US20090211982A1 - Process for treating effluent liquid fraction from post anaerobic digestion - Google Patents
Process for treating effluent liquid fraction from post anaerobic digestion Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20090211982A1 US20090211982A1 US12/391,084 US39108409A US2009211982A1 US 20090211982 A1 US20090211982 A1 US 20090211982A1 US 39108409 A US39108409 A US 39108409A US 2009211982 A1 US2009211982 A1 US 2009211982A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- liquid fraction
- organic polymer
- cationic organic
- treating
- mole
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 131
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 50
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 50
- 230000029087 digestion Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 13
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 93
- 125000002091 cationic group Chemical group 0.000 claims abstract description 79
- 229920000620 organic polymer Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 77
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 238000002203 pretreatment Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 239000002351 wastewater Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 claims description 27
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 23
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 23
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- SVPXDRXYRYOSEX-UHFFFAOYSA-N bentoquatam Chemical class O.O=[Si]=O.O=[Al]O[Al]=O SVPXDRXYRYOSEX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 11
- NJSSICCENMLTKO-HRCBOCMUSA-N [(1r,2s,4r,5r)-3-hydroxy-4-(4-methylphenyl)sulfonyloxy-6,8-dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-2-yl] 4-methylbenzenesulfonate Chemical compound C1=CC(C)=CC=C1S(=O)(=O)O[C@H]1C(O)[C@@H](OS(=O)(=O)C=2C=CC(C)=CC=2)[C@@H]2OC[C@H]1O2 NJSSICCENMLTKO-HRCBOCMUSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M Chloride anion Chemical compound [Cl-] VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920002401 polyacrylamide Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- MAUMSNABMVEOGP-UHFFFAOYSA-N (methyl-$l^{2}-azanyl)methane Chemical compound C[N]C MAUMSNABMVEOGP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe2+ Chemical compound [Fe+2] CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000004115 Sodium Silicate Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- DIZPMCHEQGEION-UHFFFAOYSA-H aluminium sulfate (anhydrous) Chemical compound [Al+3].[Al+3].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O.[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O.[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O DIZPMCHEQGEION-UHFFFAOYSA-H 0.000 claims description 3
- XFWJKVMFIVXPKK-UHFFFAOYSA-N calcium;oxido(oxo)alumane Chemical compound [Ca+2].[O-][Al]=O.[O-][Al]=O XFWJKVMFIVXPKK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 150000001805 chlorine compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims description 3
- LVYZJEPLMYTTGH-UHFFFAOYSA-H dialuminum chloride pentahydroxide dihydrate Chemical compound [Cl-].[Al+3].[OH-].[OH-].[Al+3].[OH-].[OH-].[OH-].O.O LVYZJEPLMYTTGH-UHFFFAOYSA-H 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000019351 sodium silicates Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 150000003467 sulfuric acid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 claims description 3
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 36
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonia Chemical compound N QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 19
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 15
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 14
- 239000010802 sludge Substances 0.000 description 14
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 13
- 229910021578 Iron(III) chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 12
- RBTARNINKXHZNM-UHFFFAOYSA-K iron trichloride Chemical compound Cl[Fe](Cl)Cl RBTARNINKXHZNM-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 12
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 11
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 10
- 239000005431 greenhouse gas Substances 0.000 description 10
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 description 9
- 229910021529 ammonia Inorganic materials 0.000 description 9
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 9
- 210000003608 fece Anatomy 0.000 description 8
- 239000010871 livestock manure Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 7
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000000440 bentonite Substances 0.000 description 5
- 229910000278 bentonite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000002028 Biomass Substances 0.000 description 4
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 229920006317 cationic polymer Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 4
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 3
- 229910002651 NO3 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitrate Chemical compound [O-][N+]([O-])=O NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000003973 irrigation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002262 irrigation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000011591 potassium Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052700 potassium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 3
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- IOVCWXUNBOPUCH-UHFFFAOYSA-M Nitrite anion Chemical compound [O-]N=O IOVCWXUNBOPUCH-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- GQPLMRYTRLFLPF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitrous Oxide Chemical compound [O-][N+]#N GQPLMRYTRLFLPF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910019142 PO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphorus Chemical compound [P] OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011651 chromium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005189 flocculation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000016615 flocculation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 2
- BHEPBYXIRTUNPN-UHFFFAOYSA-N hydridophosphorus(.) (triplet) Chemical compound [PH] BHEPBYXIRTUNPN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 231100000053 low toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 239000011777 magnesium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052698 phosphorus Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000011574 phosphorus Substances 0.000 description 2
- -1 potassium chemical compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 230000003389 potentiating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001223 reverse osmosis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011669 selenium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000010936 titanium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000010792 warming Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 description 2
- OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Calcium Chemical compound [Ca] OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chromium Chemical compound [Cr] VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M Ilexoside XXIX Chemical compound C[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(CC[C@@]3(C(=CC[C@H]4[C@]3(CC[C@@H]5[C@@]4(CC[C@@H](C5(C)C)OS(=O)(=O)[O-])C)C)[C@@H]2[C@]1(C)O)C)C(=O)O[C@H]6[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O6)CO)O)O)O.[Na+] DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M 0.000 description 1
- FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Magnesium Chemical compound [Mg] FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZOKXTWBITQBERF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Molybdenum Chemical compound [Mo] ZOKXTWBITQBERF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 240000007594 Oryza sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000007164 Oryza sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Potassium Chemical compound [K] ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- BUGBHKTXTAQXES-UHFFFAOYSA-N Selenium Chemical compound [Se] BUGBHKTXTAQXES-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sulfate Chemical compound [O-]S([O-])(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- LSNNMFCWUKXFEE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfurous acid Chemical compound OS(O)=O LSNNMFCWUKXFEE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titanium Chemical compound [Ti] RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- AZDRQVAHHNSJOQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N alumane Chemical class [AlH3] AZDRQVAHHNSJOQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052787 antimony Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- WATWJIUSRGPENY-UHFFFAOYSA-N antimony atom Chemical compound [Sb] WATWJIUSRGPENY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052785 arsenic Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- RQNWIZPPADIBDY-UHFFFAOYSA-N arsenic atom Chemical compound [As] RQNWIZPPADIBDY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052788 barium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- DSAJWYNOEDNPEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N barium atom Chemical compound [Ba] DSAJWYNOEDNPEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052790 beryllium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- ATBAMAFKBVZNFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N beryllium atom Chemical compound [Be] ATBAMAFKBVZNFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052793 cadmium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- BDOSMKKIYDKNTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N cadmium atom Chemical compound [Cd] BDOSMKKIYDKNTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052791 calcium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010941 cobalt Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910017052 cobalt Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N cobalt atom Chemical compound [Co] GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000001143 conditioned effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003750 conditioning effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010924 continuous production Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013365 dairy product Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009313 farming Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002550 fecal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008394 flocculating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003311 flocculating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005187 foaming Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002803 fossil fuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 1
- RUTXIHLAWFEWGM-UHFFFAOYSA-H iron(3+) sulfate Chemical compound [Fe+3].[Fe+3].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O.[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O.[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O RUTXIHLAWFEWGM-UHFFFAOYSA-H 0.000 description 1
- 229910000360 iron(III) sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000003621 irrigation water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 244000144972 livestock Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910052749 magnesium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011572 manganese Substances 0.000 description 1
- WPBNNNQJVZRUHP-UHFFFAOYSA-L manganese(2+);methyl n-[[2-(methoxycarbonylcarbamothioylamino)phenyl]carbamothioyl]carbamate;n-[2-(sulfidocarbothioylamino)ethyl]carbamodithioate Chemical compound [Mn+2].[S-]C(=S)NCCNC([S-])=S.COC(=O)NC(=S)NC1=CC=CC=C1NC(=S)NC(=O)OC WPBNNNQJVZRUHP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011785 micronutrient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013369 micronutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052750 molybdenum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011733 molybdenum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000178 monomer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002362 mulch Substances 0.000 description 1
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N nickel Substances [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910000069 nitrogen hydride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001272 nitrous oxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009406 nutrient management Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000005416 organic matter Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010979 pH adjustment Methods 0.000 description 1
- NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K phosphate Chemical compound [O-]P([O-])([O-])=O NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 1
- 239000010452 phosphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000003112 potassium compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 244000144977 poultry Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000011112 process operation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002062 proliferating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035484 reaction time Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004064 recycling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000009566 rice Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910052711 selenium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052708 sodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002364 soil amendment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002881 soil fertilizer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003319 supportive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052716 thallium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- BKVIYDNLLOSFOA-UHFFFAOYSA-N thallium Chemical compound [Tl] BKVIYDNLLOSFOA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000000108 ultra-filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052720 vanadium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- GPPXJZIENCGNKB-UHFFFAOYSA-N vanadium Chemical compound [V]#[V] GPPXJZIENCGNKB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F9/00—Multistage treatment of water, waste water or sewage
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/52—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities
- C02F1/5236—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities using inorganic agents
- C02F1/5245—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities using inorganic agents using basic salts, e.g. of aluminium and iron
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/52—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities
- C02F1/54—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities using organic material
- C02F1/56—Macromolecular compounds
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/28—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption
- C02F1/281—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption using inorganic sorbents
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/28—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption
- C02F1/283—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption using coal, charred products, or inorganic mixtures containing them
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/44—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by dialysis, osmosis or reverse osmosis
- C02F1/444—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by dialysis, osmosis or reverse osmosis by ultrafiltration or microfiltration
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/52—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities
- C02F1/5236—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities using inorganic agents
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F2001/007—Processes including a sedimentation step
Definitions
- the present invention is directed to a process for treating the liquid fraction from the effluent waste stream of a post anaerobic digestion process. More particularly, the present invention includes a process for removing contaminants from the liquid fraction which may include fine solids as well as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium chemical compounds.
- Anaerobic digesters may have an input stream containing up to 12% or 13% organic solids.
- a purpose of the digester is to convert (destruct) a portion of the solids into methane.
- a typical anaerobic digester may destroy 50% to 65% of the solids, depending on operating conditions and efficiency of the system. Some systems may destroy up to 75% of the solids, while poorly operated digesters may only destroy 30% of the solids.
- a typical effluent waste stream from an anaerobic digester may contain from about 3% to 8% solids. The amount of effluent solids may vary from this range depending upon feed solid values and operating efficiency.
- These solids are post digestion, and as such may contain, but are not limited to, high chemical oxygen demand (COD) and high biological oxygen demand (BOD) wastewater.
- COD chemical oxygen demand
- BOD biological oxygen demand
- the organic fractions present have been partially or completely destructed to yield organic fragments, all of which contribute to the general undesirable nature of the post anaerobic digester effluent.
- Some states are promulgating (and currently regulating) the containment of these wastewaters for extended periods as the volume and the contaminant loading have and remain a contributory causative effect in the deterioration of the quality of the aquifers, water sheds, streams and wet lands, from continuous irrigation and discharge of the high contaminant loaded wastewater.
- the effluent solids may be divided into those that have a size greater than about 300 microns and solids having a size less than about 25 microns ( ⁇ m).
- the fraction of larger solids (>300 ⁇ m), may represent about 60% of the total solids, and the fraction of fine solids ( ⁇ 25 ⁇ m), may represent about 40% of the total solids.
- the larger solids are usually removed using conventional mechanical separation processes. Such mechanical separation processes include, but are not limited to, centrifuge, screen press, belt press, and other industrial separation processes known in the art.
- the solids from this separation are saleable as bedding, mulch and if the contaminants are high enough, as soil amendments or fertilizer.
- the remaining liquid fraction may typically contain less than about 2% solids, of which the solids represent fine solids having a size less than about 25 ⁇ m are typically impounded in a confinement pond.
- the liquid fraction typically contains nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium compounds as well as micronutrient solids. This liquid fraction is clean enough for reuse as wash water or irrigation water, but as is evident from the intermediate loading values, unusable for other applications as it still contains high COD and BOD values as well as other contaminants rendering it unfit for a myriad of tasks within the process operations.
- the industries to which this technology would apply include, but are not limited to, dairies, bovine confinement, porcine confinement and birthing processes, poultry confinement, industrial processes where anaerobic digestion is employed, such as animal processing, food, ethanol and general food processors where a digestible wastewater is generated.
- the present invention provides a process for treating a liquid fraction of effluent wastewater from post anaerobic digestion. More particularly, the present invention provides a process for removing contaminants from the liquid fraction which may include fine solids as well as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium chemical compounds.
- the liquid fraction is obtained following mechanical separation of larger solids (greater than about 300 ⁇ m) from the effluent waste stream from an anaerobic digester.
- the liquid fraction may typically contain less than about 2% solids, of which the solids represent fine solids having a size less than about 25 ⁇ m.
- the pH of the liquid fraction may typically range from about 6.8 to 7.4, depending on the operating conditions of the anaerobic digester.
- One non-limiting embodiment within the scope of the invention includes a process for treating a liquid fraction of effluent wastewater from post anaerobic digestion.
- a metal salt flocculant is added to the liquid fraction.
- the metal salt flocculant may be added in an amount ranging from about 50 to 500 ppm in the liquid fraction. In some embodiments the metal salt flocculant may be added in an amount ranging from about 50 ppm to 250 ppm in the liquid fraction.
- the metal salt flocculant may be selected from inorganic iron and aluminum flocculant compounds having a +2 or +3 valence. In some embodiments, the metal salt flocculant may be selected from inorganic aluminum flocculant compounds having a +3 valence.
- the metal salt flocculant may be selected from polyaluminum chloride (PAC), aluminum chlorohydrate, aluminum sulfate, calcium aluminate, aluminum and sodium silicates, ferrous and ferric chlorides and sulfates, and analogs thereof.
- PAC polyaluminum chloride
- aluminum chlorohydrate aluminum chlorohydrate
- aluminum sulfate aluminum sulfate
- calcium aluminate aluminum and sodium silicates
- ferrous and ferric chlorides and sulfates and analogs thereof.
- a cationic organic polymer is added to the liquid fraction.
- the cationic organic polymer may be added in an amount ranging from about 10 ppm to about 150 ppm in the liquid fraction.
- the cationic organic polymer may have a molecular weight greater than about 3,000,000. In some embodiments, the cationic organic polymer may have a molecular weight greater than about 5,000,000.
- the cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 30 mole %.
- the cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 20 mole %.
- the cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 10 mole %.
- the cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 5 mole %.
- the cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 2.5 mole %.
- the cationic organic polymer may include a dimethyl nitrogen-based quaternary moiety to provide its cationicity.
- the cationic organic polymer is selected from polyacrylamide, Mannich polymers, diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (DADMAC), epi-dma, and mixtures thereof.
- the cationic organic polymer is selected from diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (DADMAC), epi-dma, and mixtures thereof. Due to the high molecular weight of the cationic organic polymer, the cationic organic polymer may be dry.
- DMDMAC diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride
- epi-dma epi-dma
- mixtures thereof Due to the high molecular weight of the cationic organic polymer, the cationic organic polymer may be dry.
- the metal salt flocculant and the cationic organic polymer produce a separable solid fraction in the liquid fraction.
- the separable solid may be removed from the liquid fraction to form a treated liquid fraction.
- the separable solid fraction may be separated from the liquid fraction by a mechanical separation technique. Examples of mechanical separation techniques that may be used include, but are not limited to, belt press, centrifuge, filter press, and other industrial separation processes known in the art.
- the treated liquid fraction may optionally be passed through a carbon filter or a combination of carbon and activated bentonite clays to provide ammonia removal and clarity of the liquid fraction.
- the liquid fraction is pre-treated with a small amount of pre-treatment cationic organic polymer prior to adding the metal salt flocculant.
- the pre-treatment cationic organic polymer includes the same class of cationic organic polymers as defined above. In practice, it may be the same or different as the cationic organic polymer.
- the pre-treatment cationic organic polymer may be added in an amount ranging from about 10 ppm to about 30 ppm in the liquid fraction.
- the pre-treatment cationic organic polymer reacts with the fine solids to produce a separable fine solid fraction in the liquid fraction. In some embodiments, the separable fine solid fraction is removed from the liquid fraction. Mechanical separation techniques, such as those disclosed above, may be used.
- the amount of metal salt flocculant added to the liquid fraction may be reduced by about 1 ⁇ 3.
- the metal salt flocculant may be added to the liquid fraction in an amount ranging from about 50 to 100 ppm in the liquid fraction.
- a cationic organic polymer may be added to the liquid fraction as disclosed above.
- the amount of cationic organic polymer added to the liquid fraction may range from about 10 to about 150 ppm in the liquid fraction.
- the cationic organic polymer in this pre-treatment embodiment includes the same class of cationic organic polymers as defined above.
- the metal salt flocculant and the cationic organic polymer produce a separable solid fraction in the liquid fraction, which may be removed to form a treated liquid fraction, as described above.
- the treated liquid fraction may optionally be passed through a carbon filter or a combination of carbon and activated bentonite clays, as disclosed above.
- FIG. 1 is a photograph showing the raw from post anaerobic digester waste stream effluent, an intermediate processed liquid fraction, and the final processed liquid fraction.
- FIG. 2 shows a Static Buchner funnel drainage curve to determine the achievable discharge solids from a belt filter press.
- FIG. 3 includes photographs of the screened solids from the raw sludge sample “A” based upon particle size.
- FIG. 4 shows a possible schematic configuration of a treatment system for use within the scope of the invention.
- the present invention discloses a process for removing contaminants from the liquid fraction of a post anaerobic digestion waste stream.
- the liquid fraction may include fine solids as well as chemical and nutrient contaminants.
- the separation of the fine solids may be achieved in a multistep process.
- One preferred embodiment includes addition of a metal salt flocculant and a cationic organic polymer to form a separable solid.
- Another preferred embodiment includes addition of a pre-treatment cationic organic polymer to form separable solids and removal of the solids.
- the remaining liquid fraction is them further treated by addition of a metal salt flocculant and a cationic organic polymer to form more separable solids.
- Such solids are removed using known and novel separation techniques, including but not limited to belt press, centrifuge, filter press, etc.
- Non-limiting examples of the metal salt flocculant and cationic organic polymer that may be used in the disclosed process are described above.
- the solids formed by this reaction may be separated by any known or novel separation system including, but not limited to belt press, by centrifuge, or by filter press. Continuous processes are preferred, but batch-type treatment may still be used. Any of the conventional separation systems will work to separate out the solids from the liquid.
- the liquid fraction from an anaerobic digester effluent waste stream is processed according to the invention disclosed herein eliminate contaminants from the liquid fraction. This is accomplished by the addition of a metal salt flocculant and a cationic organic polymer.
- the flocculant may include, but is not limited to, iron and aluminum compounds having a +2 or +3 valence.
- suitable flocculants include, but are not limited to, polyaluminum chloride (PAC), aluminum chlorohydrate, aluminum sulfate, calcium aluminate, aluminum and sodium silicates, ferrous and ferric chlorides and sulfates, and analogs thereof.
- the cationic organic polymer may include a dimethyl nitrogen-based quaternary moiety to provide its cationicity.
- the cationic organic polymer may contain from about 1.25 to 30 mole percent cationic charge. In some preferred embodiments, the cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 20 mole %. The cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 10 mole %. The cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 5 mole %. The cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 2.5 mole %. The cationic organic polymer may include, but is not limited to, such as a DADMAC, epi-dma, or Mannich polymers.
- Low toxicity polymers are preferred to limit contamination of the solids recovered by the process.
- Such low toxicity polymers include cationic organic polymers that have low residual monomer content. Molecular weights may range from 3 to 5 million to 14 million or more.
- the cationic polymers may be water soluble, such as the DADMAC and epi-dma polymers.
- the cationic polymers may in the form of an emulsion (typically with molecular weights in the range of about 3 to 5 million), and the cationic polymers may be dry (molecular weight greater than about 5 million) or typical high molecular weight Mannich polymers.
- the resulting solids are removed.
- the remaining liquid fraction is preferably then passed through a active carbon filter or a combination of carbon and activated bentonite clays for ammonia removal and clarity of the solution depending on the quality of the water required for the applications.
- this process yields water for cleaning, water for recycle, and water that may be further treated by reverse osmosis or ultrafiltration that is capable of being used for cattle watering directly and a number of nonfood contact applications.
- Each liquid fraction stream may be treated separately for the particular need.
- the pre-treatment cationic organic polymer may be added in an amount ranging from about 10 ppm to about 30 ppm in the liquid fraction. This amount may vary depending upon the fine solids content.
- the pre-treatment cationic organic polymer reacts with the fine solids to produce a separable fine solid fraction in the liquid fraction. In some embodiments, the separable fine solid fraction is removed from the liquid fraction. Mechanical separation techniques, such as those disclosed above, may be used.
- the amount of metal salt flocculant added to the liquid fraction may be reduced by about 1 ⁇ 3.
- the metal salt flocculant may be added to the liquid fraction in an amount ranging from about 50 to 100 ppm in the liquid fraction.
- a cationic organic polymer may be added to the liquid fraction as disclosed above.
- the amount of cationic organic polymer added to the liquid fraction may range from about 10 to about 150 ppm in the liquid fraction.
- the liquid fraction may be further treated by passing through an active carbon filter or a combination of carbon and activated bentonite clays.
- the reaction of ferric sulfate and a Ciba cationic polymer yields separable solid, which upon removal from the liquid fraction results in the “Intermediate” liquid fraction illustrated in FIG. 1 , “B” and described in Table 1.
- the “Intermediate” liquid fraction may be passed through an active carbon filter or combination of active carbon filter and bentonite clay filter.
- the column “Processed-1” reports the results of passing the “Intermediate” liquid fraction through an active carbon filter.
- the column “Processed-2” reports the results of passing the “Intermediate” liquid fraction through a combination of active carbon filter and bentonite clay filter.
- This “Final” liquid fraction, illustrated in FIG. 1 as “C” was very clear and showed neglibible TSS, no BOD, and low ammonia content.
- Ferric chloride 38.4% solution, 1.392 S.G. was added to the sludge sample prior to polymer addition.
- the optimum ferric chloride dosage rate was 342 lbs/ton SS.
- the ferric chloride dosage is preferably in the range from 100 to 500 ppm, and more preferably in the range of 250 to 300 ppm.
- a mixing and reaction time of 90-120 seconds was required before the pH and foaming stabilized and the polymer could be added.
- the pH of the sample lowered from 7.9 to 6.1 after ferric chloride addition.
- the Mannich polymer, C-341 was effective in flocculating the sludge after the addition of ferric chloride.
- the recommended dosage rate for C-341 was found to be 17.7 active lbs/ton for a belt filter press (BFP) application and 23.4 active lbs/ton for a centrifuge application.
- Centrifuge spin-down testing was conducted with 342 lbs/ton ferric chloride and 670 lbs/ton (23.4 active lbs/ton @3.5% active) of C-341 Mannich polymer. Cake dryness of 24 ⁇ 2% TS can be anticipated based upon the centrifuge spin down test results.
- the raw sludge sample “A” was analyzed and had the following characteristics:
- the screened solids from the raw sludge sample “A” based upon particle size is described below and shown in FIG. 3 .
- the sample received was light brown in color and emitted a strong cow fecal odor.
- the suspended solids were 2.24% SS and the ash content was 33.5%.
- the sample contained a high amount of dissolved solids at 0.66% and a high capillary suction time at 1184.7 seconds.
- Capillary suction time is usually indicative of the ability of sludge to release water. Capillary suction times higher than 500 seconds require high polymer dosage rates, pH adjustment or chemical conditioning.
- the sample required ferric chloride to flocculate the sludge.
- Ferric chloride at 38.4% solution and 1.392 S.G. was used.
- the polymer supplied would not flocculate the sludge alone at any dosage rate.
- the sludge needs to be conditioned prior to the use of flocculation. This is typical of any animal manure sludge sample.
- Table 2A and 2B are analytical data supportive of the clarity, contaminate removal (of the post phase one solids removal) where the “Pre Treat” portion is the actual liquid received from the effluent liquid portion of the phase one treatment and the “Post Treat” data is the phase two treatment data.
- Table 2A shows the metal reductions (or slight increases) from the addition of the chemistries only from the addition of the chemistry and no data was available from post one and two pass bentonite clay treatments.
- the Post Treat 2A is the effluent liquid put directly over bentonite clay for ammonia removal and the Post Treat 2B is a two pass removal over bentonite clay, showing both the Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) removal as well as the ammonia reductions from the 2 pass system.
- TKN Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
- FIG. 4 shows one possible non-limiting configuration (schematic) for the treatment system.
- Greenhouse gases are components of the atmosphere that increase the atmosphere's ability to trap infrared energy and contribute to so-called global warming.
- Some important greenhouse gases due to human activity include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs).
- Major sources of carbon dioxide include burning of fossil fuels and deforestation.
- Major sources of methane are livestock, paddy rice farming, and covered vented landfill emissions.
- Methane accounts for about 16% of global greenhouse-gas emissions, according to the International Energy Agency. That is far less than the most prevalent greenhouse gas, CO 2 , which accounts for 75% of the global total.
- methane is a more potent greenhouse gas, that is, it has a higher global warming potential (GWP) compared to carbon dioxide.
- the GWP depends on both the efficiency of the molecule as a greenhouse gas and its atmospheric lifetime. GWP is measured relative to the same mass of CO 2 and evaluated for a specific timescale. Methane has an atmospheric lifetime of 12 ⁇ 3 years and a GWP of 62 over 20 years, 23 over 100 years and 7 over 500 years. The decrease in GWP associated with longer times is associated with the fact that the methane is degraded to water and CO 2 by chemical reactions in the atmosphere.
- One carbon credit is defined to be the equivalent of the emission of one metric tonne of CO 2 per year into the atmosphere.
- Technology and processes and that eliminate greenhouse gas emissions may be able to claim the “carbon credit” equivalent to the eliminated greenhouse gas emission.
- methane emission is attractive because methane is such a potent greenhouse gas.
- the methane produced by the manure of a typical 1,330-pound cow is equivalent to about five metric tonnes of CO 2 per year. That is about the same amount generated annually by a typical U.S. car, one getting 20 miles per gallon and traveling 12,000 miles per year.
- the disclosed invention captures volatile solids and prevents them from forming methane that otherwise would be released into the atmosphere. Therefore, to the extent the disclosed process captures methane-producing solids, the disclosed process generates carbon credits equivalent to the methane generating potential of the captured solids.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
- Separation Of Suspended Particles By Flocculating Agents (AREA)
Abstract
A process for treating a liquid fraction of effluent wastewater from post anaerobic digestion containing fine solids having a size less than about 25 microns is disclosed. A metal salt flocculant is added to the liquid fraction in an amount ranging from about 50 to 500 ppm in the liquid fraction. The metal salt flocculant is selected from inorganic iron and aluminum flocculent compounds having a +2 or +3 valence. A cationic organic polymer is added to the liquid fraction in an amount ranging from about 10 to about 150 ppm in the liquid fraction. The cationic organic polymer has a molecular weight greater than about 3,000,000 and cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 30 mole %. The metal salt flocculent and the cationic organic polymer produce a separable solid fraction which is recovered. Pre-treatment with a small amount of the cationic organic polymer provides improved results.
Description
- This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/030,800, filed Feb. 22, 2008, which is incorporated by reference.
- The present invention is directed to a process for treating the liquid fraction from the effluent waste stream of a post anaerobic digestion process. More particularly, the present invention includes a process for removing contaminants from the liquid fraction which may include fine solids as well as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium chemical compounds.
- In recent years, anaerobic digesters are proliferating in the United States and abroad. The growth of the industry is increasing in popularity as the carbon credits and “manure to power” industry has evolved and grown. The creation of energy (electrical conversion and heat) from methane generated by the anaerobic conversion of organic matter in the wastewater has been documented and is well understood.
- Anaerobic digesters may have an input stream containing up to 12% or 13% organic solids. A purpose of the digester is to convert (destruct) a portion of the solids into methane. A typical anaerobic digester may destroy 50% to 65% of the solids, depending on operating conditions and efficiency of the system. Some systems may destroy up to 75% of the solids, while poorly operated digesters may only destroy 30% of the solids. Thus, a typical effluent waste stream from an anaerobic digester may contain from about 3% to 8% solids. The amount of effluent solids may vary from this range depending upon feed solid values and operating efficiency. These solids are post digestion, and as such may contain, but are not limited to, high chemical oxygen demand (COD) and high biological oxygen demand (BOD) wastewater. In addition, the organic fractions present have been partially or completely destructed to yield organic fragments, all of which contribute to the general undesirable nature of the post anaerobic digester effluent. Some states are promulgating (and currently regulating) the containment of these wastewaters for extended periods as the volume and the contaminant loading have and remain a contributory causative effect in the deterioration of the quality of the aquifers, water sheds, streams and wet lands, from continuous irrigation and discharge of the high contaminant loaded wastewater.
- The effluent solids may be divided into those that have a size greater than about 300 microns and solids having a size less than about 25 microns (μm). The fraction of larger solids (>300 μm), may represent about 60% of the total solids, and the fraction of fine solids (<25 μm), may represent about 40% of the total solids. The larger solids are usually removed using conventional mechanical separation processes. Such mechanical separation processes include, but are not limited to, centrifuge, screen press, belt press, and other industrial separation processes known in the art.
- The solids from this separation are saleable as bedding, mulch and if the contaminants are high enough, as soil amendments or fertilizer. The remaining liquid fraction may typically contain less than about 2% solids, of which the solids represent fine solids having a size less than about 25 μm are typically impounded in a confinement pond. The liquid fraction typically contains nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium compounds as well as micronutrient solids. This liquid fraction is clean enough for reuse as wash water or irrigation water, but as is evident from the intermediate loading values, unusable for other applications as it still contains high COD and BOD values as well as other contaminants rendering it unfit for a myriad of tasks within the process operations. The largest problem from the possible reuse of this water as wash or irrigation or for cleaning applications is the gradual build up of the contaminates present as the solids elimination step is limiting, that is, it only removes the larger solids fraction (>300 μm) and the fine solids (<25 μm) remain. Over time, the buildup of fine particulates can create additional problems requiring the effluent from the reaction be completely discharged to a confinement pond or holding area. Accepted practices of nutrient management for the post digester effluents prevent continued use over time as the nitrogen and phosphorous buildups are unacceptable.
- There are currently 104 (or more) anaerobic digesters located in the United States and/or a greater number in Europe, Canada and South America. Each of the digesters yields an effluent that is high in contaminants and in solids content, all of which have a value, a value for the solids and a value for the potentially reusable water from the process stream. To date, no system has been described that addresses the solids separation or the cleaning of the effluent water for reuse in the process from which the anaerobic digestion is employed.
- The industries to which this technology would apply include, but are not limited to, dairies, bovine confinement, porcine confinement and birthing processes, poultry confinement, industrial processes where anaerobic digestion is employed, such as animal processing, food, ethanol and general food processors where a digestible wastewater is generated.
- It will be appreciated that there is a need in the art to treat the liquid fraction from post anaerobic digestion to remove contaminants and solids, thereby to recover potentially valuable constituents. It would be an advancement in the art to provide an apparatus and process for treating effluent liquid fraction from post anaerobic digestion to clean the effluent liquid fraction and make it a clean renewable recyclable effluent for reuse or irrigation.
- The present invention provides a process for treating a liquid fraction of effluent wastewater from post anaerobic digestion. More particularly, the present invention provides a process for removing contaminants from the liquid fraction which may include fine solids as well as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium chemical compounds. As used herein, the liquid fraction is obtained following mechanical separation of larger solids (greater than about 300 μm) from the effluent waste stream from an anaerobic digester. The liquid fraction may typically contain less than about 2% solids, of which the solids represent fine solids having a size less than about 25 μm. The pH of the liquid fraction may typically range from about 6.8 to 7.4, depending on the operating conditions of the anaerobic digester.
- One non-limiting embodiment within the scope of the invention includes a process for treating a liquid fraction of effluent wastewater from post anaerobic digestion. In the process, a metal salt flocculant is added to the liquid fraction. The metal salt flocculant may be added in an amount ranging from about 50 to 500 ppm in the liquid fraction. In some embodiments the metal salt flocculant may be added in an amount ranging from about 50 ppm to 250 ppm in the liquid fraction. The metal salt flocculant may be selected from inorganic iron and aluminum flocculant compounds having a +2 or +3 valence. In some embodiments, the metal salt flocculant may be selected from inorganic aluminum flocculant compounds having a +3 valence. In some embodiments, the metal salt flocculant may be selected from polyaluminum chloride (PAC), aluminum chlorohydrate, aluminum sulfate, calcium aluminate, aluminum and sodium silicates, ferrous and ferric chlorides and sulfates, and analogs thereof.
- In the process, a cationic organic polymer is added to the liquid fraction. The cationic organic polymer may be added in an amount ranging from about 10 ppm to about 150 ppm in the liquid fraction. The cationic organic polymer may have a molecular weight greater than about 3,000,000. In some embodiments, the cationic organic polymer may have a molecular weight greater than about 5,000,000. The cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 30 mole %. The cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 20 mole %. The cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 10 mole %. The cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 5 mole %. The cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 2.5 mole %. The cationic organic polymer may include a dimethyl nitrogen-based quaternary moiety to provide its cationicity. In some embodiments, the cationic organic polymer is selected from polyacrylamide, Mannich polymers, diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (DADMAC), epi-dma, and mixtures thereof. In some embodiments, the cationic organic polymer is selected from diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (DADMAC), epi-dma, and mixtures thereof. Due to the high molecular weight of the cationic organic polymer, the cationic organic polymer may be dry.
- The metal salt flocculant and the cationic organic polymer produce a separable solid fraction in the liquid fraction. The separable solid may be removed from the liquid fraction to form a treated liquid fraction. The separable solid fraction may be separated from the liquid fraction by a mechanical separation technique. Examples of mechanical separation techniques that may be used include, but are not limited to, belt press, centrifuge, filter press, and other industrial separation processes known in the art.
- In the process, the treated liquid fraction may optionally be passed through a carbon filter or a combination of carbon and activated bentonite clays to provide ammonia removal and clarity of the liquid fraction.
- In another non-limiting embodiment within the scope of the invention, the liquid fraction is pre-treated with a small amount of pre-treatment cationic organic polymer prior to adding the metal salt flocculant. The pre-treatment cationic organic polymer includes the same class of cationic organic polymers as defined above. In practice, it may be the same or different as the cationic organic polymer. The pre-treatment cationic organic polymer may be added in an amount ranging from about 10 ppm to about 30 ppm in the liquid fraction. The pre-treatment cationic organic polymer reacts with the fine solids to produce a separable fine solid fraction in the liquid fraction. In some embodiments, the separable fine solid fraction is removed from the liquid fraction. Mechanical separation techniques, such as those disclosed above, may be used.
- In the embodiment using a pre-treatment cationic organic polymer, the amount of metal salt flocculant added to the liquid fraction may be reduced by about ⅓. In some embodiments, the metal salt flocculant may be added to the liquid fraction in an amount ranging from about 50 to 100 ppm in the liquid fraction.
- A cationic organic polymer may be added to the liquid fraction as disclosed above. In some embodiments, the amount of cationic organic polymer added to the liquid fraction may range from about 10 to about 150 ppm in the liquid fraction. The cationic organic polymer in this pre-treatment embodiment includes the same class of cationic organic polymers as defined above. The metal salt flocculant and the cationic organic polymer produce a separable solid fraction in the liquid fraction, which may be removed to form a treated liquid fraction, as described above.
- In the pre-treatment process, the treated liquid fraction may optionally be passed through a carbon filter or a combination of carbon and activated bentonite clays, as disclosed above.
- In order that the manner in which the above-recited and other features and advantages of the invention are obtained will be readily understood, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof that are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
-
FIG. 1 is a photograph showing the raw from post anaerobic digester waste stream effluent, an intermediate processed liquid fraction, and the final processed liquid fraction. -
FIG. 2 shows a Static Buchner funnel drainage curve to determine the achievable discharge solids from a belt filter press. -
FIG. 3 includes photographs of the screened solids from the raw sludge sample “A” based upon particle size.Photo # 1, +30 mesh;photo # photo # 3, 50×100 mesh;photo # photo # 5, 150×230 mesh;photo # 6, 230×325 mesh. -
FIG. 4 shows a possible schematic configuration of a treatment system for use within the scope of the invention. - The present invention discloses a process for removing contaminants from the liquid fraction of a post anaerobic digestion waste stream. The liquid fraction may include fine solids as well as chemical and nutrient contaminants. The separation of the fine solids may be achieved in a multistep process. One preferred embodiment includes addition of a metal salt flocculant and a cationic organic polymer to form a separable solid. Another preferred embodiment includes addition of a pre-treatment cationic organic polymer to form separable solids and removal of the solids. The remaining liquid fraction is them further treated by addition of a metal salt flocculant and a cationic organic polymer to form more separable solids. Such solids are removed using known and novel separation techniques, including but not limited to belt press, centrifuge, filter press, etc. Non-limiting examples of the metal salt flocculant and cationic organic polymer that may be used in the disclosed process are described above.
- The solids formed by this reaction may be separated by any known or novel separation system including, but not limited to belt press, by centrifuge, or by filter press. Continuous processes are preferred, but batch-type treatment may still be used. Any of the conventional separation systems will work to separate out the solids from the liquid.
- The liquid fraction from an anaerobic digester effluent waste stream is processed according to the invention disclosed herein eliminate contaminants from the liquid fraction. This is accomplished by the addition of a metal salt flocculant and a cationic organic polymer. The flocculant may include, but is not limited to, iron and aluminum compounds having a +2 or +3 valence. Examples of suitable flocculants include, but are not limited to, polyaluminum chloride (PAC), aluminum chlorohydrate, aluminum sulfate, calcium aluminate, aluminum and sodium silicates, ferrous and ferric chlorides and sulfates, and analogs thereof. The cationic organic polymer may include a dimethyl nitrogen-based quaternary moiety to provide its cationicity. The cationic organic polymer may contain from about 1.25 to 30 mole percent cationic charge. In some preferred embodiments, the cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 20 mole %. The cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 10 mole %. The cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 5 mole %. The cationic organic polymer may have a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 2.5 mole %. The cationic organic polymer may include, but is not limited to, such as a DADMAC, epi-dma, or Mannich polymers.
- Almost any cationic organic polymer will suffice. Low toxicity polymers are preferred to limit contamination of the solids recovered by the process. Such low toxicity polymers include cationic organic polymers that have low residual monomer content. Molecular weights may range from 3 to 5 million to 14 million or more. The cationic polymers may be water soluble, such as the DADMAC and epi-dma polymers. The cationic polymers may in the form of an emulsion (typically with molecular weights in the range of about 3 to 5 million), and the cationic polymers may be dry (molecular weight greater than about 5 million) or typical high molecular weight Mannich polymers.
- Following reaction of the metal salt flocculant and the cationic organic polymer, the resulting solids are removed. The remaining liquid fraction is preferably then passed through a active carbon filter or a combination of carbon and activated bentonite clays for ammonia removal and clarity of the solution depending on the quality of the water required for the applications. For example, this process yields water for cleaning, water for recycle, and water that may be further treated by reverse osmosis or ultrafiltration that is capable of being used for cattle watering directly and a number of nonfood contact applications. Each liquid fraction stream may be treated separately for the particular need.
- Useful results are obtained by the pre-treatment of the liquid fraction with a small amount of cationic organic polymer. The pre-treatment cationic organic polymer may be added in an amount ranging from about 10 ppm to about 30 ppm in the liquid fraction. This amount may vary depending upon the fine solids content. The pre-treatment cationic organic polymer reacts with the fine solids to produce a separable fine solid fraction in the liquid fraction. In some embodiments, the separable fine solid fraction is removed from the liquid fraction. Mechanical separation techniques, such as those disclosed above, may be used.
- In the embodiment using a pre-treatment cationic organic polymer, the amount of metal salt flocculant added to the liquid fraction may be reduced by about ⅓. In some embodiments, the metal salt flocculant may be added to the liquid fraction in an amount ranging from about 50 to 100 ppm in the liquid fraction. A cationic organic polymer may be added to the liquid fraction as disclosed above. In some embodiments, the amount of cationic organic polymer added to the liquid fraction may range from about 10 to about 150 ppm in the liquid fraction. The liquid fraction may be further treated by passing through an active carbon filter or a combination of carbon and activated bentonite clays.
- The following examples are given to illustrate various embodiments within the scope of the present invention. These are given by way of example only, and it is understood that the following examples are not comprehensive or exhaustive of the many types of embodiments of the present invention that can be prepared in accordance with the present invention.
- The reaction of ferric sulfate and a Ciba cationic polymer (dry, cationic acrylamide polymer, about 6 million molecular weight, diluted in a liquid form) yields separable solid, which upon removal from the liquid fraction results in the “Intermediate” liquid fraction illustrated in
FIG. 1 , “B” and described in Table 1. The “Intermediate” liquid fraction may be passed through an active carbon filter or combination of active carbon filter and bentonite clay filter. The column “Processed-1” reports the results of passing the “Intermediate” liquid fraction through an active carbon filter. The column “Processed-2” reports the results of passing the “Intermediate” liquid fraction through a combination of active carbon filter and bentonite clay filter. This “Final” liquid fraction, illustrated inFIG. 1 as “C” was very clear and showed neglibible TSS, no BOD, and low ammonia content. -
TABLE 1 Raw Intermediate Processed - 1 Processed - 2 TSS 2.24% 244 mg/L <10 mg/L <3 mg/L Total 2.90% <300 mg/L <40 mg/L Solids TDS 4,900 7,150 COD >20,000 mg/L >1,900 mg/L 500 mg/L BOD >10,000 mg/L 1,690 mg/L <50 mg/L N.D. TOC 725 mg/L 76 mg/L NO3 0.2 mg/L 0.02 mg/L NH3 1140 mg/L 980 mg/L 134 mg/L PO4 1.3 mg/L 0.09 mg/L pH 7.9 7.7 8.2 - Various polymers were tested to evaluate their ability to flocculate a post-anaerobic digester sludge sample. Two polymers, a Mannich polymer C-341 (high molecular weight dry cationic organic polymer) and Super Alta (a dry cationic organic polymer with mixed charge densities and molecular weight ranging from about 7 to about 12 million), were tested along with polymers used in cow and pig manure samples. None of the polymers tested by themselves were able to flocculate the sludge to a level consistent with discharge to environment or reuse for anything other than land application.
- Ferric chloride (38.4% solution, 1.392 S.G.) was added to the sludge sample prior to polymer addition. The optimum ferric chloride dosage rate was 342 lbs/ton SS. The ferric chloride dosage is preferably in the range from 100 to 500 ppm, and more preferably in the range of 250 to 300 ppm. After ferric chloride, a mixing and reaction time of 90-120 seconds was required before the pH and foaming stabilized and the polymer could be added. The pH of the sample lowered from 7.9 to 6.1 after ferric chloride addition.
- The Mannich polymer, C-341, was effective in flocculating the sludge after the addition of ferric chloride. The recommended dosage rate for C-341 was found to be 17.7 active lbs/ton for a belt filter press (BFP) application and 23.4 active lbs/ton for a centrifuge application.
- After flocculation with ferric chloride and the Mannich Polymer C-341, BFP simulations of an Andritz 1.0 m SMX®-S8 BFP were conducted at a simulated throughput of 634 lbs/hr. Cake dryness of 18.4% TS was achieved from the simulations with 342 lbs/ton SS of ferric chloride and 505 lbs/ton neat (17.7 active lbs/ton @3.5% active).
- Centrifuge spin-down testing was conducted with 342 lbs/ton ferric chloride and 670 lbs/ton (23.4 active lbs/ton @3.5% active) of C-341 Mannich polymer. Cake dryness of 24±2% TS can be anticipated based upon the centrifuge spin down test results.
- Static Buchner funnel drainage curves were conducted to determine the achievable discharge solids from an Andritz belt press. Discharge solids of 7-9% TS can be anticipated from an Andritz belt press. A drainage curve is shown in
FIG. 2 . - Industrial Fabrics Corporation 6093 is one recommended filter fabric for the sample received. Suitable filter fabric releases the solids after filtering.
- The sludge sample rated a 5 on the Andritz Abrasivity Index where 1 is the least abrasive and 10 is the most abrasive.
- The raw sludge sample “A” was analyzed and had the following characteristics:
- A. Sample Analysis
-
Total Solids (% TS @ 105° C.) 2.90 Suspended Solids (% SS @ 105° C.) 2.24 pH @ 21° C. 7.9 Specific Gravity 1.0 Ash Content of Total Solids (% of TS) 33.5 Capillary Suction Time (sec) 1184.7 - The screened solids from the raw sludge sample “A” based upon particle size is described below and shown in
FIG. 3 . -
Screened Solids: Description +30 Mesh Fraction (% of SS) 1.3 Organic Debris 30 × 50 Mesh Fraction (% of SS) 3.4 Organic Debris 50 × 100 Mesh Fraction (% of SS) 5.1 Silt, Biomass 100 × 140 Mesh Fraction (% of SS) 2.1 Silt, Biomass 140 × 230 Mesh Fraction (% of SS) 5.7 Silt, Biomass 230 × 325 Mesh Fraction (% of SS) 3.0 Biomass −325 Mesh Fraction (% of SS) 79.6 Sludge Volume Index (SVI) 44 Settled Solids (1000 ml @ 30 min) 1000 Color Brown Odor Cow Manure - B. Polymers Tested
-
Ashland: K279FLX, K290FL Ciba: 8814, 8818, 8868FS Polydyne: C-9530, C-6267 Water Solutions: C-341, Super Alta - C. Test Results
-
Test Temperature (° F.) Chemical Conditioner Ferric Chloride Chemical Dosage Rate (lbs/ton SS) 342 Recommended Polymer Water Solutions C-341 Makeup Polymer Dilution (%) 5.0 Injection Polymer Dilution (%) 5.0 Neat Polymer Dosage (lbs/ton SS) 353.7 Active Polymer Dosage 17.7 (3.5% Active) (lbs/ton SS) Recommended Belt Type IFC 6093 1.0 m SMX ®-S8 BFP Type Throughput (lb TS/hr) 634 Throughput (GPM) 56 Solids Capture (% SS ± 1%) 95 Belt Speed (FPM) 12 Cake Thickness (mm) 7 Cake Solids (% TS) 18.4 - Centrifuge Test Results
-
Ferric Polymer Spin Type Chloride Dosage Plug Anticipated Time Of Dosage Rate Rate (active Solids Cake Solids (Minutes) Test (lbs/ton SS) lbs/ton) (% TS) (% TS) 5 Glass None 23.4 11.1 24 ± 2 Tube 5 Glass 342 23.4 11.2 Tube 10 Screen 342 23.4 22.2 15 Screen 342 23.4 26.1 20 Screen 342 23.4 26.3 - The sample received was light brown in color and emitted a strong cow fecal odor. The suspended solids were 2.24% SS and the ash content was 33.5%. The sample contained a high amount of dissolved solids at 0.66% and a high capillary suction time at 1184.7 seconds. Capillary suction time is usually indicative of the ability of sludge to release water. Capillary suction times higher than 500 seconds require high polymer dosage rates, pH adjustment or chemical conditioning.
- The sample required ferric chloride to flocculate the sludge. Ferric chloride at 38.4% solution and 1.392 S.G. was used. The polymer supplied would not flocculate the sludge alone at any dosage rate. The sludge needs to be conditioned prior to the use of flocculation. This is typical of any animal manure sludge sample.
- Table 2A and 2B, are analytical data supportive of the clarity, contaminate removal (of the post phase one solids removal) where the “Pre Treat” portion is the actual liquid received from the effluent liquid portion of the phase one treatment and the “Post Treat” data is the phase two treatment data. Table 2A shows the metal reductions (or slight increases) from the addition of the chemistries only from the addition of the chemistry and no data was available from post one and two pass bentonite clay treatments.
-
TABLE 2A Demonstrated Results - Metals Reduction Pre Treat Post Treat Units Aluminum, Al 133 444 ug/L Antimony, Sb <100 <100 ug/L Arsenic, As <100 <100 ug/L Barium, Ba <50 486 ug/L Beryllium, Be <10 <10 ug/L Boron, B 1,150 197 ug/L Cadmium, Cd <5 <5 ug/L Calcium, Ca 337,000 56,100 ug/L Chromium, Cr <50 <50 ug/L Cobalt, Co 84 81 ug/L Copper, Cu 41 <10 ug/L Iron, Fe 29,800 194 ug/L Lead, Pb 133 <50 ug/L Magnesium, Mg 461,000 366,000 ug/L Manganese, Mn 13,300 952 ug/L Molybdenum, Mo <50 214 ug/L Nickel, Ni 85 63 ug/L Potassium, K 988,000 700,000 ug/L Selenium, Se <100 126 ug/L Silicon, Si 27,500 19,200 ug/L Sodium, Na 665,000 676,000 ug/L Thallium, Tl <100 <100 ug/L Titanium, Ti <100 <100 ug/L Vanadium, V <50 <50 ug/L Zinc, Zn 143 55 ug/L - In Table 2B, the Post Treat 2A is the effluent liquid put directly over bentonite clay for ammonia removal and the Post Treat 2B is a two pass removal over bentonite clay, showing both the Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) removal as well as the ammonia reductions from the 2 pass system. It is significant to note that ammonia content was reduced to 134 mg/L. This surprisingly low ammonia content may enable the water to be passed through a reverse osmosis treatment process to further remove the ammonia and render it more usable for various recycling applications, including animal watering.
-
TABLE 2B Demonstrated Results - Additional Treatment Data Pre Post Post- Post- Treat Treat Treat 2A treat 2B Nitrate (as N) 0.2 <0.2 mg/L Ammonia Direct 1,140 980 195 134 mg/L (as N) Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.3 0.2 mg/L Nitrite (as N) 0.11 0.05 mg/L Nitrogen, Total 1,180 912 124 mg/L Kjeldahl (TKN) Total Nitrogen 1,180 912 124 mg/L Total Phosphate (as P) 1.3 0.09 mg/L Chemical Oxygen >1,900 508 mg/L Demand Sulfate, SO4 129 612 mg/L Biochemical Oxygen 1,690 <69 mg/L Carbon, Total Organic, 725 76 mg/ L TOC Sulfite 5 <5 mg/L Total Suspended 244 44 <10 <3 mg/L Solids -
FIG. 4 shows one possible non-limiting configuration (schematic) for the treatment system. - “Carbon Credits” Obtained by the Treatment of Post Anaerobic Digester Effluent
- Greenhouse gases are components of the atmosphere that increase the atmosphere's ability to trap infrared energy and contribute to so-called global warming. Some important greenhouse gases due to human activity include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). Major sources of carbon dioxide include burning of fossil fuels and deforestation. Major sources of methane are livestock, paddy rice farming, and covered vented landfill emissions.
- Methane accounts for about 16% of global greenhouse-gas emissions, according to the International Energy Agency. That is far less than the most prevalent greenhouse gas, CO2, which accounts for 75% of the global total. However, methane is a more potent greenhouse gas, that is, it has a higher global warming potential (GWP) compared to carbon dioxide. The GWP depends on both the efficiency of the molecule as a greenhouse gas and its atmospheric lifetime. GWP is measured relative to the same mass of CO2 and evaluated for a specific timescale. Methane has an atmospheric lifetime of 12±3 years and a GWP of 62 over 20 years, 23 over 100 years and 7 over 500 years. The decrease in GWP associated with longer times is associated with the fact that the methane is degraded to water and CO2 by chemical reactions in the atmosphere.
- With increasing awareness of the need to reduce emission of greenhouse gases, new markets have developed to trade “carbon credits.” One carbon credit is defined to be the equivalent of the emission of one metric tonne of CO2 per year into the atmosphere. Technology and processes and that eliminate greenhouse gas emissions may be able to claim the “carbon credit” equivalent to the eliminated greenhouse gas emission.
- Eliminating methane emission is attractive because methane is such a potent greenhouse gas. As an example, the methane produced by the manure of a typical 1,330-pound cow is equivalent to about five metric tonnes of CO2 per year. That is about the same amount generated annually by a typical U.S. car, one getting 20 miles per gallon and traveling 12,000 miles per year.
- In the case of cow manure, carbon credits may be claimed by capturing or destroying “volatile solids” that otherwise would produce and release methane into the atmosphere. For example, a cow weighing 1,330 lbs. produces about 115 lbs. of manure a day. Of that manure, about 11 lbs. are considered “volatile solids” which produce about 1 cubic meter of methane per day, or 365 cubic meters of methane per year. This amount of methane is equivalent to about 5 metric tonnes of CO2 emissions per year or 5 CO2 credits per year. See, “Cows, Climate Change and Carbon Credits,” The Wall Street Journal Online, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118178859139934868.html.
- The disclosed invention captures volatile solids and prevents them from forming methane that otherwise would be released into the atmosphere. Therefore, to the extent the disclosed process captures methane-producing solids, the disclosed process generates carbon credits equivalent to the methane generating potential of the captured solids.
- While specific embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, numerous modifications come to mind without significantly departing from the spirit of the invention, and the scope of protection is only limited by the scope of the accompanying claims.
Claims (25)
1. A process for treating a liquid fraction of effluent wastewater from post anaerobic digestion comprising:
adding a metal salt flocculant to the liquid fraction in an amount ranging from about 50 to 500 ppm in the liquid fraction, wherein the metal salt flocculent is selected from inorganic iron and aluminum flocculent compounds having a +2 or +3 valence;
adding a cationic organic polymer to the liquid fraction in an amount ranging from about 10 to about 150 ppm in the liquid fraction, wherein the cationic organic polymer has a molecular weight greater than about 3,000,000 and a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 30 mole %, and wherein the metal salt flocculent and the cationic organic polymer produce a separable solid fraction in the liquid fraction; and
removing the separable solid from the liquid fraction to form a treated liquid fraction.
2. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 1 , further comprising the step of passing the treated liquid fraction through carbon filter.
3. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 1 , further comprising the step of passing the treated liquid fraction through activated bentonite clay.
4. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 1 , wherein the metal salt flocculent is selected from polyaluminum chloride (PAC), aluminum chlorohydrate, aluminum sulfate, calcium aluminate, aluminum and sodium silicates, ferrous and ferric chlorides and sulfates, and analogs thereof.
5. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 1 , wherein the metal salt flocculent is an from inorganic aluminum flocculent compounds having a +3 valence.
6. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 1 , wherein the cationic organic polymer includes a dimethyl nitrogen-based quaternary moiety to provide its cationicity.
7. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 1 , wherein the cationic organic polymer is selected from polyacrylamide, Mannich polymers, diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (DADMAC), epi-dma, and mixtures thereof.
8. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 1 , wherein the cationic organic polymer is dry.
9. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 1 , wherein the cationic organic polymer has a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 20 mole %.
10. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 1 , wherein the cationic organic polymer has a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 10 mole %.
11. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 1 , wherein the cationic organic polymer has a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 5 mole %.
12. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 1 , wherein the cationic organic polymer has a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 2.5 mole %.
13. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 1 , wherein the cationic organic polymer has a molecular weight greater than 5,000,000.
14. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 1 , wherein the separable solid fraction is separated from the liquid fraction by a mechanical separation technique.
15. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 14 , wherein the mechanical separation technique is selected from belt press, centrifuge, or filter press.
16. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 1 , wherein the metal salt flocculant is added to the liquid fraction in an amount ranging from about 150 to 250 ppm in the liquid fraction
17. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 1 , further comprising the step of adding a pre-treatment cationic organic polymer to the liquid fraction prior to the step of adding the metal salt flocculant to the liquid fraction.
18. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 17 , wherein the pre-treatment cationic organic polymer is added to the liquid fraction in an amount ranging from about 20 to 30 ppm in the liquid fraction, wherein the pre-treatment cationic organic polymer has a molecular weight greater than about 3,000,000 and a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 30 mole %.
19. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 17 , wherein the pre-treatment cationic organic polymer and the cationic organic polymer comprise the same polymer.
20. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 17 , wherein the metal salt flocculent is added to the liquid fraction in an amount ranging from about 50 to 75 ppm in the liquid fraction.
21. A process for treating a liquid fraction of effluent wastewater from post anaerobic digestion containing fine solids having a size less than about 25 microns comprising:
adding a cationic organic polymer to the liquid fraction in an amount ranging from about 10 to about 30 ppm in the liquid fraction, wherein the cationic organic polymer has a molecular weight greater than about 3,000,000 and a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 30 mole %, and wherein the cationic organic polymer and fine solids produce a separable fine solid fraction in the liquid fraction;
removing the separable fine solid fraction from the liquid fraction;
adding a metal salt flocculent to the liquid fraction in an amount ranging from about 50 to 100 ppm in the liquid fraction, wherein the metal salt flocculant is selected from inorganic iron and aluminum flocculant compounds having a +2 or +3 valence;
adding a cationic organic polymer to the liquid fraction in an amount ranging from about 10 to about 150 ppm in the liquid fraction, wherein the cationic organic polymer has a molecular weight greater than about 3,000,000 and a cationicity in the range form 1.25 mole % to 30 mole %, and wherein the metal salt flocculant and the cationic organic polymer produce a separable solid fraction in the liquid fraction; and
removing the separable solid from the liquid fraction to form a treated liquid fraction.
22. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 21 , further comprising the step of passing the treated liquid fraction through carbon filter.
23. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 21 , further comprising the step of passing the treated liquid fraction through activated bentonite clay.
24. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 21 , wherein the metal salt flocculant is an from inorganic aluminum flocculant compounds having a +3 valence.
25. The process for treating a liquid fraction according to claim 21 , wherein the cationic organic polymer is selected from polyacrylamide, diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (DADMAC), epi-dma, and mixtures thereof.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/391,084 US20090211982A1 (en) | 2008-02-22 | 2009-02-23 | Process for treating effluent liquid fraction from post anaerobic digestion |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US3080008P | 2008-02-22 | 2008-02-22 | |
US12/391,084 US20090211982A1 (en) | 2008-02-22 | 2009-02-23 | Process for treating effluent liquid fraction from post anaerobic digestion |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20090211982A1 true US20090211982A1 (en) | 2009-08-27 |
Family
ID=40986256
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/391,084 Abandoned US20090211982A1 (en) | 2008-02-22 | 2009-02-23 | Process for treating effluent liquid fraction from post anaerobic digestion |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20090211982A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2009105766A2 (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101823817A (en) * | 2010-05-18 | 2010-09-08 | 宜兴市芳惠子环保设备厂 | Self cleaning type ammonia-nitrogen wastewater treatment set device |
CN104671376A (en) * | 2015-01-30 | 2015-06-03 | 长沙理工大学 | Process for treating high-concentration pectin wastewater |
CN105692844A (en) * | 2016-04-21 | 2016-06-22 | 苏州云舒新材料科技有限公司 | High-chromaticity/high-turbidity wastewater treatment material and usage thereof |
CN108911082A (en) * | 2018-07-31 | 2018-11-30 | 宁夏宝塔石化煤化工研究院有限公司 | A kind of processing method of potato starch processing waste water |
CN109534703A (en) * | 2019-01-08 | 2019-03-29 | 胥敏 | Output salt slurry removes sodium chloride technique in a kind of chlor-alkali production |
CN109796091A (en) * | 2018-12-20 | 2019-05-24 | 上海市建工设计研究总院有限公司 | A kind of sewage water treatment method |
CN110606534A (en) * | 2019-10-30 | 2019-12-24 | 常州市振邦化工制造有限公司 | Preparation method of flocculating agent for treating oil-containing sewage of petroleum refining delayed coking |
CN114835226A (en) * | 2022-07-04 | 2022-08-02 | 北京博泰至淳生物科技有限公司 | Sewage treatment precipitator |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102531241A (en) * | 2012-03-14 | 2012-07-04 | 复旦大学 | Method for removing nitrogen and phosphorus from sludge anaerobic acidification liquor |
Citations (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS5356857A (en) * | 1976-11-01 | 1978-05-23 | Hitachi Plant Eng & Constr Co Ltd | Method of treating liquid produced through squeeze and filtration of city waste |
US4481115A (en) * | 1982-02-19 | 1984-11-06 | Allied Colloids Limited | Filtration of sewage sludge |
US4882069A (en) * | 1984-02-03 | 1989-11-21 | Continental Manufacturing & Sales Inc. | Method for the treatment of sewage and other impure water |
US5281340A (en) * | 1991-08-20 | 1994-01-25 | Mitsubishi Kasei Corporation | Cationic polymer flocculating agents |
US5681480A (en) * | 1991-08-02 | 1997-10-28 | Allied Colloids Limited | Dewatering of aqueous suspensions |
US5730882A (en) * | 1995-03-29 | 1998-03-24 | Union Oil Company Of California | Method for remediation of water containing emulsified oils |
US5846433A (en) * | 1994-06-08 | 1998-12-08 | Allied Colloids Limited | Dewatering of suspensions |
US5906750A (en) * | 1996-09-26 | 1999-05-25 | Haase; Richard Alan | Method for dewatering of sludge |
US6132625A (en) * | 1998-05-28 | 2000-10-17 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Method for treatment of aqueous streams comprising biosolids |
US6312588B1 (en) * | 1998-11-09 | 2001-11-06 | Fantom Technologies Inc. | Water purifier |
US6428705B1 (en) * | 1996-11-26 | 2002-08-06 | Microbar Incorporated | Process and apparatus for high flow and low pressure impurity removal |
US6447687B1 (en) * | 1997-04-30 | 2002-09-10 | Ciba Specialty Chemcials Water Treatments Ltd. | Dewatering of sewage sludge |
US6613230B2 (en) * | 2000-07-07 | 2003-09-02 | Ionics, Incorporated | Method for simultaneous removal of arsenic and fluoride from aqueous solutions |
US20040129639A1 (en) * | 2002-11-12 | 2004-07-08 | Water Solutions, Inc. | Extraction methodology for suspended and dissolved material from fruit and vegetable wastewater |
US20080169245A1 (en) * | 2007-01-17 | 2008-07-17 | Soil Net Llc. | Solids separation technology |
-
2009
- 2009-02-23 US US12/391,084 patent/US20090211982A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2009-02-23 WO PCT/US2009/034904 patent/WO2009105766A2/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS5356857A (en) * | 1976-11-01 | 1978-05-23 | Hitachi Plant Eng & Constr Co Ltd | Method of treating liquid produced through squeeze and filtration of city waste |
US4481115A (en) * | 1982-02-19 | 1984-11-06 | Allied Colloids Limited | Filtration of sewage sludge |
US4882069A (en) * | 1984-02-03 | 1989-11-21 | Continental Manufacturing & Sales Inc. | Method for the treatment of sewage and other impure water |
US5681480A (en) * | 1991-08-02 | 1997-10-28 | Allied Colloids Limited | Dewatering of aqueous suspensions |
US5281340A (en) * | 1991-08-20 | 1994-01-25 | Mitsubishi Kasei Corporation | Cationic polymer flocculating agents |
US5846433A (en) * | 1994-06-08 | 1998-12-08 | Allied Colloids Limited | Dewatering of suspensions |
US5730882A (en) * | 1995-03-29 | 1998-03-24 | Union Oil Company Of California | Method for remediation of water containing emulsified oils |
US5906750A (en) * | 1996-09-26 | 1999-05-25 | Haase; Richard Alan | Method for dewatering of sludge |
US6428705B1 (en) * | 1996-11-26 | 2002-08-06 | Microbar Incorporated | Process and apparatus for high flow and low pressure impurity removal |
US6447687B1 (en) * | 1997-04-30 | 2002-09-10 | Ciba Specialty Chemcials Water Treatments Ltd. | Dewatering of sewage sludge |
US6132625A (en) * | 1998-05-28 | 2000-10-17 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Method for treatment of aqueous streams comprising biosolids |
US6312588B1 (en) * | 1998-11-09 | 2001-11-06 | Fantom Technologies Inc. | Water purifier |
US6613230B2 (en) * | 2000-07-07 | 2003-09-02 | Ionics, Incorporated | Method for simultaneous removal of arsenic and fluoride from aqueous solutions |
US20040129639A1 (en) * | 2002-11-12 | 2004-07-08 | Water Solutions, Inc. | Extraction methodology for suspended and dissolved material from fruit and vegetable wastewater |
US20080169245A1 (en) * | 2007-01-17 | 2008-07-17 | Soil Net Llc. | Solids separation technology |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
Derwent abstract of Sasaki et al. (Japanese Patent #53056857A), Pages 1-2. * |
Full translation of Sasaki et al. (Japanese Patent #53056857A), Pages 1-6. * |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101823817A (en) * | 2010-05-18 | 2010-09-08 | 宜兴市芳惠子环保设备厂 | Self cleaning type ammonia-nitrogen wastewater treatment set device |
CN104671376A (en) * | 2015-01-30 | 2015-06-03 | 长沙理工大学 | Process for treating high-concentration pectin wastewater |
CN105692844A (en) * | 2016-04-21 | 2016-06-22 | 苏州云舒新材料科技有限公司 | High-chromaticity/high-turbidity wastewater treatment material and usage thereof |
CN108911082A (en) * | 2018-07-31 | 2018-11-30 | 宁夏宝塔石化煤化工研究院有限公司 | A kind of processing method of potato starch processing waste water |
CN109796091A (en) * | 2018-12-20 | 2019-05-24 | 上海市建工设计研究总院有限公司 | A kind of sewage water treatment method |
CN109534703A (en) * | 2019-01-08 | 2019-03-29 | 胥敏 | Output salt slurry removes sodium chloride technique in a kind of chlor-alkali production |
CN110606534A (en) * | 2019-10-30 | 2019-12-24 | 常州市振邦化工制造有限公司 | Preparation method of flocculating agent for treating oil-containing sewage of petroleum refining delayed coking |
CN114835226A (en) * | 2022-07-04 | 2022-08-02 | 北京博泰至淳生物科技有限公司 | Sewage treatment precipitator |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2009105766A3 (en) | 2009-12-03 |
WO2009105766A2 (en) | 2009-08-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20090211982A1 (en) | Process for treating effluent liquid fraction from post anaerobic digestion | |
Kabir et al. | Microplastics in landfill leachate: Sources, detection, occurrence, and removal | |
US8192626B2 (en) | Wastewater chemical/biological treatment method for open water discharge | |
EP3394009B1 (en) | Recovery of phosphorus compounds from wastewater | |
Youcai | Pollution control technology for leachate from municipal solid waste: landfills, incineration plants, and transfer stations | |
Pratt et al. | Biologically and chemically mediated adsorption and precipitation of phosphorus from wastewater | |
KR101628281B1 (en) | System for waste water trust management | |
KR101368459B1 (en) | Food waste effluent anaerobic advanced treatment system | |
CN104803544A (en) | Treatment method of livestock waste water and device thereof | |
CN103249670A (en) | Selenium separation and recovery from bioreactor sludge | |
Łukasiewicz | Post-coagulation sludge management for water and wastewater treatment with focus on limiting its impact on the environment | |
Pariente et al. | Wastewater treatment as a process and a resource | |
CN104478055B (en) | Sewage disposal complexing agent, its preparation method and methods for using them | |
JP6376951B2 (en) | Phosphorus recovery equipment and phosphorus recovery method | |
JP6908514B2 (en) | Deodorizing treatment system and organic matter treatment method | |
Melián | Sustainable Wastewater Treatment Systems | |
Hossaini et al. | Application of enhanced softening process in slaughterhouse wastewater treatment | |
AU2006233785B2 (en) | Method of treating raw sewage slurry | |
Proskynitopoulou et al. | Treatment of anaerobically digested pig manure by applying membrane processes for nutrient recovery and antibiotics removal | |
Rahman et al. | Inventory of inventories discussing P-recycling strategies | |
JPH11277096A (en) | Dephosphorizing method | |
JP4248086B2 (en) | Organic wastewater treatment method | |
JP3835925B2 (en) | Dephosphorization method | |
JP3835924B2 (en) | Dephosphorization method | |
Devatha et al. | Recovery of phosphorus as struvite from the dewatered liquor through crystallization using seawater as magnesium source |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WATER SOLUTIONS, INC., SOUTH DAKOTA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ALLEN, STEPHEN D.;REEL/FRAME:022298/0116 Effective date: 20090223 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |