US20120082756A1 - Preparation of Dough or Baked Products - Google Patents

Preparation of Dough or Baked Products Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20120082756A1
US20120082756A1 US13/310,011 US201113310011A US2012082756A1 US 20120082756 A1 US20120082756 A1 US 20120082756A1 US 201113310011 A US201113310011 A US 201113310011A US 2012082756 A1 US2012082756 A1 US 2012082756A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
dough
enzyme
variant
phospholipase
combination
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/310,011
Inventor
Gitte Budolfsen
Luise Christiansen
Todd Forman
Tina Spendler
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Novozymes AS
Original Assignee
Novozymes AS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Novozymes AS filed Critical Novozymes AS
Priority to US13/310,011 priority Critical patent/US20120082756A1/en
Publication of US20120082756A1 publication Critical patent/US20120082756A1/en
Priority to US13/964,164 priority patent/US9247753B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A21BAKING; EDIBLE DOUGHS
    • A21DTREATMENT, e.g. PRESERVATION, OF FLOUR OR DOUGH, e.g. BY ADDITION OF MATERIALS; BAKING; BAKERY PRODUCTS; PRESERVATION THEREOF
    • A21D8/00Methods for preparing or baking dough
    • A21D8/02Methods for preparing dough; Treating dough prior to baking
    • A21D8/04Methods for preparing dough; Treating dough prior to baking treating dough with microorganisms or enzymes
    • A21D8/042Methods for preparing dough; Treating dough prior to baking treating dough with microorganisms or enzymes with enzymes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11BPRODUCING, e.g. BY PRESSING RAW MATERIALS OR BY EXTRACTION FROM WASTE MATERIALS, REFINING OR PRESERVING FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES, e.g. LANOLIN, FATTY OILS OR WAXES; ESSENTIAL OILS; PERFUMES
    • C11B3/00Refining fats or fatty oils
    • C11B3/003Refining fats or fatty oils by enzymes or microorganisms, living or dead
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/14Hydrolases (3)
    • C12N9/16Hydrolases (3) acting on ester bonds (3.1)
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/14Hydrolases (3)
    • C12N9/16Hydrolases (3) acting on ester bonds (3.1)
    • C12N9/18Carboxylic ester hydrolases (3.1.1)
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/14Hydrolases (3)
    • C12N9/16Hydrolases (3) acting on ester bonds (3.1)
    • C12N9/18Carboxylic ester hydrolases (3.1.1)
    • C12N9/20Triglyceride splitting, e.g. by means of lipase
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12YENZYMES
    • C12Y301/00Hydrolases acting on ester bonds (3.1)
    • C12Y301/01Carboxylic ester hydrolases (3.1.1)
    • C12Y301/01003Triacylglycerol lipase (3.1.1.3)
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12YENZYMES
    • C12Y301/00Hydrolases acting on ester bonds (3.1)
    • C12Y301/01Carboxylic ester hydrolases (3.1.1)
    • C12Y301/01004Phospholipase A2 (3.1.1.4)
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12YENZYMES
    • C12Y301/00Hydrolases acting on ester bonds (3.1)
    • C12Y301/01Carboxylic ester hydrolases (3.1.1)
    • C12Y301/01026Galactolipase (3.1.1.26)
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12YENZYMES
    • C12Y301/00Hydrolases acting on ester bonds (3.1)
    • C12Y301/01Carboxylic ester hydrolases (3.1.1)
    • C12Y301/01032Phospholipase A1 (3.1.1.32)

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to methods of preparing a dough or a baked product made from dough by use of lipolytic enzymes, and to compositions for use therein.
  • WO 94/04035 EP 109244, EP 585988, WO 98/26057, WO 98/45453, WO 99/53769, WO 00/32758 and EP 575133 describe the addition of various lipolytic enzymes to dough in the preparation of bread, e.g. enzymes with activities such as triacylglycerol lipase, phospholipase and galactolipase.
  • the inventors have found that the addition to dough of a combination of two lipolytic enzymes with different substrate specificities produces a synergistic effect on the dough or on a baked product made from the dough, particularly a larger loaf volume of the baked product and/or a better shape retention during baking.
  • the invention provides a method of preparing a dough or a baked product made from dough, comprising adding a combination of two lipolytic enzymes to the dough.
  • the invention also provides a composition comprising a combination of two lipolytic enzymes.
  • the combination may comprise at least two lipolytic enzymes selected from the group consisting of galactolipase, phospholipase and triacylglycerol lipase.
  • the combination may comprise a galactolipase+a phospholipase, a phospholipase+a triacylglycerol lipase or a triacylglycerol lipase+a galactolipase.
  • the invention uses a combination of lipolytic enzymes, i.e. enzymes which are capable of hydrolyzing carboxylic ester bonds to release carboxylate (EC 3.1.1).
  • the enzyme combination includes at least two of the following three: a galactolipase, a phospholipase and a triacylglycerol lipase, i.e. enzymes predominantly having activity for a galactolipids, a phospholipid, and a triglyceride, respectively.
  • the activities may be determined by any suitable method, e.g. by assays known in the art or described later in this specification.
  • Galactolipase activity (EC 3.1.1.26), i.e. hydrolytic activity on carboxylic ester bonds in galactolipids such as DGDG (digalactosyl diglyceride).
  • the galactolipase activity may be determined, e.g., by the plate assay in this specification or by the monolayer assay 1 or 2 in WO 2000/32758.
  • Phospholipase activity (A1 or A2, EC 3.1.1.32 or 3.1.1.4), i.e. hydrolytic activity towards one or both carboxylic ester bonds in phospholipids such as lecithin.
  • the phospholipase activity may be determined by the plate assay in this specification or by an assay WO 2000/32758, e.g. the PHLU, LEU, monolayer or plate assay 1 or 2.
  • Triacylglycerol lipase activity (EC 3.1.1.3), i.e. hydrolytic activity for carboxylic ester bonds in triglycerides, e.g. 1,3-specific activity, particularly on long-chain triglycerides such as olive oil.
  • the activity on long-chain triglycerides (olive oil) and short-chain triglycerides (tributyrin) may be determined by the SLU and LU methods (described in WO 00/32758), respectively, or by the plate assay described in this specification.
  • the enzyme may have a substrate specificity for hydrolyzing long-chain fatty acyl groups rather than short-chain groups, expressed e.g.
  • this ratio may reduce the development of off-odor in dough containing milk lipids such as butter fat.
  • this ratio may be above 3.
  • Each lipolytic enzyme may have a narrow specificity with activity for one of the three substrates and little or no activity for the other two, or it may have a broader specificity with predominant activity for one substrate and less activity for the other two substrates.
  • a lipolytic enzyme is considered to be a galactolipase if it has a higher activity on galactolipids than on phospholipids and triglycerides. Similarly, it is considered to be a phospholipase or a triacylglycerol lipase if it has a higher activity for that substrate than for the other two.
  • the comparison may be done, e.g., by the plate assay in this specification using the three substrates; the largest clearing zone indicating the predominant activity.
  • the enzyme combination may comprise three or more lipolytic enzymes, e.g. comprising a galactolipase, a phospholipase and a triacylglycerol lipase.
  • the enzyme combination may have low activity on partially hydrolyzed lipids such as digalactosyl monoglyceride (DGMG), lysophospholipids (LPL) and mono- and diglycerides (MG, DG).
  • DGMG digalactosyl monoglyceride
  • LPL lysophospholipids
  • MG, DG mono- and diglycerides
  • this may lead to accumulation of such partially hydrolyzed lipids in the dough and may improve the properties of the dough and/or the baked product.
  • the lipolytic enzymes may be prokaryotic, particularly bacterial, e.g. from Pseudomonas or Bacillus .
  • the lipolytic enzymes may be eukaryotic, e.g. from fungal or animal sources.
  • Fungal lipolytic enzymes may be derived, e.g. from the following genera or species: Thermomyces , particularly T. lanuginosus (also known as Humicola lanuginosa ); Humicola , particularly H. insolens; Fusarium , particularly F. oxysporum, F. solani , and F. heterosporum; Aspergillus , particularly A. tubigensis, A. niger , and A. oryzae; Rhizomucor; Candida , particularly C. antarctica; Penicillium , particularly P. camembertii; Rhizopus , particularly Rhizopus oryzae ; or Absidia.
  • lipolytic enzymes Some particular examples of lipolytic enzymes follow:
  • the lipolytic enzymes may have a temperature optimum in the range of 30-90° C., e.g. 30-70° C.
  • the combination of the two lipolytic enzymes has a synergistic effect on dough made with the combination or on a baked product made from the dough, particularly improved dough stabilization, i.e. a larger loaf volume of the baked product and/or a better shape retention during baking, particularly in a stressed system, e.g. in the case of over-proofing or over-mixing.
  • the synergistic effect on the baked product may include a lower initial firmness and/or a more uniform and fine crumb, improved crumb structure (finer crumb, thinner cell walls, more rounded cells), of the baked product, Additionally or alternatively, there may be a synergistic effect on dough properties, e.g. a less soft dough, higher elasticity, lower extensibility.
  • Synergy may be determined by making doughs or baked products with addition of the first and the second lipolytic enzyme separately and in combination, and comparing the effects; synergy is indicated when the combination produces a better effect than each enzyme used separately.
  • the comparison may be made between the combination and each enzyme alone at double dosage (on the basis of enzyme protein or enzyme activity).
  • synergy may be said to occur if the effect of 0.5 mg of enzyme A+1.0 mg of enzyme B is greater than the effect with 1.0 mg of enzyme A and also greater than the effect with 2.0 mg of enzyme B.
  • the comparison may be made with equal total enzyme dosages (as pure enzyme protein). If the effect with the combination is greater than with either enzyme alone, this may be taken as an indication of synergy. As an example, synergy may be said to occur if the effect of 0.5 mg of enzyme A+1.0 mg of enzyme B is greater than with 1.5 mg of enzyme A or B alone.
  • Suitable dosages for the enzymes may typically be found in the range 0.01-10 mg of enzyme protein per kg of flour, particularly 0.1-5 mg/kg, e.g. 0.2-1 mg/kg.
  • Suitable dosages for each of the two enzymes in the combination may be found by first determining a suitable dosage for each enzyme alone (e.g. the optimum dosage, i.e. the dosage producing the greatest effect) and using 30-67% (e.g. 33-50%, particularly 50%) of that dosage for each enzyme in the combination. Again, if the effect with the combination is greater than with either enzyme used separately, this is taken as an indication of synergy.
  • a lipolytic enzyme with phospholipase activity may be used at a dosage of 200-5000 LEU/kg of flour, e.g. 500-2000 LEU/kg.
  • the LEU activity unit is described in WO 99/53769.
  • a lipolytic enzyme with triacylglycerol lipase activity may be used at a dosage of 20-1000 LU/kg of flour, particularly 50-500 LU/kg.
  • the LU method is described in WO 2000/32758.
  • an additional enzyme may be used together with the lipolytic enzymes.
  • the additional enzyme may be an amylase, particularly an anti-staling amylase, an amyloglucosidase, a cyclodextrin glucanotransferase, or the additional enzyme may be a peptidase, in particular an exopeptidase, a transglutaminase, a cellulase, a hemicellulase, in particular a pentosanase such as xylanase, a protease, a protein disulfide isomerase, e.g., a protein disulfide isomerase as disclosed in WO 95/00636, a glycosyltransferase, a branching enzyme (1,4- ⁇ -glucan branching enzyme), a 4- ⁇ -glucanotransferase (dextrin glycosyltransferase) or an oxidoreductase,
  • the additional enzyme may be of any origin, including mammalian and plant, and preferably of microbial (bacterial, yeast or fungal) origin and may be obtained by techniques conventionally used in the art.
  • the amylase may be a fungal or bacterial alpha-amylase, e.g. from Bacillus , particularly B. licheniformis or B. amyloliquefaciens , or from Aspergillus , particularly A. oryzae , a beta-amylase, e.g. from plant (e.g. soy bean) or from microbial sources (e.g. Bacillus ).
  • Bacillus particularly B. licheniformis or B. amyloliquefaciens
  • Aspergillus particularly A. oryzae
  • a beta-amylase e.g. from plant (e.g. soy bean) or from microbial sources (e.g. Bacillus ).
  • the xylanase is preferably of microbial origin, e.g. derived from a bacterium or fungus, such as a strain of Aspergillus , in particular of A. aculeatus, A. niger (cf. WO 91/19782), A. awamori (WO 91/18977), or A. tubigensis (WO 92/01793), from a strain of Trichoderma , e.g. T. reesei , or from a strain of Humicola , e.g. H. insolens (WO 92/17573).
  • a bacterium or fungus such as a strain of Aspergillus , in particular of A. aculeatus, A. niger (cf. WO 91/19782), A. awamori (WO 91/18977), or A. tubigensis (WO 92/01793), from a strain of Trichoderma , e.
  • amyloglucosidase may be from Aspergillus , particularly A. oryzae.
  • the glucose oxidase may be a fungal glucose oxidase, particularly from Aspergillus niger.
  • the protease may be a neutral protease from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens.
  • the method or the composition of the invention may include addition of an anti-staling amylase.
  • a galactolipase and a phospholipase may be used together with an anti-staling amylase, as described in WO 99/53769.
  • the anti-staling amylase is an amylase that is effective in retarding the staling (crumb firming) of baked products, particularly a maltogenic alpha-amylase, e.g. from Bacillus stearothermophilus strain NCIB 11837.
  • the method or composition of the invention may be made without addition of an anti-staling amylase.
  • a lipase and a phospholipase may be used without addition of an anti-staling amylase or without addition of a maltogenic alpha-amylase.
  • composition comprising Lipolytic Enzymes
  • the present invention provides a composition comprising a combination of two lipolytic enzymes as described above.
  • the composition may be an enzyme preparation for use as a baking additive.
  • the composition may also comprise flour and may be a dough or a premix.
  • the composition may be an enzyme preparation comprising a combination of lipolytic enzymes, for use as a baking additive in the process of the invention.
  • the enzyme preparation may particularly be in the form of a granulate or agglomerated powder, e.g. with a narrow particle size distribution with more than 95% (by weight) of the particles in the range from 25 to 500 ⁇ m.
  • Granulates and agglomerated powders may be prepared by conventional methods, e.g. by spraying the enzymes onto a carrier in a fluid-bed granulator.
  • the carrier may consist of particulate cores having a suitable particle size.
  • the carrier may be soluble or insoluble, e.g. a salt (such as NaCl or sodium sulfate), a sugar (such as sucrose or lactose), a sugar alcohol (such as sorbitol), starch, rice, corn grits, or soy.
  • the enzyme preparation may also be supplied as a liquid formulation, particularly a stabilized liquid.
  • Liquid enzyme preparations may, for instance, be stabilized by adding a polyol such as propylene glycol, a sugar or sugar alcohol, lactic acid or boric acid according to established methods.
  • the dough of the invention generally comprises wheat meal or wheat flour and/or other types of meal, flour or starch such as corn flour, corn starch, rye meal, rye flour, oat flour, oat meal, soy flour, sorghum meal, sorghum flour, potato meal, potato flour or potato starch.
  • flour or starch such as corn flour, corn starch, rye meal, rye flour, oat flour, oat meal, soy flour, sorghum meal, sorghum flour, potato meal, potato flour or potato starch.
  • the dough of the invention may be fresh, frozen or par-baked.
  • the dough of the invention is normally a leavened dough or a dough to be subjected to leavening.
  • the dough may be leavened in various ways, such as by adding chemical leavening agents, e.g., sodium bicarbonate or by adding a leaven (fermenting dough), but it is preferred to leaven the dough by adding a suitable yeast culture, such as a culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast), e.g. a commercially available strain of S. cerevisiae.
  • the dough may also comprise other conventional dough ingredients, e.g.: proteins, such as milk powder, gluten, and soy; eggs (either whole eggs, egg yolks or egg whites); an oxidant such as ascorbic acid, potassium bromate, potassium iodate, azodicarbonamide (ADA) or ammonium persulfate; an amino acid such as L-cysteine; a sugar; a salt such as sodium chloride, calcium acetate, sodium sulfate or calcium sulfate.
  • proteins such as milk powder, gluten, and soy
  • eggs either whole eggs, egg yolks or egg whites
  • an oxidant such as ascorbic acid, potassium bromate, potassium iodate, azodicarbonamide (ADA) or ammonium persulfate
  • an amino acid such as L-cysteine
  • a sugar a salt such as sodium chloride, calcium acetate, sodium sulfate or calcium sulfate.
  • the dough may comprise fat (triglyceride) such as granulated fat or shortening, but the invention is particularly applicable to a dough where less than 1% by weight of fat (triglyceride) is added, and particularly to a dough which is made without addition of fat.
  • fat triglyceride
  • the dough may further comprise an emulsifier such as mono- or diglycerides, diacetyl tartaric acid esters of mono- or diglycerides, sugar esters of fatty acids, polyglycerol esters of fatty acids, lactic acid esters of monoglycerides, acetic acid esters of monoglycerides, polyoxyethylene stearates, or lysolecithin.
  • an emulsifier such as mono- or diglycerides, diacetyl tartaric acid esters of mono- or diglycerides, sugar esters of fatty acids, polyglycerol esters of fatty acids, lactic acid esters of monoglycerides, acetic acid esters of monoglycerides, polyoxyethylene stearates, or lysolecithin.
  • the invention also provides a pre-mix comprising flour together with two lipolytic enzymes as described above.
  • the pre-mix may contain other dough-improving and/or bread-improving additives, e.g. any of the additives, including enzymes, mentioned above.
  • Phospholipase activity is measured as the release of free fatty acids from lecithin.
  • 500 ⁇ l 4% L-alpha-phosphatidylcholine (plant lecithin from Avanti), 5 mM CaCl 2 in 50 mM NaOAc, pH 5 is added to 50 ⁇ l enzyme solution diluted to an appropriate concentration in water.
  • the samples are incubated for 10 min at 30° C. and the reaction stopped at 95° C. for 5 min prior to centrifugation (5 min at 7000 rpm).
  • Free fatty acids are determined using the NEFA C kit from Wako Chemicals GmbH; 25 ⁇ l reaction mixture is added 250 ⁇ l Reagent A and incubated 10 min at 37° C.
  • Reagent B 500 ⁇ l Reagent B is added and the sample is incubated again, 10 min at 37° C. The absorption is measured at 550 nm. Substrate and enzyme blinds (preheated enzyme samples (10 min at 95° C.)+substrate) are included. Oleic acid is used as a fatty acid standard. 1 PHLU equals the amount of enzyme capable of releasing 1 ⁇ mol of free fatty acid/min at these conditions.
  • Equal volumes of 2% agarose and 2% Lecithin (A and B) are mixed. 250 ⁇ l 4 mg/ml crystal violet in purified water is added as indicator. The mixture is poured into appropriate petri dishes (e.g. 30 ml in 14 cm ⁇ dish), and appropriate holes are made in the agar (3-5 mm) for application of enzyme solution.
  • DGDG digalactosyl diglyceride
  • olive oil is used instead of L-alpha-Phosphatidylcholine.
  • a liquid sponge is prepared by mixing 34.8 parts of water, 60 parts of flour and 1.5 parts of instant yeast, and fermenting for 3 hours at 24° C.
  • a dough is then prepared by mixing the liquid sponge with 22.93 parts of water, 40 parts of flour, 0.5 part of instant yeast, 11.26 parts of 42 high-fructose corn syrup, 0.25 part of calcium propionate, 2 parts of oil and 2 parts of salt, 50 ppm of ascorbic acid 50 parts of wheat flour, 0.5 part of SSL (sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate), 2 parts of salt, 6 parts of sugar and water and ascorbic acid as required.
  • SSL sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate
  • a dough is prepared by mixing 100 parts (by weight) of wheat flour, 4 parts of yeast, 1.5 parts of salt and 1.5 parts of sugar with water and ascorbic acid as required to reach a suitable dough consistency.
  • Shape Factor (Shape Retention)
  • the shape factor is taken as the ratio between the height and diameter of rolls after baking (average of 10 rolls). A higher value indicates a better shape retention.
  • Softness is a measure of the degree to which, or ease with which, a dough will compress or resist compression. A sensory evaluation is done by a trained and skilled baker feeling and squeezing the dough. The results are expressed on a scale from 0 (little softness) to 10 (very soft) with the control (dough without enzyme addition) taken as 5.
  • Extensibility is a measure of the degree by which a dough can be stretched without tearing.
  • a sensory evaluation is done by a trained and skilled baker pulling a piece of kneaded dough (about 30 g) and judging the extensibility. The results are expressed on a scale from 0 (Short /low extensibility) to 10 (long/high extensibility) with the control (dough without enzyme addition) taken as 5.
  • Elasticity is a measure of the degree to which a dough tends to recover its original shape after release from a deforming force. It is evaluated by rolling a piece of dough (about 30 g) to a size of about 10 cm, and having a trained and skilled baker carefully pulling at opposite ends to judge the resistance and elasticity. The results are expressed on a scale from 0 (low/weak elasticity/recovery) to 10 (high/strong elasticity/recovery) with the control (dough without enzyme addition) taken as 5.
  • Lipolytic enzyme combinations were tested in a European Straight dough procedure as described above.
  • Fungal alpha-amylase Fungamyl Super MA, 40 ppm
  • an oxidation system ascorbic acid, 30 ppm
  • Each dough was split into rolls and pan bread. Over-proofing (indicating a stressed system) was carried out for the rolls (70 min.) and the pan bread (80 min.).
  • Variant 39 was tested in combination with variant 91 or with Aspergillus oryzae phospholipase.
  • Variants 39 and 91 are variants of the Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase according to WO 2000/32758.
  • variants 91 and 39 were selected because of the high phospholipase activity and the high galactolipase activity, respectively.
  • the Aspergillus oryzae phospholipase and variant 39 combination were chosen due to the combination of a pure phospholipase and an enzyme with high DGDG activity.
  • the plate assays described above showed that each enzyme wasx specific with little or no activity for the two other substrates.
  • the lipolytic enzymes were added according to the table below. The tests with a single enzyme were conducted with a dosage found to be optimum for the enzyme in question, and combinations were tested as indicated, with each enzyme at 33, 50 or 67% of optimal dosage.
  • A. oryzae Phospholipase and Variant 39 at 33% and 67%, respectively, of optimal dosage increases the specific volume considerably compared to each enzyme added separately at optimum dosage.
  • the combination also has a positive contribution to the shape factor of the rolls.
  • a phospholipase A2 from porcine pancreas was tested in combination with a 1,3-specific triacylglycerol lipase from Thermomyces lanuginosus in the European straight dough procedure as described above. The results were compared to each enzyme used alone in dosages considered to be optimal. The enzyme combination was made with 50% of optimal dosage of each of the enzymes.
  • the two enzymes were found to be very specific, i.e. the triacylglycerol lipase has very little activity on phospholipid and galactolipids, and the phospholipase has very little activity on triglycerides and galactolipids.
  • Variant 6 is a variant of the Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase with the following amino acid alterations (SPIRR indicates a peptide extension at the N-terminal, and 270AGGFS indicates a peptide extension at the C-terminal).
  • Loaves were prepared according to the invention by adding Variant 6 (25 LU/kg flour) and FoL (500 LU/kg flour) to the dough. For comparison, loaves were baked without lipolytic enzymes, with FoL alone (1000 LU/kg) or Variant 6 alone (50 LU/kg) which were found to be the optimal dosages for the enzymes.
  • the LU assay method is described in WO 2000/32758.
  • the standard sponge dough WPB formula was used as described above, with the hydrated distilled MG and SSL eliminated to avoid masking effects on the enzyme.
  • Loaves contained 2% soy oil as well as fungal amylase and pentosanase (Fungamyl Super MA, 50 ppm).
  • the oxidation system was 50 ppm ascorbic acid.
  • crumb softness and elasticity were measured 24 hours after baking. The trial was repeated once.
  • Variant 32 was tested in combination with Variant 13 and Variant 60.
  • the variants are variants of the Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase with the following amino acid alterations (where SPIRR indicates a peptide extension at the N-terminal, and 270AGGFS indicates a peptide extension at the C-terminal):
  • Each dough was split into rolls and pan bread. The rolls were proofed for 70 minutes (over proofing), and the pan bread was proofed for 80 minutes (over proofing). The over proofing was carried out to stress the system, in order to test the lipolytic enzymes as stabilizers.
  • Variant 32 and Variant 13 at 40% of optimum dosage provided a more uniform and fine crumb compared to each enzyme used alone.

Abstract

The addition to dough of a combination of two lipolytic enzymes with different substrate specificities produces a synergistic effect on the dough or on a baked product made from the dough, particularly a larger loaf volume of the baked product and/or a better shape retention during baking.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/882,626 filed on Sep. 15, 2010 (pending), which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/738,838 filed on Apr. 23, 2007 (now abandoned), which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/332,164 filed on 10 Jan. 3, 2003 (now abandoned), which claims priority of 35 U.S.C. 371 national application of PCT/DK01/00472 filed Jul. 6, 2001, which claims priority or the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119 of Danish application no. PA 2000 01054 filed Jul. 6, 2000 and U.S. provisional application No. 60/217,051 filed Jul. 10, 2000, the contents of which are fully incorporated herein by reference.
  • SEQUENCE LISTING
  • Applicants submit herewith a Sequence Listing in the form of a text file.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present invention relates to methods of preparing a dough or a baked product made from dough by use of lipolytic enzymes, and to compositions for use therein.
  • BACKGROUND
  • WO 94/04035, EP 109244, EP 585988, WO 98/26057, WO 98/45453, WO 99/53769, WO 00/32758 and EP 575133 describe the addition of various lipolytic enzymes to dough in the preparation of bread, e.g. enzymes with activities such as triacylglycerol lipase, phospholipase and galactolipase.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The inventors have found that the addition to dough of a combination of two lipolytic enzymes with different substrate specificities produces a synergistic effect on the dough or on a baked product made from the dough, particularly a larger loaf volume of the baked product and/or a better shape retention during baking.
  • Accordingly, the invention provides a method of preparing a dough or a baked product made from dough, comprising adding a combination of two lipolytic enzymes to the dough. The invention also provides a composition comprising a combination of two lipolytic enzymes.
  • The combination may comprise at least two lipolytic enzymes selected from the group consisting of galactolipase, phospholipase and triacylglycerol lipase. Thus, the combination may comprise a galactolipase+a phospholipase, a phospholipase+a triacylglycerol lipase or a triacylglycerol lipase+a galactolipase.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Lipolytic Enzyme
  • The invention uses a combination of lipolytic enzymes, i.e. enzymes which are capable of hydrolyzing carboxylic ester bonds to release carboxylate (EC 3.1.1). The enzyme combination includes at least two of the following three: a galactolipase, a phospholipase and a triacylglycerol lipase, i.e. enzymes predominantly having activity for a galactolipids, a phospholipid, and a triglyceride, respectively. The activities may be determined by any suitable method, e.g. by assays known in the art or described later in this specification.
  • Galactolipase activity (EC 3.1.1.26), i.e. hydrolytic activity on carboxylic ester bonds in galactolipids such as DGDG (digalactosyl diglyceride). The galactolipase activity (digalactosyl diglyceride hydrolyzing activity or DGDGase activity) may be determined, e.g., by the plate assay in this specification or by the monolayer assay 1 or 2 in WO 2000/32758.
  • Phospholipase activity (A1 or A2, EC 3.1.1.32 or 3.1.1.4), i.e. hydrolytic activity towards one or both carboxylic ester bonds in phospholipids such as lecithin. The phospholipase activity may be determined by the plate assay in this specification or by an assay WO 2000/32758, e.g. the PHLU, LEU, monolayer or plate assay 1 or 2.
  • Triacylglycerol lipase activity (EC 3.1.1.3), i.e. hydrolytic activity for carboxylic ester bonds in triglycerides, e.g. 1,3-specific activity, particularly on long-chain triglycerides such as olive oil. The activity on long-chain triglycerides (olive oil) and short-chain triglycerides (tributyrin) may be determined by the SLU and LU methods (described in WO 00/32758), respectively, or by the plate assay described in this specification. The enzyme may have a substrate specificity for hydrolyzing long-chain fatty acyl groups rather than short-chain groups, expressed e.g. as a high ratio of activities on olive oil and tributyrin, e.g. the ratio SLU/LU. Favorably, this may reduce the development of off-odor in dough containing milk lipids such as butter fat. Suitably, this ratio may be above 3.
  • Each lipolytic enzyme may have a narrow specificity with activity for one of the three substrates and little or no activity for the other two, or it may have a broader specificity with predominant activity for one substrate and less activity for the other two substrates.
  • A lipolytic enzyme is considered to be a galactolipase if it has a higher activity on galactolipids than on phospholipids and triglycerides. Similarly, it is considered to be a phospholipase or a triacylglycerol lipase if it has a higher activity for that substrate than for the other two. The comparison may be done, e.g., by the plate assay in this specification using the three substrates; the largest clearing zone indicating the predominant activity.
  • The enzyme combination may comprise three or more lipolytic enzymes, e.g. comprising a galactolipase, a phospholipase and a triacylglycerol lipase.
  • The enzyme combination may have low activity on partially hydrolyzed lipids such as digalactosyl monoglyceride (DGMG), lysophospholipids (LPL) and mono- and diglycerides (MG, DG). Favorably, this may lead to accumulation of such partially hydrolyzed lipids in the dough and may improve the properties of the dough and/or the baked product.
  • Sources of Lipolytic Enzymes
  • The lipolytic enzymes may be prokaryotic, particularly bacterial, e.g. from Pseudomonas or Bacillus. Alternatively, the lipolytic enzymes may be eukaryotic, e.g. from fungal or animal sources. Fungal lipolytic enzymes may be derived, e.g. from the following genera or species: Thermomyces, particularly T. lanuginosus (also known as Humicola lanuginosa); Humicola, particularly H. insolens; Fusarium, particularly F. oxysporum, F. solani, and F. heterosporum; Aspergillus, particularly A. tubigensis, A. niger, and A. oryzae; Rhizomucor; Candida, particularly C. antarctica; Penicillium, particularly P. camembertii; Rhizopus, particularly Rhizopus oryzae; or Absidia.
  • Some particular examples of lipolytic enzymes follow:
      • Phospholipase from bee or snake venom or from mammal pancreas, e.g. porcine pancreas.
      • Phospholipase of microbial origin, e.g. from filamentous fungi, yeast or bacteria, such as the genus or species Aspergillus, A. niger, Dictyostelium, D. discoideum, Mucor, M. javanicus, M. mucedo, M. subtilissimus, Neurospora, N. crassa, Rhizomucor, R. pusillus, Rhizopus, R. arrhizus, R. japonicus, R. stolonifer, Sclerotinia, S. libertiana, Trichophyton, T. rubrum, Whetzelinia, W. sclerotiorum, Bacillus, B. megaterium, B. subtilis, Citrobacter, C. freundii, Enterobacter, E. aerogenes, E. cloacae Edwardsiella, E. tarda, Erwinia, E. herbicola, Escherichia, E. coli, Klebsiella, K. pneumoniae, Proteus, P. vulgaris, Providencia, P. stuartii, Salmonella, S. typhimurium, Serratia, S. liquefasciens, S. marcescens, Shigella, S. flexneri, Streptomyces, S. violeceoruber, Yersinia, or Y. enterocolitica.
      • Lipase from Thermomyces lanuginosus (Humicola lanuginosa) (EP 305216, U.S. Pat. No. 5,869,438).
      • Lipase/phospholipase from Fusarium oxysporum (WO 98/26057).
      • Lysophospholipases from Aspergillus niger and A. oryzae (WO 0127251).
      • Phospholipase A1 from Aspergillus oryzae (EP 575133, JP-A 10-155493).
      • Lysophospholipase from F. venenatum (WO 00/28044).
      • Phospholipase B from A. oryzae (U.S. Pat. No. 6,146,869).
      • Lipase from A. tubigensis (WO 9845453).
      • Lipase from F. solani (U.S. Pat. No. 5,990,069).
      • Lipolytic enzyme from F. culmorum (U.S. Pat. No. 5,830,736).
      • Phospholipase from Hyphozyma (U.S. Pat. No. 6,127,137).
      • Lipolytic enzymes described in PCT/DK 01/00448.
      • Lipolytic enzymes described in DK PA 2001 00304.
      • A variant obtained by altering the amino acid sequence a lipolytic enzyme, e.g. one of the above, e.g. as described in WO 2000/32758, particularly Examples 4, 5, 6 and 13, such as variants of lipase from Thermomyces lanuginosus (also called Humicola lanuginosa).
  • The lipolytic enzymes may have a temperature optimum in the range of 30-90° C., e.g. 30-70° C.
  • Synergistic effect
  • The combination of the two lipolytic enzymes has a synergistic effect on dough made with the combination or on a baked product made from the dough, particularly improved dough stabilization, i.e. a larger loaf volume of the baked product and/or a better shape retention during baking, particularly in a stressed system, e.g. in the case of over-proofing or over-mixing.
  • Additionally or alternatively, the synergistic effect on the baked product may include a lower initial firmness and/or a more uniform and fine crumb, improved crumb structure (finer crumb, thinner cell walls, more rounded cells), of the baked product, Additionally or alternatively, there may be a synergistic effect on dough properties, e.g. a less soft dough, higher elasticity, lower extensibility.
  • Synergy may be determined by making doughs or baked products with addition of the first and the second lipolytic enzyme separately and in combination, and comparing the effects; synergy is indicated when the combination produces a better effect than each enzyme used separately.
  • The comparison may be made between the combination and each enzyme alone at double dosage (on the basis of enzyme protein or enzyme activity). Thus, synergy may be said to occur if the effect of 0.5 mg of enzyme A+1.0 mg of enzyme B is greater than the effect with 1.0 mg of enzyme A and also greater than the effect with 2.0 mg of enzyme B.
  • Alternatively, the comparison may be made with equal total enzyme dosages (as pure enzyme protein). If the effect with the combination is greater than with either enzyme alone, this may be taken as an indication of synergy. As an example, synergy may be said to occur if the effect of 0.5 mg of enzyme A+1.0 mg of enzyme B is greater than with 1.5 mg of enzyme A or B alone.
  • Suitable dosages for the enzymes may typically be found in the range 0.01-10 mg of enzyme protein per kg of flour, particularly 0.1-5 mg/kg, e.g. 0.2-1 mg/kg. Suitable dosages for each of the two enzymes in the combination may be found by first determining a suitable dosage for each enzyme alone (e.g. the optimum dosage, i.e. the dosage producing the greatest effect) and using 30-67% (e.g. 33-50%, particularly 50%) of that dosage for each enzyme in the combination. Again, if the effect with the combination is greater than with either enzyme used separately, this is taken as an indication of synergy.
  • A lipolytic enzyme with phospholipase activity may be used at a dosage of 200-5000 LEU/kg of flour, e.g. 500-2000 LEU/kg. The LEU activity unit is described in WO 99/53769.
  • A lipolytic enzyme with triacylglycerol lipase activity may be used at a dosage of 20-1000 LU/kg of flour, particularly 50-500 LU/kg. The LU method is described in WO 2000/32758.
  • Additional Enzyme
  • Optionally, an additional enzyme may be used together with the lipolytic enzymes. The additional enzyme may be an amylase, particularly an anti-staling amylase, an amyloglucosidase, a cyclodextrin glucanotransferase, or the additional enzyme may be a peptidase, in particular an exopeptidase, a transglutaminase, a cellulase, a hemicellulase, in particular a pentosanase such as xylanase, a protease, a protein disulfide isomerase, e.g., a protein disulfide isomerase as disclosed in WO 95/00636, a glycosyltransferase, a branching enzyme (1,4-□-glucan branching enzyme), a 4-□-glucanotransferase (dextrin glycosyltransferase) or an oxidoreductase, e.g., a peroxidase, a laccase, a glucose oxidase, a pyranose oxidase, a lipoxygenase, an L-amino acid oxidase or a carbohydrate oxidase.
  • The additional enzyme may be of any origin, including mammalian and plant, and preferably of microbial (bacterial, yeast or fungal) origin and may be obtained by techniques conventionally used in the art.
  • The amylase may be a fungal or bacterial alpha-amylase, e.g. from Bacillus, particularly B. licheniformis or B. amyloliquefaciens, or from Aspergillus, particularly A. oryzae, a beta-amylase, e.g. from plant (e.g. soy bean) or from microbial sources (e.g. Bacillus).
  • The xylanase is preferably of microbial origin, e.g. derived from a bacterium or fungus, such as a strain of Aspergillus, in particular of A. aculeatus, A. niger (cf. WO 91/19782), A. awamori (WO 91/18977), or A. tubigensis (WO 92/01793), from a strain of Trichoderma, e.g. T. reesei, or from a strain of Humicola, e.g. H. insolens (WO 92/17573).
  • The amyloglucosidase may be from Aspergillus, particularly A. oryzae.
  • The glucose oxidase may be a fungal glucose oxidase, particularly from Aspergillus niger.
  • The protease may be a neutral protease from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens.
  • Anti-staling Amylase
  • The method or the composition of the invention may include addition of an anti-staling amylase. In particular, a galactolipase and a phospholipase may be used together with an anti-staling amylase, as described in WO 99/53769. The anti-staling amylase is an amylase that is effective in retarding the staling (crumb firming) of baked products, particularly a maltogenic alpha-amylase, e.g. from Bacillus stearothermophilus strain NCIB 11837.
  • Alternatively, the method or composition of the invention may be made without addition of an anti-staling amylase. In particular, a lipase and a phospholipase may be used without addition of an anti-staling amylase or without addition of a maltogenic alpha-amylase.
  • Composition Comprising Lipolytic Enzymes
  • The present invention provides a composition comprising a combination of two lipolytic enzymes as described above. The composition may be an enzyme preparation for use as a baking additive. The composition may also comprise flour and may be a dough or a premix.
  • Enzyme Preparation
  • The composition may be an enzyme preparation comprising a combination of lipolytic enzymes, for use as a baking additive in the process of the invention. The enzyme preparation may particularly be in the form of a granulate or agglomerated powder, e.g. with a narrow particle size distribution with more than 95% (by weight) of the particles in the range from 25 to 500 μm.
  • Granulates and agglomerated powders may be prepared by conventional methods, e.g. by spraying the enzymes onto a carrier in a fluid-bed granulator. The carrier may consist of particulate cores having a suitable particle size. The carrier may be soluble or insoluble, e.g. a salt (such as NaCl or sodium sulfate), a sugar (such as sucrose or lactose), a sugar alcohol (such as sorbitol), starch, rice, corn grits, or soy.
  • The enzyme preparation may also be supplied as a liquid formulation, particularly a stabilized liquid. Liquid enzyme preparations may, for instance, be stabilized by adding a polyol such as propylene glycol, a sugar or sugar alcohol, lactic acid or boric acid according to established methods.
  • Dough
  • The dough of the invention generally comprises wheat meal or wheat flour and/or other types of meal, flour or starch such as corn flour, corn starch, rye meal, rye flour, oat flour, oat meal, soy flour, sorghum meal, sorghum flour, potato meal, potato flour or potato starch.
  • The dough of the invention may be fresh, frozen or par-baked.
  • The dough of the invention is normally a leavened dough or a dough to be subjected to leavening. The dough may be leavened in various ways, such as by adding chemical leavening agents, e.g., sodium bicarbonate or by adding a leaven (fermenting dough), but it is preferred to leaven the dough by adding a suitable yeast culture, such as a culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast), e.g. a commercially available strain of S. cerevisiae.
  • The dough may also comprise other conventional dough ingredients, e.g.: proteins, such as milk powder, gluten, and soy; eggs (either whole eggs, egg yolks or egg whites); an oxidant such as ascorbic acid, potassium bromate, potassium iodate, azodicarbonamide (ADA) or ammonium persulfate; an amino acid such as L-cysteine; a sugar; a salt such as sodium chloride, calcium acetate, sodium sulfate or calcium sulfate.
  • The dough may comprise fat (triglyceride) such as granulated fat or shortening, but the invention is particularly applicable to a dough where less than 1% by weight of fat (triglyceride) is added, and particularly to a dough which is made without addition of fat.
  • The dough may further comprise an emulsifier such as mono- or diglycerides, diacetyl tartaric acid esters of mono- or diglycerides, sugar esters of fatty acids, polyglycerol esters of fatty acids, lactic acid esters of monoglycerides, acetic acid esters of monoglycerides, polyoxyethylene stearates, or lysolecithin.
  • Pre-mix
  • The invention also provides a pre-mix comprising flour together with two lipolytic enzymes as described above. The pre-mix may contain other dough-improving and/or bread-improving additives, e.g. any of the additives, including enzymes, mentioned above.
  • Materials and Methods Enzyme Activity Assays Phospholipase Activity (PHLU)
  • Phospholipase activity is measured as the release of free fatty acids from lecithin. 500 μl 4% L-alpha-phosphatidylcholine (plant lecithin from Avanti), 5 mM CaCl2 in 50 mM NaOAc, pH 5 is added to 50 μl enzyme solution diluted to an appropriate concentration in water. The samples are incubated for 10 min at 30° C. and the reaction stopped at 95° C. for 5 min prior to centrifugation (5 min at 7000 rpm). Free fatty acids are determined using the NEFA C kit from Wako Chemicals GmbH; 25 μl reaction mixture is added 250 μl Reagent A and incubated 10 min at 37° C. Then 500 μl Reagent B is added and the sample is incubated again, 10 min at 37° C. The absorption is measured at 550 nm. Substrate and enzyme blinds (preheated enzyme samples (10 min at 95° C.)+substrate) are included. Oleic acid is used as a fatty acid standard. 1 PHLU equals the amount of enzyme capable of releasing 1 μmol of free fatty acid/min at these conditions.
  • Plate Assay for Phospholipase Activity
  • A) 50 ml 2% agarose in purified water is melted/stirred for 5 minutes and cooled to 60-63° C.
  • B) 50 ml 2% plant L-alpha-Phosphatidylcholine 95% in 0.2 M NaOAc, 10 mM CaCl2, pH 5.5 at 60° C. in 30 min. is blended in 15 sec. with ultrathorax.
  • Equal volumes of 2% agarose and 2% Lecithin (A and B) are mixed. 250 μl 4 mg/ml crystal violet in purified water is added as indicator. The mixture is poured into appropriate petri dishes (e.g. 30 ml in 14 cm Ø dish), and appropriate holes are made in the agar (3-5 mm) for application of enzyme solution.
  • The enzyme sample is diluted to a concentration corresponding to OD280=0.5 and 10 microliter is applied into holes in the agarose/lecithin-matrix. Plates are incubated at 30° C. and reaction zones in the plates are identified after 20-24 hours incubation, and the size of the clearing zone indicates the phospholipase activity.
  • Plate Assays for Galactolipase and Triacylglycerol Lipase Activity
  • Plate assays are carried out as for the phospholipase assay, except that digalactosyl diglyceride (DGDG) or olive oil is used instead of L-alpha-Phosphatidylcholine.
  • Baking Methods Sponge Dough
  • A liquid sponge is prepared by mixing 34.8 parts of water, 60 parts of flour and 1.5 parts of instant yeast, and fermenting for 3 hours at 24° C. A dough is then prepared by mixing the liquid sponge with 22.93 parts of water, 40 parts of flour, 0.5 part of instant yeast, 11.26 parts of 42 high-fructose corn syrup, 0.25 part of calcium propionate, 2 parts of oil and 2 parts of salt, 50 ppm of ascorbic acid 50 parts of wheat flour, 0.5 part of SSL (sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate), 2 parts of salt, 6 parts of sugar and water and ascorbic acid as required.
  • European Straight Dough Procedure
  • A dough is prepared by mixing 100 parts (by weight) of wheat flour, 4 parts of yeast, 1.5 parts of salt and 1.5 parts of sugar with water and ascorbic acid as required to reach a suitable dough consistency.
  • Shape Factor (Shape Retention)
  • The shape factor is taken as the ratio between the height and diameter of rolls after baking (average of 10 rolls). A higher value indicates a better shape retention.
  • Dough Softness
  • Softness is a measure of the degree to which, or ease with which, a dough will compress or resist compression. A sensory evaluation is done by a trained and skilled baker feeling and squeezing the dough. The results are expressed on a scale from 0 (little softness) to 10 (very soft) with the control (dough without enzyme addition) taken as 5.
  • Dough Extensibility
  • Extensibility is a measure of the degree by which a dough can be stretched without tearing. A sensory evaluation is done by a trained and skilled baker pulling a piece of kneaded dough (about 30 g) and judging the extensibility. The results are expressed on a scale from 0 (Short /low extensibility) to 10 (long/high extensibility) with the control (dough without enzyme addition) taken as 5.
  • Dough Elasticity
  • Elasticity is a measure of the degree to which a dough tends to recover its original shape after release from a deforming force. It is evaluated by rolling a piece of dough (about 30 g) to a size of about 10 cm, and having a trained and skilled baker carefully pulling at opposite ends to judge the resistance and elasticity. The results are expressed on a scale from 0 (low/weak elasticity/recovery) to 10 (high/strong elasticity/recovery) with the control (dough without enzyme addition) taken as 5.
  • EXAMPLES Example 1 Synergistic Effect of Phospholipase and Galactolipase on Dough Stabilization
  • Lipolytic enzyme combinations were tested in a European Straight dough procedure as described above. Fungal alpha-amylase (Fungamyl Super MA, 40 ppm) and an oxidation system (ascorbic acid, 30 ppm) were added to the dough system. Each dough was split into rolls and pan bread. Over-proofing (indicating a stressed system) was carried out for the rolls (70 min.) and the pan bread (80 min.).
  • Combinations with the following lipolytic enzymes were tested: Variant 39 was tested in combination with variant 91 or with Aspergillus oryzae phospholipase. Variants 39 and 91 are variants of the Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase according to WO 2000/32758.
  • The combination of variants 91 and 39 was selected because of the high phospholipase activity and the high galactolipase activity, respectively. The Aspergillus oryzae phospholipase and variant 39 combination were chosen due to the combination of a pure phospholipase and an enzyme with high DGDG activity. The plate assays described above showed that each enzyme wasx specific with little or no activity for the two other substrates.
  • The lipolytic enzymes were added according to the table below. The tests with a single enzyme were conducted with a dosage found to be optimum for the enzyme in question, and combinations were tested as indicated, with each enzyme at 33, 50 or 67% of optimal dosage.
  • Rolls Pan bread
    Specific Specific
    volume Shape volume
    Lipolytic enzyme (ml/g) factor (ml/g)
    Variant 91 7.52 0.66 5.75
    (20 LU/kg)
    Variant 39 7.42 0.65 5.77
    (250 LU/kg)
    Variant 91 (50%) + 7.57 0.66 5.94
    variant 39 (33%)
  • The results demonstrate that the combination of Variant 91 with Variant 39, added at 50% and 33% respectively of optimal dosage, improves the specific volume for both the rolls and the pan bread compared to the each enzyme added separately at optimum dosage.
  • The results regarding volume and stability improvement from the combination of Aspergillus oryzae phospholipase with Variant 39 are listed in the table below.
  • Rolls Pan bread
    Specific Specific
    volume Shape volume
    Lipolytic enzyme (ml/g) factor (ml/g)
    A. oryzae 6.27 0.57 4.96
    Phospholipase
    0.1 mg/kg
    Variant 39 (250 LU/kg) 6.40 0.60 5.18
    A. oryzae 7.31 0.68 5.80
    Phospholipase (33%) +
    variant 39 (67%)
  • The combination of A. oryzae Phospholipase and Variant 39 at 33% and 67%, respectively, of optimal dosage increases the specific volume considerably compared to each enzyme added separately at optimum dosage. The combination also has a positive contribution to the shape factor of the rolls.
  • Both the results described above show that the combination of a phospholipase and a galactolipase improves the volume and stability (shape factor) of the rolls and bread, compared to the rolls and bread containing up to thrice the dosages of the enzymes added separately.
  • Example 2 Synergistic Effect of Triacylglycerol Lipase and Phospholipase on Dough Stabilization
  • A phospholipase A2 from porcine pancreas was tested in combination with a 1,3-specific triacylglycerol lipase from Thermomyces lanuginosus in the European straight dough procedure as described above. The results were compared to each enzyme used alone in dosages considered to be optimal. The enzyme combination was made with 50% of optimal dosage of each of the enzymes.
  • Each dough was split into rolls and pan bread. The rolls were proofed for 70 minutes (over proofing), and the pan bread was proofed for 80 minutes (over proofing). The over proofing was carried out to stress the system in order to test the stabilizing effect of the enzymes.
  • Rolls Pan bread
    Sp. Vol Shape Sp. Vol
    (ml/g) factor (ml/g)
    Phospholipase (3 mg) 6.24 0.56 5.60
    Triacylglycerol lipase
    (1000 LU) 6.43 0.58 5.43
    Phospholipase +
    triacylglycerol lipase 6.88 0.60 5.93
    (50%/50%)
  • The two enzymes were found to be very specific, i.e. the triacylglycerol lipase has very little activity on phospholipid and galactolipids, and the phospholipase has very little activity on triglycerides and galactolipids.
  • The results show that when the phospholipase and the triacylglycerol lipase are combined they give a better volume and shape factor than each of the enzyme separately in a stressed system.
  • Example 3 Synergistic Effect on Dough Properties and Loaf Volume
  • The combination of Lipase/phospholipase from Fusarium oxysporum (FoL) and Variant 6 on dough and bread was evaluated. Variant 6 is a variant of the Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase with the following amino acid alterations (SPIRR indicates a peptide extension at the N-terminal, and 270AGGFS indicates a peptide extension at the C-terminal).
      • Variant 6: SPIRR +G91A +D96W +E99K +G263Q +L264A +I265T +G266D +T267A +L269N +270AGGFS
  • Loaves were prepared according to the invention by adding Variant 6 (25 LU/kg flour) and FoL (500 LU/kg flour) to the dough. For comparison, loaves were baked without lipolytic enzymes, with FoL alone (1000 LU/kg) or Variant 6 alone (50 LU/kg) which were found to be the optimal dosages for the enzymes. The LU assay method is described in WO 2000/32758.
  • The standard sponge dough WPB formula was used as described above, with the hydrated distilled MG and SSL eliminated to avoid masking effects on the enzyme. Loaves contained 2% soy oil as well as fungal amylase and pentosanase (Fungamyl Super MA, 50 ppm). The oxidation system was 50 ppm ascorbic acid. In addition to subjective evaluations, crumb softness and elasticity were measured 24 hours after baking. The trial was repeated once.
  • Dough evaluations. Evaluations of the dough at the sheeter are shown below. The dough scores for the two trials were identical.
  • Lipolytic FoL +
    enzyme None FoL Variant 6 Variant 6
    Softness 5.5 4.5 4.5 4.0
    Extensibility 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.0
    Elasticity 5.0 5.5 5.5 6.0
  • The results show that the combination of FoL and Variant 6 yielded dough that was less soft, less extensible and more elastic than either enzyme alone at double dosage.
  • The specific volume data from the tested loaves are shown below. Reproducibility between the 2 days was high.
  • FoL +
    Lipolytic enzyme None FoL Variant 6 Variant 6
    Specific Volume, 6.0 6.15 6.15 6.3
    cc/gram
  • The results demonstrate that the combination of two lipolytic enzymes gives a larger loaf volume than either enzyme alone at double dosage.
  • Example 4 Synergistic Effect on Dough Stabilization.
  • Variant 32 was tested in combination with Variant 13 and Variant 60. The variants are variants of the Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase with the following amino acid alterations (where SPIRR indicates a peptide extension at the N-terminal, and 270AGGFS indicates a peptide extension at the C-terminal):
      • Variant 32: 91A +D96W +E99K +G263Q +L264A +1265T +G266D +T267A +L269N +270AGGFS
      • Variant 60: G91A +D96W +E99K +G263Q +L264A +1265T +G266S +T267A +L269N +270AGGFS
      • Variant 13: D96F +G266S
  • Each combination was tested in a European straight dough procedure, as described above. The results were compared to each enzyme used alone. Lipolytic enzymes were added as shown in the table below. The tests with a single enzyme were conducted with a dosage considered optimum for that enzyme, and the enzyme combinations were tested with each enzyme at 50% of the optimum dosage. The combination of Variant 32 and Variant 13 was also tested with each enzyme at 40% of the optimum dosage, i.e. 20% lower dosage.
  • Each dough was split into rolls and pan bread. The rolls were proofed for 70 minutes (over proofing), and the pan bread was proofed for 80 minutes (over proofing). The over proofing was carried out to stress the system, in order to test the lipolytic enzymes as stabilizers.
  • The results from over-proofing are shown below:
  • Rolls Pan bread
    Sp. Vol. Shape Sp. Vol.
    Lipolytic enzyme (ml/g) factor (ml/g)
    added 70 min 70 min 80 min
    Variant 32 (200 LU) 7.78 0.67 6.16
    Variant 13 (500 LU) 7.24 0.66 5.69
    Variant 60 (100 LU) 7.02 0.67 5.69
    Variant 32 + Variant 13, 8.26 0.71 6.24
    50%
    Variant 32 + Variant 13, 8.03 0.69 6.30
    40%
    Variant 32 + Variant 60, 7.87 0.69 6.39
    50%
  • The results show that when the bread is stressed (over-proofed), the combinations of Variant 32 with Variant 13 or Variant 60 clearly give an improved volume and shape compared to each enzyme used alone, particularly Variant 32+Variant 13, even at reduced dosage. The results reveal that when bread is stressed (over proofed), the combinations show a significantly improved effect on volume and shape factor.
  • Furthermore, it was observed that the combination of Variant 32 and Variant 13 at 40% of optimum dosage provided a more uniform and fine crumb compared to each enzyme used alone.

Claims (3)

1-11. (canceled)
12. A method for producing a lipolytic enzyme preparation, comprising:
a) determining the substrate specificities of at least two lipolytic enzymes,
b) selecting two lipolytic enzymes which are:
i) a phospholipase and a galactolipase, or
ii) a phospholipase and a triacylglycerol lipase, or
iii) a galactolipase and a triacylglycerol lipase.
c) making baked products from doughs with addition of the two lipolytic enzymes separately and in combination,
d) determining the loaf volumes or the shape retention of the baked products,
e) selecting two lipolytic enzymes having a synergistic effect, and
f) producing the enzyme preparation comprising a combination of the two lipolytic enzymes.
13-14. (canceled)
US13/310,011 2000-07-06 2011-12-02 Preparation of Dough or Baked Products Abandoned US20120082756A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/310,011 US20120082756A1 (en) 2000-07-06 2011-12-02 Preparation of Dough or Baked Products
US13/964,164 US9247753B2 (en) 2000-07-06 2013-08-12 Preparation of dough or baked products

Applications Claiming Priority (8)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DKPA200001054 2000-07-06
DKPA200001054 2000-07-06
US21705100P 2000-07-10 2000-07-10
US10/332,164 US20050118697A1 (en) 2000-07-06 2001-07-06 Method of preparing a dough or baked product made from a dough, with addition of lipolytic enzymes
PCT/DK2001/000472 WO2002003805A1 (en) 2000-07-06 2001-07-06 Method of preparing a dough or a baked product made from a dough, with addition of lipolytic enzymes
US11/738,838 US20070207247A1 (en) 2000-07-06 2007-04-23 Preparation of dough or baked products
US12/882,626 US20110003031A1 (en) 2000-07-06 2010-09-15 Preparation of dough or baked product
US13/310,011 US20120082756A1 (en) 2000-07-06 2011-12-02 Preparation of Dough or Baked Products

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/882,626 Continuation US20110003031A1 (en) 2000-07-06 2010-09-15 Preparation of dough or baked product

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/964,164 Continuation US9247753B2 (en) 2000-07-06 2013-08-12 Preparation of dough or baked products

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120082756A1 true US20120082756A1 (en) 2012-04-05

Family

ID=26068851

Family Applications (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/332,164 Abandoned US20050118697A1 (en) 2000-07-06 2001-07-06 Method of preparing a dough or baked product made from a dough, with addition of lipolytic enzymes
US11/738,838 Abandoned US20070207247A1 (en) 2000-07-06 2007-04-23 Preparation of dough or baked products
US12/882,626 Abandoned US20110003031A1 (en) 2000-07-06 2010-09-15 Preparation of dough or baked product
US13/310,011 Abandoned US20120082756A1 (en) 2000-07-06 2011-12-02 Preparation of Dough or Baked Products
US13/964,164 Expired - Fee Related US9247753B2 (en) 2000-07-06 2013-08-12 Preparation of dough or baked products

Family Applications Before (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/332,164 Abandoned US20050118697A1 (en) 2000-07-06 2001-07-06 Method of preparing a dough or baked product made from a dough, with addition of lipolytic enzymes
US11/738,838 Abandoned US20070207247A1 (en) 2000-07-06 2007-04-23 Preparation of dough or baked products
US12/882,626 Abandoned US20110003031A1 (en) 2000-07-06 2010-09-15 Preparation of dough or baked product

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/964,164 Expired - Fee Related US9247753B2 (en) 2000-07-06 2013-08-12 Preparation of dough or baked products

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (5) US20050118697A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1301080B1 (en)
AU (1) AU7235901A (en)
WO (1) WO2002003805A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (42)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
PL191234B1 (en) 1995-06-07 2006-04-28 Danisco Method for preparing a consumer product resist on a flour dough
US6936289B2 (en) 1995-06-07 2005-08-30 Danisco A/S Method of improving the properties of a flour dough, a flour dough improving composition and improved food products
GB0112226D0 (en) 2001-05-18 2001-07-11 Danisco Method of improving dough and bread quality
US7745599B1 (en) 1995-06-07 2010-06-29 Danisco A/S Hexose oxidase-encoding DNAs and methods of use thereof
ATE223489T1 (en) 1995-06-07 2002-09-15 Danisco RECOMBINANT HEXOSE OXIDASE, METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION AND USE THEREOF
US8178090B2 (en) 1995-06-07 2012-05-15 Danisco A/S Recombinant hexose oxidase
DE69806586T2 (en) * 1997-04-09 2003-03-27 Danisco As Kopenhagen Koebenha IMPROVED METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF FLOOD PASTA AND PRODUCTS MADE FROM SUCH PASTA USING GLYZERINE OXIDASE
ES2188190T5 (en) * 1998-07-21 2007-11-16 Danisco A/S FOOD PRODUCT.
AU2002219020B2 (en) 2001-01-10 2007-05-24 Novozymes A/S Thermostable lipolytic enzyme variant
US20040170736A1 (en) * 2001-02-21 2004-09-02 Andrew Ross Production of starchy food products
AU2002339115B2 (en) * 2001-05-18 2007-03-15 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Method of preparing a dough with an enzyme
EP1803353A3 (en) * 2001-05-18 2007-07-18 Danisco A/S Method of preparing a dough with an enzyme
CN100411525C (en) * 2002-07-03 2008-08-20 诺维信公司 Treatment of dough with a lipoxygenase and a lipolytic enzyme
WO2004053152A1 (en) * 2002-12-12 2004-06-24 Novozymes A/S Method of selecting a lipolytic enzyme
US20050196766A1 (en) * 2003-12-24 2005-09-08 Soe Jorn B. Proteins
MXPA05007653A (en) 2003-01-17 2005-09-30 Danisco Method.
US7955814B2 (en) * 2003-01-17 2011-06-07 Danisco A/S Method
DE602004026733D1 (en) 2003-06-13 2010-06-02 Danisco PSEUDOMONAS POLYPEPTIDE VARIANTS WITH NONMALTIC EXORAMINE ACTIVITY AND THEIR USE IN THE PRODUCTION OF FOOD PRODUCTS
US6884443B2 (en) * 2003-08-07 2005-04-26 General Mills, Inc. Compositions and methods relating to freezer-to-oven doughs
US9311540B2 (en) 2003-12-12 2016-04-12 Careview Communications, Inc. System and method for predicting patient falls
GB0716126D0 (en) 2007-08-17 2007-09-26 Danisco Process
WO2008090395A1 (en) * 2007-01-25 2008-07-31 Danisco A/S Production of a lipid acyltransferase from transformed bacillus licheniformis cells
US7718408B2 (en) * 2003-12-24 2010-05-18 Danisco A/S Method
US7906307B2 (en) 2003-12-24 2011-03-15 Danisco A/S Variant lipid acyltransferases and methods of making
GB0405637D0 (en) * 2004-03-12 2004-04-21 Danisco Protein
EP2267108A1 (en) * 2004-07-16 2010-12-29 Danisco A/S Enzymatic oil-degumming method
US8956853B2 (en) * 2007-01-30 2015-02-17 Bunge Oils, Inc. Enzymatic degumming utilizing a mixture of PLA and PLC phospholipases
US8460905B2 (en) * 2007-09-11 2013-06-11 Bunge Oils, Inc. Enzymatic degumming utilizing a mixture of PLA and PLC phospholipases with reduced reaction time
US8241876B2 (en) 2008-01-07 2012-08-14 Bunge Oils, Inc. Generation of triacylglycerols from gums
EP2473603A1 (en) 2009-09-03 2012-07-11 DSM IP Assets B.V. Baking enzyme composition as ssl replacer
CN103988266B (en) 2011-10-07 2017-03-08 纳幕尔杜邦公司 As insulation and heat transfer unit (HTU) fluid composition, comprise the electric device of described compositionss and the preparation method of such composition
CA2870773A1 (en) * 2012-04-25 2013-10-31 Novozymes A/S Method of baking
DK2981170T3 (en) * 2013-04-05 2020-02-17 Novozymes As PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING A BAKED PRODUCT WITH ALFA AMYLASE, LIPASE AND PHOSPHOLIPASE
CN104095193A (en) * 2013-04-08 2014-10-15 深圳市绿微康生物工程有限公司 Method for improving destroyed structure of steamed bread by brightening lipase
GB201522681D0 (en) 2015-12-22 2016-02-03 Dupont Nutrition Biosci Aps Composition
JP2019505223A (en) * 2016-02-19 2019-02-28 ビーエーエスエフ ソシエタス・ヨーロピアBasf Se Baking lipase
BE1023622B1 (en) * 2016-04-29 2017-05-18 Puratos Naamloze Vennootschap Compositions for baked products containing lipolytic enzymes and their use
CA3019881A1 (en) * 2016-04-29 2017-11-02 Puratos Nv Compositions for baked products containing lipolytic enzymes and uses thereof
BE1024105B1 (en) * 2016-07-11 2017-11-16 Puratos Nv Improved composition for bakery products
CN109963469A (en) 2016-11-30 2019-07-02 诺维信公司 The method of baking
US20210169090A1 (en) * 2019-12-09 2021-06-10 Kemin Industries, Inc. Compositions of hydrolyzed lecithin and lecithin for tortillas and related methods
WO2023092018A1 (en) * 2021-11-17 2023-05-25 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Improved enzymatic modification of galactolipids in food

Family Cites Families (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE1900959A1 (en) * 1969-01-09 1970-08-27 Unilever Nv Process for the production of plant phosphatides with universal emulsifying power
JPS6030488B2 (en) 1982-11-10 1985-07-17 協和醗酵工業株式会社 Fabric improvers and fabrics containing them
CA1262654A (en) 1984-08-10 1989-11-07 Takaoki Torigoe Food quality improving agent
DE4017150A1 (en) 1990-05-28 1991-12-05 Henkel Kgaa PROCESS FOR PREPARING A BACKACTIVE PENTOSANASE PREPARATION
NL9001388A (en) 1990-06-19 1992-01-16 Unilever Nv RECOMBINANT DNA, CELL CONTAINING DERIVED DNA, ENZYME FOR WHICH THE RECOMBINANT CODES DNA AND USES THEREOF.
NZ239085A (en) 1990-07-24 1993-08-26 Gist Brocades Nv Cloning and expression of xylanase genes from fungal origin
US5869438A (en) 1990-09-13 1999-02-09 Novo Nordisk A/S Lipase variants
ATE176498T1 (en) 1991-04-02 1999-02-15 Novo Nordisk As XYLANASE, CORRESPONDING RECOMBINANT DNA SEQUENCE, AGENT CONTAINING XYLANASE, AND USE THEREOF
EP0575133B2 (en) 1992-06-16 2008-06-18 Sankyo Lifetech Company Limited Novel phospholipase A1, process for its preparation and the use thereof
DE69301796T2 (en) 1992-07-27 1996-08-01 Gist Brocades Nv Enzyme product and process to improve the quality of bread
DK104592D0 (en) 1992-08-21 1992-08-21 Novo Nordisk As COURSE OF ACTION
DK76893D0 (en) 1993-06-28 1993-06-28 Novo Nordisk As
NL9301325A (en) 1993-07-29 1995-02-16 Ecopro Bv Absorption mat for body fluid that absorbs both odor and moisture, and its use in particular in coffins, and a method for preparing such an absorption mat.
EP0784674B1 (en) 1994-10-26 2002-09-04 Novozymes A/S Novel lipolytic enzyme
GB2296011B (en) 1994-12-13 1999-06-16 Solvay Novel fusarium isolate and lipases, cutinases and enzyme compositions derived therefrom
US5989599A (en) * 1995-04-24 1999-11-23 Nestec S.A. Process for the interesterification of phospholipids
JPH10155493A (en) 1996-10-04 1998-06-16 Sankyo Co Ltd Gene coding for phospholipase a1 derived from aspergillus
US6127137A (en) 1996-10-31 2000-10-03 Novo Nordisk A/S Acidic phospholipase, production and methods using thereof
DK0869167T4 (en) * 1996-12-09 2010-03-08 Novozymes As Reduction of phosphorus-containing constituents in edible oils; which comprises a large amount of nonhydrogenated phosphorus, using a phospholipase, a phospholipase from a filamentous fungus having a phospholipase A and / or B activity
DE69806586T2 (en) 1997-04-09 2003-03-27 Danisco As Kopenhagen Koebenha IMPROVED METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF FLOOD PASTA AND PRODUCTS MADE FROM SUCH PASTA USING GLYZERINE OXIDASE
WO1999053769A1 (en) 1998-04-20 1999-10-28 Novo Nordisk A/S Preparation of dough and baked products
CA2354182C (en) 1998-11-10 2014-06-17 Novo Nordisk Biotech, Inc. Polypeptides having lysophospholipase activity and nucleic acids encoding same
EP1131416B1 (en) 1998-11-27 2009-09-02 Novozymes A/S Lipolytic enzyme variants
US6178802B1 (en) 1999-04-13 2001-01-30 The Gates Corporation Slotted crimping die for use in a crimping machine
WO2001000852A1 (en) 1999-06-29 2001-01-04 Archer-Daniels-Midland Company Regulation of carbon assimilation
EP1224267B1 (en) 1999-10-14 2011-01-05 Novozymes A/S Lysophospholipase from aspergillus
US6146869A (en) 1999-10-21 2000-11-14 Novo Nordisk Biotech, Inc. Polypeptides having phospholipase B activity and nucleic acids encoding same
BR0016068A (en) 1999-12-03 2002-08-06 Danisco Method for improving the quality of dough and bread
WO2001083761A1 (en) 2000-04-28 2001-11-08 Novozymes A/S Laccase mutants
WO2002000852A2 (en) 2000-06-26 2002-01-03 Novozymes A/S Lipolytic enzyme

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Carriere et al. Structural basis for the substrate selectivity of pancreatic lipases and some related proteins, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (1998), 1376: 417-432. *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2002003805A1 (en) 2002-01-17
EP1301080A1 (en) 2003-04-16
US20070207247A1 (en) 2007-09-06
AU7235901A (en) 2002-01-21
EP1301080B1 (en) 2011-09-14
US20050118697A1 (en) 2005-06-02
US9247753B2 (en) 2016-02-02
US20130323359A1 (en) 2013-12-05
US20110003031A1 (en) 2011-01-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9247753B2 (en) Preparation of dough or baked products
EP1073339B1 (en) Preparation of dough and baked products
US8298800B2 (en) Lipolytic enzyme variants
US9115346B2 (en) Lipolytic enzymes
US6365204B1 (en) Preparation of dough and baked products
EP0659049B1 (en) Use of lipase in baking
US20110091601A1 (en) Preparation of An Edible Product From Dough
US20010055635A1 (en) Preparation of dough and baked products
AU2001272359B2 (en) Method of preparing a dough or a baked product made from a dough, with addition of lipolytic enzymes
AU2001272359A1 (en) Method of preparing a dough or a baked product made from a dough, with addition of lipolytic enzymes
AU2008200576A1 (en) Lipolytic enzyme variants and method for their production

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION