US20060130936A1 - Surface treatment of magnesium and its alloys - Google Patents

Surface treatment of magnesium and its alloys Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060130936A1
US20060130936A1 US10/526,961 US52696103A US2006130936A1 US 20060130936 A1 US20060130936 A1 US 20060130936A1 US 52696103 A US52696103 A US 52696103A US 2006130936 A1 US2006130936 A1 US 2006130936A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
magnesium
polishing
brightening
magnesium alloy
alloy surface
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/526,961
Inventor
Ian Mawston
Serguei Panov
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Keronite International Ltd
Original Assignee
Magnesium Technology Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Magnesium Technology Ltd filed Critical Magnesium Technology Ltd
Assigned to MAGNESIUM TECHNOLOGY LIMITED reassignment MAGNESIUM TECHNOLOGY LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: PANOV, SERGUEI, MAWSTON, IAN GRANT
Publication of US20060130936A1 publication Critical patent/US20060130936A1/en
Assigned to KERONITE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED reassignment KERONITE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MAGNESIUM TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D11/00Electrolytic coating by surface reaction, i.e. forming conversion layers
    • C25D11/02Anodisation
    • C25D11/30Anodisation of magnesium or alloys based thereon
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23FNON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
    • C23F3/00Brightening metals by chemical means
    • C23F3/02Light metals
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23FNON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
    • C23F3/00Brightening metals by chemical means
    • C23F3/02Light metals
    • C23F3/03Light metals with acidic solutions
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D11/00Electrolytic coating by surface reaction, i.e. forming conversion layers
    • C25D11/38Chromatising

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to surface treatment of magnesium and its alloys and in particular, though not solely, this invention relates to providing a bright shiny and/or textured surface finish to magnesium or magnesium alloy.
  • Magnesium metal is a highly reactive metal. In its usual fabricated forms the surface appearance is relatively dull and obscured by surface oxidation products or other compounds. Accordingly, magnesium metal does not usually manifest a bright, shiny, metallic finish except when the article has been machined. Although a dull surface may not always be disadvantageous, it is often desirable to provide a bright or polished surface to magnesium for reasons of aesthetics or utility. Owing to the reactivity of magnesium, post-treatments are generally necessary to passivate the surface, and conventionally the desired surface finish is lost during this step.
  • Techniques for applying paint to magnesium or its alloys comprise in the main pre-treatments such as chromating or non-chromating conversion treatments, followed by application of a paint.
  • the paint may be in the form of a powder coat, which is electrostatically applied then oven-cured, or a wet paint.
  • the painted surface may have a shiny finish, but it is not a finish that is comparable to a shiny metallic surface.
  • magnesium and magnesium alloys Two other problems exist that make the processing of magnesium and magnesium alloys difficult. Firstly, many commercial alloy articles (especially die cast articles) exhibit significant amounts of segregation both of the surface and in the interior of the article. This together with commonly encountered casting defects produces a highly inhomogeneous surface which cannot be improved by conventional means. Secondly, as magnesium is a highly reactive metal that forms a non-continuous oxide layer, for a viable bright surface finish to be attained the surface must be treated in a manner to prevent the oxide layer forming after surface brightening or polishing treatments. Traditionally such treatments include films or coatings which are opaque and/or are produced using heavy metals and other undesirable toxic chemicals.
  • the invention consists in a method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface comprising the steps of:
  • the method comprises an initial step of pre-treating of said surface to remove surface contaminants.
  • said pre-treatment step comprises chemically etching said surface and/or degreasing said surface.
  • surface contaminants are removed prior during the pre-treatment step by contacting said surface with one or more degreasing components, such as sodium hydroxide.
  • degreasing components such as sodium hydroxide.
  • said chemical etching component comprises a nitric acid and/or phosphoric acid.
  • said pre-treatment step includes chemically blasting said surface.
  • said polishing step is carried out by a chemical polish and/or electrochemical polish while said surface is immersed in a polishing composition.
  • said chemical polish and/or electrochemical polish removes surface layers and/or reduces microscopic high points from the surface.
  • said polishing step is carried out by immersing said surface in a bath comprising one or more of the following components; a phosphoric acid solution, monopropylene glycol, ethylene glycol, and nitric acid.
  • a bath comprising one or more of the following components; a phosphoric acid solution, monopropylene glycol, ethylene glycol, and nitric acid.
  • said electrochemical polish is a galvanic electrolysis.
  • said electrochemical polish further includes the supply of an external voltage to said surface.
  • an electrolyte anti-stagnation means is utilised or an AC voltage is applied to the electrolyte containing said surface.
  • said electrolyte anti-stagnation means is an electrolyte stirrer and/or an ultrasonic wave generating means.
  • said polishing step is followed by an intermediary wash removing at least some of the chemical and/or electrolyte solution from said surface.
  • said intermediary wash is carried out in a composition containing monopropylene glycol and/or ethylene glycol.
  • said polishing step and/or said intermediary wash is followed by an alkaline wash.
  • said alkaline wash is carried out in a composition containing sodium hydroxide.
  • said alkaline wash substantially neutralises acids and/or substantially removes Aluminium, Manganese or Zinc from said surface.
  • said passivating step provides a substantially corrosion resistant and/or water insoluble surface coating or film.
  • said substantially corrosion resistant and/or water insoluble surface coating or film is a phosphate salt coating or film.
  • an inorganic material coating or sealer is applied to said substantially corrosion resistant and/or water insoluble surface coating or film.
  • said inorganic material coating or sealer is substantially transparent and/or substantially provides corrosion protection and/or at least some protection from mechanically induced damage.
  • said inorganic material coating or sealer is a silicon based composition, such as a disodium metasilicate, and a polyacrylamide coagulant in de-ionised water.
  • said passivating step and/or said inorganic material coating or sealer step is followed by a surface drying step.
  • a chemical blasting step comprises the steps of:
  • said activator is a solution selected from the following; ferric chloride, hydrochloric acid, ammonium bifluoride, and ammonium bromide.
  • said etch composition is selected from the following; ferric chloride; ferric chloride and phosphoric acid solution, or a reduced solution of ferric chloride and phosphoric acid.
  • said iron removal composition is selected from the following; nitric acid and sodium borate in solution, or nitric acid and phosphoric acid in solution.
  • said step of washing said surface is carried out with a water wash or an alkaline wash.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a process flow diagram of various process steps of one embodiment according to the present invention
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a passivation cell configuration of an embodiment according to the present invention.
  • a set of method steps for chemically and/or electrochemically brightening or texturing also termed “polishing” herein) the surface of articles composed of magnesium or its alloys are described herein.
  • the following description is accordingly given by way of example only and it should be appreciated that a number of functional equivalents can be substituted for the compositions.
  • FIG. 1 a flowchart of various steps involved in the polishing and/or brightening of a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface is shown.
  • pre-treat steps 1 to 4
  • magnesium or magnesium alloy articles Prior to processing, it is usually appropriate to pre-treat (steps 1 to 4 ) magnesium or magnesium alloy articles to clean and prepare the surfaces for brightening or polishing.
  • the treatment depends on alloy, and the most preferred treatments are summarised below for some common alloys and forming processing. Alternative treatments may be possible and in some cases, depending on the original surface condition of the article, the omission of one or more steps may be possible without adverse effect on subsequent processing steps.
  • This invention discloses a means for processing and treating magnesium or magnesium alloys to preferably generate cosmetically acceptable bright textured surfaces which may be overlaid with an inorganic, transparent and/or corrosion resistant film.
  • Table 1 examples of possible compositions (or process solutions and preferred operating conditions) for the surface treatment processing steps, subsequently to be described are set out.
  • Table 2 illustrates possible pre-treatment process steps (and operating conditions) for a number of commonly utilised alloys.
  • Table 3 provides a useful summary of some combinations of process steps (from Table 1) and their sequencing for treating the surface of magnesium or magnesium alloys.
  • Ferric nitrate Fe(NO 3 ) 3 .9H 2 O - 0.1 mol/l Potassium fluoride (KF) 0.07-0.15 mol/l
  • Chemical blast CB1 Ferric chloride FeCl 3 ) - 0.12 mol/l Ambient solution Phosphoric acid (H 3 PO 4 ) - 0.8 mol/l Improved chemical CB2A Ferric chloride (FeCl 3 ) - 0.16 mol/l Ambient blast Solution Hydrochloric acid (HCl) - 0.05 mol/l Ammonium bifluoride (NH 4 HF 2 ) - 0.06 mol/l Ammonium bromide (NH 4 Br) - 0.17 mol/l
  • references to concentrations and temperatures are illustrative examples only of values which provide a preferred surface finish.
  • the processes operate over a range, both of concentrations and temperatures.
  • substitutions may be made for chemical constituents; for instance, ethylene glycol may be used in place of monopropylene glycol.
  • the magnesium or magnesium alloy article surface may be polished to a bright or metallic finish (step 6 ), or may be chemically “blasted” by a selective etch in step 5 to give a substantially light, textured finish similar to shot blasting.
  • the method of producing these finishes is fundamentally similar in most cases and may be summarised in Table 3.
  • FIG. 1 should be read in conjunction with the foregoing tables for details of times, temperatures and process solutions applicable to each step.
  • the examples also provide illustrative details of how various alloys may be treated according to the present invention.
  • the initial method described below may have particular application to high aluminium content alloys (for example, alloys containing greater than about 3% by weight of aluminium). Although the overall concept remains similar for low aluminium content alloys (for example, less than about 3% by weight), the surface finish may not be as effective as that obtained by the low aluminium content polishing and/or brightening method also described below.
  • a process of chemical or electrochemical selective etching 3 accomplishes the removal, from the surface being treated, of discontinuities and severe alloy component segregation. This process may also impart a somewhat controllable altering to the texture of the surface.
  • the term “etched” may be interchangeable replaced by “chemically blasted” (CB).
  • CB chemically blasted
  • the word “etched” may be reserved to describe processes as used in the pre-treatment (steps 1 to 4 in FIG. 1 ) phases only.
  • An electrochemical process using a modified phosphoric acid electrolyte may be able to “micro-polish” the surface to a high degree of brightness.
  • the “electropolish” step 6 illustrated in FIG. 1 and further described in Table 3 may involve two separate treatments that may be conducted in one process vessel.
  • the first of these may be a “galvanic polish” in which the article is short-circuited to a copper counter-electrode immersed in the EP3/EP4 (composition given in Table 1) solution. During the galvanic polish there is no externally imposed current.
  • a second, and optional treatment may be conducted during the electro-polishing and may comprise the imposition of an AC voltage, at about 5 VAC.
  • the current may not be controlled and may therefore reach a value that depends on the surface area of the work being processed and the characteristics of the surface and alloy.
  • a current density of 750 to 1,500 A/m 2 may be expected.
  • a copper counter-electrode may be used in the electro-chemical cell/bath.
  • a non-damaging method for the removal of electrolyte(s) from the surface after the electro-chemical polishing step 6 may be made possible by washing the surface with a suitable electrolyte removal component in step 7 .
  • a suitable wash may be a monopropylene glycol or ethylene glycol.
  • Step 7 may then be followed by an alkaline wash step 8 to neutralise any acids and further remove any electrolyte from the surface.
  • Step 8 may then be followed by rinsing the surface with de-ionised water in step 8 A prior to the surface being treated in the passivation step 9 .
  • the resulting treated surface may then be passivated in step 9 by the anodic deposition of a transparent corrosion resistant film upon the surface, in which the deposition thickness may be controllable.
  • a suitable corrosion resistant film may, for example, be a phosphate salt film, and such a salt may be a preferred film as a result of its useful corrosion resistance properties such as water insolubility and being slightly alkaline.
  • the thickness of this deposited film may be varied to provide increased corrosion resistance, as well as altering the final surface finish to provide a variety of surface finishes, for example, a bright shiny surface (a thin layer of film), a metallic slightly dulled surface finish (a thicker layer of film than the bright shiny finish), and a “pearl-type” surface finish (a thicker layer of film that the metallic finish).
  • the thickness of the film is of the order of about 100 nm, although it should be noted that the thickness of the film should preferably not be around one quarter of the wavelength of visible light as interference effects will occur.
  • Passivation of the brightened, metallic or chemically blasted surface may be undertaken chemically, using either of PM1 or PC1 described in Table 1 or by means of an electropassivation step.
  • a DC voltage source of approximately 10-20 volts may be applied to the article to be passivated, which is made the anode of a circuit in a solution 14 of about 2% ammonium bifluoride (NH 4 HF 2 .2H 2 O) at ambient temperature, for about 30 seconds (refer to FIG. 2 for the setup).
  • An Aluminium alloy counter-electrode 15 having at least twice the surface area of the article 13 being passivated may be employed.
  • Articles to be passivated are connected to a conductive busbar which is made the anode of an electrochemical cell.
  • Such electro-passivation methods may preferably avoid the use of heavy metals and provides substantially useful corrosion resistance.
  • De-ionised rinse step 10 may follow the passivation step 9 in order to remove any passivation composition components, and may then be followed by a drying step 11 , which may be an air drying process. It may be desirable that a hot air dry process is employed.
  • this passivated surface may be treated with an inorganic, transparent and substantially corrosion resistant film, such as a solution formed by combining disodium metasilicate, a polyacrylamide coagulant and de-ionised water (IS 1 —see below).
  • an inorganic, transparent and substantially corrosion resistant film such as a solution formed by combining disodium metasilicate, a polyacrylamide coagulant and de-ionised water (IS 1 —see below).
  • these deposits can be controlled to give different deposition sizes and patterns.
  • a series of pits and ridges remain on the metal surface.
  • a surface that has a more regular geometric pattern has now replaced the original metal surface (with random defects). Hence the appearance is enhanced.
  • the metal surface becomes microscopically smoother and hence more reflective or brighter.
  • the galvanic method is supplemented by the imposition of an AC current at certain stages. This is done to assist in breaking diffusion stagnation and to remove surface contamination.
  • This is basically a bath of pure mono-propylene glycol or ethylene glycol run either cold or moderately hot to act as an intermediary wash between strong phosphoric acid solutions and the alkaline wash solution. This is used so that the neutralisation reaction is less violent and may prevent the rapid stain-producing attack of dilute phosphoric acid on magnesium alloys. Accumulated water and acid in this solution can be controlled by external treatment.
  • An inorganic sealing step is used to deposit a clear Silicon (Si) based coating over anodised or passive bright magnesium or alloy components.
  • the coating is applied by dipping or by spraying and by adjustment of the conditions different film thicknesses can be obtained.
  • the inorganic seal is advantageously substantially transparent and gives the substrate good protection against corrosion and mechanical damage. It can be used effectively over only a limited number of dye coloured anodised magnesium substrates as there can be a colour shift due to the high pH of the inorganic seal or in some cases the dye can be destroyed.
  • a limited number of colours can be applied to bright surfaces so that the metallic lustre is preserved. This is done by establishing a very thin ( ⁇ 100 nm), transparent film of Magnesium Oxide (MgO) on the bright substrate by a variety of means. It can then be dyed by a modified procedure using standard Aluminium (Al) dyes.
  • MgO Magnesium Oxide
  • non-anodised finishes are defined as decorative finishes that are non-opaque and largely reveal the substrate metal.
  • the appearance can be further sub-classified as bright, metallic, pearl, etc and the texture of the substrate may be classified as flat, brushed, etched etc.
  • the texture of the substrate may be classified as flat, brushed, etched etc.
  • the appearance is a “metallic” finish.
  • the result was a very bright finish, having a slight yellow tinge.
  • the die cast structure was plainly visible.
  • the result was a metallic finish in which casting structures were visible.
  • a die cast plate of AM50 alloy having the same dimensions as that in examples 1 and 2 above, was treated using the following processes:
  • a rolled flat plate, of AZ31B alloy, 110 mm ⁇ 80 mm, 1 mm thick was pre-conditioned so that it was clean of sundry corrosion and dirt. It was then processed as follows:
  • the result was a mirror bright finish.
  • the plate was then passivated by an electrochemical treatment. It was immersed in a solution of 2% ammonium bifluoride (NH 4 HF 2 .2H 2 O) which was contained in a plastic tank with attached stainless steel plates on each side. These were connected to the negative terminal of a suitable power supply while the article itself was attached to a bus-bar that was connected to the positive terminal. After twenty seconds, the power was switched on and maintained at around 15 VDC ( ⁇ about 1 VDC). Upon the application of the electric current the article became noticeably brighter. There was no gas evolution. Initially the current was 20 Amps, but this decayed to around 1 Amp after about 5 seconds and finally to about 0.3 Amps after about 30 seconds.
  • 2% ammonium bifluoride NH 4 HF 2 .2H 2 O
  • the process may be modified to provide an optimised or superior treatment for low aluminium content magnesium alloys, preferably magnesium alloys containing approximately 3% aluminium (by weight) or less.
  • this alternative surface treatment process works well with the fine-grained AZ31 alloy in either rolled sheet or extrusion form.
  • EP4 new additional process solution tailored to the special requirements of fine-grained AZ31 alloy in either rolled sheet or extrusion form has been developed for low electropolishing low aluminium content magnesium alloys.
  • the process including EP4 solution is superior to the above described high Aluminium content method as it has fewer process steps, superior finish, reduced cost and preferably uses less energy intensive process conditions.
  • the finished material When used in conjunction with previously defined post treatments, for example passivation, the finished material has a more aesthetic appearance and is more corrosion resistant than previously obtainable when surface treating low Aluminium content magnesium alloys using the above described high aluminium content method.
  • the process can be used with greater simplicity alongside the surface texturing or polishing process.
  • compositions shown are for 1 litre of solution.
  • the FRS2 solution (which may for example be an iron removal solution) may be used to prepare the surface for subsequent treatment.
  • the use of mixed acids in the polishing step may be used; compared to generally phosphoric acid only in the previously mentioned process for magnesium alloys having an Aluminium content of approximately 3% (by weight) or greater; together with a carrier solvent, such as monopropylene glycol (MPG).
  • MPG monopropylene glycol
  • Phosphoric acid and predominantly nitric acid may comprise the preferred mixed acids utilised for the polishing step with low aluminium content surfaces.
  • the phosphoric acid is consequently now used as a catalytic component, rather than as a major consumable component, such as the nitric acid component.
  • the polishing step using the EP4 solution may also be operated at approximately room temperature ( ⁇ 20° C.); although it is appreciated that variation in the operating temperature may increase or decrease the rate of the surface treatment steps.
  • the components of the polishing step are consumed at lower rates, which may result in reduced frequency of polishing solution replenishment.
  • the requirement of an AC supply in the AC electrochemical polishing step 6 becomes optional as the combined mixed acid and MPG provide sufficient polishing of the surface.
  • the intermediary wash step 7 for example using MPG as previously described in the process above is also no longer required, and advantageously it may be that any “washing marks” resulting from the previously described intermediary process are also eliminated.
  • Steps 1 to 4 may be omitted although in some cases an etching pre-treatment step may be required to remove any external protective coating from the surface.
  • Surface Texturing Heavy chemical blasting 1.
  • Water wash Mild chemical blasting 1.
  • Water wash Surface Polishing Treatments 1. Chemical polishing in EP4 solution 20-90 s 2. Washing in CW10 15-45 s 3. Water wash Post-treatment 1. Passivation (BPT1, voltage according to desired finish) 2. Water wash 3. Dry An Experimental Set-Up
  • a brightening process was trialled and was conducted in a 2000 ml beaker at 20 to 30° C. in EP4 solution.
  • the bath was stirred with a mechanical stirrer and its temperature recorded.
  • the brightness of the finished plates were monitored and some plates were passivated in BPT2 solution to obtain either bright, metallic or pearl finishes to assess this process.
  • This process has proven to be capable of producing excellent results on fine-grained AZ31 sheet in a very consistent manner.
  • the process is simple, has few steps and utilises relatively low cost chemicals and simple low cost plant and equipment.
  • the process is easily managed using simple laboratory tests.
  • Step E1 Step No. Operation Chemicals Temp. ° C. Time min 1 Degrease* DGA 70-80 5 2 Water rinse* Tap 15-50 0.5-1 3 Phosphoric PE3 15-35 0.5 etch 4 Water rinse Tap 15-50 0.5-1 5 Alkaline wash DGA 70-80 1-1.5 6 Water rinse Tap 15-50 0.5-1 *These steps can be omitted if metal surface does not have lubricants
  • Step X1 Step No. Operation Chemicals Temp. ° C. Time min 1 Activation CB2a 30-40 0.3 2 Chemical blast CB1 (CB1a) 30-40 1-5 3 Alkaline wash CW25 70-80 5 4 Water rinse Tap 15-50 0.5-1
  • Salt spray testing was conducted on samples of AZ31 alloy sheet or extrusion which had been brightened or polished according to the above described low Aluminium content method to determine resistance to corrosion.
  • Sample Preparation The samples were prepared using following technique: 1. No pre-treatment for clean metal (sheet or extrusion) 2. Surface cleaning by FRS2 solution (Spectrolite sheet) 3. CB2A* 20 s 4. CB1A (heavy blasting) or CB3 (mild blasting)* 3 min 5. FRS2* 2 min 6. EP4 1 min 7. CW10 15-30 s 8. Water wash 9. BPT1 1 min 10. Water wash 11. Drying 12. Acrylic powder coating# *For CB finishes only #When required
  • Corrosion was caused by uneven powder coating CN8 AZ31, Coarse BPT1 Powder coating 48 Heavy filiform extrusion CB, corrosion bright, Sample had CB2A + imperfect powder CB1a coating: brown colour on the top of CB hills CN9 AZ31, Flat, BPT1 Powder coating 48 Heavy bottom extrusion bright corrosion.
  • Relatively low corrosion resistance of bright passivated AZ31 alloy presumably is due to uneven powder coating (extrusion) and small thickness of plates (0.8 mm sheet). The latter produced centres of corrosion on the sample edges.

Abstract

Methods of polishing and/or brightening surfaces of magnesium or magnesium alloy are disclosed. Polishing and/or brightening methods suitable to both high and low aluminium content magnesium articles are disclosed. In each of the methods, the surface is polished and then passivated. Using the disclosed methods it is possible to control aspects of the appearance of the surface to thereby, for example, obtain a bright and shiny surface to a magnesium or magnesium alloy article which is both stable and corrosion resistant. It is also possible to provide a predetermined texture to the surface using optional steps.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present invention relates to surface treatment of magnesium and its alloys and in particular, though not solely, this invention relates to providing a bright shiny and/or textured surface finish to magnesium or magnesium alloy.
  • BACKGROUND ART
  • Magnesium metal, either pure or in an alloy form, is a highly reactive metal. In its usual fabricated forms the surface appearance is relatively dull and obscured by surface oxidation products or other compounds. Accordingly, magnesium metal does not usually manifest a bright, shiny, metallic finish except when the article has been machined. Although a dull surface may not always be disadvantageous, it is often desirable to provide a bright or polished surface to magnesium for reasons of aesthetics or utility. Owing to the reactivity of magnesium, post-treatments are generally necessary to passivate the surface, and conventionally the desired surface finish is lost during this step.
  • Conventional treatment of magnesium and its alloys has mostly consisted of treatments that result in an anodic coating being applied to the metal, or a paint film, following some kind of pre-treatment process intended to promote paint adhesion. Mostly these processes neither brighten nor polish the metal. Anodising processes for magnesium differ from those employed for aluminium in that the resulting surface is opaque and frequently the coating is inherently coloured. While in many applications this may be a desirable finish in itself, this is not regarded as surface polishing or brightening.
  • Techniques for applying paint to magnesium or its alloys comprise in the main pre-treatments such as chromating or non-chromating conversion treatments, followed by application of a paint. The paint may be in the form of a powder coat, which is electrostatically applied then oven-cured, or a wet paint. The painted surface may have a shiny finish, but it is not a finish that is comparable to a shiny metallic surface.
  • Techniques for chemically or electrochemically brightening other metals exist. Methods for brightening aluminium alloy articles are commonly employed in anodising plants. However, these techniques are not applicable to magnesium alloys due to their different chemistry. For example, an approach to brightening aluminium involves a combined acid mixture in which magnesium articles would dissolve rapidly.
  • Many different metals and alloys of aluminium can be brightened by either chemical or electrochemical methods. Although, many brightening methods have been known for a long time, little work has been made to accommodate magnesium and its alloys.
  • Two other problems exist that make the processing of magnesium and magnesium alloys difficult. Firstly, many commercial alloy articles (especially die cast articles) exhibit significant amounts of segregation both of the surface and in the interior of the article. This together with commonly encountered casting defects produces a highly inhomogeneous surface which cannot be improved by conventional means. Secondly, as magnesium is a highly reactive metal that forms a non-continuous oxide layer, for a viable bright surface finish to be attained the surface must be treated in a manner to prevent the oxide layer forming after surface brightening or polishing treatments. Traditionally such treatments include films or coatings which are opaque and/or are produced using heavy metals and other undesirable toxic chemicals.
  • It is also possible in some circumstances to chemically or electrochemically plate other metals, for instance, nickel, onto magnesium substrates. Although the resulting plated article has a shiny, metallic appearance, this is due to the plated metal and could not be regarded as a system for brightening or polishing magnesium or magnesium alloy articles. There are also profound disadvantages in plating other metals onto magnesium or magnesium alloy substrates including for example galvanic corrosion problems in corrosive environments, expense, processing difficulties in a plating process and high reject rates from most processes.
  • It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a surface treatment for magnesium and its alloys which will go at least some way towards addressing the foregoing problems or at least to provide the industry and/or public with a useful choice.
  • All references, including any patents or patent applications cited in this specification are hereby incorporated by reference. No admission is made that any reference constitutes prior art. The discussion of the references states what their authors assert, and the applicants reserve the right to challenge the accuracy and pertinence of the cited documents. It will be clearly understood that, although a number of prior art publications are referred to herein, this reference does not constitute an admission that any of these documents form part of the common general knowledge in the art, in New Zealand or in any other country.
  • It is acknowledged that the term ‘comprise’ may, under varying jurisdictions, be attributed with either an exclusive or an inclusive meaning. For the purpose of this specification, and unless otherwise noted, the term ‘comprise’ shall have an inclusive meaning—i.e. that it will be taken to mean an inclusion of not only the listed components it directly references, but also other non-specified components or elements. This rationale will also be used when the term ‘comprised’ or ‘comprising’ is used in relation to one or more steps in a method or process.
  • Further aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the ensuing description which is given by way of example only.
  • DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION
  • Accordingly, in a first aspect the invention consists in a method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface comprising the steps of:
      • i) polishing the surface, and
      • ii) passivating the polished surface.
  • Preferably, the method comprises an initial step of pre-treating of said surface to remove surface contaminants.
  • Preferably, said pre-treatment step comprises chemically etching said surface and/or degreasing said surface.
  • Preferably, surface contaminants are removed prior during the pre-treatment step by contacting said surface with one or more degreasing components, such as sodium hydroxide.
  • Preferably, said chemical etching component comprises a nitric acid and/or phosphoric acid.
  • Preferably, said pre-treatment step includes chemically blasting said surface.
  • Preferably, said polishing step is carried out by a chemical polish and/or electrochemical polish while said surface is immersed in a polishing composition.
  • Preferably, said chemical polish and/or electrochemical polish removes surface layers and/or reduces microscopic high points from the surface.
  • Preferably, said polishing step is carried out by immersing said surface in a bath comprising one or more of the following components; a phosphoric acid solution, monopropylene glycol, ethylene glycol, and nitric acid.
  • Preferably, said electrochemical polish is a galvanic electrolysis.
  • Preferably, said electrochemical polish further includes the supply of an external voltage to said surface.
  • Preferably, during said electrochemical polish step an electrolyte anti-stagnation means is utilised or an AC voltage is applied to the electrolyte containing said surface.
  • Preferably, said electrolyte anti-stagnation means is an electrolyte stirrer and/or an ultrasonic wave generating means.
  • Preferably, said polishing step is followed by an intermediary wash removing at least some of the chemical and/or electrolyte solution from said surface.
  • Preferably, said intermediary wash is carried out in a composition containing monopropylene glycol and/or ethylene glycol.
  • Preferably, said polishing step and/or said intermediary wash is followed by an alkaline wash.
  • Preferably, said alkaline wash is carried out in a composition containing sodium hydroxide.
  • Preferably, said alkaline wash substantially neutralises acids and/or substantially removes Aluminium, Manganese or Zinc from said surface.
  • Preferably, said passivating step provides a substantially corrosion resistant and/or water insoluble surface coating or film.
  • Preferably, said substantially corrosion resistant and/or water insoluble surface coating or film is a phosphate salt coating or film.
  • Preferably, an inorganic material coating or sealer is applied to said substantially corrosion resistant and/or water insoluble surface coating or film.
  • Preferably, said inorganic material coating or sealer is substantially transparent and/or substantially provides corrosion protection and/or at least some protection from mechanically induced damage.
  • Preferably, said inorganic material coating or sealer is a silicon based composition, such as a disodium metasilicate, and a polyacrylamide coagulant in de-ionised water.
  • Preferably, said passivating step and/or said inorganic material coating or sealer step is followed by a surface drying step.
  • Preferably, wherein a chemical blasting step comprises the steps of:
      • a. immersing the surface in an iron based solution,
      • b. activating said surface with said iron based solution, wherein said iron based solution is reduced to thereby deposit iron on said surface,
      • c. etching said surface with an etch composition to modify the activated surface layer,
      • d. stripping iron deposits from said surface with an iron removal composition, and
      • e. washing said surface to substantially remove compositions remaining on said surface.
  • Preferably, said activator is a solution selected from the following; ferric chloride, hydrochloric acid, ammonium bifluoride, and ammonium bromide.
  • Preferably, said etch composition is selected from the following; ferric chloride; ferric chloride and phosphoric acid solution, or a reduced solution of ferric chloride and phosphoric acid.
  • Preferably, said iron removal composition is selected from the following; nitric acid and sodium borate in solution, or nitric acid and phosphoric acid in solution.
  • Preferably, said step of washing said surface is carried out with a water wash or an alkaline wash.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
  • Further aspects of the present invention will become apparent from the following description which is given by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a process flow diagram of various process steps of one embodiment according to the present invention, and
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a passivation cell configuration of an embodiment according to the present invention.
  • BEST MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
  • A set of method steps for chemically and/or electrochemically brightening or texturing (also termed “polishing” herein) the surface of articles composed of magnesium or its alloys are described herein. The steps making up the processes by which the articles are polished as well as compositions of the chemical solutions that are used from the present invention. The following description is accordingly given by way of example only and it should be appreciated that a number of functional equivalents can be substituted for the compositions.
  • With reference to the drawings and in particular FIG. 1, a flowchart of various steps involved in the polishing and/or brightening of a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface is shown.
  • Prior to processing, it is usually appropriate to pre-treat (steps 1 to 4) magnesium or magnesium alloy articles to clean and prepare the surfaces for brightening or polishing. The treatment depends on alloy, and the most preferred treatments are summarised below for some common alloys and forming processing. Alternative treatments may be possible and in some cases, depending on the original surface condition of the article, the omission of one or more steps may be possible without adverse effect on subsequent processing steps.
  • This invention discloses a means for processing and treating magnesium or magnesium alloys to preferably generate cosmetically acceptable bright textured surfaces which may be overlaid with an inorganic, transparent and/or corrosion resistant film. With reference to Table 1 examples of possible compositions (or process solutions and preferred operating conditions) for the surface treatment processing steps, subsequently to be described are set out. Table 2 illustrates possible pre-treatment process steps (and operating conditions) for a number of commonly utilised alloys. Table 3 provides a useful summary of some combinations of process steps (from Table 1) and their sequencing for treating the surface of magnesium or magnesium alloys.
    TABLE 1
    PROCESS SOLUTIONS
    Name Code Composition Temperature
    Phosphoric etch PE3 Phosphoric acid (H3PO4) - 10 mol/l Ambient
    Nitric acid (HNO3) - 0.5 mol/l
    Electropolishing EP3 Phosphoric acid (H3PO4) - 10 mol/l 25-35° C.
    solution Monopropylene glycol (C3H6(OH)2) - 4.5 mol/l
    Washing solution PG1 Monopropylene glycol - 100% 40-60° C.
    Caustic washing CW25 Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) - 6.25 mol/l   70° C.
    solution
    Passivator 1 PM1 Potassium permanganate (KMnO4) - 0.25 mol/l 15-30° C.
    Phosphoric acid (H3PO4) - to adjust pH to 5-5.5
    (added as 5% H3PO4)
    Passivator 2 PC1 Chromic acid (CrO3) - 1.8 mol/l 15-30° C.
    Ferric nitrate (Fe(NO3)3.9H2O - 0.1 mol/l
    Potassium fluoride (KF) 0.07-0.15 mol/l
    Chemical blast CB1 Ferric chloride (FeCl3) - 0.12 mol/l Ambient
    solution Phosphoric acid (H3PO4) - 0.8 mol/l
    Improved chemical CB2A Ferric chloride (FeCl3) - 0.16 mol/l Ambient
    blast Solution Hydrochloric acid (HCl) - 0.05 mol/l
    Ammonium bifluoride (NH4HF2) - 0.06 mol/l
    Ammonium bromide (NH4Br) - 0.17 mol/l
  • TABLE 2
    RECOMMENDED PRE-TREATMENTS
    Pre-treatment Steps
    Forming Process Alloy Description Compound Conditions
    Die casting (for bright AZ91 Degrease CW25 1-2 min
    or metallic finish) Rinse H2O
    Phosphoric Etch PE3 30-60 seconds
    Rinse H2O
    Die casting (for bright AM50/60 Degrease CW25 1-2 minutes
    or metallic finish) Rinse H2O
    Phosphoric Etch PE3 30 seconds
    Rinse H2O
    Rolled sheet (for AZ31 Degrease CW25 1-2 minutes
    bright or metallic Rinse H2O
    finish) Phosphoric Etch PE3 Up to 2 minutes
    Rinse H2O
    Extrusion (for bright AZ31 Degrease CW25 1-2 minutes
    metallic finish) Rinse H2O
    All alloys (chemically As for bright metallic
    blasted finish) finish plus:
    Rinse CW25 30-45 seconds
    Rinse H2O
  • TABLE 3
    SUMMARY OF PROCESS SEQUENCE FOR ELECTROPOLISHING,
    METALLIC FINISH AND CHEMICAL BLAST FINISH
    Process steps
    Forming Process Alloy Finish Description Compound Conditions
    1. Chemical blasting
    (a) AZ91 Chemical blast Activation CB2A 1 minute
    Die casting AM50 Chemical blasting CB1 2-10 minutes
    Extrusion AM60 Chemical blasting 2 CB2A 1 minute
    Rolled sheet AZ31 Caustic wash CW25 1-2 minutes
    Rinse H2O
    (b) AZ31 Chemical blast Same as (a) above, then
    Extrusion Phosphoric etch PE3 1.5-2.5 minutes
    Rolled sheet Rinse H2O
    2. Electropolish
    Die casting AZ91 Bright finish No Chemical blasting EP3 8 minutes
    Galvanic polish EP3 15-20 seconds
    AC current
    Chemical blast Same as (a) above, then:
    AC current EP3 2 minutes
    Galvanic polish EP3 3-4 minutes
    AC current EP3 15-20 seconds
    AM50 Bright finish No Chemical blasting EP3 6 minutes
    AM60 Galvanic polish EP3 15-20 seconds
    AC current
    Chemical blast Same as (a) above, then:
    AC current EP3 1 minute
    Galvanic polish EP3 2-3 minutes
    AC current EP3 15-20 seconds
    Rolled sheet AZ31 Bright finish No Chemical blasting EP3 30 seconds
    Galvanic polish EP3 10 seconds
    AC current EP3 20 seconds
    Galvanic polish EP3 10 seconds
    AC current
    Extrusion AZ31 Bright finish No Chemical blasting EP3 50-60 seconds
    Galvanic polish EP3 10 seconds
    AC current
    Chemical blast Same as (a) or (b) above steps
    then as for bright finish
    EP3 50-60 seconds
    EP3 10 seconds
    Die casting AZ91 Metallic finish Galvanic polish EP3 4-5 minutes
    Note: No AC
    current
    C-blast metallic Same as (a) above then:
    Galvanic polish EP3 3-5 minutes
    AM50 Metallic Galvanic polish EP3 3.5-4 minutes
    AM60 CB metal Same as (a) above then EP3 2-3 minutes
    galvanic polish
    3. Monopropylene glycol rinse (subsequent to steps 1, 2 or step 2 as appropriate)
    Die casting AZ91 Bright Rinse
    Extrusion AZ31 Metallic PG1 3-5 secs
    (one brief dip)
    Die casting AM50 Bright Rinse
    AM60 Metallic PG1 5-7 secs
    (with
    stirring)
    4. Caustic wash (subsequent to above steps 1-3 or 2-3 as appropriate)
    All All All Caustic wash CW25 20-30 seconds
    Rinse H2O
    5. Passivation (subsequent to above steps 1-4 or 2-4 as appropriate)
    Die casting AZ91 Bright Passivate PC1 7-10 secs
    Metallic Passivate PC1 30-60 secs
    AM50 Bright Passivate PM1 7-10 secs
    AM60 Metallic Passivate PC1 30-60 secs
    All All All Electropassivate NH4HF2 30 secs,
    10-20
    volts
    Extrusion AZ31 All Passivate PC1 30-60 secs
    6 Final steps (subsequent to 1-5 or 2-5 as appropriate)
    All All All Rinse H2O
    Dry Hot air
  • In the tables, references to concentrations and temperatures are illustrative examples only of values which provide a preferred surface finish. The processes operate over a range, both of concentrations and temperatures. Furthermore, substitutions may be made for chemical constituents; for instance, ethylene glycol may be used in place of monopropylene glycol.
  • Following the pre-treatment step(s), the magnesium or magnesium alloy article surface may be polished to a bright or metallic finish (step 6), or may be chemically “blasted” by a selective etch in step 5 to give a substantially light, textured finish similar to shot blasting. The method of producing these finishes is fundamentally similar in most cases and may be summarised in Table 3.
  • FIG. 1 should be read in conjunction with the foregoing tables for details of times, temperatures and process solutions applicable to each step. The examples also provide illustrative details of how various alloys may be treated according to the present invention.
  • The initial method described below may have particular application to high aluminium content alloys (for example, alloys containing greater than about 3% by weight of aluminium). Although the overall concept remains similar for low aluminium content alloys (for example, less than about 3% by weight), the surface finish may not be as effective as that obtained by the low aluminium content polishing and/or brightening method also described below.
  • High Aluminium Content Magnesium Alloys
  • A process of chemical or electrochemical selective etching 3 accomplishes the removal, from the surface being treated, of discontinuities and severe alloy component segregation. This process may also impart a somewhat controllable altering to the texture of the surface. The term “etched” may be interchangeable replaced by “chemically blasted” (CB). The word “etched” may be reserved to describe processes as used in the pre-treatment (steps 1 to 4 in FIG. 1) phases only.
  • An electrochemical process using a modified phosphoric acid electrolyte may be able to “micro-polish” the surface to a high degree of brightness.
  • The “electropolish” step 6 illustrated in FIG. 1 and further described in Table 3 may involve two separate treatments that may be conducted in one process vessel. The first of these may be a “galvanic polish” in which the article is short-circuited to a copper counter-electrode immersed in the EP3/EP4 (composition given in Table 1) solution. During the galvanic polish there is no externally imposed current.
  • A second, and optional treatment may be conducted during the electro-polishing and may comprise the imposition of an AC voltage, at about 5 VAC. The current may not be controlled and may therefore reach a value that depends on the surface area of the work being processed and the characteristics of the surface and alloy. A current density of 750 to 1,500 A/m2 may be expected. A copper counter-electrode may be used in the electro-chemical cell/bath.
  • A non-damaging method for the removal of electrolyte(s) from the surface after the electro-chemical polishing step 6 may be made possible by washing the surface with a suitable electrolyte removal component in step 7. For example, following the electrochemical polishing step 6 in which the EP3 electrolyte is used; a suitable wash (intermediary wash) may be a monopropylene glycol or ethylene glycol.
  • Step 7 may then be followed by an alkaline wash step 8 to neutralise any acids and further remove any electrolyte from the surface. Step 8 may then be followed by rinsing the surface with de-ionised water in step 8A prior to the surface being treated in the passivation step 9.
  • The resulting treated surface may then be passivated in step 9 by the anodic deposition of a transparent corrosion resistant film upon the surface, in which the deposition thickness may be controllable. A suitable corrosion resistant film may, for example, be a phosphate salt film, and such a salt may be a preferred film as a result of its useful corrosion resistance properties such as water insolubility and being slightly alkaline. The thickness of this deposited film may be varied to provide increased corrosion resistance, as well as altering the final surface finish to provide a variety of surface finishes, for example, a bright shiny surface (a thin layer of film), a metallic slightly dulled surface finish (a thicker layer of film than the bright shiny finish), and a “pearl-type” surface finish (a thicker layer of film that the metallic finish). The thickness of the film is of the order of about 100 nm, although it should be noted that the thickness of the film should preferably not be around one quarter of the wavelength of visible light as interference effects will occur.
  • Passivation of the brightened, metallic or chemically blasted surface may be undertaken chemically, using either of PM1 or PC1 described in Table 1 or by means of an electropassivation step. As shown in FIG. 2, in an electro-passivation step a DC voltage source of approximately 10-20 volts may be applied to the article to be passivated, which is made the anode of a circuit in a solution 14 of about 2% ammonium bifluoride (NH4HF2.2H2O) at ambient temperature, for about 30 seconds (refer to FIG. 2 for the setup). An Aluminium alloy counter-electrode 15 having at least twice the surface area of the article 13 being passivated may be employed. Articles to be passivated are connected to a conductive busbar which is made the anode of an electrochemical cell. Such electro-passivation methods may preferably avoid the use of heavy metals and provides substantially useful corrosion resistance.
  • De-ionised rinse step 10 may follow the passivation step 9 in order to remove any passivation composition components, and may then be followed by a drying step 11, which may be an air drying process. It may be desirable that a hot air dry process is employed.
  • Finally, this passivated surface may be treated with an inorganic, transparent and substantially corrosion resistant film, such as a solution formed by combining disodium metasilicate, a polyacrylamide coagulant and de-ionised water (IS1—see below).
  • Theory of Chemical Processing Operations
  • Different alloys have different chemical and surface properties depending on the alloy composition and its method of fabrication. Generally for castings, there can be large areas of phase segregation and sometimes several phases are present on the surface after cleaning. All cleaning, etching, polishing and post-treatment processes react with these different phases at different rates and produce different surface textures that may have different residual rates of reaction in corrosive environments. In the case of rolled sheet, extrusion and forged material, the metal grain size is smaller and the degree of segregation much lower, hence any treatment will produce a more uniform result.
  • The other major factors influencing the success of surface treatments are largely mechanical in nature. These include a variety of casting faults, dross inclusions and surface mechanical damage. Various techniques have been developed to largely overcome the problems outlined above.
  • Chemical Blasting (CB)—Step 5
  • This is a process where iron in the process solution is reduced by the magnesium alloy and is selectively deposited on the surface as Fe or other insoluble Fe compounds. Depending on the alloy and the treatment conditions, these deposits can be controlled to give different deposition sizes and patterns. When these deposits are subsequently removed from the surface a series of pits and ridges remain on the metal surface. A surface that has a more regular geometric pattern has now replaced the original metal surface (with random defects). Hence the appearance is enhanced.
  • Polishing—Step 6
  • This is a process that removes previously accumulated surface layers and selectively removes microscopic high points from the surface. The metal surface becomes microscopically smoother and hence more reflective or brighter.
  • There are two distinct processes included under this general heading;
  • Chemical Polishing—in which the component to be polished is suspended in the polishing solution for a certain time under fixed conditions, and Galvanic Polishing—similar to the above except that the component is electrically connected to a sheet-copper counter electrode that lines the polishing tank and a galvanic current flows between the two to give a different polishing effect.
  • Sometimes the galvanic method is supplemented by the imposition of an AC current at certain stages. This is done to assist in breaking diffusion stagnation and to remove surface contamination.
  • Alkaline Washes—Step 8
  • These hot strong alkaline solutions are employed in the process schemes as a convenient method for the following:
  • In conjunction with surfactants, to remove oil, grease and die-lube (that is, basic cleaning).
    • 1. To selectively remove Al, Mn and Zn from alloy surfaces.
    • 2. To neutralise acidic films especially from the polishing process.
    • 3. To act as a pre-conditioner and activator prior to the polishing processes.
  • It is recommended that two separate baths are used, one for item 1 (DGA) and the other (free of surfactant) CW25 (see Table 1) or CW10 (described below) for other purposes.
  • MPG Wash—Step 7
  • This is basically a bath of pure mono-propylene glycol or ethylene glycol run either cold or moderately hot to act as an intermediary wash between strong phosphoric acid solutions and the alkaline wash solution. This is used so that the neutralisation reaction is less violent and may prevent the rapid stain-producing attack of dilute phosphoric acid on magnesium alloys. Accumulated water and acid in this solution can be controlled by external treatment.
  • Passivation—Step 9
  • There are several methods of passivation of the finished surface available but the methods proposed by the present invention do not use chromium, are almost transparent, are easily controlled, can produce modified finishes and are effective against corrosion and handling damage. When used in conjunction with acrylic clear powder coatings they prevent interface corrosion and resin degradation (yellowing). They also provide a compatible, stable inter-facial layer when used in conjunction with inorganic sealing.
  • Inorganic Seal
  • An inorganic sealing step is used to deposit a clear Silicon (Si) based coating over anodised or passive bright magnesium or alloy components. The coating is applied by dipping or by spraying and by adjustment of the conditions different film thicknesses can be obtained. The inorganic seal is advantageously substantially transparent and gives the substrate good protection against corrosion and mechanical damage. It can be used effectively over only a limited number of dye coloured anodised magnesium substrates as there can be a colour shift due to the high pH of the inorganic seal or in some cases the dye can be destroyed.
  • Colouring
  • A limited number of colours can be applied to bright surfaces so that the metallic lustre is preserved. This is done by establishing a very thin (<≈100 nm), transparent film of Magnesium Oxide (MgO) on the bright substrate by a variety of means. It can then be dyed by a modified procedure using standard Aluminium (Al) dyes.
  • Chemical Processing Operations
  • For the purpose of this discussion, non-anodised finishes are defined as decorative finishes that are non-opaque and largely reveal the substrate metal. The appearance can be further sub-classified as bright, metallic, pearl, etc and the texture of the substrate may be classified as flat, brushed, etched etc. As well as having the normal “silver” colour of the alloy, it is possible to produce finishes that incorporate other colours and, in general, the appearance is a “metallic” finish.
  • A number of procedures have been developed to produce a range of finishes and a specific procedure is chosen according to given parameters such as;
    • 1. Appearance e.g. bright.
    • 2. Surface texture e.g. etched.
    • 3. Colour e.g. silver
    • 4. Alloy e.g. AZ31, AM50.
    • 5. Alloy form e.g. cast, rolled sheet, forged.
  • The following set out various examples and steps involved in treating magnesium and its alloys to achieve a brightened surface finish. They are not definitive, and are examples only to illustrate preferred methodologies.
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • A die cast plate, 140 mm×100 mm, 3 mm thick, of AM50 alloy, was brightened, using the following steps:
    • 1. Degrease in CW25 at 70° C. for one minute
    • 2. Rinse in water for approximately 30 seconds
    • 3. Pre-etch in PE3 for 30 seconds
    • 4. Rinse in water
    • 5. Electropolish in EP3 solution in two stages—galvanic polish (no imposed AC voltage) for six minutes, followed by an imposed AC voltage of 5 VAC for 20 seconds.
    • 6. Rinse in monopropylene glycol for 5 seconds
    • 7. Wash in CW25 for 20 seconds at 70° C.
    • 8. Rinse in water
    • 9. Passivate, using potassium permanganate solution, PM1, for 10 seconds
    • 10. Rinse in water
    • 11. Dry using hot air
  • The result was a very bright finish, having a slight yellow tinge. The die cast structure was plainly visible.
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • A die cast plate of AZ91D alloy having the same dimensions as in example 1 above, was treated using the following processes:
    • 1. Degrease in CW25, 70° C., for 1 minute
    • 2. Rinse in water
    • 3. Pre-etch in PE3 for 30 seconds
    • 4. Rinse in water
    • 5. Polish in EP3 solution for 5 minutes, using a galvanic polish (no AC voltage)
    • 6. Rinse in monopropylene glycol for 5 seconds
    • 7. Wash in CW25, 70° C. for 20 seconds
    • 8. Rinse in water
    • 9. Passivate using PC1 for 30 seconds
    • 10. Rinse in water
    • 11. Dry using hot air
  • The result was a metallic finish in which casting structures were visible.
  • EXAMPLE 3
  • A die cast plate of AM50 alloy, having the same dimensions as that in examples 1 and 2 above, was treated using the following processes:
    • 1. Degrease in CW25 at 70° C. for 1 minute
    • 2. Rinse in water
    • 3. Pre-etch in PE3 for 30 seconds
    • 4. Wash in CW25, 70° C. for 30 seconds
    • 5. Rinse in water
    • 6. Chemical blast in three steps —1 minute in CB2A solution followed by 7 minutes in CB1 solution and finally, an additional minute in CB2A solution
    • 7. Wash in CW25, 70° C., 1 minute
    • 8. Polish in EP3 solution in three steps—one minute using an imposed AC voltage of 5 VAC, 3 minutes without AC voltage, then an additional 20 seconds using an imposed AC voltage as before.
    • 9. Rinse in monopropylene glycol for 5 seconds
    • 10. Wash in CW25, 70° C. for 20 seconds
    • 11. Rinse in water
    • 12. Passivate in PM1 for ten seconds
    • 13. Rinse in water
    • 14. Dry using hot air
  • The result was a bright finish, with a high degree of texturing which obscured most of the die cast structures. Examination through a microscope revealed a surface topography of sharp ridges adjacent to rounded pits.
  • EXAMPLE 4
  • A rolled flat plate, of AZ31B alloy, 110 mm×80 mm, 1 mm thick was pre-conditioned so that it was clean of sundry corrosion and dirt. It was then processed as follows:
    • 1. Degrease in CW25, 70° C. for one minute
    • 2. Rinse in water
    • 3. Pre-etch in PE3 for 15 seconds
    • 4. Rinse in water
    • 5. Polish using four steps—30 seconds without AC, followed by 10 seconds using an imposed AC voltage of 5 VAC, another 20 seconds without AC and finally, a further 10 seconds with the AC voltage as before
    • 6. Rinse in monopropylene glycol for 5 seconds
    • 7. Wash in CW25, 70° C. for 30 seconds
    • 8. Rinse in water
    • 9. Passivate in PC1 for 30 seconds
    • 10. Rinse in water
    • 11. Dry using hot air
  • The result was a mirror bright finish.
  • EXAMPLE 5
  • A flat plate, AM50 alloy, of the same dimensions as those in example 1 above, was processed using the following treatments:
    • 1. Degrease in CW25, 70° C. for one minute
    • 2. Rinse in water
    • 3. Pre-etch in PE3 for 15 seconds
    • 4. Rinse in water
    • 5. Polish in EP3 solution in two stages—galvanic polish (no imposed AC voltage) for six minutes, followed by an imposed AC voltage of 5 VAC for 20 seconds.
    • 6. Rinse in monopropylene glycol for 5 seconds
    • 7. Wash in CW25 for 20 seconds at 70° C.
    • 8. Rinse in water
  • The plate was then passivated by an electrochemical treatment. It was immersed in a solution of 2% ammonium bifluoride (NH4HF2.2H2O) which was contained in a plastic tank with attached stainless steel plates on each side. These were connected to the negative terminal of a suitable power supply while the article itself was attached to a bus-bar that was connected to the positive terminal. After twenty seconds, the power was switched on and maintained at around 15 VDC (±about 1 VDC). Upon the application of the electric current the article became noticeably brighter. There was no gas evolution. Initially the current was 20 Amps, but this decayed to around 1 Amp after about 5 seconds and finally to about 0.3 Amps after about 30 seconds. At this time the power was switched off, the plate was removed from the solution, rinsed with deionised water and dried. The article was bright and shiny in appearance with no obvious surface film. However, its passivity was obvious when tested using reagents towards which magnesium metal articles are normally highly reactive.
  • Low Aluminium Content Magnesium Alloys (Variant Process)
  • In addition to the above mentioned exampled and process steps, as an alternative, the process may be modified to provide an optimised or superior treatment for low aluminium content magnesium alloys, preferably magnesium alloys containing approximately 3% aluminium (by weight) or less. In particular, it has been discovered that this alternative surface treatment process works well with the fine-grained AZ31 alloy in either rolled sheet or extrusion form.
  • A new additional process solution (EP4—described below) tailored to the special requirements of fine-grained AZ31 alloy in either rolled sheet or extrusion form has been developed for low electropolishing low aluminium content magnesium alloys. The process including EP4 solution is superior to the above described high Aluminium content method as it has fewer process steps, superior finish, reduced cost and preferably uses less energy intensive process conditions. When used in conjunction with previously defined post treatments, for example passivation, the finished material has a more aesthetic appearance and is more corrosion resistant than previously obtainable when surface treating low Aluminium content magnesium alloys using the above described high aluminium content method. In addition the process can be used with greater simplicity alongside the surface texturing or polishing process.
  • The following are specifications of preferred solutions and operating conditions utilised in the low Aluminium content magnesium alloy polishing or brightening method.
  • Further Specifications of Solutions and Operating Conditions
  • Chemical Polishing solution (EP4)
  • 750 mL MPG
  • 115 mL H2O
  • 115 mL 69% HNO3
  • 20 mL 85% H3PO4
  • Temperature: 20-30° C.
  • 10% Caustic Soda (Washing Solution) CW10
    • 100 g NaOH
  • Water addition to make 1 L of the solution
  • Temperature: 70-80° C., optimum 75° C.
  • CB Solution 1 (CB1)
  • 900 mL H2O
  • 50 mL 40% FeCl3
  • 50 mL 85% H3PO4
  • Temperature: 25-40° C.
  • CB1A Solution
  • Reduced CB1 solution
  • Temperature: 25-40° C.
  • CB2A Solution
  • Activator
  • 780 mL H2O
  • 66 mL 40% FeCl3
  • 52 mL 3.5-3.7% HCl
  • 102 mL 2% NH4HF2
  • 16.7 g NH4Br
  • Temperature: 20-30° C.
  • Mild Chemical Blasting Solution CB3
  • 55 mL 85% H3PO4
  • 25 g Fe(NO3)3.9H2O
  • 11 mL 40% FeCl3
  • Water addition to make 1 L of the solution
  • Temperature: ambient (20-25° C.)
  • Iron (Fe) Removal Solution FRS2
  • 95 mL 85% HNO3
  • 35 g Na2B4O7.5H2O
  • Water addition to make 1 L of the solution
  • Temperature: ambient (20-25° C.)
  • Electropassivator BPT1
  • 30 g Na4P2O7
  • 51.7 g Na2B4O7.5H2O
  • 7.5 NaF
  • Temperature: 15-30° C.
  • Finishes: Bright—up to 70 V (except AZ31 extrusion: up to 50 V)
  • (Compositions shown are for 1 litre of solution.)
  • Phosphoric Etch (PE3)
  • 605 mL 85% H3PO4
  • 365 mL H2O
  • 30 mL 69% HNO3
  • Temperature: Ambient
  • Electropolishing Solution (EP3)
  • 645 mL 85% H3PO4
  • 323 ml monopropylene glycol: CH3CH(OH)CH2OH (MPG)
  • 32 mL H2O
  • Operating temperature: 35-45° C.
  • Important: Overheating above 50° C. is prohibited
  • Chemical Polishing Solution (EP4)
  • 750 mL MPG
  • 115 mL H2O
  • 115 mL 69% HNO3
  • 20 mL 85% H3PO4
  • Temperature: 35-45° C., optimum 40° C.
  • 7% Caustic Soda (Washing Solution) (CW7)
  • 70 g NaOH
  • Water addition to make 1 L of the solution
  • Temperature: 70-80° C., optimum 75° C.
  • Mild Chemical Blasting Solution CB3
  • 55 mL 85% H3PO4
  • 25 g Fe(NO3)3.9H2O
  • 11 mL 40% FeCl3
  • Water addition to make 1 L of the solution
  • Temperature: ambient (20-25° C.)
  • Iron (Fe) Removal Solution FR1
  • 15 mL 98% H2SO4
  • 30 mL 85% H3PO4
  • Water addition to make 1 L of the solution
  • Temperature: ambient (20-25° C.)
  • Technical Grade MPG (Washing Solution) (PG1)
  • Operating temperature: 35-45° C.
  • 25% Caustic Soda (Washing Solution) (CW25)
  • 250 g NaOH
  • 750 mL H2O
  • Operating temperature: 70-80° C.
  • Electropassivator BPT1
  • 30 g Na4P2O7
  • 51.7 g Na2B4O7.5H2O
  • 7.5 NaF
  • Temperature: 15-30° C.
  • Finishes:
  • Bright—up to 70 V (except AZ31 extrusion: up to 50 V)
  • CB Solution 1 (CB1)
  • 900 mL H2O
  • 50 mL 40% FeCl3
  • 50 mL 85% H3PO4
  • Temperature: 30-40° C.
  • CB1a Solution
  • Reduced CB1 solution
  • Temperature: 30-40° C.
  • CB2a Solution
  • Activator
  • 780 mL H2O
  • 66 mL 40% FeCl3
  • 52 mL 3.5-3.7% HCl
  • 102 mL 2% NH4HF2
  • 16.7 g NH4Br
  • Temperature: 20-30° C.
  • Inorganic Seal (IS1)
  • 12% Na2SiO3 viscosity stabilised
  • Temperature: 55-65° C.
  • Preparation of 1 L of the seal:
    • a) Dissolve 1 g of “Irrigaid” polyacrylamide coagulant in 700 mL of stirred DI water until fully dissolved
    • b) Slowly add 300 mL 40% Na2SiO3
    • c) Filter.
      Chemical Polishing Solution (EP4)
  • 750 mL MPG
  • 115 mL H2O
  • 115 mL 69% HNO3
  • 20 mL 85% H3PO4
  • Temperature: 30-35° C.
  • 10% Caustic Soda (Washing Solution) CW10
  • 100 g NaOH
  • Water addition to make 1 L of the solution
  • Temperature: 70-80° C., optimum 75° C.
  • Mild Chemical Blasting Solution CB3
  • 55 mL 85% H3PO4
  • 25 g Fe(NO3)3.9H2O
  • 11 mL 40% FeCl3
  • Water addition to make 1 L of the solution
  • Temperature: ambient (20-25° C.)
  • Iron (Fe) Removal Solution FRS1
  • 15 mL 98% H2SO4
  • 30 mL 85% H3PO4
  • Water addition to make 1 L of the solution
  • Temperature: ambient (20-25° C.)
  • Iron (Fe) Removal Solution FRS2
  • 95 mL 85% HNO3
  • 35 g Na2B4O7.5H2O
  • Water addition to make 1 L of the solution
  • Temperature: ambient (20-25° C.)
  • If the AZ31 (or similar low aluminium content alloy) surface is not covered in contaminants, no initial treatment to remove these is required. However, if the surface is covered with a protective corrosion resistant coating, then the FRS2 solution (which may for example be an iron removal solution) may be used to prepare the surface for subsequent treatment.
  • Further, for this alternative process the use of mixed acids in the polishing step may be used; compared to generally phosphoric acid only in the previously mentioned process for magnesium alloys having an Aluminium content of approximately 3% (by weight) or greater; together with a carrier solvent, such as monopropylene glycol (MPG). This alternative polishing step may produce an enhanced surface polish in a more controlled manner compared to the previously described process.
  • Phosphoric acid and predominantly nitric acid may comprise the preferred mixed acids utilised for the polishing step with low aluminium content surfaces. In fact, it is believed that the phosphoric acid is consequently now used as a catalytic component, rather than as a major consumable component, such as the nitric acid component. The polishing step using the EP4 solution may also be operated at approximately room temperature (˜20° C.); although it is appreciated that variation in the operating temperature may increase or decrease the rate of the surface treatment steps. Advantageously the components of the polishing step are consumed at lower rates, which may result in reduced frequency of polishing solution replenishment.
  • The requirement of an AC supply in the AC electrochemical polishing step 6 becomes optional as the combined mixed acid and MPG provide sufficient polishing of the surface. The intermediary wash step 7, for example using MPG as previously described in the process above is also no longer required, and advantageously it may be that any “washing marks” resulting from the previously described intermediary process are also eliminated.
  • A variety of process steps with preferred process solutions and operating conditions may now be provided by way of example. Steps 1 to 4 may be omitted although in some cases an etching pre-treatment step may be required to remove any external protective coating from the surface.
    Surface Texturing
    Heavy chemical blasting
    1. CB2A activator 20-25 s
    2. CB1A solution 3-6 min
    3. FRS2 solution 2-2.5 min (with
    intensive stirring)
    4. Water wash
    Mild chemical blasting
    1. CB2A activator 20-25 s
    2. CB3 solution 3-6 min
    3. FRS2 solution 2-2.5 min (with
    intensive stirring)
    4. Water wash
    Surface Polishing Treatments
    1. Chemical polishing in EP4 solution 20-90 s
    2. Washing in CW10 15-45 s
    3. Water wash
    Post-treatment
    1. Passivation (BPT1, voltage according to
      desired finish)
    2. Water wash
    3. Dry

    An Experimental Set-Up
  • A brightening process was trialled and was conducted in a 2000 ml beaker at 20 to 30° C. in EP4 solution.
  • The bath was stirred with a mechanical stirrer and its temperature recorded.
  • At various intervals the bath conductivity was measured and small samples of EP4 were removed for later analysis. Weight loss measurements were made on the Magnesium test plates at regular intervals as well as the amount of EP4 drag-out. All measured parameters have been evaluated as a function of the cumulative area processed.
  • Typical sample plate processing consisted of;
    • 1. Test plates were AZ31 alloy (Spectrolite) sheets 110×80×1.2 mm. Total area 0.0176 m2 each. Plates were recycled for a number of process runs and hence only one pre-treatment in dilute nitric acid was given for each new plate introduced.
    • 2. Plate accurately weighed.
    • 3. Plate polished in EP4 for 2 min and drained for 10 sec.
    • 4. Plate washed in 10% NaOH for 15 sec.
    • 5. Plate rinsed in DI water for 10 to 15 sec, hot air dried and reweighed.
  • The brightness of the finished plates were monitored and some plates were passivated in BPT2 solution to obtain either bright, metallic or pearl finishes to assess this process.
  • Any passivated plates were stripped in dilute nitric acid after assessment before return to the start of the process.
  • Results:
    • 1. A total of 247 test plates were processed through the polishing bath with no chemical replenishment during this time. The total area processed was 4.488 m2 or 2.244 m2/L.
    • 2. The cut-off point for the trial was defined to be when the metal removal rate (MMR) fell to less than 60% of the initial rate.
    • 3. All test plates were brightened very satisfactorily up to the end of the trial.
    • 4. After the trial had ended a replenishment was made to the bath and the results measured were in close agreement with prediction.
    • 5. The experimental data fits the bath operating model. This model accounts for both component consumption and dragout.
    • 6. Satisfactory methods have been developed for the analysis of Magnesium, total acid, MPG, phosphate, nitrate and MRR.
  • This process has proven to be capable of producing excellent results on fine-grained AZ31 sheet in a very consistent manner.
  • The process is simple, has few steps and utilises relatively low cost chemicals and simple low cost plant and equipment. The process is easily managed using simple laboratory tests.
  • The bath is easily maintained with a two-part addition mixture on a periodic basis.
    General Procedure (and codes) for All Finishes
    1. Pre-treatment(s) E
    2. Surface texturing X
    3. Surface treatment S
    4. Post-treatment(s) T
    5. Colouring (optional) C
  • EXAMPLES OF PROCEDURES
  • Pre-Treatments
  • E0-No Pre-Treatment Step
    E1
    Step No. Operation Chemicals Temp. ° C. Time min
    1 Degrease* DGA 70-80 5
    2 Water rinse* Tap 15-50 0.5-1
    3 Phosphoric PE3 15-35 0.5
    etch
    4 Water rinse Tap 15-50 0.5-1
    5 Alkaline wash DGA 70-80    1-1.5
    6 Water rinse Tap 15-50 0.5-1

    *These steps can be omitted if metal surface does not have lubricants
  • E2
    Step No. Operation Chemicals Temp. ° C. Time min
    1 Degrease CW25 70-80 2-3
    2 Water rinse Tap 15-50 0.5-1  

    Illustrative Surface Texturing (CB)
  • X0-No Surface Texturing Step
    X1
    Step No. Operation Chemicals Temp. ° C. Time min
    1 Activation CB2a 30-40 0.3
    2 Chemical blast CB1 (CB1a) 30-40 1-5
    3 Alkaline wash CW25 70-80 5
    4 Water rinse Tap 15-50 0.5-1  
  • X2
    Step No. Operation Chemicals Temp. ° C. Time min
    1 Chemical Blast CB1 (CB1a) 30-40 1-6
    2 Alkaline wash CW25 70-80 5
    3 Water rinse Tap 15-50 0.5-1  
  • X3
    Step No. Operation Chemicals Temp. ° C. Time min
    1 Activation CB2a 30-40 0.3-0.5
    2 Chemical blast CB3 30-40   1-5  
    3 Iron removal FR1 20-40 0.5-1.5
    4 Water rinse Tap 15-50 0.5-1  
  • Illustrative Surface Treatments
    S1
    Step No. Operation Chemicals Temp. ° C. Time min
    1 Chemical polish EP3 35-45 2
    2 Galvanic polish EP3 35-45 2-3
    3 Chemical polish EP3 35-45   1-1.5
    4 Glycol wash PG1 35-40 0.3
    5 Alkaline wash CW25 70-80 1.5-2  
    6 Water wash Tap 20-40 0.5-1  
  • S2
    Step No. Operation Chemicals Temp. ° C. Time min
    1 AC polish EP3 35-45 1
    2 Galvanic polish EP3 35-45 3-4
    3 AC polish EP3 35-45 0.3-0.5
    4 Glycol wash PG1 35-40 0.3
    5 Alkaline wash CW25 70-80 0.5-1
    6 Water wash Tap 20-40 0.5-1
  • S3
    Step No. Operation Chemicals Temp. ° C. Time min
    1 Chemical polish EP3 35-45 2
    2 Galvanic polish EP3 35-45 1-1.5
    3 AC polish EP3 35-45 0.2-0.5
    4 Glycol wash PG1 35-40 0.25-0.3
    5 Alkaline wash CW25 70-80 0.5-1
    6 Water wash Tap 20-40 0.5-1
  • S4
    Step No. Operation Chemicals Temp. ° C. Time min
    1 Chemical polish EP4 35-45 0.3-2
    2 Alkaline wash CW7 70-80 0.2-0.75
    3 Water wash Tap 20-40 0.5-1
  • Illustrative Post-treatments (Passivation)
    T1 (Bright)
    Time
    Step No. Operation Chemicals Temp. ° C. Voltage V min
    1 Electro- BPT1 15-30 40-70 2
    passivation
    2 Water rinse DI water 15-30 0.5-1
    3 Hot air dry 70-110 1
  • T2 (Metallic)
    Time
    Step No. Operation Chemicals Temp. ° C. Voltage V min
    1 Electro- BPT1 15-30 90-100 2
    passivation
    2 Water rinse DI water 15-30 0.5-1
    3 Hot air dry 70-110 1
  • T3 (Pearl)
    Time
    Step No. Operation Chemicals Temp. ° C. Voltage V min
    1 Electro- BPT1 1514 30 115-125 2
    passivation
    2 Water rinse DI water 15-30 0.5-1
    3 Hot air dry 70-110 1

    Treatment Component Table
  • Procedure codes are shown in table below.
    Finish/ AZ31 extrusion
    Alloy or sheet* AM50 cast AZ91 cast
    Flat
    Bright E0 + S4 + T1 E1 + S2 + T1 E1 + S1 + T1
    Metallic E0 + S4 + T2 E1 + S2 + T2 E1 + S1 + T2
    Pearl E0 + S4 + T3 E1 + S2 + T3 E1 + S1 + T3
    CB
    Bright E0 + X3 + S4 + T1 E1 + X1 + S2 + T1 E1 + X1 + S1 + T1
    Metallic E0 + X3 + S4 + T2 E1 + X1 + S2 + T2 E1 + X1 + S1 + T2
    Pearl E0 + X3 + S4 + T3 E1 + X1 + S2 + T3 E1 + X1 + S1 + T3

    Results from Salt Spray (Corrosion testing) of Treated Surfaces:
  • Salt spray testing was conducted on samples of AZ31 alloy sheet or extrusion which had been brightened or polished according to the above described low Aluminium content method to determine resistance to corrosion.
  • Sample Preparation:
    The samples were prepared using following technique:
    1. No pre-treatment for clean metal (sheet or extrusion)
    2. Surface cleaning by FRS2 solution (Spectrolite
    sheet)
    3. CB2A* 20 s
    4. CB1A (heavy blasting) or CB3 (mild blasting)* 3 min
    5. FRS2* 2 min
    6. EP4 1 min
    7. CW10 15-30 s
    8. Water wash
    9. BPT1 1 min
    10. Water wash
    11. Drying
    12. Acrylic powder coating#

    *For CB finishes only

    #When required
  • List of Samples
    Passiva-
    No of ting
    Sample Ahoy samples Finish voltage, V Commentary
    CN1 AZ31, 2 Mild CB, 50 Powder
    Spectrolite bright, coated
    sheet CB2A + CB3
    CN2 AZ31
    2 Coarse CB, 50 Powder
    bright, coated
    CB2A + CB1A
    CN3 AZ31
    2 Mild CB, 50 Powder
    bright, coated
    CB2A + CB3
    CN4 AZ31
    2 Mild CB, 90 Powder
    metallic, coated
    CB2A + CB3 coated
    CN5 AZ31 2 Mild CB, pearl, 120  Powder
    CB2A + CB3 coated
    CN6 AZ31 2 Flat, bright 50 Powder
    coated
    CN7 AZ31, 2 Mild CB, 50 Powder
    extrusion bright, coated
    CB2A + CB3
    CN8 AZ31, 2 Coarse CB, 50 Powder
    extrusion bright, coated
    CB2A + CB1A
    CN9 AZ31, 2 Flat, bright 50 Powder
    extrusion coated
    CN10 AZ31, 2 Heavy CB, 50 Powder
    Spectrolite bright, coated
    sheet CB2A + CB1A
    CN11 AZ31
    2 CB, bright 50 No powder
    coating
    CN12 AZ31
    2 CB, metallic 90 No powder
    coating
    CN13 AZ31
    2 CB, pearl 120  No powder
    coating
  • Experimental Results
    Hours in
    Protective salt
    Sample Alloy Finish Passivation coating spray Commentary
    Passivated metal (passivated, no protective acrylic coating)
    CN11 AZ31 CB, BPT1 No coating 24 Significant pitting
    bright corrosion on
    front side.
    Rear side: no
    corrosion
    CN12 AZ31 CB, BPT1 No coating 24 As above
    metallic
    CN13 AZ31 CB, pearl BPT1 No coating 24 As above
    Bright finish (passivated, acrylic coating)
    CN1 AZ31, Mild CB, BPT1 Powder coating 48 Heavy corrosion
    Spectrolite bright, on the top and
    sheet CB2A + on the bottom
    CB3 of the sample.
    Uncoating of
    acrylic layer
    CN2 AZ31 Coarse BPT1 Powder coating 48 As above
    CB,
    bright,
    CB2A +
    CB1A
    CN3 AZ31 Mild CB, BPT1 Powder coating 48 As above
    bright,
    CB2A +
    CB3
    CN6 AZ31 Flat, BPT1 Powder coating 48 Heavy corrosion
    bright
    CN7 AZ31, Mild CB, BPT1 Powder coating 24 Pitting corrosion
    extrusion bright, The sample could
    CB2A + endure additional
    CB3 24 hours.
    Corrosion was
    caused by uneven
    powder coating
    CN8 AZ31, Coarse BPT1 Powder coating 48 Heavy filiform
    extrusion CB, corrosion
    bright, Sample had
    CB2A + imperfect powder
    CB1a coating: brown
    colour on the top
    of CB hills
    CN9 AZ31, Flat, BPT1 Powder coating 48 Heavy bottom
    extrusion bright corrosion.
    Uncoating of
    acrylic layer
    CN10 AZ31, Heavy BPT1 Powder coating 48 As above
    Spectrolite CB,
    sheet bright,
    CB2A +
    CB1A
    Metallic finish (passivated, acrylic coating)
    CN4 AZ31 Mild CB, BPT1 Powder coating 168  Corroded from
    metallic, edges with
    CB2A + uncoating of
    CB3 acrylic layer
    Passivated samples + acrylic powder coating (local)
    CN5 AZ31 Mild CB, BPT1 Powder coating 336  Middle part of
    pearl, samples in good
    CB2A + conditions. Edge
    CB3 corrosion only

    Corrosion Testing Conclusions
  • Corrosion resistance of passivated (BPT1) and powder coated (optionally) AZ31 samples was tested. Spectrolite sheet and extrusion were used in the experiments.
    Tolerance to salt spray
    1. Sheet (bright, not passivated, powder coated) less than 24 hrs
    (from previous
    experiments)
    2. Sheet (passivated, not powder coated) up to 24 hours
    3. Sheet or extrusion (bright, passivated, powder  48 hrs
    coated)
    4. Sheet (metallic, passivated, powder coated) 168 hrs
    5. Sheet (pearl, passivated, powder coated) 336 hrs
  • Relatively low corrosion resistance of bright passivated AZ31 alloy presumably is due to uneven powder coating (extrusion) and small thickness of plates (0.8 mm sheet). The latter produced centres of corrosion on the sample edges.
  • Aspects of the present invention have been described by way of example only and it should be appreciated that modifications and additions may be made thereto without departing from the scope thereof as defined in the appended claims.

Claims (30)

1. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface composing the steps of:
i) polishing the surface, and
ii) passlvating the polished surface,
wherein the polishing step is carried out by a chemical polish and/or electro-chemical polish while said surface is immersed in a polishing composition of one or more of the following components; a phosphoric acid solution, monopmpylene glycol, ethylene glycol, dnd nitric acid.
2. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface s claimed in claim 1, wherein the method further comprises an initial step of pre-treating said surface to remove surface contaminants.
3. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface s claimed in claim 2, wherein said pre-treating step comprises chemically etching said surface and/or degreasing said surface.
4. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface claimed in claim 2, wherein surface contaminants are removed during the pre-treatment step by contacting said surface with one or more degreasing component, such as sodium hydroxide.
5. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 3, wherein said chemical etching component is nitric acid solution and/or phosphoric acid.
6. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 1, wherein said chemical polish and/or electrochemical polish removes surface layers and/or reduces microscopic high points from the surface.
7. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 1, wherein said electro-chemical polish is a galvanic electrolysis.
8. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 1, wherein said electrochemical process further includes the supply of an external voltage to said surface.
9. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 1, wherein during said electro-chemical polish an electrolyte anti-stagnation means is utilised or an AC voltage is applied to the electrolyte containing said surface.
10. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 9, wherein said electrolyte anti means is an electrolyte stirrer and/or an ultrasonic wave generating means.
11. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 1, wherein said polishing step is followed by an intermediary wash removing at least some of the chemical and/or electrolyte solution from said surface.
12. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 11, wherein said intermediary wash is carried out in a composition containing monopropylene glycol and/or ethylene glycol.
13. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 1, wherein said polishing step is followed by an alkaline wash.
14. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 11, wherein said intermediary wash is followed by an alkaline wash.
15. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 13, wherein said alkaline wash substantially neutralises acids and/or substantially removes Aluminium, Manganese or Zinc from said surface.
16. A method of polishing and/Or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 13, wherein said alkaline wash is carried out in a composition containing sodium hydroxide
17. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 1, wherein said passivating step provides a substantially corrosion resistant and/or water insoluble surface coating or film.
18. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 17 wherein said substantially corrosion resistant and/or water insoluble surface coating or film is a phosphate salt coating or film.
19. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 17, wherein said passivating step voltage is varied to alter said substantially corrosion resistant and/or water insoluble surface coating or film thickness.
20. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 1, wherein an inorganic material coating or sealer is applied to said substantially corrosion resistant and/or water insoluble surface coating or film.
21. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 18, wherein said inorganic material coating or sealer is substantially transparent and/or substantially provides corrosion protection and/or at least provides some protection from mechanically induced damage.
22. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 20, wherein said inorganic material coating or sealer is a silicon based composition, such as a disodium metasilicate, and a polyacrylamide coagulant in de-ionised water.
23. A method of polishing and/or brightening, a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 1, wherein said passivating step and/or said inorganic material coating or sealer step is followed by a surface drying step.
24. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 1 including the pre-treatment steps of:
a. immersing the surface in an iron based solution,
b. activating said surface with said Iron based solution, wherein said iron based solution is reduced to thereby deposit iron on said surface,
c. etching said surface with an etch composition to modify the activated surface layer,
d. stripping iron deposits from said surface with an iron removal composition, and
e. washing said surface to substantially remove compositions remaining on said surface.
25. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 24, wherein said activator is a solution selected from the following; ferric chloride, hydrochloric acid, ammonium bifluoride and ammonium bromide.
26. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 24, wherein said etch composition is selected from the following; ferric chloride; ferric chloride and phosphoric acid solution, or a reduce solution of ferric chloride and phosphoric acid.
27. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 24, wherein said iron removal composition is selected from the following; nitric acid and sodium borate in solution or nitric acid and phosphoric acid in solution.
28. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as claimed in claim 24, wherein said step of washing said surface is carried out with a water wash or an alkaline wash.
29. A method of polishing and/or brightening a magnesium or magnesium alloy surface as hereinbefore described and with reference to any one of the accompanying drawings.
30. A magnesium or magnesium alloy surface polished or brightened according to the method substantially as hereinbefore described and with ret to any one of the accompanying drawings.
US10/526,961 2002-09-09 2003-09-09 Surface treatment of magnesium and its alloys Abandoned US20060130936A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NZ521269 2002-09-09
NZ52126902 2002-09-09
PCT/NZ2003/000200 WO2004022818A1 (en) 2002-09-09 2003-09-09 The surface treatment of magnesium and its alloys

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060130936A1 true US20060130936A1 (en) 2006-06-22

Family

ID=31973762

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/526,961 Abandoned US20060130936A1 (en) 2002-09-09 2003-09-09 Surface treatment of magnesium and its alloys

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US20060130936A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2005538249A (en)
CN (1) CN100585024C (en)
AU (1) AU2003265019B2 (en)
DE (1) DE10393234T5 (en)
GB (1) GB2407823B (en)
WO (1) WO2004022818A1 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050211052A1 (en) * 2004-03-29 2005-09-29 Gigliotti Patrick J Guitar having a metal plate insert
US20110097573A1 (en) * 2009-01-09 2011-04-28 Nobuyuki Okuda Magnesium alloy structural member
CN102198626A (en) * 2011-05-11 2011-09-28 北京科技大学 Single-double side polishing device for magnesium alloy plate strip coil
CN102277611A (en) * 2010-06-09 2011-12-14 株式会社Nuc电子 Method for treating surface of magnesium-based metal to give metallic texture thereof
CN102944455A (en) * 2012-10-24 2013-02-27 郑州飞机装备有限责任公司 Method for distinguishing longitudinal line of wrought aluminum 2A14
US20130081951A1 (en) * 2011-09-30 2013-04-04 Apple Inc. Laser Texturizing and Anodization Surface Treatment
CN104131294A (en) * 2014-07-01 2014-11-05 蚌埠市高华电子有限公司 Antibacterial mixed polishing solution for aluminium and aluminium alloy and preparation method thereof
CN110257838A (en) * 2019-07-02 2019-09-20 佛山市南海区尚铭金属制品有限公司 Aluminum profile dusts pre-treating technology
US10612118B2 (en) 2012-04-25 2020-04-07 Arcelormittal Methods for producing a pre-lacquered metal sheet having Zn—Al—Mg coatings and corresponding metal sheet

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102005027782A1 (en) * 2005-06-15 2006-12-28 Druckguss Heidenau Gmbh Process for radiation treatment of cast Magnesium alloy components using Aluminum particles of grain size at least 4 mm to smooth the component surface and a fan-blower useful for for treating the Magnesium parts of chill castings
CN101327710B (en) * 2007-06-22 2010-08-25 比亚迪股份有限公司 Method for decorating surface of metal
CN101591799B (en) * 2008-05-30 2011-04-20 比亚迪股份有限公司 Electrolytic polishing solution of magnesium alloy and magnesium alloy surface polishing processing method
GB2469115B (en) 2009-04-03 2013-08-21 Keronite Internat Ltd Process for the enhanced corrosion protection of valve metals
CN102400205B (en) * 2010-09-19 2014-07-23 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 Electrolyte solution used for rapid evaluation of groove corrosion performance
KR101178533B1 (en) 2010-12-28 2012-08-30 재단법인 포항산업과학연구원 Method for treating surface of magnesium alloy board
CN102393128B (en) * 2011-08-12 2013-07-24 贵州钢绳股份有限公司 Surface dehydration treatment agent for phosphating steel line and application method thereof
JP6532152B2 (en) * 2015-01-23 2019-06-19 福岡県 Electropolishing liquid
CN104674332B (en) * 2015-03-23 2017-04-05 日照天一生物医疗科技有限公司 The treatment fluid and processing method of magnesium alloy bracket
CN106929897A (en) * 2015-12-30 2017-07-07 比亚迪股份有限公司 A kind of Al-alloy casing and preparation method thereof
CN106404477A (en) * 2016-08-23 2017-02-15 中国航空工业集团公司北京航空材料研究院 Sample preparation method for electron back scattering diffraction analysis of powder superalloy
DE102017222932A1 (en) * 2017-12-15 2019-06-19 Zf Friedrichshafen Ag Chemically assisted superfinishing
DE102018218393A1 (en) * 2018-10-26 2020-04-30 Aesculap Ag Process for surface treatment of a metal or alloy product and a metal or alloy product
CN111893468A (en) * 2020-07-05 2020-11-06 江苏荣企新材料科技有限公司 Aluminum-magnesium alloy metal frame surface corrosion-resistant treatment process

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3222266A (en) * 1958-08-20 1965-12-07 Kaiser Aluminium Chem Corp Method of enameling anodized aluminum
US3766030A (en) * 1971-12-27 1973-10-16 Muroc Prod Corp Method of electropolishing
US4578156A (en) * 1984-12-10 1986-03-25 American Hoechst Corporation Electrolytes for electrochemically treating metal plates
US5683522A (en) * 1995-03-30 1997-11-04 Sundstrand Corporation Process for applying a coating to a magnesium alloy product
US6319819B1 (en) * 2000-01-18 2001-11-20 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Process for passivating top interface of damascene-type Cu interconnect lines
US6335099B1 (en) * 1998-02-23 2002-01-01 Mitsui Mining And Smelting Co., Ltd. Corrosion resistant, magnesium-based product exhibiting luster of base metal and method for producing the same
US6596150B2 (en) * 1998-05-28 2003-07-22 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Production method for an aluminum support for a lithographic printing plate

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19744312A1 (en) * 1997-10-07 1999-04-08 Volkswagen Ag Method for connecting at least two joining partners made of a magnesium material
DE19800035A1 (en) * 1998-01-02 1999-07-08 Volkswagen Ag Joining of magnesium and plastic components especially of an automobile body
JP2000219975A (en) * 1999-01-28 2000-08-08 Nippon Parkerizing Co Ltd SURFACE TREATED Mg ALLOY AND SURFACE TREATING METHOD THEREFOR

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3222266A (en) * 1958-08-20 1965-12-07 Kaiser Aluminium Chem Corp Method of enameling anodized aluminum
US3766030A (en) * 1971-12-27 1973-10-16 Muroc Prod Corp Method of electropolishing
US4578156A (en) * 1984-12-10 1986-03-25 American Hoechst Corporation Electrolytes for electrochemically treating metal plates
US5683522A (en) * 1995-03-30 1997-11-04 Sundstrand Corporation Process for applying a coating to a magnesium alloy product
US6335099B1 (en) * 1998-02-23 2002-01-01 Mitsui Mining And Smelting Co., Ltd. Corrosion resistant, magnesium-based product exhibiting luster of base metal and method for producing the same
US6596150B2 (en) * 1998-05-28 2003-07-22 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Production method for an aluminum support for a lithographic printing plate
US6319819B1 (en) * 2000-01-18 2001-11-20 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Process for passivating top interface of damascene-type Cu interconnect lines

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050211052A1 (en) * 2004-03-29 2005-09-29 Gigliotti Patrick J Guitar having a metal plate insert
US20110097573A1 (en) * 2009-01-09 2011-04-28 Nobuyuki Okuda Magnesium alloy structural member
CN102277611A (en) * 2010-06-09 2011-12-14 株式会社Nuc电子 Method for treating surface of magnesium-based metal to give metallic texture thereof
US20110303545A1 (en) * 2010-06-09 2011-12-15 Nuc Electronics Co., Ltd. Method for treating surface of magnesium-based metal to give metallic texture thereof
CN102198626A (en) * 2011-05-11 2011-09-28 北京科技大学 Single-double side polishing device for magnesium alloy plate strip coil
US20130081951A1 (en) * 2011-09-30 2013-04-04 Apple Inc. Laser Texturizing and Anodization Surface Treatment
US9644283B2 (en) * 2011-09-30 2017-05-09 Apple Inc. Laser texturizing and anodization surface treatment
US10612118B2 (en) 2012-04-25 2020-04-07 Arcelormittal Methods for producing a pre-lacquered metal sheet having Zn—Al—Mg coatings and corresponding metal sheet
CN102944455A (en) * 2012-10-24 2013-02-27 郑州飞机装备有限责任公司 Method for distinguishing longitudinal line of wrought aluminum 2A14
CN104131294A (en) * 2014-07-01 2014-11-05 蚌埠市高华电子有限公司 Antibacterial mixed polishing solution for aluminium and aluminium alloy and preparation method thereof
CN110257838A (en) * 2019-07-02 2019-09-20 佛山市南海区尚铭金属制品有限公司 Aluminum profile dusts pre-treating technology

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2407823A (en) 2005-05-11
GB0504294D0 (en) 2005-04-06
GB2407823B (en) 2005-11-09
WO2004022818A1 (en) 2004-03-18
DE10393234T5 (en) 2005-10-27
AU2003265019B2 (en) 2008-08-14
CN1777706A (en) 2006-05-24
CN100585024C (en) 2010-01-27
JP2005538249A (en) 2005-12-15
AU2003265019A1 (en) 2004-03-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2003265019B2 (en) Surface treatment of magnesium and its alloys
US6884336B2 (en) Color finishing method
KR100476497B1 (en) Processing method of aluminum alloy and the product manufactured by this method
CN106282881A (en) Phosphatization or anodic oxidation are to improve the bonding of thermal spraying figure layer in electromotor cylinder bore
JP6369745B2 (en) Anodized film and sealing method thereof
US20030127338A1 (en) Process for brightening aluminum, and use of same
JP2006511698A (en) Magnesium conversion coating composition and method of using the same
CN101397688A (en) Surface treating method of zinc alloy products
WO2004063405A2 (en) Magnesium containing aluminum alloys and anodizing process
KR100484314B1 (en) Method for duplication coating of aluminum or aluminum alloy
JPH0359149B2 (en)
US20050056546A1 (en) Aluminum vehicle body
Hillis Surface engineering of magnesium alloys
EP0030305B1 (en) Chemical pretreatment for method for the electrolytical metal coating of magnesium articles
US4877495A (en) Electrolytic coloring of anodized aluminum
JPS60181282A (en) Surface treatment of aluminum alloy
JP3426800B2 (en) Pretreatment method for plating aluminum alloy material
CN216585268U (en) Anodized aluminum alloy rim
JP3673477B2 (en) Method for forming a film of magnesium alloy
CN100381615C (en) Two-step pigmenting method for green oxidation film layer on magnesium alloy surface
TWI448590B (en) Novel cyanide-free electroplating process for zinc and zinc alloy die-cast components
KR100436597B1 (en) Method for plating with molten aluminum
WO2021051297A1 (en) Cutting fluid for chamfering
Runge et al. Plating on Aluminum
JPH05171459A (en) Golden aluminum material and its production

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MAGNESIUM TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, NEW ZEALAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MAWSTON, IAN GRANT;PANOV, SERGUEI;REEL/FRAME:017247/0026;SIGNING DATES FROM 20050712 TO 20050715

AS Assignment

Owner name: KERONITE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MAGNESIUM TECHNOLOGY LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:020231/0560

Effective date: 20071010

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION