US20120174643A1 - Method and device for continuously stretch-bend-leveling metal strips - Google Patents

Method and device for continuously stretch-bend-leveling metal strips Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20120174643A1
US20120174643A1 US13/389,841 US201013389841A US2012174643A1 US 20120174643 A1 US20120174643 A1 US 20120174643A1 US 201013389841 A US201013389841 A US 201013389841A US 2012174643 A1 US2012174643 A1 US 2012174643A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
strip
rollers
straightening rollers
straightening
roller
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/389,841
Inventor
Andreas Noe
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BWG Bergwerk und Walzwerk Maschinenbau GmbH
Original Assignee
BWG Bergwerk und Walzwerk Maschinenbau GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by BWG Bergwerk und Walzwerk Maschinenbau GmbH filed Critical BWG Bergwerk und Walzwerk Maschinenbau GmbH
Assigned to BWG BERGWERK-UND WALZWERK-MASCHINENBAU GMBH reassignment BWG BERGWERK-UND WALZWERK-MASCHINENBAU GMBH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NOE, ANDREAS
Publication of US20120174643A1 publication Critical patent/US20120174643A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21DWORKING OR PROCESSING OF SHEET METAL OR METAL TUBES, RODS OR PROFILES WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21D1/00Straightening, restoring form or removing local distortions of sheet metal or specific articles made therefrom; Stretching sheet metal combined with rolling
    • B21D1/05Stretching combined with rolling

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method and an apparatus for stretch-bend-leveling metal strips, where a strip under tension below the elastic limit or the yield point is bidirectionally bent in the elastic/plastic range about at least four straightening rollers and thereby undergoes plastic stretching.
  • the plastically or elastically/plastically acting rollers are also designated as stretch rollers.
  • the amount by which the strip is (overall) plastically stretched and therefore elongated is called the stretch ratio.
  • Nonplanarity means, for example, strip waviness and/or strip cambers that are a result of length differences of the strip fibers in the strip plane.
  • nonplanarity also means strip curvature in the longitudinal and/or transverse direction that result from bending moments in the strip, for example if the strip was elastically/plastically bent about deflection rollers or is caused by elastic/plastic deformations when winding up the strip. Longitudinal curvatures are also designated as coil set; transverse curvatures are designated as cross bow.
  • the nonplanar strip is bidirectionally bent about rollers with an appropriately small diameter and under a tension that lies below the elastic limit R E or the technical elastic limit R p0.01 of the strip material so that with the superimposition of the tension with the bending, an elastic/plastic deformation in the strip is generated.
  • the strip is plastically elongated by an the amount called the stretch ratio.
  • the initially short strip fibers are elongated.
  • all strip fibers have the same length after straightening so that in theory an ideally straightened strip without waviness or strip camber is produced.
  • the geometry can be described as the wrap angle of the strip about the rollers.
  • the strip shapes to the radius of the roller. Then, the strip curvature reaches its maximum and remains constant while the wrap angle or the tension continues to increase.
  • the wrap angles are usually set in such a manner that the strip, at least in the case of the last rollers in the stretch-bending stand, no longer conform to the roller radius. Even with an optimal setting of a specified stretch-bending stand, residual bending moments occur due to fluctuations of the process parameters. The reason for this is that, in practice, the tension and accordingly the stretch ratio as well as the strength values and the strip thickness are in principle subject to certain fluctuations.
  • stretch-bend-leveling methods known from practice are to a greater or lesser extent susceptible to such fluctuations. This means that in the case of the conventional stretch-bend-leveling methods, such fluctuations influence the remaining or generated residual curvatures to a greater or lesser extent. This applies also to stretch-bend-leveling methods in which the strip is elastically/plastically deformed about four straightening rollers.
  • stretch-bend-leveling stands having four straightening rollers it is known to set the geometry of the stretch-bend-leveling stand in order to achieve the best possible straightening results.
  • a stretch-bend-leveling stand with four straightening rollers is known from DE 696 08 937 T2 (EP 0 767 014 [U.S. Pat. No. 5,758,534]), where the upper straightening rollers as well as the lower straightening rollers can be changed with respect to their position. While the lower straightening rollers can be positioned with a certain accuracy via mechanical spindle drives for improving the straightening result, the upper straightening rollers are actuated hydraulically. In this manner, a desired overlap of the rollers is adjustable.
  • multiroll levelers that are also designated as multiroller straightening apparatuses.
  • the strip is subjected to a multiplicity of bends about rollers having a small diameter.
  • the strip can be produced with minor residual curvatures.
  • a disadvantage here is the fact that the multiplicity of rollers involve high expenditures for maintenance and spare parts.
  • the lower and the upper rollers are each frictionally engaged with each other via the support rollers or intermediate rollers and support rollers like a 1:1 gear. Since the strip, when running through the multiroller stand, is plastically elongated, the strip speed increases to the same extent.
  • the strip runs synchronously only at one roller; between the other rollers and the strip, a slip occurs.
  • the rollers in high-speed trip processing lines run often with high rotational speed.
  • the slip can induce vibrations that can generate chatter marks on the strip surface. In practice, this is not acceptable for a variety of applications. For these reasons, conventional stretch-bend-leveling stands were combined with multiroller straightening units (cf. EP 0 665 069 B1 or DE 695 14 010).
  • DE 27 50 752 [GB 2,007,556] describes a method for straightening and for improving the quality properties of metal strips, in particular electrical strips, where the metal strip to be treated is bent without counter pressure and is subjected to a plastic alternating bending. While maintaining its plastic bending state, the metal strip is bent in a flat position, where the deflections of the metal strip following the last bending are carried out exclusively in the elastic or near-elastic range.
  • an object of the invention to provide a stretch-bend-leveling method that, with low installation-related expenditures, delivers optimal flatness results and is in particular not susceptible to fluctuations of the process parameters (tension, strip strength and strip thickness).
  • an apparatus shall be proposed that is characterized by a simple and cost-effective construction and yet delivers the desired results.
  • the invention teaches for a generic method for continuously stretch-bend-leveling metal strips of the above-described kind that the bending radii are set at all four straightening rollers individually and independently of each other. For this, the invention proposes that all four bending rollers are adjusted in a controlled manner. If the strip is bidirectionally bent about more than four straightening rollers, the invention proposes that the bending radii at least of the last four rollers with regard to the strip travel direction are set individually and independently of each other by preferably adjusting at least the last four rollers individually in a controlled manner.
  • the positions of the straightening rollers are then set with an accuracy as well as control accuracy that corresponds to an accuracy with regard to the wrap angles of the strip about the straightening rollers of ⁇ 0.05° or less, preferably ⁇ 0.02° or less.
  • the wrap angles of the strip about one or a plurality of straightening rollers, preferably about all straightening rollers, can be 0.5° to 60°, preferably 1° to 35°.
  • the (total) stretch ratio is, for example, 0.1% to 1.5%, preferably 0.2% to 0.6%.
  • the tension in the strip is preferably approximately 30% to 60% of the elastic limit of the strip or the strip material.
  • the invention further proposes that the spacing between at least two straightening rollers provided (directly) one behind the other (with regard to the travel direction of the strip) is at least 15% of the (maximum) strip width, for example at least 30% of the (maximum) strip width, particularly preferred at least 50% of the (maximum) strip width. It can be useful here if these spacings for all four straightening rollers are provided between each pair of two straightening rollers located (directly) one behind the other. For example, the spacings between two such immediately adjacent straightening rollers can be at least 150 mm, preferably at least 300 mm.
  • the spacing in the strip travel direction between at least two straightening rollers is set or can be set in a variable manner.
  • the optimal spacings for a certain strip can then be predetermined based on the model.
  • the invention further proposes that the target values for the position of the straightening rollers and/or the target values for the wrap angles of the strip about the straightening rollers are determined with a calculation model that considers at least stress in the longitudinal and transverse directions and, as calculation parameters, processes the strip thickness, the modulus of elasticity, the Poisson's ratio, the cyclic strength behavior of the strip, the tension in the strip, the roller radii and the geometry of the strip track about the rollers, for which the target values of the strip thickness and the strength, for example the yield point, are calculated such that the residual longitudinal curvature and the residual transverse curvature become zero or at least negligible.
  • a calculation model that considers at least stress in the longitudinal and transverse directions and, as calculation parameters, processes the strip thickness, the modulus of elasticity, the Poisson's ratio, the cyclic strength behavior of the strip, the tension in the strip, the roller radii and the geometry of the strip track about the rollers, for which the target values of the strip thickness and the strength, for
  • the invention further proposes that downstream of or behind one or a plurality of straightening rollers, for example downstream of the last straightening roller, particularly preferred downstream of each straightening roller, the cross bow of the strip over the strip width is measured.
  • These measured cross bows can then be combined in a controller that, based on the measured values, corrects the wrap angles or roller positions in such a manner that a strip with a sufficiently small residual longitudinal and residual transverse curvature is generated.
  • the invention comprises in the first instance such embodiments for which the target values for the bending radii and therefore for the roller positions and/or the wrap angles are determined by a mathematical model, where the installation is then operated using these values. Simulations have shown that such approaches, even with certain fluctuations of the process parameters, deliver excellent results.
  • a correction can be carried out “offline.” As described, there is the optional possibility of performing an “online” correction taking into account the measured values as a controller working with or without feedback.
  • This feedback control can also be based on a calculation model that considers at least stress in the longitudinal and transverse directions and that, as calculation parameters, processes the strip thickness, the modulus of elasticity, the Poisson's ratio, the cyclical strength behavior of the strip, the tension in the strip, the roller radii and the geometry of the track of the strip about the rollers, and where a residual longitudinal or transverse curvature is assigned to a certain cross bow.
  • the described calculation models can be based on a finite element method that is able to consider stress and elongations also over the strip width. Based on the expected maximum strip nonplanarity or the nonplanarity measured before straightening, the plastically-elastically acting rollers' optimal stretch ratio and/or optimal horizontal spacings, which result in minimal residual nonplanarity, here in particular waviness and strip camber, can be calculated using the finite element method.
  • the invention is also an apparatus for continuously stretch-bend-leveling metal strips with a method of the described kind.
  • Such an apparatus has at least four bending rollers about that a strip under a tension below the elastic limit is bidirectionally bent in the plastic or elastic/plastic range.
  • Such an apparatus further comprises at least one controller working with or without feedback.
  • the invention proposes that the bending radii at all four straightening rollers can be set individually and independently of each other.
  • the invention preferably proposes that all four straightening rollers are connected to the controller and can be adjusted in a controlled manner.
  • the individual straightening rollers are each provided with one or a plurality of finely adjustable actuators, preferably screw jacks.
  • the diameter of one or a plurality or preferably all four straightening rollers is, for example, 15 mm to 150 mm, preferably 25 mm to 80 mm. It has already been explained that particularly preferred relatively large spacings between the individual straightening rollers are used in operation. Particularly preferred, the apparatus is configured such that these spacings are adjustable in that, for example, the position of at least one straightening roller along the strip travel direction can be variably set.
  • the immersion depths at given wrap angles become relatively large.
  • the stretch-bending stand usually has to be opened, that is, the rollers are moved apart. If the spacings traveled in the course of this are long, this process takes a long time. If in the case of a continuous line, the strip continues to run during this time, as a consequence, the unstraightened strip lengths around the joint become large. This is in principle undesirable.
  • the invention therefore proposes that upstream and/or downstream of at least one elastically/plastically acting straightening roller, an adjacent deflection roller is provided that preferably has at least three times the diameter, particularly preferred at least ten times the diameter of the straightening roller.
  • the deflection rollers have such a diameter that for at least a portion of the strip thickness range to be straightened only a purely elastic strip deformation occurs.
  • at least the last two rollers should be implemented without intermediate deflection rollers in order to achieve the highest possible accuracy when setting the wrap angle.
  • At least one of the adjacent deflection rollers has a concave or convex roller shape.
  • one of the two adjacent deflection rollers or also both adjacent deflection rollers can be equipped with a roller bending mechanism in the horizontal and/or vertical direction.
  • a shape-variable tensioning roller or deflection roller wrapped by at least 120° can be provided upstream of the first elastically/plastically acting straightening roller.
  • elastically/plastically acting straightening rollers can be supported against deflection by support rollers.
  • segmented support rollers can be used.
  • the elastically/plastically acting rollers can be supported against deflection by two rows of segmented support rollers or two intermediate rollers and three rows of segmented support rollers.
  • FIG. 1 is a simplified schematic view of an apparatus according to the invention for stretch-bend-leveling
  • FIG. 2 is a view like FIG. 1 showing a modified embodiment
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram of calculated residual longitudinal curvatures for a metal strip that has been straightened with an apparatus according to FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the residual longitudinal curvature produced by a conventional three-roller stand with a single adjustment.
  • the figures illustrate an apparatus for continuously stretch-bend-leveling metal strips 1 .
  • the apparatus has four straightening rollers 2 about which a strip 1 under a tension below the elastic limit is bidirectionally bent in the plastic or plastic-elastic range.
  • Each of the straightening rollers 2 is supported in a manner known per se by at least two support rollers 3 .
  • the strip 1 is under a tension below the elastic limit.
  • unillustrated tensioning rollers are provided, for example a set of brake rollers at the upstream end and a set of draw rollers at the upstream and downstream end.
  • the bending radii can be set for each of the four straightening rollers case individually or independently of each other.
  • all four straightening rollers 2 can be adjusted in a position-controlled manner by an unillustrated controller and a respective unillustrated actuator, for example screw jacks, namely in a direction V vertical to the strip travel direction R.
  • a respective unillustrated actuator for example screw jacks
  • the parameters and in particular the roller radii and the tension in the strip are adapted to each other in such a manner that the strip at all four straightening rollers does not quite conform to the roller radius. Accordingly, by controlling the adjustment depth and therefore by controlling the position and the resultant setting of the wrap angle, the respective bending radius can be varied.
  • no further rollers are provided between the four straightening rollers 2 . Only upstream and downstream of the entire straightening roller arrangement are there deflection rollers 4 .
  • FIG. 2 shows a modified embodiment in which one deflection roller 4 a is provided upstream and one deflection roller 4 b is downstream of each straightening roller 2 .
  • the positions of all four straightening rollers 2 can be varied in a position-controlled manner perpendicular to the strip travel direction R.
  • the embodiment according to FIG. 1 is in principle preferably used because, except for the elastically acting pass-line rollers at the upstream and downstream end, it does not need any further (purely elastically acting) rollers, the optional embodiment according to FIG. 2 can be of advantage. Combinations of the two embodiments are also possible.
  • the purely elastically acting deflection rollers it should be noted that they act elastically only in the case of thin and/or high-strength strips, for example aluminum in the strip thickness range below one millimeter. Moreover, they have an elastic/plastic effect, although a minor one, and can influence the straightening result with regard to residual curvature. If a stretch-bend-leveling stand is to cover a wider strip thickness range, it is particularly preferred that the deflection rollers are dispensed with.
  • the exact target positions of all four straightening rollers 2 are determined by a mathematical model.
  • a mathematical model that considers at least stress in the longitudinal and transverse directions and, as calculation parameters, processes the strip thickness, the modulus of elasticity, the Poisson's ratio, the cyclic strength behavior of the strip, the tension in the strip, the roller radii and the geometry of the strip track about the rollers, for which the target values of the strip thickness and the strength, for example the yield point, are calculated in such a manner that the residual longitudinal curvatures and the residual transverse curvatures become zero or at least almost zero.
  • the positions of the straightening rollers 2 can be exactly set. This opens the possibility, depending on the experimental results, to perform “offline” a correction of these positions.
  • the initially specified setting ensures that the residual curvature behavior is extremely resistant to fluctuations of the process parameters such as, in particular, the tension and the strength values and the strip thickness of the strip. Since in practice, a strip of a coil is usually subject to certain strength and thickness fluctuations and, moreover, the tension cannot always be exactly maintained, the residual curvatures obtained with the previously known methods were also subjected to significant fluctuations. This is avoided within the context of the invention.
  • the method according to the invention shows a particularly gentle residual curvature behavior. In this connection, reference is made to a comparison of FIGS. 3 and 4 .
  • FIG. 3 shows the residual longitudinal curvature k-L (in 1/m) as a function of the stretch ratio S (in %) for an aluminum strip that was straightened with an apparatus according to FIG. 1 .
  • These are calculated values generated with a mathematical model.
  • a yield point of 250 MPa with fluctuations of ⁇ 10 MPa and a strip thickness of 0.28 mm with fluctuations of ⁇ 0.05 mm were assumed.
  • the limit values of the residual longitudinal curvature of ⁇ 0.5 m ⁇ 1 considered as being permissible are also shown in the figure. It is apparent that the residual longitudinal curvature in the specified tolerance window lies within a rather large stretch-ratio range of 0.31 to 0.59%.
  • the fact that the residual longitudinal curvature fluctuates in a stretch ratio window of ⁇ 0.05% only by 0.15 m ⁇ 1 is remarkable.
  • the residual transverse curvatures not shown here are always smaller than the residual longitudinal curvatures.
  • the residual longitudinal curvatures within a stretch ratio window of 0.36 to 0.52% are limited to a negative range with very little fluctuations.
  • the residual curvature profile in the diagram can be shifted upward or downward. In this manner, a defined positive residual longitudinal curvature can be set.
  • FIG. 4 shows a corresponding simulation with a three-roller stand, where the individual rollers are likewise adjustable in a position-controlled manner.
  • the last four straightening rollers can be individually set according to the invention with regard to their wrap angles so that a gentle residual curvature behavior is achieved.
  • the absolute value of the residual transverse curvature is significantly lower than the one of the residual longitudinal curvature.
  • the residual longitudinal curvature of a plate cut out after straightening corresponds approximately to the transverse curvature of the strip measured in the stretch-bend-leveling machine with the strip under tension.
  • a simple method is to vary the wrap angle in the last elastically/plastically acting roller and thereby to shift the residual curvature profile shown in FIG. 3 upward or downward.
  • a closed feedback control system is also conceivable here.
  • measuring devices can be provided that are connected to a controller working with or without feedback. This is not illustrated in the figures.
  • the rollers With a finite element model, for example, the theoretically optimal cross bow downstream of each roller can be anticipated. Subsequently, the rollers can be set in such a manner that the measured cross bows match the calculated ones as well as possible. It can then be assumed that the actual straightening process deviates only minimally from the theoretically calculated one, and therefore also the straightening result is a good match.
  • the position-controlled adjustment (transverse to the strip travel direction) is preferably carried out by finely adjustable screw jacks.
  • fine adjustment works usually with an adjustment speed of 2 to 3 mm/sec.
  • the rollers are moved apart. If the distances to be traveled in the course of this are long, this process with the finely adjustable screw jacks takes a relatively long time.
  • the deflection rollers 4 a provided upstream and the deflection rollers 4 b provided downstream are provided in the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2 . In this manner, the adjustment spacings are considerably shortened.
  • the straightening rollers are also provided with a quick adjusting mechanism, for example with hydraulic or pneumatic cylinder actuators. It can be advantageous to provide one common quick adjusting mechanism for a plurality of straightening rollers. For example, in the embodiment according to FIG. 1 it can be advantageous to mount the first straightening roller and the third straightening roller on a common top frame that can be adjusted with one or a plurality of cylinder actuators.
  • the second straightening roller and the fourth straightening roller can be provided on a bottom frame that likewise can be displaced with one or a plurality of cylinder actuators.
  • the quick adjustment can be carried out, for example, between two dead stops for opening and closing the stretch-bend-leveling stand.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Straightening Metal Sheet-Like Bodies (AREA)
  • Registering, Tensioning, Guiding Webs, And Rollers Therefor (AREA)
  • Wire Processing (AREA)
  • Shaping Of Tube Ends By Bending Or Straightening (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a method and a device for continuously stretch-bend-leveling metal strips, wherein a strip under a tensile stress below the elastic limit is alternatingly bent about at least four straightening rollers in the plastic or elastic-plastic region and thereby undergoes plastic stretching. The bending radii of all four straightening rollers are thereby set dually and independently of each other, as the straightening rollers are set up having individually controlled positions.

Description

  • The invention relates to a method and an apparatus for stretch-bend-leveling metal strips, where a strip under tension below the elastic limit or the yield point is bidirectionally bent in the elastic/plastic range about at least four straightening rollers and thereby undergoes plastic stretching. The plastically or elastically/plastically acting rollers are also designated as stretch rollers. The amount by which the strip is (overall) plastically stretched and therefore elongated is called the stretch ratio.
  • With such a stretch-bend-leveling method, nonplanar metal strips can be straightened and therefore, nonplanarity can be eliminated. Nonplanarity means, for example, strip waviness and/or strip cambers that are a result of length differences of the strip fibers in the strip plane. However, nonplanarity also means strip curvature in the longitudinal and/or transverse direction that result from bending moments in the strip, for example if the strip was elastically/plastically bent about deflection rollers or is caused by elastic/plastic deformations when winding up the strip. Longitudinal curvatures are also designated as coil set; transverse curvatures are designated as cross bow. During stretch-bend-leveling, the nonplanar strip is bidirectionally bent about rollers with an appropriately small diameter and under a tension that lies below the elastic limit RE or the technical elastic limit Rp0.01 of the strip material so that with the superimposition of the tension with the bending, an elastic/plastic deformation in the strip is generated. The strip is plastically elongated by an the amount called the stretch ratio. In the case of the plastic elongation, the initially short strip fibers are elongated. In the ideal case, all strip fibers have the same length after straightening so that in theory an ideally straightened strip without waviness or strip camber is produced.
  • With the stretch-bend-leveling methods known from practice, it is in principle possible that after the straightening, due to the bidirectional bending in the elastic/plastic range, residual bending moments remain in the strip that can become visible as cross bow and, in the case of a cut-out sheet, can result in a plastic residual curvature in the longitudinal and/or transverse direction. The residual bending moments are caused if the individual bends are not optimally adapted to each other in terms of intensity. The bending radii depend on the strip parameters (thickness, modulus of elasticity, cyclic strength behavior, Poisson's ratio), the tension in the strip, the roller diameters and the geometry of the strip track directly engaging the rollers. In a first approximation, the geometry can be described as the wrap angle of the strip about the rollers. In the case of a sufficiently large wrap angle or a sufficient tension, the strip shapes to the radius of the roller. Then, the strip curvature reaches its maximum and remains constant while the wrap angle or the tension continues to increase. However, the wrap angles are usually set in such a manner that the strip, at least in the case of the last rollers in the stretch-bending stand, no longer conform to the roller radius. Even with an optimal setting of a specified stretch-bending stand, residual bending moments occur due to fluctuations of the process parameters. The reason for this is that, in practice, the tension and accordingly the stretch ratio as well as the strength values and the strip thickness are in principle subject to certain fluctuations. The stretch-bend-leveling methods known from practice are to a greater or lesser extent susceptible to such fluctuations. This means that in the case of the conventional stretch-bend-leveling methods, such fluctuations influence the remaining or generated residual curvatures to a greater or lesser extent. This applies also to stretch-bend-leveling methods in which the strip is elastically/plastically deformed about four straightening rollers.
  • For such stretch-bend-leveling stands having four straightening rollers it is known to set the geometry of the stretch-bend-leveling stand in order to achieve the best possible straightening results. For example, a stretch-bend-leveling stand with four straightening rollers is known from DE 696 08 937 T2 (EP 0 767 014 [U.S. Pat. No. 5,758,534]), where the upper straightening rollers as well as the lower straightening rollers can be changed with respect to their position. While the lower straightening rollers can be positioned with a certain accuracy via mechanical spindle drives for improving the straightening result, the upper straightening rollers are actuated hydraulically. In this manner, a desired overlap of the rollers is adjustable.
  • A similar configuration applies to the stretch-bend-leveling stands known from DE 695 14 010 T2 (EP 0 665 069 [U.S. Pat. No. 5,666,836]) and DE 38 85 019 T2 (EP 0 298 852 U.S. Pat. No. [4,898,013]).
  • The professional article “Benefits of a new leveler technology for packaging steels: MultiRoller Tension Leveler” (Emmanuel Dechassey, Irsid, Arcelor group, METEC Congress June 2003) describes in a similar manner a stretch-bend-leveling apparatus with four straightening rollers. The overlap of he first straightening unit (first and second rollers) and the overlap of the second straightening unit (third and fourth rollers) are adjustable.
  • DE 691 01 995 T2 (EP 0 446 130 [U.S. Pat. No. 5,127,249]) mentions also the possibility of changing the position of all four straightening rollers. However, this serves primarily for changing between a waiting position and a working position. The reason for this is that in the case of a stretch-bend-leveling stand, it is normally necessary to open the stand so that a joint between two coils or strips can pass through, and to subsequently close it again. In any case, practical experience has shown that the known stretch-bend-leveling stands and stretch-bend-leveling methods are relatively susceptible to fluctuations of the process parameters so that residual curvatures cannot be minimized in the desired manner.
  • In principle less susceptible to the process parameters are so-called multiroll levelers that are also designated as multiroller straightening apparatuses. During multiroller straightening, the strip is subjected to a multiplicity of bends about rollers having a small diameter. By using many rollers, the strip can be produced with minor residual curvatures. A disadvantage here is the fact that the multiplicity of rollers involve high expenditures for maintenance and spare parts. Moreover, the lower and the upper rollers are each frictionally engaged with each other via the support rollers or intermediate rollers and support rollers like a 1:1 gear. Since the strip, when running through the multiroller stand, is plastically elongated, the strip speed increases to the same extent. Thus, the strip runs synchronously only at one roller; between the other rollers and the strip, a slip occurs. The rollers in high-speed trip processing lines run often with high rotational speed. The slip can induce vibrations that can generate chatter marks on the strip surface. In practice, this is not acceptable for a variety of applications. For these reasons, conventional stretch-bend-leveling stands were combined with multiroller straightening units (cf. EP 0 665 069 B1 or DE 695 14 010).
  • Apart from this, DE 27 50 752 [GB 2,007,556] describes a method for straightening and for improving the quality properties of metal strips, in particular electrical strips, where the metal strip to be treated is bent without counter pressure and is subjected to a plastic alternating bending. While maintaining its plastic bending state, the metal strip is bent in a flat position, where the deflections of the metal strip following the last bending are carried out exclusively in the elastic or near-elastic range. Preferably, only two bending rollers without counter pressure rollers are implemented while positioning one or a plurality of deflection rollers therebetween or downstream thereof. It is also possible to provide a plurality of bending rollers. It is always important that the last bending is carried out with a plastic bending deformation as high as possible and subsequently, the metal strip is only bent elastically or predominantly elastically.
  • Based on the known prior art, it is an object of the invention to provide a stretch-bend-leveling method that, with low installation-related expenditures, delivers optimal flatness results and is in particular not susceptible to fluctuations of the process parameters (tension, strip strength and strip thickness). In addition, an apparatus shall be proposed that is characterized by a simple and cost-effective construction and yet delivers the desired results.
  • To achieve this object, the invention teaches for a generic method for continuously stretch-bend-leveling metal strips of the above-described kind that the bending radii are set at all four straightening rollers individually and independently of each other. For this, the invention proposes that all four bending rollers are adjusted in a controlled manner. If the strip is bidirectionally bent about more than four straightening rollers, the invention proposes that the bending radii at least of the last four rollers with regard to the strip travel direction are set individually and independently of each other by preferably adjusting at least the last four rollers individually in a controlled manner.
  • Studies using a calculation model that considers stress in the longitudinal and transverse directions and, as calculation parameters, considers the strip thickness, the modulus of elasticity, the Poisson's ratio, the cyclic strength behavior of the strip, the tension in the strip, the roller diameters and the geometry of the strip track about the rollers, have surprisingly shown that this method delivers excellent residual curvature results and is in particular relatively unsusceptible to fluctuations of the process parameters. Of particular importance is here that the four elastically/plastically acting bendings can be adjusted or are set independently of each other with a sufficient accuracy and in a position-controlled manner. The positions of the straightening rollers are then set with an accuracy as well as control accuracy that corresponds to an accuracy with regard to the wrap angles of the strip about the straightening rollers of ±0.05° or less, preferably ±0.02° or less. The wrap angles of the strip about one or a plurality of straightening rollers, preferably about all straightening rollers, can be 0.5° to 60°, preferably 1° to 35°. The (total) stretch ratio is, for example, 0.1% to 1.5%, preferably 0.2% to 0.6%. The tension in the strip is preferably approximately 30% to 60% of the elastic limit of the strip or the strip material.
  • The simulation calculations have shown that a two-roller configuration for stretch-bend leveling usually does not achieve the goal because the longitudinal and transverse bending moment curves as a function of the strip curvatures are not negatively mirror-imaged to each other as is the case for pure bending, but are shifted relative to each other due to tension. Thus, for correcting plastic strip curvatures in the longitudinal and transverse directions generated at the first roller, a single roller is not sufficient because with it only the longitudinal or the transverse bending moments can be balanced. The minimal number of rollers for generating an ideal strip without residual curvatures with given process parameters is therefore three. However, calculations have shown that the achieved residual bending moments or the elimination of such residual bending moments in a stretch-bend-leveling stand with three rollers is relatively susceptible to fluctuations of the process parameters. The same applies to a four-roller stand in which the individual rollers cannot be adjusted individually and independently of each other with the required accuracy. This problem is solved here by the method according to the invention in which the four rollers are adjusted individually and independently of each other in a position-controlled manner.
  • The invention further proposes that the spacing between at least two straightening rollers provided (directly) one behind the other (with regard to the travel direction of the strip) is at least 15% of the (maximum) strip width, for example at least 30% of the (maximum) strip width, particularly preferred at least 50% of the (maximum) strip width. It can be useful here if these spacings for all four straightening rollers are provided between each pair of two straightening rollers located (directly) one behind the other. For example, the spacings between two such immediately adjacent straightening rollers can be at least 150 mm, preferably at least 300 mm. Model-based studies have led to the surprising result that also through a suitable selection of the spacings between the elastically/plastically acting straightening rollers, the process-related differences of the stretch ratio over the strip width can be minimized or compensated. It was found that in general larger horizontal spacings have a beneficial effect. With a given maximal installation length of the stretch-bend-leveling stand it is useful to implement at least one spacing between elastically/plastically acting rollers with at least 30% of the maximum strip width, but at least with 500 mm. A decisive factor here is the spacing of the straightening rollers along the strip travel direction. In a horizontally designed stretch-bend-leveling stand, this corresponds to the horizontal spacing. However, a spacing in a diagonal or vertical direction can in principle also be meant, depending on the direction in which the strip is guided.
  • Depending on the spectrum of applications of the products to be straightened, different roller spacings are optimal so that a further improvement of the straightening results with regard to the waviness can be achieved if these spacings are variable or adjustable. Therefore, according to a further proposal of the invention that is independently important, the spacing in the strip travel direction between at least two straightening rollers is set or can be set in a variable manner. The optimal spacings for a certain strip can then be predetermined based on the model.
  • The invention further proposes that the target values for the position of the straightening rollers and/or the target values for the wrap angles of the strip about the straightening rollers are determined with a calculation model that considers at least stress in the longitudinal and transverse directions and, as calculation parameters, processes the strip thickness, the modulus of elasticity, the Poisson's ratio, the cyclic strength behavior of the strip, the tension in the strip, the roller radii and the geometry of the strip track about the rollers, for which the target values of the strip thickness and the strength, for example the yield point, are calculated such that the residual longitudinal curvature and the residual transverse curvature become zero or at least negligible. Thus, in the ideal case, strips with extremely small residual curvatures are generated. However, there is the optional possibility of determining the target values with the calculation model with the proviso that, on the one hand, an extremely small or negligible residual curvature value is achieved, but also that the residual curvatures take a defined value. The invention is based on the knowledge that there are in fact applications in which residual transverse curvatures have to be avoided completely, in which, however, certain residual longitudinal curvatures can be tolerated as long as they are present exclusively in one defined direction and therefore have only one defined sign.
  • Optionally, the invention further proposes that downstream of or behind one or a plurality of straightening rollers, for example downstream of the last straightening roller, particularly preferred downstream of each straightening roller, the cross bow of the strip over the strip width is measured. These measured cross bows can then be combined in a controller that, based on the measured values, corrects the wrap angles or roller positions in such a manner that a strip with a sufficiently small residual longitudinal and residual transverse curvature is generated.
  • Accordingly, the invention comprises in the first instance such embodiments for which the target values for the bending radii and therefore for the roller positions and/or the wrap angles are determined by a mathematical model, where the installation is then operated using these values. Simulations have shown that such approaches, even with certain fluctuations of the process parameters, deliver excellent results. Optionally, there is the possibility of correcting the target values during the startup of the installation or, where applicable, also during the operation, namely on the basis of experimentally obtained results. Such a correction can be carried out “offline.” As described, there is the optional possibility of performing an “online” correction taking into account the measured values as a controller working with or without feedback. This feedback control can also be based on a calculation model that considers at least stress in the longitudinal and transverse directions and that, as calculation parameters, processes the strip thickness, the modulus of elasticity, the Poisson's ratio, the cyclical strength behavior of the strip, the tension in the strip, the roller radii and the geometry of the track of the strip about the rollers, and where a residual longitudinal or transverse curvature is assigned to a certain cross bow.
  • The described calculation models can be based on a finite element method that is able to consider stress and elongations also over the strip width. Based on the expected maximum strip nonplanarity or the nonplanarity measured before straightening, the plastically-elastically acting rollers' optimal stretch ratio and/or optimal horizontal spacings, which result in minimal residual nonplanarity, here in particular waviness and strip camber, can be calculated using the finite element method.
  • The invention is also an apparatus for continuously stretch-bend-leveling metal strips with a method of the described kind. Such an apparatus has at least four bending rollers about that a strip under a tension below the elastic limit is bidirectionally bent in the plastic or elastic/plastic range. Such an apparatus further comprises at least one controller working with or without feedback. The invention proposes that the bending radii at all four straightening rollers can be set individually and independently of each other. For this purpose, the invention preferably proposes that all four straightening rollers are connected to the controller and can be adjusted in a controlled manner. For this, the individual straightening rollers are each provided with one or a plurality of finely adjustable actuators, preferably screw jacks. The diameter of one or a plurality or preferably all four straightening rollers is, for example, 15 mm to 150 mm, preferably 25 mm to 80 mm. It has already been explained that particularly preferred relatively large spacings between the individual straightening rollers are used in operation. Particularly preferred, the apparatus is configured such that these spacings are adjustable in that, for example, the position of at least one straightening roller along the strip travel direction can be variably set.
  • Another requirement for a straightening process, apart from having no residual curvature, is to minimize waviness/strip camber. Waviness present in the strip prior to straightening is to be eliminated and the straightening process itself should not generate new waviness. Stretch-bend-leveling involves the problem that the strip deforms elastically/plastically at the roller and thereby is plastically elongated. The plastic longitudinal elongation is accompanied by a plastic reduction of the strip width. This means the strip section immediately upstream of the roller is wider than the one immediately downstream of the roller. However, since the strip cannot rapidly change width, shear stresses develop in the strip plane that vary along the strip width and the strip length. The shear stresses in turn result in an overall uneven plastic deformation over the strip width, therefore in different plastic longitudinal elongations over the strip width and thus in waviness caused by the straightening process. This waviness is usually center waviness that increases with increasing stretch ratio. The model-based studies have led to the surprising result that these process-related differences of the stretch ratio in the strip width can be minimized or compensated by a suitable selection of the spacings between the elastically/plastically acting rollers. It was found that, in general, larger horizontal spacings have an advantageous effect. Depending on the spectrum of applications of the products to be straightened, different roller spacings are optimal so that a further improvement of the straightening result with regard to the waviness is achieved if at least one straightening roller is horizontally adjustable.
  • For large horizontal spacings of the elastically/plastically acting straightening rollers, the immersion depths at given wrap angles become relatively large. For passing through a joint between two coils, for example a punch connection or a welding seam, the stretch-bending stand usually has to be opened, that is, the rollers are moved apart. If the spacings traveled in the course of this are long, this process takes a long time. If in the case of a continuous line, the strip continues to run during this time, as a consequence, the unstraightened strip lengths around the joint become large. This is in principle undesirable. As an optional refinement, the invention therefore proposes that upstream and/or downstream of at least one elastically/plastically acting straightening roller, an adjacent deflection roller is provided that preferably has at least three times the diameter, particularly preferred at least ten times the diameter of the straightening roller. In this manner, the positioning spacings and therefore the unstraightened strip sections are significantly shortened. The deflection rollers have such a diameter that for at least a portion of the strip thickness range to be straightened only a purely elastic strip deformation occurs. Preferably, at least the last two rollers should be implemented without intermediate deflection rollers in order to achieve the highest possible accuracy when setting the wrap angle.
  • Moreover, it is possible that at least one of the adjacent deflection rollers has a concave or convex roller shape. Furthermore, one of the two adjacent deflection rollers or also both adjacent deflection rollers can be equipped with a roller bending mechanism in the horizontal and/or vertical direction. A shape-variable tensioning roller or deflection roller wrapped by at least 120° can be provided upstream of the first elastically/plastically acting straightening roller. With this measure it is achieved that at least at one elastically/plastically acting straightening roller, a certain tension distribution over the strip width is set so as to be able to influence the stretch ratio distribution over the strip width in such a manner that after straightening, a strip with the lowest possible residual waviness is obtained. Specifically, increasing the tension at the strip edges would counteract center waviness.
  • Apart from that, elastically/plastically acting straightening rollers can be supported against deflection by support rollers. For example, segmented support rollers can be used. For instance, the elastically/plastically acting rollers can be supported against deflection by two rows of segmented support rollers or two intermediate rollers and three rows of segmented support rollers.
  • In the following, the invention is explained in more detail with reference to a drawing illustrating one embodiment. In the figures:
  • FIG. 1 is a simplified schematic view of an apparatus according to the invention for stretch-bend-leveling,
  • FIG. 2 is a view like FIG. 1 showing a modified embodiment,
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram of calculated residual longitudinal curvatures for a metal strip that has been straightened with an apparatus according to FIG. 1, and
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the residual longitudinal curvature produced by a conventional three-roller stand with a single adjustment.
  • The figures illustrate an apparatus for continuously stretch-bend-leveling metal strips 1. In the illustrated embodiments, the apparatus has four straightening rollers 2 about which a strip 1 under a tension below the elastic limit is bidirectionally bent in the plastic or plastic-elastic range. Each of the straightening rollers 2 is supported in a manner known per se by at least two support rollers 3. The strip 1 is under a tension below the elastic limit. For this purpose, unillustrated tensioning rollers are provided, for example a set of brake rollers at the upstream end and a set of draw rollers at the upstream and downstream end.
  • According to the invention, the bending radii can be set for each of the four straightening rollers case individually or independently of each other. For this, all four straightening rollers 2 can be adjusted in a position-controlled manner by an unillustrated controller and a respective unillustrated actuator, for example screw jacks, namely in a direction V vertical to the strip travel direction R. This is indicated in the figures by the functional positions of the rollers 2 illustrated with dot-dash lines. The parameters and in particular the roller radii and the tension in the strip are adapted to each other in such a manner that the strip at all four straightening rollers does not quite conform to the roller radius. Accordingly, by controlling the adjustment depth and therefore by controlling the position and the resultant setting of the wrap angle, the respective bending radius can be varied.
  • In the embodiment according to FIG. 1, no further rollers are provided between the four straightening rollers 2. Only upstream and downstream of the entire straightening roller arrangement are there deflection rollers 4.
  • In contrast, FIG. 2 shows a modified embodiment in which one deflection roller 4 a is provided upstream and one deflection roller 4 b is downstream of each straightening roller 2. In this embodiment too, the positions of all four straightening rollers 2 can be varied in a position-controlled manner perpendicular to the strip travel direction R.
  • Although the embodiment according to FIG. 1 is in principle preferably used because, except for the elastically acting pass-line rollers at the upstream and downstream end, it does not need any further (purely elastically acting) rollers, the optional embodiment according to FIG. 2 can be of advantage. Combinations of the two embodiments are also possible. In terms of the purely elastically acting deflection rollers it should be noted that they act elastically only in the case of thin and/or high-strength strips, for example aluminum in the strip thickness range below one millimeter. Moreover, they have an elastic/plastic effect, although a minor one, and can influence the straightening result with regard to residual curvature. If a stretch-bend-leveling stand is to cover a wider strip thickness range, it is particularly preferred that the deflection rollers are dispensed with.
  • For the startup of such an installation, the exact target positions of all four straightening rollers 2 are determined by a mathematical model. When doing this, it is possible to first determine the target wrap angle with a calculation model that considers at least stress in the longitudinal and transverse directions and, as calculation parameters, processes the strip thickness, the modulus of elasticity, the Poisson's ratio, the cyclic strength behavior of the strip, the tension in the strip, the roller radii and the geometry of the strip track about the rollers, for which the target values of the strip thickness and the strength, for example the yield point, are calculated in such a manner that the residual longitudinal curvatures and the residual transverse curvatures become zero or at least almost zero. In this manner, the positions of the straightening rollers 2 can be exactly set. This opens the possibility, depending on the experimental results, to perform “offline” a correction of these positions.
  • Particularly important is the fact that the initially specified setting ensures that the residual curvature behavior is extremely resistant to fluctuations of the process parameters such as, in particular, the tension and the strength values and the strip thickness of the strip. Since in practice, a strip of a coil is usually subject to certain strength and thickness fluctuations and, moreover, the tension cannot always be exactly maintained, the residual curvatures obtained with the previously known methods were also subjected to significant fluctuations. This is avoided within the context of the invention. The method according to the invention shows a particularly gentle residual curvature behavior. In this connection, reference is made to a comparison of FIGS. 3 and 4.
  • FIG. 3 shows the residual longitudinal curvature k-L (in 1/m) as a function of the stretch ratio S (in %) for an aluminum strip that was straightened with an apparatus according to FIG. 1. These are calculated values generated with a mathematical model. In the illustrated embodiment, a yield point of 250 MPa with fluctuations of ±10 MPa and a strip thickness of 0.28 mm with fluctuations of ±0.05 mm were assumed. The limit values of the residual longitudinal curvature of ±0.5 m−1 considered as being permissible are also shown in the figure. It is apparent that the residual longitudinal curvature in the specified tolerance window lies within a rather large stretch-ratio range of 0.31 to 0.59%. Moreover, the fact that the residual longitudinal curvature fluctuates in a stretch ratio window of ±0.05% only by 0.15 m−1 is remarkable. The residual transverse curvatures not shown here are always smaller than the residual longitudinal curvatures.
  • Furthermore, the residual longitudinal curvatures within a stretch ratio window of 0.36 to 0.52% are limited to a negative range with very little fluctuations. By adapting the wrap angle at the last roller, the residual curvature profile in the diagram can be shifted upward or downward. In this manner, a defined positive residual longitudinal curvature can be set.
  • In comparison, FIG. 4 shows a corresponding simulation with a three-roller stand, where the individual rollers are likewise adjustable in a position-controlled manner. It is apparent that in the case of fluctuations of the stretch ratio, the residual longitudinal curvature fluctuates in a significantly wider range. The limit value is met only in a range for the stretch ratio of 0.33 to 0.36%. In practice, for example in acceleration and deceleration phases, this can hardly be allowed for.
  • Apart from that, it is overall remarkable that the described results are achieved with relatively few straightening rollers so that overall the installation is characterized by a simple and cost-effective construction.
  • If a variant is operated with more than four straightening rollers, at least the last four straightening rollers can be individually set according to the invention with regard to their wrap angles so that a gentle residual curvature behavior is achieved. When selecting suitable wrap angles with the method according to the invention, the absolute value of the residual transverse curvature is significantly lower than the one of the residual longitudinal curvature. Thus the residual longitudinal curvature of a plate cut out after straightening corresponds approximately to the transverse curvature of the strip measured in the stretch-bend-leveling machine with the strip under tension. It is therefore optionally proposed to measure the cross bow at least at the downstream end, and from the measured value to conclude the residual longitudinal curvature and in the case of a deviation from the desired value, to change the setting of the wrap angle and therefore also the position until the cross bow corresponding to the desired residual longitudinal curvature is obtained.
  • A simple method is to vary the wrap angle in the last elastically/plastically acting roller and thereby to shift the residual curvature profile shown in FIG. 3 upward or downward. Also conceivable here is a closed feedback control system. Furthermore, it can make sense to measure the cross bow after each elastic/plastic bending in order to optimize the setting of all wrap angles and to be able to compare it with the calculation model. For this, measuring devices can be provided that are connected to a controller working with or without feedback. This is not illustrated in the figures. With a finite element model, for example, the theoretically optimal cross bow downstream of each roller can be anticipated. Subsequently, the rollers can be set in such a manner that the measured cross bows match the calculated ones as well as possible. It can then be assumed that the actual straightening process deviates only minimally from the theoretically calculated one, and therefore also the straightening result is a good match.
  • As already explained, the position-controlled adjustment (transverse to the strip travel direction) is preferably carried out by finely adjustable screw jacks. Such a fine adjustment works usually with an adjustment speed of 2 to 3 mm/sec. For passing through a joint of two coils, for example a punch connection or a welding seam, it can optionally be useful to open the stretch-bending stand, that is, the rollers are moved apart. If the distances to be traveled in the course of this are long, this process with the finely adjustable screw jacks takes a relatively long time. For this reason, the deflection rollers 4 a provided upstream and the deflection rollers 4 b provided downstream are provided in the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2. In this manner, the adjustment spacings are considerably shortened.
  • Alternatively or additionally, there is the possibility of providing, in addition the fine adjustment (via for example screw jacks), a quick adjusting mechanism. This possibility is suitable in particular for the embodiment according to FIG. 1, but can in principle also be provided for the embodiment according to FIG. 2. In this case, the straightening rollers are also provided with a quick adjusting mechanism, for example with hydraulic or pneumatic cylinder actuators. It can be advantageous to provide one common quick adjusting mechanism for a plurality of straightening rollers. For example, in the embodiment according to FIG. 1 it can be advantageous to mount the first straightening roller and the third straightening roller on a common top frame that can be adjusted with one or a plurality of cylinder actuators. Correspondingly, the second straightening roller and the fourth straightening roller can be provided on a bottom frame that likewise can be displaced with one or a plurality of cylinder actuators. The quick adjustment can be carried out, for example, between two dead stops for opening and closing the stretch-bend-leveling stand. These possibilities are not illustrated in the figures.

Claims (31)

1. A method for continuously stretch-bend-leveling metal strips, where a strip under tension below the elastic limit is bidirectionally bent in the plastic or elastic range about at least four straightening rollers and thereby undergoes plastic stretching, wherein
the bending radii at all four straightening rollers are set individually and independently of each other.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein for setting the bending radii, all four straightening rollers are adjusted in a position-controlled manner.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the strip is bent about more than four straightening rollers, wherein the bending radii, at least at the last four straightening rollers, are set individually and independently of each other by individually adjusting preferably at least the last four straightening rollers in a position-controlled manner.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the positions of the straightening rollers are set with an accuracy, for example control accuracy, which corresponds to an accuracy with regard to the wrap angles of the strip about the straightening rollers of ±0.05° or less, preferably ±0.02° or less.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the wrap angles of the strip about one or a plurality of straightening rollers, preferably about all four straightening rollers are 0.5° to 60°.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the stretch ratio is 0.1% to 1.5%.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the tension in the strip is 10% to 90% of the elastic limit of the strip or the strip material.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the spacing between at least two straightening rollers provided one behind the other with regard to the travel direction of the strip is at least 15% of the maximum strip width.
9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the spacing between two straightening rollers provided one behind the other is at least 150 mm.
10. The method according to claim 8, wherein the spacing between two straightening rollers provided one behind the other is provided at all four straightening rollers.
11. The method for continuously stretch-bend-leveling metal strips, wherein a strip under tension below the elastic limit is bidirectionally bent in the plastic or elastic range about at least four straightening rollers and thereby undergoes plastic stretching according to claim 1, wherein the spacing in the travel direction of the strip between at least two straightening rollers is set in a variable manner.
12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the target values for the positions of the straightening rollers or the target values for the wrap angles of the strip about the straightening rollers are determined with a calculation model that takes into account at least stress in longitudinal and transverse directions and, as calculation parameters, processes the strip thickness, the modulus of elasticity, the Poisson's ratio, the cyclic strength behavior of the strip, the tension in the strip, the roller radii or the geometry of the strip track about the rollers, or the target values of the strip thickness or the yield strength.
13. The method according to claim 12, wherein the target values are determined with the calculation model with the proviso that the residual longitudinal curvature and the residual transverse curvature becomes zero.
14. The method according to claim 12, wherein the target values are determined with the calculation model with the proviso that the residual curvature becomes zero and the residual longitudinal curvature takes a defined value.
15. The method according to claim 1, wherein downstream of one or a plurality of straightening rollers the cross bow of the strip over the strip width is measured.
16. The method according to claim 15, wherein the feedback control of the position or wrap angle is carried out taking into account the obtained measured values for the cross bow.
17. The method according to claim 16, wherein the feedback control is based on a calculation model that considers at least stress in the longitudinal and transverse directions and, as calculation parameters, processes the strip thickness, the modulus of elasticity, the Poisson's ratio, the cyclic strength behavior of the strip, the tension in the strip, the roller radii and the geometry of the strip track about the rollers, and a certain cross bow is associated with a residual longitudinal or transverse curvature.
18. The method according to claim 1, wherein the calculation model or the calculation models is/are based on the finite element method by the expected maximum nonplanarity of the strip or the nonplanarity of the strip measured prior to straightening, the optimal stretch ratio or the elastically/plastically acting straightening rollers' optimal horizontal spacings, which result in the minimal residual nonplanarity, are calculated using the finite element methods.
19. An apparatus for continuously stretch-bend-leveling metal strips according to a method according to claim 1, comprising at least four straightening rollers about which a strip under tension below the elastic limit is bidirectionally bent in the plastic or elastic/plastic range, and further comprising at least one controller working with or without feedback, wherein
the bending radii at all four straightening rollers can be set individually and independently of each other.
20. The apparatus according to claim 19, wherein all four straightening rollers are connected to a controller and can be adjusted in a position-controlled manner.
21. The apparatus according to claim 19, wherein the diameters of one or a plurality of straightening rollers and preferably all four straightening rollers are 15 mm to 150 mm.
22. The apparatus according to claim 19, wherein of the four straightening rollers at least the last two straightening rollers are provided directly one behind the other without interposing further rollers.
23. The apparatus according to claim 22, wherein the four straightening rollers are provided directly one behind the other without interposition of further rollers.
24. The apparatus for continuously stretch-bend-leveling metal strips according to a method according to claim 1, comprising a plurality of straightening rollers about which a strip under tension below an elastic limit is bidirectionally bent in the plastic or elastic/plastic range wherein the spacing between at least two straightening rollers can be variably set in the travel direction of the strip.
25. The apparatus according to claim 24, wherein the position of at least one straightening roller, preferably of all straightening rollers along the strip travel direction can be set.
26. The apparatus according to claim 19, wherein upstream or downstream of at least one straightening roller, an adjacent deflection roller is provided, the deflection roller or the deflection rollers preferably having three times the diameter of the straightening roller.
27. The apparatus according to claim 26, wherein the upstream deflection roller or the downstream deflection roller has a concave or convex roller shape.
28. The apparatus according to claim 26, wherein the upstream deflection roller or the downstream deflection roller is equipped with a roller bending mechanism in the horizontal or vertical direction.
29. The apparatus according to claim 19, wherein upstream of the first straightening roller a shape-variable tensioning roller or deflection roller is provided that is wrapped by the metal strip for example by at least 120°.
30. The apparatus according to claim 19, wherein the straightening rollers can be adjusted by actuators.
31. The apparatus according to claim 19, wherein individual position-adjustable straightening rollers or each of a plurality of position-adjustable straightening rollers are commonly and additionally provided with a quick adjusting mechanism.
US13/389,841 2009-09-18 2010-09-10 Method and device for continuously stretch-bend-leveling metal strips Abandoned US20120174643A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102009041852A DE102009041852A1 (en) 2009-09-18 2009-09-18 Method and apparatus for continuous stretch bending of metal strips
DE102009041852.0 2009-09-18
PCT/EP2010/063284 WO2011032890A1 (en) 2009-09-18 2010-09-10 Method and device for continuously stretch-bend-leveling metal strips

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120174643A1 true US20120174643A1 (en) 2012-07-12

Family

ID=43414062

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/389,841 Abandoned US20120174643A1 (en) 2009-09-18 2010-09-10 Method and device for continuously stretch-bend-leveling metal strips

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US20120174643A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2477764B1 (en)
KR (1) KR101651313B1 (en)
CN (1) CN102548681B (en)
DE (1) DE102009041852A1 (en)
ES (1) ES2574616T3 (en)
RU (1) RU2540286C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2011032890A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150013417A1 (en) * 2013-06-14 2015-01-15 Andreas Noe Method and apparatus for stretch-leveling metal strip
WO2017100264A1 (en) 2015-12-08 2017-06-15 The American University In Cairo Shear enhanced rolling (ser). a method to improve grain size uniformity in rolled alloy billets.
US20180318895A1 (en) * 2015-11-10 2018-11-08 Primetals Technologies France SAS Method for measuring the flatness of a metal product and associated device
WO2022119901A1 (en) * 2020-12-01 2022-06-09 Magna International Inc. Wave roll die assembly

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2013160566A1 (en) 2012-04-25 2013-10-31 Arcelormittal Investigacion Y Desarrollo, S.L. Method for producing a metal sheet having oiled zn-al-mg coatings, and corresponding metal sheet
DE102012020444B4 (en) * 2012-10-18 2015-01-22 Vdeh-Betriebsforschungsinstitut Gmbh Method for determining the tensile strength of a strip in a straightening machine and tensile softness sensor
CN103316964A (en) * 2013-06-26 2013-09-25 江苏亨特宏业重工有限公司 Stretch bending straightening unit control system of aluminum tape processing equipment
DE102016106208A1 (en) 2016-04-05 2017-10-05 Bwg Bergwerk- Und Walzwerk-Maschinenbau Gmbh Method for stretch bending of a strip
CN105880315A (en) * 2016-06-14 2016-08-24 佛山市荣星数控设备制造有限公司 Circuit structure for withdrawal and straightening machine
DE102016121448B4 (en) * 2016-11-09 2018-08-30 Bwg Bergwerk- Und Walzwerk-Maschinenbau Gmbh Method and device for stretch bending of a metal strip
EP3437749A1 (en) * 2017-08-04 2019-02-06 Primetals Technologies France SAS Multi-roller flattener of a metal strip
CN109513795B (en) * 2018-12-29 2024-03-15 西南铝业(集团)有限责任公司 Ultra-large-size section bar stretching and straightening equipment for spaceflight and filling piece
CN109991163B (en) * 2019-04-22 2021-12-21 湖南继兴科技有限公司 Adhesive detection equipment
USD1001927S1 (en) 2020-04-21 2023-10-17 Ekaterina Dominguez Set of resistance bands with handles
CN113699341B (en) * 2021-10-29 2021-12-31 宁波德洲精密电子有限公司 Lead frame material internal stress adjustment and leveling equipment
CN116910944B (en) * 2023-09-13 2023-12-26 中基科技(武汉)有限公司 Technological parameter determining method and device of marine profile straightening machine and electronic equipment

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4539830A (en) * 1982-09-15 1985-09-10 Bwg Bergwerk-Und Walzwerk-Maschinenbau Gmbh System for making thin metal strip
US5329798A (en) * 1989-09-18 1994-07-19 Hitachi, Ltd. Leveling device and leveling method
US5687595A (en) * 1995-06-03 1997-11-18 Bwg Bergwerk- Und Walzwerk-Maschinenbau Gmbh Method of and apparatus for correcting curvature of rolled metal strip
US5704237A (en) * 1995-03-14 1998-01-06 Bwg Bergwerk- Und Walzwerk- Maschinenbau Gmbh Apparatus for continuously leveling thin metal strip
US20020174699A1 (en) * 2001-05-22 2002-11-28 Bwg Bergwerk- Und Walzwerk-Maschinenbau Gmbh Method of and apparatus for eliminating crossbow in metal strip
US7185519B2 (en) * 2003-09-15 2007-03-06 The Bradbury Company, Inc. Methods and apparatus for monitoring and conditioning strip material

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SU712173A1 (en) * 1977-06-01 1980-01-30 Славянский Филиал Всесоюзного Ордена Ленина Научно-Исследовательского И Проектно- Конструкторского Института Металлургического Машиностроения Apparatus for straightening rolled sheets by extension with bending
DE2750752B2 (en) * 1977-11-12 1980-08-28 Bwg Bergwerk- Und Walzwerk-Maschinenbau Gmbh, 4100 Duisburg Method and device for straightening and improving the quality properties of metal strips, in particular electrical strips
JPS62238022A (en) * 1986-04-10 1987-10-19 Nippon Steel Corp Operation method for tension leveler
FR2617744B1 (en) 1987-07-08 1994-05-20 Clecim METHOD AND INSTALLATION FOR FLOORING A METAL STRIP
SU1690887A1 (en) * 1989-07-04 1991-11-15 Донецкий научно-исследовательский институт черной металлургии Method for straightening of rolled sheets
FR2659254B1 (en) 1990-03-09 1992-07-10 Clecim Sa SHEET FLOORING INSTALLATION.
JPH05177256A (en) * 1991-12-28 1993-07-20 Noriyoshi Miyamoto Device for straightening deflection of coiled stock
FR2715592B1 (en) 1994-02-01 1996-04-12 Clecim Sa Method and installation for leveling a thin metal strip.
FR2739578B1 (en) * 1995-10-06 1998-01-02 Clecim Sa PARALLEL CYLINDER PLANER
RU2177849C2 (en) * 1999-12-28 2002-01-10 Открытое акционерное общество "Уральский завод тяжелого машиностроения" Method for continuously straightening rolled products
JP3924276B2 (en) * 2003-10-21 2007-06-06 新日本製鐵株式会社 Straightening method for thin wide plate
DE102004041732A1 (en) * 2004-08-28 2006-03-02 Sms Demag Ag Method of straightening a metal strip and straightening machine
DE102008024013B3 (en) * 2008-05-16 2009-08-20 Bwg Bergwerk- Und Walzwerk-Maschinenbau Gmbh Method and device for straightening a metal strip

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4539830A (en) * 1982-09-15 1985-09-10 Bwg Bergwerk-Und Walzwerk-Maschinenbau Gmbh System for making thin metal strip
US5329798A (en) * 1989-09-18 1994-07-19 Hitachi, Ltd. Leveling device and leveling method
US5704237A (en) * 1995-03-14 1998-01-06 Bwg Bergwerk- Und Walzwerk- Maschinenbau Gmbh Apparatus for continuously leveling thin metal strip
US5687595A (en) * 1995-06-03 1997-11-18 Bwg Bergwerk- Und Walzwerk-Maschinenbau Gmbh Method of and apparatus for correcting curvature of rolled metal strip
US20020174699A1 (en) * 2001-05-22 2002-11-28 Bwg Bergwerk- Und Walzwerk-Maschinenbau Gmbh Method of and apparatus for eliminating crossbow in metal strip
US7185519B2 (en) * 2003-09-15 2007-03-06 The Bradbury Company, Inc. Methods and apparatus for monitoring and conditioning strip material

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150013417A1 (en) * 2013-06-14 2015-01-15 Andreas Noe Method and apparatus for stretch-leveling metal strip
EP2813299B1 (en) 2013-06-14 2017-01-25 Bwg Bergwerk- Und Walzwerk-Maschinenbau Gmbh Method and device for aligning metal strips by stretch bending
US9604270B2 (en) * 2013-06-14 2017-03-28 BWG Bergwerk—und Walzwerk—Maschinenbau GmbH Method and apparatus for stretch-leveling metal strip
US20180318895A1 (en) * 2015-11-10 2018-11-08 Primetals Technologies France SAS Method for measuring the flatness of a metal product and associated device
AU2016353955B2 (en) * 2015-11-10 2021-11-25 Clecim SAS Method for measuring the flatness of a metal product and associated device
US11235365B2 (en) * 2015-11-10 2022-02-01 Clecim S.A.S. Method for measuring the flatness of a metal product and associated device
WO2017100264A1 (en) 2015-12-08 2017-06-15 The American University In Cairo Shear enhanced rolling (ser). a method to improve grain size uniformity in rolled alloy billets.
CN108885159A (en) * 2015-12-08 2018-11-23 开罗美国大学 Rolling (SER), a kind of method for improving particle size uniformity in rolled alloy blank are strengthened in shearing
EP3387410A4 (en) * 2015-12-08 2019-12-04 The American University in Cairo Shear enhanced rolling (ser). a method to improve grain size uniformity in rolled alloy billets.
WO2022119901A1 (en) * 2020-12-01 2022-06-09 Magna International Inc. Wave roll die assembly

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
RU2540286C2 (en) 2015-02-10
KR101651313B1 (en) 2016-08-25
RU2012115467A (en) 2013-10-27
KR20120069692A (en) 2012-06-28
WO2011032890A1 (en) 2011-03-24
ES2574616T3 (en) 2016-06-21
EP2477764A1 (en) 2012-07-25
CN102548681A (en) 2012-07-04
EP2477764B1 (en) 2016-04-20
CN102548681B (en) 2015-11-25
DE102009041852A1 (en) 2011-04-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20120174643A1 (en) Method and device for continuously stretch-bend-leveling metal strips
US8291738B2 (en) Method of and apparatus for leveling strip
RU2395359C2 (en) Facility for flattening metal bands and procedure for flattening metal bands
US9604270B2 (en) Method and apparatus for stretch-leveling metal strip
EP3150294B1 (en) Cut-to-length steel coil processing line with stretcher leveler and temper mill and method
US9174257B2 (en) Stretch-bending straightener
KR102469251B1 (en) Systems and methods for controlling flatness of a metal substrate with low pressure rolling
US20120028068A1 (en) Method for producing profiled metal sheets
CA2835680C (en) Method and apparatus for producing metal sections with a closely toleranced chamber dimension
JP3802727B2 (en) Shape steel straightening method and apparatus
JP2003154410A (en) Method and device for straightening shape excellent in dimensional shape of cross section and straightness over entire length
US9956600B2 (en) Universal dies of controllable curvature
US11883867B2 (en) Roll line
JPH0351493B2 (en)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BWG BERGWERK-UND WALZWERK-MASCHINENBAU GMBH, GERMA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NOE, ANDREAS;REEL/FRAME:027840/0194

Effective date: 20120306

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION