. It is to be understood that although the present disclosure explains the method and the system in context of a credit card fraud, the method and system may be used in a similar manner for other types of frauds such as loan fraud, insurance fraud, all types of identity fraud, employment fraud, etc.
- Referring to
FIG. 1 , a pictorial representation of a system used for early fraud detection and early enrollment of a fraud voiceprint into a fraudster database is shown, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. In one embodiment, a caller 2 may call amodern enterprise 4 using a suitable telephone network such as PSTN/Mobile/VOIP 6 for placing an order for goods or services. In one embodiment, a Private Branch Exchange (PBX) 8 may be used to receive the call. The PBX 8 may send the call audio to anaudio recording device 10 which may record the call audio. In one embodiment, a call-center ‘X’ may receive and record the call on behalf of themodern enterprise 4, however, in another embodiment, themodern enterprise 4 may employ an agent (in house or outsourced) or any other third party to receive and record the call. - The
audio recording device 10 may be configured to transmit the recorded call to atransaction database 12, hereinafterdatabase 12. Thedatabase 12 includes phone details of all possible calls received at themodern enterprise 4. In one embodiment, the phone details may include at least one of an audio conversation between themodern enterprise 4 and the callers, an amount of the transaction, type of goods or services ordered for (in case of a credit card transaction), a time of call, quantity of goods, reason for the call like placing an order or checking status, credit card credentials, a recipient of the goods, a place of shipment, billing address, caller identity such as a name and/or a social security number of the caller or agent ID (in case of an agent) or an employee ID number, a phone number from which the call is made, a phone number to which the call is made, and other transaction information. In one embodiment, thedatabase 12 may include anaudio database 14 and anorder database 16. Theaudio database 14 is capable of storing call audios and theorder database 16 is capable of storing order details. - The
modern enterprise 4 may also include afraudster database 18. Thefraudster database 18 includes voice signatures or voice prints of known fraudsters. Essentially, a voice signature or voice print includes a set of voice characteristics that uniquely identify a person's voice. In one embodiment, each voice signature in thefraudster database 18 is assigned a unique identifier (ID), which in accordance with one embodiment may include one or more incident details such as a social security number used, a name used, credit card credentials used, date and time of fraud, an amount of the fraud, a type of fraud, enterprise impacted, and other details associated with the fraud incident. - In one embodiment, the phone details of certain callers may be transmitted to an Early Fraud Detection (EFD)
system 20 via afile transfer server 22 using Internet/LAN 24. TheEFD system 20 helps in early enrollment of a suspect voiceprint into thefraudster database 18. Specifically, theEFD system 20 processes the phone details of the callers to identify suspect voice prints present in thedatabase 12 to enroll certain suspect voiceprints into thefraudster database 18. The suspect voice prints are enrolled into thefraudster database 18 which may then be used to stop future fraudulent transactions in the manner described in the specifications of U.S. Ser. No. 11/404,342, U.S. Ser. No. 11/754,974, U.S. Ser. No. 11/754,975, and U.S. Ser. No. 12/352,530, each of which is incorporated herein by reference. More details about the working of theEFD system 20 will be described later in this section. In one embodiment, theEFD system 20 may be a distributed system that includes components that are not all located at a single location, but instead are distributed over multiple locations. TheEFD system 20 may include software to facilitate communications with themodern enterprise 4 or the call-center ‘X’ to access thedatabase 12. In one embodiment, the software may include a browser which is an application that facilitates communications via the Internet with themodern enterprise 4 or the call center ‘X’ using networking protocols such as for example the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)/the Internet Protocol (IP), the Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP), etc. In another embodiment, the EFD may be integrated in themodern enterprise 4, thereby alleviating the need of transferring the phone details of callers. - Referring now to
FIG. 2 , an internal block diagram of theEFD system 20 is shown, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. TheEFD system 20 includes aselection engine 26, amemory device 28, avoice processing engine 30, and anenrollment engine 32. Each of thecomponents 26 to 32 may be implemented in hardware or in software or as a combination of both hardware and software. Further, it is to be understood that while thecomponents 26 to 32 are shown as separate components based on function, some or all the components may be integrated. - In one embodiment, the
EFD system 20 may use theselection engine 26 to select or choose certain audio data from thedatabase 12. The audio data may include phone details of some callers. Selecting audio data from thedatabase 12 is important because thedatabase 12 includes a high volume of data and will consume a lot of time if analyzed completely. Therefore, to save time and computations, a part of thedatabase 12 is selected for analysis. This also helps in maintaining a good speed of theEFD system 20. In one embodiment, theselection engine 26 may stream audio data via thefile transfer server 22 in real time or after the call or on demand using Internet/LAN 24. Alternatively, theselection engine 26 may request for audio data in a batch using transmitting techniques such as Email/Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP)/HTTP/Service Control Point (SCP)/Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) via the Internet/LAN 24. - In one embodiment, the audio data may be selected based on selection criteria. The selection criteria may help in filtering the
database 12 to select the audio data in a way such that a maximum probability of identifying a fraudster is achieved. The selection criteria may be defined considering a pattern which may be followed by fraudsters. In other words, the selection criteria may help in segregating high risk audio data from thedatabase 12. For example, in one embodiment, the audio data of last two weeks may be selected for analysis. This may be done because when a fraudster hacks certain credit cards, they generally have less time to do as many transactions as possible before the credit card stops working. Therefore, selecting the audio data of the last two weeks may be helpful to identify a fraudster. Further, the selection criteria may also include multiple calls made from a same phone number. This may be helpful to identify a fraudster because a fraudster may use a same phone line to place orders. - Other selection criteria may include multiple calls made from a specific phone number pattern. This may be helpful because the fraudster can use different public telephone booths in a same town to place orders. Specific phone number pattern may belong to a specific geographic location. The selection criteria may also include specific out-of-pattern orders such as an order for five LCD TVs within two days from a specific phone number pattern. The selection criteria may also include transaction profile similarities, for example all orders for a specific number and/or type of product, all wire transfers made before 9:00 A.M., similar transactions including transactions related to a specific geographic location and transactions related to a specific action such as change of address on an account, all calls for same account, random sampling, all orders that exceed a certain dollar value, all calls that have been call forwarded (all calls with similar telephony characteristics), all calls from a specific service provider (Skype or VOIP, landline, or mobile), calls for which an expected channel (landline, wireless, or VOIP) that phone number is associated with (based on phone data records) is different from a channel detected (e.g. by channel detection determined by analyzing audio signal' characteristics), all calls from Automatic Number Identifications (ANIs) frequently used, etc. Therefore, based on these selection criteria, the audio data may be selected for the purpose of identifying a fraudster in the audio data.
- The audio data may be processed using the
voice processing engine 30. Specifically, thevoice processing engine 30 processes the audio data to uniquely identify individuals who called multiple times. More specifically, thevoice processing engine 30 uses voice biometrics to identify individuals in the audio data who called multiple times. With the help of voice biometrics, thevoice processing engine 30 scans each voice sample in the audio data to identify individuals who called multiple times. Subsequently, thevoice processing engine 30 determines whether the individuals who called multiple times used multiple caller identities. This may be done by checking the phone details which include caller identity information of all the callers. A person who called multiple times using multiple caller identities may be a fraudster. In one embodiment, when a fraudster uses a certain number of credit cards, he may also use the identity of the actual credit holder to place an order for goods or services over the phone. When the fraudster uses more than one credit card, he may use more than one caller identity. Therefore, a person who called multiple times using multiple caller identities may be a fraudster. In another embodiment, when an employee, who was fired by a merchant at one location, may use a different identity to get a job with the same merchant at a different location. Therefore, the employee who called multiple times using multiple caller identities may be a fraudster. - Based on these types of frauds, a fraud model may be defined. Specifically, the fraud model may be based on a fraudster who called multiple times using multiple identities. In one embodiment, the fraud model may be stored in the
memory device 28. Further, the fraud model may include at least one hypothesis indicative of a fraudulent transaction. In the present embodiment, the hypothesis includes a single voiceprint being matched to multiple caller identities. The hypothesis may be manually coded into thememory device 28. - In the present embodiment, the
voice processing engine 30 processes the audio data based on the fraud model to identify at least one suspect voiceprint in the audio data suspected of belonging to a fraudster. More specifically, thevoice processing engine 30 checks the audio data to determine whether the individuals who called multiple times used multiple caller identities. In other words, thevoice processing engine 30 checks the phone details of individuals who called multiple times to determine whether the hypothesis is true or not. If the hypothesis is true, i.e. if an individual is found to have called multiple times using multiple caller identities, theenrollment engine 32 enrolls the suspect voiceprint into thefraudster database 18. Otherwise, a next set of audios in the audio data is checked. In one embodiment, theEFD system 20 may periodically check thedatabase 12 to proactively enroll a suspect voiceprint into thefraudster database 18 prior to receiving a fraud report from a credit card company or from the merchant. In another embodiment, theEFD system 20 may perform such a check on demand by a modern enterprise. Therefore, with each such check, theEFD system 20 may shrink the window between the fraud event and the modern enterprise realization that a fraud has occurred. - Referring to
FIG. 3 , a high level flowchart of a method to determine whether a suspect voiceprint belongs to a fraudster is shown, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. At 300, a set of audios of the audio data having suspect voiceprints is processed. At 302, individuals who called multiple times are identified. At 304, it is determined whether the individuals who called multiple times used multiple caller identities. If yes, then the individual is declared a fraudster at 306 and the suspect voiceprint is enrolled into thefraudster database 18. Otherwise, a next set of audios of the audio data is processed at 300. - Referring to
FIG. 4 , a flowchart of a method to determine whether an individual from the audio data called multiple times is shown, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. In one embodiment, to determine this, let us assume that the number of audios in the audio data are ‘N’ i.e. from a1 to an and the number of callers who called multiple times are Y i.e. from F1 to Fy, where Y≦N. In the flowchart, at 400, a first person is chosen. At 402, an unassigned audio an is picked up. At 404, a voice print model Fy is generated for an. At 406, all the remaining audios of the set a1 to an are screened against the voice print Fy and it is determined which audios from the a1 to an match voice print Fy. At 408, all the audios from the set of a1 to an that match the voiceprint Fy, are marked. At 410, it is determined whether all audios i.e. an are assigned. If no, then a next person is chosen to run the flowchart on. If yes, then at 412 it is determined that Y=y. This means that the corresponding individuals called multiple times. - Referring to
FIG. 5 , a flowchart of a method to determine whether an individual from the audio data called multiple times is shown, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. In one embodiment, to determine this, let us assume that the number of audios in the audio data are ‘N’ i.e. from a1 to an and the number of callers who called multiple times are Y i.e. from F1 to Fy, where Y≦N. In the flowchart, at 500, temporary voice prints Vpn are created for each an (n=1 to N). At 502, each an is screened against Vpi (i≠n) to generate N*(N−1) scores representing likelihood that an and Vpi are same individual. At 504, similar audios are grouped resulting in Y groups, each group representing a unique individual. At 506, a voiceprint Fy is generated for each group. At 508, Y individuals are identified. - Referring now to
FIG. 6 , a flowchart of a method for early fraud detection and enrolling a voiceprint into afraudster database 18 is shown, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. At 600, audio data may be selected based on selection criteria. Further, at 602, a fraud model is defined. The fraud model includes at least one hypothesis indicative of a fraudulent transaction. In one embodiment, the hypothesis indicative of the fraudulent transaction includes a single voiceprint being matched to multiple caller identities. At 604, the audio data is processed based on the fraud model to identify at least one suspect voiceprint in the audio data suspected of belonging to a fraudster. The suspect voiceprint is considered identified when the hypothesis is true. At 606, it is determined whether the hypothesis is true or not. If the hypothesis is true, then at 608, the suspect voiceprint is enrolled into afraudster database 18. However, if the hypothesis is not true, then at 610, it is assumed that there is no fraudster in the audio data. - Referring now
FIG. 7 ,system 70 to implement the method disclosed herein is shown, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. TheEFD system 20 and the server system have, thus far, been described in terms of their respective functions. By way of example, each of theEFD system 20 and server system of the present disclosure may be implemented using thesystem 70 ofFIG. 7 . Thesystem 70 typically includes at least oneprocessor 72 coupled to amemory 74. Theprocessor 72 may represent one or more processors (e.g., microprocessors), and thememory 74 may represent random access memory (RAM) devices comprising a main storage of thesystem 70, as well as any supplemental levels of memory e.g., cache memories, non-volatile or back-up memories (e.g. programmable or flash memories), read-only memories, etc. In addition, thememory 74 may be considered to include memory storage physically located elsewhere in thesystem 70, e.g. any cache memory in theprocessor 72, as well as any storage capacity used as a virtual memory, e.g., as stored on amass storage device 80. - The
system 70 also typically receives a number of inputs and outputs for communicating information externally. For interface with a user or operator, thesystem 70 may include one or more user input devices 76 (e.g.; a keyboard, a mouse, etc.) and a display 78 (e.g., a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) panel). - For additional storage, the
system 70 may also include one or moremass storage devices 80, e.g., a floppy or other removable disk drive, a hard disk drive, a Direct Access Storage Device (DASD), an optical drive (e.g. a Compact Disk (CD) drive, a Digital Versatile Disk (DVD) drive, etc.) and/or a tape drive, among others. Furthermore, thesystem 70 may include an interface with one or more networks 82 (e.g., a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a wireless network, and/or the Internet among others) to permit the communication of information with other computers coupled to the networks. It should be appreciated that thesystem 70 typically includes suitable analog and/or digital interfaces between theprocessor 72 and each of thecomponents - The
system 70 operates under the control of anoperating system 84, and executes various computer software applications, components, programs, objects, modules, etc. to perform the respective functions of theEFD system 20 and server system of the present disclosure. Moreover, various applications, components, programs, objects, etc. may also execute on one or more processors in another computer coupled to thesystem 70 via anetwork 82, e.g. in a distributed computing environment, whereby the processing required to implement the functions of a computer program may be allocated to multiple computers over a network. - In general, the routines executed to implement the embodiments of the present disclosure, may be implemented as part of an operating system or a specific applications component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions referred to as “computer programs.” The computer programs typically comprise one or more instructions set at various times in various memory and storage devices in a computer, and that, when read and executed by one or more processors in a computer, cause the computer to perform operations necessary to execute elements involving the various aspects of the present disclosure. Moreover, while the disclosure has been described in the context of fully functioning computers and computer systems, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments of the present disclosure are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that the present disclosure applies equally regardless of the particular type of machine or computer-readable media used to actually effect the distribution. Examples of computer-readable media include but are not limited to recordable type media such as volatile and non-volatile memory devices, floppy and other removable disks, hard disk drives, optical disks (e.g., Compact Disk Read-Only Memory (CD ROMS), Digital Versatile Disks, (DVDs), etc.), among others, and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links.
- One advantage of the techniques and systems described herein is that fraud detection is based on a fraudster's voice, which being biometric in nature is linked to the fraudster. Further, the method and system enables a person to detect fraud much before a confirmed fraud report is issued by a credit card company thereby minimizing the amount of damage that could be caused.
Claims (21)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/898,679 US20130253919A1 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2013-05-21 | Method and System for Enrolling a Voiceprint in a Fraudster Database |
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US67347205P | 2005-04-21 | 2005-04-21 | |
US11/404,342 US20060248019A1 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2006-04-14 | Method and system to detect fraud using voice data |
US33567710P | 2010-01-11 | 2010-01-11 | |
US12/856,037 US8510215B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2010-08-13 | Method and system for enrolling a voiceprint in a fraudster database |
US13/898,679 US20130253919A1 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2013-05-21 | Method and System for Enrolling a Voiceprint in a Fraudster Database |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/856,037 Continuation US8510215B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2010-08-13 | Method and system for enrolling a voiceprint in a fraudster database |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20130253919A1 true US20130253919A1 (en) | 2013-09-26 |
Family
ID=43221225
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/856,037 Active 2026-05-12 US8510215B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2010-08-13 | Method and system for enrolling a voiceprint in a fraudster database |
US13/898,679 Abandoned US20130253919A1 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2013-05-21 | Method and System for Enrolling a Voiceprint in a Fraudster Database |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/856,037 Active 2026-05-12 US8510215B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2010-08-13 | Method and system for enrolling a voiceprint in a fraudster database |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US8510215B2 (en) |
Cited By (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060248019A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2006-11-02 | Anthony Rajakumar | Method and system to detect fraud using voice data |
US20090119106A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2009-05-07 | Anthony Rajakumar | Building whitelists comprising voiceprints not associated with fraud and screening calls using a combination of a whitelist and blacklist |
US20100305946A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2010-12-02 | Victrio | Speaker verification-based fraud system for combined automated risk score with agent review and associated user interface |
US20100303211A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2010-12-02 | Victrio | Method and system for generating a fraud risk score using telephony channel based audio and non-audio data |
US8793131B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2014-07-29 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems, methods, and media for determining fraud patterns and creating fraud behavioral models |
US8903859B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2014-12-02 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems, methods, and media for generating hierarchical fused risk scores |
US9113001B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2015-08-18 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems, methods, and media for disambiguating call data to determine fraud |
US9215321B2 (en) | 2013-06-20 | 2015-12-15 | Bank Of America Corporation | Utilizing voice biometrics |
US9236052B2 (en) | 2013-06-20 | 2016-01-12 | Bank Of America Corporation | Utilizing voice biometrics |
US9380041B2 (en) | 2013-09-30 | 2016-06-28 | Bank Of America Corporation | Identification, verification, and authentication scoring |
US9460722B2 (en) | 2013-07-17 | 2016-10-04 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Blind diarization of recorded calls with arbitrary number of speakers |
US9503571B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2016-11-22 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems, methods, and media for determining fraud patterns and creating fraud behavioral models |
US9571652B1 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2017-02-14 | Verint Americas Inc. | Enhanced diarization systems, media and methods of use |
JPWO2015194148A1 (en) * | 2014-06-17 | 2017-04-20 | 日本電気株式会社 | Caller identification device, caller identification method, and recording medium for storing caller identification program |
US9875739B2 (en) | 2012-09-07 | 2018-01-23 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Speaker separation in diarization |
US9875742B2 (en) | 2015-01-26 | 2018-01-23 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Word-level blind diarization of recorded calls with arbitrary number of speakers |
US9984706B2 (en) | 2013-08-01 | 2018-05-29 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Voice activity detection using a soft decision mechanism |
US10091349B1 (en) | 2017-07-11 | 2018-10-02 | Vail Systems, Inc. | Fraud detection system and method |
US10134401B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2018-11-20 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Diarization using linguistic labeling |
US10212277B2 (en) * | 2017-07-16 | 2019-02-19 | Shaobo Kuang | System and method for detecting phone frauds or scams |
US10269352B2 (en) * | 2016-12-23 | 2019-04-23 | Nice Ltd. | System and method for detecting phonetically similar imposter phrases |
CN110070875A (en) * | 2019-04-29 | 2019-07-30 | 深圳市友杰智新科技有限公司 | A kind of anti-telecommunication fraud method based on voice keyword detection and vocal print |
US10503469B2 (en) | 2012-12-19 | 2019-12-10 | Visa International Service Association | System and method for voice authentication |
CN110659468A (en) * | 2019-08-21 | 2020-01-07 | 江苏大学 | File encryption and decryption system based on C/S architecture and speaker identification technology |
US10623581B2 (en) | 2017-07-25 | 2020-04-14 | Vail Systems, Inc. | Adaptive, multi-modal fraud detection system |
US10887452B2 (en) | 2018-10-25 | 2021-01-05 | Verint Americas Inc. | System architecture for fraud detection |
US11115521B2 (en) | 2019-06-20 | 2021-09-07 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for authentication and fraud detection |
US11443734B2 (en) * | 2019-08-26 | 2022-09-13 | Nice Ltd. | System and method for combining phonetic and automatic speech recognition search |
US11538128B2 (en) | 2018-05-14 | 2022-12-27 | Verint Americas Inc. | User interface for fraud alert management |
US11538063B2 (en) | 2018-09-12 | 2022-12-27 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Online fraud prevention and detection based on distributed system |
US11868453B2 (en) | 2019-11-07 | 2024-01-09 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for customer authentication based on audio-of-interest |
Families Citing this family (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8073691B2 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2011-12-06 | Victrio, Inc. | Method and system for screening using voice data and metadata |
US20070280436A1 (en) * | 2006-04-14 | 2007-12-06 | Anthony Rajakumar | Method and System to Seed a Voice Database |
CN101673544B (en) * | 2009-10-10 | 2012-07-04 | 上海电虹软件有限公司 | Cross monitoring method and system based on voiceprint recognition and location tracking |
WO2012042200A1 (en) * | 2010-09-30 | 2012-04-05 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Speech comparison |
US10424011B2 (en) | 2011-11-02 | 2019-09-24 | Gain Credit Holdings, Inc | Systems and methods for shared lending risk |
US8914645B2 (en) | 2013-02-13 | 2014-12-16 | Daniel Duncan | Systems and methods for identifying biometric information as trusted and authenticating persons using trusted biometric information |
US8572398B1 (en) | 2013-02-13 | 2013-10-29 | Daniel Duncan | Systems and methods for identifying biometric information as trusted and authenticating persons using trusted biometric information |
US9143506B2 (en) | 2013-02-13 | 2015-09-22 | Daniel Duncan | Systems and methods for identifying biometric information as trusted and authenticating persons using trusted biometric information |
US20150142446A1 (en) * | 2013-11-21 | 2015-05-21 | Global Analytics, Inc. | Credit Risk Decision Management System And Method Using Voice Analytics |
US10262655B2 (en) | 2014-11-03 | 2019-04-16 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Augmentation of key phrase user recognition |
JP6519413B2 (en) * | 2015-08-31 | 2019-05-29 | 富士通株式会社 | Nuisance call detection device, nuisance call detection method, and program |
US9930186B2 (en) * | 2015-10-14 | 2018-03-27 | Pindrop Security, Inc. | Call detail record analysis to identify fraudulent activity |
US9692885B2 (en) | 2015-11-17 | 2017-06-27 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Determining scam risk during a voice call |
CN107343077B (en) * | 2016-04-28 | 2019-12-13 | 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 | Method, device and equipment for identifying malicious phone and establishing identification model |
CN108696626B (en) * | 2017-04-12 | 2021-05-04 | 中国移动通信集团福建有限公司 | Illegal information processing method and device |
JP6457682B1 (en) * | 2018-04-16 | 2019-01-23 | パスロジ株式会社 | Authentication system, authentication method, and program |
CN108833720B (en) * | 2018-05-04 | 2021-11-30 | 北京邮电大学 | Fraud telephone number identification method and system |
US10659588B1 (en) * | 2019-03-21 | 2020-05-19 | Capital One Services, Llc | Methods and systems for automatic discovery of fraudulent calls using speaker recognition |
US11470194B2 (en) | 2019-08-19 | 2022-10-11 | Pindrop Security, Inc. | Caller verification via carrier metadata |
CN113641834B (en) * | 2021-06-30 | 2022-10-21 | 荣耀终端有限公司 | File processing method and electronic equipment |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5638430A (en) * | 1993-10-15 | 1997-06-10 | Linkusa Corporation | Call validation system |
US6044382A (en) * | 1995-05-19 | 2000-03-28 | Cyber Fone Technologies, Inc. | Data transaction assembly server |
US20030009333A1 (en) * | 1996-11-22 | 2003-01-09 | T-Netix, Inc. | Voice print system and method |
US20040240631A1 (en) * | 2003-05-30 | 2004-12-02 | Vicki Broman | Speaker recognition in a multi-speaker environment and comparison of several voice prints to many |
US20050125226A1 (en) * | 2003-10-29 | 2005-06-09 | Paul Magee | Voice recognition system and method |
US20050273442A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2005-12-08 | Naftali Bennett | System and method of fraud reduction |
US20060212407A1 (en) * | 2005-03-17 | 2006-09-21 | Lyon Dennis B | User authentication and secure transaction system |
US20090254971A1 (en) * | 1999-10-27 | 2009-10-08 | Pinpoint, Incorporated | Secure data interchange |
US20100114744A1 (en) * | 2008-10-30 | 2010-05-06 | Metro Enterprises, Inc. | Reputation scoring and reporting system |
Family Cites Families (37)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS58129682A (en) * | 1982-01-29 | 1983-08-02 | Toshiba Corp | Individual verifying device |
EP0598469A3 (en) | 1992-10-27 | 1996-07-10 | Daniel P Dunlevy | Interactive credit card fraud control process. |
US5805674A (en) * | 1995-01-26 | 1998-09-08 | Anderson, Jr.; Victor C. | Security arrangement and method for controlling access to a protected system |
US7006605B1 (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 2006-02-28 | Ochopee Big Cypress Llc | Authenticating a caller before providing the caller with access to one or more secured resources |
US6266640B1 (en) * | 1996-08-06 | 2001-07-24 | Dialogic Corporation | Data network with voice verification means |
US5999525A (en) * | 1996-11-18 | 1999-12-07 | Mci Communications Corporation | Method for video telephony over a hybrid network |
US6145083A (en) * | 1998-04-23 | 2000-11-07 | Siemens Information And Communication Networks, Inc. | Methods and system for providing data and telephony security |
US6427137B2 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2002-07-30 | Accenture Llp | System, method and article of manufacture for a voice analysis system that detects nervousness for preventing fraud |
EP1132797A3 (en) * | 2000-03-08 | 2005-11-23 | Aurora Wireless Technologies, Ltd. | Method for securing user identification in on-line transaction systems |
JP3825222B2 (en) * | 2000-03-24 | 2006-09-27 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Personal authentication device, personal authentication system, and electronic payment system |
US7263506B2 (en) * | 2000-04-06 | 2007-08-28 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Identification and management of fraudulent credit/debit card purchases at merchant ecommerce sites |
US7039951B1 (en) * | 2000-06-06 | 2006-05-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for confidence based incremental access authentication |
GB2391373A (en) * | 2002-07-31 | 2004-02-04 | David Toms | A system for the automatic detection of a fraudulent transaction |
US7333798B2 (en) * | 2002-08-08 | 2008-02-19 | Value Added Communications, Inc. | Telecommunication call management and monitoring system |
US20040029087A1 (en) * | 2002-08-08 | 2004-02-12 | Rodney White | System and method for training and managing gaming personnel |
US6931113B2 (en) * | 2002-11-08 | 2005-08-16 | Verizon Services Corp. | Facilitation of a conference call |
US7634063B2 (en) * | 2003-01-02 | 2009-12-15 | Technology Patents, Llc | System and method for monitoring individuals |
US7212613B2 (en) * | 2003-09-18 | 2007-05-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for telephonic voice authentication |
US7398925B2 (en) * | 2003-12-09 | 2008-07-15 | First Data Corporation | Systems and methods for assessing the risk of a financial transaction using biometric information |
US20060106605A1 (en) * | 2004-11-12 | 2006-05-18 | Saunders Joseph M | Biometric record management |
US8224753B2 (en) * | 2004-12-07 | 2012-07-17 | Farsheed Atef | System and method for identity verification and management |
DE602005018108D1 (en) * | 2004-12-13 | 2010-01-14 | Securicom Nsw Pty Ltd | IMPROVING THE RESPONSE OF BIOMETRIC ACCESS SYSTEMS |
JP4672003B2 (en) * | 2005-02-18 | 2011-04-20 | 富士通株式会社 | Voice authentication system |
US8924285B2 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2014-12-30 | Verint Americas Inc. | Building whitelists comprising voiceprints not associated with fraud and screening calls using a combination of a whitelist and blacklist |
US20120053939A9 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2012-03-01 | Victrio | Speaker verification-based fraud system for combined automated risk score with agent review and associated user interface |
US20070280436A1 (en) * | 2006-04-14 | 2007-12-06 | Anthony Rajakumar | Method and System to Seed a Voice Database |
US8073691B2 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2011-12-06 | Victrio, Inc. | Method and system for screening using voice data and metadata |
US8930261B2 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2015-01-06 | Verint Americas Inc. | Method and system for generating a fraud risk score using telephony channel based audio and non-audio data |
US20060248019A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2006-11-02 | Anthony Rajakumar | Method and system to detect fraud using voice data |
AU2006242555A1 (en) * | 2005-04-29 | 2006-11-09 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for fraud monitoring, detection, and tiered user authentication |
US7386105B2 (en) * | 2005-05-27 | 2008-06-10 | Nice Systems Ltd | Method and apparatus for fraud detection |
US20060293891A1 (en) * | 2005-06-22 | 2006-12-28 | Jan Pathuel | Biometric control systems and associated methods of use |
US20070041517A1 (en) * | 2005-06-30 | 2007-02-22 | Pika Technologies Inc. | Call transfer detection method using voice identification techniques |
GB0519424D0 (en) * | 2005-09-23 | 2005-11-02 | Smithies Christopher P K | Method and system for verification of personal identity |
US7668769B2 (en) * | 2005-10-04 | 2010-02-23 | Basepoint Analytics, LLC | System and method of detecting fraud |
US7822605B2 (en) * | 2006-10-19 | 2010-10-26 | Nice Systems Ltd. | Method and apparatus for large population speaker identification in telephone interactions |
US8145562B2 (en) * | 2009-03-09 | 2012-03-27 | Moshe Wasserblat | Apparatus and method for fraud prevention |
-
2010
- 2010-08-13 US US12/856,037 patent/US8510215B2/en active Active
-
2013
- 2013-05-21 US US13/898,679 patent/US20130253919A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5638430A (en) * | 1993-10-15 | 1997-06-10 | Linkusa Corporation | Call validation system |
US6044382A (en) * | 1995-05-19 | 2000-03-28 | Cyber Fone Technologies, Inc. | Data transaction assembly server |
US20030009333A1 (en) * | 1996-11-22 | 2003-01-09 | T-Netix, Inc. | Voice print system and method |
US20090254971A1 (en) * | 1999-10-27 | 2009-10-08 | Pinpoint, Incorporated | Secure data interchange |
US20040240631A1 (en) * | 2003-05-30 | 2004-12-02 | Vicki Broman | Speaker recognition in a multi-speaker environment and comparison of several voice prints to many |
US20050125226A1 (en) * | 2003-10-29 | 2005-06-09 | Paul Magee | Voice recognition system and method |
US20050273442A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2005-12-08 | Naftali Bennett | System and method of fraud reduction |
US20060212407A1 (en) * | 2005-03-17 | 2006-09-21 | Lyon Dennis B | User authentication and secure transaction system |
US20100114744A1 (en) * | 2008-10-30 | 2010-05-06 | Metro Enterprises, Inc. | Reputation scoring and reporting system |
Cited By (67)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9503571B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2016-11-22 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems, methods, and media for determining fraud patterns and creating fraud behavioral models |
US20090119106A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2009-05-07 | Anthony Rajakumar | Building whitelists comprising voiceprints not associated with fraud and screening calls using a combination of a whitelist and blacklist |
US20100305946A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2010-12-02 | Victrio | Speaker verification-based fraud system for combined automated risk score with agent review and associated user interface |
US20100303211A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2010-12-02 | Victrio | Method and system for generating a fraud risk score using telephony channel based audio and non-audio data |
US8793131B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2014-07-29 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems, methods, and media for determining fraud patterns and creating fraud behavioral models |
US8903859B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2014-12-02 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems, methods, and media for generating hierarchical fused risk scores |
US8924285B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2014-12-30 | Verint Americas Inc. | Building whitelists comprising voiceprints not associated with fraud and screening calls using a combination of a whitelist and blacklist |
US8930261B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2015-01-06 | Verint Americas Inc. | Method and system for generating a fraud risk score using telephony channel based audio and non-audio data |
US9113001B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2015-08-18 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems, methods, and media for disambiguating call data to determine fraud |
US20060248019A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2006-11-02 | Anthony Rajakumar | Method and system to detect fraud using voice data |
US9571652B1 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2017-02-14 | Verint Americas Inc. | Enhanced diarization systems, media and methods of use |
US9875739B2 (en) | 2012-09-07 | 2018-01-23 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Speaker separation in diarization |
US10950242B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2021-03-16 | Verint Systems Ltd. | System and method of diarization and labeling of audio data |
US10692501B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2020-06-23 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Diarization using acoustic labeling to create an acoustic voiceprint |
US11227603B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2022-01-18 | Verint Systems Ltd. | System and method of video capture and search optimization for creating an acoustic voiceprint |
US11367450B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2022-06-21 | Verint Systems Inc. | System and method of diarization and labeling of audio data |
US11380333B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2022-07-05 | Verint Systems Inc. | System and method of diarization and labeling of audio data |
US10950241B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2021-03-16 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Diarization using linguistic labeling with segmented and clustered diarized textual transcripts |
US10902856B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2021-01-26 | Verint Systems Ltd. | System and method of diarization and labeling of audio data |
US10720164B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2020-07-21 | Verint Systems Ltd. | System and method of diarization and labeling of audio data |
US11322154B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2022-05-03 | Verint Systems Inc. | Diarization using linguistic labeling |
US10692500B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2020-06-23 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Diarization using linguistic labeling to create and apply a linguistic model |
US10650826B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2020-05-12 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Diarization using acoustic labeling |
US10522153B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2019-12-31 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Diarization using linguistic labeling |
US10522152B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2019-12-31 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Diarization using linguistic labeling |
US10446156B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2019-10-15 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Diarization using textual and audio speaker labeling |
US10134401B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2018-11-20 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Diarization using linguistic labeling |
US10134400B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2018-11-20 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Diarization using acoustic labeling |
US10438592B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2019-10-08 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Diarization using speech segment labeling |
US11776547B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2023-10-03 | Verint Systems Inc. | System and method of video capture and search optimization for creating an acoustic voiceprint |
US10503469B2 (en) | 2012-12-19 | 2019-12-10 | Visa International Service Association | System and method for voice authentication |
US9609134B2 (en) | 2013-06-20 | 2017-03-28 | Bank Of America Corporation | Utilizing voice biometrics |
US9734831B2 (en) | 2013-06-20 | 2017-08-15 | Bank Of America Corporation | Utilizing voice biometrics |
US9215321B2 (en) | 2013-06-20 | 2015-12-15 | Bank Of America Corporation | Utilizing voice biometrics |
US9236052B2 (en) | 2013-06-20 | 2016-01-12 | Bank Of America Corporation | Utilizing voice biometrics |
US9881617B2 (en) | 2013-07-17 | 2018-01-30 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Blind diarization of recorded calls with arbitrary number of speakers |
US9460722B2 (en) | 2013-07-17 | 2016-10-04 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Blind diarization of recorded calls with arbitrary number of speakers |
US10109280B2 (en) | 2013-07-17 | 2018-10-23 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Blind diarization of recorded calls with arbitrary number of speakers |
US9984706B2 (en) | 2013-08-01 | 2018-05-29 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Voice activity detection using a soft decision mechanism |
US11670325B2 (en) | 2013-08-01 | 2023-06-06 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Voice activity detection using a soft decision mechanism |
US10665253B2 (en) | 2013-08-01 | 2020-05-26 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Voice activity detection using a soft decision mechanism |
US9380041B2 (en) | 2013-09-30 | 2016-06-28 | Bank Of America Corporation | Identification, verification, and authentication scoring |
US9860373B2 (en) | 2014-06-17 | 2018-01-02 | Nec Corporation | Caller identification apparatus, caller identification method, and recording medium on which caller identification program has been stored |
JPWO2015194148A1 (en) * | 2014-06-17 | 2017-04-20 | 日本電気株式会社 | Caller identification device, caller identification method, and recording medium for storing caller identification program |
US10366693B2 (en) | 2015-01-26 | 2019-07-30 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Acoustic signature building for a speaker from multiple sessions |
US10726848B2 (en) | 2015-01-26 | 2020-07-28 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Word-level blind diarization of recorded calls with arbitrary number of speakers |
US11636860B2 (en) | 2015-01-26 | 2023-04-25 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Word-level blind diarization of recorded calls with arbitrary number of speakers |
US9875742B2 (en) | 2015-01-26 | 2018-01-23 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Word-level blind diarization of recorded calls with arbitrary number of speakers |
US9875743B2 (en) | 2015-01-26 | 2018-01-23 | Verint Systems Ltd. | Acoustic signature building for a speaker from multiple sessions |
US10269352B2 (en) * | 2016-12-23 | 2019-04-23 | Nice Ltd. | System and method for detecting phonetically similar imposter phrases |
US10477012B2 (en) | 2017-07-11 | 2019-11-12 | Vail Systems, Inc. | Fraud detection system and method |
US10091349B1 (en) | 2017-07-11 | 2018-10-02 | Vail Systems, Inc. | Fraud detection system and method |
US10212277B2 (en) * | 2017-07-16 | 2019-02-19 | Shaobo Kuang | System and method for detecting phone frauds or scams |
US10623581B2 (en) | 2017-07-25 | 2020-04-14 | Vail Systems, Inc. | Adaptive, multi-modal fraud detection system |
US11538128B2 (en) | 2018-05-14 | 2022-12-27 | Verint Americas Inc. | User interface for fraud alert management |
US11538063B2 (en) | 2018-09-12 | 2022-12-27 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Online fraud prevention and detection based on distributed system |
US11240372B2 (en) | 2018-10-25 | 2022-02-01 | Verint Americas Inc. | System architecture for fraud detection |
US10887452B2 (en) | 2018-10-25 | 2021-01-05 | Verint Americas Inc. | System architecture for fraud detection |
CN110070875B (en) * | 2019-04-29 | 2021-12-31 | 深圳市友杰智新科技有限公司 | Anti-telecommunication fraud method based on voice keyword detection and voiceprint |
CN110070875A (en) * | 2019-04-29 | 2019-07-30 | 深圳市友杰智新科技有限公司 | A kind of anti-telecommunication fraud method based on voice keyword detection and vocal print |
US11652917B2 (en) | 2019-06-20 | 2023-05-16 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for authentication and fraud detection |
US11115521B2 (en) | 2019-06-20 | 2021-09-07 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for authentication and fraud detection |
CN110659468A (en) * | 2019-08-21 | 2020-01-07 | 江苏大学 | File encryption and decryption system based on C/S architecture and speaker identification technology |
US11443734B2 (en) * | 2019-08-26 | 2022-09-13 | Nice Ltd. | System and method for combining phonetic and automatic speech recognition search |
US11605373B2 (en) | 2019-08-26 | 2023-03-14 | Nice Ltd. | System and method for combining phonetic and automatic speech recognition search |
US11587549B2 (en) | 2019-08-26 | 2023-02-21 | Nice Ltd. | System and method for combining phonetic and automatic speech recognition search |
US11868453B2 (en) | 2019-11-07 | 2024-01-09 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for customer authentication based on audio-of-interest |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20100305960A1 (en) | 2010-12-02 |
US8510215B2 (en) | 2013-08-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8510215B2 (en) | Method and system for enrolling a voiceprint in a fraudster database | |
US8930261B2 (en) | Method and system for generating a fraud risk score using telephony channel based audio and non-audio data | |
US9503571B2 (en) | Systems, methods, and media for determining fraud patterns and creating fraud behavioral models | |
US8793131B2 (en) | Systems, methods, and media for determining fraud patterns and creating fraud behavioral models | |
US10685657B2 (en) | Biometrics platform | |
US8924285B2 (en) | Building whitelists comprising voiceprints not associated with fraud and screening calls using a combination of a whitelist and blacklist | |
US9113001B2 (en) | Systems, methods, and media for disambiguating call data to determine fraud | |
US20060218407A1 (en) | Method of confirming the identity of a person | |
US10872068B2 (en) | Systems and methods for providing searchable customer call indexes | |
US20120053939A9 (en) | Speaker verification-based fraud system for combined automated risk score with agent review and associated user interface | |
US20170133017A1 (en) | Systems, methods, and media for determining fraud risk from audio signals | |
US8073691B2 (en) | Method and system for screening using voice data and metadata | |
US20060248019A1 (en) | Method and system to detect fraud using voice data | |
US7801288B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for fraud detection | |
US20150381801A1 (en) | Systems, methods, and media for disambiguating call data to determine fraud | |
US20070280436A1 (en) | Method and System to Seed a Voice Database | |
US20070174186A1 (en) | Authenticated and distributed transaction processing | |
US20140254778A1 (en) | Systems and methods for identifying a caller | |
US20100161468A1 (en) | Systems and methods for authenticating parties engaging in a financial transaction | |
Goode et al. | Exploring interpersonal relationships in security information sharing | |
WO2006133515A1 (en) | A method of confirming the identity of a person |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: VICTRIO, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GUTIERREZ, RICHARD;RAJAKUMAR, ANTHONY;GUERRA, LISA M.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:031200/0884 Effective date: 20100621 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: VERINT AMERICAS INC., GEORGIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:VICTRIO, INC.;REEL/FRAME:032482/0445 Effective date: 20140311 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, ILLINOIS Free format text: GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:VERINT AMERICAS INC.;REEL/FRAME:043293/0567 Effective date: 20170629 Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, IL Free format text: GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:VERINT AMERICAS INC.;REEL/FRAME:043293/0567 Effective date: 20170629 |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: ON APPEAL -- AWAITING DECISION BY THE BOARD OF APPEALS |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION RENDERED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION |