US20120202897A1 - Method of purifying a gas - Google Patents

Method of purifying a gas Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20120202897A1
US20120202897A1 US13/369,197 US201213369197A US2012202897A1 US 20120202897 A1 US20120202897 A1 US 20120202897A1 US 201213369197 A US201213369197 A US 201213369197A US 2012202897 A1 US2012202897 A1 US 2012202897A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
gas
hydrogen
sulphide
wash solution
purified
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/369,197
Inventor
Kari I. KESKINEN
Jukka Koskinen
Juhani Aittamaa
Marianne PETTERSSON
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Neste Oyj
Original Assignee
Neste Oyj
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Neste Oyj filed Critical Neste Oyj
Priority to US13/369,197 priority Critical patent/US20120202897A1/en
Assigned to NESTE OIL OYJ reassignment NESTE OIL OYJ ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KOSKINEN, JUKKA, PETTERSSON, MARIANNE, AITTAMAA, JUHANI, KESKINEN, KARI I.
Publication of US20120202897A1 publication Critical patent/US20120202897A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/48Sulfur compounds
    • B01D53/52Hydrogen sulfide
    • B01D53/526Mixtures of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/14Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by absorption
    • B01D53/1406Multiple stage absorption
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/14Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by absorption
    • B01D53/1456Removing acid components
    • B01D53/1462Removing mixtures of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01BNON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
    • C01B17/00Sulfur; Compounds thereof
    • C01B17/20Methods for preparing sulfides or polysulfides, in general
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01GCOMPOUNDS CONTAINING METALS NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C01D OR C01F
    • C01G3/00Compounds of copper
    • C01G3/04Halides
    • C01G3/06Oxychlorides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10JPRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
    • C10J3/00Production of combustible gases containing carbon monoxide from solid carbonaceous fuels
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10KPURIFYING OR MODIFYING THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE
    • C10K1/00Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide
    • C10K1/002Removal of contaminants
    • C10K1/003Removal of contaminants of acid contaminants, e.g. acid gas removal
    • C10K1/004Sulfur containing contaminants, e.g. hydrogen sulfide
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10KPURIFYING OR MODIFYING THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE
    • C10K1/00Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide
    • C10K1/002Removal of contaminants
    • C10K1/003Removal of contaminants of acid contaminants, e.g. acid gas removal
    • C10K1/005Carbon dioxide
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10KPURIFYING OR MODIFYING THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE
    • C10K1/00Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide
    • C10K1/08Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors
    • C10K1/085Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors two direct washing treatments, one with an aqueous liquid and one with a non-aqueous liquid
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10KPURIFYING OR MODIFYING THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE
    • C10K1/00Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide
    • C10K1/08Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors
    • C10K1/10Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors with aqueous liquids
    • C10K1/105Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors with aqueous liquids containing metal compounds other than alkali- or earth-alkali carbonates, -hydroxides, oxides, or salts of inorganic acids derived from sulfur
    • C10K1/108Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors with aqueous liquids containing metal compounds other than alkali- or earth-alkali carbonates, -hydroxides, oxides, or salts of inorganic acids derived from sulfur containing Cu compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10KPURIFYING OR MODIFYING THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE
    • C10K1/00Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide
    • C10K1/08Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors
    • C10K1/16Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors with non-aqueous liquids
    • C10K1/165Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by washing with liquids; Reviving the used wash liquors with non-aqueous liquids at temperatures below zero degrees Celsius
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2252/00Absorbents, i.e. solvents and liquid materials for gas absorption
    • B01D2252/20Organic absorbents
    • B01D2252/202Alcohols or their derivatives
    • B01D2252/2021Methanol
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2257/00Components to be removed
    • B01D2257/30Sulfur compounds
    • B01D2257/304Hydrogen sulfide
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2257/00Components to be removed
    • B01D2257/50Carbon oxides
    • B01D2257/504Carbon dioxide
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/10Feedstock materials
    • C10G2300/1011Biomass
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/20Characteristics of the feedstock or the products
    • C10G2300/201Impurities
    • C10G2300/207Acid gases, e.g. H2S, COS, SO2, HCN
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/40Characteristics of the process deviating from typical ways of processing
    • C10G2300/44Solvents
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10JPRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
    • C10J2300/00Details of gasification processes
    • C10J2300/09Details of the feed, e.g. feeding of spent catalyst, inert gas or halogens
    • C10J2300/0913Carbonaceous raw material
    • C10J2300/0916Biomass
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02CCAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
    • Y02C20/00Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases
    • Y02C20/40Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases of CO2
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E20/00Combustion technologies with mitigation potential
    • Y02E20/16Combined cycle power plant [CCPP], or combined cycle gas turbine [CCGT]
    • Y02E20/18Integrated gasification combined cycle [IGCC], e.g. combined with carbon capture and storage [CCS]
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E50/00Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
    • Y02E50/30Fuel from waste, e.g. synthetic alcohol or diesel
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/10Reduction of greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions
    • Y02P10/146Perfluorocarbons [PFC]; Hydrofluorocarbons [HFC]; Sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P20/00Technologies relating to chemical industry
    • Y02P20/141Feedstock
    • Y02P20/145Feedstock the feedstock being materials of biological origin
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P20/00Technologies relating to chemical industry
    • Y02P20/151Reduction of greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions, e.g. CO2
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P30/00Technologies relating to oil refining and petrochemical industry
    • Y02P30/20Technologies relating to oil refining and petrochemical industry using bio-feedstock

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to gas purification.
  • the present invention concerns a method for removing hydrogen sulphide and similar sulphurous compounds optionally together with ammonia and hydrogen chloride from a gas produced by gasification of biomass.
  • a Fischer-Tropsch reactor in the following also abbreviated FT reactor
  • hydrogen and carbon monoxide are reacted in the presence of a transition metal catalyst, such as cobalt or iron, to form a composition containing a broad range of linear alkanes up to waxes.
  • a transition metal catalyst such as cobalt or iron
  • a number of carbonaceous sources have been used as raw-materials for producing a hydrogen and carbon monoxide containing gas (also known as a “syngas”) which can be fed into the FT process.
  • a hydrogen and carbon monoxide containing gas also known as a “syngas”
  • coal was used as the primary raw-material, but lately also natural gas has been taken into use in commercial processes.
  • biological materials such as plant oils, plant waxes and other plant products and plant parts or even oils and waxes of animal origin, are gasified and processed to produce a suitable feed.
  • a biomass comprising whole plants is used as a raw-material.
  • the BTL process allows for the utilization of forestry residues.
  • a BTL process includes the steps of biomass feed pre-treatment, biomass gasification, raw syngas cooling and filtering, raw gas purification, shift reaction for balancing H 2 /CO ratio, FT-process and FT product refining.
  • biomass feed pre-treatment biomass gasification
  • raw syngas cooling and filtering raw gas purification
  • shift reaction for balancing H 2 /CO ratio e.g. by blowing it into the gasification zone
  • FT-process e.g. by blowing it into the gasification zone
  • a typical temperature range is about 500 to about 900° C.
  • biomass such as lignocellulosic materials
  • biomass will produce a gas containing carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen and water gas.
  • the gas will also contain some hydrocarbons and impurities, such as sulphur compounds and trace metal compounds. These have to be removed.
  • the process also contains steps for syngas purification and guarding (i.e. for protecting of catalysts downstream in the process).
  • the gas obtained from gasification of biomass which gas oftentimes has been subjected to further reforming, is cooled before the Fischer-Tropsch reaction and impurities, such as COS, HCN, CO 2 , traces of alkali metal compounds and metal (Ni, Fe) carbonyl compounds, HCl, NH 3 , tar compounds and sulphur compounds are removed from the gas which optionally is being reformed.
  • impurities such as COS, HCN, CO 2 , traces of alkali metal compounds and metal (Ni, Fe) carbonyl compounds, HCl, NH 3 , tar compounds and sulphur compounds are removed from the gas which optionally is being reformed.
  • the feed gas conducted to a H 2 S removal processes contains typically 100 to 400 ppm H 2 S, 20 to 40 vol-% CO 2 , 0.5 to 6 vol-% CH 4 , to 40 vol-% H 2 , 10 to 30 vol-% CO.
  • the pressure of the feed gas is preferably 4 to 30 bar(a), depending on gasifier operation pressure.
  • the temperature of the feed is approximately 30 to approximately 100° C.
  • methanol wash is utilized for separating sulphur compounds and carbon dioxide. These wash processes are commercially applied for effective CO 2 removal at low sulphur contents.
  • a conventional methanol wash operates at temperatures of about ⁇ 40° C. and thus requires abundant energy. Tar compounds (like naphthalene and benzene) are removed typically by additional physical wash and metal carbonyls by heat treatment or guard beds.
  • the present invention aims at providing a method of efficient removal of hydrogen sulphide and other impurities, like NH 3 , COS, HCN and small alkali metal compounds from synthesis gas.
  • the present invention is based on the idea of absorbing impurities, for example sulphur compounds (in particular sulphides, such as H 2 S), present in the synthesis gas into an aqueous solution containing metal ions, and precipitating the absorbed sulphur compound with the metal ions to form solid metal sulphide(s).
  • impurities for example sulphur compounds (in particular sulphides, such as H 2 S)
  • sulphur compounds in particular sulphides, such as H 2 S
  • gas containing large volumes of hydrogen sulphide can be freed from the hydrogen sulphide by first conducting the gas stream into aqueous solutions containing copper ions in water for absorbing the hydrogen sulphide and then oxidizing the copper sulphide thus formed with air or oxygen gas to produce elemental sulphur.
  • the aqueous absorption medium contains rather high concentrations of copper ions (28.9 g Cu in 1400 ml water), and absorption of the hydrogen sulphide is carried out by bubbling the gas into the aqueous medium.
  • sulphur and/or sulphur containing contaminant compounds can be removed from a gas flow, which also comprises CO 2 by a method which comprises the steps of: placing the gas flow into contact with a preselected metal ion in the form of an aqueous salt solution at a pH lying in the range of between about ⁇ 0.05 and about 7.0, wherein the metal ion and the contaminants react together in order to form a solid metal salt of the contaminants which precipitates out of the gas flow.
  • the metal ion is preferably chosen such that the corresponding metal sulphide thereof is substantially non-soluble, wherein the metal is chosen from the group substantially consisting of Zn, Fe, Cu, Ag, Pb, Cd, Co, Mg, Mn, Ni, and Sn. Examples are given on the use of 1M ZnSO 4 and 1M CuSO 4 as washing liquids.
  • metal ions for example Cu 2+ ions, react fast with H 2 S in liquid at even very small metal ion concentrations.
  • the concentration of the metal ion compound of the wash solution depends on the corresponding metal sulphide solubility at given solution.
  • the metal ion concentration for copper can be even lower than about 1000 weight-ppm, or lower than about 100 weight-ppm, calculated from the weight of the absorption liquid. This allows for a very effective and profitable integrated process concept for removal of H 2 S and other impurities mentioned above from syngas.
  • the absorption liquid can be contacted with the gas which is to be purified for example in a column, such as a tray or packed column, but other contacting devices can also be used.
  • the absorption liquid can be applied by spraying or atomizing, although bubbling is not excluded.
  • sulphurous compounds to form metal sulphides also acidic compounds, such as hydrogen chloride will become absorbed.
  • the aqueous, metal ion containing solution can be applied in acidic form. In this form, it will be capable of absorbing such as ammonia (NH 3 ) and hydrogen chloride (HCl) as well as other alkaline and acidic impurities.
  • the present invention is characterized by what is stated in the characterizing part of claim 1 .
  • the present absorption process for this specific application allows also for the following advantages: removal of the impurities described above and especially the almost complete removal of H 2 S enhances the following methanol wash process in terms of reduced energy costs due to H 2 S removal from methanol, and reduced H 2 S guard bed costs before FT-reactor.
  • Aqueous copper sulfate precipitates hydrogen sulfide as copper sulfide according to Formula I:
  • H 2 S has to be dissolved in liquid phase where the reaction of H 2 S and Me-SO 4 takes place fast.
  • Me 2+ ions and H 2 S have to be present in liquid film where the reaction takes place and mass transfer of H 2 S and Me 2+ ions into liquid film are limiting the reactions. Reaction of Me 2+ ions with H 2 S forms MeS, which will precipitate as small crystals effectively because of small solubility of the sulphide in water.
  • the crystals are formed by nucleation and crystal growth mechanisms.
  • the nucleation and crystal growth rate depend on the supersaturation of Me 2+ and S 2 ⁇ ions in film. Mass transfer may depend also on nucleation rate, which affects the Me 2+ and S 2 ⁇ concentrations.
  • the pH of the ion system has to be within a specific range depending on the metal ion used.
  • pH should be approximately within the range of 1 to 5.2 to prevent precipitation of other components than CuS, such as CuCO 3 , Cu(OH) 2 , and (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 depending on the CuSO 4 -water solution concentration and synthesis gas composition, and the total pressure and temperature.
  • H 2 S is precipitated from liquid as sulphides with metal ions. Because the solubility of metal sulphides is very small, lean metal ion concentrations can be used and efficient precipitation is still achieved.
  • Precipitation of sulphides is a convenient and more advantageous way of purifying H 2 S than traditional methanol wash, because it gives an additional driving force for mass transfer of H 2 S from the gas to the liquid phase. This is due to the fact that H 2 S, HS ⁇ and S 2 ⁇ concentrations in the liquid phase are kept small due to the precipitation of S 2 ⁇ as metal sulphide. Using an acidic wash solution, also ammonia can be washed out from the gas.
  • the present process can be used in a plant producing hydrocarbon compositions which are suitable as such as diesel fuels or which can be processed into diesel fuels.
  • the washing is carried out in a multi-stage process, for example by counter-current washing.
  • an aqueous effluent can be withdrawn which is in practice totally free from metal ions derived from the washing liquid and which can be conducted to further treatment in a conventional waste water processing plant.
  • FIGS. 1 to 3 relate to Example 1:
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an experiment comprising gas contacting with absorbent solution, here aqueous CuSO 4 solution, binding H 2 S thereto.
  • absorbent solution here aqueous CuSO 4 solution
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an experiment comprising gas contacting with absorbent solution, here aqueous CuSO 4 solution, binding H 2 S thereto.
  • a ratio of H 2 S mole flow in the wash bottle outlet/H 2 S mole flow in the wash bottle inlet as a function of time [h:min] is disclosed; the experiment was started at 9:33 and last point measured at 15:11;
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an experiment similar to the one discussed above with respect to FIG. 1 , comprising gas contacting with absorbent solution, here aqueous CuSO 4 solution, binding H 2 S thereto.
  • absorbent solution here aqueous CuSO 4 solution
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an experiment similar to the one discussed above with respect to FIG. 1 , comprising gas contacting with absorbent solution, here aqueous CuSO 4 solution, binding H 2 S thereto.
  • absorbent solution here aqueous CuSO 4 solution
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a further experiment similar to the one of FIG. 1 , comprising gas contacting with absorbent solution, here aqueous CuSO 4 solution, binding H 2 S thereto.
  • absorbent solution here aqueous CuSO 4 solution
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a further experiment similar to the one of FIG. 1 , comprising gas contacting with absorbent solution, here aqueous CuSO 4 solution, binding H 2 S thereto.
  • absorbent solution here aqueous CuSO 4 solution
  • FIG. 4 shows the various gas concentrations of Example 2 and the effluent gas S concentration as a function of the stoichiometric ratio of Cu/S in the feed;
  • FIG. 5 is the flow sheet of an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 6 shows in side-view the structure of a spray chamber according to the present invention, as discussed in more detail in Example 3.
  • the present invention relates to purification of gas obtained by gasification of a biomass feedstock.
  • the present invention provides a method of purifying gasification gas (syngas) by absorbing impurities of syngas in a liquid absorption medium containing metal ions capable of binding sulphide ions into solid sulphides which have low solubility and which can therefore be precipitated from the solution.
  • the present invention carried out by contacting the gas with an acidic aqueous wash solution containing transition metal ions capable of binding to sulphide ions of the sulphide compounds present in the gas.
  • concentration of the transition metal cations can be small, for example the aqueous solution has a concentration in respect of the transition metal ions of about 0.00001 M to about 0.1 M, e.g. about 0.00001 M to about 0.01 M, in particular 0.00001 M to 0.01 M.
  • a significant portion of the sulphide impurities present and contained in the gas can be converted into the form of transition metal sulphide compounds.
  • the sulphide compounds thus formed are preferably precipitated into the wash solution whereby the sulphide impurities are removed from the gas.
  • the purified gas so obtained is separated from the aqueous solution.
  • the hydrogen sulphide impurities contained in the gas are bound into practically insoluble (i.e. sparingly soluble) transition metal sulphide compounds.
  • the metal ions, i.e. cations, of the wash solution are derived from transition metals selected from the group of copper, zinc, iron and cobalt and mixtures thereof, in particular from copper, zinc and iron and mixtures thereof.
  • the metal ions of the wash solution comprise bivalent metal cations of copper, zinc and iron and mixtures thereof.
  • the transition metal ions are obtained from water soluble metal salts by dissolving said salts in water.
  • the aqueous solution is prepared by dissolving about 1 to about 10,000 parts, preferably about 50 to about 5,000 parts by weight of a metal salt into 1,000,000 parts by weight of water.
  • the concentration of the aqueous wash solution is typically about 0.00005 M to about 0.005 M, preferably about 0.0001 M to about 0.001 M.
  • the water soluble metal salts of the above mentioned cations can comprise an anion selected from the group of anions derived from inorganic acids, such as sulphate, sulphite, phosphate, phosphite, nitrate, chloride and carbonate and mixtures thereof.
  • Anions derived from simple organic acids are also possible. Examples of such anions are citrate, malonate and acetate and mixtures thereof.
  • anions include the following: sulphate, sulphite, bisulphite, thiosulphate, chloride, iodide, phosphate, monobasic phosphate, dibasic phosphate, hypophosphite, dihydrogen pyrophosphate, carbonate, bicarbonate, metasilicate, citrate, malate, maleate, malonate, succinate, lactate, formate, acetate, butyrate, propionate, benzoate, tartrate, ascorbate and gluconate.
  • the combinations of the metal cations and anions are selected such that the metal salt obtained is water soluble.
  • the salt may also be a hydrated salt.
  • Such salts are typically crystalline salt hydrates with one or more bonded water molecules of crystallization.
  • CuSO 4 solution can be prepared either by dissolving CuSO 4 powder in water or reacting CuO powder with a solution of H 2 SO 4 and water.
  • H 2 SO 4 formed has to be removed from any circulating washing fluid.
  • H 2 SO 4 formed will react with CuO producing the desired Cu 2+ and SO 4 2 ⁇ ions.
  • metallic Cu powder with H 2 SO 4 water solution produces CuSO 4 water solution and hydrogen.
  • the aqueous wash solution is acidic or weakly acidic; preferably it has a pH of about 1 to about 6.5, in particular about 1 to about 5.
  • the pH will vary within the indicated range depending on the metal cations.
  • the gas is contacted with the wash solution at a temperature in the range of 10 and 80° C. and at a pressure in the range from 1 to 50 bar (absolute pressure).
  • the washing can be carried out at ambient temperature and pressure (20 to 25° C. and 1 bar(a)), although it is equally possible to work the present technology at lower temperatures (10 to ⁇ 20° C.) and at elevated temperatures (>25 to 80° C.).
  • the pressure can be in excess of 1 bar(a), for example about 1.5 to about 50 bar(a).
  • the syngas obtained from gasification is recovered at higher temperature than indicated in the preceding. Therefore, in one embodiment, the gasification gas is cooled to a temperature in the above indicated range (10 to 80° C.) before being contacted with the washing liquid. It is possible to recover some of the heat contained in the gasification gas by contacting it with a cooling media, for example with cooling water, in a heat exchanger.
  • the molar ratio of metal cation to sulphide compounds of the gas to be purified is typically in excess of 1, preferably about 1.4 to about 6, in particular about 1.5 to about 5.5, advantageously about 2 to about 4.5.
  • the contacting of the syngas with the absorption medium takes place by spraying or atomizing the absorption medium into the gas.
  • the contacting of the syngas with the absorption medium takes place in the interface between the gas and droplets of the absorption medium.
  • the gas to be purified is bubbled into a stirred tank containing the absorption solution.
  • This embodiment of an alternative process concept is described more in detail in Example 1.
  • absorption towers with plates and/or packing can be used in a counter-current operation.
  • the detailed equipment type depends on the concentration of the metal ions in the solution and the amount and impurity content of the gas.
  • One way of performing the chemical absorption process is to use the chemical spray absorption concept combined with sieve tray(s) above the spray chamber section(s) as described and shown in Example 3 and in FIG. 6 .
  • the wash solution is contacted with the gas in a spray chamber having an essentially vertical central axis, said gas being fed into the spray chamber from the bottom or from the top and withdrawn from the opposite end so as to advance in the direction of the central axis of the spray chamber.
  • the wash solution is fed through spray nozzles arranged as one or more spray zones in series along the central axis at different heights in the spray chamber. In a preferred embodiment there are 1 to 10 spray zones, for example 2 to 5 spray zones in the contacting device.
  • the gas is fed into a spray chamber, for example of the preceding type, via gas distributors arranged below the lowest spray zone, and the metal sulphide is withdrawn from the absorber along with the used wash liquid via an outlet arranged in the bottom part of the chamber.
  • the metal sulphide is separated and taken to further treatment.
  • copper sulphate is used as a water-soluble salt for preparing the present wash solution: Almost all of the Cu 2+ -ions from the CuSO 4 wash unit will be precipitated as CuS-crystals and removed by filtration from wash liquid effluent.
  • CuS-crystals and CuSO 4 -water slurry are separated from circulated wash liquid and they can be fed into the lower wash section with additional water. Part of synthesis gas is fed into the lower wash column, where almost all of Cu-ions in the effluent wash liquid will be precipitated.
  • the wash solution contains less than 1500 wt-ppm as metal, for example less than 500 wt-ppm, preferably about 10 to about 450 wt-ppm, for example 15 to 400 wt-ppm, of a copper salt, in particular copper sulphate.
  • a transition metal ion washing unit can also consist of two Me 2+ water wash sections (named following the direction of the gas flow), wherein a first section is operated with an aqueous wash dilute with Me 2+ ions and a second section is operated with another aqueous wash rather highly concentrated with Me 2+ ions.
  • the necessary amount of Me 2+ ions is fed in the form of an aqueous Me 2+ solution into the second section and circulated.
  • Synthesis gas from the first wash section will be fed into the second wash section where almost all of the H 2 S in the synthesis gas will be removed by counter-current wash.
  • This process is illustrated in FIG. 5 .
  • the first and the second section(s) can be arranged along a vertical axis of a contacting zone or device one above the other. In one embodiment, the second section(s) is/are placed above the first section(s).
  • the necessary amount of Cu 2+ -ions is fed in the form of a CuSO 4 -water solution into the second wash section and circulated (stream 4 ). Synthesis gas from the first wash section will be fed into the second wash section where almost all of H 2 S in synthesis gas will be removed by counter-current wash, as also shown in FIG. 5 .
  • the inlet gas in a first stage, is contacted with a washing liquid which is “lean” in the sense that it contains less than a stoichiometric amount of metal ions with respect to the sulphide compounds present.
  • the gas treated is contacted with a washing liquid which contains an excess of metal ions with respect to the sulphide compounds present in the gas.
  • the wash solutions contain as metal, just as above, typically less than 1500 wt-ppm, for example less than 500 wt-ppm, preferably about 10 to about 450 wt-ppm, of a copper salt, in particular copper sulphate, the actual concentration being determined based on the sulphide concentration in the gas to be treated in the various stages.
  • a copper salt in particular copper sulphate
  • an aqueous effluent can be withdrawn from the first gas wash stage which is in practice totally free from metal ions derived from the washing liquid and which can be conducted to further treatment in a conventional waste water processing plant.
  • the purification results using transition metal ions in aqueous washing liquids are very good.
  • the present method is capable of removing a significant portion of the hydrogen sulphide from the gas. At least 95% preferably at least 98% advantageously at least 99.5% of the hydrogen sulphide is removed from the gas.
  • the concentration of hydrogen sulphide of the purified gas is less than about 100 ppb by volume, in particular less than about 50 ppb by volume.
  • the purified gas has several uses. It can be used for producing hydrogen, methanol, ethanol, dimethyl ether or aldehydes optionally by hydroformulation or directly used in engines for producing for example electricity. Also it can be used for SNG (Synthetic Natural Gas) production.
  • SNG Synthetic Natural Gas
  • the purified gas can also be used for producing a hydrocarbon composition containing C 4 -C 90 hydrocarbons, optionally after further purification.
  • the hydrocarbon composition can be produced by a Fischer-Tropsch (FT) process.
  • the gas purification step can be integrated into an FT-process such that the process comprises the steps of
  • a copper salt is dissolved into an aqueous solution for providing the wash liquid for the above application.
  • concentration of the copper salt, such as copper sulphate, in the wash solution is preferably 1500 ppm-wt or less, in particular 100 to 1200 ppm-wt, in one embodiment less than 1000 wt-ppm, in particular about 10 to about 450 wt-ppm.
  • the gas is obtained by oxygen blown gasification of biomass usually contains carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen and hydrocarbons possibly together with inert components.
  • the organic raw-material or feedstock of the process is preferably a material composed of biological matter, i.e. of a matter of vegetable or animal origin.
  • biological matter i.e. of a matter of vegetable or animal origin.
  • biomass will be used for designating any such raw-material.
  • a typical feature of the feedstock materials of the present process is that they contain carbon, in particular in excess of about 20%, preferably in excess of about 30%, advantageously in excess of about 40% by dry matter.
  • the biomass feedstock is preferably selected from annual or perennial plants and parts and residues thereof, such as wood, wood chips and particles (saw dust etc), forestry residues and thinnings; agricultural residues, such as straw, olive thinnings; energy crops, such as willow, energy hay, Miscanthous ; and peat.
  • waste materials such as refuse derived fuel (RDF); wastes from sawmills, plywood, furniture and other mechanical forestry wastes; and waste slurries (including industrial and municipal wastes).
  • RDF refuse derived fuel
  • wastes from sawmills, plywood, furniture and other mechanical forestry wastes and waste slurries (including industrial and municipal wastes).
  • waste slurries including industrial and municipal wastes.
  • animal products such as fats and waxes can also be used.
  • pyrolysis oil produced from biomass and waste liquors from pulping process are a suitable bio-based feed for gasification.
  • the biomass is generally gasified in a oxygen blown gasifier either in a fluidized bed reactor or a circulating fluidized bed reactor (CFB) at a temperature in the range of about 500 to about 900° C.
  • the circulating bed is formed by a granular or particulate bed material, such as alumina-silicate (e.g. sand) or a similar inorganic material.
  • the biomass is preferably milled or grinded to an average particle or granule size of less than about 5 mm, preferably less than about 2 mm, in particular not more than 1 mm before gasification. It is typically fed into the reactor with a moisture content of less than 15% by weight, preferably to 10% by weight or less. Gasification can be promoted by feeding steam, air or oxygen into the reactor, particularly advantageous results being obtained with oxygen and oxygen in combination with steam.
  • the “carbon conversion”, i.e. conversion of elemental carbon contained in the raw-material into light compounds, hydrocarbons and tar, is higher than 70%, preferably higher than 75%, in particular in excess of 80% by weight of the carbon in the raw-material.
  • a gas containing carbon monoxide, hydrogen and carbon dioxide as main components along with some water or steam is produced.
  • the gas is recovered. It can be used in the Fischer-Tropsch process for producing hydrocarbons by reacting carbon monoxide with hydrogen in the presence of a catalyst for converting at least a significant part of the carbon monoxide and hydrogen contained in the gas into a hydrocarbon composition containing C 4 -C 90 hydrocarbons.
  • the hydrocarbon composition thus obtained is recovered and subjected to further processing.
  • the FT hydrocarbon composition is preferably further processed by hydrotreatment, such as hydroisomerization, with hydrogen gas at an increased temperature in the presence of a catalyst in order to produce a hydrocarbon composition suitable as a diesel class hydrocarbon or as composition from which such a hydrocarbon can be produced.
  • hydrotreatment e.g. hydroisomerization
  • hydrogen gas is performed at a temperature of about 300° C. in a fixed bed reactor.
  • the catalyst is typically a supported or unsupported metal catalyst, e.g. nickel on carbon.
  • a product gas exhibiting a molar ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide of 0.5 to 1.5 is produced.
  • gasification of a wood, annual plant or peat raw-material will upon gasification in the presence of oxygen gas yield a product gas in which the molar ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide is about 0.8 to about 1.1.
  • the molar ratio of hydrogen-to-carbon monoxide needs to be raised to about 2 before the FT reaction. For this reason, there is a need for a separate step in which the ratio is increased, said step being carried out at the latest immediately before or even simultaneously with the Fischer-Tropsch reaction.
  • the step of contacting the gas with the wash solution is preceded by at least one purification step of the gas.
  • This embodiment can be combined with any of the embodiments described above.
  • At least one of the preceding purification steps is advantageously selected from the group of filtration, membrane filtration, pressure swing absorption and washing with a liquid capable of, for example, absorbing carbon dioxide.
  • the impurity components were purchased from AGA as dilute hydrogen mixture gases H 2 S/H 2 , COS/H 2 and NH 3 /H 2 .
  • H 2 S concentration was 500 ppm (vol) in all experiments.
  • 85 ppm (vol) COS and 800 ppm (vol) NH 3 were used in the feed.
  • nearly all COS was hydrolyzed already before the absorption bottle as it was not possible to bypass the catalytic reactor, where COS hydrolysis took place as a side reaction of water gas shift reaction.
  • the product gas was analyzed online using a mass spectrometer (GC-MS but GC separation not in use).
  • the quantitation limit is dependent on the component, and in these MS measurements quantitation limit was about 1 ppm.
  • the mass transfer in the bubbled gas wash bottle was enhanced by agitation.
  • H 2 S mole flow in wash bottle outlet/H 2 S mole flow in wash bottle inlet in different experiments is shown as a function of time in FIGS. 1-3 :
  • CuSO 4 was capable of removing 500 ppm H 2 S (mol-frac) completely from feed gas both with 0.01 and 0.005 wt-% water solutions.
  • the product is solid CuS deposit. Too high pH resulted in deposition of e.g. metal hydroxides or carbonates in which case no or less hydrogen sulphide was removed. Carbonate formation was also dependent on CO2 partial pressure. Too low pH resulted in no deposit formation in which case no hydrogen sulphide was removed (results not shown). NH 3 in the feed did not influence H 2 S removal by copper sulfate.
  • the experimental setup was the following: the bottle of copper sulphate wash solution was placed between two reactor product coolers and drum type volumetric gas flow meter. By opening the valves the gas could be made to flow through the CuSO 4 water solution and after that to the GC-MS, and subsequently the gas was conducted to the drum type volumetric gas flow meter for venting.
  • the first point shown graphically is from the point of time immediately before the gas was conducted to the CuSO 4 bottle. At that point of time, precipitation of CuS is not detectable yet. Then, a 4 sample series was taken within 7 minutes, after a short break a new series of 4 samples was taken within 7 minutes etc.
  • the mol-% of H 2 S in effluent gas was measured by on-line hydrogen sulphide gas analyses.
  • the measured H 2 S mole fraction in effluent syngas was at minimum 70 ppb at equivalent Cu 2+ molar feed ratio to H 2 S value of 6.
  • a wash absorption column can be designed as shown in attached FIG. 6 .
  • the process will be described with particular reference to the embodiment of the drawing, although it should be pointed out that the specific details of the wash absorption column are not to be construed limiting for the use of a wash absorption column in the present invention.
  • a wash absorption column 21 consists of sieve plate demister unit 25 followed by spray absorption section and gas inlet distributor 29 in the bottom part of the spray chamber.
  • the column may have sieve plate 26 , 27 and 28 , as indicated, and spray sections 22 , 23 and 24 in series to enhance wash and absorption efficiency.
  • Very lean CuSO 4 -water solution less than 500 weight-ppm is fed into the spray chamber 21 on a sieve plate 26 on the top of the chamber and sprayed into the spray chamber below the sieve plate by specific spray nozzle system 22 , where effective mass transfer between sprayed liquid droplets and gas takes place. Sulphur components are reacting in liquid phase rapidly with Cu 2+ at very small ion concentrations.
  • the spray nozzle system is specially designed to enable homogenous dense CuSO 4 -water droplet phase having effective contact with entering synthesis gas.
  • the nozzles are preferably operating in series at different height levels in the column.
  • Synthesis gas described above is fed into the reactor via gas distributors 29 from the bottom part of the chamber.
  • the H 2 S molecules in the synthesis gas are contacting effectively the sprayed liquid droplets enabling effective mass transfer of H 2 S into liquid phase and fast reaction with Cu 2+ ions in droplets generating CuS and H 2 SO 4 according to reaction:
  • a part of the sprayed small droplets are entrained up with the gas to be separated from the gas on tray plate on the top of the spray chamber.
  • CuS is separated as crystallized solid in CuS separation unit.
  • the separation unit could be CuS-settling basin, hydrocyclone, and centrifuge or filtration unit.
  • the exhaust gas after H 2 S absorption process contains less than 50 ppb vol H 2 S, and no extra guard beds for additional H 2 S removal for FT-synthesis are necessarily needed.
  • a number of advantages are obtained using a wash absorption column in general, including the specific wash absorption column shown in the drawing.
  • very low concentrations of Cu 2+ -ions react fast with H 2 S in liquid phase.
  • This fact allows very effective and profitable process concept for removal of H 2 S and other impurities mentioned above from syngas down to less than 20 ppb by volume.
  • H 2 S is chemically reacted with CuSO 4 forming solid CuS and sulphuric acid.
  • CuS is easy to be separate as a solid to be utilized as a raw material in copper industry.
  • CuS formed can be used in the preparation of metallic copper or other copper compounds.
  • the herein disclosed H 2 S removal process is very effective and no extra H 2 S removal beds are needed for FT-synthesis.
  • a spray unit allows effective mass transfer of H 2 S into droplets and relatively low reactor size. Most of the effective mass transfer takes place immediately after spraying.

Abstract

A method of purifying gas obtained by gasification of a biomass feedstock. The gas which contains carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen, hydrocarbons and mixtures thereof can be freed from impurities, such as hydrogen sulphide, hydrogen chloride, ammonia, carbonyl sulphide, hydrogen cyanide and mixtures thereof, by contacting the gas with an acidic aqueous wash solution of transition metal ions capable of binding to sulphide ions, by binding a significant portion of the hydrogen sulphide impurities contained in the gas into practically insoluble transition metal sulphide compounds to remove hydrogen sulphide impurities from the gas; and by separating the thus obtained purified gas from the aqueous solution. The purified gas is suitable for production of hydrocarbon compositions by, for example the Fischer-Tropsch process.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to gas purification. In particular, the present invention concerns a method for removing hydrogen sulphide and similar sulphurous compounds optionally together with ammonia and hydrogen chloride from a gas produced by gasification of biomass.
  • 2. Description of Related Art
  • In a Fischer-Tropsch reactor (in the following also abbreviated FT reactor), hydrogen and carbon monoxide are reacted in the presence of a transition metal catalyst, such as cobalt or iron, to form a composition containing a broad range of linear alkanes up to waxes. After suitable processing this product forms a liquid hydrocarbon composition that is useful as a fuel for combustion engines, in particular diesel engines.
  • A number of carbonaceous sources have been used as raw-materials for producing a hydrogen and carbon monoxide containing gas (also known as a “syngas”) which can be fed into the FT process. Originally, coal was used as the primary raw-material, but lately also natural gas has been taken into use in commercial processes. Even more recently various processes have been developed in which biological materials, such as plant oils, plant waxes and other plant products and plant parts or even oils and waxes of animal origin, are gasified and processed to produce a suitable feed. In a further alternative approach, viz. in the BTL process (biomass to liquid process), a biomass comprising whole plants is used as a raw-material. The BTL process allows for the utilization of forestry residues.
  • Conventionally, a BTL process includes the steps of biomass feed pre-treatment, biomass gasification, raw syngas cooling and filtering, raw gas purification, shift reaction for balancing H2/CO ratio, FT-process and FT product refining. For gasification of the biomass oxygen gas can be used (e.g. by blowing it into the gasification zone) for minimizing inerts in syngas.
  • For fuel production by the FT process, it is preferred to use steam or oxygen or combinations thereof blown into the gasification. A typical temperature range is about 500 to about 900° C.
  • At these conditions, biomass, such as lignocellulosic materials, will produce a gas containing carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen and water gas. Further, the gas will also contain some hydrocarbons and impurities, such as sulphur compounds and trace metal compounds. These have to be removed.
  • Therefore, the process also contains steps for syngas purification and guarding (i.e. for protecting of catalysts downstream in the process).
  • In practice, the gas obtained from gasification of biomass, which gas oftentimes has been subjected to further reforming, is cooled before the Fischer-Tropsch reaction and impurities, such as COS, HCN, CO2, traces of alkali metal compounds and metal (Ni, Fe) carbonyl compounds, HCl, NH3, tar compounds and sulphur compounds are removed from the gas which optionally is being reformed.
  • To mention an example of a typical composition: the feed gas conducted to a H2S removal processes contains typically 100 to 400 ppm H2S, 20 to 40 vol-% CO2, 0.5 to 6 vol-% CH4, to 40 vol-% H2, 10 to 30 vol-% CO.
  • The pressure of the feed gas is preferably 4 to 30 bar(a), depending on gasifier operation pressure. The temperature of the feed is approximately 30 to approximately 100° C.
  • For removing the impurities at least one, conventionally a plurality of separate treatment steps are employed. Typically methanol wash is utilized for separating sulphur compounds and carbon dioxide. These wash processes are commercially applied for effective CO2 removal at low sulphur contents. A conventional methanol wash operates at temperatures of about −40° C. and thus requires abundant energy. Tar compounds (like naphthalene and benzene) are removed typically by additional physical wash and metal carbonyls by heat treatment or guard beds.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It is an aim of the present invention to eliminate at least a part of the problems related to the known technology.
  • In particular, the present invention aims at providing a method of efficient removal of hydrogen sulphide and other impurities, like NH3, COS, HCN and small alkali metal compounds from synthesis gas.
  • The present invention is based on the idea of absorbing impurities, for example sulphur compounds (in particular sulphides, such as H2S), present in the synthesis gas into an aqueous solution containing metal ions, and precipitating the absorbed sulphur compound with the metal ions to form solid metal sulphide(s).
  • It is known in the art that gas containing large volumes of hydrogen sulphide can be freed from the hydrogen sulphide by first conducting the gas stream into aqueous solutions containing copper ions in water for absorbing the hydrogen sulphide and then oxidizing the copper sulphide thus formed with air or oxygen gas to produce elemental sulphur.
  • In this known technology, disclosed in DE 2304497, the aqueous absorption medium contains rather high concentrations of copper ions (28.9 g Cu in 1400 ml water), and absorption of the hydrogen sulphide is carried out by bubbling the gas into the aqueous medium.
  • It is also known in the art (EP0986432) that sulphur and/or sulphur containing contaminant compounds can be removed from a gas flow, which also comprises CO2 by a method which comprises the steps of: placing the gas flow into contact with a preselected metal ion in the form of an aqueous salt solution at a pH lying in the range of between about −0.05 and about 7.0, wherein the metal ion and the contaminants react together in order to form a solid metal salt of the contaminants which precipitates out of the gas flow. The metal ion is preferably chosen such that the corresponding metal sulphide thereof is substantially non-soluble, wherein the metal is chosen from the group substantially consisting of Zn, Fe, Cu, Ag, Pb, Cd, Co, Mg, Mn, Ni, and Sn. Examples are given on the use of 1M ZnSO4 and 1M CuSO4 as washing liquids.
  • In connection with the present invention, it was found out that metal ions, for example Cu2+ ions, react fast with H2S in liquid at even very small metal ion concentrations.
  • Typically the concentration of the metal ion compound of the wash solution depends on the corresponding metal sulphide solubility at given solution. The metal ion concentration for copper can be even lower than about 1000 weight-ppm, or lower than about 100 weight-ppm, calculated from the weight of the absorption liquid. This allows for a very effective and profitable integrated process concept for removal of H2S and other impurities mentioned above from syngas.
  • The absorption liquid can be contacted with the gas which is to be purified for example in a column, such as a tray or packed column, but other contacting devices can also be used. The absorption liquid can be applied by spraying or atomizing, although bubbling is not excluded. When absorbing sulphurous compounds to form metal sulphides also acidic compounds, such as hydrogen chloride will become absorbed. Further, the aqueous, metal ion containing solution can be applied in acidic form. In this form, it will be capable of absorbing such as ammonia (NH3) and hydrogen chloride (HCl) as well as other alkaline and acidic impurities.
  • More specifically, the present invention is characterized by what is stated in the characterizing part of claim 1.
  • Considerable advantages are obtained by the invention. Thus, in the present novel method separate purification phases are combined. Even the gas cooling stage can be combined. Impurities, like H2S, COS, NH3, HCl, some organic compounds and small particles, are absorbed in water solution.
  • The present absorption process for this specific application allows also for the following advantages: removal of the impurities described above and especially the almost complete removal of H2S enhances the following methanol wash process in terms of reduced energy costs due to H2S removal from methanol, and reduced H2S guard bed costs before FT-reactor.
  • Aqueous copper sulfate precipitates hydrogen sulfide as copper sulfide according to Formula I:

  • Cu2++H2S+SO4 2−→CuS+2H++SO4 2−  (1)
  • Generally, the absorption of H2S from synthesis gas into Me-SO4-water solution (wherein Me stands for a metal, in particular a transition metal, such as copper, iron, zinc or cobalt) is a mass transfer limited process. H2S has to be dissolved in liquid phase where the reaction of H2S and Me-SO4 takes place fast. Me2+ ions and H2S have to be present in liquid film where the reaction takes place and mass transfer of H2S and Me2+ ions into liquid film are limiting the reactions. Reaction of Me2+ ions with H2S forms MeS, which will precipitate as small crystals effectively because of small solubility of the sulphide in water.
  • The crystals are formed by nucleation and crystal growth mechanisms. The nucleation and crystal growth rate depend on the supersaturation of Me2+ and S2− ions in film. Mass transfer may depend also on nucleation rate, which affects the Me2+ and S2− concentrations.
  • Also other components in synthesis gas, like CO2, NH3, are dissolved and reacted.
  • The pH of the ion system has to be within a specific range depending on the metal ion used. To take an example, for copper, i.e. Cu2+, pH should be approximately within the range of 1 to 5.2 to prevent precipitation of other components than CuS, such as CuCO3, Cu(OH)2, and (NH4)2SO4 depending on the CuSO4-water solution concentration and synthesis gas composition, and the total pressure and temperature.
  • Additionally H2S is precipitated from liquid as sulphides with metal ions. Because the solubility of metal sulphides is very small, lean metal ion concentrations can be used and efficient precipitation is still achieved.
  • Precipitation of sulphides is a convenient and more advantageous way of purifying H2S than traditional methanol wash, because it gives an additional driving force for mass transfer of H2S from the gas to the liquid phase. This is due to the fact that H2S, HS and S2− concentrations in the liquid phase are kept small due to the precipitation of S2− as metal sulphide. Using an acidic wash solution, also ammonia can be washed out from the gas.
  • The present process can be used in a plant producing hydrocarbon compositions which are suitable as such as diesel fuels or which can be processed into diesel fuels.
  • In a particularly preferred embodiment, the washing is carried out in a multi-stage process, for example by counter-current washing. In that embodiment, an aqueous effluent can be withdrawn which is in practice totally free from metal ions derived from the washing liquid and which can be conducted to further treatment in a conventional waste water processing plant.
  • Next, the present invention will be examined in more detail with the aid of a detailed description and referring to the attached drawing of a wash column for removal of impurities, such as H2S, NH3 and COS from synthesis gas for FT synthesis.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIGS. 1 to 3 relate to Example 1:
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an experiment comprising gas contacting with absorbent solution, here aqueous CuSO4 solution, binding H2S thereto. In the figure, a ratio of H2S mole flow in the wash bottle outlet/H2S mole flow in the wash bottle inlet as a function of time [h:min] is disclosed; the experiment was started at 9:33 and last point measured at 15:11;
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an experiment similar to the one discussed above with respect to FIG. 1, comprising gas contacting with absorbent solution, here aqueous CuSO4 solution, binding H2S thereto. In the figure, a ratio of H2S mole flow in the wash bottle outlet/H2S mole flow in the wash bottle inlet as a function of time [h:min] is disclosed; the experiment was started at 9:53;
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a further experiment similar to the one of FIG. 1, comprising gas contacting with absorbent solution, here aqueous CuSO4 solution, binding H2S thereto. In the figure, a ratio of H2S mole flow in the wash bottle outlet/H2S mole flow in the wash bottle inlet as a function of time [h:min] is disclosed; the experiment was started at 10:43;
  • FIG. 4 shows the various gas concentrations of Example 2 and the effluent gas S concentration as a function of the stoichiometric ratio of Cu/S in the feed;
  • FIG. 5 is the flow sheet of an embodiment of the invention; and
  • FIG. 6 shows in side-view the structure of a spray chamber according to the present invention, as discussed in more detail in Example 3.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • For the sake of order it should be pointed out that the preferred embodiments are discussed with particular reference to copper sulphate as an absorbing metal salt compound.
  • Although copper sulphate is very efficient and preferred in many embodiments, the other salts mentioned below can also be used in the same embodiments.
  • To the extent that numerical values and numerical ranges are indicated it should be noted that the approximate (“about”) values are to be interpreted as also including the exact values.
  • As mentioned above, the present invention relates to purification of gas obtained by gasification of a biomass feedstock. In particular, the present invention provides a method of purifying gasification gas (syngas) by absorbing impurities of syngas in a liquid absorption medium containing metal ions capable of binding sulphide ions into solid sulphides which have low solubility and which can therefore be precipitated from the solution.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the present invention carried out by contacting the gas with an acidic aqueous wash solution containing transition metal ions capable of binding to sulphide ions of the sulphide compounds present in the gas. The concentration of the transition metal cations can be small, for example the aqueous solution has a concentration in respect of the transition metal ions of about 0.00001 M to about 0.1 M, e.g. about 0.00001 M to about 0.01 M, in particular 0.00001 M to 0.01 M. A significant portion of the sulphide impurities present and contained in the gas can be converted into the form of transition metal sulphide compounds. The sulphide compounds thus formed are preferably precipitated into the wash solution whereby the sulphide impurities are removed from the gas. The purified gas so obtained is separated from the aqueous solution.
  • Preferably a significant portion of the hydrogen sulphide impurities contained in the gas are bound into practically insoluble (i.e. sparingly soluble) transition metal sulphide compounds.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the metal ions, i.e. cations, of the wash solution are derived from transition metals selected from the group of copper, zinc, iron and cobalt and mixtures thereof, in particular from copper, zinc and iron and mixtures thereof. Advantageously, the metal ions of the wash solution comprise bivalent metal cations of copper, zinc and iron and mixtures thereof.
  • The transition metal ions are obtained from water soluble metal salts by dissolving said salts in water. In one embodiment, the aqueous solution is prepared by dissolving about 1 to about 10,000 parts, preferably about 50 to about 5,000 parts by weight of a metal salt into 1,000,000 parts by weight of water.
  • The concentration of the aqueous wash solution is typically about 0.00005 M to about 0.005 M, preferably about 0.0001 M to about 0.001 M.
  • For the preparation of suitable wash solutions the water soluble metal salts of the above mentioned cations can comprise an anion selected from the group of anions derived from inorganic acids, such as sulphate, sulphite, phosphate, phosphite, nitrate, chloride and carbonate and mixtures thereof. Anions derived from simple organic acids (typically of the kind having no more than 10 carbon atoms for example 6 or less carbon atoms) are also possible. Examples of such anions are citrate, malonate and acetate and mixtures thereof.
  • Based on the above, specific non-limiting examples of anions include the following: sulphate, sulphite, bisulphite, thiosulphate, chloride, iodide, phosphate, monobasic phosphate, dibasic phosphate, hypophosphite, dihydrogen pyrophosphate, carbonate, bicarbonate, metasilicate, citrate, malate, maleate, malonate, succinate, lactate, formate, acetate, butyrate, propionate, benzoate, tartrate, ascorbate and gluconate.
  • With reference to the above, in a particularly preferred embodiment, the combinations of the metal cations and anions are selected such that the metal salt obtained is water soluble.
  • The salt may also be a hydrated salt. Such salts are typically crystalline salt hydrates with one or more bonded water molecules of crystallization.
  • CuSO4 solution can be prepared either by dissolving CuSO4 powder in water or reacting CuO powder with a solution of H2SO4 and water. In the first case, H2SO4 formed has to be removed from any circulating washing fluid. In the second case H2SO4 formed will react with CuO producing the desired Cu2+ and SO4 2− ions. Additionally metallic Cu powder with H2SO4 water solution produces CuSO4 water solution and hydrogen.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the aqueous wash solution is acidic or weakly acidic; preferably it has a pH of about 1 to about 6.5, in particular about 1 to about 5. The pH will vary within the indicated range depending on the metal cations.
  • Generally, the gas is contacted with the wash solution at a temperature in the range of 10 and 80° C. and at a pressure in the range from 1 to 50 bar (absolute pressure). Thus, the washing can be carried out at ambient temperature and pressure (20 to 25° C. and 1 bar(a)), although it is equally possible to work the present technology at lower temperatures (10 to <20° C.) and at elevated temperatures (>25 to 80° C.). The pressure can be in excess of 1 bar(a), for example about 1.5 to about 50 bar(a).
  • Typically, the syngas obtained from gasification is recovered at higher temperature than indicated in the preceding. Therefore, in one embodiment, the gasification gas is cooled to a temperature in the above indicated range (10 to 80° C.) before being contacted with the washing liquid. It is possible to recover some of the heat contained in the gasification gas by contacting it with a cooling media, for example with cooling water, in a heat exchanger.
  • The molar ratio of metal cation to sulphide compounds of the gas to be purified (i.e. Me2+/S ratio of the feed) is typically in excess of 1, preferably about 1.4 to about 6, in particular about 1.5 to about 5.5, advantageously about 2 to about 4.5.
  • There are several options for contacting of syngas with the washing liquid/absorption medium as will appear from the working embodiments discussed below.
  • In a first preferred embodiment, the contacting of the syngas with the absorption medium takes place by spraying or atomizing the absorption medium into the gas. Preferably, the contacting of the syngas with the absorption medium takes place in the interface between the gas and droplets of the absorption medium.
  • In a second preferred embodiment, the gas to be purified is bubbled into a stirred tank containing the absorption solution. This embodiment of an alternative process concept is described more in detail in Example 1.
  • In a third embodiment, absorption towers with plates and/or packing can be used in a counter-current operation. The detailed equipment type depends on the concentration of the metal ions in the solution and the amount and impurity content of the gas.
  • One way of performing the chemical absorption process is to use the chemical spray absorption concept combined with sieve tray(s) above the spray chamber section(s) as described and shown in Example 3 and in FIG. 6.
  • Thus, in one particular embodiment based on the spray chamber approach, the wash solution is contacted with the gas in a spray chamber having an essentially vertical central axis, said gas being fed into the spray chamber from the bottom or from the top and withdrawn from the opposite end so as to advance in the direction of the central axis of the spray chamber. The wash solution is fed through spray nozzles arranged as one or more spray zones in series along the central axis at different heights in the spray chamber. In a preferred embodiment there are 1 to 10 spray zones, for example 2 to 5 spray zones in the contacting device.
  • The gas is fed into a spray chamber, for example of the preceding type, via gas distributors arranged below the lowest spray zone, and the metal sulphide is withdrawn from the absorber along with the used wash liquid via an outlet arranged in the bottom part of the chamber.
  • After absorption, the metal sulphide is separated and taken to further treatment. To mention one specific example in which copper sulphate is used as a water-soluble salt for preparing the present wash solution: Almost all of the Cu2+-ions from the CuSO4 wash unit will be precipitated as CuS-crystals and removed by filtration from wash liquid effluent.
  • After adsorption of the sulphides, CuS-crystals and CuSO4-water slurry are separated from circulated wash liquid and they can be fed into the lower wash section with additional water. Part of synthesis gas is fed into the lower wash column, where almost all of Cu-ions in the effluent wash liquid will be precipitated.
  • In the above embodiments, the wash solution contains less than 1500 wt-ppm as metal, for example less than 500 wt-ppm, preferably about 10 to about 450 wt-ppm, for example 15 to 400 wt-ppm, of a copper salt, in particular copper sulphate.
  • A transition metal ion washing unit can also consist of two Me2+ water wash sections (named following the direction of the gas flow), wherein a first section is operated with an aqueous wash dilute with Me2+ ions and a second section is operated with another aqueous wash rather highly concentrated with Me2+ ions. The necessary amount of Me2+ ions is fed in the form of an aqueous Me2+ solution into the second section and circulated. Synthesis gas from the first wash section will be fed into the second wash section where almost all of the H2S in the synthesis gas will be removed by counter-current wash.
  • This process is illustrated in FIG. 5.
  • The first and the second section(s) can be arranged along a vertical axis of a contacting zone or device one above the other. In one embodiment, the second section(s) is/are placed above the first section(s).
  • The necessary amount of Cu2+-ions is fed in the form of a CuSO4-water solution into the second wash section and circulated (stream 4). Synthesis gas from the first wash section will be fed into the second wash section where almost all of H2S in synthesis gas will be removed by counter-current wash, as also shown in FIG. 5.
  • Thus, in the above disclosed multiple-stage process, in a first stage, the inlet gas is contacted with a washing liquid which is “lean” in the sense that it contains less than a stoichiometric amount of metal ions with respect to the sulphide compounds present. In a last stage of the process, the gas treated is contacted with a washing liquid which contains an excess of metal ions with respect to the sulphide compounds present in the gas. There can be 2 to 30 washing stages, typically however there are 2 to 10, in particular 2 to 5. In these embodiments, the wash solutions contain as metal, just as above, typically less than 1500 wt-ppm, for example less than 500 wt-ppm, preferably about 10 to about 450 wt-ppm, of a copper salt, in particular copper sulphate, the actual concentration being determined based on the sulphide concentration in the gas to be treated in the various stages.
  • As mentioned earlier, by a process of the above kind, an aqueous effluent can be withdrawn from the first gas wash stage which is in practice totally free from metal ions derived from the washing liquid and which can be conducted to further treatment in a conventional waste water processing plant.
  • The purification results using transition metal ions in aqueous washing liquids are very good. The present method is capable of removing a significant portion of the hydrogen sulphide from the gas. At least 95% preferably at least 98% advantageously at least 99.5% of the hydrogen sulphide is removed from the gas.
  • As a result, in a preferred embodiment, the concentration of hydrogen sulphide of the purified gas is less than about 100 ppb by volume, in particular less than about 50 ppb by volume.
  • The purified gas has several uses. It can be used for producing hydrogen, methanol, ethanol, dimethyl ether or aldehydes optionally by hydroformulation or directly used in engines for producing for example electricity. Also it can be used for SNG (Synthetic Natural Gas) production.
  • The purified gas can also be used for producing a hydrocarbon composition containing C4-C90 hydrocarbons, optionally after further purification. In particular, the hydrocarbon composition can be produced by a Fischer-Tropsch (FT) process.
  • The gas purification step can be integrated into an FT-process such that the process comprises the steps of
      • first gasifying the raw-material, e.g. by oxygen blown gasification, to produce a gas containing as main components carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen and hydrocarbons possibly together with inert components and as minor component impurities selected from hydrogen sulphide, hydrogen chloride, ammonia, hydrogen cyanide and carbonyl sulphide and mixtures thereof;
      • then feeding the gas obtained by gasification of the raw-material into a reformer;
      • reforming the gas in order to decrease the content of the hydrocarbons in a gaseous effluent of the reformer and simultaneously converting the tar components into CO, CO2 and water;
      • withdrawing the gaseous effluent from an outlet of the reformer;
      • optionally adjusting the hydrogen-to-carbon monoxide ratio of the purified gas;
      • removing a significant portion of the impurities from the gas by contacting the gas with a wash solution consisting of an acidic, lean solution of transition metal ions in water;
      • withdrawing the purified gas;
      • optionally adjusting the hydrogen-to-carbon monoxide ratio of the purified gas, and
      • feeding the gas thus obtained into a Fischer-Tropsch reaction zone to produce a hydrocarbon composition in the presence of a catalyst.
  • Preferably a copper salt is dissolved into an aqueous solution for providing the wash liquid for the above application. The concentration of the copper salt, such as copper sulphate, in the wash solution is preferably 1500 ppm-wt or less, in particular 100 to 1200 ppm-wt, in one embodiment less than 1000 wt-ppm, in particular about 10 to about 450 wt-ppm.
  • For all of these applications, the gas is obtained by oxygen blown gasification of biomass usually contains carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen and hydrocarbons possibly together with inert components.
  • The organic raw-material or feedstock of the process is preferably a material composed of biological matter, i.e. of a matter of vegetable or animal origin. In the present context, the term “biomass” will be used for designating any such raw-material.
  • A typical feature of the feedstock materials of the present process is that they contain carbon, in particular in excess of about 20%, preferably in excess of about 30%, advantageously in excess of about 40% by dry matter. The biomass feedstock is preferably selected from annual or perennial plants and parts and residues thereof, such as wood, wood chips and particles (saw dust etc), forestry residues and thinnings; agricultural residues, such as straw, olive thinnings; energy crops, such as willow, energy hay, Miscanthous; and peat.
  • However, it is also possible to use various waste materials, such as refuse derived fuel (RDF); wastes from sawmills, plywood, furniture and other mechanical forestry wastes; and waste slurries (including industrial and municipal wastes). In addition to such materials of vegetable origin, various animal products such as fats and waxes can also be used.
  • Also, pyrolysis oil produced from biomass and waste liquors from pulping process are a suitable bio-based feed for gasification.
  • The biomass is generally gasified in a oxygen blown gasifier either in a fluidized bed reactor or a circulating fluidized bed reactor (CFB) at a temperature in the range of about 500 to about 900° C. The circulating bed is formed by a granular or particulate bed material, such as alumina-silicate (e.g. sand) or a similar inorganic material. The biomass is preferably milled or grinded to an average particle or granule size of less than about 5 mm, preferably less than about 2 mm, in particular not more than 1 mm before gasification. It is typically fed into the reactor with a moisture content of less than 15% by weight, preferably to 10% by weight or less. Gasification can be promoted by feeding steam, air or oxygen into the reactor, particularly advantageous results being obtained with oxygen and oxygen in combination with steam.
  • Depending on the biomass and the temperature and on the concentration of oxygen, the “carbon conversion”, i.e. conversion of elemental carbon contained in the raw-material into light compounds, hydrocarbons and tar, is higher than 70%, preferably higher than 75%, in particular in excess of 80% by weight of the carbon in the raw-material.
  • By gasification, a gas containing carbon monoxide, hydrogen and carbon dioxide as main components along with some water or steam is produced. The gas is recovered. It can be used in the Fischer-Tropsch process for producing hydrocarbons by reacting carbon monoxide with hydrogen in the presence of a catalyst for converting at least a significant part of the carbon monoxide and hydrogen contained in the gas into a hydrocarbon composition containing C4-C90 hydrocarbons. The hydrocarbon composition thus obtained is recovered and subjected to further processing.
  • In case of waxes and similar hydrocarbons which are solid or semi-solid at ambient temperature and, generally, and also in case of any high-molecular weight hydrocarbons, the FT hydrocarbon composition is preferably further processed by hydrotreatment, such as hydroisomerization, with hydrogen gas at an increased temperature in the presence of a catalyst in order to produce a hydrocarbon composition suitable as a diesel class hydrocarbon or as composition from which such a hydrocarbon can be produced. Typically, hydrotreatment (e.g. hydroisomerization) with hydrogen gas is performed at a temperature of about 300° C. in a fixed bed reactor. The catalyst is typically a supported or unsupported metal catalyst, e.g. nickel on carbon.
  • In a conventional gasification reactor, a product gas exhibiting a molar ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide of 0.5 to 1.5 is produced. In particular, gasification of a wood, annual plant or peat raw-material will upon gasification in the presence of oxygen gas yield a product gas in which the molar ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide is about 0.8 to about 1.1. In practice, the molar ratio of hydrogen-to-carbon monoxide needs to be raised to about 2 before the FT reaction. For this reason, there is a need for a separate step in which the ratio is increased, said step being carried out at the latest immediately before or even simultaneously with the Fischer-Tropsch reaction.
  • The step of contacting the gas with the wash solution is preceded by at least one purification step of the gas. This embodiment can be combined with any of the embodiments described above.
  • At least one of the preceding purification steps is advantageously selected from the group of filtration, membrane filtration, pressure swing absorption and washing with a liquid capable of, for example, absorbing carbon dioxide.
  • EXPERIMENTAL PART Example 1 Semibatch Absorption Tests of H2S Removal, Using Aqueous Copper Sulfate (CuSO4) as a Model Absorbent Materials and Methods
  • The absorption experiments were carried out using a micro reactor equipment for WGS reaction.
  • Semibatch absorption tests of H2S removal, using copper sulfate (CuSO4)-water solution as absorbent, were carried out in a simple 0.5 liter gas-wash bottle with magnetic stirring, placed in the product line of a micro reactor before the online mass spectrometer.
  • Absorption tests were carried out at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. Total gas feed flow was 12 dm3/h to the WGS reactor. The basic gas feed composition is shown in Table 1.
  • TABLE 1
    Basic feed composition.
    Total flow H2O CO CO2 H2 N2 CH4
    litre(NTP)/h vol-% vol-% vol-% vol-% vol-% vol-%
    12.0 36 12 22 24 5 1
  • The impurity components were purchased from AGA as dilute hydrogen mixture gases H2S/H2, COS/H2 and NH3/H2. In the feed, H2S concentration was 500 ppm (vol) in all experiments. In some tests also 85 ppm (vol) COS and 800 ppm (vol) NH3 were used in the feed. However, nearly all COS was hydrolyzed already before the absorption bottle as it was not possible to bypass the catalytic reactor, where COS hydrolysis took place as a side reaction of water gas shift reaction.
  • The product gas was analyzed online using a mass spectrometer (GC-MS but GC separation not in use). The quantitation limit is dependent on the component, and in these MS measurements quantitation limit was about 1 ppm.
  • In absorption experiments carried out in laboratory in a bubbled gas wash bottle described above the following test programme was carried out as follows:
  • The CuSO4 concentration varied in different experiments from dilute 50 ppm up to 500 ppm. The mass transfer in the bubbled gas wash bottle was enhanced by agitation.
      • Absorption rate of H2S in CuSO4-water solution was measured at different CuSO4 concentrations.
      • Definition of crystallized Cu-solid components and particle size distribution of crystallized particles.
    Results
  • The feed rates of different impurity components in synthesis gas entering WGS reactor in the experiments were:
      • Test 1—CuSO4 conc. 0.01 wt-%, H2S concentration in feed gas 500 ppmv
      • Test 2—CuSO4 conc. 0.01 wt-%, H2S concentration in feed gas 500 ppmv, NH3 800 ppmv, COS 85 ppmv
      • Test 3—CuSO4 conc. 0.0051 wt-%, H2S concentration in feed gas 500 ppmv, NH3 800 ppmv, COS 85 ppmv
  • H2S mole flow in wash bottle outlet/H2S mole flow in wash bottle inlet in different experiments is shown as a function of time in FIGS. 1-3:
  • CONCLUSIONS
  • CuSO4 was capable of removing 500 ppm H2S (mol-frac) completely from feed gas both with 0.01 and 0.005 wt-% water solutions. The product is solid CuS deposit. Too high pH resulted in deposition of e.g. metal hydroxides or carbonates in which case no or less hydrogen sulphide was removed. Carbonate formation was also dependent on CO2 partial pressure. Too low pH resulted in no deposit formation in which case no hydrogen sulphide was removed (results not shown). NH3 in the feed did not influence H2S removal by copper sulfate.
  • With regard to the results described in the figures it should be pointed out that the experimental setup was the following: the bottle of copper sulphate wash solution was placed between two reactor product coolers and drum type volumetric gas flow meter. By opening the valves the gas could be made to flow through the CuSO4 water solution and after that to the GC-MS, and subsequently the gas was conducted to the drum type volumetric gas flow meter for venting. The first point shown graphically is from the point of time immediately before the gas was conducted to the CuSO4 bottle. At that point of time, precipitation of CuS is not detectable yet. Then, a 4 sample series was taken within 7 minutes, after a short break a new series of 4 samples was taken within 7 minutes etc.
  • The points in the figures in which the H2S concentration is 0 indicate points where all H2S is removed from the gas. Suddenly after that all the copper is depleted and the H2S concentration increases again.
  • Some of the tests have contained COS in the feed. Having passed the WGS reactor it has in practice been completely hydrolyzed since the feed also contains water:

  • COS+H2O< - - - >H2S+CO2
  • Then, there is more H2S in the feed of the CuSO4 washing than the amount of H2S fed into the system. This effect could be seen in the analysis in the amount of effluent COS 0-3 ppmv.
  • Example 2 Absorption Test for H2S Removal from Syngas in Packed Bed Absorption Column
  • Absorption tests for H2S removal from syngas in packed bed absorption column were carried out in a Pilot scale test unit. The absorber performance was tested in a syngas preparation plant in Varkaus, Finland.
  • Absorber details and data sheets are shown below:
  • Absorber:
      • packed bed absorber, packing metal, 2-in or 50 mm, surface area 100 m2/m3,
      • height: 9 m, diameter 0.1 m.
  • Feed Gas:
      • feed rate: 50-60 kg/h
      • pressure 30 bar, temperature 25° C.
      • Composition/mol-%: CO 21, CO2 30, H2 31, CH 4 3, N 2 15, H2S 140 ppm, naphthalene 100 ppm, benzene 1200 ppm and traces NH3 and COS.
  • Absorbent Feed:
      • CuSO4—water, concentration 0.15 wt-%
      • Feed rate was varied, equivalent Cu2+ molar feed ratio to H2S 1.5-6
  • The mol-% of H2S in effluent gas was measured by on-line hydrogen sulphide gas analyses. The measured H2S mole fraction in effluent syngas was at minimum 70 ppb at equivalent Cu2+ molar feed ratio to H2S value of 6.
  • As a result, the correlation between product gas S concentration and stoichiometric Cu/S ratio in the feed was determined. For stoichiometric ratios from 1 to 5 almost linear correlation was observed, wherein the stoichiometric ratio of 1.5 for Cu/S led to less than 3 ppmv H2S and ratio 5 led to 90 ppbv H2S in the product gas.
  • Example 3 Wash Absorption Column for H2S Removal
  • A wash absorption column can be designed as shown in attached FIG. 6. In the following the process will be described with particular reference to the embodiment of the drawing, although it should be pointed out that the specific details of the wash absorption column are not to be construed limiting for the use of a wash absorption column in the present invention.
  • A wash absorption column 21 consists of sieve plate demister unit 25 followed by spray absorption section and gas inlet distributor 29 in the bottom part of the spray chamber. The column may have sieve plate 26, 27 and 28, as indicated, and spray sections 22, 23 and 24 in series to enhance wash and absorption efficiency.
  • Very lean CuSO4-water solution, less than 500 weight-ppm is fed into the spray chamber 21 on a sieve plate 26 on the top of the chamber and sprayed into the spray chamber below the sieve plate by specific spray nozzle system 22, where effective mass transfer between sprayed liquid droplets and gas takes place. Sulphur components are reacting in liquid phase rapidly with Cu2+ at very small ion concentrations.
  • The spray nozzle system is specially designed to enable homogenous dense CuSO4-water droplet phase having effective contact with entering synthesis gas.
  • The nozzles are preferably operating in series at different height levels in the column. Synthesis gas described above is fed into the reactor via gas distributors 29 from the bottom part of the chamber. The H2S molecules in the synthesis gas are contacting effectively the sprayed liquid droplets enabling effective mass transfer of H2S into liquid phase and fast reaction with Cu2+ ions in droplets generating CuS and H2SO4 according to reaction:

  • CuSO4+H2S=CuS+H2SO4
  • Most of the liquid as sprayed droplets are hitting the chamber wall and falling down to the bottom.
  • A part of the sprayed small droplets are entrained up with the gas to be separated from the gas on tray plate on the top of the spray chamber.
  • CuS is separated as crystallized solid in CuS separation unit. The separation unit could be CuS-settling basin, hydrocyclone, and centrifuge or filtration unit.
  • The exhaust gas after H2S absorption process contains less than 50 ppb vol H2S, and no extra guard beds for additional H2S removal for FT-synthesis are necessarily needed.
  • Instead of Cu-ions also other metals that form sulphides of very low solubility can be used. Iron and zinc are such. Used FT catalysts (Fe, Co) can be utilised.
  • Advantages of using a wash absorption column:
  • A number of advantages are obtained using a wash absorption column in general, including the specific wash absorption column shown in the drawing. Thus, very low concentrations of Cu2+-ions react fast with H2S in liquid phase. This fact allows very effective and profitable process concept for removal of H2S and other impurities mentioned above from syngas down to less than 20 ppb by volume. H2S is chemically reacted with CuSO4 forming solid CuS and sulphuric acid. CuS is easy to be separate as a solid to be utilized as a raw material in copper industry. CuS formed can be used in the preparation of metallic copper or other copper compounds. The herein disclosed H2S removal process is very effective and no extra H2S removal beds are needed for FT-synthesis. A spray unit allows effective mass transfer of H2S into droplets and relatively low reactor size. Most of the effective mass transfer takes place immediately after spraying.

Claims (25)

1. A method of purifying gas obtained by gasification of a biomass feedstock to produce a gas containing a main component selected from a group consisting of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen, hydrocarbons and mixtures thereof and a minor component selected from a group consisting of hydrogen sulphide, hydrogen chloride, ammonia, carbonyl sulphide, hydrogen cyanide and mixtures thereof, the method comprising:
contacting the gas with an acidic aqueous wash solution of transition metal ions capable of binding to sulphide ions;
binding a significant portion of the hydrogen sulphide impurities contained in the gas into substantially insoluble transition metal sulphide compounds to remove hydrogen sulphide impurities from the gas and produce a purified gas; and
separating the purified gas from the aqueous wash solution.
2. The method according to claim 1, comprising:
precipitating the metal sulphide in the aqueous solution.
3. The method according to claim 1, comprising:
deriving the transition metal ions of the acqueous wash solution from transition metals selected from the group consisting of copper, zinc, iron, cobalt and mixtures thereof.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the aqueous wash solution has a pH of about 1 to about 6.5.
5. The method according to claim 1, comprising:
preparing the aqueous solution by dissolving about 1 to 10,000 parts by weight of a metal salt into 1,000,000 parts by weight of water.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein a concentration of the aqueous wash solution in respect of the transition metal ion(s) is 0.00001 M to 0.1 M.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein a molar ratio of the metal ion to sulphide compounds of the gas to be purified is in excess of about 1.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the contacting of the gas with the wash solution comprises:
spraying droplets of the wash solution into the gas, maintained in gaseous phase; and
precipitating absorbed sulphur compound formed as solid metal sulphide in the droplets of the wash solution.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the wash solution is contacted with the gas in a spray chamber having an essentially vertical central axis, said gas being fed into the spray chamber so as to advance in a direction of the central axis of the spray chamber and the wash solution being fed through spray nozzles arranged as one or more spray zones in series along the central axis at different heights in the spray chamber.
10. The method according to claim 9, wherein the gas is fed into the spray chamber via gas distributors arranged below a lowest spray zone, and the metal sulphide is withdrawn from a reactor along with used wash liquid via an outlet arranged in a bottom part of the chamber.
11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the wash solution contains less than 1500 wt-ppm as metal of a copper salt.
12. The method according to claim 11, wherein a significant portion of the hydrogen sulphide is removed from the gas, in particular at least 95% of the hydrogen sulphide is removed from the gas.
13. The method according to claim 1, wherein a concentration of hydrogen sulphide of the purified gas is less than about 100 ppb by volume.
14. The method according to claim 1, wherein the gas is contacted with the wash solution at a temperature in the range of 10 and 80° C. and at a pressure in the range from 1 to 50 bar(a).
15. The method according to claim 14, wherein the contacting of the gas with the wash solution is preceded by at least one purification step of the gas.
16. The method according to claim 15, wherein H2S removal from syngas is carried out by washing effected in a multi-stage process.
17. The method according to claim 16, comprising:
in a first stage, contacting inlet gas with a washing liquid which contains less than a stoichiometric amount of metal ions with respect to sulphide compounds present; and
in a second stage of the process, contacting the gas treated with a washing liquid which contains an excess of metal ions with respect to the sulphide compounds present in the gas.
18. The method according to claim 17, comprising:
producing, with the purified gas, at least one of hydrogen, SNG (synthetic natural gas) methanol, dimethyl ether or aldehydes.
19. The method according to claim 18, comprising:
producing, with the purified gas, a hydrocarbon composition containing C4-C90 hydrocarbons.
20. The method according to claim 19, comprising:
gasifying raw-material by oxygen-blown gasification to produce a gas containing as main components carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen and hydrocarbons and as a minor component impurities selected from a group consisting of hydrogen sulphide, hydrogen chloride, ammonia, hydrogen cyanide and carbonyl sulphide and mixtures thereof;
feeding the gas obtained by gasification of the raw-material into a reformer;
reforming the gas to decrease content of hydrocarbons in a gaseous effluent of the reformer;
withdrawing gaseous effluent from an outlet of the reformer;
adjusting a hydrogen-to-carbon monoxide molar ratio of the purified gas;
removing a significant portion of impurities from the gas by contacting the gas with a wash solution consisting of a lean solution of transition metal ions in water;
withdrawing the purified gas;
adjusting the hydrogen-to-carbon monoxide molar ratio of the purified gas if needed; and
feeding the gas into a Fischer-Tropsch reaction zone.
21. The method according to claim 20, wherein a concentration of copper salt in the wash solution is 1500 ppm-wt or less.
22. The method according to claim 21, comprising:
producing a hydrocarbon composition which is solid or semi-solid at ambient temperature; and
processing the hydrocarbon composition by hydrotreatment with hydrogen gas at an increased temperature in a presence of a catalyst to produce a hydrocarbon composition suitable as a diesel class hydrocarbon or as a composition from which such a hydrocarbon can be produced.
23. The method according to claim 3, wherein the transition metal ions are bivalent metal ions, and the aqueous wash solution has a pH of 1.5 to about 5.5 which is prepared by dissolving about 50 to 5000 parts by weight of a metal salt into 1,000,000 parts by weight of water, with a concentration of the aqueous wash solution in respect of the transition metal ions being 0.0001 m to 0.001 M, and a molar ratio of the metal ions to sulphide compound of the gas to be purified being about 2 to about 4.5.
24. The method according to claim 11, wherein the wash solution containing less than about 10 to about 450 wt-ppm of copper sulphate, and 99.5% of hydrogen-sulphide is removed from the gas.
25. The method according to claim 20, comprising:
adjusting the hydrogen-to-carbon monoxide molar ratio of the purified gas; and
adjusting the hydrogen-to-carbon monoxide molar ratio of the purified gas if needed.
US13/369,197 2011-02-08 2012-02-08 Method of purifying a gas Abandoned US20120202897A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/369,197 US20120202897A1 (en) 2011-02-08 2012-02-08 Method of purifying a gas

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161440420P 2011-02-08 2011-02-08
EP11153704 2011-02-08
EP11153704.9 2011-02-08
US13/369,197 US20120202897A1 (en) 2011-02-08 2012-02-08 Method of purifying a gas

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120202897A1 true US20120202897A1 (en) 2012-08-09

Family

ID=44168969

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/369,197 Abandoned US20120202897A1 (en) 2011-02-08 2012-02-08 Method of purifying a gas
US13/368,975 Active 2032-10-28 US9707511B2 (en) 2011-02-08 2012-02-08 Two-stage gas washing method

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/368,975 Active 2032-10-28 US9707511B2 (en) 2011-02-08 2012-02-08 Two-stage gas washing method

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (2) US20120202897A1 (en)
EP (2) EP2484427B1 (en)
CN (2) CN103547353B (en)
BR (2) BR112013020016B1 (en)
CA (2) CA2826340C (en)
EA (2) EA024546B1 (en)
ES (2) ES2641640T3 (en)
WO (2) WO2012107640A2 (en)

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014035686A1 (en) * 2012-08-27 2014-03-06 Proton Power, Inc. Methods, systems, and devices for synthesis gas recapture
US9023124B2 (en) 2008-02-19 2015-05-05 Proton Power, Inc Conversion of C—O—H compounds into hydrogen for power or heat generation
US9254461B2 (en) 2014-01-10 2016-02-09 Proton Power, Inc. Methods, systems, and devices for liquid hydrocarbon fuel production, hydrocarbon chemical production, and aerosol capture
US9272239B2 (en) 2011-08-31 2016-03-01 Neste Oyj Two-stage gas washing method applying sulfide precipitation and alkaline absorption
WO2016091393A1 (en) * 2014-12-10 2016-06-16 L'air Liquide Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L' Exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude Process and plant for the purification of raw synthesis gas
US20170158504A1 (en) * 2015-12-04 2017-06-08 Grannus Llc Polygeneration production of hydrogen for use in various industrial processes
US9698439B2 (en) 2008-02-19 2017-07-04 Proton Power, Inc. Cellulosic biomass processing for hydrogen extraction
US9707511B2 (en) 2011-02-08 2017-07-18 Neste Oyj Two-stage gas washing method
WO2018001991A1 (en) 2016-06-28 2018-01-04 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Apparatus and process for purifying syngas
US10005961B2 (en) 2012-08-28 2018-06-26 Proton Power, Inc. Methods, systems, and devices for continuous liquid fuel production from biomass
CN108939832A (en) * 2018-09-20 2018-12-07 广东伸丰环保科技有限公司 Four circulation NMP gas concentration units and its recovery method
US10228131B2 (en) 2012-06-27 2019-03-12 Grannus Llc Polygeneration production of power and fertilizer through emissions capture
WO2019129578A1 (en) 2017-12-27 2019-07-04 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Process for purifying syngas
US20200197865A1 (en) * 2018-12-21 2020-06-25 King Fahd University Of Petroleum And Minerals Method of sweetening hydrocarbon gas from hydrogen sulfide
WO2024059566A1 (en) * 2022-09-13 2024-03-21 Sungas Renewables, Inc. Management of tars and oils in gasification processes

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102012110520B4 (en) * 2012-11-02 2019-01-31 L'Air Liquide Société Anonyme pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude Process for the production of dry synthetic natural gas (SNG)
FI20126265L (en) * 2012-12-04 2014-06-05 Vapo Oy A method to enhance the carbon footprint of the fuel produced in a BtL plant
EP2969131B1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2020-02-26 Stamicarbon B.V. acting under the name of MT Innovation Center Cos and cs2 abatement method
CN103977671A (en) * 2014-06-06 2014-08-13 湖州强马分子筛有限公司 Waste-gas purifying treatment method and device of carbon molecular sieve
KR102050370B1 (en) * 2015-05-12 2019-11-29 지멘스 악티엔게젤샤프트 Method and apparatus for desulfurization of gas streams
CN106310893A (en) * 2015-06-17 2017-01-11 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Absorption liquid with high hydrogen sulfide removal rate
EP3368472B1 (en) 2015-10-29 2020-03-18 Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company Water-gas shift catalyst
GB201519139D0 (en) * 2015-10-29 2015-12-16 Johnson Matthey Plc Process
GB201519133D0 (en) 2015-10-29 2015-12-16 Johnson Matthey Plc Process
CN107987891A (en) * 2017-11-24 2018-05-04 彭小慧 A kind of purification recovery device of garbage cracking synthesis gas
CN108636061A (en) * 2018-04-17 2018-10-12 南安市创培电子科技有限公司 A kind of high effective desulphurization device of boiler waste gas
CN112048345A (en) * 2020-09-28 2020-12-08 姚英 Organic sulfur conversion reactor for blast furnace gas
CN114317040A (en) * 2021-12-29 2022-04-12 新奥科技发展有限公司 Oil-containing gas purification system and oil-containing gas purification method
CN114381306B (en) * 2022-01-19 2022-10-14 北京北科环境工程有限公司 High-selectivity blast furnace gas fine desulfurization purification method

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6550751B1 (en) * 1997-11-26 2003-04-22 Marsulex Environmental Technologies Corp. Gas-liquid contactor with liquid redistribution device
US20040036055A1 (en) * 2000-07-25 2004-02-26 Norbert Asprion Method for neutralising a stream of fluid, and washing liquid for use in one such method

Family Cites Families (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE350591C (en) * 1919-10-26 1922-03-23 Kohlentechnik M B H Ges Process for removing hydrogen sulfide from gases
GB497255A (en) 1937-03-06 1938-12-15 Standard Oil Dev Co An improved process for refining petroleum distillates
US2889197A (en) * 1955-05-17 1959-06-02 Baumann Friedrich Method of removing carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide from gases
US3435590A (en) * 1967-09-01 1969-04-01 Chevron Res Co2 and h2s removal
US3761569A (en) * 1971-01-28 1973-09-25 Mobil Oil Corp Method of removing hydrogen sulfide from gases
DE2304497A1 (en) 1973-01-31 1974-08-08 Norddeutsche Affinerie Hydrogen sulphide removal from gases - by absorption in wash liq. contg. copper ions,and oxidn. in acid medium contg. halide
DE2433078C3 (en) 1974-07-10 1979-12-06 Metallgesellschaft Ag, 6000 Frankfurt Process for the purification of gases produced by gasifying solid fossil fuels using water vapor and oxygen under pressure
US4252548A (en) * 1979-01-02 1981-02-24 Kryos Energy Inc. Carbon dioxide removal from methane-containing gases
US4298584A (en) * 1980-06-05 1981-11-03 Eic Corporation Removing carbon oxysulfide from gas streams
US4749555A (en) * 1986-10-02 1988-06-07 Shell Oil Company Process for the selective removal of hydrogen sulphide and carbonyl sulfide from light hydrocarbon gases containing carbon dioxide
GB9116267D0 (en) 1991-07-27 1991-09-11 Tioxide Chemicals Limited Aqueous compositions
FR2724161B1 (en) * 1994-09-02 1996-11-15 Inst Francais Du Petrole PROCESS FOR THE EXTRACTION OF HYDROGEN SULFIDE CONTAINED IN A GAS MIXTURE
NL1006200C2 (en) 1997-06-02 1998-12-03 Procede Twente B V Method and system for the selective removal of contaminants from gas flows.
AU2001282155A1 (en) * 2000-07-11 2002-01-21 Matti Nurmia Process for separating carbon dioxide, co2, from combustion gas
CA2366470A1 (en) 2001-12-28 2003-06-28 William Dale Storey Solution and method for scavenging hydrogen sulphide
FI20030241A (en) * 2003-02-17 2004-08-18 Fortum Oyj A method for producing a synthesis gas
NO326645B1 (en) 2005-06-28 2009-01-26 Ntnu Technology Transfer As Process and apparatus for removing and recovering acid gases, CO2 and / or H2S.
EP1907101A1 (en) 2005-07-22 2008-04-09 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Process for producing a gas stream depleted of hydrogen sulphide and of mercaptans
DE102007008690A1 (en) 2007-02-20 2008-08-21 Linde Ag Production of gas products from synthesis gas
WO2008113766A2 (en) * 2007-03-16 2008-09-25 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Process to prepare a hydrocarbon
WO2009013233A2 (en) * 2007-07-20 2009-01-29 Upm-Kymmene Oyj Method and apparatus for producing liquid biofuel from solid biomass
FI122786B (en) 2007-07-20 2012-06-29 Upm Kymmene Oyj Use of carbon dioxide from synthetic hydrocarbon chains
FI20085400A0 (en) 2007-11-09 2008-04-30 Upm Kymmene Oyj Method for integrated waste water treatment
EP2188040A1 (en) * 2007-08-30 2010-05-26 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Process for removal of hydrogen sulphide and carbon dioxide from an acid gas stream
FI20075794L (en) 2007-11-09 2009-05-10 Upm Kymmene Oyj An integrated process for the production of diesel fuel from biological material and products, uses and devices associated with the process
US20090220406A1 (en) * 2008-02-29 2009-09-03 Greatpoint Energy, Inc. Selective Removal and Recovery of Acid Gases from Gasification Products
WO2009113006A2 (en) * 2008-03-12 2009-09-17 Sasol Technology (Proprietary) Limited Hydrocarbon synthesis
WO2010060978A1 (en) 2008-11-28 2010-06-03 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. A method of treating a syngas stream and an apparatus therefor
KR100948334B1 (en) * 2009-02-09 2010-03-17 이상범 Ammonia and hydrogen sulfide removing aparatus contained in biogas
EP2223889A3 (en) 2009-02-25 2011-06-22 Linde Aktiengesellschaft Device for converting solid or liquid fuels into a gaseous fuel
FI123686B (en) 2010-03-03 2013-09-30 Neste Oil Oyj A method for reforming gasification gas
US8945496B2 (en) * 2010-11-30 2015-02-03 General Electric Company Carbon capture systems and methods with selective sulfur removal
ES2641640T3 (en) 2011-02-08 2017-11-10 Neste Oyj Two stage gas washing method
EP2564918B1 (en) 2011-08-31 2018-03-07 Neste Oyj A two-stage gas washing method applying sulfide precipitation and alkaline absorption

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6550751B1 (en) * 1997-11-26 2003-04-22 Marsulex Environmental Technologies Corp. Gas-liquid contactor with liquid redistribution device
US20040036055A1 (en) * 2000-07-25 2004-02-26 Norbert Asprion Method for neutralising a stream of fluid, and washing liquid for use in one such method

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
EPA, EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition, January 2002. *
H. ter Maat et al., "The removal of hydrogen sulfide from gas stream using an aqueous metal sulfate absorbent Part I. The absorption of hydrogen sulfide in metal sulfate solutions", Separation and Purification Technology 43 (2005) 183-197. *
H. ter Maat et al., "Theoretical and Experimental Study of the Absorption Rate of H2S in CuSO4 Solutions, The Effect of Enhancement of Mass Transfer by a Precipitation Reaction", Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A): 100-108. *

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9561956B2 (en) 2008-02-19 2017-02-07 Proton Power, Inc. Conversion of C-O-H compounds into hydrogen for power or heat generation
US9023124B2 (en) 2008-02-19 2015-05-05 Proton Power, Inc Conversion of C—O—H compounds into hydrogen for power or heat generation
US9698439B2 (en) 2008-02-19 2017-07-04 Proton Power, Inc. Cellulosic biomass processing for hydrogen extraction
US9707511B2 (en) 2011-02-08 2017-07-18 Neste Oyj Two-stage gas washing method
US9272239B2 (en) 2011-08-31 2016-03-01 Neste Oyj Two-stage gas washing method applying sulfide precipitation and alkaline absorption
US10228131B2 (en) 2012-06-27 2019-03-12 Grannus Llc Polygeneration production of power and fertilizer through emissions capture
US9023243B2 (en) 2012-08-27 2015-05-05 Proton Power, Inc. Methods, systems, and devices for synthesis gas recapture
WO2014035686A1 (en) * 2012-08-27 2014-03-06 Proton Power, Inc. Methods, systems, and devices for synthesis gas recapture
US10005961B2 (en) 2012-08-28 2018-06-26 Proton Power, Inc. Methods, systems, and devices for continuous liquid fuel production from biomass
US9254461B2 (en) 2014-01-10 2016-02-09 Proton Power, Inc. Methods, systems, and devices for liquid hydrocarbon fuel production, hydrocarbon chemical production, and aerosol capture
US10391443B2 (en) 2014-12-10 2019-08-27 L'air Liquide Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude Process and plant for the purification of raw synthesis gas
WO2016091393A1 (en) * 2014-12-10 2016-06-16 L'air Liquide Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L' Exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude Process and plant for the purification of raw synthesis gas
CN105688601A (en) * 2014-12-10 2016-06-22 乔治·克劳德方法的研究开发空气股份有限公司 Process and plant for the purification of raw synthesis gas
US20170158504A1 (en) * 2015-12-04 2017-06-08 Grannus Llc Polygeneration production of hydrogen for use in various industrial processes
US10611634B2 (en) 2015-12-04 2020-04-07 Grannus, Llc Polygeneration production of hydrogen for use in various industrial processes
US9957161B2 (en) * 2015-12-04 2018-05-01 Grannus, Llc Polygeneration production of hydrogen for use in various industrial processes
AU2017291185B2 (en) * 2016-06-28 2020-03-26 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Apparatus and process for purifying syngas
WO2018001991A1 (en) 2016-06-28 2018-01-04 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Apparatus and process for purifying syngas
WO2019129578A1 (en) 2017-12-27 2019-07-04 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Process for purifying syngas
CN108939832A (en) * 2018-09-20 2018-12-07 广东伸丰环保科技有限公司 Four circulation NMP gas concentration units and its recovery method
US20200197865A1 (en) * 2018-12-21 2020-06-25 King Fahd University Of Petroleum And Minerals Method of sweetening hydrocarbon gas from hydrogen sulfide
US11731080B2 (en) * 2018-12-21 2023-08-22 King Fahd University Of Petroleum And Minerals Method of sweetening hydrocarbon gas from hydrogen sulfide
WO2024059566A1 (en) * 2022-09-13 2024-03-21 Sungas Renewables, Inc. Management of tars and oils in gasification processes

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EA201391134A1 (en) 2014-02-28
EA201391122A1 (en) 2014-02-28
BR112013020016B1 (en) 2021-01-05
CN103547353B (en) 2016-09-07
CA2826445A1 (en) 2012-08-16
WO2012107640A2 (en) 2012-08-16
EP2484427A2 (en) 2012-08-08
ES2641640T3 (en) 2017-11-10
EP2484427B1 (en) 2017-07-19
WO2012107641A3 (en) 2012-11-15
EP2484427A3 (en) 2012-08-29
EP2673069A2 (en) 2013-12-18
EA024546B1 (en) 2016-09-30
CN103547353A (en) 2014-01-29
US20120214881A1 (en) 2012-08-23
CA2826445C (en) 2019-05-07
CA2826340C (en) 2020-04-14
BR112013020016A2 (en) 2017-02-21
BR112013019997B1 (en) 2020-12-15
EP2673069B1 (en) 2018-04-25
EA025153B1 (en) 2016-11-30
WO2012107640A3 (en) 2012-10-04
WO2012107641A2 (en) 2012-08-16
US9707511B2 (en) 2017-07-18
ES2674137T3 (en) 2018-06-27
CN103476482A (en) 2013-12-25
CA2826340A1 (en) 2012-08-16
CN103476482B (en) 2016-03-16
BR112013019997A2 (en) 2017-03-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2673069B1 (en) Method of purifying a gas
AU2008285282B2 (en) Process for the generation of a synthesis gas
JP5771615B2 (en) Hydrogenation methanation process of carbonaceous feedstock
EP2564918B1 (en) A two-stage gas washing method applying sulfide precipitation and alkaline absorption
CA2837418C (en) Method of producing a hydrocarbon composition
CN102395659A (en) Method and system for the production of a combustible gas from a fuel
CA2880681C (en) Method of purifying gas streams

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: NESTE OIL OYJ, FINLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KESKINEN, KARI I.;KOSKINEN, JUKKA;AITTAMAA, JUHANI;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20120312 TO 20120315;REEL/FRAME:028091/0167

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION