US20130027795A1 - Systems and methods for providing mirrors with high stiffness and low inertia involving chemical etching - Google Patents

Systems and methods for providing mirrors with high stiffness and low inertia involving chemical etching Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20130027795A1
US20130027795A1 US13/560,023 US201213560023A US2013027795A1 US 20130027795 A1 US20130027795 A1 US 20130027795A1 US 201213560023 A US201213560023 A US 201213560023A US 2013027795 A1 US2013027795 A1 US 2013027795A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
mirror
beryllium
etching agent
wall section
rotation motor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/560,023
Inventor
David C. Brown
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Novanta Inc
Original Assignee
GSI Group Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by GSI Group Corp filed Critical GSI Group Corp
Priority to US13/560,023 priority Critical patent/US20130027795A1/en
Assigned to GSI GROUP CORPORATION reassignment GSI GROUP CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BROWN, DAVID C.
Publication of US20130027795A1 publication Critical patent/US20130027795A1/en
Assigned to CAMBRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC. reassignment CAMBRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GSI GROUP CORPORATION
Assigned to GSI GROUP CORPORATION reassignment GSI GROUP CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CAMBRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Priority to US15/195,156 priority patent/US10761293B2/en
Assigned to NOVANTA CORPORATION reassignment NOVANTA CORPORATION CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CAMBRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B7/00Mountings, adjusting means, or light-tight connections, for optical elements
    • G02B7/18Mountings, adjusting means, or light-tight connections, for optical elements for prisms; for mirrors
    • G02B7/182Mountings, adjusting means, or light-tight connections, for optical elements for prisms; for mirrors for mirrors
    • G02B7/1821Mountings, adjusting means, or light-tight connections, for optical elements for prisms; for mirrors for mirrors for rotating or oscillating mirrors
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23FNON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
    • C23F1/00Etching metallic material by chemical means
    • C23F1/10Etching compositions
    • C23F1/14Aqueous compositions
    • C23F1/16Acidic compositions
    • C23F1/30Acidic compositions for etching other metallic material
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B26/00Optical devices or arrangements for the control of light using movable or deformable optical elements
    • G02B26/08Optical devices or arrangements for the control of light using movable or deformable optical elements for controlling the direction of light
    • G02B26/10Scanning systems
    • G02B26/105Scanning systems with one or more pivoting mirrors or galvano-mirrors

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to the fabrication of optical components in limited rotation motor systems, and relates in particular, to the fabrication of such components having high stiffness and low inertia.
  • Scanning mirror systems generally include a mirror surface that is either mounted on a substrate or is formed as part of a substrate, wherein the substrate is coupled to a shaft of a motor system.
  • Such motors may either run continuously (e.g., for use with a polygonal mirror) or such motors may be limited rotation motors providing movement within a limited angular range.
  • a mirror is mounted to the output shaft of a limited rotation motor and the limited rotation motor is controlled by a control loop that seeks to cause the rotor of the motor, and therefore the mirror, to follow a position and velocity command waveform with arbitrarily high fidelity.
  • the acceleration of the mirror within the system is limited by the rate of rise of current in the motor windings.
  • the positional precision is limited by the signal to noise ratio of the feedback method.
  • the bandwidth of the system (which is its ability to move from position A to position B at a desired high velocity and to then settle at position B precisely in the shortest possible time), is limited primarily by vibrations in the moving parts.
  • the bandwidth of the system will nominally be 1 ⁇ 2 the first torsional resonance in the moving structure.
  • the invention provides a method of fabricating a mirror for use in limited rotation motor systems.
  • the method includes the steps of providing a mirror structure including at least one wall section, and exposing the at least one wall section to a fluid etching agent to thereby provide chemical milling of the mirror structure.
  • the invention provides a mirror for use in a limited rotation motor system, and the mirror includes a backing structure opposite a front of the mirror.
  • the backing structure includes at least one wall section having a tapered shape that tapers as the wall extends away from a front of the mirror.
  • the invention provides a mirror for use in a limited rotation motor system that includes a backing structure opposite a front of the mirror, and the backing structure includes features that provide rigidity to the mirror and that have thicknesses that become reduced in a direction away from the front of the mirror.
  • FIG. 1 shows an illustrated diagrammatic enlarged view of a portion of a limited rotation motor to be processed in accordance with the present invention
  • FIG. 2 shows an illustrated diagrammatic enlarged view of a portion of a limited rotation motor following processing in accordance an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 3 shows an illustrative diagrammatic front view of a mirror substrate to be processed in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 4 shows an illustrative diagrammatic top view of the mirror substrate shown in FIG. 3 taken along line 4 - 4 thereof;
  • FIG. 5 shows an illustrative diagrammatic side sectional view of the mirror substrate shown in FIG. 3 taken along line 5 - 5 thereof;
  • FIG. 6 shows an illustrative diagrammatic back view of the mirror substrate shown in FIG. 3 ;
  • FIG. 7 shows an illustrative diagrammatic enlarged view of a portion of the back of the mirror substrate shown in FIG. 6 ;
  • FIGS. 8A-8C show illustrative diagrammatic enlarged views of a portion of a mirror substrate being processed in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 9 shows an illustrative diagrammatic back view of a mirror substrate that has been processed in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 10 shows an illustrative diagrammatic enlarged view of a portion of the back of the mirror substrate shown in FIG. 9 ;
  • FIG. 11 an illustrative diagrammatic side view of the mirror substrate shown in FIG. 9 taken along line 11 - 11 thereof;
  • FIG. 12 shows an illustrative diagrammatic isometric view of the mirror substrate of FIG. 9 ;
  • FIG. 13 shows an illustrative diagrammatic view of a limited rotation motor system using an optical element that includes a mirror substrate of the present invention.
  • Certain high stiffness and low inertia materials are known to be used for making moving (or dynamic) mirrors that move during use, such as mirrors in limited rotation motor systems. It is desired that such mirrors (ideally) have infinite stiffness and zero inertia, and beryllium for example, provides an excellent choice given its high stiffness and low mass.
  • mirror structures may be machined to further reduce the mass of the mirror, specifically on the back of the mirror and near the edges furthest from the axis of rotation of the mirror.
  • This machining is designed to further reduce the mass of the mirror while not significantly reducing the stiffness of the mirror.
  • FIG. 1 shows at 10 a beryllium mirror substrate, including wall sections 12 and a floor 14 that remain following material removal.
  • a computer file representing a solid model may be converted directly into machining instructions on a machine tool that mills the part in plan, drills the longitudinal hole, and performs such secondary operations such as drilling and tapping holes as may be required while still a section of a surface of the parent beryllium block.
  • the substrate 10 may be further processed by removing it from the parent material block on which it is milled by means of a sawing-off process such as wire EDM (Electrical Discharge Machining) or electro chemical sawing.
  • the separated substrate is then finished typically in accordance with desired tolerances. It may then conventionally be used as-is, or further processed by plating, vacuum coating, or both.
  • the present invention is directed to a process for generating the substrate itself.
  • the production of a single substratum on a face of a parent block or the production of a multiplicity of substrata on one or more faces of a parent block or in fact the production of a single substratum from a single near-net-shape block all share the same issues and therefore these variants do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention.
  • the exact size and shape of the substratum and the precise configuration of the stiffening structure on the back of the mirror are variants that do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
  • section thickness of the beryllium is severely reduced (as it must be in order to produce the low inertia desired in mirror substrates) at some reduced thickness, section bending takes place during machining. This bending causes deeper cracking.
  • the minimum section thickness practical has been approximately 0.5 mm in structures of the scale of mirror substrates as shown at d 1 in FIG. 1 . This section thickness then essentially puts a lower limit on the inertia that can be achieved.
  • the surface cracking caused during machining such as milling may be removed by immersing the clean part after machining in an etchant solution such as 60% concentration hydrofluoric acid (HF) 1 part and 69% concentration nitric acid (HNO 3 ) 9 parts or other suitable etchant.
  • etchant solution such as 60% concentration hydrofluoric acid (HF) 1 part and 69% concentration nitric acid (HNO 3 ) 9 parts or other suitable etchant.
  • the material removal rate at 20 C+/ ⁇ 5 C is about 18 microns per minute per surface exposed to the etchant. Although this may seem slow compared with typical milling tooth loading of 5 microns at a spindle speed of 10000 RPM, the milling takes place over a single line contact somewhere on the part, whereas the etching takes place simultaneously over the entire exposed surface of the part, and is therefore much faster.
  • agitation bath composition and temperature remaining constant it is adequate for the desired metal removal depth to be controlled by the time the part is immersed in the bath
  • a beryllium mirror structure (such as shown in FIG. 1 ) may remain in the etching bath for an extended period of time of, for example, 5 to 6 minutes, with the last minute, for example, providing a period of time during which the substrate is being slowly removed from the etchant bath as discussed in more detail below.
  • sections of the beryllium structure become etched to much smaller dimensions as shown at 20 in FIG. 2 .
  • the etched walls are shown at 22 and the etched floor is shown at 24 .
  • the thickness of the floor section for example, may be reduced from d 2 (e.g., about 0.5 mm) to d 4 (e.g., about 0.4 mm).
  • the wall sections become tapered, having triangular cross-sectional shapes.
  • the thickness of the wall sections may be reduced from d 1 (again e.g., about 0.5 mm) to walls having a variable thickness that is for example, about 0.25 mm at the thickest part (d 3 ) down to possibly zero at the top.
  • d 1 e.g., about 0.5 mm
  • d 3 thickest part
  • the tapering may be controlled by controlling the rate of removal of the substrate from the fluid bath as well as by controlling the agitation of the substrate within the fluid bath as discussed in more detail below.
  • the removal of material from the reflective face of the substrate reduces its inertia, it also reduces its stiffness: however, a minimum stiffness is required in order to support the forces produced during polishing of the reflective surface.
  • the required minimum section thickness (the inverse of stiffness first order therefore inertia all other things remaining constant) will vary with the intended wavelength of use.
  • FIGS. 3-7 show a beryllium mirror structure 30 having a front side 32 that provides a highly reflective surface and a back side 34 .
  • the sides furthest from the axis of rotation (A R ) of the mirror are reduced as shown at 35 , and an cavity 33 may be provided that contains mirror damping material as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0271679, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
  • the back side 34 is machined to removed beryllium material in a honeycomb pattern from areas 36 , leaving wall sections 38 that are six sided and formed adjacent one another to provide support for the mirror yet with a reduced weight (due to the removal of material).
  • the substrate 40 may be processed by immersion in the etchant solution 42 discussed above.
  • a protective film 44 is provided over the highly reflective mirror surface to prevent etching of the highly reflective mirror surface.
  • the shapes of the walls 46 may be controlled, permitting the walls 46 to be thinnest furthest from the highly reflective mirror surface.
  • the taper of the walls therefore, may be linear or non-linear.
  • the walls 46 and the floors 48 still define generally hexagonal shapes, but are thinner, particularly at the further ends thereof.
  • the wall sections 58 and the floor 59 of the mirror structure 50 are etched to provide tapered shapes as shown in FIG. 2 .
  • the wall sections in particular, have a shape that tapers as the wall extends away from the highly reflective surface of the mirror.
  • the front side 52 of the mirror 50 remains unetched due to masking.
  • the hexagonal shaped walls have a reduced thickness due to the etching, yet still provide structural support for the mirror.
  • the hexagonal walls are shorter in height near the lateral edges away from the axis of rotation of the mirror (A R ).
  • the present invention is very economical compared with the machining of discrete individual section thicknesses, so that even if in the future a method is found which allows the direct machining of thinner sections than those now possible, processes of the invention will continue to provide a more economical approach to the production of very thin very low inertia mirrors.
  • a single rather thick substrate is milled or otherwise machined in multiple units, and the individual units are then processed using etching to the final dimensions required for a particular wavelength or wavelength interval of rise.
  • a section of beryllium mirror stiffening ribs and/or a face may be reduced to a desired thickness by etching, and/or by masking the exposed mirror face to effectively deepen the ribs without causing cracking in the reflecting face.
  • a rate of mechanical agitation may be controlled to control the partial exhaustion of the etchant so that triangular cross-sections thinner at the open end are produced.
  • selected areas of the mirror substrate may be masked prior to etching to prevent etching in those areas, and in further embodiments, the etching substrata may be machined to a uniform over-size section thickness to a variable final desired section thickness.
  • the optical element 62 (e.g., the mirror 50 ) is coupled to a limited rotation motor 64 via mirror mounting structure 66 (e.g., via a clamp, threaded mounting structure and/or a tapered mounting structure as disclosed for example in U.S. Pat. No. 7,212,325, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety) for rotation about the motor rotor axis A R .
  • mirror mounting structure 66 e.g., via a clamp, threaded mounting structure and/or a tapered mounting structure as disclosed for example in U.S. Pat. No. 7,212,325, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety
  • the system 60 also includes a position transducer 68 that is coupled to a feedback control system 70 that provides a command signal 72 to the motor 64 responsive to an input command signal from an input node 74 and a feedback signal 76 from the position transducer 68 to control the speed and/or position of the motor shaft, and therefore the optical element 62 .
  • the feedback control system is used to cause the rotor of the motor, and therefore the mirror, to follow a position and velocity command waveform with arbitrarily high fidelity. There are limits however, on the fidelity with which the system may follow the input command signal.
  • the acceleration of the mirror in the system for example is limited by the rate of rise of current in the motor windings, and the positional precision is limited by the signal to noise ratio of the feedback system.
  • the ability of the system to move the mirror from a position A to a position B at a desired high velocity and to then settle at position B precisely in the shortest time (the bandwidth of the system) is limited primarily by vibrations in the moving parts.
  • Providing a mirror substrate in accordance with the invention advantageously permits the mirror to be very high in stiffness yet low in inertia.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Optical Elements Other Than Lenses (AREA)
  • ing And Chemical Polishing (AREA)
  • Exposure And Positioning Against Photoresist Photosensitive Materials (AREA)
  • Mechanical Optical Scanning Systems (AREA)

Abstract

A method is disclosed of fabricating a mirror for use in limited rotation motor systems, said method comprising the steps of providing a mirror structure including at least one wall section, and exposing the at least one wall section to a fluid etching agent to thereby provide chemical milling of the mirror structure.

Description

    PRIORITY
  • The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/513,274 filed Jul. 29, 2011, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
  • BACKGROUND
  • The present invention generally relates to the fabrication of optical components in limited rotation motor systems, and relates in particular, to the fabrication of such components having high stiffness and low inertia.
  • Scanning mirror systems generally include a mirror surface that is either mounted on a substrate or is formed as part of a substrate, wherein the substrate is coupled to a shaft of a motor system. Such motors may either run continuously (e.g., for use with a polygonal mirror) or such motors may be limited rotation motors providing movement within a limited angular range. These applications require that the mirror be as stiff as possible consistent with a minimum of inertia as they are accelerated back and forth over the limited angular range.
  • In typical limited rotation scanning systems (also called galvanometer systems) a mirror is mounted to the output shaft of a limited rotation motor and the limited rotation motor is controlled by a control loop that seeks to cause the rotor of the motor, and therefore the mirror, to follow a position and velocity command waveform with arbitrarily high fidelity.
  • There are limits, however, on the fidelity with which the system may follow the command. For example, the acceleration of the mirror within the system is limited by the rate of rise of current in the motor windings. The positional precision is limited by the signal to noise ratio of the feedback method. The bandwidth of the system (which is its ability to move from position A to position B at a desired high velocity and to then settle at position B precisely in the shortest possible time), is limited primarily by vibrations in the moving parts. The bandwidth of the system will nominally be ½ the first torsional resonance in the moving structure.
  • It is customary, therefore, to make the moving parts as stiff as possible within the constraints of the allowable system inertia. Since the torque required of the motor to reach a specified acceleration is directly proportional to the inertia and is proportional to the current (whose rate of rise is limited as noted above), it is often the case that when the system parameters are optimized for a particular inertia, some component, typically the mirror, even when made of a very high stiffness-to-inertia material, is not as stiff as is required to reach system bandwidth goals. In this case, extra material is added to the mirror to increase its stiffness, but, at the cost of additional inertia, requiring a larger, more expensive motor as well as a control loop that is capable of driving the additional inertia.
  • There is a need therefore, for a limited rotation motor system that provides improved bandwidth without requiring a larger, more expensive motor and accompanying control system.
  • SUMMARY
  • In accordance with an embodiment, the invention provides a method of fabricating a mirror for use in limited rotation motor systems. The method includes the steps of providing a mirror structure including at least one wall section, and exposing the at least one wall section to a fluid etching agent to thereby provide chemical milling of the mirror structure.
  • In accordance with another embodiment, the invention provides a mirror for use in a limited rotation motor system, and the mirror includes a backing structure opposite a front of the mirror. The backing structure includes at least one wall section having a tapered shape that tapers as the wall extends away from a front of the mirror.
  • In accordance with a further embodiment, the invention provides a mirror for use in a limited rotation motor system that includes a backing structure opposite a front of the mirror, and the backing structure includes features that provide rigidity to the mirror and that have thicknesses that become reduced in a direction away from the front of the mirror.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The following description may be further understood with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
  • FIG. 1 shows an illustrated diagrammatic enlarged view of a portion of a limited rotation motor to be processed in accordance with the present invention;
  • FIG. 2 shows an illustrated diagrammatic enlarged view of a portion of a limited rotation motor following processing in accordance an embodiment of the present invention;
  • FIG. 3 shows an illustrative diagrammatic front view of a mirror substrate to be processed in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
  • FIG. 4 shows an illustrative diagrammatic top view of the mirror substrate shown in FIG. 3 taken along line 4-4 thereof;
  • FIG. 5 shows an illustrative diagrammatic side sectional view of the mirror substrate shown in FIG. 3 taken along line 5-5 thereof;
  • FIG. 6 shows an illustrative diagrammatic back view of the mirror substrate shown in FIG. 3;
  • FIG. 7 shows an illustrative diagrammatic enlarged view of a portion of the back of the mirror substrate shown in FIG. 6;
  • FIGS. 8A-8C show illustrative diagrammatic enlarged views of a portion of a mirror substrate being processed in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
  • FIG. 9 shows an illustrative diagrammatic back view of a mirror substrate that has been processed in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
  • FIG. 10 shows an illustrative diagrammatic enlarged view of a portion of the back of the mirror substrate shown in FIG. 9;
  • FIG. 11 an illustrative diagrammatic side view of the mirror substrate shown in FIG. 9 taken along line 11-11 thereof;
  • FIG. 12 shows an illustrative diagrammatic isometric view of the mirror substrate of FIG. 9; and
  • FIG. 13 shows an illustrative diagrammatic view of a limited rotation motor system using an optical element that includes a mirror substrate of the present invention.
  • The drawings are shown for illustrative purposes only.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Certain high stiffness and low inertia materials are known to be used for making moving (or dynamic) mirrors that move during use, such as mirrors in limited rotation motor systems. It is desired that such mirrors (ideally) have infinite stiffness and zero inertia, and beryllium for example, provides an excellent choice given its high stiffness and low mass.
  • It is also known that mirror structures may be machined to further reduce the mass of the mirror, specifically on the back of the mirror and near the edges furthest from the axis of rotation of the mirror. This machining is designed to further reduce the mass of the mirror while not significantly reducing the stiffness of the mirror. In this regard, it is desired to machine the mirror in such a way that walls remain to provide stiffness (e.g., in a honeycomb pattern) that are as thin as possible.
  • While materials used for mirror structures have very low specific inertia (gm-cm2 per unit area), it is difficult to machine certain low inertia materials such as beryllium to very fine thicknesses without cracking. Beryllium is also expensive to machine and produces a dust that is hazardous. Machine tooling is generally unique to specific materials, requiring various speeds, feeds, lubricants, coolants, tool geometries materials and coatings. It is therefore desirable to increase the manufacturing speed of beryllium mirrors, and at the same time, overcome the limitations of the known machining art.
  • FIG. 1 shows at 10 a beryllium mirror substrate, including wall sections 12 and a floor 14 that remain following material removal. As is know in the art, a computer file representing a solid model may be converted directly into machining instructions on a machine tool that mills the part in plan, drills the longitudinal hole, and performs such secondary operations such as drilling and tapping holes as may be required while still a section of a surface of the parent beryllium block.
  • The substrate 10 may be further processed by removing it from the parent material block on which it is milled by means of a sawing-off process such as wire EDM (Electrical Discharge Machining) or electro chemical sawing. The separated substrate is then finished typically in accordance with desired tolerances. It may then conventionally be used as-is, or further processed by plating, vacuum coating, or both.
  • The present invention is directed to a process for generating the substrate itself. As is known to those skilled in the machining art, the production of a single substratum on a face of a parent block or the production of a multiplicity of substrata on one or more faces of a parent block or in fact the production of a single substratum from a single near-net-shape block all share the same issues and therefore these variants do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention. The exact size and shape of the substratum and the precise configuration of the stiffening structure on the back of the mirror are variants that do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
  • One of the difficulties in machining beryllium is that the surface develops cracking as a result of the machining forces and the heat developed. With care, using very sharp tools, flood coolant, and spindle speeds in milling under 10,000 RPM these cracks are restricted to the top 10 microns or so of the surface. Even so, they must be removed after machining and before use because otherwise they tend to grow in length and depth, particularly if the part is stressed as during acceleration, until they meet in the interior of the part and cause rupture.
  • Unfortunately, when the section thickness of the beryllium is severely reduced (as it must be in order to produce the low inertia desired in mirror substrates) at some reduced thickness, section bending takes place during machining. This bending causes deeper cracking. As a result, the minimum section thickness practical has been approximately 0.5 mm in structures of the scale of mirror substrates as shown at d1 in FIG. 1. This section thickness then essentially puts a lower limit on the inertia that can be achieved.
  • The surface cracking caused during machining such as milling may be removed by immersing the clean part after machining in an etchant solution such as 60% concentration hydrofluoric acid (HF) 1 part and 69% concentration nitric acid (HNO3) 9 parts or other suitable etchant. The material removal rate at 20 C+/−5 C is about 18 microns per minute per surface exposed to the etchant. Although this may seem slow compared with typical milling tooth loading of 5 microns at a spindle speed of 10000 RPM, the milling takes place over a single line contact somewhere on the part, whereas the etching takes place simultaneously over the entire exposed surface of the part, and is therefore much faster. In general, because of the linear relationship between material removed and immersion time, agitation bath composition and temperature remaining constant, it is adequate for the desired metal removal depth to be controlled by the time the part is immersed in the bath.
  • As the depth-to-width ratio of any enclosed areas on the backing structure increases however, general agitation becomes less effective and surface tension of the etchant tends to keep the exhausted chemicals in place on the walls to be thinned. In order to more completely refresh the local effectiveness of the etchant, it is necessary to periodically move the local surface of the etchant up and down the walls so that the integrated position of the surface of the etchant over time resembles a slow withdrawal of the part out of the bath with a dither. In other words, the part is withdrawn at a constant rate superimposed on which there is a small up-and-down motion that has the effect of washing away any exhausted etchant adhering to the walls.
  • In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a beryllium mirror structure (such as shown in FIG. 1) may remain in the etching bath for an extended period of time of, for example, 5 to 6 minutes, with the last minute, for example, providing a period of time during which the substrate is being slowly removed from the etchant bath as discussed in more detail below. Following such a treatment, sections of the beryllium structure become etched to much smaller dimensions as shown at 20 in FIG. 2. The etched walls are shown at 22 and the etched floor is shown at 24. The thickness of the floor section, for example, may be reduced from d2 (e.g., about 0.5 mm) to d4 (e.g., about 0.4 mm). Further, the wall sections become tapered, having triangular cross-sectional shapes. The thickness of the wall sections, for example, may be reduced from d1 (again e.g., about 0.5 mm) to walls having a variable thickness that is for example, about 0.25 mm at the thickest part (d3) down to possibly zero at the top. This has the desirable effect of further reducing the mass of the ribbing and therefore the inertia of the part, particularly since more mass is removed further from the axis of rotation of the mirror. The tapering may be controlled by controlling the rate of removal of the substrate from the fluid bath as well as by controlling the agitation of the substrate within the fluid bath as discussed in more detail below.
  • Mirrors formed of such a process were tested and found to be exceptionally low in specific inertia. During further development of the process, it was found that the ribs could be reliably reduced to a line at the top without reducing their height (stiffness) simply by controlling the immersion time. The triangular shaping of the rib cross-section is attributed to partial exhaustion of the etchant inside the closed cells.
  • Although the removal of material from the reflective face of the substrate reduces its inertia, it also reduces its stiffness: however, a minimum stiffness is required in order to support the forces produced during polishing of the reflective surface. In keeping with the requirement that the reflective surface be flat to ¼ wavelength or better at the wavelength of use, it follows then that the required minimum section thickness (the inverse of stiffness first order therefore inertia all other things remaining constant) will vary with the intended wavelength of use. Conventionally, it was necessary to machine a mirror substratum to a section thickness in inverse proportion to the intended wavelength of use (¼ of a shorter wavelength is a smaller absolute allowed departure from flatness, and so requires a stiffer substrate).
  • FIGS. 3-7 show a beryllium mirror structure 30 having a front side 32 that provides a highly reflective surface and a back side 34. The sides furthest from the axis of rotation (AR) of the mirror are reduced as shown at 35, and an cavity 33 may be provided that contains mirror damping material as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0271679, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. As shown at 36 in FIGS. 6 and 7, the back side 34 is machined to removed beryllium material in a honeycomb pattern from areas 36, leaving wall sections 38 that are six sided and formed adjacent one another to provide support for the mirror yet with a reduced weight (due to the removal of material).
  • As shown in FIGS. 8A-8C, the substrate 40 may be processed by immersion in the etchant solution 42 discussed above. A protective film 44 is provided over the highly reflective mirror surface to prevent etching of the highly reflective mirror surface. By controlling the rate of separation of the substrate 40 from the etchant solution 42, the shapes of the walls 46 may be controlled, permitting the walls 46 to be thinnest furthest from the highly reflective mirror surface. The taper of the walls, therefore, may be linear or non-linear. The walls 46 and the floors 48 still define generally hexagonal shapes, but are thinner, particularly at the further ends thereof.
  • With reference to FIGS. 9-12, following chemical treatment in the fluid etching agent, the wall sections 58 and the floor 59 of the mirror structure 50 are etched to provide tapered shapes as shown in FIG. 2. The wall sections, in particular, have a shape that tapers as the wall extends away from the highly reflective surface of the mirror. Again, the front side 52 of the mirror 50 remains unetched due to masking. As shown in FIGS. 9 and 10, the hexagonal shaped walls have a reduced thickness due to the etching, yet still provide structural support for the mirror. As shown at 57 in FIGS. 11 and 12, the hexagonal walls are shorter in height near the lateral edges away from the axis of rotation of the mirror (AR).
  • Because the etching process is fast and un-attended, the present invention is very economical compared with the machining of discrete individual section thicknesses, so that even if in the future a method is found which allows the direct machining of thinner sections than those now possible, processes of the invention will continue to provide a more economical approach to the production of very thin very low inertia mirrors. In practice therefore, a single rather thick substrate is milled or otherwise machined in multiple units, and the individual units are then processed using etching to the final dimensions required for a particular wavelength or wavelength interval of rise.
  • In accordance with various embodiments of the invention, therefore, a section of beryllium mirror stiffening ribs and/or a face may be reduced to a desired thickness by etching, and/or by masking the exposed mirror face to effectively deepen the ribs without causing cracking in the reflecting face. In accordance with further embodiments, a rate of mechanical agitation may be controlled to control the partial exhaustion of the etchant so that triangular cross-sections thinner at the open end are produced. In accordance with further embodiments, selected areas of the mirror substrate may be masked prior to etching to prevent etching in those areas, and in further embodiments, the etching substrata may be machined to a uniform over-size section thickness to a variable final desired section thickness.
  • As further shown in FIG. 13, in a limited rotation motor system 60, the optical element 62 (e.g., the mirror 50) is coupled to a limited rotation motor 64 via mirror mounting structure 66 (e.g., via a clamp, threaded mounting structure and/or a tapered mounting structure as disclosed for example in U.S. Pat. No. 7,212,325, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety) for rotation about the motor rotor axis AR. The system 60 also includes a position transducer 68 that is coupled to a feedback control system 70 that provides a command signal 72 to the motor 64 responsive to an input command signal from an input node 74 and a feedback signal 76 from the position transducer 68 to control the speed and/or position of the motor shaft, and therefore the optical element 62.
  • The feedback control system is used to cause the rotor of the motor, and therefore the mirror, to follow a position and velocity command waveform with arbitrarily high fidelity. There are limits however, on the fidelity with which the system may follow the input command signal. The acceleration of the mirror in the system for example, is limited by the rate of rise of current in the motor windings, and the positional precision is limited by the signal to noise ratio of the feedback system. The ability of the system to move the mirror from a position A to a position B at a desired high velocity and to then settle at position B precisely in the shortest time (the bandwidth of the system) is limited primarily by vibrations in the moving parts. Providing a mirror substrate in accordance with the invention advantageously permits the mirror to be very high in stiffness yet low in inertia.
  • Those skilled in the art will appreciate that numerous modifications and variations may be made to the above disclosed embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims (20)

1. A method of fabricating a mirror for use in limited rotation motor systems, said method comprising the steps of providing a mirror structure including at least one wall section, and exposing the at least one wall section to a fluid etching agent to thereby provide chemical milling of the mirror structure.
2. The method as claimed claim 1, wherein said mirror substrate includes beryllium.
3. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said fluid etching agent includes hydrofluoric acid (HF).
4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said fluid etching agent includes nitric acid (HNO3).
5. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said method includes the step of applying a mask to a protected area to prevent etching of the protected area.
6. The method as claimed in claim 5, wherein said protected area is a front reflective surface of the mirror.
7. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said method further includes the step of agitating a bath that includes the beryllium structure and the fluid etching agent.
8. The method as claimed in claim 7, wherein said method further includes the step of controlling a rate of agitation of the bath that includes the beryllium and the fluid etching agent to control a shape of the at least one wall section.
9. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said mirror structure is removed from the fluid etching agent when the mirror reaches a target reduced weight.
10. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said method further includes the step of drawing the beryllium structure from the fluid etching agent at a controlled rate such that the at least one wall section forms a tapered wall.
11. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said method provides uniform milling of exposed surfaces of the beryllium structure.
12. A mirror for use in a limited rotation motor systems formed from the method of claim 1.
13. A mirror for use in a limited rotation motor system, said mirror comprising a backing structure opposite a front of the mirror, said backing structure including at least one wall section having a tapered shape that tapers as the wall extends away from the front of the mirror.
14. The mirror as claimed in claim 13, wherein said backing structure includes beryllium.
15. The mirror as claimed in claim 13, wherein said wall sections are formed by chemical etching.
16. The mirror as claimed in claim 13, wherein said tapered shape of the wall section has a thickness of no greater than about 0.25 mm.
17. The mirror as claimed in claim 13, wherein said backing structure includes a plurality of hexagonally shaped wall sections each of which is tapered as the wall extends away from the front of the mirror.
18. A mirror for use in a limited rotation motor system, said mirror comprising a backing structure opposite a front of the mirror, said backing structure including features that provide rigidity to the mirror and that have thicknesses that become reduced in a direction away from the front of the mirror.
19. The mirror as claimed in claim 18, wherein said backing structure includes beryllium.
20. The mirror as claimed in claim 18, wherein said features have thicknesses of no greater than about 0.25 mm.
US13/560,023 2011-07-29 2012-07-27 Systems and methods for providing mirrors with high stiffness and low inertia involving chemical etching Abandoned US20130027795A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/560,023 US20130027795A1 (en) 2011-07-29 2012-07-27 Systems and methods for providing mirrors with high stiffness and low inertia involving chemical etching
US15/195,156 US10761293B2 (en) 2011-07-29 2016-06-28 Systems and methods for providing mirrors with high stiffness and low inertia involving chemical etching

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161513274P 2011-07-29 2011-07-29
US13/560,023 US20130027795A1 (en) 2011-07-29 2012-07-27 Systems and methods for providing mirrors with high stiffness and low inertia involving chemical etching

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/195,156 Division US10761293B2 (en) 2011-07-29 2016-06-28 Systems and methods for providing mirrors with high stiffness and low inertia involving chemical etching

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20130027795A1 true US20130027795A1 (en) 2013-01-31

Family

ID=47597023

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/560,023 Abandoned US20130027795A1 (en) 2011-07-29 2012-07-27 Systems and methods for providing mirrors with high stiffness and low inertia involving chemical etching
US15/195,156 Active 2034-03-19 US10761293B2 (en) 2011-07-29 2016-06-28 Systems and methods for providing mirrors with high stiffness and low inertia involving chemical etching

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/195,156 Active 2034-03-19 US10761293B2 (en) 2011-07-29 2016-06-28 Systems and methods for providing mirrors with high stiffness and low inertia involving chemical etching

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (2) US20130027795A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2737357A4 (en)
JP (1) JP6188692B2 (en)
KR (1) KR102108022B1 (en)
CN (1) CN103842887B (en)
CA (1) CA2839308A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2013019607A2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4016159A1 (en) * 2020-12-09 2022-06-22 Yazaki Corporation Head-up display device

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2022140128A (en) * 2021-03-12 2022-09-26 京セラ株式会社 mirror actuator
JP2022140129A (en) * 2021-03-12 2022-09-26 京セラ株式会社 mirror actuator

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2162590A (en) * 1939-01-14 1939-06-13 James L Richter Simulated bevel vanity mirror
US2439999A (en) * 1944-12-09 1948-04-20 Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co Process of forming films upon the surfaces of glass plates
US2658317A (en) * 1951-02-23 1953-11-10 Libbey Owens Ford Glass Co Process of working glass
US3487520A (en) * 1966-10-19 1970-01-06 Hughes Aircraft Co Process for producing heat transfer panels
US6316288B1 (en) * 1997-03-21 2001-11-13 Seiko Epson Corporation Semiconductor device and methods of manufacturing film camera tape
US7365464B2 (en) * 2003-09-05 2008-04-29 Gsi Group Corporation Composite rotor and output shaft for galvanometer motor and method of manufacture thereof
US7672343B2 (en) * 2005-07-12 2010-03-02 Gsi Group Corporation System and method for high power laser processing
US20100103546A1 (en) * 2008-08-21 2010-04-29 Martin Schaefer Substrate for a mirror support with reduced weight as well as mirror with reduced-weight mirror support

Family Cites Families (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3524132A (en) * 1967-07-06 1970-08-11 Honeywell Inc Galvanometer having a wide reflective mirror with low inertia
US3799680A (en) * 1972-01-03 1974-03-26 Kollmorgen Corp Photometer optical system having viewing magnification and light attenuation means
DE2936667A1 (en) 1978-09-12 1980-03-20 Canon Kk COPIER
US4492669A (en) * 1983-03-21 1985-01-08 The Perkin-Elmer Corporation Method and means for making a beryllium mirror
US4685778A (en) * 1986-05-12 1987-08-11 Pollock David B Process for nuclear hardening optics and product produced thereby
US5076700A (en) * 1990-12-20 1991-12-31 Litton Systems, Inc. Bonded lightweight mirror structure
US6108121A (en) * 1998-03-24 2000-08-22 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Micromachined high reflectance deformable mirror
JP3531554B2 (en) * 1999-10-21 2004-05-31 松下電器産業株式会社 Optical mirror, optical scanner and laser processing machine
US6939475B2 (en) * 2001-08-31 2005-09-06 Daishinku Corporation Etching method, etched product formed by the same, and piezoelectric vibration device, method for producing the same
JP2005506909A (en) * 2001-10-22 2005-03-10 モンタナ ステート ユニバーシティ−ボーズマン Reinforced surface micromachined structure and manufacturing method thereof
JP4151959B2 (en) * 2003-06-19 2008-09-17 株式会社リコー Vibrating mirror and manufacturing method thereof, optical writing device, and image forming apparatus
WO2005052925A2 (en) 2003-11-24 2005-06-09 Gsi Lumonics Corporation Improved mirror mounting structures for scanners employing limited rotation motors
US7404647B1 (en) * 2003-12-11 2008-07-29 Gsi Group Corporation Method for optimal material selection and processing for dynamic mirror applications
WO2005119309A1 (en) * 2004-06-04 2005-12-15 Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Method of producing reflection mirror and reflection mirror
KR100707133B1 (en) * 2006-05-16 2007-04-13 삼성전자주식회사 Mirror structure and optical scanner having the same
JP2008209653A (en) * 2007-02-26 2008-09-11 Brother Ind Ltd Optical scanner, retina scanning type display device, and method for manufacturing optical scanner
US20090062024A1 (en) * 2007-08-27 2009-03-05 Gsi Group Corporation Mirror Mounting
JP2010008613A (en) * 2008-06-25 2010-01-14 Panasonic Electric Works Co Ltd Semiconductor machine structure and optical scanning mirror using the same
JP5693564B2 (en) * 2009-04-23 2015-04-01 ケンブリッジ テクノロジー インコーポレイテッド System and method for providing improved performance of a scanning mirror coupled to a finite rotation motor and mirror
JP2011064964A (en) * 2009-09-17 2011-03-31 Hoya Corp Optical scanner
CN101930088B (en) * 2010-08-04 2012-07-04 中国建筑材料科学研究总院 Surface-vitrified beryllium metal flat reflector and special glass

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2162590A (en) * 1939-01-14 1939-06-13 James L Richter Simulated bevel vanity mirror
US2439999A (en) * 1944-12-09 1948-04-20 Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co Process of forming films upon the surfaces of glass plates
US2658317A (en) * 1951-02-23 1953-11-10 Libbey Owens Ford Glass Co Process of working glass
US3487520A (en) * 1966-10-19 1970-01-06 Hughes Aircraft Co Process for producing heat transfer panels
US6316288B1 (en) * 1997-03-21 2001-11-13 Seiko Epson Corporation Semiconductor device and methods of manufacturing film camera tape
US7365464B2 (en) * 2003-09-05 2008-04-29 Gsi Group Corporation Composite rotor and output shaft for galvanometer motor and method of manufacture thereof
US7672343B2 (en) * 2005-07-12 2010-03-02 Gsi Group Corporation System and method for high power laser processing
US20100103546A1 (en) * 2008-08-21 2010-04-29 Martin Schaefer Substrate for a mirror support with reduced weight as well as mirror with reduced-weight mirror support

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4016159A1 (en) * 2020-12-09 2022-06-22 Yazaki Corporation Head-up display device
US11586047B2 (en) 2020-12-09 2023-02-21 Yazaki Corporation Head-up display device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2737357A2 (en) 2014-06-04
WO2013019607A2 (en) 2013-02-07
US10761293B2 (en) 2020-09-01
JP2014524594A (en) 2014-09-22
US20170045709A1 (en) 2017-02-16
CN103842887B (en) 2017-03-08
KR20140105709A (en) 2014-09-02
KR102108022B1 (en) 2020-05-28
EP2737357A4 (en) 2015-04-22
CA2839308A1 (en) 2013-02-07
CN103842887A (en) 2014-06-04
WO2013019607A3 (en) 2013-03-28
JP6188692B2 (en) 2017-08-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10761293B2 (en) Systems and methods for providing mirrors with high stiffness and low inertia involving chemical etching
Friedrich et al. Development of the micromilling process for high-aspect-ratio microstructures
Huo Micro-cutting: fundamentals and applications
Reynaerts et al. Machining of three-dimensional microstructures in silicon by electro-discharge machining
Ziberov et al. Effect of cutting fluid on micromilling of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy
Huo et al. Experimental investigation on micromilling of oxygen-free, high-conductivity copper using tungsten carbide, chemistry vapour deposition, and single-crystal diamond micro tools
EP3523103B1 (en) Method of machining brittle materials and machined product obtained by such a method
JP2005051007A (en) Manufacturing method of semiconductor chip
Hwang et al. Fabrication of a micro-pin array with high density and high hardness by combining mechanical peck-drilling and reverse-EDM
Rakwal et al. Fabrication of compliant high aspect ratio silicon microelectrode arrays using micro-wire electrical discharge machining
Ahn et al. Improvement of micro-machining accuracy by 2-dimensional vibration cutting
Min et al. Variation in machinability of single crystal materials in micromachining
JP2003231096A (en) Torsion spring for mems structure
JP2006326705A (en) Cutting tool
Kuriyagawa et al. Development of micro ultrasonic abrasive machining system (1st report, studies in micro ultrasonic abrasive machining)
Avila et al. Deburring of cross-drilled hole intersections by mechanized cutting
JP2669198B2 (en) XY stage
CN112404532A (en) Auxiliary machining method for aviation thin-wall micro-structural part
Choong et al. Micro-machinability studies of single crystal silicon using diamond end-mill
JPH0734064B2 (en) Method of manufacturing rotating polygon mirror
CN220278506U (en) Electric spark tool
Weng Fabrication of microelectrodes for EDM machining by a combined etching process
Abdelkawy et al. Machinability assessment of soda lime glass in ultrasonic-assisted drilling
Kim et al. Vibration control of a wire cut discharge machine using ER brake actuator
KR0151935B1 (en) Patterning method using chemicl and mechanical process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: GSI GROUP CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BROWN, DAVID C.;REEL/FRAME:028834/0203

Effective date: 20120730

AS Assignment

Owner name: CAMBRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GSI GROUP CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:030956/0336

Effective date: 20130730

AS Assignment

Owner name: GSI GROUP CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CAMBRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:037513/0367

Effective date: 20151231

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: NOVANTA CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:CAMBRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:043919/0001

Effective date: 20151231