US20050086874A1 - Flexible, adaptable loft city - Google Patents

Flexible, adaptable loft city Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050086874A1
US20050086874A1 US10/693,313 US69331303A US2005086874A1 US 20050086874 A1 US20050086874 A1 US 20050086874A1 US 69331303 A US69331303 A US 69331303A US 2005086874 A1 US2005086874 A1 US 2005086874A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
space
main
allow
constructed
generally
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/693,313
Inventor
Roy Diehl
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US10/693,313 priority Critical patent/US20050086874A1/en
Publication of US20050086874A1 publication Critical patent/US20050086874A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04BUILDING
    • E04HBUILDINGS OR LIKE STRUCTURES FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES; SWIMMING OR SPLASH BATHS OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; TENTS OR CANOPIES, IN GENERAL
    • E04H1/00Buildings or groups of buildings for dwelling or office purposes; General layout, e.g. modular co-ordination or staggered storeys
    • E04H1/02Dwelling houses; Buildings for temporary habitation, e.g. summer houses
    • E04H1/04Apartment houses arranged in two or more levels

Definitions

  • This invention relates to architectural structures intended primarily for human occupation and use as residence, place of business and similar day-to-day activities.
  • the invention is intended to solve a central issue in modern urban development: how to combine the advantages of a high-density urban environment with those of a low-density suburban area while reducing or avoiding the difficulties and problems associated with each.
  • Low-density suburban areas provide residents with those open spaces. Homes with yards situated on cul-de-sacs, undeveloped wooded areas and farm fields, commercial and industrial areas isolated and dispersed, all contribute to a feeling of openness and nature. However, this dispersion of homes, store, businesses and so on prevents the creation of a critical mass of human energy to often to support even a good restaurant, much less the museums, orchestras, institutes, organizations and attractions the make cities so much more vibrant. They also fail to reduce overall transportation demands, trading suburban distance for urban congestion.
  • This invention allows all of the places where the activities of ordinary life occur, including homes, businesses, shops, schools, and so on, to be established in a single structure, built in a specific manner to readily allow subsequent redevelopment as needed over the course of time without alteration of the primary structure.
  • the buildings commonly laid out along numerous streets are instead stacked atop each other, drastically reducing distances between them and significantly increasing the ability to preserve large tracts of open, accessible and usable land, for purposes such as parks, playgrounds, fields and similar grounds.
  • the amount of land that may be preserved for such uses relative to normal development is significant. For example, a community of 5,000 residents in a conventional development would occupy approximately 420 acres, of which buildings, streets and parking lots would cover 117 acres, or 28% of the total area. A loft city structure, built on six levels and occupying the same 420 acres would cover only 3.2% of the total area, its footprint occupying only 13.4 acres, but supporting twice the population. In a conventional development, most of the 303 acres not covered by building or pavement would be partitioned into small, private yards or lawns; in a loft city, the 406 acres unencumbered by building or pavement would amount to a vast expanse of park land, as well as the family garden plots commonly seen in European cities. The result is a community that, with twice the population density, nonetheless has vastly superior open spaces.
  • the loft city provides the opportunity, with minimal restrictions, for occupants to develop floor plans tailored to their personal wants or needs, and making use of more than one level, to provide balcony space outside the envelope of the structure, and to build exterior walls and windows, and interior floors and walls to suit themselves. residents thus have most of the freedom of suburban developers in spite of working within an established structure.
  • Structural floor space in the loft city is constructed to support a multitude of final uses, and thus avoid both predetermination of initial use and obstruction to eventual change in use. This also provides enormous flexibility in the scale allowable for individual occupants.
  • Floor plans need not be finalized in the design of the loft city structure; instead, the loft city structure is specifically intended to support a wide range of scale in subsequent development of floor plans. The useable life of the basic structure may thus extend indefinitely in the future even in a dynamic, changing community.
  • the financing of a project can be bifurcated between the primary structure and the secondary construction.
  • the builder of the primary structure need not finance or manage the secondary construction, while the number of developers in the secondary aspects of construction may be quite numerous and varied in the scale of their specific projects and in the financing of those projects.
  • the structure also differs from the commonly seen structures by providing for a tremendous amount of balcony space for nearly every unit. This contrasts with shopping malls and office buildings which only rarely have exterior space other than at ground level. It also contrasts with many residential buildings which often provide only minimal balconies with minimal usable space. Such balcony space incidentally eliminates the common presentation of a monolithic facade of brick and glass.
  • the scale of the structure allows a healthy diversity in the financial resources of its residents.
  • Conventional housing developments are often designed in blocks of relatively consistent cost, producing homogeneous communities.
  • people with greater and lesser financial means can thrive in a common environment to their mutual benefit.
  • FIG. 1 presents a cross section of the structure, perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, illustrating the variations possible in mezzanines, stages, exterior walls and walls adjoining corridors.
  • Vertical structure elements have been omitted for clarity, since their placement is not an essential element of this invention. Partitions and other walls interior to tenants space have also been omitted, since flexibility in their placement is an essential element of this invention.
  • stages may be constructed at various heights above the main level, and need not be continuous across any specific tenant space. Whether a specific stage is supported directly by an element of the main structure or by tenant-constructed elements, such as interior load-bearing walls, will depend on acceptable limits of load distribution in the specific application. Numbered examples illustrated here include:
  • FIG. 2 presents a schematic view of variations in the construction of floor space on main levels.
  • 16 indicates potential uncovered balcony space exposed to the weather.
  • 17 indicates floor space reserved for subsequent build-out, generally within a weather-tight envelope, but in certain applications in such a manner as could allow the surface to be exposes to the weather.
  • 18 indicates space to be finished as a corridor for common access through the length of the structure.
  • 19 indicates a main level with a central corridor, bordered on each side by floor space intended for subsequent build-out, each space in turn bordered by floor space built to support use either open or protected from the weather.
  • 20 illustrates the same overall allocation of space, but illustrates holes in the main floor, 21, in the corridor and in tenant space, such as for light wells or to allow for access to a main level from the space below.
  • 22 also illustrates the same overall allocation of floor space as in 19, but with a continuous longitudinal gap, labeled 23, dividing the corridor into two separate, neighboring spaces. Such a gap, which may be as wide or narrow as structurally permitted in a specific structure, may be desired for esthetic effect, for circulation of air or access to light.
  • 24 indicates a truncated main level, for which the corridor has space only on one side for build-out.
  • 25 indicate a main level for which no tenant space has been reserved for potential use as a balcony.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates allowable variations in the longitudinal arrangement of main levels.
  • 26 indicates a main floor that is non-continuous, such as where it is desired to provide greater height in only one section of the overall structure.
  • 27 indicates an allowable interruption in the length of a main floor, providing greater vertical clearance to the main floor below. This may be done to provide an open gallery, for example, or to provide greater vertical space for subsequent build-out.
  • 28 indicates a main level that does not extend as far as the level above it, while 29 indicates a main level that extends beyond the level below.
  • 30 indicates staggered main levels, which each allow free space to the main level below.
  • FIG. 4 provides an illustration of variations in the general geometry of a main structure.
  • 31 indicates a wing anchored on the main structure and extending outward from the main structure.
  • 32 indicates a wing extending from the main structure into a central plaza or courtyard area, labeled 33, formed by the main structure, 34.
  • the creation of an internal plaza is optional and not an essential element of this invention.
  • 35 indicates a wing extending from the main structure to another wing.
  • 36 indicates a wing that is curved, rather than straight.
  • the flexible, adaptable loft city is created by the erection of a primary structure involving a system of columns supporting continuous platforms, with a vertical separation between platforms sufficient to allow the subsequent insertion of a mezzanine, not an essential component of the primary structure, with sufficient clearance above and below said mezzanine to allow for occupancy and use by human beings; utility connections, such as electric, water, sewage and telecommunications, are placed at regular intervals along the length of the primary structure sufficient to allow for subdivision of the primary structure into independent units.
  • a central corridor runs longitudinally through the primary structure as the primary method of access to units.
  • the outer perimeter of the primary structure should generally be constructed in a manner to allow exterior use, such as in the manner of a balcony or porch.
  • the primary structure may be constructed in any manner desired, whether by steel frame, concrete, wood, or other materials, as this is not essential to the invention.
  • the primary structure must incorporate such elements as may be necessary, such as flanges, bolts, eyelets, rims, etc., to allow for subsequent insertion of a stage, a mezzanine or a suspended ceiling at any point in time after the primary structure is completed.
  • the secondary build-out of the loft city with floors, ceilings, interior walls and partitions, and exterior walls and facades, other than in common-use areas (such as entries, corridors and stairwells), may be accomplished in any manner acceptable in the specific application. It is an essential element of the invention that the primary structure provide a framework for subsequent build-out and not be structurally dependent on any element of the build-out.
  • the invention incorporates certain elements commonly seen in contemporary architecture.
  • shopping malls commonly feature substantial main corridors linking all tenant-occupied space, and allow walls, partitions, floors and ceilings to be altered by tenants to suit their use.
  • Lofts of course, have long provided tenants flexibility in build-out within the space they occupy.
  • Large central court yards figure prominently in European urban architecture of prior centuries.
  • Novel elements of the invention include providing tenants with the discretion beyond erection of interior walls and partitions (as in lofts and shopping malls), allowing them instead also the freedom to construct and maintain exterior walls, with windows, to suit their wishes; to erect mezzanines and stages at various elevations to provide multiple floor levels within their space; to provide themselves with heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment for their own space; to retain and develop substantial outdoor balcony space on a unit-by-unit basis; and to do so anticipating, allowing and encouraging mixed residential, commercial and other uses in a single structure.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Residential Or Office Buildings (AREA)

Abstract

The essence of this invention is the allocation and use of space, both floor space and available volume, within the structure. The invention exists to create what is essentially a stacked array of building sites and internal passageways for subsequent build-out as housing, offices, stores and myriad other uses. The structure is intended to be built on such a scale as to provide space for an entire community, meeting its needs for residential, commercial, and public uses, while preserving potential open green space around the structure to a degree unheralded in the history of urban development. As a necessary consequence, such uses of this invention will result in reduced consumption of energy and other resources, reduced output of pollutants, and increased availability of free time to its residents.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • Not Applicable.
  • STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
  • Not Applicable.
  • REFERENCE TO SEQUENCE LISTING, A TABLE, OR A COMPUTER PROGRAM LISTING COMPACT DISK APPENDIX
  • Not Applicable.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates to architectural structures intended primarily for human occupation and use as residence, place of business and similar day-to-day activities.
  • The invention is intended to solve a central issue in modern urban development: how to combine the advantages of a high-density urban environment with those of a low-density suburban area while reducing or avoiding the difficulties and problems associated with each.
  • The most active, vibrant communities in the world are found in high-density, mixed-use areas. Cities like New York, London, Paris, Tokyo and San Francisco have a high population density, which goes hand-in-hand with the high density of urban amenities of culture, business and entertainment. At the same time, though, such cities suffer from congestion, poor air quality and lack of open spaces.
  • Low-density suburban areas provide residents with those open spaces. Homes with yards situated on cul-de-sacs, undeveloped wooded areas and farm fields, commercial and industrial areas isolated and dispersed, all contribute to a feeling of openness and nature. However, this dispersion of homes, store, businesses and so on prevents the creation of a critical mass of human energy to often to support even a good restaurant, much less the museums, orchestras, institutes, organizations and attractions the make cities so much more vibrant. They also fail to reduce overall transportation demands, trading suburban distance for urban congestion.
  • The modern American habit of building and maintaining suburbs of innumerable free-standing structures dependent on automotive transit imposes great costs on residents in terms of money, energy and pollution. Great swaths of land are severely under-utilized as parking lots, streets and yards for private residences. Free-standing structures are exposed to the weather on every side, imposing substantial heating and cooling costs.
  • The adverse effects of over-utilization of automobiles in terms of pollution of the air and water, as well as in terms of the economic cost of street and highway construction and maintenance, are broadly understood. The cost imposed on the environment by maintenance of vast areas of green lawns, with fertilizers, pesticides in run-off and at times great volumes of water devoted to keeping lawns green, have been widely explored and are becoming generally understood.
  • In terms of economics and finance, development occurs on an opportunistic basis by individual actors with little direction other than the perceived market for a specific project. Zoning controls provide some direction, but at the cost of exacerbating the dispersal of community real property assets. Once a property is developed, whether in the city or the suburb, its use has been determined and will only rarely be changed until it, and its environs, has decayed so substantially that it needs to be extensively renovated or simply destroyed in order for a new use to begin.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention allows all of the places where the activities of ordinary life occur, including homes, businesses, shops, schools, and so on, to be established in a single structure, built in a specific manner to readily allow subsequent redevelopment as needed over the course of time without alteration of the primary structure. In effect, the buildings commonly laid out along numerous streets are instead stacked atop each other, drastically reducing distances between them and significantly increasing the ability to preserve large tracts of open, accessible and usable land, for purposes such as parks, playgrounds, fields and similar grounds.
  • The amount of land that may be preserved for such uses relative to normal development is significant. For example, a community of 5,000 residents in a conventional development would occupy approximately 420 acres, of which buildings, streets and parking lots would cover 117 acres, or 28% of the total area. A loft city structure, built on six levels and occupying the same 420 acres would cover only 3.2% of the total area, its footprint occupying only 13.4 acres, but supporting twice the population. In a conventional development, most of the 303 acres not covered by building or pavement would be partitioned into small, private yards or lawns; in a loft city, the 406 acres unencumbered by building or pavement would amount to a vast expanse of park land, as well as the family garden plots commonly seen in European cities. The result is a community that, with twice the population density, nonetheless has vastly superior open spaces.
  • Aside from land use, the loft city provides the opportunity, with minimal restrictions, for occupants to develop floor plans tailored to their personal wants or needs, and making use of more than one level, to provide balcony space outside the envelope of the structure, and to build exterior walls and windows, and interior floors and walls to suit themselves. Residents thus have most of the freedom of suburban developers in spite of working within an established structure.
  • Structural floor space in the loft city is constructed to support a multitude of final uses, and thus avoid both predetermination of initial use and obstruction to eventual change in use. This also provides enormous flexibility in the scale allowable for individual occupants. Floor plans need not be finalized in the design of the loft city structure; instead, the loft city structure is specifically intended to support a wide range of scale in subsequent development of floor plans. The useable life of the basic structure may thus extend indefinitely in the future even in a dynamic, changing community.
  • Because the structure is developed in two distinct stages, the financing of a project can be bifurcated between the primary structure and the secondary construction. The builder of the primary structure need not finance or manage the secondary construction, while the number of developers in the secondary aspects of construction may be quite numerous and varied in the scale of their specific projects and in the financing of those projects.
  • The structure also differs from the commonly seen structures by providing for a tremendous amount of balcony space for nearly every unit. This contrasts with shopping malls and office buildings which only rarely have exterior space other than at ground level. It also contrasts with many residential buildings which often provide only minimal balconies with minimal usable space. Such balcony space incidentally eliminates the common presentation of a monolithic facade of brick and glass.
  • Finally, the scale of the structure allows a healthy diversity in the financial resources of its residents. Conventional housing developments are often designed in blocks of relatively consistent cost, producing homogeneous communities. In a loft city, people with greater and lesser financial means can thrive in a common environment to their mutual benefit.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING
  • FIG. 1 presents a cross section of the structure, perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, illustrating the variations possible in mezzanines, stages, exterior walls and walls adjoining corridors. Vertical structure elements have been omitted for clarity, since their placement is not an essential element of this invention. Partitions and other walls interior to tenants space have also been omitted, since flexibility in their placement is an essential element of this invention. Note that stages may be constructed at various heights above the main level, and need not be continuous across any specific tenant space. Whether a specific stage is supported directly by an element of the main structure or by tenant-constructed elements, such as interior load-bearing walls, will depend on acceptable limits of load distribution in the specific application. Numbered examples illustrated here include:
      • 1. Penthouse structure, with open balconies.
      • 2. Common-use or private tenant-owned area open to weather.
      • 3. Full inside mezzanine extended over open balcony.
      • 4. Bridge through corridor space, linking mezzanine levels on opposing sides of that corridor.
      • 5. Full inside mezzanine, lower balcony space incorporated into inside space, partial open upper balcony.
      • 6. Full mezzanine, all space incorporated into inside space.
      • 7. Partial platform, partial mezzanine, balcony space fully incorporated into inside space.
      • 8. Main level with reduced vertical clearance, such as for vehicle parking space.
      • 9. Potential location of common utilities connections.
      • 10. Potential location of common utilities connections.
      • 11. Enclosed upper and lower balconies not incorporated into interior space, partial mezzanine extending into corridor.
      • 12. Partial mezzanine, open lower balcony, open upper partial balcony.
      • 13. Potential locations of common utilities connections.
      • 14. Full inside mezzanine, single-level open balcony.
      • 15. Full inside mezzanine; open lower and full upper balconies.
  • FIG. 2 presents a schematic view of variations in the construction of floor space on main levels. 16 indicates potential uncovered balcony space exposed to the weather. 17 indicates floor space reserved for subsequent build-out, generally within a weather-tight envelope, but in certain applications in such a manner as could allow the surface to be exposes to the weather. 18 indicates space to be finished as a corridor for common access through the length of the structure. 19 indicates a main level with a central corridor, bordered on each side by floor space intended for subsequent build-out, each space in turn bordered by floor space built to support use either open or protected from the weather. 20 illustrates the same overall allocation of space, but illustrates holes in the main floor, 21, in the corridor and in tenant space, such as for light wells or to allow for access to a main level from the space below. 22 also illustrates the same overall allocation of floor space as in 19, but with a continuous longitudinal gap, labeled 23, dividing the corridor into two separate, neighboring spaces. Such a gap, which may be as wide or narrow as structurally permitted in a specific structure, may be desired for esthetic effect, for circulation of air or access to light. 24 indicates a truncated main level, for which the corridor has space only on one side for build-out. 25 indicate a main level for which no tenant space has been reserved for potential use as a balcony.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates allowable variations in the longitudinal arrangement of main levels. 26 indicates a main floor that is non-continuous, such as where it is desired to provide greater height in only one section of the overall structure. 27 indicates an allowable interruption in the length of a main floor, providing greater vertical clearance to the main floor below. This may be done to provide an open gallery, for example, or to provide greater vertical space for subsequent build-out. 28 indicates a main level that does not extend as far as the level above it, while 29 indicates a main level that extends beyond the level below. 30 indicates staggered main levels, which each allow free space to the main level below.
  • FIG. 4 provides an illustration of variations in the general geometry of a main structure. 31 indicates a wing anchored on the main structure and extending outward from the main structure. 32 indicates a wing extending from the main structure into a central plaza or courtyard area, labeled 33, formed by the main structure, 34. The creation of an internal plaza is optional and not an essential element of this invention. 35 indicates a wing extending from the main structure to another wing. 36 indicates a wing that is curved, rather than straight.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The flexible, adaptable loft city is created by the erection of a primary structure involving a system of columns supporting continuous platforms, with a vertical separation between platforms sufficient to allow the subsequent insertion of a mezzanine, not an essential component of the primary structure, with sufficient clearance above and below said mezzanine to allow for occupancy and use by human beings; utility connections, such as electric, water, sewage and telecommunications, are placed at regular intervals along the length of the primary structure sufficient to allow for subdivision of the primary structure into independent units. A central corridor runs longitudinally through the primary structure as the primary method of access to units. The outer perimeter of the primary structure should generally be constructed in a manner to allow exterior use, such as in the manner of a balcony or porch.
  • The primary structure may be constructed in any manner desired, whether by steel frame, concrete, wood, or other materials, as this is not essential to the invention. The primary structure must incorporate such elements as may be necessary, such as flanges, bolts, eyelets, rims, etc., to allow for subsequent insertion of a stage, a mezzanine or a suspended ceiling at any point in time after the primary structure is completed.
  • The secondary build-out of the loft city with floors, ceilings, interior walls and partitions, and exterior walls and facades, other than in common-use areas (such as entries, corridors and stairwells), may be accomplished in any manner acceptable in the specific application. It is an essential element of the invention that the primary structure provide a framework for subsequent build-out and not be structurally dependent on any element of the build-out.
  • The invention incorporates certain elements commonly seen in contemporary architecture. For example, shopping malls commonly feature substantial main corridors linking all tenant-occupied space, and allow walls, partitions, floors and ceilings to be altered by tenants to suit their use. Lofts, of course, have long provided tenants flexibility in build-out within the space they occupy. Large central court yards figure prominently in European urban architecture of prior centuries.
  • Novel elements of the invention include providing tenants with the discretion beyond erection of interior walls and partitions (as in lofts and shopping malls), allowing them instead also the freedom to construct and maintain exterior walls, with windows, to suit their wishes; to erect mezzanines and stages at various elevations to provide multiple floor levels within their space; to provide themselves with heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment for their own space; to retain and develop substantial outdoor balcony space on a unit-by-unit basis; and to do so anticipating, allowing and encouraging mixed residential, commercial and other uses in a single structure.

Claims (1)

1. The primary structure has at least two main floors, each generally with sufficient vertical clearance to allow the construction, erection or installation of a mezzanine at an intermediate level above the main floor so as to allow ordinary human habitation and use below and above said mezzanine.
The primary structure is constructed with such structural elements as may be appropriate in the particular application to allow exterior walls, interior partitions, mezzanines elevated platforms or stages, suspended ceilings and finished floors to be constructed, installed, altered and removed independent of the main structure. It thus intentionally omits permanent or finished exterior or interior walls or finished floors in space allocated for final use.
A broad segment of floor space generally no less than 6 feet but often 10 feet or more in width adjacent to the edge of the structure, and running generally the length of the structure, is constructed in such manner as to allow its use as a balcony exposed to the weather, such as by selection or treatment of materials, slope of decking and provision of drainage.
The uppermost main level of the main structure may be constructed to allow additional secondary construction thereon, such as a penthouse, or common-use space open to the weather, such as a promenade, or a combination thereof, or with a roof or roofing in place.
Passageway within the structure is provided by broad central corridors generally 12 feet or greater in width, which may be penetrated by light wells or more significant openings for air circulation, light or other desired effects, and may or may not be of a constant width.
Corridors are constructed, finished, maintained and operated independently from tenant space, with such HVAC, lighting, fire sprinklers and other utilities as may be necessary or appropriate for their use or function.
Utilities, including but not limited to electricity, water, sewage, natural gas and telecommunications, are installed in the main structure with appropriate fixtures provided at such regular intervals as may be necessary to allow tenants to connect with said utilities.
Equipment for heating, ventilation, air conditioning, water heating and other similar needs in tenant space are generally installed, operated, maintained, modified, removed and replaced by tenants.
The overall geometry of the structure may in a line, square, circle or with such other geometry appropriate to the building site, but always featuring a central corridor on each main level providing a primary route for movement through the length of the structure.
Construction methods and materials are not material to this invention. The primary structure may be built using, for example, steel frame, pre-cast or cast-in-place concrete, wood frame, stone or advanced materials, depending on specific engineering, financial and other considerations of each project. The methods, devices, mechanisms and processes of facilitating installation, erection or construction of walls, partitions, floors, platforms and stages in tenant space are similarly not material to this invention, and may be created, selected or designed for specific projects based on relevant engineering, financial and other considerations.
US10/693,313 2003-10-24 2003-10-24 Flexible, adaptable loft city Abandoned US20050086874A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/693,313 US20050086874A1 (en) 2003-10-24 2003-10-24 Flexible, adaptable loft city

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/693,313 US20050086874A1 (en) 2003-10-24 2003-10-24 Flexible, adaptable loft city

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050086874A1 true US20050086874A1 (en) 2005-04-28

Family

ID=34522360

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/693,313 Abandoned US20050086874A1 (en) 2003-10-24 2003-10-24 Flexible, adaptable loft city

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20050086874A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103321452A (en) * 2013-06-25 2013-09-25 常望洲 Three-dimensional sky villa
JP2021105309A (en) * 2019-12-27 2021-07-26 株式会社竹中工務店 building

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6270552B1 (en) * 1997-09-30 2001-08-07 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Rotary hearth furnace for reducing oxides, and method of operating the furnace
US20020073637A1 (en) * 2000-10-10 2002-06-20 Stewart Jerry W. Multi-story multiple dwelling complex with semi-private garage to apartment entry and exit pathways
US20020170243A1 (en) * 2001-05-15 2002-11-21 Don Lawrence C. Construction system for manufactured housing units
US6493996B1 (en) * 1999-04-14 2002-12-17 Simon Alexander Modular building construction system
US20030005653A1 (en) * 2001-07-03 2003-01-09 Keizo Sataka Multiple dwelling house
US6550197B1 (en) * 1999-11-22 2003-04-22 Bruce W. Gray Methods and apparatus for a multi-story dwelling with attached garages
US20040006940A1 (en) * 1999-11-22 2004-01-15 Gray Bruce W. Methods and apparatus for a multi-story dwelling with attached garages

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6270552B1 (en) * 1997-09-30 2001-08-07 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Rotary hearth furnace for reducing oxides, and method of operating the furnace
US6493996B1 (en) * 1999-04-14 2002-12-17 Simon Alexander Modular building construction system
US6550197B1 (en) * 1999-11-22 2003-04-22 Bruce W. Gray Methods and apparatus for a multi-story dwelling with attached garages
US20040006940A1 (en) * 1999-11-22 2004-01-15 Gray Bruce W. Methods and apparatus for a multi-story dwelling with attached garages
US20020073637A1 (en) * 2000-10-10 2002-06-20 Stewart Jerry W. Multi-story multiple dwelling complex with semi-private garage to apartment entry and exit pathways
US20020170243A1 (en) * 2001-05-15 2002-11-21 Don Lawrence C. Construction system for manufactured housing units
US6651393B2 (en) * 2001-05-15 2003-11-25 Lorwood Properties, Inc. Construction system for manufactured housing units
US20030005653A1 (en) * 2001-07-03 2003-01-09 Keizo Sataka Multiple dwelling house
US6922960B2 (en) * 2001-07-03 2005-08-02 Institute Of International Environment Multiple dwelling house

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103321452A (en) * 2013-06-25 2013-09-25 常望洲 Three-dimensional sky villa
JP2021105309A (en) * 2019-12-27 2021-07-26 株式会社竹中工務店 building
JP7429534B2 (en) 2019-12-27 2024-02-08 株式会社竹中工務店 building

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4098039A (en) Multi-level building with prefabricated triangular cantilever units
WO2008009213A1 (en) Multi-floor buliding
US4035973A (en) Bisectional architectural structure
Ellis Explaining Residential Density [Research & Debate]
US20050086874A1 (en) Flexible, adaptable loft city
JP6907885B2 (en) Arrangement structure of buildings
KR102154215B1 (en) Construction Method of Independent Apartment House
Vataman et al. Integration of Composite Structures in Modern Day Architecture: Case Study of City Business Centre, Timisoara, Romania
Crochon Bridging Communities, Building Serendipity.
Zotic et al. Functional Zoning of the City/Village Area and Its Contribution to the Sustainable Development of Settlements
RU2649705C1 (en) School building
Fuhlrott Underground libraries
Sun et al. KNOT—Renovation project of the former market of Torre Spaccata in ROME
Fleet Engage: Other options food pantry, midtown community center
Zawawi et al. PREPERED BY
Friedman Denser Living
Markham Transitional Living Community: a Study of Transformation
Mulvey et al. The Three-Dimensional Urbanism of Raffles City Chongqing
Cohen Alternative design solution to public housing: Ciudad Losada, Venezuela.
Constant Josep Luís Sert: Harvard University Campus Planning and Buildings, 1956–1968
van den Hoek Central Spaces//Public places: Redesign of the Koudenhorn police building into a public library and city dwellings
Rose Gateway to next
Villarreal More than an intersection: A mixed-use building in Lubbock, Texas
LI et al. Bud&Dun-minimal apartment in Shanghai
Del Bo et al. Nature and Mixed Types Architecture for Milano Farini

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION