US20090171829A1 - Method and apparatus for deriving benchmarks for trading instruments - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for deriving benchmarks for trading instruments Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090171829A1
US20090171829A1 US12/365,339 US36533909A US2009171829A1 US 20090171829 A1 US20090171829 A1 US 20090171829A1 US 36533909 A US36533909 A US 36533909A US 2009171829 A1 US2009171829 A1 US 2009171829A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
price
benchmark
deal
quote
market
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/365,339
Inventor
Edward R. Howorka
David Jifeng Liu
Jeffrey Edward Power
Nasir Ahmed Zubairi
Neena Jain
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
EBS Group Ltd
CME Group Inc
Original Assignee
EBS Group Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by EBS Group Ltd filed Critical EBS Group Ltd
Priority to US12/365,339 priority Critical patent/US20090171829A1/en
Publication of US20090171829A1 publication Critical patent/US20090171829A1/en
Priority to US14/946,849 priority patent/US20160086276A1/en
Assigned to NEX GROUP PLC reassignment NEX GROUP PLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HOWORKA, EDWARD R., Liu, David Jifeng, Power, Jeffrey Edward
Assigned to CME Group Inc. reassignment CME Group Inc. MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NEX GROUP PLC
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/04—Trading; Exchange, e.g. stocks, commodities, derivatives or currency exchange
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce
    • G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0283—Price estimation or determination
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes

Definitions

  • This invention relates to methods, apparatus and systems for deriving benchmarks for use in trading instruments, particularly but not exclusively, financial instruments such as foreign exchange (FX), including FX spot, FX forwards and other foreign exchange products.
  • FX foreign exchange
  • Benchmarks are used in the trading of instruments such as FX spot to provide a reference point which indicates the actual state of the market and which is neither biased to the buy side or sell side of the market. As markets can move very rapidly it is important to recalculate the benchmarks frequently and to distribute them to participating traders and other interested parties so that the benchmarks remain a reliable indicator.
  • Benchmarks may be derived in a number of ways. However, all are based on the market history, and access to good information as to the current state of the market, and trades conducted in the market is essential. Typically, a financial institution will trade a variety of currency pairs and benchmarks need to be established in each of those pairs.
  • the present invention aims to provide an improved algorithm for calculation of benchmarks.
  • the algorithm calculates benchmarks on the basis of the prices of deals conducted since a previous benchmark was established, quotes at present in the market and the previous benchmark price.
  • the invention further aims to provide a computerized system which can calculate those benchmarks according to the algorithm and then deliver them to traders.
  • a method of establishing a benchmark price for trades in a instrument at a given time comprising: acquiring from at least one trading system the price at which deals in the instrument have been conducted since a previous benchmark price was established; acquiring the prices of quotes at present in the trading system; calculating a market price from the deal prices and the quote prices; and calculating a benchmark price from the previous benchmark price and the market price.
  • the benchmark is established periodically every t seconds. This enables the benchmark price to remain an accurate reflection of the true state of the market.
  • the calculation of market prices includes the summing of the weights of all deal prices occurring since the previous benchmark.
  • the market price may be calculated from a deal price obtained from the arithmetic average of individual deal prices for deals conducted since the previous benchmark was established, weighted by their deal weight.
  • Deal price calculation may further include calculation of a scatter for deals conducted since the previous benchmark price was established. This deal price scatter may be derived from the standard deviation of deals measured with respect to deal price and weight.
  • a quote scatter price is also calculated for all quotes entered into the market since the previous benchmark price was established. This scatter may be derived from the standard derivation of quote prices measured with respect to quote price and weight.
  • the market price is derived from an average of the quote and deal prices each sealed by its own weight.
  • a market price weight is calculated from the sum of the deal and quote price weights.
  • a market price scatter is calculated, for example from the standard derivation of weighted market prices.
  • a phantom price is also calculated. If no prices have been entered since the last benchmark, this phantom price is equal to the previous benchmark. If prices have been entered, this price is zero.
  • the phantom price may have a weight which is equal to a very small constant, for example 0.5*10 ⁇ 6 .
  • the phantom price may also have a scatter which is equal to a small constant, such as 1% of the base figure of the instrument being traded.
  • the benchmark price is derived from the market price, a market price weight, the previous benchmark price, and a previous benchmark price weight.
  • the latter weight may be calculated from the sum of the market price weight and the last benchmark price weight modified by a time markdown.
  • a benchmark price error is also calculated.
  • This error may be a standard error derived from the benchmark scatter and the benchmark price weight.
  • a further aspect of the invention provides a method of establishing a benchmark price for trades in a instrument at a given time, comprising: acquiring from at least one trading system deal price information relating to prices at which deals in the instrument have been conducted since a previous benchmark price was established; calculating from the deal price information, a deal price weight, a deal price and a deal scatter; acquiring from the at least one trading system price quote information relating to the prices of quotes at present in the trading system; calculating from the quote price information a quote price weight, a quote price and a quote price scatter; calculating a market price weight, a market price and a market price scatter from the deal price weight, the deal price and the deal price scatter, the quote price weight, the quote price and the quote price scatter; and calculating a benchmark price from the previous benchmark price and the market price.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates how deal prices may be scattered or condensed during any time interval
  • FIG. 2 is an example of a benchmark established in a quote only market
  • FIG. 3 is a further example of a benchmark established in a quote only market
  • FIG. 4 is a still further example of a benchmark established in a quote only market
  • FIG. 5 is an example of a benchmark established in a deal only market
  • FIG. 6 is a further example of a benchmark established in a deal only market
  • FIG. 7 is a still further example of a benchmark established in a deal only market
  • FIG. 8 is a schematic block diagram of a system for implementing calculating and delivering benchmarks to traders.
  • FIG. 9 is a schematic block diagram of a further embodiment of a system for implementing calculating and delivering benchmarks to traders in which benchmarks are also exchanged with a third party.
  • the Benchmark price is derived from the market price and the previous Benchmark price.
  • the market price is itself derived from the deal price and the quote price.
  • the deal price is calculated from actual deals that have been done on the system and the quote price is calculated from quotes (bids and offers) that have been entered into the system by traders.
  • the Benchmark Price attempts to describe the price best by utilizing market information acquired from one or more sources, such as an anonymous trading system.
  • the Benchmark Price is calculated at a given frequency, for example, every t seconds. At each tick, a Benchmark is published along with a margin of error called the Standard Error.
  • Using the market information from the trading system is like sampling the price population at the tick time. This sample includes deal and quote transactions. These transactions act as traders' votes on where the market is.
  • the currency pair price is a population (P) at any given moment.
  • P the mean
  • SD(P) the Standard Deviation
  • the Benchmark Price approximates MN(P) by sampling this price population.
  • P is used to represent the “price population” as well as the price; that is, the Mean price of the population, just as MN(P).
  • Benchmark Price P n is derived from Market Price at the time, and P n ⁇ 1 , the Benchmark Price at the last tick n ⁇ 1.
  • Market price consists of Deal Price calculated from deals that occurred in the past time interval, and Quote Price calculated from quotes at the moment.
  • DealPrice function (deal price and volume in the past time interval of n ⁇ 1 to n);
  • QuotePrice function (quotes price and volume at n);
  • MarketPrice function (QuotePrice, DealPrice);
  • BenchmarkPrice function (MarketPrice, BenchmarkPrice at n ⁇ 1).
  • the weight serves as the sample size in statistical terms.
  • traders can trade at a minimum trading size.
  • the parameter which is defined by the trading system, is the minimum amount of a bid or offer order. In an interbank trading system trading spot FX this is typically in the order of $US 1 million ($1M). Every minimum trading size in the trades should be considered as ONE “vote” for a price. All “votes” should be taken into consideration. The larger the volume of a transaction, the more the “votes” (more confidence about the price) carried by the trade.
  • a trading amount is converted to units of “minimum trading size” when it is being weighted. Where the minimum is $1M, a bid of $10M would count as 10 votes when being weighed.
  • the weight of the price W and Scatter ⁇ are used internally.
  • the weight W is used when the price is combined with other prices to form a new one.
  • a margin of error or a Standard Error is calculated. It provides a measure of confidence in the Benchmark Price derived from the market data.
  • Benchmark B as a sample of the price population P using market information (prices/volumes of deals and quotes).
  • MN(B), WT(B), SD(B), and SE(B) be the mean (Benchmark Price), Weight (sample size), Standard Deviation, and Standard Error, respectively.
  • the Benchmark Price is almost certain (a 95% chance) in the 2*SE-neighborhood of the “true price”. Hence, the smaller the SE, the more precise is the Benchmark Price.
  • the Benchmark is calculated at a certain frequency. At each tick t when the Benchmark is to be calculated, there may be deals which have occurred since calculation of the last Benchmark at time (t ⁇ 1). Deal Price is derived from the deals in the past time interval. It is an average price of all deal prices weighted by the volume and age of deals.
  • each deal is weighted by the “minimum trading size”. That is, the Volume V i of a deal d i is the deal's amount in the units of minimum trading size. In the $10M example above, the volume would be 10.
  • the Deal Price Weight consists of all weights of all deals that occurred in the past time interval. It is a summation of all deal weights:
  • each deal's weight is its Volume.
  • Table 2 lists the Deal Price of five deals that occurred in the past time interval. The Deal Price is a real number, not restricted by whole pips 0.9779882353.
  • deal prices may scatter widely, reflecting a market in which traders disagree with each other on where the market is and the votes are widespread.
  • deal prices may concentrate at one spot, where everyone agrees where the market is. This is illustrated in FIG. 1 .
  • the Deal Price Scatter can be measured by the Standard Deviation of deals:
  • ⁇ d ⁇ ⁇ i ⁇ W ⁇ ( d i ) ⁇ ( P ⁇ ( d i ) - P d ) 2 ⁇ i ⁇ W ⁇ ( d i ) Equation ⁇ ⁇ 4
  • SD Standard Deviation
  • Equations 1, 2, and 3 define, respectively, the three elements (P d , W d , ⁇ d ) of Deal Price.
  • Quote Price is derived from all live quotes in the anonymous trading system or other data source at the tick-time.
  • a quote can be at the minimum trading size. Therefore, each quote is weighted by the minimum trading size. That is, the Volume of a quote Q i is the quote's amount in the units of minimum trading size.
  • the front line of a market is drawn by the Best Bid (P b ) and Best Offer (P o ).
  • P b Best Bid
  • P o Best Offer
  • the distance of a quote price from the Best measured in the number of pips, shows “how good the quote price is”.
  • the term “pip” is well understood in the financial trading art and refers to the least significant digit of the price that is quoted.
  • the Best Bid is the highest bid
  • the Best Offer is the lowest offer of the Market from which data is obtained, regardless of credit situation. This is not always the best price that is displayed to traders, as many trading systems do not display to traders prices which they cannot deal, for example submitted by a counterparty with whom they have no or insufficient credit.
  • Table 4 shows an example of weight of quotes. All quotes have the same Volume, but the distances to the Best vary.
  • the weight of the quotes goes down 1 ⁇ 2 each time the quote moves one more pip away from the market.
  • a volume of twenty at one-pip away is worth (is equivalent to) a volume of 10 at the zero-pip; a volume of 160 at 4-pips away is worth (is equivalent to) the volume of 10 at zero-pip.
  • the weight of a group of quotes is merely the summation of the weight of each individual quote.
  • the Weight of Bids V b is the volume-equivalent of the bids at the Best Bid price
  • the Weight of Offers V o is the volume-equivalent of the offers at Best Offer price.
  • the Quote Price Weight consists of a scaled summation of Bid Weight and Offer Weight.
  • the Quote Price Weight is:
  • ⁇ is a constant coefficient which controls the share of quote's weight in Market Price, as will be discussed;
  • V b is the Weight of Bids
  • V o is the Weight of Offers.
  • Table 6 shows an example of Weight of Offers. Although there are five offers in the market with a total volume of 50, the offers are worth 19.375 at the Best Offer price.
  • Table 7 shows an example of Weight of Bids. Although there are five bids in the market with a total volume of 310, the bids are worth 50 at the Best Bid price.
  • the weight of bids V b and offers V o defines “buying and selling demand” at the time.
  • ⁇ is a constant coefficient (a percentage) that converts quote volume into deal volume.
  • Deals almost always occur only at or near the “front line” of the market. That is, buys resulting from the buying demand are at the Best Offer price of P o , and sells resulting from the selling demand are at the Best Bid price of P b . There will be some deviation from this, particularly where a party does not have credit with the owner or owners of the best offer or bid and so trades below the front line. Even so the trade will almost always be very close to that front line.
  • the bids, and the resulting “buying power”, are now converted into deals of buy at the price of PO and volume of ⁇ *V b .
  • the offers, and the resulting “selling power”, are now converted into deals of sell at price P b and volume of ⁇ *V o .
  • P q is the average price of buys at P o with volume ⁇ V b and sells at P b with volume V o . Note that in Equation 8, the ⁇ s are cancelled out. That is, ⁇ does not influence the outcome of Quote Price. Quote Price is solely determined by the Best Prices and the liquidity of the market.
  • Table 9 shows how the quote scatter is obtained, using the results of Table 8 and the value of P q obtained above.
  • the Market Price Triplet (P m , W m , ⁇ m ) is constructed by simply combining Deal Price information (P d , W d , ⁇ d ) and Quote Price information (P q , W q , ⁇ q ). Without using historical information, Market Price is calculated from current live quotes and the latest deals that occurred in the past time interval.
  • the Market Price PM is derived by averaging the Quote Price and Deal Price, and each is scaled by its Weight:
  • Equation 10 shows how Equation 10 can be used to obtain the market price.
  • the Market Price Weight is summation of Deal Price Weight and Quote Price Weight:
  • Table 12 shows the Market Price weigh W m
  • ⁇ m ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ V o ⁇ ( P b - P m ) 2 + ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ V b ⁇ ( P o - P m ) 2 + ⁇ i ⁇ W ⁇ ( d i ) ⁇ ( P ⁇ ( d i ) - P m ) 2 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ V o + ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ V b + ⁇ i ⁇ W ⁇ ( d i ) Equation ⁇ ⁇ 13
  • ⁇ m ⁇ ⁇ i ⁇ W ⁇ ( d i ) ⁇ ( P ⁇ ( d i ) - P m ) 2 ⁇ i ⁇ W ⁇ ( d i ) Equation ⁇ ⁇ 13 ⁇ ( b )
  • Table 13 continues the example of table 10 and shows calculations of Market Price Scatter:
  • the Market Price uses the current, latest information of the market. But in some off-peak hours or in some less-active currency pairs, complete current information may not be available. In those situations, Market Price (P m , W m , ⁇ m ) must be combined with the previous Benchmark Price to derive the current price.
  • current Benchmark Price triplet (P n , W n , ⁇ n ) is derived from the current Market Price (P m , W m , ⁇ m ), the last Benchmark Price (P n ⁇ 1 , W n ⁇ 1 , ⁇ n ⁇ 1 ) calculated at the last tick, and a Phantom Price (P ph , W ph , ⁇ ph ). As the last benchmark was calculated one time-interval ago, it is discounted accordingly.
  • the weight of the last Benchmark Price is marked down by a faction of 2 ⁇ cT , where T is the time interval from the last Benchmark to the current tick.
  • Phantom Price is an imaginary price introduced to balance the no-price situation.
  • the Phantom price has a very tiny weight that injects little influence on the calculations when prices are present, but which prevents the Benchmark weight from becoming zero where there are no prices in the Benchmark period. This, in turn, prevents the Standard Error from becoming infinite. It follows that in an active market, the phantom price is not essential to the calculation of the benchmark.
  • Phantom Price When prices exist in the market, Phantom Price is equal to Market Price. When there is no price in the market, Phantom Price equals the previous Benchmark Price. That is:
  • the weight of the Phantom Price W ph is a tiny constant, for example a half of one-millionth (0.5*10 ⁇ 6 ). In the case of the minimum trading amount of one million (of base currency) for most currencies, the weight is 1 ⁇ 2 unit of the base currency. For example, while the minimum-trading amount for EUR/USD is one million (1,000,000) Euro, its Phantom Price's weight is 0.5 Euro. It will be seen from later discussion that this modest amount can ensure that the Standard Error does not become infinite.
  • Phantom Price ⁇ ph is a tiny constant as well. It is set at 1% of a Big Figure of a currency. The purpose of having ⁇ ph is to prevent the scatter from becoming zero (therefore zero Standard Error) in quiet market.
  • the Benchmark price is the average on the Market Price and (n ⁇ 1) Benchmark Price, weighted by their Weights.
  • the (n ⁇ 1) Benchmark Price Weight has an extra time-markdown):
  • the coefficient c is the same one used in the deal price elapsed-time markdown.
  • the Benchmark Price Weight is a summation of Market Price Weight and the last Benchmark Price Weight after applying the time markdown of 2 ⁇ cT :
  • Phantom Price Weight W ph is a small constant.
  • Phantom Price is introduced solely to prevent the weight of the Benchmark from going down to zero in a quiet market when there is neither any price nor deal. Since its weight is tiny, it does not effect the price in a regular or busy market.
  • M 1 , M 2 , ⁇ , ⁇ 2 and N 1 , N 2 are the means, SDs and sample sizes of the two samples.
  • the combined price, weight and scatter triplet of (P c , W c , ⁇ c ) are then obtained from the Market Price (P m , W m , ⁇ m ) and the Phantom Price (P ph , W ph , ⁇ ph ).
  • ⁇ c ⁇ ( W m - 1 ) ⁇ ⁇ m 2 W m + W p ⁇ ⁇ h - 1 + ( W p ⁇ ⁇ h - 1 ) ⁇ ⁇ p ⁇ ⁇ h 2 W m + W p ⁇ ⁇ h - 1 + W m ⁇ W p ⁇ ⁇ h ⁇ ( P m - P p ⁇ ⁇ h ) 2 ( W m + W p ⁇ ⁇ h ) ⁇ ( W m + W p ⁇ ⁇ h - 1 )
  • Equation 16 (P c , W c , ⁇ c ) and (P n ⁇ 1 , W n ⁇ 1 *2 ⁇ cT , ⁇ n ⁇ 1 ), gives:
  • ⁇ n ⁇ ( W c - 1 ) ⁇ ⁇ c 2 W c + W n - 1 * 2 - cT - 1 + ( W n - 1 ⁇ * 2 - cT - 1 ) ⁇ ⁇ n - 1 2 W c + W n - 1 * 2 - cT - 1 + W c ⁇ W n - 1 * 2 - cT ⁇ ( P c - P n - 1 ) 2 ( W c + W n - 1 * 2 - cT ) ⁇ ( W c + W n - 1 * 2 - cT - 1 ) Equation ⁇ ⁇ 17
  • the scatter is bounded by at least one ⁇ ph . It makes sense that, when there is no price in market, the scatter is at least one ⁇ ph (it is set at 1% of a Big Figure or one pip).
  • Table 15 shows the Benchmark Price Scatter:
  • the Standard Error is a commonly used index of the error entailed in estimating a population mean based on the information in a random sample of size N:
  • ⁇ is the Benchmark Price Scatter ⁇ n
  • E n is always smaller than the Benchmark Price Scatter ⁇ n .
  • E n The Standard Error (E n ) has its special meaning, as explained below. 2*E n defines the “95%-bracket” around Benchmark Price P n . That is, in a still-market, if the scatter is one pip, then the “95%-bracket” is bounded by 20 big figures on each side of the Benchmark Price; if the scatter is two pips, then the “95%-bracket” is bounded by 40 big figures on each side of the Benchmark Price.
  • the Benchmark Price of 0.9779340193 has a 95% chance lying within 0.0000355847 pips of the true price P, or, the Benchmark Price of 0.9779340193 has a 95% chance satisfying:
  • the Standard Error of the mean may be calculated as follows:
  • the population mean has a 68% chance of lying within one SE of the mean of a single randomly chosen sample S, and a 95% chance of lying within two SE of the mean of a single randomly chosen sample S).
  • the SE of the Mean can be calculated (approximated).
  • FIG. 5 shows the relationship between Deal Price and Benchmark price.
  • the Benchmark Price P n is at the deal price, as expected.
  • the Benchmark Price Scatter ⁇ n and SE are zeros, as expected. Since there is only one deal in market.
  • FIG. 6 shows the relationship between Deal Prices and Benchmarks over time.
  • the Benchmark Price P n also “vibrates” in between deal prices, but with only a 40% “amplitude” of the deals. This is because of the Benchmark at tick n is smoothed by the price at the previous tick.
  • the Benchmark Scatter is at 0.47 pips (47% of the deal price spread).
  • FIG. 7 shows the relationship between deal prices and Benchmark prices from which one may conclude:
  • the Benchmark Price P n is at the middle of deal prices, as expected.
  • the Benchmark Scatter is at 0.5 pips (50% of the deal price spread). SE decreases compared to Example 3.2 above, as the Weight has doubled, and SE is inversely proportional to sqrt(Weight).
  • FIGS. 8 and 9 show two examples of systems for deriving and providing benchmarks to traders.
  • benchmarks are derived from price and deal data obtained from a single source.
  • FIG. 9 they are derived from priced and deal data supplied from more than one source.
  • bid and offer prices and deals are conveniently supplied from a trading system, for example an anonymous trading system such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,014,627 of Togher et al.
  • the information could be supplied from any suitable trading system, trading in the instrument to which the benchmark relates.
  • Such a system must provide price and deal information and may or may not be anonymous.
  • Bid/offer prices and deal prices may even be supplied from a non-computerized source such as an open out cry market or a voice broker.
  • Most trading systems enable traders to trade a variety of currency pairs. For example, USD: EUR, USA:JPY, USD:CAD; EUR:JPY; EUR:CAD and CAD:JPY and other GB currency pairs.
  • the system will establish a benchmark every t seconds for each of these currency pairs as well as other currency pairs that may be traded.
  • the benchmarks will then be communicated to traders trading on the system and to traders trading on other systems, for example on conversational systems or direct dealing systems.
  • the benchmarks may also be released more generally into the financial community.
  • the anonymous trading system is shown at 10 .
  • the price and deal information is passed via a gateway 12 to a market rate feed server 14 where the benchmark calculation is performed according to the algorithm described above.
  • Market Rate Feeders are, in themselves, a well-known tool for distributing price information from a source to a number of subscribers, however it is not conventional for them to calculate benchmarks.
  • the system of U.S. Pat. No. 6,014,627 operates by using a series of arbitrators, based on geographical location, to keep a trading book of orders (bids and offers) entered into the system by traders.
  • Traders receive market views showing the best bids and offers which are filtered by a Market Distributor according to their ability to deal prices.
  • the arbitrator holds a log of all deals conducted on the system and provides deal information, since the last benchmark, together with bids and offers entered and active in the system, via a city node, which is a local node via which trading banks are connected to the system, to the MRF server 14 .
  • This market data is delivered to traders 20 on other systems in XML or other formats over a TCP/IP link via a wide area network 22 and a Conversational Direct Dealing (CDD) server 24 and a Secure Communication Server (SCS) 26 .
  • the market data is enhanced with the benchmarks calculated by the MRF 14 .
  • the benchmarks are also communicated back to the anonymous trading system for distribution, via the market distributor, to traders trading on the anonymous trading system 10 .
  • the benchmarks may be used to calculate the big figure (most significant digits) of the currency rate at the anonymous trading system.
  • the market rate feed unit 14 differs from prior art units in that the benchmark calculation algorithm described above is implemented.
  • the MRF 14 calculates benchmarks at predetermined equal intervals over a trading day, for example every second.
  • the MRF receives the order book from the trading system together with the deals done since the last benchmark, calculates the new benchmark and distributes the benchmark.
  • benchmarks for some currencies may be calculated from trading information provided from a different source than the anonymous trading system 10 .
  • This source 28 may be a different trading system, which, for example has greater liquidity in some currency pairs than trading system 10 .
  • the benchmarks for some currency pairs will be calculated from the price and deal data provided from the third party trading system 30 via the third party server 28 .
  • the market rate feed server 14 could be configured to receive bid/offer and deal price information for a given currency pair from both the anonymous trading system 10 and the third party trading system 30 .

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Technology Law (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)
  • Steering Control In Accordance With Driving Conditions (AREA)
  • Power Steering Mechanism (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

Benchmarks for the price of a financial instrument such as FX spot rate for a currency pair are calculated by an algorithm based on a previous benchmark and a market price. The market price is derived from a deal price and a quote price. The deal price is based on deals conducted since the last benchmark and the quote price is based on bids and offers entered since the last benchmark. For each of the deal and quote prices, a price, weight and scatter is calculated which is used to calculate a benchmark price, weight and scatter and a benchmark error.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates to methods, apparatus and systems for deriving benchmarks for use in trading instruments, particularly but not exclusively, financial instruments such as foreign exchange (FX), including FX spot, FX forwards and other foreign exchange products.
    • BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION
  • Benchmarks are used in the trading of instruments such as FX spot to provide a reference point which indicates the actual state of the market and which is neither biased to the buy side or sell side of the market. As markets can move very rapidly it is important to recalculate the benchmarks frequently and to distribute them to participating traders and other interested parties so that the benchmarks remain a reliable indicator.
  • Benchmarks may be derived in a number of ways. However, all are based on the market history, and access to good information as to the current state of the market, and trades conducted in the market is essential. Typically, a financial institution will trade a variety of currency pairs and benchmarks need to be established in each of those pairs.
    • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention aims to provide an improved algorithm for calculation of benchmarks. The algorithm calculates benchmarks on the basis of the prices of deals conducted since a previous benchmark was established, quotes at present in the market and the previous benchmark price. The invention further aims to provide a computerized system which can calculate those benchmarks according to the algorithm and then deliver them to traders.
  • More specifically there is provided a method of establishing a benchmark price for trades in a instrument at a given time, comprising: acquiring from at least one trading system the price at which deals in the instrument have been conducted since a previous benchmark price was established; acquiring the prices of quotes at present in the trading system; calculating a market price from the deal prices and the quote prices; and calculating a benchmark price from the previous benchmark price and the market price.
  • Preferably, the benchmark is established periodically every t seconds. This enables the benchmark price to remain an accurate reflection of the true state of the market.
  • Preferably, the calculation of market prices includes the weighting of deal prices according to size and/or age. Weighting may be performed in terms of multiples of a minimum deal size, preferably according to the formula W(di)=Vi*2−ct where Vi is the volume of the deal, t is the elapsed time since the previous benchmark, and c is a constant determining the speed at which deals are marked down over time.
  • Preferably, the calculation of market prices includes the summing of the weights of all deal prices occurring since the previous benchmark.
  • The market price may be calculated from a deal price obtained from the arithmetic average of individual deal prices for deals conducted since the previous benchmark was established, weighted by their deal weight. Deal price calculation may further include calculation of a scatter for deals conducted since the previous benchmark price was established. This deal price scatter may be derived from the standard deviation of deals measured with respect to deal price and weight.
  • The calculation of market prices may also comprise weighting quote prices according to size and age. Weighting may be in terms of a minimum quote size and may be according to their distance from the best quote in the market. Weighting may be performed according to the formula: W(Qi)=Vi*2−P(Qi)−B where Vi is the volume of a quote, P(Qi) is the quote price and B is the best bid or offer depending on whether Qi is a bid or an offer.
  • All quote prices occurring since the previous benchmark may also be summed and adjusted by a constant representing demand as part of the process of obtaining the market price.
  • Preferably, a quote scatter price is also calculated for all quotes entered into the market since the previous benchmark price was established. This scatter may be derived from the standard derivation of quote prices measured with respect to quote price and weight.
  • Preferably, the market price is derived from an average of the quote and deal prices each sealed by its own weight. A market price weight is calculated from the sum of the deal and quote price weights. Preferably a market price scatter is calculated, for example from the standard derivation of weighted market prices.
  • Preferably, a phantom price is also calculated. If no prices have been entered since the last benchmark, this phantom price is equal to the previous benchmark. If prices have been entered, this price is zero.
  • The phantom price may have a weight which is equal to a very small constant, for example 0.5*10−6. The phantom price may also have a scatter which is equal to a small constant, such as 1% of the base figure of the instrument being traded.
  • Preferably, the benchmark price is derived from the market price, a market price weight, the previous benchmark price, and a previous benchmark price weight. The latter weight may be calculated from the sum of the market price weight and the last benchmark price weight modified by a time markdown.
  • Preferably, a benchmark price error is also calculated. This error may be a standard error derived from the benchmark scatter and the benchmark price weight.
  • A further aspect of the invention provides a method of establishing a benchmark price for trades in a instrument at a given time, comprising: acquiring from at least one trading system deal price information relating to prices at which deals in the instrument have been conducted since a previous benchmark price was established; calculating from the deal price information, a deal price weight, a deal price and a deal scatter; acquiring from the at least one trading system price quote information relating to the prices of quotes at present in the trading system; calculating from the quote price information a quote price weight, a quote price and a quote price scatter; calculating a market price weight, a market price and a market price scatter from the deal price weight, the deal price and the deal price scatter, the quote price weight, the quote price and the quote price scatter; and calculating a benchmark price from the previous benchmark price and the market price.
    • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
  • FIG. 1 illustrates how deal prices may be scattered or condensed during any time interval;
  • FIG. 2 is an example of a benchmark established in a quote only market;
  • FIG. 3 is a further example of a benchmark established in a quote only market;
  • FIG. 4 is a still further example of a benchmark established in a quote only market;
  • FIG. 5 is an example of a benchmark established in a deal only market;
  • FIG. 6 is a further example of a benchmark established in a deal only market;
  • FIG. 7 is a still further example of a benchmark established in a deal only market;
  • FIG. 8 is a schematic block diagram of a system for implementing calculating and delivering benchmarks to traders; and
  • FIG. 9 is a schematic block diagram of a further embodiment of a system for implementing calculating and delivering benchmarks to traders in which benchmarks are also exchanged with a third party.
    •  DESCRIPTION OF BEST MODE
  • The algorithm used to calculate benchmark prices will first be described. A computerized system which can calculate those benchmarks according to the algorithm and then deliver them to traders will then be described.
  • The following description considers how benchmark prices are derived from the various trading data that is available, for example from an anonymous trading system, or another trading system or systems. The Benchmark price is derived from the market price and the previous Benchmark price. The market price is itself derived from the deal price and the quote price. The deal price is calculated from actual deals that have been done on the system and the quote price is calculated from quotes (bids and offers) that have been entered into the system by traders.
  • In the foreign exchange market, for example, the price of a currency pair moves up and down. The Benchmark Price attempts to describe the price best by utilizing market information acquired from one or more sources, such as an anonymous trading system. The Benchmark Price is calculated at a given frequency, for example, every t seconds. At each tick, a Benchmark is published along with a margin of error called the Standard Error.
  • Using the market information from the trading system is like sampling the price population at the tick time. This sample includes deal and quote transactions. These transactions act as traders' votes on where the market is.
  • The currency pair price is a population (P) at any given moment. Suppose its mean is MN(P) (the “true price”) and its Standard Deviation is SD(P). The Benchmark Price approximates MN(P) by sampling this price population. In the following description, P is used to represent the “price population” as well as the price; that is, the Mean price of the population, just as MN(P).
  • A general overview will first be given, showing how Benchmark prices are calculated. The derivation of each element will then be discussed in more detail.
    • Prices
  • At time n, Benchmark Price Pn is derived from Market Price at the time, and Pn−1, the Benchmark Price at the last tick n−1. Market price consists of Deal Price calculated from deals that occurred in the past time interval, and Quote Price calculated from quotes at the moment.
  • These four elements may be expressed as follows:
  • At time n: DealPrice=function (deal price and volume in the past time interval of n−1 to n);
    QuotePrice=function (quotes price and volume at n);
    MarketPrice=function (QuotePrice, DealPrice); and
    BenchmarkPrice=function (MarketPrice, BenchmarkPrice at n−1).
    • Weight and Scatter
  • For each of these prices, an associated weight W and a value of Scatter, or an approximated Standard Deviation, σ are also calculated. That is, a triplet of (P, W, σ) is associated with each data point.
  • In the following description, the manner in which each of these three P, W, σ will be discussed for DealPrice, QuotePrice, MarketPrice and BenchmarkPrice.
  • The weight serves as the sample size in statistical terms. In this example, in common with most anonymous trading systems, traders can trade at a minimum trading size. The parameter, which is defined by the trading system, is the minimum amount of a bid or offer order. In an interbank trading system trading spot FX this is typically in the order of $US 1 million ($1M). Every minimum trading size in the trades should be considered as ONE “vote” for a price. All “votes” should be taken into consideration. The larger the volume of a transaction, the more the “votes” (more confidence about the price) carried by the trade.
  • In other words, a trading amount is converted to units of “minimum trading size” when it is being weighted. Where the minimum is $1M, a bid of $10M would count as 10 votes when being weighed.
  • The weight of the price W and Scatter σ are used internally. The weight W is used when the price is combined with other prices to form a new one.
    • Standard Error
  • From the weight W and Scatter σ, a margin of error or a Standard Error is calculated. It provides a measure of confidence in the Benchmark Price derived from the market data.
  • Consider a Benchmark B as a sample of the price population P using market information (prices/volumes of deals and quotes). Let MN(B), WT(B), SD(B), and SE(B) be the mean (Benchmark Price), Weight (sample size), Standard Deviation, and Standard Error, respectively.
  • If Standard Error SE(B)=SE (pips), then we can say that the sample mean MN(B) has a 95% chance of lying within two SE of the mean of the population of MN(P) (the “true price”), or, the Benchmark Price has a 95% chance satisfying:

  • MN(P)−2*SE<Benchmark Price<MN(P)+2*SE
  • That is, the Benchmark Price is almost certain (a 95% chance) in the 2*SE-neighborhood of the “true price”. Apparently, the smaller the SE, the more precise is the Benchmark Price.
  • For example, if MN(S)=0.9779 and SE(S)=0.00002, and P is the “true price” of the currency pair, then the Benchmark Price of 0.9779 has a 95% chance lying within (P−0.00004, P+0.00004 or, conversely, P has a 95% chance of lying within the Benchmark Price interval of (0.97786, 0.97794).
  • The Standard Error and its formula is discussed in greater detail later on.
  • Thus, it can be seen that the Deal Price and the Quote Price are the fundamental building blocks of the Benchmark Price. The manner in which these are obtained will now be discussed in detail.
    • Deal Price
  • The Benchmark is calculated at a certain frequency. At each tick t when the Benchmark is to be calculated, there may be deals which have occurred since calculation of the last Benchmark at time (t−1). Deal Price is derived from the deals in the past time interval. It is an average price of all deal prices weighted by the volume and age of deals.
    • Deal Price Weight (Wd)
  • Deals of larger amounts count more than smaller amounts. Recent deals count more than aged deals.
    • “Minimum Trading Size” Adjustment
  • As mentioned above, each deal is weighted by the “minimum trading size”. That is, the Volume Vi of a deal di is the deal's amount in the units of minimum trading size. In the $10M example above, the volume would be 10.
    • Time Markdown
  • In the past time interval since the last benchmark price, many deals may have occurred. Deals that happened in the same second (or some other defined time interval) are considered the same “age”. Going backwards, the deals that occurred in the second away from the tick-time are discounted by an exponential function 2−ct, where t is the number of seconds away from the tick-time and c is a constant.
  • For example, if c=0.5 and t=1 (one second earlier than tick-time), 2−ct=2−0.5=0.707. That is, the deal that happened one second ago is worth 70.7% of the deal that happened now (at tick-second). If c=1 and t=1, 2−ct=2−1=0.5. That is, the deal that happened one second ago is worth one-half of the deal that happened now (at tick-second).
    • Weight of a Deal
  • To apply the minimum trading size adjustment and time markdown to deals that occurred in the past time interval, the weight of a deal di must be calculated as follows:

  • W(d i)=V i*2−ct,  Equation 1
  • where
      • Vi is the Volume (deal amount in minimum trading size units) of deal di;
      • t is time elapsed in seconds since di occurred (to the tick-time);
      • c is a constant coefficient of adjustment defining the speed of deal price markdown.
    Deal Price Weight
  • The Deal Price Weight consists of all weights of all deals that occurred in the past time interval. It is a summation of all deal weights:

  • W d=Σi W(d i)=Σi V i*2−ct  Equation 2
  • where Σ1 runs over all deals occurring in the past time interval;
      • Vi is the Volume (deal amount in “minimum trading size” units) of deal di;
      • t is time elapsed in second since di occurred (to the tick-time);
      • c is a constant coefficient of adjustment defining the speed of deal price markdown.
  • Table 1 lists the time-markdown-values of 2-ct according to time elapsed (t) for C=0.5 and C=1.0:
  • TABLE 1
    c = 0.5 c = 1.0
    t −ct 2 − ct −ct 2 − ct
    0 0.0 1.0000 0.0 1.0000
    1 −0.5 0.7071 −1.0 0.5000
    2 −1.0 0.5000 −2.0 0.2500
    3 −1.5 0.3536 −3.0 0.1250
    4 −2.0 0.2500 −4.0 0.0625
    5 −2.5 0.1768 −5.0 0.0312
    6 −3.0 0.1250 −6.0 0.0156
    7 −3.5 0.0884 −7.0 0.0078
    8 −4.0 0.0625 −8.0 0.0039
    9 −4.5 0.0442 −9.0 0.0020
    10 −5.0 0.0312 −10.0 0.0010
  • It will be seen that the larger the value of C, the faster the markdown.
  • In the special case of a Benchmark frequency of one second, the Benchmark is calculated every second and only deals that occurred in the past second are used in the calculation. Then Equation 2 becomes

  • W d=Σi W(d i)=Σi V i*2−ct=Σi V i*2−c×0=Σi V i*1=Σi V i.
  • This suggests that the parameter c that controls the markdown speed looses its effect, and the time markdown disappears, as will been seen below, the time markdown is used in the form of a historical price markdown, where c plays the same role.
    • Deal Price (Pd)
  • If P(di) is the price of a deal di, then the combined deal price of all deals that occurred in the past time interval is simply the arithmetic average of all deals weighted by their Weights of Deal:
  • P d = ∑ i P ( d i ) * W ( d i ) ∑ i W ( d i ) Equation 3
  • where
      • Σi runs through all deals di occurred in the past time interval.
  • In the case of a one-second Benchmark, each deal's weight is its Volume. Table 2 lists the Deal Price of five deals that occurred in the past time interval. The Deal Price is a real number, not restricted by whole pips 0.9779882353.
  • TABLE 2
    Deals Price (P) Weight (W) P * W
    1 0.9781 2 1.956200
    2 0.9780 2 1.956000
    3 0.9781 1 0.978100
    4 0.9780 7 6.846000
    5 0.9779 5 4.889500
    Total: 17 16.625800
    Deal Price 0.9779882353
    (Pd):

    Deal Price Scatter (σd)
  • In the past time interval, deal prices may scatter widely, reflecting a market in which traders disagree with each other on where the market is and the votes are widespread. Alternatively, deal prices may concentrate at one spot, where everyone agrees where the market is. This is illustrated in FIG. 1.
  • The Deal Price Scatter can be measured by the Standard Deviation of deals:
  • σ d = √ ∑ i W ( d i ) ( P ( d i ) - P d ) 2 ∑ i W ( d i ) Equation 4
  • where
      • Pd is the Deal Price calculated from equation 3 above;
      • W(di) is the individual Deal Weight derived from equation 1 above;
      • Σi runs through all deals di that occurred in the past time interval.
  • The Standard Deviation (SD) of a population is a measurement of the spread of the population distribution. It is like an average distance of the population to the mean of the population. Large SD is a good indication of volatility showing that prices are widely dispersed from the average.
  • Using the example above, table 3 shows the Scatter: Scatter=sqrt (0.0000000776/17)=0.0000675831.
  • TABLE 3
    W * (P −
    Deals Price (P) Weight (W) P * W Pd)2
    1 0.9781 2 1.956200 0.0000000250
    2 0.9780 2 1.956000 0.0000000003
    3 0.9781 1 0.978100 0.0000000125
    4 0.9780 7 6.846000 0.0000000010
    5 0.9779 5 4.889500 0.0000000389
    Total: 17 16.625800 0.0000000776
    Deal Price 0.9779882353
    (Pd):
    Scatter 0.0000675831
    (σd):
  • It will be appreciated from the above discussion that Equations 1, 2, and 3 define, respectively, the three elements (Pd, Wd, σd) of Deal Price.
    • Quote Price
  • Quote Price is derived from all live quotes in the anonymous trading system or other data source at the tick-time.
  • When there are more offers in the market, more people are trying to sell. The liquidity on the offer/selling side results in sells at the prices of the “front line” of bids, the Best Bid.
  • Conversely, if there are more bids, more people are buying. The liquidity on the bid/buying side results in buys at the prices of the “front line” of offers, the Best Offer.
  • Quote Price maps market liquidity to “Buying Power” at the Best Bid and Best Offer prices at the time.
    • Quote Price Weight (Wq)
  • As with Deal Price, a quote with a small amount is worth less than a quote with a large amount. A far-away-from-the-market quote is not worth as much as a close-to-the-market quote. To describe the weight of a quote, we need to take into consideration both the amount and the positioning of the quote with respect to the best Bid/Offer.
    • “Minimum Trading Size” Adjustment
  • A quote can be at the minimum trading size. Therefore, each quote is weighted by the minimum trading size. That is, the Volume of a quote Qi is the quote's amount in the units of minimum trading size.
    • Distance Markdown
  • The front line of a market is drawn by the Best Bid (Pb) and Best Offer (Po). The distance of a quote price from the Best, measured in the number of pips, shows “how good the quote price is”. The term “pip” is well understood in the financial trading art and refers to the least significant digit of the price that is quoted.
  • At any moment, the Best Bid is the highest bid, and the Best Offer is the lowest offer of the Market from which data is obtained, regardless of credit situation. This is not always the best price that is displayed to traders, as many trading systems do not display to traders prices which they cannot deal, for example submitted by a counterparty with whom they have no or insufficient credit.
  • If P(Qi) is the price of a quote Qi, and B is the price of the Best of the same side, then the distance of this quote to the Best is |P(Qi)−B|. The position markdown is defined by the exponential function:

  • 2−|P(Qi)−B|
  • When the distance is 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, . . . , (pips), 2−|P(Qi)−B|=1, ½, ¼, ⅛, 1/16, . . . .
    • Weight of a Quote
  • To apply minimum trading size and the distance markdown, the weight of a quote Qi is:

  • W(Q i)=V i*2−|P(Qi)−B|,  Equation 5
  • where
      • Vi is the Volume (quote amount in “minimum trading size” unit) of quote Qi;
      • P(Qi) is the price of quote Qi;
        B=Pb (Best Bid) if Qi is a bid, B=Po (Best Offer) if Qi is an offer, and
        |P(Qi)−B| is in the number of pips, the distance to the Best Price.
  • It can be seen that a quote is weighted by its Volume and marked down by its distance to the Best Price.
  • Table 4 shows an example of weight of quotes. All quotes have the same Volume, but the distances to the Best vary.
  • TABLE 4
    Offers Price Volume Distance Weight
    1 0.9780 10 0 10.0000
    2 0.9781 10 1 5.0000
    3 0.9782 10 2 2.5000
    4 0.9783 10 3 1.2500
    5 0.9784 10 4 0.6250
  • The weight of the quotes goes down ½ each time the quote moves one more pip away from the market.
  • In the example of Table 5 below, the quotes' distances to the Best vary, and their Volumes get larger when moving away from the market.
  • TABLE 5
    Bids Price Volume Distance Weight
    1 0.9779 10 0 10.0000
    2 0.9778 20 1 10.0000
    3 0.9777 40 2 10.0000
    4 0.9776 80 3 10.0000
    5 0.9775 160 4 10.0000
  • As can be seen from Table 5, a volume of twenty at one-pip away is worth (is equivalent to) a volume of 10 at the zero-pip; a volume of 160 at 4-pips away is worth (is equivalent to) the volume of 10 at zero-pip.
    • Weight of All Quotes
  • The weight of a group of quotes is merely the summation of the weight of each individual quote.
    • The Weight of Bids is

  • V b=Σi b W(Q i)=Σi b V i/2(Pb−Pi),  Equation 6
    • and the Weight of Offers is

  • V o=Σi o W(Q i)=Σi o V i/2(Pi−Po),  Equation 7
  • where
      • W(Qi) is the weight of quote Qi;
      • Σi b sums up all bids, Σi o sums up all offers;
      • Vi is the Volume of quote Qi;
      • Pb is the Best Bid, Po is the Best Offer, and (Pb−Pi), (Pi−Po) are in pips.
      • Note the (Pb−Pi)≧0 since Pb is the highest bid, and (Pi−Po)≧0 since Po is the lowest offer.
  • Thus, the Weight of Bids Vb is the volume-equivalent of the bids at the Best Bid price, and the Weight of Offers Vo is the volume-equivalent of the offers at Best Offer price.
  • The Quote Price Weight consists of a scaled summation of Bid Weight and Offer Weight. The Quote Price Weight is:

  • W q=λΣi W(Q i)=λ(V b +V o)  Equation 8
  • where
    λ is a constant coefficient which controls the share of quote's weight in Market Price, as will be discussed;
    • Vb is the Weight of Bids; and Vo is the Weight of Offers.
  • Where the market is one-sided, that is there are only bids or offers in the market, Wq=0. That is, one-sided quotes do not carry any weight. In the next section to be described, the quotes are converted to “deals” in the calculation of a quote's price. An “empty” side causes the “deal price” to be zero. Therefore, the weight of non-deal is zero.
  • Table 6 shows an example of Weight of Offers. Although there are five offers in the market with a total volume of 50, the offers are worth 19.375 at the Best Offer price.
  • TABLE 6
    Offers Price Volume Distance Weight
    1 0.9780 10 0 10.0000
    2 0.9781 10 1 5.0000
    3 0.9782 10 2 2.5000
    4 0.9783 10 3 1.2500
    5 0.9784 10 4 0.6250
    Vo: 19.3750
  • Table 7 shows an example of Weight of Bids. Although there are five bids in the market with a total volume of 310, the bids are worth 50 at the Best Bid price.
  • TABLE 7
    Bids Price Volume Distance Weight
    1 0.9779 10 0 10.0000
    2 0.9778 20 1 10.0000
    3 0.9777 40 2 10.0000
    4 0.9776 80 3 10.0000
    5 0.9775 160 4 10.0000
    Vb: 50.0000
  • Table 8 shows an example of the Quote Price Weight. (Vb+Vo)=69.375 volume of quote, but the Quote Price Weight is reduced to 6.940 due to the λ scale-down.
  • TABLE 8
    Offers Price Volume Distance Weight Bids Price Volume Distance Weight
    1 0.9780 10 0 10.0000 1 0.9779 10 0 10.0000
    2 0.9781 10 1 5.0000 2 0.9778 20 1 10.0000
    3 0.9782 10 2 2.5000 3 0.9777 40 2 10.0000
    4 0.9783 10 3 1.2500 4 0.9776 80 3 10.0000
    5 0.9784 10 4 0.6250 5 0.9775 160 4 10.0000
    Vo: 19.3750 Vb: 50.0000
  • From Table 8, if λ=0.1, then:

  • W q=λ(V b +V o)=0.1*(19.375+50.0)=6.9375.
    • Quote Price (Pq)
  • The weight of bids Vb and offers Vo defines “buying and selling demand” at the time. The Buys/Sells resulting from the demand is a function of the prices (Pb, Po) and the liquidity (Vb, Vo) at the time. That is, Buys=Functionb (Vb, Vo, Pb, Po). Similarly, Sells=Functions(Vb, Vo, Pb, Po).
  • The buy volume is proportional to Vb (buying demand) and the sell volume is directly proportional to Vo (selling demand). Therefore, Functionb and Functions are linear:

  • deal-volume=λ*demand,
  • or more specifically,

  • Buy-volume=λ*(buying demand)=λ*Vb,

  • Sell-volume=λ*(selling demand)=λ*Vo;
  • where λ is a constant coefficient (a percentage) that converts quote volume into deal volume.
  • Deals almost always occur only at or near the “front line” of the market. That is, buys resulting from the buying demand are at the Best Offer price of Po, and sells resulting from the selling demand are at the Best Bid price of Pb. There will be some deviation from this, particularly where a party does not have credit with the owner or owners of the best offer or bid and so trades below the front line. Even so the trade will almost always be very close to that front line.
  • The bids, and the resulting “buying power”, are now converted into deals of buy at the price of PO and volume of λ*Vb. The offers, and the resulting “selling power”, are now converted into deals of sell at price Pb and volume of λ*Vo.
  • As quotes are mapped into “deals” of buys of λVb volume at price Po and sells of λVo volume at price Pb, the deal price formula of Equation 3 can be used to derive the Quote Price Pq:
  • P q = P b * λ V o + P o * λ V b λ V o + λ V b = P b * V o + P o * V b V o + V b Equation 9
  • where
      • Pb and Po are Best Bid and Best Offer, respectively;
      • Vb and Vo are Weight of Bids and Weight of Offers, respectively.
  • Pq is the average price of buys at Po with volume λVb and sells at Pb with volume Vo. Note that in Equation 8, the λs are cancelled out. That is, λ does not influence the outcome of Quote Price. Quote Price is solely determined by the Best Prices and the liquidity of the market.
  • Mapping quotes to “deals” requires both sides of the market to work. In the cases of no quote or a one-sided-market, Pq=0. As stated above, in these cases, the quote's weight is also zero.
  • By way of example, and continuing from the results of Table 8 above, where Pb=0.9779, Po=0.9780, Vb=50.0, and Vo=19.375, we have
  • P q = P b * V o + P o * V b V o + V b = 0.9779 * 19.375 + 0.9780 * 50.0 19.375 + 50.0 = 0.9779720720719
  • As the buying demand is larger (Vb=50.0>Vo=19.375), the Quote Price Pq is pushed up, at almost the Best Offer price.
  • Quote Price Scatter (σq)
  • Since the quotes are mapped into deals, we can apply the formula of Deal Scatter on the quotes'. According to Equation 4, the quote “scatterness” the Standard Deviation of quotes is:
  • σ q = √ λ V o ( P b - P q ) 2 + λ V b ( P o - P q ) 2 λ V o + λ V b = √ V o ( P b - P q ) 2 + V b ( P o - P q ) 2 V o + V b Equation 10
      • Pq is the Quote Price derived from Equation 8 above;
      • Pb and Po are EBS Best Bid and Best Offer, respectively;
      • Vb and Vo are Weight of Bids and Weight of Offers, respectively.
  • It can now be seen that the three elements of the triplet (Pq, Wq, σq) of Quote Price are defined by Equations 9, 8 and 10 respectively.
  • Where the market is one sided, σq=0.
  • Table 9 shows how the quote scatter is obtained, using the results of Table 8 and the value of Pq obtained above.
  • TABLE 9
    Vb + Scatter
    Pb Po Pq Vb Vo Vo(Pb − Pq)2 Vb(Po − Pq)2 Vo (σq)
    0.9779 0.9780 0.9779720721 50.000 19.375 0.0000001006 0.0000000390 69.375 0.0000448645
  • The Deal Price triplet (Pd, Wd, σq) and the Quote Price triplet (Pq, Wq and σq) have now been defined. These values need to be consolidated in the Market Price to give a good indication of where the market actually is.
    • Market Price
  • The Market Price Triplet (Pm, Wm, σm) is constructed by simply combining Deal Price information (Pd, Wd, σd) and Quote Price information (Pq, Wq, σq). Without using historical information, Market Price is calculated from current live quotes and the latest deals that occurred in the past time interval.
    • Market Price (Pm)
  • The Market Price PM is derived by averaging the Quote Price and Deal Price, and each is scaled by its Weight:
  • P m = P q * W q + P d * W d W q + W d Equation 11
  • where
      • Pq is the Quote Price from Equation 8 above;
      • Pd is the Deal Price from Equation 3;
      • Wq is the Quote Weight from Equation 7; and
      • Wd is the Deal Weight from Equation 2.
  • Equation 8 stated that Wq=λ (Vb+Vo), and the constant coefficient λ is used to control the share of quotes. Equation 11 shows that since Quote Price is weighted by its weight of Wq, and Wq=λ (Vb+Vo), λ plays an important role of scaling quote weight in respect to Deal Weight. Thus, if λ=0.1, it means a 10 volume of quotes is worth one volume of deals.
  • Following on from the Example of Table 10, Table 11 shows how Equation 10 can be used to obtain the market price.
  • TABLE 11
    Pq 0.9779720721 0.9779882353 Pd
    Wq 6.9375 17.0000 Wd
    σq 0.0000448645 0.0000675831 σd
    Market 0.9779835509
    Price:
    • Market Price Weight (Wm)
  • The Market Price Weight is summation of Deal Price Weight and Quote Price Weight:

  • W m =W d +W q  Equation 12
  • Wd and Wq calculations are stated by Equations 2 and 7 respectively.
  • Thus, continuing with the example, of Table 10, Table 12 shows the Market Price weigh Wm
  • TABLE 12
    Wq Wd Wm
    6.9375 17.0000 23.9375

    Market Price Scatter (σm)
  • Applying the definition of Standard Deviation, we get the Market Price Scatter as follow:
  • σ m = √ λ V o ( P b - P m ) 2 + λ V b ( P o - P m ) 2 + ∑ i W ( d i ) ( P ( d i ) - P m ) 2 λ V o + λ V b + ∑ i W ( d i ) Equation 13
  • If Pq=0 (no quotes, one-sided-market), then quotes are no longer part of the consideration and Equation 13 becomes:
  • σ m = √ ∑ i W ( d i ) ( P ( d i ) - P m ) 2 ∑ i W ( d i ) Equation 13 ( b )
  • Table 13 continues the example of table 10 and shows calculations of Market Price Scatter:
  • TABLE 13
    Price Weight
    Pm Deals (P) (W) λ W * (P − Pm)2
    0.9779836 1 0.9781 2 0.0000000271
    2 0.9780 2 0.0000000005
    3 0.9781 1 0.0000000136
    4 0.9780 7 0.0000000019
    5 0.9779 5 0.0000000349
    Bid->Buy 0.9780 50.000 0.1 0.0000000014
    Offer->Sell 0.9779 19.375 0.1 0.0000000135
    Total: 23.937500 0.0000000929
    Scatter 0.0000622966
    (σm):
  • At each tick t, the Market Price uses the current, latest information of the market. But in some off-peak hours or in some less-active currency pairs, complete current information may not be available. In those situations, Market Price (Pm, Wm, σm) must be combined with the previous Benchmark Price to derive the current price.
  • Having now obtained the Market Price, the Benchmark Price may now be derived.
    • Benchmark Price
  • Suppose the current tick is n, then current Benchmark Price triplet (Pn, Wn, σn) is derived from the current Market Price (Pm, Wm, σm), the last Benchmark Price (Pn−1, Wn−1, σn−1) calculated at the last tick, and a Phantom Price (Pph, Wph, σph). As the last benchmark was calculated one time-interval ago, it is discounted accordingly.
  • The weight of the last Benchmark Price is marked down by a faction of 2−cT, where T is the time interval from the last Benchmark to the current tick.
  • Phantom Price is an imaginary price introduced to balance the no-price situation. The Phantom price has a very tiny weight that injects little influence on the calculations when prices are present, but which prevents the Benchmark weight from becoming zero where there are no prices in the Benchmark period. This, in turn, prevents the Standard Error from becoming infinite. It follows that in an active market, the phantom price is not essential to the calculation of the benchmark.
  • When prices exist in the market, Phantom Price is equal to Market Price. When there is no price in the market, Phantom Price equals the previous Benchmark Price. That is:

  • Pph=Pm when Pm≠0; Pph=Pn−1 when Pm=0.
  • The weight of the Phantom Price Wph is a tiny constant, for example a half of one-millionth (0.5*10−6). In the case of the minimum trading amount of one million (of base currency) for most currencies, the weight is ½ unit of the base currency. For example, while the minimum-trading amount for EUR/USD is one million (1,000,000) Euro, its Phantom Price's weight is 0.5 Euro. It will be seen from later discussion that this modest amount can ensure that the Standard Error does not become infinite.
  • The scatter of Phantom Price σph is a tiny constant as well. It is set at 1% of a Big Figure of a currency. The purpose of having σph is to prevent the scatter from becoming zero (therefore zero Standard Error) in quiet market.
    • Benchmark Price (Pn)
  • The Benchmark price is the average on the Market Price and (n−1) Benchmark Price, weighted by their Weights. The (n−1) Benchmark Price Weight has an extra time-markdown): Thus
  • P n = P m * W m + P n - 1 * W n - 1 * 2 - cT + P p h * W p h W m + W n - 1 * 2 - cT + W p h Equation 14
  • where
      • Pm is the Market Price from Equation 10 above;
      • Wm is the Market Price Weight from Equation 11;
      • Pn−1 is the previous Benchmark Price;
      • Pph is Phantom Price. Pph=Pm if Pm≠0; Pph=Pn−1 if Pm=0;
      • Wph is the weight of Phantom Price, a small constant, set at 0.5*10−6;
      • Wn−1 is the previous Benchmark Price Weight;
      • T is the tick time interval in seconds; and
      • c is a constant coefficient of adjustment defining the speed of deal/Benchmark price markdown.
  • The coefficient c is the same one used in the deal price elapsed-time markdown.
  • In the case of a still-market (Pm=0, Wm=0), Pn=Pn−1. That is, Benchmark Price does not change.
  • Referring back to the example as discussed in Table 11, suppose c=1.0 and T=1, and suppose Pn−1=0.9778096128, Wn−1=19.0458, the Benchmark Price Pn by using Equation 13 is shown in the Table below.
  • TABLE 14
    Wm + Wn − 1 *
    Pm Wm Pn − 1 Wn − 1 Pph Wph 2-ct + Wph Pn
    0.9779835509 23.9375 0.9778095128 19.0458 0.9778095128 0.000001 33.4604009156 0.9779340193
    • Benchmark Price Weight (Wn)
  • The Benchmark Price Weight is a summation of Market Price Weight and the last Benchmark Price Weight after applying the time markdown of 2−cT:

  • W n =W m +W n−1*2−cT +W ph  Equation 15
  • Where the Phantom Price Weight Wph is a small constant.
  • Again, the Phantom Price is introduced solely to prevent the weight of the Benchmark from going down to zero in a quiet market when there is neither any price nor deal. Since its weight is tiny, it does not effect the price in a regular or busy market.
  • In the case of a still-market (Pm=0, Wn=0), suppose W1 is the last Benchmark Price before an interval with no new active prices, then the Benchmark Price Weights are:
  • W 1 , W 2 = W 1 * 2 - cT + W p h , W 3 = W 2 * 2 - cT + W p h = W 1 * 2 - 2 cT + W p h * 2 - cT + W p h , … , W n = W n - 1 * 2 - cT + W p h = W 1 * 2 - ( n - 1 ) cT + W p h * 2 - ( n - 2 ) cT + … + W p h * 2 - cT + W p h = W 1 * 2 - ( n - 1 ) cT + W p h ( 1 - 2 - ( n - 1 ) cT ) / ( 1 - 2 - cT ) = W 1 * 2 - ( n - 1 ) cT + W p h / ( 1 - 2 - cT ) - W p h * 2 - ( n - 1 ) cT / ( 1 - 2 - cT )
  • When n→∞≈(c=1 and Benchmark is calculated every second: T=1), then Wn→Wph/(1−2−cT)=2*Wph. That is, in a quiet market, the weight converges to 2*Wph. If Phantom Price is 0.5*10−6 (0.0000005), then the weight converges to 10−6 (one-millionth).
  • Continuing with the example of Table 14, suppose c=1.0, T=1, Equation 14 provides a Benchmark Price Weight Wn=Wm+Wn−1*2−cT=33.4603999156.
  • Benchmark Price Scatter (v=)
  • Before calculating the Benchmark Price scatter σn, the combined values of the Market Price and Phantom Price must be obtained.
  • In general, with two samples of the same population, there are two sets of means, sample sizes (weights) and Standard Deviations (Scatters). The two samples can be combined and the combined samples' Standard Deviation SD can be derived from the SDs of the two separate samples. Thus:
  • ( 4.3 .0 ) σ 1 + 2 = √ ( N 1 - 1 ) σ 1 2 N 1 + N 2 - 1 + ( N 2 - 1 ) σ 2 2 N 1 + N 2 - 1 + N 1 N 2 ( M 1 - M 2 ) 2 ( N 1 + N 2 ) ( N 1 + N 2 - 1 ) Equation 16
  • Where M1, M2, σ, σ2 and N1, N2 are the means, SDs and sample sizes of the two samples. The combined price, weight and scatter triplet of (Pc, Wc, σc) are then obtained from the Market Price (Pm, Wm, σm) and the Phantom Price (Pph, Wph, σph).
  • As the Phantom Price equal the Market Price when a Market Price exists, and equals the previous Benchmark Price when no Market Price exists, Pc=Pm if Pm≠0; Pc=Pn−1 if Pm=0. The combined weight Wc=Wm+Wph.
  • Finally, by applying the combined standard deviation of Equation 16 on (Pm, Wm, σm), and (Pph, Wph, σph):
  • σ c = √ ( W m - 1 ) σ m 2 W m + W p h - 1 + ( W p h - 1 ) σ p h 2 W m + W p h - 1 + W m W p h ( P m - P p h ) 2 ( W m + W p h ) ( W m + W p h - 1 )
  • From this formula, it can be concluded that when Pm≠0, σc≈σm. That is, when prices exist, σc is just the Market Price's scatter σm. When Pm=0, σc≈√σm 2+σph 2 That is, when there is no prices, σc is bounded by at least one σph, since √σm 2+σph 2≧σph. This effectively prevents σc from going down to zero.
  • With (Pc, Wc, σc) having been derived, the Benchmark Price scatter can be calculated.
  • Applying Equation 16 on (Pc, Wc, σc) and (Pn−1, Wn−1*2−cT, σn−1), gives:
  • σ n = √ ( W c - 1 ) σ c 2 W c + W n - 1 * 2 - cT - 1 + ( W n - 1 * 2 - cT - 1 ) σ n - 1 2 W c + W n - 1 * 2 - cT - 1 + W c W n - 1 * 2 - cT ( P c - P n - 1 ) 2 ( W c + W n - 1 * 2 - cT ) ( W c + W n - 1 * 2 - cT - 1 ) Equation 17
  • Equation 17 functions like the combined scatter over (Pm, Wm, σm) and (Pn−1, Wn−1*2−cT, σn−1), since when Pm≠0, Pc=Pm, Wc≈Wm and σc≈σm. In the case of a still-market (Pm=0, Wm=0), σn≈√σn−1 2+σph 2.
  • That is, the scatter is bounded by at least one σph. It makes sense that, when there is no price in market, the scatter is at least one σph (it is set at 1% of a Big Figure or one pip).
  • Following the example of Table 14, Table 15 shows the Benchmark Price Scatter:
  • TABLE 15
    Wm + Wn − 1 *
    Pm Wm σm Pn − 1 Wn − 1 σn−1 2-ct σn
    0.9779835509 23.9375 0.0000622966 0.9778095128 19.0458 0.0000761207 33.4603999156 0.0001029197
    • Benchmark Price Error (En)
  • The Standard Error is a commonly used index of the error entailed in estimating a population mean based on the information in a random sample of size N:
  • E n = √ σ 2 N
  • In this case, σ is the Benchmark Price Scatter σn, and N=Wn=Wm+Wn−1*2−cT+Wph:
  • E n = √ σ n 2 W m + W n - 1 * 2 - cT + W p h Equation 18
  • It can be seen that En is always smaller than the Benchmark Price Scatter σn. The larger the weights, corresponding to more sample points, the smaller the error.
  • In the case of a still-market (Pm=0, Wm=0)
  • E n = σ n √ W n - 1 * 2 - cT + W p h
  • when n→∞, the Error En→σn/√2*Wph. When Wph=0.5*10−6, En→σn/√0.000001=1000*σn.
  • In other words, if the scatter σn is at one pip, then the Standard Error is at 10 big figures.
  • The Standard Error (En) has its special meaning, as explained below. 2*En defines the “95%-bracket” around Benchmark Price Pn. That is, in a still-market, if the scatter is one pip, then the “95%-bracket” is bounded by 20 big figures on each side of the Benchmark Price; if the scatter is two pips, then the “95%-bracket” is bounded by 40 big figures on each side of the Benchmark Price.
  • Continuing with the example of Table 15, the Benchmark Price Error can now be calculated.
  • En=sqrt(σn 2/(Wm+Wn−1*2−cT+Wph))=sqrt(0.00010291972/33.460−40092)=0.0000177923.
  • Therefore, twice the Standard Error=2*0.0000177923=0.0000355847 (pips).
  • That is, at tick n, the Benchmark Price of 0.9779340193 has a 95% chance lying within 0.0000355847 pips of the true price P, or, the Benchmark Price of 0.9779340193 has a 95% chance satisfying:

  • P−0.0000355847<0.9779340193<P+0.0000355847
  • The Standard Error of the mean may be calculated as follows:
    • Central Limit Theorem
  • If P is a population of size m and S is a sample of P with size n (n<m), let MN(S) be the mean of S, and SD(S) be the Standard Deviation of S, then Central Limit Theorem states that:
    • (1) When n is large, the distribution of the means Mi of ALL possible samples of size n is approximately a Normal Distribution (that is, M1 M2, . . . , Mk form a normal distribution);
    • (2) MN (Mi)=MN(P)
    •  That is, the mean of the distribution of Mi equals to the mean of the population.
    • (3)
  • S D ( M i ) = S D ( P ) / sqrt ( n ) === === === defined as Standard Error ( S E )
    •  That is, the SD of the distribution of Mi equals the SD of the population divided by the square root of n.
  • Since Mi is a Normal Distribution, then the mean of a random sample S has a 68% chance of lying within one SE of the population mean, or a 95% change lying within two SE of the population mean:

  • MN(P)−2*SE<MN(S)<MN(P)+2*SE.
  • (Conversely, the population mean has a 68% chance of lying within one SE of the mean of a single randomly chosen sample S, and a 95% chance of lying within two SE of the mean of a single randomly chosen sample S).
    • SE Approximation
  • Since SD (P) is usually not available, it is a common practice when n is large to use the Standard Deviation of a sample S instead:
  • S E = S D ( M i ) = SD ( P ) / sqrt ( n ) === === === === approximated by S D ( S ) / sqrt ( n )
  • Therefore, for any sample of size n the SE of the Mean can be calculated (approximated).
  • The following section gives some examples of Benchmark calculations following the Equations derived in the foregoing sections.
    • Example 1
  • This example is a summary of the examples used above. Deal Price=(Pd, Wd, σd), Quote Price=(Pq, Wq, σq), Market Price=(Pm, Wm, σm), and Benchmark Price at n=(Pn, Wn, σn).
  •
    Figure US20090171829A1-20090702-C00001
    Figure US20090171829A1-20090702-C00002
    Figure US20090171829A1-20090702-C00003
    Figure US20090171829A1-20090702-C00004
    • Example 2.1
  • Quote only market: There are only two quotes in market. They are 1 pip apart, 1 million on each side. We want to find out Benchmark's (Pn, Wn, σn) and SE.
  • Note that when there is no deal, Market Price is the same as the Quote Price. By applying Benchmark formulas, we have:
  • Quote Prices Benchmarks
    Bid Vb Offer Vo Pq Wq σq Pn Wn σn SE
    0 0 0
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.00011180
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.3 0.000050 0.00009129
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.35 0.000050 0.00008452
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.375 0.000050 0.00008165
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.3875 0.000050 0.00008032
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.39375 0.000050 0.00007968
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.396875 0.000050 0.00007937
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.3984375 0.000050 0.00007921
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.3992188 0.000050 0.00007913
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.3996094 0.000050 0.00007910
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.3998047 0.000050 0.00007908
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.3999023 0.000050 0.00007907
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.3999512 0.000050 0.00007906
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.3999756 0.000050 0.00007906
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.3999878 0.000050 0.00007906
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.3999939 0.000050 0.00007906
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.3999969 0.000050 0.00007906
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.3999985 0.000050 0.00007906
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.3999992 0.000050 0.00007906
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.3999996 0.000050 0.00007906
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.3999998 0.000050 0.00007906
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.3999999 0.000050 0.00007906
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.00007906
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.00007906
    0.9800 1 0.9801 1 0.98005 0.2 0.000050 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.00007906
    SE = 0.00007906,
    2 * SE = 0.0001581,
    4 * SE = 0.000316
  • The relationship between the Benchmark and the Bid and offer prices is shown in FIG. 2. A number of conclusions can be drawn as follows:
    • (1) The Benchmark Price Pn is in the middle of the bid and offer, (Pb+Po)/2, as expected.
    • (2) The Benchmark Price Weight Wn converges to (2×total volume×λ) Namely, Wn−>2×2×0.1=0.4 after 16 rounds (16 seconds)
    • (3) The Benchmark Price Scatter σn is ½ of the quote spread, as expected. SE is larger the Dn because Wn is small (0.4)
    Example 2.2
  • Quote only market: There are only two quotes in market. They are 2 pips apart, 1 million on each side. We want to find out (Pn, Wn, σn) and SE. This example is the same as 2.1 above, except for the larger spread.
  • Note that when there is no deal, Market Price is the same as the Quote Price. By applying Benchmark formulas, we have:
  • Quote Prices Benchmarks
    Bid Vb Offer Vo Pq Wq σq Pn Wn σn SE
    0 0 0
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.00022361
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.3 0.000100 0.00018257
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.35 0.000100 0.00016903
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.375 0.000100 0.00016330
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.3875 0.000100 0.00016064
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.39375 0.000100 0.00015936
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.396875 0.000100 0.00015874
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.3984375 0.000100 0.00015842
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.3992188 0.000100 0.00015827
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.3996094 0.000100 0.00015819
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.3998047 0.000100 0.00015815
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.3999023 0.000100 0.00015813
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.3999512 0.000100 0.00015812
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.3999756 0.000100 0.00015812
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.3999878 0.000100 0.00015812
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.3999939 0.000100 0.00015812
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.3999969 0.000100 0.00015811
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.3999985 0.000100 0.00015811
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.3999992 0.000100 0.00015811
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.3999996 0.000100 0.00015811
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.3999998 0.000100 0.00015811
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.3999999 0.000100 0.00015811
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.4 0.000100 0.00015811
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.4 0.000100 0.00015811
    0.9800 1 0.9802 1 0.9801 0.2 0.000100 0.9801 0.4 0.000100 0.00015811
    SE = 0.00015811,
    2 * SE = 0.0003162,
    4 * SE = 0.00063247
  • The relationship between the Benchmark and the Bid and offer prices is shown in FIG. 3. A number of conclusions can be drawn as follows:
  • There is no change for (1) and (2). But the wider spread changes σn and SE:
  • (1) Pn is at the middle of the bid and offer, (Pb+Po)/2, as expected.
    (2) No weight change, Wn converges to (2×total volume×λ)=2×2×0.1=0.4 after 16 rounds.
    (3) σn is ½ of the quote spread, as expected. But since the spread is twice as large as in Example 2.1, σn and SE both double their values. It makes sense: wider spread makes the market less certain.
    • Example 2.3
  • Quote only market: There are only two quotes in market. They are 1 pip apart, 2 million on each side. We want to find out (Pn, Wn, σn) and SE. (This example is the same as 2.1, only with larger volumes).
  • Note that when there is no deal, Market Price is the same as the Quote Price. By applying Benchmark formulas, we have:
  • Quote Prices Benchmarks
    Bid Vb Offer Vo Pq Wq σq Pn Wn σn SE
    0 0 0
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.00007906
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.6 0.000050 0.00006455
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.7 0.000050 0.00005976
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.75 0.000050 0.00005774
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.775 0.000050 0.00005680
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.7875 0.000050 0.00005634
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.79375 0.000050 0.00005612
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.796875 0.000050 0.00005601
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.7984375 0.000050 0.00005596
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.7992188 0.000050 0.00005593
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.7996094 0.000050 0.00005592
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.7998047 0.000050 0.00005591
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.7999023 0.000050 0.00005591
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.7999512 0.000050 0.00005590
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.7999756 0.000050 0.00005590
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.7999878 0.000050 0.00005590
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.7999939 0.000050 0.00005590
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.7999969 0.000050 0.00005590
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.7999985 0.000050 0.00005590
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.7999992 0.000050 0.00005590
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.7999996 0.000050 0.00005590
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.7999998 0.000050 0.00005590
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.7999999 0.000050 0.00005590
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.8 0.000050 0.00005590
    0.9800 2 0.9801 2 0.98005 0.4 0.000050 0.98005 0.8 0.000050 0.00005590
    SE = 0.00005590,
    2 * SE = 0.0001118,
    4 * SE = 0.00022361
  • The relationship between the Benchmark and the Bid and offer prices is shown in FIG. 4. A number of conclusions can be drawn as follows:
  • There is no change for (1) and σn; weight doubles; The doubling of the Weight makes SE smaller:
  • 1) Pn is at the middle of the bid and offer, (Pb+Po)/2, as expected.
    (2) Weight doubles. Wn converges to (2×total volume×λ) 2×4×0.1=0.8 after 16 rounds.
    (3) σn is ½ of the quote spread, as expected. But since the heavier Weight (more certainty), SE decreases almost 30% comparing with Example 2.1 (it is inversely proportional to sqrt(Weight)).
    • Example 3.1
  • Deal only market: There are only one 1 million deals occurring every second at the same price. We want to find out (Pn, Wn, σn) and SE. Note that when there is no quote, Market Price is the same as the Deal Price. By applying Benchmark formulas, we have:
  • Deal Prices Benchmarks
    Deal Pd Wd σd Pn Wn σn SE
    0.00000 0 0.000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.5 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.75 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.875 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.9375 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.96875 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.984375 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.9921875 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.9960938 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.9980469 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.9990234 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.9995117 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.9997559 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.9998779 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.999939 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.9999695 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.9999847 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.9999924 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.9999962 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.9999981 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.999999 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.9999995 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.9999998 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.9999999 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1.9999999 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 2 0.000000 0.00000000
  • FIG. 5 shows the relationship between Deal Price and Benchmark price.
  • The following conclusions can be drawn:
  • (1) The Benchmark Price Pn is at the deal price, as expected.
    (2) The Benchmark Price Weight Wn converges to (2×total volume Namely, Wn−>2×1=2 after 22 rounds (22 seconds).
    (3) The Benchmark Price Scatter σn and SE are zeros, as expected. Since there is only one deal in market.
    • Example 3.2
  • Deal only market: There is only one 1 million deal occurring every second alternately at two different prices one pip apart. We want to find out (Pn, Wn, σn) and SE. This example is like Example 3.1, only deal prices are not at a steady price but “vibrate” one-pip apart. By applying the formulas, we have:
  • Deal Prices Benchmarks
    Deal Deal Pd Wd σd Pn Wn σn SE
    0.00000 0 0.000000
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98000 1 0.000000 0.00000000
    0.9801 0.98010 1 0.00000000 0.98007 1.5 0.000047 0.00003849
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98003 1.75 0.000045 0.00003415
    0.9801 0.98010 1 0.00000000 0.98007 1.875 0.000047 0.00003443
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98003 1.9375 0.000047 0.00003358
    0.9801 0.98010 1 0.00000000 0.98007 1.96875 0.000047 0.00003360
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98003 1.984375 0.000047 0.00003340
    0.9801 0.98010 1 0.00000000 0.98007 1.9921875 0.000047 0.00003340
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98003 1.9960938 0.000047 0.00003335
    0.9801 0.98010 1 0.00000000 0.98007 1.9980469 0.000047 0.00003335
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98003 1.9990234 0.000047 0.00003334
    0.9801 0.98010 1 0.00000000 0.98007 1.9995117 0.000047 0.00003334
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98003 1.9997559 0.000047 0.00003333
    0.9801 0.98010 1 0.00000000 0.98007 1.9998779 0.000047 0.00003333
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98003 1.999939 0.000047 0.00003333
    0.9801 0.98010 1 0.00000000 0.98007 1.9999695 0.000047 0.00003333
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98003 1.9999847 0.000047 0.00003333
    0.9801 0.98010 1 0.00000000 0.98007 1.9999924 0.000047 0.00003333
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98003 1.9999962 0.000047 0.00003333
    0.9801 0.98010 1 0.00000000 0.98007 1.9999981 0.000047 0.00003333
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98003 1.999999 0.000047 0.00003333
    0.9801 0.98010 1 0.00000000 0.98007 1.9999995 0.000047 0.00003333
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98003 1.9999998 0.000047 0.00003333
    0.9801 0.98010 1 0.00000000 0.98007 1.9999999 0.000047 0.00003333
    0.9800 0.98000 1 0.00000000 0.98003 1.9999999 0.000047 0.00003333
    0.9801 0.98010 1 0.00000000 0.98007 2 0.000047 0.00003333
    SE = 0.00003333,
    2 * SE = 0.000067,
    4 * SE = 0.00013
  • FIG. 6 shows the relationship between Deal Prices and Benchmarks over time.
  • From FIG. 6, we can conclude:
  • There is no change for Weight, but everything else changes:
  • (1) The Benchmark Price Pn also “vibrates” in between deal prices, but with only a 40% “amplitude” of the deals. This is because of the Benchmark at tick n is smoothed by the price at the previous tick.
    (2) The Benchmark Price Weight Wn converges to (2×total volume)=2×1=2.
    (3) The Benchmark Scatter is at 0.47 pips (47% of the deal price spread).
    • Example 3.3
  • Deal only market: There are only two 1 million deals occurring every second at two different prices one-pip apart. We want to find out (Pn, Wn, σn) and SE. By applying Benchmark formulas, we have:
  • Deal Prices Benchmarks
    Deal Deal Pd Wd σd Pn Wn σn SE
    0.00000 0 0.000000
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 2 0.000050 0.00003536
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3 0.000050 0.00002887
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.5 0.000050 0.00002673
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.75 0.000050 0.00002582
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.875 0.000050 0.00002540
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.9375 0.000050 0.00002520
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.96875 0.000050 0.00002510
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.984375 0.000050 0.00002505
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.9921875 0.000050 0.00002502
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.9960938 0.000050 0.00002501
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.9980469 0.000050 0.00002501
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.9990234 0.000050 0.00002500
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.9995117 0.000050 0.00002500
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.9997559 0.000050 0.00002500
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.9998779 0.000050 0.00002500
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.999939 0.000050 0.00002500
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.9999695 0.000050 0.00002500
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.9999847 0.000050 0.00002500
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.9999924 0.000050 0.00002500
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.9999962 0.000050 0.00002500
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.9999981 0.000050 0.00002500
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.999999 0.000050 0.00002500
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.9999995 0.000050 0.00002500
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.9999998 0.000050 0.00002500
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.9999999 0.000050 0.00002500
    0.9800 0.9801 0.98005 2 0.00005000 0.98005 3.9999999 0.000050 0.00002500
    SE = 0.00002500,
    2 * SE = 0.00005000,
    4 * SE = 0.0001
  • FIG. 7 shows the relationship between deal prices and Benchmark prices from which one may conclude:
  • There is no change for Weight (1) but everything else changes:
  • (1) The Benchmark Price Pn is at the middle of deal prices, as expected.
    (2) The Benchmark Price Weight Wn converges to (2×total volume)=2×2=4.
    (3) The Benchmark Scatter is at 0.5 pips (50% of the deal price spread). SE decreases compared to Example 3.2 above, as the Weight has doubled, and SE is inversely proportional to sqrt(Weight).
  • Having discussed how the Benchmarks are derived, the following description details how a system may be set up to calculate benchmarks and distribute them to traders. FIGS. 8 and 9 show two examples of systems for deriving and providing benchmarks to traders. In the system of FIG. 8, benchmarks are derived from price and deal data obtained from a single source. In that of FIG. 9 they are derived from priced and deal data supplied from more than one source.
  • From the discussion above, it is clear that for a benchmark to be calculated for a given currency pair, the previous benchmark must be available together with bids and offer prices entered into the system since the last benchmark together with the prices of deals done in the time since the last benchmark was calculated.
  • These bid and offer prices and deals are conveniently supplied from a trading system, for example an anonymous trading system such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,014,627 of Togher et al. However, the information could be supplied from any suitable trading system, trading in the instrument to which the benchmark relates. Such a system must provide price and deal information and may or may not be anonymous. Bid/offer prices and deal prices may even be supplied from a non-computerized source such as an open out cry market or a voice broker.
  • Most trading systems enable traders to trade a variety of currency pairs. For example, USD: EUR, USA:JPY, USD:CAD; EUR:JPY; EUR:CAD and CAD:JPY and other GB currency pairs. In a preferred embodiment the system will establish a benchmark every t seconds for each of these currency pairs as well as other currency pairs that may be traded. The benchmarks will then be communicated to traders trading on the system and to traders trading on other systems, for example on conversational systems or direct dealing systems. The benchmarks may also be released more generally into the financial community.
  • In the embodiment of FIG. 8, the anonymous trading system is shown at 10. The price and deal information is passed via a gateway 12 to a market rate feed server 14 where the benchmark calculation is performed according to the algorithm described above. Market Rate Feeders (MRF) are, in themselves, a well-known tool for distributing price information from a source to a number of subscribers, however it is not conventional for them to calculate benchmarks.
  • The system of U.S. Pat. No. 6,014,627 operates by using a series of arbitrators, based on geographical location, to keep a trading book of orders (bids and offers) entered into the system by traders. Traders receive market views showing the best bids and offers which are filtered by a Market Distributor according to their ability to deal prices. The arbitrator holds a log of all deals conducted on the system and provides deal information, since the last benchmark, together with bids and offers entered and active in the system, via a city node, which is a local node via which trading banks are connected to the system, to the MRF server 14. This market data is delivered to traders 20 on other systems in XML or other formats over a TCP/IP link via a wide area network 22 and a Conversational Direct Dealing (CDD) server 24 and a Secure Communication Server (SCS) 26. The market data is enhanced with the benchmarks calculated by the MRF 14. The benchmarks are also communicated back to the anonymous trading system for distribution, via the market distributor, to traders trading on the anonymous trading system 10. The benchmarks may be used to calculate the big figure (most significant digits) of the currency rate at the anonymous trading system.
  • Thus, the market rate feed unit 14 differs from prior art units in that the benchmark calculation algorithm described above is implemented. The MRF 14 calculates benchmarks at predetermined equal intervals over a trading day, for example every second. Thus, the MRF receives the order book from the trading system together with the deals done since the last benchmark, calculates the new benchmark and distributes the benchmark.
  • In the variant of FIG. 9, benchmarks for some currencies may be calculated from trading information provided from a different source than the anonymous trading system 10. This source 28 may be a different trading system, which, for example has greater liquidity in some currency pairs than trading system 10. The benchmarks for some currency pairs will be calculated from the price and deal data provided from the third party trading system 30 via the third party server 28.
  • As an alternative, the market rate feed server 14 could be configured to receive bid/offer and deal price information for a given currency pair from both the anonymous trading system 10 and the third party trading system 30.

Claims (38)

1. A method of establishing a benchmark price for trades in an instrument at a given time, comprising the step of: periodically calculating the benchmark price from a previous benchmark price and a measure of deal prices occurring since the previous benchmark price, wherein the benchmark price is further calculated with respect to a phantom price, and wherein the phantom price is equal to the previous benchmark price if no prices are entered into the market since the previous benchmark was established, and zero when prices have been entered into the market since the last benchmark was established.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the phantom price is weighted with a weight equal to a very small constant.
3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the weight of the phantom price is 0.5*10−6.
4. A method according to claim 2, wherein the phantom price has a scatter equal to a small constant.
5. A method according to claim 4, wherein the scatter of the phantom price is equal to 1% of the big figure of the instrument being traded.
6. A method of establishing a benchmark price for trades in an instrument at a given time, comprising the step of:
periodically calculating the benchmark price from a previous benchmark price and a measure of deal prices occurring since the previous benchmark price, wherein the deal prices are weighted in accordance with their age.
7. A method according to claim 6, comprising calculating a Quote Price from the measure of quote prices.
8. A method according to claim 7, wherein the Quote Price including a weighting.
9. A method according to claim 8, wherein the weighting is based on at least one of the quote size, quote age and distance from the best quote in the market of quotes from which the Quote Price is calculated.
10. A method according to claim 7, comprising calculating a scatter for the Quote Price.
11. A method according to claim 6, comprising calculating a Deal Price from the measure of deal prices.
12. A method according to claim 11, wherein the Deal Price including a weighting based on the weighting of the deal prices.
13. A method according to claim 11, comprising calculating a scatter for the Deal Price.
14. A method according to claim 6, comprising calculating a Benchmark Price Weight.
15. A method according to claim 6, comprising calculating a Benchmark Price scatter.
16. A method according to claim 6, comprising calculating a Benchmark Price Error.
17. A method of establishing a benchmark price for trades in an instrument at a given time, comprising the step of: periodically calculating the benchmark price from a previous benchmark price and a measure of deal prices occurring since the previous benchmark price, wherein the deal prices are weighted in accordance with their volume.
18. A method according to claim 17, comprising calculating a Quote Price from the measure of quote prices.
19. A method according to claim 18, wherein the Quote Price including a weighting.
20. A method according to claim 19, wherein the weighting is based on at least one of the quote size, quote age and distance from the best quote in the market of quotes from which the Quote Price is calculated.
21. A method according to claim 18, comprising calculating a scatter for the Quote Price.
22. A method according to claim 17, comprising calculating a Deal Price from the measure of deal prices.
23. A method according to claim 18, wherein the Deal Price including a weighting based on said weighting of the deal prices.
24. A method according to claim 22, comprising calculating a scatter for the Deal Price.
25. A method according to claim 17, comprising calculating a Benchmark Price Weight.
26. A method according to claim 18, comprising calculating a Benchmark Price scatter.
27. A method according to claim 19, comprising calculating a Benchmark Price Error.
28. A method of establishing a benchmark price for trades in an instrument at a given time, comprising the step of:
periodically calculating the benchmark price from a previous benchmark price and a measure of deal prices occurring since the previous benchmark price, wherein the deal prices are weighted in accordance with their age and volume.
29. A method according to claim 28, comprising calculating a Quote Price from the quote prices.
30. A method according to claim 29, wherein the Quote Price including a weighting.
31. A method according to claim 30, wherein the weighting is based on at least one of the quote size, quote age and distance from the best quote in the market of quotes from which the Quote Price is calculated.
32. A method according to claim 29, comprising calculating a scatter for the Quote Price.
33. A method according to claim 28, comprising calculating a Deal Price from the deal prices.
34. A method according to claim 33, wherein the Deal Price including a weighting based on the weighting of the deal prices.
35. A method according to claim 28, comprising calculating a scatter for the Deal Price.
36. A method according to claim 28, comprising calculating a Benchmark Price Weight.
37. A method according to claim 28, comprising calculating a Benchmark Price scatter.
38. A method according to claim 28, comprising calculating a Benchmark Price Error.
US12/365,339 2003-01-02 2009-02-04 Method and apparatus for deriving benchmarks for trading instruments Abandoned US20090171829A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/365,339 US20090171829A1 (en) 2003-01-02 2009-02-04 Method and apparatus for deriving benchmarks for trading instruments
US14/946,849 US20160086276A1 (en) 2003-01-02 2015-11-20 Method and apparatus for deriving benchmarks for trading instruments

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US43802503P 2003-01-02 2003-01-02
US74569403A 2003-12-29 2003-12-29
US10/983,170 US8548892B2 (en) 2003-01-02 2004-11-05 Method and apparatus for deriving benchmarks for trading instruments
US12/365,339 US20090171829A1 (en) 2003-01-02 2009-02-04 Method and apparatus for deriving benchmarks for trading instruments

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/983,170 Division US8548892B2 (en) 2003-01-02 2004-11-05 Method and apparatus for deriving benchmarks for trading instruments

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/946,849 Continuation US20160086276A1 (en) 2003-01-02 2015-11-20 Method and apparatus for deriving benchmarks for trading instruments

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090171829A1 true US20090171829A1 (en) 2009-07-02

Family

ID=32713266

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/983,170 Active 2029-05-16 US8548892B2 (en) 2003-01-02 2004-11-05 Method and apparatus for deriving benchmarks for trading instruments
US12/365,339 Abandoned US20090171829A1 (en) 2003-01-02 2009-02-04 Method and apparatus for deriving benchmarks for trading instruments
US14/946,849 Abandoned US20160086276A1 (en) 2003-01-02 2015-11-20 Method and apparatus for deriving benchmarks for trading instruments

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/983,170 Active 2029-05-16 US8548892B2 (en) 2003-01-02 2004-11-05 Method and apparatus for deriving benchmarks for trading instruments

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/946,849 Abandoned US20160086276A1 (en) 2003-01-02 2015-11-20 Method and apparatus for deriving benchmarks for trading instruments

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (3) US8548892B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1581851A2 (en)
AU (1) AU2003300123A1 (en)
DE (1) DE112016005332T5 (en)
GB (1) GB2414835A (en)
WO (2) WO2004061618A2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070218919A1 (en) * 2006-03-14 2007-09-20 Ozulkulu Esref S Information broadcast for wireless cellular networks
US20130103458A1 (en) * 2011-10-19 2013-04-25 Oracle International Corporation Markdown optimization system using a reference price
WO2014144974A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Integral Development Inc. Method and apparatus for real-time benchmarking

Families Citing this family (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5905974A (en) * 1996-12-13 1999-05-18 Cantor Fitzgerald Securities Automated auction protocol processor
US6850907B2 (en) 1996-12-13 2005-02-01 Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. Automated price improvement protocol processor
US7392214B1 (en) 1999-04-30 2008-06-24 Bgc Partners, Inc. Systems and methods for trading
US7392217B2 (en) 2001-05-09 2008-06-24 Bgc Partners, Inc. Systems and methods for controlling traders from manipulating electronic trading markets
US8566212B2 (en) 2002-10-31 2013-10-22 Bgc Partners, Inc. Electronic systems and methods for providing a trading interface with advanced features
EP1416363A3 (en) 2002-10-31 2006-07-26 eSpeed, Inc. Keyboard for trading system
US8131626B2 (en) 2003-11-17 2012-03-06 Bgc Partners, Inc. Customizable trading display of market data
US8131625B2 (en) * 2003-11-17 2012-03-06 Bgc Partners, Inc. Customizable trading display of market data
GB2425626A (en) 2005-03-24 2006-11-01 Espeed Inc System for protecting against erroneous price entries in the electronic trading of financial and other instruments
US7765137B1 (en) 2005-05-05 2010-07-27 Archipelago Holdings, Inc. Method and system for maintaining an order on a selected market center
US7908201B2 (en) * 2005-05-05 2011-03-15 Archipelago Holdings, Inc. Cross and post order
AU2006244483B2 (en) 2005-05-05 2012-05-31 Nyse Group, Inc. Tracking liquidity order
US7873561B1 (en) 2005-05-05 2011-01-18 Archipelago Holdings, Inc. Method and system for maintaining an order on a selected market center with maximum price exemption parameter
US7937315B2 (en) 2005-05-05 2011-05-03 Archipelago Holdings, Inc. Portfolio execution and reporting
US7912775B1 (en) 2005-05-05 2011-03-22 Archipelago Holdings, Inc. Liquidity analysis system and method
WO2006121687A2 (en) * 2005-05-05 2006-11-16 Archipelago Holdings, Inc. Reprice-to-block order
JP2008541238A (en) 2005-05-05 2008-11-20 アーキペラゴ ホールディングス インコーポレイテッド Auction and transfer of unpriced orders
WO2006121688A2 (en) * 2005-05-05 2006-11-16 Archipelago Holdings, Inc. Anti-internalization order modifier
WO2006121691A2 (en) * 2005-05-06 2006-11-16 Archipelago Holdings, Inc. Passive liquidity order
US7933828B2 (en) 2005-07-26 2011-04-26 Cfph, Llc System and method for displaying and/or analyzing a limit order book
WO2007038084A2 (en) 2005-09-23 2007-04-05 Archipelago Holdings, Inc. Directed order
US8229832B2 (en) 2006-01-09 2012-07-24 Bgc Partners, Inc. Systems and methods for establishing first on the follow trading priority in electronic trading systems
WO2008013828A2 (en) 2006-07-28 2008-01-31 Archipelago Holdings, Inc. Enhanced quote and order integration system and method
US7917418B2 (en) * 2006-12-04 2011-03-29 Archipelago Holdings, Inc. Efficient data dissemination for financial instruments
WO2008113032A1 (en) * 2007-03-14 2008-09-18 Lehman Brothers Inc. Systems and methods for processing pricing data
EP2156399A4 (en) 2007-06-06 2011-05-11 Tradeweb Markets Llc Method ans system for identifying high probability trade matches
WO2012008915A1 (en) * 2010-07-13 2012-01-19 M-Daq Pte Ltd Method and system of trading a security in a foreign currency
US11100577B1 (en) 2010-08-20 2021-08-24 Nex Services North America Llc Anonymous trading system
US20120317053A1 (en) * 2011-06-10 2012-12-13 Benchmark Solutions Holdings, Inc. Fixed income securities market data display
US8706610B2 (en) 2011-08-16 2014-04-22 Sl-X Technology Uk Ltd. Systems and methods for electronically initiating and executing securities lending transactions
WO2013025938A2 (en) 2011-08-16 2013-02-21 Sl-X Ip Sarl Systems and methods for electronically initiating and executing securities lending transactions
EP2973342A4 (en) 2013-03-15 2016-10-19 Tradeweb Markets Llc System and method for financial matching
US10346917B2 (en) 2016-04-04 2019-07-09 Fidessa Trading Uk Limited Order execution quality of financial market transactions utilizing an adjusted Z-score benchmark

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6236980B1 (en) * 1998-04-09 2001-05-22 John P Reese Magazine, online, and broadcast summary recommendation reporting system to aid in decision making
US20020042765A1 (en) * 2000-10-09 2002-04-11 Dawson Brian T. Apparatus and methods for handling trading data
US20020059131A1 (en) * 2000-08-10 2002-05-16 Goodwin Thomas R. Systems and methods for trading and originating financial products using a computer network
US6493682B1 (en) * 1998-09-15 2002-12-10 Pendelton Trading Systems, Inc. Optimal order choice: evaluating uncertain discounted trading alternatives
US20030074292A1 (en) * 2001-10-11 2003-04-17 Masuda Economic Research Institute Ltd. Stock price chart
US20030149648A1 (en) * 2000-05-01 2003-08-07 Olsen Richard B. Method and system for measuring market conditions
US20040210502A1 (en) * 2003-04-03 2004-10-21 Ananth Madhavan Fair value model based system, method, and computer program product for valuing foreign-based securities in a mutual fund
US20060059078A1 (en) * 2004-09-15 2006-03-16 The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. Sell-side benchmarking of security trading

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4488615A (en) * 1982-09-24 1984-12-18 Adwest Engineering Ltd. Rack and pinion steering gear and vehicle fitted with same
DE4335390B4 (en) * 1993-10-16 2007-04-12 Trw Fahrwerksysteme Gmbh & Co Kg Power steering device
EP1234748B1 (en) * 2001-02-23 2003-11-12 Visteon Global Technologies, Inc. Damper valve for hydraulic power steering device
EP1807298A1 (en) * 2004-11-04 2007-07-18 Continental Teves AG & Co. oHG Power steering for motor vehicles
JP4669800B2 (en) * 2006-03-09 2011-04-13 日立オートモティブシステムズ株式会社 Power steering device
JP5154469B2 (en) * 2009-02-17 2013-02-27 日立オートモティブシステムズ株式会社 Variable displacement pump and power steering device using the same
JP5787164B2 (en) * 2011-11-24 2015-09-30 株式会社ジェイテクト Hydraulic power steering device

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6236980B1 (en) * 1998-04-09 2001-05-22 John P Reese Magazine, online, and broadcast summary recommendation reporting system to aid in decision making
US6493682B1 (en) * 1998-09-15 2002-12-10 Pendelton Trading Systems, Inc. Optimal order choice: evaluating uncertain discounted trading alternatives
US20030149648A1 (en) * 2000-05-01 2003-08-07 Olsen Richard B. Method and system for measuring market conditions
US20020059131A1 (en) * 2000-08-10 2002-05-16 Goodwin Thomas R. Systems and methods for trading and originating financial products using a computer network
US20020042765A1 (en) * 2000-10-09 2002-04-11 Dawson Brian T. Apparatus and methods for handling trading data
US20030074292A1 (en) * 2001-10-11 2003-04-17 Masuda Economic Research Institute Ltd. Stock price chart
US20040210502A1 (en) * 2003-04-03 2004-10-21 Ananth Madhavan Fair value model based system, method, and computer program product for valuing foreign-based securities in a mutual fund
US20060059078A1 (en) * 2004-09-15 2006-03-16 The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. Sell-side benchmarking of security trading

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Bond Price Data and Bond Market Liquidity. Sarig and Warga. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. pp. 367-378. September 1989. Vol. 24, No. 3. *
Opening and Closing the Market: Evidence from the London Stock Exchange. Ellul, Shin, and Tonks. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. pp. 779-801. December 2005. vol 40, no. 4. *
Quantifying market order execution quality at the New York stock exchange. Bacidore, Ross, and Sofianos. Journal of Financial Markets. vol 6, issue 3. pp. 281-307. May 2003. *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070218919A1 (en) * 2006-03-14 2007-09-20 Ozulkulu Esref S Information broadcast for wireless cellular networks
US20130103458A1 (en) * 2011-10-19 2013-04-25 Oracle International Corporation Markdown optimization system using a reference price
WO2014144974A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Integral Development Inc. Method and apparatus for real-time benchmarking

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2004061618A2 (en) 2004-07-22
EP1581851A2 (en) 2005-10-05
GB0513557D0 (en) 2005-08-10
US20160086276A1 (en) 2016-03-24
AU2003300123A8 (en) 2004-07-29
WO2017087756A1 (en) 2017-05-26
GB2414835A (en) 2005-12-07
AU2003300123A1 (en) 2004-07-29
US8548892B2 (en) 2013-10-01
WO2004061618A3 (en) 2006-05-11
DE112016005332T5 (en) 2018-08-02
US20050171895A1 (en) 2005-08-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8548892B2 (en) Method and apparatus for deriving benchmarks for trading instruments
US20190295167A1 (en) System and method for estimating and optimizing transaction costs
US20190279299A1 (en) Method and apparatus for improved electronic trading
US7165046B2 (en) System and method for an efficient dynamic multi-unit auction
US7805358B2 (en) System and method for limiting aggressive trading in a electronic trading system
US7917427B2 (en) Method and system for providing rule-based collateral allocation and substitution
US8676693B2 (en) System and method for risk management using average expiration times
US20140149273A1 (en) Market Microstructure Data Method and Appliance
US20030046218A1 (en) System and method for protecting positions in volatile markets
US20150262305A1 (en) Coupon blending of swap portfolio
US20230080465A1 (en) Basket pricing at client
Bacidore et al. Changes in order characteristics, displayed liquidity, and execution quality on the New York Stock Exchange around the switch to decimal pricing
US20170200226A1 (en) Methods and systems for creating an interest rate swap volatility index and trading derivative products based thereon
US8630935B1 (en) System and method for the creation and rebalancing of beneficial interests in tracking investment vehicles over multiple market
US20170046777A1 (en) Bidder system for efficient dynamic multi-unit auction
JP7218037B1 (en) Transaction management system
US11676123B2 (en) Network switch and terminal device
US20200265519A1 (en) Method and system for creating a securities lending rate volatility indicator
US20140156440A1 (en) System and method for an efficient dynamic multi-unit auction
Murra Volatility Smile and Risk Neutral Density for FX Options: An Example for the USDMXN
US20150235317A1 (en) System for an Anonymous Equities Trading Market
Wu The impact on transaction costs of changes in relative tick size
AU2011204873A1 (en) System and method for limiting aggressive trading in an electronic trading system
WO2011114334A2 (en) Method and system for performing zero-sum trading

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: NEX GROUP PLC, UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HOWORKA, EDWARD R.;LIU, DAVID JIFENG;POWER, JEFFREY EDWARD;REEL/FRAME:050280/0713

Effective date: 20050316

Owner name: CME GROUP INC., ILLINOIS

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:NEX GROUP PLC;REEL/FRAME:050284/0375

Effective date: 20181101