US20060117738A1 - Method and device for controlling the functioning of a nitrogen oxide trap for an internal combustion engine running on a lean mixture - Google Patents
Method and device for controlling the functioning of a nitrogen oxide trap for an internal combustion engine running on a lean mixture Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060117738A1 US20060117738A1 US10/522,724 US52272405A US2006117738A1 US 20060117738 A1 US20060117738 A1 US 20060117738A1 US 52272405 A US52272405 A US 52272405A US 2006117738 A1 US2006117738 A1 US 2006117738A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- signal
- nitrogen oxides
- meaningful signal
- sensor
- oxygen sensor
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N3/00—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust
- F01N3/08—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous
- F01N3/0807—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by using absorbents or adsorbents
- F01N3/0828—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by using absorbents or adsorbents characterised by the absorbed or adsorbed substances
- F01N3/0842—Nitrogen oxides
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
- B01D53/34—Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
- B01D53/92—Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases
- B01D53/94—Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases by catalytic processes
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
- B01D53/34—Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
- B01D53/46—Removing components of defined structure
- B01D53/54—Nitrogen compounds
- B01D53/56—Nitrogen oxides
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
- B01D53/34—Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
- B01D53/92—Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases
- B01D53/94—Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases by catalytic processes
- B01D53/9495—Controlling the catalytic process
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N11/00—Monitoring or diagnostic devices for exhaust-gas treatment apparatus, e.g. for catalytic activity
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N13/00—Exhaust or silencing apparatus characterised by constructional features ; Exhaust or silencing apparatus, or parts thereof, having pertinent characteristics not provided for in, or of interest apart from, groups F01N1/00 - F01N5/00, F01N9/00, F01N11/00
- F01N13/009—Exhaust or silencing apparatus characterised by constructional features ; Exhaust or silencing apparatus, or parts thereof, having pertinent characteristics not provided for in, or of interest apart from, groups F01N1/00 - F01N5/00, F01N9/00, F01N11/00 having two or more separate purifying devices arranged in series
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N3/00—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust
- F01N3/08—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous
- F01N3/10—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust
- F01N3/18—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust characterised by methods of operation; Control
- F01N3/20—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust characterised by methods of operation; Control specially adapted for catalytic conversion ; Methods of operation or control of catalytic converters
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
- F02D41/02—Circuit arrangements for generating control signals
- F02D41/021—Introducing corrections for particular conditions exterior to the engine
- F02D41/0235—Introducing corrections for particular conditions exterior to the engine in relation with the state of the exhaust gas treating apparatus
- F02D41/027—Introducing corrections for particular conditions exterior to the engine in relation with the state of the exhaust gas treating apparatus to purge or regenerate the exhaust gas treating apparatus
- F02D41/0275—Introducing corrections for particular conditions exterior to the engine in relation with the state of the exhaust gas treating apparatus to purge or regenerate the exhaust gas treating apparatus the exhaust gas treating apparatus being a NOx trap or adsorbent
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
- F02D41/02—Circuit arrangements for generating control signals
- F02D41/14—Introducing closed-loop corrections
- F02D41/1438—Introducing closed-loop corrections using means for determining characteristics of the combustion gases; Sensors therefor
- F02D41/1439—Introducing closed-loop corrections using means for determining characteristics of the combustion gases; Sensors therefor characterised by the position of the sensor
- F02D41/1441—Plural sensors
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N2250/00—Combinations of different methods of purification
- F01N2250/12—Combinations of different methods of purification absorption or adsorption, and catalytic conversion
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N2250/00—Combinations of different methods of purification
- F01N2250/14—Combinations of different methods of purification absorption or adsorption, and filtering
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N2430/00—Influencing exhaust purification, e.g. starting of catalytic reaction, filter regeneration, or the like, by controlling engine operating characteristics
- F01N2430/06—Influencing exhaust purification, e.g. starting of catalytic reaction, filter regeneration, or the like, by controlling engine operating characteristics by varying fuel-air ratio, e.g. by enriching fuel-air mixture
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N2570/00—Exhaust treating apparatus eliminating, absorbing or adsorbing specific elements or compounds
- F01N2570/14—Nitrogen oxides
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N3/00—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust
- F01N3/08—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous
- F01N3/0807—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by using absorbents or adsorbents
- F01N3/0814—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by using absorbents or adsorbents combined with catalytic converters, e.g. NOx absorption/storage reduction catalysts
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N3/00—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust
- F01N3/08—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous
- F01N3/0807—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by using absorbents or adsorbents
- F01N3/0821—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by using absorbents or adsorbents combined with particulate filters
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02B—INTERNAL-COMBUSTION PISTON ENGINES; COMBUSTION ENGINES IN GENERAL
- F02B37/00—Engines characterised by provision of pumps driven at least for part of the time by exhaust
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
- F02D41/02—Circuit arrangements for generating control signals
- F02D41/14—Introducing closed-loop corrections
- F02D41/1401—Introducing closed-loop corrections characterised by the control or regulation method
- F02D2041/1413—Controller structures or design
- F02D2041/1432—Controller structures or design the system including a filter, e.g. a low pass or high pass filter
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
- F02D41/02—Circuit arrangements for generating control signals
- F02D41/14—Introducing closed-loop corrections
- F02D41/1438—Introducing closed-loop corrections using means for determining characteristics of the combustion gases; Sensors therefor
- F02D41/1444—Introducing closed-loop corrections using means for determining characteristics of the combustion gases; Sensors therefor characterised by the characteristics of the combustion gases
- F02D41/1454—Introducing closed-loop corrections using means for determining characteristics of the combustion gases; Sensors therefor characterised by the characteristics of the combustion gases the characteristics being an oxygen content or concentration or the air-fuel ratio
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
- F02D41/02—Circuit arrangements for generating control signals
- F02D41/14—Introducing closed-loop corrections
- F02D41/1438—Introducing closed-loop corrections using means for determining characteristics of the combustion gases; Sensors therefor
- F02D41/1444—Introducing closed-loop corrections using means for determining characteristics of the combustion gases; Sensors therefor characterised by the characteristics of the combustion gases
- F02D41/1454—Introducing closed-loop corrections using means for determining characteristics of the combustion gases; Sensors therefor characterised by the characteristics of the combustion gases the characteristics being an oxygen content or concentration or the air-fuel ratio
- F02D41/1456—Introducing closed-loop corrections using means for determining characteristics of the combustion gases; Sensors therefor characterised by the characteristics of the combustion gases the characteristics being an oxygen content or concentration or the air-fuel ratio with sensor output signal being linear or quasi-linear with the concentration of oxygen
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A50/00—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE in human health protection, e.g. against extreme weather
- Y02A50/20—Air quality improvement or preservation, e.g. vehicle emission control or emission reduction by using catalytic converters
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method and a device for control of the operation of a nitrogen oxides trap for an internal combustion engine running on lean mixture.
- a nitrogen oxides trap continuously captures the nitrogen oxides contained in the exhaust gases produced by the said engine. It is therefore necessary to regenerate the nitrogen oxides trap periodically in order to unburden it, which is achieved by an operation known as purging, during which the nitrogen oxides content is reduced.
- Termination of the purging can be commanded, for example, at the end of a predetermined time after the engine was changed over to running on rich mixture.
- Termination of the purging can be commanded, for example, at the end of a predetermined time after the engine was changed over to running on rich mixture.
- the object of the present invention is to overcome this problem and in particular to provide a method and means with which it is possible, in optimal manner, to command a stop to purging of a catalyst of the nitrogen oxides trap type disposed in the exhaust line of an internal combustion engine that normally runs on lean mixture.
- the object of the invention is a method for control of the operation of a nitrogen oxides trap for an internal combustion engine running on lean mixture, wherein purging of the said nitrogen oxides trap is commanded periodically.
- this method is characterized in that a first oxygen sensor is disposed in the exhaust pipe downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap, and the evolution of a meaningful signal representative of the signal delivered by this sensor is observed, a substantial increase of this meaningful signal from a first plateau of substantially constant level, reached following a variation subsequent to a changeover of the engine from running on lean mixture to running on rich mixture, being used as the indicator to command the end of purging.
- the command to end purging of the nitrogen oxides trap is therefore achieved in response to a notable evolution of the meaningful signal representative of the condition of the oxygen sensor disposed downstream from the trap, this evolution comprising a marked increase of the signal beyond a first plateau reached practically as soon as the beginning of purging and at which the signal had previously substantially stabilized.
- the inventors in fact observed that, under substantially constant conditions upstream from the nitrogen oxides trap during purging, the signal delivered by the oxygen sensor disposed downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap still underwent a meaningful evolution at the moment when the reduction of all stored nitrogen oxides was sufficiently complete.
- lambda sensors normally deliver a signal that is practically binary as a function of whether or not oxygen is being detected.
- Proportional sensors are certainly more suitable for measuring a range of concentrations or progressive variations, but the signal that they are capable of delivering nevertheless varies abruptly if the evolution of the oxygen content is strong and fast.
- the gaseous mixture exiting the nitrogen oxides trap then remains without effect on the sensor while these reactions are occurring, and it is only at the end of the reduction reactions that the reducing agents are then present in excess at the outlet of the nitrogen oxides trap, causing the sensor signal to shoot up, since it is then truly representative of the end of purging.
- the inventors therefore searched for another means of detecting this end of purging. They discovered that, surprisingly, since in particular the lambda sensors are considered to deliver a quasi-binary signal, this signal delivered by an oxygen sensor underwent a new variation starting from a substantially constant plateau at which the arrival of the HC had caused the signal to shoot up as soon as purging began.
- This modification of the concentration of reducing agents downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap influences the signal of oxygen sensors of all-or-nothing type, such as the lambda sensors or the sensors of proportional type, such as the sensors known under the name of UEGO® sensor, which then present a signal in the form of the said second plateau situated at a level higher than the first plateau.
- the oxygen sensors of the lambda type and the oxygen sensors of the proportional type are particularly sensitive to hydrogen present in the exhaust gases, and they exhibit a large variation of their signal when the H2 concentration in the exhaust gases changes and therefore during the shift from the first to the second plateau.
- This particular feature therefore made it possible to take advantage of the variation of the signal from its first plateau to detect the end of purging and consequently to command the engine to return to running on poor mixture, if necessary with a certain time delay after detection of the variation proper.
- a second oxygen sensor disposed upstream from the nitrogen oxides trap, in order to deliver a reference signal relative to which the evolution of the signal delivered by the first sensor is compared in order to deliver the said meaningful signal.
- This reference signal which can be influenced by variations of the operating conditions of the engine independent of those programmed for the purging operation proper, therefore makes it possible, by comparison, to reliably detect the variation that is indicative of the end of the reduction reactions in the nitrogen oxides trap.
- the higher H 2 concentration in the gases downstream than in the gases upstream from the nitrogen oxides trap is manifested by a higher signal for the sensor situated downstream than for the sensor situated upstream when the reduction of the stored nitrogen oxides is sufficiently advanced.
- the signal of the upstream lambda sensor can be at the same level as the signal of the downstream lambda sensor at the second plateau.
- the oxygen sensor or sensors will be chosen from among the sensors of the following type: sensor of lambda type, proportional oxygen sensor, nitrogen oxides detector, in which the capability of measuring the oxygen concentration is used.
- O2 function of the Nox detector denotes the use of the oxygen-concentration measuring function of a nitrogen oxides detector, as indicated in the foregoing.
- the increase of the meaningful signal is detected by applying filtering of the first derivative of the meaningful signal and by comparing the filtered first derivative with a predetermined threshold.
- the increase of the meaningful signal is detected by applying filtering of the second derivative of the meaningful signal and observing the passage of the filtered second derivative through zero in decreasing threshold.
- the increase of the meaningful signal is detected by taking the difference between the instantaneous value of the meaningful signal and a sliding mean of the said signal, and by comparing this difference with a threshold.
- the increase of the meaningful signal, for a lambda sensor is detected by comparing the voltage value delivered by the sensor with a predetermined threshold.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic and partial representation of the gas circuit of the said engine
- FIG. 2 is a graph that shows the curves representative of the signal of different sensors disposed upstream and downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap, and that illustrates the variation of the signal used as indicator of the end of purging.
- FIG. 1 there are schematically represented the elements of the engine through which the gases pass, and there are seen therein, successively in the direction of flow of the gases:
- a first oxygen sensor 21 is mounted downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap, and a second oxygen sensor 22 is mounted upstream from the nitrogen oxides trap, the two sensors being connected to a calculating unit 23 , which itself is connected to an engine-control unit 24 .
- Sensors 21 and 22 are, for example, proportional or lambda sensors.
- the graph of FIG. 2 shows the results of test measurements performed with different types of sensors as a function of the time from initiation of purging.
- the left scale represents the value of the signal delivered by a sensor
- the right scale represents the quantity of CO downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap (for trace 6 ).
- Line 3 represents the signal delivered by a sensor of lambda type disposed downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap. On the line there is clearly seen the upward shoot 31 of the sensor as soon as purging begins, and the first plateau 32 which remains substantially stable during purging, then the marked variation 34 of the signal, representative of the arrival of H 2 at the sensor and is therefore indicative of the end of purging, before the signal restabilizes at a second plateau 33 .
- Line 4 represents the signal delivered by a sensor of proportional type disposed downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap. On the line there is clearly seen the upward shoot 41 of the sensor as soon as purging begins, and the first plateau 42 which remains substantially stable during purging, then the marked variation 44 of the signal, representative of the arrival of H 2 at the sensor and is therefore indicative of the end of purging, before the signal restabilizes at a second plateau 43 .
- line 5 represents the signal delivered by a sensor of proportional type disposed upstream from the nitrogen oxides trap. It is clearly seen that this signal also undergoes an abrupt rise 51 at the moment of initiation of purging, due to the influx of reducing agents in the exhaust gases. In contrast, the signal then remains constant on a plateau 52 , as long as the engine is maintained under constant conditions of running on rich mixture. In the event of any perturbation whatsoever of these conditions during purging, that perturbation will correspondingly affect both the upstream sensor and the sensor situated downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap, and it will be possible to use this signal delivered by the upstream sensor as a reference for evaluating, by comparison, the variations of the signal of the downstream sensor, truly indicative of the end of purging.
- plateau 42 is situated below plateau 52 , the difference corresponding to the fraction of the reducing agents used to reduce the nitrogen oxides stored in the filter.
- the signal of the downstream sensor shifts above that of the upstream sensor, clearly illustrating the arrival at the sensor of the hydrogen formed in the nitrogen oxides trap by the aforesaid reaction mechanism.
- the line 7 which represents the filtered first derivative of the signal, and illustrates the possibility of detecting the end of purging by comparing this signal with a predetermined threshold, crossed by the said derivative during its abrupt increase 71 , corresponding to the increase of the slope of the signal obtained from the sensor.
- the invention is not limited to the examples described hereinabove. It is intended more particularly for diesel engines, but it could also be applied in general to all engines that normally run on lean mixture.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Toxicology (AREA)
- Exhaust Gas After Treatment (AREA)
- Electrical Control Of Air Or Fuel Supplied To Internal-Combustion Engine (AREA)
Abstract
A method in which a first oxygen sensor is disposed on an exhaust pipe upstream from a nitrogen oxide trap, and development of a meaningful signal representative of the signal supplied by the sensor is monitored. A substantial increase of the meaningful signal, which is obtained following a variation resulting from a motor being switched from running on a lean mixture to running on a rich mixture, from a first plate having an essentially constant level is used as an indicator to control an end of a purge process. The method can be applied to diesel engines.
Description
- The present invention relates to a method and a device for control of the operation of a nitrogen oxides trap for an internal combustion engine running on lean mixture.
- More particularly, it is intended for diesel engines, or in general for engines whose operation takes place under conditions of emission of exhaust gas with relatively low richness.
- The use of catalysts of the nitrogen oxides trap type, also commonly known as “Nox Trap”, is already known in diesel engines. It corresponds to the desire to avoid discharge of nitrogen oxides in the exhaust gases, since the emission of nitrogen oxides at the engine outlet is increasing with the current attempts to run the engines on lean mixture, that is under conditions of excess oxygen relative to the fuel and therefore excess air. In other words, in this type of operation with lean mixture, the richness at the intake is lower than 1, the value corresponding to a stoichiometric mixture.
- During operation of the engine, a nitrogen oxides trap continuously captures the nitrogen oxides contained in the exhaust gases produced by the said engine. It is therefore necessary to regenerate the nitrogen oxides trap periodically in order to unburden it, which is achieved by an operation known as purging, during which the nitrogen oxides content is reduced. It is known to perform this purging periodically, temporarily commanding the richness of the engine to be increased, in such a way that the richness of the exhaust gases upstream from the nitrogen oxides trap is greater than 1 and that the oxygen concentration is low, that is, such that the engine generates reducing agents such as HC, CO and H2, capable of reducing the nitrogen oxides stored on the substrate of the trap, by means of the following reactions:
NO2+2 H2->½N2+2 H2O
NO2+2 CO->½N2+2 CO2
(m/4+n)NO2+CnHm->(m/8+n/2)N2+n CO2+m/2 H2O - Termination of the purging can be commanded, for example, at the end of a predetermined time after the engine was changed over to running on rich mixture. However, that does not make any allowance for the real burden of the nitrogen oxides trap, and there is the risk that either purging will be incomplete or that the phase of running on rich mixture will be impractically long.
- The object of the present invention is to overcome this problem and in particular to provide a method and means with which it is possible, in optimal manner, to command a stop to purging of a catalyst of the nitrogen oxides trap type disposed in the exhaust line of an internal combustion engine that normally runs on lean mixture.
- With these objectives in mind, the object of the invention is a method for control of the operation of a nitrogen oxides trap for an internal combustion engine running on lean mixture, wherein purging of the said nitrogen oxides trap is commanded periodically.
- According to the invention, this method is characterized in that a first oxygen sensor is disposed in the exhaust pipe downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap, and the evolution of a meaningful signal representative of the signal delivered by this sensor is observed, a substantial increase of this meaningful signal from a first plateau of substantially constant level, reached following a variation subsequent to a changeover of the engine from running on lean mixture to running on rich mixture, being used as the indicator to command the end of purging.
- In the method according to the invention, the command to end purging of the nitrogen oxides trap is therefore achieved in response to a notable evolution of the meaningful signal representative of the condition of the oxygen sensor disposed downstream from the trap, this evolution comprising a marked increase of the signal beyond a first plateau reached practically as soon as the beginning of purging and at which the signal had previously substantially stabilized. The inventors in fact observed that, under substantially constant conditions upstream from the nitrogen oxides trap during purging, the signal delivered by the oxygen sensor disposed downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap still underwent a meaningful evolution at the moment when the reduction of all stored nitrogen oxides was sufficiently complete.
- One difficulty encountered was actually that, in the case of engines running on lean mixture, such as diesel engines, the signal of an oxygen sensor disposed downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap shoots up almost immediately, as soon as purging is initiated, and that therefore this premature upward shoot obviously could not be used to indicate the end of reduction of the nitrogen oxides stored in the nitrogen oxides trap.
- It is recalled here that lambda sensors normally deliver a signal that is practically binary as a function of whether or not oxygen is being detected. Proportional sensors are certainly more suitable for measuring a range of concentrations or progressive variations, but the signal that they are capable of delivering nevertheless varies abruptly if the evolution of the oxygen content is strong and fast.
- For engines running on lean mixture, the initiation of purging, which takes place by changeover to a substantially richer mode of operation in order to provide reducing elements capable of reacting with the stored nitrogen oxides, leads to a large excess of HC in the gases passing through the nitrogen oxides trap and arriving immediately at the downstream sensor, which itself reacts almost immediately by reaching saturation.
- It was known beforehand, in the case of a gasoline engine running on lean mixture, that the upward shoot of the signal of the sensor indicated the disappearance of oxygen at the outlet of the nitrogen oxides trap, which therefore could be interpreted as the end of purging, that is, the arrival again of a reducing mixture at the sensor, whereas previously, during purging, the reducing agents originating from the engine were being consumed by the reduction reactions used for purging. In fact, in this case, the proportion of CO to HC in the exhaust gases is relatively high, but, since the reducing power of CO is much stronger than that of HC, a kind of equilibrium is established between the aforesaid reduction reactions, leading to a substantially equivalent participation of all reducing agents delivered by the engine in purging of the nitrogen oxides trap. As a result, the gaseous mixture exiting the nitrogen oxides trap then remains without effect on the sensor while these reactions are occurring, and it is only at the end of the reduction reactions that the reducing agents are then present in excess at the outlet of the nitrogen oxides trap, causing the sensor signal to shoot up, since it is then truly representative of the end of purging.
- In contrast to the foregoing, it became apparent to the inventors that, in the case of the engines considered by the present invention, operating with a richness on the order of 1 to 1.1, the upward shoot of the signal takes place almost as soon as purging begins following the relatively massive arrival of HC at the sensor disposed downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap. An explanation of this phenomenon, which does not occur in the case of operation with greater richness, such as 1.2 to 1.4, appears to lie in the fact that the HC/CO ratio is higher in the exhaust gases in the case of operation with lower richness. In fact, the evolution of CO content as a function of richness is exponential, while it is linear for HC. Now, since the reducing power of H2 and of CO is greater than that of HC, the purging reactions will therefore take place preferentially with these H2 and CO reducing agents but, because of the relative excess of HC, the equilibrium of reactions mentioned in the foregoing no longer is established, thus leading to the presence of unreacted HC at the outlet of the nitrogen oxides trap practically as soon as purging begins. The variation of the signal delivered by the sensor therefore no longer is indicative of the total reduction of the nitrogen oxides contained in the nitrogen oxides trap, but to the contrary is evident as soon as purging begins.
- The inventors therefore searched for another means of detecting this end of purging. They discovered that, surprisingly, since in particular the lambda sensors are considered to deliver a quasi-binary signal, this signal delivered by an oxygen sensor underwent a new variation starting from a substantially constant plateau at which the arrival of the HC had caused the signal to shoot up as soon as purging began.
- An analysis of this phenomenon led to the observation that, after the signal arrived in this way at the level of the first plateau and was maintained there during purging as long as the aforesaid reduction reactions did not treat the majority of the nitrogen oxides stored on the catalyst substrate of the nitrogen oxides trap, this signal shifted to a second plateau of higher level, substantially at the moment of the end of the said reduction reactions, and then remained at this level as long as the engine continued to run on rich mixture. The inventors then imagined taking advantage of this evolution of the shift of the signal from the first to the second plateau as an indicator of the end of purging and thus for commanding automatically the return to running the engine on normal mixture, that is, on lean mixture.
- One explanation of this phenomenon is that, during the purging phase, the quantity of hydrogen downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap is close to zero, because the hydrogen upstream is consumed almost completely by the catalytic reactions, the reducing power of H2 being predominant, as already indicated hereinabove. When the reduction reactions are terminated by virtue of the small residual quantity of nitrogen oxides stored in the nitrogen oxides trap, the HC, CO and H2 reducing agents will be found in increasing concentration downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap and simultaneously will favor the formation of H2 within the nitrogen oxides trap via various mechanisms, including in particular:
H2O+CO->H2+CO2 - This formation of H2 was measured by gas-phase chromatography and continuous mass spectrometry.
- This modification of the concentration of reducing agents downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap influences the signal of oxygen sensors of all-or-nothing type, such as the lambda sensors or the sensors of proportional type, such as the sensors known under the name of UEGO® sensor, which then present a signal in the form of the said second plateau situated at a level higher than the first plateau. The oxygen sensors of the lambda type and the oxygen sensors of the proportional type are particularly sensitive to hydrogen present in the exhaust gases, and they exhibit a large variation of their signal when the H2 concentration in the exhaust gases changes and therefore during the shift from the first to the second plateau.
- This particular feature therefore made it possible to take advantage of the variation of the signal from its first plateau to detect the end of purging and consequently to command the engine to return to running on poor mixture, if necessary with a certain time delay after detection of the variation proper.
- According to a particular arrangement of the invention, there is additionally used a second oxygen sensor disposed upstream from the nitrogen oxides trap, in order to deliver a reference signal relative to which the evolution of the signal delivered by the first sensor is compared in order to deliver the said meaningful signal. The use of this reference signal, which can be influenced by variations of the operating conditions of the engine independent of those programmed for the purging operation proper, therefore makes it possible, by comparison, to reliably detect the variation that is indicative of the end of the reduction reactions in the nitrogen oxides trap.
- In addition, with oxygen sensors of the same type upstream and downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap, for example two lambda sensors or two proportional sensors, the sensitive element of which is temperature-controlled or else the signal of which is corrected as a function of the temperature of the sensitive element, the higher H2 concentration in the gases downstream than in the gases upstream from the nitrogen oxides trap is manifested by a higher signal for the sensor situated downstream than for the sensor situated upstream when the reduction of the stored nitrogen oxides is sufficiently advanced.
- As a function of the H2 concentration upstream, and in the case in which two lambda sensors are used, the signal of the upstream lambda sensor can be at the same level as the signal of the downstream lambda sensor at the second plateau.
- Traditionally, the oxygen sensor or sensors will be chosen from among the sensors of the following type: sensor of lambda type, proportional oxygen sensor, nitrogen oxides detector, in which the capability of measuring the oxygen concentration is used.
- In the case of use of a sensor upstream and of a sensor downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap, it will also be possible for the two sensors to be of different types, and particular, it will then be possible to use, for the purposes of the invention, sensors that may already be installed in the exhaust line to perform other functions. In particular, it will be possible to use the different combinations listed in the following table.
Upstream sensor Downstream sensor Proportional sensor Lambda sensor Proportional sensor O2 function of the Nox detector Lambda sensor Proportional sensor Lambda sensor O2 function of the Nox detector O2 function of the Nox detector Lambda sensor O2 function of the Nox detector Proportional sensor - where “O2 function of the Nox detector” denotes the use of the oxygen-concentration measuring function of a nitrogen oxides detector, as indicated in the foregoing.
- When two oxygen sensors of different nature are used, it is necessary either to introduce a transfer function between the sensor signals (taking into account any differences in response times) or to use cells equivalent to that of the lambda sensor.
- According to a first embodiment, the increase of the meaningful signal is detected by applying filtering of the first derivative of the meaningful signal and by comparing the filtered first derivative with a predetermined threshold.
- According to a second embodiment, the increase of the meaningful signal is detected by applying filtering of the second derivative of the meaningful signal and observing the passage of the filtered second derivative through zero in decreasing threshold.
- According to a third embodiment, the increase of the meaningful signal is detected by taking the difference between the instantaneous value of the meaningful signal and a sliding mean of the said signal, and by comparing this difference with a threshold.
- According to a fourth embodiment, the increase of the meaningful signal, for a lambda sensor, is detected by comparing the voltage value delivered by the sensor with a predetermined threshold.
- A practical example of the invention will now be described for a diesel engine.
- Reference will be made to the attached drawings, wherein:
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic and partial representation of the gas circuit of the said engine, -
FIG. 2 is a graph that shows the curves representative of the signal of different sensors disposed upstream and downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap, and that illustrates the variation of the signal used as indicator of the end of purging. - On
FIG. 1 there are schematically represented the elements of the engine through which the gases pass, and there are seen therein, successively in the direction of flow of the gases: -
-
inlet 11 for air arriving from the air filter, -
suction part 12 of a turbocompressor, -
intake manifold 13, - the upper part of
cylinder 14, equipped with aninjector 15, -
exhaust tubes 16 and theexhaust part 17 of the turbocompressor, -
nitrogen oxides trap 18, - the exhaust line, equipped with a
particle filter 19.
-
- A
first oxygen sensor 21 is mounted downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap, and asecond oxygen sensor 22 is mounted upstream from the nitrogen oxides trap, the two sensors being connected to a calculatingunit 23, which itself is connected to an engine-control unit 24. -
Sensors - The graph of
FIG. 2 shows the results of test measurements performed with different types of sensors as a function of the time from initiation of purging. On the ordinate, the left scale represents the value of the signal delivered by a sensor, and the right scale represents the quantity of CO downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap (for trace 6). -
Line 3 represents the signal delivered by a sensor of lambda type disposed downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap. On the line there is clearly seen the upward shoot 31 of the sensor as soon as purging begins, and thefirst plateau 32 which remains substantially stable during purging, then themarked variation 34 of the signal, representative of the arrival of H2 at the sensor and is therefore indicative of the end of purging, before the signal restabilizes at asecond plateau 33. - Line 4 represents the signal delivered by a sensor of proportional type disposed downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap. On the line there is clearly seen the upward shoot 41 of the sensor as soon as purging begins, and the first plateau 42 which remains substantially stable during purging, then the marked variation 44 of the signal, representative of the arrival of H2 at the sensor and is therefore indicative of the end of purging, before the signal restabilizes at a
second plateau 43. - In comparison, line 5 represents the signal delivered by a sensor of proportional type disposed upstream from the nitrogen oxides trap. It is clearly seen that this signal also undergoes an abrupt rise 51 at the moment of initiation of purging, due to the influx of reducing agents in the exhaust gases. In contrast, the signal then remains constant on a plateau 52, as long as the engine is maintained under constant conditions of running on rich mixture. In the event of any perturbation whatsoever of these conditions during purging, that perturbation will correspondingly affect both the upstream sensor and the sensor situated downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap, and it will be possible to use this signal delivered by the upstream sensor as a reference for evaluating, by comparison, the variations of the signal of the downstream sensor, truly indicative of the end of purging.
- It will also be noted that the level of plateau 42 is situated below plateau 52, the difference corresponding to the fraction of the reducing agents used to reduce the nitrogen oxides stored in the filter. In contrast, when purging is terminated, the signal of the downstream sensor shifts above that of the upstream sensor, clearly illustrating the arrival at the sensor of the hydrogen formed in the nitrogen oxides trap by the aforesaid reaction mechanism.
- On this graph there was also represented a line 6 representing the evolution of the CO content downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap, measured in experimental manner, and the evolution of which, marked by the strong increase 61 at the moment when the sensor signals shift from the first to the second plateau, clearly corroborates the end of consumption of the said CO for reducing the nitrogen oxides stored in the nitrogen oxides trap, and therefore the advanced disappearance thereof.
- As an example of how the signal obtained from the sensors is processed, there was also represented in the graph the line 7, which represents the filtered first derivative of the signal, and illustrates the possibility of detecting the end of purging by comparing this signal with a predetermined threshold, crossed by the said derivative during its abrupt increase 71, corresponding to the increase of the slope of the signal obtained from the sensor.
- Similarly, there was also represented the line 8, which represents the second derivative, whose passage through zero in decreasing threshold 81 can also be used as information indicative of the end of purging.
- The invention is not limited to the examples described hereinabove. It is intended more particularly for diesel engines, but it could also be applied in general to all engines that normally run on lean mixture.
Claims (16)
1-10. (canceled)
11. A method for control of operation of a nitrogen oxides trap for an internal combustion engine running on a lean mixture, wherein purging of the nitrogen oxides trap is commanded periodically, and a first oxygen sensor is disposed in an exhaust pipe downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap, the method comprising:
observing evolution of a meaningful signal representative of a signal delivered by the first oxygen sensor;
using an increase of the meaningful signal from a first plateau of substantially constant level, reached following a variation subsequent to a changeover of the engine from running on a lean mixture to running on a rich mixture, as an indicator to command an end of purging.
12. A method according to claim 11 , wherein a second oxygen sensor disposed upstream from the nitrogen oxides trap is additionally used to deliver a reference signal, relative to which the evolution of the signal delivered by the first oxygen sensor is compared to deliver the meaningful signal.
13. A method according to claim 11 , wherein the increase of the meaningful signal is detected by applying filtering of a first derivative of the meaningful signal and by comparing the filtered first derivative with a predetermined threshold.
14. A method according to claim 12 , wherein the increase of the meaningful signal is detected by applying filtering of a first derivative of the meaningful signal and by comparing the filtered first derivative with a predetermined threshold.
15. A method according to claim 11 , wherein the increase of the meaningful signal is detected by applying filtering of a second derivative of the meaningful signal and observing passage of the filtered second derivative through zero in decreasing threshold.
16. A method according to claim 12 , wherein the increase of the meaningful signal is detected by applying filtering of a second derivative of the meaningful signal and observing passage of the filtered second derivative through zero in decreasing threshold.
17. A method according to claim 11 , wherein the increase of the meaningful signal is detected by taking a difference between an instantaneous value of the meaningful signal and a sliding mean of the meaningful signal, and by comparing the difference with a threshold.
18. A method according to claim 12 , wherein the increase of the meaningful signal is detected by taking a difference between an instantaneous value of the meaningful signal and a sliding mean of the meaningful signal, and by comparing the difference with a threshold.
19. A method according to claim 11 , wherein the increase of the meaningful signal, for a lambda sensor, is detected by comparing a voltage value delivered by the first oxygen sensor with a predetermined threshold.
20. A method according to claim 12 , wherein the increase of the meaningful signal, for a lambda sensor, is detected by comparing a voltage value delivered by the first oxygen sensor with a predetermined threshold.
21. A method according to claim 11 , wherein the first oxygen sensor is chosen from among sensors of a sensor of lambda type, proportional oxygen sensor, nitrogen oxides detector, in which the oxygen-concentration measuring function is used.
22. A method according to claim 12 , wherein the first oxygen sensor is chosen from among sensors of a sensor of lambda type, proportional oxygen sensor, nitrogen oxides detector, in which the oxygen-concentration measuring function is used.
23. A method according to claim 22 , wherein the first and second oxygen sensors are of different types.
24. A device for control of an operation of a nitrogen oxides trap for an internal combustion engine running on a lean mixture, for use of the method according to claim 11 , the engine being equipped with an exhaust line containing a nitrogen oxides trap, the device comprising:
a first oxygen sensor disposed on an exhaust line downstream from the nitrogen oxides trap; and
calculating means for determining an increase of a meaningful signal representative of the signal delivered by the first oxygen sensor from a first plateau of substantially constant level, reached following initiation of a purging operation, and using the increase as an indicator to command an end of purging.
25. A device according to claim 24 , further comprising a second oxygen sensor disposed upstream from the nitrogen oxides trap and connected to the calculating means to deliver a reference signal thereto.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR0209712A FR2843044B1 (en) | 2002-07-31 | 2002-07-31 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MANAGING THE OPERATION OF A NITROGEN OXIDE TRAP FOR AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE OPERATING IN A POOR MIXTURE. |
FR02/09712 | 2002-07-31 | ||
PCT/FR2003/002421 WO2004012846A2 (en) | 2002-07-31 | 2003-07-30 | Method and device for controlling the functioning of a nitrogen oxide trap for an internal combustion engine running on a lean mixture |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060117738A1 true US20060117738A1 (en) | 2006-06-08 |
Family
ID=30129564
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/522,724 Abandoned US20060117738A1 (en) | 2002-07-31 | 2003-07-30 | Method and device for controlling the functioning of a nitrogen oxide trap for an internal combustion engine running on a lean mixture |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20060117738A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1525045A2 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2005534855A (en) |
KR (1) | KR20050030965A (en) |
AU (1) | AU2003281833A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2493529A1 (en) |
FR (1) | FR2843044B1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2004012846A2 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7603845B2 (en) | 2004-06-17 | 2009-10-20 | Renault S.A.S. | Method and device for managing the operation of a nitrogen oxide trap, and diagnosing its ageing condition |
US20110112745A1 (en) * | 2008-04-04 | 2011-05-12 | Renault S.A.S. | System and method for controlling the fresh air and burnt gases introduced into an internal combustion engine during transitions between the purging of a nitrogen oxides trap and the regeneration of a particulate filter |
US20150027106A1 (en) * | 2013-07-29 | 2015-01-29 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Control apparatus for operating an internal combustion engine |
WO2016146907A1 (en) * | 2015-03-17 | 2016-09-22 | Peugeot Citroen Automobiles Sa | Method for purging or charging oxygen of a catalyst installed in the flow of an engine |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2876736B1 (en) * | 2004-10-18 | 2007-01-19 | Renault Sas | METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A NITROGEN OXIDE TRAP OF AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5970707A (en) * | 1997-09-19 | 1999-10-26 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Exhaust gas purification device for an internal combustion engine |
US6171565B1 (en) * | 1998-01-10 | 2001-01-09 | Degussa-Huls Aktiengesellschaft | Process for the operation of a nitrogen oxides storage catalyst |
US6324834B1 (en) * | 1997-12-15 | 2001-12-04 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Running of an internal combustion engine in conjunction with an NOx-accumulator catalytic converter |
US6408615B1 (en) * | 1998-02-27 | 2002-06-25 | Volkswagen Ag | Method for controlling an NOx accumulating catalytic converter |
US6438944B1 (en) * | 2000-03-17 | 2002-08-27 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for optimizing purge fuel for purging emissions control device |
US6502388B2 (en) * | 2000-02-23 | 2003-01-07 | Hitachi Ltd. | Engine exhaust gas cleaning system |
US6588251B2 (en) * | 1998-06-29 | 2003-07-08 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for checking the dynamic behavior of a measuring sensor in the exhaust tract of an internal combustion engine |
US6862880B2 (en) * | 2000-07-21 | 2005-03-08 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method for operating a catalyst |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1998055742A1 (en) * | 1997-06-03 | 1998-12-10 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | PROCESS FOR REGENERATING AN NOx ACCUMULATOR CATALYTIC CONVERTER |
DE19844082C1 (en) * | 1998-09-25 | 1999-10-14 | Siemens Ag | Regeneration of a nitrogen oxides storage catalyst used with lean burn engine |
DE10057936A1 (en) * | 2000-11-22 | 2002-05-23 | Volkswagen Ag | Regenerating nitrogen oxides storage catalyst in exhaust gas channel of lean-burn I.C. engine involves using extrapolated oxygen-dependent signal |
DE10057938A1 (en) * | 2000-11-22 | 2002-05-23 | Volkswagen Ag | Regenerating nitrogen oxides storage catalyst in I.C. engine involves extrapolating oxygen-dependent signal from oxygen-sensitive measuring device |
-
2002
- 2002-07-31 FR FR0209712A patent/FR2843044B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2003
- 2003-07-30 JP JP2004525500A patent/JP2005534855A/en active Pending
- 2003-07-30 US US10/522,724 patent/US20060117738A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-07-30 AU AU2003281833A patent/AU2003281833A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-07-30 KR KR1020057001684A patent/KR20050030965A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2003-07-30 WO PCT/FR2003/002421 patent/WO2004012846A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2003-07-30 CA CA002493529A patent/CA2493529A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-07-30 EP EP03756518A patent/EP1525045A2/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5970707A (en) * | 1997-09-19 | 1999-10-26 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Exhaust gas purification device for an internal combustion engine |
US6324834B1 (en) * | 1997-12-15 | 2001-12-04 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Running of an internal combustion engine in conjunction with an NOx-accumulator catalytic converter |
US6171565B1 (en) * | 1998-01-10 | 2001-01-09 | Degussa-Huls Aktiengesellschaft | Process for the operation of a nitrogen oxides storage catalyst |
US6408615B1 (en) * | 1998-02-27 | 2002-06-25 | Volkswagen Ag | Method for controlling an NOx accumulating catalytic converter |
US6588251B2 (en) * | 1998-06-29 | 2003-07-08 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for checking the dynamic behavior of a measuring sensor in the exhaust tract of an internal combustion engine |
US6502388B2 (en) * | 2000-02-23 | 2003-01-07 | Hitachi Ltd. | Engine exhaust gas cleaning system |
US6438944B1 (en) * | 2000-03-17 | 2002-08-27 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for optimizing purge fuel for purging emissions control device |
US6862880B2 (en) * | 2000-07-21 | 2005-03-08 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method for operating a catalyst |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7603845B2 (en) | 2004-06-17 | 2009-10-20 | Renault S.A.S. | Method and device for managing the operation of a nitrogen oxide trap, and diagnosing its ageing condition |
US20110112745A1 (en) * | 2008-04-04 | 2011-05-12 | Renault S.A.S. | System and method for controlling the fresh air and burnt gases introduced into an internal combustion engine during transitions between the purging of a nitrogen oxides trap and the regeneration of a particulate filter |
US8589054B2 (en) * | 2008-04-04 | 2013-11-19 | Renault S.A.S. | System and method for controlling the fresh air and burnt gases introduced into an internal combustion engine during transitions between the purging of a nitrogen oxides trap and the regeneration of a particulate filter |
US20150027106A1 (en) * | 2013-07-29 | 2015-01-29 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Control apparatus for operating an internal combustion engine |
WO2016146907A1 (en) * | 2015-03-17 | 2016-09-22 | Peugeot Citroen Automobiles Sa | Method for purging or charging oxygen of a catalyst installed in the flow of an engine |
FR3033832A1 (en) * | 2015-03-17 | 2016-09-23 | Peugeot Citroen Automobiles Sa | PROCESS FOR PURGING OR LOADING OXYGEN FROM A CATALYST INSTALLED IN THE FLOW OF AN ENGINE |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2004012846A2 (en) | 2004-02-12 |
AU2003281833A1 (en) | 2004-02-23 |
KR20050030965A (en) | 2005-03-31 |
JP2005534855A (en) | 2005-11-17 |
CA2493529A1 (en) | 2004-02-12 |
WO2004012846A3 (en) | 2004-04-08 |
EP1525045A2 (en) | 2005-04-27 |
FR2843044B1 (en) | 2005-04-08 |
AU2003281833A8 (en) | 2004-02-23 |
FR2843044A1 (en) | 2004-02-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
KR100734194B1 (en) | Exhaust gas control apparatus and exhaust gas control method for internal combustion engine | |
US7134274B2 (en) | Exhaust gas control apparatus for internal combustion engine | |
US7793489B2 (en) | Fuel control for robust detection of catalytic converter oxygen storage capacity | |
US7168237B2 (en) | Deterioration diagnosing device and diagnosing method for exhaust gas purification catalyst | |
CN100532797C (en) | Exhaust control device for internal combustion engine and method | |
US20090199543A1 (en) | Catalyst monitoring system and monitoring method | |
US6195987B1 (en) | Exhaust gas purifying apparatus of internal combustion engine | |
US20100146936A1 (en) | Catalyst Deterioration Detection Device | |
US6301882B1 (en) | Exhaust gas purification control apparatus of engine | |
JP3759567B2 (en) | Catalyst degradation state detection device | |
US6802181B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for monitoring catalyst efficiency and secondary air injection | |
JP2008175173A (en) | Air-fuel ratio control device | |
US6546719B2 (en) | Air-fuel ratio control apparatus of internal combustion engine | |
US20060117738A1 (en) | Method and device for controlling the functioning of a nitrogen oxide trap for an internal combustion engine running on a lean mixture | |
JP3988073B2 (en) | Abnormality diagnosis device for exhaust gas sensor | |
JP4075486B2 (en) | Degradation judgment method and apparatus for gas sensor | |
US11828243B2 (en) | Exhaust gas control apparatus and exhaust gas control method for internal combustion engine | |
US7230210B2 (en) | Method for controlling the operation of a probe | |
JP3198770B2 (en) | Catalyst deterioration determination device for internal combustion engine | |
JP2007071111A (en) | Fuel property determining device for internal combustion engine | |
JPH05321642A (en) | Catalyst deterioration detecting device | |
JPH0610737A (en) | Air-fuel ratio control device for engine | |
JP2002097937A (en) | Exhaust emission control device for internal combustion engine |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: RENAULT S.A.S., FRANCE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:COCHET, STEPHANE;DIONNET, BERNARD;DANEAU, MARC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:016920/0689 Effective date: 20050305 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |