US20100148472A1 - Alpine ski with controlled flexion - Google Patents

Alpine ski with controlled flexion Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100148472A1
US20100148472A1 US12/632,506 US63250609A US2010148472A1 US 20100148472 A1 US20100148472 A1 US 20100148472A1 US 63250609 A US63250609 A US 63250609A US 2010148472 A1 US2010148472 A1 US 2010148472A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
zone
ski
mounting
deformation zone
flexion deformation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/632,506
Inventor
Axel Phelipon
Lionel FAVRET
Aldric BOURGIER
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Salomon SAS
Original Assignee
Salomon SAS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Salomon SAS filed Critical Salomon SAS
Assigned to SALOMON S.A.S. reassignment SALOMON S.A.S. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BOURGIER, ALDRIC, FAVRET, LIONEL, PHELIPON, AXEL
Publication of US20100148472A1 publication Critical patent/US20100148472A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63CSKATES; SKIS; ROLLER SKATES; DESIGN OR LAYOUT OF COURTS, RINKS OR THE LIKE
    • A63C5/00Skis or snowboards
    • A63C5/06Skis or snowboards with special devices thereon, e.g. steering devices
    • A63C5/07Skis or snowboards with special devices thereon, e.g. steering devices comprising means for adjusting stiffness
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63CSKATES; SKIS; ROLLER SKATES; DESIGN OR LAYOUT OF COURTS, RINKS OR THE LIKE
    • A63C5/00Skis or snowboards
    • A63C5/003Structure, covering or decoration of the upper ski surface

Definitions

  • the invention relates to an alpine ski used, in particular, for the practice of “freestyle” skiing, i.e., for performing various maneuvers, or tricks, such as jumps or glides in an adapted environment which includes rails, for example, on which a skier can slide his/her skis transverse to the longitudinal axis thereof.
  • the document FR 2 042 420 also discloses a ski having a zone with a reduced flexional strength.
  • the objective is to make it easier to ski using a lateral inclination technique, which requires occupying a rear position.
  • a rotation occurs between the front portion and the rear portion of the ski, around a point located immediately behind the middle of ski, i.e., in the area of the rear binding, or heel piece.
  • a skier sometimes wants to perform a trick in which the skier slides the front or rear end, i.e., the shovel or spatula, of the skis on a rail.
  • the skis of the prior art flex evenly over their entire lengths, so that it is difficult for a skier to reproduce the same maneuver several times. Indeed, depending upon the positioning of the ski with respect to the rail, it is not possible to anticipate the behavior of the ski with a sufficient degree of accuracy.
  • the invention improves upon characteristics and abilities of known skis, overcoming, or at least lessening, the aforementioned disadvantages and, more particularly, the invention encompasses an alpine ski that facilitates the performance of certain freestyle maneuvers, or tricks, and that facilitates the reproducibility of such freestyle maneuvers/tricks.
  • the invention is directed to an alpine ski having binding mounting zone centered on a mounting point, and a unique zone of deformation in flexion between the mounting zone and at least one end of the ski.
  • a deformation in flexion of the ski is a flexion deformation along a longitudinal axis or direction of the ski.
  • the particular flexion deformation zone makes it possible to obtain a localized and reproducible deformation of the ski in that zone.
  • the front end, or spatula or shovel sometimes simply referred to as the tip, defined between this zone and the extreme end of the ski, on the one hand, and the zone for mounting the binding, on the other hand, practically does not flex.
  • the skier can obtain the same behavior several successive times, in particular while performing maneuvers, or tricks, known as a “nose press” or “tail press”.
  • such a ski can incorporate one or several of the following characteristics, taken in any technically acceptable combination:
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a ski according to a first embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 2 is a top view of the ski of FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 3 is a side view of the ski of FIGS. 1 and 2 ;
  • FIG. 4 is a longitudinal cross section, on a larger scale, of the detail IV in FIG. 3 ;
  • FIG. 5 is a partial side view of the ski of FIGS. 1 to 4 , in a configuration for testing of its flexibility, and on a smaller scale than FIG. 4 ;
  • FIG. 6 is a side view corresponding to the detail IV in FIG. 3 , for a ski according to a second embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 7 is a view similar to FIG. 6 , for a ski according to a third embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a view similar to FIG. 6 , for a ski according to a fourth embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 9 is a view similar to FIG. 6 , for a ski according to a fifth embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 10 is a view similar to FIG. 6 , but with a partial cut-away zone, for a ski according to a sixth embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 11 is a partial side view of a ski according to a seventh embodiment of the invention.
  • the ski 1 shown in FIGS. 1 to 5 is a ski known as freestyle ski, the central longitudinal axis X 1 of which extends from its front end 2 towards its rear end 4 , these two ends, or twin tips, being raised with respect to a mounting zone 6 for a binding for a boot 130 shown in FIG. 3 .
  • This mounting zone is defined in accordance with the NF ISO 8364 standard.
  • the front end 2 , or front tip is located on the side of the mounting zone 6 on which the front abutment 110 of the binding is fixed; whereas the rear end 4 , or rear tip, is arranged on the side of the zone 6 where the heelpiece 120 of the binding is mounted.
  • a twin tip ski is illustrated in the exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 1 , the invention encompasses other forms of alpine skis, including those having a front tip and a rear tail, the latter not being raised upwardly like the front tip.
  • the waist width I 1 of the ski 1 is greater than 66 mm, or greater than 75 mm in a particular embodiment.
  • the zone 6 is centered on a mounting point A 6 defined according to the NF ISO 8364 standard.
  • the mounting zone has an axial length L 6 .
  • a length or a dimension is referred to as “axial” when it extends parallel to the axis X 1 , whereas it is referred to as “transverse” when it extends perpendicular to this axis.
  • the waist width I 1 is a transverse width.
  • the zone 6 has a minimal thickness e 6 ranging between 8 and 25 mm over its length L 6 .
  • the thickness of the ski in the zone 6 is, for a desired rigidity, a function of its width in this same zone.
  • the ski 1 has an upper surface 8 and a sole 10 .
  • a particular deformation zone Z 1 of the ski 1 is arranged between the mounting zone 6 and the front end 2 , i.e., forward of the zone 6 .
  • a second particular deformation zone Z 2 is arranged between the zone 6 and the rear end 4 , i.e., at the rear of the zone 6 .
  • Each of the particular flexion deformation zones Z 1 and Z 2 is manifested by a localized reduction in the thickness of the ski 1 .
  • zones Z 1 and Z 2 are provided to adopt a generally dihedral configuration when the ski is subjected to a deformation force in flexion. Such is particularly the case when a skier performs a maneuver known as a “nose press”, i.e., with the front section, or shovel or spatula, of the ski supported on a rail, in which case the zone Z 1 becomes deformed. Similarly, the zone Z 2 becomes deformed when the user performs a maneuver known as a “tail press”, i.e., the rear section, or shovel or spatula, of the ski is supported on the rail.
  • a “nose press” i.e., with the front section, or shovel or spatula
  • the ski 1 includes, in addition to the sole 10 , an upper reinforcement 12 , or reinforcement layer, made of glass fibers or other strengthening material, a lower reinforcement 14 , or reinforcement layer, also made of glass fibers, e.g., and a core 16 that can be made of wood or foam.
  • the reinforcements 12 and 14 are loaded with metal, such as aluminum, for example.
  • the reinforcements 12 and 14 can also be made of carbon fibers, aramide, Kevlar® (registered trademark), steel, aluminum, titanal, or other metal alloys. These reinforcements can also be comprised of several layers, for example a layer of glass fibers and a layer of aluminum.
  • a finish layer 15 is affixed on, or above, the reinforcement 12 and bears the decoration of the ski. It can be made of an assembly of a plurality, or several, layers.
  • the thickness e 16 of the core 16 is locally reduced in order to form the zone Z 1 , so that the total thickness e 1 of the ski 1 in the zone Z 1 has a minimal value ranging between 6 and 8 mm, i.e., a value substantially less than that of the thickness e 6 .
  • the thickness e 1 corresponds to the sum of the minimal thickness e 16 and of the thicknesses of the reinforcements 12 and 14 and of the sole 10 , these two thicknesses being substantially constant over the length of the ski 1 .
  • the minimal value the thickness e 16 is greater than 1.5 mm to limit the risk of rupture of the core 16 in the zone Z 1 .
  • the front shovel 18 or spatula, of the ski 1 is defined herein as being the portion of the ski extending between the zone Z 1 and the front end 2 , or tip.
  • the minimal thickness e 18 of the shovel 18 is between 8.5 and 11 mm. This thickness is greater than in conventional skis, in which it has a value generally ranging between 5 and 7.5 mm. This needs to be brought closer because the shovel 18 can be substantially more rigid than in conventional skis, because the flexing of the ski occurs primarily in the area of the zones Z 1 and Z 2 .
  • the rigidity of the shovel 18 is dependent upon the distance between the reinforcements 12 and 14 , i.e., upon the thickness of the core 16 .
  • the rigidity of the shovel is not actually affected because the distance between the reinforcements remains similar to that of the illustrated embodiment.
  • the shovel can have a total thickness of 16 mm by having the same rigidity as that of the shovel 18 shown in the drawing figures, if the thickness of the sandwich comprised of the elements 12 , 14 , and 16 has a minimal value ranging between 8.5 mm and 11 mm.
  • the rear shovel or spatula 19 of the ski 1 is defined between the zone Z 2 and the rear end 4 , or, in the illustrated twin tip ski, the rear tip.
  • the minimal thickness e 19 of the shovel 19 has same value as the thickness e 18 .
  • a straight line ⁇ 1 perpendicular to the axis X 1 , is positioned where the thickness of the ski begins to decrease by moving away from the point A 6 , in relation to the value the thickness e 6 .
  • a straight line ⁇ ′ 1 perpendicular to the axis X 1 , is positioned where the thickness of the ski 1 begins to decrease, by moving away from the end 2 , in relation to the value the thickness e 16 .
  • the zone Z 1 is defined between the straight lines ⁇ 1 and ⁇ ′ 1 .
  • a central point A 1 of the zone Z 1 is equidistant from the straight lines ⁇ 1 and ⁇ ′ 1 and is located on the surface 8 , halfway between the right and left lateral edges 20 and 22 of the ski 1 .
  • This point can be considered as a softening point, or a weakened point, of the ski in the zone Z 1 .
  • the axial length L 1 of the zone Z 1 i.e., the axial distance between the straight lines ⁇ 1 and ⁇ ′ 1 , has a value ranging between 150 and 200 mm.
  • the axial distance D 1 between the straight line ⁇ 1 and the mounting point A 6 has a value ranging between 285 and 385 mm.
  • the axial distance D′ 1 between the points A 1 and A 6 is between 360 and 480 mm.
  • the zone Z 1 should be sufficiently spaced from the middle of the ski so that the particular deformation zone has a limited effect on the normal performance or functioning of the ski, i.e., such as that while traversing a flat trail, without any particular trick or maneuver being performed by the skier.
  • the zone Z 1 is positioned well beyond the rear binding.
  • the skier's support forces are not modified.
  • the particular deformation zone comes into play and precisely determines the location at which the ski indeed will become deformed.
  • the zone Z 2 is substantially symmetrical with the zone Z i with respect to the mounting point A 6 . It extends between two straight lines ⁇ 2 and ⁇ ′ 2 perpendicular to the axis X 1 , and there is a central point A 2 , or softening point, of the zone Z 2 on the surface 8 .
  • the axial length L 2 of the zone Z 2 is between 150 and 200 mm, and the straight line ⁇ 2 extends a distance D 2 , ranging between 285 and 365 mm with respect to the mounting point A 6 .
  • the distance D′ 2 between the points A 2 and A 6 is between 360 and 480 mm.
  • the zone Z 2 may not be at the same distance from the point A 6 as the zone Z 1 .
  • zones with various lengths can be provided along the axis X 1 , between the mounting zone 6 and the zones Z 1 and Z 2 .
  • the lengths L 1 and L 2 are not necessarily equal, just as the lengths D 1 and D 2 , on the one hand, and D′ 1 and D′ 2 , on the other hand.
  • the ski 1 includes a single particular deformation zone Z 1 between the mounting zone 6 and the end 2 , so that the ski 1 is capable of becoming deformed in only one zone between the front of the skier's boot and the front end of the ski.
  • a single particular deformation zone is provided between the mounting zone 6 and the rear end 4 , so that the skier knows that the ski can become deformed in only one zone between the rear of the boot and the rear end of the ski.
  • the flexing behavior of the ski 1 is reproducible, i.e., predictable, which makes it easier for the skier to control the ski, including controlling the ski during the performance of elaborate freestyle tricks.
  • This behavior can be characterized by a measurement of the flexion properties of the ski 1 when a given force is exerted on the ski, which is supported on two rods 202 and 204 , each having a circular cross section, the centers of which are spaced from one another by an axial distance d 200 equal to 400 mm, and which are arranged under the sole 10 of the ski, symmetrically on both sides of the zone Z 1 .
  • the bending deflection f of the zone Z 1 is shown in the configuration of FIG. 5 . This deflection is the maximum distance between the straight line ⁇ 3 and the sole 10 , when the ski 1 is subject to the load E 1 .
  • the thicknesses and distances mentioned hereinabove are such that, for a static load E 1 with an intensity equal to 900 Newtons, i.e., corresponding to a weight of approximately 90 kg, and a distance d 200 equal to 400 mm, the deflection f is greater than 13 mm.
  • These thicknesses and distances can be selected by digital simulation or tests on samples, so that this deflection is greater than 15 mm.
  • the zone Z 2 is also configured so that the deflection defined under the same conditions has a value greater than 13 mm, and 15 mm in a particular embodiment.
  • the flexion zone Z 1 enables the shovel 18 to pivot upwards, about an axis perpendicular to the axis X 1 and passing in the vicinity of the point A 1 , which makes it easier for the ski 1 to lift off.
  • the ski 1 of FIG. 6 includes, above the particular deformation zone Z 1 , a metal plate 30 that is secured onto the ski 1 by means of two screws 32 .
  • This plate can be secured on the ski 1 by any other appropriately configured attachment expedient.
  • the plate 30 is made of composite material.
  • An elastomeric block 34 is arranged between the plate 30 and the upper surface 8 of the ski 1 .
  • the plate 30 makes it possible to maintain the longitudinal rigidity of the ski, i.e., related to longitudinal flexion, to a value comparable to that of a conventional ski, as long as the plate 30 does not buckle. In other words, the ski becomes slightly deformed or does not become deformed in the zone Z 1 as long as the bending stress is not sufficient to cause the plate 30 to buckle.
  • the ski has a behavior such that a threshold value of the bending stress makes it possible to achieve an effective flexing in the zone Z 1 .
  • the elastomeric block 34 guarantees that if the plate 30 buckles, it becomes deformed upwards and not in the direction of the sole 10 of the ski 1 .
  • This block is however optional insofar as a preferred buckling direction for the plate 30 can be obtained by means of an adapted configuration thereof.
  • the shovel 18 is not thicker than in a conventional ski. It has a thickness e 18 ranging between 5 mm and 7.5 mm. Indeed, one can consider that the plate 30 at least partially compensates for the loss of rigidity of the ski, whereas, in the first embodiment, it is the thick shovels that fulfill this function.
  • a counter-deflection stop blade or plate 40 is secured on the ski by a screw 42 arranged in the area of one of its ends 43 .
  • the blade 40 extends above the particular deformation zone Z 1 of the ski 1 .
  • the blade 40 is bent so as to come in support against an abutment 46 that is fixed with respect to the ski 1 .
  • the blade 40 comes in support via its end 44 against the abutment 46 , which limits the deformation of the ski 1 .
  • a spring 48 is inserted between the end 44 of the blade 40 and an abutment 49 fixed with respect to the ski 1 .
  • This spring exerts on the end 44 a force E 2 that is directed towards the screw 42 , which can enable the blade 44 to restore the energy of the spring after bending, and to provide more rebound to the ski.
  • two abutments 50 and 60 are attached in the particular bending zone Z 1 , and they each have a surface 52 or 62 adapted to come in support against the surface of the other abutment, so as to limit the flexing of the ski 1 in the zone Z 1 .
  • These abutments thus make it possible to limit the deformation of the ski 1 to a predetermined angle corresponding to the angle defined between the surfaces 52 and 62 .
  • an elastomeric wedge or spacer can be positioned between the surfaces 52 and 62 , which improves the bending progressiveness in the zone Z 1 and which yields better performance when the ski snaps back.
  • the particular deformation zone Z 1 of the ski 1 is formed by a succession of elastomeric blades 70 inserted in the ski 1 , starting from its upper surface 8 , and which are adapted to be compressed to enable the ski to bend.
  • the lengths of the blades 70 taken parallel to the thickness e 1 of the ski 1 , increases and then decreases over the length of the zone Z 1 taken parallel to the axis X 1 .
  • all of the blades 70 can have the same length.
  • an elastomeric block 80 is positioned in the thickness of the ski 1 , which creates a particular deformation zone Z 1 , this zone being covered with a counter-deflection stop blade 90 functioning similar to the blade 40 in the embodiment of FIG. 7 .
  • the abutment 46 is replaced by one or several screws 96 fixed in the ski 1 , and against which the ends with oblong openings 94 provided in the blade 90 can come into support.
  • an elastomeric block 100 extends on both sides of a small island 102 forming the upper portion of the mounting zone 6 of the ski 1 .
  • the elastomeric block has a minimal thickness e 100 under the small island 102 , this thickness increasing at the front and rear of the small island 102 to create two particular deformation zones Z 1 and Z 2 of the ski 1 .
  • An upper reinforcement 104 extends on the tops of the shovels 18 and 19 of the ski 1 , and also under the block 100 and the small island 102 , in order to guarantee a certain rigidity of the ski 1 .
  • the deformation zones Z 1 and Z 2 of the skis of the embodiments of FIGS. 6 to 11 generally have the same behavior as those of the first embodiment: under a static load of 900 Newtons, applied to the center of each of these deformation zones along a direction perpendicular to the ski sole.
  • Each deformation zone adopts a generally dihedral configuration, with a deflection f that has a value greater than or equal to 13 mm, and 15 mm in a particular embodiment, when the ski is supported on two rods or beams that are 400 mm apart.
  • a counter-deflection stop blade can be used in the embodiment of FIG. 9 .
  • Plates, such as the plate 30 of the embodiment of FIG. 6 can be used in the other embodiments, in addition to or in replacement of a counter-deflection stop blade. It is not necessary to use a spring, such as the spring 48 , in the embodiments equipped with a counter-deflection stop blade.
  • the invention has been described in relation to a twin tip freestyle ski. It however applies to other types of skis, in particular a ski of which only the front tip is raised, i.e., the tail having an otherwise conventional shape.

Landscapes

  • Footwear And Its Accessory, Manufacturing Method And Apparatuses (AREA)

Abstract

An alpine ski includes a zone for mounting a binding centered on a mounting point, and a single particular flexion deformation zone arranged between the mounting zone and one or each end of the ski. Under a static load of 900 Newtons, applied to the center of the particular deformation zone and along a direction perpendicular to the ski sole, the deformation zone adopts a generally dihedral configuration, whose deflection is greater than or equal to 13 mm, 15 mm in a particular embodiment, the ski being supported on two rods arranged under the sole, symmetrically on both sides of the zone and spaced from one another by an axial distance equal to 400 mm.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 of French Patent Application No. 08 06872, filed on Dec. 8, 2008, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference thereto in its entirety.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The invention relates to an alpine ski used, in particular, for the practice of “freestyle” skiing, i.e., for performing various maneuvers, or tricks, such as jumps or glides in an adapted environment which includes rails, for example, on which a skier can slide his/her skis transverse to the longitudinal axis thereof.
  • 2. Description of Background and Other Information
  • It is known from U.S. Pat. No. 7,341,271 to configure a ski to have zones with variable flexional rigidity in order to obtain an efficient transmission of forces when the ski adopts a curved configuration, with a substantially constant radius of curvature over its length, as shown in the drawings of this patent.
  • The document FR 2 042 420 also discloses a ski having a zone with a reduced flexional strength. In this case, the objective is to make it easier to ski using a lateral inclination technique, which requires occupying a rear position. As described in the preamble of the document FR 2 042 420, a rotation occurs between the front portion and the rear portion of the ski, around a point located immediately behind the middle of ski, i.e., in the area of the rear binding, or heel piece.
  • For the practice of freestyle, a skier sometimes wants to perform a trick in which the skier slides the front or rear end, i.e., the shovel or spatula, of the skis on a rail. In this case, the skis of the prior art flex evenly over their entire lengths, so that it is difficult for a skier to reproduce the same maneuver several times. Indeed, depending upon the positioning of the ski with respect to the rail, it is not possible to anticipate the behavior of the ski with a sufficient degree of accuracy.
  • SUMMARY
  • The invention improves upon characteristics and abilities of known skis, overcoming, or at least lessening, the aforementioned disadvantages and, more particularly, the invention encompasses an alpine ski that facilitates the performance of certain freestyle maneuvers, or tricks, and that facilitates the reproducibility of such freestyle maneuvers/tricks.
  • To this end, the invention is directed to an alpine ski having binding mounting zone centered on a mounting point, and a unique zone of deformation in flexion between the mounting zone and at least one end of the ski.
  • In the context of the Invention, a deformation in flexion of the ski is a flexion deformation along a longitudinal axis or direction of the ski.
  • According to the invention, the particular flexion deformation zone, the location of which is known to the skier, makes it possible to obtain a localized and reproducible deformation of the ski in that zone. The front end, or spatula or shovel, sometimes simply referred to as the tip, defined between this zone and the extreme end of the ski, on the one hand, and the zone for mounting the binding, on the other hand, practically does not flex. Thus, depending upon the characteristics of the particular deformation zone, the skier can obtain the same behavior several successive times, in particular while performing maneuvers, or tricks, known as a “nose press” or “tail press”.
  • According to advantageous, but non-limiting aspects of the invention, such a ski can incorporate one or several of the following characteristics, taken in any technically acceptable combination:
      • The particular flexion deformation zone is arranged so that, under a static load of 900 Newtons (N) applied to the center of the particular deformation zone and along a direction perpendicular to the sole of the ski, this deformation zone adopts a generally dihedral configuration whose deflection is greater than or equal to 13 mm, and 15 mm in a particular embodiment, the ski being supported on two rods (202, 204) arranged under the sole (10), symmetrically on both sides of the zone (Z1) and spaced from one another by an axial distance d200 equal to 400 mm;
      • The particular deformation zone extends, with respect to the mounting point of the ski, along an axial distance ranging between 285 and 365 mm. In the context of the present invention, an axial distance is measured parallel to a longitudinal axis of the ski;
      • The particular deformation zone is centered on a softening point arranged, with respect to the mounting point, at a distance ranging between 360 and 480 mm;
      • The particular deformation zone is a zone of reduced thickness, or height, in relation to the mounting zone, on the one hand, and to the shovel (or spatula) defined between the particular deformation zone and the adjacent end (or tip) of the ski, on the other hand. In this case, the particular deformation zone has a minimal thickness ranging between 6 and 8 mm, whereas the shovel has a minimal thickness ranging between 8.5 and 11 mm;
      • In an alternative, the particular deformation zone is formed by a fitting made of a more flexible material than the constituent material(s) of the mounting zone and of the end sections of the ski.
        • The preferred deformation zone is equipped with means for limiting or controlling its deformation. These means can include a deformable plate fixed on the upper surface of the ski, and which is mechanically biased as a function of the deformation of the ski in the particular deformation zone;
        • The ski includes two particular deformation zones arranged between the mounting zone and the front tip of the ski, and between the mounting zone and the rear tip of the ski, respectively.
    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The invention will be better understood, and other advantages thereof will become more clearly apparent, from the following description of seven embodiments of an alpine ski, given only by way example, and in reference to the annexed drawings, in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a ski according to a first embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 2 is a top view of the ski of FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 3 is a side view of the ski of FIGS. 1 and 2;
  • FIG. 4 is a longitudinal cross section, on a larger scale, of the detail IV in FIG. 3;
  • FIG. 5 is a partial side view of the ski of FIGS. 1 to 4, in a configuration for testing of its flexibility, and on a smaller scale than FIG. 4;
  • FIG. 6 is a side view corresponding to the detail IV in FIG. 3, for a ski according to a second embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 7 is a view similar to FIG. 6, for a ski according to a third embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 8 is a view similar to FIG. 6, for a ski according to a fourth embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 9 is a view similar to FIG. 6, for a ski according to a fifth embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 10 is a view similar to FIG. 6, but with a partial cut-away zone, for a ski according to a sixth embodiment of the invention; and
  • FIG. 11 is a partial side view of a ski according to a seventh embodiment of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The ski 1 shown in FIGS. 1 to 5 is a ski known as freestyle ski, the central longitudinal axis X1 of which extends from its front end 2 towards its rear end 4, these two ends, or twin tips, being raised with respect to a mounting zone 6 for a binding for a boot 130 shown in FIG. 3. This mounting zone is defined in accordance with the NF ISO 8364 standard. The front end 2, or front tip, is located on the side of the mounting zone 6 on which the front abutment 110 of the binding is fixed; whereas the rear end 4, or rear tip, is arranged on the side of the zone 6 where the heelpiece 120 of the binding is mounted. Although a twin tip ski is illustrated in the exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the invention encompasses other forms of alpine skis, including those having a front tip and a rear tail, the latter not being raised upwardly like the front tip.
  • The waist width I1 of the ski 1 is greater than 66 mm, or greater than 75 mm in a particular embodiment. The zone 6 is centered on a mounting point A6 defined according to the NF ISO 8364 standard. The mounting zone has an axial length L6.
  • A length or a dimension is referred to as “axial” when it extends parallel to the axis X1, whereas it is referred to as “transverse” when it extends perpendicular to this axis. The waist width I1 is a transverse width.
  • The zone 6 has a minimal thickness e6 ranging between 8 and 25 mm over its length L6. The thickness of the ski in the zone 6 is, for a desired rigidity, a function of its width in this same zone.
  • The ski 1 has an upper surface 8 and a sole 10.
  • A particular deformation zone Z1 of the ski 1 is arranged between the mounting zone 6 and the front end 2, i.e., forward of the zone 6. A second particular deformation zone Z2 is arranged between the zone 6 and the rear end 4, i.e., at the rear of the zone 6.
  • Each of the particular flexion deformation zones Z1 and Z2 is manifested by a localized reduction in the thickness of the ski 1.
  • These zones Z1 and Z2 are provided to adopt a generally dihedral configuration when the ski is subjected to a deformation force in flexion. Such is particularly the case when a skier performs a maneuver known as a “nose press”, i.e., with the front section, or shovel or spatula, of the ski supported on a rail, in which case the zone Z1 becomes deformed. Similarly, the zone Z2 becomes deformed when the user performs a maneuver known as a “tail press”, i.e., the rear section, or shovel or spatula, of the ski is supported on the rail.
  • As seen more particularly in FIG. 4, the ski 1 includes, in addition to the sole 10, an upper reinforcement 12, or reinforcement layer, made of glass fibers or other strengthening material, a lower reinforcement 14, or reinforcement layer, also made of glass fibers, e.g., and a core 16 that can be made of wood or foam. In a particular embodiment, the reinforcements 12 and 14 are loaded with metal, such as aluminum, for example. The reinforcements 12 and 14 can also be made of carbon fibers, aramide, Kevlar® (registered trademark), steel, aluminum, titanal, or other metal alloys. These reinforcements can also be comprised of several layers, for example a layer of glass fibers and a layer of aluminum.
  • A finish layer 15, commonly referred to as the “top”, is affixed on, or above, the reinforcement 12 and bears the decoration of the ski. It can be made of an assembly of a plurality, or several, layers.
  • The thickness e16 of the core 16 is locally reduced in order to form the zone Z1, so that the total thickness e1 of the ski 1 in the zone Z1 has a minimal value ranging between 6 and 8 mm, i.e., a value substantially less than that of the thickness e6. The thickness e1 corresponds to the sum of the minimal thickness e16 and of the thicknesses of the reinforcements 12 and 14 and of the sole 10, these two thicknesses being substantially constant over the length of the ski 1.
  • In practice, the minimal value the thickness e16 is greater than 1.5 mm to limit the risk of rupture of the core 16 in the zone Z1. In an alternative, however, one can provide an interruption of the core 16 in the area of the zone Z1 and/or zone Z2, which makes it possible to put the upper 12 and lower 14 reinforcements in contact, in order to limit the constraints in these reinforcements.
  • The front shovel 18, or spatula, of the ski 1 is defined herein as being the portion of the ski extending between the zone Z1 and the front end 2, or tip. The minimal thickness e18 of the shovel 18 is between 8.5 and 11 mm. This thickness is greater than in conventional skis, in which it has a value generally ranging between 5 and 7.5 mm. This needs to be brought closer because the shovel 18 can be substantially more rigid than in conventional skis, because the flexing of the ski occurs primarily in the area of the zones Z1 and Z2.
  • In practice, the rigidity of the shovel 18 is dependent upon the distance between the reinforcements 12 and 14, i.e., upon the thickness of the core 16. In the case in which the shovel includes a top or layer that is spaced from the upper reinforcement, with a possible interposition of a fitting or spacer, the rigidity of the shovel is not actually affected because the distance between the reinforcements remains similar to that of the illustrated embodiment. For example, the shovel can have a total thickness of 16 mm by having the same rigidity as that of the shovel 18 shown in the drawing figures, if the thickness of the sandwich comprised of the elements 12, 14, and 16 has a minimal value ranging between 8.5 mm and 11 mm.
  • The rear shovel or spatula 19 of the ski 1 is defined between the zone Z2 and the rear end 4, or, in the illustrated twin tip ski, the rear tip. The minimal thickness e19 of the shovel 19 has same value as the thickness e18.
  • A straight line Δ1, perpendicular to the axis X1, is positioned where the thickness of the ski begins to decrease by moving away from the point A6, in relation to the value the thickness e6. A straight line Δ′1, perpendicular to the axis X1, is positioned where the thickness of the ski 1 begins to decrease, by moving away from the end 2, in relation to the value the thickness e16. The zone Z1 is defined between the straight lines Δ1 and Δ′1.
  • A central point A1 of the zone Z1 is equidistant from the straight lines Δ1 and Δ′1 and is located on the surface 8, halfway between the right and left lateral edges 20 and 22 of the ski 1. This point can be considered as a softening point, or a weakened point, of the ski in the zone Z1.
  • The axial length L1 of the zone Z1, i.e., the axial distance between the straight lines Δ1 and Δ′1, has a value ranging between 150 and 200 mm. The axial distance D1 between the straight line Δ1 and the mounting point A6 has a value ranging between 285 and 385 mm. The axial distance D′1 between the points A1 and A6 is between 360 and 480 mm.
  • The zone Z1 should be sufficiently spaced from the middle of the ski so that the particular deformation zone has a limited effect on the normal performance or functioning of the ski, i.e., such as that while traversing a flat trail, without any particular trick or maneuver being performed by the skier. In practice, as shown in FIG. 3, the zone Z1 is positioned well beyond the rear binding. Thus, during normal use, the skier's support forces are not modified. Conversely, as soon as the skier takes support on the rear portion of the ski, in order to perform a trick, or maneuver, the particular deformation zone comes into play and precisely determines the location at which the ski indeed will become deformed.
  • The zone Z2 is substantially symmetrical with the zone Zi with respect to the mounting point A6. It extends between two straight lines Δ2 and Δ′2 perpendicular to the axis X1, and there is a central point A2, or softening point, of the zone Z2 on the surface 8. The axial length L2 of the zone Z2 is between 150 and 200 mm, and the straight line Δ2 extends a distance D2, ranging between 285 and 365 mm with respect to the mounting point A6. The distance D′2 between the points A2 and A6 is between 360 and 480 mm.
  • In an alternative embodiment, the zone Z2 may not be at the same distance from the point A6 as the zone Z1. In particular, zones with various lengths can be provided along the axis X1, between the mounting zone 6 and the zones Z1 and Z2.
  • The lengths L1 and L2 are not necessarily equal, just as the lengths D1 and D2, on the one hand, and D′1 and D′2, on the other hand.
  • The ski 1 includes a single particular deformation zone Z1 between the mounting zone 6 and the end 2, so that the ski 1 is capable of becoming deformed in only one zone between the front of the skier's boot and the front end of the ski. Similarly, a single particular deformation zone is provided between the mounting zone 6 and the rear end 4, so that the skier knows that the ski can become deformed in only one zone between the rear of the boot and the rear end of the ski.
  • In view of the existence of the zones Z1 and Z2, and of the relative rigidity of the mounting zone 6 and of the shovels 18 and 19, the flexing behavior of the ski 1 is reproducible, i.e., predictable, which makes it easier for the skier to control the ski, including controlling the ski during the performance of elaborate freestyle tricks.
  • This behavior can be characterized by a measurement of the flexion properties of the ski 1 when a given force is exerted on the ski, which is supported on two rods 202 and 204, each having a circular cross section, the centers of which are spaced from one another by an axial distance d200 equal to 400 mm, and which are arranged under the sole 10 of the ski, symmetrically on both sides of the zone Z1.
  • When the ski 1 is supported on the two rods 202 and 204 under the effect of its weight, its sole 10 is substantially flat in the zone Z1, and its trace in the plane of FIG. 5 is a horizontal straight line Δ3 which passes on the tops of the bars 202 and 204.
  • When a load E1 perpendicular to the sole 10 is exerted in the center of the zone Z1, i.e., in the vicinity of the point A1, and in a direction extending from the surface 8 towards the sole 10, while the ski 1 is in support on the rods 202 and 204, as explained hereinabove, the ski flexes in the zone Z1 and adopts a generally dihedral configuration in the vicinity of this zone, as shown in FIG. 5.
  • The bending deflection f of the zone Z1 is shown in the configuration of FIG. 5. This deflection is the maximum distance between the straight line Δ3 and the sole 10, when the ski 1 is subject to the load E1.
  • The thicknesses and distances mentioned hereinabove are such that, for a static load E1 with an intensity equal to 900 Newtons, i.e., corresponding to a weight of approximately 90 kg, and a distance d200 equal to 400 mm, the deflection f is greater than 13 mm.
  • These thicknesses and distances, for particular embodiments, can be selected by digital simulation or tests on samples, so that this deflection is greater than 15 mm.
  • The zone Z2 is also configured so that the deflection defined under the same conditions has a value greater than 13 mm, and 15 mm in a particular embodiment.
  • This confers a good behavior for the ski 1 when the skier performs tricks, or maneuvers, such as mentioned hereinabove.
  • Moreover, when the skier skis in powder snow, the flexion zone Z1 enables the shovel 18 to pivot upwards, about an axis perpendicular to the axis X1 and passing in the vicinity of the point A1, which makes it easier for the ski 1 to lift off.
  • In the second to seventh embodiments shown in FIGS. 6 to 11, the elements that are similar to those of the first embodiment have the same numeral references.
  • The ski 1 of FIG. 6 includes, above the particular deformation zone Z1, a metal plate 30 that is secured onto the ski 1 by means of two screws 32. This plate can be secured on the ski 1 by any other appropriately configured attachment expedient. In an alternative, the plate 30 is made of composite material.
  • An elastomeric block 34 is arranged between the plate 30 and the upper surface 8 of the ski 1. The plate 30 makes it possible to maintain the longitudinal rigidity of the ski, i.e., related to longitudinal flexion, to a value comparable to that of a conventional ski, as long as the plate 30 does not buckle. In other words, the ski becomes slightly deformed or does not become deformed in the zone Z1 as long as the bending stress is not sufficient to cause the plate 30 to buckle. With respect to the embodiment of FIGS. 1 to 5, the ski has a behavior such that a threshold value of the bending stress makes it possible to achieve an effective flexing in the zone Z1.
  • The elastomeric block 34 guarantees that if the plate 30 buckles, it becomes deformed upwards and not in the direction of the sole 10 of the ski 1. This block is however optional insofar as a preferred buckling direction for the plate 30 can be obtained by means of an adapted configuration thereof.
  • In this embodiment, the shovel 18 is not thicker than in a conventional ski. It has a thickness e18 ranging between 5 mm and 7.5 mm. Indeed, one can consider that the plate 30 at least partially compensates for the loss of rigidity of the ski, whereas, in the first embodiment, it is the thick shovels that fulfill this function.
  • In the embodiment of FIG. 7, a counter-deflection stop blade or plate 40 is secured on the ski by a screw 42 arranged in the area of one of its ends 43. The blade 40 extends above the particular deformation zone Z1 of the ski 1. In the area of its end 44 opposite the screw 42, the blade 40 is bent so as to come in support against an abutment 46 that is fixed with respect to the ski 1. Thus, in the case of a load that tends to deform the shovel 18 in the direction of the arrow F2 in FIG. 7, the blade 40 comes in support via its end 44 against the abutment 46, which limits the deformation of the ski 1.
  • To make the ski more lively, i.e., to provide the ski with more reactivity or with pep, a spring 48 is inserted between the end 44 of the blade 40 and an abutment 49 fixed with respect to the ski 1. This spring exerts on the end 44 a force E2 that is directed towards the screw 42, which can enable the blade 44 to restore the energy of the spring after bending, and to provide more rebound to the ski.
  • In the embodiment of FIG. 8, two abutments 50 and 60 are attached in the particular bending zone Z1, and they each have a surface 52 or 62 adapted to come in support against the surface of the other abutment, so as to limit the flexing of the ski 1 in the zone Z1. These abutments thus make it possible to limit the deformation of the ski 1 to a predetermined angle corresponding to the angle defined between the surfaces 52 and 62.
  • According to one advantageous aspect of a particular embodiment of the invention, an elastomeric wedge or spacer can be positioned between the surfaces 52 and 62, which improves the bending progressiveness in the zone Z1 and which yields better performance when the ski snaps back.
  • In the embodiment of FIG. 9, the particular deformation zone Z1 of the ski 1 is formed by a succession of elastomeric blades 70 inserted in the ski 1, starting from its upper surface 8, and which are adapted to be compressed to enable the ski to bend.
  • The lengths of the blades 70, taken parallel to the thickness e1 of the ski 1, increases and then decreases over the length of the zone Z1 taken parallel to the axis X1. In an alternative, all of the blades 70 can have the same length.
  • In the embodiment of FIG. 10, an elastomeric block 80 is positioned in the thickness of the ski 1, which creates a particular deformation zone Z1, this zone being covered with a counter-deflection stop blade 90 functioning similar to the blade 40 in the embodiment of FIG. 7. The abutment 46 is replaced by one or several screws 96 fixed in the ski 1, and against which the ends with oblong openings 94 provided in the blade 90 can come into support.
  • In the embodiment of FIG. 11, an elastomeric block 100 extends on both sides of a small island 102 forming the upper portion of the mounting zone 6 of the ski 1. The elastomeric block has a minimal thickness e100 under the small island 102, this thickness increasing at the front and rear of the small island 102 to create two particular deformation zones Z1 and Z2 of the ski 1.
  • An upper reinforcement 104, visible through a cut-away section of FIG. 11, extends on the tops of the shovels 18 and 19 of the ski 1, and also under the block 100 and the small island 102, in order to guarantee a certain rigidity of the ski 1.
  • The deformation zones Z1 and Z2 of the skis of the embodiments of FIGS. 6 to 11 generally have the same behavior as those of the first embodiment: under a static load of 900 Newtons, applied to the center of each of these deformation zones along a direction perpendicular to the ski sole. Each deformation zone adopts a generally dihedral configuration, with a deflection f that has a value greater than or equal to 13 mm, and 15 mm in a particular embodiment, when the ski is supported on two rods or beams that are 400 mm apart.
  • The technical features of the various embodiments mentioned hereinabove can be combined with one another. For example, a counter-deflection stop blade can be used in the embodiment of FIG. 9. Plates, such as the plate 30 of the embodiment of FIG. 6, can be used in the other embodiments, in addition to or in replacement of a counter-deflection stop blade. It is not necessary to use a spring, such as the spring 48, in the embodiments equipped with a counter-deflection stop blade.
  • The invention has been described in relation to a twin tip freestyle ski. It however applies to other types of skis, in particular a ski of which only the front tip is raised, i.e., the tail having an otherwise conventional shape.
  • The embodiments and alternative embodiments have been described hereinabove by way of example, and the invention encompasses any and all equivalent embodiments.
  • The invention illustratively disclosed herein suitably may be practiced in the absence of any element which is not specifically disclosed herein.

Claims (10)

1. An alpine ski comprising:
a mounting zone for mounting a binding, the mounting zone being centered on a mounting point;
a front end and a rear end;
a sole;
at least a single particular flexion deformation zone consisting of a single particular front flexion deformation zone between the mounting zone and the front end of the ski and/or a single particular rear flexion deformation zone between the mounting zone and the rear end of the ski;
said particular flexion deformation zone being centered on a softening point positioned, in relation to the mounting point, at a distance ranging between 360 and 480 mm.
2. An alpine ski according to claim 1, wherein:
the particular flexion deformation zone is arranged so that, under a static load of 900 Newtons, applied to the center of the particular flexion deformation zone and along a direction perpendicular to the ski sole, the deformation zone adopts a generally dihedral configuration having a deflection greater than or equal to 13 mm, the ski being supported on two rods arranged under the sole, symmetrically on both sides of the particular flexion deformation zone and spaced from one another by an axial distance equal to 400 mm.
3. An alpine ski according to claim 2, wherein:
said deflection is equal to approximately 15 mm.
4. An alpine ski according to claim 1, wherein:
the particular flexion deformation zone extends, in relation to the mounting point of the binding zone over an axial distance ranging between 285 and 365 mm.
5. An alpine ski according to claim 1, wherein:
the particular flexion deformation zone is a zone having a reduced thickness with respect to the mounting zone, on the one hand, and with respect to a zone extending between the particular flexion deformation zone and said one of the ends of the ski, on the other hand.
6. An alpine ski according to claim 5, wherein:
the particular flexion deformation zone has a minimal thickness ranging between 6 and 8 mm, and wherein the zone extending between the particular flexion deformation zonel has a minimal thickness ranging between 8.5 mm and 11 mm.
7. An alpine ski according to claim 1, wherein:
the particular flexion deformation zone is formed by a fitting made out of a more flexible material than constituent material(s) of the mounting zone and end zones of the ski.
8. An alpine ski according to claim 1, wherein:
the particular flexion deformation zone is equipped with means for limiting or controlling deformation of the ski in the particular flexion deformation zone.
9. An alpine ski according to claim 8, wherein:
the limiting or controlling means include a plate fixed on the upper surface of the ski and which is mechanically biased as a function of deformation of the ski in the particular flexion deformation zone.
10. An alpine ski according to claim 1, wherein:
the at least a single particular flexion deformation zone comprises two particular flexion deformation zones, said two particular flexion deformation zones consisting of a first deformation zone arranged between the mounting zone and the front end of the ski, and a second deformation zone arranged between the mounting zone and the rear end of the ski.
US12/632,506 2008-12-08 2009-12-07 Alpine ski with controlled flexion Abandoned US20100148472A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR08.06872 2008-12-08
FR0806872A FR2939323B1 (en) 2008-12-08 2008-12-08 ALPINE SKI WITH CONTROLLED FLEXION

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100148472A1 true US20100148472A1 (en) 2010-06-17

Family

ID=40929565

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/632,506 Abandoned US20100148472A1 (en) 2008-12-08 2009-12-07 Alpine ski with controlled flexion

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20100148472A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2193824B1 (en)
FR (1) FR2939323B1 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090189370A1 (en) * 2008-01-25 2009-07-30 Salomon S.A.S. Alpine Ski with an Adjustment Arrangement
US20100038884A1 (en) * 2004-11-23 2010-02-18 Anton Dynamics, Inc. Suspension System for a Ski
US20100194076A1 (en) * 2005-02-16 2010-08-05 Anton F. Wilson Snowboards
US20100327560A1 (en) * 2009-06-26 2010-12-30 Salomon S.A.S. Gliding board
US9305120B2 (en) 2011-04-29 2016-04-05 Bryan Marc Failing Sports board configuration
WO2016068498A1 (en) * 2014-10-30 2016-05-06 주식회사 경동스포츠 Snowboard having tension adjusting function
WO2016090499A1 (en) * 2014-12-12 2016-06-16 Chameleon Technologies Inc. Snow gliding devices incorporating morphing structures
EP3115090A1 (en) * 2015-06-19 2017-01-11 Anton F. Wilson Automatically adaptive ski
AT518978A4 (en) * 2016-11-25 2018-03-15 Atomic Austria Gmbh ski

Citations (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3907315A (en) * 1973-04-30 1975-09-23 Joseph P Charneck Skies
US4848784A (en) * 1986-05-27 1989-07-18 Atomic Skifabrik Alois Rohrmoser Ski with damper processed in its core
US4974868A (en) * 1989-11-01 1990-12-04 Morris James K Modified snowboard
US5335931A (en) * 1991-12-13 1994-08-09 Salomon S.A. Ski having an upper face of variable width
US5346244A (en) * 1992-01-28 1994-09-13 Salomon Sa Ski comprising a projecting central platform
US5427401A (en) * 1992-06-11 1995-06-27 Skis Rossignol Sa Ski having at least one recess formed in an upper surface thereof
US6059307A (en) * 1997-10-28 2000-05-09 Western; Michael W. Skateboard deck and method for making the same
US6315317B1 (en) * 1998-12-23 2001-11-13 Skis Dynastar Board for gliding
US20010042969A1 (en) * 2000-05-10 2001-11-22 Salomon S.A Alpine ski
US6382658B1 (en) * 1997-11-19 2002-05-07 North Shore Partners Method of making a snowboard having improved turning performance
US6394483B2 (en) * 1997-11-19 2002-05-28 North Shore Partners Snowboard body
US6499758B1 (en) * 1998-03-20 2002-12-31 William H. Bollman Egonomic sportsboard
US20030094777A1 (en) * 1997-09-05 2003-05-22 Louis Fournier Ergonomic sportsboard
US20040084878A1 (en) * 2002-10-03 2004-05-06 Salomon S.A. Gliding or rolling board
US20040135327A1 (en) * 2002-01-15 2004-07-15 Roland Bunter Ski sport apparatus with integrated force transmission system
US20050140117A1 (en) * 2003-12-24 2005-06-30 Skis Dynastar Ski
US20070170694A1 (en) * 2006-01-25 2007-07-26 Salomon S.A. Gliding or rolling board
US20080238040A1 (en) * 2005-07-18 2008-10-02 Vinko Avgustin Ski or Snowboard Having Improved Torsional Rigidity
US20080290621A1 (en) * 2007-05-25 2008-11-27 Skis Rossignol Alpine snowboard
US7708303B1 (en) * 2005-10-19 2010-05-04 Yankee Snowboards Llc Product for traversing snow
US7798514B2 (en) * 2008-04-10 2010-09-21 Never Summer Industries, Inc. Cambered snowboard
US20120181777A1 (en) * 2011-01-13 2012-07-19 Drake Powderworks, Llc Spoon skis and snowboards

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE6926357U (en) * 1969-06-30 1969-12-18 Juergen Philipp SPECIAL SKI FOR SCROLL TECHNOLOGY
FR2042420A1 (en) * 1969-05-06 1971-02-12 Engelbert Hans
CH675362A5 (en) * 1988-04-18 1990-09-28 Francois Wirz Ski with removable elements to adjust torsional rigidity - elements being elastic semi-elastic or rigid and held in longitudinal grooves upper surface
FR2702386B1 (en) * 1993-03-11 1995-04-28 Rossignol Sa Ski equipped with interactive means for modifying its stiffness.
FR2815879B1 (en) * 2000-10-31 2003-02-07 Rossignol Sa BOOSTER PLATFORM TO BE ANCHORED ON A SKI
FR2825646B1 (en) * 2001-06-08 2003-10-17 Salomon Sa SKI PLANNED FOR THE PRACTICE OF ALPINE SKIING

Patent Citations (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3907315A (en) * 1973-04-30 1975-09-23 Joseph P Charneck Skies
US4848784A (en) * 1986-05-27 1989-07-18 Atomic Skifabrik Alois Rohrmoser Ski with damper processed in its core
US4974868A (en) * 1989-11-01 1990-12-04 Morris James K Modified snowboard
US5335931A (en) * 1991-12-13 1994-08-09 Salomon S.A. Ski having an upper face of variable width
US5346244A (en) * 1992-01-28 1994-09-13 Salomon Sa Ski comprising a projecting central platform
US5427401A (en) * 1992-06-11 1995-06-27 Skis Rossignol Sa Ski having at least one recess formed in an upper surface thereof
US20030094777A1 (en) * 1997-09-05 2003-05-22 Louis Fournier Ergonomic sportsboard
US6059307A (en) * 1997-10-28 2000-05-09 Western; Michael W. Skateboard deck and method for making the same
US6382658B1 (en) * 1997-11-19 2002-05-07 North Shore Partners Method of making a snowboard having improved turning performance
US6394483B2 (en) * 1997-11-19 2002-05-28 North Shore Partners Snowboard body
US6499758B1 (en) * 1998-03-20 2002-12-31 William H. Bollman Egonomic sportsboard
US6315317B1 (en) * 1998-12-23 2001-11-13 Skis Dynastar Board for gliding
US20010042969A1 (en) * 2000-05-10 2001-11-22 Salomon S.A Alpine ski
US20040135327A1 (en) * 2002-01-15 2004-07-15 Roland Bunter Ski sport apparatus with integrated force transmission system
US7341271B2 (en) * 2002-01-15 2008-03-11 Buenter Roland Ski spot apparatus with integrated force transmission system
US20040084878A1 (en) * 2002-10-03 2004-05-06 Salomon S.A. Gliding or rolling board
US7083183B2 (en) * 2003-12-24 2006-08-01 Skis Dynastar Ski
US20050140117A1 (en) * 2003-12-24 2005-06-30 Skis Dynastar Ski
US20080238040A1 (en) * 2005-07-18 2008-10-02 Vinko Avgustin Ski or Snowboard Having Improved Torsional Rigidity
US7837217B2 (en) * 2005-07-18 2010-11-23 Elan, D.O.O. Ski or snowboard having improved torsional rigidity
US7708303B1 (en) * 2005-10-19 2010-05-04 Yankee Snowboards Llc Product for traversing snow
US20070170694A1 (en) * 2006-01-25 2007-07-26 Salomon S.A. Gliding or rolling board
US20080290621A1 (en) * 2007-05-25 2008-11-27 Skis Rossignol Alpine snowboard
US7798514B2 (en) * 2008-04-10 2010-09-21 Never Summer Industries, Inc. Cambered snowboard
US8029013B2 (en) * 2008-04-10 2011-10-04 Never Summer Industries, Inc. Cambered snowboard
US20120181777A1 (en) * 2011-01-13 2012-07-19 Drake Powderworks, Llc Spoon skis and snowboards

Cited By (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100038884A1 (en) * 2004-11-23 2010-02-18 Anton Dynamics, Inc. Suspension System for a Ski
US8794658B2 (en) 2004-11-23 2014-08-05 Anton F. Wilson Suspension system for a ski
US20100194076A1 (en) * 2005-02-16 2010-08-05 Anton F. Wilson Snowboards
US20090189370A1 (en) * 2008-01-25 2009-07-30 Salomon S.A.S. Alpine Ski with an Adjustment Arrangement
US8172250B2 (en) * 2008-01-25 2012-05-08 Salomon S.A.S. Alpine ski with an adjustment arrangement
US20100327560A1 (en) * 2009-06-26 2010-12-30 Salomon S.A.S. Gliding board
US8240697B2 (en) 2009-06-26 2012-08-14 Salomon S.A.S. Gliding board
US9526970B1 (en) 2011-04-29 2016-12-27 Bryan Marc Failing Sports board configuration
US10471333B1 (en) 2011-04-29 2019-11-12 Bryan Marc Failing Sports board configuration
US9305120B2 (en) 2011-04-29 2016-04-05 Bryan Marc Failing Sports board configuration
US11724174B1 (en) 2011-04-29 2023-08-15 Bryan Marc Failing Sports board configuration
US9884244B1 (en) 2011-04-29 2018-02-06 Bryan Marc Failing Sports board configuration
US11285375B1 (en) 2011-04-29 2022-03-29 Bryan Marc Failing Sports board configuration
WO2016068498A1 (en) * 2014-10-30 2016-05-06 주식회사 경동스포츠 Snowboard having tension adjusting function
WO2016090499A1 (en) * 2014-12-12 2016-06-16 Chameleon Technologies Inc. Snow gliding devices incorporating morphing structures
EP3115090A1 (en) * 2015-06-19 2017-01-11 Anton F. Wilson Automatically adaptive ski
US9950242B2 (en) * 2015-06-19 2018-04-24 Anton F. Wilson Automatically adaptive ski
US10933296B2 (en) 2015-06-19 2021-03-02 Anton F. Wilson Automatically adaptive ski
US20170043238A1 (en) * 2015-06-19 2017-02-16 Anton F. Wilson Automatically Adaptive Ski
AT518978B1 (en) * 2016-11-25 2018-03-15 Atomic Austria Gmbh ski
AT518978A4 (en) * 2016-11-25 2018-03-15 Atomic Austria Gmbh ski

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2193824B1 (en) 2014-05-21
FR2939323A1 (en) 2010-06-11
FR2939323B1 (en) 2011-03-25
EP2193824A1 (en) 2010-06-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20100148472A1 (en) Alpine ski with controlled flexion
US5988668A (en) Snowboard
US5855389A (en) Torsionally reinforced snowboard
US20020014757A1 (en) Gliding board
US9327180B2 (en) Gliding or rolling board
JPH04292182A (en) Ski plate consisting of bottom plate and auxiliary steel material
JPH0623083A (en) Ski board comprising base plate and auxliary rigid material consisting of two parts connected with said base plate
JPH0698962A (en) Vibration attenuator for ski board
US20060175802A1 (en) Snowboard impact plate and binding release mechanism
US7837217B2 (en) Ski or snowboard having improved torsional rigidity
US4895388A (en) Pair of skis
EP1221334A1 (en) Gliding board with varying bending properties
US20080305330A1 (en) Gliding or rolling board
US6637766B2 (en) Alpine ski
US8172250B2 (en) Alpine ski with an adjustment arrangement
JPH04317676A (en) Ski board containing clamp mounting base
US6679514B2 (en) Binding support plate and board-type runner for same
US7021647B2 (en) Board for gliding
US6059306A (en) Glide board intended for snowboarding
KR20110091881A (en) Snowboard
US6619688B2 (en) Alpine ski
US8684393B2 (en) Alpine ski
JP3065950U (en) Sliding board used for performing alpine skiing or snow surfing
US6082747A (en) Process for making a snow board and snow board thus obtained
US5623773A (en) Ski boot having a reinforced rear shaft portion

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SALOMON S.A.S.,FRANCE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PHELIPON, AXEL;FAVRET, LIONEL;BOURGIER, ALDRIC;REEL/FRAME:024073/0866

Effective date: 20100125

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION