US20080108507A1 - Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function - Google Patents

Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080108507A1
US20080108507A1 US11/735,213 US73521307A US2008108507A1 US 20080108507 A1 US20080108507 A1 US 20080108507A1 US 73521307 A US73521307 A US 73521307A US 2008108507 A1 US2008108507 A1 US 2008108507A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
regions
dna
clones
sequence
protein
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/735,213
Inventor
Ulf Hans Eskil Soderlind
Carl Arne Krister Borrebaeck
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=10806508&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20080108507(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US11/735,213 priority Critical patent/US20080108507A1/en
Publication of US20080108507A1 publication Critical patent/US20080108507A1/en
Priority to US13/110,412 priority patent/US20110287486A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/10Processes for the isolation, preparation or purification of DNA or RNA
    • C12N15/102Mutagenizing nucleic acids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K16/00Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K16/00Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies
    • C07K16/44Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material not provided for elsewhere, e.g. haptens, metals, DNA, RNA, amino acids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/10Processes for the isolation, preparation or purification of DNA or RNA
    • C12N15/102Mutagenizing nucleic acids
    • C12N15/1027Mutagenizing nucleic acids by DNA shuffling, e.g. RSR, STEP, RPR
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/10Processes for the isolation, preparation or purification of DNA or RNA
    • C12N15/102Mutagenizing nucleic acids
    • C12N15/1031Mutagenizing nucleic acids mutagenesis by gene assembly, e.g. assembly by oligonucleotide extension PCR
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/10Processes for the isolation, preparation or purification of DNA or RNA
    • C12N15/1034Isolating an individual clone by screening libraries
    • C12N15/1058Directional evolution of libraries, e.g. evolution of libraries is achieved by mutagenesis and screening or selection of mixed population of organisms
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/10Processes for the isolation, preparation or purification of DNA or RNA
    • C12N15/1034Isolating an individual clone by screening libraries
    • C12N15/1086Preparation or screening of expression libraries, e.g. reporter assays
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K2317/00Immunoglobulins specific features
    • C07K2317/60Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by non-natural combinations of immunoglobulin fragments
    • C07K2317/62Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by non-natural combinations of immunoglobulin fragments comprising only variable region components
    • C07K2317/622Single chain antibody (scFv)
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K2317/00Immunoglobulins specific features
    • C07K2317/90Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by (pharmaco)kinetic aspects or by stability of the immunoglobulin
    • C07K2317/92Affinity (KD), association rate (Ka), dissociation rate (Kd) or EC50 value
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T436/00Chemistry: analytical and immunological testing
    • Y10T436/14Heterocyclic carbon compound [i.e., O, S, N, Se, Te, as only ring hetero atom]
    • Y10T436/142222Hetero-O [e.g., ascorbic acid, etc.]
    • Y10T436/143333Saccharide [e.g., DNA, etc.]

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function. Particularly, but not exclusively, it relates to the shuffling of polynucleotide sequence segments within a coding sequence.
  • Protein function can be modified and improved in vitro by a variety of methods, including site directed mutagenesis (Moore et al, 1987) combinatorial cloning (Huse et al, 1989; Marks et al, 1992) and random mutagenesis combined with appropriate selection systems (Barbas et al, 1992).
  • the method of random mutagenesis together with selection has been used in a number of cases to improve protein function and two different strategies exist. Firstly, randomization of the entire gene sequence in combination with the selection of a variant (mutant) protein with the desired characteristics, followed by a new round of random mutagenesis and selection. This method can then be repeated until a protein variant is found which is considered optimal (Moore et al, 1996).
  • the traditional route to introduce mutations is by error prone PCR (Leung et al, 1989) with a mutation rate of ⁇ 0.7%.
  • defined regions of the gene can be mutagenized with degenerate primers, which allows for mutation rates up to 100% (Griffiths et al, 1994; Yang et al, 1995). The higher the mutation rate used, the more limited the region of the gene that can be subjected to mutations.
  • Random mutation has been used extensively in the field of antibody engineering. In vivo formed antibody genes can be cloned in vitro (Larrick et al, 1989) and random combinations of the genes encoding the variable heavy and light genes can be subjected to selection (Marks et al, 1992). Functional antibody fragments selected can be further improved using random mutagenesis and additional rounds of selections (Hoogenboom et al, 1992).
  • phage display technology Selection of functional proteins from molecular libraries has been revolutionized by the development of the phage display technology (Parmley et al, 1987; McCafferty et al, 1990; Barbas et al, 1991).
  • the phenotype (protein) is directly linked to its corresponding genotype (DNA) and this allows for directly cloning of the genetic material which can then be subjected to further modifications in order to improve protein function.
  • Phage display has been used to clone functional binders from a variety of molecular libraries with up to 10 11 transformants in size (Griffiths et al, 1994).
  • phage display can be used to directly clone functional binders from molecular libraries, and can also be used to improve further the clones originally selected.
  • Random combination of DNA from different mutated clones is a more efficient way to search through sequence space.
  • the concept of DNA shuffling (Stemmer, 1994) utilises random fragmentation of DNA and assembly of fragments into a functional coding sequence. In this process it is possible to introduce chemically synthesised DNA sequences and in this way target variation to defined places in the gene which DNA sequence is known (Crameri et al, 1995). In theory, it is also possible to shuffle DNA between any clones. However, if the resulting shuffled gene is to be functional with respect to expression and activity, the clones to be shuffled have to be related or even identical with the exception of a low level of random is mutations. DNA shuffling between genetically different clones will generally produce non-functional genes.
  • the present invention provides a method of obtaining a polynucleotide sequence encoding a protein of desired characteristics comprising the steps of incorporating at least one variant nucleotide region (variant motif) into defined nucleotide regions (scaffold sequence) derived from a parent polynucleotide sequence.
  • the new assembled polynucleotide sequence may then be expressed and the resulting protein screened to determine its characteristics.
  • the present method allows protein characteristics to be altered by modifying the polynucleotide sequence encoding the protein in a specific manner. This may be achieved by either a) replacing a specified region of the nucleotide sequence with a different nucleotide sequence or b) by mutating the specified region so as to alter the nucleotide sequence. These specified regions (variant motifs) are incorporated within scaffold or framework regions (scaffold sequence) of the original polynucleotide sequence (parent polynucleotide sequence) which when reassembled will encoded a protein of altered characteristics. The characteristics of the encoded protein are altered as a result of the amino acid sequence being changed corresponding to the changes in the coding polynucleotide sequence.
  • the present inventors Rather than modifying a sequence at random and then relying on extensive screening for the desired coded protein, the present inventors have found it desirable to provide a method which modifies selected segments (variant motifs) of a protein while maintaining others.
  • the variant motifs may be segments of nucleotide sequence that encode specified regions of a protein. For example, functional regions of a protein (e.g. loops) or CDR regions in an antibody.
  • the scaffold sequence may be segments of nucleotide sequence which it is desirable to maintain, for example they may encode more structural regions of the protein, e.g. framework regions in an antibody.
  • the variant motifs may be nucleotide segments which originated from the same polynucleotide sequence as the scaffold sequence, i.e. the parent polynucleotide sequence, but which have been mutated so as to alter the coding sequence from that in the parent.
  • the parent polynucleotide sequence may encode an antibody.
  • the nucleotide sequences encoding the CDR regions of the antibody (variant motifs) may be selected from the remaining coding sequence of the parent polynucleotide, mutated and then reassembled with scaffold sequence derived from the remaining coding sequence.
  • the expressed antibody will differ from the wild type antibody expressed by the parent polynucleotide in the CDR regions only.
  • the variant motif may be derived from a polynucleotide sequence encoding a protein sequentially related to the protein encoded by the parent polynucleotide sequence.
  • the CDR regions from one antibody may be replaced by the CDR regions of another antibody (antibody B).
  • the resulting expressed protein can be screened for desired characteristics.
  • Desirable characteristics may be changes in the biological properties of the protein.
  • the tertiary structure of the protein may be altered. This may affect its binding properties, the ability for it to be secreted from cells or into cells or, for enzymes, its catalytic properties.
  • the protein is an antibody or part thereof it may be desirable to alter its ability to specifically bind to an antigen or to improve its binding properties in comparison to the parent antibody.
  • step (d) assembling nucleotide sequence encoding a protein by incorporating nucleotide sequences derived from step (c) above with nucleotide sequence encoding scaffold sequence.
  • the method may further comprise the step of expressing the resulting protein encoded by the assembled nucleotide sequence and screening for desired properties.
  • the parent polynucleotide sequence is DNA from which is derived DNA sequences encoding the variant motifs and scaffold sequences.
  • the pairs of oligonucleotides are single-stranded oligonucleotide primers.
  • One of said pair may be linked to a member of a specific binding pair (MSBP).
  • MSBP is preferably biotin, whose specific binding partner could for example be streptavidin.
  • Random mutation can be accomplished by any conventional method; but a suitable method is error-prone PCR.
  • the protein in question could, for example, be an antibody or antibody fragment having desirable characteristics.
  • antibody fragments capable of binding an antigen or other binding partner, are the Fab fragment consisting of the VL, VH, Cl and CHI domains; the Fd fragment consisting of the VH, and CHl domains; the Fv fragment consisting of the VL and VH domains of a single arm of an antibody; the dAb fragment which consists of a VH domain; isolated CDR regions and F(ab′)2 fragments, a bivalent fragment including two Fab fragments linked by a disulphide bridge at the hinge region.
  • Single chain Fv fragments are also included.
  • oligonucleotide primers could be synthesised corresponding to sequences bounding the CDRs (the variant motifs), so that DNA encoding the CDRs are amplified, along with any mutations that may have occurred in the CDRs.
  • These can be incorporated in the reassembly of the antibody coding sequence, using the amplified CDR DNA sequences and the unmutated scaffold framework (FR) DNA sequences, resulting in the expression of an antibody which has a novel combination of CDRs, and potentially having altered properties which can be selected or screened for in conventional manner.
  • the CDRs may be taken from one or more existing antibodies, but be of unknown sequence.
  • the individual CDRs can be amplified, isolated and assembled into a predetermined scaffold.
  • the present invention allows a novel way for the isolation of DNA sequences from genetically related clones that are functionally different.
  • Genetically related clones are those that belong to a particular structural class, for example immunoglobulins or alpha-beta-barrels.
  • the invention allows for both isolation and random combination into a given DNA sequence of functional sequences from these related clones. These functional sequences may be loops that perform binding or catalysis.
  • the concept of the invention is demonstrated using antibody molecules where CDR-regions from different germline sequences can be isolated and randomly combined into a defined framework sequence.
  • the invention expands the complexity of the molecular libraries that can be selected using phage display.
  • the concept of the invention is also demonstrated by the affinity maturation of antibody fragments by the isolation and random combination of mutated CDR-regions.
  • DNA shuffling concept (Stemmer, 1994) to isolate specific sequences and randomly combine these into a given gene sequence, as it is not possible to amplify individual DNA regions formed in vivo using DNA shuffling. Combination of entire gene sequences is possible, but here defined regions cannot be shuffled. Rather all the DNA is shuffled. Thus, DNA sequences from genetically related clones that are functionally different, eg proteins that belong to structural classes like immunoglobulins or alpha-beta-barrels, cannot be shuffled in such a way that specific regions are kept constant and other regions are shuffled.
  • the system provided by the present invention offers a simple way to randomly combine functional regions of proteins (eg loops) to a defined (specifically selected) scaffold, ie shuffling of loops to a given protein tertiary structure in order to find new protein functions.
  • the DNA shuffling technology introduces mutations at a rate of 0.7% (Stemmer, 1994).
  • the known DNA shuffling technology does not allow for shuffling of unmutated regions, since the process itself introduces mutations at random positions, including the scaffold regions.
  • the invention allows for mutagenesis of defined DNA-sequences together with shuffling and assembly of these pieces of DNA into a coding region, and will allow for mutagenesis of defined regions and subsequent selection of these regions in combination.
  • the invention allows for different regions of DNA from different sequences (clones) to be shuffled and randomly combined. This increases the genetic variation from which functional antibody fragments are selected and will thus increase the probability of selecting proteins with the desired characteristics. It can be realised that by randomly shuffling as few as a hundred CDRs at each position in the VH and VL of an fragment, as many as 10 12 combinations may be obtained thereby extending the variability normally found in the immune system.
  • the invention provides amplification of defined regions from eg a cDNA library using two primers of which one is biotinylated.
  • MSBP e.g. biotin, group
  • single stranded DNA can be isolated and used in the gene assembly process.
  • the present inventors have demonstrated this with the amplification of diverse CDR regions from an antibody gene library and the combination of these CDR regions randomly to a given framework region.
  • defined regions of DNA can be interspaced by random regions of DNA (CDR regions), which have an in vivo origin or can be chemically synthesized.
  • the present invention also provides polynucleotide sequences and the proteins they encoded produced by the method described above. There is also provided vectors incorporating the polynucleotide sequences and host cell transformed by the vectors.
  • the present invention also provides a polynucleotide library comprising polynucleotides created by the method described above which may be used for phage display.
  • FIG. 1 shows shuffling of specific DNA sequences between different clones, based on the assembly of gene sequences from a set of overlapping oligo-nucleotides following a one-step PCR protocol.
  • FIG. 2 shows different dissociation rate constants for different CDR-shuffled clones.
  • a low bar represents slow dissociation-rate, a high bar represents a fast dissociation-rate.
  • Clone 36 is the original non-mutated antibody fragment.
  • FIG. 3 shows the results of affinity purified scFv antibody fragment assayed on HPLC, Superose S-200 FPLC-column (Pharmacia) in PBS buffer. Peak 1 is the monomeric form of the antibody fragment, peak 2 is a small amount of impurity and peak 3 is NaN3 (sodium azid), used as a preservative.
  • FIG. 4 shows a schematic representation of amplification of defined sequences of DNA and the shuffling of these into a master framework. Only the CDR regions are amplified.
  • FIG. 4A Assembly of genes for the VH-domain. The template is scFv-B11 mutated with error prone PCR. An individual CDR is amplified using two primers adjacent to the particular CDR and one of these primers is biotinylated at the 5′ end. The individual CDR is amplified and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) is produced with the mutations focused to the CDR since the two amplification primers do not contain any mutations. This DNA is separated into two single stranded DNA molecules. The molecule without biotin is used in gene assembly.
  • dsDNA double-stranded DNA
  • Primers 725 , 729 , 730 , 728 , 727 are synthesized in a DNA synthesizer and primers H 2 , H 3 , H 5 contain mutated CDR and are amplified as above.
  • FIG. 4B Assembly of genes for the VL-domain. CDRs are amplified in the same way as in A. Primers 759 , 738 , 745 , 744 , 880 are synthesized in a DNA synthesizer and primers L 2 , L 3 , L 5 contain mutated CDR and are amplified as above.
  • FIG. 5 shows the alignment of the peptide sequences for clones 3 , 11 and 31 with the original non-mutated antibody fragment (wt). The CDR-regions are marked. Mutations in clones 3 , 11 and 31 are underlined.
  • FIG. 6 shows the principles for the isolation of single-stranded DNA for the shuffling of defined DNA regions.
  • FIG. 7 shows the length of CDR 3 heavy chain from different clones. These CDR regions have been amplified from different germline sequences and randomly cloned to a defined framework region (from DP-47 sequence).
  • FIG. 8 shows a schematic representation of amplification of defined sequences of DNA and the shuffling of these into a master framework. All the oligonucleotides used in the gene assembly are amplified by PCR, but only the CDR regions contain any genetic variation.
  • FIG. 8A Assembly of genes for the VH-domain. The template for the framework region amplification is scFv-B11, whereas CDRs are amplified from cDNA prepared from peripheral blood lymphocytes, tonsils and spleen. An individual DNA fragment is amplified using two primers located at the ends of the fragments to be amplified and one of these primers is biotinylated at the 5′ end.
  • the individual DNA fragment is amplified and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) is produced.
  • This DNA is separated into two single stranded DNA molecules.
  • the molecule without biotin is used in gene assembly, i.e. primers H 1 , H 4 , H 6 and these primers contain no variation.
  • Primers HCDR 1 , HCDR 2 , HCDR 3 contain different CDR and are amplified using two primers adjacent to the particular CDR and one of these primers is biotinylated at the 5′ end.
  • the individual CDR is amplified and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) is produced with the variation focused to the CDR since the two amplification primers do not contain any mutations.
  • This DNA is separated into two singled stranded DNA molecules and used in gene assembly of VH domain in a library format, i.e. the variation in the CDRs is derived from different germ-line sequences.
  • Primers BT 25 and BT 26 are synthesized in a DNA-synthesizing machine.
  • FIG. 8B Assembly of genes for the VL-domain. In principle the same procedure as in A. Primers L 1 , L 4 , L 6 are amplified and produced by PCR and contain no variation. LCDR 1 , LCDR 2 , LCDR 3 contain different CDR. Primers BT 7 and BT 12 are synthesized in a DNA-synthesizing machine.
  • FIG. 9 shows the variation in a library constructed according to FIG. 8 .
  • the scFv region of library clones and original scFv-B11, binding to FITC (fluorescein-iso-thiocyanate) was synthesized by PCR. Purified PCR products were cut with BstNI and separated on a 2.5% agarose gel. Clones 1 - 15 are in lane 2 - 16 , clones 16 - 29 are in lane 18 - 31 .
  • Original scFv-B11 is in lane 32 . Analysis revealed that 28 clones could be sorted in 13 different groups according to restriction pattern and fragment size.
  • FIG. 9B shows clones showing similar restriction pattern in the experiment exemplified in FIG. 9A cut by both BstNI and BamHI and separated on 3% agarose gels.
  • the groups of similar clones described in experiment A were put together on the gels. Clone 8 and 28 from experiment A were excluded due to space limitations.
  • Lane 1 - 8 standard, clone 7 , 9 , 13 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 25 , respectively
  • One aspect of the DNA shuffling procedure can be illustrated by the following steps in FIG. 1 .
  • a gene coding for a protein of interest is divided into overlapping oligonucleotides.
  • oligonucleotides are assembled using PCR into a full length gene-sequence.
  • the gene sequence is subjected to mutagenesis, eg by error-prone PCR.
  • Pairs of oligonucleotides are synthesized, each pair covering a region defined by one of the oligonucleotides in step A above, except for a region located in the middle of the step A oligonucleotide. This uncovered region is the DNA sequence that can be shuffled after PCR amplification. These two synthesised oligonucleotides can thus be used as amplification primers to amplify the uncovered region.
  • the present inventors have demonstrated the concept of shuffling of defined DNA in different experimental settings. Firstly, the shuffling of in vitro mutated CDR regions in an antibody fragment for affinity maturation purposes (example 1 and 2) is exemplified and secondly the shuffling of in vivo formed CDRs for creation of a highly variable antibody library (example 3 and 4) is exemplified.
  • a model system was developed, based on the scFv-B11 antibody fragment which binds to FITC.
  • the full-length gene encoding this scFv was assembled from a set of 12 oligonucleotides ( FIG. 4A and FIG. 4B ) representing the known DNA sequence of the scFv-B11, and the functional binding of the gene product to FITC could be verified.
  • This gene sequence was then mutagenized using error-prone PCR, and the DNA encoding the CDR regions were amplified as described above, using the amplification primers, one of which is biotinylated. (The CDR regions are the parts of the antibody molecule involved in binding the antigen, in this case FITC).
  • clones 3 , 11 , 27 and 31 were chosen to be analyzed in more detail as these clones exhibited the larger changes in off-rates. These clones were expressed and affinity-purified on a column conjugated with FITC-BSA and eluted with a low pH buffer. The purified scFv-antibody fragments were further purified and analyzed with HPLC, using a Pharmacia Superdex 200 FPLC column with the capacity to separate the monomeric and dimeric form of the antibodies. In all clones the monomeric form dominated (typical size profile is shown in FIG. 3 ). This was then purified and used in detailed analysis of affinity using a BIAcore biosensor (Table 1).
  • Clone # 11 exhibited an affinity 2.8 times higher than the original scFv-B11 antibody fragment. This increase is based on a slower off-rate.
  • One clone (# 27 ) showed 2 times increase in association-rate.
  • the overall affinity of this clone was similar to the original FITC-B11 clone due to a faster dissociation-rate.
  • the distribution of different association and dissociation-rates among the clones was considered a source for CDR-reshuffling for further improvement of affinities.
  • the mutation rates were found to be in between 2% and 4%, as determined from the base changes in the 90 bp long sequence built up from three CDR regions together. This is more than the error-prone PCR mutation rate, and indicates that there is combination of individual CDR regions from different clones.
  • clones selected for their binding affinity to FITC were used in an additional round of CDR-amplification and library construction.
  • the reshuffled library will contain mutated shuffled CDR-regions, selected for improved binding to FITC. In this way, new combinations of CDR-regions, improved with respect to binding, could be constructed and the library subjected to selection for binders with improved affinities.
  • the pool of all clones obtained from the selection procedure (as detailed in example 1) were used as template for CDR amplifications.
  • One amplification was carried out for each CDR using primers listed in Table 2.
  • the amplification was performed according to following parameters: 100 ng template (1.6 ⁇ 10 8 CFU bacteria grown for 6 h), 60 pmol each primer, 5 Units PFU polymerase (Stratagene), 1 ⁇ PFU buffer, 500 ⁇ M dNTPs, reaction volume 100 ⁇ l, preheat 96° C. for 10 minutes, 96° C. for 1 minute: 68° C. for 1 minute: 72° C. for 1 minute for 25 cycles, 72° C. for 10 minutes.
  • This procedure was essentially the same as for CDR amplification in Example 1.
  • the amplified CDR were used for assembly into VH and VL encoding sequence according to FIGS. 1 , 4 A, 4 B and Table 3.
  • VH and VL were then assembled into a scFv encoding sequence according to standard procedures (Griffiths et al 1994).
  • the resulting library was subjected to panning so as to select binders with improved affinities to FITC.
  • the selection procedure for the reshuffled library was essentially the same as for the initially shuffled library.
  • the total number of clones obtained after selection was 510 .
  • Six clones (B) were chosen from this new pool and were tested and compared to 6 clones (A) from the first pool, originating from the shuffled library (Table 4).
  • a gene library was constructed encoding scFv antibody fragments.
  • the strategy used for this library is based on the assembly of a set of oligonucleotides into a sequence encoding VH and VL antibody domains ( FIGS. 8A , 8 B.)
  • Native in vivo formed CDR regions can be shuffled and assembled into a given master framework.
  • this concept further and assembled both VH and VL encoding gene sequences with native CDR regions into a given master framework. Thus, all six CDR positions have been shuffled.
  • the template origin for CDR amplification was cDNA from peripheral blood B-cells, spleen, tonsils and lymphnodes.
  • Oligonucleotides encoding the framework regions have also been amplified using the strategy with two flanking primers, where one is biotinylated (primers L 1 , H 1 L 4 , H 4 , L 6 , H 6 ).
  • the primers used are described in Table 6 and in FIG. 8A , BB.
  • PCR parameters for CDR and framework region amplification were essentially the same as described in example 2.
  • the PCR parameters for assembly of genes encoding VH and VL are described in Table 7.
  • VH VL Primer BT25 Primer BT7 30 pmol Primer H1 Primer L1 0.6 pmol Primer HCDR1 Primer LCDR1 0.6 pmol Primer HCDR2 Primer LCDR2 0.6 pmol Primer H4 Primer L4 0.6 pmol Primer HCDR5 Primer LCDR3 0.6 pmol Primer H6 Primer L6 0.6 pmol Primer BT26 Primer BT12 30 pmol Taq Taq 10 Units dNTPs dNTPs 200 ⁇ M 1x Taq buffer 1x Taq buffer to 100 ⁇ l Preheat 95° 10 minutes, 20 cycles: 95° 1 minutes, 68° 1 minutes, 72° 1 minutes and 72° 10 minutes.
  • VH and VL gene sequences were assembled into a scFv coding sequence using standard protocols (Griffiths et al 1994).
  • a library of 1.1 ⁇ 10 9 members were constructed out of the 40 clones tested all 40 contained an insert of the right size as determined by PCR agarose gel electrophoresis.
  • PCR amplified and purified inserts were subjected to cleavage by BsTN1 and BamH1. Clones showed different restriction patterns, as determined by agarose gel electrophoresis and compared to the control scFv-B11 ( FIG. 9 ).
  • clones from the library containing the FLAG sequence (Hopp et al, 1989), as well as control bacteria with and without FLAG sequence, were plated at low density on Luria broth-plates containing 100 ⁇ g/ml ampicillin, 25 ⁇ g/ml tetracycline and 1% glucose. The plates were grown at 37° C. over night and lifted to nitrocellulose filters by standard methods (Sambrook et al 1989).
  • filters were incubated for 4 hrs on plates containing 0.5 mM isopropyl-thio- ⁇ -D-galactoside (IPTG) but without glucose. Bacteria were then lysed by lyzosyme/chloroform treatment, the filters were washed and incubated with anti-FLAG M2 antibody (Kodak) followed by anti-mouse peroxidase conjugated second antibody (P260 Dakopatts) and detected by DAB 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydroklorid, Sigma) (Table 8).
  • IPTG isopropyl-thio- ⁇ -D-galactoside
  • the anti-FLAG antibody detects a FLAG sequence situated downstream of the scFv gene in the library constructs as well as in the control vector pFAS5cHis scFvB11, but not in the original vector pFAB5cHis. Clones, to which the anti-FLAG antibody binds, therefore contains an intact open reading frame of the scFv gene.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Ecology (AREA)
  • Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for in vitro creation of molecular libraries evolution of protein function. Particularly, it relates to variability and modification of protein function by shuffling polynucleotide sequence segments. A protein of desired characteristics can be obtained by incorporating variant peptide regions (variant motifs) into defined peptide regions (scaffold sequence). The variant motifs can be obtained from parent DNA which has been subjected to mutagenesis to create a plurality of differently mutated derivatives thereof or they can be obtained from in vivo sequences. These variant motifs can then be incorporated into a scaffold sequence and the resulting coded protein screened for desired characteristics. This method is ideally used for obtaining antibodies with desired characteristics by isolating individual CDR DNA sequences and incorporating them into a scaffold which may, for example, be from a totally different antibody.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function. Particularly, but not exclusively, it relates to the shuffling of polynucleotide sequence segments within a coding sequence.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Protein function can be modified and improved in vitro by a variety of methods, including site directed mutagenesis (Moore et al, 1987) combinatorial cloning (Huse et al, 1989; Marks et al, 1992) and random mutagenesis combined with appropriate selection systems (Barbas et al, 1992).
  • The method of random mutagenesis together with selection has been used in a number of cases to improve protein function and two different strategies exist. Firstly, randomization of the entire gene sequence in combination with the selection of a variant (mutant) protein with the desired characteristics, followed by a new round of random mutagenesis and selection. This method can then be repeated until a protein variant is found which is considered optimal (Moore et al, 1996). Here, the traditional route to introduce mutations is by error prone PCR (Leung et al, 1989) with a mutation rate of ≈0.7%.
  • Secondly, defined regions of the gene can be mutagenized with degenerate primers, which allows for mutation rates up to 100% (Griffiths et al, 1994; Yang et al, 1995). The higher the mutation rate used, the more limited the region of the gene that can be subjected to mutations.
  • Random mutation has been used extensively in the field of antibody engineering. In vivo formed antibody genes can be cloned in vitro (Larrick et al, 1989) and random combinations of the genes encoding the variable heavy and light genes can be subjected to selection (Marks et al, 1992). Functional antibody fragments selected can be further improved using random mutagenesis and additional rounds of selections (Hoogenboom et al, 1992).
  • The strategy of random mutagenesis is followed by selection. Variants with interesting characteristics can be selected and the mutagenized DNA regions from different variants, each with interesting characteristics, are combined into one coding sequence (Yang et al, 1995). This is a multi-step sequential process, and potential synergistic effects of different mutations in different regions can be lost, since they are not subjected to selection in combination. Thus, these two strategies do not include simultaneous mutagenesis of defined regions and selection of a combination of these regions. Another process involves combinatorial pairing of genes which can be used to improve e.g. antibody affinity (Marks et al, 1992). Here, the three CDR-regions in each variable gene are fixed and this technology does not allow for shuffling of individual CDR regions between clones.
  • Selection of functional proteins from molecular libraries has been revolutionized by the development of the phage display technology (Parmley et al, 1987; McCafferty et al, 1990; Barbas et al, 1991). Here, the phenotype (protein) is directly linked to its corresponding genotype (DNA) and this allows for directly cloning of the genetic material which can then be subjected to further modifications in order to improve protein function. Phage display has been used to clone functional binders from a variety of molecular libraries with up to 1011 transformants in size (Griffiths et al, 1994). Thus, phage display can be used to directly clone functional binders from molecular libraries, and can also be used to improve further the clones originally selected.
  • Random combination of DNA from different mutated clones is a more efficient way to search through sequence space. The concept of DNA shuffling (Stemmer, 1994) utilises random fragmentation of DNA and assembly of fragments into a functional coding sequence. In this process it is possible to introduce chemically synthesised DNA sequences and in this way target variation to defined places in the gene which DNA sequence is known (Crameri et al, 1995). In theory, it is also possible to shuffle DNA between any clones. However, if the resulting shuffled gene is to be functional with respect to expression and activity, the clones to be shuffled have to be related or even identical with the exception of a low level of random is mutations. DNA shuffling between genetically different clones will generally produce non-functional genes.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • At its most general the present invention provides a method of obtaining a polynucleotide sequence encoding a protein of desired characteristics comprising the steps of incorporating at least one variant nucleotide region (variant motif) into defined nucleotide regions (scaffold sequence) derived from a parent polynucleotide sequence. The new assembled polynucleotide sequence may then be expressed and the resulting protein screened to determine its characteristics.
  • The present method allows protein characteristics to be altered by modifying the polynucleotide sequence encoding the protein in a specific manner. This may be achieved by either a) replacing a specified region of the nucleotide sequence with a different nucleotide sequence or b) by mutating the specified region so as to alter the nucleotide sequence. These specified regions (variant motifs) are incorporated within scaffold or framework regions (scaffold sequence) of the original polynucleotide sequence (parent polynucleotide sequence) which when reassembled will encoded a protein of altered characteristics. The characteristics of the encoded protein are altered as a result of the amino acid sequence being changed corresponding to the changes in the coding polynucleotide sequence.
  • Rather than modifying a sequence at random and then relying on extensive screening for the desired coded protein, the present inventors have found it desirable to provide a method which modifies selected segments (variant motifs) of a protein while maintaining others.
  • The variant motifs may be segments of nucleotide sequence that encode specified regions of a protein. For example, functional regions of a protein (e.g. loops) or CDR regions in an antibody.
  • The scaffold sequence may be segments of nucleotide sequence which it is desirable to maintain, for example they may encode more structural regions of the protein, e.g. framework regions in an antibody.
  • The variant motifs may be nucleotide segments which originated from the same polynucleotide sequence as the scaffold sequence, i.e. the parent polynucleotide sequence, but which have been mutated so as to alter the coding sequence from that in the parent. For example, the parent polynucleotide sequence may encode an antibody. The nucleotide sequences encoding the CDR regions of the antibody (variant motifs) may be selected from the remaining coding sequence of the parent polynucleotide, mutated and then reassembled with scaffold sequence derived from the remaining coding sequence. The expressed antibody will differ from the wild type antibody expressed by the parent polynucleotide in the CDR regions only.
  • Alternatively, the variant motif may be derived from a polynucleotide sequence encoding a protein sequentially related to the protein encoded by the parent polynucleotide sequence. For example, the CDR regions from one antibody (antibody A) may be replaced by the CDR regions of another antibody (antibody B).
  • In each case the resulting expressed protein can be screened for desired characteristics. Desirable characteristics may be changes in the biological properties of the protein. For example, the tertiary structure of the protein may be altered. This may affect its binding properties, the ability for it to be secreted from cells or into cells or, for enzymes, its catalytic properties. If the protein is an antibody or part thereof it may be desirable to alter its ability to specifically bind to an antigen or to improve its binding properties in comparison to the parent antibody.
  • According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of obtaining a protein of desired characteristics by incorporating variant peptide regions (variant motifs) into defined peptide regions (scaffold sequence), which method comprises the steps of:
  • (a) subjecting parent polynucleotide sequence encoding one or more protein motifs to mutagenesis to create a plurality of differently mutated derivatives thereof, or obtaining parent polynucleotide encoding a plurality of variant protein motifs of unknown sequence,
  • (b) providing a plurality of pairs of oligonucleotides, each pair representing spaced-apart locations on the parent polynucleotide sequence bounding an intervening variant protein motif, and using each said pair of oligonucleotides as amplification primers to amplify the intervening motif;
  • (c) obtaining single-stranded nucleotide sequence from the thus-isolated amplified nucleotide sequence; and
  • (d) assembling nucleotide sequence encoding a protein by incorporating nucleotide sequences derived from step (c) above with nucleotide sequence encoding scaffold sequence.
  • The method may further comprise the step of expressing the resulting protein encoded by the assembled nucleotide sequence and screening for desired properties.
  • Preferably the parent polynucleotide sequence is DNA from which is derived DNA sequences encoding the variant motifs and scaffold sequences.
  • Preferably the pairs of oligonucleotides are single-stranded oligonucleotide primers. One of said pair may be linked to a member of a specific binding pair (MSBP). The MSBP is preferably biotin, whose specific binding partner could for example be streptavidin. By using the specific binding pair the amplified nucleotide sequences may be isolated.
  • Random mutation can be accomplished by any conventional method; but a suitable method is error-prone PCR.
  • The protein in question could, for example, be an antibody or antibody fragment having desirable characteristics. Example of antibody fragments, capable of binding an antigen or other binding partner, are the Fab fragment consisting of the VL, VH, Cl and CHI domains; the Fd fragment consisting of the VH, and CHl domains; the Fv fragment consisting of the VL and VH domains of a single arm of an antibody; the dAb fragment which consists of a VH domain; isolated CDR regions and F(ab′)2 fragments, a bivalent fragment including two Fab fragments linked by a disulphide bridge at the hinge region. Single chain Fv fragments are also included.
  • In one approach, after randomly mutating DNA encoding the antibody, or a portion of that DNA (eg that which encodes the Fab regions or variable regions), oligonucleotide primers could be synthesised corresponding to sequences bounding the CDRs (the variant motifs), so that DNA encoding the CDRs are amplified, along with any mutations that may have occurred in the CDRs. These can be incorporated in the reassembly of the antibody coding sequence, using the amplified CDR DNA sequences and the unmutated scaffold framework (FR) DNA sequences, resulting in the expression of an antibody which has a novel combination of CDRs, and potentially having altered properties which can be selected or screened for in conventional manner.
  • In another approach, rather than mutate CDRs and reassembling them back into an antibody which will be closely related to the parent antibody from which the CDRs were derived, the CDRs may be taken from one or more existing antibodies, but be of unknown sequence. Using oligonucleotide primers representing sequences bounding the various CDRs, the individual CDRs can be amplified, isolated and assembled into a predetermined scaffold.
  • Of course, combinations of the foregoing approaches could be used, with CDRs taken from one or more parent antibodies, and assembled into a scaffold to produce a completely new, secondary antibody, then, after screening to obtain a secondary antibody with desired characteristics, the DNA encoding it could be mutated, the CDRs amplified and isolated, and then reassembled with unmutated non-CDR (scaffold) DNA from the secondary antibody, to produce variants of the secondary antibody which are mutated in the CDRs, and which can be screened for improved properties with respect to the originally selected secondary antibody.
  • The present invention allows a novel way for the isolation of DNA sequences from genetically related clones that are functionally different. Genetically related clones are those that belong to a particular structural class, for example immunoglobulins or alpha-beta-barrels. The invention allows for both isolation and random combination into a given DNA sequence of functional sequences from these related clones. These functional sequences may be loops that perform binding or catalysis.
  • The concept of the invention is demonstrated using antibody molecules where CDR-regions from different germline sequences can be isolated and randomly combined into a defined framework sequence. The invention expands the complexity of the molecular libraries that can be selected using phage display. The concept of the invention is also demonstrated by the affinity maturation of antibody fragments by the isolation and random combination of mutated CDR-regions.
  • It is not possible to use the DNA shuffling concept (Stemmer, 1994) to isolate specific sequences and randomly combine these into a given gene sequence, as it is not possible to amplify individual DNA regions formed in vivo using DNA shuffling. Combination of entire gene sequences is possible, but here defined regions cannot be shuffled. Rather all the DNA is shuffled. Thus, DNA sequences from genetically related clones that are functionally different, eg proteins that belong to structural classes like immunoglobulins or alpha-beta-barrels, cannot be shuffled in such a way that specific regions are kept constant and other regions are shuffled.
  • The system provided by the present invention offers a simple way to randomly combine functional regions of proteins (eg loops) to a defined (specifically selected) scaffold, ie shuffling of loops to a given protein tertiary structure in order to find new protein functions. Furthermore, the DNA shuffling technology introduces mutations at a rate of 0.7% (Stemmer, 1994). Thus, the known DNA shuffling technology (Stemmer, 1994) does not allow for shuffling of unmutated regions, since the process itself introduces mutations at random positions, including the scaffold regions.
  • In contrast, the invention allows for mutagenesis of defined DNA-sequences together with shuffling and assembly of these pieces of DNA into a coding region, and will allow for mutagenesis of defined regions and subsequent selection of these regions in combination.
  • The invention allows for different regions of DNA from different sequences (clones) to be shuffled and randomly combined. This increases the genetic variation from which functional antibody fragments are selected and will thus increase the probability of selecting proteins with the desired characteristics. It can be realised that by randomly shuffling as few as a hundred CDRs at each position in the VH and VL of an fragment, as many as 1012 combinations may be obtained thereby extending the variability normally found in the immune system.
  • The invention provides amplification of defined regions from eg a cDNA library using two primers of which one is biotinylated. Using the MSBP, e.g. biotin, group, single stranded DNA can be isolated and used in the gene assembly process. The present inventors have demonstrated this with the amplification of diverse CDR regions from an antibody gene library and the combination of these CDR regions randomly to a given framework region. Thus, defined regions of DNA (framework regions) can be interspaced by random regions of DNA (CDR regions), which have an in vivo origin or can be chemically synthesized.
  • The present invention also provides polynucleotide sequences and the proteins they encoded produced by the method described above. There is also provided vectors incorporating the polynucleotide sequences and host cell transformed by the vectors.
  • The present invention also provides a polynucleotide library comprising polynucleotides created by the method described above which may be used for phage display.
  • Aspects and embodiments of the present invention will now be illustrated, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying figures. Further aspects and embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. All documents mentioned in this text are incorporated herein by reference.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 shows shuffling of specific DNA sequences between different clones, based on the assembly of gene sequences from a set of overlapping oligo-nucleotides following a one-step PCR protocol.
  • FIG. 2 shows different dissociation rate constants for different CDR-shuffled clones. A low bar represents slow dissociation-rate, a high bar represents a fast dissociation-rate. Clone 36 is the original non-mutated antibody fragment.
  • FIG. 3 shows the results of affinity purified scFv antibody fragment assayed on HPLC, Superose S-200 FPLC-column (Pharmacia) in PBS buffer. Peak 1 is the monomeric form of the antibody fragment, peak 2 is a small amount of impurity and peak 3 is NaN3 (sodium azid), used as a preservative.
  • FIG. 4 shows a schematic representation of amplification of defined sequences of DNA and the shuffling of these into a master framework. Only the CDR regions are amplified. FIG. 4A: Assembly of genes for the VH-domain. The template is scFv-B11 mutated with error prone PCR. An individual CDR is amplified using two primers adjacent to the particular CDR and one of these primers is biotinylated at the 5′ end. The individual CDR is amplified and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) is produced with the mutations focused to the CDR since the two amplification primers do not contain any mutations. This DNA is separated into two single stranded DNA molecules. The molecule without biotin is used in gene assembly. Primers 725, 729, 730, 728, 727 are synthesized in a DNA synthesizer and primers H2, H3, H5 contain mutated CDR and are amplified as above. FIG. 4B: Assembly of genes for the VL-domain. CDRs are amplified in the same way as in A. Primers 759, 738, 745, 744, 880 are synthesized in a DNA synthesizer and primers L2, L3, L5 contain mutated CDR and are amplified as above.
  • FIG. 5 shows the alignment of the peptide sequences for clones 3, 11 and 31 with the original non-mutated antibody fragment (wt). The CDR-regions are marked. Mutations in clones 3, 11 and 31 are underlined.
  • FIG. 6 shows the principles for the isolation of single-stranded DNA for the shuffling of defined DNA regions.
  • FIG. 7 shows the length of CDR3 heavy chain from different clones. These CDR regions have been amplified from different germline sequences and randomly cloned to a defined framework region (from DP-47 sequence).
  • FIG. 8 shows a schematic representation of amplification of defined sequences of DNA and the shuffling of these into a master framework. All the oligonucleotides used in the gene assembly are amplified by PCR, but only the CDR regions contain any genetic variation. FIG. 8A: Assembly of genes for the VH-domain. The template for the framework region amplification is scFv-B11, whereas CDRs are amplified from cDNA prepared from peripheral blood lymphocytes, tonsils and spleen. An individual DNA fragment is amplified using two primers located at the ends of the fragments to be amplified and one of these primers is biotinylated at the 5′ end. The individual DNA fragment is amplified and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) is produced. This DNA is separated into two single stranded DNA molecules. The molecule without biotin is used in gene assembly, i.e. primers H1, H4, H6 and these primers contain no variation. Primers HCDR1, HCDR2, HCDR3 contain different CDR and are amplified using two primers adjacent to the particular CDR and one of these primers is biotinylated at the 5′ end. The individual CDR is amplified and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) is produced with the variation focused to the CDR since the two amplification primers do not contain any mutations. This DNA is separated into two singled stranded DNA molecules and used in gene assembly of VH domain in a library format, i.e. the variation in the CDRs is derived from different germ-line sequences. Primers BT25 and BT26 are synthesized in a DNA-synthesizing machine. FIG. 8B: Assembly of genes for the VL-domain. In principle the same procedure as in A. Primers L1, L4, L6 are amplified and produced by PCR and contain no variation. LCDR1, LCDR2, LCDR3 contain different CDR. Primers BT7 and BT12 are synthesized in a DNA-synthesizing machine.
  • FIG. 9 shows the variation in a library constructed according to FIG. 8. The scFv region of library clones and original scFv-B11, binding to FITC (fluorescein-iso-thiocyanate) was synthesized by PCR. Purified PCR products were cut with BstNI and separated on a 2.5% agarose gel. Clones 1-15 are in lane 2-16, clones 16-29 are in lane 18-31. Original scFv-B11 is in lane 32. Analysis revealed that 28 clones could be sorted in 13 different groups according to restriction pattern and fragment size. Eight clones (1, 2, 8, 10, 12, 16, 26, 27) were unique, 2 clones (17, 24) appeared similar, 1 group of clones (18, 23, 29) had 3 similar members, 2 groups (5, 15, 14, 19) and (3, 4, 6, 11) had 4 members and 1 group (7, 9, 13, 20, 21, 22, 25) had 7 similar members. This experiment underestimates the variation in the library since BstNI detects only a fraction of sequence variability. In addition, the gel resolution did not allow the detection of minor size differences and did not resolve fragments below 100 bp.
  • FIG. 9B shows clones showing similar restriction pattern in the experiment exemplified in FIG. 9A cut by both BstNI and BamHI and separated on 3% agarose gels. To facilitate comparison, the groups of similar clones described in experiment A were put together on the gels. Clone 8 and 28 from experiment A were excluded due to space limitations.
  • Gel I) Lane 1-8; standard, clone 5,15,14,19,2,27, original scFv-B11, respectively Gel II) Lane 1-8; standard, clone 16,17,24,18,23,29,26, respectively Gel III) Lane 1-8; standard, clone 7,9,13,20,21,22,25, respectively Gel VI) Lane 1-8; standard, clone 3,4,6,11,1,10,12, respectively
  • Under these improved experimental conditions, essentially all clones had different restriction patterns/fragments sizes. All clones were different from the original scFv-B11 gene (lane 8, gel 1). Moreover, the groups of clones which appeared similar in FIG. 9A were found to be different as analyzed in FIG. 9B. See clone 5,15,14,19 (lanes 2-5 gel I), clone 17,24 (lanes 3-4 gel II), clone 18,23,29 (lanes 5-7 gel II), clones 7,9,13,20,21,22,25, (lanes 2-8, gel III) and clones 3,4,6,11 (lanes 2-5 gel IV).
  • In conclusion, these experiments suggest that the library contains high variability.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION AND EXEMPLIFICATION OF THE INVENTION
  • One aspect of the DNA shuffling procedure can be illustrated by the following steps in FIG. 1.
  • A: A gene coding for a protein of interest is divided into overlapping oligonucleotides.
  • B: The oligonucleotides are assembled using PCR into a full length gene-sequence.
  • C: The gene sequence is subjected to mutagenesis, eg by error-prone PCR.
  • D: Pairs of oligonucleotides are synthesized, each pair covering a region defined by one of the oligonucleotides in step A above, except for a region located in the middle of the step A oligonucleotide. This uncovered region is the DNA sequence that can be shuffled after PCR amplification. These two synthesised oligonucleotides can thus be used as amplification primers to amplify the uncovered region.
  • E: One of these amplification primers is biotinylated and the double-stranded PCR product can then be isolated using well-known strepavidin systems.
  • F: From the thus isolated amplified oligonucleotides can be obtained a single-stranded DNA sequence containing DNA from the uncovered region mentioned above, which can then be used as oligo-nucleotide in a new assembly of the gene sequence as described in step A.
  • G: If DNA sequences from different clones and from different regions of the mutated gene sequence are amplified and made single-stranded, they will combine randomly in the PCR process of gene assembly. This random combination is the basis for in vitro molecular evolution.
  • EXAMPLES
  • The present inventors have demonstrated the concept of shuffling of defined DNA in different experimental settings. Firstly, the shuffling of in vitro mutated CDR regions in an antibody fragment for affinity maturation purposes (example 1 and 2) is exemplified and secondly the shuffling of in vivo formed CDRs for creation of a highly variable antibody library (example 3 and 4) is exemplified.
  • 1. Affinity Maturation
  • A model system was developed, based on the scFv-B11 antibody fragment which binds to FITC. The full-length gene encoding this scFv was assembled from a set of 12 oligonucleotides (FIG. 4A and FIG. 4B) representing the known DNA sequence of the scFv-B11, and the functional binding of the gene product to FITC could be verified. This gene sequence was then mutagenized using error-prone PCR, and the DNA encoding the CDR regions were amplified as described above, using the amplification primers, one of which is biotinylated. (The CDR regions are the parts of the antibody molecule involved in binding the antigen, in this case FITC).
  • All six CDR regions were amplified and a new gene was assembled using six oligonucleotides selected from the first assembly of 12 oligonucleotide (see above) (these were not mutagenized) and six from the amplification of mutagenized CDR regions. Selection of functional antibody fragments that bound FITC was carried out using phage display. 50% of the clones bound FITC with different dissociation-rates than did the original scFv-B11, as measured in the BIAcore biosensor (FIG. 2). This demonstrates that the clones were changed in the way they recognized FITC.
  • Of the 16 clones identified to bind FITC in BIAcore (FIG. 2) clones 3, 11, 27 and 31 were chosen to be analyzed in more detail as these clones exhibited the larger changes in off-rates. These clones were expressed and affinity-purified on a column conjugated with FITC-BSA and eluted with a low pH buffer. The purified scFv-antibody fragments were further purified and analyzed with HPLC, using a Pharmacia Superdex 200 FPLC column with the capacity to separate the monomeric and dimeric form of the antibodies. In all clones the monomeric form dominated (typical size profile is shown in FIG. 3). This was then purified and used in detailed analysis of affinity using a BIAcore biosensor (Table 1).
  • TABLE 1
    Affinity determination of selected.
    Clone kASS(M−1 S−1) kDISS (S−1) KA (M−1)
    #3 2.0 × 105 4.3 × 10−3 4.8 × 107
    #11 2.6 × 105 3.3 × 10−3 7.8 × 107
    #27 5.0 × 105 16.0 × 10−3 3.1 × 107
    #31 1.2 × 105 5.4 × 10−3 2.1 × 107
    (FITC-B11 original) 2.7 × 105 9.7 × 10−3 2.8 × 107
  • Clone # 11 exhibited an affinity 2.8 times higher than the original scFv-B11 antibody fragment. This increase is based on a slower off-rate. One clone (#27) showed 2 times increase in association-rate. However, the overall affinity of this clone was similar to the original FITC-B11 clone due to a faster dissociation-rate. The distribution of different association and dissociation-rates among the clones was considered a source for CDR-reshuffling for further improvement of affinities.
  • Three clones were sequenced. In the VH region (ie half of the scFv-B11 and carrying three CDR regions) the mutations found were all in the CDR regions as expected, since these were the only regions mutagenized and amplified using the amplification primers. Interestingly, all the CDR regions were different and carried different mutations (FIG. 5). However, in the case of CDR region 2, the same mutation was found (a tyrosine to histidine substitution) in all 3 clones (the rest of CDR regions differed between the clones).
  • Furthermore, the mutation rates were found to be in between 2% and 4%, as determined from the base changes in the 90 bp long sequence built up from three CDR regions together. This is more than the error-prone PCR mutation rate, and indicates that there is combination of individual CDR regions from different clones.
  • 2. Affinity Maturation-Reshuffling
  • In order to perform a second shuffling (reshuffling), clones selected for their binding affinity to FITC were used in an additional round of CDR-amplification and library construction. In theory, the reshuffled library will contain mutated shuffled CDR-regions, selected for improved binding to FITC. In this way, new combinations of CDR-regions, improved with respect to binding, could be constructed and the library subjected to selection for binders with improved affinities.
  • The pool of all clones obtained from the selection procedure (as detailed in example 1) were used as template for CDR amplifications. One amplification was carried out for each CDR using primers listed in Table 2.
  • TABLE 2
    Sequences for primers used in CDR-shuffling.
    CDR Reamplification Primers
    764 5′ B-GTC CCT GAG ACT CTC CTG TGC AGC
    CTC TGG ATT CAC CTT T 3′
    875 5′ TCC CTG GAG CCT GGC GGA CCC A 3′
    876 5′ CGC CAG GCT CCA GGG AAG GGG CTG GAG
    TGG GTC TCA 3′
    765 5′ B-GGA ATT GTC TCT GGA GAT GGT GAA 3′
    799 5′ GAG CCG AGG ACA CGG CCG TGT ATT ACT
    GTG CAA GA 3′
    766 5′ B-GCG CTG CTC ACG GTG ACC AGG GTA
    CCT TGG CCC CA 3′
    767 5′ B-AGC GTC TGG GAC CCC CGG GCA GAG GGT
    CAC CAT CTC TTG T 3′
    800 5′ GGG CCG TTC CTG GGA GCT GCT GGT
    ACC A 3′
    801 5′ GCT CCC AGG AAC GGC CCC CAA ACT CCT
    CAT CTA T 3′
    768 5′ B-GAC TTG GAG CCA GAG AAT CGG TCA GGG
    ACC CC 3′
    802 5′ CTC CGG TCC GAG GAT GAG GCT GAT TAT
    TAC TGT 3′
    769 5′ B-CGT CAG CTT GGT TCC TCC GCC GAA 3′
    Framework VH
    727 5′ CCG CCG GAT CCA CCT CCG CCT GAA CCG CCT
    CCA CCG CTG CTC ACG GTG ACC A 3′
    728 5′ GAC CGA TGG ACC TTT GGT ACC GGC GCT GCT
    CAC GGT GAC CA 3′
    729 5′ GAG GTG CAG CTG TTG GAG TCT GGG GGA GGC
    TTG GTA CAG CCT GGG GGG TCC CTG AGA CTC
    TCC TGT 3′
    730 5′ GGC CGT GTC CTC GGC TCT GAG GCT GTT CAT
    TTG CAG ATA CAG CGT GTT CTT GGA ATT GTC TCT
    GGA GAT GGT 3′
    Framework VL
    738 5′ CAG TCT GTG CTG ACT CAG CCA CCC TCA GCG
    TCT GGG ACC CCC G 3′
    744 5′ ACT AGT TGG ACT AGC CAC AGT CCG TGG TTG
    ACC TAG GAC CGT CAG CTT GGT TCC TCC GC 3′
    745 5′ CTC ATC CTC GGA CCG GAG CCC ACT GAT GGC
    CAG GGA GCC TGA GGT GCC AGA CTT GGA GCC AGA
    GAA TCG 3′
    1129 5′ CAG GCG GAG GTG GAT CCG GCG GTG GCG GAT
    CGC AGT CTG TGC TGA CTC AGC CAC CCT CAG CGT
    CTG GGA CCC CCG 3′
    Amplification primers VH\TL Assembly
    1125 5′ ACT CGC GGC CCA ACC GGC CAT GGC CGA GGT
    GCA GCT GTT GGA G 3′
    1126 5′ CAA CTT TCT TGT CGA CTT TAT CAT CAT CAT
    CTT TAT AAT CAC CTA GGA CCG TCA GCT TGG T 3′
    B = Biotin labeled 5′ primer
  • The amplification was performed according to following parameters: 100 ng template (1.6×108 CFU bacteria grown for 6 h), 60 pmol each primer, 5 Units PFU polymerase (Stratagene), 1×PFU buffer, 500 μM dNTPs, reaction volume 100 μl, preheat 96° C. for 10 minutes, 96° C. for 1 minute: 68° C. for 1 minute: 72° C. for 1 minute for 25 cycles, 72° C. for 10 minutes. This procedure was essentially the same as for CDR amplification in Example 1. The amplified CDR were used for assembly into VH and VL encoding sequence according to FIGS. 1, 4A, 4B and Table 3.
  • TABLE 3
    PCR parameters for the assembly of VH and VL gene
    sequences in CDR-shuffling
    VL VH
    Primer
    759 Primer 725 30 pmol
    Primer
    738 Primer 729 0.6 pmol
    Primer L2 Primer H2 0.6 pmol
    Primer L3 Primer H3 0.6 pmol
    Primer
    745 Primer 730 0.6 pmol
    Primer L5 Primer H5 0.6 pmol
    Primer
    744 Primer 728 0.6 pmol
    Primer
    880 Primer 727 30 pmol
    Taq Taq
    10 Units
    dNTPs dNTPs 200 μM
    1x Taq buffer 1x Taq buffer to 100 μl
    Preheat 95° 10 minutes, 20 cycles: 95° 1 minutes, 68° 1 minutes, 72° 1 minutes 72° 10 minutes.
  • The VH and VL were then assembled into a scFv encoding sequence according to standard procedures (Griffiths et al 1994). The resulting library was subjected to panning so as to select binders with improved affinities to FITC. The selection procedure for the reshuffled library was essentially the same as for the initially shuffled library. The total number of clones obtained after selection was 510. Six clones (B) were chosen from this new pool and were tested and compared to 6 clones (A) from the first pool, originating from the shuffled library (Table 4).
  • TABLE 4
    Dissociation-rates of individual clones selected from the
    shuffled library (clones A) and from the reshuffled
    library (clones B).
    Clone KDISS (s−1 × 10−3)
    scFv-B11 (original) 12.9
     1A 6.3
    12A 5.7
    13A 9.0
    14A 9.7
    16A 1.8
    17A 7.9
    22B 0.2
    31B 0.3
    32B 9.8
    33B 6.8
    34B 7.3
    35B 8.7
  • Two clones from the reshuffling experiments (22B and 31B) exhibited substantially slower dissociation-rates, indicating that the reshuffling process yielded binders with improved affinities.
  • 3. Cloning and Shuffling of Defined DNA Regions
  • In our system it is possible to amplify defined regions from a cDNA library using two primers of which one is biotinylated. Using the biotin group, single stranded DNA can be isolated an used in the gene assembly process (FIG. 6). We have demonstrated this with the amplification of diverse CDR regions from an antibody gene library and the combination of these CDR regions randomly to a given framework region. Thus, defined regions of DNA (framework regions) can be interspaced by random regions of DNA (CDR regions) which have an in vivo origin (Table 5). The CDR3 region vary in size (FIG. 7). Alternatively, these regions could be chemically synthesised.
  • TABLE 5
    Combination of CDR regions from different germline sequences
    transplanted to the DP-47 framework encoding the variable heavy
    domain. For CDR1 and CDR2 the suggested germline origin is indicate.
    For CDR3 the number of residues in the CDR-region is written. N.D = not
    determined.
    Clone CDR1 CDR2 CDR3
    1 DP-35 DP-42 12
    2 DP-49 DP-53 13
    3 N.D. DP-51 11
    4 DP-32 DP-47 10
    5 DP-41 DP-47 8
    6 DP-32 DP-77 9
    7 DP-31 DP-47 7
    8 DP-49 DP-35 5
    9 DP-49 DP-35 N.D.
    10 DP-48 DP-48 N.D.
    11 DP-51 DP-47 10
    12 DP-34 DP-31 N.D.
    13 DP-85 DP-53 4
    14 DP-31 DP-77 10
    15 DP-34 DP-53 4
  • 4. Library Construction
  • A gene library was constructed encoding scFv antibody fragments. The strategy used for this library is based on the assembly of a set of oligonucleotides into a sequence encoding VH and VL antibody domains (FIGS. 8A, 8B.) Native in vivo formed CDR regions can be shuffled and assembled into a given master framework. In this example we have developed this concept further and assembled both VH and VL encoding gene sequences with native CDR regions into a given master framework. Thus, all six CDR positions have been shuffled. The template origin for CDR amplification was cDNA from peripheral blood B-cells, spleen, tonsils and lymphnodes. Oligonucleotides encoding the framework regions have also been amplified using the strategy with two flanking primers, where one is biotinylated (primers L1, H1 L4, H4, L6, H6). The primers used are described in Table 6 and in FIG. 8A, BB.
  • TABLE 6
    Sequences for primers used in library
    construction.
    Amplification of framework fragments
    BT1. 5′ ACA GTC ATA ATG AAA TAC CTA TTG C 3′
    BT2. 5′ B-GC ACA GGA GAG TCT CA 3′
    BT3. 5′ B-CA CCA TCT CCA GAG ACA ATT CC 3′
    BT4. 5′ GGC CGT GTC CTC GGC TCT 3′
    BT5. 5′ B-TG GTC ACC GTG AGC AGC 3′
    BTG. 5′ CCG CCG GAT CCA CCT 3′
    BT7. 5′ CAG GCG GAG GTG GAT CCG GC 3′
    BT8. 5′ B-CG GGG GTC CCA GAC GCT 3′
    BT9. 5′ B-CG ATT CTC TGG CTC CAA GT 3′
    BT10. 5′ CTC ATC CTC GGA CCG GA 3′
    BT11. 5′ B-TC GGC GGA GGA ACC AAG CT 3′
    BT12 5′ TGG CCT TGA TAT TCA CAA ACG AAT 3′
    Amplification of in vivo CDR
    BT13. 5′ B-TC CCT GAG ACT CTC CTG TGC AGC CTC TGG
    ATT CAC CTT 3′
    BT14. 5′ TTC CCT GGA GCC TGG CGG ACC CA 3′
    BT15. 5′ B-GG AAT TGT CTC TGG AGA TGG TGA A 3′
    BT16. 5′ GTC CGC CAG GCT CCA 3′
    BT17. 5′ B-CG CTG CTC ACG GTG ACC AGT GTA CCT TGG
    CCC CA 3′
    BT18. 5′ AGA GCC GAG GAC ACG GCC GTG TAT TAC
    TGT 3′
    BT19. 5′ B-AG CGT CTG GGA CCC CCG GGC AGA GGG TCA
    CCA TCT CTT 3′
    BT20. 5′ GGG CCG TTC CTG GGA GCT GCT GAT ACC A 3′
    BT21. 5′ GCT CCC AGG AAC GGC CCC CAA ACT CCT CAT
    CTA T 3′
    BT22. 5′ B-GA CTT GGA GCC AGA GAA TCG GTC AGG GAC
    CCC 3′
    BT23. 5′ B-GT CAG CTT GGT TCC TCC GCC GAA 3′
    BT24. 5′ CTC CGG TCC GAG GAT GAG GCT GAT TAT TAC
    T 3′
    Assembly of VH and VL
    5T25. 5′ B-TA CCT ATT GCC TAC GGC AGC CGC TGG ATT
    GTT ATT ACT CGC GGC CCA GCC GGC CAT GGC
    CGA 3′
    BT2G. 5′ CCG CCG GAT CCA CCT CCG CCT GAA CCG CCT
    CCA CCG CTG CTC ACG GTG ACC A 3′
    Amplification primers 2nd assembly
    BT27. 5′ B-TGG CCT TGA TAT TCA CAA ACG AAT 3′
    BT28. 5′ B-ACG GCA GCC GCT GGA TTG 3′
    B = Biotin labeled 5′ primer
  • The PCR parameters for CDR and framework region amplification were essentially the same as described in example 2. The PCR parameters for assembly of genes encoding VH and VL are described in Table 7.
  • TABLE 7
    PCR parameters for the assembly of VH and VL gene
    sequences for library construction.
    VH VL
    Primer BT25 Primer BT7 30 pmol
    Primer H1 Primer L1 0.6 pmol
    Primer HCDR1 Primer LCDR1 0.6 pmol
    Primer HCDR2 Primer LCDR2 0.6 pmol
    Primer H4 Primer L4 0.6 pmol
    Primer HCDR5 Primer LCDR3 0.6 pmol
    Primer H6 Primer L6 0.6 pmol
    Primer BT26 Primer BT12 30 pmol
    Taq Taq
    10 Units
    dNTPs dNTPs 200 μM
    1x Taq buffer 1x Taq buffer to 100 μl
    Preheat 95° 10 minutes, 20 cycles: 95° 1 minutes, 68° 1 minutes, 72° 1 minutes and 72° 10 minutes.
  • The assembled VH and VL gene sequences were assembled into a scFv coding sequence using standard protocols (Griffiths et al 1994). A library of 1.1×109 members were constructed out of the 40 clones tested all 40 contained an insert of the right size as determined by PCR agarose gel electrophoresis. In order to test the variability in the library, PCR amplified and purified inserts were subjected to cleavage by BsTN1 and BamH1. Clones showed different restriction patterns, as determined by agarose gel electrophoresis and compared to the control scFv-B11 (FIG. 9).
  • In order to estimate the frequency of clones able to express scFv antibody fragments, clones from the library containing the FLAG sequence (Hopp et al, 1989), as well as control bacteria with and without FLAG sequence, were plated at low density on Luria broth-plates containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin, 25 μg/ml tetracycline and 1% glucose. The plates were grown at 37° C. over night and lifted to nitrocellulose filters by standard methods (Sambrook et al 1989). In order to induce synthesis of the scFv genes in the bacteria, filters were incubated for 4 hrs on plates containing 0.5 mM isopropyl-thio-β-D-galactoside (IPTG) but without glucose. Bacteria were then lysed by lyzosyme/chloroform treatment, the filters were washed and incubated with anti-FLAG M2 antibody (Kodak) followed by anti-mouse peroxidase conjugated second antibody (P260 Dakopatts) and detected by DAB 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydroklorid, Sigma) (Table 8).
  • TABLE 8
    Frequency of intact antibody genes in the library
    FLAG positive Percent positive
    Library Pool Tested clones clones clones
    A 145 88 60
    B 77 52 67
    C 158 105 66
    D 68 48 70
    All library 448 293 65.4
    pools
    Positive control 64 64 100
    pFAB5cHis
    scFvB11
    Negative control 30 0 0
    pFAB5cHis
  • The anti-FLAG antibody detects a FLAG sequence situated downstream of the scFv gene in the library constructs as well as in the control vector pFAS5cHis scFvB11, but not in the original vector pFAB5cHis. Clones, to which the anti-FLAG antibody binds, therefore contains an intact open reading frame of the scFv gene.
  • REFERENCES
    • Barbas, C F et al: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 88:7978-82 (1991)
    • Barbas, C F et al: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 89:4457-61 (1992)
    • Crameri, A et al: Biotechniques, 18:194-196 (1995)
    • Griffiths, A D et al: EMBO J, 13:3245-3260 (1994)
    • Hoogenboom, H R et al: J Mol Biol, 227:381-8 (1992)
    • Hopp, T. P. et al: Biotechniques 7: 580-589 (1989)
    • Huse, W D et al: Science, 246:1275-81 (1989)
    • Larrick, J W et al: Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 160:1250-6 (1989)
    • Leung, D W et al: Technique, 1:11-15 (1989)
    • Marks, J D et al: Biotechnology, 10:779-83 (1992)
    • McCafferty, J et al: Nature, 348:552-4 (1990)
    • Moore, J C et al: Nature Biotechnology, 14:458-467 (1996)
    • Parmley, S F et al: Gene, 73:305-318 (1988)
    • Roberts, S et al: Nature, 328:731-4 (1987)
    • Sambrook, J et al: Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. Cold spring Harbor Laboratory Press 1989.
    • Stemmer, W P: Nature, 370:389-391 (1994)
    • Yang, W P et al: J Mol Biol, 254:392-403 (1995)

Claims (2)

1-55. (canceled)
56. A method of generating an assembled polynucleotide sequence encoding a protein of desired characteristics comprising the steps of:
a) providing at least one polynucleotide sequence comprising one or more variant polynucleotide sequences encoding one or more in vivo formed variant protein motifs;
b) providing one or more pairs of defined oligonucleotides, each pair representing spaced apart locations on the at least one polynucleotide sequence of step a), each pair binding adjacent to a variant polynucleotide sequence encoding an in vivo formed variant protein motif;
c) using the pairs of defined oligonucleotides as amplification primers for PCR to amplify the variant polynucleotide sequences encoding the in vivo formed variant protein motifs of the at least one polynucleotide sequence of step a) and performing PCR amplification on the at least one polynucleotide sequences of step a);
d) obtaining one or more single-stranded polynucleotide sequences from the amplified polynucleotide sequences in step c);
e) providing one or more unmutated, specifically selected, scaffold polynucleotide sequences encoding one or more mutated peptide regions; and
f) annealing said one or more single-stranded polynucleotide sequences from step d) with the unmutated, specifically selected, scaffold polynucleotide sequences from step e) such that annealed polynucleotides with one or more gaps is formed, and filling the one or more gaps present in the annealed polynucleotides, thereby generating one or more assembled polynucleotide sequences.
US11/735,213 1997-01-24 2007-04-13 Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function Abandoned US20080108507A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/735,213 US20080108507A1 (en) 1997-01-24 2007-04-13 Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
US13/110,412 US20110287486A1 (en) 1997-01-24 2011-05-18 Method for In Vitro Molecular Evolution of Protein Function

Applications Claiming Priority (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB9701425.2A GB9701425D0 (en) 1997-01-24 1997-01-24 A method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
GB9701425.2 1997-01-24
PCT/GB1998/000219 WO1998032845A1 (en) 1997-01-24 1998-01-26 A method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
US34171199A 1999-09-21 1999-09-21
US10/118,100 US6989250B2 (en) 1997-01-24 2002-04-08 Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
US11/109,264 US7432083B2 (en) 1997-01-24 2005-04-19 Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
US11/735,213 US20080108507A1 (en) 1997-01-24 2007-04-13 Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/109,264 Continuation US7432083B2 (en) 1997-01-24 2005-04-19 Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/110,412 Continuation US20110287486A1 (en) 1997-01-24 2011-05-18 Method for In Vitro Molecular Evolution of Protein Function

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080108507A1 true US20080108507A1 (en) 2008-05-08

Family

ID=10806508

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/118,100 Expired - Lifetime US6989250B2 (en) 1997-01-24 2002-04-08 Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
US11/109,264 Expired - Fee Related US7432083B2 (en) 1997-01-24 2005-04-19 Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
US11/735,213 Abandoned US20080108507A1 (en) 1997-01-24 2007-04-13 Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
US13/110,412 Abandoned US20110287486A1 (en) 1997-01-24 2011-05-18 Method for In Vitro Molecular Evolution of Protein Function

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/118,100 Expired - Lifetime US6989250B2 (en) 1997-01-24 2002-04-08 Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
US11/109,264 Expired - Fee Related US7432083B2 (en) 1997-01-24 2005-04-19 Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/110,412 Abandoned US20110287486A1 (en) 1997-01-24 2011-05-18 Method for In Vitro Molecular Evolution of Protein Function

Country Status (12)

Country Link
US (4) US6989250B2 (en)
EP (2) EP1352959A1 (en)
JP (1) JP3703499B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE255163T1 (en)
AU (1) AU745615B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2278585C (en)
DE (1) DE69820054T3 (en)
DK (1) DK0988378T4 (en)
ES (1) ES2212260T5 (en)
GB (1) GB9701425D0 (en)
PT (1) PT988378E (en)
WO (1) WO1998032845A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (129)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7018793B1 (en) 1995-12-07 2006-03-28 Diversa Corporation Combinatorial screening of mixed populations of organisms
US6939689B2 (en) 1995-12-07 2005-09-06 Diversa Corporation Exonuclease-mediated nucleic acid reassembly in directed evolution
US6238884B1 (en) 1995-12-07 2001-05-29 Diversa Corporation End selection in directed evolution
US6358709B1 (en) 1995-12-07 2002-03-19 Diversa Corporation End selection in directed evolution
US5830696A (en) 1996-12-05 1998-11-03 Diversa Corporation Directed evolution of thermophilic enzymes
US6740506B2 (en) 1995-12-07 2004-05-25 Diversa Corporation End selection in directed evolution
GB9701425D0 (en) * 1997-01-24 1997-03-12 Bioinvent Int Ab A method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
WO1998047089A1 (en) 1997-04-11 1998-10-22 California Institute Of Technology Apparatus and method for automated protein design
GB9712512D0 (en) * 1997-06-16 1997-08-20 Bioinvent Int Ab A method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
US6951719B1 (en) 1999-08-11 2005-10-04 Proteus S.A. Process for obtaining recombined nucleotide sequences in vitro, libraries of sequences and sequences thus obtained
US6991922B2 (en) 1998-08-12 2006-01-31 Proteus S.A. Process for in vitro creation of recombinant polynucleotide sequences by oriented ligation
FR2782323B1 (en) * 1998-08-12 2002-01-11 Proteus PROCESS FOR THE IN VITRO PRODUCTION OF RECOMBINANT POLYNUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCES, SEQUENCE BANKS AND SEQUENCES THUS OBTAINED
US7315786B2 (en) 1998-10-16 2008-01-01 Xencor Protein design automation for protein libraries
US6403312B1 (en) 1998-10-16 2002-06-11 Xencor Protein design automatic for protein libraries
US20020048772A1 (en) 2000-02-10 2002-04-25 Dahiyat Bassil I. Protein design automation for protein libraries
EP1157093A1 (en) * 1998-10-16 2001-11-28 Xencor, Inc. Protein design automation for protein libraries
US7112661B1 (en) * 1998-10-30 2006-09-26 The Research Foundation Of State University Of New York Variable heavy chain and variable light chain regions of antibodies to human platelet glycoprotein Ib alpha
EP1073710A4 (en) * 1999-02-04 2007-12-19 Verenium Corp Non-stochastic generation of genetic vaccines and enzymes
JP2002537836A (en) * 1999-03-09 2002-11-12 ディベルサ コーポレーション End selection in directed evolution
US7291714B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2007-11-06 Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Glycoprotein VI and uses thereof
EP1118663A1 (en) 2000-01-07 2001-07-25 Universiteit Utrecht Nucleic acids encoding chemotaxis inhibitory polypeptides
WO2001059066A2 (en) * 2000-02-10 2001-08-16 Xencor, Inc. Protein design automation for protein libraries
EP1621617A1 (en) * 2000-02-10 2006-02-01 Xencor, Inc. Protein design automation for protein libraries
WO2001064864A2 (en) * 2000-02-28 2001-09-07 Maxygen, Inc. Single-stranded nucleic acid template-mediated recombination and nucleic acid fragment isolation
GB0008419D0 (en) * 2000-04-05 2000-05-24 Bioinvent Int Ab A method for invitro molecular evolution of antibody function
US6994963B1 (en) 2000-07-10 2006-02-07 Ambion, Inc. Methods for recombinatorial nucleic acid synthesis
ES2361925T3 (en) 2000-08-25 2011-06-24 Basf Plant Science Gmbh POLINUCLEOTIDES OF PLANTS CODING PRENIL PROTEASAS.
AU9120801A (en) * 2000-09-15 2002-03-26 Verenium Corporation Combinatorial screening of mixed populations of organisms
US20020155439A1 (en) * 2000-12-04 2002-10-24 Ana Rodriguez Method for generating a library of mutant oligonucleotides using the linear cyclic amplification reaction
EP1510959A3 (en) * 2001-08-10 2006-07-26 Xencor, Inc. Protein design automation for protein libraries
EP1456410A2 (en) * 2001-12-11 2004-09-15 AlgoNomics N.V. Method for displaying loops from immunoglobulin domains in different contexts
JP2005512578A (en) * 2001-12-19 2005-05-12 ロシュ ダイアグノスティックス コーポレーション PCR-based highly efficient polypeptide screening
JP2005519595A (en) * 2002-03-01 2005-07-07 ダイアックス、コープ Modular recombinatorial display library
WO2004016811A2 (en) * 2002-08-19 2004-02-26 Danmarks Tekniske Universitet (Dtu) Methods and kit for genes shuffling using tagged primers
SE0302312D0 (en) 2002-10-04 2003-08-27 Forskarpatent I Syd Ab Peptide-based passive immunization therapy for the treatment of atherosclerosis
ATE503834T1 (en) * 2003-08-27 2011-04-15 Proterec Ltd LIBRARIES OF RECOMBINANT CHIMERIC PROTEINS
GB0500703D0 (en) * 2005-01-14 2005-02-23 Bioinvent Int Ab Molecular biology method
US8076108B2 (en) * 2005-04-26 2011-12-13 Cargill, Incorporated Polypeptides and biosynthetic pathways for the production of stereoisomers of monatin and their precursors
GB0517878D0 (en) 2005-09-02 2005-10-12 Bioinvent Int Ab Immunotherapeutic treatment
GB2432366B (en) * 2005-11-19 2007-11-21 Alligator Bioscience Ab A method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
BRPI0506047A (en) * 2005-12-12 2007-10-02 Ubea method of obtaining chimeric nucleotide sequences and chimeric nucleotide sequence
GB0525214D0 (en) 2005-12-12 2006-01-18 Bioinvent Int Ab Biological materials and uses thereof
US7572618B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2009-08-11 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Polynucleotides encoding novel PCSK9 variants
US8067179B2 (en) 2006-11-30 2011-11-29 Research Development Foundation Immunoglobulin libraries
FR2910493B1 (en) * 2006-12-20 2012-12-14 Bio Modeling Systems Ou Bmsystems METHOD FOR THE RANDOM DIVERSIFICATION OF A GENETIC SEQUENCE FOR PRESERVING THE IDENTITY OF CERTAIN INTERNAL SEGMENTS OF THE GENETIC SEQUENCE
EP2155789B1 (en) 2007-05-01 2013-07-24 Research Development Foundation Immunoglobulin fc libraries
BRPI0815046A2 (en) * 2007-07-31 2014-10-14 Verenium Corp CUSTOMIZING MULTIPLE LOCAL COMBINATION ASSEMBLY
JP2011504371A (en) 2007-11-21 2011-02-10 オレゴン ヘルス アンド サイエンス ユニバーシティー Anti-factor XI monoclonal antibody and method of use thereof
EP2130918A1 (en) * 2008-06-05 2009-12-09 C-Lecta GmbH Method for creating a variant library of DNA sequences
US20090312196A1 (en) * 2008-06-13 2009-12-17 Codexis, Inc. Method of synthesizing polynucleotide variants
CA3059768A1 (en) 2008-09-05 2010-03-11 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Continuous directed evolution of proteins and nucleic acids
US9221902B2 (en) 2008-11-07 2015-12-29 Fabrus, Inc. Combinatorial antibody libraries and uses thereof
PT2373691T (en) 2008-12-18 2019-05-08 Univ Vanderbilt Anti-fxi antibodies and methods of use
GB0903151D0 (en) 2009-02-25 2009-04-08 Bioinvent Int Ab Antibody uses and methods
BRPI1011195B1 (en) * 2009-05-20 2020-10-13 Novimmune S.A methods to produce a collection of nucleic acids
EP2448972A4 (en) 2009-06-30 2012-11-28 Res Dev Foundation Immunoglobulin fc polypeptides
EP2470653A1 (en) * 2009-08-26 2012-07-04 Research Development Foundation Methods for creating antibody libraries
EP2473529B1 (en) 2009-09-03 2016-02-10 Cancer Research Technology Limited Clec14a inhibitors
GB0917044D0 (en) 2009-09-29 2009-11-18 Cytoguide As Agents, uses and methods
GB0917054D0 (en) 2009-09-29 2009-11-11 Cytoguide As Agents, uses and methods
EP2496600A1 (en) 2009-11-04 2012-09-12 Fabrus LLC Methods for affinity maturation-based antibody optimization
EP2332995A1 (en) 2009-12-10 2011-06-15 Bayer Schering Pharma Aktiengesellschaft Neutralizing prolactin receptor antibodies and their therapeutic use
GB201105584D0 (en) 2011-04-01 2011-05-18 Imp Innovations Ltd Cancer methods
GB201011771D0 (en) 2010-07-13 2010-08-25 Bioinvent Int Ab Biological material and particular uses thereof
CA2825370A1 (en) 2010-12-22 2012-06-28 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Continuous directed evolution
JP6228014B2 (en) 2011-02-07 2017-11-08 リサーチ ディベロップメント ファウンデーション Engineered immunoglobulin Fc polypeptides
EP2530089A1 (en) 2011-06-03 2012-12-05 Bayer Pharma Aktiengesellschaft Neutralising prolactin receptor antibody Mat3 and its therapeutical use
DK2726651T3 (en) * 2011-06-28 2019-01-28 Codexis Inc PROTEIN INVARIANT GENERATION BY REGION SHUFFLING
WO2013066438A2 (en) 2011-07-22 2013-05-10 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Evaluation and improvement of nuclease cleavage specificity
GB201115280D0 (en) 2011-09-05 2011-10-19 Alligator Bioscience Ab Antibodies, uses and methods
GB201115529D0 (en) 2011-09-08 2011-10-26 Imp Innovations Ltd Antibodies, uses and methods
GB2495113A (en) 2011-09-29 2013-04-03 Bioinvent Int Ab Anti-ICAM-1 antibody for treating multiple-myeloma-related disorders
SG11201402619VA (en) 2011-11-23 2014-10-30 Igenica Biotherapeutics Inc Anti-cd98 antibodies and methods of use thereof
US20150147274A1 (en) 2011-12-02 2015-05-28 Cancer Research Technology Limited Antibodies against hgf - receptor and uses
GB201122325D0 (en) 2011-12-23 2012-02-01 Cytoguide As Novel formulations
WO2013167669A1 (en) 2012-05-10 2013-11-14 Bayer Pharma Aktiengesellschaft Antibodies capable of binding to the coagulation factor xi and/or its activated form factor xia and uses thereof
EP2906598A1 (en) 2012-10-09 2015-08-19 Igenica Biotherapeutics, Inc. Anti-c16orf54 antibodies and methods of use thereof
GB201300346D0 (en) 2013-01-09 2013-02-20 Biolnvent Internat Ab BiologIcal materials and uses thereof
US20150044192A1 (en) 2013-08-09 2015-02-12 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Methods for identifying a target site of a cas9 nuclease
US9340799B2 (en) 2013-09-06 2016-05-17 President And Fellows Of Harvard College MRNA-sensing switchable gRNAs
US10179911B2 (en) 2014-01-20 2019-01-15 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Negative selection and stringency modulation in continuous evolution systems
AU2015209131B2 (en) 2014-01-24 2020-06-25 Ngm Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. Binding proteins and methods of use thereof
WO2015121383A1 (en) 2014-02-12 2015-08-20 Michael Uhlin Bispecific antibodies for use in stem cell transplantation
CA2956224A1 (en) 2014-07-30 2016-02-11 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Cas9 proteins including ligand-dependent inteins
US10920208B2 (en) 2014-10-22 2021-02-16 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Evolution of proteases
GB201501004D0 (en) 2015-01-21 2015-03-04 Cancer Rec Tech Ltd Inhibitors
US10457737B2 (en) 2015-02-09 2019-10-29 Research Development Foundation Engineered immunoglobulin Fc polypeptides displaying improved complement activation
US11299729B2 (en) 2015-04-17 2022-04-12 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Vector-based mutagenesis system
US10392674B2 (en) 2015-07-22 2019-08-27 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Evolution of site-specific recombinases
US11524983B2 (en) 2015-07-23 2022-12-13 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Evolution of Bt toxins
US10612011B2 (en) 2015-07-30 2020-04-07 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Evolution of TALENs
WO2017058859A1 (en) 2015-09-29 2017-04-06 Celgene Corporation Pd-1 binding proteins and methods of use thereof
CN108699116A (en) 2015-10-23 2018-10-23 哈佛大学的校长及成员们 The CAS9 albumen of evolution for gene editing
AU2017306676B2 (en) 2016-08-03 2024-02-22 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Adenosine nucleobase editors and uses thereof
CA3033327A1 (en) 2016-08-09 2018-02-15 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Programmable cas9-recombinase fusion proteins and uses thereof
US11542509B2 (en) 2016-08-24 2023-01-03 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Incorporation of unnatural amino acids into proteins using base editing
US10751414B2 (en) 2016-09-19 2020-08-25 Celgene Corporation Methods of treating psoriasis using PD-1 binding antibodies
WO2018053401A1 (en) 2016-09-19 2018-03-22 Celgene Corporation Methods of treating vitiligo using pd-1 binding proteins
AU2017342543B2 (en) 2016-10-14 2024-06-27 President And Fellows Of Harvard College AAV delivery of nucleobase editors
US10745677B2 (en) 2016-12-23 2020-08-18 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Editing of CCR5 receptor gene to protect against HIV infection
EP3592853A1 (en) 2017-03-09 2020-01-15 President and Fellows of Harvard College Suppression of pain by gene editing
WO2018165629A1 (en) 2017-03-10 2018-09-13 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Cytosine to guanine base editor
JP7191388B2 (en) 2017-03-23 2022-12-19 プレジデント アンド フェローズ オブ ハーバード カレッジ Nucleobase editors comprising nucleic acid programmable DNA binding proteins
US11560566B2 (en) 2017-05-12 2023-01-24 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Aptazyme-embedded guide RNAs for use with CRISPR-Cas9 in genome editing and transcriptional activation
WO2019010164A1 (en) 2017-07-06 2019-01-10 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Evolution of trna synthetases
US11732274B2 (en) 2017-07-28 2023-08-22 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Methods and compositions for evolving base editors using phage-assisted continuous evolution (PACE)
US12060553B2 (en) 2017-08-25 2024-08-13 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Evolution of BoNT peptidases
WO2019139645A2 (en) 2017-08-30 2019-07-18 President And Fellows Of Harvard College High efficiency base editors comprising gam
WO2019056002A1 (en) 2017-09-18 2019-03-21 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Continuous evolution for stabilized proteins
US11795443B2 (en) 2017-10-16 2023-10-24 The Broad Institute, Inc. Uses of adenosine base editors
WO2019241649A1 (en) 2018-06-14 2019-12-19 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Evolution of cytidine deaminases
GB201814451D0 (en) 2018-09-05 2018-10-17 Valerie Nicholas Carl Kristoffer Methods
JP7266670B2 (en) 2018-09-27 2023-04-28 セルジーン コーポレイション SIRPα binding proteins and methods of use thereof
EP3856773A1 (en) 2018-09-28 2021-08-04 Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd. Il-36 antibodies and uses thereof
WO2020191171A1 (en) 2019-03-19 2020-09-24 The Broad Institute, Inc. Methods and compositions for editing nucleotide sequences
GB2584441A (en) 2019-06-03 2020-12-09 Fenomark Diagnostics Ab Medical uses, methods and uses
MX2022014008A (en) 2020-05-08 2023-02-09 Broad Inst Inc Methods and compositions for simultaneous editing of both strands of a target double-stranded nucleotide sequence.
EP4188960A4 (en) 2020-08-03 2024-09-11 Janssen Biotech Inc Materials and methods for multidirectional biotransportation in virotherapeutics
KR20230069171A (en) 2020-09-15 2023-05-18 바이엘 악티엔게젤샤프트 Novel anti-A2AP antibodies and uses thereof
EP4271482A2 (en) 2020-12-31 2023-11-08 Alamar Biosciences, Inc. Binder molecules with high affinity and/ or specificity and methods of making and use thereof
GB2603166A (en) 2021-01-29 2022-08-03 Thelper As Therapeutic and Diagnostic Agents and Uses Thereof
EP4314047A1 (en) 2021-03-30 2024-02-07 Bayer Aktiengesellschaft Anti-sema3a antibodies and uses thereof
EP4396229A1 (en) 2021-09-02 2024-07-10 Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum Stiftung des öffentlichen Rechts Anti-cecam6 antibodies with reduced side-effects
JP2024539650A (en) 2021-10-15 2024-10-29 シートムエックス セラピューティクス,インコーポレイテッド Activatable Polypeptide Complexes
WO2023064955A1 (en) 2021-10-15 2023-04-20 Cytomx Therapeutics, Inc. Activatable anti-cd3, anti-egfr, heteromultimeric bispecific polypeptide complex
EP4416178A1 (en) 2021-10-15 2024-08-21 CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. Activatable polypeptide complex
TW202337904A (en) 2022-01-07 2023-10-01 美商壯生和壯生企業創新公司 Materials and methods of il-1β binding proteins
GB202201137D0 (en) 2022-01-28 2022-03-16 Thelper As Therapeutic and diagnostic agents and uses thereof
WO2024013727A1 (en) 2022-07-15 2024-01-18 Janssen Biotech, Inc. Material and methods for improved bioengineered pairing of antigen-binding variable regions

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5023171A (en) * 1989-08-10 1991-06-11 Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research Method for gene splicing by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction
US5252479A (en) * 1991-11-08 1993-10-12 Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. Safe vector for gene therapy
US5395750A (en) * 1992-02-28 1995-03-07 Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. Methods for producing proteins which bind to predetermined antigens
US5573907A (en) * 1990-01-26 1996-11-12 Abbott Laboratories Detecting and amplifying target nucleic acids using exonucleolytic activity
US5605793A (en) * 1994-02-17 1997-02-25 Affymax Technologies N.V. Methods for in vitro recombination
US5834252A (en) * 1995-04-18 1998-11-10 Glaxo Group Limited End-complementary polymerase reaction
US5873458A (en) * 1997-09-12 1999-02-23 Kao; Kuo-Min Drawer type CD box structure
US5948624A (en) * 1994-05-11 1999-09-07 Rothschild; Kenneth J. Methods for the detection and isolation of biomolecules
US5969108A (en) * 1990-07-10 1999-10-19 Medical Research Council Methods for producing members of specific binding pairs
US6159690A (en) * 1997-06-16 2000-12-12 Bioinvent International Ab Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function using exonuclease and amplification
US6300064B1 (en) * 1995-08-18 2001-10-09 Morphosys Ag Protein/(poly)peptide libraries
US6335160B1 (en) * 1995-02-17 2002-01-01 Maxygen, Inc. Methods and compositions for polypeptide engineering

Family Cites Families (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR0184860B1 (en) 1988-11-11 1999-04-01 메디칼 리써어치 카운실 Single domain ligands receptors comprising said ligands methods for their production and use of said ligands
EP0454781B1 (en) 1989-01-23 1998-12-16 Chiron Corporation Recombinant cells for therapies of infection and hyperproliferative disorders and preparation thereof
GB8919607D0 (en) 1989-08-30 1989-10-11 Wellcome Found Novel entities for cancer therapy
US5387505A (en) * 1990-05-04 1995-02-07 Eastman Kodak Company Preparation and isolation of single-stranded biotinylated nucleic acids by heat avidin-biotin cleavage
US5858725A (en) 1990-10-10 1999-01-12 Glaxo Wellcome Inc. Preparation of chimaeric antibodies using the recombinant PCR strategy
DE69229222D1 (en) 1991-03-07 1999-06-24 Bradbury SELECTION OF SPECIFIC PROTEINS BY A BIOLOGICAL PROCESS
IL103059A0 (en) 1991-09-30 1993-02-21 Boehringer Ingelheim Int Conjugates for introducing nucleic acid into higher eucaryotic cells
US5667988A (en) * 1992-01-27 1997-09-16 The Scripps Research Institute Methods for producing antibody libraries using universal or randomized immunoglobulin light chains
AU4782693A (en) * 1992-08-04 1994-03-03 British Technology Group Inc Method for design of novel proteins and proteins produced thereby
WO1994012632A1 (en) * 1992-11-27 1994-06-09 University College London Improvements in nucleic acid synthesis by pcr
AU6132994A (en) * 1993-02-02 1994-08-29 Scripps Research Institute, The Methods for producing antibody libraries using universal or randomized immunoglobulin light chains
US6117679A (en) 1994-02-17 2000-09-12 Maxygen, Inc. Methods for generating polynucleotides having desired characteristics by iterative selection and recombination
US5837458A (en) * 1994-02-17 1998-11-17 Maxygen, Inc. Methods and compositions for cellular and metabolic engineering
BR9506861A (en) 1994-02-22 1997-09-23 Novo Nordisk As Process for preparing and producing a variant of an original lipolytic enzyme variant of liplitic enzyme construction of DNA vector host cell detergent additive and detergent composition
WO1996017056A1 (en) * 1994-12-02 1996-06-06 Institut Pasteur Hypermutagenesis
AU3204895A (en) * 1995-02-01 1996-08-21 University Of Massachusetts Medical Center Methods of selecting a random peptide that binds to a target protein
AR000862A1 (en) 1995-02-03 1997-08-06 Novozymes As VARIANTS OF A MOTHER-AMYLASE, A METHOD TO PRODUCE THE SAME, A DNA STRUCTURE AND A VECTOR OF EXPRESSION, A CELL TRANSFORMED BY SUCH A DNA STRUCTURE AND VECTOR, A DETERGENT ADDITIVE, DETERGENT COMPOSITION, A COMPOSITION FOR AND A COMPOSITION FOR THE ELIMINATION OF
US6110668A (en) 1996-10-07 2000-08-29 Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Wissenschaften E.V. Gene synthesis method
GB9701425D0 (en) * 1997-01-24 1997-03-12 Bioinvent Int Ab A method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
US6153410A (en) * 1997-03-25 2000-11-28 California Institute Of Technology Recombination of polynucleotide sequences using random or defined primers

Patent Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5023171A (en) * 1989-08-10 1991-06-11 Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research Method for gene splicing by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction
US5573907A (en) * 1990-01-26 1996-11-12 Abbott Laboratories Detecting and amplifying target nucleic acids using exonucleolytic activity
US5969108A (en) * 1990-07-10 1999-10-19 Medical Research Council Methods for producing members of specific binding pairs
US5252479A (en) * 1991-11-08 1993-10-12 Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. Safe vector for gene therapy
US5395750A (en) * 1992-02-28 1995-03-07 Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. Methods for producing proteins which bind to predetermined antigens
US5830721A (en) * 1994-02-17 1998-11-03 Affymax Technologies N.V. DNA mutagenesis by random fragmentation and reassembly
US5811238A (en) * 1994-02-17 1998-09-22 Affymax Technologies N.V. Methods for generating polynucleotides having desired characteristics by iterative selection and recombination
US5605793A (en) * 1994-02-17 1997-02-25 Affymax Technologies N.V. Methods for in vitro recombination
US5948624A (en) * 1994-05-11 1999-09-07 Rothschild; Kenneth J. Methods for the detection and isolation of biomolecules
US6335160B1 (en) * 1995-02-17 2002-01-01 Maxygen, Inc. Methods and compositions for polypeptide engineering
US5834252A (en) * 1995-04-18 1998-11-10 Glaxo Group Limited End-complementary polymerase reaction
US6300064B1 (en) * 1995-08-18 2001-10-09 Morphosys Ag Protein/(poly)peptide libraries
US6159690A (en) * 1997-06-16 2000-12-12 Bioinvent International Ab Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function using exonuclease and amplification
US6495321B1 (en) * 1997-06-16 2002-12-17 Bioinvent International Ab Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
US5873458A (en) * 1997-09-12 1999-02-23 Kao; Kuo-Min Drawer type CD box structure

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0988378A1 (en) 2000-03-29
AU5771898A (en) 1998-08-18
US20030077613A1 (en) 2003-04-24
WO1998032845A1 (en) 1998-07-30
EP1352959A1 (en) 2003-10-15
ATE255163T1 (en) 2003-12-15
DE69820054D1 (en) 2004-01-08
CA2278585A1 (en) 1998-07-30
US6989250B2 (en) 2006-01-24
CA2278585C (en) 2011-09-27
PT988378E (en) 2004-04-30
DE69820054T2 (en) 2004-09-09
JP2001508660A (en) 2001-07-03
GB9701425D0 (en) 1997-03-12
AU745615B2 (en) 2002-03-28
EP0988378B1 (en) 2003-11-26
DK0988378T4 (en) 2009-12-14
EP0988378B2 (en) 2009-11-18
US20110287486A1 (en) 2011-11-24
JP3703499B2 (en) 2005-10-05
EP0988378B9 (en) 2010-08-04
US7432083B2 (en) 2008-10-07
ES2212260T3 (en) 2004-07-16
US20050266451A1 (en) 2005-12-01
DK0988378T3 (en) 2004-01-26
ES2212260T5 (en) 2010-04-05
DE69820054T3 (en) 2010-05-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6989250B2 (en) Method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
Low et al. Mimicking somatic hypermutation: affinity maturation of antibodies displayed on bacteriophage using a bacterial mutator strain
JP4067516B2 (en) DNA mutagenesis by random fragmentation and reassembly
JP4015193B2 (en) Method for producing a polynucleotide having desired characteristics by iterative selection and recombination
McGuinness et al. Phage diabody repertoires for selection of large numbers of bispecific antibody fragments
JPH06508511A (en) Method for producing specific binding pair members
WO2003035842A2 (en) Hybridization control of sequence variation
JP4842490B2 (en) Method of in vitro molecular evolution of antibody function
CA2430582C (en) A method for in vitro molecular evolution of protein function
AU2001252253A1 (en) A method for in vitro molecular evolution of antibody function
CA2593417C (en) Method of mutagenesis
JP2012503982A (en) Compatible display vector system
CA2125240A1 (en) Synthetic gene libraries
US8518645B2 (en) Method of mutagenesis
WO2017125871A1 (en) A method of generating a synthetic antibody library, said library and application(s) thereof
WO2006074765A1 (en) Molecular biology method
US8728983B2 (en) Phage display vector
Nielsen et al. Affinity maturation by chain shuffling and site directed mutagenesis
Huovinen Methods of genetic diversity creation and functional display for directed evolution experiments
AU2002353886A1 (en) Hybridization control of sequence variation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION