US20100312518A1 - Integrated Circuit Arrangement - Google Patents
Integrated Circuit Arrangement Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20100312518A1 US20100312518A1 US12/847,262 US84726210A US2010312518A1 US 20100312518 A1 US20100312518 A1 US 20100312518A1 US 84726210 A US84726210 A US 84726210A US 2010312518 A1 US2010312518 A1 US 2010312518A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- signal
- noise
- integrated circuit
- circuit arrangement
- processing unit
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R29/00—Arrangements for measuring or indicating electric quantities not covered by groups G01R19/00 - G01R27/00
- G01R29/26—Measuring noise figure; Measuring signal-to-noise ratio
Definitions
- Automatic test apparatuses (automatic test equipment, ATE) may be used, for example, to subject chips or electronic components to marginal tests, parameter tests or functional tests.
- an integrated circuit arrangement may have a signal input and a signal output, a signal processing unit which is connected to the signal input and to the signal output, a noise source for generating a noise signal, and a noise line which connects the noise source to the signal input.
- FIG. 1 shows a first embodiment
- FIG. 2 shows a second embodiment
- FIG. 3 shows a third embodiment
- FIG. 4 shows an integrated noise source for use in an integrated circuit arrangement
- FIG. 5 shows a further integrated noise source for use in an integrated circuit arrangement
- FIG. 6 shows a further integrated noise source for use in an integrated circuit arrangement
- FIG. 7 shows a further embodiment for processing differential input signals
- FIG. 8 shows integrated noise sources for use in the integrated circuit arrangement shown in FIG. 7 ;
- FIG. 9 shows a further embodiment for processing differential input signals.
- a method for testing an integrated circuit arrangement having a signal processing unit, which is connected to a signal input and to a signal output, a noise source and a first interruption unit may comprises the following steps:
- the integrated circuit arrangement is provided and is contact-connected to a measuring device at the signal output;
- the output signal from the signal processing unit is measured at the signal output with respect to a noise signal having a first noise level
- the output signal from the signal processing unit is measured at the signal output with respect to a noise signal having a second noise level.
- a method for testing an integrated circuit arrangement having a signal processing unit, which is connected to a signal input and to a signal output, a noise source and a first interruption unit may comprise the following steps:
- the integrated circuit arrangement is provided with the interruption unit in a first state in which the signal flow of the noise signal from the noise source to the signal processing unit is allowed, and is contact-connected to a measuring device at the signal output;
- the first interruption unit is changed to a second state in which the signal flow of the noise signal from the noise source to the signal processing unit is interrupted.
- the embodiment has the advantage that it is possible to characterize the noise behavior of the integrated circuit arrangement with a considerably lower degree of complexity.
- FIG. 1 shows a first embodiment.
- FIG. 1 shows an integrated circuit arrangement having a signal input 20 and a signal output 60 as well as a signal processing unit 100 which is connected to the signal input 20 and to the signal output 60 .
- the integrated circuit arrangement also has a noise source 50 for generating a noise signal, said noise source being connected to the signal input 20 by means of a noise line 55 .
- the signal input 20 comprises the connection pad 21 and the input signal line 22
- the signal output 60 comprises the connection pad 61 and the output signal line 62 .
- MMICs Microwave Monolithic Integrated Circuits
- noise measurements on integrated circuits in particular radio-frequency characterization of MMICs
- RF measurements for example in the mm wavelength range (for example at 77 GHz)
- mechanical tolerances may frequently pass into the wavelength range of the test signals.
- the embodiment has the advantage that it is possible to characterize the integrated circuit arrangement with a considerably lower degree of complexity. If a noise measurement is carried out using a noise source which is accommodated on the chip to be tested, the measuring tip which was usually used to apply the noise signal to the integrated circuit arrangement from the outside can be omitted.
- the internal noise source serves the same purpose as an external noise source.
- the reproducibility of the noise source on the chip is very good.
- process control measurements which take place anyway can be used to predict the characteristics of the noise source in a relatively accurate manner by means of correlation to the PCM measurements.
- FIG. 2 shows a second embodiment.
- FIG. 2 likewise shows an integrated circuit arrangement having a signal input 20 and a signal output 60 as well as a signal processing unit 100 which is connected to the signal input 20 and to the signal output 60 .
- the integrated circuit arrangement also has a noise source 50 for generating a noise signal and a first interruption unit 80 which, in a first state, allows the signal flow of the noise signal from the noise source 50 to the signal processing unit 100 and, in a second state, interrupts the signal flow of the noise signal from the noise source 50 to the signal processing unit 100 .
- the following method for measuring noise can be carried out using the integrated circuit arrangement shown in FIG. 2 .
- the integrated circuit arrangement in a first step a), is provided with the interruption unit in a first state in which the signal flow of the noise signal from the noise source to the signal processing unit is allowed.
- step b) the output signal from the signal processing unit is measured at the signal output with respect to the noise signal, and, in a step c), after the measurement has been concluded, the first interruption unit is changed to a second state in which the signal flow of the noise signal from the noise source to the signal processing unit is interrupted.
- interruption unit makes it possible to isolate the noise source from the signal processing unit after measurement has been carried out, thus largely preventing the integrated noise source from influencing subsequent operation of the signal processing unit.
- the noise source thus does not interfere with subsequent operation of the signal processing unit.
- the interruption unit has a switching element, a fuse and/or an antifuse.
- the transition between the first and second states of the interruption unit it is preferred for the transition between the first and second states of the interruption unit to be able to be implemented by means of an electrical current.
- the transition between the first and second states of the interruption unit can be implemented by means of a laser beam.
- the first interruption unit is changed to the second state in a reversible manner.
- the noise source 50 also has a control input 51 which can be used to control the noise source for the purpose of generating at least two different noise levels. Accordingly, the following method for measuring noise can also be carried out using the integrated circuit arrangement shown in FIG. 2 . In this case, in a first step: a) the integrated circuit arrangement is provided and is contact-connected to a measuring device at the signal output.
- step b) the output signal from the signal processing unit is measured at the signal output with respect to a noise signal having a first noise level
- step c the output signal from the signal processing unit is measured at the signal output with respect to a noise signal having a second noise level.
- the noise source 50 is thus activated and the noise power is measured at the output.
- the noise source 50 is then deactivated (switched off but not yet disconnected) and the noise power is measured again at the output. Finally, after a successful test, the noise source 50 can be disconnected by the interruption unit 80 .
- the measurement is carried out using at least two different noise levels. If, for example, the noise source is connected between two different ENRs via a control input 51 , two different noise levels are established at the IF output in the case of a mixer, for example.
- the noise properties of the signal processing unit 100 can be accurately determined on the basis of said noise levels.
- the integrated noise source 50 behaves, on the input side, like an external calibrated noise source, which is pulsed, and provides two defined and different noise levels (ENRs) when switched on and switched off.
- ELRs noise levels
- a so-called “Noise Figure Meter” can then be used to measure the change in the noise level for these two different input noise levels, from which the noise properties of the test object (DUT) can be derived.
- the measurement object need only be contact-connected to an RF measuring tip at a signal input LO in this case.
- FIG. 3 shows a third embodiment.
- FIG. 3 likewise shows an integrated circuit arrangement having a signal input 20 and a signal output 60 as well as a signal processing unit 100 which is connected to the signal input 20 and to the signal output 60 .
- the integrated circuit arrangement also has a noise source 50 for generating a noise signal and a first interruption unit 80 which, in a first state, allows the signal flow of the noise signal from the noise source 50 to the signal processing unit 100 and, in a second state, interrupts the signal flow of the noise signal from the noise source 50 to the signal processing unit 100 .
- the signal input 20 has a connection pad 21 and an input signal line 22 and the interruption unit 80 is arranged in the immediate vicinity of the connection pad 21 .
- the interruption unit 80 according to this embodiment is provided with a desired separation point 81 which is also referred to as a fuse 81 .
- the fuse 81 may be designed in such a manner that the noise line 55 may be easily cut at this point by means of irradiation and/or a flow of current, for instance by providing a locally reduced thickness or width of the line.
- a laser is preferably used during the separating operation.
- a switching element 82 for the interruption unit 80 to be provided instead of a fuse 81 .
- the switching element 82 is preferably likewise arranged in the vicinity of the connection pad 21 ( FIG. 3 a ). Contact between the noise source 50 and the signal processing unit 100 can thus now be made/broken in a reversible manner.
- FIG. 4 shows the internal structure of one embodiment of an integrated noise source.
- the noise source has a resistor 52 and a heating unit 53 , the temperature of the resistor 52 being able to be set to different values with the aid of the heating unit 53 .
- the resistor 52 is connected to the signal processing unit 100 by means of the noise line 55 . Furthermore, the other connection of the resistor 52 can be connected to a fixed potential, for example to the ground potential.
- FIG. 5 shows the internal structure of a further embodiment of an integrated noise source 50 .
- an avalanche diode 54 which is connected to the noise line 55 via a capacitor. If a control signal is applied to the control input 51 , the avalanche breakdown of the avalanche diode 54 can be used to generate a noise signal on the noise line 55 .
- FIG. 6 likewise shows the internal structure of a further embodiment of an integrated noise source 50 .
- an amplifier 56 which amplifies the thermal noise of the resistor 52 and outputs it on the noise line 55 .
- a control signal at the control input 51 can be used to set the gain of the amplifier 56 , with the result that different noise levels can be generated.
- FIG. 7 shows a further embodiment for processing symmetrical (differential) input signals.
- the signal processing unit 100 has a mixer 110 and a filter 140 .
- the mixer 110 reduces the signal RF, which is applied to the signal inputs 20 , 30 , to an intermediate frequency IF using a signal LO from a local oscillator (not shown), which is applied to the further signal inputs 120 , 130 , said intermediate frequency being output at the signal outputs 60 , 70 by means of the filter 120 . If, instead of an input signal, a noise signal is then passed from the noise sources 50 , 90 to the mixer 110 , the noise behavior of the mixer 110 can be measured.
- FIG. 8 shows the integrated noise sources 50 , 90 for use in the integrated circuit arrangement shown in FIG. 7 .
- the noise sources 50 and 90 each have a resistor 52 and 92 . These resistors 52 and 92 are each connected to the noise lines 55 and 95 , respectively, via cascode amplifiers 58 and 98 .
- a control signal at the control input 51 can be used to set the gain of the amplifiers 58 , 98 , with the result that different noise levels can be generated.
- FIG. 9 shows a further embodiment.
- the signal processing unit 100 is again in the form of a mixer and a local signal source 150 which is in the form of a local oscillator is additionally provided.
- the signal source 150 it is preferred for the signal source 150 to be in the form of a voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO).
- VCO voltage-controlled oscillator
- the local signal source 150 is connected to the signal processing unit 100 by means of a transmission line 150 . Therefore, it is possible to dispense with applying signals to the signal inputs 120 , 130 when measuring noise in this embodiment.
- the embodiment shown in FIG. 9 additionally has a second interruption unit 180 which, in a first state, allows the signal flow of the signal from the signal source 150 to the signal processing unit 100 and, in a second state, interrupts the signal flow of the signal from the signal source 150 to the signal processing unit 100 .
- the interruption unit has a switching element, a fuse and/or an antifuse.
- the transition between the first and second states of the interruption unit it is preferred for the transition between the first and second states of the interruption unit to be able to be implemented by means of an electrical current.
- the transition between the first and second states of the interruption unit can be implemented by means of a laser beam.
- the second interruption unit it may be preferred in this case for the second interruption unit to be changed to the second state in an irreversible manner.
- the second interruption unit is changed to the second state in a reversible manner.
- Using the second interruption unit 180 makes it possible to isolate the signal source 150 from the signal processing unit 100 after measurement has been carried out, thus largely preventing the integrated signal source from influencing subsequent operation of the signal processing unit. The signal source thus does not interfere with subsequent operation of the signal processing unit.
- the contact-connections to RF signals may be completely dispensed with when measuring noise and only LF signals need to be measured at the signal output.
- the input-side noise source provides two defined noise levels.
- the on-chip local oscillator is activated and provides a 77 GHz signal which is used by the mixer to down-convert the RF noise spectrum into a signal around DC at the IF output. After a successful test, the noise source and the local oscillator are disconnected from the mixer by the interruption units and do not impair the actual function of the mixer.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Tests Of Electronic Circuits (AREA)
- Semiconductor Integrated Circuits (AREA)
Abstract
An integrated circuit arrangement has a signal input 20 and a signal output 60, a signal processing unit 100 which is connected to the signal input 20 and to the signal output 60, a noise source 50 for generating a noise signal, and a noise line 55 which connects the noise source 50 to the signal input 20.
Description
- This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/680,869 filed on Mar. 1, 2007 that claims priority from German Patent Application No. DE 10 2007 007 357.9, which was filed on Feb. 14, 2007, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
- Electronic components and chips are tested during production or following production. Automatic test apparatuses (automatic test equipment, ATE) may be used, for example, to subject chips or electronic components to marginal tests, parameter tests or functional tests.
- In this context, measurements of the noise behavior of integrated circuits are very important since integrated circuits are generally exposed to various noise signals during operation. Therefore, against the background of continually increasing quality demands of consumers, cost-effective test methods which make it possible to characterize the noise behavior of integrated circuits in a simple and accurate manner are desirable.
- According to an embodiment, an integrated circuit arrangement may have a signal input and a signal output, a signal processing unit which is connected to the signal input and to the signal output, a noise source for generating a noise signal, and a noise line which connects the noise source to the signal input.
- Embodiments will be described below with reference to exemplary embodiments which are shown in the appended figures. However, the invention is not restricted to the specifically described exemplary embodiments but rather may be modified and varied in a suitable manner. It is within the scope of the invention to combine individual features and combinations of features of one exemplary embodiment with features and combinations of features of another exemplary embodiment.
-
FIG. 1 shows a first embodiment; -
FIG. 2 shows a second embodiment; -
FIG. 3 shows a third embodiment; -
FIG. 4 shows an integrated noise source for use in an integrated circuit arrangement; -
FIG. 5 shows a further integrated noise source for use in an integrated circuit arrangement; -
FIG. 6 shows a further integrated noise source for use in an integrated circuit arrangement; -
FIG. 7 shows a further embodiment for processing differential input signals; -
FIG. 8 shows integrated noise sources for use in the integrated circuit arrangement shown inFIG. 7 ; and -
FIG. 9 shows a further embodiment for processing differential input signals. - According to another embodiment, a method for testing an integrated circuit arrangement having a signal processing unit, which is connected to a signal input and to a signal output, a noise source and a first interruption unit, may comprises the following steps:
- a) the integrated circuit arrangement is provided and is contact-connected to a measuring device at the signal output;
- b) the output signal from the signal processing unit is measured at the signal output with respect to a noise signal having a first noise level; and
- c) the output signal from the signal processing unit is measured at the signal output with respect to a noise signal having a second noise level.
- According to another embodiment, a method for testing an integrated circuit arrangement having a signal processing unit, which is connected to a signal input and to a signal output, a noise source and a first interruption unit, may comprise the following steps:
- a) the integrated circuit arrangement is provided with the interruption unit in a first state in which the signal flow of the noise signal from the noise source to the signal processing unit is allowed, and is contact-connected to a measuring device at the signal output;
- b) the output signal from the signal processing unit is measured at the signal output with respect to the noise signal; and
- c) after the measurement has been concluded, the first interruption unit is changed to a second state in which the signal flow of the noise signal from the noise source to the signal processing unit is interrupted.
- As a result of the use of a noise source which is integrated in the chip of the circuit arrangement, the embodiment has the advantage that it is possible to characterize the noise behavior of the integrated circuit arrangement with a considerably lower degree of complexity.
- In order to simplify understanding of the description, identical reference numbers are used below when identical elements which are used together in the figures are involved. Elements in one embodiment may also be used in another embodiment without this being individually mentioned in each case.
-
FIG. 1 shows a first embodiment.FIG. 1 shows an integrated circuit arrangement having asignal input 20 and asignal output 60 as well as asignal processing unit 100 which is connected to thesignal input 20 and to thesignal output 60. - The integrated circuit arrangement also has a
noise source 50 for generating a noise signal, said noise source being connected to thesignal input 20 by means of anoise line 55. In this case, thesignal input 20 comprises theconnection pad 21 and theinput signal line 22, and thesignal output 60 comprises theconnection pad 61 and theoutput signal line 62. - Hence, the practice of carrying out noise measurements on integrated circuits, for example “Microwave Monolithic Integrated Circuits”, so-called MMICs can be performed. In general, noise measurements on integrated circuits, in particular radio-frequency characterization of MMICs, are very costly since the measuring tips used in this case are very expensive and additionally have only a limited service life. It is also difficult to reproduce noise measurements, in particular RF measurements, for example in the mm wavelength range (for example at 77 GHz), since mechanical tolerances may frequently pass into the wavelength range of the test signals.
- As a result of the use of a noise source which is integrated in the chip of the circuit arrangement, the embodiment has the advantage that it is possible to characterize the integrated circuit arrangement with a considerably lower degree of complexity. If a noise measurement is carried out using a noise source which is accommodated on the chip to be tested, the measuring tip which was usually used to apply the noise signal to the integrated circuit arrangement from the outside can be omitted.
- In this case, the internal noise source serves the same purpose as an external noise source. The reproducibility of the noise source on the chip is very good. In addition, process control measurements (PCM) which take place anyway can be used to predict the characteristics of the noise source in a relatively accurate manner by means of correlation to the PCM measurements.
-
FIG. 2 shows a second embodiment.FIG. 2 likewise shows an integrated circuit arrangement having asignal input 20 and asignal output 60 as well as asignal processing unit 100 which is connected to thesignal input 20 and to thesignal output 60. - The integrated circuit arrangement also has a
noise source 50 for generating a noise signal and afirst interruption unit 80 which, in a first state, allows the signal flow of the noise signal from thenoise source 50 to thesignal processing unit 100 and, in a second state, interrupts the signal flow of the noise signal from thenoise source 50 to thesignal processing unit 100. - The following method for measuring noise can be carried out using the integrated circuit arrangement shown in
FIG. 2 . In this case, in a first step a), the integrated circuit arrangement is provided with the interruption unit in a first state in which the signal flow of the noise signal from the noise source to the signal processing unit is allowed. - Then, in step b), the output signal from the signal processing unit is measured at the signal output with respect to the noise signal, and, in a step c), after the measurement has been concluded, the first interruption unit is changed to a second state in which the signal flow of the noise signal from the noise source to the signal processing unit is interrupted.
- Using the interruption unit makes it possible to isolate the noise source from the signal processing unit after measurement has been carried out, thus largely preventing the integrated noise source from influencing subsequent operation of the signal processing unit. The noise source thus does not interfere with subsequent operation of the signal processing unit.
- According to one preferred embodiment, the interruption unit has a switching element, a fuse and/or an antifuse. In this case, it is preferred for the transition between the first and second states of the interruption unit to be able to be implemented by means of an electrical current. Alternatively, the transition between the first and second states of the interruption unit can be implemented by means of a laser beam. Depending on the application, it may be preferred in this case for the first interruption unit to be changed to the second state in an irreversible manner.
- If recurrent tests are intended to be allowed during operation of the signal processing unit in a system, it is preferred for the first interruption unit to be changed to the second state in a reversible manner.
- The
noise source 50 also has acontrol input 51 which can be used to control the noise source for the purpose of generating at least two different noise levels. Accordingly, the following method for measuring noise can also be carried out using the integrated circuit arrangement shown inFIG. 2 . In this case, in a first step: a) the integrated circuit arrangement is provided and is contact-connected to a measuring device at the signal output. - Then, in step b), the output signal from the signal processing unit is measured at the signal output with respect to a noise signal having a first noise level, and, in a step c), the output signal from the signal processing unit is measured at the signal output with respect to a noise signal having a second noise level.
- For example, only the
noise source 50 is thus activated and the noise power is measured at the output. Thenoise source 50 is then deactivated (switched off but not yet disconnected) and the noise power is measured again at the output. Finally, after a successful test, thenoise source 50 can be disconnected by theinterruption unit 80. - According to this preferred embodiment, the measurement is carried out using at least two different noise levels. If, for example, the noise source is connected between two different ENRs via a
control input 51, two different noise levels are established at the IF output in the case of a mixer, for example. The noise properties of thesignal processing unit 100 can be accurately determined on the basis of said noise levels. - In this case, the
integrated noise source 50 behaves, on the input side, like an external calibrated noise source, which is pulsed, and provides two defined and different noise levels (ENRs) when switched on and switched off. On the output side, a so-called “Noise Figure Meter” can then be used to measure the change in the noise level for these two different input noise levels, from which the noise properties of the test object (DUT) can be derived. In the case of radio-frequency measurements, the measurement object need only be contact-connected to an RF measuring tip at a signal input LO in this case. -
FIG. 3 shows a third embodiment.FIG. 3 likewise shows an integrated circuit arrangement having asignal input 20 and asignal output 60 as well as asignal processing unit 100 which is connected to thesignal input 20 and to thesignal output 60. - The integrated circuit arrangement also has a
noise source 50 for generating a noise signal and afirst interruption unit 80 which, in a first state, allows the signal flow of the noise signal from thenoise source 50 to thesignal processing unit 100 and, in a second state, interrupts the signal flow of the noise signal from thenoise source 50 to thesignal processing unit 100. - In this case, the
signal input 20 has aconnection pad 21 and aninput signal line 22 and theinterruption unit 80 is arranged in the immediate vicinity of theconnection pad 21. As can be seen from the enlarged view inFIG. 3 , theinterruption unit 80 according to this embodiment is provided with a desiredseparation point 81 which is also referred to as afuse 81. Thefuse 81 may be designed in such a manner that thenoise line 55 may be easily cut at this point by means of irradiation and/or a flow of current, for instance by providing a locally reduced thickness or width of the line. A laser is preferably used during the separating operation. - If recurrent tests are intended to be allowed during operation of the signal processing unit in a system, it is preferred for a switching
element 82 for theinterruption unit 80 to be provided instead of afuse 81. In this case, the switchingelement 82 is preferably likewise arranged in the vicinity of the connection pad 21 (FIG. 3 a). Contact between thenoise source 50 and thesignal processing unit 100 can thus now be made/broken in a reversible manner. -
FIG. 4 shows the internal structure of one embodiment of an integrated noise source. The noise source has aresistor 52 and aheating unit 53, the temperature of theresistor 52 being able to be set to different values with the aid of theheating unit 53. Theresistor 52 is connected to thesignal processing unit 100 by means of thenoise line 55. Furthermore, the other connection of theresistor 52 can be connected to a fixed potential, for example to the ground potential. - If the
resistor 52 is heated by theheating unit 53, a corresponding noise signal is transmitted to thesignal processing unit 100 by means of thenoise line 55 and the noise behavior of said signal processing unit can be determined. -
FIG. 5 shows the internal structure of a further embodiment of anintegrated noise source 50. In this case, provision is made of anavalanche diode 54 which is connected to thenoise line 55 via a capacitor. If a control signal is applied to thecontrol input 51, the avalanche breakdown of theavalanche diode 54 can be used to generate a noise signal on thenoise line 55. -
FIG. 6 likewise shows the internal structure of a further embodiment of anintegrated noise source 50. In this case, provision is made of an amplifier 56 which amplifies the thermal noise of theresistor 52 and outputs it on thenoise line 55. A control signal at thecontrol input 51 can be used to set the gain of the amplifier 56, with the result that different noise levels can be generated. -
FIG. 7 shows a further embodiment for processing symmetrical (differential) input signals. In this case, thesignal processing unit 100 has amixer 110 and afilter 140. Themixer 110 reduces the signal RF, which is applied to thesignal inputs further signal inputs filter 120. If, instead of an input signal, a noise signal is then passed from the noise sources 50, 90 to themixer 110, the noise behavior of themixer 110 can be measured. - In this case,
FIG. 8 shows theintegrated noise sources 50, 90 for use in the integrated circuit arrangement shown inFIG. 7 . The noise sources 50 and 90 each have aresistor resistors cascode amplifiers 58 and 98. A control signal at thecontrol input 51 can be used to set the gain of theamplifiers 58, 98, with the result that different noise levels can be generated. -
FIG. 9 shows a further embodiment. In the embodiment shown inFIG. 9 , thesignal processing unit 100 is again in the form of a mixer and alocal signal source 150 which is in the form of a local oscillator is additionally provided. In this case, it is preferred for thesignal source 150 to be in the form of a voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO). - The
local signal source 150 is connected to thesignal processing unit 100 by means of atransmission line 150. Therefore, it is possible to dispense with applying signals to thesignal inputs - The embodiment shown in
FIG. 9 additionally has asecond interruption unit 180 which, in a first state, allows the signal flow of the signal from thesignal source 150 to thesignal processing unit 100 and, in a second state, interrupts the signal flow of the signal from thesignal source 150 to thesignal processing unit 100. - According to one preferred embodiment, the interruption unit has a switching element, a fuse and/or an antifuse. In this case, it is preferred for the transition between the first and second states of the interruption unit to be able to be implemented by means of an electrical current. Alternatively, the transition between the first and second states of the interruption unit can be implemented by means of a laser beam. Depending on the application, it may be preferred in this case for the second interruption unit to be changed to the second state in an irreversible manner.
- If recurrent tests are intended to be allowed during operation of the signal processing unit in a system, it is preferred for the second interruption unit to be changed to the second state in a reversible manner.
- Using the
second interruption unit 180 makes it possible to isolate thesignal source 150 from thesignal processing unit 100 after measurement has been carried out, thus largely preventing the integrated signal source from influencing subsequent operation of the signal processing unit. The signal source thus does not interfere with subsequent operation of the signal processing unit. - If the embodiment shown in
FIG. 9 is operated as a so-called “Direct Conversion” mixer, the contact-connections to RF signals may be completely dispensed with when measuring noise and only LF signals need to be measured at the signal output. - In the case of a 77 GHz direct conversion mixer, as is used in automotive radar front ends, for example, the input-side noise source provides two defined noise levels. The on-chip local oscillator is activated and provides a 77 GHz signal which is used by the mixer to down-convert the RF noise spectrum into a signal around DC at the IF output. After a successful test, the noise source and the local oscillator are disconnected from the mixer by the interruption units and do not impair the actual function of the mixer.
Claims (23)
1. An integrated circuit arrangement having:
a signal input and a signal output;
a signal processing unit which is connected to the signal input and to the signal output;
a noise source for generating a noise signal and having a control input; and
a noise line which connects the noise source to the signal input,
wherein the components of the integrated circuit arrangement are integrated on a single integrated circuit chip.
2. The integrated circuit arrangement according to claim 1 , comprising a first interruption unit which, in a first state, allows the signal flow of the noise signal to the signal input and, in a second state, interrupts the signal flow of the noise signal to the signal input.
3. The integrated circuit arrangement according to claim 2 , wherein the interruption unit has a switching element, a fuse and/or an antifuse.
4. The integrated circuit arrangement according to claim 2 , wherein the transition between the first and second states of the interruption unit is able to be implemented by means of an electrical current.
5. The integrated circuit arrangement according to claim 2 , wherein the transition between the first and second states of the interruption unit is able to be implemented by means of irradiation, in particular with a laser beam.
6. The integrated circuit arrangement according to claim 2 , wherein the signal input has a connection pad on the single integrated circuit chip and an input signal line, and the interruption unit is integrated on the single integrated circuit chip and is arranged in the immediate vicinity of the connection pad.
7. The integrated circuit arrangement according to claim 1 , wherein the noise source has a resistor and/or an avalanche diode.
8. The integrated circuit arrangement according to claim 2 , wherein the noise source has a heating unit.
9. The integrated circuit arrangement according to claim 2 , wherein the noise source has an amplifier.
10. The integrated circuit arrangement according to claim 2 , wherein the signal processing unit has a mixer, a demodulator and/or a filter.
11. The integrated circuit arrangement according to claim 2 , wherein the circuit arrangement has a signal source which is connected to the signal processing unit by means of a signal line.
12. The integrated circuit arrangement according to claim 11 , wherein the signal source is an RF oscillator, in particular a voltage-controlled RF oscillator.
13. The integrated circuit arrangement according to claim 11 , comprising a second interruption unit which, in a first state, allows the signal flow to the signal processing unit and, in a second state, interrupts the signal flow to the signal processing unit.
14. The integrated circuit arrangement according to claim 2 , wherein the circuit arrangement has at least two signal inputs for receiving a symmetrical input signal, said signal inputs being connected to a respective noise source by means of a respective noise line.
15. A method for testing an integrated circuit arrangement having a signal processing unit, which is connected to a signal input and to a signal output, and a noise source, wherein the components of the integrated circuit arrangement are integrated on a single integrated circuit chip, said method having the following steps:
a) providing the integrated circuit arrangement and contact-connecting the integrated circuit arrangement to a measuring device at the signal output;
b) measuring the output signal from the signal processing unit at the signal output with respect to a noise signal having a first noise level; and
c) measuring the output signal from the signal processing unit at the signal output with respect to a noise signal having a second noise level that is different than the first noise level.
16. A method for testing an integrated circuit arrangement having a signal processing unit, which is connected to a signal input and to a signal output, a noise source and a first interruption unit, wherein the components of the integrated circuit arrangement are integrated on a single integrated circuit chip, said method having the following steps:
a) providing the integrated circuit arrangement with the interruption unit in a first state in which the signal flow of the noise signal from the noise source to the signal processing unit is allowed, and contact-connected the integrated circuit arrangement to a measuring device at the signal output;
b) measuring the output signal from the signal processing unit at the signal output with respect to the noise signal; and
c) after the measurement has been concluded, changing the first interruption unit to a second state in which the signal flow of the noise signal from the noise source to the signal processing unit is interrupted;
wherein the measurement is carried out with at least two different noise levels.
17. The method according to claim 16 , wherein the first interruption unit is changed to a second state in an irreversible manner.
18. The method according to claim 16 , wherein the first interruption unit is changed to the second state by means of irradiation, in particular with a laser.
19. The method according to claim 16 , wherein the measurement is carried out while a signal is passed from a signal source of the circuit arrangement to the signal processing unit.
20. The method according to claim 19 , wherein a second interruption unit is changed, after the measurement has been concluded, to a second state in which the signal flow from the signal source to the signal processing unit is interrupted.
21. The method according to claim 20 , wherein the second interruption unit is changed to a second state in an irreversible manner.
22. The method according to claim 15 , wherein the characteristics of the noise source is determined by means of process control measurements during the production process used.
23. An integrated circuit arrangement having:
a signal input and a signal output;
a signal processing unit which is connected to the signal input and to the signal output;
a noise source for generating a noise signal;
a noise line which connects the noise source to the signal input; and
a first interruption unit which, in a first state, allows the signal flow of the noise signal to the signal input and, in a second state, interrupts the signal flow of the noise signal to the signal input,
wherein the components of the integrated circuit arrangement are integrated on a single integrated circuit chip.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/847,262 US20100312518A1 (en) | 2007-02-14 | 2010-07-30 | Integrated Circuit Arrangement |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102007007357.9 | 2007-02-14 | ||
DE102007007357.9A DE102007007357B4 (en) | 2007-02-14 | 2007-02-14 | Integrated circuit arrangement |
US11/680,869 US7880477B2 (en) | 2007-02-14 | 2007-03-01 | Integrated circuit arrangement |
US12/847,262 US20100312518A1 (en) | 2007-02-14 | 2010-07-30 | Integrated Circuit Arrangement |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/680,869 Continuation US7880477B2 (en) | 2007-02-14 | 2007-03-01 | Integrated circuit arrangement |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20100312518A1 true US20100312518A1 (en) | 2010-12-09 |
Family
ID=39627987
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/680,869 Expired - Fee Related US7880477B2 (en) | 2007-02-14 | 2007-03-01 | Integrated circuit arrangement |
US12/847,262 Abandoned US20100312518A1 (en) | 2007-02-14 | 2010-07-30 | Integrated Circuit Arrangement |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/680,869 Expired - Fee Related US7880477B2 (en) | 2007-02-14 | 2007-03-01 | Integrated circuit arrangement |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7880477B2 (en) |
DE (1) | DE102007007357B4 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR101132884B1 (en) * | 2009-02-04 | 2012-04-03 | 엘에스산전 주식회사 | Noise mesurement system in power stabilazation network, varialbe filter applied in the same, and method for mesuring noise in power stabilazation network |
US8237603B2 (en) * | 2010-01-29 | 2012-08-07 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Receiver test circuits, systems and methods |
DE102012210470B4 (en) * | 2012-06-21 | 2015-09-17 | Ihp Gmbh - Innovations For High Performance Microelectronics / Leibniz-Institut Für Innovative Mikroelektronik | MEMS microviscosimeter |
Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5148124A (en) * | 1991-10-03 | 1992-09-15 | Lockheed Sanders, Inc. | Monolithic microwave integrated circuit noise generator and variable resistance device |
US5585974A (en) * | 1995-02-17 | 1996-12-17 | Conner Peripherals, Inc. | Disk drive with PRML read channel calibration using a noise generator |
US6294841B1 (en) * | 1998-06-08 | 2001-09-25 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Integrated semiconductor circuit having dummy structures |
US20030090306A1 (en) * | 1999-11-02 | 2003-05-15 | Takeshi Saito | Thermal noise random pulse generator and random number generator |
US20050101282A1 (en) * | 1999-04-15 | 2005-05-12 | Kumiko Takikawa | Semiconductor integrated circuit |
US20050156612A1 (en) * | 2003-12-16 | 2005-07-21 | Peter Pochmuller | Test system and test structure for testing an integrated circuit and an integrated circuit having a test structure |
US7024175B1 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2006-04-04 | Mitel Corporation | System for masking microphonic voice signals in wired telecommunications equipment |
US20060221531A1 (en) * | 2003-08-22 | 2006-10-05 | Makoto Nagata | Circuit for detecting and measuring noise in semiconductor integrated circuit |
US20080156612A1 (en) * | 2005-01-24 | 2008-07-03 | Joan Carlos Jimenez | Article Dispensing Machine |
US7447490B2 (en) * | 2005-05-18 | 2008-11-04 | Nvidia Corporation | In-situ gain calibration of radio frequency devices using thermal noise |
Family Cites Families (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AR197528A1 (en) | 1972-10-02 | 1974-04-15 | Rca Corp | ELECTRONIC BEAM DEVIATION CIRCUIT |
US4857765A (en) * | 1987-11-17 | 1989-08-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Noise control in an integrated circuit chip |
US5331217A (en) * | 1992-06-18 | 1994-07-19 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Low power integrated circuit white noise source |
GB2349523A (en) * | 1999-04-30 | 2000-11-01 | Sgs Thomson Microelectronics | Testing an analogue component |
DE19928545C1 (en) | 1999-06-22 | 2001-01-25 | Siemens Ag | Mobile radio receiver with calibration facility for FM demodulator |
JP2001308271A (en) * | 2000-04-18 | 2001-11-02 | Hitachi Ltd | Semiconductor integrated circuit, designing method and method of manufacture |
US6636722B1 (en) | 2000-09-12 | 2003-10-21 | Tektronix, Inc. | Broadband receiver amplitude/phase normalization using a broadband temperature compensated noise source and a pseudo random sequence generator |
US6928242B1 (en) * | 2000-10-13 | 2005-08-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Built in self test method and circuit for parallel optical transmitters |
US6593806B1 (en) | 2001-08-10 | 2003-07-15 | Cirrus Logic, Inc. | Circuits and methods for compensating switched mode amplifiers |
DE10154532C2 (en) | 2001-11-07 | 2003-10-23 | Advanced Micro Devices Inc | Digital circuit, WLAN emulation tester, digital data generating device and method for generating and outputting digital data with any probability distribution |
EP1476764A1 (en) | 2002-02-22 | 2004-11-17 | DaimlerChrysler AG | Method and system for sampling at least one antenna |
JP2005098981A (en) * | 2003-08-27 | 2005-04-14 | Nec Corp | Semiconductor integrated circuit device, measurement result managing system, and management server |
US20050260963A1 (en) | 2004-05-19 | 2005-11-24 | Motorola, Inc. | Receiver system and method for wideband self test |
-
2007
- 2007-02-14 DE DE102007007357.9A patent/DE102007007357B4/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2007-03-01 US US11/680,869 patent/US7880477B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2010
- 2010-07-30 US US12/847,262 patent/US20100312518A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5148124A (en) * | 1991-10-03 | 1992-09-15 | Lockheed Sanders, Inc. | Monolithic microwave integrated circuit noise generator and variable resistance device |
US5585974A (en) * | 1995-02-17 | 1996-12-17 | Conner Peripherals, Inc. | Disk drive with PRML read channel calibration using a noise generator |
US6294841B1 (en) * | 1998-06-08 | 2001-09-25 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Integrated semiconductor circuit having dummy structures |
US20050101282A1 (en) * | 1999-04-15 | 2005-05-12 | Kumiko Takikawa | Semiconductor integrated circuit |
US20030090306A1 (en) * | 1999-11-02 | 2003-05-15 | Takeshi Saito | Thermal noise random pulse generator and random number generator |
US7024175B1 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2006-04-04 | Mitel Corporation | System for masking microphonic voice signals in wired telecommunications equipment |
US20060221531A1 (en) * | 2003-08-22 | 2006-10-05 | Makoto Nagata | Circuit for detecting and measuring noise in semiconductor integrated circuit |
US20050156612A1 (en) * | 2003-12-16 | 2005-07-21 | Peter Pochmuller | Test system and test structure for testing an integrated circuit and an integrated circuit having a test structure |
US20080156612A1 (en) * | 2005-01-24 | 2008-07-03 | Joan Carlos Jimenez | Article Dispensing Machine |
US7447490B2 (en) * | 2005-05-18 | 2008-11-04 | Nvidia Corporation | In-situ gain calibration of radio frequency devices using thermal noise |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE102007007357A1 (en) | 2008-08-21 |
DE102007007357B4 (en) | 2018-06-21 |
US20080191710A1 (en) | 2008-08-14 |
US7880477B2 (en) | 2011-02-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0715177B1 (en) | Architecture for RF signal automatic test equipment | |
EP2353018B1 (en) | Integrated circuit and test method therefor | |
US8667353B2 (en) | Semiconductor chip and test method | |
US7809517B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for measuring phase noise/jitter in devices under test | |
KR101331722B1 (en) | System and method for testing a radio frequency integrated circuit | |
JP2005518172A (en) | Method and system for testing at least one antenna | |
JP4689125B2 (en) | Improved test and calibration circuit and method in automatic test equipment | |
US9310410B1 (en) | Load and source pull test system for RF and baseband frequencies | |
US7880477B2 (en) | Integrated circuit arrangement | |
US20050258815A1 (en) | Method for measuring a three-port device using a two-port vector network analyzer | |
JP2003179562A (en) | Method and device for characterizing nonlinear properties of rf and microwave devices in roughly matched environment | |
US20050137814A1 (en) | Method of measuring noise figure using arbitrary waveforms | |
US20060223440A1 (en) | Low frequency noise source and method of calibration thereof | |
Sampietro et al. | High sensitivity noise measurement with a correlation spectrum analyzer | |
US10873868B2 (en) | Apparatus for measuring radio frequency power as well as method of analyzing a radio frequency signal | |
Brown et al. | RF testing on a mixed signal tester | |
US20050070268A1 (en) | Method of testing RF circuit, and arrangement | |
US8237603B2 (en) | Receiver test circuits, systems and methods | |
TW201231999A (en) | System and method for determining power supply noise in an integrated circuit | |
Wursthorn et al. | A true-RMS integrated power sensor for on-chip calibration | |
Béland et al. | An enhanced on-wafer millimeter-wave noise parameter measurement system | |
Zeinolabedinzadeh | Millimeter-wave and THz Measurement Practices | |
Nose et al. | A 0.016 mm $^{2} $, 2.4 GHz RF Signal Quality Measurement Macro for RF Test and Diagnosis | |
Lahdes et al. | 60 GHZ on-wafer noise parameter measurements using cold-source method | |
Bergeret et al. | UHF RFID chip measurement |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |