US20100139644A1 - Heliostat calibration - Google Patents
Heliostat calibration Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20100139644A1 US20100139644A1 US12/608,826 US60882609A US2010139644A1 US 20100139644 A1 US20100139644 A1 US 20100139644A1 US 60882609 A US60882609 A US 60882609A US 2010139644 A1 US2010139644 A1 US 2010139644A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- heliostat
- light
- array
- macro
- intensity
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24S—SOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
- F24S50/00—Arrangements for controlling solar heat collectors
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24S—SOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
- F24S20/00—Solar heat collectors specially adapted for particular uses or environments
- F24S20/20—Solar heat collectors for receiving concentrated solar energy, e.g. receivers for solar power plants
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24S—SOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
- F24S23/00—Arrangements for concentrating solar-rays for solar heat collectors
- F24S23/70—Arrangements for concentrating solar-rays for solar heat collectors with reflectors
- F24S23/79—Arrangements for concentrating solar-rays for solar heat collectors with reflectors with spaced and opposed interacting reflective surfaces
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24S—SOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
- F24S50/00—Arrangements for controlling solar heat collectors
- F24S50/20—Arrangements for controlling solar heat collectors for tracking
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24S—SOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
- F24S23/00—Arrangements for concentrating solar-rays for solar heat collectors
- F24S23/70—Arrangements for concentrating solar-rays for solar heat collectors with reflectors
- F24S2023/87—Reflectors layout
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24S—SOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
- F24S50/00—Arrangements for controlling solar heat collectors
- F24S50/20—Arrangements for controlling solar heat collectors for tracking
- F24S2050/25—Calibration means; Methods for initial positioning of solar concentrators or solar receivers
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24S—SOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
- F24S23/00—Arrangements for concentrating solar-rays for solar heat collectors
- F24S23/70—Arrangements for concentrating solar-rays for solar heat collectors with reflectors
- F24S23/74—Arrangements for concentrating solar-rays for solar heat collectors with reflectors with trough-shaped or cylindro-parabolic reflective surfaces
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F24—HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
- F24S—SOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
- F24S23/00—Arrangements for concentrating solar-rays for solar heat collectors
- F24S23/70—Arrangements for concentrating solar-rays for solar heat collectors with reflectors
- F24S23/77—Arrangements for concentrating solar-rays for solar heat collectors with reflectors with flat reflective plates
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E10/00—Energy generation through renewable energy sources
- Y02E10/40—Solar thermal energy, e.g. solar towers
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E10/00—Energy generation through renewable energy sources
- Y02E10/40—Solar thermal energy, e.g. solar towers
- Y02E10/47—Mountings or tracking
Definitions
- Embodiments relate to the conversion of solar radiation to usable forms of energy such as heat or electricity.
- Some embodiments of the present invention relate to systems, methods and articles of manufacturing for facilitating the conversion of solar radiation to thermal and electric energy.
- Embodiments of the present invention relate to a solar energy system comprising: (a) a plurality of heliostats configured to reflect sunlight to a target mounted on a tower, each heliostat including a respective heliostat controller, the target, the target being selecting from the group consisting of an energy conversion target and/or a secondary reflector; and (b) a macro-array of light-intensity sensors characterized by a maximum sensor-sensor distance and mounted on the tower such that when any heliostat of the plurality of heliostats reflects a beam of light onto the macro-array of light-intensity sensors, the maximum dimension of the reflected beam's projection on the macro-array is at most twice the maximum sensor-sensor distance, wherein each heliostat controller is operative to control its respective heliostat so that the light beam reflected by the heliostat traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors.
- the macro-array is substantially co-planar.
- the macro-array of light-intensity sensors is a two dimensional macro-array.
- the light-intensity sensors are configured to acquire time-series light intensity data while the projected light beam traverses across the macro-array of light sensors.
- the heliostat controller is operative to: i) before the beam traversing, direct the heliostat to the target mounted on the tower according to an initial set of aiming parameters; and ii) after the beam traversing, redirect the heliostat to the target mounted on the tower according to a modified set of aiming parameters that is modified in accordance with light intensity data generated by light intensity sensors of the macro-array.
- the heliostat controller is operative to effect the re-directing according to the modified set of aiming parameters after the beam traversing.
- the heliostat controller is operative to effect the re-directing according to the modified set of aiming parameters immediately only after a time delay.
- the controller is operative to re-direct the heliostat to the target according to the initial set of aiming parameters.
- the modified set of aiming parameters is modified in accordance with at least one of: i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
- the system further comprises: c. a heliostat-field controller operative to: i) select, from the plurality of heliostats, a sub-plurality of heliostats that is to be simultaneously directed to the target (i.e., operated so that at least one point in time they are all directed to the target—there is no requirement to simultaneously re-orient the heliostats of the sub-plurality); and ii) direct the selected sub-plurality of heliostats the target (i.e., cause a situation where the selected sub-plurality is simultaneously directed to the target), wherein the heliostat field controller is operative to carry out the heliostat selection in accordance with respective light intensity measurements of macro-array taken when each heliostat's reflected beam respectively traverses the macro-array.
- only the selected sub-plurality is directed to the target.
- at least the selected sub-plurality is directed to the target.
- the heliostat-field controller is operative to effect the selection in accordance with at least one of: i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; and ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
- the system further comprises: c) electronic circuitry configured to measure at least one beam projection parameter of the heliostat beam according to the light intensity measurements acquired by light-intensity sensors while the heliostat beam traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors.
- the electronic circuitry is configured to effect the measuring in accordance with at least one of: i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; and ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
- the system further comprises: c) electronic circuitry configured to measure at least one of: i) a shape of the heliostat beam; ii) a flux intensity map of the heliostat beam; and iii) an offset of the heliostat beam, according to the light intensity measurements acquired by light-intensity sensors while the heliostat beam traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors.
- the electronic circuitry is configured to effect the measuring in accordance with at least one of: i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; and ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
- the heliostat controllers collectively are configured so that multiple overlapping heliostat reflection beams including first and second heliostat reflection beams simultaneously traverse the macro-array to simultaneously illuminate one or more of the light-intensity sensors.
- the light-intensity sensors of the macro-array are image sensors; and ii) the system further comprises: c) electronic circuitry operative to: A) determine, from the images generated by the image sensors, relative light intensity contributions of the overlapping first and second heliostat beams when the first and second beams overlap and traverse the macro-array; and B) in accordance with the relative light intensity contributions, determine at least one of: I) a shape of the first and/or second heliostat beam; II) a flux intensity map of the first and/or second heliostat beam; and III) an offset of the first and/or second heliostat beam.
- the heliostat controllers collectively are configured so that the first and second heliostat beams overlap at some times and are disjoint at other times while the first and second beams traverse the macro-array.
- the light-intensity sensors of the macro-array are image sensors; and ii) the system further comprises: c) electronic circuitry operative to determine when the first and second beams are disjoint, and in accordance with the disjoint time period(s), determine at least one of: I) a shape of the first and/or second heliostat beam; II) a flux intensity map of the first and/or second heliostat beam; III) an offset of the first and/or second heliostat beam; and IV) an indication of beam area (for example, beam diameter or any other indication).
- each of the light sensors of the macro-array are image sensors.
- the image sensors are selected from the group consisting of a CCD microarray and a CMOS microarray.
- each of the light sensors of the macro-array are photo-detectors incapable of detecting an image.
- each of the light sensors are photo-voltaic cells.
- each of the light-intensity sensors is mounted to the tower.
- the energy conversion target is selected from the group consisting of solar boiler target and a molten salt solar receiver.
- the solar boiler target is selected from the group consisting of a solar evaporator, a solar re-heater and a solar superheater.
- the energy conversion target includes one or more photovoltaic and/or photo-electrovoltaic cells.
- the tower height is at least 25 meters.
- the tower height is at least 100 meters.
- the system further comprises: c. a projector configured to project artificial light onto the heliostat such that the traversing reflected beam that traverses the macro-array includes the artificial light generated by the projector.
- the projector is configured so that the apparent width (i.e., either as detectable at the heliostat mirror or at the macro-array of light sensors) of the light source of the projector is equivalent to the apparent width from the sun.
- the projector is mounted on the tower.
- Some embodiments of the present invention provide a method of operating a solar energy system, the method comprising:
- each heliostat of the plurality respectively controlling each heliostat of the plurality so that the light beam reflected by the heliostat traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors characterized by a maximum sensor-sensor distance and mounted on the tower such that when any heliostat of the plurality of heliostats reflects a beam of light onto the macro-array of light-intensity sensors, the maximum dimension of the reflected beam's projection on the macro-array is at most twice the maximum sensor-sensor distance.
- time-series light intensity data is acquired by the light-intensity sensors while the projected light beam traverses across the macro-array of light sensors.
- the method further comprises: before the beam traversing, directing the heliostat to the target mounted on the tower according to an initial set of aiming parameters; and after the beam traversing, re-directing the heliostat to the target mounted on the tower according to a modified set of aiming parameters that is modified in accordance with light intensity data generated by light intensity sensors of the macro-array.
- the re-directing is carried out according to the modified set of aiming parameters after the beam traversing.
- the re-directing is carried out according to the modified set of aiming parameters immediately only after a time delay.
- the re-directing the heliostat to the target is carried out according to the initial set of aiming parameters.
- the modified set of aiming parameters is modified in accordance with at least one of: i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
- the method further comprises: i) selecting, from the plurality of heliostats, a sub-plurality of heliostats that is to be simultaneously directed to the target (i.e., operated so that at least one point in time they are all directed to the target—there is no requirement to simultaneously re-orient the heliostats of the sub-plurality); and ii) directing the selected sub-plurality of heliostats the target (i.e., cause a situation where the selected sub-plurality is simultaneously directed to the target), wherein the heliostat selection is carried out in accordance with respective light intensity measurements of macro-array taken when each heliostat's reflected beam respectively traverses the macro-array.
- only the selected sub-plurality is directed to the target.
- at least the selected sub-plurality is directed to the target.
- the selection is carried out in accordance with at least one of: i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; and ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
- At least one beam projection parameter of the heliostat beam is measured according to the light intensity measurements acquired by light-intensity sensors while the heliostat beam traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors.
- the measuring is carried out in accordance with at least one of: i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; and ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
- At least one of the following is measured: i) a shape of the heliostat beam; ii) a flux intensity map of the heliostat beam; and iii) an offset of the heliostat beam, according to the light intensity measurements acquired by light-intensity sensors while the heliostat beam traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors.
- the measuring is carried out in accordance with at least one of: i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; and ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
- multiple overlapping heliostat reflection beams including first and second heliostat reflection beams simultaneously traverse the macro-array to simultaneously illuminate one or more of the light-intensity sensors.
- the method further comprises: A) determining, from the images generated by the image sensors, relative light intensity contributions of the overlapping first and second heliostat beams when the first and second beams overlap and traverse the macro-array; and B) in accordance with the relative light intensity contributions, determine at least one of: I) a shape of the first and/or second heliostat beam; II) a flux intensity map of the first and/or second heliostat beam; and III) an offset of the first and/or second heliostat beam.
- the first and second heliostat beams overlap at some times and are disjoint at other times while the first and second beams traverse the macro-array.
- the light-intensity sensors of the macro-array are image sensors; and ii) the method further comprises: determining at least one of: I) a shape of the first and/or second heliostat beam; II) a flux intensity map of the first and/or second heliostat beam; III) an offset of the first and/or second heliostat beam; and IV) an indication of beam area (for example, beam diameter or any other indication).
- FIGS. 1 and 2 are diagrammatic elevation views of a plurality of heliostats and a central power tower in accordance with different embodiments of the invention.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a hierarchical control system for a solar power tower system.
- FIGS. 4A-6B are diagrammatic elevation views of various examples of arrays of light intensity detectors.
- FIGS. 7A-7C are flowcharts of routines of operating a solar energy system.
- FIG. 8 illustrates heliostat offset
- FIGS. 9A and 9B are diagrammatic elevation views of a heliostat and a central power tower system equipped with an array of light intensity detectors.
- FIG. 10 is a diagrammatic elevation view of a heliostat and a central power tower system equipped with an array of light intensity detectors and an additional mechanical element in accordance with a preferred embodiment.
- FIG. 11 is a diagrammatic plan view of a solar power tower system showing an example of how a plurality arrays can be provided to cover a surround heliostat field.
- FIG. 12 a diagrammatic elevation view of a heliostat and a central power tower system equipped with an array of light intensity detectors and a light projector in accordance with a preferred embodiment.
- FIG. 13 is diagrammatic elevation view of an array of light intensity detectors illustrating a method for calibrating multiple heliostats at substantially the same time.
- FIGS. 14A-14F illustrate time series of multiple beams traversing an array of light intensity sensors in accordance with some embodiments.
- FIGS. 15A , 16 are flowcharts of routines for characterizing reflection beams of one or more heliostats.
- FIG. 15B illustrates multiple heliostats directed to a macro-array of light intensity sensors.
- FIG. 16 illustrates an image of at least a portion of a field of heliostats.
- a solar power tower system includes at least one tower and at least one set of heliostats. Each heliostat tracks to reflect light to a target on a tower.
- the heliostats can be arrayed in any suitable manner, but preferably their spacing and positioning are selected to provide optimal financial return over a life cycle according to predictive weather data and at least one optimization goal such as total solar energy utilization, energy storage, electricity production, or revenue generation from sales of electricity.
- An ‘energy conversion target’ or solar receiver uses reflected and optionally concentrated solar radiation and converts it to some useful form of energy, such as heat or electricity.
- the solar receiver may be located at the top of a receiver tower or at some other location, for example if an intermediate reflector (also called a secondary reflector) is used to bounce light received at the top of a tower down to a receiver located at ground level or at an intermediate height.
- an intermediate reflector also called a secondary reflector
- the terms ‘energy conversion target’ and ‘solar receiver’ are used interchangeably and refer to a device or apparatus for converting insolation into some other form of energy—for example, electricity or thermal energy.
- a solar power tower system 44 in which heliostats 38 include mirrors 8 that reflect incident solar radiation 28 onto a target mounted on tower 44 (for example, solar receiver 1 ).
- the heliostat-mounted mirrors 8 are capable of tracking the apparent movement of the sun 25 across the sky each day in order to maintain the reflective focus in the direction of the receiver 1 as the angle of the incident radiation 28 changes.
- This tracking capability may be provided at least in part by a heliostat controller (not shown in FIG. 1 —see, for example, element 65 of FIG. 3 ) for controlling one or more orientation parameters of mirror 8 to aim reflection beam 398 .
- the heliostat controller may include any combination of mechanical parts (for example including motors, actuators, etc) and/or electrical circuitry (for example, integrated circuits).
- the electrical circuitry includes one or more computer microprocessors configured to execute software or code module(s) residing in volatile memory.
- the heliostat controller may include gate array electronics for example, field-programmable gate array (FPGA).
- FPGA field-programmable gate array
- heliostat controller of heliostat 38 may also be configured for aiming the mirrors 8 at locations other than the target located atop tower 43 .
- solar receiver 1 (for the present disclosure, “receiver” and “solar receiver” are used interchangeably) is located atop a tower 43 .
- FIG. 2 illustrates an alternative embodiment where receiver 1 is located on the ground, and the target is a secondary reflector (in contrast to FIG. 1 where the target is a solar receiver).
- the heliostat-mounted mirrors 8 reflect solar radiation onto one or more secondary reflectors 9 which further reflect the radiation onto the receiver 1 .
- the reflection of the incident radiation beam 28 produces a reflection beam 398 which is reflected to the target, which is either a solar receiver (i.e., for converting insolation to another form of energy such as thermal energy or electricity) or a secondary reflector configured to relay light to a solar receiver.
- the solar receiver (either mounted on the tower as in FIG. 1 or operative to receive insolation from a secondary mounted on the tower as in FIG. 2 ) is a solar boiler for boiling water and/or heating steam—this solar boiler may be operatively linked to an apparatus 45 for converting solar steam to electricity.
- the solar receiver is a molten salt solar receiver.
- the solar receiver includes one or more ‘efficient’ photovoltaic and/or photoelectrochemical cells.
- ‘efficient’ photovoltaic and/or photoelectrochemical cell are cells capable of effecting ‘efficient’ (i.e., at least 10% efficiency) photovoltaic conversion at concentrations of at least 20 suns. Photovoltaic and/or photoelectrochemical cell that are unable to reach this level of efficiency are referred to as ‘inefficient’ cells.
- tower is much taller (e.g. at least 5 times or 10 times or 20 times or more) than heliostats 38 .
- the tower height is at least 25 meters. In another example, the tower height is at least 100 meters.
- heliostat mirror is drawn in the figs as a straight line representing a planar mirror, it is appreciated that this is not a limitation, and that other shaped mirrors may be employed.
- each heliostat may include a heliostat controller (NOT SHOWN) including mechanical parts and electrical circuitry for tracking the sun.
- heliostat controllers may be operative to move the reflection beam to another location other than the target (i.e., the receiver 1 or the reflector 9 ).
- the target i.e., the receiver 1 or the reflector 9 .
- a target is the ‘macro-array’ of light-intensity detectors discussed below.
- each heliostat controller is autonomous and may aim mirror 8 to provide a certain functionality without requiring external input.
- each heliostat controller may respond to one or more electronic communications (for example, external commands) received from external electronic device or system (located at any location) describing how to aim mirror 8 .
- electronic communications for example, external commands
- the heliostat controller is ‘operative’ to provide the functionality (for example, aiming functionality).
- a solar power tower system 44 also generally includes a heliostat field control system (not shown in FIGS. 1-2 ) for helping the system operator or owner attain or maintain pre-defined operating parameters and/or constraints, some of which may be based on achieving optimization goals and some of which may be based on maintaining the safety of the system and its operation.
- a heliostat field control system (not shown in FIGS. 1-2 ) for helping the system operator or owner attain or maintain pre-defined operating parameters and/or constraints, some of which may be based on achieving optimization goals and some of which may be based on maintaining the safety of the system and its operation.
- a heliostat field control system can be used to ensure that light energy flux is distributed across the surface of a target in accordance with a predetermined set of desired values (see for example, WO/2009/103077 incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), or it can be used to maximize conversion of energy from solar radiation to latent and/or sensible heat in a working fluid within a receiver, and/or conversion of solar energy to electricity by photovoltaic (or photoelectrochemical) means, while ensuring that local temperatures on the surface of the receiver, or local concentrations of solar flux, do not exceed a predetermined local maximum.
- heliostat field controller may communicate aiming instructions to one or more heliostat controllers which are configured to then provide this aiming functionality.
- a central heliostat field control system communicates hierarchically through a data communications network with controllers of individual heliostats.
- FIG. 3 illustrates an example of such a hierarchical control system 91 that includes three levels of control hierarchy, although in other embodiments there can be more or fewer levels of hierarchy, and in still other embodiments the entire data communications network can be without hierarchy, for example in a distributed processing arrangement using a peer-to-peer communications protocol.
- HACS heliostat array control systems
- a master control system (MCS) 95 which indirectly controls the operation of heliostats in heliostat fields 96 , 97 by communicating with heliostat array control systems 92 , 93 through network 94 .
- Master control system 95 further controls the operation of a solar receiver (not shown) by communication through network 94 to a receiver control system (RCS) 99 .
- RCS receiver control system
- the portion of network 94 provided in heliostat field 96 is based on copper wire or fiber optics connections, and each of the programmable heliostat control systems 65 provided in heliostat field 96 is equipped with a wired communications adapter 76 , as are master control system 95 , heliostat array control system 92 and wired network control bus router 100 , which is optionally deployed in network 94 to handle communications traffic to and among the programmable heliostat control systems 65 in heliostat field 96 more efficiently.
- the programmable heliostat control systems 65 provided in heliostat field 97 communicate with heliostat array control system 93 through network 94 by means of wireless communications.
- each of the programmable heliostat control systems 65 in heliostat field 97 is equipped with a wireless communications adapter 77 , as are heliostat array control system 93 and wireless network router 101 , which is optionally deployed in network 94 to handle network traffic to and among the programmable heliostat control systems 65 in heliostat field 97 more efficiently.
- master control system 95 is optionally equipped with a wireless communications adapter (not shown).
- One of the possible functions of a control system is to direct heliostats to various aiming points on the surface of a target, or alternatively not on the surface of a target when operating conditions require it. This is done on the basis of periodically or continuously evaluating various inputs, which can include (but not exhaustively): predictive and/or measured meteorological data; and measured and/or calculated operating conditions and parameters of heliostats and receivers.
- various inputs can include (but not exhaustively): predictive and/or measured meteorological data; and measured and/or calculated operating conditions and parameters of heliostats and receivers.
- the operating conditions and parameters which can be used in applying control functions are instant and historical temperature data for the external surface of the receiver, and instant and historical light energy flux density data for the external surface of the receiver.
- the distribution of temperature across the surface of a receiver at a given moment can be compared with a pre-determined set of desired values or with the data for an earlier moment in time in order for the controller to decide whether current heliostat aiming instructions are adequate to meet system optimization goals or safety-based operational constraints, and especially when taking into account measured and predictive weather data.
- the distribution of light energy flux density across the surface of a target at a given moment can be compared with a predetermined set of desired values, or, alternatively, used to calibrate the calculation of predicted flux densities that are used by a control system which generates sets of aiming points and directs heliostats to those aiming points based on those predicted patterns of resultant light energy flux density.
- the skilled artisan is directed, for example, WO/2009/103077 incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
- Another function of a control system includes the calibration of heliostats, or more specifically, the calibration of the reflection of solar radiation on a target with respect to a desired or predicted reflection, for example in terms of the location of the reflection, or in terms of the shape of the reflection, or in terms of the intensity of light flux at a plurality of points in the reflection, or in terms of any combination of data that describes the beam projection (reflection) in a desired format.
- this functionality may be provided by the heliostat controller of a single heliostat either autonomously or in response to electronic communications received, for example, from a heliostat field controller.
- a system for calibrating heliostats includes an array of light intensity detectors.
- FIGS. 4A-4E , 6 A- 6 B, 7 A- 7 B, 13 illustrate various arrays 100 of light intensity detectors 101 .
- the array 100 of light detectors 101 is mounted on tower 43 , for example, below the heliostat target.
- the reflection beam 398 (i.e., a reflection of a beam of sunlight or artificial light incident to mirror 8 ) produced by each heliostat may be directed at array 100 of light intensity detectors.
- Each light intensity detector is used for detecting the intensity of light reflected by heliostats.
- element 399 represents the cross section of reflection beam 398 as it is projected onto the array 101 of light sensors—in various embodiments, a maximum dimension of the cross section 399 of reflection beam 398 as projected onto the target and/or the array 101 of light intensity may be at least 30 cm, or at least 70 cm or at least 1 meter or at least 1.5 meters.
- light intensity data acquired by each of the light intensity sensors may be used to characterize reflection beam 398 and/or a property of the cross-section 399 thereof to determine a ‘projected beam property.’
- a measurement of the shape or cross-sectional-area (or an indicative parameter thereof) may be derived from the light intensity data.
- a beam intensity map measuring the flux intensity at different locations of the reflected beam cross section 399 may be derived from the light intensity data.
- a so-called beam offset may be derived from the light intensity data (see the discussion below with reference to FIG. 8 ).
- the light intensity data and/or data may be useful calibrating the heliostat to determine and/or modify one or more operating parameters of one or more of heliostats 38 .
- the heliostat calibration may be carried out in a closed-loop system although alternatively it can be used in a open-loop system.
- a closed-loop system is one in which the data obtained or derived by the light intensity detector array is used to change heliostat aiming instructions, to change the characterization of a heliostat in a database, or to bring about heliostat maintenance by having a computer program analyze the data and issue electronic instructions on a periodic or real-time basis without significant operator intervention.
- An open-loop system is one in which the data is stored or analyzed, and used at a later time for changing heliostat aiming instructions or for bringing about heliostat maintenance, usually after intervention by a human operator.
- Light intensity detectors can include image sensors using charge-coupled device (CCD) or complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology, or devices incorporating such a sensor.
- CCD charge-coupled device
- CMOS complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor
- Light intensity detectors can also include photodetectors, so-called light meters, which generally include a photovoltaic or photoresistant sensor.
- ordinary solar cells such as photovoltaic or photoelectrochemical cells (for example, inefficient photovoltaic or photoelectrochemical cells) can be used as light intensity detectors.
- any one of these devices can be used to register a digital representation of the light reflected by a heliostat mirror 8 from a light source, either via digital imaging or by direct or indirect registration of light intensity levels.
- the array 100 of light intensity detectors 101 is preferably positioned so as to be accessible to the reflected light beams of large numbers of heliostats and therefore are best located at, near or on a central tower on which a receiver or other target is located since large numbers of heliostats are generally capable of aiming reflected light in the direction of a central tower.
- the array 100 is most preferably close to a target (such as a receiver or secondary reflector) so as to minimize travel time of heliostats diverted from regular tracking (focusing reflected light onto the target) for the purposes of calibration (see for example, FIGS. 8-10 , 12 ).
- FIGS. 4A-4E are illustrations of a one dimensional array 100 of light intensity detectors 101 .
- FIGS. 6A-7B and 13 - 14 F are illustrations of a two dimensional array 100 of light intensity detectors 101 .
- the array of light intensity detectors are ‘macro-arrays’ of light intensity detectors where the maximum sensor-sensor distance between light-intensity sensors of the array is (i) at least 0.5 meter and/or (ii) at least 0.5 times or at least 1.0 time or at least 1.5 times or at least 2.0 times the maximum dimension of the reflected beam's projection 399 onto the macro-array of light-intensity sensors.
- the “maximum sensor-sensor distance” is the maximum distance between any pair of sensors of the macro-array 100 of sensors 101 —in the example of FIGS. 4A-4E the maximum sensor-sensor distance is the distance between 101 A and 101 H, in FIGS. 14A-14F the maximum sensor-sensor distance is the distance between 101 A and 101 G.
- the maximum dimension of the reflected beam's 398 projection 399 is indicated by 397 .
- FIGS. 4A-4F indicate a plurality of snapshots in time as the reflected beam's 398 projection 99 beam projection traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors.
- light intensity readings at each of the sensors 101 A- 101 H may be recorded for a plurality of points in time t 0 -t 4 .
- the shape of the beam may be determined according to: (i) the time series of the light intensity measurements; (ii) the speed at which the projection beam traverses the macro-array of light intensity sensors (this may be constant or may vary in team); and/or (iii) the distance between the various sensors 101 at which light intensity measurements are taken.
- the computed area of the reflection beam 399 may be a function of the distance between 101 B and 101 G (where a large distance would indicate a larger area). Furthermore, in the example of FIGS. 4A-4F , the computed area of the reflection beam 399 may be a function of the reflected beam's projection traversal speed. In this case, a faster speed may indicate a larger beam area for fixed points in time, a larger speed indicates that the projection of the reflection beam has traveled a greater distance.
- the system is capable of measuring or approximating the shape of a heliostat beam projection from time series data of light intensity detectors, including data obtained from moving heliostats. This is best accomplished by designing the size and shape of the array of light intensity detectors that can do this in conjunction with the movement of a heliostat. For example, as illustrated in FIGS.
- the array 100 comprises a single line (or alternatively arc, not shown) of light intensity detectors 101 , provided substantially transversely to the tracking path of the beam projection 399 of light reflected from a heliostat, may be used to generate a set of time series that can be used by the system, together with ‘external’ data on the tracking speed of a heliostat and optionally the distance of a heliostat from the array, to approximate the shape of a heliostat beam projection.
- a single line or alternatively arc, not shown
- an array 100 includes at least one additional and optionally parallel line or arc of light intensity detectors 101 , which can be added in order to facilitate measurement or approximation of the speed of the beam projection 399 (since the distance between any two detectors 101 in the path of the beam projection 399 , for example 101 b and 101 a in the figure, could be made known to the system).
- the array 100 includes a two-dimensional array, or matrix, of at least partly offset rows or columns of detectors 101 that serve to increase resolution, in one or two dimensions, of the detection or measurement of light intensity.
- the size of the matrix can be continually increased to improve the resolution of the data capture, but ultimately the decision on the size of the matrix will be based on an economic tradeoff between the cost of additional light intensity detectors versus the incremental added value of higher resolution in the raw data.
- the incremental added value may also depend on the size of a heliostat beam projection and the number of heliostats.
- an array 100 of light intensity detectors 101 may be arranged with different and non-uniform densities of detectors 101 in different areas of the array 100 , for example so as to provide higher resolution at the edges of the array 100 ( FIG. 6 a ), or alternatively so as to provide higher resolution at the center of the array 100 ( FIG. 6 b ).
- Such non-uniform placement of detectors 101 may be, for example, in order to obtain a projection perimeter with greater resolution (as in FIG. 6 a ) or for the purpose of determining with greater precision the statistical distribution or even the calculated centroid of a heliostat beam projection 399 (as in FIG. 6 b ).
- the light intensity detectors are separated by a distance on the order of magnitude of the size of the cells—however, this is not a limitation, and larger or smaller separations are certainly possible. In some embodiments, larger or smaller separations are certainly possible. as long as the maximum separation is on the order of magnitude of the size of the team. In one non-limiting embodiment, all of the light detectors are part of a large PVC panel having inefficient PVC cells.
- FIGS. 7A-7C are flow charts of routines for operating a heliostat of a solar energy system according to some embodiments.
- a heliostat is directed at the target (e.g. a solar energy conversation target and/or a secondary reflector) mounted on the tower—for example, to generate energy from the reflected beam that is projected onto the target.
- the same heliostat is directed to the macro-array 100 such that the projected heliostat reflection beam traverses across the macro-array of light sensors.
- the heliostat is redirected from a first orientation when it is aiming at the target to a second orientation when to aim at the macro-array of light sensors (and traverse across the macro-array).
- the heliostat is directed at the target, and then may be re-directed to aim away from both the tower and the macro-array altogether—according to this second example, only at after some time delay. (e.g. a time delay of minutes, hours or days between the time when step S 301 finishes and the time when step S 305 begins).
- the light intensities are measured by light intensity sensors 101 of macro-array 100 .
- one or more beam projection parameters of the heliostat are determined.
- step S 309 for each heliostat, respective light intensities are measured.
- step S 361 the light intensity data is analyzed.
- the respective shape or flux intensity map of each heliostat is determined—for example, to create a database of heliostat shapes or heliostat intensity maps.
- step S 365 according go the results of the data analysis, heliostat selection may be carried out—i.e., a sub-plurality of the plurality of heliostats may be selected for simultaneous aiming at the target. In one example, it may be desired to provide a certain flux distribution at the target, and heliostat reflection beams (whose beam parameters are known from the light intensity data) may be selected accordingly.
- FIG. 8 illustrates the concept of heliostat offset. It is noted that in many cases, heliostat controller attempts to aim the heliostat at the target so that the centroid of the reflection beam is located at target centroid location 660 . In many real-world scenarios, over time certain factors may cause the heliostat to deviate from its preferred operating parameters—for example, wind or rain may move the mirror or one or more heliostat moving parts associated with the aiming the heliostat, changes in temperature may distort the mirror, seismic activity may influence heliostat aiming or any other factors may influence heliostat aiming.
- wind or rain may move the mirror or one or more heliostat moving parts associated with the aiming the heliostat
- changes in temperature may distort the mirror
- seismic activity may influence heliostat aiming or any other factors may influence heliostat aiming.
- aiming and ‘directing’ are used interchangeably.
- Embodiments of the present invention provide techniques and apparatus for measuring the actual centroid location 664 according to the light intensity measurements detected by light intensity sensors 101 of the macro-array. If desired, this information may then be used to determine the offset vector 668 .
- step S 301 * the heliostat is directed to the target mounted on the tower (i.e., an solar energy conversion target and/or a secondary reflector) according to an initial set of aiming parameters.
- Steps S 305 and S 309 of FIG. 7B is the same as step as steps S 305 and S 309 of FIG. 7A .
- step S 321 the heliostat is directed to the target according to a modified set of aiming parameters.
- a modified set of aiming parameters it is possible to compute the actual centroid location 664 and/or offset vector 668 and then to configure the heliostat control to compensate for any offset.
- step S 301 * it is possible (i) at an initial time t 1 to direct the heliostat in step S 301 * according initial parameters at the target according to an initial set of aiming parameters; (ii) at a later time t 2 (either immediately after S 301 * or after any time delay—it is appreciated that in the interim the heliostat may be directed in any direction including away from both the target and the macro-array in the interim) to direct the heliostat in step S 305 at the macro-array of light-intensity sensors where in step S 309 the light intensities measurements are taken and (iii) at yet a later time t 3 (either immediately after S 305 or after any time delay—it is appreciated that in the interim the heliostat may be directed in any direction including away from both the target and the macro-array in the interim) in step S 321 to direct the heliostat back at the target according to a modified set of aiming parameters.
- the system includes software for providing instructions to heliostats to track to the array, including at least one set of tracking coordinates and tracking speed.
- the instructions can be propagated through a data network or communicated directly in accordance with the architecture of the solar field control system.
- the instructions if transmitted in advance, may include a time when the heliostat controller should initiate execution of the instructions, and the heliostat controller may be equipped with data storage means for storing such instructions.
- the instructions can be pre-programmed in a heliostat controller.
- a heliostat controller may include a stored set of instructions to track to the calibration array with a given periodicity such as, for example, weekly or monthly.
- the heliostat calibration system is capable of obtaining a time series of data points representing the light intensity reflected by a heliostat to each digital imaging device or other light intensity detector, including while the heliostat is in motion. For example, if it takes 30 seconds for the light reflected from a heliostat in motion to traverse a light intensity detector while the heliostat is tracking across the detector, then the time series would include a plurality of data points (digital images and/or digital light intensity measurements) captured during those 30 seconds and preferably at a resolution sufficiently high as to indicate with a desired level of precision the beginning and end of the incidence of light on the detector as well as the intensity level at each time point.
- all of the detectors in an array may capture a time series of data points beginning when a first detector in the array detects light reflected from a heliostat and ending only when no detectors in the array detect reflected light from the heliostat.
- all of the detectors in the array obtain, record or process light intensity data (or digital images) all of the time when it is known that heliostats are to be calibrated, leaving the task of determining beginning and ending time points for each individual heliostat to image- or data-processing software elsewhere in the system.
- the time series data from each light intensity detector can be recorded for later processing, and/or transmitted, whether directly or through a data network, to a computer or data storage device elsewhere in the system for processing and analysis of the data.
- the system also includes computer hardware and software for analyzing the data obtained or recorded from the digital imaging devices or other light intensity detectors.
- the analysis is performed for the purpose of calibrating the heliostat, where calibrating may include at least one of: determining the deviation of the calculated centroid of the heliostat's beam projection from the predicted; determining or approximating the beam projection shape and its deviation from the predicted; determining the intensity of light at a plurality of points within the beam projection and any deviation from the projected distribution of light intensity; determining the speed of the traversal of the beam projection and any deviation from the predicted; correcting a structural or assembly error, or shape aberration, or any other malfunction or deviation from design in a heliostat; storing or using any of these data elements for the purpose of updating or changing a database of heliostat-related data or of updating or changing the aiming and/or tracking instructions of a heliostat; or analysis of the data by a system designer or operator.
- the analysis software is capable of calculating a beam projection shape and/or calculating the statistical distribution and/or centroid of the beam projection distribution, using data obtained and/or recorded by the light intensity detectors, including time series data, and optionally using statistical techniques applying a Gaussian or other probabilistic distribution to the light intensity of a heliostat beam projection.
- the software can be capable of producing a digital map of the light intensity at a plurality of points in the beam projection. Any of these calculated parameters can be used in the calibration of heliostats as described above.
- Heliostats (or a control system for heliostats and/or heliostat controllers) are configured to modify aiming instructions such as target coordinates in response to data obtained during the calibration process or in response to the result of the analysis of the data.
- the analysis software can also include software to eliminate or cancel out the effects of diffuse or ambient light measured by a light intensity detector, for example by measuring such light before and/or after the traversal of a heliostat beam.
- the analysis software can also include software for transformation of a curvilinear projection in order to ‘translate’ a beam projection shape and/or map of light intensity values to the surface geometry of a receiver, taking into account: the different angle of incidence of reflected light on the receiver compared with that on the array; the different attitude of the receiver with respect to the heliostat field; and/or the external surface characteristics of the receiver (for example which may comprise individual round boiler tubes rather than a smooth external surface panel.
- a solar power tower system in another embodiment, includes a solar field and an array of light intensity detectors on a tower.
- a target such as a thermal or photovoltaic receiver, or alternatively a secondary reflector, is situated at or near the top of the tower.
- the array of light intensity detectors can be provided in accordance with any of the embodiments described above.
- FIG. 9A a receiver 1 sits atop a tower 43 , similar to the arrangement of FIG. 1 .
- At least one heliostat 38 is configured with tracking and pivoting means as described above to reflect sunlight 28 onto the receiver 1 .
- An array 100 of light intensity detectors (not shown individually) is positioned on the tower 43 below the receiver 1 so that a heliostat 38 can also track to the array 100 and reflect sunlight 28 onto the array 100 . Reflected light 30 falls upon the array in accordance with tracking instructions executed by a heliostat 38 from time to time.
- the array 100 can optionally be angled toward the solar field in order to cause light reflected from heliostats to impinge upon the array at a more desirable angle, if the benefits of such an angling would outweigh additional material, installation and/or maintenance costs.
- the array of detectors could be either above the secondary reflector or on one of the tower supports of the secondary reflector as shown in FIG. 9B .
- receiver 1 sits on—but not at the top of—a tower 43 (or alternatively near or at its base) on which is provided a secondary reflector 9 , similar to the arrangement of FIG. 2 .
- At least one heliostat 38 is configured with tracking and pivoting means as described above to reflect sunlight onto the secondary reflector 9 .
- An array 100 a of light intensity detectors (not shown individually) is positioned on the tower 43 below the secondary reflector 9 so that a heliostat 38 can also track to the array 100 b .
- an array 100 b of light intensity detectors (not shown individually) is positioned on the tower 43 higher than the secondary reflector 9 , in a location allowing a heliostat to track to the array 100 b without the beam being blocked by the receiver at least part of the time.
- the array of light intensity detectors includes optical or mechanical elements to improve the ability of the detectors to detect or measure the light reflected by heliostats.
- An example of a mechanical element is one that substantially blocks direct sunlight, or sunlight reflected by objects other than heliostat mirrors, from reaching the detectors during most of the hours of the day, such as a shade or awning. Such an element can also serve to keep precipitation and some windborne particles off the light intensity detectors.
- FIG. 10 shows an example of a mechanical element 105 positioned on a tower 43 so as to reduce direct sunlight and/or precipitation impinging on an array 100 of light intensity detectors (not shown individually).
- optical element is a filter that can be placed over individual light intensity detectors, or alternatively over the entire array or a portion thereof, in order to reduce total or maximum light intensity to a level more appropriate to the sensitivity or operating characteristics of the light intensity detectors.
- optical elements may include lenses with anti-reflective coatings or dust-repellent coatings, focusing lenses or spectrally selective filters.
- light intensity may be moderated by software.
- the solar power tower system includes multiple arrays of light intensity detectors in order to make such arrays accessible to all the heliostats in a solar field.
- a solar power tower system includes a surround receiver on a four-sided tower, and additionally includes a surround field of heliostats, i.e., 360° around the tower.
- the system would include four arrays, one on each side of the tower.
- the light intensity detectors should be selected to allow for an acceptance angle wide enough to accommodate the respective portion of the solar field, in this example the acceptance angle (for each of four arrays) would have to be 90°, as illustrated in FIG. 11 . Referring now to FIG.
- a tower 43 on which a receiver (not shown) is sited—is surrounded by a solar field 39 comprising, inter alia, a plurality of heliostats 38 in each of four quadrants Q 1 , Q 2 , Q 3 and Q 4 .
- Light intensity detector arrays 100 are positioned on the tower such that each array 100 can accommodate calibration of the heliostats in one of the four quadrants Q 1 , Q 2 , Q 3 and Q 4 .
- the solar power tower system includes a light projector that can be used for performing heliostat calibration at night.
- the projector must be of sufficient power as to allow the light intensity detectors to register the intensity of its light when reflected thereupon by a heliostat, with a desired level of data resolution.
- An example of a suitable light projector is a Strong Britelight® 10000 available from Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc., of Omaha, Nebr., although it is possible to use a light projector of lower power rating as well. Operation of such an embodiment is illustrated in FIG.
- a light projector 108 mounted on a tower 43 between a receiver 1 and a light intensity detector array 100 shines light 31 onto a heliostat 38
- reflected light 32 strikes the light intensity detector array 100 in accordance with tracking instructions executed by the heliostat 38 from time to time.
- the projector will be designed so as to create a source of light (as seen from the solar field) of a size comparable to the apparent size of the disk of the sun (for example 9 mrad as ‘seen’ by a heliostat), in order to allow for registration and calibration of not only aiming and tracking accuracy but also of beam projection shape deviation from a desired or predicted shape.
- a method for operating a solar power tower system includes using an array of digital imaging devices or other light intensity detectors to capture and/or record the light reflected from a heliostat for the purposes of calibration, where calibration can include at least one of: determining or approximating a statistical distribution and/or centroid of a heliostat's beam project and/or its deviation from a desired or predicted set of values; determining the beam projection shape and/or its deviation from a desired or predicted set of values; determining the intensity of light at a plurality of points within the beam projection and/or any deviation from a desired or predicted set of values; determining the speed of the traversal of the beam projection and/or any deviation from a desired or predicted set of values; correcting a structural or assembly error, or shape aberration, or any other malfunction or deviation from design in a heliostat; storing or using any of these data elements for the purpose of updating or changing a database of heliostat-related data or of updating or changing the aiming and/or tracking instructions of
- the array is used for calibration of heliostats in a solar power tower system by causing each heliostat, or alternatively groups of heliostats, to traverse the array periodically in accordance with a manufacturer's specification, for example once every two weeks, once every month, or once every two months. Therefore, the method preferably includes sending instructions, directly or through a data communications network, to a heliostat to cause it to track to the array. Alternatively it would be possible to make use of a preprogrammed heliostat controller which causes a heliostat to track to the array with a desired periodicity or under certain preset conditions.
- light reflected by the heliostat onto an array of light intensity detectors can come from the sun, the moon, or from a light projector.
- the method also preferably includes selecting heliostats for tracking to the light intensity detector array in accordance with their relative availability or, conversely, with in accordance with how much each heliostat is needed by the solar power tower system. For example, it is known that during hours of peak insolation many heliostats are turned away from their usual receiver or other target in order not to overload a receiver or some other system component (such as a turbine in the case of a concentrated solar thermal plant, or power inverters in the case of a concentrated photovoltaic plant), or so as not to exceed a contractual or regulatory limit (for example the conditions of a power purchasing agreement).
- a receiver or some other system component such as a turbine in the case of a concentrated solar thermal plant, or power inverters in the case of a concentrated photovoltaic plant
- heliostats not instantly required during such peak insolation hours, and instead to cause them to track to the calibration array at that time.
- the method also preferably includes obtaining and optionally recording a time series of the light intensity reflected by the heliostat to each digital imaging device or light intensity detector, including while the heliostat is moving. If the tracking speed of the heliostat and the distance from the heliostat to the array are known, then it is possible to calculate at least one dimension of the beam projection from the time series; alternatively, by using a known distance between members of the array, it is possible to calculate at least one dimension of the beam projection from the time series without the need for external data.
- the method most preferably includes analyzing data obtained and/or recorded from the array of light intensity detectors (or digital imaging devices) to yield a characterization of the beam projection of a heliostat, where the characterization includes at least one of: a map of the light intensity at a plurality of points in the beam projection; the shape of the beam projection either as a set of points describing a perimeter or a mathematical expression for the shape; a mathematical expression for distribution of light in the beam such as a statistical distribution; a beam centroid; or the deviation of any of these measured or characterized parameters from a design target or from a predicted set of values.
- the characterization is optimally used by a control system and/or system operator to calibrate the aiming of the heliostat or for any other aspect of heliostat calibration as described above.
- the method includes causing a plurality of heliostats to track simultaneously or nearly simultaneously to an array, and obtaining (or recording) light intensity indications for the purposes of heliostat calibration.
- a plurality of heliostats to track simultaneously or nearly simultaneously to an array, and obtaining (or recording) light intensity indications for the purposes of heliostat calibration.
- four heliostats track simultaneously to a two-dimensional array (i.e., an array having at least two columns and two rows, where the columns and/or rows can be in the shape of lines, staggered lines or arcs) from different directions at the same time in such a way that each heliostat beam projection can be independently analyzed.
- each beam projection 399 traverses at least one row 106 or column 107 of light intensity detectors 101 within the array 100 before intersecting or overlapping with another beam projection 399 .
- at least part and preferably at least half of each beam projection 399 traverses at least one row 106 or column 107 of light intensity detectors 101 within the array 100 after ceasing to intersect or overlap with other beam projections 399 .
- software captures most or all of the desired beam shape times series data for each beam projection during the time that the beam projection doesn't intersect with other beam projections.
- the light intensity detectors are digital imaging devices and different pixels or groups of pixels in the imaging sensor can be used for recording the light intensity of different heliostats.
- FIGS. 14A-14F illustrate time series of multiple beams 99 A, 99 B traversing an array 100 of light intensity sensors 101 in accordance with some embodiments. At times t 0 , t 1 , t 2 and t 5 beams 99 A and 99 B do not overlap (they are disjoint)—at times t 3 and t 4 beams 99 a and 99 B overlap.
- FIG. 15A is a flow chart of an exemplary routine for determining one or more beam projection parameters of a heliostat in situations where multiple heliostat reflection beams are simultaneously incident on the macro-array 100 of light intensity detectors 101 so that multiple reflection beams overlap at one or more light intensity detectors 101 .
- step S 501 a plurality of heilostats are controlled so that multiple reflection beams simultaneously traverse the macro-array of light detectors.
- step S 555 when the projections of two or more heliostat reflection beams 398 simultaneously traverse the macro-array 100 of detectors 101 , one or more sensors are simultaneously illuminated by multiple reflection beams (for example, in FIG. 14D sensors 101 C and 101 F are simultaneously illuminated by beams whose projection is 99 A and 99 B; in FIG. 14E sensors 101 G and 101 F are simultaneously illuminated by beams whose projection is 99 A and 99 B).
- the light intensity detectors are image detectors, and a respective image is acquired by each light intensity detector. It is possible to analyze the contents of each image and in accordance with the results of the image analysis, to determine the relative contributions.
- FIG. 15B illustrates a plurality of heliostats 38 A, 38 B configured to simultaneously reflect respective incident beams 28 A, 28 B onto a macro-array 100 of image detectors which provide light-intensity detector functionality.
- the image generated may, in one example, look like the image illustrated in FIG. 15C .
- the image is at least a portion of the field of heliostats from the point of view of the one of the image sensors for the particular case of a light intensity sensor looking down upon the field of heliostats.
- the field of heliostats includes two heliostats 38 A, 38 B (having mirrors 8 A and 8 B) simultaneously directed to a given image detector to simultaneously illuminate the given image detector.
- many of the heliostats are drawn identically—it is appreciated that in many applications, this typically is not the case, and heliostat mirrors may have different shapes and/or sizes and/or orientations.
- the contribution of heliostat 38 A ( 38 B) having mirror 8 A ( 8 B) is a function of the size in the image of heliostat 38 A ( 38 B) (where a larger size would indicate a larger light contribution) and the color and/or grey shade of heliostat 38 A ( 38 B).
- the grey shade (or color) of the heliostat may be indicative of the intensity of the incident light beam 28 (and hence the reflected light beam 398 ) on a heliostat, this may be useful for determining a relative contribution of light intensity of a particular heliostat.
- the size of the heliostat in the image may also be useful for determining a relative contribution of light intensity of a particular heliostat.
- FIG. 15A it is possible to determine relative contributions to the light intensity of reflection beams of different heliostats.
- FIG. 16 it is possible to give a greater weight (when computing a heliostat projected beam parameter such as beam shape or centroid location or intensity or when determining modified operating parameters for one or more heliostats) to images acquired when the beams are not overlapping, For example, in some embodiments, it may be assumed that the measurements from a single heliostat beam are more reliable than measurements taken from a light detector simultaneously illuminated by multiple heliostat reflection beams.
- step S 501 of FIG. 501 the plurality of reflection beams traverse the macro-array of light detectors.
- step S 521 the data acquired at a light intensity sensor simultaneously illuminated by multiple beams is discarded or is given a lower weight.
- step S 513 a decision to utilize this data when characterizing the beam may be made and/or the data may be given a greater weight—for example, when computing or more beam projection parameters or when effecting a decision based upon the measurements of one or more light intensity detectors.
- multiple beams simultaneously incident on the macroarray may be numerically separated from multiple time samples of the overlapping beam images. This may be done using known image processing techniques. Further, images can be captured at higher resolution that a sparse detector array by disambiguating multiple sparse images from a time series.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Sustainable Development (AREA)
- Sustainable Energy (AREA)
- Thermal Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Optical Elements Other Than Lenses (AREA)
Abstract
Embodiments relate to solar energy systems and methods of operating the same. In some embodiments, the solar energy system comprising: a plurality of heliostats configured to reflect sunlight to a target mounted on a tower, each heliostat including a respective heliostat controller, the target, the target being selecting from the group consisting of an energy conversion target and/or a secondary reflector; and a macro-array of light-intensity sensors characterized by a maximum sensor-sensor distance and mounted on the tower such that when any heliostat of the plurality of heliostats reflects a beam of light onto the macro-array of light-intensity sensors, the maximum dimension of the reflected beam's projection on the macro-array is at most twice the maximum sensor-sensor distance, wherein each heliostat controller is operative to control its respective heliostat so that the light beam reflected by the heliostat traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors.
Description
- This patent application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/109,205 filed on Oct. 29, 2008.
- Embodiments relate to the conversion of solar radiation to usable forms of energy such as heat or electricity.
- Some embodiments of the present invention relate to systems, methods and articles of manufacturing for facilitating the conversion of solar radiation to thermal and electric energy.
- Embodiments of the present invention relate to a solar energy system comprising: (a) a plurality of heliostats configured to reflect sunlight to a target mounted on a tower, each heliostat including a respective heliostat controller, the target, the target being selecting from the group consisting of an energy conversion target and/or a secondary reflector; and (b) a macro-array of light-intensity sensors characterized by a maximum sensor-sensor distance and mounted on the tower such that when any heliostat of the plurality of heliostats reflects a beam of light onto the macro-array of light-intensity sensors, the maximum dimension of the reflected beam's projection on the macro-array is at most twice the maximum sensor-sensor distance, wherein each heliostat controller is operative to control its respective heliostat so that the light beam reflected by the heliostat traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors.
- In some embodiments, the macro-array is substantially co-planar.
- In some embodiments, the macro-array of light-intensity sensors is a two dimensional macro-array.
- In some embodiments, the light-intensity sensors are configured to acquire time-series light intensity data while the projected light beam traverses across the macro-array of light sensors.
- In some embodiments, the heliostat controller is operative to: i) before the beam traversing, direct the heliostat to the target mounted on the tower according to an initial set of aiming parameters; and ii) after the beam traversing, redirect the heliostat to the target mounted on the tower according to a modified set of aiming parameters that is modified in accordance with light intensity data generated by light intensity sensors of the macro-array.
- In some embodiments, the heliostat controller is operative to effect the re-directing according to the modified set of aiming parameters after the beam traversing.
- In some embodiments, the heliostat controller is operative to effect the re-directing according to the modified set of aiming parameters immediately only after a time delay.
- In some embodiments, during the period of the time delay, the controller is operative to re-direct the heliostat to the target according to the initial set of aiming parameters.
- In some embodiments, the modified set of aiming parameters is modified in accordance with at least one of: i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
- In some embodiments, the system further comprises: c. a heliostat-field controller operative to: i) select, from the plurality of heliostats, a sub-plurality of heliostats that is to be simultaneously directed to the target (i.e., operated so that at least one point in time they are all directed to the target—there is no requirement to simultaneously re-orient the heliostats of the sub-plurality); and ii) direct the selected sub-plurality of heliostats the target (i.e., cause a situation where the selected sub-plurality is simultaneously directed to the target), wherein the heliostat field controller is operative to carry out the heliostat selection in accordance with respective light intensity measurements of macro-array taken when each heliostat's reflected beam respectively traverses the macro-array.
- In some embodiments, only the selected sub-plurality is directed to the target. Alternatively, at least the selected sub-plurality is directed to the target.
- In some embodiments, the heliostat-field controller is operative to effect the selection in accordance with at least one of: i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; and ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
- In some embodiments, the system further comprises: c) electronic circuitry configured to measure at least one beam projection parameter of the heliostat beam according to the light intensity measurements acquired by light-intensity sensors while the heliostat beam traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors.
- In some embodiments, the electronic circuitry is configured to effect the measuring in accordance with at least one of: i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; and ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
- In some embodiments, the system further comprises: c) electronic circuitry configured to measure at least one of: i) a shape of the heliostat beam; ii) a flux intensity map of the heliostat beam; and iii) an offset of the heliostat beam, according to the light intensity measurements acquired by light-intensity sensors while the heliostat beam traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors.
- In some embodiments, the electronic circuitry is configured to effect the measuring in accordance with at least one of: i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; and ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
- In some embodiments, the heliostat controllers collectively are configured so that multiple overlapping heliostat reflection beams including first and second heliostat reflection beams simultaneously traverse the macro-array to simultaneously illuminate one or more of the light-intensity sensors.
- In some embodiments, i) the light-intensity sensors of the macro-array are image sensors; and ii) the system further comprises: c) electronic circuitry operative to: A) determine, from the images generated by the image sensors, relative light intensity contributions of the overlapping first and second heliostat beams when the first and second beams overlap and traverse the macro-array; and B) in accordance with the relative light intensity contributions, determine at least one of: I) a shape of the first and/or second heliostat beam; II) a flux intensity map of the first and/or second heliostat beam; and III) an offset of the first and/or second heliostat beam.
- In some embodiments, the heliostat controllers collectively are configured so that the first and second heliostat beams overlap at some times and are disjoint at other times while the first and second beams traverse the macro-array.
- In some embodiments, i) the light-intensity sensors of the macro-array are image sensors; and ii) the system further comprises: c) electronic circuitry operative to determine when the first and second beams are disjoint, and in accordance with the disjoint time period(s), determine at least one of: I) a shape of the first and/or second heliostat beam; II) a flux intensity map of the first and/or second heliostat beam; III) an offset of the first and/or second heliostat beam; and IV) an indication of beam area (for example, beam diameter or any other indication).
- In some embodiments, each of the light sensors of the macro-array are image sensors.
- In some embodiments, the image sensors are selected from the group consisting of a CCD microarray and a CMOS microarray.
- In some embodiments, each of the light sensors of the macro-array are photo-detectors incapable of detecting an image.
- In some embodiments, each of the light sensors are photo-voltaic cells.
- In some embodiments, each of the light-intensity sensors is mounted to the tower.
- In some embodiments, the energy conversion target is selected from the group consisting of solar boiler target and a molten salt solar receiver.
- In some embodiments, the solar boiler target is selected from the group consisting of a solar evaporator, a solar re-heater and a solar superheater.
- In some embodiments, the energy conversion target includes one or more photovoltaic and/or photo-electrovoltaic cells.
- In some embodiments, the tower height is at least 25 meters.
- In some embodiments, the tower height is at least 100 meters.
- In some embodiments, the system further comprises: c. a projector configured to project artificial light onto the heliostat such that the traversing reflected beam that traverses the macro-array includes the artificial light generated by the projector.
- In one example, the projector is configured so that the apparent width (i.e., either as detectable at the heliostat mirror or at the macro-array of light sensors) of the light source of the projector is equivalent to the apparent width from the sun.
- In some embodiments, the projector is mounted on the tower.
- Some embodiments of the present invention provide a method of operating a solar energy system, the method comprising:
- a. reflecting sunlight from each of a plurality of heliostats to a target mounted on a tower, the target being selecting from the group consisting of an energy conversion target and/or a secondary reflector; and
- b. respectively controlling each heliostat of the plurality so that the light beam reflected by the heliostat traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors characterized by a maximum sensor-sensor distance and mounted on the tower such that when any heliostat of the plurality of heliostats reflects a beam of light onto the macro-array of light-intensity sensors, the maximum dimension of the reflected beam's projection on the macro-array is at most twice the maximum sensor-sensor distance.
- In some embodiments, time-series light intensity data is acquired by the light-intensity sensors while the projected light beam traverses across the macro-array of light sensors.
- In some embodiments, the method further comprises: before the beam traversing, directing the heliostat to the target mounted on the tower according to an initial set of aiming parameters; and after the beam traversing, re-directing the heliostat to the target mounted on the tower according to a modified set of aiming parameters that is modified in accordance with light intensity data generated by light intensity sensors of the macro-array.
- In some embodiments, the re-directing is carried out according to the modified set of aiming parameters after the beam traversing.
- In some embodiments, the re-directing is carried out according to the modified set of aiming parameters immediately only after a time delay.
- In some embodiments, the re-directing the heliostat to the target is carried out according to the initial set of aiming parameters.
- In some embodiments, the modified set of aiming parameters is modified in accordance with at least one of: i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
- In some embodiments, the method further comprises: i) selecting, from the plurality of heliostats, a sub-plurality of heliostats that is to be simultaneously directed to the target (i.e., operated so that at least one point in time they are all directed to the target—there is no requirement to simultaneously re-orient the heliostats of the sub-plurality); and ii) directing the selected sub-plurality of heliostats the target (i.e., cause a situation where the selected sub-plurality is simultaneously directed to the target), wherein the heliostat selection is carried out in accordance with respective light intensity measurements of macro-array taken when each heliostat's reflected beam respectively traverses the macro-array.
- In some embodiments, only the selected sub-plurality is directed to the target. Alternatively, at least the selected sub-plurality is directed to the target.
- In some embodiments, the selection is carried out in accordance with at least one of: i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; and ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
- In some embodiments, at least one beam projection parameter of the heliostat beam is measured according to the light intensity measurements acquired by light-intensity sensors while the heliostat beam traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors.
- In some embodiments, the measuring is carried out in accordance with at least one of: i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; and ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
- In some embodiments, at least one of the following is measured: i) a shape of the heliostat beam; ii) a flux intensity map of the heliostat beam; and iii) an offset of the heliostat beam, according to the light intensity measurements acquired by light-intensity sensors while the heliostat beam traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors.
- In some embodiments, the measuring is carried out in accordance with at least one of: i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; and ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
- In some embodiments, multiple overlapping heliostat reflection beams including first and second heliostat reflection beams simultaneously traverse the macro-array to simultaneously illuminate one or more of the light-intensity sensors.
- In some embodiments, the method further comprises: A) determining, from the images generated by the image sensors, relative light intensity contributions of the overlapping first and second heliostat beams when the first and second beams overlap and traverse the macro-array; and B) in accordance with the relative light intensity contributions, determine at least one of: I) a shape of the first and/or second heliostat beam; II) a flux intensity map of the first and/or second heliostat beam; and III) an offset of the first and/or second heliostat beam.
- In some embodiments, the first and second heliostat beams overlap at some times and are disjoint at other times while the first and second beams traverse the macro-array.
- In some embodiments, i) the light-intensity sensors of the macro-array are image sensors; and ii) the method further comprises: determining at least one of: I) a shape of the first and/or second heliostat beam; II) a flux intensity map of the first and/or second heliostat beam; III) an offset of the first and/or second heliostat beam; and IV) an indication of beam area (for example, beam diameter or any other indication).
- Other objects, advantages and novel features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
-
FIGS. 1 and 2 are diagrammatic elevation views of a plurality of heliostats and a central power tower in accordance with different embodiments of the invention. -
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a hierarchical control system for a solar power tower system. -
FIGS. 4A-6B are diagrammatic elevation views of various examples of arrays of light intensity detectors. -
FIGS. 7A-7C are flowcharts of routines of operating a solar energy system. -
FIG. 8 illustrates heliostat offset. -
FIGS. 9A and 9B are diagrammatic elevation views of a heliostat and a central power tower system equipped with an array of light intensity detectors. -
FIG. 10 is a diagrammatic elevation view of a heliostat and a central power tower system equipped with an array of light intensity detectors and an additional mechanical element in accordance with a preferred embodiment. -
FIG. 11 is a diagrammatic plan view of a solar power tower system showing an example of how a plurality arrays can be provided to cover a surround heliostat field. -
FIG. 12 a diagrammatic elevation view of a heliostat and a central power tower system equipped with an array of light intensity detectors and a light projector in accordance with a preferred embodiment. -
FIG. 13 is diagrammatic elevation view of an array of light intensity detectors illustrating a method for calibrating multiple heliostats at substantially the same time. -
FIGS. 14A-14F illustrate time series of multiple beams traversing an array of light intensity sensors in accordance with some embodiments. -
FIGS. 15A , 16 are flowcharts of routines for characterizing reflection beams of one or more heliostats. -
FIG. 15B illustrates multiple heliostats directed to a macro-array of light intensity sensors. -
FIG. 16 illustrates an image of at least a portion of a field of heliostats. - According to the some embodiments, a solar power tower system includes at least one tower and at least one set of heliostats. Each heliostat tracks to reflect light to a target on a tower. The heliostats can be arrayed in any suitable manner, but preferably their spacing and positioning are selected to provide optimal financial return over a life cycle according to predictive weather data and at least one optimization goal such as total solar energy utilization, energy storage, electricity production, or revenue generation from sales of electricity.
- An ‘energy conversion target’ or solar receiver uses reflected and optionally concentrated solar radiation and converts it to some useful form of energy, such as heat or electricity. The solar receiver may be located at the top of a receiver tower or at some other location, for example if an intermediate reflector (also called a secondary reflector) is used to bounce light received at the top of a tower down to a receiver located at ground level or at an intermediate height. For the present disclosure, the terms ‘energy conversion target’ and ‘solar receiver’ are used interchangeably and refer to a device or apparatus for converting insolation into some other form of energy—for example, electricity or thermal energy.
- Referring now to the figures and in particular to
FIG. 1 , a solarpower tower system 44 is provided in whichheliostats 38 includemirrors 8 that reflect incidentsolar radiation 28 onto a target mounted on tower 44 (for example, solar receiver 1). The heliostat-mountedmirrors 8 are capable of tracking the apparent movement of thesun 25 across the sky each day in order to maintain the reflective focus in the direction of thereceiver 1 as the angle of theincident radiation 28 changes. This tracking capability may be provided at least in part by a heliostat controller (not shown in FIG. 1—see, for example,element 65 ofFIG. 3 ) for controlling one or more orientation parameters ofmirror 8 to aimreflection beam 398. - The skilled artisan will realize that the heliostat controller may include any combination of mechanical parts (for example including motors, actuators, etc) and/or electrical circuitry (for example, integrated circuits). In one non-limiting example, the electrical circuitry includes one or more computer microprocessors configured to execute software or code module(s) residing in volatile memory. In another non-limiting example, the heliostat controller may include gate array electronics for example, field-programmable gate array (FPGA). As will be explained below, in some embodiments, heliostat controller of
heliostat 38 may also be configured for aiming themirrors 8 at locations other than the target located atoptower 43. - In the example of
FIG. 1 , solar receiver 1 (for the present disclosure, “receiver” and “solar receiver” are used interchangeably) is located atop atower 43.FIG. 2 illustrates an alternative embodiment wherereceiver 1 is located on the ground, and the target is a secondary reflector (in contrast toFIG. 1 where the target is a solar receiver). Thus, in the example ofFIG. 2 , the heliostat-mountedmirrors 8 reflect solar radiation onto one or moresecondary reflectors 9 which further reflect the radiation onto thereceiver 1. - As shown in the figures, the reflection of the
incident radiation beam 28 produces areflection beam 398 which is reflected to the target, which is either a solar receiver (i.e., for converting insolation to another form of energy such as thermal energy or electricity) or a secondary reflector configured to relay light to a solar receiver. In one example, the solar receiver (either mounted on the tower as inFIG. 1 or operative to receive insolation from a secondary mounted on the tower as inFIG. 2 ) is a solar boiler for boiling water and/or heating steam—this solar boiler may be operatively linked to anapparatus 45 for converting solar steam to electricity. In another example, the solar receiver is a molten salt solar receiver. In yet another example, the solar receiver includes one or more ‘efficient’ photovoltaic and/or photoelectrochemical cells. - For the present disclosure, ‘efficient’ photovoltaic and/or photoelectrochemical cell are cells capable of effecting ‘efficient’ (i.e., at least 10% efficiency) photovoltaic conversion at concentrations of at least 20 suns. Photovoltaic and/or photoelectrochemical cell that are unable to reach this level of efficiency are referred to as ‘inefficient’ cells.
- It is appreciated that
FIG. 1 (and none of the figures) is not required to be to scale—for example, in some embodiment, tower is much taller (e.g. at least 5 times or 10 times or 20 times or more) thanheliostats 38. In one example, the tower height is at least 25 meters. In another example, the tower height is at least 100 meters. - Although the heliostat mirror is drawn in the figs as a straight line representing a planar mirror, it is appreciated that this is not a limitation, and that other shaped mirrors may be employed.
- As noted above, each heliostat may include a heliostat controller (NOT SHOWN) including mechanical parts and electrical circuitry for tracking the sun. In some embodiments and as will be discussed below, heliostat controllers may be operative to move the reflection beam to another location other than the target (i.e., the
receiver 1 or the reflector 9). One example of such a target is the ‘macro-array’ of light-intensity detectors discussed below. - In some embodiments, each heliostat controller is autonomous and may aim
mirror 8 to provide a certain functionality without requiring external input. Alternatively or additionally, each heliostat controller may respond to one or more electronic communications (for example, external commands) received from external electronic device or system (located at any location) describing how to aimmirror 8. For both cases, it may be said that the heliostat controller is ‘operative’ to provide the functionality (for example, aiming functionality). - A solar
power tower system 44 also generally includes a heliostat field control system (not shown inFIGS. 1-2 ) for helping the system operator or owner attain or maintain pre-defined operating parameters and/or constraints, some of which may be based on achieving optimization goals and some of which may be based on maintaining the safety of the system and its operation. For example, a heliostat field control system can be used to ensure that light energy flux is distributed across the surface of a target in accordance with a predetermined set of desired values (see for example, WO/2009/103077 incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), or it can be used to maximize conversion of energy from solar radiation to latent and/or sensible heat in a working fluid within a receiver, and/or conversion of solar energy to electricity by photovoltaic (or photoelectrochemical) means, while ensuring that local temperatures on the surface of the receiver, or local concentrations of solar flux, do not exceed a predetermined local maximum. - Overall control of the multiple heliostats can be either centralized in a single computer or distributed among several or many processors. Thus, in some embodiments, decisions about where to aim the heliostats may be carried out locally by the various heliostat controllers. Alternatively or additionally, heliostat field controller may communicate aiming instructions to one or more heliostat controllers which are configured to then provide this aiming functionality.
- In an exemplary embodiment, a central heliostat field control system communicates hierarchically through a data communications network with controllers of individual heliostats.
FIG. 3 illustrates an example of such ahierarchical control system 91 that includes three levels of control hierarchy, although in other embodiments there can be more or fewer levels of hierarchy, and in still other embodiments the entire data communications network can be without hierarchy, for example in a distributed processing arrangement using a peer-to-peer communications protocol. - At a lowest level of control hierarchy (i.e., the level provided by heliostat controller) in the illustration there are provided programmable heliostat control systems (HCS) 65, which control the two-axis (azimuth and elevation) movements of heliostats (not shown), for example as they track the movement of the sun. At a higher level of control hierarchy, heliostat array control systems (HACS) 92,93 are provided, each of which controls the operation of
heliostats 38 in heliostat fields 96,97 respectively, by communicating with programmableheliostat control systems 65 associated with thoseheliostats 38 through amultipoint data network 94 employing a network operating system such as CAN, Devicenet, Ethernet, or the like. At a still higher level of control hierarchy a master control system (MCS) 95 is provided which indirectly controls the operation of heliostats in heliostat fields 96,97 by communicating with heliostatarray control systems network 94.Master control system 95 further controls the operation of a solar receiver (not shown) by communication throughnetwork 94 to a receiver control system (RCS) 99. In the example illustrated in the figure, the portion ofnetwork 94 provided inheliostat field 96 is based on copper wire or fiber optics connections, and each of the programmableheliostat control systems 65 provided inheliostat field 96 is equipped with a wired communications adapter 76, as aremaster control system 95, heliostatarray control system 92 and wired networkcontrol bus router 100, which is optionally deployed innetwork 94 to handle communications traffic to and among the programmableheliostat control systems 65 inheliostat field 96 more efficiently. In addition, the programmableheliostat control systems 65 provided inheliostat field 97 communicate with heliostatarray control system 93 throughnetwork 94 by means of wireless communications. To this end, each of the programmableheliostat control systems 65 inheliostat field 97 is equipped with a wireless communications adapter 77, as are heliostatarray control system 93 andwireless network router 101, which is optionally deployed innetwork 94 to handle network traffic to and among the programmableheliostat control systems 65 inheliostat field 97 more efficiently. In addition,master control system 95 is optionally equipped with a wireless communications adapter (not shown). - One of the possible functions of a control system (including local heliostat controller(s) and/or one or more higher-level controllers—for example, a centralized heliostat field controller) is to direct heliostats to various aiming points on the surface of a target, or alternatively not on the surface of a target when operating conditions require it. This is done on the basis of periodically or continuously evaluating various inputs, which can include (but not exhaustively): predictive and/or measured meteorological data; and measured and/or calculated operating conditions and parameters of heliostats and receivers. Among the operating conditions and parameters which can be used in applying control functions are instant and historical temperature data for the external surface of the receiver, and instant and historical light energy flux density data for the external surface of the receiver. For example, the distribution of temperature across the surface of a receiver at a given moment can be compared with a pre-determined set of desired values or with the data for an earlier moment in time in order for the controller to decide whether current heliostat aiming instructions are adequate to meet system optimization goals or safety-based operational constraints, and especially when taking into account measured and predictive weather data. Similarly, the distribution of light energy flux density across the surface of a target at a given moment can be compared with a predetermined set of desired values, or, alternatively, used to calibrate the calculation of predicted flux densities that are used by a control system which generates sets of aiming points and directs heliostats to those aiming points based on those predicted patterns of resultant light energy flux density. The skilled artisan is directed, for example, WO/2009/103077 incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
- Another function of a control system includes the calibration of heliostats, or more specifically, the calibration of the reflection of solar radiation on a target with respect to a desired or predicted reflection, for example in terms of the location of the reflection, or in terms of the shape of the reflection, or in terms of the intensity of light flux at a plurality of points in the reflection, or in terms of any combination of data that describes the beam projection (reflection) in a desired format. As noted above, this functionality may be provided by the heliostat controller of a single heliostat either autonomously or in response to electronic communications received, for example, from a heliostat field controller.
- In some embodiments, a system for calibrating heliostats includes an array of light intensity detectors.
FIGS. 4A-4E , 6A-6B, 7A-7B, 13 illustratevarious arrays 100 oflight intensity detectors 101. In one non-limiting example, (see, for example,FIGS. 8-10 , 12) thearray 100 oflight detectors 101 is mounted ontower 43, for example, below the heliostat target. - In some embodiments, at one or more times, instead of being directed at the target, the reflection beam 398 (i.e., a reflection of a beam of sunlight or artificial light incident to mirror 8) produced by each heliostat may be directed at
array 100 of light intensity detectors. Each light intensity detector is used for detecting the intensity of light reflected by heliostats. In the figures,element 399 represents the cross section ofreflection beam 398 as it is projected onto thearray 101 of light sensors—in various embodiments, a maximum dimension of thecross section 399 ofreflection beam 398 as projected onto the target and/or thearray 101 of light intensity may be at least 30 cm, or at least 70 cm or at least 1 meter or at least 1.5 meters. - As will be discussed in greater detail below, light intensity data acquired by each of the light intensity sensors may be used to characterize
reflection beam 398 and/or a property of thecross-section 399 thereof to determine a ‘projected beam property.’ In one non-limiting example, a measurement of the shape or cross-sectional-area (or an indicative parameter thereof) may be derived from the light intensity data. In another example, a beam intensity map measuring the flux intensity at different locations of the reflectedbeam cross section 399 may be derived from the light intensity data. In yet another example, a so-called beam offset may be derived from the light intensity data (see the discussion below with reference toFIG. 8 ). - The light intensity data and/or data may be useful calibrating the heliostat to determine and/or modify one or more operating parameters of one or more of
heliostats 38. The heliostat calibration may be carried out in a closed-loop system although alternatively it can be used in a open-loop system. A closed-loop system is one in which the data obtained or derived by the light intensity detector array is used to change heliostat aiming instructions, to change the characterization of a heliostat in a database, or to bring about heliostat maintenance by having a computer program analyze the data and issue electronic instructions on a periodic or real-time basis without significant operator intervention. An open-loop system is one in which the data is stored or analyzed, and used at a later time for changing heliostat aiming instructions or for bringing about heliostat maintenance, usually after intervention by a human operator. - Light intensity detectors can include image sensors using charge-coupled device (CCD) or complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology, or devices incorporating such a sensor. For example, a consumer digital camera with a CCD ‘chip’ can serve as an image sensor. Light intensity detectors can also include photodetectors, so-called light meters, which generally include a photovoltaic or photoresistant sensor. Alternatively, as is known in the art, ordinary solar cells such as photovoltaic or photoelectrochemical cells (for example, inefficient photovoltaic or photoelectrochemical cells) can be used as light intensity detectors. According to some embodiments, any one of these devices can be used to register a digital representation of the light reflected by a
heliostat mirror 8 from a light source, either via digital imaging or by direct or indirect registration of light intensity levels. - In some embodiments, the
array 100 oflight intensity detectors 101 is preferably positioned so as to be accessible to the reflected light beams of large numbers of heliostats and therefore are best located at, near or on a central tower on which a receiver or other target is located since large numbers of heliostats are generally capable of aiming reflected light in the direction of a central tower. Thearray 100 is most preferably close to a target (such as a receiver or secondary reflector) so as to minimize travel time of heliostats diverted from regular tracking (focusing reflected light onto the target) for the purposes of calibration (see for example,FIGS. 8-10 , 12). -
FIGS. 4A-4E are illustrations of a onedimensional array 100 oflight intensity detectors 101.FIGS. 6A-7B and 13-14F are illustrations of a twodimensional array 100 oflight intensity detectors 101. In the example of the figures, the array of light intensity detectors are ‘macro-arrays’ of light intensity detectors where the maximum sensor-sensor distance between light-intensity sensors of the array is (i) at least 0.5 meter and/or (ii) at least 0.5 times or at least 1.0 time or at least 1.5 times or at least 2.0 times the maximum dimension of the reflected beam'sprojection 399 onto the macro-array of light-intensity sensors. - The “maximum sensor-sensor distance” is the maximum distance between any pair of sensors of the macro-array 100 of
sensors 101—in the example ofFIGS. 4A-4E the maximum sensor-sensor distance is the distance between 101A and 101H, inFIGS. 14A-14F the maximum sensor-sensor distance is the distance between 101A and 101G. InFIG. 4A , the maximum dimension of the reflected beam's 398projection 399 is indicated by 397. -
FIGS. 4A-4F indicate a plurality of snapshots in time as the reflected beam's 398projection 99 beam projection traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors. In the example ofFIGS. 4A-4F , light intensity readings at each of thesensors 101A-101H may be recorded for a plurality of points in time t0-t4. The shape of the beam (or any other beam projection parameter) may be determined according to: (i) the time series of the light intensity measurements; (ii) the speed at which the projection beam traverses the macro-array of light intensity sensors (this may be constant or may vary in team); and/or (iii) the distance between thevarious sensors 101 at which light intensity measurements are taken. - Thus, in one example related to
FIGS. 4A-4F , the computed area of thereflection beam 399 may be a function of the distance between 101B and 101G (where a large distance would indicate a larger area). Furthermore, in the example ofFIGS. 4A-4F , the computed area of thereflection beam 399 may be a function of the reflected beam's projection traversal speed. In this case, a faster speed may indicate a larger beam area for fixed points in time, a larger speed indicates that the projection of the reflection beam has traveled a greater distance. - Thus, in some embodiments, the system is capable of measuring or approximating the shape of a heliostat beam projection from time series data of light intensity detectors, including data obtained from moving heliostats. This is best accomplished by designing the size and shape of the array of light intensity detectors that can do this in conjunction with the movement of a heliostat. For example, as illustrated in
FIGS. 4A-4F , thearray 100 comprises a single line (or alternatively arc, not shown) oflight intensity detectors 101, provided substantially transversely to the tracking path of thebeam projection 399 of light reflected from a heliostat, may be used to generate a set of time series that can be used by the system, together with ‘external’ data on the tracking speed of a heliostat and optionally the distance of a heliostat from the array, to approximate the shape of a heliostat beam projection. In another example, illustrated inFIG. 5A , anarray 100 includes at least one additional and optionally parallel line or arc oflight intensity detectors 101, which can be added in order to facilitate measurement or approximation of the speed of the beam projection 399 (since the distance between any twodetectors 101 in the path of thebeam projection 399, for example 101 b and 101 a in the figure, could be made known to the system). In yet another example, illustrated inFIG. 5B , thearray 100 includes a two-dimensional array, or matrix, of at least partly offset rows or columns ofdetectors 101 that serve to increase resolution, in one or two dimensions, of the detection or measurement of light intensity. The size of the matrix can be continually increased to improve the resolution of the data capture, but ultimately the decision on the size of the matrix will be based on an economic tradeoff between the cost of additional light intensity detectors versus the incremental added value of higher resolution in the raw data. The incremental added value may also depend on the size of a heliostat beam projection and the number of heliostats. For example, if the detectors are expensive, and the deployment of a very large number of heliostats (tens of thousands) allows the achievement of only a moderate level of precision in calibration, then a system designer may prefer to use a small number of detectors (say, fewer than ten), whereas if the detectors were to be inexpensive and a smaller number of larger heliostats were to be involved which would typically demand a higher level of calibration accuracy, then a system designer may choose to use a larger number of detectors. In yet a further example, illustrated inFIGS. 6 a and 6 b, anarray 100 oflight intensity detectors 101 may be arranged with different and non-uniform densities ofdetectors 101 in different areas of thearray 100, for example so as to provide higher resolution at the edges of the array 100 (FIG. 6 a), or alternatively so as to provide higher resolution at the center of the array 100 (FIG. 6 b). Such non-uniform placement ofdetectors 101 may be, for example, in order to obtain a projection perimeter with greater resolution (as inFIG. 6 a) or for the purpose of determining with greater precision the statistical distribution or even the calculated centroid of a heliostat beam projection 399 (as inFIG. 6 b). - In
FIGS. 4A-4E (and in other figures) the light intensity detectors are separated by a distance on the order of magnitude of the size of the cells—however, this is not a limitation, and larger or smaller separations are certainly possible. In some embodiments, larger or smaller separations are certainly possible. as long as the maximum separation is on the order of magnitude of the size of the team. In one non-limiting embodiment, all of the light detectors are part of a large PVC panel having inefficient PVC cells. -
FIGS. 7A-7C are flow charts of routines for operating a heliostat of a solar energy system according to some embodiments. - Reference is made to
FIG. 7A . In step S301 a heliostat is directed at the target (e.g. a solar energy conversation target and/or a secondary reflector) mounted on the tower—for example, to generate energy from the reflected beam that is projected onto the target. In step S305, the same heliostat is directed to the macro-array 100 such that the projected heliostat reflection beam traverses across the macro-array of light sensors. - In a first example, the heliostat is redirected from a first orientation when it is aiming at the target to a second orientation when to aim at the macro-array of light sensors (and traverse across the macro-array). In a second example, the heliostat is directed at the target, and then may be re-directed to aim away from both the tower and the macro-array altogether—according to this second example, only at after some time delay. (e.g. a time delay of minutes, hours or days between the time when step S301 finishes and the time when step S305 begins). In step S309 the light intensities are measured by
light intensity sensors 101 ofmacro-array 100. In step S315, one or more beam projection parameters of the heliostat are determined. - Reference is now made to
FIG. 7C . In step S309, for each heliostat, respective light intensities are measured. In step S361, the light intensity data is analyzed. In one particular example, the respective shape or flux intensity map of each heliostat is determined—for example, to create a database of heliostat shapes or heliostat intensity maps. In step S365, according go the results of the data analysis, heliostat selection may be carried out—i.e., a sub-plurality of the plurality of heliostats may be selected for simultaneous aiming at the target. In one example, it may be desired to provide a certain flux distribution at the target, and heliostat reflection beams (whose beam parameters are known from the light intensity data) may be selected accordingly. -
FIG. 8 illustrates the concept of heliostat offset. It is noted that in many cases, heliostat controller attempts to aim the heliostat at the target so that the centroid of the reflection beam is located at target centroid location 660. In many real-world scenarios, over time certain factors may cause the heliostat to deviate from its preferred operating parameters—for example, wind or rain may move the mirror or one or more heliostat moving parts associated with the aiming the heliostat, changes in temperature may distort the mirror, seismic activity may influence heliostat aiming or any other factors may influence heliostat aiming. - For the present disclosure, the terms ‘aiming’ and ‘directing’ are used interchangeably.
- Thus, as illustrated in
FIG. 8 , theactual centroid location 664 of the reflected heliostat beam obtained when the heliostat controller attempts to aim at location 660 actually deviates from the target centroid location - Embodiments of the present invention provide techniques and apparatus for measuring the
actual centroid location 664 according to the light intensity measurements detected bylight intensity sensors 101 of the macro-array. If desired, this information may then be used to determine the offsetvector 668. - Reference is now made to
FIG. 7B . In step S301*, the heliostat is directed to the target mounted on the tower (i.e., an solar energy conversion target and/or a secondary reflector) according to an initial set of aiming parameters. Steps S305 and S309 ofFIG. 7B is the same as step as steps S305 and S309 ofFIG. 7A . - In step S321, the heliostat is directed to the target according to a modified set of aiming parameters. Thus, in one non-limiting use case, it is possible to compute the
actual centroid location 664 and/or offsetvector 668 and then to configure the heliostat control to compensate for any offset. In one particular example, it is possible to immediately re-aim the heliostat at the target according to the modified set of aiming parameters. Alternatively, it is possible to only do so after a time delay. - In another example, it is possible (i) at an initial time t1 to direct the heliostat in step S301* according initial parameters at the target according to an initial set of aiming parameters; (ii) at a later time t2 (either immediately after S301* or after any time delay—it is appreciated that in the interim the heliostat may be directed in any direction including away from both the target and the macro-array in the interim) to direct the heliostat in step S305 at the macro-array of light-intensity sensors where in step S309 the light intensities measurements are taken and (iii) at yet a later time t3 (either immediately after S305 or after any time delay—it is appreciated that in the interim the heliostat may be directed in any direction including away from both the target and the macro-array in the interim) in step S321 to direct the heliostat back at the target according to a modified set of aiming parameters.
- In some embodiments, the system includes software for providing instructions to heliostats to track to the array, including at least one set of tracking coordinates and tracking speed. The instructions can be propagated through a data network or communicated directly in accordance with the architecture of the solar field control system. The instructions, if transmitted in advance, may include a time when the heliostat controller should initiate execution of the instructions, and the heliostat controller may be equipped with data storage means for storing such instructions. Alternatively the instructions can be pre-programmed in a heliostat controller. For example, a heliostat controller may include a stored set of instructions to track to the calibration array with a given periodicity such as, for example, weekly or monthly.
- In preferred embodiments, the heliostat calibration system is capable of obtaining a time series of data points representing the light intensity reflected by a heliostat to each digital imaging device or other light intensity detector, including while the heliostat is in motion. For example, if it takes 30 seconds for the light reflected from a heliostat in motion to traverse a light intensity detector while the heliostat is tracking across the detector, then the time series would include a plurality of data points (digital images and/or digital light intensity measurements) captured during those 30 seconds and preferably at a resolution sufficiently high as to indicate with a desired level of precision the beginning and end of the incidence of light on the detector as well as the intensity level at each time point. In another example, all of the detectors in an array may capture a time series of data points beginning when a first detector in the array detects light reflected from a heliostat and ending only when no detectors in the array detect reflected light from the heliostat. In yet another example, all of the detectors in the array obtain, record or process light intensity data (or digital images) all of the time when it is known that heliostats are to be calibrated, leaving the task of determining beginning and ending time points for each individual heliostat to image- or data-processing software elsewhere in the system. The time series data from each light intensity detector can be recorded for later processing, and/or transmitted, whether directly or through a data network, to a computer or data storage device elsewhere in the system for processing and analysis of the data.
- In particularly preferred embodiments, the system also includes computer hardware and software for analyzing the data obtained or recorded from the digital imaging devices or other light intensity detectors. The analysis is performed for the purpose of calibrating the heliostat, where calibrating may include at least one of: determining the deviation of the calculated centroid of the heliostat's beam projection from the predicted; determining or approximating the beam projection shape and its deviation from the predicted; determining the intensity of light at a plurality of points within the beam projection and any deviation from the projected distribution of light intensity; determining the speed of the traversal of the beam projection and any deviation from the predicted; correcting a structural or assembly error, or shape aberration, or any other malfunction or deviation from design in a heliostat; storing or using any of these data elements for the purpose of updating or changing a database of heliostat-related data or of updating or changing the aiming and/or tracking instructions of a heliostat; or analysis of the data by a system designer or operator.
- Most preferably, the analysis software is capable of calculating a beam projection shape and/or calculating the statistical distribution and/or centroid of the beam projection distribution, using data obtained and/or recorded by the light intensity detectors, including time series data, and optionally using statistical techniques applying a Gaussian or other probabilistic distribution to the light intensity of a heliostat beam projection. Additionally, the software can be capable of producing a digital map of the light intensity at a plurality of points in the beam projection. Any of these calculated parameters can be used in the calibration of heliostats as described above. Heliostats (or a control system for heliostats and/or heliostat controllers) are configured to modify aiming instructions such as target coordinates in response to data obtained during the calibration process or in response to the result of the analysis of the data.
- The analysis software can also include software to eliminate or cancel out the effects of diffuse or ambient light measured by a light intensity detector, for example by measuring such light before and/or after the traversal of a heliostat beam. The analysis software can also include software for transformation of a curvilinear projection in order to ‘translate’ a beam projection shape and/or map of light intensity values to the surface geometry of a receiver, taking into account: the different angle of incidence of reflected light on the receiver compared with that on the array; the different attitude of the receiver with respect to the heliostat field; and/or the external surface characteristics of the receiver (for example which may comprise individual round boiler tubes rather than a smooth external surface panel.
- In another embodiment, a solar power tower system includes a solar field and an array of light intensity detectors on a tower. A target such as a thermal or photovoltaic receiver, or alternatively a secondary reflector, is situated at or near the top of the tower. The array of light intensity detectors can be provided in accordance with any of the embodiments described above.
- In the case of a thermal receiver or photovoltaic target, for example, the array of detectors would optimally be provided just below the receiver on the side of the tower as shown in
FIG. 9A . Referring now toFIG. 9A , areceiver 1 sits atop atower 43, similar to the arrangement ofFIG. 1 . At least oneheliostat 38 is configured with tracking and pivoting means as described above to reflectsunlight 28 onto thereceiver 1. Anarray 100 of light intensity detectors (not shown individually) is positioned on thetower 43 below thereceiver 1 so that aheliostat 38 can also track to thearray 100 and reflectsunlight 28 onto thearray 100. Reflected light 30 falls upon the array in accordance with tracking instructions executed by aheliostat 38 from time to time. Thearray 100 can optionally be angled toward the solar field in order to cause light reflected from heliostats to impinge upon the array at a more desirable angle, if the benefits of such an angling would outweigh additional material, installation and/or maintenance costs. - In the case of a secondary reflector used as a ‘beam-down’ mirror, the array of detectors could be either above the secondary reflector or on one of the tower supports of the secondary reflector as shown in
FIG. 9B . InFIG. 9B ,receiver 1 sits on—but not at the top of—a tower 43 (or alternatively near or at its base) on which is provided asecondary reflector 9, similar to the arrangement ofFIG. 2 . At least oneheliostat 38 is configured with tracking and pivoting means as described above to reflect sunlight onto thesecondary reflector 9. Anarray 100 a of light intensity detectors (not shown individually) is positioned on thetower 43 below thesecondary reflector 9 so that aheliostat 38 can also track to thearray 100 b. Alternatively, (or, optionally, additionally,) anarray 100 b of light intensity detectors (not shown individually) is positioned on thetower 43 higher than thesecondary reflector 9, in a location allowing a heliostat to track to thearray 100 b without the beam being blocked by the receiver at least part of the time. - In a preferred embodiment, the array of light intensity detectors includes optical or mechanical elements to improve the ability of the detectors to detect or measure the light reflected by heliostats. An example of a mechanical element is one that substantially blocks direct sunlight, or sunlight reflected by objects other than heliostat mirrors, from reaching the detectors during most of the hours of the day, such as a shade or awning. Such an element can also serve to keep precipitation and some windborne particles off the light intensity detectors.
FIG. 10 shows an example of amechanical element 105 positioned on atower 43 so as to reduce direct sunlight and/or precipitation impinging on anarray 100 of light intensity detectors (not shown individually). - An example of an optical element is a filter that can be placed over individual light intensity detectors, or alternatively over the entire array or a portion thereof, in order to reduce total or maximum light intensity to a level more appropriate to the sensitivity or operating characteristics of the light intensity detectors. Other examples of optical elements may include lenses with anti-reflective coatings or dust-repellent coatings, focusing lenses or spectrally selective filters. Alternatively, light intensity may be moderated by software.
- In a particularly preferred embodiment, the solar power tower system includes multiple arrays of light intensity detectors in order to make such arrays accessible to all the heliostats in a solar field. In an example, a solar power tower system includes a surround receiver on a four-sided tower, and additionally includes a surround field of heliostats, i.e., 360° around the tower. In this case the system would include four arrays, one on each side of the tower. As the light intensity detectors should be selected to allow for an acceptance angle wide enough to accommodate the respective portion of the solar field, in this example the acceptance angle (for each of four arrays) would have to be 90°, as illustrated in
FIG. 11 . Referring now toFIG. 11 , atower 43—on which a receiver (not shown) is sited—is surrounded by asolar field 39 comprising, inter alia, a plurality ofheliostats 38 in each of four quadrants Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4. Lightintensity detector arrays 100, each with an acceptance angle of 90°, are positioned on the tower such that eacharray 100 can accommodate calibration of the heliostats in one of the four quadrants Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4. - In another preferred embodiment, the solar power tower system includes a light projector that can be used for performing heliostat calibration at night. The projector must be of sufficient power as to allow the light intensity detectors to register the intensity of its light when reflected thereupon by a heliostat, with a desired level of data resolution. An example of a suitable light projector is a Strong Britelight® 10000 available from Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc., of Omaha, Nebr., although it is possible to use a light projector of lower power rating as well. Operation of such an embodiment is illustrated in
FIG. 12 , where alight projector 108 mounted on atower 43 between areceiver 1 and a lightintensity detector array 100 shines light 31 onto aheliostat 38, and reflected light 32 strikes the lightintensity detector array 100 in accordance with tracking instructions executed by theheliostat 38 from time to time. In an alternative preferred embodiment, the projector will be designed so as to create a source of light (as seen from the solar field) of a size comparable to the apparent size of the disk of the sun (for example 9 mrad as ‘seen’ by a heliostat), in order to allow for registration and calibration of not only aiming and tracking accuracy but also of beam projection shape deviation from a desired or predicted shape. - In other embodiments, a method for operating a solar power tower system includes using an array of digital imaging devices or other light intensity detectors to capture and/or record the light reflected from a heliostat for the purposes of calibration, where calibration can include at least one of: determining or approximating a statistical distribution and/or centroid of a heliostat's beam project and/or its deviation from a desired or predicted set of values; determining the beam projection shape and/or its deviation from a desired or predicted set of values; determining the intensity of light at a plurality of points within the beam projection and/or any deviation from a desired or predicted set of values; determining the speed of the traversal of the beam projection and/or any deviation from a desired or predicted set of values; correcting a structural or assembly error, or shape aberration, or any other malfunction or deviation from design in a heliostat; storing or using any of these data elements for the purpose of updating or changing a database of heliostat-related data or of updating or changing the aiming and/or tracking instructions of a heliostat; or analysis of the data by a system designer or operator. According to the method, the array is used for calibration of heliostats in a solar power tower system by causing each heliostat, or alternatively groups of heliostats, to traverse the array periodically in accordance with a manufacturer's specification, for example once every two weeks, once every month, or once every two months. Therefore, the method preferably includes sending instructions, directly or through a data communications network, to a heliostat to cause it to track to the array. Alternatively it would be possible to make use of a preprogrammed heliostat controller which causes a heliostat to track to the array with a desired periodicity or under certain preset conditions. In any of the embodiments, light reflected by the heliostat onto an array of light intensity detectors can come from the sun, the moon, or from a light projector.
- The method also preferably includes selecting heliostats for tracking to the light intensity detector array in accordance with their relative availability or, conversely, with in accordance with how much each heliostat is needed by the solar power tower system. For example, it is known that during hours of peak insolation many heliostats are turned away from their usual receiver or other target in order not to overload a receiver or some other system component (such as a turbine in the case of a concentrated solar thermal plant, or power inverters in the case of a concentrated photovoltaic plant), or so as not to exceed a contractual or regulatory limit (for example the conditions of a power purchasing agreement). It is therefore desirable to select those heliostats not instantly required during such peak insolation hours, and instead to cause them to track to the calibration array at that time. In another example, there may be excess heliostats on one side of a tower; for example, it is known that the heliostats east of a tower in the afternoon (in the northern hemisphere) can reflect up to three times as much light onto the eastern side of a receiver than they can in the morning (because reflected light is reduced in accordance with the cosine of half the angle between incidence and reflection). In accordance with the method it would be desirable to cause such excess heliostats to track to the calibration array during such times as they are not needed for energy conversion so as not to make them unavailable at other times when they are more acutely needed (e.g., the morning hours in the eastern field example).
- The method also preferably includes obtaining and optionally recording a time series of the light intensity reflected by the heliostat to each digital imaging device or light intensity detector, including while the heliostat is moving. If the tracking speed of the heliostat and the distance from the heliostat to the array are known, then it is possible to calculate at least one dimension of the beam projection from the time series; alternatively, by using a known distance between members of the array, it is possible to calculate at least one dimension of the beam projection from the time series without the need for external data.
- The method most preferably includes analyzing data obtained and/or recorded from the array of light intensity detectors (or digital imaging devices) to yield a characterization of the beam projection of a heliostat, where the characterization includes at least one of: a map of the light intensity at a plurality of points in the beam projection; the shape of the beam projection either as a set of points describing a perimeter or a mathematical expression for the shape; a mathematical expression for distribution of light in the beam such as a statistical distribution; a beam centroid; or the deviation of any of these measured or characterized parameters from a design target or from a predicted set of values. According to the method, the characterization, optionally including any measurable or calculable deviation from a design goal or predicted set of values, is optimally used by a control system and/or system operator to calibrate the aiming of the heliostat or for any other aspect of heliostat calibration as described above.
- In a preferred embodiment, the method includes causing a plurality of heliostats to track simultaneously or nearly simultaneously to an array, and obtaining (or recording) light intensity indications for the purposes of heliostat calibration. In an example illustrated in
FIG. 13 , four heliostats track simultaneously to a two-dimensional array (i.e., an array having at least two columns and two rows, where the columns and/or rows can be in the shape of lines, staggered lines or arcs) from different directions at the same time in such a way that each heliostat beam projection can be independently analyzed. This arrangement is optimally arranged so that at least part and preferably at least half of eachbeam projection 399 traverses at least onerow 106 orcolumn 107 oflight intensity detectors 101 within thearray 100 before intersecting or overlapping with anotherbeam projection 399. Similarly, after intersecting withother beam projections 399, at least part and preferably at least half of eachbeam projection 399 traverses at least onerow 106 orcolumn 107 oflight intensity detectors 101 within thearray 100 after ceasing to intersect or overlap withother beam projections 399. In the example, software captures most or all of the desired beam shape times series data for each beam projection during the time that the beam projection doesn't intersect with other beam projections. In another example, the light intensity detectors are digital imaging devices and different pixels or groups of pixels in the imaging sensor can be used for recording the light intensity of different heliostats. -
FIGS. 14A-14F illustrate time series ofmultiple beams array 100 oflight intensity sensors 101 in accordance with some embodiments. At times t0, t1, t2 andt5 beams -
FIG. 15A is a flow chart of an exemplary routine for determining one or more beam projection parameters of a heliostat in situations where multiple heliostat reflection beams are simultaneously incident on the macro-array 100 oflight intensity detectors 101 so that multiple reflection beams overlap at one or morelight intensity detectors 101. - In step S501, a plurality of heilostats are controlled so that multiple reflection beams simultaneously traverse the macro-array of light detectors.
- In step S555, when the projections of two or more heliostat reflection beams 398 simultaneously traverse the macro-array 100 of
detectors 101, one or more sensors are simultaneously illuminated by multiple reflection beams (for example, inFIG. 14D sensors FIG. 14E sensors - According to some embodiments, when multiple beams reflected from a heliostat simultaneously illuminate a given
light intensity sensor 101, it is possible to determine the light intensity contribution of each reflection beam of multiple beams. - In one non-limiting example, the light intensity detectors are image detectors, and a respective image is acquired by each light intensity detector. It is possible to analyze the contents of each image and in accordance with the results of the image analysis, to determine the relative contributions.
-
FIG. 15B illustrates a plurality ofheliostats - When simultaneous reflection beams 98A, 98B are incident upon an image detector (i.e., overlapping beam projections as in
FIGS. 14D-14E ), the image generated may, in one example, look like the image illustrated inFIG. 15C . InFIG. 15C , the image is at least a portion of the field of heliostats from the point of view of the one of the image sensors for the particular case of a light intensity sensor looking down upon the field of heliostats. The field of heliostats includes twoheliostats mirrors FIG. 15C , for illustrative purposes only, many of the heliostats are drawn identically—it is appreciated that in many applications, this typically is not the case, and heliostat mirrors may have different shapes and/or sizes and/or orientations. - It is now disclosed that it is possible to analyze the image acquired the image by the image detector, and according to the contents to determine (within some tolerance) the relative contributions of multiple heliostat reflection beams reflected onto the image detector. Thus, in the example of
FIG. 15C , the contribution ofheliostat 38A (38B) havingmirror 8A (8B) is a function of the size in the image ofheliostat 38A (38B) (where a larger size would indicate a larger light contribution) and the color and/or grey shade ofheliostat 38A (38B). Because the grey shade (or color) of the heliostat may be indicative of the intensity of the incident light beam 28 (and hence the reflected light beam 398) on a heliostat, this may be useful for determining a relative contribution of light intensity of a particular heliostat. In addition, the size of the heliostat in the image may also be useful for determining a relative contribution of light intensity of a particular heliostat. - In some embodiments, towards this end, it may be useful to maintain a database of heliostats shapes and sizes in order to identify the particular heliostats in the image.
- Thus, in the embodiment of
FIG. 15A , it is possible to determine relative contributions to the light intensity of reflection beams of different heliostats. Alternatively or additionally, as inFIG. 16 , it is possible to give a greater weight (when computing a heliostat projected beam parameter such as beam shape or centroid location or intensity or when determining modified operating parameters for one or more heliostats) to images acquired when the beams are not overlapping, For example, in some embodiments, it may be assumed that the measurements from a single heliostat beam are more reliable than measurements taken from a light detector simultaneously illuminated by multiple heliostat reflection beams. - Thus, in step S501 of
FIG. 501 , the plurality of reflection beams traverse the macro-array of light detectors. - In steps S505-S509, it is determined if multiple reflection beams are simultaneously illuminating a light intensity detector—for the example of
FIGS. 14A-14F , fordetector 101F this is true at time=t3 and time=t4, fordetector 101A this is never true, fordetector 101 C this is true only for time=t3. - In the event of an overlap (step S521) then the data acquired at a light intensity sensor simultaneously illuminated by multiple beams is discarded or is given a lower weight. In the event of no overlap (step S513), then a decision to utilize this data when characterizing the beam may be made and/or the data may be given a greater weight—for example, when computing or more beam projection parameters or when effecting a decision based upon the measurements of one or more light intensity detectors.
- In addition to the techniques discussed above, multiple beams simultaneously incident on the macroarray may be numerically separated from multiple time samples of the overlapping beam images. This may be done using known image processing techniques. Further, images can be captured at higher resolution that a sparse detector array by disambiguating multiple sparse images from a time series.
- Certain features of this invention may sometimes be used to advantage without a corresponding use of the other features. While a specific embodiment of the invention has been shown and described in detail to illustrate the application of the principles of the invention, it will be understood that the invention may be embodied otherwise without departing from such principles.
Claims (33)
1. A solar energy system comprising:
a. a plurality of heliostats configured to reflect sunlight to a target mounted on a tower, each heliostat including a respective heliostat controller, the target, the target being selecting from the group consisting of an energy conversion target and/or a secondary reflector; and
b. a macro-array of light-intensity sensors characterized by a maximum sensor-sensor distance and mounted on the tower such that when any heliostat of the plurality of heliostats reflects a beam of light onto the macro-array of light-intensity sensors, the maximum dimension of the reflected beam's projection on the macro-array is at most twice the maximum sensor-sensor distance,
wherein each heliostat controller is operative to control its respective heliostat so that the light beam reflected by the heliostat traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the macro-array of light-intensity sensors is substantially co-planar.
3. The system of claim 1 , where the macro-array of light-intensity sensors is a two dimensional macro-array.
4. The system of claim 1 , where the light-intensity sensors are configured to acquire time-series light intensity data while the reflected beam's projection traverses across the macro-array of light sensors.
5. The system of claim 1 wherein the heliostat controller is operative to:
i) before the traversing of the projection of the reflection beam, direct the heliostat to the target mounted on the tower according to an initial set of aiming parameters; and
ii) after the traversing of the projection of the reflection beam, re-direct the heliostat to the target mounted on the tower according to a modified set of aiming parameters that is modified in accordance with light intensity data generated by light intensity sensors of the macro-array.
6. The system of claim 5 wherein the heliostat controller is operative to effect the re-directing according to the modified set of aiming parameters after the beam traversing.
7. The system of claim 5 wherein the heliostat controller is operative to effect the re-directing according to the modified set of aiming parameters immediately after the beam traversing.
8. The system of claim 4 wherein the heliostat controller is operative to effect the re-directing according to the modified set of aiming parameters immediately only after a time delay.
9. The system of claim 8 wherein during the period of the time delay, the controller is operative to re-direct the heliostat to the target according to the initial set of aiming parameters.
10. The system of claim 6 wherein the modified set of aiming parameters is modified in accordance with at least one of:
i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; and
ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
11. The system of claim 1 further comprising:
c. a heliostat-field controller operative to:
i) select, from the plurality of heliostats, a sub-plurality of heliostats that is to be simultaneously directed to the target; and
ii) direct the selected sub-plurality of heliostats the target,
wherein the heliostat field controller is operative to carry out the heliostat selection in accordance with respective light intensity measurements of macro-array taken when each heliostat's reflected beam respectively traverses the macro-array.
12. The system of claim 11 wherein the heliostat-field controller is operative to effect the selection in accordance with at least one of:
i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; and
ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
13. The system of claim 1 wherein the system further comprises:
c) electronic circuitry configured to measure at least one beam projection parameter of the heliostat beam according to the light intensity measurements acquired by light-intensity sensors while the heliostat beam traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors.
14. The system of claim 13 wherein the electronic circuitry is configured to effect the measuring in accordance with at least one of:
i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; and
ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
15. The system of claim 1 wherein the system further comprises:
c) electronic circuitry configured to measure at least one of:
i) a shape of the heliostat beam;
ii) a flux intensity map of the heliostat beam;
iii) an offset of the heliostat beam; and
iv) an indication of beam area.
according to the light intensity measurements acquired by light-intensity sensors while the heliostat beam traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors.
16. The system of claim 15 wherein the electronic circuitry is configured to effect the measuring in accordance with at least one of:
i) distances between light-intensity sensors of the macro-array of light-intensity sensors; and
ii) a beam traversal speed of the traversing reflected heliostat beam.
17. The system of claim 1 wherein: the heliostat controllers collectively are configured so that multiple overlapping heliostat reflection beams including first and second heliostat reflection beams simultaneously traverse the macro-array to simultaneously illuminate one or more of the light-intensity sensors.
18. The system of claim 17 wherein:
i) the light-intensity sensors of the macro-array are image sensors; and
ii) the system further comprises:
c) electronic circuitry operative to:
A) determine, from the images generated by the image sensors, relative light intensity contributions of the overlapping first and second heliostat beams when the first and second beams overlap and traverse the macro-array; and
B) in accordance with the relative light intensity contributions, determine at least one of:
I) a shape of the first and/or second heliostat beam;
II) a flux intensity map of the first and/or second heliostat beam;
III) an offset of the first and/or second heliostat beam; and
IV) an indication of beam area.
19. The system of claim 17 wherein the heliostat controllers collectively are configured so that the first and second heliostat beams overlap at some times and are disjoint at other times while the first and second beams traverse the macro-array.
20. The system of claim 19 wherein:
i) the light-intensity sensors of the macro-array are image sensors; and
ii) the system further comprises:
c) electronic circuitry operative to determine when the first and second beams are disjoint, and in accordance with the disjoint time period(s), determine at least one of:
I) a shape of the first and/or second heliostat beam;
II) a flux intensity map of the first and/or second heliostat beam;
Ill) an offset of the first and/or second heliostat beam; and
IV) an indication of beam area.
21. The system of claim 1 wherein each of the light sensors of the macro-array are image sensors.
22. The system of claim 21 wherein the image sensors are selected from the group consisting of a CCD microarray and a CMOS microarray.
23. The system of claim 1 wherein each of the light sensors of the macro-array are photo-detectors incapable of detecting an image.
24. The system of claim 23 wherein each of the light sensors are photo-voltaic cells.
25. The system of claim 1 wherein each of the light-intensity sensors is mounted to the tower.
26. The system of claim 1 wherein the energy conversion target is selected from the group consisting of solar boiler target and a molten salt solar receiver.
27. The system of claim 26 wherein the solar boiler target is selected from the group consisting of a solar evaporator, a solar re-heater and a solar superheater.
28. The system of claim 1 wherein the energy conversion target includes one or more photovoltaic and/or photo-electrovoltaic cells.
29. The system of claim 1 wherein a height of the tower is at least 25 meters.
30. The system of claim 1 wherein a height of the tower is at least 100 meters.
31. The system of claim 1 further comprising:
c. a projector configured to project artificial light onto the heliostat such that the traversing reflected beam that traverses the macro-array includes the artificial light generated by the projector.
32. The system of claim 31 wherein the projector is mounted on the tower.
33. A method of operating a solar energy system, the method comprising:
a. respectively reflecting sunlight from each of a plurality of heliostats to a target mounted on a tower, the target being selecting from the group consisting of an energy conversion target and/or a secondary reflector; and
b. respectively controlling each heliostat of the plurality so that the light beam reflected by the heliostat traverses the macro-array of light-intensity sensors characterized by a maximum sensor-sensor distance and mounted on the tower such that when any heliostat of the plurality of heliostats reflects a beam of light onto the macro-array of light-intensity sensors, the maximum dimension of the reflected beam's projection on the macro-array is at most twice the maximum sensor-sensor distance.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/608,826 US20100139644A1 (en) | 2008-10-29 | 2009-10-29 | Heliostat calibration |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10920508P | 2008-10-29 | 2008-10-29 | |
US12/608,826 US20100139644A1 (en) | 2008-10-29 | 2009-10-29 | Heliostat calibration |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20100139644A1 true US20100139644A1 (en) | 2010-06-10 |
Family
ID=42229668
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/608,826 Abandoned US20100139644A1 (en) | 2008-10-29 | 2009-10-29 | Heliostat calibration |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20100139644A1 (en) |
Cited By (63)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090250052A1 (en) * | 2007-11-12 | 2009-10-08 | Luz Ii Ltd. | Solar receiver with energy flux measurement and control |
US20100006087A1 (en) * | 2008-07-10 | 2010-01-14 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Systems and methods for control of a solar power tower using infrared thermography |
US20100191378A1 (en) * | 2007-03-26 | 2010-07-29 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Distributed power towers with differentiated functionalities |
US20100236239A1 (en) * | 2007-06-11 | 2010-09-23 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Solar receiver |
US20100300510A1 (en) * | 2007-07-23 | 2010-12-02 | Brightsource Industries (Israel), Ltd. | Solar energy systems with reflecting and photovoltaic conversion means |
US20110000478A1 (en) * | 2009-07-02 | 2011-01-06 | Dan Reznik | Camera-based heliostat tracking controller |
US20110036343A1 (en) * | 2008-02-14 | 2011-02-17 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Devices, methods, and systems for control of heliostats |
US20110088396A1 (en) * | 2009-10-15 | 2011-04-21 | Brightsource Industries (Israel), Ltd. | Method and system for operating a solar steam system |
US20110120448A1 (en) * | 2009-11-25 | 2011-05-26 | Google Inc. | Heliostat control scheme using cameras |
US20110153087A1 (en) * | 2009-07-27 | 2011-06-23 | Acciona Solar Power, Inc. | Solar power plant with virtual sun tracking |
US20110174294A1 (en) * | 2010-01-18 | 2011-07-21 | Tigi Ltd. | Method And System For Allocating Solar Radiation Between Multiple Applications |
US20110220091A1 (en) * | 2010-01-20 | 2011-09-15 | Brightsource Industries (Israel), Ltd. | Method and apparatus for operating a solar energy system to account for cloud shading |
WO2011163468A2 (en) * | 2010-06-23 | 2011-12-29 | Solaflect Energy, Llc | Optical control system for heliostats |
CN102354225A (en) * | 2011-09-29 | 2012-02-15 | 深圳市联讯创新工场科技开发有限公司 | Calibration system and calibration method for heliostat of solar generating station |
CN102354226A (en) * | 2011-09-29 | 2012-02-15 | 深圳市联讯创新工场科技开发有限公司 | Heliostat calibration system of solar power station and calibration method |
WO2012075437A1 (en) * | 2010-12-03 | 2012-06-07 | Black Swan Solar, Inc. | Robotic heliostat calibaration system and method |
CN102495640A (en) * | 2011-12-08 | 2012-06-13 | 深圳市联讯创新工场科技开发有限公司 | Heliostat calibration method and system for solar power station |
ES2389354A1 (en) * | 2010-11-18 | 2012-10-25 | Darío GARCÍA ROMERO | Automatic system for the calibration of heli¿statos de planta termosolar type torre. (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding) |
US20130021471A1 (en) * | 2011-07-21 | 2013-01-24 | Google Inc. | Reflective Surface Orientating with Multiple View Ports |
WO2013018013A1 (en) * | 2011-08-02 | 2013-02-07 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Spillage reducing improvements for solar receivers |
US20130048049A1 (en) * | 2011-08-22 | 2013-02-28 | Kent Flanery | Method and apparatus for controlling photovoltaic plant output using lagging or leading tracking angle |
WO2013044848A1 (en) * | 2011-09-29 | 2013-04-04 | Sun Haixiang | Calibration system and calibration method for heliostat in solar power station |
US20130104963A1 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2013-05-02 | Daniel P. Cap | Targets for heliostat health monitoring |
WO2013065667A1 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2013-05-10 | 三菱重工業株式会社 | Heliostat control method, heliostat control device, heat collection facility, method for operating solar heat collection device, and solar heat collection device |
US8442790B2 (en) | 2010-12-03 | 2013-05-14 | Qbotix, Inc. | Robotic heliostat calibration system and method |
US20130206209A1 (en) * | 2010-07-23 | 2013-08-15 | Solagen Pty Ltd. | Conversion of Solar Energy |
WO2012100363A3 (en) * | 2011-01-28 | 2013-08-22 | Airlight Energy Ip Sa | Method and apparatus for measuring the reflection properties of a reflector |
CN103309359A (en) * | 2012-03-14 | 2013-09-18 | 亮源工业(以色列)有限公司 | Methods and systems for operating solar tower systems |
US8664577B1 (en) | 2011-09-21 | 2014-03-04 | Sandia Corporation | Long range heliostat target using array of normal incidence pyranometers to evaluate a beam of solar radiation |
CN103684211A (en) * | 2012-08-30 | 2014-03-26 | 中国科学院上海高等研究院 | Tower type solar power generation system |
US20140146741A1 (en) * | 2012-11-26 | 2014-05-29 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Systems and methods for wireless communications in a solar field |
US8881720B2 (en) | 2010-05-28 | 2014-11-11 | Qbotix, Inc. | Heliostat repositioning system and method |
US20150090251A1 (en) * | 2012-04-03 | 2015-04-02 | Magaldi Industrie S.R.L. | Device, system and method for high level of energetic efficiency for the storage and use of thermal energy of solar origin |
US9003795B2 (en) | 2009-11-24 | 2015-04-14 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Method and apparatus for operating a solar steam system |
US20150323772A1 (en) * | 2012-06-19 | 2015-11-12 | Abengoa Solar New Technologies, S.A. | Mixed heliostat field |
WO2015173899A1 (en) * | 2014-05-14 | 2015-11-19 | 株式会社 日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Solar thermal power generation system, and calibration system for solar thermal power generation system |
US20160013752A1 (en) * | 2014-07-09 | 2016-01-14 | Eustratios N. Carabateas | Mirror system for considerably increasing the productivity of photovoltaic power plants |
US9249785B2 (en) | 2012-01-31 | 2016-02-02 | Brightsource Industries (Isreal) Ltd. | Method and system for operating a solar steam system during reduced-insolation events |
US9328601B2 (en) | 2013-04-30 | 2016-05-03 | General Electric Company | System and method for enhanced recovery of oil from an oil field |
WO2016110606A1 (en) * | 2015-01-05 | 2016-07-14 | Abengoa Solar New Technologies, S.A. | System and method for detecting incident radiation on a solar receiver |
EP2883009A4 (en) * | 2012-08-07 | 2016-08-10 | Logos Technologies Llc | Solar energy collection utilizing heliostats |
US9494341B2 (en) | 2011-05-27 | 2016-11-15 | Solarcity Corporation | Solar tracking system employing multiple mobile robots |
US9500390B1 (en) * | 2011-11-14 | 2016-11-22 | Esolar, Inc. | Heliostat field power controller for setting a throttle to determine an optimum distribution of energy |
WO2016193612A1 (en) * | 2015-06-03 | 2016-12-08 | Optimum Tracker | Method for predictive control of the orientation of a solar tracker |
CN106524529A (en) * | 2016-09-30 | 2017-03-22 | 浙江中控太阳能技术有限公司 | Heliostat mirror field used for tower solar thermal power plant |
US9639090B1 (en) * | 2012-12-21 | 2017-05-02 | Esolar, Inc. | Safe target position computation for heliostats near a concentrating solar power receiver |
CN107449453A (en) * | 2017-07-24 | 2017-12-08 | 国家电网公司 | Comprehensive monitor system based on electric force pole tower |
US9857040B1 (en) * | 2015-08-20 | 2018-01-02 | X Development Llc | Kinematically linked optical components for light redirection |
US9910156B2 (en) | 2012-06-30 | 2018-03-06 | Solarreserve Technology, Llc | Using optical proxy light to aim redirected light at a target using heliostats |
US9910127B2 (en) | 2011-03-14 | 2018-03-06 | Solarreserve Technology, Llc | Apparatus and method for pointing light sources |
US9939177B2 (en) | 2011-03-14 | 2018-04-10 | Solarreserve Technology, Llc | Optical proxy for sensing and pointing of light sources |
WO2018096301A1 (en) * | 2016-11-28 | 2018-05-31 | Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives | Concentrated solar plant |
US20180274819A1 (en) * | 2015-10-02 | 2018-09-27 | Fundación Cener-Ciemat | Calibration method for heliostats |
US10184883B2 (en) * | 2016-11-17 | 2019-01-22 | Lawrence Livermore National Security, Llc | Detecting isotopologues of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in concomitance of water or methane |
US20190086122A1 (en) * | 2017-05-18 | 2019-03-21 | Shanghai Parasol Renewable Energy Co., Ltd | Heliostat Surface Shape Detection System and Method Based on Multi-View Image Recognition |
CN110030741A (en) * | 2019-03-19 | 2019-07-19 | 南京师范大学 | The bearing calibration of secondary reflection mirror in a kind of tower type solar secondary reflection system |
ES2738907A1 (en) * | 2018-07-25 | 2020-01-27 | Fund Cener Ciemat | DEVICE, SYSTEM AND PROCEDURE FOR CHARACTERIZATION OF REFLECTIVE ELEMENTS FROM THE BEAMS OF LIGHT REFLECTED IN THE SAME (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding) |
CN111459194A (en) * | 2020-04-10 | 2020-07-28 | 中国电力工程顾问集团西北电力设计院有限公司 | Solar thermal power generation aiming point determination method based on heliostat measured light spot |
CN112417732A (en) * | 2020-11-24 | 2021-02-26 | 西安交通大学 | Safe and efficient hybrid aiming method for heliostat of tower-type solar thermal power station |
US11009263B2 (en) * | 2019-02-25 | 2021-05-18 | Karl von Kries | Systems and methods for altering rotation of a solar rotational manufacturing system |
EP3940951A1 (en) | 2020-07-14 | 2022-01-19 | Soltec Innovations, S.L. | Single axis solar tracker management method and solar plant implementing said method |
US11307284B2 (en) | 2015-07-02 | 2022-04-19 | Nextracker Inc. | Method for controlling the orientation of a solar tracker based on cartographic models |
DE102020134876A1 (en) | 2020-12-04 | 2022-06-09 | FH Aachen, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts | Arrangement and method for detecting radiation |
Citations (40)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2999943A (en) * | 1959-12-08 | 1961-09-12 | Hoffman Electronics Corp | Self-orienting heliotropic device |
US4102326A (en) * | 1977-09-28 | 1978-07-25 | Sommer Warren T | Central receiver solar collector using mechanically linked mirrors |
US4146785A (en) * | 1978-02-13 | 1979-03-27 | Sunpower Systems Corporation | Sun-tracking control system for solar collector |
US4164123A (en) * | 1976-08-25 | 1979-08-14 | Smith Otto J M | Solar thermal electric power plant |
US4219729A (en) * | 1978-06-16 | 1980-08-26 | Smith Otto J M | Method of aligning and locating the mirrors of a collector field with respect to a receptor tower |
US4247182A (en) * | 1979-04-24 | 1981-01-27 | Smith Otto J M | Heliostat with a protective enclosure |
US4283887A (en) * | 1977-10-21 | 1981-08-18 | General Electric Company | Solar heliostat enclosure, enclosure foundation and installation method and machine therefor |
US4297521A (en) * | 1978-12-18 | 1981-10-27 | Johnson Steven A | Focusing cover solar energy collector apparatus |
US4438630A (en) * | 1982-09-07 | 1984-03-27 | Combustion Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for maintaining operating temperatures in a molten salt co-generating unit |
US4474169A (en) * | 1980-06-03 | 1984-10-02 | Steutermann Edward M | Solar heat collector control device |
US4490981A (en) * | 1982-09-29 | 1985-01-01 | Milton Meckler | Fixed solar concentrator-collector-satelite receiver and co-generator |
US4773751A (en) * | 1984-03-09 | 1988-09-27 | Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha | Infinite level setting device for a distance measuring device |
US5417052A (en) * | 1993-11-05 | 1995-05-23 | Midwest Research Institute | Hybrid solar central receiver for combined cycle power plant |
US5578140A (en) * | 1994-02-01 | 1996-11-26 | Yeda Research And Development Co., Ltd. | Solar energy plant |
US5862799A (en) * | 1995-06-22 | 1999-01-26 | Yeda Research And Development Company Ltd. | Control of a heliostat field in a solar energy plant |
US6653551B2 (en) * | 2001-10-23 | 2003-11-25 | Leon L. C. Chen | Stationary photovoltaic array module design for solar electric power generation systems |
US6662801B2 (en) * | 2001-10-02 | 2003-12-16 | Pinnacle West Capital Corporation | Celestial tracking apparatus and method of controlling wind stow therefor |
US20040025931A1 (en) * | 2002-08-09 | 2004-02-12 | S.I.E.M. S.R.L. | Solar panel for simultaneous generation of electric and thermal energy |
US20040086021A1 (en) * | 2002-11-01 | 2004-05-06 | Litwin Robert Zachary | Infrared temperature sensors for solar panel |
US6818818B2 (en) * | 2002-08-13 | 2004-11-16 | Esmond T. Goei | Concentrating solar energy receiver |
US20050126170A1 (en) * | 2003-12-10 | 2005-06-16 | The Boeing Company | Solar power system and method for power generation |
US20070272234A1 (en) * | 2004-03-30 | 2007-11-29 | Nathan Allen | Solar collector mounting array |
US7340899B1 (en) * | 2004-10-26 | 2008-03-11 | Solar Energy Production Corporation | Solar power generation system |
US20080295883A1 (en) * | 2007-05-30 | 2008-12-04 | Varisolar Inc. | Adaptive solar concentrator system |
US20090038608A1 (en) * | 2007-08-07 | 2009-02-12 | Caldwell Douglas W | Multi-receiver heliostat system architecture |
US20090056701A1 (en) * | 2007-08-27 | 2009-03-05 | Mills David R | Linear fresnel solar arrays and drives therefor |
US7523921B2 (en) * | 2007-01-19 | 2009-04-28 | Garrity Robert M | High wind fence system |
US20090151769A1 (en) * | 2007-12-14 | 2009-06-18 | Corbin John C | Device and system for improved solar cell energy collection and solar cell protection |
US20090178668A1 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2009-07-16 | Deepak Boggavarapu | Central Receiver Solar Power Systems: Architecture And Controls Methods |
US20090241938A1 (en) * | 2008-03-28 | 2009-10-01 | Porter Arbogast | Solar thermal receiver for medium- and high-temperature applications |
US20100191378A1 (en) * | 2007-03-26 | 2010-07-29 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Distributed power towers with differentiated functionalities |
US20100236239A1 (en) * | 2007-06-11 | 2010-09-23 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Solar receiver |
US20100263709A1 (en) * | 2009-04-15 | 2010-10-21 | Richard Norman | Systems for cost-effective concentration and utilization of solar energy |
US20100282242A1 (en) * | 2007-11-12 | 2010-11-11 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Solar power tower system operation and control |
US20100300510A1 (en) * | 2007-07-23 | 2010-12-02 | Brightsource Industries (Israel), Ltd. | Solar energy systems with reflecting and photovoltaic conversion means |
US7884279B2 (en) * | 2006-03-16 | 2011-02-08 | United Technologies Corporation | Solar tracker |
US20110036343A1 (en) * | 2008-02-14 | 2011-02-17 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Devices, methods, and systems for control of heliostats |
US20110088396A1 (en) * | 2009-10-15 | 2011-04-21 | Brightsource Industries (Israel), Ltd. | Method and system for operating a solar steam system |
US20110220091A1 (en) * | 2010-01-20 | 2011-09-15 | Brightsource Industries (Israel), Ltd. | Method and apparatus for operating a solar energy system to account for cloud shading |
US8033110B2 (en) * | 2008-03-16 | 2011-10-11 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Solar power generation with multiple energy conversion modes |
-
2009
- 2009-10-29 US US12/608,826 patent/US20100139644A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (43)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2999943A (en) * | 1959-12-08 | 1961-09-12 | Hoffman Electronics Corp | Self-orienting heliotropic device |
US4164123A (en) * | 1976-08-25 | 1979-08-14 | Smith Otto J M | Solar thermal electric power plant |
US4102326A (en) * | 1977-09-28 | 1978-07-25 | Sommer Warren T | Central receiver solar collector using mechanically linked mirrors |
US4283887A (en) * | 1977-10-21 | 1981-08-18 | General Electric Company | Solar heliostat enclosure, enclosure foundation and installation method and machine therefor |
US4146785A (en) * | 1978-02-13 | 1979-03-27 | Sunpower Systems Corporation | Sun-tracking control system for solar collector |
US4219729A (en) * | 1978-06-16 | 1980-08-26 | Smith Otto J M | Method of aligning and locating the mirrors of a collector field with respect to a receptor tower |
US4297521A (en) * | 1978-12-18 | 1981-10-27 | Johnson Steven A | Focusing cover solar energy collector apparatus |
US4247182A (en) * | 1979-04-24 | 1981-01-27 | Smith Otto J M | Heliostat with a protective enclosure |
US4474169A (en) * | 1980-06-03 | 1984-10-02 | Steutermann Edward M | Solar heat collector control device |
US4438630A (en) * | 1982-09-07 | 1984-03-27 | Combustion Engineering, Inc. | Method and system for maintaining operating temperatures in a molten salt co-generating unit |
US4490981A (en) * | 1982-09-29 | 1985-01-01 | Milton Meckler | Fixed solar concentrator-collector-satelite receiver and co-generator |
US4773751A (en) * | 1984-03-09 | 1988-09-27 | Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha | Infinite level setting device for a distance measuring device |
US5417052A (en) * | 1993-11-05 | 1995-05-23 | Midwest Research Institute | Hybrid solar central receiver for combined cycle power plant |
US5578140A (en) * | 1994-02-01 | 1996-11-26 | Yeda Research And Development Co., Ltd. | Solar energy plant |
US5862799A (en) * | 1995-06-22 | 1999-01-26 | Yeda Research And Development Company Ltd. | Control of a heliostat field in a solar energy plant |
US6662801B2 (en) * | 2001-10-02 | 2003-12-16 | Pinnacle West Capital Corporation | Celestial tracking apparatus and method of controlling wind stow therefor |
US6653551B2 (en) * | 2001-10-23 | 2003-11-25 | Leon L. C. Chen | Stationary photovoltaic array module design for solar electric power generation systems |
US20040025931A1 (en) * | 2002-08-09 | 2004-02-12 | S.I.E.M. S.R.L. | Solar panel for simultaneous generation of electric and thermal energy |
US6818818B2 (en) * | 2002-08-13 | 2004-11-16 | Esmond T. Goei | Concentrating solar energy receiver |
US20040086021A1 (en) * | 2002-11-01 | 2004-05-06 | Litwin Robert Zachary | Infrared temperature sensors for solar panel |
US20050126170A1 (en) * | 2003-12-10 | 2005-06-16 | The Boeing Company | Solar power system and method for power generation |
US7296410B2 (en) * | 2003-12-10 | 2007-11-20 | United Technologies Corporation | Solar power system and method for power generation |
US20070272234A1 (en) * | 2004-03-30 | 2007-11-29 | Nathan Allen | Solar collector mounting array |
US7340899B1 (en) * | 2004-10-26 | 2008-03-11 | Solar Energy Production Corporation | Solar power generation system |
US7884279B2 (en) * | 2006-03-16 | 2011-02-08 | United Technologies Corporation | Solar tracker |
US7523921B2 (en) * | 2007-01-19 | 2009-04-28 | Garrity Robert M | High wind fence system |
US20100191378A1 (en) * | 2007-03-26 | 2010-07-29 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Distributed power towers with differentiated functionalities |
US20080295883A1 (en) * | 2007-05-30 | 2008-12-04 | Varisolar Inc. | Adaptive solar concentrator system |
US20100236239A1 (en) * | 2007-06-11 | 2010-09-23 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Solar receiver |
US20100300510A1 (en) * | 2007-07-23 | 2010-12-02 | Brightsource Industries (Israel), Ltd. | Solar energy systems with reflecting and photovoltaic conversion means |
US20090038608A1 (en) * | 2007-08-07 | 2009-02-12 | Caldwell Douglas W | Multi-receiver heliostat system architecture |
US20090056701A1 (en) * | 2007-08-27 | 2009-03-05 | Mills David R | Linear fresnel solar arrays and drives therefor |
US20100282242A1 (en) * | 2007-11-12 | 2010-11-11 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Solar power tower system operation and control |
US8001960B2 (en) * | 2007-11-12 | 2011-08-23 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Method and control system for operating a solar power tower system |
US20120024282A1 (en) * | 2007-11-12 | 2012-02-02 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Method and control system for operating a solar power tower system |
US20090178668A1 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2009-07-16 | Deepak Boggavarapu | Central Receiver Solar Power Systems: Architecture And Controls Methods |
US20090151769A1 (en) * | 2007-12-14 | 2009-06-18 | Corbin John C | Device and system for improved solar cell energy collection and solar cell protection |
US20110036343A1 (en) * | 2008-02-14 | 2011-02-17 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Devices, methods, and systems for control of heliostats |
US8033110B2 (en) * | 2008-03-16 | 2011-10-11 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Solar power generation with multiple energy conversion modes |
US20090241938A1 (en) * | 2008-03-28 | 2009-10-01 | Porter Arbogast | Solar thermal receiver for medium- and high-temperature applications |
US20100263709A1 (en) * | 2009-04-15 | 2010-10-21 | Richard Norman | Systems for cost-effective concentration and utilization of solar energy |
US20110088396A1 (en) * | 2009-10-15 | 2011-04-21 | Brightsource Industries (Israel), Ltd. | Method and system for operating a solar steam system |
US20110220091A1 (en) * | 2010-01-20 | 2011-09-15 | Brightsource Industries (Israel), Ltd. | Method and apparatus for operating a solar energy system to account for cloud shading |
Cited By (106)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100191378A1 (en) * | 2007-03-26 | 2010-07-29 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Distributed power towers with differentiated functionalities |
US8544272B2 (en) | 2007-06-11 | 2013-10-01 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Solar receiver |
US20100236239A1 (en) * | 2007-06-11 | 2010-09-23 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Solar receiver |
US20100300510A1 (en) * | 2007-07-23 | 2010-12-02 | Brightsource Industries (Israel), Ltd. | Solar energy systems with reflecting and photovoltaic conversion means |
US8360051B2 (en) * | 2007-11-12 | 2013-01-29 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Solar receiver with energy flux measurement and control |
US20090250052A1 (en) * | 2007-11-12 | 2009-10-08 | Luz Ii Ltd. | Solar receiver with energy flux measurement and control |
US8739775B2 (en) | 2008-02-14 | 2014-06-03 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Devices, methods, and systems for control of heliostats |
US20110036343A1 (en) * | 2008-02-14 | 2011-02-17 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Devices, methods, and systems for control of heliostats |
US8931475B2 (en) | 2008-07-10 | 2015-01-13 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Systems and methods for control of a solar power tower using infrared thermography |
US20100006087A1 (en) * | 2008-07-10 | 2010-01-14 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Systems and methods for control of a solar power tower using infrared thermography |
US20110000478A1 (en) * | 2009-07-02 | 2011-01-06 | Dan Reznik | Camera-based heliostat tracking controller |
US20110160924A1 (en) * | 2009-07-27 | 2011-06-30 | Acciona Solar Power, Inc. | Solar power plant with scalable communications protocol |
US8630293B2 (en) | 2009-07-27 | 2014-01-14 | Acciona Solar Power | Solar power plant with scalable communications protocol |
US20110153087A1 (en) * | 2009-07-27 | 2011-06-23 | Acciona Solar Power, Inc. | Solar power plant with virtual sun tracking |
US20110088396A1 (en) * | 2009-10-15 | 2011-04-21 | Brightsource Industries (Israel), Ltd. | Method and system for operating a solar steam system |
US8627664B2 (en) | 2009-10-15 | 2014-01-14 | Brightsource Industries (Israel), Ltd. | Method and system for operating a solar steam system |
US9003795B2 (en) | 2009-11-24 | 2015-04-14 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Method and apparatus for operating a solar steam system |
US20110120448A1 (en) * | 2009-11-25 | 2011-05-26 | Google Inc. | Heliostat control scheme using cameras |
US20110174294A1 (en) * | 2010-01-18 | 2011-07-21 | Tigi Ltd. | Method And System For Allocating Solar Radiation Between Multiple Applications |
US20110220091A1 (en) * | 2010-01-20 | 2011-09-15 | Brightsource Industries (Israel), Ltd. | Method and apparatus for operating a solar energy system to account for cloud shading |
US9170033B2 (en) | 2010-01-20 | 2015-10-27 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Method and apparatus for operating a solar energy system to account for cloud shading |
US8881720B2 (en) | 2010-05-28 | 2014-11-11 | Qbotix, Inc. | Heliostat repositioning system and method |
WO2011163468A2 (en) * | 2010-06-23 | 2011-12-29 | Solaflect Energy, Llc | Optical control system for heliostats |
CN103314382A (en) * | 2010-06-23 | 2013-09-18 | 索拉弗莱克特能源有限责任公司 | Optical control system for heliostats |
WO2011163468A3 (en) * | 2010-06-23 | 2014-03-20 | Solaflect Energy, Llc | Optical control system for heliostats |
US20130206209A1 (en) * | 2010-07-23 | 2013-08-15 | Solagen Pty Ltd. | Conversion of Solar Energy |
US9373739B2 (en) * | 2010-07-23 | 2016-06-21 | Raygen Resources Pty Ltd | Conversion of solar energy |
ES2389354A1 (en) * | 2010-11-18 | 2012-10-25 | Darío GARCÍA ROMERO | Automatic system for the calibration of heli¿statos de planta termosolar type torre. (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding) |
AU2011336375B2 (en) * | 2010-12-03 | 2017-03-30 | Solarcity Corporation | Robotic heliostat and calibration system and method |
EP2646759A4 (en) * | 2010-12-03 | 2015-02-25 | Qbotix Inc | Robotic heliostat calibaration system and method |
US8442790B2 (en) | 2010-12-03 | 2013-05-14 | Qbotix, Inc. | Robotic heliostat calibration system and method |
WO2012075437A1 (en) * | 2010-12-03 | 2012-06-07 | Black Swan Solar, Inc. | Robotic heliostat calibaration system and method |
CN103328907A (en) * | 2010-12-03 | 2013-09-25 | 克博蒂克斯公司 | Robotic heliostat calibaration system and method |
JP2016053471A (en) * | 2010-12-03 | 2016-04-14 | ソーラーシティ コーポレーション | Robotic heliostat calibration system and method |
US9506783B2 (en) | 2010-12-03 | 2016-11-29 | Solarcity Corporation | Robotic heliostat calibration system and method |
WO2012100363A3 (en) * | 2011-01-28 | 2013-08-22 | Airlight Energy Ip Sa | Method and apparatus for measuring the reflection properties of a reflector |
US9910127B2 (en) | 2011-03-14 | 2018-03-06 | Solarreserve Technology, Llc | Apparatus and method for pointing light sources |
US9939177B2 (en) | 2011-03-14 | 2018-04-10 | Solarreserve Technology, Llc | Optical proxy for sensing and pointing of light sources |
US9494341B2 (en) | 2011-05-27 | 2016-11-15 | Solarcity Corporation | Solar tracking system employing multiple mobile robots |
US20130021471A1 (en) * | 2011-07-21 | 2013-01-24 | Google Inc. | Reflective Surface Orientating with Multiple View Ports |
WO2013018013A1 (en) * | 2011-08-02 | 2013-02-07 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Spillage reducing improvements for solar receivers |
US20130048049A1 (en) * | 2011-08-22 | 2013-02-28 | Kent Flanery | Method and apparatus for controlling photovoltaic plant output using lagging or leading tracking angle |
US8664577B1 (en) | 2011-09-21 | 2014-03-04 | Sandia Corporation | Long range heliostat target using array of normal incidence pyranometers to evaluate a beam of solar radiation |
CN102354225A (en) * | 2011-09-29 | 2012-02-15 | 深圳市联讯创新工场科技开发有限公司 | Calibration system and calibration method for heliostat of solar generating station |
WO2013044849A1 (en) * | 2011-09-29 | 2013-04-04 | Sun Haixiang | Heliostat calibration system and calibration method of solar power station |
CN102354226A (en) * | 2011-09-29 | 2012-02-15 | 深圳市联讯创新工场科技开发有限公司 | Heliostat calibration system of solar power station and calibration method |
WO2013044848A1 (en) * | 2011-09-29 | 2013-04-04 | Sun Haixiang | Calibration system and calibration method for heliostat in solar power station |
WO2013044850A1 (en) * | 2011-09-29 | 2013-04-04 | Sun Haixiang | Calibration system and calibration method for heliostat in solar power station |
WO2013065667A1 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2013-05-10 | 三菱重工業株式会社 | Heliostat control method, heliostat control device, heat collection facility, method for operating solar heat collection device, and solar heat collection device |
CN103092148A (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2013-05-08 | 普拉特及惠特尼火箭达因公司 | Targets for heliostat health monitoring |
US9127861B2 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2015-09-08 | Solarreserve Technology, Llc | Targets for heliostat health monitoring |
US20130104963A1 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2013-05-02 | Daniel P. Cap | Targets for heliostat health monitoring |
US9500390B1 (en) * | 2011-11-14 | 2016-11-22 | Esolar, Inc. | Heliostat field power controller for setting a throttle to determine an optimum distribution of energy |
WO2013083053A1 (en) * | 2011-12-08 | 2013-06-13 | Sun Haixiang | Calibration method and calibration system for heliostat of solar power station |
CN102495640A (en) * | 2011-12-08 | 2012-06-13 | 深圳市联讯创新工场科技开发有限公司 | Heliostat calibration method and system for solar power station |
US9249785B2 (en) | 2012-01-31 | 2016-02-02 | Brightsource Industries (Isreal) Ltd. | Method and system for operating a solar steam system during reduced-insolation events |
US20130239952A1 (en) * | 2012-03-14 | 2013-09-19 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Methods and systems for operating solar tower systems |
CN103309359A (en) * | 2012-03-14 | 2013-09-18 | 亮源工业(以色列)有限公司 | Methods and systems for operating solar tower systems |
US20150090251A1 (en) * | 2012-04-03 | 2015-04-02 | Magaldi Industrie S.R.L. | Device, system and method for high level of energetic efficiency for the storage and use of thermal energy of solar origin |
US20150323772A1 (en) * | 2012-06-19 | 2015-11-12 | Abengoa Solar New Technologies, S.A. | Mixed heliostat field |
US10514530B2 (en) * | 2012-06-19 | 2019-12-24 | Abengoa Solar New Technologies, S.A. | Mixed heliostat field |
US9910156B2 (en) | 2012-06-30 | 2018-03-06 | Solarreserve Technology, Llc | Using optical proxy light to aim redirected light at a target using heliostats |
EP2883009A4 (en) * | 2012-08-07 | 2016-08-10 | Logos Technologies Llc | Solar energy collection utilizing heliostats |
CN103684211A (en) * | 2012-08-30 | 2014-03-26 | 中国科学院上海高等研究院 | Tower type solar power generation system |
US9161385B2 (en) * | 2012-11-26 | 2015-10-13 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Systems and methods for wireless communications in a solar field |
US20140146741A1 (en) * | 2012-11-26 | 2014-05-29 | Brightsource Industries (Israel) Ltd. | Systems and methods for wireless communications in a solar field |
US9639090B1 (en) * | 2012-12-21 | 2017-05-02 | Esolar, Inc. | Safe target position computation for heliostats near a concentrating solar power receiver |
US9328601B2 (en) | 2013-04-30 | 2016-05-03 | General Electric Company | System and method for enhanced recovery of oil from an oil field |
WO2015173899A1 (en) * | 2014-05-14 | 2015-11-19 | 株式会社 日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Solar thermal power generation system, and calibration system for solar thermal power generation system |
US20160013752A1 (en) * | 2014-07-09 | 2016-01-14 | Eustratios N. Carabateas | Mirror system for considerably increasing the productivity of photovoltaic power plants |
US10418932B2 (en) * | 2014-07-09 | 2019-09-17 | Eustratios N. Carabateas | Mirror system for considerably increasing the productivity of photovoltaic power plants |
WO2016110606A1 (en) * | 2015-01-05 | 2016-07-14 | Abengoa Solar New Technologies, S.A. | System and method for detecting incident radiation on a solar receiver |
FR3037133A1 (en) * | 2015-06-03 | 2016-12-09 | Optimum Tracker | METHOD OF CONTROLLING PREDICTIVE ORIENTATION OF A SOLAR FOLLOWER |
EP4174401A1 (en) * | 2015-06-03 | 2023-05-03 | Nextracker LLC | Method for predictive control of the orientation of a solar tracker |
CN107923659A (en) * | 2015-06-03 | 2018-04-17 | 最佳追踪系统公司 | The method of the orientation of PREDICTIVE CONTROL solar tracker |
US11387774B2 (en) | 2015-06-03 | 2022-07-12 | Nextracker Llc | Method for predictive control of the orientation of a solar tracker |
US11196381B2 (en) | 2015-06-03 | 2021-12-07 | Nextracker Inc. | Method for predictive control of the orientation of a solar tracker |
EP3892938A1 (en) * | 2015-06-03 | 2021-10-13 | NEXTracker, Inc. | Method for predictive control of the orientation of a solar tracker |
US10903783B2 (en) | 2015-06-03 | 2021-01-26 | Nextracker Inc. | Method for predictive control of the orientation of a solar tracker |
EP3628939A1 (en) * | 2015-06-03 | 2020-04-01 | NEXTracker, Inc. | Method for predictive control of the orientation of a solar tracker |
WO2016193612A1 (en) * | 2015-06-03 | 2016-12-08 | Optimum Tracker | Method for predictive control of the orientation of a solar tracker |
US10541644B2 (en) | 2015-06-03 | 2020-01-21 | Nextracker Inc | Method for predictive control of the orientation of a solar tracker |
US11774539B2 (en) | 2015-07-02 | 2023-10-03 | Nextracker Llc | Method for controlling the orientation of a solar tracker based on cartographic models |
US11327143B2 (en) | 2015-07-02 | 2022-05-10 | Nextracker Inc. | Method for controlling the orientation of a solar tracker based on cartographic models |
US11307284B2 (en) | 2015-07-02 | 2022-04-19 | Nextracker Inc. | Method for controlling the orientation of a solar tracker based on cartographic models |
US9857040B1 (en) * | 2015-08-20 | 2018-01-02 | X Development Llc | Kinematically linked optical components for light redirection |
US10801684B2 (en) | 2015-08-20 | 2020-10-13 | X Development Llc | Kinematically linked optical components for light redirection |
US20180274819A1 (en) * | 2015-10-02 | 2018-09-27 | Fundación Cener-Ciemat | Calibration method for heliostats |
CN106524529A (en) * | 2016-09-30 | 2017-03-22 | 浙江中控太阳能技术有限公司 | Heliostat mirror field used for tower solar thermal power plant |
US10184883B2 (en) * | 2016-11-17 | 2019-01-22 | Lawrence Livermore National Security, Llc | Detecting isotopologues of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in concomitance of water or methane |
WO2018096301A1 (en) * | 2016-11-28 | 2018-05-31 | Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives | Concentrated solar plant |
FR3059391A1 (en) * | 2016-11-28 | 2018-06-01 | Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives | SOLAR POWER PLANT WITH CONCENTRATION. |
US20190086122A1 (en) * | 2017-05-18 | 2019-03-21 | Shanghai Parasol Renewable Energy Co., Ltd | Heliostat Surface Shape Detection System and Method Based on Multi-View Image Recognition |
US10697670B2 (en) * | 2017-05-18 | 2020-06-30 | Shanghai Parasol Renewable Energy Co., Ltd | Heliostat surface shape detection system and method based on multi-view image recognition |
CN107449453A (en) * | 2017-07-24 | 2017-12-08 | 国家电网公司 | Comprehensive monitor system based on electric force pole tower |
CN112469947A (en) * | 2018-07-25 | 2021-03-09 | 西班牙环境能源技术研究中心基金会 | Apparatus, system and method for characterizing a reflective element by reflecting a beam |
WO2020021147A1 (en) | 2018-07-25 | 2020-01-30 | Fundación Cener-Ciemat | Device, system and method of characterizing reflective elements through reflected light beams |
US11953236B2 (en) | 2018-07-25 | 2024-04-09 | Fundación Cener-Ciemat | Characterization device for characterizing the quality of light beams reflected from a surface of a reflective element and method therefor |
ES2738907A1 (en) * | 2018-07-25 | 2020-01-27 | Fund Cener Ciemat | DEVICE, SYSTEM AND PROCEDURE FOR CHARACTERIZATION OF REFLECTIVE ELEMENTS FROM THE BEAMS OF LIGHT REFLECTED IN THE SAME (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding) |
US11009263B2 (en) * | 2019-02-25 | 2021-05-18 | Karl von Kries | Systems and methods for altering rotation of a solar rotational manufacturing system |
CN110030741A (en) * | 2019-03-19 | 2019-07-19 | 南京师范大学 | The bearing calibration of secondary reflection mirror in a kind of tower type solar secondary reflection system |
CN111459194A (en) * | 2020-04-10 | 2020-07-28 | 中国电力工程顾问集团西北电力设计院有限公司 | Solar thermal power generation aiming point determination method based on heliostat measured light spot |
WO2022013288A1 (en) | 2020-07-14 | 2022-01-20 | Soltec Innovations S.L. | Single axis solar tracker management method and solar plant implementing said method |
EP3940951A1 (en) | 2020-07-14 | 2022-01-19 | Soltec Innovations, S.L. | Single axis solar tracker management method and solar plant implementing said method |
CN112417732A (en) * | 2020-11-24 | 2021-02-26 | 西安交通大学 | Safe and efficient hybrid aiming method for heliostat of tower-type solar thermal power station |
DE102020134876A1 (en) | 2020-12-04 | 2022-06-09 | FH Aachen, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts | Arrangement and method for detecting radiation |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20100139644A1 (en) | Heliostat calibration | |
US9222702B2 (en) | Systems and methods for control and calibration of a solar power tower system | |
US20130239952A1 (en) | Methods and systems for operating solar tower systems | |
US8931475B2 (en) | Systems and methods for control of a solar power tower using infrared thermography | |
US8192027B2 (en) | Calibration and tracking control of heliostats in a central tower receiver solar power plant | |
CN102549350B (en) | Calibration system for solar collector installation | |
Röger et al. | Techniques to measure solar flux density distribution on large-scale receivers | |
US20140083413A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for mapping cloud shading on the ground in a large area | |
US20110259320A1 (en) | Solar light collecting method in multi-tower beam-down light collecting system | |
US20110220091A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for operating a solar energy system to account for cloud shading | |
WO2014016727A2 (en) | Method and apparatus for operating a solar energy system including monitoring of cloud shading | |
US20150226461A1 (en) | Solar energy collection utilizing heliostats | |
CN103874891B (en) | For sensing and point to the optics alternative of aiming light source | |
US20120325314A1 (en) | Solar Power Collection Using High-Focus-Accuracy Mirror Array | |
US10697669B2 (en) | CSP tracking | |
US20120325313A1 (en) | Solar-Tower System With High-Focus-Accuracy Mirror Array | |
WO2017187445A1 (en) | Sun position detector and method of sensing sun position | |
US11774360B2 (en) | Method for determining relative degrees of reflectance of a measurement surface | |
Rodríguez-Sánchez et al. | Development of a new method to estimate the incident solar flux on central receivers from deteriorated heliostats | |
US20230275541A1 (en) | Single axis solar tracker management method and solar plant implementing said method | |
EP3701201A1 (en) | Solar power plant provided with a device for measuring direct normal insolation | |
Lehmann et al. | High efficiency passive adjustment toroidal heliostat collector for solar receiver with graphite energy storage | |
WO2022234316A1 (en) | Uav-based system and method for the characterization of the radiant field of reflective concentrating solar systems | |
Ulmer et al. | Techniques to Measure Solar Flux Density Distribution on Large-Scale Receivers | |
WO2009132394A1 (en) | Solar tracking apparatus and method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BRIGHTSOURCE INDUSTRIES (ISRAEL) LTD., ISRAEL Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SCHWARZBACH, JOSEPH;KROYZER, GIL;SIGNING DATES FROM 20110105 TO 20110106;REEL/FRAME:025603/0868 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |