US20130059501A1 - Method for stripping gamma-gamma prime coating from gamma-gamma prime alloy - Google Patents
Method for stripping gamma-gamma prime coating from gamma-gamma prime alloy Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20130059501A1 US20130059501A1 US13/223,667 US201113223667A US2013059501A1 US 20130059501 A1 US20130059501 A1 US 20130059501A1 US 201113223667 A US201113223667 A US 201113223667A US 2013059501 A1 US2013059501 A1 US 2013059501A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- coating
- gamma
- visual inspection
- grit blasting
- hydrochloric acid
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23F—NON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
- C23F1/00—Etching metallic material by chemical means
- C23F1/44—Compositions for etching metallic material from a metallic material substrate of different composition
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24C—ABRASIVE OR RELATED BLASTING WITH PARTICULATE MATERIAL
- B24C1/00—Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods
- B24C1/08—Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods for polishing surfaces, e.g. smoothing a surface by making use of liquid-borne abrasives
- B24C1/086—Descaling; Removing coating films
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23F—NON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
- C23F1/00—Etching metallic material by chemical means
- C23F1/10—Etching compositions
- C23F1/14—Aqueous compositions
- C23F1/16—Acidic compositions
- C23F1/28—Acidic compositions for etching iron group metals
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01D—NON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
- F01D5/00—Blades; Blade-carrying members; Heating, heat-insulating, cooling or antivibration means on the blades or the members
- F01D5/005—Repairing methods or devices
Definitions
- the present invention relates to removing a coating from a superalloy substrate.
- the invention relates to systems and methods for improving the removal of a coating from a superalloy substrate.
- gamma/gamma prime bond coats for nickel base superalloys of the gamma/gamma prime type because this type of coating has demonstrated greater spallation resistance over conventional gamma/beta systems.
- Gamma/gamma prime alloys are solid solutions of the alloy with intermetallic compounds as a second phase.
- gamma/gamma prime coating provides difficulties in stripping without damage to the substrate due to the close similarities of the coating and the base material.
- the coatings suffer environmental damage and need to be periodically replaced or repaired to extend the life of the gas turbine hardware. Because of the corrosion and oxidation products that form on the surfaces, it is necessary to completely remove and reapply the coatings in selected areas before placing the component back in service. Mechanical means of removing the coatings such as abrasive blasting or machining are not preferred because of cost and the chance of harming the underlying substrate.
- the present invention provides a method of stripping bond coats from nickel based superalloys that have been used in gas turbine engines, such as on turbine blades.
- the bond coats are gamma/gamma prime polycrystalline alloys
- the substrates are gamma/gamma prime single crystal alloys.
- the coatings are subjected to turbine operating conditions and in time need to be removed and replaced.
- the method includes grit blasting followed by the use of hydrochloric acid solutions, followed by rinsing. The cycle may be repeated several times, with inspection between cycles.
- FIG. 1 illustrates the steps of removing a bond coat from a substrate used in gas turbine parts.
- FIG. 2 is a table showing the composition of coatings that were applied to a superalloy base bar.
- FIG. 3 is a table showing the composition of different coatings that were applied to a superalloy base bar.
- FIGS. 4 and 5 are microphotographs of a strip cycle over five hours total of the method of this invention on a first bond coat.
- FIGS. band 7 are microphotographs of a strip cycle over nine hours total of the method of this invention on a second bond coat.
- Method 100 for removing a bond coat from a substrate of a superalloy part is used to prepare the part for subsequent repair.
- First, an appropriate part needing repair is selected (Step 101 ).
- the part may be any of the many parts in gas turbine engines as well as other apparatus that are formed of superalloy metals and have a bond coat on their surfaces.
- Method 100 has been found to be effective, for example, on turbine air foils and stator vanes.
- the selected part is grit blasted as a first step in removing the bond coat (Step 103 ).
- Grit blasting is intended to remove surface oxides and may be performed, for example, using 240 aluminum oxide. Good results have been obtained using 240 aluminum oxide particles at a pressure ranging from about 30 psi to about 60 psi for suction type machines.
- 240 aluminum oxide has a grit size of 240 on the ANSI Standards macro grade grit size.
- the part is then placed in an agitated soak bath containing a high concentration of hydrochloric acid (HCl) in water (Step 105 ).
- HCl hydrochloric acid
- the HCl concentration does not significantly affect the strip rate. Acceptable concentrations may range for 55% to 100% HCl.
- the part is then placed in the bath of HCl for a period of time, such as for about one to three hours.
- the bath temperature can be elevated and Step 105 is effective if the bath is at 150° F. (65.6° C.), though lower and higher temperatures of plus or minus 10° F. (5.5° C.) are also effective.
- Step 107 the part is removed and rinsed. Care should be taken to avoid contact with the HCl when rinsing, as well as all other times.
- Step 109 An effective inspection is a “smut check” (Step 109 ).
- a smut check involves placing the part in the acid solution of Step 105 for a short time, such as five minutes or so, followed by a visual inspection. The part without a coating will have a gun metal finish. If some or all of the part has a black or gray color, this is evidence that the coating or some of it remains.
- Step 105 is repeated for a period of time, such as an additional hour, including the smut check time of Step 109 , followed by Step 107 and, once again, Step 109 .
- a period of time such as an additional hour, including the smut check time of Step 109 .
- the total number of hours of soak time may range from about three to about ten hours. Total soak times of six to nine hours have been found to be effective. No damage to the substrate was observed during the prescribed time for this process.
- the repeat cycle may also include repeating Step 103 prior to Steps 105 and 107 .
- the cycle of grit blast, soak in HCl and rinse is to be repeated until the smut check of Step 109 fails to show any dark color.
- Step 111 When Step 109 does not reveal smut, the part is then subjected to an additional inspection, which is a heat tint test (Step 111 ).
- the part is carefully removed, using white gloves or other non-contaminating devices and put in an air circulating oven.
- One effective air circulating oven is known as a Blue-M oven, which are available from Thermal Product Solutions in New Columbia, Pa..
- Hot air circulates over the part in Step 111 .
- the temperature will be determined by the reaction of the part to the hot air as it will form oxides.
- the oxide color of the coating is different from the oxide color of the base alloy. Typically, the temperature may be 1050° F., ⁇ 25° F.
- Step 111 the part is again visually inspected. If the color is like flat gold or dusty brass, some coating remains, and Steps 105 - 111 are repeated. If the coating is removed, the base metal will have a violet or blue color. If the color of the stripped area is the same as the uncoated area, the part is stripped. A good comparison to determine if the coating is fully stripped is to compare the heat tinted surface of a previously coated area to an uncoated heat tinted surface on the same part. If those surfaces look similar then the coatings is stripped.
- the coated area will heat tint differently than the base metal. After heat tint confirms that the coating has been removed, the part is ready for further processing, which may include further repair and then recoating of the base coat, or, may only involve recoating. (Step 113 ). The part is then ready for reuse.
- Bond coats such as those in FIGS. 2 and 3 , as well as all others used in the present invention, are polycrystalline alloys. Polycrystalline alloys have grain boundaries at the point where each of the multitude of crystals forming the polycrystalline material so the process solution can dissolve the coating. In contrast, a single crystal alloy has no grain boundaries to be attached by the acid. The surface of the single crystal substrate material is the only grain boundary of that material. There are no short-circuit paths or surface area to attack with the process solution. It has been discovered that the method of this invention is capable of removing the coatings, using abrasion, heat, acid and rinses, of polycrystalline coatings on single crystal substrates without significantly affecting the substrate.
- the specific test procedure included the following steps. All grit blasting was performed with 240 aluminum oxide at 45 psi in a suction cabinet. The soak solution was approximately 75% HCl in water at a temperature of 150° F. All heat tints were performed in an air circulating Blue-M oven at 1050° F. ⁇ 25° F. for one hour.
- FIG. 4 shows a microphotograph of the surface of a coating having the composition shown in FIG. 3 on a second generation nickel-based alloy as identified above.
- FIG. 5 illustrates the result of treating after five hours of soaking using the strip cycles as set forth above. The surface is sufficiently cleared of bond coat that an additional grit blasting at most would be necessary to have the surface ready to use.
- FIG. 6 shows a microphotograph of the surface of a coating having the composition shown in FIG. 2 on a second generation nickel-based alloy as identified above.
- FIG. 7 illustrates the result of treating after nine hours of soaking using the strip cycles as set forth above. The surface is sufficiently cleared of bond coat and no further treatment would be necessary to have the surface ready to use.
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to removing a coating from a superalloy substrate. In particular, the invention relates to systems and methods for improving the removal of a coating from a superalloy substrate.
- It is advantageous to provide gamma/gamma prime bond coats for nickel base superalloys of the gamma/gamma prime type because this type of coating has demonstrated greater spallation resistance over conventional gamma/beta systems. Gamma/gamma prime alloys are solid solutions of the alloy with intermetallic compounds as a second phase. However, gamma/gamma prime coating provides difficulties in stripping without damage to the substrate due to the close similarities of the coating and the base material.
- During operation, the coatings suffer environmental damage and need to be periodically replaced or repaired to extend the life of the gas turbine hardware. Because of the corrosion and oxidation products that form on the surfaces, it is necessary to completely remove and reapply the coatings in selected areas before placing the component back in service. Mechanical means of removing the coatings such as abrasive blasting or machining are not preferred because of cost and the chance of harming the underlying substrate.
- The method of choice for those experienced in the art is chemical removal (or chemical stripping) wherein the coating to be removed is exposed to a solution that weakens and eventually dissolves the coating. However, care must be taken to avoid damage to the base material if replacement is to be avoided.
- The present invention provides a method of stripping bond coats from nickel based superalloys that have been used in gas turbine engines, such as on turbine blades. The bond coats are gamma/gamma prime polycrystalline alloys, and the substrates are gamma/gamma prime single crystal alloys. The coatings are subjected to turbine operating conditions and in time need to be removed and replaced. The method includes grit blasting followed by the use of hydrochloric acid solutions, followed by rinsing. The cycle may be repeated several times, with inspection between cycles.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates the steps of removing a bond coat from a substrate used in gas turbine parts. -
FIG. 2 is a table showing the composition of coatings that were applied to a superalloy base bar. -
FIG. 3 is a table showing the composition of different coatings that were applied to a superalloy base bar. -
FIGS. 4 and 5 are microphotographs of a strip cycle over five hours total of the method of this invention on a first bond coat. - FIGS. band 7 are microphotographs of a strip cycle over nine hours total of the method of this invention on a second bond coat.
-
Method 100 for removing a bond coat from a substrate of a superalloy part is used to prepare the part for subsequent repair. First, an appropriate part needing repair is selected (Step 101). The part may be any of the many parts in gas turbine engines as well as other apparatus that are formed of superalloy metals and have a bond coat on their surfaces.Method 100 has been found to be effective, for example, on turbine air foils and stator vanes. - The selected part is grit blasted as a first step in removing the bond coat (Step 103). Grit blasting is intended to remove surface oxides and may be performed, for example, using 240 aluminum oxide. Good results have been obtained using 240 aluminum oxide particles at a pressure ranging from about 30 psi to about 60 psi for suction type machines. 240 aluminum oxide has a grit size of 240 on the ANSI Standards macro grade grit size.
- The part is then placed in an agitated soak bath containing a high concentration of hydrochloric acid (HCl) in water (Step 105). The HCl concentration does not significantly affect the strip rate. Acceptable concentrations may range for 55% to 100% HCl. The part is then placed in the bath of HCl for a period of time, such as for about one to three hours. The bath temperature can be elevated and
Step 105 is effective if the bath is at 150° F. (65.6° C.), though lower and higher temperatures of plus orminus 10° F. (5.5° C.) are also effective. - After the soaking has been completed, the part is removed and rinsed (Step 107). Care should be taken to avoid contact with the HCl when rinsing, as well as all other times. After the part is rinsed, it is inspected to see whether or not the coating has been removed. An effective inspection is a “smut check” (Step 109). A smut check involves placing the part in the acid solution of
Step 105 for a short time, such as five minutes or so, followed by a visual inspection. The part without a coating will have a gun metal finish. If some or all of the part has a black or gray color, this is evidence that the coating or some of it remains. If it appears that some coating remains, as is normally the case afterStep 105 has been performed only once,Step 105 is repeated for a period of time, such as an additional hour, including the smut check time ofStep 109, followed byStep 107 and, once again,Step 109. In most instances the total number of hours of soak time may range from about three to about ten hours. Total soak times of six to nine hours have been found to be effective. No damage to the substrate was observed during the prescribed time for this process. - Alternatively, the repeat cycle may also include repeating
Step 103 prior toSteps Step 109 fails to show any dark color. - When
Step 109 does not reveal smut, the part is then subjected to an additional inspection, which is a heat tint test (Step 111). The part is carefully removed, using white gloves or other non-contaminating devices and put in an air circulating oven. One effective air circulating oven is known as a Blue-M oven, which are available from Thermal Product Solutions in New Columbia, Pa.. Hot air circulates over the part inStep 111. The temperature will be determined by the reaction of the part to the hot air as it will form oxides. The oxide color of the coating is different from the oxide color of the base alloy. Typically, the temperature may be 1050° F.,±25° F. (579.4° C.±13.9° C., although higher temperatures are also contemplated, such as 1300° F.±25° F. (704.4 ° C.±13.9° C.). After about an hour ofStep 111, the part is again visually inspected. If the color is like flat gold or dusty brass, some coating remains, and Steps 105-111 are repeated. If the coating is removed, the base metal will have a violet or blue color. If the color of the stripped area is the same as the uncoated area, the part is stripped. A good comparison to determine if the coating is fully stripped is to compare the heat tinted surface of a previously coated area to an uncoated heat tinted surface on the same part. If those surfaces look similar then the coatings is stripped. The coated area will heat tint differently than the base metal. After heat tint confirms that the coating has been removed, the part is ready for further processing, which may include further repair and then recoating of the base coat, or, may only involve recoating. (Step 113). The part is then ready for reuse. - A number of experiments were performed using
method 100 on different superalloy coated bars. Specifically, the coatings shown inFIGS. 2 and 3 were placed on a second generation nickel based superalloy. Bond coats such as those inFIGS. 2 and 3 , as well as all others used in the present invention, are polycrystalline alloys. Polycrystalline alloys have grain boundaries at the point where each of the multitude of crystals forming the polycrystalline material so the process solution can dissolve the coating. In contrast, a single crystal alloy has no grain boundaries to be attached by the acid. The surface of the single crystal substrate material is the only grain boundary of that material. There are no short-circuit paths or surface area to attack with the process solution. It has been discovered that the method of this invention is capable of removing the coatings, using abrasion, heat, acid and rinses, of polycrystalline coatings on single crystal substrates without significantly affecting the substrate. - The specific test procedure included the following steps. All grit blasting was performed with 240 aluminum oxide at 45 psi in a suction cabinet. The soak solution was approximately 75% HCl in water at a temperature of 150° F. All heat tints were performed in an air circulating Blue-M oven at 1050° F.±25° F. for one hour.
- Grit blast
- Soak for one or more hours
- Rinse to remove residue
- Smut check
- Repeat the grit blast, soak, rinse and smut check until the test indicates the coating has been removed.
- Heat tint for one hour
- Remove a section for metallographic review
-
FIG. 4 shows a microphotograph of the surface of a coating having the composition shown inFIG. 3 on a second generation nickel-based alloy as identified above.FIG. 5 illustrates the result of treating after five hours of soaking using the strip cycles as set forth above. The surface is sufficiently cleared of bond coat that an additional grit blasting at most would be necessary to have the surface ready to use. -
FIG. 6 shows a microphotograph of the surface of a coating having the composition shown inFIG. 2 on a second generation nickel-based alloy as identified above.FIG. 7 illustrates the result of treating after nine hours of soaking using the strip cycles as set forth above. The surface is sufficiently cleared of bond coat and no further treatment would be necessary to have the surface ready to use. - While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment(s), it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment(s) disclosed, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Claims (18)
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/223,667 US9103037B2 (en) | 2011-09-01 | 2011-09-01 | Method for stripping gamma-gamma prime coating from gamma-gamma prime alloy |
SG2012043246A SG188032A1 (en) | 2011-09-01 | 2012-06-12 | Method for stripping gamma-gamma prime coating from gamma-gamma prime alloy |
EP20120182484 EP2565295A1 (en) | 2011-09-01 | 2012-08-30 | Method for stripping gamma-gamma prime coating from gamma-gamma prime alloy |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/223,667 US9103037B2 (en) | 2011-09-01 | 2011-09-01 | Method for stripping gamma-gamma prime coating from gamma-gamma prime alloy |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20130059501A1 true US20130059501A1 (en) | 2013-03-07 |
US9103037B2 US9103037B2 (en) | 2015-08-11 |
Family
ID=46796409
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/223,667 Active 2034-03-27 US9103037B2 (en) | 2011-09-01 | 2011-09-01 | Method for stripping gamma-gamma prime coating from gamma-gamma prime alloy |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9103037B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2565295A1 (en) |
SG (1) | SG188032A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10125425B2 (en) | 2013-07-01 | 2018-11-13 | General Electric Company | Method for smut removal during stripping of coating |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3155536A (en) * | 1962-06-06 | 1964-11-03 | Avco Corp | Aluminum oxidation resistant coating for nickel and cobalt base alloy parts |
US4089736A (en) * | 1976-04-27 | 1978-05-16 | Rolls-Royce Limited | Method of removing Al-Cr-Co coatings from nickel alloy substrates |
US4176433A (en) * | 1978-06-29 | 1979-12-04 | United Technologies Corporation | Method of remanufacturing turbine vane clusters for gas turbine engines |
US20050161438A1 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2005-07-28 | Kool Lawrence B. | Method for chemically removing aluminum-containing materials from a substrate |
US20070023142A1 (en) * | 2002-12-19 | 2007-02-01 | Lagraff John R | Airfoil refurbishment method |
US20070131255A1 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2007-06-14 | Nigel-Philip Cox | Method for removing a layer area of a component |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4425185A (en) | 1982-03-18 | 1984-01-10 | United Technologies Corporation | Method and composition for removing nickel aluminide coatings from nickel superalloys |
US4534823A (en) | 1983-12-05 | 1985-08-13 | United Technologies Corporation | Chemical milling IN-100 nickel superalloy |
US6494960B1 (en) | 1998-04-27 | 2002-12-17 | General Electric Company | Method for removing an aluminide coating from a substrate |
EP1870497A1 (en) | 2006-06-23 | 2007-12-26 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for the electrochemical stripping of a metallic coating from an element |
US20090252987A1 (en) | 2008-04-02 | 2009-10-08 | United Technologies Corporation | Inspection and repair process using thermal acoustic imaging |
US7875200B2 (en) | 2008-05-20 | 2011-01-25 | United Technologies Corporation | Method for a repair process |
SG157262A1 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2009-12-29 | Turbine Overhaul Services Pte | Microwave assisted chemical stripping of coatings |
-
2011
- 2011-09-01 US US13/223,667 patent/US9103037B2/en active Active
-
2012
- 2012-06-12 SG SG2012043246A patent/SG188032A1/en unknown
- 2012-08-30 EP EP20120182484 patent/EP2565295A1/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3155536A (en) * | 1962-06-06 | 1964-11-03 | Avco Corp | Aluminum oxidation resistant coating for nickel and cobalt base alloy parts |
US4089736A (en) * | 1976-04-27 | 1978-05-16 | Rolls-Royce Limited | Method of removing Al-Cr-Co coatings from nickel alloy substrates |
US4176433A (en) * | 1978-06-29 | 1979-12-04 | United Technologies Corporation | Method of remanufacturing turbine vane clusters for gas turbine engines |
US20070131255A1 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2007-06-14 | Nigel-Philip Cox | Method for removing a layer area of a component |
US20070023142A1 (en) * | 2002-12-19 | 2007-02-01 | Lagraff John R | Airfoil refurbishment method |
US20050161438A1 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2005-07-28 | Kool Lawrence B. | Method for chemically removing aluminum-containing materials from a substrate |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US9103037B2 (en) | 2015-08-11 |
EP2565295A1 (en) | 2013-03-06 |
SG188032A1 (en) | 2013-03-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1314797B1 (en) | Chemical removal of a chromium oxide coating from an article | |
US6725540B2 (en) | Method for repairing turbine engine components | |
US6174448B1 (en) | Method for stripping aluminum from a diffusion coating | |
US3607398A (en) | Chemical stripping process | |
EP1788125A2 (en) | Strip process for superalloys | |
JPH0245712B2 (en) | ||
JP4762393B2 (en) | Method for removing high temperature corrosion products from diffusion aluminide coatings | |
US9212555B2 (en) | Method for removing the coating from a gas turbine component | |
US20080272004A1 (en) | Method for the production of an aluminum diffusion coating for oxidation protection | |
US7146990B1 (en) | Process for repairing sulfidation damaged turbine components | |
US20060231123A1 (en) | Method for removing a layer area of a component | |
EP1043424A1 (en) | Method for locally removing oxidation and corrosion product from the surface of turbine engine components | |
Antony et al. | Aircraft gas turbine blade and vane repair | |
US20110120972A1 (en) | Replacement process for fluoride ion cleaning | |
US9103037B2 (en) | Method for stripping gamma-gamma prime coating from gamma-gamma prime alloy | |
US7125457B2 (en) | Method for removing oxide from cracks in turbine components | |
US20060057416A1 (en) | Article having a surface protected by a silicon-containing diffusion coating | |
US20170369981A1 (en) | Treated gas turbine components and processes of treating gas turbine systems and gas turbine components | |
US10125425B2 (en) | Method for smut removal during stripping of coating | |
US7875200B2 (en) | Method for a repair process | |
US11235405B2 (en) | Method of repairing superalloy components using phase agglomeration | |
EP3266902B1 (en) | Oxide film removal method | |
JP2003034887A (en) | Method for removing oxidation resistant film on hot member surface | |
CN109023391A (en) | The removal liquid of metal surface coat of aluminide and its preparation method and application method | |
IES980638A2 (en) | Method of cleaning metal components |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, CONNECTICUT Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PARKOS, JOSEPH;RIEWE, CURTIS H.;MORIN, THOMAS M.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:026844/0341 Effective date: 20110830 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:054062/0001 Effective date: 20200403 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, CONNECTICUT Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE AND REMOVE PATENT APPLICATION NUMBER 11886281 AND ADD PATENT APPLICATION NUMBER 14846874. TO CORRECT THE RECEIVING PARTY ADDRESS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 054062 FRAME: 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF ADDRESS;ASSIGNOR:UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:055659/0001 Effective date: 20200403 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: RTX CORPORATION, CONNECTICUT Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:064714/0001 Effective date: 20230714 |