US20070205186A1 - Flexible scan field - Google Patents
Flexible scan field Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070205186A1 US20070205186A1 US11/736,638 US73663807A US2007205186A1 US 20070205186 A1 US20070205186 A1 US 20070205186A1 US 73663807 A US73663807 A US 73663807A US 2007205186 A1 US2007205186 A1 US 2007205186A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- scan
- field
- scan field
- size
- laser
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 24
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 21
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000012856 packing Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000005422 blasting Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000001747 pupil Anatomy 0.000 abstract description 39
- 238000003754 machining Methods 0.000 abstract description 18
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 33
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 19
- 238000005459 micromachining Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000009966 trimming Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000003990 capacitor Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000593 degrading effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003989 dielectric material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K26/00—Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
- B23K26/02—Positioning or observing the workpiece, e.g. with respect to the point of impact; Aligning, aiming or focusing the laser beam
- B23K26/06—Shaping the laser beam, e.g. by masks or multi-focusing
- B23K26/0665—Shaping the laser beam, e.g. by masks or multi-focusing by beam condensation on the workpiece, e.g. for focusing
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K26/00—Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
- B23K26/02—Positioning or observing the workpiece, e.g. with respect to the point of impact; Aligning, aiming or focusing the laser beam
- B23K26/06—Shaping the laser beam, e.g. by masks or multi-focusing
- B23K26/064—Shaping the laser beam, e.g. by masks or multi-focusing by means of optical elements, e.g. lenses, mirrors or prisms
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K26/00—Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
- B23K26/02—Positioning or observing the workpiece, e.g. with respect to the point of impact; Aligning, aiming or focusing the laser beam
- B23K26/06—Shaping the laser beam, e.g. by masks or multi-focusing
- B23K26/064—Shaping the laser beam, e.g. by masks or multi-focusing by means of optical elements, e.g. lenses, mirrors or prisms
- B23K26/0648—Shaping the laser beam, e.g. by masks or multi-focusing by means of optical elements, e.g. lenses, mirrors or prisms comprising lenses
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K26/00—Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
- B23K26/08—Devices involving relative movement between laser beam and workpiece
- B23K26/082—Scanning systems, i.e. devices involving movement of the laser beam relative to the laser head
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K26/00—Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
- B23K26/351—Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring for trimming or tuning of electrical components
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01C—RESISTORS
- H01C17/00—Apparatus or processes specially adapted for manufacturing resistors
- H01C17/22—Apparatus or processes specially adapted for manufacturing resistors adapted for trimming
- H01C17/24—Apparatus or processes specially adapted for manufacturing resistors adapted for trimming by removing or adding resistive material
- H01C17/242—Apparatus or processes specially adapted for manufacturing resistors adapted for trimming by removing or adding resistive material by laser
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01G—CAPACITORS; CAPACITORS, RECTIFIERS, DETECTORS, SWITCHING DEVICES, LIGHT-SENSITIVE OR TEMPERATURE-SENSITIVE DEVICES OF THE ELECTROLYTIC TYPE
- H01G13/00—Apparatus specially adapted for manufacturing capacitors; Processes specially adapted for manufacturing capacitors not provided for in groups H01G4/00 - H01G11/00
Definitions
- the invention relates to energy beam scanning, and more particularly, to optimizing characteristics of a laser beam to the applicable machining operations.
- Energy beams such as laser beams
- micro-machining operations are commonly used in numerous different types of machining operations, including what are often referred to as micro-machining operations.
- laser beams are used to machine features on substrates, such as printed circuit boards and panels.
- One typical micro-machining operation involves the laser trimming of resistors and capacitors printed on a substrate.
- FIG. 1 depicts a conventional laser beam micro-machining system 10 of the type used for resistor trimming.
- the system 10 includes a laser beam emitter 15 operating under the control of the system controller 55 .
- the emitted laser beam 20 passes through a fixed beam expander 25 to the scan subsystem 30 .
- the scan subsystem 30 includes beam directing optics 35 and a focus lens 40 .
- the scan system 30 also operates under the control of the system controller 55 .
- the beam 20 is directed by the beam directing optics 35 through the focus lens 40 .
- the beam directing optics 35 includes a pair of galvo driven mirrors.
- the focus lens 40 has a field of view and focuses the beam 20 so that the beam 20 impinges point 22 on a resistor 45 on the substrate 50 to perform the trimming operation.
- An X-Y stage 52 is provided to move the substrate 50 in two axes to position the resistor under the field of view of the lens 40 .
- the focal point 22 of the directed beam impinges on the substrate 50 , so as to perform the trimming operation.
- the fixed beam expander 25 establishes the size (effective entrance pupil) of the beam entering the scan system 30 . As shown in FIG. 1 , using the fixed beam expander 25 results in the collimated beam entering the scan subsystem having a pupil size B which corresponds to a spot size B′ of the beam at the focal point 22 on the focal surface. Thus, should a larger or smaller spot size be desired, the fixed beam expander 25 must be replaced with another beam expander having the appropriate beam expansion ratio to achieve the desired spot size.
- a fixed beam expander that will cause the effective entrance pupil size of the beam entering the scan subsystem to be less than B must be substituted for the fixed beam expander 25 .
- a fixed beam expander that will cause the effective entrance pupil size of the beam entering the scan subsystem to be greater than B must be substituted for the fixed beam expander 25 . In any such cases, the beam expander must be changed.
- the achievable spot size within the scan field in a conventional laser machining system is governed by a number of factors, including the pupil size and the focus lens characteristics.
- Relevant focus lens characteristics include the lens focal length, the lens performance degradation at large angles, the telecentricity of the focus lens, and the complexity and cost of the focus lens.
- a focus lens having a large field of view and a long focal length must be used. Without increasing the beam pupil size, this will result in the beam having a large spot size at the focal surface.
- the pupil size is increased, the size of the mirrors or other beam directing components must also be increased, thereby degrading dynamic performance.
- the beam pupil size at the beam directing optics must be increased.
- a focus lens having a high degree of telecentricity may be required.
- the packing density of the features to be machined is high, resulting in the need for a small beam spot size at the focal surface, then the complexity and cost of designing and manufacturing such a focus lens can be quite high.
- a machining system capable of machining features at various packing densities on substrates having different sizes and/or shapes without resorting to a different system or manually changing the focus lens in the scanning subassembly.
- One embodiment of the present invention provides a flexibly optimized material processing system.
- the system includes a laser emitter configured to emit a laser beam.
- Beam adjusting optics having a beam expansion ratio are configured to adjust the emitted laser beam by adjusting the beam expansion ratio.
- Beam directing optics are configured to provide a variable effective pupil corresponding to the adjusted laser beam.
- the beam directing optics are further configured to direct the adjusted beam to one or more targets within a scan field.
- a lens having a field of view encompassing at least the scan field, is configured to focus the directed laser beam onto the one or more targets within the scan field.
- a control processor is configured to receive input corresponding to a material processing parameter, and to issue at least one optimized control signal based on the at least one material processing parameter.
- the beam adjusting optics can be, for example, a zoom telescope.
- the beam directing optics can be, for example, one or more galvanometer mirror scanners.
- the system may further include a motion system that is configured to move a work piece containing at least one target relative to the scan field, and to position the at least one target within the scan field for processing (e.g., laser trimming of a circuit component or link blasting in a memory array).
- the optimized control signal is an optimum effective pupil of the beam directing optics corresponding to a scan field dimension.
- the optimized control signal is an optimum scan field dimension corresponding to one of the effective pupil of the beam directing optics, a focused laser beam spot size, a positional accuracy, a scanning speed, a material handling step size of a motion system, and a telecentricity value.
- the optimized control signal is an optimum material handling step size corresponding to one of a scan field dimension, a step period of a motion system, a substrate dimension, and a dimension of a selected area of a substrate.
- the beam adjusting optics can, for instance, be automatically or manually operated to adjust the beam expansion ratio according to an optimum beam expansion ratio value determined by the controller.
- the material processing parameter can be, for example, any one of a spot size, a substrate dimension, a dimension of a selected area of a substrate, an orientation of a selected area of a substrate, a packing density, a step time of a motion system, a step size of a motion system, a number of steps of a motion system, a scan speed, a positional accuracy, a telecentricity value, and a desired spot quality.
- the controller can be configured to determine at least one optimized value of the beam expansion ratio, a scan field dimension, and a material handling step size of a motion system, based on the material processing parameter.
- the beam expansion ratio is a first value
- the scan field is a first scan field
- the beam adjusting optics are further configured to again adjust the beam expansion ratio from the first value to a second value
- the beam directing optics are further configured to direct the again adjusted beam to a target within the second scan field.
- the first scan field has a first size and the second scan field has a second size.
- the first scan field has a first shape and the second scan field has a second shape.
- the field of view of the lens encompasses at least a first scan field and a second scan field, and is further configured to focus a first directed laser beam with a first effective pupil size onto one or more targets within the first scan field, and to focus a second directed laser beam with a second effective pupil size onto one or more targets within the second scan field, wherein at least one scan field size is limited by spot size degradation over the field of view.
- the system may include a control processor that is configured to receive an input identifying the scan field, and to issue scan control signals based on the received input.
- the beam directing optics are further configured to direct the adjusted beam in accordance with the issued scan control signals.
- the system may include a control processor that is configured to receive an input corresponding to a focused beam spot size, and to issue spot size control signals based on the received input.
- the beam adjusting optics are further configured to adjust the beam expansion ratio in accordance with the issued spot size control signals.
- the system may include a control processor that is configured to receive an input corresponding to a beam spot size, and to issue spot size control signals based on the received input.
- a display monitor can be configured to display parameters for manually operating the beam adjusting optics to adjust the beam expansion ratio in accordance with the issued spot size control signals.
- the system may include a control processor that is configured to receive an input identifying the scan field, and to issue motion control signals based on the received input.
- a motion system is configured to move a work piece relative to the scan field in accordance with the issued motion control signals.
- Another embodiment of the present invention provides a method of flexibly optimized material processing.
- the method includes receiving at least one material processing parameter relevant to impinging a work piece with a laser beam.
- the method continues with issuing at least one optimized control signal based on the at least one material processing parameter.
- the method further includes adjusting the laser beam to a first adjusted beam in accordance with the at least one optimized control signal, and directing the adjusted laser beam to one or more targets within a first scan field.
- the method proceeds with focusing the directed beam onto the one or more targets within the first scan field.
- adjusting the laser beam to a first adjusted beam may include automatically or manually adjusting a beam expansion ratio to a first optimized value.
- issuing at least one optimized control signal includes issuing an optimum effective pupil corresponding to a scan field dimension.
- issuing at least one optimized control signal includes issuing an optimum scan field dimension corresponding to one of an effective pupil, a process beam spot size, a positional accuracy, a scanning speed, a material handling step size, and a telecentricity value.
- issuing at least one optimized control signal includes issuing an optimum material handling step size corresponding to one of a scan field dimension, a step period of a motion system, a substrate dimension, and a dimension of a selected area of a substrate.
- issuing at least one optimized control signal includes issuing an optimum value of at least one of a beam expansion ratio, a scan field dimension, and a material handling step size based on the process parameter.
- the at least one material processing parameter received can be, for example, any one of a spot size, a substrate dimension, a dimension of a selected area of a substrate, orientation of a selected area of a substrate, packing density, a step time of a motion system, step size of a motion system, a number of steps of a motion system, a scan speed, a positional accuracy, a telecentricity, and a spot quality.
- adjusting the laser beam to a first adjusted beam includes adjusting a beam expansion ratio to a first value.
- the method includes further adjusting the beam expansion ratio to a second value, and directing the further adjusted beam to one or more targets within a second scan field.
- the first scan field has a first size and the second scan field has a second size.
- the first scan field has a first shape and the second scan field has a second shape.
- Adjusting the laser beam can be carried out, for example, using a zoom telescope. Directing the adjusted laser beam can be carried out, for example, using one or more galvanometer mirror scanners.
- adjusting the laser beam to a first adjusted beam includes adjusting a beam expansion ratio to a first value, where the method further includes adjusting the beam expansion ratio to a second value to provide a second adjusted beam, directing the second adjusted beam to one or more targets within a second scan field, and focusing the second adjusted beam onto one or more targets within the second scan field.
- at least one scan field size is limited by spot size degradation over a field of view.
- the first scan field size is limited by spot size degradation at a first effective pupil size over the field of view
- the second scan field size is limited by spot size degradation at a second effective pupil size over the field of view.
- the method may include receiving an input identifying a scan field dimension, issuing scan control signals based on the received input, and directing the adjusted beam in accordance with the issued scan control signals.
- the method may include receiving an input identifying a focused beam spot size, issuing spot size control signals based on the received input, and adjusting a beam expansion ratio in accordance with the issued spot size control signals.
- the method may include receiving an input identifying a focused beam spot size, issuing spot size control signals based on the received input, and displaying parameters for manually adjusting a beam expansion ratio in accordance with the issued spot size control signals.
- the method may include receiving an input identifying a scan field dimension, and issuing motion control signals based on the received input, to move the work piece relative to the scan field in accordance with the issued scan control signals.
- the system includes an emitter configured to emit a laser beam, a control processor configured to issue optimized control signals, and beam adjusting optics configured to adjust the emitted laser beam in accordance with at least one of the optimized control signals.
- a lens having a field of view, is configured to focus the adjusted beam onto one or more targets within a scan field encompassed by the field of view.
- Beam directing optics are configured to direct the adjusted beam to at least one of the one or more targets within the scan field.
- the scan field is a first scan field.
- the beam adjusting optics are further configured to again adjust the emitted laser beam, and the lens is further configured to focus the again adjusted beam onto one or more targets within a second scan field encompassed by the field of view.
- the beam directing optics are further configured to direct the again adjusted beam within the second scan field.
- the beam directing optics can be further configured to direct the adjusted beam in accordance with at least one of the optimized control signals.
- the system may further include a motion system configured to move a work piece relative to the scan field in accordance with at least one of the control signals.
- FIG. 1 depicts a conventional micro-machining system.
- FIG. 2 depicts a micro-machining system configured in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 3A depicts exemplary laser beam spots at the focal point achievable using the micro-machining system of FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 3B depicts the exemplary laser beam spots of FIG. 3A in relation to the scan field.
- FIG. 4 depicts example variations in the scan field that can be accommodated by the micro-machining system of FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 5 is a detailed depiction of a micro-machining system controller configured in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 depicts a look-up table usable to control the micro-machining system shown in FIG. 2 , in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- Embodiments of the present invention can be employed to machine features at various sizes and/or packing densities on work pieces having different sizes and/or shapes. This machining can be accomplished without using different systems and without manually installing and de-installing different focus lenses in the scan subassembly.
- Various material processing parameters including, for example, field size, accuracy, telecentricity, step size and/or spot size can be flexibly optimized for a particular application.
- FIG. 2 depicts a micro-machining system 110 configured in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- the system could be used for various types of machining operations, such as a trimming operation for untrimmed circuit elements (e.g., film resistors, capacitors, and inductors) formed on a PCB panel or on any panel or other type of substrate.
- untrimmed circuit elements e.g., film resistors, capacitors, and inductors
- the system 110 can be employed for other applications (e.g., drilling, marking, micro-perforating), and may include various other elements and supporting functionality not shown in FIG. 2 , as will be apparent in light of this disclosure.
- the substrate will typically include one or more untrimmed circuit elements, such as resistors, capacitors, and/or inductors formed contiguous with at least one of dielectric or conductive layers that make up the substrate.
- an untrimmed element may also include a portion of the dielectric layer or a portion of the conductive layer, as is the case for an untrimmed embedded capacitor.
- the substrate may include other circuitry and interconnections (both printed and placed) as well.
- the substrate may include any componentry or features that relate to that particular substrate's function, whether it be electrical, mechanical, chemical, textural, or visual in nature. Regardless of the substrates topology and intended function, the principles of the present invention may be employed to selectively and accurately direct an energy beam to the substrate for whatever purpose.
- the substrate may be used to form a plurality of substantially identical circuits, formed in a repeated pattern, or to form a single circuit (e.g., a computer mother board). On the other hand, the substrate may be used to form a plurality of different circuits formed in a pattern.
- the substrate may be the same size as the finished circuit board fabricated therefrom, or may be subsequently diced up to form a plurality of smaller sized finished circuit boards.
- the system 110 includes laser beam emitter 115 operating under the control of the system controller 155 .
- System controller 155 may include one or more controllers (e.g., programmable microcontrollers configured with one or more processors, I/O capability, memory, and a number of coded processes to carry out desired functionality) for controlling the position, velocity and power output of the focused laser beam and movement of the substrate during machining, as well as during periods when the system is not performing machining operations.
- the beam emitter 115 may include, for example, a laser beam generator such as a solid state or gas laser, but could alternatively be a simple emitting device, such as an optic fiber that emits a laser beam generated outside the system.
- the laser beam emitter 115 may be of any type, the laser beam emitter 115 will emit an energy beam at a wavelength that is compatible with the type of machining being performed. For example, if a dielectric material is primarily being processed, a CO 2 laser emitting at a wavelength of approximately 10 um may be used. If a conductive layer is being trimmed, then a solid state laser (e.g., laser diode) emitting at a wavelength of approximately 1.06 um may be used. If the trimming is a photochemical process, the laser wavelength may be visible or ultraviolet light, such a light of approximately 533 nm and shorter.
- a solid state laser e.g., laser diode
- the emitted laser beam 120 passes through an adjustable beam expander 125 (e.g., zoom telescope) to the scan subsystem 130 .
- Adjustment of the beam expander 125 can be controlled either manually or by the system controller 155 as shown in FIG. 2 , as will be discussed herein.
- the scan subsystem 130 also operates under the control of the system controller 155 .
- the scan subsystem 130 includes beam directing optics 135 and focus lens 140 .
- the beam directing optics 135 is provided between the beam expander 125 and the focus lens 140 , and is capable of directing the laser beam over a selected region of the substrate 150 (or other work piece). This selected region is also referred to the selected scan field herein.
- the focus lens 140 is for focusing the directed laser beam to a desired size and energy density at the focal point 122 .
- the beam directing optics 135 may be implemented with conventional technology, and is capable of scanning a laser beam in one or more directions.
- a pair of orthogonally mounted galvanometer mirror scanners serve as the beam directing optics 135 .
- Each galvanometer mirror scanner (sometimes referred to herein as a galvo driven mirror or galvo mirror) includes an angular position transducer for tracking the angular position of the mirrors, and a servo driver for controlling the angular rotation of each deflecting mirror to direct the laser beam along a path to a desired position.
- the system controller 155 includes all driving controls for the laser beam emitter 115 and the beam directing optics 135 . However, these controls could be incorporated into one or more subsystem controllers, separate from the system controller 155 , if so desired.
- the lens 140 may, for example, range from about 1.0 inch in diameter up to about 8 inches in diameter, and have a field of view that allows the laser beam to be directed over about a 2 to 4 inch square region or scan field. In one particular embodiment, the focus lens 140 facilitates up to a 3.5 inch square scan field on the work piece 150 . Note, however, that the lens diameter and field of view can vary from one embodiment to the next, and the present invention is not intended to be limited to any one such embodiment.
- the maximum scan field of the scan subsystem 130 is limited by the field of view of the focus lens 140 , and allows a focused beam to address selected positions within the field of view.
- the scan subsystem 130 is a galvo-based scan subsystem with two mirrors, over an intermediate scan field, the effective pupil of the mirrors may be increased without increasing the mirror size as would be required for maintaining a large pupil over the largest scan field.
- the field of view of lens 140 is usually smaller than the size of the work piece 150 .
- all of the machining within a scan field encompassed in the lens 140 field of view is performed without moving the work piece 150 .
- the work piece 150 is then moved to position the next target portion of the work piece 150 in the field of view of lens 140 for processing.
- the X-Y stage 152 is adapted to move or step the work piece 150 so as to position the next target portion of the work piece 150 into the field of view of lens 140 .
- the X-Y stage 152 can operate, for example, under the control of the system controller 155 .
- the X-Y stage 152 operates under manual control (e.g., hand operated X-Y micrometers), or the under the control of a dedicated controller module that is distinct from the system controller 155 .
- the lens 140 is a telecentric lens and the beam directing optics 135 are positioned substantially at a focal surface of the lens 140 so that the laser beam impinges substantially normal or perpendicular to the target surface.
- the scan subsystem 130 emits a beam that is focused substantially on a feature 145 of the work piece 150 , such as a resistor or simply the surface work piece 150 itself, and has sufficient power to precisely remove or otherwise machine or process the feature or work piece material in a controlled manner.
- the position of the laser beam 120 emitted by the laser beam emitter 115 can be directed by the beam directing optics 135 of the scan subsystem 130 to impinge on the focal surface within the field of view of the lens 140 .
- the power and modulation of the laser beam can be controlled, for example, by laser control signals issued by the controller 155 to the emitter 115 .
- the desired positioning and motion characteristics of the laser beam 120 can be controlled by scan control signals issue by the system controller 155 to the scan subsystem 130 .
- the system controller 155 of the embodiment shown in FIG. 2 is generally programmed or otherwise configured to control the operation of the entire machining system. However, numerous control schemes will be apparent in light of this disclosure.
- the focus lens 140 focuses the beam so that the beam impinges focal point 122 on the feature 145 of work piece 150 (or on the work piece itself) to perform the desired machining.
- the feature 145 is a film resistor and work piece 150 is a substrate on which the film resistor is formed.
- the directed beam impinges on a resistor to perform a laser trimming operation, which generally increases the resistance of the resistor to some target value.
- the feature 145 could be a target spot on the surface of the work piece 150 , where the laser beam would be focused to impinge on that target spot.
- the adjustable beam expander 125 can be a zoom telescope.
- the zoom telescope varies the pupil size of the beam entering the scan subsystem 130 .
- the effective entrance pupil of the beam entering the scan subsystem 130 can be adjusted as desired.
- the beam entering the scan subsystem 130 may have a pupil size which ranges from size A to size C, and the focused beam may have corresponding spot sizes ranging from A′ to C′ at the point 122 , as shown in FIG. 3A .
- the spot size can be modified to better correspond to the desired processing.
- the beam expander 125 can be controlled either manually by an operator or automatically by the system controller 155 (or other such controlling environment) to adjust the pupil size of the beam entering the scan subsystem 130 , based on the desired spot size.
- a combination manual and automatic mode i.e., semi-automatic
- the system can be configured so that the operator can be relatively non-skilled, in that express instructions can be presented to the operator (e.g., via a monitor or pre-programmed audio instructions) indicating how to adjust, control, or otherwise manipulate the beam expander 125 to provide a desired pupil size.
- the beam expander 125 can be operated to vary the pupil size of the beam entering the scan subassembly 130 from pupil size A, to pupil size B, to pupil size C, which in turn results in the spot size at the point 122 varying from spot size A′, to spot size B′, to spot size C′, respectively.
- pupil size A which is the smallest
- focus spot size A′ which is optimized to be the largest without substantial degradation over the largest scan field 310 of the focus lens 140 .
- Pupil size B results in an optimized intermediate spot size B′ without substantial degradation over an intermediate scan field 320 .
- Pupil size C is the largest pupil size, and results in the smallest spot size C′ without substantial degradation over the smallest optimized scan field 330 .
- the spot size may be increased by decreasing the beam expansion ratio of the laser beam. Note that when the scan field is limited by degradation, the beam cannot be expanded unless the scan field is reduced.
- FIG. 4 depicts various shaped scan fields 410 , 420 , 430 and 440 within the lens field of view 450 , which are achieved by controlling the beam directing optics 135 to correspond to the optimized scan field (e.g., via signals from the system controller 155 ).
- the optimized combinations of spot sizes A′, B′ and C′ and scan field sizes 410 , 420 , 430 and 440 can be accommodated as shown in FIG. 4 .
- the optimized spot sizes and scan field sizes are achieved by controlling the entrance pupil to change the spot size, and by controlling the scan subsystem 130 , and more particularly the beam directing optics 135 , to change the scan field size.
- the control can be automatic (e.g., carried out by controller 155 ) or semi-automatic (e.g., carried out by controller 155 in part and by an operator in part) or manually (e.g., carried out by an operator).
- An optimized scan field may be determined within a field of view in conjunction with motion of the X-Y stage 152 .
- a different area of the work piece 150 can be stepped to using the stage 152 , to process further elements within the scan field.
- the motion of the X-Y stage 152 may be determined based on the properties of the scan field shape.
- controller 155 may control stage 152 in increments proportional to the X-Y dimensions of scan field 430 .
- the scan field may, in turn, have proportions determined to optimize the scanning speed of the X-Y stage 152 .
- scan field 310 may contain an accuracy requirement.
- Scan field 320 which is smaller than 310 , may have an increased accuracy due to the decreased scan field size.
- Scan field 330 which is the smallest scan field, may have the highest level of accuracy due to the smallest field size. As the scan fields are reduced from 310 to 320 to 330 , the non-telecentric error of a non-telecentric imaging system will be reduced in sequence from the largest scan field 310 through 320 to the smallest scan field 330 .
- FIG. 5 illustrates a block diagram of the controller 155 configured in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the controller 155 includes a control processor 510 having an interconnected processor 512 and memory 514 .
- memory 514 could be multiple memory devices including, for example, random access memory, read only memory, floppy disk memory, hard disk memory, and/or other types of memory.
- the processor 512 interacts with the memory 514 to function in accordance with programmed instructions stored on the memory 514 and to store or access data in the memory 514 .
- the control processor 510 is interconnected to a display monitor 520 and controls the display of relevant information to the system operator. Input devices including a keyboard 530 and mouse 540 are also provided. These devices can be utilized by the operator to input data to the control processor 510 . A connection to a communications network is also provided to allow inputs and system programming from a remote location.
- the control processor 510 is also interconnected to the laser beam emitter 115 and scan subsystem 130 .
- the control processor 510 may be optionally connected to the adjustable beam expander 125 .
- control processor unit 510 receives operator inputs via the keyboard 530 , mouse 540 , data ports (e.g., X-Y stage data ports and RS232 data port), or communications network.
- the control processor 510 processes these inputs in the processor 512 , in accordance with the programmed instruction stored in the memory 514 , to generate control signals to the laser emitter 115 , to the scan subsystem 130 , and optionally to the beam expander 125 .
- FIG. 6 depicts a lookup table that can be stored in the memory 514 of the control processor 510 and used by the processor 512 to generate control signals to the laser emitter 115 , the scan subsystem 130 , the beam expander 125 and/or the display monitor 520 .
- a portion of the lookup table includes a column having each of various scan field sizes.
- a row associated with each of the scan field sizes has a set of parameters for scanning the galvo mirror(s) over the selected field size/shape.
- an operator can input a scan field size, such as scan field size 610 corresponding to the typical square scan field 410 shown in FIG. 4 , and the processor 512 will process the input scan field size 610 by accessing the lookup table of FIG. 6 in the memory 514 to determine that the galvo mirror must be rotated to correspond to 610 ′.
- the processor 512 then generates a scan control signal that is transmitted to the scan subsystem 130 .
- the galvo driven mirror beam directing optics 135
- the galvo driven mirror is operated to correspond to 610 ′ thereby establishing the desired scan field.
- the operator may also input a feature size, a feature density, or alternatively a spot size, which can be processed by the processor 512 by accessing the lookup table shown in FIG. 6 in the memory 514 to determine the appropriate zoom telescope (beam expander 125 ) operation for the applicable field size. For example, if the desired spot size is a medium spot size (e.g., 35 microns), the processor 512 can determine that the zoom telescope must be operated to correspond to b′ as indicated in the fourth column of the lookup table shown in FIG. 6 .
- a medium spot size e.g. 35 microns
- the processor 512 will generate control signals corresponding to the determined zoom telescope adjustment and either transmit the control signals to the zoom telescope so that the adjustment is made automatically or to the display monitor 520 . If the control signal is transmitted to the display monitor 520 , the display monitor will present to the system operator with appropriate instructions for manually adjusting the zoom telescope to correspond with b′. The adjustment of the zoom telescope will result in a pupil size B of the beam entering the scan system 130 and a corresponding spot size B′ of the beam at the focal point 122 .
- the scan field size column may include multiple entries for the same size and shape scan field so that other possible combinations of scan field size and shape and spot size are included within the lookup table.
- the programmed instructions stored at the memory 514 could include corresponding algorithms that would be executed by the processor 512 to generate the desired control signals.
- memory structures other than lookup tables, such as linked lists and simple indexed data files, can be used to store pertinent control information.
- FIG. 6 shows in the column labeled X-Y step size that for different field size and shape, the X-Y step parameters (e.g., step time, step size, number of steps) can change, for instance, from b′′ to a′′. Note that step size can be adjusted for either the X or Y direction, or both. Also, the column labeled calibration shows that the field calibration may change with field size and shape, for instance, b′′′ and a′′′.
- the X-Y step parameters e.g., step time, step size, number of steps
- step size can be adjusted for either the X or Y direction, or both.
- the column labeled calibration shows that the field calibration may change with field size and shape, for instance, b′′′ and a′′′.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Laser Beam Processing (AREA)
- Microscoopes, Condenser (AREA)
- Eye Examination Apparatus (AREA)
- Optical Communication System (AREA)
- Mechanical Optical Scanning Systems (AREA)
Abstract
An energy beam machining system includes an emitter for emitting an energy beam and beam adjusting optics, such as a zoom telescope, for adjusting the pupil size of the system to multiple values. The adjusting of the pupil size can be carried out automatically, semi-automatically, or manually. In manual modes, instructions can be presented to the operator (e.g., via a monitor or pre-programmed audio instruction) indicating how to adjust pupil size. A focus lens focuses the adjusted beam directed along each path at a different focal point within a scan field encompassed in the field of view of the focus lens. Beam directing optics are configured to enable multiple scan fields within the field of view of the focus lens.
Description
- This application is a continuation of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 10/967895, filed Oct. 18, 2004, which is a nonprovisional of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/512043, filed Oct. 17, 2003, both of which are herein incorporated in their entirety by reference.
- The invention relates to energy beam scanning, and more particularly, to optimizing characteristics of a laser beam to the applicable machining operations.
- Energy beams, such as laser beams, are commonly used in numerous different types of machining operations, including what are often referred to as micro-machining operations. In conventional micro-machining operations, laser beams are used to machine features on substrates, such as printed circuit boards and panels. One typical micro-machining operation involves the laser trimming of resistors and capacitors printed on a substrate.
-
FIG. 1 depicts a conventional laserbeam micro-machining system 10 of the type used for resistor trimming. Thesystem 10 includes alaser beam emitter 15 operating under the control of thesystem controller 55. The emittedlaser beam 20 passes through a fixed beam expander 25 to thescan subsystem 30. - As shown, the
scan subsystem 30 includesbeam directing optics 35 and afocus lens 40. Thescan system 30 also operates under the control of thesystem controller 55. Thebeam 20 is directed by thebeam directing optics 35 through thefocus lens 40. Thebeam directing optics 35 includes a pair of galvo driven mirrors. Thefocus lens 40 has a field of view and focuses thebeam 20 so that thebeam 20impinges point 22 on aresistor 45 on thesubstrate 50 to perform the trimming operation. AnX-Y stage 52 is provided to move thesubstrate 50 in two axes to position the resistor under the field of view of thelens 40. Thefocal point 22 of the directed beam impinges on thesubstrate 50, so as to perform the trimming operation. - The fixed beam expander 25 establishes the size (effective entrance pupil) of the beam entering the
scan system 30. As shown inFIG. 1 , using the fixed beam expander 25 results in the collimated beam entering the scan subsystem having a pupil size B which corresponds to a spot size B′ of the beam at thefocal point 22 on the focal surface. Thus, should a larger or smaller spot size be desired, thefixed beam expander 25 must be replaced with another beam expander having the appropriate beam expansion ratio to achieve the desired spot size. - Generally, if a larger spot size is desired at
focal point 22, a fixed beam expander that will cause the effective entrance pupil size of the beam entering the scan subsystem to be less than B must be substituted for the fixed beam expander 25. On the other hand, if a smaller spot size is desired at thefocal point 22, a fixed beam expander that will cause the effective entrance pupil size of the beam entering the scan subsystem to be greater than B must be substituted for the fixed beam expander 25. In any such cases, the beam expander must be changed. - In addition, it has recently become necessary for such machines as shown in
FIG. 1 to be used in machining features on substrates having various sizes and/or various shapes. Varying the size and/or shape of the substrate will result in a need to vary the size of the scan field that must be covered by a focused beam having the desired spot size. The step size of the X-Y stage movement may also have to correspondingly change. Accuracy of beam placement and the degree of telecentricity may also vary with the changes in the field size. - The achievable spot size within the scan field in a conventional laser machining system is governed by a number of factors, including the pupil size and the focus lens characteristics. Relevant focus lens characteristics include the lens focal length, the lens performance degradation at large angles, the telecentricity of the focus lens, and the complexity and cost of the focus lens.
- With regard to degradation, it will be understood that focusing a beam through the outside area of the focus lens will often result in degraded performance when smaller spots are desired. In addition, beam positional accuracy may be degraded near the perimeter of the focal surface when the field size is increased. Moreover, in a non-telecentric system, telecentricity may also be degraded near the perimeter of the focal surface at increased field sizes.
- To address a large scan field, a focus lens having a large field of view and a long focal length must be used. Without increasing the beam pupil size, this will result in the beam having a large spot size at the focal surface. However, if the pupil size is increased, the size of the mirrors or other beam directing components must also be increased, thereby degrading dynamic performance. To achieve a smaller beam spot size at the focal surface, without increasing the focal length, the beam pupil size at the beam directing optics must be increased.
- For some scan field applications, a focus lens having a high degree of telecentricity may be required. However, if the packing density of the features to be machined is high, resulting in the need for a small beam spot size at the focal surface, then the complexity and cost of designing and manufacturing such a focus lens can be quite high.
- Accordingly, conventional approaches to machining features at varying packing densities on substrates having different sizes and/or shapes is to utilize separate systems, with a fixed field size and X-Y stage step size, optimized for each particular machining application, as required. A separate focus lens for different fields is required. The different focus lenses are manually installed and de-installed in the scan subassembly prior to initiating of the machining of features for a particular job. This results in increased manufacturing costs.
- Hence, the need exists for a machining system capable of machining features at various packing densities on substrates having different sizes and/or shapes without resorting to a different system or manually changing the focus lens in the scanning subassembly.
- One embodiment of the present invention provides a flexibly optimized material processing system. The system includes a laser emitter configured to emit a laser beam. Beam adjusting optics having a beam expansion ratio are configured to adjust the emitted laser beam by adjusting the beam expansion ratio. Beam directing optics are configured to provide a variable effective pupil corresponding to the adjusted laser beam. The beam directing optics are further configured to direct the adjusted beam to one or more targets within a scan field. A lens, having a field of view encompassing at least the scan field, is configured to focus the directed laser beam onto the one or more targets within the scan field. A control processor is configured to receive input corresponding to a material processing parameter, and to issue at least one optimized control signal based on the at least one material processing parameter. The beam adjusting optics can be, for example, a zoom telescope. The beam directing optics can be, for example, one or more galvanometer mirror scanners. The system may further include a motion system that is configured to move a work piece containing at least one target relative to the scan field, and to position the at least one target within the scan field for processing (e.g., laser trimming of a circuit component or link blasting in a memory array).
- In one such embodiment, the optimized control signal is an optimum effective pupil of the beam directing optics corresponding to a scan field dimension. In another such embodiment, the optimized control signal is an optimum scan field dimension corresponding to one of the effective pupil of the beam directing optics, a focused laser beam spot size, a positional accuracy, a scanning speed, a material handling step size of a motion system, and a telecentricity value. In another such embodiment, the optimized control signal is an optimum material handling step size corresponding to one of a scan field dimension, a step period of a motion system, a substrate dimension, and a dimension of a selected area of a substrate. Note that the beam adjusting optics can, for instance, be automatically or manually operated to adjust the beam expansion ratio according to an optimum beam expansion ratio value determined by the controller.
- The material processing parameter can be, for example, any one of a spot size, a substrate dimension, a dimension of a selected area of a substrate, an orientation of a selected area of a substrate, a packing density, a step time of a motion system, a step size of a motion system, a number of steps of a motion system, a scan speed, a positional accuracy, a telecentricity value, and a desired spot quality. The controller can be configured to determine at least one optimized value of the beam expansion ratio, a scan field dimension, and a material handling step size of a motion system, based on the material processing parameter.
- In one particular case, the beam expansion ratio is a first value, and the scan field is a first scan field. Here, the beam adjusting optics are further configured to again adjust the beam expansion ratio from the first value to a second value, and the beam directing optics are further configured to direct the again adjusted beam to a target within the second scan field. In one such embodiment, the first scan field has a first size and the second scan field has a second size. In another such embodiment, the first scan field has a first shape and the second scan field has a second shape. In another particular case, the field of view of the lens encompasses at least a first scan field and a second scan field, and is further configured to focus a first directed laser beam with a first effective pupil size onto one or more targets within the first scan field, and to focus a second directed laser beam with a second effective pupil size onto one or more targets within the second scan field, wherein at least one scan field size is limited by spot size degradation over the field of view.
- The system may include a control processor that is configured to receive an input identifying the scan field, and to issue scan control signals based on the received input. Here, the beam directing optics are further configured to direct the adjusted beam in accordance with the issued scan control signals. The system may include a control processor that is configured to receive an input corresponding to a focused beam spot size, and to issue spot size control signals based on the received input. Here, the beam adjusting optics are further configured to adjust the beam expansion ratio in accordance with the issued spot size control signals. The system may include a control processor that is configured to receive an input corresponding to a beam spot size, and to issue spot size control signals based on the received input. Here, a display monitor can be configured to display parameters for manually operating the beam adjusting optics to adjust the beam expansion ratio in accordance with the issued spot size control signals. The system may include a control processor that is configured to receive an input identifying the scan field, and to issue motion control signals based on the received input. Here, a motion system is configured to move a work piece relative to the scan field in accordance with the issued motion control signals.
- Another embodiment of the present invention provides a method of flexibly optimized material processing. The method includes receiving at least one material processing parameter relevant to impinging a work piece with a laser beam. The method continues with issuing at least one optimized control signal based on the at least one material processing parameter. The method further includes adjusting the laser beam to a first adjusted beam in accordance with the at least one optimized control signal, and directing the adjusted laser beam to one or more targets within a first scan field. The method proceeds with focusing the directed beam onto the one or more targets within the first scan field. Note that adjusting the laser beam to a first adjusted beam may include automatically or manually adjusting a beam expansion ratio to a first optimized value.
- In one such embodiment, issuing at least one optimized control signal includes issuing an optimum effective pupil corresponding to a scan field dimension. In another such embodiment, issuing at least one optimized control signal includes issuing an optimum scan field dimension corresponding to one of an effective pupil, a process beam spot size, a positional accuracy, a scanning speed, a material handling step size, and a telecentricity value. In another such embodiment, issuing at least one optimized control signal includes issuing an optimum material handling step size corresponding to one of a scan field dimension, a step period of a motion system, a substrate dimension, and a dimension of a selected area of a substrate. In another such embodiment, issuing at least one optimized control signal includes issuing an optimum value of at least one of a beam expansion ratio, a scan field dimension, and a material handling step size based on the process parameter. The at least one material processing parameter received can be, for example, any one of a spot size, a substrate dimension, a dimension of a selected area of a substrate, orientation of a selected area of a substrate, packing density, a step time of a motion system, step size of a motion system, a number of steps of a motion system, a scan speed, a positional accuracy, a telecentricity, and a spot quality.
- In one particular case, adjusting the laser beam to a first adjusted beam includes adjusting a beam expansion ratio to a first value. Here, the method includes further adjusting the beam expansion ratio to a second value, and directing the further adjusted beam to one or more targets within a second scan field. In one such case, the first scan field has a first size and the second scan field has a second size. In another such case, the first scan field has a first shape and the second scan field has a second shape. Adjusting the laser beam can be carried out, for example, using a zoom telescope. Directing the adjusted laser beam can be carried out, for example, using one or more galvanometer mirror scanners. In another particular case, adjusting the laser beam to a first adjusted beam includes adjusting a beam expansion ratio to a first value, where the method further includes adjusting the beam expansion ratio to a second value to provide a second adjusted beam, directing the second adjusted beam to one or more targets within a second scan field, and focusing the second adjusted beam onto one or more targets within the second scan field. Here, at least one scan field size is limited by spot size degradation over a field of view. In another particular case, the first scan field size is limited by spot size degradation at a first effective pupil size over the field of view, and the second scan field size is limited by spot size degradation at a second effective pupil size over the field of view.
- The method may include receiving an input identifying a scan field dimension, issuing scan control signals based on the received input, and directing the adjusted beam in accordance with the issued scan control signals. The method may include receiving an input identifying a focused beam spot size, issuing spot size control signals based on the received input, and adjusting a beam expansion ratio in accordance with the issued spot size control signals. The method may include receiving an input identifying a focused beam spot size, issuing spot size control signals based on the received input, and displaying parameters for manually adjusting a beam expansion ratio in accordance with the issued spot size control signals. The method may include receiving an input identifying a scan field dimension, and issuing motion control signals based on the received input, to move the work piece relative to the scan field in accordance with the issued scan control signals.
- Another embodiment of the present invention provides a material processing system. The system includes an emitter configured to emit a laser beam, a control processor configured to issue optimized control signals, and beam adjusting optics configured to adjust the emitted laser beam in accordance with at least one of the optimized control signals. A lens, having a field of view, is configured to focus the adjusted beam onto one or more targets within a scan field encompassed by the field of view. Beam directing optics are configured to direct the adjusted beam to at least one of the one or more targets within the scan field. In one such case, the scan field is a first scan field. Here, the beam adjusting optics are further configured to again adjust the emitted laser beam, and the lens is further configured to focus the again adjusted beam onto one or more targets within a second scan field encompassed by the field of view. In addition, the beam directing optics are further configured to direct the again adjusted beam within the second scan field. The beam directing optics can be further configured to direct the adjusted beam in accordance with at least one of the optimized control signals. The system may further include a motion system configured to move a work piece relative to the scan field in accordance with at least one of the control signals.
- The features and advantages described herein are not all-inclusive and, in particular, many additional features and advantages will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the drawings, specification, and claims. Moreover, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and not to limit the scope of the inventive subject matter.
-
FIG. 1 depicts a conventional micro-machining system. -
FIG. 2 depicts a micro-machining system configured in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 3A depicts exemplary laser beam spots at the focal point achievable using the micro-machining system ofFIG. 2 . -
FIG. 3B depicts the exemplary laser beam spots ofFIG. 3A in relation to the scan field. -
FIG. 4 depicts example variations in the scan field that can be accommodated by the micro-machining system ofFIG. 2 . -
FIG. 5 is a detailed depiction of a micro-machining system controller configured in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 6 depicts a look-up table usable to control the micro-machining system shown inFIG. 2 , in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. - Embodiments of the present invention can be employed to machine features at various sizes and/or packing densities on work pieces having different sizes and/or shapes. This machining can be accomplished without using different systems and without manually installing and de-installing different focus lenses in the scan subassembly. Various material processing parameters including, for example, field size, accuracy, telecentricity, step size and/or spot size can be flexibly optimized for a particular application.
- Overview
-
FIG. 2 depicts amicro-machining system 110 configured in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The system could be used for various types of machining operations, such as a trimming operation for untrimmed circuit elements (e.g., film resistors, capacitors, and inductors) formed on a PCB panel or on any panel or other type of substrate. Note that thesystem 110 can be employed for other applications (e.g., drilling, marking, micro-perforating), and may include various other elements and supporting functionality not shown inFIG. 2 , as will be apparent in light of this disclosure. - For trimming operations, the substrate will typically include one or more untrimmed circuit elements, such as resistors, capacitors, and/or inductors formed contiguous with at least one of dielectric or conductive layers that make up the substrate. Note that an untrimmed element may also include a portion of the dielectric layer or a portion of the conductive layer, as is the case for an untrimmed embedded capacitor. The substrate may include other circuitry and interconnections (both printed and placed) as well.
- For other operations, such as marking, drilling, and perforating, the substrate may include any componentry or features that relate to that particular substrate's function, whether it be electrical, mechanical, chemical, textural, or visual in nature. Regardless of the substrates topology and intended function, the principles of the present invention may be employed to selectively and accurately direct an energy beam to the substrate for whatever purpose.
- The substrate may be used to form a plurality of substantially identical circuits, formed in a repeated pattern, or to form a single circuit (e.g., a computer mother board). On the other hand, the substrate may be used to form a plurality of different circuits formed in a pattern. The substrate may be the same size as the finished circuit board fabricated therefrom, or may be subsequently diced up to form a plurality of smaller sized finished circuit boards.
- System Architecture
- As shown in
FIG. 2 , thesystem 110 includeslaser beam emitter 115 operating under the control of thesystem controller 155.System controller 155 may include one or more controllers (e.g., programmable microcontrollers configured with one or more processors, I/O capability, memory, and a number of coded processes to carry out desired functionality) for controlling the position, velocity and power output of the focused laser beam and movement of the substrate during machining, as well as during periods when the system is not performing machining operations. Thebeam emitter 115 may include, for example, a laser beam generator such as a solid state or gas laser, but could alternatively be a simple emitting device, such as an optic fiber that emits a laser beam generated outside the system. - Although the
laser beam emitter 115 may be of any type, thelaser beam emitter 115 will emit an energy beam at a wavelength that is compatible with the type of machining being performed. For example, if a dielectric material is primarily being processed, a CO2 laser emitting at a wavelength of approximately 10 um may be used. If a conductive layer is being trimmed, then a solid state laser (e.g., laser diode) emitting at a wavelength of approximately 1.06 um may be used. If the trimming is a photochemical process, the laser wavelength may be visible or ultraviolet light, such a light of approximately 533 nm and shorter. - The emitted
laser beam 120 passes through an adjustable beam expander 125 (e.g., zoom telescope) to thescan subsystem 130. Adjustment of thebeam expander 125 can be controlled either manually or by thesystem controller 155 as shown inFIG. 2 , as will be discussed herein. Thescan subsystem 130 also operates under the control of thesystem controller 155. - The
scan subsystem 130 includesbeam directing optics 135 and focus lens 140. Thebeam directing optics 135 is provided between thebeam expander 125 and the focus lens 140, and is capable of directing the laser beam over a selected region of the substrate 150 (or other work piece). This selected region is also referred to the selected scan field herein. The focus lens 140 is for focusing the directed laser beam to a desired size and energy density at thefocal point 122. and - The
beam directing optics 135 may be implemented with conventional technology, and is capable of scanning a laser beam in one or more directions. In theFIG. 2 embodiment, a pair of orthogonally mounted galvanometer mirror scanners (only one shown) serve as thebeam directing optics 135. Each galvanometer mirror scanner (sometimes referred to herein as a galvo driven mirror or galvo mirror) includes an angular position transducer for tracking the angular position of the mirrors, and a servo driver for controlling the angular rotation of each deflecting mirror to direct the laser beam along a path to a desired position. - In the
FIG. 2 embodiment, thesystem controller 155 includes all driving controls for thelaser beam emitter 115 and thebeam directing optics 135. However, these controls could be incorporated into one or more subsystem controllers, separate from thesystem controller 155, if so desired. - For resistor trimming operations, the lens 140 may, for example, range from about 1.0 inch in diameter up to about 8 inches in diameter, and have a field of view that allows the laser beam to be directed over about a 2 to 4 inch square region or scan field. In one particular embodiment, the focus lens 140 facilitates up to a 3.5 inch square scan field on the
work piece 150. Note, however, that the lens diameter and field of view can vary from one embodiment to the next, and the present invention is not intended to be limited to any one such embodiment. - In any case, the maximum scan field of the
scan subsystem 130 is limited by the field of view of the focus lens 140, and allows a focused beam to address selected positions within the field of view. When thescan subsystem 130 is a galvo-based scan subsystem with two mirrors, over an intermediate scan field, the effective pupil of the mirrors may be increased without increasing the mirror size as would be required for maintaining a large pupil over the largest scan field. - In general, the field of view of lens 140 is usually smaller than the size of the
work piece 150. Typically, all of the machining within a scan field encompassed in the lens 140 field of view is performed without moving thework piece 150. Thework piece 150 is then moved to position the next target portion of thework piece 150 in the field of view of lens 140 for processing. TheX-Y stage 152 is adapted to move or step thework piece 150 so as to position the next target portion of thework piece 150 into the field of view of lens 140. - The
X-Y stage 152 can operate, for example, under the control of thesystem controller 155. Alternatively, theX-Y stage 152 operates under manual control (e.g., hand operated X-Y micrometers), or the under the control of a dedicated controller module that is distinct from thesystem controller 155. In one embodiment, the lens 140 is a telecentric lens and thebeam directing optics 135 are positioned substantially at a focal surface of the lens 140 so that the laser beam impinges substantially normal or perpendicular to the target surface. - The
scan subsystem 130 emits a beam that is focused substantially on afeature 145 of thework piece 150, such as a resistor or simply thesurface work piece 150 itself, and has sufficient power to precisely remove or otherwise machine or process the feature or work piece material in a controlled manner. The position of thelaser beam 120 emitted by thelaser beam emitter 115 can be directed by thebeam directing optics 135 of thescan subsystem 130 to impinge on the focal surface within the field of view of the lens 140. - The power and modulation of the laser beam can be controlled, for example, by laser control signals issued by the
controller 155 to theemitter 115. Likewise, the desired positioning and motion characteristics of thelaser beam 120 can be controlled by scan control signals issue by thesystem controller 155 to thescan subsystem 130. Thesystem controller 155 of the embodiment shown inFIG. 2 is generally programmed or otherwise configured to control the operation of the entire machining system. However, numerous control schemes will be apparent in light of this disclosure. - The focus lens 140 focuses the beam so that the beam impinges
focal point 122 on thefeature 145 of work piece 150 (or on the work piece itself) to perform the desired machining. In one particular implementation, thefeature 145 is a film resistor andwork piece 150 is a substrate on which the film resistor is formed. The directed beam impinges on a resistor to perform a laser trimming operation, which generally increases the resistance of the resistor to some target value. However if, for example, the applicable operation required drilling an aperture or perforation in thework piece 150, then thefeature 145 could be a target spot on the surface of thework piece 150, where the laser beam would be focused to impinge on that target spot. - As previously stated, the
adjustable beam expander 125 can be a zoom telescope. In such an embodiment, the zoom telescope varies the pupil size of the beam entering thescan subsystem 130. Thus, by controlling operation of the zoom telescope, the effective entrance pupil of the beam entering thescan subsystem 130 can be adjusted as desired. For example, using the zoom telescope as depicted inFIG. 2 , the beam entering thescan subsystem 130 may have a pupil size which ranges from size A to size C, and the focused beam may have corresponding spot sizes ranging from A′ to C′ at thepoint 122, as shown inFIG. 3A . Hence, by controlling the operation of the zoom telescope, the spot size can be modified to better correspond to the desired processing. - The
beam expander 125 can be controlled either manually by an operator or automatically by the system controller 155 (or other such controlling environment) to adjust the pupil size of the beam entering thescan subsystem 130, based on the desired spot size. A combination manual and automatic mode (i.e., semi-automatic) can also be configured, where a lower degree of operator involvement is required. Note that the system can be configured so that the operator can be relatively non-skilled, in that express instructions can be presented to the operator (e.g., via a monitor or pre-programmed audio instructions) indicating how to adjust, control, or otherwise manipulate thebeam expander 125 to provide a desired pupil size. - Adjustable Pupil Size
- Thus, the
beam expander 125 can be operated to vary the pupil size of the beam entering thescan subassembly 130 from pupil size A, to pupil size B, to pupil size C, which in turn results in the spot size at thepoint 122 varying from spot size A′, to spot size B′, to spot size C′, respectively. As shown inFIG. 3B , pupil size A, which is the smallest, results in focus spot size A′, which is optimized to be the largest without substantial degradation over thelargest scan field 310 of the focus lens 140. Pupil size B results in an optimized intermediate spot size B′ without substantial degradation over anintermediate scan field 320. Pupil size C, is the largest pupil size, and results in the smallest spot size C′ without substantial degradation over the smallest optimizedscan field 330. Within any scan field, the spot size may be increased by decreasing the beam expansion ratio of the laser beam. Note that when the scan field is limited by degradation, the beam cannot be expanded unless the scan field is reduced. - Adjustable Scan Field
-
FIG. 4 depicts various shaped scan fields 410, 420, 430 and 440 within the lens field ofview 450, which are achieved by controlling thebeam directing optics 135 to correspond to the optimized scan field (e.g., via signals from the system controller 155). By controlling theadjustable beam expander 125 or otherwise modifying the beam pupil, the optimized combinations of spot sizes A′, B′ and C′ and scanfield sizes FIG. 4 . - The optimized spot sizes and scan field sizes are achieved by controlling the entrance pupil to change the spot size, and by controlling the
scan subsystem 130, and more particularly thebeam directing optics 135, to change the scan field size. The control can be automatic (e.g., carried out by controller 155) or semi-automatic (e.g., carried out bycontroller 155 in part and by an operator in part) or manually (e.g., carried out by an operator). - An optimized scan field may be determined within a field of view in conjunction with motion of the
X-Y stage 152. A different area of thework piece 150 can be stepped to using thestage 152, to process further elements within the scan field. If thework piece 150 has a tiled processing surface with contiguous segments, the motion of theX-Y stage 152 may be determined based on the properties of the scan field shape. For example,controller 155 may controlstage 152 in increments proportional to the X-Y dimensions ofscan field 430. The scan field may, in turn, have proportions determined to optimize the scanning speed of theX-Y stage 152. - Referring to
FIG. 3B , scanfield 310 may contain an accuracy requirement.Scan field 320, which is smaller than 310, may have an increased accuracy due to the decreased scan field size.Scan field 330, which is the smallest scan field, may have the highest level of accuracy due to the smallest field size. As the scan fields are reduced from 310 to 320 to 330, the non-telecentric error of a non-telecentric imaging system will be reduced in sequence from thelargest scan field 310 through 320 to thesmallest scan field 330. - System Control
-
FIG. 5 illustrates a block diagram of thecontroller 155 configured in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As shown, thecontroller 155 includes a control processor 510 having aninterconnected processor 512 andmemory 514. Note thatmemory 514 could be multiple memory devices including, for example, random access memory, read only memory, floppy disk memory, hard disk memory, and/or other types of memory. Theprocessor 512 interacts with thememory 514 to function in accordance with programmed instructions stored on thememory 514 and to store or access data in thememory 514. - The control processor 510 is interconnected to a
display monitor 520 and controls the display of relevant information to the system operator. Input devices including akeyboard 530 and mouse 540 are also provided. These devices can be utilized by the operator to input data to the control processor 510. A connection to a communications network is also provided to allow inputs and system programming from a remote location. The control processor 510 is also interconnected to thelaser beam emitter 115 andscan subsystem 130. The control processor 510 may be optionally connected to theadjustable beam expander 125. - In operation, the control processor unit 510 receives operator inputs via the
keyboard 530, mouse 540, data ports (e.g., X-Y stage data ports and RS232 data port), or communications network. The control processor 510 processes these inputs in theprocessor 512, in accordance with the programmed instruction stored in thememory 514, to generate control signals to thelaser emitter 115, to thescan subsystem 130, and optionally to thebeam expander 125. -
FIG. 6 depicts a lookup table that can be stored in thememory 514 of the control processor 510 and used by theprocessor 512 to generate control signals to thelaser emitter 115, thescan subsystem 130, thebeam expander 125 and/or thedisplay monitor 520. - As shown in
FIG. 6 , a portion of the lookup table includes a column having each of various scan field sizes. A row associated with each of the scan field sizes has a set of parameters for scanning the galvo mirror(s) over the selected field size/shape. Accordingly, an operator can input a scan field size, such asscan field size 610 corresponding to the typical square scan field 410 shown inFIG. 4 , and theprocessor 512 will process the inputscan field size 610 by accessing the lookup table ofFIG. 6 in thememory 514 to determine that the galvo mirror must be rotated to correspond to 610′. Theprocessor 512 then generates a scan control signal that is transmitted to thescan subsystem 130. In accordance with the received scan control signal, the galvo driven mirror (beam directing optics 135) is operated to correspond to 610′ thereby establishing the desired scan field. - The operator may also input a feature size, a feature density, or alternatively a spot size, which can be processed by the
processor 512 by accessing the lookup table shown inFIG. 6 in thememory 514 to determine the appropriate zoom telescope (beam expander 125) operation for the applicable field size. For example, if the desired spot size is a medium spot size (e.g., 35 microns), theprocessor 512 can determine that the zoom telescope must be operated to correspond to b′ as indicated in the fourth column of the lookup table shown inFIG. 6 . - Accordingly, the
processor 512 will generate control signals corresponding to the determined zoom telescope adjustment and either transmit the control signals to the zoom telescope so that the adjustment is made automatically or to thedisplay monitor 520. If the control signal is transmitted to thedisplay monitor 520, the display monitor will present to the system operator with appropriate instructions for manually adjusting the zoom telescope to correspond with b′. The adjustment of the zoom telescope will result in a pupil size B of the beam entering thescan system 130 and a corresponding spot size B′ of the beam at thefocal point 122. - Although only a single listing of each of the scan field sizes for the scan fields depicted in
FIG. 4 are shown inFIG. 6 , it will be recognized in light of this disclosure that the scan field size column may include multiple entries for the same size and shape scan field so that other possible combinations of scan field size and shape and spot size are included within the lookup table. It will further be recognized that in lieu of a lookup table, the programmed instructions stored at thememory 514 could include corresponding algorithms that would be executed by theprocessor 512 to generate the desired control signals. Also, memory structures other than lookup tables, such as linked lists and simple indexed data files, can be used to store pertinent control information. -
FIG. 6 shows in the column labeled X-Y step size that for different field size and shape, the X-Y step parameters (e.g., step time, step size, number of steps) can change, for instance, from b″ to a″. Note that step size can be adjusted for either the X or Y direction, or both. Also, the column labeled calibration shows that the field calibration may change with field size and shape, for instance, b″′ and a″′. - The foregoing description of the embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of this disclosure. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto.
Claims (6)
1. A laser material processing system for link blasting in a memory array comprising:
a laser emitter configured to emit a laser beam;
a zoom telescope configured to adjust the emitted laser beam by adjusting the beam expansion ratio;
beam directing optics configured to direct the adjusted beam within a plurality of scan fields to one or more target links of a memory array;
a lens having a field of view encompassing the plurality of scan fields configured to focus the directed laser beam onto the one or more target links of the memory array;
a control processor configured to receive input corresponding to a packing density of links in a memory array and to issue at least one optimized signal based on the packing density, the at least one optimized signal corresponding to a scan field size and a selected spot size formed without degradation over the scan field; and
a motion system configured to move the memory array relative to the scan field and to position at least one link within the scan field for blasting;
wherein each scan field has a field size and an associated minimum spot size that is formed without degradation over each respective scan field, the minimum spot size increasing with each respective larger field size, and wherein degraded spots are formed beyond the respective scan field within the field of view of the lens, and wherein a zoom telescope setting corresponds to each minimum spot size.
2. The laser material processing system according to claim 1 , wherein the motion system moves the memory array relative to the scan field at a controlled velocity corresponding to the scan field size.
3. The laser material processing system according to claim 1 , wherein the emitter is an optic fiber that emits a laser beam.
4. The laser material processing system according to claim 3 , wherein the laser beam is generated outside the system.
5. The laser material processing system according to claim 1 , wherein the scan field size is determined to optimize the scanning speed of the motion system.
6. The laser material processing system according to claim 1 , wherein the scan field size is limited by a positioning accuracy requirement.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/736,638 US20070205186A1 (en) | 2003-10-17 | 2007-04-18 | Flexible scan field |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US51204303P | 2003-10-17 | 2003-10-17 | |
US10/967,895 US7238913B2 (en) | 2003-10-17 | 2004-10-18 | Flexible scan field |
US11/736,638 US20070205186A1 (en) | 2003-10-17 | 2007-04-18 | Flexible scan field |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/967,895 Continuation US7238913B2 (en) | 2003-10-17 | 2004-10-18 | Flexible scan field |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20070205186A1 true US20070205186A1 (en) | 2007-09-06 |
Family
ID=34465306
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/967,895 Active US7238913B2 (en) | 2003-10-17 | 2004-10-18 | Flexible scan field |
US11/695,721 Active US7402774B2 (en) | 2003-10-17 | 2007-04-03 | Flexible scan field |
US11/736,638 Abandoned US20070205186A1 (en) | 2003-10-17 | 2007-04-18 | Flexible scan field |
Family Applications Before (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/967,895 Active US7238913B2 (en) | 2003-10-17 | 2004-10-18 | Flexible scan field |
US11/695,721 Active US7402774B2 (en) | 2003-10-17 | 2007-04-03 | Flexible scan field |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US7238913B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1680255A4 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2007509368A (en) |
CN (1) | CN100544877C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005037478A2 (en) |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110187025A1 (en) * | 2010-02-04 | 2011-08-04 | Costin Sr Darryl J | Laser etching system and method |
WO2012127040A1 (en) * | 2011-03-24 | 2012-09-27 | Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique | Adaptive digital device for focusing a laser beam |
US9300106B2 (en) | 2011-09-05 | 2016-03-29 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie Gmbh | Laser device with a laser unit and a fluid container for a cooling means of said laser |
US9348026B2 (en) | 2011-09-05 | 2016-05-24 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie Gmbh | Device and method for determination of a position of an object by means of ultrasonic waves |
US9573227B2 (en) * | 2011-09-05 | 2017-02-21 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlight Technologie GmbH | Marking apparatus with a plurality of lasers, deflection means, and telescopic means for each laser beam |
US9577399B2 (en) * | 2011-09-05 | 2017-02-21 | Alltec Angew Andte Laserlicht Technologie Gmbh | Marking apparatus with a plurality of lasers and individually adjustable sets of deflection means |
US9573223B2 (en) * | 2011-09-05 | 2017-02-21 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie Gmbh | Marking apparatus with a plurality of gas lasers with resonator tubes and individually adjustable deflection means |
US9595801B2 (en) * | 2011-09-05 | 2017-03-14 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie Gmbh | Marking apparatus with a plurality of lasers and a combining deflection device |
US9664898B2 (en) | 2011-09-05 | 2017-05-30 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie Gmbh | Laser device and method for marking an object |
US10236654B2 (en) | 2011-09-05 | 2019-03-19 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlight Technologie GmbH | Marking apparatus with at least one gas laser and heat dissipator |
Families Citing this family (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7486705B2 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2009-02-03 | Imra America, Inc. | Femtosecond laser processing system with process parameters, controls and feedback |
WO2005121889A2 (en) * | 2004-06-07 | 2005-12-22 | Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. | Aom modulation techniques for improving laser system performance |
US7133187B2 (en) * | 2004-06-07 | 2006-11-07 | Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. | AOM modulation techniques employing plurality of transducers to improve laser system performance |
US7885311B2 (en) | 2007-03-27 | 2011-02-08 | Imra America, Inc. | Beam stabilized fiber laser |
DE112006001394B4 (en) * | 2005-06-01 | 2010-04-08 | Phoeton Corp., Atsugi | Laser processing device and laser processing method |
US20090323739A1 (en) * | 2006-12-22 | 2009-12-31 | Uv Tech Systems | Laser optical system |
US20080151951A1 (en) * | 2006-12-22 | 2008-06-26 | Elliott David J | Laser optical system |
US7897924B2 (en) * | 2007-04-12 | 2011-03-01 | Imra America, Inc. | Beam scanning imaging method and apparatus |
US8847114B1 (en) * | 2007-05-07 | 2014-09-30 | Purdue Research Foundation | Laser-assisted micromachining system and method |
WO2009136189A1 (en) * | 2008-05-07 | 2009-11-12 | Ulive Enterprises Limited | Microstructuring |
GB2460648A (en) * | 2008-06-03 | 2009-12-09 | M Solv Ltd | Method and apparatus for laser focal spot size control |
JP4873578B2 (en) * | 2009-09-07 | 2012-02-08 | 住友重機械工業株式会社 | Laser processing apparatus and method for determining processing conditions |
KR101256954B1 (en) * | 2010-06-15 | 2013-04-25 | (주)엔에스 | Roll-film cutting apparatus utilizing a laser |
US20120097833A1 (en) * | 2010-10-22 | 2012-04-26 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Laser scanning device |
US8669507B2 (en) * | 2010-10-22 | 2014-03-11 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Laser scanning device |
CN102751585B (en) * | 2011-04-20 | 2015-03-11 | 深圳光启高等理工研究院 | Electromagnetic wave lens, wave beam scanning device and wave beam scanning method |
KR102138223B1 (en) | 2011-07-05 | 2020-07-28 | 일렉트로 싸이언티픽 인더스트리이즈 인코포레이티드 | Systems and methods for providing temperature stability of acousto-optic beam deflectors and acousto-optic modulators during use |
JP5908705B2 (en) * | 2011-11-30 | 2016-04-26 | 株式会社ディスコ | Laser processing equipment |
FR2993805B1 (en) | 2012-07-27 | 2014-09-12 | Phenix Systems | DEVICE FOR MANUFACTURING THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECTS WITH SUPERIMPOSED LAYERS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME |
US20150298253A1 (en) * | 2014-04-18 | 2015-10-22 | Revolaze, LLC | Systems and methods for patterning using a laser |
GB2529453B (en) * | 2014-08-20 | 2019-04-17 | Datalase Ltd | Label imaging and cutting |
CN104616851B (en) * | 2015-01-23 | 2017-09-29 | 洛阳冰岩激光设备有限公司 | A kind of laser resistance adjuster |
CN114654082A (en) * | 2016-12-30 | 2022-06-24 | 伊雷克托科学工业股份有限公司 | Method and system for extending optics lifetime in a laser processing apparatus |
US11440098B2 (en) | 2018-12-27 | 2022-09-13 | Layerwise Nv | Three-dimensional printing system optimizing contour formation for multiple energy beams |
Citations (30)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4289378A (en) * | 1978-06-21 | 1981-09-15 | Ernst Remy | Apparatus for adjusting the focal point of an operating laser beam focused by an objective |
US4532402A (en) * | 1983-09-02 | 1985-07-30 | Xrl, Inc. | Method and apparatus for positioning a focused beam on an integrated circuit |
US5109149A (en) * | 1990-03-15 | 1992-04-28 | Albert Leung | Laser, direct-write integrated circuit production system |
US5168454A (en) * | 1989-10-30 | 1992-12-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Formation of high quality patterns for substrates and apparatus therefor |
US5171964A (en) * | 1990-07-23 | 1992-12-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | High accuracy, high flexibility, energy beam machining system |
US5293025A (en) * | 1991-08-01 | 1994-03-08 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Method for forming vias in multilayer circuits |
US5362940A (en) * | 1990-11-09 | 1994-11-08 | Litel Instruments | Use of Fresnel zone plates for material processing |
US5523543A (en) * | 1994-09-09 | 1996-06-04 | Litel Instruments | Laser ablation control system and method |
US5998759A (en) * | 1996-12-24 | 1999-12-07 | General Scanning, Inc. | Laser processing |
US6177998B1 (en) * | 1998-03-05 | 2001-01-23 | General Scanning, Inc. | Method and system for high speed measuring of microscopic targets |
US6204955B1 (en) * | 1999-07-09 | 2001-03-20 | Advanced Optical Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus for dynamic control of light direction in a broad field of view |
US6307799B1 (en) * | 1998-12-03 | 2001-10-23 | Nanyang Technological University | Acousto optic data storage system on a stationary and high density data storage media |
US6341029B1 (en) * | 1999-04-27 | 2002-01-22 | Gsi Lumonics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for shaping a laser-beam intensity profile by dithering |
US6430465B2 (en) * | 2000-01-11 | 2002-08-06 | Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. | Abbe error correction system and method |
US6437283B1 (en) * | 1999-11-29 | 2002-08-20 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Device and method for processing substrates |
US6462306B1 (en) * | 1999-04-27 | 2002-10-08 | Gsi Lumonics, Inc. | System and method for material processing using multiple laser beams |
US6476351B1 (en) * | 1996-01-05 | 2002-11-05 | Lazare Kaplan International, Inc. | Laser marking system |
US6483071B1 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2002-11-19 | General Scanning Inc. | Method and system for precisely positioning a waist of a material-processing laser beam to process microstructures within a laser-processing site |
US6495791B2 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2002-12-17 | General Scanning, Inc. | Method and subsystem for generating a trajectory to be followed by a motor-driven stage when processing microstructures at a laser-processing site |
US6501061B1 (en) * | 1999-04-27 | 2002-12-31 | Gsi Lumonics Inc. | Laser calibration apparatus and method |
US6633338B1 (en) * | 1999-04-27 | 2003-10-14 | Gsi Lumonics, Inc. | Programmable illuminator for vision system |
US6639177B2 (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2003-10-28 | Gsi Lumonics Corporation | Method and system for processing one or more microstructures of a multi-material device |
US6674045B2 (en) * | 2001-03-07 | 2004-01-06 | Nec Corporation | Galvanometer controller and laser machining apparatus |
US20040056009A1 (en) * | 2001-06-13 | 2004-03-25 | Orbotech Ltd | Multiple beam micro-machining system and method |
US6750974B2 (en) * | 2002-04-02 | 2004-06-15 | Gsi Lumonics Corporation | Method and system for 3D imaging of target regions |
US6787734B2 (en) * | 2002-07-25 | 2004-09-07 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | System and method of laser drilling using a continuously optimized depth of focus |
US6875950B2 (en) * | 2002-03-22 | 2005-04-05 | Gsi Lumonics Corporation | Automated laser trimming of resistors |
US6951995B2 (en) * | 2002-03-27 | 2005-10-04 | Gsi Lumonics Corp. | Method and system for high-speed, precise micromachining an array of devices |
US20050279739A1 (en) * | 2004-06-18 | 2005-12-22 | Bruland Kelly J | Semiconductor structure processing using multiple laser beam spots spaced on-axis to increase single-blow throughput |
US7125761B2 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2006-10-24 | Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. | Laser irradiation apparatus, laser irradiation method, and method for manufacturing semiconductor device |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH07116869A (en) * | 1993-10-21 | 1995-05-09 | Nippon Steel Corp | Marking method by laser beam |
US5837962A (en) * | 1996-07-15 | 1998-11-17 | Overbeck; James W. | Faster laser marker employing acousto-optic deflection |
JPH1190988A (en) * | 1997-09-25 | 1999-04-06 | Hyper Photon System:Kk | Optical system |
DE10035446A1 (en) * | 1999-07-23 | 2001-04-05 | Heidelberg Instruments Mikrotechnik Gmbh | Micro bore hole generation method involves determining substrate position using interferometer; computer system processes position signal into table position |
-
2004
- 2004-10-18 US US10/967,895 patent/US7238913B2/en active Active
- 2004-10-18 WO PCT/US2004/034378 patent/WO2005037478A2/en active Application Filing
- 2004-10-18 JP JP2006535408A patent/JP2007509368A/en active Pending
- 2004-10-18 EP EP04795525A patent/EP1680255A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2004-10-18 CN CNB2004800278685A patent/CN100544877C/en active Active
-
2007
- 2007-04-03 US US11/695,721 patent/US7402774B2/en active Active
- 2007-04-18 US US11/736,638 patent/US20070205186A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (37)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4289378A (en) * | 1978-06-21 | 1981-09-15 | Ernst Remy | Apparatus for adjusting the focal point of an operating laser beam focused by an objective |
US4532402A (en) * | 1983-09-02 | 1985-07-30 | Xrl, Inc. | Method and apparatus for positioning a focused beam on an integrated circuit |
US5168454A (en) * | 1989-10-30 | 1992-12-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Formation of high quality patterns for substrates and apparatus therefor |
US5109149A (en) * | 1990-03-15 | 1992-04-28 | Albert Leung | Laser, direct-write integrated circuit production system |
US5171964A (en) * | 1990-07-23 | 1992-12-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | High accuracy, high flexibility, energy beam machining system |
US5362940A (en) * | 1990-11-09 | 1994-11-08 | Litel Instruments | Use of Fresnel zone plates for material processing |
US5293025A (en) * | 1991-08-01 | 1994-03-08 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Method for forming vias in multilayer circuits |
US5523543A (en) * | 1994-09-09 | 1996-06-04 | Litel Instruments | Laser ablation control system and method |
US6476351B1 (en) * | 1996-01-05 | 2002-11-05 | Lazare Kaplan International, Inc. | Laser marking system |
US5998759A (en) * | 1996-12-24 | 1999-12-07 | General Scanning, Inc. | Laser processing |
US6452686B1 (en) * | 1998-03-05 | 2002-09-17 | General Scanning, Inc. | Method and system for high speed measuring of microscopic targets |
US6181425B1 (en) * | 1998-03-05 | 2001-01-30 | General Scanning, Inc. | Method and system for high speed measuring of microscopic targets |
US6249347B1 (en) * | 1998-03-05 | 2001-06-19 | General Scanning, Inc. | Method and system for high speed measuring of microscopic targets |
US6177998B1 (en) * | 1998-03-05 | 2001-01-23 | General Scanning, Inc. | Method and system for high speed measuring of microscopic targets |
US6366357B1 (en) * | 1998-03-05 | 2002-04-02 | General Scanning, Inc. | Method and system for high speed measuring of microscopic targets |
US6307799B1 (en) * | 1998-12-03 | 2001-10-23 | Nanyang Technological University | Acousto optic data storage system on a stationary and high density data storage media |
US6341029B1 (en) * | 1999-04-27 | 2002-01-22 | Gsi Lumonics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for shaping a laser-beam intensity profile by dithering |
US6462306B1 (en) * | 1999-04-27 | 2002-10-08 | Gsi Lumonics, Inc. | System and method for material processing using multiple laser beams |
US6501061B1 (en) * | 1999-04-27 | 2002-12-31 | Gsi Lumonics Inc. | Laser calibration apparatus and method |
US6633338B1 (en) * | 1999-04-27 | 2003-10-14 | Gsi Lumonics, Inc. | Programmable illuminator for vision system |
US6496292B2 (en) * | 1999-04-27 | 2002-12-17 | Gsi Lumonics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for shaping a laser-beam intensity profile by dithering |
US6204955B1 (en) * | 1999-07-09 | 2001-03-20 | Advanced Optical Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus for dynamic control of light direction in a broad field of view |
US6437283B1 (en) * | 1999-11-29 | 2002-08-20 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Device and method for processing substrates |
US6430465B2 (en) * | 2000-01-11 | 2002-08-06 | Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. | Abbe error correction system and method |
US6495791B2 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2002-12-17 | General Scanning, Inc. | Method and subsystem for generating a trajectory to be followed by a motor-driven stage when processing microstructures at a laser-processing site |
US6573473B2 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2003-06-03 | General Scanning Inc. | Method and system for precisely positioning a waist of a material-processing laser beam to process microstructures within a laser-processing site |
US6483071B1 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2002-11-19 | General Scanning Inc. | Method and system for precisely positioning a waist of a material-processing laser beam to process microstructures within a laser-processing site |
US6674045B2 (en) * | 2001-03-07 | 2004-01-06 | Nec Corporation | Galvanometer controller and laser machining apparatus |
US6639177B2 (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2003-10-28 | Gsi Lumonics Corporation | Method and system for processing one or more microstructures of a multi-material device |
US6777645B2 (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2004-08-17 | Gsi Lumonics Corporation | High-speed, precision, laser-based method and system for processing material of one or more targets within a field |
US20040056009A1 (en) * | 2001-06-13 | 2004-03-25 | Orbotech Ltd | Multiple beam micro-machining system and method |
US6875950B2 (en) * | 2002-03-22 | 2005-04-05 | Gsi Lumonics Corporation | Automated laser trimming of resistors |
US6951995B2 (en) * | 2002-03-27 | 2005-10-04 | Gsi Lumonics Corp. | Method and system for high-speed, precise micromachining an array of devices |
US6750974B2 (en) * | 2002-04-02 | 2004-06-15 | Gsi Lumonics Corporation | Method and system for 3D imaging of target regions |
US6787734B2 (en) * | 2002-07-25 | 2004-09-07 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | System and method of laser drilling using a continuously optimized depth of focus |
US7125761B2 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2006-10-24 | Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. | Laser irradiation apparatus, laser irradiation method, and method for manufacturing semiconductor device |
US20050279739A1 (en) * | 2004-06-18 | 2005-12-22 | Bruland Kelly J | Semiconductor structure processing using multiple laser beam spots spaced on-axis to increase single-blow throughput |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110187025A1 (en) * | 2010-02-04 | 2011-08-04 | Costin Sr Darryl J | Laser etching system and method |
WO2012127040A1 (en) * | 2011-03-24 | 2012-09-27 | Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique | Adaptive digital device for focusing a laser beam |
US9300106B2 (en) | 2011-09-05 | 2016-03-29 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie Gmbh | Laser device with a laser unit and a fluid container for a cooling means of said laser |
US9348026B2 (en) | 2011-09-05 | 2016-05-24 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie Gmbh | Device and method for determination of a position of an object by means of ultrasonic waves |
US9573227B2 (en) * | 2011-09-05 | 2017-02-21 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlight Technologie GmbH | Marking apparatus with a plurality of lasers, deflection means, and telescopic means for each laser beam |
US9577399B2 (en) * | 2011-09-05 | 2017-02-21 | Alltec Angew Andte Laserlicht Technologie Gmbh | Marking apparatus with a plurality of lasers and individually adjustable sets of deflection means |
US9573223B2 (en) * | 2011-09-05 | 2017-02-21 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie Gmbh | Marking apparatus with a plurality of gas lasers with resonator tubes and individually adjustable deflection means |
US9595801B2 (en) * | 2011-09-05 | 2017-03-14 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie Gmbh | Marking apparatus with a plurality of lasers and a combining deflection device |
US9664898B2 (en) | 2011-09-05 | 2017-05-30 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie Gmbh | Laser device and method for marking an object |
US10236654B2 (en) | 2011-09-05 | 2019-03-19 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlight Technologie GmbH | Marking apparatus with at least one gas laser and heat dissipator |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7402774B2 (en) | 2008-07-22 |
CN1856383A (en) | 2006-11-01 |
JP2007509368A (en) | 2007-04-12 |
US20070181546A1 (en) | 2007-08-09 |
WO2005037478A3 (en) | 2006-04-27 |
WO2005037478A2 (en) | 2005-04-28 |
US20050161444A1 (en) | 2005-07-28 |
EP1680255A2 (en) | 2006-07-19 |
CN100544877C (en) | 2009-09-30 |
EP1680255A4 (en) | 2008-10-08 |
US7238913B2 (en) | 2007-07-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7402774B2 (en) | Flexible scan field | |
US6605799B2 (en) | Modulation of laser energy with a predefined pattern | |
KR100691924B1 (en) | A material machining apparatus and method | |
KR100446052B1 (en) | Laser beam machining apparatus using a plurality of galvanoscanners | |
JP5443390B2 (en) | Multi-mirror calibration system | |
US7545024B2 (en) | Laser beam processing apparatus for processing semiconductor wafer in production of semiconductor devices, laser beam processing method executed therein, and such semiconductor wafer processed thereby | |
KR20040045404A (en) | Method for the calibration of the optical system on a laser machine for machining electrical circuit substrates | |
US20050165590A1 (en) | System and method for virtual laser marking | |
JP5808267B2 (en) | Laser processing apparatus and laser processing method | |
CN1703298A (en) | Method for determining the focal position of a laser beam | |
JP2003136270A (en) | Laser beam machining device | |
JP2003505247A (en) | How to drill fine holes | |
US6721343B2 (en) | Laser processing apparatus with position controller | |
CN111515526A (en) | Multi-beam processing device and method | |
JPH0732183A (en) | Co2 laser beam machine | |
JP3323987B2 (en) | Laser processing equipment | |
JP3395141B2 (en) | Laser processing equipment | |
JPH09308983A (en) | Laser beam machine | |
JP2002210578A (en) | Device for laser beam irradiation and method for laser beam machining | |
JP2001001171A (en) | Laser beam machine for display substrate | |
JP2002035975A (en) | Method and device for laser drill | |
KR20070031264A (en) | Flexible scan field | |
JP3312294B2 (en) | Laser processing apparatus and laser processing method using multi-axis galvano scanner | |
JP2008114257A (en) | Laser machining apparatus and laser machining method | |
JP4505854B2 (en) | Laser processing equipment |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GSI LUMONICS CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KITAI, ANTON T;EHRMANN, JONATHAN S;REEL/FRAME:019182/0483;SIGNING DATES FROM 20041028 TO 20050329 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO PAY ISSUE FEE |