US20050130254A1 - Drug testing system with bio-artificial liver - Google Patents

Drug testing system with bio-artificial liver Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050130254A1
US20050130254A1 US10/738,905 US73890503A US2005130254A1 US 20050130254 A1 US20050130254 A1 US 20050130254A1 US 73890503 A US73890503 A US 73890503A US 2005130254 A1 US2005130254 A1 US 2005130254A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
chamber
liver slices
liver
slices
gas
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/738,905
Inventor
Sung-soo Park
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
HepaHope Inc
Original Assignee
HepaHope Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to US10/738,905 priority Critical patent/US20050130254A1/en
Application filed by HepaHope Inc filed Critical HepaHope Inc
Priority to AU2004303755A priority patent/AU2004303755A1/en
Priority to EP04753322A priority patent/EP1697496A4/en
Priority to CA002549904A priority patent/CA2549904A1/en
Priority to PCT/US2004/016477 priority patent/WO2005061694A1/en
Priority to KR1020067014294A priority patent/KR20060127880A/en
Priority to JP2006545312A priority patent/JP2007513638A/en
Priority to BRPI0418051A priority patent/BRPI0418051A2/en
Priority to CNA2004800374790A priority patent/CN1894396A/en
Assigned to HEPAHOPE, INC. reassignment HEPAHOPE, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: PARK, SUNG-SOO
Publication of US20050130254A1 publication Critical patent/US20050130254A1/en
Priority to US11/210,511 priority patent/US7829325B2/en
Priority to IL176256A priority patent/IL176256A0/en
Priority to ZA200605435A priority patent/ZA200605435B/en
Priority to CNA2006800349228A priority patent/CN101268364A/en
Priority to CNA200680034950XA priority patent/CN101268365A/en
Priority to ZA200801829A priority patent/ZA200801829B/en
Priority to US12/717,063 priority patent/US20100159503A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12MAPPARATUS FOR ENZYMOLOGY OR MICROBIOLOGY; APPARATUS FOR CULTURING MICROORGANISMS FOR PRODUCING BIOMASS, FOR GROWING CELLS OR FOR OBTAINING FERMENTATION OR METABOLIC PRODUCTS, i.e. BIOREACTORS OR FERMENTERS
    • C12M41/00Means for regulation, monitoring, measurement or control, e.g. flow regulation
    • C12M41/46Means for regulation, monitoring, measurement or control, e.g. flow regulation of cellular or enzymatic activity or functionality, e.g. cell viability
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/5005Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
    • G01N33/5008Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics
    • G01N33/5014Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics for testing toxicity
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/5005Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
    • G01N33/5008Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics
    • G01N33/5082Supracellular entities, e.g. tissue, organisms

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a drug testing system with a biological artificial liver and, more particularly, a bioreactor for evaluation, detection and testing of drug candidates, drugs and drug metabolites.
  • liver damage is of great concern.
  • Conventional in vivo and in vitro tests utilizing small animals and cell culture techniques are therefore widely used to assess liver function in drug development.
  • these conventional tests have particular disadvantages, such as individual variation, high costs to use large animals, and loss of naturally existing characteristics of liver in situ.
  • Bioartificial liver devices are currently being developed. It is believed that hepatic function can only be replaced with the biological substrate, that is, liver cells or a whole liver specimen, which requires the availability of liver tissue from xenogenic or human sources.
  • the mechanical component of these hybrid devices serves both to remove toxins and to create a barrier between the patient's serum and the biologic component of the liver support device.
  • the biologic component of these hybrid liver support devices may consist of liver slices, granulated liver, or hepatocytes from low-grade tumor cells or porcine hepatocytes. These biologic components are housed within chambers often referred to as bioreactors.
  • bioreactors are housed within chambers often referred to as bioreactors.
  • problems remain with respect to maintaining the functionality of the individual cell lines used in these devices. Most devices use immortalized cell lines. It has been found that over time these cells lose specific functions.
  • Circe Biomedical (Lexington, Mass.), Vitagen (La Jolla, Calif.), Excorp Medical (Oakdale, Minn.), and Algenix (Shoreview, Minn.).
  • the Circe Biomedical device integrates viable liver cells with biocompatible membranes into an extracorporeal, bioartificial liver assist system.
  • Vitagen's ELAD® Extracorporeal Liver Assist Device
  • Artificial Liver is a two-chambered hollow-fiber cartridge containing a cultured human liver cell line (C3A). The cartridge contains a semipermeable membrane with a characterized molecular weight cutoff.
  • This membrane allows for physical compartmentalization of the cultured human cell line and the patient's ultrafiltrate.
  • Algenix provides a system in which an external liver support system uses porcine liver cells. Individual porcine hepatocytes pass through a membrane to process the human blood cells.
  • Excorp Medical's device contains a hollow fiber membrane (with 100 kDa cutoff) bioreactor that separates the patient's blood from approximately 100 grams of primary porcine hepatocytes that have been harvested from purpose-raised, pathogen-free pigs. Blood passes though a cylinder filled with hollow polymer fibers and a suspension containing billions of pig liver cells. The fibers act as a barrier to prevent proteins and cell byproducts of the pig cells from directly contacting the patient's blood but allow the necessary contact between the cells so that the toxins in the blood can be removed.
  • the present invention provides a system for testing a potential drug candidate for toxicity.
  • the system has a liver-slice culture apparatus made up of a chamber having a medium inlet and a gas valve, a plurality of animal liver slices positioned securely within the chamber so as to maximize the surface area of the liver slices exposed to the medium, means for selectively supplying and removing a medium in the chamber so that the medium in the chamber comes into contact with the liver slices, and is removed from contact with the liver slices, and a reservoir for containing the medium as it enters and exits the chamber.
  • the animal liver slices are cultured in an environment of an oxygenated gas under the supply of the medium at regular intervals so that said slices are exposed alternately to the medium and to the gas.
  • the toxicity of the potential drug candidate can be determined by observing the effectiveness of the liver slices to metabolize a compound in the presence of the potential drug candidate.
  • the system has a mesh at least partially surrounding the animal liver slices so as to form a space and to retain the slices within this space.
  • the mesh is approximately vertical in the chamber. Additional embodiments have two meshes at least partially surrounding the liver slices.
  • the invention also provides methods for evaluating the toxicity of a drug.
  • the methods involve supplying a culture medium, contacting the culture medium with animal liver slices, where the animal liver slices are positioned securely in a chamber so as to maximize the surface area of liver slices exposed to the culture medium.
  • the chamber has a plasma inlet and a gas valve, means for selectively supplying and removing plasma in the chamber so that the plasma in the chamber comes into contact with the liver slices, and is removed from contact with the liver slices, means for supplying a gas to the chamber, and a reservoir for containing plasma as it enters and exits the chamber.
  • the method further involves contacting the liver slices with a gas mixture of oxygen and carbon dioxide, exposing the liver slices alternately to plasma and the gas mixture of oxygen and carbon dioxide gas, and exposing the liver slices to the drug to be tested.
  • the toxicity of the drug can be determined by observing the effectiveness of the liver slices to metabolize a compound in the presence of the drug.
  • the compound to be metabolized can be selected from the group consisting of ammonia and lidocaine.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the system of the present invention
  • FIG. 2A is a side sectional view of the liver-slice arrangement of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2B is a perspective view of the liver-slice arrangement of FIG. 2A ;
  • FIG. 3A is a graphical representation of in vitro lidocaine clearance with continuous and intermittent perfusion using the bioartificial liver system of the present invention
  • FIG. 3B is a graphical representation of in vitro lidocaine clearance with a 6 hour and a 24 hour run using the bioartificial liver system of the present invention
  • FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of in vitro DMX concentration with a 6 hour and a 24 hour run using the bioartificial liver system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of in vitro ammonia clearance with a 6 hour and a 24 hour run using the bioartificial liver system of the present invention.
  • the objective during the pre-clinical drug development stage is for a pharmaceutical company to show that the compound is reasonably safe for use in the next phase, which is small-scale clinical studies.
  • the compound's toxic and pharmacologic effects are realized through in vivo and in vitro animal testing.
  • the FDA will ask the pharmaceutical company to: (1) develop a pharmacologic profile of the drug; (2) determine the acute toxicity of the drug in at least two species of animals; and (3) conduct short-term toxicity studies ranging from 2 weeks to 3 months, depending on the proposed duration and use of the substance in the proposed clinical studies. The process is complicated and costly with hundreds and sometimes thousands of compounds being tested.
  • the present invention by using liver slices, is ideally suited to the pre-clinical development process.
  • the number of animals required is minimized, as is the need for subjecting the animal to often stressful and painful testing procedures.
  • a bioartificial liver system for evaluation, detection and testing of drug candidates, drugs and drug metabolites.
  • the system has a liver-slice culture apparatus.
  • the apparatus has a chamber with a gas valve, and a plurality of animal liver slices positioned securely within the chamber so as to maximize the surface area of the liver slices exposed to a medium.
  • the culture medium rises in the chamber so that the liver slices are completely immersed. This means is also able to remove the culture medium from contact with the liver slices.
  • a reservoir is provided for containing the culture medium as it enters and exits the chamber.
  • the chamber is preferably thermoregulated.
  • the temperature is preferably kept at about 36.5 degrees C.
  • rodent liver slices it is kept between about 36 to 38 degrees C.
  • pig liver slices are very sensitive to temperature fluctuation and it must be maintained at 38 degrees C., the normal body temperature of pigs.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of drug testing system 10 in accordance with the present invention.
  • culture medium 13 is introduced into the liver-slice culture apparatus 14 .
  • Liver slices 15 are arranged between two wire meshes 16 and placed vertically parallel within the bioreactor. As culture medium is introduced into the bioreactor, the fluid level begins to rise until it comes into contact with the liver slices, and eventually the liver slices are completely immersed.
  • Oxygenated gas is introduced by gas valve 17 in the top of the chamber.
  • gas valve 17 is shown in the top of the chamber, it is also contemplated herein that the gas valve could be on the side or bottom of the chamber, provided with an appropriate seal to prevent leakage of liquid medium.
  • the gas is preferably a mixture of 95% by volume O 2 and 5% by volume CO 2 , and is supplied at a pressure ranging from 1 to 10 ATM to the chamber through the gas valve and discharged therefrom, while controlling the pressure by a pressure controller (not shown).
  • a solenoid valve may be coupled with the pressure controller to maintain a pre-set gas pressure.
  • Gas sterilizing device 18 for example, a syringe filter having a pore size of about 0.22 ⁇ m, is preferably installed in gas valve 17 to filter out microbes, thereby sterilizing the supply gas to the chamber.
  • Gas check valve 11 with gas sterilizing device 18 is positioned on the medium reservoir and serves to equalize the pressure between the reservoir and atmosphere.
  • the liver slices are cultured under the supplies of liquid culture medium and an oxygenated gas.
  • the liquid culture medium, or the plasma is supplied through the reservoir into the chamber and the oxygenated gas is supplied through the top of the chamber.
  • Each is supplied at regular intervals so that each of the liver slices is exposed alternately to the medium and to the gas at an exposure-time ratio ranging from about 1:2 to about 1:4, preferably about 1:2.5 to about 1:3.5, and most preferably about 1:3.
  • Pump 19 controls the flow of the culture medium.
  • the liver-slice apparatus of the present invention is shown, as represented by numeral 20 .
  • Two stainless steel meshes 21 and 22 are provided, the size of which can be chosen based on the dimensions of the chamber. These two meshes are preferably arranged in parallel. In a preferred embodiment, the meshes have about a 0.26 mm pore size. Also, in a preferred embodiment, the meshes are pressed to ensure consistent flatness. Between meshes 21 and 22 is a plurality of liver-slices 23 arranged in an orderly fashion.
  • the two meshes are positioned on each side of the liver slices with enough room so as to not crush the liver slices, but also so as to hold them sufficiently so that they do not get washed away by the plasma.
  • FIGS. 2A and 2B show a relatively small number of liver slices positioned between the meshes, it is to be understood that the efficiency of the apparatus is dependent upon the number of liver slices employed.
  • two meshes are shown, it is contemplated herein that a single mesh may be used. That mesh is formed to surround, at least partially, the liver slices thereby forming a space and to retain them in that space.
  • the mesh could be formed in a suitably dimensioned U-shape.
  • Liver slices used in the present invention may be obtained from a suitable animal, for example, a rabbit, pig, dog, rodent, or human, depending on the intended use of the apparatus. Also, they may be of any size or shape suitable for maintaining the viability and essential functions thereof. In the present invention the liver slices are preferred to have a thickness ranging from about 10 ⁇ m to about 2,000 ⁇ m, and more preferably ranging from about 100 ⁇ m to about 500 ⁇ m.
  • the present invention is ideally suited to testing the toxicity and efficiency of a drug. This testing is accomplished by exposing the liver slices to a drug or drug candidate and observing the ability of the liver slices to metabolize a compound, which compound or its metabolites can be detected. For example, ammonia and lidocaine are common compounds that can be metabolized by healthy liver tissue. The following example shows this testing.
  • the following example illustrates the in vitro performance of the system using liver slices and forms the model for the drug testing system of the present invention.
  • the example here shows the efficiency of liver slices to metabolize ammonia and lidocaine in the presence of drug candidate HL100.
  • the liver converts ammonia to urea, which is excreted into the urine by the kidneys.
  • ammonia accumulates in the blood because of both decreased blood clearance and decreased ability to form urea. Elevated ammonia levels can be toxic, especially to the brain, and play a role in the development of hepatic encephalopathy. Accordingly, measuring ammonia clearance can assess liver function. More specifically, measuring ammonia clearance provides an indication of the operability of the present invention to metabolize compounds that may or may not be harmful to the liver.
  • lidocaine is a drug that can be converted by the liver from a toxic form into a non-toxic metabolite known as dimethyl xylidine (DMX).
  • DMX dimethyl xylidine
  • the measure of lidocaine clearance is an indication of the performance of the present invention. By measuring the clearance of ammonia or lidocaine in the presence of the drug candidate, a toxicity profile for the drug candidate can be generated. If the drug candidate is toxic to liver cells, there will be a build-up of ammonia and lidocaine in these examples. Therefore there is an observable direct relationship between drug candidate toxicity and lidocaine or ammonia levels.
  • liver slices were approximately 1 cm in diameter with an average weight of 50 mg. Approximately 2 grams total were used in this example. The slices were then pre-cultured by immersion in approximately 200 ml of Williams E media with 10% FCS and drained upon exposure to an oxygenated gas. Each liver slice is exposed alternately to the medium and to the gas at an exposure-time ratio of approximately 1:3.
  • the gas mixture approximately 95% oxygen, 5% CO 2 at 1 ATM, was maintained in the chamber throughout the study.
  • the gas mixture was exchanged every twelve minutes.
  • Bolus doses of lidocaine (2 mg) or ammonia (20 mg) were injected.
  • the ammonia and DMX were measured by collecting samples at 0, 5, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes, after 6 hours and 25 hours of cultivation. The results are summarized in FIGS. 3A, 3B , 4 and 5 .
  • FIG. 3A is a graphical representation of in vitro clearance of a 2 mg dose of lidocaine.
  • Continuous perfusion was performed (as indicated by the diamonds) and intermittent perfusion (time-exposure ratio of 1:3) was also performed (indicated by the circles).
  • Three separate trials were performed for each.
  • the level of lidocaine dropped from between 3.2 and 5.8 ⁇ g to approximately 0.9 ⁇ g. This level was reduced to approximately 0.5 ⁇ g at 120 minutes.
  • the results demonstrate that the device of the present invention reduced lidocaine levels to non-toxic levels within 30 minutes even in the presence of drug candidate HL 100.
  • the intermittent perfusion (approximately 1:3) requires less volume of medium while achieving substantially the same results.
  • the results show that the drug candidate does not substantially impair the ability of the liver slices to metabolize lidocaine.
  • FIG. 3B is a graphical representation of in vitro clearance of a 2 mg dose of lidocaine for prior run times of 6 hours and 24 hours.
  • the liver slices were exposed to gas either continuously or intermittently in a ratio of 1:3 for 6 hours and for 24 hours prior to lidocaine loading.
  • Initial readings of lidocaine were between 2 ⁇ g and 7.8 ⁇ g.
  • lidocaine levels reduced to approximately 0.80 ⁇ g for the 6 hour trials and for the continuous perfusion 24 hour trial.
  • Within 60 minutes all trials were showing lidocaine levels between 0.75 ⁇ g and 1 ⁇ g. Again, the results demonstrate the efficiency of the device to reduce lidocaine levels to non-toxic levels with intermittent perfusion while exposed to HL 100.
  • FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of in vitro DMX concentration build-up from a 2 mg lidocaine dose. Initially DMX concentration remained approximately zero, until approximately 18 minutes. The DMX metabolites were observed increasing in concentration after 18 minutes and reached approximately maximal values at 60 minutes. However, for the 24 hour 1:3 exposure trial, the DMX concentration continued to increase up to 120 minutes. These results show the ability of the present invention to metabolize lidocaine (as indicated by the DMX metabolite concentration increasing over time) in the presence of HL 100. There was no significant difference between the continuous perfusion trial and the intermittent perfusion trial, except for the 24 hour exposure trial mentioned above.
  • FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of in vitro ammonia clearance of a 20 mg loading dose. At approximately 30 minutes maximal ammonia clearance was observed in all trials. These results demonstrate the ability of the present invention to remove ammonia relatively quickly to non-toxic levels in the presence of drug candidate HL 100. In addition, there was no significant difference between the trials with continuous perfusion and those with intermittent perfusion, thereby indicating that less medium can be used while still retaining activity and efficiency of the device.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Hematology (AREA)
  • Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Apparatus Associated With Microorganisms And Enzymes (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)

Abstract

A drug testing system using a liver-slice culture apparatus. The apparatus has a chamber with plasma and gas valves, animal liver slices being positioned securely in the chamber so as to maximize the surface area of liver slices exposed to the culture medium. Plasma is supplied to the chamber so that it rises to contact the liver slices, and is alternately removed from contacting the liver slices. Gas is supplied to the top of the chamber. The system also includes a reservoir for containing media entering and exiting the chamber. Methods are provided for assessing the toxicity of a drug or drug candidate.

Description

    BACKROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The invention relates to a drug testing system with a biological artificial liver and, more particularly, a bioreactor for evaluation, detection and testing of drug candidates, drugs and drug metabolites.
  • 2. Discussion of Related Art
  • In 2001, the average cost to develop a new drug exceeded $800 million, according to a study by the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. Of this, approximately $16 million on average per company was used for pre-clinical research. Reduction of testing time and cost in drug development is therefore a critical factor to the survival of most pharmaceutical companies. In addition, since there is usually more than one company competing in the same drug arena, any competitive advantage would be welcome. A major portion of drug development costs is borne during the FDA approval process. However, much of this cost cannot be managed in the same way that pre-clinical costs can. To address soaring pre-clinical costs, more efficient, affordable, and timely methods of in vivo and in vitro testing and selection of potential new drug candidates are of significant interest in the industry.
  • In developing a new drug, toxicity is always an important consideration. Since the liver metabolizes most drugs, liver damage is of great concern. Conventional in vivo and in vitro tests utilizing small animals and cell culture techniques are therefore widely used to assess liver function in drug development. However, these conventional tests have particular disadvantages, such as individual variation, high costs to use large animals, and loss of naturally existing characteristics of liver in situ.
  • To overcome these disadvantages, cell culture systems have also been used. However, with these models cell-to-cell connective interactions cannot be maintained for a desired length of time. This leads to failure of the testing scheme.
  • Bioartificial liver devices are currently being developed. It is believed that hepatic function can only be replaced with the biological substrate, that is, liver cells or a whole liver specimen, which requires the availability of liver tissue from xenogenic or human sources. Recent efforts have combined mechanical and biologic support systems in hybrid liver support devices. The mechanical component of these hybrid devices serves both to remove toxins and to create a barrier between the patient's serum and the biologic component of the liver support device. The biologic component of these hybrid liver support devices may consist of liver slices, granulated liver, or hepatocytes from low-grade tumor cells or porcine hepatocytes. These biologic components are housed within chambers often referred to as bioreactors. However problems remain with respect to maintaining the functionality of the individual cell lines used in these devices. Most devices use immortalized cell lines. It has been found that over time these cells lose specific functions.
  • There are several groups developing bioartificial liver devices, for example, Circe Biomedical (Lexington, Mass.), Vitagen (La Jolla, Calif.), Excorp Medical (Oakdale, Minn.), and Algenix (Shoreview, Minn.). The Circe Biomedical device integrates viable liver cells with biocompatible membranes into an extracorporeal, bioartificial liver assist system. Vitagen's ELAD® (Extracorporeal Liver Assist Device) Artificial Liver is a two-chambered hollow-fiber cartridge containing a cultured human liver cell line (C3A). The cartridge contains a semipermeable membrane with a characterized molecular weight cutoff. This membrane allows for physical compartmentalization of the cultured human cell line and the patient's ultrafiltrate. Algenix provides a system in which an external liver support system uses porcine liver cells. Individual porcine hepatocytes pass through a membrane to process the human blood cells. Excorp Medical's device contains a hollow fiber membrane (with 100 kDa cutoff) bioreactor that separates the patient's blood from approximately 100 grams of primary porcine hepatocytes that have been harvested from purpose-raised, pathogen-free pigs. Blood passes though a cylinder filled with hollow polymer fibers and a suspension containing billions of pig liver cells. The fibers act as a barrier to prevent proteins and cell byproducts of the pig cells from directly contacting the patient's blood but allow the necessary contact between the cells so that the toxins in the blood can be removed.
  • Various aspects of these devices represent improvements over pre-existing technology, but they still have particular disadvantages. The effectiveness of these devices, all of which use individual hepatocytes, is limited due to the lack of cell-to-cell interactions, which characterize the liver in its in vivo state. Accordingly, a bioartificial liver with improved efficiency, viability, and functionality for use in drug development would be beneficial.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It is one object of the present invention to provide a system to test the toxicity of a potential drug candidate and its metabolites.
  • The present invention provides a system for testing a potential drug candidate for toxicity. The system has a liver-slice culture apparatus made up of a chamber having a medium inlet and a gas valve, a plurality of animal liver slices positioned securely within the chamber so as to maximize the surface area of the liver slices exposed to the medium, means for selectively supplying and removing a medium in the chamber so that the medium in the chamber comes into contact with the liver slices, and is removed from contact with the liver slices, and a reservoir for containing the medium as it enters and exits the chamber. The animal liver slices are cultured in an environment of an oxygenated gas under the supply of the medium at regular intervals so that said slices are exposed alternately to the medium and to the gas. When the live slices are exposed to the potential drug candidate the toxicity of the potential drug candidate can be determined by observing the effectiveness of the liver slices to metabolize a compound in the presence of the potential drug candidate.
  • In a further embodiment, the system has a mesh at least partially surrounding the animal liver slices so as to form a space and to retain the slices within this space. In this embodiment the mesh is approximately vertical in the chamber. Additional embodiments have two meshes at least partially surrounding the liver slices.
  • The invention also provides methods for evaluating the toxicity of a drug. The methods involve supplying a culture medium, contacting the culture medium with animal liver slices, where the animal liver slices are positioned securely in a chamber so as to maximize the surface area of liver slices exposed to the culture medium. The chamber has a plasma inlet and a gas valve, means for selectively supplying and removing plasma in the chamber so that the plasma in the chamber comes into contact with the liver slices, and is removed from contact with the liver slices, means for supplying a gas to the chamber, and a reservoir for containing plasma as it enters and exits the chamber. The method further involves contacting the liver slices with a gas mixture of oxygen and carbon dioxide, exposing the liver slices alternately to plasma and the gas mixture of oxygen and carbon dioxide gas, and exposing the liver slices to the drug to be tested. When the live slices are exposed to the drug the toxicity of the drug can be determined by observing the effectiveness of the liver slices to metabolize a compound in the presence of the drug.
  • In the embodiments disclosed herein, the compound to be metabolized can be selected from the group consisting of ammonia and lidocaine.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
  • Further particularities and advantages of the invention will become clear from the following description of preferred embodiment, with reference to the drawing, in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the system of the present invention;
  • FIG. 2A is a side sectional view of the liver-slice arrangement of the present invention;
  • FIG. 2B is a perspective view of the liver-slice arrangement of FIG. 2A;
  • FIG. 3A is a graphical representation of in vitro lidocaine clearance with continuous and intermittent perfusion using the bioartificial liver system of the present invention;
  • FIG. 3B is a graphical representation of in vitro lidocaine clearance with a 6 hour and a 24 hour run using the bioartificial liver system of the present invention;
  • FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of in vitro DMX concentration with a 6 hour and a 24 hour run using the bioartificial liver system of the present invention; and
  • FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of in vitro ammonia clearance with a 6 hour and a 24 hour run using the bioartificial liver system of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • The objective during the pre-clinical drug development stage is for a pharmaceutical company to show that the compound is reasonably safe for use in the next phase, which is small-scale clinical studies. The compound's toxic and pharmacologic effects are realized through in vivo and in vitro animal testing. At a minimum, the FDA will ask the pharmaceutical company to: (1) develop a pharmacologic profile of the drug; (2) determine the acute toxicity of the drug in at least two species of animals; and (3) conduct short-term toxicity studies ranging from 2 weeks to 3 months, depending on the proposed duration and use of the substance in the proposed clinical studies. The process is complicated and costly with hundreds and sometimes thousands of compounds being tested.
  • This testing is often performed by an independent third party in order to rule out any appearance of bias. Every effort is made to ensure that as few animals as possible are used, and that they are treated humanely. Usually two species of animals, one rodent and one non-rodent are used because a drug may affect one species differently than another. Since most drugs are metabolized in the liver, toxicity studies naturally focus on the effects on the liver.
  • The present invention, by using liver slices, is ideally suited to the pre-clinical development process. The number of animals required is minimized, as is the need for subjecting the animal to often stressful and painful testing procedures.
  • In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a bioartificial liver system for evaluation, detection and testing of drug candidates, drugs and drug metabolites. The system has a liver-slice culture apparatus.
  • In one embodiment of the present invention, the apparatus has a chamber with a gas valve, and a plurality of animal liver slices positioned securely within the chamber so as to maximize the surface area of the liver slices exposed to a medium. There is a means for selectively supplying and removing culture medium to the chamber so that the culture medium in the chamber rises to come into contact with the liver slices. The culture medium rises in the chamber so that the liver slices are completely immersed. This means is also able to remove the culture medium from contact with the liver slices. In additional embodiments, there is also a means for supplying a gas to the top of the chamber so that the liver slices are exposed alternately to the gas and to the culture medium. Additionally, a reservoir is provided for containing the culture medium as it enters and exits the chamber. The chamber is preferably thermoregulated. For human liver slices, the temperature is preferably kept at about 36.5 degrees C. For rodent liver slices, it is kept between about 36 to 38 degrees C. However, pig liver slices are very sensitive to temperature fluctuation and it must be maintained at 38 degrees C., the normal body temperature of pigs.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of drug testing system 10 in accordance with the present invention. From reservoir 12 culture medium 13 is introduced into the liver-slice culture apparatus 14. Liver slices 15 are arranged between two wire meshes 16 and placed vertically parallel within the bioreactor. As culture medium is introduced into the bioreactor, the fluid level begins to rise until it comes into contact with the liver slices, and eventually the liver slices are completely immersed.
  • Oxygenated gas is introduced by gas valve 17 in the top of the chamber. Although the gas valve is shown in the top of the chamber, it is also contemplated herein that the gas valve could be on the side or bottom of the chamber, provided with an appropriate seal to prevent leakage of liquid medium. The gas is preferably a mixture of 95% by volume O2 and 5% by volume CO2, and is supplied at a pressure ranging from 1 to 10 ATM to the chamber through the gas valve and discharged therefrom, while controlling the pressure by a pressure controller (not shown). A solenoid valve (also not shown) may be coupled with the pressure controller to maintain a pre-set gas pressure. Gas sterilizing device 18, for example, a syringe filter having a pore size of about 0.22 μm, is preferably installed in gas valve 17 to filter out microbes, thereby sterilizing the supply gas to the chamber. Gas check valve 11 with gas sterilizing device 18 is positioned on the medium reservoir and serves to equalize the pressure between the reservoir and atmosphere.
  • Stabilization of the liver slices is an important feature of the invention. The liver slices are cultured under the supplies of liquid culture medium and an oxygenated gas. The liquid culture medium, or the plasma, is supplied through the reservoir into the chamber and the oxygenated gas is supplied through the top of the chamber. Each is supplied at regular intervals so that each of the liver slices is exposed alternately to the medium and to the gas at an exposure-time ratio ranging from about 1:2 to about 1:4, preferably about 1:2.5 to about 1:3.5, and most preferably about 1:3. Pump 19 controls the flow of the culture medium.
  • Although plasma is a relatively good medium to maintain cell viability, there are too many unknown factors present and therefore the results vary from animal to animal. In the present invention Waymouth MB 752/1 medium is preferred over plasma. To prevent central necrosis, the gas mixture described above, 95% O2 and 5% CO2, is preferably used. Since this mixture may produce free oxygen radicals, which are very toxic to liver cells, a high concentration of glutathione and vitamin E, as oxygen free radical scavengers and anti-oxidants, are added. For use of this medium, the formula should be supplemented with 10% complement inactivated Fetal Vovine of Calf Serum and L-Glutamine.
  • Referring now to the drawing, and more particularly FIGS. 2A and 2B, the liver-slice apparatus of the present invention is shown, as represented by numeral 20. Two stainless steel meshes 21 and 22 are provided, the size of which can be chosen based on the dimensions of the chamber. These two meshes are preferably arranged in parallel. In a preferred embodiment, the meshes have about a 0.26 mm pore size. Also, in a preferred embodiment, the meshes are pressed to ensure consistent flatness. Between meshes 21 and 22 is a plurality of liver-slices 23 arranged in an orderly fashion. The two meshes are positioned on each side of the liver slices with enough room so as to not crush the liver slices, but also so as to hold them sufficiently so that they do not get washed away by the plasma. Although FIGS. 2A and 2B show a relatively small number of liver slices positioned between the meshes, it is to be understood that the efficiency of the apparatus is dependent upon the number of liver slices employed. In addition, although two meshes are shown, it is contemplated herein that a single mesh may be used. That mesh is formed to surround, at least partially, the liver slices thereby forming a space and to retain them in that space. For example, the mesh could be formed in a suitably dimensioned U-shape.
  • Liver slices used in the present invention may be obtained from a suitable animal, for example, a rabbit, pig, dog, rodent, or human, depending on the intended use of the apparatus. Also, they may be of any size or shape suitable for maintaining the viability and essential functions thereof. In the present invention the liver slices are preferred to have a thickness ranging from about 10 μm to about 2,000 μm, and more preferably ranging from about 100 μm to about 500 μm.
  • The present invention is ideally suited to testing the toxicity and efficiency of a drug. This testing is accomplished by exposing the liver slices to a drug or drug candidate and observing the ability of the liver slices to metabolize a compound, which compound or its metabolites can be detected. For example, ammonia and lidocaine are common compounds that can be metabolized by healthy liver tissue. The following example shows this testing.
  • EXAMPLE 1 In Vitro Performance
  • The following example illustrates the in vitro performance of the system using liver slices and forms the model for the drug testing system of the present invention. The example here shows the efficiency of liver slices to metabolize ammonia and lidocaine in the presence of drug candidate HL100.
  • The liver converts ammonia to urea, which is excreted into the urine by the kidneys. In the presence of severe liver disease, ammonia accumulates in the blood because of both decreased blood clearance and decreased ability to form urea. Elevated ammonia levels can be toxic, especially to the brain, and play a role in the development of hepatic encephalopathy. Accordingly, measuring ammonia clearance can assess liver function. More specifically, measuring ammonia clearance provides an indication of the operability of the present invention to metabolize compounds that may or may not be harmful to the liver.
  • In addition, lidocaine is a drug that can be converted by the liver from a toxic form into a non-toxic metabolite known as dimethyl xylidine (DMX). The measure of lidocaine clearance is an indication of the performance of the present invention. By measuring the clearance of ammonia or lidocaine in the presence of the drug candidate, a toxicity profile for the drug candidate can be generated. If the drug candidate is toxic to liver cells, there will be a build-up of ammonia and lidocaine in these examples. Therefore there is an observable direct relationship between drug candidate toxicity and lidocaine or ammonia levels.
  • A 3 to 3.5 kg rabbit was euthanized and liver slices obtained. The slices were approximately 1 cm in diameter with an average weight of 50 mg. Approximately 2 grams total were used in this example. The slices were then pre-cultured by immersion in approximately 200 ml of Williams E media with 10% FCS and drained upon exposure to an oxygenated gas. Each liver slice is exposed alternately to the medium and to the gas at an exposure-time ratio of approximately 1:3.
  • The gas mixture, approximately 95% oxygen, 5% CO2 at 1 ATM, was maintained in the chamber throughout the study. The gas mixture was exchanged every twelve minutes. Bolus doses of lidocaine (2 mg) or ammonia (20 mg) were injected. The ammonia and DMX were measured by collecting samples at 0, 5, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes, after 6 hours and 25 hours of cultivation. The results are summarized in FIGS. 3A, 3B, 4 and 5.
  • FIG. 3A is a graphical representation of in vitro clearance of a 2 mg dose of lidocaine. Continuous perfusion was performed (as indicated by the diamonds) and intermittent perfusion (time-exposure ratio of 1:3) was also performed (indicated by the circles). Three separate trials were performed for each. At approximately 30 minutes after lidocaine loading, the level of lidocaine dropped from between 3.2 and 5.8 μg to approximately 0.9 μg. This level was reduced to approximately 0.5 μg at 120 minutes. The results demonstrate that the device of the present invention reduced lidocaine levels to non-toxic levels within 30 minutes even in the presence of drug candidate HL 100. As compared to continuous medium perfusion, the intermittent perfusion (approximately 1:3) requires less volume of medium while achieving substantially the same results. The results show that the drug candidate does not substantially impair the ability of the liver slices to metabolize lidocaine.
  • FIG. 3B is a graphical representation of in vitro clearance of a 2 mg dose of lidocaine for prior run times of 6 hours and 24 hours. In these runs, the liver slices were exposed to gas either continuously or intermittently in a ratio of 1:3 for 6 hours and for 24 hours prior to lidocaine loading. Initial readings of lidocaine were between 2 μg and 7.8 μg. However, within 30 minutes lidocaine levels reduced to approximately 0.80 μg for the 6 hour trials and for the continuous perfusion 24 hour trial. Within 60 minutes all trials were showing lidocaine levels between 0.75 μg and 1 μg. Again, the results demonstrate the efficiency of the device to reduce lidocaine levels to non-toxic levels with intermittent perfusion while exposed to HL 100.
  • FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of in vitro DMX concentration build-up from a 2 mg lidocaine dose. Initially DMX concentration remained approximately zero, until approximately 18 minutes. The DMX metabolites were observed increasing in concentration after 18 minutes and reached approximately maximal values at 60 minutes. However, for the 24 hour 1:3 exposure trial, the DMX concentration continued to increase up to 120 minutes. These results show the ability of the present invention to metabolize lidocaine (as indicated by the DMX metabolite concentration increasing over time) in the presence of HL 100. There was no significant difference between the continuous perfusion trial and the intermittent perfusion trial, except for the 24 hour exposure trial mentioned above.
  • FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of in vitro ammonia clearance of a 20 mg loading dose. At approximately 30 minutes maximal ammonia clearance was observed in all trials. These results demonstrate the ability of the present invention to remove ammonia relatively quickly to non-toxic levels in the presence of drug candidate HL 100. In addition, there was no significant difference between the trials with continuous perfusion and those with intermittent perfusion, thereby indicating that less medium can be used while still retaining activity and efficiency of the device.
  • While the present invention has been illustrated and described by means of a specific embodiment, it is to be understood that numerous changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the accompanying claims.

Claims (16)

1. A system for testing a potential drug candidate for toxicity, said system comprising:
a liver-slice culture apparatus, the culture apparatus comprising:
a chamber having a medium inlet and a gas valve;
a plurality of animal liver slices positioned securely within said chamber so as to maximize the surface area of the liver slices exposed to a medium; and
means for selectively supplying and removing a medium in the chamber so that the medium in the chamber comes into contact with the liver slices, and is removed from contact with the liver slices; and
a reservoir for containing the medium as it enters and exits the chamber, said animal liver slices being cultured in an environment of an oxygenated gas under the supply of the medium at regular intervals so that said slices are exposed alternatively to the medium and to the gas;
wherein when the liver slices are exposed to the potential drug candidate the toxicity of the potential drug candidate can be determined by observing the effectiveness of the liver slices to metabolize a compound in the presence of the potential drug candidate.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein a mesh at least partially surrounds said animal liver slices so as to form a space and to retain said slices within said space, said mesh being approximately vertical in the chamber.
3. The system of claim 2, wherein two meshes at least partially surround said liver slices.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the liver slices have a thickness in the range of about 10 μm to about 2,000 μm.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the liver slices have a thickness in the range of about 100 μm to about 500 μm.
6. The system of claim 1, further comprising a means for introducing a gas to the gas valve.
7. The system of claim 6, wherein the gas is a mixture of oxygen and carbon dioxide.
8. The system of claim 7, wherein the gas-to-plasma exposure time ratio to the animal liver slices is about 1:2 to about 1:4.
9. The system of claim 7, wherein the gas-to-plasma exposure time ratio to the animal liver slices is about 1:3.
10. The system of claim 1, further comprising an immunological filter inserted in the gas valve.
11. The system of claim 1, wherein the chamber is sealable.
12. The system of claim 11, wherein the chamber is thermoregulated.
13. The system of claim 1, wherein the compound is selected from the group consisting of ammonia and lidocaine.
14. A method for evaluating the toxicity of a drug, said method comprising:
supplying a culture medium;
contacting the culture medium with animal liver slices, the animal liver slices being positioned securely in a chamber so as to maximize the surface area of liver slices exposed to the culture medium, wherein the chamber has a plasma inlet and a gas valve, means for selectively supplying and removing plasma in the chamber so that the plasma in the chamber comes into contact with the liver slices, and is alternately removed from contact with the liver slices, means for supplying a gas to the chamber, a reservoir for containing plasma as it enters and exits the chamber, the method further comprising:
contacting the liver slices with a gas mixture of oxygen and carbon dioxide;
exposing the liver slices alternatively to plasma and the gas mixture of oxygen and carbon dioxide gas; and
exposing the liver slices to the drug to be tested;
wherein when the liver slices are exposed to the drug the toxicity of the drug can be determined by observing the effectiveness of the liver slices to metabolize a compound in the presence of the drug.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein a mesh at least partially surrounds said animal liver slices so as to form a space and to retain said slices within said space, said mesh being positioned approximately vertical in the chamber.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the compound is selected from the group consisting of ammonia and lidocaine.
US10/738,905 2003-06-27 2003-12-16 Drug testing system with bio-artificial liver Abandoned US20050130254A1 (en)

Priority Applications (16)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/738,905 US20050130254A1 (en) 2003-12-16 2003-12-16 Drug testing system with bio-artificial liver
AU2004303755A AU2004303755A1 (en) 2003-12-16 2004-05-25 Drug testing system with bio-artificial liver
EP04753322A EP1697496A4 (en) 2003-12-16 2004-05-25 Drug testing system with bio-artificial liver
CA002549904A CA2549904A1 (en) 2003-12-16 2004-05-25 Drug testing system with bio-artificial liver
PCT/US2004/016477 WO2005061694A1 (en) 2003-12-16 2004-05-25 Drug testing system with bio-artificial liver
KR1020067014294A KR20060127880A (en) 2003-12-16 2004-05-25 Drug test system with bio-artificial liver
JP2006545312A JP2007513638A (en) 2003-12-16 2004-05-25 Drug testing system using bioartificial liver
BRPI0418051A BRPI0418051A2 (en) 2003-12-16 2004-05-25 bio-artificial liver drug testing system
CNA2004800374790A CN1894396A (en) 2003-12-16 2004-05-25 Drug testing system with bio-artificial liver
US11/210,511 US7829325B2 (en) 2003-12-16 2005-08-24 Drug testing with bio-artificial organ slices including for example those derived from liver
IL176256A IL176256A0 (en) 2003-12-16 2006-06-12 Drug testing system with bio-artificial liver
ZA200605435A ZA200605435B (en) 2003-12-16 2006-06-30 Drug testing system with bio-artificial liver
CNA2006800349228A CN101268364A (en) 2003-12-16 2006-08-24 New enhanced method for drug testing and screening using human tissue
CNA200680034950XA CN101268365A (en) 2003-12-16 2006-08-24 Chemical Sensitivity Tester
ZA200801829A ZA200801829B (en) 2003-12-16 2008-02-26 Novel enhanced processes for drug testing and screening using human tissue
US12/717,063 US20100159503A1 (en) 2003-06-27 2010-03-03 Enhanced processes for drug testing and screening using tissue samples

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/738,905 US20050130254A1 (en) 2003-12-16 2003-12-16 Drug testing system with bio-artificial liver

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/210,511 Continuation-In-Part US7829325B2 (en) 2003-06-27 2005-08-24 Drug testing with bio-artificial organ slices including for example those derived from liver

Related Child Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/608,372 Continuation-In-Part US20040265997A1 (en) 2003-06-27 2003-06-27 Bio-artificial liver system
US11/210,511 Division US7829325B2 (en) 2003-06-27 2005-08-24 Drug testing with bio-artificial organ slices including for example those derived from liver

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050130254A1 true US20050130254A1 (en) 2005-06-16

Family

ID=34654273

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/738,905 Abandoned US20050130254A1 (en) 2003-06-27 2003-12-16 Drug testing system with bio-artificial liver
US11/210,511 Expired - Fee Related US7829325B2 (en) 2003-06-27 2005-08-24 Drug testing with bio-artificial organ slices including for example those derived from liver

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/210,511 Expired - Fee Related US7829325B2 (en) 2003-06-27 2005-08-24 Drug testing with bio-artificial organ slices including for example those derived from liver

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (2) US20050130254A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1697496A4 (en)
JP (1) JP2007513638A (en)
KR (1) KR20060127880A (en)
CN (3) CN1894396A (en)
AU (1) AU2004303755A1 (en)
BR (1) BRPI0418051A2 (en)
CA (1) CA2549904A1 (en)
IL (1) IL176256A0 (en)
WO (1) WO2005061694A1 (en)
ZA (2) ZA200605435B (en)

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070048732A1 (en) * 2005-08-30 2007-03-01 Hepahope, Inc. Chemosensitivity tester
EP1931987A4 (en) * 2005-08-24 2009-03-18 Hepahope Inc Novel enhanced processes for drug testing and screening using human tissue
US7829325B2 (en) 2003-12-16 2010-11-09 Hepahope, Inc. Drug testing with bio-artificial organ slices including for example those derived from liver
WO2012166630A3 (en) * 2011-05-27 2013-03-21 Xenotech Llc In vitro test system to evaluate xenobiotics as immune-modulators of drug transport and metabolism in human hepatocytes
WO2013070073A1 (en) * 2011-11-07 2013-05-16 Tulip Life Science Products B.V. Device for culturing cells
WO2013158939A1 (en) * 2012-04-18 2013-10-24 Hemoshear, Llc In vitro model for pathological or physiologic conditions
CN101743472B (en) * 2007-05-18 2014-09-17 生命线科学公司 Ex vivo methods for testing organ system disruption
US9617521B2 (en) 2013-10-21 2017-04-11 Hemoshear, Llc In vitro model for a tumor microenvironment
WO2018185760A1 (en) * 2017-04-05 2018-10-11 Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd. Ex-vivo culture system and methods of using same
US20210162125A1 (en) * 2018-02-28 2021-06-03 Pop Test Oncology Llc Medical Devices and Uses Thereof
GB2587987B (en) * 2018-05-09 2022-12-21 Emulate Inc Host-biome interactions
US20230013813A1 (en) * 2019-12-03 2023-01-19 The University Of Adelaide Cell culture microdevice

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20080052597A (en) * 2005-08-24 2008-06-11 헤파호프 인코포레이티드 Pharmaceutical Sensitivity Testing Machine
JP2009505661A (en) * 2005-08-24 2009-02-12 ヘパホープ インコーポレイテッド A new and effective process for drug testing and drug screening using human tissue
WO2007025154A1 (en) * 2005-08-24 2007-03-01 Hepahope, Inc. Chemosensitivity tester
WO2007085621A1 (en) * 2006-01-27 2007-08-02 Boehringer Ingelheim International Gmbh Method and apparatus for exerting an effect on cells
DE102006021406B4 (en) * 2006-05-08 2008-08-07 B.R.A.H.M.S Aktiengesellschaft In vitro method for the early detection of drug- and addiction-induced liver damage and for the detection of the already reached stage of liver damage
CN102010821A (en) * 2010-09-02 2011-04-13 天津开发区合普工贸有限公司 Cell gaseous exposure experiment control device
CN102010822A (en) * 2010-09-14 2011-04-13 天津开发区合普工贸有限公司 Cell culture fluid atomizing supply device
ITRM20110066A1 (en) * 2011-02-14 2012-08-15 Innate Pharma Sa IN VITRO METHOD FOR CULTIVATION OF HEPATITIC VIRUSES TO CARRY OUT A QUICK EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTIVIRAL THERAPY
WO2019222847A1 (en) * 2018-05-22 2019-11-28 Morphocell Technologies Inc. Perfusion bioreactor, perfusion device, artificial liver system, and related methods

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5733285A (en) * 1995-07-13 1998-03-31 Fastenetix, Llc Polyaxial locking mechanism
US5773285A (en) * 1994-11-09 1998-06-30 Park; Sung-Su Static organ culture apparatus
US5866420A (en) * 1993-10-08 1999-02-02 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture Artificial liver device
US5976870A (en) * 1994-11-09 1999-11-02 Park; Sung-Su Artificial liver composed of a liver-slice culture apparatus

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4308351A (en) 1980-04-18 1981-12-29 Joseph Leighton System for growing tissue cultures
US4559299A (en) 1983-02-04 1985-12-17 Brown University Research Foundation Inc. Cytotoxicity assays in cell culturing devices
JPH08163996A (en) 1994-12-13 1996-06-25 Sumitomo Bakelite Co Ltd Animal cytotoxicity test method
DE69633189T2 (en) 1995-10-06 2005-08-11 Academisch Ziekenhuis Bij De Universiteit Van Amsterdam Solid support for use in cell culture, in particular for the cultivation of liver cells, bioreactor containing the solid support, and the use thereof in a bio-artificial liver system
WO1997015655A2 (en) 1995-10-20 1997-05-01 Michael Sittinger New artificial tissue, method for the production and the use thereof
US5827729A (en) 1996-04-23 1998-10-27 Advanced Tissue Sciences Diffusion gradient bioreactor and extracorporeal liver device using a three-dimensional liver tissue
JP2002233361A (en) 2001-02-06 2002-08-20 Ueda Seni Kagaku Shinkokai Method for culturing liver tissue section using trimming type gel
US20040185558A1 (en) 2003-01-30 2004-09-23 Corinne Griguer Method for culturing brain tissue in three dimensions
US20050130254A1 (en) 2003-12-16 2005-06-16 Park Sung-Soo Drug testing system with bio-artificial liver
US20040265997A1 (en) 2003-06-27 2004-12-30 Park Sung-Soo Bio-artificial liver system
US6852505B1 (en) 2003-10-15 2005-02-08 Chau-Ting Yeh Hepatitis

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5866420A (en) * 1993-10-08 1999-02-02 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture Artificial liver device
US5773285A (en) * 1994-11-09 1998-06-30 Park; Sung-Su Static organ culture apparatus
US5976870A (en) * 1994-11-09 1999-11-02 Park; Sung-Su Artificial liver composed of a liver-slice culture apparatus
US5733285A (en) * 1995-07-13 1998-03-31 Fastenetix, Llc Polyaxial locking mechanism

Cited By (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7829325B2 (en) 2003-12-16 2010-11-09 Hepahope, Inc. Drug testing with bio-artificial organ slices including for example those derived from liver
EP1931987A4 (en) * 2005-08-24 2009-03-18 Hepahope Inc Novel enhanced processes for drug testing and screening using human tissue
US20070048733A1 (en) * 2005-08-30 2007-03-01 Hepahope, Inc. Novel enhanced processes for drug testing and screening using human tissue
US20070048732A1 (en) * 2005-08-30 2007-03-01 Hepahope, Inc. Chemosensitivity tester
CN101743472B (en) * 2007-05-18 2014-09-17 生命线科学公司 Ex vivo methods for testing organ system disruption
US10001471B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2018-06-19 Xenotech Llc In vitro test system to evaluate xenobiotics as immune-modulators of drug transport and metabolism in human hepatocytes
WO2012166630A3 (en) * 2011-05-27 2013-03-21 Xenotech Llc In vitro test system to evaluate xenobiotics as immune-modulators of drug transport and metabolism in human hepatocytes
US8846576B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2014-09-30 Xenotech Llc In vitro test system to evaluate xenobiotics as immune-modulators of drug transport and metabolism in human hepatocytes
US10648968B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2020-05-12 XenoTech, L.L.C. In vitro test system to evaluate xenobiotics as immune-modulators of drug transport and metabolism in human hepatocytes
WO2013070073A1 (en) * 2011-11-07 2013-05-16 Tulip Life Science Products B.V. Device for culturing cells
US10920186B2 (en) 2011-11-07 2021-02-16 Greiner Bio-One Gmbh Device for culturing cells
CN104039947A (en) * 2011-11-07 2014-09-10 荷兰生命科学产品有限公司 Device for culturing cells
US10514374B2 (en) 2012-04-18 2019-12-24 Hemoshear, Llc In vitro model for pathological or physiologic conditions
US11061016B2 (en) 2012-04-18 2021-07-13 Hemoshear, Llc In vitro model for pathological or physiologic conditions
US9658211B2 (en) 2012-04-18 2017-05-23 Hemoshear, Llc In vitro model for pathological or physiologic conditions
WO2013158939A1 (en) * 2012-04-18 2013-10-24 Hemoshear, Llc In vitro model for pathological or physiologic conditions
US10837957B2 (en) 2012-04-18 2020-11-17 Hemoshear, Llc In vitro model for pathological or physiologic conditions
US9500642B2 (en) 2012-04-18 2016-11-22 Hemoshear, Llc In vitro model for pathological or physiologic conditions
US9617521B2 (en) 2013-10-21 2017-04-11 Hemoshear, Llc In vitro model for a tumor microenvironment
US10221394B2 (en) 2013-10-21 2019-03-05 Hemoshear, Llc In vitro model for a tumor microenvironment
US11008549B2 (en) 2013-10-21 2021-05-18 Hemoshear, Llc In vitro model for a tumor microenvironment
AU2018248137B2 (en) * 2017-04-05 2024-03-07 Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd. Ex-vivo culture system and methods of using same
WO2018185760A1 (en) * 2017-04-05 2018-10-11 Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd. Ex-vivo culture system and methods of using same
CN110678543A (en) * 2017-04-05 2020-01-10 耶达研究及发展有限公司 In vitro culture system and method of use
IL269821B1 (en) * 2017-04-05 2023-10-01 Yeda Res & Dev In vitro culture system and methods for its use
EP4317971A3 (en) * 2017-04-05 2024-04-17 Yeda Research and Development Co. Ltd Ex-vivo culture system and methods of using same
IL269821B2 (en) * 2017-04-05 2024-02-01 Yeda Res & Dev Ex-vivo culture system and methods of using same
US11920162B2 (en) 2017-04-05 2024-03-05 Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd. Ex-vivo culture system and methods of using same
US20210162125A1 (en) * 2018-02-28 2021-06-03 Pop Test Oncology Llc Medical Devices and Uses Thereof
US12227727B2 (en) * 2018-02-28 2025-02-18 Pop Test Oncology Llc Medical devices and uses thereof
GB2587987B (en) * 2018-05-09 2022-12-21 Emulate Inc Host-biome interactions
US11827872B2 (en) * 2019-12-03 2023-11-28 The University Of Adelaide Cell culture microdevice
US20230013813A1 (en) * 2019-12-03 2023-01-19 The University Of Adelaide Cell culture microdevice

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20060127880A (en) 2006-12-13
ZA200801829B (en) 2008-12-31
JP2007513638A (en) 2007-05-31
US7829325B2 (en) 2010-11-09
CN101268364A (en) 2008-09-17
EP1697496A1 (en) 2006-09-06
CN101268365A (en) 2008-09-17
AU2004303755A1 (en) 2005-07-07
CN1894396A (en) 2007-01-10
EP1697496A4 (en) 2007-01-03
US20050282152A1 (en) 2005-12-22
ZA200605435B (en) 2007-11-28
WO2005061694A1 (en) 2005-07-07
IL176256A0 (en) 2006-10-05
BRPI0418051A2 (en) 2017-04-18
CA2549904A1 (en) 2005-07-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7829325B2 (en) Drug testing with bio-artificial organ slices including for example those derived from liver
US5278048A (en) Methods for detecting the effect of cell affecting agents on living cells
EP0171896A1 (en) Cell viability assay methods and apparatus
KR20180069882A (en) Microfluidic model of blood brain barrier
US12129492B2 (en) Human liver microphysiology platform and self assembly liver acinus model and methods of their use
US20090104640A1 (en) Method of Evaluating Biological Material and Bioreactor Therefor
RU2752085C2 (en) Barrier function measurements
US20100159503A1 (en) Enhanced processes for drug testing and screening using tissue samples
Boss et al. Encapsulation of insulin‐secreting cells expressing a genetically encoded fluorescent calcium indicator for cell‐based sensing in vivo
CN111819277A (en) Device, kit and method for three-dimensional cell culture
JP2009505662A (en) Chemotherapy sensitivity tester
WO2007025154A1 (en) Chemosensitivity tester
Rivera Microphysiological System with Continuous Control and Sensing of Oxygen Elucidates Hypoxic Intestinal Epithelial Stem Cell Fates
JP2009095291A (en) Method of and device for monitoring cytotoxicity
WO2007025153A1 (en) Novel enhanced processes for drug testing and screening using human tissue
KR20080056163A (en) Drug testing and screening methods using new and improved human tissue
Eddy et al. Correlation between the in vitro and in vivo blood-brain barrier permeabilities of H2 receptor antagonists

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: HEPAHOPE, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PARK, SUNG-SOO;REEL/FRAME:014771/0156

Effective date: 20040621

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION