US20080036765A1 - Model simplification apparatus and program - Google Patents
Model simplification apparatus and program Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080036765A1 US20080036765A1 US11/836,190 US83619007A US2008036765A1 US 20080036765 A1 US20080036765 A1 US 20080036765A1 US 83619007 A US83619007 A US 83619007A US 2008036765 A1 US2008036765 A1 US 2008036765A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- mesh
- feature
- shapes
- similar
- geometry features
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T17/00—Three dimensional [3D] modelling, e.g. data description of 3D objects
- G06T17/20—Finite element generation, e.g. wire-frame surface description, tesselation
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an apparatus for supporting a CAE (Computer Aided Engineering), which provides rationalization and high efficiency of development and design work by means of a three-dimensional CAD (Computer Aided Design) and numerical simulation as well as a CAE (Computer Aided Manufacturing), which provides rationalization and high efficiency of manufacturing work.
- CAE Computer Aided Engineering
- the invention is suitable for apparatus that simplifies and forms a mesh for numerical analysis on a geometric model input to a computer.
- 3D data may include small geometrical shapes of parts such as very small holes and grooves.
- a mesh that is used in CAE becomes very fine and the time of computation for analysis will increase.
- a shape is selected for simplification, based on parameters representing the dimensions of feature shapes, which is described, for example, in Japanese laid-open Patent publication No. 2000-331194. Also, in Japanese laid-open Patent publication No. 2001-117907, it is described that, for a polyhedral geometric model (polygon model), a polyhedral model is numerically represented from an axial moment function of a polyhedron and a similar model is searched out.
- An object of the present invention is to allow for efficient selection of partial shapes similar to any specified portion in a model with regard to 3D geometric model data, thereby making it possible to efficiently perform geometry simplification even for complex and large shapes.
- the present invention is configured as follows, to solve the above problem.
- a model simplification apparatus that, after input of a 3D geometric model to be subjected to numerical analysis to a computer, forms a surface mesh for numerical analysis on the geometric model while simplifying it, the model simplification apparatus comprising:
- a mesh formation section for forming a surface mesh by using a plurality of mesh elements on the input geometric model and registering the surface mesh as an initial mesh into a database
- a geometry feature definition section for classifying the surface mesh into partial surface meshes having geometry features based on angles formed between respective adjacent mesh elements, and calculating feature quantities of the partial surface meshes classified;
- a feature shape input section capable of sequentially inputting each group of mesh elements of the geometry features as reference feature shapes
- a similar feature shape search section for searching for groups of mesh elements of similar geometry features to said reference feature shapes, wherein the similar geometry features are comprised of groups of geometry features whose adjacency is equal to an adjacency of the reference feature shapes and in which the summation of differences of feature quantities between the similar feature shapes and the reference feature shapes is not greater than a threshold value;
- a mesh simplification section for removing groups of mesh elements corresponding to the similar feature shapes from the initial mesh, and forming simplified mesh parts newly instead of removed similar feature shapes in spaces made by the removal.
- Another aspect of the present invention is as follows.
- a computer program product for use in a model simplification apparatus that, after input of a 3D geometric model to be subjected to numerical analysis to a computer, forms a surface mesh for numerical analysis on the geometric model while simplifying it, the computer program comprising:
- the similar geometry features are comprised of groups of geometry features whose adjacency is equal to an adjacency of the reference feature shapes and in which the summation of differences of feature quantities between the similar feature shapes and the reference feature shapes is not greater than a threshold value;
- a search is performed for similar feature shapes based on feature vectors of classified geometry features. Therefore, it is possible to make an efficient selection of partial shapes similar to a portion specified for simplification from a geometric model and to efficiently perform mesh geometry simplification even for complex and large shapes.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a model simplification apparatus which is one embodiment according to the present invention.
- FIGS. 2A and 2B show perspective views of a geometric model and its surface mesh according to an embodiment
- FIGS. 3A and 3B exemplify mesh data according to an embodiment
- FIG. 4 shows perspective views of geometry features according to an embodiment
- FIG. 5 shows the histograms of geometry features according to an embodiment
- FIG. 6 shows a screen provided by a feature shape input unit according to an embodiment
- FIG. 7 shows a perspective view of a similar feature shape according to an embodiment
- FIG. 8 shows a simplified mesh according to an embodiment
- FIG. 9 shows a simplified mesh in which a groove shape was removed according to an embodiment
- FIG. 10 shows perspective views of an object to explain simplification according to an embodiment
- FIG. 11 shows a screen provided by a history data registration unit according to an embodiment.
- FIG. 1 An embodiment of a configuration of a model simplification apparatus is shown in FIG. 1 .
- This apparatus includes:
- the apparatus further includes:
- a feature shape input section 4 for prompting a system user to select groups of mesh elements of any geometry features referred to as feature shapes (reference feature shapes) in the initial mesh read out from the database, and registering the groups as feature shape data into a database;
- a similar feature shape search section 5 for searching for groups of mesh elements of geometry features (referred to as similar feature shapes) similar to the selected feature shapes in the initial mesh and registering the groups as similar feature data into a database.
- the similar feature shapes are comprised of groups of mesh elements having geometry features whose adjacency is equal to an adjacency of the above-mentioned feature shapes selected by the system user and in which the summation of differences of feature quantities between the similar feature shapes and the feature shapes selected by the system user is not greater than a threshold value.
- the apparatus further includes:
- a mesh simplification section 6 for removing groups of mesh elements corresponding to the similar feature shapes from the registered initial mesh, forming simplified mesh parts newly instead of removed similar feature shapes in spaces made by the removal, and registering the simplified mesh parts into a database;
- FIG. 2A Details of simplification of a 3D geometric model which is illustrated in FIG. 2A are explained. Holes 201 to 203 with counter bores, holes 204 and 205 , grooves 206 and 207 are worked in the geometric model shown in FIG. 2A .
- the tetrahedral mesh formation section 2 forms a surface mesh as illustrated in FIG. 2B on a geometric model ( FIG. 2A ) having been input via the input/output device 1 and registers it as an initial mesh into the database.
- a Delaunay method, an advancing front method, etc. are available as methods of forming such a surface mesh.
- Mesh data is comprised of element data and node data, as shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B .
- the element data includes the number of elements and node numbers constituting each element (namely mesh element) which are registered as the element data.
- the node data includes the number of nodes and the coordinate (X-coordinate, Y-coordinate, Z-coordinate) of each node which are registered as the node data.
- the geometry feature definition section 3 classifies a surface mesh into partial surface meshes, which are referred to as geometry features, based on angles formed between respective adjacent mesh elements respectively, and calculates feature quantities representing the geometry features.
- FIG. 4 illustrates classification of the surface mesh of FIG. 2B into geometry features of the partial surfaces respectively by using an angle threshold value of 45 degrees.
- the surface mesh is classified into a total of 28 geometry features 401 to 428 .
- the angle threshold value can be changed by the system user.
- the feature quantity of each geometry feature of the partial surface meshes is calculated as follows.
- each geometry feature when representing a centroidal distance between each two mesh elements (namely each pair of mesh elements as adjacent mesh elements) by a first axis, and representing an angle formed between the normal vectors of each two mesh elements by a second axis, areas of all pairs of mesh elements are accumulated with a histogram at positions (coordinates) corresponding on the first and second axes.
- the first axis is normalized such that a maximum l max of the centroidal distance is 1 and a minimum l min is 0, the region of the first axis is defined by a range from 0 to 1.
- the second axis represents the angle formed between the normal vectors of each of all two mesh elements, its range is represented by range from 0 to 180 degrees.
- a value of histogram of (L i , ⁇ j ) is denoted by Z (L i , ⁇ j ).
- the form of the histogram represents the geometry feature as each partial surface mesh, and it becomes a value not depending on its position and rotation.
- the geometry features (partial surface meshes) 405 , 406 , 407 , 413 , and 419 shown in FIG. 4 their respective histograms 505 , 506 , 507 , 513 , and 519 are shown in FIG. 5 .
- inter-centroid distance of each two meshes is represented on the axis (the first axis) in a depth direction
- the angle formed between the normal vectors of each two meshes is represented on the axis (the second axis) in a lateral direction.
- the feature shape input section 4 prompts the system user to select any groups of mesh elements as geometry features, each of which is referred to as the feature shape, and registers them as feature shape data into the database.
- a screen image provided by the feature shape input section is shown in FIG. 6 .
- the user is allowed to select any groups of mesh elements as geometry features.
- the selected groups of mesh elements of the geometry features are displayed in the same screen like an example image denoted by a reference number 602 .
- a set of three geometric shapes G 10 , G 11 , and G 12 which constitute a hole with counter bore denoted by a reference number 201 in FIGS. 2A and 2B , are selected (in the example image 602 of FIG. 6 , “G” of a character is added to each head of reference numbers of the geometry features).
- the feature shape input section 4 registers the selected groups of mesh elements corresponding to geometry features as feature shape data into the database assigning the reference numbers (G 10 , G 11 , G 12 ) to the selected groups of mesh elements as geometry features.
- the similar feature shape search section 5 searches for groups of geometry features similar to the feature shapes selected by the system user in the initial mesh and registers the groups as similar feature data into a database.
- the similar feature shapes are comprised of groups of mesh elements having geometry features whose adjacency is equal to an adjacency of the above-mentioned feature shapes selected by the system user and in which the summation of differences of feature quantities between the similar feature shapes and the feature shapes selected by the system user is not greater than a threshold value.
- V AB is represented by a real number within a range of from 0 to 1 and this number nearer to 0 indicates closer similarity in shape between the geometry features A and B.
- FIG. 7 shows similar feature shapes (groups of geometry features) 701 and 702 searched for with regard to the example image 602 , wherein the difference of a feature quantity between each similar feature shape (each searched geometry feature) and each selected feature shape (each reference geometry feature) is assumed to be 0.05.
- the mesh simplification unit 6 removes groups of partial surface meshes (mesh elements) having the searched similar feature shapes and forms simplified mesh parts newly instead of the removed partial surface meshes (searched similar feature shapes) in spaces formed by the removal.
- the boundary of the space where each group of partial surface meshes was removed has one surface mesh part belonging to a mesh side. Therefore, the boundary of the space is searched for and a surface mesh part is formed again by using their nodes. Available methods of forming again the mesh part in such a space are Delaunay method, advancing front method, etc.
- FIG. 8 a finally entire surface mesh 801 with mesh parts (for example, corresponding to holes with counter bores) simplified by the mesh simplification unit 6 is shown.
- the mesh simplification unit 6 registers simplified mesh parts into the database.
- the history data registration section 7 registers an association of a feature shape selected by the system user with a procedural step as history information into the database.
- a groove shape denoted by 901 of FIG. 9 is selected as feature shapes (partial surface meshes G 14 , G 15 , G 16 ) from the surface mesh denoted by 801 , groups of geometric features similar to the selected feature shapes are searched for, simplification is performed to the searched geometric features, and a surface mesh denoted by 902 is formed finally.
- the history data registration section 7 associates groups (for example G 14 , G 15 , G 16 ) of geometry features belonging to feature shapes used for search with groups of surface mesh elements constituting the respective feature shapes and registers this association during simplification in accordance with a simplification procedure, as exemplified by a table denoted by 903 .
- the present simplification procedure is to form a model in an intermediate machined state based on a final product shape; i.e., the simplification procedure reverses a machining procedure. Therefore, actually, first, holes 204 and 205 are machined in a base part; then, grooves 206 , 207 are cut; and finally, holes 201 , 202 , 203 with counter bores are machined.
- Simplification of a model denoted by 1001 (j surface mesh data is denoted by 1002 ) in FIG. 10 is performed as follows.
- the machining process of this model is the same as for the model denoted by 202 in FIGS. 2A and 2B , the simplification can be performed more efficiently by reusing the history data 903 on previously performed simplification.
- the history data registration section 7 prompts the system user to select a simplification history to be reused from the history data registered in the database. Then, this section displays selected history data in a list in which a procedural steps are associated with feature shapes for which simplification was executed in the steps, for example, as exemplified in FIG. 11 .
- the history data registration unit 7 prompts the system user to select a simplification process. Simplification is executed for all feature shapes registered associated with a selected procedure (process) which was performed previously. The simplification method is as already described.
- 1003 denotes a simplified model when the system user selects a step 1101 of FIG. 11 as a process, and the process is that only the holes with counter bores are simplified from the object 1002 .
- 1004 denotes a simplified model when the system user selects steps 1001 and 1002 of FIG. 11 as a process, and the holes with counter bores and grooves are simplified from the object 1002 .
- model simplification apparatus it is possible to, after any partial shape is selected, search for a partial shape similar to this shape and perform simplification in a batch fashion. Consequently, improving the efficiency of the work can be achieved. Furthermore, by reusing simplification history, it is possible to easily obtain an intermediate machined shape of a part which is machined by a similar machining procedural step.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Graphics (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Processing Or Creating Images (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present application claims priority from Japanese application serial no. 2006-216366, filed on Aug. 9, 2006, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by references into this application.
- The present invention relates to an apparatus for supporting a CAE (Computer Aided Engineering), which provides rationalization and high efficiency of development and design work by means of a three-dimensional CAD (Computer Aided Design) and numerical simulation as well as a CAE (Computer Aided Manufacturing), which provides rationalization and high efficiency of manufacturing work. In particular, the invention is suitable for apparatus that simplifies and forms a mesh for numerical analysis on a geometric model input to a computer.
- Efforts for improving the efficiency of design and manufacturing by utilizing 3D (three-dimensional) model data formed during a design process in CAE and CAM are widely practiced. However, 3D data may include small geometrical shapes of parts such as very small holes and grooves. In such cases, for example, a mesh that is used in CAE becomes very fine and the time of computation for analysis will increase.
- For this reason, simplification to remove the shapes of some parts considered as having no effect on a solution of analysis calculation from a model is performed widely. Especially, in CAM, it is required to form an intermediate shape before machining from a final product shape as input data to machining equipment. The intermediate shape is formed by removing the shapes of some parts such as screw holes from the final product shape. In CAM, it is desirable that specified shapes and similar partial shapes can be removed collectively, because shapes that can be machined by each individual machining equipment are generally fixed.
- As for geometry simplification, apparatus, and a similar shape search method, it is known that a shape is selected for simplification, based on parameters representing the dimensions of feature shapes, which is described, for example, in Japanese laid-open Patent publication No. 2000-331194. Also, in Japanese laid-open Patent publication No. 2001-117907, it is described that, for a polyhedral geometric model (polygon model), a polyhedral model is numerically represented from an axial moment function of a polyhedron and a similar model is searched out.
- The above-mentioned techniques of prior art enable simplification of basic feature shapes such as holes and fillets in a batch fashion, based on their parameters. However, feature shapes that can be simplified are limited to those registered beforehand. Complex and large shapes are hard to simplify in view of efficiency, computation time, etc. The method of searching for a polyhedral shape similar to an arbitrary polyhedral shape is not capable of searching for a partial feature shape existing in a polyhedral shape and cannot accommodate needs sufficiently.
- An object of the present invention is to allow for efficient selection of partial shapes similar to any specified portion in a model with regard to 3D geometric model data, thereby making it possible to efficiently perform geometry simplification even for complex and large shapes.
- The present invention is configured as follows, to solve the above problem.
- A model simplification apparatus that, after input of a 3D geometric model to be subjected to numerical analysis to a computer, forms a surface mesh for numerical analysis on the geometric model while simplifying it, the model simplification apparatus comprising:
- a mesh formation section for forming a surface mesh by using a plurality of mesh elements on the input geometric model and registering the surface mesh as an initial mesh into a database;
- a geometry feature definition section for classifying the surface mesh into partial surface meshes having geometry features based on angles formed between respective adjacent mesh elements, and calculating feature quantities of the partial surface meshes classified;
- a feature shape input section capable of sequentially inputting each group of mesh elements of the geometry features as reference feature shapes;
- a similar feature shape search section for searching for groups of mesh elements of similar geometry features to said reference feature shapes, wherein the similar geometry features are comprised of groups of geometry features whose adjacency is equal to an adjacency of the reference feature shapes and in which the summation of differences of feature quantities between the similar feature shapes and the reference feature shapes is not greater than a threshold value; and
- a mesh simplification section for removing groups of mesh elements corresponding to the similar feature shapes from the initial mesh, and forming simplified mesh parts newly instead of removed similar feature shapes in spaces made by the removal.
- Another aspect of the present invention is as follows.
- A computer program product for use in a model simplification apparatus that, after input of a 3D geometric model to be subjected to numerical analysis to a computer, forms a surface mesh for numerical analysis on the geometric model while simplifying it, the computer program comprising:
- a function for forming a surface mesh by using a plurality of mesh elements on the input geometric model and registering the surface mesh as an initial mesh into a database;
- a function for classifying the surface mesh into partial surface meshes having geometry features based on angles formed between respective adjacent mesh elements, and calculating feature quantities of the partial surface meshes classified;
- a function capable of sequentially inputting each group of mesh elements of the geometry features as reference feature shapes;
- a function for searching for groups of mesh elements of similar geometry features to the reference feature shapes, wherein the similar geometry features are comprised of groups of geometry features whose adjacency is equal to an adjacency of the reference feature shapes and in which the summation of differences of feature quantities between the similar feature shapes and the reference feature shapes is not greater than a threshold value; and
- a function for removing groups of mesh elements corresponding to the similar feature shapes from the initial mesh, and forming simplified mesh parts newly instead of removed similar feature shapes in spaces made by the removal.
- According to the present invention, a search is performed for similar feature shapes based on feature vectors of classified geometry features. Therefore, it is possible to make an efficient selection of partial shapes similar to a portion specified for simplification from a geometric model and to efficiently perform mesh geometry simplification even for complex and large shapes.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a model simplification apparatus which is one embodiment according to the present invention; -
FIGS. 2A and 2B show perspective views of a geometric model and its surface mesh according to an embodiment; -
FIGS. 3A and 3B exemplify mesh data according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 4 shows perspective views of geometry features according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 5 shows the histograms of geometry features according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 6 shows a screen provided by a feature shape input unit according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 7 shows a perspective view of a similar feature shape according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 8 shows a simplified mesh according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 9 shows a simplified mesh in which a groove shape was removed according to an embodiment; -
FIG. 10 shows perspective views of an object to explain simplification according to an embodiment; and -
FIG. 11 shows a screen provided by a history data registration unit according to an embodiment. - An embodiment of a configuration of a model simplification apparatus is shown in
FIG. 1 . - This apparatus includes:
-
- an input/
output device 1 with a keyboard, a mouse, a display, etc. for inputting and displaying data; - a
mesh formation section 2 for taking in a geometric model to be analyzed, automatically forming a surface mesh on the geometric model or reading an exiting surface mesh on the geometric model, and registering the surface mesh as an initial mesh into a database; and - a geometry
feature definition section 3 for reading out the initial mesh from the database, forming geometry feature data based on angles between respective adjacent mesh elements of the initial mesh, calculating a feature quantity representing the geometric feature, and registering the feature quantity into a database.
- an input/
- The apparatus further includes:
- a feature
shape input section 4 for prompting a system user to select groups of mesh elements of any geometry features referred to as feature shapes (reference feature shapes) in the initial mesh read out from the database, and registering the groups as feature shape data into a database; and - a similar feature
shape search section 5 for searching for groups of mesh elements of geometry features (referred to as similar feature shapes) similar to the selected feature shapes in the initial mesh and registering the groups as similar feature data into a database. Here, the similar feature shapes are comprised of groups of mesh elements having geometry features whose adjacency is equal to an adjacency of the above-mentioned feature shapes selected by the system user and in which the summation of differences of feature quantities between the similar feature shapes and the feature shapes selected by the system user is not greater than a threshold value. - The apparatus further includes:
- a
mesh simplification section 6 for removing groups of mesh elements corresponding to the similar feature shapes from the registered initial mesh, forming simplified mesh parts newly instead of removed similar feature shapes in spaces made by the removal, and registering the simplified mesh parts into a database; and -
- a history data registration section 7 for registering association of the feature shape selected by the system user and a procedural step thereof as history information into a database.
- Details of simplification of a 3D geometric model which is illustrated in
FIG. 2A are explained.Holes 201 to 203 with counter bores, holes 204 and 205,grooves FIG. 2A . -
- (1) Mesh Formation Section
- The tetrahedral
mesh formation section 2 forms a surface mesh as illustrated inFIG. 2B on a geometric model (FIG. 2A ) having been input via the input/output device 1 and registers it as an initial mesh into the database. A Delaunay method, an advancing front method, etc. are available as methods of forming such a surface mesh. Mesh data is comprised of element data and node data, as shown inFIGS. 3A and 3B . The element data includes the number of elements and node numbers constituting each element (namely mesh element) which are registered as the element data. The node data includes the number of nodes and the coordinate (X-coordinate, Y-coordinate, Z-coordinate) of each node which are registered as the node data. -
- (2) Geometry Feature Definition Section
- The geometry
feature definition section 3 classifies a surface mesh into partial surface meshes, which are referred to as geometry features, based on angles formed between respective adjacent mesh elements respectively, and calculates feature quantities representing the geometry features. - Classification into the partial surface meshes as the geometry features is explained as follows.
- That is, obtaining a normal vector of each mesh element in the surface mesh; then, calculating each angle formed between normal vectors of adjacent mesh elements, and defining (classifying) each group of the mesh elements in which each angle formed between normal vectors of adjacent mesh elements is within a threshold value (angle threshold value), as a geometry feature of the partial surface mesh.
-
FIG. 4 illustrates classification of the surface mesh ofFIG. 2B into geometry features of the partial surfaces respectively by using an angle threshold value of 45 degrees. Here, the surface mesh is classified into a total of 28 geometry features 401 to 428. Incidentally, the angle threshold value can be changed by the system user. - The feature quantity of each geometry feature of the partial surface meshes is calculated as follows.
- At the time of calculating the feature quantity, first, the following histogram is formed for all pairs of mesh elements as adjacent mesh elements belonging to each geometry feature (each partial surface mesh). In each geometry feature, when representing a centroidal distance between each two mesh elements (namely each pair of mesh elements as adjacent mesh elements) by a first axis, and representing an angle formed between the normal vectors of each two mesh elements by a second axis, areas of all pairs of mesh elements are accumulated with a histogram at positions (coordinates) corresponding on the first and second axes. The first axis is normalized such that a maximum lmax of the centroidal distance is 1 and a minimum lmin is 0, the region of the first axis is defined by a range from 0 to 1. This region is discretized to a finite number of sections N, wherein each section is represented by Li (i=1, 2, . . . , N). As the second axis represents the angle formed between the normal vectors of each of all two mesh elements, its range is represented by range from 0 to 180 degrees. This is discretized by a finite number of sections M, wherein each section is represented by θj (j=1, 2, . . . , M). That is, each of all two mesh elements is represented definitely belongs to any coordinate of (Li, θj). A value of histogram of (Li, θj) is denoted by Z (Li, θj).
- Then, a sum (Val) of histogram values is obtained, the accumulation (Dum) of the areas at each position (coordinate) on the first and second axes is divided by this sum (Val), thereby the histogram is normalized such that the summation of histogram becomes “1”. This is expressed as:
- The form of the histogram represents the geometry feature as each partial surface mesh, and it becomes a value not depending on its position and rotation. Here, by way of example, for the geometry features (partial surface meshes) 405, 406, 407, 413, and 419 shown in
FIG. 4 , theirrespective histograms FIG. 5 . In the histograms, inter-centroid distance of each two meshes is represented on the axis (the first axis) in a depth direction, and the angle formed between the normal vectors of each two meshes is represented on the axis (the second axis) in a lateral direction. -
- (3) Feature Shape Input Section
- The feature
shape input section 4 prompts the system user to select any groups of mesh elements as geometry features, each of which is referred to as the feature shape, and registers them as feature shape data into the database. - A screen image provided by the feature shape input section is shown in
FIG. 6 . Using amouse pointer 601, the user is allowed to select any groups of mesh elements as geometry features. The selected groups of mesh elements of the geometry features are displayed in the same screen like an example image denoted by areference number 602. In this example, a set of three geometric shapes G10, G11, and G12, which constitute a hole with counter bore denoted by areference number 201 inFIGS. 2A and 2B , are selected (in theexample image 602 ofFIG. 6 , “G” of a character is added to each head of reference numbers of the geometry features). After the selection, the featureshape input section 4 registers the selected groups of mesh elements corresponding to geometry features as feature shape data into the database assigning the reference numbers (G10, G11, G12) to the selected groups of mesh elements as geometry features. -
- (4) Similar Feature Shape Search Section
- The similar feature
shape search section 5 searches for groups of geometry features similar to the feature shapes selected by the system user in the initial mesh and registers the groups as similar feature data into a database. The similar feature shapes are comprised of groups of mesh elements having geometry features whose adjacency is equal to an adjacency of the above-mentioned feature shapes selected by the system user and in which the summation of differences of feature quantities between the similar feature shapes and the feature shapes selected by the system user is not greater than a threshold value. - For example, in the feature shape of the
example image 602 ofFIG. 6 , selected geometric features G10 and Gll, G11 and G12 are adjacent respectively, but G10 and G12 are not adjacent. Three geometry features whose adjacency is equal to this adjacency are all searched for in the initial mesh. Searching for groups of geometry features having such an adjacency can be performed easily, because the adjacency among the geometry features is self-evident. - With regard groups of the geometry features searched for from view of the adjacency, difference of the feature quantities between each of the searched geometry features and each of the selected feature shapes is calculated and the summation thereof is calculated. When assuming a histogram representing the feature quantity of a reference geometry feature A (namely selected feature shape) as ZA (Li, θj) and a histogram representing the feature quantity of a geometry feature B (namely searched geometry feature as a similar feature) as ZB (Li, θj), a difference VAB between these feature quantities is expressed as:
- Here, VAB is represented by a real number within a range of from 0 to 1 and this number nearer to 0 indicates closer similarity in shape between the geometry features A and B.
- In this way, groups of geometry features similar to feature shapes selected by the system user can be searched for.
-
FIG. 7 shows similar feature shapes (groups of geometry features) 701 and 702 searched for with regard to theexample image 602, wherein the difference of a feature quantity between each similar feature shape (each searched geometry feature) and each selected feature shape (each reference geometry feature) is assumed to be 0.05. -
- (5) Mesh Simplification Section
- The
mesh simplification unit 6 removes groups of partial surface meshes (mesh elements) having the searched similar feature shapes and forms simplified mesh parts newly instead of the removed partial surface meshes (searched similar feature shapes) in spaces formed by the removal. - The boundary of the space where each group of partial surface meshes was removed has one surface mesh part belonging to a mesh side. Therefore, the boundary of the space is searched for and a surface mesh part is formed again by using their nodes. Available methods of forming again the mesh part in such a space are Delaunay method, advancing front method, etc. In
FIG. 8 , a finallyentire surface mesh 801 with mesh parts (for example, corresponding to holes with counter bores) simplified by themesh simplification unit 6 is shown. - Finally, the
mesh simplification unit 6 registers simplified mesh parts into the database. By the manner described hereinbefore, it is possible to efficiently search for a shape similar to an arbitrary complex shape such as a hole with counter bore and perform its simplification. -
- (6) History Data Registration Unit
- The history data registration section 7 registers an association of a feature shape selected by the system user with a procedural step as history information into the database.
- Assume that, for example, a groove shape denoted by 901 of
FIG. 9 is selected as feature shapes (partial surface meshes G14, G15, G16) from the surface mesh denoted by 801, groups of geometric features similar to the selected feature shapes are searched for, simplification is performed to the searched geometric features, and a surface mesh denoted by 902 is formed finally. In this case, the history data registration section 7 associates groups (for example G14, G15, G16) of geometry features belonging to feature shapes used for search with groups of surface mesh elements constituting the respective feature shapes and registers this association during simplification in accordance with a simplification procedure, as exemplified by a table denoted by 903. - By this registration, for example, when another model is simplified, registered feature shapes can be used as a search key. The present simplification procedure is to form a model in an intermediate machined state based on a final product shape; i.e., the simplification procedure reverses a machining procedure. Therefore, actually, first, holes 204 and 205 are machined in a base part; then,
grooves - Here, reusing history data is explained. Simplification of a model denoted by 1001 (j surface mesh data is denoted by 1002) in
FIG. 10 is performed as follows. When the machining process of this model is the same as for the model denoted by 202 inFIGS. 2A and 2B , the simplification can be performed more efficiently by reusing thehistory data 903 on previously performed simplification. - The history data registration section 7 prompts the system user to select a simplification history to be reused from the history data registered in the database. Then, this section displays selected history data in a list in which a procedural steps are associated with feature shapes for which simplification was executed in the steps, for example, as exemplified in
FIG. 11 . - The history data registration unit 7 prompts the system user to select a simplification process. Simplification is executed for all feature shapes registered associated with a selected procedure (process) which was performed previously. The simplification method is as already described.
- In
FIG. 10, 1003 denotes a simplified model when the system user selects astep 1101 ofFIG. 11 as a process, and the process is that only the holes with counter bores are simplified from theobject 1002. Also, 1004 denotes a simplified model when the system user selectssteps FIG. 11 as a process, and the holes with counter bores and grooves are simplified from theobject 1002. - According to the model simplification apparatus described hereinbefore, it is possible to, after any partial shape is selected, search for a partial shape similar to this shape and perform simplification in a batch fashion. Consequently, improving the efficiency of the work can be achieved. Furthermore, by reusing simplification history, it is possible to easily obtain an intermediate machined shape of a part which is machined by a similar machining procedural step.
Claims (5)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2006-216366 | 2006-08-09 | ||
JP2006216366A JP4893148B2 (en) | 2006-08-09 | 2006-08-09 | Shape simplification device and program used therefor |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080036765A1 true US20080036765A1 (en) | 2008-02-14 |
US8089478B2 US8089478B2 (en) | 2012-01-03 |
Family
ID=39050262
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/836,190 Expired - Fee Related US8089478B2 (en) | 2006-08-09 | 2007-08-09 | Model simplification apparatus and program |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8089478B2 (en) |
JP (1) | JP4893148B2 (en) |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110128284A1 (en) * | 2009-11-30 | 2011-06-02 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Geometry simplification apparatus, geometry simplification method, and program |
US20130182960A1 (en) * | 2010-09-30 | 2013-07-18 | Thomson Licensing | Method and apparatus for encoding geometry patterns, and method for apparatus for decoding geometry patterns |
CN103839224A (en) * | 2012-11-26 | 2014-06-04 | 镇江京江软件园有限公司 | Method for performing zoom process on batch pictures |
US20160283616A1 (en) * | 2013-12-16 | 2016-09-29 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Analysis mesh data generating method and analysis mesh data generating device |
US20170243398A1 (en) * | 2014-10-15 | 2017-08-24 | Gaia3D Inc. | Method and system for reducing volume of three-dimensional modeling data |
US9898859B2 (en) | 2014-03-31 | 2018-02-20 | Fujitsu Limited | Apparatus and method for managing structure data |
CN109657350A (en) * | 2018-12-19 | 2019-04-19 | 湖南城市学院 | Basic data stage division based on BIM technology |
US10540476B2 (en) | 2015-11-16 | 2020-01-21 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Computer-implemented method for simplifying analysis of a computer-aided model |
US12073513B1 (en) * | 2018-11-09 | 2024-08-27 | Ansys, Inc. | Mesh imprint in priority mesh generation for dirty models |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8697152B2 (en) | 2005-08-31 | 2014-04-15 | Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. | Anti-inflammatory compositions and personal care compositions comprising olive leaf (Olea europea) extract |
US8758838B2 (en) | 2005-08-31 | 2014-06-24 | Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. | Anti-inflammatory compositions and methods of use |
JP6540238B2 (en) * | 2015-06-02 | 2019-07-10 | 大日本印刷株式会社 | Data output regulation device for three-dimensional object modeling |
KR102237040B1 (en) * | 2019-03-20 | 2021-04-06 | 금오공과대학교 산학협력단 | Method And Computer Program For Configure Lightweight Files for 3D geometry Visualization |
WO2020242047A1 (en) * | 2019-05-30 | 2020-12-03 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for acquiring virtual object data in augmented reality |
WO2022091181A1 (en) * | 2020-10-26 | 2022-05-05 | インテグラル・テクノロジー株式会社 | Shape data processing device, shape data processing method, and shape data processing program |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020167518A1 (en) * | 1996-10-16 | 2002-11-14 | Alexander Migdal | System and method for computer modeling of 3D objects or surfaces by mesh constructions having optimal quality characteristics and dynamic resolution capabilities |
US20030090526A1 (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2003-05-15 | Ichiro Nishigaki | Analysis work support system |
US20040213915A1 (en) * | 2001-10-26 | 2004-10-28 | Andersen Henrik John | Method of flexible process planning for surface processes |
US20050002571A1 (en) * | 2000-05-24 | 2005-01-06 | Masaki Hiraga | Object shape exploration using topology matching |
US7079990B2 (en) * | 2001-02-08 | 2006-07-18 | Solidworks Corporation | Automated connections of computer-aided design components |
US20070279414A1 (en) * | 2006-05-31 | 2007-12-06 | Vandenbrande Jan H | Methods and apparatus for automated part positioning based on geometrical comparisons |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2000331194A (en) * | 1999-05-24 | 2000-11-30 | Hitachi Ltd | Method for simplifying shape model |
JP3610270B2 (en) | 1999-10-21 | 2005-01-12 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション | Polyhedron shape comparison search method and system |
JP4664218B2 (en) * | 2006-02-28 | 2011-04-06 | 国立大学法人北海道大学 | Mesh model generation system |
JP4785598B2 (en) * | 2006-04-07 | 2011-10-05 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Similar shape search device |
-
2006
- 2006-08-09 JP JP2006216366A patent/JP4893148B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2007
- 2007-08-09 US US11/836,190 patent/US8089478B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020167518A1 (en) * | 1996-10-16 | 2002-11-14 | Alexander Migdal | System and method for computer modeling of 3D objects or surfaces by mesh constructions having optimal quality characteristics and dynamic resolution capabilities |
US20050002571A1 (en) * | 2000-05-24 | 2005-01-06 | Masaki Hiraga | Object shape exploration using topology matching |
US7079990B2 (en) * | 2001-02-08 | 2006-07-18 | Solidworks Corporation | Automated connections of computer-aided design components |
US20040213915A1 (en) * | 2001-10-26 | 2004-10-28 | Andersen Henrik John | Method of flexible process planning for surface processes |
US20030090526A1 (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2003-05-15 | Ichiro Nishigaki | Analysis work support system |
US20070279414A1 (en) * | 2006-05-31 | 2007-12-06 | Vandenbrande Jan H | Methods and apparatus for automated part positioning based on geometrical comparisons |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110128284A1 (en) * | 2009-11-30 | 2011-06-02 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Geometry simplification apparatus, geometry simplification method, and program |
US8847952B2 (en) | 2009-11-30 | 2014-09-30 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Geometry simplification apparatus, geometry simplification method, and program |
US20130182960A1 (en) * | 2010-09-30 | 2013-07-18 | Thomson Licensing | Method and apparatus for encoding geometry patterns, and method for apparatus for decoding geometry patterns |
US9002121B2 (en) * | 2010-09-30 | 2015-04-07 | Thomson Licensing | Method and apparatus for encoding geometry patterns, and method for apparatus for decoding geometry patterns |
CN103839224A (en) * | 2012-11-26 | 2014-06-04 | 镇江京江软件园有限公司 | Method for performing zoom process on batch pictures |
US20160283616A1 (en) * | 2013-12-16 | 2016-09-29 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Analysis mesh data generating method and analysis mesh data generating device |
US10628619B2 (en) * | 2013-12-16 | 2020-04-21 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Analysis mesh data generating method and analysis mesh data generating device |
US9898859B2 (en) | 2014-03-31 | 2018-02-20 | Fujitsu Limited | Apparatus and method for managing structure data |
US20170243398A1 (en) * | 2014-10-15 | 2017-08-24 | Gaia3D Inc. | Method and system for reducing volume of three-dimensional modeling data |
US10540476B2 (en) | 2015-11-16 | 2020-01-21 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Computer-implemented method for simplifying analysis of a computer-aided model |
US12073513B1 (en) * | 2018-11-09 | 2024-08-27 | Ansys, Inc. | Mesh imprint in priority mesh generation for dirty models |
CN109657350A (en) * | 2018-12-19 | 2019-04-19 | 湖南城市学院 | Basic data stage division based on BIM technology |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2008040921A (en) | 2008-02-21 |
JP4893148B2 (en) | 2012-03-07 |
US8089478B2 (en) | 2012-01-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8089478B2 (en) | Model simplification apparatus and program | |
Gao et al. | Automatic recognition of interacting machining features based on minimal condition subgraph | |
Behera et al. | Tool path generation framework for accurate manufacture of complex 3D sheet metal parts using single point incremental forming | |
EP2750106B1 (en) | Geometrical elements transformed by rigid motions | |
Sheen et al. | Transformation of a thin-walled solid model into a surface model via solid deflation | |
EP2750107B1 (en) | Groups of faces that form a geometrical pattern | |
EP2400410A1 (en) | Computing of a resulting closed triangulated polyhedral surface from a first and a second modeled object | |
CN107545025B (en) | Querying databases using morphological criteria | |
EP3206100B1 (en) | Planning of computer numerical control (cnc) machining operations with the aid of a digital computer | |
JP2003186512A (en) | Creating apparatus and method for intermediate-stage model | |
Shah | Designing with parametric cad: Classification and comparison of construction techniques | |
Ning et al. | Part machining feature recognition based on a deep learning method | |
Saravanan et al. | Optimal geometric tolerance design framework for rigid parts with assembly function requirements using evolutionary algorithms | |
Kailash et al. | A volume decomposition approach to machining feature extraction of casting and forging components | |
Geng et al. | Feature recognition and volume generation of uncut regions for electrical discharge machining | |
Tapie et al. | Topological model for machining of parts with complex shapes | |
Raj Prasanth et al. | Collision detection during planning for sheet metal bending by bounding volume hierarchy approaches | |
CN107567641B (en) | System and method for identifying replicas | |
US11775699B2 (en) | Extracting grasping cues from tool geometry for digital human models | |
US20090228328A1 (en) | Method and Apparatus for Quantifying Aesthetic Preferences in Product Design Using Production Rules | |
CN107330179A (en) | A kind of three-dimensional process model Method of Creation Process containing technique supplemental characteristic | |
Karnik et al. | Geometric algorithms for containment analysis of rotational parts | |
Zulkifli et al. | Decomposition of interacting features using a Kohonen self-organizing feature map neural network | |
Ranjan et al. | Automatic recognition of machining features from a solid model using the 2D feature pattern | |
Qu et al. | Circular hole recognition for STL‐based toolpath generation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HITACHI, LTD., JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HIRIYA, MASAYUKI;KATAOKA, ICHIRO;REEL/FRAME:019987/0633;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070807 TO 20070808 Owner name: HITACHI, LTD., JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HIRIYA, MASAYUKI;KATAOKA, ICHIRO;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070807 TO 20070808;REEL/FRAME:019987/0633 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20200103 |