US20120174713A1 - Method of Agglomeration - Google Patents
Method of Agglomeration Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20120174713A1 US20120174713A1 US13/146,733 US201013146733A US2012174713A1 US 20120174713 A1 US20120174713 A1 US 20120174713A1 US 201013146733 A US201013146733 A US 201013146733A US 2012174713 A1 US2012174713 A1 US 2012174713A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- ore
- agglomerated
- agglomeration
- solution
- agglomerating
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B1/00—Preliminary treatment of ores or scrap
- C22B1/14—Agglomerating; Briquetting; Binding; Granulating
- C22B1/24—Binding; Briquetting ; Granulating
- C22B1/2406—Binding; Briquetting ; Granulating pelletizing
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B23/00—Obtaining nickel or cobalt
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B1/00—Preliminary treatment of ores or scrap
- C22B1/14—Agglomerating; Briquetting; Binding; Granulating
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B23/00—Obtaining nickel or cobalt
- C22B23/005—Preliminary treatment of ores, e.g. by roasting or by the Krupp-Renn process
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B3/00—Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes
- C22B3/04—Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes by leaching
- C22B3/06—Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes by leaching in inorganic acid solutions, e.g. with acids generated in situ; in inorganic salt solutions other than ammonium salt solutions
- C22B3/08—Sulfuric acid, other sulfurated acids or salts thereof
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P10/00—Technologies related to metal processing
- Y02P10/20—Recycling
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method of agglomeration of nickel laterite ores, particularly to the agglomeration of ores for the purpose of heap leaching.
- Heap leaching is one method for economically extracting metals from low-grade ores. Generally, it involves piling raw ore into heaps and introducing a leaching solution over the top of the heap to percolate down through the heap. The leaching solution extracts the desired metal values from the ore and is collected as a pregnant leach solution (PLS), for example, in perforated drainage pipes located beneath the heap. The PLS is then transported to a processing plant where the desired metal values are separated from the impurities in the PLS and recovered.
- PLS pregnant leach solution
- An agglomeration process can be used to bind finer particles in the ore to form larger particles and thereby improve an ore's leaching characteristics.
- larger particle sizes facilitates percolation of leach solutions through the heaped ore material and ensures that the target metal values contained in the fine materials are contacted by the leaching solution.
- the agglomerated particles are generally cured in open air, undisturbed for a time period long enough so that the sulfuric acid has enough chemical reaction time to attack the nickel containing minerals, partially dissolve some of the ore, remove some of the contained water (by air evaporation) and allow basic sulfates and/or silicates, or silica gel to be precipitated and form into a binding agent to keep the remaining ore particles together in a pellet form.
- the curing time can range from one hour to several days.
- the use of strong or concentrated acid in an agglomeration process is advantageous due to the generation of heat from the exothermic reaction of the acid and the small amount of moisture present in the ore. This can result in better break-down of the ore minerals and exposing the target metal values.
- concentrated acid solutions for agglomeration one of the main problems with using concentrated acid solutions for agglomeration is that the resulting agglomerates can become friable, resulting in blockages in the heap once agglomerates begin to break into smaller particles.
- the use of concentrated acid can also promote dissolution of unwanted impurities.
- agglomeration of nickel laterite ores is optimised using a selected range of conditions that fall outside the conditions covered by GR1001555, U.S. Pat. No. 6,312,500 and WO2007143779.
- ore and “ore material” are understood to include nickel laterite in the form of any one of ore, ore reject material, concentrate, waste rock or mill scats material.
- agglomerating a nickel laterite ore comprising the steps of:
- nickel laterite ore is optimally agglomerated using an agglomerating solution having a sulfuric acid concentration of between 100 to 400 g/L and preferably between 140 to 280 g/L.
- Optimal agglomeration of nickel laterite ore improves the permeability of the ore heap, and enables the agglomerated ore to be piled in higher heaps as compared to prior agglomerated ore, which in turn allows a heap leaching process to achieve more efficient recovery rates, increase output rates and reduce costs.
- the agglomerating method of the present invention can be used for the limonitic portion of the ore or the saprolitic portion which may be selected to be leached separately, or for a whole of ore mix
- the agglomerating solution includes sulphuric acid content capable of agglomerating smaller particles of nickel laterite ore into larger particles.
- the agglomerating solution may also contain water in the form of water, underground brine, saline solution, hypersaline solution, sea water, recycle solution or a mixture thereof.
- the agglomerating solution may comprise a pregnant leach solution (PLS) from a downstream heap leach circuit.
- PLS pregnant leach solution
- the amount of sulfuric acid added to the agglomeration step per tonne of ore can vary depending on the actual composition of the nickel laterite ore to be agglomerated, the moisture content of the ore, the acid used and other factors. Typically, agglomeration is achieved by adding between 20 and 50 kg of acid per dry tonne of ore material. In a preferred embodiment, agglomeration is achieved by adding about 35 kg of acid per dry tonne of ore.
- the process of the present invention further includes a step prior to the ore feeding step of reducing the size of the nickel laterite ore material to be agglomerated to less than 1 inch.
- the ore can be reduced in size using any suitable size reduction equipment including ball mills, crushers, hammer mills or the like.
- the process of the present invention further includes a step prior to the ore feeding step of adjusting the moisture content of an ore material to be agglomerated to a predetermined level.
- the initial (natural_moisture content of the ore material prior to agglomeration can be between 1% and 40% wt/wt. This initial moisture content of the ore material can be adjusted prior to agglomeration to a selected moisture content between 1% and 40% wt/wt.
- the moisture content of the ore material is adjusted prior to agglomeration to be between 5% and 30% wt/wt. In yet others, to between 15% and 25% wt/wt. After agglomeration the final moisture content of the ore material can be adjusted to be between 5% and 40% wt/wt with the addition of or without the addition of aqueous solution.
- agglomeration the moisture content of the ore material is adjusted prior to agglomeration to be between 5% and 30% wt/wt. In yet others, to between 15% and 25% wt/wt. After agglomeration the final moisture content of the ore material can be adjusted to be between 5% and 40% wt/wt with the addition of or without the addition of aqueous solution.
- other ranges may be suitable for an individual ore. This level will vary for individual ores, depending on the source and mineralogy, and will be determined by test work for each case.
- This step can be done either after, before or during the size reduction step if such a step is undertaken.
- the agglomerated ore is preferably cured for an amount of time that may vary from an hour to several days, depending on the completion of the chemical bonding process that takes place within the resultant particles. This will vary for each individual ore, depending on the ore source and mineralogy. In most cases, the optimum curing time will need to be established experimentally for each individual ore.
- the process of the present invention further comprises a step, after the acid addition step of curing the agglomerated ore for a predetermined curing time.
- the curing time of the agglomerated ore material can be anywhere between 1 hour to several days.
- the agglomeration circuit of the agglomeration step can include any suitable agglomeration equipment, for example one or more drum or rotary disc agglomerator.
- a method of agglomerating nickel laterite ores is provided for improving the heap leaching characteristics of that laterite ore.
- the particle size of the nickel laterite ore is first reduced for example by crushing in a ball mill, where necessary, to an average particle size of less than 2.54 cm and, preferably between about 6 mesh (3350 micron) and about 2 cm
- the nickel laterite ore is subjected to a moisture adjustment step in which the initial (natural) moisture content of the ore is adjusted to a predetermined level by air drying the ore in a heap, or by adding water to the ore, as required before agglomeration.
- a too-wetted laterite may be sun-dried to decrease the initial moisture.
- the final moisture content of the ore is determined with bench or small continuous operation to determine how much extra water/solution in addition to concentrated acid can be added in ore to create qualified pellets for good permeability.
- the crushed particles are then fed into an agglomeration stage to be agglomerated.
- the particles are mixed with an agglomerating solution, preferably a solution containing between about 140 and 280 g/L of sulphuric acid, to agglomerate the ore particles.
- the agglomeration step may be carried out in a rotary disk, drum, or other suitable apparatus known in the art.
- the sulfuric acid may be mixed with a source of water, including saline, underground brine, fresh water, sea water, hypersaline solution or recycle solution.
- the quantity of sulfuric acid used is generally that necessary to attack the acid consuming mineral materials in the ore (generally the readily available MgO from magnesium silicates that are present in the ore).
- agglomerated particles have an average particle size between about 6 mesh (3350 micron) and about 2.54 cm.
- the agglomerated pellets are generally cured for an amount of time that may vary from an hour to several days, depending on the completion of the chemical bonding process that takes place. Preferably, the curing time ranges from about 4 hours to 10 hours.
- the agglomerated ore particles (usually in the form of pellets) are stored in open air, undisturbed for a time period long enough so that the sulfuric acid will have enough chemical reaction time to partially dissolve some of the ore and to remove some of the contained water by air evaporation such that basic sulfates and/or silicates, or silica gel is precipitated and formed into a binding agent to keep the remaining ore particles together in pellet form.
- the chemical bonding process consists of resolubilisation of precipitated silica gel and the dissolution of iron and magnesium from the ore with the strong acid used for pelletization.
- excess water evaporates and some of the water is taken as crystal water and causes a re-precipitation of magnesium-iron-silica gel “glue” that acts as a chemical bonding agent between the solid particles making solid pellets that have a definite physical strength.
- the curing time will be a function of the quantity of excess, or free, water that needs to be removed from the “glue” phase.
- the agglomerated pellets are then formed into a heap having a base and a top.
- a leach solution is applied to the top of the heap and allowed to percolate downward through the heap.
- the PLS is collected at the bottom of the heap and may be recycled, collected for nickel (and/or cobalt) recovery, or a combination of both.
- the leach solution is preferably sulfuric acid.
- the leach solution may be a recycled solution from which pay metal values have been recovered.
- the pelletized agglomerated ore is formed into two, or a series of, heaps and leached in a counter-current process.
- acid in the range of about 20 to about 50 kgs of sulfuric acid per ton of ore is all that is required to produce a pellet with the desired physical characteristics to withstand handling and pile loads that are incurred from heaping the ore.
- optimum agglomerating acid dose for agglomeration based on a Knappes permeability test is around 35 kgs of sulfuric acid per ton of ore using an agglomerating solution of 140 to 280 g/L sulfuric acid.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
- Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
Abstract
A method of agglomerating a nickel laterite ore comprising the steps of: i) feeding a nickel laterite ore material to be agglomerated into an agglomeration circuit; and ii) adding a sulfuric acid containing agglomerating solution to the ore material in the agglomeration circuit to provide an agglomerated ore material, wherein the acid concentration of the agglomerating solution is between 100 to 400 g/L.
Description
- The present invention relates to a method of agglomeration of nickel laterite ores, particularly to the agglomeration of ores for the purpose of heap leaching.
- The following discussion of the background to the invention is intended to facilitate an understanding of the invention. However, it should be appreciated that the discussion is not an acknowledgement or admission that any of the material referred to was published, known or part of the common general knowledge as at the priority date of the application.
- Heap leaching is one method for economically extracting metals from low-grade ores. Generally, it involves piling raw ore into heaps and introducing a leaching solution over the top of the heap to percolate down through the heap. The leaching solution extracts the desired metal values from the ore and is collected as a pregnant leach solution (PLS), for example, in perforated drainage pipes located beneath the heap. The PLS is then transported to a processing plant where the desired metal values are separated from the impurities in the PLS and recovered.
- An agglomeration process can be used to bind finer particles in the ore to form larger particles and thereby improve an ore's leaching characteristics. In heap leaching, larger particle sizes facilitates percolation of leach solutions through the heaped ore material and ensures that the target metal values contained in the fine materials are contacted by the leaching solution.
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,312,500 in the name of BHP Minerals International Inc describes one method of agglomerating laterite ores. In this patent, the ore is initially crushed, when necessary, to a particle size range of less than one inch (2.54 cm). The particles are then agglomerated by mixing the particles with a concentrated sulfuric acid in a rotary disk or drum agglomerator. The agglomerated particles are generally cured in open air, undisturbed for a time period long enough so that the sulfuric acid has enough chemical reaction time to attack the nickel containing minerals, partially dissolve some of the ore, remove some of the contained water (by air evaporation) and allow basic sulfates and/or silicates, or silica gel to be precipitated and form into a binding agent to keep the remaining ore particles together in a pellet form. The curing time can range from one hour to several days.
- The use of strong or concentrated acid in an agglomeration process is advantageous due to the generation of heat from the exothermic reaction of the acid and the small amount of moisture present in the ore. This can result in better break-down of the ore minerals and exposing the target metal values. However, one of the main problems with using concentrated acid solutions for agglomeration is that the resulting agglomerates can become friable, resulting in blockages in the heap once agglomerates begin to break into smaller particles. The use of concentrated acid can also promote dissolution of unwanted impurities.
- Greek patent GR1001555 in the name of Agatzini teaches a heap leaching process in which low to very low grade nickel and cobalt oxide ores can be agglomerated by wetting the ore with either water or leach solution (lixiviant) which preferably contains between 1 N to 2 N (49 to 98 g/L) sulfuric acid.
- International patent publication WO2007143779 in the name of Murrin Murrin Operations Pty Ltd relates to a method for agglomeration of a Nickel Laterite ore where the moisture content of an ore material to be agglomerated is adjusted to a predetermined level, and that ore material is agglomerated using an acid containing agglomerating solution having an acid concentration that does not exceed about 100 g/L. The use of a dilute acid solution for agglomeration is taught as providing a suitable agglomerated ore material (“agglomerate”) that does not sacrifice the structural integrity of the agglomerates. Heap leachate percolation rates and extraction levels are also taught as being improved.
- The applicant's have surprisingly found that agglomeration of nickel laterite ores is optimised using a selected range of conditions that fall outside the conditions covered by GR1001555, U.S. Pat. No. 6,312,500 and WO2007143779.
- Throughout the specification, the terms “ore” and “ore material” are understood to include nickel laterite in the form of any one of ore, ore reject material, concentrate, waste rock or mill scats material.
- According to the present invention, there is provided a method of agglomerating a nickel laterite ore comprising the steps of:
-
- i) feeding a nickel laterite ore material to be agglomerated into an agglomeration circuit; and
- ii) adding a sulfuric acid containing agglomerating solution to the ore material in the agglomeration circuit to provide an agglomerated ore material, wherein the sulfuric acid concentration of the agglomerating solution is between 100 to 400 g/L.
- The applicant has found that despite the teaching of prior patent publications, nickel laterite ore is optimally agglomerated using an agglomerating solution having a sulfuric acid concentration of between 100 to 400 g/L and preferably between 140 to 280 g/L. Optimal agglomeration of nickel laterite ore improves the permeability of the ore heap, and enables the agglomerated ore to be piled in higher heaps as compared to prior agglomerated ore, which in turn allows a heap leaching process to achieve more efficient recovery rates, increase output rates and reduce costs.
- The agglomerating method of the present invention can be used for the limonitic portion of the ore or the saprolitic portion which may be selected to be leached separately, or for a whole of ore mix
- The agglomerating solution includes sulphuric acid content capable of agglomerating smaller particles of nickel laterite ore into larger particles. The agglomerating solution may also contain water in the form of water, underground brine, saline solution, hypersaline solution, sea water, recycle solution or a mixture thereof. In some embodiments, the agglomerating solution may comprise a pregnant leach solution (PLS) from a downstream heap leach circuit.
- The amount of sulfuric acid added to the agglomeration step per tonne of ore can vary depending on the actual composition of the nickel laterite ore to be agglomerated, the moisture content of the ore, the acid used and other factors. Typically, agglomeration is achieved by adding between 20 and 50 kg of acid per dry tonne of ore material. In a preferred embodiment, agglomeration is achieved by adding about 35 kg of acid per dry tonne of ore.
- In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to reduce the size of the ore before the agglomeration step. In these embodiments, the process of the present invention further includes a step prior to the ore feeding step of reducing the size of the nickel laterite ore material to be agglomerated to less than 1 inch. The ore can be reduced in size using any suitable size reduction equipment including ball mills, crushers, hammer mills or the like.
- The moisture content of the ore has been found to affect the agglomerating step of the present invention. It is therefore preferable for the ore to be pre-treated to control the moisture content of the ore material to be agglomerated. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the process of the present invention further includes a step prior to the ore feeding step of adjusting the moisture content of an ore material to be agglomerated to a predetermined level. For example, in some embodiments, the initial (natural_moisture content of the ore material prior to agglomeration can be between 1% and 40% wt/wt. This initial moisture content of the ore material can be adjusted prior to agglomeration to a selected moisture content between 1% and 40% wt/wt. In other embodiments, the moisture content of the ore material is adjusted prior to agglomeration to be between 5% and 30% wt/wt. In yet others, to between 15% and 25% wt/wt. After agglomeration the final moisture content of the ore material can be adjusted to be between 5% and 40% wt/wt with the addition of or without the addition of aqueous solution. However, it is to be understood that other ranges may be suitable for an individual ore. This level will vary for individual ores, depending on the source and mineralogy, and will be determined by test work for each case.
- This step can be done either after, before or during the size reduction step if such a step is undertaken.
- The agglomerated ore is preferably cured for an amount of time that may vary from an hour to several days, depending on the completion of the chemical bonding process that takes place within the resultant particles. This will vary for each individual ore, depending on the ore source and mineralogy. In most cases, the optimum curing time will need to be established experimentally for each individual ore. In these embodiments, the process of the present invention further comprises a step, after the acid addition step of curing the agglomerated ore for a predetermined curing time. The curing time of the agglomerated ore material can be anywhere between 1 hour to several days.
- The agglomeration circuit of the agglomeration step can include any suitable agglomeration equipment, for example one or more drum or rotary disc agglomerator.
- The present invention will now be described with reference to particular preferred embodiments of the present invention.
- In accordance with the present invention, a method of agglomerating nickel laterite ores is provided for improving the heap leaching characteristics of that laterite ore.
- In a typical nickel laterite heap leaching process, the particle size of the nickel laterite ore is first reduced for example by crushing in a ball mill, where necessary, to an average particle size of less than 2.54 cm and, preferably between about 6 mesh (3350 micron) and about 2 cm
- In some embodiments, the nickel laterite ore is subjected to a moisture adjustment step in which the initial (natural) moisture content of the ore is adjusted to a predetermined level by air drying the ore in a heap, or by adding water to the ore, as required before agglomeration. For example, in wet conditions (rain or similar conditions), a too-wetted laterite may be sun-dried to decrease the initial moisture. The final moisture content of the ore is determined with bench or small continuous operation to determine how much extra water/solution in addition to concentrated acid can be added in ore to create qualified pellets for good permeability.
- The crushed particles are then fed into an agglomeration stage to be agglomerated. In this stage, the particles are mixed with an agglomerating solution, preferably a solution containing between about 140 and 280 g/L of sulphuric acid, to agglomerate the ore particles. The agglomeration step may be carried out in a rotary disk, drum, or other suitable apparatus known in the art. The sulfuric acid may be mixed with a source of water, including saline, underground brine, fresh water, sea water, hypersaline solution or recycle solution. The quantity of sulfuric acid used is generally that necessary to attack the acid consuming mineral materials in the ore (generally the readily available MgO from magnesium silicates that are present in the ore). It has been found that about 35 kg of sulfuric acid per ton of ore (dry base). However, the quantity can range from about 20 to about 50 kg sulfuric acid per ton of ore (dry base). The resulting agglomerated particles (pellets) have an average particle size between about 6 mesh (3350 micron) and about 2.54 cm.
- The agglomerated pellets are generally cured for an amount of time that may vary from an hour to several days, depending on the completion of the chemical bonding process that takes place. Preferably, the curing time ranges from about 4 hours to 10 hours. During curing, the agglomerated ore particles (usually in the form of pellets) are stored in open air, undisturbed for a time period long enough so that the sulfuric acid will have enough chemical reaction time to partially dissolve some of the ore and to remove some of the contained water by air evaporation such that basic sulfates and/or silicates, or silica gel is precipitated and formed into a binding agent to keep the remaining ore particles together in pellet form. The chemical bonding process consists of resolubilisation of precipitated silica gel and the dissolution of iron and magnesium from the ore with the strong acid used for pelletization. During the curing process, excess water evaporates and some of the water is taken as crystal water and causes a re-precipitation of magnesium-iron-silica gel “glue” that acts as a chemical bonding agent between the solid particles making solid pellets that have a definite physical strength. The curing time will be a function of the quantity of excess, or free, water that needs to be removed from the “glue” phase.
- The agglomerated pellets are then formed into a heap having a base and a top. A leach solution is applied to the top of the heap and allowed to percolate downward through the heap. The PLS is collected at the bottom of the heap and may be recycled, collected for nickel (and/or cobalt) recovery, or a combination of both. The leach solution is preferably sulfuric acid. The leach solution may be a recycled solution from which pay metal values have been recovered. Preferably, the pelletized agglomerated ore is formed into two, or a series of, heaps and leached in a counter-current process.
- In the practice of the present invention, acid in the range of about 20 to about 50 kgs of sulfuric acid per ton of ore is all that is required to produce a pellet with the desired physical characteristics to withstand handling and pile loads that are incurred from heaping the ore. Overall, optimum agglomerating acid dose for agglomeration based on a Knappes permeability test is around 35 kgs of sulfuric acid per ton of ore using an agglomerating solution of 140 to 280 g/L sulfuric acid.
- Where the terms “comprise”, “comprises”, “comprised” or “comprising” are used in this specification (including the claims) they are to be interpreted as specifying the presence of the stated features, integers, steps or components, but not precluding the presence of one or more other feature, integer, step, component or group thereof.
Claims (12)
1. A method of agglomerating a nickel laterite ore comprising the steps of:
i) feeding a nickel laterite ore material to be agglomerated into an agglomeration circuit; and
ii) adding a sulfuric acid containing agglomerating solution to the ore material in the agglomeration circuit to provide an agglomerated ore material, wherein the acid concentration of the agglomerating solution is between 100 to 400 g/L.
2. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the acid concentration of the agglomerating solution is between 140 to 280 g/L.
3. A method according to claim 1 wherein agglomerating solution is added at between 20 and 50 kg of acid per tonne of ore material.
4. A method according to claim 3 wherein agglomerating solution is added at about 35 kg of acid per tonne of ore.
5. A method according to claim 1 further including a step of:
adjusting the moisture content of an ore material to be agglomerated to a predetermined level, prior to feeding the ore into the agglomeration circuit.
6. A method according to claim 5 , wherein the moisture content of the ore material is adjusted prior to agglomeration to be between 5% and 30% wt/wt.
7. A method according to claim 1 further including a step of:
reducing the size of the nickel laterite ore material to be agglomerated to less than 1 inch, prior to feeding the ore into the agglomeration circuit.
8. A method according to claim 1 further comprising the step of curing the agglomerated ore for a predetermined curing time.
9. A method according to claim 8 , wherein the curing time of the agglomerated ore material is between 1 hour to 10 days.
10. A method according to claim 8 wherein the curing time of the agglomerated ore material falls within the range of about 1 hour to 10 hours.
11. A method according to claim 1 wherein the agglomeration circuit includes one or more drum or rotary disc agglomerators.
12. A method according to claim 1 wherein the agglomerating solution comprises a pregnant leach solution from a downstream heap leach circuit.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2009900378A AU2009900378A0 (en) | 2009-02-02 | Method of agglomeration | |
AU2009900378 | 2009-02-02 | ||
PCT/AU2010/000096 WO2010085857A1 (en) | 2009-02-02 | 2010-02-02 | Method of agglomeration |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20120174713A1 true US20120174713A1 (en) | 2012-07-12 |
Family
ID=42395061
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/146,733 Abandoned US20120174713A1 (en) | 2009-02-02 | 2010-02-02 | Method of Agglomeration |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20120174713A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2385994B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2012516937A (en) |
KR (1) | KR20110127169A (en) |
CN (1) | CN102301017A (en) |
AU (1) | AU2010207893B2 (en) |
CO (1) | CO6410246A2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010085857A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CL2015001298A1 (en) | 2015-05-13 | 2016-05-20 | Univ Técnica Federico Santa María | Agglomeration drum and mineral agglomeration procedure for mineral pretreatment. |
JP6849279B2 (en) * | 2017-02-21 | 2021-03-24 | 株式会社日向製錬所 | How to make briquettes |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6312500B1 (en) * | 2000-03-30 | 2001-11-06 | Bhp Minerals International Inc. | Heap leaching of nickel containing ore |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3845189A (en) * | 1972-06-07 | 1974-10-29 | Universal Oil Prod Co | Hydrometallurgical recovery of nickel values |
GR1001555B (en) | 1991-05-31 | 1994-03-22 | - | Nickel and cobalt recovery from low-grade nickel oxide ores by the technique of heap leaching using dilute sulphiric acid at ambient temperature |
AU2007260577B2 (en) * | 2006-06-12 | 2010-10-28 | Murrin Murrin Operations Pty Ltd | Method for agglomeration |
EP2054534A4 (en) * | 2006-08-23 | 2011-07-20 | Murrin Murrin Operations Pty Ltd | Improved hydrometallurgical method for the extraction of nickel from laterite ores |
WO2008034188A1 (en) * | 2006-09-21 | 2008-03-27 | Metallica Minerals Ltd | Improved process for producing feed material for a leaching process |
WO2009018619A1 (en) * | 2007-08-07 | 2009-02-12 | Bhp Billiton Ssm Development Pty Ltd | Atmospheric acid leach process for laterites |
-
2010
- 2010-02-02 AU AU2010207893A patent/AU2010207893B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2010-02-02 EP EP10735439.1A patent/EP2385994B1/en active Active
- 2010-02-02 US US13/146,733 patent/US20120174713A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2010-02-02 WO PCT/AU2010/000096 patent/WO2010085857A1/en active Application Filing
- 2010-02-02 JP JP2011546536A patent/JP2012516937A/en active Pending
- 2010-02-02 CN CN2010800057283A patent/CN102301017A/en active Pending
- 2010-02-02 KR KR1020117020182A patent/KR20110127169A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2011
- 2011-08-01 CO CO11096442A patent/CO6410246A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6312500B1 (en) * | 2000-03-30 | 2001-11-06 | Bhp Minerals International Inc. | Heap leaching of nickel containing ore |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2012516937A (en) | 2012-07-26 |
WO2010085857A1 (en) | 2010-08-05 |
KR20110127169A (en) | 2011-11-24 |
EP2385994A1 (en) | 2011-11-16 |
AU2010207893A1 (en) | 2011-08-18 |
CN102301017A (en) | 2011-12-28 |
EP2385994A4 (en) | 2016-06-15 |
EP2385994B1 (en) | 2019-07-03 |
CO6410246A2 (en) | 2012-03-30 |
AU2010207893B2 (en) | 2015-12-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Huang et al. | Selective recovery of valuable metals from nickel converter slag at elevated temperature with sulfuric acid solution | |
AU2008100922A4 (en) | Heap leaching of nickel containing ore | |
US11952288B2 (en) | Method for producing battery-grade nickel sulfate by using laterite nickel ore | |
KR20070053211A (en) | Method for nikel and cobalt recovery from laterite ores by reaction with concentrated acid water leaching | |
AU2008299587B2 (en) | Limonite and saprolite heap leach process | |
EP2385994B1 (en) | Method of agglomeration | |
RU2694188C1 (en) | Processing method of oxidised nickel-cobalt ore | |
US9624560B2 (en) | Recovery of residual copper from heap leach residues | |
AU2005100146A4 (en) | Process for refining lateritic ore | |
AU2006101059A4 (en) | Hydrometallurgical Method for the Extraction of Nickel and Cobalt from Laterite Ores | |
EP1922423B1 (en) | Hydrometallurgical method for the extraction of nickel and cobalt from laterite ores | |
RU2430170C1 (en) | Extraction method of gold from oxidised argillaceous gold-bearing ores | |
RU2571676C1 (en) | Processing method of polymetallic ores | |
JP2021176985A (en) | Method for recovering nickel, cobalt and other metal from laterite nickel ore | |
AU2006279255B2 (en) | Hydrometallurgical method for the extraction of nickel and cobalt from laterite ores | |
US20230416150A1 (en) | Binder for an agglomeration process | |
WO2023002460A1 (en) | Methods to accelerate sequestration of carbon | |
EP1984528A1 (en) | Improved base metal recovery process from heap leaching | |
WO2021234653A1 (en) | Heap leaching |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BHP BILLITON SSM DEVELOPMENT PTY LTD., AUSTRALIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MORA, NELSON;MORONEY, ADAM SEAN;THOMAS, SCOTT;SIGNING DATES FROM 20110816 TO 20111106;REEL/FRAME:027198/0720 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |