US20110272787A1 - Formation of selenide, sulfide or mixed selenide-sulfide films on metal or metal coated substrates - Google Patents

Formation of selenide, sulfide or mixed selenide-sulfide films on metal or metal coated substrates Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20110272787A1
US20110272787A1 US13/105,045 US201113105045A US2011272787A1 US 20110272787 A1 US20110272787 A1 US 20110272787A1 US 201113105045 A US201113105045 A US 201113105045A US 2011272787 A1 US2011272787 A1 US 2011272787A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
film
oxygen
films
metal
selenide
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/105,045
Inventor
Erten Eser
Shannon Fields
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Eser Erten
Original Assignee
University of Delaware
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of Delaware filed Critical University of Delaware
Priority to US13/105,045 priority Critical patent/US20110272787A1/en
Publication of US20110272787A1 publication Critical patent/US20110272787A1/en
Assigned to ESER, ERTEN reassignment ESER, ERTEN ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FIELDS, SHANNON
Assigned to FIELDS, SHANNON, ESER, ERTEN reassignment FIELDS, SHANNON ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
Assigned to UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY reassignment UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONFIRMATORY LICENSE (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C26/00Coating not provided for in groups C23C2/00 - C23C24/00
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C14/00Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material
    • C23C14/06Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material characterised by the coating material
    • C23C14/14Metallic material, boron or silicon
    • C23C14/20Metallic material, boron or silicon on organic substrates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C14/00Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material
    • C23C14/22Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material characterised by the process of coating
    • C23C14/56Apparatus specially adapted for continuous coating; Arrangements for maintaining the vacuum, e.g. vacuum locks
    • C23C14/562Apparatus specially adapted for continuous coating; Arrangements for maintaining the vacuum, e.g. vacuum locks for coating elongated substrates

Definitions

  • the invention is directed to a new process and a new composition of matter. It deals with the formation of selenide, sulfide, and mixed selenide-sulfide on metal or metal coated substrates requiring temperatures in excess of 200° C. Specifically, it solves the problem of crack formation which commonly occurs when copper, indium, gallium, diselenide, i.e., CuInGaSe 2 (CIGS) is deposited onto a molybdenum coated substrate. It also improves the adhesion of the CIGS film to the Mo layer. In the past, both of these issues have impeded the development of CIGS based photovoltaic (PV) devices on flexible polymer substrates.
  • PV photovoltaic
  • the invention also applies to other substrates as well, such as Mo coated glass and Mo coated metal foils, as well as glass, polymer and metal foil substrates coated with niobium (Nb), tantalum (Ta), tungsten (W), titanium (Ti), for example.
  • the invention further applies to methods of forming CIGS films by selenization of precursors films.
  • Such precursor films can include metals or compounds in the form of uniform layers or powders as long as the selenide, sulfide or mixed selenide-sulfide is formed on metal film such as, for example, Mo, Ta, W, and TI.
  • the invention improves the adhesion of the film to the substrate.
  • FIG. 1 An example of the cracking found in prior art composite films can be seen in the Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) micrograph shows in FIG. 1 where the CIGS layer (white area) was deposited on a Mo film (dark area) which coated a polyimide film.
  • SEM Scanning Electron Microscopy
  • the present invention is at least based on the discovery that the root cause of the cracking in Mo films is a chemical reaction with Se, which reduces the yield strength of the film. Consequently, this invention utilizes means for inhibiting this chemical reaction by limiting the exposure of the Mo film to Se and by incorporating oxygen into the Mo at concentrations high enough to passivate against reaction with Se.
  • the invention comprises new compositions of matter and a process which includes inhibiting the reaction of Mo with Se during the formation of CIGS films.
  • the process of this invention comprises:
  • FIG. 1 is a SEM micrograph showing cracks on both Mo film (dark area) and on the CIGS layer (bright area);
  • FIG. 2 a is a photograph of a sample with 4 CIGS devices fabricated on a cracked Mo back contact
  • FIG. 2 b shows a JV characteristic of one of the devices in utilized back contact 1 alone and 1 and 2 ;
  • FIG. 3 is a roll-to-roll reactor for the physical vapor deposition of CIGS films onto a web type substrate
  • FIG. 4 a is an exploded schematic view of the web guide
  • FIG. 4 b is a schematic view of the web guide with upper and lower sections fitted together;
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic of a Se/S source
  • FIG. 6 a is an auger depth profile of reference Mo film TM24312.2B.
  • FIG. 6 b is an auger depth profile of a film TM 24961.1 having low web tension.
  • FIG. 6 c is an auger depth profile of a film TM24961.2 with 5% oxygen over the second target.
  • the invention is based on a set of experiments. During these experiments CIGS films were deposited, in a roll-to-roll deposition reactor, on Mo coated Upilex-S polyimide web. These experiments compared the Mo cracking and adhesion of the CIGS films to Mo for depositions performed under conditions of high and a factor of 10 lower levels of selenium (Se) vapor. Table I summarizes these results and also gives the composition of the CIGS films.
  • FIG. 3 shows schematically a roll-to-roll reactor for the physical vapor deposition of CIGS films onto a web type substrate that incorporates the methods described above.
  • the reactor is divided into three regions.
  • Region 100 contains evaporation sources and is isolated from the other regions except for the rectangular deposition zone opening ( 10 ) where the evaporation materials condense on the web and the pumping port ( 20 ) connecting Region 100 to the vacuum pump.
  • Web transport ( 30 ) and heating components ( 40 ) are located in Region 200 .
  • a web guide ( 50 ) is also located in Region 200 positioned right over the deposition zone.
  • the web guide shown in more detail in FIG. 4 , serves multiple operational purposes.
  • the guide's lower section has an opening ( 56 ) that is aligned with the deposition zone opening ( 1 ) of FIG. 3 .
  • the holes ( 58 ) on the sides of the lower section of the web guide are for temperature sensors, such as thermocouples, for the measurement and control of the web temperature.
  • the sections of the web guide extending upstream and downstream from the deposition zone serves to create very low gaseous conductance to isolate Region 100 from Region 200 and therefore minimize the leakage of Se/S into the Region 200 .
  • the web guide made out of an infrared (IR) transmitting glass such as Vicor or quartz so that it doesn't interfere with the heating of the web substrate. It is also preferred to have all the surfaces of the web guide “flame polished” to reduce the risk of damaging the substrate and to reduce the risk of breakage of the guide itself during heating and/or cooling.
  • IR infrared
  • Another advantage of using glass as the material of construction for the web guide is its inertness towards reaction with Se and/or S. As a result, periodic maintenance cleaning of the guide will be relatively easier.
  • Another advantage of the web guide is the fact that it acts as a support for the web. In the case of high throughput processing, web speed has to be increased.
  • Region 200 In order to further reduce the leakage of Se/S from Region 100 into Region 200 a gas purge is established in Region 200 .
  • a flow of gas is introduced into the Region 200 through inlets ( 6 ) and is pumped out through pumping holes ( 70 ) into Region 300 as shown in FIG. 3 .
  • the flow rate and the conductance of the holes ( 70 ) are adjusted to provide an excess of pressure in Region 200 relative to Region 100 .
  • Region 300 would contain all other components required for the operation of the system.
  • FIG. 5 shows schematically a Se/S source 80 that provides a workable solution to the difficulties mentioned above.
  • thermocouple ( 852 ) The surface temperature of the melt is measured and controlled by the sheathed thermocouple ( 82 ) attached to a ring shaped float ( 84 ). In this way, irrespective of the melt level, thermocouple ( 852 ) always indicates the melt surface temperature.
  • the float material can be glass or graphite and can have a sealed internal cavity to increase buoyancy especially in the case of S evaporation.
  • Cooling coil ( 86 ) through which water flows at controlled rates provides adjustable heat removal to balance heat load to the source mainly through the manifold. The system is then able to control low melt surface temperatures by the external heater ( 88 ) with feedback from thermocouple ( 82 ).
  • Oxygen will also passivate other metal films such as tungsten (W), chromium (Cr), tantalum (Ta), niobium (Nb), vanadium (V), titanium (Ti), and others susceptible to reaction with selenium and/or sulfur during deposition of selenide, sulfide, and mixed selenide/sulfide films on them. This is because oxidation reactions have lower Gibbs free energy than the selenization or sufurization reactions. However, the minimum oxygen level for passivation would be different for different metal films.
  • Method of forming the metal films would also control the minimum oxygen level for passivation as they would give different structures to the films. It should also be emphasized that the type of the selenide, sulfide, and the mixed selenide/sulfide film and the method of forming it will affect the minimum oxygen level for passivation. Therefore, in general, the minimum oxygen level for passivation has to be determined experimentally in each case.
  • any method can be used to introduce oxygen into the metal films as long as it does not degrade operational characteristics of the films that would be defined by the user.
  • the oxygen can be introduced by mixing oxygen gas or other oxygen containing gas to the sputtering gas such as argon.
  • the percentage of the oxygen or oxygen containing gas in the sputtering gas has to be determined experimentally to give the desired oxygen level in the Mo film. This is because the amount of oxygen in the sputtering gas mixture is not sufficient, by itself, to determine the oxygen concentration in the metal film. In fact, for a given gas concentration, the amount of oxygen in the film can differ greatly from one system to another.
  • oxygenated top layer need not be deposited at the same time and in the same reactor as the non-oxygenated bottom portion of the metal film.
  • the metal film can be passivated by allowing the polyimide be heated naturally by the sputtering plasma.
  • the water in the polyimide outgases during the deposition of the metal thus providing the oxygen necessary for passivation. It will be shown in Section B3 that this method of oxygenation also gave satisfactory results.
  • the invention identifies reaction between Se/S and metal film substrate as being detrimental to the mechanical integrity (i.e. cracking) of both the metal and selenide/sulfide films and also being the cause of reduced adhesion between the metal and the selenide/sulfide films. It solves these problems by suppressing the reaction between the metal film and Se/S through process related techniques and through the addition of oxygen, above a certain minimum level, into the metal film passivating it against reaction with Se/S.
  • Present technology doesn't provide a solution to the cracking of metal and selenide/sulfide films.
  • the technology favors an oversupply of Se/S during the formation of the selenide/sulfide films aggravating the problem.
  • web guide/sealing assembly can be used in any web coating application to seal the web transport section from the coating section.
  • a Upilex S polyimide sputter coated with Mo was used in a roll-to-roll CIGS deposition process.
  • the sputter deposition system which produced such a product consists of two targets 3 inches apart facing a web carrier drum over which polyimide web is stretched.
  • the drum rotates in synchronization with the web translation to avoid sliding of the web over its surface. Heating of the web due to the sputtering plasmas is limited due to the drum acting as a heat sink.
  • the drum can be actively refrigerated to further limit web temperature, though in the present this was not the case. All the Mo films discussed here are approximately 2000 ⁇ thick. This initial material showed substantial cracking during the deposition of CIGS films.
  • CIGS films were deposited on these substrates in an inline reactor.
  • the composition of the CIGS films were found to be similar, as shown in Table 3.1, but the film on substrate TM24312.2B showed cracking while films on substrates TM24961.1 and TM24961.2 had no observable cracks.
  • Auger depth profiles of these three Mo films are shown in FIGS. 6 a - 6 c and highlight the differences in the oxygen content.
  • the oxygen content of the film is between 2 to 3 at % in the top and bottom half of the film corresponding to the deposition from the second and first target respectively.
  • Oxygen peak of in the middle of the film corresponds to the gettering of background oxygen by the freshly deposited film during transit between the two targets. The peak concentration doesn't have much meaning since the depth resolution in the data is rather poor.
  • Mo film TM24961.1 shows qualitatively the same oxygen distribution but the amount of oxygen in the top and bottom half of the film is approximately around 7 at %.
  • the source of this oxygen is water desorbing from the polyimide as a result of heating by the sputtering plasmas due to the fact that there is very little heat removal by the backing drum because of the low web tension. Again there is an oxygen peak in the middle of the film due to the gettering by the freshly deposited 1 st half of the film.
  • Mo film TM24961.2 again has qualitatively similar oxygen distribution but in this case there is an intentional injection of oxygen onto the second target. As a result in the top half of the film, oxygen concentration is around 8 at % while in the bottom half is around 4 at % closer to the value in the reference film. Again there is a peak in the oxygen distribution in the middle of the film.
  • Table 3.2 gives the device performance data on the CIGS solar cells fabricated on the materials discussed above. Data convincingly shows that, devices fabricated on oxygen containing Mo films outperform the ones fabricated on the reference Mo. This is not surprising in view of the film cracking observed on the latter.

Abstract

A composition for preventing cracking in composite structures comprising a metal coated substrate and a selenide, sulfide or mixed selenidesulfide film. Specifically, cracking is prevented in the coating of molybdenum coated substrates upon which a copper, indium-gallium diselenide (CIGS) film is deposited. Cracking is inhibited by adding a Se passivating amount of oxygen to the Mo and limiting the amount of Se deposited on the Mo coating.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a Divisional application of application Ser. No. 11/577,777 filed on Apr. 23, 2007, which is a U.S. National Phase filing of PCT International Application No. PCT/US2005/037711 filed on Oct. 21, 2005, which claims the priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/620,352 filed on Oct. 21, 2004; the entire contents of all of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
  • STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
  • This invention was developed under a grant no. AdJ-1-30630-12 from the National Renewable Energy Laboratories.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention is directed to a new process and a new composition of matter. It deals with the formation of selenide, sulfide, and mixed selenide-sulfide on metal or metal coated substrates requiring temperatures in excess of 200° C. Specifically, it solves the problem of crack formation which commonly occurs when copper, indium, gallium, diselenide, i.e., CuInGaSe2 (CIGS) is deposited onto a molybdenum coated substrate. It also improves the adhesion of the CIGS film to the Mo layer. In the past, both of these issues have impeded the development of CIGS based photovoltaic (PV) devices on flexible polymer substrates.
  • In a more general way, the invention also applies to other substrates as well, such as Mo coated glass and Mo coated metal foils, as well as glass, polymer and metal foil substrates coated with niobium (Nb), tantalum (Ta), tungsten (W), titanium (Ti), for example. The invention further applies to methods of forming CIGS films by selenization of precursors films. Such precursor films can include metals or compounds in the form of uniform layers or powders as long as the selenide, sulfide or mixed selenide-sulfide is formed on metal film such as, for example, Mo, Ta, W, and TI. In cases where selenide or mixed selenide-sulfide films are formed directly on metal foils, the invention improves the adhesion of the film to the substrate.
  • An example of the cracking found in prior art composite films can be seen in the Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) micrograph shows in FIG. 1 where the CIGS layer (white area) was deposited on a Mo film (dark area) which coated a polyimide film. Such cracks dramatically reduce the performance of CIGS based PV devices. This consequently is illustrated in FIGS. 2 a and 2 b. FIG. 2 a is the photograph of a sample containing 4 devices. On the same there are two orthogonal contact lines (labeled 1 and 2 in FIG. 2.2 a) to the underlying Mo film that is the electrical back contact to the devices. FIG. 2 b gives the current density vs voltage (JV) characteristics of one of the devices utilizing one and both of the contact lines. When only the contact line 1 is used, current collection from the device is severely limited compared to the case when contact line 2 is placed orthogonal to line 1. The explanation for this is that, in this particular case, the cracks are mostly parallel to contact line 1 and therefore current can't be collected by the contact line 1 alone.
  • U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,310,281 B1 and 6,372,538 B1 dated respectively Oct. 30, 2001 and Apr. 16, 2002 allege that during the fabrication of CIGS photovoltaic modules on polyimide substrates, cracking of sputter deposited Mo layer during subsequent downstream processing can be avoided by the addition of oxygen or water vapor into the sputtering gas. These disclosures allege that as a result of this addition of oxygen or water vapor into the sputtering gas, oxygen is entrained into the Mo layer creating a higher level of internal compressive stress in the Mo layer as a result of which “these layers are able to tolerate temperature changes that occur in subsequent processing without suffering temperature-induced cracking and fracturing.” However, these patents fail to state the amount of oxygen entrained into the films, and instead, give the range of the relative amount of water vapor or oxygen in the sputtering gas. The amount of oxygen in the Mo is intimately related to the design and operation of the sputtering system used for the deposition of Mo layers. These patents do not suggest an amount of oxygen concentration in the Mo film which is necessary to suppress the cracking of such films during the fabrication of CIGS photovoltaic modules. Indeed, studies to the issuance of these patents have concluded without exception, that Mo cracking is an unresolved problem.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is at least based on the discovery that the root cause of the cracking in Mo films is a chemical reaction with Se, which reduces the yield strength of the film. Consequently, this invention utilizes means for inhibiting this chemical reaction by limiting the exposure of the Mo film to Se and by incorporating oxygen into the Mo at concentrations high enough to passivate against reaction with Se.
  • Thus, the invention comprises new compositions of matter and a process which includes inhibiting the reaction of Mo with Se during the formation of CIGS films. For example, with reference to the vapor disposition of CIGS films on a Mo coated substrate in a roll-to-roll system, the process of this invention comprises:
  • providing a substrate which is coated with Mo containing a sufficient amount of oxygen to passivate against Se,
  • introducing the Mo coated substrate into a chamber means for vapor depositing Se, Cu, In, Ga fluxes onto the surface of the Mo coating, said chamber means containing a separate, substantially isolated vapor deposition zone,
  • simultaneously depositing Se, Cu, In and Ga onto the Mo coated substrate within the deposition zone,
  • limiting the amount of Se deposited on the Mo coated substrate to only that amount required to form a CIGS film thereon.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a SEM micrograph showing cracks on both Mo film (dark area) and on the CIGS layer (bright area);
  • FIG. 2 a is a photograph of a sample with 4 CIGS devices fabricated on a cracked Mo back contact;
  • FIG. 2 b shows a JV characteristic of one of the devices in utilized back contact 1 alone and 1 and 2;
  • FIG. 3 is a roll-to-roll reactor for the physical vapor deposition of CIGS films onto a web type substrate;
  • FIG. 4 a is an exploded schematic view of the web guide;
  • FIG. 4 b is a schematic view of the web guide with upper and lower sections fitted together;
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic of a Se/S source; and
  • FIG. 6 a is an auger depth profile of reference Mo film TM24312.2B.
  • FIG. 6 b is an auger depth profile of a film TM 24961.1 having low web tension.
  • FIG. 6 c is an auger depth profile of a film TM24961.2 with 5% oxygen over the second target.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • The invention is based on a set of experiments. During these experiments CIGS films were deposited, in a roll-to-roll deposition reactor, on Mo coated Upilex-S polyimide web. These experiments compared the Mo cracking and adhesion of the CIGS films to Mo for depositions performed under conditions of high and a factor of 10 lower levels of selenium (Se) vapor. Table I summarizes these results and also gives the composition of the CIGS films.
  • Consumption of Se was estimated by measuring Se level in the source before and after certain number of runs. Adhesion results were estimated from the amount of film lifted off by 40 oz/″ tape. In order to evaluate cracking of Mo under the CIGS a 1″×1″ sample was cut and CIGS was removed from the corners. Then indium solder was placed over the four corners. Resistance between two diagonal corners relative to the same resistance on the unprocessed Mo coated Upilex-S gives an indication of the severity of cracking. It should be pointed out that even though resistance of the Mo film was used to quantify the degree of cracking, these cracks are visually observable since they in turn cause the cracking of the CIGS film deposited over the Mo layer. In evaluating cracking and adhesion it is prudent not to take into account the runs grayed in the Table I because of the large compositional deviations in the films from single phase CIGS.
  • Examination of the data in the Table I show that reducing the amount of Se co-evaporated along with copper (Cu), indium (In), and gallium (Ga) while still maintaining enough to form the CIGS compound, reduces crack density on the Mo layer and improves adhesion of the CIGS film to Mo layer. The process seems to be the chemical reaction of the excess Se with Mo structurally weakening Mo layer and thus causing cracking due to stresses associated with roll-to-roll processing of flexible web. Mo—Se reaction also seems to result in reducing adhesion of CIGS to Mo probably as a consequence of the formation of structurally weak reaction by-products at the interface.
  • TABLE I
    Cracking and CIGS/Mo adhesion of CIGS films deposited under different Se
    consumption levels.
    CuInGaSe2 Film Composition
    Run Cu In Ga Se Cu/ Ga/ Cracking Adhesion
    # Date Substrate (at %) (at %) (at %) (at %) In + Ga In + Ga Diag. R (Ω) 40 oz/″ tape Se operation Comments
    70209 May 16, 2003 TM23930.A 24.6 19.7 6.6 49.1 0.94 0.25 348 poor source full @
    70210 May 19, 2003 TM23930.A 24 19.3 7.4 49.3 0.90 0.28 721 poor start same as
    70211 May 21, 2003 TM23930.A 27.5 24.9 10.5 37.2 0.78 0.30 2 NA 209 same as
    209. No 1st
    pass. Source 30
    mm below top
    @ end. 10 to
    12 mm/ run
    consumption
    70213 May 27, 2003 TM23930.A 22.9 21.7 5.8 49.7 0.83 0.21 412 poor same as 209
    70215 Jun. 9, 2003 TM23930.A 25.1 19 7.6 48.3 0.94 0.29 6 good source full new Cu
    @ start
    70216 Jun. 18, 2003 TM23930.B 42.8 12 4.3 40.9 2.63 0.26 9 good same as 215 boat ab-
    ort after
    30 min
    70217 Jun. 20, 2003 TM23930.B 26.7 20.4 4.5 48.5 1.07 0.18 57 good same as 215
    70218 Jun. 25, 2003 TM23940.B 23.5 20.7 6.3 49.5 0.87 0.23 461 good same as 215
    70219 Jul. 1, 2003 TM23940.B 16.3 24.29 6.5 52.9 0.53 0.21 955 good same as
    215.5 mm
    below top @
    end. 1 mm/run
    consumption
    Note:
    Diagonal resistance on the Mo coated substrates prior to CuInGaSe2 deposition measured around 2 Ω.
  • FIG. 3 shows schematically a roll-to-roll reactor for the physical vapor deposition of CIGS films onto a web type substrate that incorporates the methods described above. The reactor is divided into three regions. Region 100 contains evaporation sources and is isolated from the other regions except for the rectangular deposition zone opening (10) where the evaporation materials condense on the web and the pumping port (20) connecting Region 100 to the vacuum pump. Web transport (30) and heating components (40) are located in Region 200. In addition, a web guide (50) is also located in Region 200 positioned right over the deposition zone. The web guide, shown in more detail in FIG. 4, serves multiple operational purposes. It has an upper section (52) and a lower section (54) that snugly fit each other forming a rectangular tunnel, slightly larger in width than the web, through which the web substrate is transported. The height of the tunnel is no larger than twice the substrate thickness. The guide's lower section has an opening (56) that is aligned with the deposition zone opening (1) of FIG. 3. The holes (58) on the sides of the lower section of the web guide are for temperature sensors, such as thermocouples, for the measurement and control of the web temperature. The sections of the web guide extending upstream and downstream from the deposition zone serves to create very low gaseous conductance to isolate Region 100 from Region 200 and therefore minimize the leakage of Se/S into the Region 200. It is preferred to have the web guide made out of an infrared (IR) transmitting glass such as Vicor or quartz so that it doesn't interfere with the heating of the web substrate. It is also preferred to have all the surfaces of the web guide “flame polished” to reduce the risk of damaging the substrate and to reduce the risk of breakage of the guide itself during heating and/or cooling. Another advantage of using glass as the material of construction for the web guide is its inertness towards reaction with Se and/or S. As a result, periodic maintenance cleaning of the guide will be relatively easier. Another advantage of the web guide is the fact that it acts as a support for the web. In the case of high throughput processing, web speed has to be increased. In order to keep CIGS film thickness unchanged it is necessary to increase the deposition zone length to accommodate larger number of sources. Under these conditions the sagging of the web is unavoidable and becomes a problem. However, this problem is avoided when a web guide is used, since the guide supports the weight of the web during its transition through the deposition zone.
  • In order to further reduce the leakage of Se/S from Region 100 into Region 200 a gas purge is established in Region 200. A flow of gas is introduced into the Region 200 through inlets (6) and is pumped out through pumping holes (70) into Region 300 as shown in FIG. 3. The flow rate and the conductance of the holes (70) are adjusted to provide an excess of pressure in Region 200 relative to Region 100. Region 300 would contain all other components required for the operation of the system.
  • For such a system to operate efficiently it is necessary to accurately control Se effusion rate and keep it to a minimum level as required by the formation of the CIGS film on the moving substrate. This requires an accurate control of the surface temperature of the liquid Se (or S) in the source, which in turn sets the vapor pressure in the source above the melt. Se/S have high vapor pressures at moderately low temperatures such that operational surface temperatures are expected to be in the range of 200° C. to 400° C. and should be colder than the upstream delivery manifold to avoid condensation therein. This high temperature manifold provides an uncontrollable heat flow into the source. FIG. 5 shows schematically a Se/S source 80 that provides a workable solution to the difficulties mentioned above. The surface temperature of the melt is measured and controlled by the sheathed thermocouple (82) attached to a ring shaped float (84). In this way, irrespective of the melt level, thermocouple (852) always indicates the melt surface temperature. The float material can be glass or graphite and can have a sealed internal cavity to increase buoyancy especially in the case of S evaporation. Cooling coil (86) through which water flows at controlled rates provides adjustable heat removal to balance heat load to the source mainly through the manifold. The system is then able to control low melt surface temperatures by the external heater (88) with feedback from thermocouple (82).
  • Methods that would inhibit the reaction of Mo with Se are based on the principle that reactivity of Mo to Se can be suppressed by adding oxygen in sufficient concentrations to Mo. The reason behind this approach is that the Gibbs free energy of the reaction of Mo with oxygen is lower than the Gibbs free energy of the reaction of Mo with Se or S. For illustration purposes Gibbs free energy for some of the selenization, sulfurization and oxidation reactions of Mo at 700 K (427° C.) are given below:
  • Mo + Se2 = MoSe2 ΔGrx = −164 kJ/mol
    Mo + ¼Se8 = MoSe2 ΔGrx = −142 kJ/mol
    3Mo + 2Se2 = Mo3Se4 ΔGrx = −363 kJ/mol
    Mo + S2 = MoS2 ΔGrx = −270 kJ/mol
    Mo + ¼S8 = MoS2 ΔGrx = −249 kJ/mol
    2Mo + 3/2S2 = Mo2S3 ΔGrx = −403 kJ/mol
    Mo + 3/2O2 = MoO3 ΔGrx = −566 kJ/mol
    Mo + O2 = MoO2 ΔGrx = −467 kJ/mol
  • These reaction energies imply that Mo films may be passivated against Se and/or S by introducing an appropriate amount of oxygen into the Mo film. The amount of oxygen in the Mo film has to be larger than a minimum level to be effective in passivating against chemical reactions with Se and/or S. Passivation against Se and against S would require different minimum level of oxygen in the film. As will be described later (paragraph B3), in the case of Mo sputter-coated polyimide substrates, 3 to 4 atomic percent oxygen was found to be inadequate for passivation against Se and thus resulted in cracking of Mo film and low adhesion of the CIGS film to Mo. However, 6 to 8 atomic percent oxygen prevented Mo cracking and resulted in better adhesion of CIGS film to Mo.
  • Oxygen will also passivate other metal films such as tungsten (W), chromium (Cr), tantalum (Ta), niobium (Nb), vanadium (V), titanium (Ti), and others susceptible to reaction with selenium and/or sulfur during deposition of selenide, sulfide, and mixed selenide/sulfide films on them. This is because oxidation reactions have lower Gibbs free energy than the selenization or sufurization reactions. However, the minimum oxygen level for passivation would be different for different metal films.
  • Method of forming the metal films would also control the minimum oxygen level for passivation as they would give different structures to the films. It should also be emphasized that the type of the selenide, sulfide, and the mixed selenide/sulfide film and the method of forming it will affect the minimum oxygen level for passivation. Therefore, in general, the minimum oxygen level for passivation has to be determined experimentally in each case.
  • Any method can be used to introduce oxygen into the metal films as long as it does not degrade operational characteristics of the films that would be defined by the user. In the case of Mo films or other films of refractory metals, the preferred method of film forming being sputtering, the oxygen can be introduced by mixing oxygen gas or other oxygen containing gas to the sputtering gas such as argon. The percentage of the oxygen or oxygen containing gas in the sputtering gas has to be determined experimentally to give the desired oxygen level in the Mo film. This is because the amount of oxygen in the sputtering gas mixture is not sufficient, by itself, to determine the oxygen concentration in the metal film. In fact, for a given gas concentration, the amount of oxygen in the film can differ greatly from one system to another.
  • Since the purpose of oxygen is to passivate Mo film against reaction with Se and/or S it would be sufficient to oxygenate the top portion of the film in order to achieve the desired effect rather than introduce oxygen throughout the thickness of the metal film. As will be shown in Section B3, oxygenation of the top 1000 Å of 2000 Å Mo film was adequate for the passivation of the entire film. In this instance, as well, the thickness of the oxygenated top layer need be determined experimentally. It should be pointed out that oxygenated top layer need not be deposited at the same time and in the same reactor as the non-oxygenated bottom portion of the metal film.
  • In the case of polyimide films, which always contain a certain percentage of water, the metal film can be passivated by allowing the polyimide be heated naturally by the sputtering plasma. In this case, the water in the polyimide outgases during the deposition of the metal thus providing the oxygen necessary for passivation. It will be shown in Section B3 that this method of oxygenation also gave satisfactory results.
  • The invention identifies reaction between Se/S and metal film substrate as being detrimental to the mechanical integrity (i.e. cracking) of both the metal and selenide/sulfide films and also being the cause of reduced adhesion between the metal and the selenide/sulfide films. It solves these problems by suppressing the reaction between the metal film and Se/S through process related techniques and through the addition of oxygen, above a certain minimum level, into the metal film passivating it against reaction with Se/S.
  • Present technology doesn't provide a solution to the cracking of metal and selenide/sulfide films. In fact, at the present time, the technology favors an oversupply of Se/S during the formation of the selenide/sulfide films aggravating the problem.
  • Applications could extend beyond photovoltaics where selenide and/or sulfide films are deposited on metal and metal coated substrates. Also, web guide/sealing assembly can be used in any web coating application to seal the web transport section from the coating section.
  • Following is the summary of the experiments testing the invention.
  • A Upilex S polyimide sputter coated with Mo was used in a roll-to-roll CIGS deposition process. The sputter deposition system which produced such a product consists of two targets 3 inches apart facing a web carrier drum over which polyimide web is stretched. The drum rotates in synchronization with the web translation to avoid sliding of the web over its surface. Heating of the web due to the sputtering plasmas is limited due to the drum acting as a heat sink. The drum can be actively refrigerated to further limit web temperature, though in the present this was not the case. All the Mo films discussed here are approximately 2000 Å thick. This initial material showed substantial cracking during the deposition of CIGS films. Subsequently Mo deposition conditions were modified to obtain a Mo film that would not crack during CIGS deposition. Two Mo runs on Upilex S were conducted under the same conditions as a previous deposition, identified as TM24312.2B, which resulted in heavy film cracking, except for two changes. In the first run the web tension was reduced as much as possible allowing the web temperature to rise. In the second case, 5% oxygen was introduced into the sputtering gas directed onto the second target from which top half of the total Mo thickness is deposited. These two runs were identified as TM24961.1 and TM24961.2 respectively.
  • CIGS films were deposited on these substrates in an inline reactor. The composition of the CIGS films were found to be similar, as shown in Table 3.1, but the film on substrate TM24312.2B showed cracking while films on substrates TM24961.1 and TM24961.2 had no observable cracks.
  • TABLE 3.1
    Composition of CIGS Mo coated films deposited on different
    Upilex S substrates.
    Cu In Ga Se
    Run (at (at (at (at Cu/ Ga/
    # Substrate %) %) %) %) In + Ga In + Ga
    70227 TM24312.2B 24.0 21.0 6.1 48.8 0.89 0.23
    70261 TM24961.1 24.2 17.9 8.7 49.3 0.91 0.33
    70262 22.0 18.2 8.2 51.6 0.83 0.31
    70264 TM24961.2 24.0 18.5 8.0 49.6 0.91 0.30
    70265 24.4 18.7 7.6 49.3 0.93 0.29
  • Auger depth profiles of these three Mo films are shown in FIGS. 6 a-6 c and highlight the differences in the oxygen content. In the case of the reference film, TM24312.2B, the oxygen content of the film is between 2 to 3 at % in the top and bottom half of the film corresponding to the deposition from the second and first target respectively. Oxygen peak of in the middle of the film corresponds to the gettering of background oxygen by the freshly deposited film during transit between the two targets. The peak concentration doesn't have much meaning since the depth resolution in the data is rather poor.
  • Mo film TM24961.1 shows qualitatively the same oxygen distribution but the amount of oxygen in the top and bottom half of the film is approximately around 7 at %. The source of this oxygen is water desorbing from the polyimide as a result of heating by the sputtering plasmas due to the fact that there is very little heat removal by the backing drum because of the low web tension. Again there is an oxygen peak in the middle of the film due to the gettering by the freshly deposited 1st half of the film.
  • Mo film TM24961.2 again has qualitatively similar oxygen distribution but in this case there is an intentional injection of oxygen onto the second target. As a result in the top half of the film, oxygen concentration is around 8 at % while in the bottom half is around 4 at % closer to the value in the reference film. Again there is a peak in the oxygen distribution in the middle of the film.
  • The absence of any observable film cracking on substrates TM24961.1 and TM24961.2 is associated with the adequate oxygen concentrations in the Mo films, which in the present case is around 6 to 8 at %. Based on the data from the reference film 3 at % oxygen is not enough to suppress cracking. It is important to point out that 8 at % oxygen in the top half of the film while the bottom half has 4 at % suppresses the crack formation. This is an indication that the process of crack formation involves the top of the Mo film rather than the full thickness of the film.
  • Table 3.2 gives the device performance data on the CIGS solar cells fabricated on the materials discussed above. Data convincingly shows that, devices fabricated on oxygen containing Mo films outperform the ones fabricated on the reference Mo. This is not surprising in view of the film cracking observed on the latter.
  • TABLE 3.2
    Solar cell parameters of the CIGS devices on TM24312.2B, TM24961.1 and
    TM24961.2 substrates
    Eff FF Voc Jsc Roc Gsc
    Sample # Cell # Substrate (%) (%) (V) (mA/cm2) (Ω-cm2) (mS/cm2)
    70227.211 1 TM24312.2B 2.1 23.7 0.407 22.1 24.1 42.3
    2 2.7 26.9 0.423 23.7 17.0 36.3
    3 1.7 22.6 0.368 21.0 21.4 56.4
    4 2.5 25.2 0.403 24.9 18.5 45.2
    70227.212 1 2.2 24.1 0.384 23.5 22.2 46.7
    2 2.7 25.4 0.409 25.8 17.1 44.0
    3 2.3 26.4 0.361 24.3 18.2 40.4
    4 2.6 26.0 0.391 25.8 15.8 46.5
    70227.221 1 1.9 22.0 0.409 21.6 23.8 54.1
    2 2.1 23.1 0.414 22.3 20.7 51.0
    3 2.0 22.6 0.394 22.9 22.9 48.8
    4 2.3 24.1 0.423 22.9 22.5 39.8
    70227.222 1 1.7 22.3 0.373 20.3 24.0 52.2
    2 2.1 22.8 0.403 23.0 19.7 54.5
    3 2.2 23.5 0.391 24.2 19.4 50.6
    4 2.3 22.9 0.402 24.8 18.4 54.8
    70261.12A 1 TM24961.2 10.4 58.0 0.536 33.5 4.3 0.9
    2 10.3 58.9 0.537 32.6 3.9 11.0
    3 11.0 61.7 0.537 33.1 3.7 2.2
    4 10.8 61.2 0.536 33.0 3.6 2.1
    70261.12B 1 8.8 51.3 0.530 32.5 5.9 3.8
    2 9.0 50.6 0.527 33.6 5.6 7.4
    3 9.4 55.1 0.535 32.0 5.5 2.9
    4 9.2 52.4 0.527 33.4 5.4 7.2
    70262.22A 1 8.4 49.7 0.512 33.0 6.9 3.4
    2 8.7 52.1 0.509 32.7 6.2 2.9
    3 3.0 25.1 0.502 23.9 21.2 30.2
    4 9.3 53.3 0.515 33.7 6.3 1.6
    70262.22B 1 8.2 47.5 0.517 33.3 7.8 3.1
    2 8.0 49.5 0.512 31.7 7.4 2.5
    3 9.0 52.4 0.514 33.5 6.8 4.2
    4 8.7 52.9 0.510 32.4 6.7 3.0
    70264.21 1 TM24961.1 9.4 56.5 0.508 32.6 4.4 1.6
    2 9.8 57.7 0.509 33.5 4.2 2.0
    3 10.1 60.5 0.509 32.7 3.7 4.8
    4 10.0 58.8 0.510 33.3 3.9 3.5
    70264.22 1 9.1 54.8 0.505 32.7 5.3 5.8
    2 9.4 56.3 0.509 32.9 4.7 0.6
    3 8.4 52.1 0.508 31.8 5.4 2.4
    4 8.1 50.4 0.501 32.1 5.6 7.7
    70265.12 1 10.5 63.6 0.500 33.0 2.8 5.6
    2 10.6 63.8 0.504 32.9 2.8 5.0
    3 10.7 65.8 0.499 32.5 2.4 0.8
    4 10.8 65.9 0.502 32.6 2.4 4.0
    70265.22 1 10.5 63.2 0.503 33.0 3.0 3.7
    2 10.5 63.5 0.505 32.8 3.0 2.7
    3 10.1 62.3 0.508 32.0 3.0 4.1
    4 9.8 60.7 0.503 32.2 3.2 1.9
    70265.32 1 10.0 60.9 0.505 32.6 3.5 12.2
    2 10.2 62.0 0.504 32.7 3.3 2.8
    3 10.1 62.9 0.502 32.0 3.2 5.0
    4 10.5 63.9 0.505 32.5 2.9 3.4
    70265.42 1 9.8 60.0 0.502 32.6 3.9 1.3
    2 10.0 61.1 0.501 32.8 3.5 6.4
    3 9.9 62.2 0.501 31.9 3.3 1.2
    4 10.3 63.3 0.502 32.2 3.0 2.5
    70265.52 1 9.1 55.3 0.502 32.8 5.5 1.3
    2 9.6 58.2 0.500 32.9 4.4 2.0
    3 9.6 58.5 0.500 32.8 4.8 4.1
    4 10.1 61.0 0.501 33.1 3.8 5.7
    70265.62 1 7.6 46.0 0.517 31.9 13.2 8.4
    2 7.7 48.3 0.516 31.1 11.4 4.6
    3 8.5 51.9 0.518 31.5 10.5 0.7
    4 8.7 53.1 0.518 31.7 9.2 3.8
    70265.72 1 5.6 35.4 0.528 29.9 36.0 4.5
    2 6.2 38.8 0.529 30.3 31.7 6.1
    3 5.5 37.2 0.524 28.2 40.3 8.4
    4 6.7 41.9 0.531 29.9 30.6 5.1
  • The foregoing description of the invention illustrates and describes the present invention. Additionally, the disclosure shows and describes only the preferred embodiments of the invention in the context of a formation of selenide, sulfide or mixed selenide-sulfide films on metal or metal coated substrates, but, as mentioned above, it is to be understood that the invention is capable of use in various other combinations, modifications, and environments and is capable of changes or modifications within the scope of the inventive concept as expressed herein, commensurate with the above teachings and/or the skill or knowledge of the relevant art. The embodiments described hereinabove are further intended to explain best modes known of practicing the invention and to enable others skilled in the art to utilize the invention in such, or other, embodiments and with the various modifications required by the particular applications or uses of the invention. Accordingly, the description is not intended to limit the invention to the form or application disclosed herein. Also, it is intended that the appended claims be construed to include alternative embodiments.

Claims (3)

1-19. (canceled)
20. A metal-coated substrate with a CuInGaR2 film on a surface of the metal coating, wherein R is Se or a combination of Se and S, wherein the metal coating contains oxygen in an amount sufficient to inhibit reaction of the metal with Se, and wherein the metal is selected from the group consisting of Mo, W, Cr, Ta, Nb, V and Ti.
21. The metal-coated substrate according to claim 20 wherein the amount of oxygen is 6-8 atomic percent.
US13/105,045 2004-10-21 2011-05-11 Formation of selenide, sulfide or mixed selenide-sulfide films on metal or metal coated substrates Abandoned US20110272787A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/105,045 US20110272787A1 (en) 2004-10-21 2011-05-11 Formation of selenide, sulfide or mixed selenide-sulfide films on metal or metal coated substrates

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US62035204P 2004-10-21 2004-10-21
PCT/US2005/037711 WO2006047207A2 (en) 2004-10-21 2005-10-21 Formation of selenide, sulfide or mixed selenide-sulfide films on metal or metal coated substrates
US57777708A 2008-07-29 2008-07-29
US13/105,045 US20110272787A1 (en) 2004-10-21 2011-05-11 Formation of selenide, sulfide or mixed selenide-sulfide films on metal or metal coated substrates

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2005/037711 Division WO2006047207A2 (en) 2004-10-21 2005-10-21 Formation of selenide, sulfide or mixed selenide-sulfide films on metal or metal coated substrates
US57777708A Division 2004-10-21 2008-07-29

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110272787A1 true US20110272787A1 (en) 2011-11-10

Family

ID=36228250

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/577,777 Expired - Fee Related US8168256B2 (en) 2004-10-21 2005-10-21 Formation of selenide, sulfide or mixed selenide-sulfide films on metal or metal coated substrates
US13/105,045 Abandoned US20110272787A1 (en) 2004-10-21 2011-05-11 Formation of selenide, sulfide or mixed selenide-sulfide films on metal or metal coated substrates
US13/460,253 Abandoned US20120213933A1 (en) 2004-10-21 2012-04-30 Formation of Selenide, Sulfide or Mixed Selenide-Sulfide Films on Metal or Metal Coated Substrates

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/577,777 Expired - Fee Related US8168256B2 (en) 2004-10-21 2005-10-21 Formation of selenide, sulfide or mixed selenide-sulfide films on metal or metal coated substrates

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/460,253 Abandoned US20120213933A1 (en) 2004-10-21 2012-04-30 Formation of Selenide, Sulfide or Mixed Selenide-Sulfide Films on Metal or Metal Coated Substrates

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (3) US8168256B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2006047207A2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2013082279A1 (en) * 2011-11-29 2013-06-06 Itn Energy Systems, Inc. Multi-zone modular coater

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2188406B1 (en) 2007-09-12 2018-03-07 Flisom AG Method for manufacturing a compound film
US8323408B2 (en) 2007-12-10 2012-12-04 Solopower, Inc. Methods and apparatus to provide group VIA materials to reactors for group IBIIIAVIA film formation
US8163090B2 (en) * 2007-12-10 2012-04-24 Solopower, Inc. Methods structures and apparatus to provide group VIA and IA materials for solar cell absorber formation
EP2287239B1 (en) * 2008-05-20 2014-06-04 Ube Industries, Ltd. Polyimide metal laminate and solar cell
ES2581378T3 (en) * 2008-06-20 2016-09-05 Volker Probst Processing device and procedure for processing stacked processing products
KR20110097908A (en) * 2008-11-28 2011-08-31 볼커 프로브스트 Method for producing semiconductor layers and coated substrates treated with elemental selenium and/or sulfur, in particular flat substrates
US9419151B2 (en) 2012-04-25 2016-08-16 Guardian Industries Corp. High-reflectivity back contact for photovoltaic devices such as copper—indium-diselenide solar cells
US9935211B2 (en) * 2012-04-25 2018-04-03 Guardian Glass, LLC Back contact structure for photovoltaic devices such as copper-indium-diselenide solar cells
US9246025B2 (en) 2012-04-25 2016-01-26 Guardian Industries Corp. Back contact for photovoltaic devices such as copper-indium-diselenide solar cells

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6372538B1 (en) * 2000-03-16 2002-04-16 University Of Delaware Fabrication of thin-film, flexible photovoltaic module
US6310281B1 (en) * 2000-03-16 2001-10-30 Global Solar Energy, Inc. Thin-film, flexible photovoltaic module
SE525704C2 (en) 2003-08-12 2005-04-05 Sandvik Ab Coated steel product of metal strip material comprising an electrically insulating layer doped with one or more alkali metals
US7115304B2 (en) * 2004-02-19 2006-10-03 Nanosolar, Inc. High throughput surface treatment on coiled flexible substrates

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2013082279A1 (en) * 2011-11-29 2013-06-06 Itn Energy Systems, Inc. Multi-zone modular coater
US9777365B2 (en) 2011-11-29 2017-10-03 Itn Energy Systems, Inc. Multi-zone modular coater

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20090017207A1 (en) 2009-01-15
WO2006047207A2 (en) 2006-05-04
WO2006047207A3 (en) 2007-04-12
US8168256B2 (en) 2012-05-01
US20120213933A1 (en) 2012-08-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20110272787A1 (en) Formation of selenide, sulfide or mixed selenide-sulfide films on metal or metal coated substrates
TWI413269B (en) Method and apparatus for converting precursor layers into photovoltaic absorbers
US7989256B2 (en) Method for manufacturing CIS-based thin film solar cell
JP4540724B2 (en) CIS type thin film solar cell manufacturing method
US8059945B2 (en) Nozzle-based, vapor-phase, plume delivery structure for use in production of thin-film deposition layer
CN101459200B (en) Preparation method of flexible CIGS thin-film solar cell and absorption layer
US20100297835A1 (en) Methods for fabricating copper indium gallium diselenide (cigs) compound thin films
Yu et al. Unveiling the selenization reaction mechanisms in ambient air‐processed highly efficient kesterite solar cells
US20100282300A1 (en) Method for producing an electrode made with molybdenum oxide
US8323408B2 (en) Methods and apparatus to provide group VIA materials to reactors for group IBIIIAVIA film formation
Ishizuka et al. Texture and morphology variations in (In, Ga) 2Se3 and Cu (In, Ga) Se2 thin films grown with various Se source conditions
JP2011171605A (en) Method of manufacturing chalcopyrite film
Gossla et al. Five-source PVD for the deposition of Cu (In1− xGax)(Se1− ySy) 2 absorber layers
US20140256082A1 (en) Method and apparatus for the formation of copper-indiumgallium selenide thin films using three dimensional selective rf and microwave rapid thermal processing
US20120288986A1 (en) Electroplating method for depositing continuous thin layers of indium or gallium rich materials
Schulte et al. Toward efficient Cu (In, Ga) Se2 solar cells prepared by reactive magnetron co‐sputtering from metallic targets in an Ar: H2Se atmosphere
Lin et al. A simple non-toxic simultaneous selenization/sulfurization process for Cu (In, Ga)(S, Se) 2 solar cells
Akcay et al. Na incorporation into Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film absorbers from RF-sputtered NaF precursors
Messaid et al. Optimization of a rear system based on titanium nitride for a flexible CuInSe2 solar cell
KR101237466B1 (en) Device for forming light absorbing layer by selenization
Onuma et al. Preparation and properties of CuInS2 thin film prepared from electroplated precursor
US20170236710A1 (en) Machine and process for continuous, sequential, deposition of semiconductor solar absorbers having variable semiconductor composition deposited in multiple sublayers
Aninat et al. In-situ X-ray diffraction annealing study of electroplated and sputtered Cu-In-Ga precursors for application to sequential Cu (In, Ga) Se2 processes
Eser et al. Critical issues in vapor deposition of Cu (InGa) Se/sub 2/on polymer web: source spitting and back contact cracking
Han et al. Inhibiting aluminum oxidation in CuInAl precursor films: Significance for achieving high-performance Cu (InAl) Se2 solar cells

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: FIELDS, SHANNON, DELAWARE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE;REEL/FRAME:027940/0018

Effective date: 20120314

Owner name: ESER, ERTEN, DELAWARE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FIELDS, SHANNON;REEL/FRAME:027940/0050

Effective date: 20120323

Owner name: ESER, ERTEN, DELAWARE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE;REEL/FRAME:027940/0018

Effective date: 20120314

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE;REEL/FRAME:063432/0671

Effective date: 20230119