US20080047875A1 - Desulfurization process - Google Patents

Desulfurization process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080047875A1
US20080047875A1 US11/977,363 US97736307A US2008047875A1 US 20080047875 A1 US20080047875 A1 US 20080047875A1 US 97736307 A US97736307 A US 97736307A US 2008047875 A1 US2008047875 A1 US 2008047875A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
fuel
group
impurities
titanium
catalyst
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/977,363
Inventor
Lawrence Karas
Roger Grey
Michael Lynch
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Lyondell Chemical Technology LP
Original Assignee
Lyondell Chemical Technology LP
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to US11/977,363 priority Critical patent/US20080047875A1/en
Application filed by Lyondell Chemical Technology LP filed Critical Lyondell Chemical Technology LP
Publication of US20080047875A1 publication Critical patent/US20080047875A1/en
Assigned to CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS Assignors: ARCO CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY L.P., ARCO CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, BASELL NORTH AMERICA, INC., BASELL POLYOLEFIN GMBH, BASELL POLYOLEFINE GMBH, EQUISTAR CHEMICALS. LP., LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANY, LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P., LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY, NATIONAL DISTILLERS AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION, OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, OLIN CORPORATION, QUANTUM CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Assigned to CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: ARCO CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY L.P., ARCO CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, BASELL NORTH AMERICA, INC., BASELL POLYOLEFIN GMBH, BASELL POLYOLEFINE GMBH, EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, L.P., LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANY
Assigned to CITIBANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment CITIBANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND COLLATERAL AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P.
Assigned to UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P.
Assigned to LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, LP reassignment LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, LP RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Assigned to LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P., EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, LP reassignment LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Assigned to EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, LP, LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P. reassignment EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, LP RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Assigned to LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, LP reassignment LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, LP RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Assigned to DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, AS COLLATERAL AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P.
Assigned to UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P.
Assigned to CITIBANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT reassignment CITIBANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P.
Assigned to WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P.
Assigned to LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P. reassignment LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Assigned to BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. reassignment BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. APPOINTMENT OF SUCCESSOR ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT Assignors: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH
Assigned to LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P. reassignment LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Assigned to LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P. reassignment LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CITIBANK, N.A.
Assigned to LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P. reassignment LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G53/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more refining processes
    • C10G53/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more refining processes plural serial stages only
    • C10G53/14Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by two or more refining processes plural serial stages only including at least one oxidation step

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a process for removing organosulfur impurites found in fuel streams.
  • the process comprises oxidizing the organosulfur impurites by reaction with an organic hydroperoxide in the presence of a sulfur oxidation catalyst to produce sulfones, extracting the sulfones from the fuel stream, and then contacting the fuel stream with a Group 4 to 11 transition metal-containing decomposition catalyst in order to decompose the residual organic hydroperoxides in the fuel stream.
  • Hydrocarbon fractions produced in the petroleum industry are typically contaminated with various sulfur impurities. These hydrocarbon fractions include diesel fuel and gasoline, including natural, straight run and cracked gasolines.
  • sulfur-containing hydrocarbon fractions include the normally gaseous petroleum fraction as well as naphtha, kerosene, jet fuel, fuel oil, and the like.
  • the presence of sulfur compounds is undesirable since they result in a serious pollution problem.
  • Combustion of hydrocarbons containing these impurities results in the release of sulfur oxides which are noxious and corrosive.
  • hydrodesulfurization readily converts mercaptans, thioethers, and disulfides
  • organsulfur compounds such as substituted and unsubstituted thiophene, benzothiophene, and dibenzothiophene are difficult to remove and require harsher reaction conditions.
  • 3,816,301 discloses a process for reducing the sulfur content of sulfur containing hydrocarbons by oxidizing at least a portion of the sulfur impurities with an organic hydroperoxide such as tertiary butyl hydroperoxide in the presence of certain catalysts.
  • the catalyst described is preferably a molybdenum-containing catalyst.
  • This invention is a process for removing organosulfur impurites found in fuels.
  • the process comprises contacting the fuel with an organic hydroperoxide in the presence of a sulfur oxidation catalyst to convert a substantial portion of the organosulfur impurities to sulfones.
  • the organic hydroperoxide is converted into the corresponding alcohol on reaction with the organosulfur impurities.
  • a residual amount of organic hydroperoxide typically remains after the oxidation step.
  • the sulfones are then extracted from the fuel to form a purified fuel.
  • the purified fuel is then contacted with a supported Group 4 to 11 transition metal catalyst to decompose the residual organic hydroperoxide in the fuel.
  • the process of the invention comprises oxidizing organosulfur impurities found in fuels with an organic hydroperoxide in the presence of a sulfur oxidation catalyst.
  • Any oxidation catalyst that oxidizes the organosulfur impurities to sulfones is sufficient.
  • Sulfur oxidation catalysts are described in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,565,793 and 3,816,301, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • Suitable oxidation catalysts include soluble Group 4-6 transition metal such as compounds of titanium, zirconium, vanadium, chromium, and molybdenum (e.g., molybdenum hexacarbonyl).
  • Suitable oxidation catalysts also include supported Group 4-6 transition metals that comprise a Group 4-6 transition metal and a support such as silica, alumina, clays, carbon, and the like.
  • the oxidation catalyst is a titanium-containing silicon Is oxide catalyst.
  • Titanium-containing silicon oxide catalysts are well known and are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,367,342, 5,759,945, 6,011,162, 6,114,552, 6,187,934, 6,323,147, European Patent Publication Nos. 0345856 and 0492697 and Castillo et al., J. Catalysis 161, pp. 524-529 (1996), the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
  • Such titanium-containing silicon oxide catalysts typically comprise an inorganic oxygen compound of silicon in chemical combination with an inorganic oxygen compound of titanium (e.g., an oxide or hydroxide of titanium).
  • the inorganic oxygen compound of titanium is preferably combined with the oxygen compound of silicon in a high positive oxidation state, e.g., tetravalent titanium.
  • the proportion of the inorganic oxygen compound of titanium contained in the catalyst composition can be varied, but generally the catalyst composition contains, based on total catalyst composition, at least 0.1% by weight of titanium with amounts from about 0.2% by weight to about 50% by weight being preferred and amounts from about 0.2% to about 10% by weight being most preferred.
  • titania-on-silica also sometimes referred to as “TiO 2 /SiO 2 ”
  • TiO 2 /SiO 2 which comprises titanium (titanium dioxide) supported on silica (silicon dioxide).
  • the titania-on-silica may be in either silylated or nonsilylated form.
  • titania-on-silica catalysts may be accomplished by a variety of techniques known in the art.
  • One such method involves impregnating an inorganic siliceous solid support with a titanium tetrahalide (e.g., TiCl 4 ), either by solution or vapor-phase impregnation, followed by drying and then calcination at an elevated temperature (e.g., 500° C. to 900° C.).
  • Vapor-phase impregnation is described in detail in European Patent Pub. No. 0345856 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety).
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,011,162 discloses a liquid-phase impregnation of silica using titanium halide in a non-oxygen containing solvent.
  • the catalyst composition is suitably prepared by calcining a mixture of inorganic siliceous solids and titanium dioxide at elevated temperature, e.g., 500° C. to 1000° C.
  • the catalyst composition is prepared by cogelling a mixture of a titanium salt and a silica sol by conventional methods of preparing metal supported catalyst compositions.
  • the titanium-containing silicon oxide catalysts may optionally incorporate non-interfering and/or catalyst promoting substances, especially those which are chemically inert to the oxidation reactants and products.
  • the catalysts may contain minor amounts of promoters, for example, alkali metals (e.g., sodium, potassium) or alkaline earth metals (e.g., barium, calcium, magnesium) as oxides or hydroxides.
  • alkali metal and/or alkaline earth metal levels of from 0.01 to 5% by weight based on the total weight of the titanium-containing silicon oxide catalyst composition are typically suitable.
  • the oxidation catalyst may be employed in any convenient physical form such as, for example, powder, flakes, granules, spheres or pellets.
  • the organosulfur oxidation process of the invention comprises contacting the fuel containing organosulfur impurities with an organic hydroperoxide in the presence of the oxidation catalyst.
  • Suitable fuels include diesel fuel and gasoline, including natural, straight run and cracked gasolines.
  • Other sulfur-containing fuels include the normally gaseous petroleum fraction as well as naphtha, kerosine, jet fuel, fuel oil, and the like. Diesel fuel is a particularly preferred fuel.
  • Preferred organic hydroperoxides are hydrocarbon hydroperoxides having from 3 to 20 carbon atoms. Particularly preferred are secondary and tertiary hydroperoxides of from 3 to 15 carbon atoms. Exemplary organic hydroperoxides suitable for use include t-butyl hydroperoxide, t-amyl hydroperoxide, cyclohexyl hydroperoxide, ethylbenzene hydroperoxide, and cumene hydroperoxide. T-butyl hydroperoxide is especially useful.
  • the organosulfur compound:hydroperoxide molar ratio is not particularly critical, but it is preferable to employ a molar ratio of approximately 2:1 to about 1:5.
  • the oxidation reaction is conducted in the liquid phase at moderate temperatures and pressures. Suitable reaction temperatures vary from 0° C. to 200° C., but preferably from 25° C. to 150° C. The reaction is preferably conducted at or above atmospheric pressure. The precise pressure is not critical. Typical pressures vary from 1 atmosphere to 100 atmospheres.
  • the oxidation reaction may be performed using any of the conventional reactor configurations known in the art for such oxidation processes. Continuous as well as batch procedures may be used.
  • the catalyst may be deployed in the form of a fixed bed or slurry.
  • the oxidation process of the invention converts a substantial portion of the organosulfur impurities into sulfones. Typically, greater than about 50 percent of the organosulfur impurities are converted into sulfones, preferably greater than about 80 percent, and most preferably greater than about 90 percent.
  • the oxidation process of the invention also converts a substantial portion of the organic hydroperoxide to the corresponding alcohol. For instance, tertiary butyl alcohol results if tertiary butyl hydroperoxide is used as the organic peroxide. Typically, greater than about 50 percent of the organic hydroperoxide is converted into the corresponding alcohol, preferably greater than about 80 percent, and most preferably greater than about 90 percent. Following the oxidation of organosulfur impurities, a residual portion of the organic hydroperoxide typically remains in the fuel.
  • the titanium-containing silicon oxide catalyst When a titanium-containing silicon oxide catalyst is used in the oxidation step of the process, the titanium-containing silicon oxide catalyst tends to slowly deteriorate in performance when used repeatedly or in a continuous process. The deterioration appears to be associated with the presence of organonitrogen impurities in the fuel itself. Removal of the organonitrogen impurities prior to the oxidation step is therefore a preferred embodiment of the process of the invention.
  • the fuel Prior to oxidation of the organosulfur impurities, the fuel may be subjected to an organonitrogen removal step.
  • the removal of organonitrogen impurities from fuels may be accomplished by extraction techniques. Purification by extraction methods is well-known in the art. Suitable extraction methods include, but are not limited to, solid-liquid extractions using adsorbents and liquid-liquid extractions using polar solvents.
  • the extraction step removes at least 50 percent of the nitrogen content from the fuel. Preferably, more than about 70 percent of the nitrogen content in the fuel is removed by extraction. After isolation of the fuel having a reduced amount of organonitrogen impurities, the fuel may then be subject to oxidation.
  • the product mixture may be treated using an extraction process to remove the sulfones from the fuel.
  • Any viable extraction process such as liquid-liquid or solid-liquid extraction, may be used.
  • the sulfone removal step may be conducted by solid-liquid or liquid-liquid extraction.
  • the sulfones may be removed from the fuel by solid-liquid extraction with at least one solid adsorbent.
  • the adsorbents useful in the invention include any adsorbent capable of removing the sulfones from fuels.
  • Useful adsorbents include clays, inorganic oxides such as aluminum oxides, silicon oxides, silica-aluminas, zeolitic materials such as zeolite Y, Zeolite X, ZSM-5, and mixtures thereof. Mixtures of the adsorbents may also be employed.
  • Particularly useful adsorbents include silicas, aluminas, and silica-aluminas.
  • the adsorptive contact is conveniently carried out at temperatures in the range of about 15° C. to 90° C., preferably 20° C. to 40° C.
  • the flow rates are not critical, however flow rates of about 0.5 to 10 volumes of the fuel per volume of adsorbent per hour are preferred, with a flow rate of about 1 to 5 volumes particularly preferred. It is generally preferred to employ more than one adsorbent contact beds so that a depleted bed can be regenerated while a fresh bed is used. Regeneration can be accomplished by first draining the fuel, and washing the adsorbent bed with a hydrocarbon solvent or solvent mixture such as heptane to remove the residual fuel from the adsorbent.
  • the fuel may be recovered from the hydrocarbon solvent by any method such as evaporation of the hydrocarbon solvent.
  • the adsorbent bed is then washed with a polar solvent or solvent mixture such as water, methanol, or other solvents, followed by drying or by stripping with a heated inert gas such as steam, nitrogen or the like.
  • the polar solvent of solvent mixture may be recovered, by, e.g., distillation, for reuse in regeneration.
  • the alcohol may be removed by any conventional technique, such as simple distillation and/or stripping the fuel after oxidation with a gas such as carbon dioxide or nitrogen.
  • the alcohol may also be separated from the fuel by a liquid-liquid extraction step in which the fuel is contacted with a polar solvent such as water or an alcohol (such as methanol) that is immiscible with the fuel.
  • an impure stream is contacted with an extraction liquid.
  • the extraction liquid is immiscible with and has a different (usually lower) density than the impure stream.
  • the mixture is intimately mixed by any of a variety of different techniques. During the intimate mixing, the impurity passes from the impure stream into the extraction liquid, to an extent determined by the so-called partition coefficient of such substance in the conditions concerned.
  • Extraction processes may be operated batch-wise or continuously.
  • the impure stream may be mixed with an immiscible extraction liquid in an agitated vessel, after which the layers are settled and separated. The extraction may be repeated if more than one contact is required.
  • Most extraction equipment is continuous, with either successive stage contacts or differential contacts.
  • Typical liquid extraction equipment includes mixer-settlers, vertical towers of various kinds which operate by gravity flow, agitated tower extractors, and centrifugal extractors.
  • the liquid-liquid extraction embodiment of the invention comprises contacting the fuel containing sulfones with a polar solvent.
  • a polar solvent Any polar solvent that is immiscible and having a different density than the fuel may be used.
  • Particular preferred polar solvents are selected from the group consisting of alcohol, ketone, water, and mixtures thereof.
  • the alcohol may be any alcohol that is immiscible with the fuel, and is preferably a C 1 -C 4 alcohol, most preferably methanol.
  • the ketone may be any ketone that is immiscible with the fuel, and is preferably a C 3 -C 8 aliphatic ketone, such as acetone and methyl ethyl ketone, or mixtures of ketones containing acetone.
  • Especially preferred solvents include mixtures of alcohol and water, most preferably a methanol-water mixture.
  • the mixture preferably comprises about 0.5 to about 50 weight percent water, most preferably from about 1 to about 10 weight percent water.
  • the solvent:fuel ratio is not critical but preferably is from about 10:1 to about 1:10.
  • the decomposition step comprises contacting the fuel having a reduced amount of sulfones and containing residual organic hydroperoxide with a decomposition catalyst, wherein the residual organic hydroperoxide is converted mainly into the corresponding alcohol.
  • the decomposition catalyst is a Group 4 to 11 transition metal-containing catalyst.
  • the decomposition catalyst may be any solid catalyst that removes the residual organic hydroperoxide from the fuel.
  • the decomposition catalyst comprises a Group 4 to 11 transition metal and a support.
  • the support is preferably a porous material. Supports are well-known in the art. There are no particular restrictions on the type of support that are used.
  • the support can be inorganic oxides, inorganic chlorides, carbon, and organic polymer resins. Preferred inorganic oxides include oxides of Group 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 13, or 14 elements.
  • Particularly preferred inorganic oxide supports include silica, alumina, titania, zirconia, niobium oxides, tantalum oxides, molybdenum oxides, tungsten oxides, amorphous titania-silica, amorphous zirconia-silica, amorphous niobia-silica, and the like.
  • Preferred organic polymer resins include polystyrene, polystyrene-divinylbenzene copolymers, crosslinked polyethyleneimines, and polybenzimidizole.
  • Suitable supports also include organic polymer resins grafted onto inorganic oxide supports, such as polyethylenimine-silica.
  • Preferred supports also include carbon.
  • Particularly preferred supports include carbon, silica, alumina, and silica-aluminas. The support may also include the Group 4-11 transition metal
  • the support has a surface area in the range of about 10 to about 700 m 2 /g, more preferably from about 50 to about 500 m 2 /g, and most preferably from about 100 to about 400 m 2 /g.
  • the pore volume of the support is in the range of about 0.1 to about 4.0 mL/g, more preferably from about 0.5 to about 3.5 mL/g, and most preferably from about 0.8 to about 3.0 mL/g.
  • the average particle size of the support is in the range of about 0.1 to about 10,000 ⁇ m, more preferably from about 1 to about 5,000 ⁇ m, and most preferably from about 10 to about 500 ⁇ m.
  • the average pore diameter is typically in the range of about 10 to about 1000 ⁇ , preferably about 20 to about 500 ⁇ , and most preferably about 50 to about 350 ⁇ .
  • the decomposition catalyst also contains a Group 4 to 11 transition metal, preferably a Group 4 to 9 transition metal. While any of the Group 4 to 11 transition metals can be utilized (e.g., titanium, zirconium, vanadium, chromium, molybdenum, manganese, rhenium, iron, ruthenium, cobalt, nickel, palladium, copper), either alone or in combination, chromium, titanium, iron, ruthenium, and cobalt are preferred. Chromium, titanium, and iron are especially preferred.
  • the amount of transition metal present in the supported catalyst will be in the range of from 0.01 to 20 weight percent, preferably 0.1 to 10 weight percent.
  • the manner in which the transition metal is incorporated into the supported catalyst is not considered to be particularly critical.
  • the transition metal may be supported on the support by impregnation, adsorption, ion-exchange, precipitation, or the like.
  • the Group 4 to 11 transition metal may also be incorporated into the framework of an inorganic oxide support material.
  • the transition metal may be incorporated into a silica framework with in MFI and MCM structures such as TS-1, Ti-beta, and the like.
  • the Group 4 to 11 transition metal-containing decomposition catalyst may also be a solid inorganic compound of a Group 4 to 11 transition metal, such as titanium oxide, tungsten oxide, iron oxide, molybdenum chloride, manganese hydroxide, nickel carbide, and the like.
  • the decomposition catalyst may be optionally thermally treated in a gas such as nitrogen, helium, vacuum, hydrogen, oxygen, air, or the like.
  • the thermal treatment temperature is typically from about 50 to about 900° C.
  • the decomposition catalyst may additionally comprise a binder or the like and may be molded, spray dried, shaped or extruded into any desired form prior to use.
  • the catalyst is preferably in the form of a suspension or fixed-bed.
  • the process may be performed using a continuous flow, semi-batch or batch mode of operation. It is advantageous to work at a pressure of 1-100 bars.
  • Decomposition according to the invention is carried out at a temperature effective to achieve the desired reduction in organic hydroperoxide, preferably at temperatures in the range of 0-250° C., more preferably, 20-150° C.
  • a fuel product is produced by the process of the invention.
  • Chevron/Phillips diesel containing 30 ppm N and 380 ppm S is tested in a continuous oxidation run using a titania-on-silica catalyst synthesized as described below.
  • the diesel is pretreated by passing the diesel over an alumina bed to remove organonitrogen impurities so that the nitrogen content of fuel is less than 7 ppm N.
  • a reaction mixture of 99% diesel fuel (plus toluene) and 1% Lyondell TBHP oxidate (containing approximately 43 wt. % TBHP and 56 wt. % tertiary butyl alcohol) is fed to a fixed-bed reactor containing titania-on-silica catalyst (50 cc, 21 g) at a liquid hourly space velocity of 3 hr ⁇ 1 , a temperature of 80° C.
  • the diesel is fed to the reactor at 150 cc/hr.
  • a 1:1 mixture of toluene:TBHP oxidate is fed to the reactor at 3 cc/hr.
  • the sulfur content after oxidation and removal of sulfones by alumina adsorption for the first 2 weeks of operation is less than 12 ppm S.
  • the diesel fuel contained approximately 2000 ppm TBHP.
  • Example 1 The treated diesel fuel of Example 1 was contacted with two supported chromium catalysts in separate runs.
  • the diesel fuel was contacted with Catalyst A at 120° C. for 30 minutes and with Catalyst B at 80° C. for 30 minutes. Both runs resulted in 100% conversion of TBHP and no visual degradation of the diesel fuel samples.

Abstract

This invention is a method of purifying fuels containing organosulfur impurities. The fuel is oxidized with an organic hydroperoxide in the presence of an oxidation catalyst to form a sulfone product, followed by extraction of the sulfone product by solid-liquid or liquid-liquid extraction. The fuel is then contacted with a decomposition catalyst to remove the residual organic hydroperoxide from the fuel.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates to a process for removing organosulfur impurites found in fuel streams. The process comprises oxidizing the organosulfur impurites by reaction with an organic hydroperoxide in the presence of a sulfur oxidation catalyst to produce sulfones, extracting the sulfones from the fuel stream, and then contacting the fuel stream with a Group 4 to 11 transition metal-containing decomposition catalyst in order to decompose the residual organic hydroperoxides in the fuel stream.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Hydrocarbon fractions produced in the petroleum industry are typically contaminated with various sulfur impurities. These hydrocarbon fractions include diesel fuel and gasoline, including natural, straight run and cracked gasolines.
  • Other sulfur-containing hydrocarbon fractions include the normally gaseous petroleum fraction as well as naphtha, kerosene, jet fuel, fuel oil, and the like. The presence of sulfur compounds is undesirable since they result in a serious pollution problem. Combustion of hydrocarbons containing these impurities results in the release of sulfur oxides which are noxious and corrosive.
  • Federal legislation, specifically the Clean Air Act of 1964 as well as the amendments of 1990 and 1999 have imposed increasingly more stringent requirements to reduce the amount of sulfur released to the atmosphere. The United States Environmental Protection Agency has lowered the sulfur standard for diesel fuel to 15 parts per million by weight (ppmw), effective in mid-2006, from the present standard of 500 ppmw. For reformulated gasoline, the current standard of 300 ppmw has been lowered to 30 ppmw, effective Jan. 1, 2004.
  • Because of these regulatory actions, the need for more effective desulfurization methods is always present. Processes for the desulfurization of hydrocarbon fractions containing organosulfur impurities are well known in the art. The most common method of desulfurization of fuels is hydrodesulfurization, in which the fuel is reacted with hydrogen gas at elevated temperature and high pressure in the presence of a costly catalyst. U.S. Pat. No. 5,985,136, for example, describes a hydrodesulfurization process to reduce sulfur level in naptha feedstreams. Organic sulfur is reduced by this reaction to gaseous H2S, which is then oxidized to elemental sulfur by the Claus process. Unfortunately, unreacted H2S from the process is harmful, even in very small amounts. Although hydrodesulfurization readily converts mercaptans, thioethers, and disulfides, other organsulfur compounds such as substituted and unsubstituted thiophene, benzothiophene, and dibenzothiophene are difficult to remove and require harsher reaction conditions.
  • Because of the problems associated with hydrodesulfurization, research continues on other sulfur removal processes. For instance, U.S. Pat. No. 6,402,939 describes the ultrasonic oxidation of sulfur impurities in fossil fuels using hydroperoxides, especially hydrogen peroxide. These oxidized sulfur impurities may be more readily separated from the fossil fuels than non-oxidized impurities. Another method involves the desulfurization of hydrocarbon materials where the fraction is first treated by oxidizing the sulfur-containing hydrocarbon with an oxidant in the presence of a catalyst. U.S. Pat. No. 3,816,301, for example, discloses a process for reducing the sulfur content of sulfur containing hydrocarbons by oxidizing at least a portion of the sulfur impurities with an organic hydroperoxide such as tertiary butyl hydroperoxide in the presence of certain catalysts. The catalyst described is preferably a molybdenum-containing catalyst.
  • In sum, new methods to remove the sulfur compound impurities in hydrocarbon fractions are required.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention is a process for removing organosulfur impurites found in fuels. The process comprises contacting the fuel with an organic hydroperoxide in the presence of a sulfur oxidation catalyst to convert a substantial portion of the organosulfur impurities to sulfones. In this step, the organic hydroperoxide is converted into the corresponding alcohol on reaction with the organosulfur impurities. However, a residual amount of organic hydroperoxide typically remains after the oxidation step. The sulfones are then extracted from the fuel to form a purified fuel. The purified fuel is then contacted with a supported Group 4 to 11 transition metal catalyst to decompose the residual organic hydroperoxide in the fuel.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The process of the invention comprises oxidizing organosulfur impurities found in fuels with an organic hydroperoxide in the presence of a sulfur oxidation catalyst. Any oxidation catalyst that oxidizes the organosulfur impurities to sulfones is sufficient. Sulfur oxidation catalysts are described in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,565,793 and 3,816,301, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference. Suitable oxidation catalysts include soluble Group 4-6 transition metal such as compounds of titanium, zirconium, vanadium, chromium, and molybdenum (e.g., molybdenum hexacarbonyl). Suitable oxidation catalysts also include supported Group 4-6 transition metals that comprise a Group 4-6 transition metal and a support such as silica, alumina, clays, carbon, and the like.
  • Most preferably, the oxidation catalyst is a titanium-containing silicon Is oxide catalyst. Titanium-containing silicon oxide catalysts are well known and are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,367,342, 5,759,945, 6,011,162, 6,114,552, 6,187,934, 6,323,147, European Patent Publication Nos. 0345856 and 0492697 and Castillo et al., J. Catalysis 161, pp. 524-529 (1996), the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
  • Such titanium-containing silicon oxide catalysts typically comprise an inorganic oxygen compound of silicon in chemical combination with an inorganic oxygen compound of titanium (e.g., an oxide or hydroxide of titanium). The inorganic oxygen compound of titanium is preferably combined with the oxygen compound of silicon in a high positive oxidation state, e.g., tetravalent titanium. The proportion of the inorganic oxygen compound of titanium contained in the catalyst composition can be varied, but generally the catalyst composition contains, based on total catalyst composition, at least 0.1% by weight of titanium with amounts from about 0.2% by weight to about 50% by weight being preferred and amounts from about 0.2% to about 10% by weight being most preferred.
  • One class of titanium-containing silicon oxide catalysts particularly suitable for the oxidation of organosulfur impurities is titania-on-silica (also sometimes referred to as “TiO2/SiO2”), which comprises titanium (titanium dioxide) supported on silica (silicon dioxide). The titania-on-silica may be in either silylated or nonsilylated form.
  • The preparation of titania-on-silica catalysts may be accomplished by a variety of techniques known in the art. One such method involves impregnating an inorganic siliceous solid support with a titanium tetrahalide (e.g., TiCl4), either by solution or vapor-phase impregnation, followed by drying and then calcination at an elevated temperature (e.g., 500° C. to 900° C.). Vapor-phase impregnation is described in detail in European Patent Pub. No. 0345856 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). U.S. Pat. No. 6,011,162 discloses a liquid-phase impregnation of silica using titanium halide in a non-oxygen containing solvent. In another technique, the catalyst composition is suitably prepared by calcining a mixture of inorganic siliceous solids and titanium dioxide at elevated temperature, e.g., 500° C. to 1000° C. Alternatively, the catalyst composition is prepared by cogelling a mixture of a titanium salt and a silica sol by conventional methods of preparing metal supported catalyst compositions.
  • The titanium-containing silicon oxide catalysts may optionally incorporate non-interfering and/or catalyst promoting substances, especially those which are chemically inert to the oxidation reactants and products. The catalysts may contain minor amounts of promoters, for example, alkali metals (e.g., sodium, potassium) or alkaline earth metals (e.g., barium, calcium, magnesium) as oxides or hydroxides. Alkali metal and/or alkaline earth metal levels of from 0.01 to 5% by weight based on the total weight of the titanium-containing silicon oxide catalyst composition are typically suitable.
  • The oxidation catalyst may be employed in any convenient physical form such as, for example, powder, flakes, granules, spheres or pellets.
  • The organosulfur oxidation process of the invention comprises contacting the fuel containing organosulfur impurities with an organic hydroperoxide in the presence of the oxidation catalyst. Suitable fuels include diesel fuel and gasoline, including natural, straight run and cracked gasolines. Other sulfur-containing fuels include the normally gaseous petroleum fraction as well as naphtha, kerosine, jet fuel, fuel oil, and the like. Diesel fuel is a particularly preferred fuel.
  • Preferred organic hydroperoxides are hydrocarbon hydroperoxides having from 3 to 20 carbon atoms. Particularly preferred are secondary and tertiary hydroperoxides of from 3 to 15 carbon atoms. Exemplary organic hydroperoxides suitable for use include t-butyl hydroperoxide, t-amyl hydroperoxide, cyclohexyl hydroperoxide, ethylbenzene hydroperoxide, and cumene hydroperoxide. T-butyl hydroperoxide is especially useful.
  • In such an oxidation process the organosulfur compound:hydroperoxide molar ratio is not particularly critical, but it is preferable to employ a molar ratio of approximately 2:1 to about 1:5.
  • The oxidation reaction is conducted in the liquid phase at moderate temperatures and pressures. Suitable reaction temperatures vary from 0° C. to 200° C., but preferably from 25° C. to 150° C. The reaction is preferably conducted at or above atmospheric pressure. The precise pressure is not critical. Typical pressures vary from 1 atmosphere to 100 atmospheres.
  • The oxidation reaction may be performed using any of the conventional reactor configurations known in the art for such oxidation processes. Continuous as well as batch procedures may be used. For example, the catalyst may be deployed in the form of a fixed bed or slurry.
  • The oxidation process of the invention converts a substantial portion of the organosulfur impurities into sulfones. Typically, greater than about 50 percent of the organosulfur impurities are converted into sulfones, preferably greater than about 80 percent, and most preferably greater than about 90 percent. The oxidation process of the invention also converts a substantial portion of the organic hydroperoxide to the corresponding alcohol. For instance, tertiary butyl alcohol results if tertiary butyl hydroperoxide is used as the organic peroxide. Typically, greater than about 50 percent of the organic hydroperoxide is converted into the corresponding alcohol, preferably greater than about 80 percent, and most preferably greater than about 90 percent. Following the oxidation of organosulfur impurities, a residual portion of the organic hydroperoxide typically remains in the fuel.
  • When a titanium-containing silicon oxide catalyst is used in the oxidation step of the process, the titanium-containing silicon oxide catalyst tends to slowly deteriorate in performance when used repeatedly or in a continuous process. The deterioration appears to be associated with the presence of organonitrogen impurities in the fuel itself. Removal of the organonitrogen impurities prior to the oxidation step is therefore a preferred embodiment of the process of the invention. Prior to oxidation of the organosulfur impurities, the fuel may be subjected to an organonitrogen removal step. The removal of organonitrogen impurities from fuels may be accomplished by extraction techniques. Purification by extraction methods is well-known in the art. Suitable extraction methods include, but are not limited to, solid-liquid extractions using adsorbents and liquid-liquid extractions using polar solvents.
  • If organonitrogen extraction is employed, the extraction step removes at least 50 percent of the nitrogen content from the fuel. Preferably, more than about 70 percent of the nitrogen content in the fuel is removed by extraction. After isolation of the fuel having a reduced amount of organonitrogen impurities, the fuel may then be subject to oxidation.
  • When the oxidation has proceeded to the desired extent, the product mixture may be treated using an extraction process to remove the sulfones from the fuel. Any viable extraction process, such as liquid-liquid or solid-liquid extraction, may be used.
  • The sulfone removal step may be conducted by solid-liquid or liquid-liquid extraction. The sulfones may be removed from the fuel by solid-liquid extraction with at least one solid adsorbent. The adsorbents useful in the invention include any adsorbent capable of removing the sulfones from fuels. Useful adsorbents include clays, inorganic oxides such as aluminum oxides, silicon oxides, silica-aluminas, zeolitic materials such as zeolite Y, Zeolite X, ZSM-5, and mixtures thereof. Mixtures of the adsorbents may also be employed. Particularly useful adsorbents include silicas, aluminas, and silica-aluminas.
  • The adsorptive contact is conveniently carried out at temperatures in the range of about 15° C. to 90° C., preferably 20° C. to 40° C. The flow rates are not critical, however flow rates of about 0.5 to 10 volumes of the fuel per volume of adsorbent per hour are preferred, with a flow rate of about 1 to 5 volumes particularly preferred. It is generally preferred to employ more than one adsorbent contact beds so that a depleted bed can be regenerated while a fresh bed is used. Regeneration can be accomplished by first draining the fuel, and washing the adsorbent bed with a hydrocarbon solvent or solvent mixture such as heptane to remove the residual fuel from the adsorbent. The fuel may be recovered from the hydrocarbon solvent by any method such as evaporation of the hydrocarbon solvent. The adsorbent bed is then washed with a polar solvent or solvent mixture such as water, methanol, or other solvents, followed by drying or by stripping with a heated inert gas such as steam, nitrogen or the like. The polar solvent of solvent mixture may be recovered, by, e.g., distillation, for reuse in regeneration.
  • If a solid-liquid extraction process is used to remove sulfones, it is preferable to remove the alcohol product of the oxidation step prior to the solid-liquid sulfone extraction process. The alcohol may be removed by any conventional technique, such as simple distillation and/or stripping the fuel after oxidation with a gas such as carbon dioxide or nitrogen. The alcohol may also be separated from the fuel by a liquid-liquid extraction step in which the fuel is contacted with a polar solvent such as water or an alcohol (such as methanol) that is immiscible with the fuel.
  • In a typical liquid-liquid extraction process, an impure stream is contacted with an extraction liquid. The extraction liquid is immiscible with and has a different (usually lower) density than the impure stream. The mixture is intimately mixed by any of a variety of different techniques. During the intimate mixing, the impurity passes from the impure stream into the extraction liquid, to an extent determined by the so-called partition coefficient of such substance in the conditions concerned. Extraction processes may be operated batch-wise or continuously. The impure stream may be mixed with an immiscible extraction liquid in an agitated vessel, after which the layers are settled and separated. The extraction may be repeated if more than one contact is required. Most extraction equipment is continuous, with either successive stage contacts or differential contacts. Typical liquid extraction equipment includes mixer-settlers, vertical towers of various kinds which operate by gravity flow, agitated tower extractors, and centrifugal extractors.
  • The liquid-liquid extraction embodiment of the invention comprises contacting the fuel containing sulfones with a polar solvent. Any polar solvent that is immiscible and having a different density than the fuel may be used. Particular preferred polar solvents are selected from the group consisting of alcohol, ketone, water, and mixtures thereof. The alcohol may be any alcohol that is immiscible with the fuel, and is preferably a C1-C4 alcohol, most preferably methanol. The ketone may be any ketone that is immiscible with the fuel, and is preferably a C3-C8 aliphatic ketone, such as acetone and methyl ethyl ketone, or mixtures of ketones containing acetone. Especially preferred solvents include mixtures of alcohol and water, most preferably a methanol-water mixture. When alcohol-water mixtures are used as the extraction solvent, the mixture preferably comprises about 0.5 to about 50 weight percent water, most preferably from about 1 to about 10 weight percent water. The solvent:fuel ratio is not critical but preferably is from about 10:1 to about 1:10.
  • Following sulfone removal, the fuel will still typically contain a residual portion of organic hydroperoxide. The organic hydroperoxide is not a desirable component in fuels as its presence may result in decreased fuel stability. The decomposition step comprises contacting the fuel having a reduced amount of sulfones and containing residual organic hydroperoxide with a decomposition catalyst, wherein the residual organic hydroperoxide is converted mainly into the corresponding alcohol.
  • The decomposition catalyst is a Group 4 to 11 transition metal-containing catalyst. The decomposition catalyst may be any solid catalyst that removes the residual organic hydroperoxide from the fuel. Preferably, the decomposition catalyst comprises a Group 4 to 11 transition metal and a support. The support is preferably a porous material. Supports are well-known in the art. There are no particular restrictions on the type of support that are used. For instance, the support can be inorganic oxides, inorganic chlorides, carbon, and organic polymer resins. Preferred inorganic oxides include oxides of Group 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 13, or 14 elements. Particularly preferred inorganic oxide supports include silica, alumina, titania, zirconia, niobium oxides, tantalum oxides, molybdenum oxides, tungsten oxides, amorphous titania-silica, amorphous zirconia-silica, amorphous niobia-silica, and the like. Preferred organic polymer resins include polystyrene, polystyrene-divinylbenzene copolymers, crosslinked polyethyleneimines, and polybenzimidizole. Suitable supports also include organic polymer resins grafted onto inorganic oxide supports, such as polyethylenimine-silica. Preferred supports also include carbon. Particularly preferred supports include carbon, silica, alumina, and silica-aluminas. The support may also include the Group 4-11 transition metal
  • Preferably, the support has a surface area in the range of about 10 to about 700 m2/g, more preferably from about 50 to about 500 m2/g, and most preferably from about 100 to about 400 m2/g. Preferably, the pore volume of the support is in the range of about 0.1 to about 4.0 mL/g, more preferably from about 0.5 to about 3.5 mL/g, and most preferably from about 0.8 to about 3.0 mL/g. Preferably, the average particle size of the support is in the range of about 0.1 to about 10,000 μm, more preferably from about 1 to about 5,000 μm, and most preferably from about 10 to about 500 μm. The average pore diameter is typically in the range of about 10 to about 1000 Å, preferably about 20 to about 500 Å, and most preferably about 50 to about 350 Å.
  • The decomposition catalyst also contains a Group 4 to 11 transition metal, preferably a Group 4 to 9 transition metal. While any of the Group 4 to 11 transition metals can be utilized (e.g., titanium, zirconium, vanadium, chromium, molybdenum, manganese, rhenium, iron, ruthenium, cobalt, nickel, palladium, copper), either alone or in combination, chromium, titanium, iron, ruthenium, and cobalt are preferred. Chromium, titanium, and iron are especially preferred.
  • Typically, the amount of transition metal present in the supported catalyst will be in the range of from 0.01 to 20 weight percent, preferably 0.1 to 10 weight percent. The manner in which the transition metal is incorporated into the supported catalyst is not considered to be particularly critical. For example, the transition metal may be supported on the support by impregnation, adsorption, ion-exchange, precipitation, or the like. The Group 4 to 11 transition metal may also be incorporated into the framework of an inorganic oxide support material.
  • For example, the transition metal may be incorporated into a silica framework with in MFI and MCM structures such as TS-1, Ti-beta, and the like.
  • The Group 4 to 11 transition metal-containing decomposition catalyst may also be a solid inorganic compound of a Group 4 to 11 transition metal, such as titanium oxide, tungsten oxide, iron oxide, molybdenum chloride, manganese hydroxide, nickel carbide, and the like.
  • The decomposition catalyst may be optionally thermally treated in a gas such as nitrogen, helium, vacuum, hydrogen, oxygen, air, or the like. The thermal treatment temperature is typically from about 50 to about 900° C. The decomposition catalyst may additionally comprise a binder or the like and may be molded, spray dried, shaped or extruded into any desired form prior to use.
  • For the organic hydroperoxide decomposition step of the invention, the catalyst is preferably in the form of a suspension or fixed-bed. The process may be performed using a continuous flow, semi-batch or batch mode of operation. It is advantageous to work at a pressure of 1-100 bars. Decomposition according to the invention is carried out at a temperature effective to achieve the desired reduction in organic hydroperoxide, preferably at temperatures in the range of 0-250° C., more preferably, 20-150° C.
  • A fuel product is produced by the process of the invention.
  • The following examples merely illustrate the invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize many variations that are within the spirit of the invention and scope of the claims.
  • EXAMPLE 1 Oxidation of Sulfur Impurities in Diesel Fuel
  • Chevron/Phillips diesel containing 30 ppm N and 380 ppm S is tested in a continuous oxidation run using a titania-on-silica catalyst synthesized as described below. The diesel is pretreated by passing the diesel over an alumina bed to remove organonitrogen impurities so that the nitrogen content of fuel is less than 7 ppm N.
  • A reaction mixture of 99% diesel fuel (plus toluene) and 1% Lyondell TBHP oxidate (containing approximately 43 wt. % TBHP and 56 wt. % tertiary butyl alcohol) is fed to a fixed-bed reactor containing titania-on-silica catalyst (50 cc, 21 g) at a liquid hourly space velocity of 3 hr−1, a temperature of 80° C. The diesel is fed to the reactor at 150 cc/hr. A 1:1 mixture of toluene:TBHP oxidate is fed to the reactor at 3 cc/hr. The sulfur content after oxidation and removal of sulfones by alumina adsorption for the first 2 weeks of operation is less than 12 ppm S. The diesel fuel contained approximately 2000 ppm TBHP.
  • EXAMPLE 2 Decomposition of Residual TBHP
  • The treated diesel fuel of Example 1 was contacted with two supported chromium catalysts in separate runs. Catalyst A contained 1.0 wt. % Cr on silica gel (surface area=501 m2/g). Catalyst B contained 1.0 wt. % Cr and 2.56 wt. % Ti on silica gel (surface are=505 m2/g). The diesel fuel was contacted with Catalyst A at 120° C. for 30 minutes and with Catalyst B at 80° C. for 30 minutes. Both runs resulted in 100% conversion of TBHP and no visual degradation of the diesel fuel samples.
  • In contrast, attempts to thermally decompose the residual TBHP by heating the diesel fuel with no catalyst present at 180° C. for 15 minutes results in little if any TBHP conversion. This run also resulted in significant hydrocarbon degradation.

Claims (10)

1-11. (canceled)
12. A process comprising:
(a) extracting organonitrogen impurities from a fuel containing organonitrogen and organosulfur impurities whereby the nitrogen content of fuel is reduced by at least 50 percent to produce a fuel having a reduced amount of organonitrogen impurities;
(b) isolating the fuel having a reduced amount of organonitrogen impurities;
(c) contacting the isolated fuel having a reduced amount of organonitrogen impurities with an organic hydroperoxide in the presence of a titanium-containing silicon oxide catalyst to form an oxidized fuel, wherein a substantial portion of the organosulfur impurities are converted into sulfones and a residual amount of organic hydroperoxide remains in the oxidized fuel;
(d) extracting the sulfones from the oxidized fuel by solid-liquid extraction using at least one sulfone adsorbent or liquid-liquid extraction using at least one polar solvent to form a fuel having a reduced amount of sulfones and a residual amount of organic hydroperoxide; and
(e) contacting the fuel from step (d) with a Group 4 to 11 transition metal-containing decomposition catalyst comprising a Group 4 to 11 transition metal and a support.
13. The process of claim 12 wherein the organic hydroperoxide is tertiary butyl hydroperoxide.
14. The process of claim 12 wherein the titanium-containing silicon oxide catalyst is titania-on-silica.
15. The process of claim 12 wherein the sulfone adsorbent is selected from the group consisting of silicas, aluminas, and silica-aluminas.
16. The process of claim 12 wherein the polar solvent is selected from the group consisting of a C1-C4 alcohol, a C3-C8 ketone, water, and mixtures thereof.
17. The process of claim 12 wherein the Group 4 to 11 transition metal is selected from the group consisting of chromium, titanium, iron, and mixtures thereof and the support is selected from the group consisting of silicas, aluminas, silica-aluminas, and carbon.
18. The process of claim 12 wherein the decomposition catalyst comprises chromium, silica, and optionally titanium.
19. (canceled)
20. (canceled)
US11/977,363 2004-01-09 2007-10-24 Desulfurization process Abandoned US20080047875A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/977,363 US20080047875A1 (en) 2004-01-09 2007-10-24 Desulfurization process

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/754,952 US7314545B2 (en) 2004-01-09 2004-01-09 Desulfurization process
US11/977,363 US20080047875A1 (en) 2004-01-09 2007-10-24 Desulfurization process

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/754,952 Division US7314545B2 (en) 2004-01-09 2004-01-09 Desulfurization process

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080047875A1 true US20080047875A1 (en) 2008-02-28

Family

ID=34739474

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/754,952 Expired - Fee Related US7314545B2 (en) 2004-01-09 2004-01-09 Desulfurization process
US11/977,363 Abandoned US20080047875A1 (en) 2004-01-09 2007-10-24 Desulfurization process

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/754,952 Expired - Fee Related US7314545B2 (en) 2004-01-09 2004-01-09 Desulfurization process

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (2) US7314545B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2005071046A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110147272A1 (en) * 2009-12-23 2011-06-23 General Electric Company Emulsification of hydrocarbon gas oils to increase efficacy of water based hydrogen sulfide scavengers
WO2012036445A2 (en) * 2010-09-13 2012-03-22 한국화학연구원 Catalyst for selective oxidative desulfurization and preparation method thereof
US10533141B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-01-14 Mag{tilde over (e)}mã Technology LLC Process and device for treating high sulfur heavy marine fuel oil for use as feedstock in a subsequent refinery unit
US10604709B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-03-31 Magēmā Technology LLC Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil from distressed heavy fuel oil materials
US11788017B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2023-10-17 Magëmã Technology LLC Multi-stage process and device for reducing environmental contaminants in heavy marine fuel oil

Families Citing this family (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2839307B1 (en) * 2002-05-03 2004-07-09 Solvay PROCESS FOR DESULFURIZING A HYDROCARBON MIXTURE
US7744749B2 (en) * 2005-09-08 2010-06-29 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Diesel oil desulfurization by oxidation and extraction
US8715489B2 (en) * 2005-09-08 2014-05-06 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for oxidative conversion of organosulfur compounds in liquid hydrocarbon mixtures
WO2008153633A2 (en) 2007-05-03 2008-12-18 Applied Nano Works, Inc. Product containing monomer and polymers of titanyls and methods for making same
US9061273B2 (en) 2008-03-26 2015-06-23 Auterra, Inc. Sulfoxidation catalysts and methods and systems of using same
US9206359B2 (en) 2008-03-26 2015-12-08 Auterra, Inc. Methods for upgrading of contaminated hydrocarbon streams
US8764973B2 (en) 2008-03-26 2014-07-01 Auterra, Inc. Methods for upgrading of contaminated hydrocarbon streams
KR101609372B1 (en) * 2008-03-26 2016-04-05 오테라, 인코포레이티드 Sulfoxidation catalysts and methods and systems of using same
US8894843B2 (en) 2008-03-26 2014-11-25 Auterra, Inc. Methods for upgrading of contaminated hydrocarbon streams
US8298404B2 (en) 2010-09-22 2012-10-30 Auterra, Inc. Reaction system and products therefrom
US8197671B2 (en) * 2008-03-26 2012-06-12 Auterra, Inc. Methods for upgrading of contaminated hydrocarbon streams
US8241490B2 (en) * 2008-03-26 2012-08-14 Auterra, Inc. Methods for upgrading of contaminated hydrocarbon streams
US8562821B2 (en) * 2008-12-15 2013-10-22 Council of Scientific & Industrial Research Center for High Technology Process for the removal of sulfones from oxidized hydrocarbon fuels
US8524073B2 (en) * 2009-03-23 2013-09-03 General Electric Company Surface modified sorbent
US9296960B2 (en) * 2010-03-15 2016-03-29 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Targeted desulfurization process and apparatus integrating oxidative desulfurization and hydrodesulfurization to produce diesel fuel having an ultra-low level of organosulfur compounds
US20110220550A1 (en) * 2010-03-15 2011-09-15 Abdennour Bourane Mild hydrodesulfurization integrating targeted oxidative desulfurization to produce diesel fuel having an ultra-low level of organosulfur compounds
US9828557B2 (en) 2010-09-22 2017-11-28 Auterra, Inc. Reaction system, methods and products therefrom
US20130015104A1 (en) * 2011-07-12 2013-01-17 Adnan Al-Hajji Process for sulfone conversion by super electron donors
US9005433B2 (en) 2011-07-27 2015-04-14 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated process for in-situ organic peroxide production and oxidative heteroatom conversion
CN103842319B (en) 2011-07-31 2017-06-09 沙特阿拉伯石油公司 With the oxidation desulfurizing method that the sulfone integrated is decomposed
KR101985559B1 (en) 2011-09-27 2019-06-03 사우디 아라비안 오일 컴퍼니 Selective liquid-liquid extraction of oxidative desulfurization reaction products
JP2015501361A (en) 2011-10-24 2015-01-15 アディティア ビルラ ヌーヴォ リミテッドAditya Birla Nuvo Limited Improved process for producing carbon black
US8906227B2 (en) 2012-02-02 2014-12-09 Suadi Arabian Oil Company Mild hydrodesulfurization integrating gas phase catalytic oxidation to produce fuels having an ultra-low level of organosulfur compounds
BR112014024263B1 (en) 2012-03-30 2021-03-09 Aditya Birla Science And Technology Company Ltd process for obtaining carbon black powder
US8920635B2 (en) 2013-01-14 2014-12-30 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Targeted desulfurization process and apparatus integrating gas phase oxidative desulfurization and hydrodesulfurization to produce diesel fuel having an ultra-low level of organosulfur compounds
US10246647B2 (en) 2015-03-26 2019-04-02 Auterra, Inc. Adsorbents and methods of use
US10450516B2 (en) 2016-03-08 2019-10-22 Auterra, Inc. Catalytic caustic desulfonylation
US10661250B2 (en) 2018-04-13 2020-05-26 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Synthetic silica as packing material in supported liquid extraction
US11198824B2 (en) * 2019-05-16 2021-12-14 Alternative Petroleum Technologies Holdings Corp. System and method for liquid hydrocarbon desulfurization
US11661557B2 (en) 2020-03-15 2023-05-30 University Of Dayton Desulfurization techniques

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6171478B1 (en) * 1998-07-15 2001-01-09 Uop Llc Process for the desulfurization of a hydrocarbonaceous oil
US6551501B1 (en) * 1999-06-02 2003-04-22 Haldor Topsoe A/S Combined process for improved hydrotreating of diesel fuels
US7144499B2 (en) * 2003-11-26 2006-12-05 Lyondell Chemical Technology, L.P. Desulfurization process

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB713740A (en) * 1950-11-15 1954-08-18 Anglo Iranian Oil Co Ltd Improvements in or relating to the treatment of sulphur-containing mineral oils
US3565793A (en) * 1968-12-27 1971-02-23 Texaco Inc Desulfurization with a catalytic oxidation step
US4367342A (en) * 1969-04-02 1983-01-04 Shell Oil Company Olefin epoxidation
US3816301A (en) * 1972-06-30 1974-06-11 Atlantic Richfield Co Process for the desulfurization of hydrocarbons
WO1984002716A1 (en) * 1983-01-07 1984-07-19 British Petroleum Co Plc Process for upgrading hydrocarbon fuels
GB8813484D0 (en) 1988-06-08 1988-07-13 Shell Int Research Process for preparation of oxirane compound
IT1244478B (en) 1990-12-21 1994-07-15 Eniricerche Spa CATALYTICALLY ACTIVE GEL AND PROCEDURE FOR ITS PREPARATION
US5759945A (en) * 1997-03-26 1998-06-02 Arco Chemical Technology, L.P. Preparation of titanium-containing catalysts using titanosiloxane polymers
US6187934B1 (en) * 1997-03-26 2001-02-13 Sumitomo Chemical Company Limited Titanium-containing solid catalyst
US6011162A (en) * 1997-05-05 2000-01-04 Arco Chemical Technology, L.P. Epoxidation process using improved heterogeneous catalyst composition
US5985136A (en) * 1998-06-18 1999-11-16 Exxon Research And Engineering Co. Two stage hydrodesulfurization process
SG82626A1 (en) * 1998-08-04 2001-08-21 Sumitomo Chemical Co Titanium-containing silicon oxide catalyst
GB9903164D0 (en) * 1999-02-15 1999-04-07 Ici Plc Sulpher removal
US6368495B1 (en) * 1999-06-07 2002-04-09 Uop Llc Removal of sulfur-containing compounds from liquid hydrocarbon streams
US6114552A (en) * 1999-09-28 2000-09-05 Arco Chemical Technology, L.P. Heterogeneous epoxidation catalyst
US6402939B1 (en) * 2000-09-28 2002-06-11 Sulphco, Inc. Oxidative desulfurization of fossil fuels with ultrasound
AU2002354180A1 (en) * 2001-11-20 2003-06-10 Consejo Superior De Investigaciones Cientificas Method of oxidising sulphur compounds present in gasoline, kerosene and diesel fractions

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6171478B1 (en) * 1998-07-15 2001-01-09 Uop Llc Process for the desulfurization of a hydrocarbonaceous oil
US6551501B1 (en) * 1999-06-02 2003-04-22 Haldor Topsoe A/S Combined process for improved hydrotreating of diesel fuels
US7144499B2 (en) * 2003-11-26 2006-12-05 Lyondell Chemical Technology, L.P. Desulfurization process

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110147272A1 (en) * 2009-12-23 2011-06-23 General Electric Company Emulsification of hydrocarbon gas oils to increase efficacy of water based hydrogen sulfide scavengers
WO2012036445A2 (en) * 2010-09-13 2012-03-22 한국화학연구원 Catalyst for selective oxidative desulfurization and preparation method thereof
WO2012036445A3 (en) * 2010-09-13 2012-06-07 한국화학연구원 Catalyst for selective oxidative desulfurization and preparation method thereof
US10533141B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-01-14 Mag{tilde over (e)}mã Technology LLC Process and device for treating high sulfur heavy marine fuel oil for use as feedstock in a subsequent refinery unit
US10563133B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-02-18 Magëmä Technology LLC Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil
US10563132B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-02-18 Magēmā Technology, LLC Multi-stage process and device for treatment heavy marine fuel oil and resultant composition including ultrasound promoted desulfurization
US10584287B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-03-10 Magēmā Technology LLC Heavy marine fuel oil composition
US10604709B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-03-31 Magēmā Technology LLC Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil from distressed heavy fuel oil materials
US10655074B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-05-19 Mag{hacek over (e)}m{hacek over (a)} Technology LLC Multi-stage process and device for reducing environmental contaminates in heavy marine fuel oil
US10836966B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-11-17 Magēmā Technology LLC Multi-stage process and device utilizing structured catalyst beds and reactive distillation for the production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil
US11136513B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2021-10-05 Magëmä Technology LLC Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil from distressed heavy fuel oil materials
US11203722B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2021-12-21 Magëmä Technology LLC Multi-stage process and device for treatment heavy marine fuel oil and resultant composition including ultrasound promoted desulfurization
US11345863B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2022-05-31 Magema Technology, Llc Heavy marine fuel oil composition
US11441084B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2022-09-13 Magēmā Technology LLC Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil
US11447706B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2022-09-20 Magēmā Technology LLC Heavy marine fuel compositions
US11492559B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2022-11-08 Magema Technology, Llc Process and device for reducing environmental contaminates in heavy marine fuel oil
US11530360B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2022-12-20 Magēmā Technology LLC Process and device for treating high sulfur heavy marine fuel oil for use as feedstock in a subsequent refinery unit
US11560520B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2023-01-24 Magēmā Technology LLC Multi-stage process and device for treatment heavy marine fuel oil and resultant composition and the removal of detrimental solids
US11788017B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2023-10-17 Magëmã Technology LLC Multi-stage process and device for reducing environmental contaminants in heavy marine fuel oil
US11795406B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2023-10-24 Magemä Technology LLC Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil from distressed heavy fuel oil materials
US11884883B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2024-01-30 MagêmãTechnology LLC Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil
US11912945B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2024-02-27 Magēmā Technology LLC Process and device for treating high sulfur heavy marine fuel oil for use as feedstock in a subsequent refinery unit

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20050150156A1 (en) 2005-07-14
US7314545B2 (en) 2008-01-01
WO2005071046A1 (en) 2005-08-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7314545B2 (en) Desulfurization process
US7144499B2 (en) Desulfurization process
US7276152B2 (en) Oxidative desulfurization and denitrogenation of petroleum oils
US7270742B2 (en) Organosulfur oxidation process
US7666297B2 (en) Oxidative desulfurization and denitrogenation of petroleum oils
RU2565758C2 (en) Methods for upgrading polluted hydrocarbon flows
EP2190787B1 (en) Removal of residual sulfur compounds from a caustic stream
US20060180501A1 (en) Process and device for desulphurizing hydrocarbons containing thiophene derivatives
JP2004501222A (en) Selective hydrogen treatment and mercaptan removal
EA016125B1 (en) Diesel oil desulfurization by oxidation and extraction
EP1601749B1 (en) Organosulfur oxidation process
KR100996263B1 (en) Process for manufacturing of dibenzothiophene sulfone to biphenyl
MXPA04008358A (en) Removal of sulfur-containing compounds from liquid hydrocarbon streams.
KR101068994B1 (en) Catalyst for removal sulfur dioxide of dibenzothiophene sulfone and Process for manufacturing of biphenyl using that
CN101063043B (en) Oxidation deodorizing method for benzine
WO2005061675A1 (en) Process for the oxidative desulfurization of hydrocarbon fractions and plant thereof
GB2366803A (en) Sulphur removal from a hydrocarbon stream
DeLancey i, United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8877013 B2

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NEW YORK

Free format text: GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS;ASSIGNORS:BASELL POLYOLEFINE GMBH;ARCO CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY L.P.;ARCO CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020704/0562

Effective date: 20071220

Owner name: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT,NEW YORK

Free format text: GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS;ASSIGNORS:BASELL POLYOLEFINE GMBH;ARCO CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY L.P.;ARCO CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020704/0562

Effective date: 20071220

AS Assignment

Owner name: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NEW YORK

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:BASELL POLYOLEFINE GMBH;ARCO CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY L.P.;ARCO CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:021354/0708

Effective date: 20071220

Owner name: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT,NEW YORK

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:BASELL POLYOLEFINE GMBH;ARCO CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY L.P.;ARCO CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:021354/0708

Effective date: 20071220

AS Assignment

Owner name: CITIBANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND COLLAT

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:022708/0830

Effective date: 20090303

XAS Not any more in us assignment database

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:022520/0782

AS Assignment

Owner name: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, CONN

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:023449/0138

Effective date: 20090303

Owner name: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT,CONNE

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:023449/0138

Effective date: 20090303

AS Assignment

Owner name: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P.,DELAWARE

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024337/0705

Effective date: 20100430

Owner name: EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, LP,TEXAS

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024337/0705

Effective date: 20100430

Owner name: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P.,DELAWARE

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024337/0856

Effective date: 20100430

Owner name: EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, LP,TEXAS

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024337/0856

Effective date: 20100430

Owner name: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, LP,DELAWARE

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024337/0020

Effective date: 20100430

Owner name: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, LP,DELAWARE

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024337/0285

Effective date: 20100430

Owner name: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, LP, DELAWARE

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024337/0020

Effective date: 20100430

Owner name: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, LP, DELAWARE

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024337/0285

Effective date: 20100430

Owner name: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P., DELAWARE

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024337/0705

Effective date: 20100430

Owner name: EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, LP, TEXAS

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024337/0705

Effective date: 20100430

Owner name: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P., DELAWARE

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024337/0856

Effective date: 20100430

Owner name: EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, LP, TEXAS

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:024337/0856

Effective date: 20100430

AS Assignment

Owner name: DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, AS COLLATERA

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:024342/0421

Effective date: 20100430

AS Assignment

Owner name: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT,CONNE

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:024342/0801

Effective date: 20100430

Owner name: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, CONN

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:024342/0801

Effective date: 20100430

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: CITIBANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT,NEW YORK

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:024397/0818

Effective date: 20100430

Owner name: CITIBANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, NEW YORK

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:024397/0818

Effective date: 20100430

AS Assignment

Owner name: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATE

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:024402/0681

Effective date: 20100430

AS Assignment

Owner name: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P., TEXAS

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:032125/0296

Effective date: 20131018

Owner name: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P., TEXAS

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS;REEL/FRAME:032123/0799

Effective date: 20131017

Owner name: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P., TEXAS

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:032138/0134

Effective date: 20131016

Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TEXAS

Free format text: APPOINTMENT OF SUCCESSOR ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;ASSIGNOR:UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:032137/0639

Effective date: 20110304

Owner name: LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L.P., TEXAS

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:032137/0156

Effective date: 20131022