US20110108386A1 - Apparatus and method for variable torque braking of escalators and moving walkways - Google Patents
Apparatus and method for variable torque braking of escalators and moving walkways Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110108386A1 US20110108386A1 US12/613,940 US61394009A US2011108386A1 US 20110108386 A1 US20110108386 A1 US 20110108386A1 US 61394009 A US61394009 A US 61394009A US 2011108386 A1 US2011108386 A1 US 2011108386A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- brake coil
- brake
- coil current
- escalator
- deceleration rate
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P3/00—Arrangements for stopping or slowing electric motors, generators, or dynamo-electric converters
- H02P3/06—Arrangements for stopping or slowing electric motors, generators, or dynamo-electric converters for stopping or slowing an individual dynamo-electric motor or dynamo-electric converter
- H02P3/08—Arrangements for stopping or slowing electric motors, generators, or dynamo-electric converters for stopping or slowing an individual dynamo-electric motor or dynamo-electric converter for stopping or slowing a dc motor
- H02P3/16—Arrangements for stopping or slowing electric motors, generators, or dynamo-electric converters for stopping or slowing an individual dynamo-electric motor or dynamo-electric converter for stopping or slowing a dc motor by combined electrical and mechanical braking
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B29/00—Safety devices of escalators or moving walkways
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to controlled braking mechanisms, and more particularly, to a variable torque braking apparatus and method for use in conjunction with escalators, moving walkways, and the like.
- open control loop systems with guided compression springs are bi-stable braking devices. That is, the brake is released during starting and running and applied with a constant spring force when the escalator or power walk is stopped. Due to this bi-stable functionality, the stopping distance and stopping rates can vary widely depending on escalator loading. For example, a lightly loaded escalator will stop in less time and over a shorter distance than a fully loaded escalator.
- a large flywheel is often added to the motor to offset the effects of escalator loading. Even though the large flywheel can provide the inertia to prevent the escalator from stopping too quickly when the escalator is lightly loaded, this same inertia is counterproductive when the escalator is fully loaded.
- the large flywheel requires that the brakes provide enough torque to stop the load on the escalator as well as to stop the large flywheel. Thus, the presence of the flywheel requires the brakes to be oversized for all applications.
- the difference in stopping distance and rate can still vary between no load and full load conditions. In many applications, this difference in stopping distances can still pose a problem if the customer requires that the stop distance range be narrower than the open loop brake system can provide. Additionally, in the United States and Canada, the ASME A17.1 Escalator Safety Code limits maximum deceleration rates as well as maximum stopping distances.
- Another problem that can arise with open loop spring applied braking systems is that the available brake torque may diminish over time due to brake wear or environmental conditions. As a result, the stopping rates and distances can become non-code compliant and/or may not meet customer specifications if the brake is not readjusted or replaced regularly.
- inverters e.g., AC drives
- inverters can be costly and can require extra room in the escalator truss for mounting. This can be prohibitive on some types of escalators where there is no extra room in the truss.
- at least one of a dynamic resistor or a regeneration unit is required to dump the generated braking energy. Both items also add cost and require space for mounting.
- ceramic magnetic brakes utilizing closed control loop braking may solve many of the problems inherent in guided compression spring open control loop braking systems, they nevertheless present other issues. For example, while stopping distances and rates achieved using closed loop controlled magnetic braking systems may be much more consistent than with open loop spring applied braking systems, the magnetic brake can tend to be sluggish. Consequently, the braking system can be relatively slow to hone in on a specific braking torque required for a given escalator load. The result is that the stopping rate may either under shoot or over shoot a set point at the beginning of the stop sequence, thereby producing a “wavy” stop until the control is able to hone in on the correct torque.
- magnetic brakes can vary from brake to brake, it is necessary to tune the closed loop brake controller for each brake before putting the brake into service. If the brake controller is not tuned, then it is possible for the brake to drag slightly over time and/or provide a stop that is not optimum. Also, the use of a magnetic brake does not allow the addition of a second brake on the same motor. As a result, magnetic brakes cannot be used for certain applications, particularly in Europe where the European escalator code (EN code) requires the use of compression guided springs as well as a second brake whenever the rise of the escalator exceeds a certain height.
- EN code European escalator code
- the invention is directed to a braking apparatus for an escalator or moving walkway as well as a method for controlling a braking profile for an escalator or moving walkway.
- a braking apparatus may include a braking element, a linearly controllable solenoid assembly, a biasing mechanism, and a control device.
- the braking element may be adapted to engage a brake drum or brake disk on a drive shaft of the escalator or moving walkway.
- the linearly controllable solenoid assembly may include a brake coil and an elongated member.
- the elongated member may be moveable linearly along an axis and the braking element may be coupled to the elongated member.
- the biasing mechanism may be arranged to bias the elongated member in a first direction along the axis to increase a torque applied to the drive shaft by the braking element.
- the control device may be configured to modulate a current to the brake coil based on at least one measured parameter associated with an operating condition of the escalator or moving walkway, whereby the elongated member is biased in a second direction along the axis opposite the first direction to decrease the torque applied to the drive shaft by the braking element.
- a method for controlling a braking profile for an escalator or moving walkway using the braking apparatus may include biasing the elongated member in a first direction along the axis with a biasing mechanism to increase a torque applied to the drive shaft by the braking element.
- the method may further include modulating a current to the brake coil with a control device based on at least one measured parameter associated with an operating condition of the escalator or moving walkway, whereby the elongated member is biased in a second direction along the axis opposite the first direction to decrease the torque applied to the drive shaft by the braking element.
- FIG. 1 is a partial schematic side view of a braking apparatus for an escalator or moving walkway according to an embodiment of the invention
- FIG. 2 is a partial perspective view of the braking apparatus of FIG. 1 ;
- FIG. 3 depicts a partial schematic illustration of a control device of the braking apparatus of FIG. 1 , including an exemplary freewheeling diode flyback circuit according to an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 1 is a partial schematic side view of a braking apparatus 10 for an escalator or moving walkway, according to an embodiment of the invention.
- the escalator or moving walkway (not shown herein in further detail) may comprise any known or conventional escalator or moving walkway as would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.
- Escalators are also referred to as moving staircases.
- Moving walkways are also referred to as moving sidewalks (or speedwalks), moving ramps (or speedramps), autowalks, and travelators and may include, for example, a plurality of pallets arranged one after the other to form a substantially even and/or linear track extending substantially horizontally or somewhat inclined relative to a direction of motion.
- FIG. 2 is a partial perspective view of the braking apparatus of FIG. 1 .
- the braking apparatus 10 shown in the embodiment depicted in FIGS. 1 and 2 includes a braking element 12 , a controllable solenoid assembly including a brake coil 14 and an elongated member 16 , a biasing mechanism 18 , and an electronic control device 20 .
- the braking apparatus 10 may be arranged and configured to stop the escalator or moving walkway at a predetermined deceleration rate and within a predetermined stop distance regardless of the load on the escalator or moving walkway when an emergency shutoff sequence or command is initiated. In this way, passengers on the escalator or moving walkway may remain safe and comfortable during deceleration.
- Such an emergency shutoff sequence may be initiated manually by the pressing of an emergency shutoff button or switch (not shown) or automatically via one or more sensors (not shown) arranged to monitor the operating status of the escalator or moving walkway.
- the braking apparatus 10 may stop the escalator or moving walkway by applying a variable torque to an output mechanism of an AC drive motor 22 , in particular, a drive shaft and/or a brake drum 26 (brake disk) secured to the drive shaft 24 , based on a measured load on the escalator or moving walkway.
- the braking element 12 may be, for example, in the form of a brake band of friction material (e.g., metal, plastic, rubber, leather, cloth, fiber composite, etc.) arranged concentrically around an outer annular surface 28 of the brake drum 26 .
- the braking element 12 may be optionally engageable with at least a portion (e.g. approximately 270 degrees) of the outer annular surface 28 of the brake drum 26 to apply a variable or adjustable torque thereto.
- the braking element 12 may be secured at a first end 30 to a fixed point on the escalator or moving walkway, for example, on a housing of the drive motor 22 .
- a second end 32 of the braking element 12 may be pivotably attached to the elongated member 16 to ensure consistent clearance of the braking element 12 from the brake drum 26 when released.
- One or more spacing rollers may be utilized in combination with a pin to pivotably attach the second end 32 of the braking element 12 to the elongated member 16 .
- the brake coil 14 of the solenoid assembly may be mounted on a bracket or frame 34 which may be fixedly secured to, for example, the housing of the drive motor 22 or another stationary portion of the escalator or moving walkway.
- the elongated member 16 may include a metallic core 36 moveably arranged within the windings of brake coil 14 and coupled at an outer end to an intermediate portion or linkage member 38 .
- the intermediate linkage member 38 may be arranged adjacent to the outer annular surface 28 the brake drum 26 and may include an arched or curved portion adapted to provide additional clearance for the braking element 12 when it is released from the brake drum 26 .
- the elongated member 16 may also include another end linkage member or rod 40 coupled to the intermediate linkage member 38 and to an adjustable plate 42 .
- the elongated member 16 including metallic core 36 , intermediate linkage member 38 , and end linkage member 40 , could also be formed as a single integrally formed member.
- the elongated member 16 is arranged to be linearly moveable bi-directionally along an axis A as indicated by double-ended arrow B shown in FIG. 1 .
- the biasing mechanism 18 which may be, for example, a compression spring, is arranged to bias the elongated member 16 in a first direction (i.e., to the right in FIG. 1 ) along the axis A to increase a torque applied to the drive shaft 24 (via brake drum 26 ) by the braking element 12 .
- a current is supplied to the brake coil 14
- the elongated member 16 is biased in a second direction (i.e., to the left in FIG.
- the elongated member 16 is utilized in tension to provide a low hysteresis, pull release linkage for optimum variable torque control.
- the tension in the elongated member 16 maintains a straight alignment of action and movement to minimize extraneous lateral movement and friction in the linkage that can occur with compression-type release linkages.
- the rod 40 extends through an opening in a fixed plate 44 and is attached at a second end to the adjustable plate 42 by, for example, an adjustable threaded connection.
- the compression spring 18 acts to bias plate 42 and rod 40 in the first direction along the line of action defined by axis A to increase the torque applied to the drive shaft 24 (via brake drum 26 ) by the braking element 12 .
- This is the default safety position of the braking apparatus 10 when no power is provided to the drive motor 22 and/or to the brake coil 14 . Allowing adjustment of the rod 40 relative to the plate 42 provides the ability to adjust the length and force of the compressing spring 18 and, thus, the torque applied to the brake drum 26 .
- One or more brake wear switch indicators 46 may also be provided proximate the rod 40 and plate 42 .
- the electronic control device 20 may be electrically coupled to or in electronic communication with one or more of the brake coil 14 , the drive motor 22 , and the brake wear switch indicators 46 via electrical and/or electronic links 50 , 52 , and 54 , respectively.
- the control device 20 may include, for example, but not limited to, a printed circuit board (PC Board) that may include, for example, a proportional-integral-derivative controller (PID) such as a programmable logic controller (PLC) or a digital controller implemented with a microcontroller unit (MCU) or processor 100 .
- PLC programmable logic controller
- MCU microcontroller unit
- the control device 20 may also be configured with software, including fuzzy logic software, for execution by the processor 100 .
- the control device 20 may also include a current regulator device 62 such as, for example, a pulse-width modulation (PWM) device.
- PWM pulse-width modulation
- the control device 20 may be configured to modulate a current supplied to the brake coil 14 .
- the elongated member 16 is biased linearly in the second direction (to the left in FIG. 1 ) along the axis A opposite the first direction to decrease or remove the torque applied to the drive shaft 24 (via brake drum 26 ) by the braking element 12 .
- the amount of current supplied to the brake coil 14 may be varied or adjusted based on the output value of the PWM device 62 and/or the status of one or more of the drive motor 22 and the brake wear switch indicators 46 received by the control device 20 via electrical and/or electronic links 52 and 54 .
- the torque applied to the drive shaft 24 can be adjusted to control a braking profile of the escalator or moving walkway.
- control device 20 may provide a current to the brake coil 14 sufficient to ensure that the braking element 12 is open, that is, to ensure the braking element 12 does not contact or apply any torque to brake drum 26 .
- the control device 20 may, for example, output a minimum brake coil current necessary to keep the brake open while conserving energy.
- control device 20 can execute a stop algorithm to modulate the brake coil current as needed in a closed loop control to apply a variable torque to the motor output drive shaft 24 to stop the escalator or moving walkway at a predetermined deceleration rate and within a predetermined stop distance regardless of the load on the escalator or moving walkway.
- the control device 20 may first estimate a load on the escalator or moving walkway by measuring an instantaneous speed of the AC drive motor 22 , to which power has been cut. For example, upon initiation of the stop sequence, the control device 20 may request/receive (via link 52 ) RPM data of the motor 22 with respect to a motor droop characteristic at a specified time after the stop command and, based on the RPM data, calculate the estimated load on the escalator or moving walkway. Such calculation may involve utilizing a RPM-load look-up or correlation table.
- the control device 20 may then initially adjust (i.e., reduce) the brake coil current to an estimated level sufficient to stop the escalator or moving walkway at a stored programmable deceleration rate based on the estimated load. By doing so, the initial brake torque output command from the control device 20 may be very close to an actual brake torque required to stop the given load at the predetermined deceleration rate.
- An advantage of having the initial brake torque being very close to the actual required brake torque is that time is thereafter minimized for the control device 20 to find the precise torque required to stop a given load at the predetermined deceleration rate. As a result, under-shooting and/or over-shooting the desired deceleration rate is minimized and a more stable consistent stop is thereby provided.
- the control device 20 may also, upon receiving the stop command, estimate a temperature of the brake coil 14 . As the brake coil 14 warms up or cools down, the resistance in the brake coil 14 varies proportionately. If temperature variations in the brake coil 14 are not compensated for, a given PWM output could result in a different brake coil current providing different brake torque values at different times and thereby prevent the braking apparatus 10 from providing a consistent deceleration over the normal operating temperature range of the brake coil.
- the control device 20 may, for example, compensate for brake coil temperature by monitoring how much the PWM device duty cycle changes during normal operation. When a stop command is given, the actual PWM output value may be subtracted from some known PWM output value for a given brake coil current. The difference is called the offset.
- the offset can be positive or negative and may be added to the estimated PWM output value for loading.
- the control device 20 may be able to compensate for temperature-related resistance variations in the brake coil 14 and thereby provide a consistent deceleration rate over the normal operating temperature range of the brake coil 14 .
- the control device 20 may also include closed loop fuzzy logic software configured to continuously or intermittently adjust and/or modulate the brake coil current (and therefore the applied torque) during the stop sequence to precisely control the braking deceleration rate of the escalator or moving walkway.
- the control device 20 may continuously or intermittently measure the deceleration rate of the escalator or moving walkway via link 52 and compare the measured value to the predetermined stored programmable deceleration rate. When the measured deceleration rate of the escalator or moving walkway is less than the stored programmable deceleration rate (indicating a heavy load), the control device 20 may decrease the brake coil current, thus increasing the torque applied by the braking element 12 to the drive shaft 24 .
- the control device 20 may increase the brake coil current, thus decreasing the torque applied by the braking element 12 to the drive shaft 24 .
- the control device 20 may continue to modulate the brake coil current accordingly until the escalator or moving walkway comes to a complete stop.
- the fuzzy logic software of the control device 20 may include a symmetrical diminishing algorithm with clipping logic executable by the processor to precisely control the deceleration rate (braking profile) of the escalator or moving walkway during the stop sequence and to prevent the control device 20 , in particular the current regulator or PWM device 62 , from outputting a brake current (corresponding to the PWM current output value) greater than or equal to a stored programmable maximum allowable value or less than or equal to zero.
- the fuzzy logic software may include instructions to monitor the actual PWM current output value and compare this output value to the stored programmable maximum allowable value. The control device 20 can then output an adjusted output value corresponding to a particular brake torque to be generated.
- the control device 20 may increase the output value by an amount that is the product of the actual output value and a predetermined percentage greater than one hundred percent. For example, if the measured deceleration rate is greater than 175% of the stored programmable deceleration rate and the actual output value is less than or equal to 50% of the maximum allowable value, then the actual output value may be increased by 130%.
- the actual output value may be increased by 118%. If the measured deceleration rate is greater than 125% (but less than or equal to 150%) of the stored programmable deceleration rate and the actual output value is less than or equal to 50% of the maximum allowable value, then the actual output value may be increased by 106%.
- the actual output value may be increased by 103%.
- the control device 20 may increase the output value by a predetermined percentage of the difference between the maximum allowable value and the actual output value. For example, if the measured deceleration rate is greater than 175% of the stored programmable deceleration rate and the actual output value is greater than 50% of the maximum allowable value, then the output value may be increased by adding 30% of the difference between the maximum allowable value and the actual output value.
- the output value may be increased by adding 18% of the difference between the maximum allowable value and the actual output value. If the measured deceleration rate is greater than 125% (but less than or equal to 150%) of the stored programmable deceleration rate and the actual output value is greater than 50% of the maximum allowable value, then the output value may be increased by adding 6% of the difference between the maximum allowable value and the actual output value.
- the brake output value may be increased by adding 3% of the difference between the maximum allowable value and the actual output value.
- the change in the current regulator's output value is the product of some predetermined percent and the actual output value.
- the change in output value is the sum of the actual output value and a percent of the difference between the actual output value and the maximum allowable output. So, the farther away from the maximum output the greater the output value can be increased. Also, the closer the actual output value is to the maximum allowable output, then the smaller the output value can be increased. In this way, the actual output value can never increase to be equal to or greater than the maximum allowable output.
- the control device 20 may decrease the output value by a predetermined percentage of the difference between the maximum allowable value and the actual output value.
- the control device 20 may decrease the output value by an amount that is the product of the actual output value and a predetermined percentage less than one hundred percent.
- control device 20 As the control device 20 recalculates the current regulator's output value, it limits the actual output value to the stored maximum or minimum PWM output value. That is, if the calculated PWM output value exceeds the maximum possible PWM output value, then the control device 20 sets the PWM output value to the maximum PWM output value. Likewise, if the control device 20 calculates a PWM output value of less than the minimum output value, then the control device 20 sets the PWM output value to the minimum allowed PWM output value.
- a result of the execution of the fuzzy logic software by the control device 20 is that the deceleration rate may remain more or less constant regardless of the load on the escalator or power walk. This can allow longer periods of time between required brake adjustments since only the torque required to stop a given load is applied and can eliminate the need to precisely mathematically model the entire mechanical system of an escalator or moving walkway in order to determine the appropriate brake torque for a given load. Furthermore, the symmetrical diminishing algorithm and clipping logic may provide a more stable, responsive control without delay time introduced into the system due to what is known as Integral Wind Up.
- the control device 20 may also include a freewheeling diode flyback circuit 60 coupled to the brake coil 14 .
- Freewheeling diode flyback circuits are known in the art and are commonly used to avoid damage to circuitry due to flyback effects of inductive loads.
- FIG. 3 depicts a schematic illustration of a freewheeling diode flyback circuit 60 of the control device 20 and coupled to the brake coil 14 and including a permanent flyback resistor 70 on the anode side of a high speed flyback diode 72 .
- the microcontroller unit or processor 100 of the control device 20 may be configured to temporarily insert an additional flyback resistor 74 in the freewheeling diode flyback circuit 60 to reduce the brake set time.
- Inserting the additional resistance 74 which is shorted out by a switch 80 during operation of the escalator or moving walkway, can reduce the inductance-to-resistance (L/R) time constant of the brake coil 14 .
- Reducing the set time of the brake can reduce coasting time and distance during the time it takes for the brake to set. That is, reducing the set time of the brake can reduce the amplitude of any velocity increase during the time it takes for the brake to set when the escalator is heavily loaded and can provide for more consistent stop profiles over the entire loading range of the escalator or moving walkway.
- the additional flyback resistance 74 must be removed after a short duration of time since it may be of sufficient size to prevent the brake coil 14 from being controlled by the PWM device 62 of the control device 20 . Only the normal flyback resistor 70 must remain in the circuit for control of the brake.
- the control device 20 may also, for example, reduce the brake coil current to a specified minimum level during a run mode of the escalator or moving walkway to conserve energy.
- the brake coil current can be reduced after the brake opens since it takes less current to hold the brake open than it does to open the brake.
- the control device 20 may, for example, modulate or reduce the brake coil current during a run mode of the escalator or moving walkway to an optimum minimum value based on measured temperature changes in the brake coil 14 . For example, as the brake coil 14 warms up or cools down, the resistance in the brake coil 14 may vary proportionately causing a given brake coil current output of the control device 20 to provide a different relative position of the elongated member 16 of the braking apparatus 10 .
- the brake may set during normal run operation. On the other hand, if brake coil current is too high, the brake coil 14 could overheat.
- controlling the brake coil open current while compensating for brake coil temperature allows the control device 20 to hold the brake coil current steady at an optimum value over the entire operating temperature range of the brake coil 14 . Reducing the brake coil current while in the run mode may help reduce energy consumption, reduce brake coil running temperature, reduces escalator controller power supply requirements, and/or reduces heat dissipation in the control device 20 .
- the control device 20 may be optionally configured to operate the braking element 12 in a fixed torque mode or a variable torque mode.
- the braking apparatus 10 may be a modular unit configured such that multiple braking apparatuses 10 may be coupled to one or more control devices 20 and stacked on a single brake drive shaft 24 .
- Such a modular braking apparatus 10 may be installed with new escalators or moving walkways and may also allow retrofitting of existing escalators or moving walkways.
- the braking apparatus 10 may provide a consistent stopping distance and stopping rate for an escalator or moving walkway for all escalator loading conditions. No flywheel is required since the closed loop control device 20 compensates for escalator loading. Moreover, no inverter, braking resistor, or regeneration unit is required. Also, no adjustment of the brake control device is required at installation.
Abstract
Description
- 1. Field of Invention
- The present invention relates generally to controlled braking mechanisms, and more particularly, to a variable torque braking apparatus and method for use in conjunction with escalators, moving walkways, and the like.
- 2. Related Art
- Current braking systems for escalators and moving walkways (also known as, e.g., power walks or travelators) include, for example, open control loop braking systems with guided compression springs. Alternatively or in addition, closed control loop braking systems with ceramic magnetic brakes have been utilized. Each of these braking systems, however, present a variety of control issues.
- For example, open control loop systems with guided compression springs are bi-stable braking devices. That is, the brake is released during starting and running and applied with a constant spring force when the escalator or power walk is stopped. Due to this bi-stable functionality, the stopping distance and stopping rates can vary widely depending on escalator loading. For example, a lightly loaded escalator will stop in less time and over a shorter distance than a fully loaded escalator.
- To reduce the stopping distance differences between no load and full load conditions on the escalator, a large flywheel is often added to the motor to offset the effects of escalator loading. Even though the large flywheel can provide the inertia to prevent the escalator from stopping too quickly when the escalator is lightly loaded, this same inertia is counterproductive when the escalator is fully loaded. The large flywheel requires that the brakes provide enough torque to stop the load on the escalator as well as to stop the large flywheel. Thus, the presence of the flywheel requires the brakes to be oversized for all applications.
- Moreover, notwithstanding the addition of a large flywheel, the difference in stopping distance and rate can still vary between no load and full load conditions. In many applications, this difference in stopping distances can still pose a problem if the customer requires that the stop distance range be narrower than the open loop brake system can provide. Additionally, in the United States and Canada, the ASME A17.1 Escalator Safety Code limits maximum deceleration rates as well as maximum stopping distances.
- Another problem that can arise with open loop spring applied braking systems is that the available brake torque may diminish over time due to brake wear or environmental conditions. As a result, the stopping rates and distances can become non-code compliant and/or may not meet customer specifications if the brake is not readjusted or replaced regularly.
- In an effort to provide consistent stopping, some manufacturers of escalators and moving walkways have added inverters (e.g., AC drives) to provide dynamic motor braking. The addition of inverters, however, can also have disadvantages. Inverters can be costly and can require extra room in the escalator truss for mounting. This can be prohibitive on some types of escalators where there is no extra room in the truss. Also, at least one of a dynamic resistor or a regeneration unit is required to dump the generated braking energy. Both items also add cost and require space for mounting.
- Moreover, it is generally not practical to add closed loop control to guided compression spring braking systems because the brake coils on these types of units are bi-stable devices. Bi-stable devices are designed to be either actuated or not actuated. Consequently, controlling the brake linearly is not possible through closed loop control.
- Although ceramic magnetic brakes utilizing closed control loop braking may solve many of the problems inherent in guided compression spring open control loop braking systems, they nevertheless present other issues. For example, while stopping distances and rates achieved using closed loop controlled magnetic braking systems may be much more consistent than with open loop spring applied braking systems, the magnetic brake can tend to be sluggish. Consequently, the braking system can be relatively slow to hone in on a specific braking torque required for a given escalator load. The result is that the stopping rate may either under shoot or over shoot a set point at the beginning of the stop sequence, thereby producing a “wavy” stop until the control is able to hone in on the correct torque.
- Furthermore, since the magnetic null characteristics of magnetic brakes can vary from brake to brake, it is necessary to tune the closed loop brake controller for each brake before putting the brake into service. If the brake controller is not tuned, then it is possible for the brake to drag slightly over time and/or provide a stop that is not optimum. Also, the use of a magnetic brake does not allow the addition of a second brake on the same motor. As a result, magnetic brakes cannot be used for certain applications, particularly in Europe where the European escalator code (EN code) requires the use of compression guided springs as well as a second brake whenever the rise of the escalator exceeds a certain height.
- The invention is directed to a braking apparatus for an escalator or moving walkway as well as a method for controlling a braking profile for an escalator or moving walkway.
- In an embodiment of the invention, a braking apparatus is provided. The braking apparatus may include a braking element, a linearly controllable solenoid assembly, a biasing mechanism, and a control device. The braking element may be adapted to engage a brake drum or brake disk on a drive shaft of the escalator or moving walkway. The linearly controllable solenoid assembly may include a brake coil and an elongated member. The elongated member may be moveable linearly along an axis and the braking element may be coupled to the elongated member. The biasing mechanism may be arranged to bias the elongated member in a first direction along the axis to increase a torque applied to the drive shaft by the braking element. The control device may be configured to modulate a current to the brake coil based on at least one measured parameter associated with an operating condition of the escalator or moving walkway, whereby the elongated member is biased in a second direction along the axis opposite the first direction to decrease the torque applied to the drive shaft by the braking element.
- In another embodiment of the invention, a method for controlling a braking profile for an escalator or moving walkway using the braking apparatus is also provided. The method may include biasing the elongated member in a first direction along the axis with a biasing mechanism to increase a torque applied to the drive shaft by the braking element. The method may further include modulating a current to the brake coil with a control device based on at least one measured parameter associated with an operating condition of the escalator or moving walkway, whereby the elongated member is biased in a second direction along the axis opposite the first direction to decrease the torque applied to the drive shaft by the braking element.
- Further features and advantages of the invention, as well as the structure and operation of various embodiments of the invention, are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
- The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following, more particular description of some example embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Unless otherwise indicated, the accompanying drawing figures are not to scale. Several embodiments of the invention will be described with respect to the following drawings, in which like reference numerals represent like features throughout the figures, and in which:
-
FIG. 1 is a partial schematic side view of a braking apparatus for an escalator or moving walkway according to an embodiment of the invention; -
FIG. 2 is a partial perspective view of the braking apparatus ofFIG. 1 ; and -
FIG. 3 depicts a partial schematic illustration of a control device of the braking apparatus ofFIG. 1 , including an exemplary freewheeling diode flyback circuit according to an embodiment of the invention. - In describing the example embodiments illustrated in the drawings, specific terminology is employed for the sake of clarity. However, the invention is not intended to be limited to the specific terminology so selected. It is to be understood that each specific element includes all technical equivalents that operate in a similar manner to accomplish a similar purpose.
-
FIG. 1 is a partial schematic side view of abraking apparatus 10 for an escalator or moving walkway, according to an embodiment of the invention. The escalator or moving walkway (not shown herein in further detail) may comprise any known or conventional escalator or moving walkway as would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Escalators are also referred to as moving staircases. Moving walkways are also referred to as moving sidewalks (or speedwalks), moving ramps (or speedramps), autowalks, and travelators and may include, for example, a plurality of pallets arranged one after the other to form a substantially even and/or linear track extending substantially horizontally or somewhat inclined relative to a direction of motion.FIG. 2 is a partial perspective view of the braking apparatus ofFIG. 1 . - The
braking apparatus 10 shown in the embodiment depicted inFIGS. 1 and 2 includes abraking element 12, a controllable solenoid assembly including abrake coil 14 and anelongated member 16, abiasing mechanism 18, and anelectronic control device 20. Thebraking apparatus 10 may be arranged and configured to stop the escalator or moving walkway at a predetermined deceleration rate and within a predetermined stop distance regardless of the load on the escalator or moving walkway when an emergency shutoff sequence or command is initiated. In this way, passengers on the escalator or moving walkway may remain safe and comfortable during deceleration. Such an emergency shutoff sequence may be initiated manually by the pressing of an emergency shutoff button or switch (not shown) or automatically via one or more sensors (not shown) arranged to monitor the operating status of the escalator or moving walkway. Thebraking apparatus 10 may stop the escalator or moving walkway by applying a variable torque to an output mechanism of anAC drive motor 22, in particular, a drive shaft and/or a brake drum 26 (brake disk) secured to thedrive shaft 24, based on a measured load on the escalator or moving walkway. - According to the embodiment shown in
FIGS. 1 and 2 , thebraking element 12 may be, for example, in the form of a brake band of friction material (e.g., metal, plastic, rubber, leather, cloth, fiber composite, etc.) arranged concentrically around an outerannular surface 28 of thebrake drum 26. Thebraking element 12 may be optionally engageable with at least a portion (e.g. approximately 270 degrees) of the outerannular surface 28 of thebrake drum 26 to apply a variable or adjustable torque thereto. Thebraking element 12 may be secured at afirst end 30 to a fixed point on the escalator or moving walkway, for example, on a housing of thedrive motor 22. Asecond end 32 of thebraking element 12 may be pivotably attached to theelongated member 16 to ensure consistent clearance of thebraking element 12 from thebrake drum 26 when released. One or more spacing rollers may be utilized in combination with a pin to pivotably attach thesecond end 32 of thebraking element 12 to theelongated member 16. - The
brake coil 14 of the solenoid assembly may be mounted on a bracket orframe 34 which may be fixedly secured to, for example, the housing of thedrive motor 22 or another stationary portion of the escalator or moving walkway. Theelongated member 16 may include ametallic core 36 moveably arranged within the windings ofbrake coil 14 and coupled at an outer end to an intermediate portion orlinkage member 38. Theintermediate linkage member 38 may be arranged adjacent to the outerannular surface 28 thebrake drum 26 and may include an arched or curved portion adapted to provide additional clearance for thebraking element 12 when it is released from thebrake drum 26. Theelongated member 16 may also include another end linkage member orrod 40 coupled to theintermediate linkage member 38 and to anadjustable plate 42. Theelongated member 16, includingmetallic core 36,intermediate linkage member 38, and endlinkage member 40, could also be formed as a single integrally formed member. - The
elongated member 16 is arranged to be linearly moveable bi-directionally along an axis A as indicated by double-ended arrow B shown inFIG. 1 . Thebiasing mechanism 18, which may be, for example, a compression spring, is arranged to bias theelongated member 16 in a first direction (i.e., to the right inFIG. 1 ) along the axis A to increase a torque applied to the drive shaft 24 (via brake drum 26) by thebraking element 12. On the other hand, when a current is supplied to thebrake coil 14, theelongated member 16 is biased in a second direction (i.e., to the left inFIG. 1 ) along the axis A to decrease the torque applied to the drive shaft 24 (via brake drum 26) by thebraking element 12. That is, as current to thebrake coil 14 is increased, the torque applied to thedrive shaft 24 by thebraking element 12 is decreased or removed. In this way, theelongated member 16 is utilized in tension to provide a low hysteresis, pull release linkage for optimum variable torque control. The tension in theelongated member 16 maintains a straight alignment of action and movement to minimize extraneous lateral movement and friction in the linkage that can occur with compression-type release linkages. When thebraking apparatus 10 is mounted on an escalator or moving walkway, the axis A may extend substantially perpendicular to thedrive shaft 24 and substantially parallel to a tangent of thedrive shaft 24. - As shown in the embodiment depicted in
FIGS. 1 and 2 , therod 40 extends through an opening in a fixedplate 44 and is attached at a second end to theadjustable plate 42 by, for example, an adjustable threaded connection. Thecompression spring 18 acts to biasplate 42 androd 40 in the first direction along the line of action defined by axis A to increase the torque applied to the drive shaft 24 (via brake drum 26) by thebraking element 12. This is the default safety position of thebraking apparatus 10 when no power is provided to thedrive motor 22 and/or to thebrake coil 14. Allowing adjustment of therod 40 relative to theplate 42 provides the ability to adjust the length and force of the compressingspring 18 and, thus, the torque applied to thebrake drum 26. One or more brake wearswitch indicators 46 may also be provided proximate therod 40 andplate 42. - The
electronic control device 20 may be electrically coupled to or in electronic communication with one or more of thebrake coil 14, thedrive motor 22, and the brake wearswitch indicators 46 via electrical and/orelectronic links control device 20 may include, for example, but not limited to, a printed circuit board (PC Board) that may include, for example, a proportional-integral-derivative controller (PID) such as a programmable logic controller (PLC) or a digital controller implemented with a microcontroller unit (MCU) orprocessor 100. Thecontrol device 20 may also be configured with software, including fuzzy logic software, for execution by theprocessor 100. Thecontrol device 20 may also include acurrent regulator device 62 such as, for example, a pulse-width modulation (PWM) device. - The
control device 20 may be configured to modulate a current supplied to thebrake coil 14. As noted above, when thecontrol device 20 outputs a current to thebrake coil 14, theelongated member 16 is biased linearly in the second direction (to the left inFIG. 1 ) along the axis A opposite the first direction to decrease or remove the torque applied to the drive shaft 24 (via brake drum 26) by thebraking element 12. The amount of current supplied to thebrake coil 14 may be varied or adjusted based on the output value of thePWM device 62 and/or the status of one or more of thedrive motor 22 and the brake wearswitch indicators 46 received by thecontrol device 20 via electrical and/orelectronic links drive shaft 24 can be adjusted to control a braking profile of the escalator or moving walkway. - During operation of the escalator or moving walkway, the
control device 20 may provide a current to thebrake coil 14 sufficient to ensure that thebraking element 12 is open, that is, to ensure thebraking element 12 does not contact or apply any torque tobrake drum 26. Thecontrol device 20 may, for example, output a minimum brake coil current necessary to keep the brake open while conserving energy. Upon initiation of a stop sequence, for example, by manually pressing an emergency stop button or automatic sensing of an run operation error, thecontrol device 20 can execute a stop algorithm to modulate the brake coil current as needed in a closed loop control to apply a variable torque to the motoroutput drive shaft 24 to stop the escalator or moving walkway at a predetermined deceleration rate and within a predetermined stop distance regardless of the load on the escalator or moving walkway. - After receiving a stop command, the
control device 20 may first estimate a load on the escalator or moving walkway by measuring an instantaneous speed of theAC drive motor 22, to which power has been cut. For example, upon initiation of the stop sequence, thecontrol device 20 may request/receive (via link 52) RPM data of themotor 22 with respect to a motor droop characteristic at a specified time after the stop command and, based on the RPM data, calculate the estimated load on the escalator or moving walkway. Such calculation may involve utilizing a RPM-load look-up or correlation table. Thecontrol device 20 may then initially adjust (i.e., reduce) the brake coil current to an estimated level sufficient to stop the escalator or moving walkway at a stored programmable deceleration rate based on the estimated load. By doing so, the initial brake torque output command from thecontrol device 20 may be very close to an actual brake torque required to stop the given load at the predetermined deceleration rate. An advantage of having the initial brake torque being very close to the actual required brake torque is that time is thereafter minimized for thecontrol device 20 to find the precise torque required to stop a given load at the predetermined deceleration rate. As a result, under-shooting and/or over-shooting the desired deceleration rate is minimized and a more stable consistent stop is thereby provided. - The
control device 20 may also, upon receiving the stop command, estimate a temperature of thebrake coil 14. As thebrake coil 14 warms up or cools down, the resistance in thebrake coil 14 varies proportionately. If temperature variations in thebrake coil 14 are not compensated for, a given PWM output could result in a different brake coil current providing different brake torque values at different times and thereby prevent thebraking apparatus 10 from providing a consistent deceleration over the normal operating temperature range of the brake coil. Thecontrol device 20 may, for example, compensate for brake coil temperature by monitoring how much the PWM device duty cycle changes during normal operation. When a stop command is given, the actual PWM output value may be subtracted from some known PWM output value for a given brake coil current. The difference is called the offset. The offset can be positive or negative and may be added to the estimated PWM output value for loading. In this way, thecontrol device 20 may be able to compensate for temperature-related resistance variations in thebrake coil 14 and thereby provide a consistent deceleration rate over the normal operating temperature range of thebrake coil 14. - The
control device 20 may also include closed loop fuzzy logic software configured to continuously or intermittently adjust and/or modulate the brake coil current (and therefore the applied torque) during the stop sequence to precisely control the braking deceleration rate of the escalator or moving walkway. Thecontrol device 20 may continuously or intermittently measure the deceleration rate of the escalator or moving walkway vialink 52 and compare the measured value to the predetermined stored programmable deceleration rate. When the measured deceleration rate of the escalator or moving walkway is less than the stored programmable deceleration rate (indicating a heavy load), thecontrol device 20 may decrease the brake coil current, thus increasing the torque applied by thebraking element 12 to thedrive shaft 24. On the other hand, when the measured deceleration rate of the escalator or moving walkway is greater than the stored programmable deceleration rate (indicating a light load), thecontrol device 20 may increase the brake coil current, thus decreasing the torque applied by thebraking element 12 to thedrive shaft 24. Thecontrol device 20 may continue to modulate the brake coil current accordingly until the escalator or moving walkway comes to a complete stop. - The fuzzy logic software of the
control device 20 may include a symmetrical diminishing algorithm with clipping logic executable by the processor to precisely control the deceleration rate (braking profile) of the escalator or moving walkway during the stop sequence and to prevent thecontrol device 20, in particular the current regulator orPWM device 62, from outputting a brake current (corresponding to the PWM current output value) greater than or equal to a stored programmable maximum allowable value or less than or equal to zero. The fuzzy logic software may include instructions to monitor the actual PWM current output value and compare this output value to the stored programmable maximum allowable value. Thecontrol device 20 can then output an adjusted output value corresponding to a particular brake torque to be generated. - When the measured deceleration rate is greater than the stored programmable deceleration rate (set point) and the current regulator's actual output value (e.g., a PWM value) is less than or equal to half of the maximum allowable value, the
control device 20 may increase the output value by an amount that is the product of the actual output value and a predetermined percentage greater than one hundred percent. For example, if the measured deceleration rate is greater than 175% of the stored programmable deceleration rate and the actual output value is less than or equal to 50% of the maximum allowable value, then the actual output value may be increased by 130%. If the measured deceleration rate is greater than 150% (but less than or equal to 175%) of the stored programmable deceleration rate and the actual output value is less than or equal to 50% of the maximum allowable value, then the actual output value may be increased by 118%. If the measured deceleration rate is greater than 125% (but less than or equal to 150%) of the stored programmable deceleration rate and the actual output value is less than or equal to 50% of the maximum allowable value, then the actual output value may be increased by 106%. If the measured deceleration rate is greater than 110% (but less than or equal to 125%) of the stored programmable deceleration rate and the actual output value is less than or equal to 50% of the maximum allowable value, then the actual output value may be increased by 103%. - When the measured deceleration rate is greater than the stored programmable deceleration rate (set point) and the actual output value is greater than half of the maximum allowable value, the
control device 20 may increase the output value by a predetermined percentage of the difference between the maximum allowable value and the actual output value. For example, if the measured deceleration rate is greater than 175% of the stored programmable deceleration rate and the actual output value is greater than 50% of the maximum allowable value, then the output value may be increased by adding 30% of the difference between the maximum allowable value and the actual output value. If the measured deceleration rate is greater than 150% (but less than or equal to 175%) of the stored programmable deceleration rate and the actual output value is greater than 50% of the maximum allowable value, then the output value may be increased by adding 18% of the difference between the maximum allowable value and the actual output value. If the measured deceleration rate is greater than 125% (but less than or equal to 150%) of the stored programmable deceleration rate and the actual output value is greater than 50% of the maximum allowable value, then the output value may be increased by adding 6% of the difference between the maximum allowable value and the actual output value. If the measured deceleration rate is greater than 110% (but less than or equal to 125%) of the stored programmable deceleration rate and the actual output value is greater than 50% of the maximum allowable value, then the brake output value may be increased by adding 3% of the difference between the maximum allowable value and the actual output value. - Thus, if the actual output value is less than ½ of the maximum allowable output, then the change in the current regulator's output value is the product of some predetermined percent and the actual output value. Whereas, if the actual output value is greater than ½ of the maximum allowable output then the change in output value is the sum of the actual output value and a percent of the difference between the actual output value and the maximum allowable output. So, the farther away from the maximum output the greater the output value can be increased. Also, the closer the actual output value is to the maximum allowable output, then the smaller the output value can be increased. In this way, the actual output value can never increase to be equal to or greater than the maximum allowable output.
- In contrast, when the measured deceleration rate is less than the stored programmable deceleration rate (set point) and the actual output value is greater than half of the maximum allowable value, the
control device 20 may decrease the output value by a predetermined percentage of the difference between the maximum allowable value and the actual output value. When the measured deceleration rate is less than the stored programmable deceleration rate and the actual output value is less than or equal to half of the maximum allowable value, thecontrol device 20 may decrease the output value by an amount that is the product of the actual output value and a predetermined percentage less than one hundred percent. Thus, the logic for decreasing the brake coil current is similar to that for increasing the current. The farther away from a zero output, the greater the actual output value can be decreased. Also, the closer the actual output value is to a zero output, then the smaller the output value can be decreased. In this way, the actual output value can never decrease to be equal to or less than a zero output. - As the
control device 20 recalculates the current regulator's output value, it limits the actual output value to the stored maximum or minimum PWM output value. That is, if the calculated PWM output value exceeds the maximum possible PWM output value, then thecontrol device 20 sets the PWM output value to the maximum PWM output value. Likewise, if thecontrol device 20 calculates a PWM output value of less than the minimum output value, then thecontrol device 20 sets the PWM output value to the minimum allowed PWM output value. - A result of the execution of the fuzzy logic software by the
control device 20 is that the deceleration rate may remain more or less constant regardless of the load on the escalator or power walk. This can allow longer periods of time between required brake adjustments since only the torque required to stop a given load is applied and can eliminate the need to precisely mathematically model the entire mechanical system of an escalator or moving walkway in order to determine the appropriate brake torque for a given load. Furthermore, the symmetrical diminishing algorithm and clipping logic may provide a more stable, responsive control without delay time introduced into the system due to what is known as Integral Wind Up. - The
control device 20 may also include a freewheelingdiode flyback circuit 60 coupled to thebrake coil 14. Freewheeling diode flyback circuits are known in the art and are commonly used to avoid damage to circuitry due to flyback effects of inductive loads.FIG. 3 depicts a schematic illustration of a freewheelingdiode flyback circuit 60 of thecontrol device 20 and coupled to thebrake coil 14 and including a permanent flyback resistor 70 on the anode side of a highspeed flyback diode 72. The microcontroller unit orprocessor 100 of thecontrol device 20 may be configured to temporarily insert anadditional flyback resistor 74 in the freewheelingdiode flyback circuit 60 to reduce the brake set time. Inserting theadditional resistance 74, which is shorted out by aswitch 80 during operation of the escalator or moving walkway, can reduce the inductance-to-resistance (L/R) time constant of thebrake coil 14. Reducing the set time of the brake can reduce coasting time and distance during the time it takes for the brake to set. That is, reducing the set time of the brake can reduce the amplitude of any velocity increase during the time it takes for the brake to set when the escalator is heavily loaded and can provide for more consistent stop profiles over the entire loading range of the escalator or moving walkway. - The
additional flyback resistance 74 must be removed after a short duration of time since it may be of sufficient size to prevent thebrake coil 14 from being controlled by thePWM device 62 of thecontrol device 20. Only the normal flyback resistor 70 must remain in the circuit for control of the brake. - The
control device 20 may also, for example, reduce the brake coil current to a specified minimum level during a run mode of the escalator or moving walkway to conserve energy. The brake coil current can be reduced after the brake opens since it takes less current to hold the brake open than it does to open the brake. Thecontrol device 20 may, for example, modulate or reduce the brake coil current during a run mode of the escalator or moving walkway to an optimum minimum value based on measured temperature changes in thebrake coil 14. For example, as thebrake coil 14 warms up or cools down, the resistance in thebrake coil 14 may vary proportionately causing a given brake coil current output of thecontrol device 20 to provide a different relative position of theelongated member 16 of thebraking apparatus 10. If the brake coil current drops too low, the brake may set during normal run operation. On the other hand, if brake coil current is too high, thebrake coil 14 could overheat. Thus, controlling the brake coil open current while compensating for brake coil temperature allows thecontrol device 20 to hold the brake coil current steady at an optimum value over the entire operating temperature range of thebrake coil 14. Reducing the brake coil current while in the run mode may help reduce energy consumption, reduce brake coil running temperature, reduces escalator controller power supply requirements, and/or reduces heat dissipation in thecontrol device 20. - The
control device 20 may be optionally configured to operate thebraking element 12 in a fixed torque mode or a variable torque mode. Furthermore, thebraking apparatus 10 may be a modular unit configured such thatmultiple braking apparatuses 10 may be coupled to one ormore control devices 20 and stacked on a singlebrake drive shaft 24. Such amodular braking apparatus 10 may be installed with new escalators or moving walkways and may also allow retrofitting of existing escalators or moving walkways. - In general, the
braking apparatus 10 may provide a consistent stopping distance and stopping rate for an escalator or moving walkway for all escalator loading conditions. No flywheel is required since the closedloop control device 20 compensates for escalator loading. Moreover, no inverter, braking resistor, or regeneration unit is required. Also, no adjustment of the brake control device is required at installation. - While various exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of the invention should not be limited by the above-described embodiments, but should instead be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
Claims (34)
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/613,940 US7950514B1 (en) | 2009-11-06 | 2009-11-06 | Apparatus and method for variable torque braking of escalators and moving walkways |
PCT/US2010/051075 WO2011056331A1 (en) | 2009-11-06 | 2010-10-01 | Apparatus and method for variable torque braking of escalators and moving walkways |
CN201080060655.8A CN102712258B (en) | 2009-11-06 | 2010-10-01 | Apparatus and method for variable torque braking of escalators and moving walkways |
EP10828726.9A EP2496435A4 (en) | 2009-11-06 | 2010-10-01 | Apparatus and method for variable torque braking of escalators and moving walkways |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/613,940 US7950514B1 (en) | 2009-11-06 | 2009-11-06 | Apparatus and method for variable torque braking of escalators and moving walkways |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20110108386A1 true US20110108386A1 (en) | 2011-05-12 |
US7950514B1 US7950514B1 (en) | 2011-05-31 |
Family
ID=43970232
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/613,940 Expired - Fee Related US7950514B1 (en) | 2009-11-06 | 2009-11-06 | Apparatus and method for variable torque braking of escalators and moving walkways |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7950514B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2496435A4 (en) |
CN (1) | CN102712258B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2011056331A1 (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
ES2378627A1 (en) * | 2011-12-14 | 2012-04-16 | Thyssenkrupp Elevator Innovation Center, S.A. | Braking system for escalators and moving walkways. |
US20120139457A1 (en) * | 2010-11-29 | 2012-06-07 | Aktiebolaget Skf | Electronic drive having an electro-mechanical break |
US20170101289A1 (en) * | 2015-10-08 | 2017-04-13 | Kone Corporation | Method for controlling an elevator |
WO2017171212A1 (en) * | 2016-03-28 | 2017-10-05 | (주)에이치피엔알티 | Apparatus for preventing reverse movement of escalator |
US20220131484A1 (en) * | 2019-01-21 | 2022-04-28 | Sew-Eurodrive Gmbh & Co. Kg | Drive system and method for operating a drive system |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8534444B2 (en) * | 2009-06-16 | 2013-09-17 | Otis Elevator Company | Escalator dual solenoid main drive shaft brake |
FI20090265A (en) * | 2009-07-03 | 2011-01-04 | Kone Corp | Passenger conveyor and method |
US20130104586A1 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2013-05-02 | General Electric Company | Refrigeration appliance with hot water dispenser and related control system |
US9994428B2 (en) | 2013-11-18 | 2018-06-12 | Otis Elevator Company | Brake for use in passenger conveyor system |
EP3080028B1 (en) | 2013-12-12 | 2023-05-10 | Otis Elevator Company | Safety system for use in a drive system |
US9385637B2 (en) * | 2014-05-21 | 2016-07-05 | Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation | Brake controller |
JP6603483B2 (en) * | 2015-05-28 | 2019-11-06 | 株式会社日立ビルシステム | Abnormality detection apparatus and abnormality detection method |
CN205400553U (en) * | 2016-03-04 | 2016-07-27 | 关健民 | Curtain |
CN111032560B (en) * | 2017-08-30 | 2021-09-21 | 通力电梯有限公司 | Passenger conveyor |
GB2566497B (en) * | 2017-09-15 | 2020-07-29 | Illinois Tool Works | Braking system for electromagnetic motors |
GB2585471B (en) * | 2017-09-15 | 2021-07-21 | Illinois Tool Works | Braking system for electromagnetic motors |
Citations (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1743995A (en) * | 1925-11-13 | 1930-01-14 | Gad R Bartlett | Escalator |
US2085873A (en) * | 1936-02-03 | 1937-07-06 | Cincinnati Traction Building C | Magnetic track brake system |
US2824623A (en) * | 1954-08-02 | 1958-02-25 | U S Automatic Corp | Automatic stairway elevator |
US3830344A (en) * | 1973-02-15 | 1974-08-20 | Reliance Electric Co | Brake and control therefor |
US3896925A (en) * | 1972-09-29 | 1975-07-29 | Hitachi Ltd | Braking system for an electrically-operated road such as an escalator |
US4023655A (en) * | 1975-11-21 | 1977-05-17 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Brake for elevator |
US4031987A (en) * | 1974-10-26 | 1977-06-28 | Elliston, Evans And Jackson Limited | Spring applied, electrically released brake with adjustable thrust element |
US4033434A (en) * | 1975-02-26 | 1977-07-05 | Firma Siegerland-Bremsen | Self adjusting brake system |
US4588065A (en) * | 1984-08-27 | 1986-05-13 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Escalator with controlled brake |
US4875558A (en) * | 1989-03-16 | 1989-10-24 | Otis Elevator Company | Safety brake for escalators |
US5337878A (en) * | 1993-12-28 | 1994-08-16 | Otis Elevator Company | Assembly and method for adjusting brake force for passenger conveyor emergency brake |
US6112166A (en) * | 1997-10-31 | 2000-08-29 | Digimetrix, Inc. | Portable measurement tool and method for escalators and moving walks |
US20020109404A1 (en) * | 1999-07-28 | 2002-08-15 | Ludwig Balzer-Apke | Method for regulating the brake(s) of an escalator or a moving walkway |
US20030102199A1 (en) * | 2000-04-14 | 2003-06-05 | Sascha Neumann | Method and device for controlling the brake(s) of a device for transporting people |
US6805224B2 (en) * | 2002-12-30 | 2004-10-19 | Inventio Ag | Automated brake torque monitoring system |
US6896119B2 (en) * | 2001-12-24 | 2005-05-24 | Inventio Ag | Method of stopping conveying equipment for persons |
US6971496B1 (en) * | 2004-07-09 | 2005-12-06 | Kone Corporation | Escalator braking with multiple deceleration rates |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4975627A (en) * | 1988-08-15 | 1990-12-04 | Otis Elevator Company | Brake sequenced elevator motor speed control |
-
2009
- 2009-11-06 US US12/613,940 patent/US7950514B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2010
- 2010-10-01 CN CN201080060655.8A patent/CN102712258B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2010-10-01 EP EP10828726.9A patent/EP2496435A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2010-10-01 WO PCT/US2010/051075 patent/WO2011056331A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1743995A (en) * | 1925-11-13 | 1930-01-14 | Gad R Bartlett | Escalator |
US2085873A (en) * | 1936-02-03 | 1937-07-06 | Cincinnati Traction Building C | Magnetic track brake system |
US2824623A (en) * | 1954-08-02 | 1958-02-25 | U S Automatic Corp | Automatic stairway elevator |
US3896925A (en) * | 1972-09-29 | 1975-07-29 | Hitachi Ltd | Braking system for an electrically-operated road such as an escalator |
US3830344A (en) * | 1973-02-15 | 1974-08-20 | Reliance Electric Co | Brake and control therefor |
US4031987A (en) * | 1974-10-26 | 1977-06-28 | Elliston, Evans And Jackson Limited | Spring applied, electrically released brake with adjustable thrust element |
US4033434A (en) * | 1975-02-26 | 1977-07-05 | Firma Siegerland-Bremsen | Self adjusting brake system |
US4023655A (en) * | 1975-11-21 | 1977-05-17 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Brake for elevator |
US4588065A (en) * | 1984-08-27 | 1986-05-13 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Escalator with controlled brake |
US4875558A (en) * | 1989-03-16 | 1989-10-24 | Otis Elevator Company | Safety brake for escalators |
US5337878A (en) * | 1993-12-28 | 1994-08-16 | Otis Elevator Company | Assembly and method for adjusting brake force for passenger conveyor emergency brake |
US6112166A (en) * | 1997-10-31 | 2000-08-29 | Digimetrix, Inc. | Portable measurement tool and method for escalators and moving walks |
US20020109404A1 (en) * | 1999-07-28 | 2002-08-15 | Ludwig Balzer-Apke | Method for regulating the brake(s) of an escalator or a moving walkway |
US6520300B2 (en) * | 1999-07-28 | 2003-02-18 | Kone Corporation | Method for regulating the brake(s) of an escalator or a moving walkway |
US20030102199A1 (en) * | 2000-04-14 | 2003-06-05 | Sascha Neumann | Method and device for controlling the brake(s) of a device for transporting people |
US6766893B2 (en) * | 2000-04-14 | 2004-07-27 | Kone Corporation | Method and device for controlling the brake(s) of a device for transporting people |
US6896119B2 (en) * | 2001-12-24 | 2005-05-24 | Inventio Ag | Method of stopping conveying equipment for persons |
US6805224B2 (en) * | 2002-12-30 | 2004-10-19 | Inventio Ag | Automated brake torque monitoring system |
US6971496B1 (en) * | 2004-07-09 | 2005-12-06 | Kone Corporation | Escalator braking with multiple deceleration rates |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20120139457A1 (en) * | 2010-11-29 | 2012-06-07 | Aktiebolaget Skf | Electronic drive having an electro-mechanical break |
US8847523B2 (en) * | 2010-11-29 | 2014-09-30 | Aktiebolaget SLF | Electronic drive having an electro-mechanical brake |
ES2378627A1 (en) * | 2011-12-14 | 2012-04-16 | Thyssenkrupp Elevator Innovation Center, S.A. | Braking system for escalators and moving walkways. |
CN103159125A (en) * | 2011-12-14 | 2013-06-19 | 蒂森克虏伯电梯创新中心私人控股公司 | Braking system for escalators and moving walkways |
EP2604567B1 (en) * | 2011-12-14 | 2016-07-06 | Thyssenkrupp Elevator Innovation Center, S.A. | Braking system for escalators and moving walkways. |
US20170101289A1 (en) * | 2015-10-08 | 2017-04-13 | Kone Corporation | Method for controlling an elevator |
US10029883B2 (en) * | 2015-10-08 | 2018-07-24 | Kone Corporation | Method for controlling an elevator |
WO2017171212A1 (en) * | 2016-03-28 | 2017-10-05 | (주)에이치피엔알티 | Apparatus for preventing reverse movement of escalator |
US20220131484A1 (en) * | 2019-01-21 | 2022-04-28 | Sew-Eurodrive Gmbh & Co. Kg | Drive system and method for operating a drive system |
US11722076B2 (en) * | 2019-01-21 | 2023-08-08 | Sew-Eurodrive Gmbh & Co. Kg | Drive system and method for operating a drive system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN102712258B (en) | 2015-04-08 |
CN102712258A (en) | 2012-10-03 |
US7950514B1 (en) | 2011-05-31 |
WO2011056331A1 (en) | 2011-05-12 |
EP2496435A4 (en) | 2016-03-09 |
EP2496435A1 (en) | 2012-09-12 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7950514B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for variable torque braking of escalators and moving walkways | |
US5337878A (en) | Assembly and method for adjusting brake force for passenger conveyor emergency brake | |
CN103159125B (en) | Brakes for escalator and movable sidewalk | |
KR101288722B1 (en) | Brake device for elevator | |
FI121065B (en) | Lift system | |
US9803712B2 (en) | Brake monitoring | |
US9434575B2 (en) | Method and device for a safe emergency stop of an elevator | |
US7686139B2 (en) | Elevator device | |
US8473129B2 (en) | Track brake controller | |
US4231452A (en) | Spring applied, electric released drum brake | |
CN110127302B (en) | Belt conveyor and method for operating same | |
US11458945B2 (en) | Electromechanical brake system | |
GB0324243D0 (en) | A control system and method for a disc brake | |
WO2003031309A1 (en) | Brake controller of elevator | |
JP2014169186A (en) | Traction sheave elevator and driving method for traction sheave | |
CN108290706B (en) | Method for controlling a braking device of an elevator installation | |
US20170072931A1 (en) | Electric brake device | |
CN104692199A (en) | Elevator | |
RU2253605C2 (en) | Method to control brake(s) of escalator or moving sidewalk | |
WO2006033165A1 (en) | Armature movement detection apparatus and armature position estimation apparatus for an elevator brake | |
CN105246812B (en) | For controlling the device of no current brake | |
CN109879149B (en) | Brake control system and method for escalator | |
KR101322594B1 (en) | Force control method of electronic parking brake system | |
EP3464150A1 (en) | Conveyor control device | |
WO2012125102A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for controlling the position of an armature in an electromagnetic actuator |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KONE CORPORATION, FINLAND Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:NURNBERG, THOMAS;BOOM, ANTHONY;REEL/FRAME:023483/0359 Effective date: 20091105 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20230531 |