US20080083533A1 - Diagnostic sleeve shifting tool - Google Patents
Diagnostic sleeve shifting tool Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080083533A1 US20080083533A1 US11/539,240 US53924006A US2008083533A1 US 20080083533 A1 US20080083533 A1 US 20080083533A1 US 53924006 A US53924006 A US 53924006A US 2008083533 A1 US2008083533 A1 US 2008083533A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- well
- sleeve
- tool
- production
- condition
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 41
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 32
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 claims description 30
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 10
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 10
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 description 7
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 3
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000003129 oil well Substances 0.000 description 2
- 244000261422 Lysimachia clethroides Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001010 compromised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002285 radioactive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005204 segregation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B34/00—Valve arrangements for boreholes or wells
- E21B34/06—Valve arrangements for boreholes or wells in wells
- E21B34/14—Valve arrangements for boreholes or wells in wells operated by movement of tools, e.g. sleeve valves operated by pistons or wire line tools
Definitions
- Embodiments described relate to well configurations and diagnostic tools employed therefor.
- embodiments of diagnostic tools are described that include the capacity to shift or slide a sleeve within a well over a perforation or aperture in order to close or open the access to the well thereat.
- Well diagnostic tools may be employed to analyze the condition of a well and its surroundings. Such logging tools may come in handy for performing diagnostics in the face of an unintended event. For example, in the case of an oil well, unintended sudden or significant water production may occur. In light of such an event, a logging tool may be employed to determine an overall production profile of the well. A logging tool may be used to obtain fluid hydrocarbon, gas hydrocarbons and water saturation values as well as data relative to the geology surrounding the well. As described below, logging data may even be taken from many segments of the well.
- a production profile of the entire well may be obtained along with an understanding of the contribution of various well segments to that overall profile and how they inter-act in the dynamic behavior of a well.
- corrective maintenance may be performed on the well based on the results of the described logging application.
- Every production hour lost to the performance of other operations at the well, such as the described logging may be quite significant. For example, in the case of an offshore subsea well, the cost of any operation may exceed about $10,000 per hour whether productive in obtaining targeted fluids or not. Additionally, production time may be lost in taking corrective action following the logging application. That is, depending on the results of the logging application, certain sections of the well may need to be sealed off, for example to prevent water uptake as in the above noted scenario. Certain well features such as sliding sleeves may be employed to reduce this amount of additional time required to close off a well segment. However, even use of a sliding sleeve requires physical intervention by placement of a tool at the site of a sliding sleeve in order to manipulate its closure.
- a significant degree of additional production time and expense may be lost in taking the corrective action.
- this expense is exacerbated in the case of horizontal, high angle, subsea or other wells of challenging access configurations.
- a horizontal offshore well may be shut off for ten or more hours at a cost of several hundred thousand dollars in rig time and expense in order to run a logging application and take even minimal corrective action on the well such as effecting closure of a sliding sleeve.
- An apparatus includes a shaft with a diagnostic implement coupled thereto.
- the diagnostic implement may be used to establish a condition of a well.
- a sleeve shifting device is coupled to the shaft in order to move a sleeve within the well based on the condition.
- FIG. 1 is a side sectional overview of a well having a production assembly and a borehole assembly employing an embodiment of a diagnostic sleeve shifting tool.
- FIG. 2 is an enlarged view of the diagnostic sleeve shifting tool within the borehole assembly taken from section lines 2 - 2 of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 3A is a side cross sectional view of the diagnostic sleeve shifting tool of FIG. 2 positioned with an engagement mechanism thereof relative to a sleeve of the borehole assembly.
- FIG. 3B is a side cross sectional view of the diagnostic sleeve shifting tool of FIG. 3A with engagement mechanism actuated for engagement of the sleeve.
- FIG. 3C is a side cross sectional view of the diagnostic sleeve shifting tool of FIG. 3B engaged with and moving the sleeve via the engagement mechanism.
- FIG. 4 is a flow chart summarizing an embodiment of employing a diagnostic sleeve shifting tool to perform diagnostics on, and move a sleeve of, a well borehole assembly.
- Embodiments are described with reference to certain hydrocarbon well configurations and diagnostic tools. However, tools employing a variety of diagnostic implements applied to a host of different well configurations may be employed. Regardless, embodiments described herein include a diagnostic tool having the capacity to shift or slide a well sleeve between an open and a closed state over a well perforation or aperture.
- the well 101 includes a production assembly 175 coupled to a borehole assembly 177 .
- the well 101 is an offshore horizontal oil well as is apparent from the location of the production assembly 175 above the water 150 and the horizontal orientation of the borehole assembly 177 underground 155 .
- embodiments described herein may be applicable to a variety of well types including production and injection wells, wherein production fluids include but are not limited to oil, gas, condensate and water, while injection well include but are not limited to water, gas and carbon dioxide.
- use of an embodiment of a diagnostic sleeve shifting tool 100 may be of particular benefit for high angle (e.g. over about 55°), horizontal, offshore, or other wells of comparatively challenging accessibility.
- the production assembly 175 for the offshore horizontal well 101 of FIG. 1 includes a production deck 196 to accommodate applications for dealing with the challenges of advancing tools through a tortuous borehole assembly 177 .
- a coiled tubing application may be employed whereby coiled tubing 180 is drawn from a tubing reel 181 and advanced through a gooseneck guide 190 by an injector head 192 .
- the coiled tubing 180 may be directed beyond a production tree 198 with enough force to actually drill underground 155 .
- the coiled tubing 180 may be directed with enough force to advance a diagnostic sleeve shifting tool (DSST) 100 through the tortuous borehole assembly 177 .
- DSST diagnostic sleeve shifting tool
- a conventional jointed tubing or a wireline with a tractor mechanism may be employed in place of the coiled tubing 180 for moving the DSST 100 .
- the production assembly 175 may also include a control unit 194 with user interface, power unit 191 and other conventional production assembly features and tools.
- a production tree 198 is located below the production deck 196 where a variety of application hook-ups may be coupled.
- a single borehole assembly 177 is shown coupled to the production tree 198 .
- a variety of assemblies for any number of particular applications may be coupled to the production tree 198 .
- the borehole assembly 177 couples to the production tree 198 with a borehole casing 125 extending downward through the water 150 below the offshore well 101 and underground 155 .
- the borehole casing 125 lines a borehole that extends horizontally as alluded to above. This is not an uncommon occurrence in the case of an offshore well 101 .
- the horizontal nature of the borehole assembly 177 presents a tortuous path for advancement of a DSST 100 or other tools. As a result, advancement of such devices may be achieved with an aggressive application such as the described coiled tubing deployment technique. In other embodiments, advancement of such tools may be achieved with jointed tubing or conventional tractor applications, for example, to achieve downward sleeve opening as described further below.
- advancement and retrieval of a tool through an entire borehole assembly may take between about 6 and about 24 hours depending on factors such as the task to be performed by the tool, the extent and tortuousness of the borehole assembly 177 , and the particular application employed for advancement and retrieval of the tool.
- This may be especially important in the case of a high angle or horizontal well 101 as shown, where longer advancement and retrieval times may inherently be involved. For example, it may take more than two to four times as long to advance and retrieve a tool through a tortuous well 101 as shown, as compared to a substantially vertical well.
- the underground 155 portion of the well 101 reveals production regions 157 , 159 adjacent the horizontal portion of the borehole casing 125 .
- Perforations or apertures 131 , 132 in the borehole casing 125 are provided adjacent the production regions 157 , 159 .
- the well 101 may be provided with access to targeted fluids such as hydrocarbons which may be contained underground 155 .
- targeted fluids such as hydrocarbons which may be contained underground 155 .
- a variety of hydrocarbon and other gas or liquid fluids may be accessed underground 155 by such a well 101 .
- the well 101 is likely to extend through numerous additional production regions (not shown) before terminating.
- the well 101 may extend for several miles traversing potentially dozens of production regions from which targeted fluids may be drawn.
- these regions 157 , 159 appear to be fairly close to one another in FIG. 1 .
- such production regions 157 , 159 may be as much as a mile apart or more.
- the above described production regions 157 , 159 including those not necessarily shown in FIG. 1 , each contribute an individual amount to the overall production of the well 101 .
- a first production region 157 may contribute a first amount of targeted fluid to well operations while a second production region 159 may contribute a second amount.
- These amounts may vary from one region (i.e. 157 ) to the next (i.e. 159 ).
- added together an overall production profile for operations at the well 101 may be established.
- the overall production profile for operations at the well 101 may be at an optimum, with each production region positively contributing thereto.
- an event may arise in which production at a given production region (i.e. 157 , 159 ) is compromised, perhaps even to the point of adversely affecting the overall production profile for the well operations.
- the regions 157 , 159 may not be producing at all or may be taking in fluid.
- Embodiments of the DSST 100 may also be useful in these areas of the well. For example, upon detection of such an area the DSST 100 may be used to open an adjacent sleeve 135 , 136 and run a confirmation log to determine the affect of the sleeve closing.
- an adverse event such as water leakage into the first production region 157 may occur.
- This is a common scenario for nearly all maturing production well(s) 101 . Nevertheless, such water leakage may be to the point that the overall production profile of well operations is adversely affected. In fact, it may take no more than about 10% water production by the well 101 as a whole in order to render production operations at the well fruitless.
- it may be advantageous to close off the first production region 157 in order to optimize or restore effective production of the targeted hydrocarbon. In fact, as a preventative and optimizing measure, this may be done when no more than about 5% water production is encountered.
- Closing off the production region 157 or 159 may be achieved by closure of a corresponding sleeve 135 or 136 , respectively, adjacent thereto, as detailed further below.
- a corresponding sleeve 135 or 136 may be deemed economical and prudent to re-open a the sliding sleeve 135 , 136 producing at high water percentage as higher variations in produced fluids may be tolerable.
- the DSST 100 would be used at each of the decision points in the life of the well 101 .
- an example of an event at the first production region 157 is described.
- an event may present itself as a fairly sudden change in the production profile of well operations. In the example provided this might be the sudden emergence of water production adversely affecting the production of targeted hydrocarbons. However, the location of such water production may not readily be apparent. Therefore, a logging tool such as the DSST 100 may be employed for surveying the borehole assembly 177 to determine the site of the event as described further below. The DSST 100 may also be used to obtain fluid hydrocarbon and water saturation values as well as data relative to the geology surrounding the well 101 .
- the DSST 100 is capable of measuring all fluids and gases, and can determine if a given fluid is water, gas or oil and the velocity and/or rate of each phase.
- the DSST 100 may also be configured to determine the location (segregation) of the fluid (gas) type in the well bore. This can be determined at any location in the well 101 .
- the DSST 100 is shown advancing within the borehole casing 125 to the production regions 157 , 159 .
- the DSST 100 may include a shaft 250 equipped with a variety of diagnostic implements ( 220 , 240 , 260 , 280 ) to establish conditions of the well 101 within the borehole casing 125 .
- a saturation implement 220 may be provided to obtain water flow information.
- An ejector implement 260 may be employed in conjunction with the saturation implement 220 . That is, the ejector implement 260 may eject a non-radioactive marker for detection by the saturation implement 220 in establishing water flow information.
- diagnostic implements may include an imaging implement 240 as well as a fullbore spinner implement 280 to measure fluid velocity. Additionally, a variety of other diagnostic implements may be accommodated by the DSST 100 for establishing pressure, temperature or other well conditions. In one embodiment, the DSST 100 may include any means of obtaining logging information at the production regions of interest.
- coiled tubing 180 with the DSST 100 assembled thereto may then be advanced through the borehole assembly 177 .
- a conventional, and potentially more economical, tractor advancing mechanism may be employed.
- the DSST 100 may be advanced while acquiring data relative to each segment of the borehole assembly 177 including those immediately adjacent regions 157 , 159 as well as those less directly adjacent such regions 157 , 159 .
- a survey of the borehole assembly 177 to acquire data in this manner may be referred to as logging.
- Typical logging and follow on sleeve shifting procedures as described above may take ten hours or more at considerable expense given the loss of targeted fluid production during this procedure time. Therefore, the benefit of employing a DSST 100 that eliminates the introduction of a separate sleeve shifting tool and procedure may be quite significant as detailed below. That is, embodiments of a DSST 100 may be configured to eliminate the need for running a wholly separate follow on sleeve shifting procedure in order to close a sleeve 135 , 136 once the site of the water leak is established. As a result, potentially tens, and in some cases hundreds, of thousands of dollars in cost for rig and operation time required by the use of a conventional separate sleeve shifting procedures may be avoided.
- logging of the entire borehole assembly 177 with the DSST 100 as indicated above may provide operators with critical information.
- a logging procedure may be used to identify the source of an undesirable event such as the above noted water leakage. That is, in the above hypothetical scenario, an example of an event at the first production region 157 is described where water may be leaking through a first aperture 131 . Water leaking into the borehole casing 125 in this manner may significantly impair production of targeted fluids.
- the shaft 250 of the DSST 100 is equipped with a sleeve shifting device 200 in order to effect closure of a first sleeve 135 over the first aperture 131 to stop the indicated water leakage into the borehole casing 125 .
- this sleeve shifting device 200 which provides significant time and cost savings by eliminating the need to advance a separate sleeve shifting tool to the first aperture 131 to achieve closure of the first sleeve 135 .
- a method of moving a sleeve with the DSST 100 is shown. That is, with reference to the water leakage scenario noted above, a single DSST 100 may be employed for both running a logging procedure and for closing a first sleeve 135 over a first aperture 131 to prevent water leakage into the borehole casing 125 from the first production region 157 . With reference to FIG. 3A , the DSST 100 may be advanced throughout the borehole casing 125 of a well in running a logging procedure as described above and indicated at 420 .
- the DSST 100 may be drawn from the terminal end of the borehole casing 125 and toward the first sleeve 135 .
- the sleeve shifting device 200 is positioned adjacent the first sleeve 135 , slightly downhole thereof. In this manner, the sleeve shifting device 200 may be expanded, allowing further movement of the DSST 100 to close the first sleeve 135 as detailed below.
- the positioning and movement of the DSST 100 is achieved via coiled tubing 180 as described further below.
- a conventional tractor mechanism, or another appropriate means may be employed to achieve movement of the DSST 100 .
- the sleeve shifting device 200 is shown expanded from the shaft 250 of the DSST 100 adjacently downhole of the first sleeve 135 as indicated above. Precise positioning of the DSST 100 and sleeve shifting device 200 may be confirmed by an implement of the DSST 100 such as the imaging implement 240 or other locating device (see FIG. 2 ). Once positioned as indicated, an operator may send an electronic signal via wire or fiber optic cable to the DSST 100 for expansion of the sleeve shifting device 200 as shown. Expansion may be achieved physically by conventional means such as hydraulics. In one embodiment, expansion of the sleeve shifting device 200 may occur in an automated fashion via a control unit 194 or other mechanism having the capacity to take advantage of logging information obtained during the logging procedure.
- the DSST 100 with expanded sleeve shifting device 200 is shown being drawn from the borehole casing 125 in an uphole direction (see arrow 300 ). That is, the coiled tubing 180 is being retracted via conventional means at the production assembly 175 of FIG. 1 . Retraction of the coiled tubing 180 in this manner forces the expanded sleeve shifting device 200 into contact with the first sleeve 135 . Thus, given the sliding or shifting nature of the first sleeve 135 , it is drawn over the first aperture 131 in order to close off the first production region 157 as indicated at 450 . In this manner water leakage into the borehole casing 125 from the first production region 157 may be terminated.
- a diagnostic implement of the DSST 100 is employed at this time to confirm the cessation of water leakage. As indicated at 460 , such a confirmation log may help ensure that the intended shifting of the sleeve 135 and closure of the first aperture 131 has occurred.
- the sleeve shifting device 200 may be retracted back toward the shaft 250 allowing complete removal of the DSST 100 from within the borehole casing 125 .
- closure of the first aperture 131 and retraction of the sleeve shifting device 200 may be achieved manually or in an automated fashion which takes advantage of logging information obtained during the initial logging procedure.
- a closed sleeve similar to the first sleeve 135 may be opened by positioning the DSST 100 and sleeve shifting device 200 slightly uphole of the sleeve 135 and advancing the coiled tubing 180 downwardly.
- opening and closing of a sleeve may take place in an opposite direction to the embodiments shown herein.
- an expanded sleeve shifting device 200 may close a sleeve over a more downhole aperture by positioning the DSST 100 uphole of the sleeve and advancing there-toward. Similarly, opening of such an aperture may be achieved by positioning the DSST 100 slightly downhole of the sleeve and retracting the expanded sleeve shifting device 200 theretoward.
- the above described techniques of employing the DSST 100 may be employed to close off a water leak at the first production region 157 . As a result, the overall production profile of the well 101 may be optimized and the DSST 100 removed as indicated above.
- the DSST 100 is employed to perform diagnostics both before and after sleeve shifting procedures as indicated at 470 . That is, diagnostics may point to a particular production region 157 as the source of an event. However, it is possible that in order to achieve an optimum production profile, multiple sleeves may need to be shifted as described. In such circumstances, logging information may require updating after initial sleeve shifting procedures in order to determine subsequent sleeve shifting procedures that may be desired. Furthermore, even where this is not the case, it may be worthwhile to confirm the accuracy of the logging information while the DSST 100 remains within the borehole assembly 177 . That is, this may be preferable to shutting down production to re-run DSST 100 procedures in the unfortunate event that a single application of these procedures failed to optimize the overall production profile of the well 101 .
- logging information may be used to allow operators to take corrective action in the face of an undesirable event.
- logging information may also be employed in order to further optimize the overall production profile over the life of the well 101 .
- a well 101 may be configured with numerous sleeves adjacent numerous production regions as noted above.
- many of the sleeves may be open and many others closed, the status of each determined based on the particular conditions present at each production region at the outset of operations.
- the pressure present at several downhole production regions at the outset of operations may be minimal compared to the majority of the remaining production regions. Therefore, rather than allow these downhole production regions to potentially siphon off targeted fluids, they may initially be closed off by adjacent sleeves.
- the DSST 100 may be employed as a valuable management tool throughout the life of the well, not limited to use during more sudden undesirable events.
- the embodiments described herein provide a diagnostic sleeve shifting tool that eliminates the need for running an entirely separate sleeve shifting procedure and tool through a well once determining that a particular sleeve or sleeves of the well need to be shifted. Employment of such a diagnostic sleeve shifting tool may save considerable time and expense, perhaps even in the tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars range. This is due to the significant savings in production and equipment operation time that may be achieved by employing a single tool capable of both performing logging applications and follow-on sleeve shifting. Furthermore, the effectiveness of sleeve shifting may be established in real time by diagnostic implements of the tool while sleeve shifting capability remains in the well (i.e. also with the tool).
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- Embodiments described relate to well configurations and diagnostic tools employed therefor. In particular, embodiments of diagnostic tools are described that include the capacity to shift or slide a sleeve within a well over a perforation or aperture in order to close or open the access to the well thereat.
- Exploring, drilling and completing hydrocarbon and other wells are generally complicated, time consuming and ultimately very expensive endeavors. This may be especially true in the case of certain wells where the configuration and environment of the well presents added challenges, such as in the case of horizontal or subsea wells.
- In recognition of the potentially enormous expense of well completion added emphasis has been placed on well monitoring and maintenance over the years. That is, placing emphasis on increasing the life and productivity of a given well may help ensure that the well provides a healthy return on the significant investment involved in its completion. Thus, over the years, well diagnostics have become a more sophisticated and critical part of managing well operations.
- Well diagnostic tools, often referred to as production logging tools, may be employed to analyze the condition of a well and its surroundings. Such logging tools may come in handy for performing diagnostics in the face of an unintended event. For example, in the case of an oil well, unintended sudden or significant water production may occur. In light of such an event, a logging tool may be employed to determine an overall production profile of the well. A logging tool may be used to obtain fluid hydrocarbon, gas hydrocarbons and water saturation values as well as data relative to the geology surrounding the well. As described below, logging data may even be taken from many segments of the well. Thus, a production profile of the entire well may be obtained along with an understanding of the contribution of various well segments to that overall profile and how they inter-act in the dynamic behavior of a well. As also described below, corrective maintenance may be performed on the well based on the results of the described logging application.
- Unfortunately, running a logging tool through a well as indicated above requires that production from the well be shut off while a logging cable, with logging tool attached thereto, is lowered into the well. This may require well production to be shut off for six hours or more in a vertical well. Furthermore, in the case of horizontal or incline wells, common in the case of subsea wells, slower and more aggressive techniques such as coiled tubing may be necessary in order to advance the logging tool through the well for taking various measurements. Such a well may be shut off for 6-8 hours just to advance the logging tool through the well. Additional production time is then lost in performing analysis with the logging tool and thereafter removing the tool from the well.
- Every production hour lost to the performance of other operations at the well, such as the described logging may be quite significant. For example, in the case of an offshore subsea well, the cost of any operation may exceed about $10,000 per hour whether productive in obtaining targeted fluids or not. Additionally, production time may be lost in taking corrective action following the logging application. That is, depending on the results of the logging application, certain sections of the well may need to be sealed off, for example to prevent water uptake as in the above noted scenario. Certain well features such as sliding sleeves may be employed to reduce this amount of additional time required to close off a well segment. However, even use of a sliding sleeve requires physical intervention by placement of a tool at the site of a sliding sleeve in order to manipulate its closure. Thus, a significant degree of additional production time and expense may be lost in taking the corrective action. As alluded to above, this expense is exacerbated in the case of horizontal, high angle, subsea or other wells of challenging access configurations. For example, a horizontal offshore well may be shut off for ten or more hours at a cost of several hundred thousand dollars in rig time and expense in order to run a logging application and take even minimal corrective action on the well such as effecting closure of a sliding sleeve.
- An apparatus is provided that includes a shaft with a diagnostic implement coupled thereto. The diagnostic implement may be used to establish a condition of a well. Additionally, a sleeve shifting device is coupled to the shaft in order to move a sleeve within the well based on the condition.
-
FIG. 1 is a side sectional overview of a well having a production assembly and a borehole assembly employing an embodiment of a diagnostic sleeve shifting tool. -
FIG. 2 is an enlarged view of the diagnostic sleeve shifting tool within the borehole assembly taken from section lines 2-2 ofFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 3A is a side cross sectional view of the diagnostic sleeve shifting tool ofFIG. 2 positioned with an engagement mechanism thereof relative to a sleeve of the borehole assembly. -
FIG. 3B is a side cross sectional view of the diagnostic sleeve shifting tool ofFIG. 3A with engagement mechanism actuated for engagement of the sleeve. -
FIG. 3C is a side cross sectional view of the diagnostic sleeve shifting tool ofFIG. 3B engaged with and moving the sleeve via the engagement mechanism. -
FIG. 4 is a flow chart summarizing an embodiment of employing a diagnostic sleeve shifting tool to perform diagnostics on, and move a sleeve of, a well borehole assembly. - Embodiments are described with reference to certain hydrocarbon well configurations and diagnostic tools. However, tools employing a variety of diagnostic implements applied to a host of different well configurations may be employed. Regardless, embodiments described herein include a diagnostic tool having the capacity to shift or slide a well sleeve between an open and a closed state over a well perforation or aperture.
- Referring now to
FIG. 1 , an embodiment of a well 101 is shown. The well 101 includes aproduction assembly 175 coupled to aborehole assembly 177. In the embodiment shown, the well 101 is an offshore horizontal oil well as is apparent from the location of theproduction assembly 175 above thewater 150 and the horizontal orientation of theborehole assembly 177underground 155. However, embodiments described herein may be applicable to a variety of well types including production and injection wells, wherein production fluids include but are not limited to oil, gas, condensate and water, while injection well include but are not limited to water, gas and carbon dioxide. Nevertheless, use of an embodiment of a diagnosticsleeve shifting tool 100 may be of particular benefit for high angle (e.g. over about 55°), horizontal, offshore, or other wells of comparatively challenging accessibility. - In terms of challenging accessibility, the
production assembly 175 for the offshore horizontal well 101 ofFIG. 1 includes aproduction deck 196 to accommodate applications for dealing with the challenges of advancing tools through atortuous borehole assembly 177. For example, a coiled tubing application may be employed whereby coiledtubing 180 is drawn from atubing reel 181 and advanced through agooseneck guide 190 by aninjector head 192. In certain applications, thecoiled tubing 180 may be directed beyond aproduction tree 198 with enough force to actually drill underground 155. Thus, in the embodiment shown, thecoiled tubing 180 may be directed with enough force to advance a diagnostic sleeve shifting tool (DSST) 100 through thetortuous borehole assembly 177. In an alternate embodiment, however, a conventional jointed tubing or a wireline with a tractor mechanism may be employed in place of the coiledtubing 180 for moving theDSST 100. - Continuing with reference to
FIG. 1 , theproduction assembly 175 may also include acontrol unit 194 with user interface,power unit 191 and other conventional production assembly features and tools. As indicated above, aproduction tree 198 is located below theproduction deck 196 where a variety of application hook-ups may be coupled. For purposes here, asingle borehole assembly 177 is shown coupled to theproduction tree 198. However, in other embodiments a variety of assemblies for any number of particular applications may be coupled to theproduction tree 198. - The
borehole assembly 177 couples to theproduction tree 198 with aborehole casing 125 extending downward through thewater 150 below theoffshore well 101 andunderground 155. In the embodiment shown, theborehole casing 125 lines a borehole that extends horizontally as alluded to above. This is not an uncommon occurrence in the case of anoffshore well 101. However, as also alluded to above, the horizontal nature of theborehole assembly 177 presents a tortuous path for advancement of aDSST 100 or other tools. As a result, advancement of such devices may be achieved with an aggressive application such as the described coiled tubing deployment technique. In other embodiments, advancement of such tools may be achieved with jointed tubing or conventional tractor applications, for example, to achieve downward sleeve opening as described further below. - Regardless of the particular application employed, advancement and retrieval of a tool through an entire borehole assembly may take between about 6 and about 24 hours depending on factors such as the task to be performed by the tool, the extent and tortuousness of the
borehole assembly 177, and the particular application employed for advancement and retrieval of the tool. Thus, the significance of efficient and proper performance of the tool along with its efficient advancement and retrieval may be seen. This may be especially important in the case of a high angle or horizontal well 101 as shown, where longer advancement and retrieval times may inherently be involved. For example, it may take more than two to four times as long to advance and retrieve a tool through a tortuous well 101 as shown, as compared to a substantially vertical well. - The significance of the above described time and expense involved, may be magnified where erroneous performance by an inserted tool results in the need to repeat the procedure, once again shutting off targeted fluid production by the well 101 for an extensive period of time. Thus, as described below, any reduction in the amount of time the
well 101 is shut down for such procedures may be of great benefit. Such benefit may be afforded by use of aDSST 100 as described further below. - Continuing with reference to
FIG. 1 , the underground 155 portion of the well 101 revealsproduction regions borehole casing 125. Perforations orapertures borehole casing 125 are provided adjacent theproduction regions well 101. Additionally, while only twoproduction regions corresponding apertures regions FIG. 1 . However,such production regions - The above described
production regions FIG. 1 , each contribute an individual amount to the overall production of thewell 101. For example, afirst production region 157 may contribute a first amount of targeted fluid to well operations while asecond production region 159 may contribute a second amount. These amounts may vary from one region (i.e. 157) to the next (i.e. 159). However, added together an overall production profile for operations at the well 101 may be established. - As indicated above, potential disparity between the contributions of the above noted production regions (i.e. 157, 159) may be present. Nevertheless, the overall production profile for operations at the well 101 may be at an optimum, with each production region positively contributing thereto. However, in certain circumstances an event may arise in which production at a given production region (i.e. 157, 159) is compromised, perhaps even to the point of adversely affecting the overall production profile for the well operations. Note that in some instances the
regions DSST 100 may also be useful in these areas of the well. For example, upon detection of such an area theDSST 100 may be used to open anadjacent sleeve - By way of example, in an embodiment where the targeted fluid is a hydrocarbon, an adverse event such as water leakage into the
first production region 157 may occur. This is a common scenario for nearly all maturing production well(s) 101. Nevertheless, such water leakage may be to the point that the overall production profile of well operations is adversely affected. In fact, it may take no more than about 10% water production by the well 101 as a whole in order to render production operations at the well fruitless. Thus, as described below, rather than cease operations at the well 101 altogether, it may be advantageous to close off thefirst production region 157 in order to optimize or restore effective production of the targeted hydrocarbon. In fact, as a preventative and optimizing measure, this may be done when no more than about 5% water production is encountered. Closing off theproduction region corresponding sleeve sleeve DSST 100 would be used at each of the decision points in the life of thewell 101. - In the above hypothetical scenario, an example of an event at the
first production region 157 is described. In practice, however, it would be likely that the particular region of the event would be unknown, at least initially. For example, from the standpoint of operators at theproduction assembly 175, an event may present itself as a fairly sudden change in the production profile of well operations. In the example provided this might be the sudden emergence of water production adversely affecting the production of targeted hydrocarbons. However, the location of such water production may not readily be apparent. Therefore, a logging tool such as theDSST 100 may be employed for surveying theborehole assembly 177 to determine the site of the event as described further below. TheDSST 100 may also be used to obtain fluid hydrocarbon and water saturation values as well as data relative to the geology surrounding thewell 101. In one embodiment theDSST 100 is capable of measuring all fluids and gases, and can determine if a given fluid is water, gas or oil and the velocity and/or rate of each phase. TheDSST 100 may also be configured to determine the location (segregation) of the fluid (gas) type in the well bore. This can be determined at any location in thewell 101. - Continuing with reference to
FIGS. 1 and 2 , theDSST 100 is shown advancing within theborehole casing 125 to theproduction regions DSST 100 may include ashaft 250 equipped with a variety of diagnostic implements (220, 240, 260, 280) to establish conditions of the well 101 within theborehole casing 125. For example, a saturation implement 220 may be provided to obtain water flow information. An ejector implement 260 may be employed in conjunction with the saturation implement 220. That is, the ejector implement 260 may eject a non-radioactive marker for detection by the saturation implement 220 in establishing water flow information. Other diagnostic implements may include an imaging implement 240 as well as a fullbore spinner implement 280 to measure fluid velocity. Additionally, a variety of other diagnostic implements may be accommodated by theDSST 100 for establishing pressure, temperature or other well conditions. In one embodiment, theDSST 100 may include any means of obtaining logging information at the production regions of interest. - In the case of an event, such as the above noted water production, recovery of targeted fluids by the
production assembly 175 may be temporarily terminated. In the embodiment shown, coiledtubing 180 with theDSST 100 assembled thereto may then be advanced through theborehole assembly 177. Alternatively, a conventional, and potentially more economical, tractor advancing mechanism may be employed. As indicated above, theDSST 100 may be advanced while acquiring data relative to each segment of theborehole assembly 177 including those immediatelyadjacent regions such regions borehole assembly 177 to acquire data in this manner may be referred to as logging. - Typical logging and follow on sleeve shifting procedures as described above may take ten hours or more at considerable expense given the loss of targeted fluid production during this procedure time. Therefore, the benefit of employing a
DSST 100 that eliminates the introduction of a separate sleeve shifting tool and procedure may be quite significant as detailed below. That is, embodiments of aDSST 100 may be configured to eliminate the need for running a wholly separate follow on sleeve shifting procedure in order to close asleeve - Continuing with reference to
FIGS. 1 and 2 , logging of theentire borehole assembly 177 with theDSST 100 as indicated above may provide operators with critical information. For example, such a logging procedure may be used to identify the source of an undesirable event such as the above noted water leakage. That is, in the above hypothetical scenario, an example of an event at thefirst production region 157 is described where water may be leaking through afirst aperture 131. Water leaking into theborehole casing 125 in this manner may significantly impair production of targeted fluids. Therefore, theshaft 250 of theDSST 100 is equipped with asleeve shifting device 200 in order to effect closure of afirst sleeve 135 over thefirst aperture 131 to stop the indicated water leakage into theborehole casing 125. As described further herein, it is thissleeve shifting device 200 which provides significant time and cost savings by eliminating the need to advance a separate sleeve shifting tool to thefirst aperture 131 to achieve closure of thefirst sleeve 135. - Referring now to
FIGS. 3A-3C , and with added reference to the flow-chart ofFIG. 4 , a method of moving a sleeve with theDSST 100 is shown. That is, with reference to the water leakage scenario noted above, asingle DSST 100 may be employed for both running a logging procedure and for closing afirst sleeve 135 over afirst aperture 131 to prevent water leakage into the borehole casing 125 from thefirst production region 157. With reference toFIG. 3A , theDSST 100 may be advanced throughout theborehole casing 125 of a well in running a logging procedure as described above and indicated at 420. Once the water leakage information is established by the logging procedure, theDSST 100 may be drawn from the terminal end of theborehole casing 125 and toward thefirst sleeve 135. As shown inFIG. 3A and indicated at 430, thesleeve shifting device 200 is positioned adjacent thefirst sleeve 135, slightly downhole thereof. In this manner, thesleeve shifting device 200 may be expanded, allowing further movement of theDSST 100 to close thefirst sleeve 135 as detailed below. In the embodiment ofFIGS. 3A-3C , the positioning and movement of theDSST 100 is achieved via coiledtubing 180 as described further below. However in an alternate embodiment a conventional tractor mechanism, or another appropriate means, may be employed to achieve movement of theDSST 100. - Referring specifically to
FIG. 3B , thesleeve shifting device 200 is shown expanded from theshaft 250 of theDSST 100 adjacently downhole of thefirst sleeve 135 as indicated above. Precise positioning of theDSST 100 andsleeve shifting device 200 may be confirmed by an implement of theDSST 100 such as the imaging implement 240 or other locating device (seeFIG. 2 ). Once positioned as indicated, an operator may send an electronic signal via wire or fiber optic cable to theDSST 100 for expansion of thesleeve shifting device 200 as shown. Expansion may be achieved physically by conventional means such as hydraulics. In one embodiment, expansion of thesleeve shifting device 200 may occur in an automated fashion via acontrol unit 194 or other mechanism having the capacity to take advantage of logging information obtained during the logging procedure. - Referring now to
FIG. 3C , theDSST 100 with expandedsleeve shifting device 200 is shown being drawn from theborehole casing 125 in an uphole direction (see arrow 300). That is, thecoiled tubing 180 is being retracted via conventional means at theproduction assembly 175 ofFIG. 1 . Retraction of the coiledtubing 180 in this manner forces the expandedsleeve shifting device 200 into contact with thefirst sleeve 135. Thus, given the sliding or shifting nature of thefirst sleeve 135, it is drawn over thefirst aperture 131 in order to close off thefirst production region 157 as indicated at 450. In this manner water leakage into the borehole casing 125 from thefirst production region 157 may be terminated. In one embodiment, a diagnostic implement of theDSST 100 is employed at this time to confirm the cessation of water leakage. As indicated at 460, such a confirmation log may help ensure that the intended shifting of thesleeve 135 and closure of thefirst aperture 131 has occurred. - Once closure of the
first aperture 131 is achieved, thesleeve shifting device 200 may be retracted back toward theshaft 250 allowing complete removal of theDSST 100 from within theborehole casing 125. Once again, closure of thefirst aperture 131 and retraction of thesleeve shifting device 200 may be achieved manually or in an automated fashion which takes advantage of logging information obtained during the initial logging procedure. - The above described method of employing the
DSST 100 details closure of asleeve 135 by retraction ofcoiled tubing 180. However, in another embodiment a closed sleeve, similar to thefirst sleeve 135 may be opened by positioning theDSST 100 andsleeve shifting device 200 slightly uphole of thesleeve 135 and advancing thecoiled tubing 180 downwardly. Additionally, in an alternative configuration of theborehole assembly 177, opening and closing of a sleeve may take place in an opposite direction to the embodiments shown herein. For example, in such an alternate configuration, an expandedsleeve shifting device 200 may close a sleeve over a more downhole aperture by positioning theDSST 100 uphole of the sleeve and advancing there-toward. Similarly, opening of such an aperture may be achieved by positioning theDSST 100 slightly downhole of the sleeve and retracting the expandedsleeve shifting device 200 theretoward. The above described techniques of employing theDSST 100 may be employed to close off a water leak at thefirst production region 157. As a result, the overall production profile of the well 101 may be optimized and theDSST 100 removed as indicated above. However, in one embodiment, theDSST 100 is employed to perform diagnostics both before and after sleeve shifting procedures as indicated at 470. That is, diagnostics may point to aparticular production region 157 as the source of an event. However, it is possible that in order to achieve an optimum production profile, multiple sleeves may need to be shifted as described. In such circumstances, logging information may require updating after initial sleeve shifting procedures in order to determine subsequent sleeve shifting procedures that may be desired. Furthermore, even where this is not the case, it may be worthwhile to confirm the accuracy of the logging information while theDSST 100 remains within theborehole assembly 177. That is, this may be preferable to shutting down production to re-runDSST 100 procedures in the unfortunate event that a single application of these procedures failed to optimize the overall production profile of thewell 101. - As indicated above, logging information may be used to allow operators to take corrective action in the face of an undesirable event. However, such logging information may also be employed in order to further optimize the overall production profile over the life of the
well 101. For example, a well 101 may be configured with numerous sleeves adjacent numerous production regions as noted above. At the outset of operations at the well 101 many of the sleeves may be open and many others closed, the status of each determined based on the particular conditions present at each production region at the outset of operations. For example, in one scenario the pressure present at several downhole production regions at the outset of operations may be minimal compared to the majority of the remaining production regions. Therefore, rather than allow these downhole production regions to potentially siphon off targeted fluids, they may initially be closed off by adjacent sleeves. However, over the life of the well 101, pressure at the remaining production regions may naturally decrease to about that of the downhole production regions. Confirmation of this fact and corresponding opening of the downhole production regions may be achieved in a single application of theDSST 100 as described above. Thus, theDSST 100 may be employed as a valuable management tool throughout the life of the well, not limited to use during more sudden undesirable events. - The embodiments described herein provide a diagnostic sleeve shifting tool that eliminates the need for running an entirely separate sleeve shifting procedure and tool through a well once determining that a particular sleeve or sleeves of the well need to be shifted. Employment of such a diagnostic sleeve shifting tool may save considerable time and expense, perhaps even in the tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars range. This is due to the significant savings in production and equipment operation time that may be achieved by employing a single tool capable of both performing logging applications and follow-on sleeve shifting. Furthermore, the effectiveness of sleeve shifting may be established in real time by diagnostic implements of the tool while sleeve shifting capability remains in the well (i.e. also with the tool). Thus, additional cost savings may be experienced in the form of improved effectiveness of diagnostic and sleeve shifting operations. Furthermore, while exemplary embodiments described, other embodiments are possible. Additionally, many changes, modifications, and substitutions may be made without departing from the scope of the described embodiments.
Claims (25)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/539,240 US7543636B2 (en) | 2006-10-06 | 2006-10-06 | Diagnostic sleeve shifting tool |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/539,240 US7543636B2 (en) | 2006-10-06 | 2006-10-06 | Diagnostic sleeve shifting tool |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080083533A1 true US20080083533A1 (en) | 2008-04-10 |
US7543636B2 US7543636B2 (en) | 2009-06-09 |
Family
ID=39274130
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/539,240 Active 2027-02-10 US7543636B2 (en) | 2006-10-06 | 2006-10-06 | Diagnostic sleeve shifting tool |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7543636B2 (en) |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070137291A1 (en) * | 2005-10-14 | 2007-06-21 | Annabel Green | Tubing expansion |
US20090194296A1 (en) * | 2008-02-01 | 2009-08-06 | Peter Gillan | Extended Length Cable Assembly for a Hydrocarbon Well Application |
US8413723B2 (en) | 2006-01-12 | 2013-04-09 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods of using enhanced wellbore electrical cables |
US9027657B2 (en) | 2009-09-22 | 2015-05-12 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Wireline cable for use with downhole tractor assemblies |
US20150176369A1 (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2015-06-25 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Autonomous selective shifting tool |
US9412492B2 (en) | 2009-04-17 | 2016-08-09 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Torque-balanced, gas-sealed wireline cables |
EP2705212A4 (en) * | 2011-05-06 | 2016-10-05 | Services Petroliers Schlumberger | Downhole shifting tool |
US11387014B2 (en) | 2009-04-17 | 2022-07-12 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Torque-balanced, gas-sealed wireline cables |
US20230400349A1 (en) * | 2022-06-10 | 2023-12-14 | Astro Technology Group, Llc | Pipeline condition sensing for protecting against theft of a substance flowing through a pipeline |
US20240175354A1 (en) * | 2022-11-29 | 2024-05-30 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Well testing method using tubing hanger deployed apparatus |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8517112B2 (en) * | 2009-04-30 | 2013-08-27 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System and method for subsea control and monitoring |
EP2290190A1 (en) * | 2009-08-31 | 2011-03-02 | Services Petroliers Schlumberger | Method and apparatus for controlled bidirectional movement of an oilfield tool in a wellbore environment |
AU2011313769A1 (en) | 2010-10-05 | 2013-05-02 | Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. | Wireline conveyed apparatus for wellbore fluid treatment |
US9080420B2 (en) * | 2011-08-19 | 2015-07-14 | Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc | Multiple shift sliding sleeve |
US10280698B2 (en) * | 2016-10-24 | 2019-05-07 | General Electric Company | Well restimulation downhole assembly |
Citations (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2726848A (en) * | 1954-09-27 | 1955-12-13 | Montgomery | Logging sub |
US4254832A (en) * | 1978-11-13 | 1981-03-10 | Westbay Instruments Ltd. | Sampler and measurement apparatus |
US4917191A (en) * | 1989-02-09 | 1990-04-17 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for selectively shifting a tool member |
US5044436A (en) * | 1990-08-24 | 1991-09-03 | Chevron Research And Technology Company | Steam injection profiling with unstable radioactive isotopes |
US5186255A (en) * | 1991-07-16 | 1993-02-16 | Corey John C | Flow monitoring and control system for injection wells |
US5305833A (en) * | 1993-02-16 | 1994-04-26 | Halliburton Company | Shifting tool for sliding sleeve valves |
US5589825A (en) * | 1994-07-06 | 1996-12-31 | Lwt Instruments Inc. | Logging or measurement while tripping |
US6026911A (en) * | 1996-12-02 | 2000-02-22 | Intelligent Inspection Corporation | Downhole tools using artificial intelligence based control |
US6554064B1 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2003-04-29 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method and apparatus for a sand screen with integrated sensors |
US20040055746A1 (en) * | 2002-06-19 | 2004-03-25 | Ross Colby Munro | Subterranean well completion incorporating downhole-parkable robot therein |
US6722439B2 (en) * | 2002-03-26 | 2004-04-20 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Multi-positioned sliding sleeve valve |
US6755257B2 (en) * | 2001-02-09 | 2004-06-29 | Reeves Wireline Technologies Limited | Drillpipe assembly and a method of deploying a logging tool |
US20050067563A1 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-03-31 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Apparatus and method for determining thermal neutron capture cross section of a subsurface formation from a borehole using multiple detectors |
US20050072577A1 (en) * | 2003-10-07 | 2005-04-07 | Freeman Tommie A. | Apparatus for actuating a well tool and method for use of same |
US20050126787A1 (en) * | 2003-12-11 | 2005-06-16 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Lock mechanism for a sliding sleeve |
US20050199394A1 (en) * | 2001-12-19 | 2005-09-15 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Production Profile Determination and Modification System |
US6961663B2 (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2005-11-01 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Borehole compensation system and method for a resistivity logging tool |
US20050288819A1 (en) * | 2002-10-11 | 2005-12-29 | Neil De Guzman | Apparatus and method for an autonomous robotic system for performing activities in a well |
US6983795B2 (en) * | 2002-04-08 | 2006-01-10 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Downhole zone isolation system |
US20060054316A1 (en) * | 2004-09-13 | 2006-03-16 | Heaney Francis M | Method and apparatus for production logging |
US7134493B2 (en) * | 2001-03-09 | 2006-11-14 | Shell Oil Company | Logging system for use in a wellbore |
US20070272408A1 (en) * | 2006-05-26 | 2007-11-29 | Zazovsky Alexander F | Flow control using a tortuous path |
US20080065362A1 (en) * | 2006-09-08 | 2008-03-13 | Lee Jim H | Well completion modeling and management of well completion |
-
2006
- 2006-10-06 US US11/539,240 patent/US7543636B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (29)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2726848A (en) * | 1954-09-27 | 1955-12-13 | Montgomery | Logging sub |
US4254832A (en) * | 1978-11-13 | 1981-03-10 | Westbay Instruments Ltd. | Sampler and measurement apparatus |
US4917191A (en) * | 1989-02-09 | 1990-04-17 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for selectively shifting a tool member |
US5044436A (en) * | 1990-08-24 | 1991-09-03 | Chevron Research And Technology Company | Steam injection profiling with unstable radioactive isotopes |
US5186255A (en) * | 1991-07-16 | 1993-02-16 | Corey John C | Flow monitoring and control system for injection wells |
US5305833A (en) * | 1993-02-16 | 1994-04-26 | Halliburton Company | Shifting tool for sliding sleeve valves |
US5589825A (en) * | 1994-07-06 | 1996-12-31 | Lwt Instruments Inc. | Logging or measurement while tripping |
US6026911A (en) * | 1996-12-02 | 2000-02-22 | Intelligent Inspection Corporation | Downhole tools using artificial intelligence based control |
US6554064B1 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2003-04-29 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method and apparatus for a sand screen with integrated sensors |
US20030085038A1 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2003-05-08 | Restarick Henry L. | Sand screen with integrated sensors |
US6684951B2 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2004-02-03 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Sand screen with integrated sensors |
US6755257B2 (en) * | 2001-02-09 | 2004-06-29 | Reeves Wireline Technologies Limited | Drillpipe assembly and a method of deploying a logging tool |
US7134493B2 (en) * | 2001-03-09 | 2006-11-14 | Shell Oil Company | Logging system for use in a wellbore |
US6961663B2 (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2005-11-01 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Borehole compensation system and method for a resistivity logging tool |
US20050199394A1 (en) * | 2001-12-19 | 2005-09-15 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Production Profile Determination and Modification System |
US6722439B2 (en) * | 2002-03-26 | 2004-04-20 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Multi-positioned sliding sleeve valve |
US6983795B2 (en) * | 2002-04-08 | 2006-01-10 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Downhole zone isolation system |
US6799633B2 (en) * | 2002-06-19 | 2004-10-05 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Dockable direct mechanical actuator for downhole tools and method |
US6953094B2 (en) * | 2002-06-19 | 2005-10-11 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Subterranean well completion incorporating downhole-parkable robot therein |
US20040055746A1 (en) * | 2002-06-19 | 2004-03-25 | Ross Colby Munro | Subterranean well completion incorporating downhole-parkable robot therein |
US20050288819A1 (en) * | 2002-10-11 | 2005-12-29 | Neil De Guzman | Apparatus and method for an autonomous robotic system for performing activities in a well |
US7303010B2 (en) * | 2002-10-11 | 2007-12-04 | Intelligent Robotic Corporation | Apparatus and method for an autonomous robotic system for performing activities in a well |
US20050067563A1 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-03-31 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Apparatus and method for determining thermal neutron capture cross section of a subsurface formation from a borehole using multiple detectors |
US20050072577A1 (en) * | 2003-10-07 | 2005-04-07 | Freeman Tommie A. | Apparatus for actuating a well tool and method for use of same |
US7150318B2 (en) * | 2003-10-07 | 2006-12-19 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Apparatus for actuating a well tool and method for use of same |
US20050126787A1 (en) * | 2003-12-11 | 2005-06-16 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Lock mechanism for a sliding sleeve |
US20060054316A1 (en) * | 2004-09-13 | 2006-03-16 | Heaney Francis M | Method and apparatus for production logging |
US20070272408A1 (en) * | 2006-05-26 | 2007-11-29 | Zazovsky Alexander F | Flow control using a tortuous path |
US20080065362A1 (en) * | 2006-09-08 | 2008-03-13 | Lee Jim H | Well completion modeling and management of well completion |
Cited By (25)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9140115B2 (en) | 2005-01-12 | 2015-09-22 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods of using enhanced wellbore electrical cables |
US8549906B2 (en) | 2005-10-14 | 2013-10-08 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Tubing expansion |
US20070137291A1 (en) * | 2005-10-14 | 2007-06-21 | Annabel Green | Tubing expansion |
US20090000794A1 (en) * | 2005-10-14 | 2009-01-01 | Annabel Green | Tubing expansion |
US7634942B2 (en) * | 2005-10-14 | 2009-12-22 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Tubing expansion |
US20100078166A1 (en) * | 2005-10-14 | 2010-04-01 | Annabel Green | Tubing expansion |
US7913555B2 (en) | 2005-10-14 | 2011-03-29 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Tubing expansion |
US20110168386A1 (en) * | 2005-10-14 | 2011-07-14 | Annabel Green | Tubing expansion |
US7500389B2 (en) * | 2005-10-14 | 2009-03-10 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Tubing expansion |
US8413723B2 (en) | 2006-01-12 | 2013-04-09 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods of using enhanced wellbore electrical cables |
US8807225B2 (en) | 2006-01-12 | 2014-08-19 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods of using enhanced wellbore electrical cables |
US8697992B2 (en) * | 2008-02-01 | 2014-04-15 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Extended length cable assembly for a hydrocarbon well application |
US20090194296A1 (en) * | 2008-02-01 | 2009-08-06 | Peter Gillan | Extended Length Cable Assembly for a Hydrocarbon Well Application |
US9412492B2 (en) | 2009-04-17 | 2016-08-09 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Torque-balanced, gas-sealed wireline cables |
US11387014B2 (en) | 2009-04-17 | 2022-07-12 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Torque-balanced, gas-sealed wireline cables |
US9027657B2 (en) | 2009-09-22 | 2015-05-12 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Wireline cable for use with downhole tractor assemblies |
US9677359B2 (en) | 2009-09-22 | 2017-06-13 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Wireline cable for use with downhole tractor assemblies |
US10240416B2 (en) | 2009-09-22 | 2019-03-26 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Wireline cable for use with downhole tractor assemblies |
US10605022B2 (en) | 2009-09-22 | 2020-03-31 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Wireline cable for use with downhole tractor assemblies |
EP2705212A4 (en) * | 2011-05-06 | 2016-10-05 | Services Petroliers Schlumberger | Downhole shifting tool |
US10006263B2 (en) | 2011-05-06 | 2018-06-26 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Downhole shifting tool |
US9759040B2 (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2017-09-12 | Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc | Autonomous selective shifting tool |
US20150176369A1 (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2015-06-25 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Autonomous selective shifting tool |
US20230400349A1 (en) * | 2022-06-10 | 2023-12-14 | Astro Technology Group, Llc | Pipeline condition sensing for protecting against theft of a substance flowing through a pipeline |
US20240175354A1 (en) * | 2022-11-29 | 2024-05-30 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Well testing method using tubing hanger deployed apparatus |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7543636B2 (en) | 2009-06-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7543636B2 (en) | Diagnostic sleeve shifting tool | |
CA2499340C (en) | Downhole sampling tool and method for using same | |
US10774635B2 (en) | Restimulation process using coiled tubing and fiber optics | |
US12025968B2 (en) | Systems and methods for positioning a shifting profile geometry | |
US10883365B2 (en) | Embeddable downhole probe | |
Sehsah et al. | Intelligent drilling system: expanding the envelope of wired drill pipe | |
US20230323771A1 (en) | Method and system for monitoring an annulus pressure of a well | |
US8511391B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for coupling conduit segments | |
US11231315B2 (en) | Acoustic detection of position of a component of a fluid control device | |
Shumakov et al. | Get the Most About Your Reservoir From Downhole Pressure Data by Managing Environmental and Operational Interference | |
US9732611B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for formation testing and sampling when performing subterranean operations | |
CN101519962B (en) | Valve sleeve shifting tool for diagnosis | |
Julian et al. | Use of 3D visualization software for multifinger caliper analysis at Prudhoe Bay, Alaska | |
Fornari et al. | Challenges and Innovations in Water Shut off for Naturally Fractured Reservoir in Subsea Wells | |
US20240353810A1 (en) | Normalized shifting visualizer | |
US20140298894A1 (en) | Line pressure testing technique | |
Soerensen et al. | Electromechanical Wireline Tool for DHSV Investigation and Remediation | |
Maxted et al. | Advances in multi-finger caliper technology and data acquisition | |
Nwabulue et al. | Well Test Design & Acquisition Strategies: Proactively Assuring Data Usability by Optimizing Design and Data Acquisition | |
Paluruan et al. | Successful DST Operation in Deep, HPHT, Wildcat Exploration Well Deploying the Newest Technology in Wireless Telemetry SRO and Upgraded Bottomhole Sampling System | |
Setiawan et al. | Samarang Downhole Integrity Diagnostic Techniques | |
Julian et al. | Rigless tubing repair using permanent and retrievable straddles on the North Slope, Alaska | |
Denney | Well-Testing Operations in High-Temperature Environments-Worldwide Experiences and Best Practices | |
Nathanael et al. | Well and Reservoir Surveillance in Mature Gas Field Peciko and Its Application in Well and Reservoir Management | |
Carpenter | Riglessly Restoring the Functionality of Subsurface Safety Valves |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MALONE, BRADLEY P.;SWAREN, JASON;HEROIAN, JR, THOROS;REEL/FRAME:018772/0499;SIGNING DATES FROM 20061107 TO 20061115 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |