US20040182708A1 - Electrical field flow fractionation (EFFF) using an electrically insulated flow channel - Google Patents
Electrical field flow fractionation (EFFF) using an electrically insulated flow channel Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040182708A1 US20040182708A1 US10/781,083 US78108304A US2004182708A1 US 20040182708 A1 US20040182708 A1 US 20040182708A1 US 78108304 A US78108304 A US 78108304A US 2004182708 A1 US2004182708 A1 US 2004182708A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- channel
- fractionation
- flow
- efff
- solution
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D17/00—Separation of liquids, not provided for elsewhere, e.g. by thermal diffusion
- B01D17/06—Separation of liquids from each other by electricity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N30/00—Investigating or analysing materials by separation into components using adsorption, absorption or similar phenomena or using ion-exchange, e.g. chromatography or field flow fractionation
- G01N30/0005—Field flow fractionation
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to field flow fractionation technology. More particularly this invention relates to a method of and apparatus for electric field flow fractionation wherein the fractionation flow channel is electrically insulated from the applied electrical field.
- FFF Field flow fractionation
- the fractionation field is imposed perpendicular to the length and width, and parallel to the channel height. Due to capillary effects, a parabolic flow profile develops between the top and bottom plates. A sample is injected into the carrier stream prior to entering the channel, and the sample components are monitored downstream of the channel exit port.
- the fluid flow velocity within the channel is a function of distance from the channel walls.
- the fluid flow velocity is at a maximum at a position midway between the top and bottom plates, and is at a minimum at the channel walls.
- This characteristic distance depends on the type of particle/molecule and its interaction strength with the field, and the particles/molecules diffusion rate in the carrier.
- a particulate/molecular distribution centered close to the wall will be in a slower moving laminae than one centered midway between the walls.
- the distribution centered midway between the walls will be moving faster through the channel and thus, it will exit the channel prior to the distribution centered near the wall.
- the present invention is an apparatus and a process for separation and resolution of particles suspended in, or molecules dissolved in, a sample mixture using electrical field flow fractionation (EFFF). Fractionation of individual components in a mixture/solution is obtained by the interaction of particles/molecules with an electric field applied perpendicular to the flow direction, and externally to the fractionation flow channel. A parabolic flow profile is established between two conducting plate electrodes.
- the plate electrodes are electrically isolated from the sample and carrier with a thin, non-permeable, insulating coating on the inside surfaces of the electrodes (channel walls). This coating forms a barrier between the solution phase and the electric circuit used to generate the applied electric field.
- the flow channel is formed by sandwiching a shaped insulating gasket between the two parallel plate electrodes.
- the side walls of the channel are defined then by the inside walls of the shaped gasket.
- the top and bottom walls are formed by the two, coated, parallel plate electrodes.
- the channel has an inlet port at one end, and an outlet port at the opposite end.
- a carrier fluid comprising either water or an organic solvent is pumped in the channel through the inlet port, and it exits out the outlet port.
- a sample is mixed with the carrier liquid prior to entering the channel and the sample is monitored for separation of the particles/molecules downstream of the exit port.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic, perspective view of an EFFF device using an electrically insulated fractionation flow channel according to the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a detail, schematic view of the flow of a sample in a device according to FIG. 1.
- FIG. 3 is an enlarged, side schematic view of the flow profile from FIG. 2.
- FIG. 4 is a graph of the output from an analyzer of the exit port from a device according to FIG. 1 operating on beta carotene and yellow toner.
- FIG. 5 is a graph of the output from an analyzer of the exit port from a device according to FIG. 1 operating on inverse micelles of LudoxTM in H 2 0/AOT dodecane.
- Charge transfer across the channel boundary causes a current to flow through the charging circuit.
- Current measurements can be used as an indication that there is movement of the charge carriers within the channel, which may be useful information. But, the presence of current also indicates that electrochemical processes are occurring at the channel surface, and this is a detrimental effect of the conducting channel walls. Current also means some species are undergoing reduction-oxidation (redox) processes. In this case, the analyte could be undergoing reductive or oxidative processes that alter its identity.
- Electrical FFF separates charged particles through their interaction with the applied electric field. If the charged particles migrate toward the channel wall and lose their charge, they may continue to move down the channel, but with no charge, and diffusion alone acts to re-disperse them. This will cause unwanted band broadening and loss of resolving power of the instrument.
- Particles with like charge will tend to repel each other which acts to reduce particle flocculation. If the particles lose their charge, particle flocculation is more likely, i.e., interparticle adhesion and adhesion to the channel wall are more likely to occur.
- the configuration disclosed herein circumvents all of these adverse conditions and permits effective particle separation and analysis based upon size and electrophoretic mobility.
- FIG. 1 A schematic of the EFFF apparatus and process of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1.
- the design employs a ribbon shaped channel that is obtained by sandwiching a shaped electrically insulating gasket between two parallel plate electrodes.
- the electrodes are insulated from the carrier liquid with a thin layer of PTFE, which serves to eliminate any charge transfer processes from occurring across the electrode boundary.
- Inlet and outlet ports at the apex at each end of the channel permit fluid flow through the channel.
- the channel dimensions are typically 125 ⁇ m (height) ⁇ 67 cm (length) ⁇ 1 cm (width). Due to the high aspect ratio of the channel, a parabolic flow profile develops across the narrow height dimension. This is shown in FIG. 2.
- FIG. 3 An enlarged, side schematic view of the flow profile from FIG. 2 is schematically shown in FIG. 3.
- a high molecular weight polymer (more influenced by the fractionation field) is separated from a low molecular wight polymer (less influenced by the fractionation field).
- an Alltech model 301 HPLC pump is used to pump the carrier solution through the channel, and an HP series 1050 UV detector is used in combination with a Wyatt Technology miniDAWN to detect and size eluting particles.
- a Rheodyne model 7725 seven port sample injection valve is used to inject typically a 20 ⁇ L sample into the channel.
- An HP model 33120A function generator is used to establish, monitor and control the electrostatic potential across the channel.
- One carrier (solvent) for use in this work is Norpar-12TM, available from Exxon Corporation. This is a normal paraffinic hydrocarbon with average chain length of 12 carbons and a conductivity of ⁇ 0.1 pmho. The fractionation cell filled with this solvent behaves very much like a capacitor, and I/E calculations may be approximated using standard formulas.
- the preferred carrier solution used is NorparTM with a non ionic surfactant Triton N-42 and a zirconium metal soap.
- a solution of soluble zirconium hexadecanoate (Hex-CemTM) is available from Mooney Chemical (Cleveland, Ohio). Dispersions of various pigments, including Sun Fast Blue, Sun Brite Yellow and Sun Brite Maroon, all from Sun Chemical, are typically dispersed into NorparTM as electrophotographic toners.
- EFFF EFFF enables us to separate components in a mixture by differences in the strength of the coupling of the analyte particles between the electrostatic field and the particles' diffusivity. If the coupling between the field and particle is weak, or if the particle is a fast diffuser, then there may be no measurable retention. The greater the particle field interaction or the slower the diffusion rate, the greater the retention. This is shown in FIG. 4. A mixture of beta carotene and yellow toner particles is separated due to differences in electrophoretic mobility and diffusion rate. Beta carotene is a small uncharged molecule, and it is not retained.
- beta carotene can be used to determine the channel void volume, i.e., the geometric volume of the channel, or the volume of carrier required to elute an unretained species.
- the yellow toner particles are retained, and the retention volume can be seen to depend on the field strength.
- the beta carotene peak position is invariant with field strength and it is always observed at 1.63 mL. This is the void volume of the channel.
- Np-EFFF channel Another advantage of the Np-EFFF channel is the ability to separate and characterize micellar structures.
- a micelle is defined as a small droplet of one solvent suspended in a second, immiscible solvent. “Micelle” is usually assumed to mean a non-aqueous droplet suspended in an aqueous medium.
- Reverse (or “inverse”) micelles are usually understood to mean water droplets suspended in a non-aqueous solvent. Either or both liquids may contain other solutes as well, and could therefore be a solution. The figure shows retention of inverse micelles.
- the sample consisted of a 10% aqueous LudoxTM solution suspended in a solution of dodecane and the non-ionic surfactant AOT. Retention volume increases with field strength, according to theory, showing the separation of the micelles according to size, electrophoretic mobility and diffusitivity.
- micellar structures Due to the fragility of micellar structures, there are very few methods of characterizing them without destroying them. Chromatographic and centrifugation methods are too aggressive. The shear forces of these aggressive methods destroy the micelles. In contrast, the Np-EFFF channel separate the micelles, and can be used to determine micelle size distribution and re-organization rates, for example.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Thermal Sciences (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Electrostatic Separation (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Electric Means (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention is an apparatus and a process for separation and resolution of particles suspended in, or molecules dissolved in, a sample mixture or solution using electrical field flow fractionation (EFFF). Fractionation of individual components in the mixture/solution is obtained by the interaction of particles/molecules with an electric field applied perpendicular to the flow direction, and externally to the fractionation channel. The plate electrodes are electrically isolated from the sample and carrier within a thin, non-permeable, insulating coating on the inside surfaces electrodes. This coating forms a barrier between the solution phase and the electric circuit used to generate the working electric field. The flow channel is formed by sandwiching a shaped insulating gasket between the two parallel plate electrodes. The side walls of the channel are defined then by the inside walls of the shaped, insulating gasket.
Description
- This is a continuation of, and claims priority from, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/676,301, filed Sep. 26, 2000, entitled Electrical Field Flow Fractionation (EFFF) Using An Electrically Insulated Flow Channel, issuing as U.S. Pat. No. 6,692,627 on Feb. 17, 2004, which application is herein incorporated by reference.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- This invention relates generally to field flow fractionation technology. More particularly this invention relates to a method of and apparatus for electric field flow fractionation wherein the fractionation flow channel is electrically insulated from the applied electrical field.
- 2. Related Art
- Field flow fractionation (FFF) was first described in the patent literature in U.S. Pat. No. 3,449,938 (Giddings). Fractionation of components in a mixture was achieved by applying a temperature gradient between the top and bottom plates of a fractionation flow channel. Since then, separation has been achieved by the use of various types of force fields. A general method for separation by FFF is: A ribbon shaped flow channel is created by sandwiching a shaped gasket between two parallel plates (channel walls). The channel is typically long in the axial dimension, i.e., for analytical purposes, about 10-100 cm long in the direction of fluid flow. A typical channel has a width of 1-2 cm and a height of 25-200 μm. The fractionation field is imposed perpendicular to the length and width, and parallel to the channel height. Due to capillary effects, a parabolic flow profile develops between the top and bottom plates. A sample is injected into the carrier stream prior to entering the channel, and the sample components are monitored downstream of the channel exit port.
- With conditions of laminar flow, the fluid flow velocity within the channel is a function of distance from the channel walls. The fluid flow velocity is at a maximum at a position midway between the top and bottom plates, and is at a minimum at the channel walls. When a fractionation field is applied perpendicular to the direction of laminar flow, any particle/molecule that interacts with the force will be forced to one or the other wall of the channel. However, particle/molecule accumulation at a wall cannot continue indefinitely, as particulate/molecular mass diffusion acts to counter the buildup of concentration at the wall. The two competing processes come to equilibrium, creating a Gaussian concentration distribution at a characteristic distance from the wall. This characteristic distance depends on the type of particle/molecule and its interaction strength with the field, and the particles/molecules diffusion rate in the carrier. A particulate/molecular distribution centered close to the wall will be in a slower moving laminae than one centered midway between the walls. The distribution centered midway between the walls will be moving faster through the channel and thus, it will exit the channel prior to the distribution centered near the wall.
- Early demonstrations of an electric field applied to an FFF flow channel used a semipermeable membrane for the channel walls, with the electrodes positioned externally. A later EFFF channel design used graphite plate electrodes, (U.S. Pat. No. 5,240,618 Caldwell et al.) The carrier solution used in this latter case was either deionized water or an aqueous solution containing a red-ox couple such as quinone/hydroquinone. In both of these examples there was an electrical current flow across the channel.
- The present invention is an apparatus and a process for separation and resolution of particles suspended in, or molecules dissolved in, a sample mixture using electrical field flow fractionation (EFFF). Fractionation of individual components in a mixture/solution is obtained by the interaction of particles/molecules with an electric field applied perpendicular to the flow direction, and externally to the fractionation flow channel. A parabolic flow profile is established between two conducting plate electrodes. The plate electrodes are electrically isolated from the sample and carrier with a thin, non-permeable, insulating coating on the inside surfaces of the electrodes (channel walls). This coating forms a barrier between the solution phase and the electric circuit used to generate the applied electric field.
- The flow channel is formed by sandwiching a shaped insulating gasket between the two parallel plate electrodes. The side walls of the channel are defined then by the inside walls of the shaped gasket. The top and bottom walls are formed by the two, coated, parallel plate electrodes. The channel has an inlet port at one end, and an outlet port at the opposite end. A carrier fluid comprising either water or an organic solvent is pumped in the channel through the inlet port, and it exits out the outlet port. A sample is mixed with the carrier liquid prior to entering the channel and the sample is monitored for separation of the particles/molecules downstream of the exit port.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic, perspective view of an EFFF device using an electrically insulated fractionation flow channel according to the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a detail, schematic view of the flow of a sample in a device according to FIG. 1.
- FIG. 3, is an enlarged, side schematic view of the flow profile from FIG. 2.
- FIG. 4 is a graph of the output from an analyzer of the exit port from a device according to FIG. 1 operating on beta carotene and yellow toner.
- FIG. 5 is a graph of the output from an analyzer of the exit port from a device according to FIG. 1 operating on inverse micelles of Ludox™ in
H 20/AOT dodecane. - All the known prior demonstrations of particulate/molecular separation using EFFF were done using a channel design that employed conducting electrodes or ion permeable membranes for the channel walls. Both of these designs allow charge transfer across the channel boundary. Insulator coated aluminum walls, on the other hand, allow an electric field to be applied across the channel, but do not allow charge transfer across the channel boundary. In addition, the insulator coating reduces chemical and physical interactions between the analyte particles and the channel walls. The insulator may be polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or any other non-conductor.
- Charge transfer across the channel boundary causes a current to flow through the charging circuit. Current measurements can be used as an indication that there is movement of the charge carriers within the channel, which may be useful information. But, the presence of current also indicates that electrochemical processes are occurring at the channel surface, and this is a detrimental effect of the conducting channel walls. Current also means some species are undergoing reduction-oxidation (redox) processes. In this case, the analyte could be undergoing reductive or oxidative processes that alter its identity. Electrical FFF separates charged particles through their interaction with the applied electric field. If the charged particles migrate toward the channel wall and lose their charge, they may continue to move down the channel, but with no charge, and diffusion alone acts to re-disperse them. This will cause unwanted band broadening and loss of resolving power of the instrument.
- Particles with like charge will tend to repel each other which acts to reduce particle flocculation. If the particles lose their charge, particle flocculation is more likely, i.e., interparticle adhesion and adhesion to the channel wall are more likely to occur. The configuration disclosed herein circumvents all of these adverse conditions and permits effective particle separation and analysis based upon size and electrophoretic mobility.
- A schematic of the EFFF apparatus and process of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1. The design employs a ribbon shaped channel that is obtained by sandwiching a shaped electrically insulating gasket between two parallel plate electrodes. The electrodes are insulated from the carrier liquid with a thin layer of PTFE, which serves to eliminate any charge transfer processes from occurring across the electrode boundary. Inlet and outlet ports at the apex at each end of the channel permit fluid flow through the channel. The channel dimensions are typically 125 μm (height)×67 cm (length)×1 cm (width). Due to the high aspect ratio of the channel, a parabolic flow profile develops across the narrow height dimension. This is shown in FIG. 2.
- An enlarged, side schematic view of the flow profile from FIG. 2 is schematically shown in FIG. 3. In FIG. 3 a high molecular weight polymer (more influenced by the fractionation field) is separated from a low molecular wight polymer (less influenced by the fractionation field).
- For analytical purposes, an Alltech model 301 HPLC pump is used to pump the carrier solution through the channel, and an HP series 1050 UV detector is used in combination with a Wyatt Technology miniDAWN to detect and size eluting particles. A Rheodyne model 7725 seven port sample injection valve is used to inject typically a 20 μL sample into the channel. An HP model 33120A function generator is used to establish, monitor and control the electrostatic potential across the channel.
- One carrier (solvent) for use in this work is Norpar-12™, available from Exxon Corporation. This is a normal paraffinic hydrocarbon with average chain length of 12 carbons and a conductivity of <0.1 pmho. The fractionation cell filled with this solvent behaves very much like a capacitor, and I/E calculations may be approximated using standard formulas. The preferred carrier solution used is Norpar™ with a non ionic surfactant Triton N-42 and a zirconium metal soap.
- A solution of soluble zirconium hexadecanoate (Hex-Cem™) is available from Mooney Chemical (Cleveland, Ohio). Dispersions of various pigments, including Sun Fast Blue, Sun Brite Yellow and Sun Brite Maroon, all from Sun Chemical, are typically dispersed into Norpar™ as electrophotographic toners.
- The focus of this experiment was to separate toner particles by electrophoretic mobility with EFFF.
- EFFF enables us to separate components in a mixture by differences in the strength of the coupling of the analyte particles between the electrostatic field and the particles' diffusivity. If the coupling between the field and particle is weak, or if the particle is a fast diffuser, then there may be no measurable retention. The greater the particle field interaction or the slower the diffusion rate, the greater the retention. This is shown in FIG. 4. A mixture of beta carotene and yellow toner particles is separated due to differences in electrophoretic mobility and diffusion rate. Beta carotene is a small uncharged molecule, and it is not retained. Thus, beta carotene can be used to determine the channel void volume, i.e., the geometric volume of the channel, or the volume of carrier required to elute an unretained species. The yellow toner particles are retained, and the retention volume can be seen to depend on the field strength. The beta carotene peak position is invariant with field strength and it is always observed at 1.63 mL. This is the void volume of the channel.
- Another advantage of the Np-EFFF channel is the ability to separate and characterize micellar structures. In this instance, we have demonstrated the retention of reverse micelles according to the ratio of their electrophoretic mobilities and diffusivities. A micelle is defined as a small droplet of one solvent suspended in a second, immiscible solvent. “Micelle” is usually assumed to mean a non-aqueous droplet suspended in an aqueous medium. Reverse (or “inverse”) micelles are usually understood to mean water droplets suspended in a non-aqueous solvent. Either or both liquids may contain other solutes as well, and could therefore be a solution. The figure shows retention of inverse micelles. The sample consisted of a 10% aqueous Ludox™ solution suspended in a solution of dodecane and the non-ionic surfactant AOT. Retention volume increases with field strength, according to theory, showing the separation of the micelles according to size, electrophoretic mobility and diffusitivity.
- Due to the fragility of micellar structures, there are very few methods of characterizing them without destroying them. Chromatographic and centrifugation methods are too aggressive. The shear forces of these aggressive methods destroy the micelles. In contrast, the Np-EFFF channel separate the micelles, and can be used to determine micelle size distribution and re-organization rates, for example.
- Although this invention has been described above with reference to particular means, materials and embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to these disclosed particulars, but extends instead to all equivalents within the scope of the following claims.
Claims (4)
1. An EFFF apparatus, comprising a pair of plate electrodes electrically isolated from the fractionation flow channel.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the electrical isolation is obtained with a thin, non-permeable insulating coating on the flow channel side of each electrode.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the coating is a PTFE coating.
4. An EFFF process wherein electrodes are electrically isolated from the fractionation flow channel.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/781,083 US20040182708A1 (en) | 2000-09-26 | 2004-02-17 | Electrical field flow fractionation (EFFF) using an electrically insulated flow channel |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/676,301 US6692627B1 (en) | 2000-09-26 | 2000-09-26 | Electrical field flow fractionation (EFFF) using an electrically insulated flow channel |
US10/781,083 US20040182708A1 (en) | 2000-09-26 | 2004-02-17 | Electrical field flow fractionation (EFFF) using an electrically insulated flow channel |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/676,301 Continuation US6692627B1 (en) | 2000-09-26 | 2000-09-26 | Electrical field flow fractionation (EFFF) using an electrically insulated flow channel |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040182708A1 true US20040182708A1 (en) | 2004-09-23 |
Family
ID=31188897
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/676,301 Expired - Fee Related US6692627B1 (en) | 2000-09-26 | 2000-09-26 | Electrical field flow fractionation (EFFF) using an electrically insulated flow channel |
US10/781,083 Abandoned US20040182708A1 (en) | 2000-09-26 | 2004-02-17 | Electrical field flow fractionation (EFFF) using an electrically insulated flow channel |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/676,301 Expired - Fee Related US6692627B1 (en) | 2000-09-26 | 2000-09-26 | Electrical field flow fractionation (EFFF) using an electrically insulated flow channel |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6692627B1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080206802A1 (en) * | 2006-04-26 | 2008-08-28 | Fujitsu Limited | Microinjection device and microinjection method |
US20200408726A1 (en) * | 2019-06-25 | 2020-12-31 | Wyatt Technology Corporation | Sealing a field flow fractionator |
Families Citing this family (35)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6692627B1 (en) * | 2000-09-26 | 2004-02-17 | Boise State University | Electrical field flow fractionation (EFFF) using an electrically insulated flow channel |
NO316109B1 (en) * | 2001-11-07 | 2003-12-15 | Aibel As | A coalescer device |
US7086386B2 (en) * | 2004-03-05 | 2006-08-08 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Engine system and method accounting for engine misfire |
US7811438B2 (en) | 2004-12-08 | 2010-10-12 | Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated | Bio-enrichment device to enhance sample collection and detection |
EP1877754A1 (en) * | 2005-04-29 | 2008-01-16 | The Uab Research Foundation | Device for the growth of macromolecular crystals and drug screening |
US7681738B2 (en) * | 2005-09-12 | 2010-03-23 | Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated | Traveling wave arrays, separation methods, and purification cells |
US20080237044A1 (en) * | 2007-03-28 | 2008-10-02 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for concentrating molecules |
US8292083B2 (en) * | 2007-04-19 | 2012-10-23 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for separating particles, cells, molecules and particulates |
US8702945B2 (en) * | 2007-05-18 | 2014-04-22 | University Of Washington | Time-varying flows for microfluidic particle separation |
US7837379B2 (en) | 2007-08-13 | 2010-11-23 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Devices for producing a continuously flowing concentration gradient in laminar flow |
US7931734B2 (en) * | 2007-08-29 | 2011-04-26 | Board Of Regents Of The Nevada System Of Higher Education, On Behalf Of The Desert Research Institute | Particle separation |
US8396700B2 (en) * | 2008-09-02 | 2013-03-12 | Board Of Regents Of The Nevada System Of Higher Education, On Behalf Of The Desert Research Institute | Aggregate simulation |
CN102245310A (en) | 2008-11-05 | 2011-11-16 | Fmc技术股份有限公司 | Gas electrostatic coalescer |
US20100224479A1 (en) * | 2009-02-02 | 2010-09-09 | The Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Educ., on Behalf of the Desert Res. Inst. | Morphology engineering of aggregates |
US9475709B2 (en) | 2010-08-25 | 2016-10-25 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Perforated graphene deionization or desalination |
CN102319519B (en) * | 2011-06-27 | 2013-12-25 | 薛思东 | Extract continuous electrical separation system |
US10653824B2 (en) | 2012-05-25 | 2020-05-19 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Two-dimensional materials and uses thereof |
US9610546B2 (en) | 2014-03-12 | 2017-04-04 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Separation membranes formed from perforated graphene and methods for use thereof |
US9744617B2 (en) | 2014-01-31 | 2017-08-29 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Methods for perforating multi-layer graphene through ion bombardment |
US10418143B2 (en) | 2015-08-05 | 2019-09-17 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Perforatable sheets of graphene-based material |
US9834809B2 (en) | 2014-02-28 | 2017-12-05 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Syringe for obtaining nano-sized materials for selective assays and related methods of use |
US10980919B2 (en) | 2016-04-14 | 2021-04-20 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Methods for in vivo and in vitro use of graphene and other two-dimensional materials |
US10376845B2 (en) | 2016-04-14 | 2019-08-13 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Membranes with tunable selectivity |
WO2014164621A1 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2014-10-09 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Method for forming filter with uniform aperture size |
US9572918B2 (en) | 2013-06-21 | 2017-02-21 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Graphene-based filter for isolating a substance from blood |
CA2938305A1 (en) | 2014-01-31 | 2015-08-06 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Processes for forming composite structures with a two-dimensional material using a porous, non-sacrificial supporting layer |
CN105940479A (en) | 2014-01-31 | 2016-09-14 | 洛克希德马丁公司 | Methods for perforating two-dimensional materials using a broad ion field |
CA2942496A1 (en) | 2014-03-12 | 2015-09-17 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Separation membranes formed from perforated graphene |
WO2015138808A1 (en) * | 2014-03-12 | 2015-09-17 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Graphene-based molecular separation and sequestration device |
EA201790508A1 (en) | 2014-09-02 | 2017-08-31 | Локхид Мартин Корпорейшн | HEMODIALYSIS AND HEMOPHILTRATION MEMBRANES BASED ON TWO-DIMENSIONAL MEMBRANE MATERIAL AND METHODS OF THEIR APPLICATION |
JP2018530499A (en) | 2015-08-06 | 2018-10-18 | ロッキード・マーチン・コーポレーション | Nanoparticle modification and perforation of graphene |
WO2017180139A1 (en) | 2016-04-14 | 2017-10-19 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Two-dimensional membrane structures having flow passages |
JP2019511451A (en) | 2016-04-14 | 2019-04-25 | ロッキード・マーチン・コーポレーション | Method of processing graphene sheet for large transfer using floatation method |
WO2017180141A1 (en) | 2016-04-14 | 2017-10-19 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Selective interfacial mitigation of graphene defects |
SG11201808961QA (en) | 2016-04-14 | 2018-11-29 | Lockheed Corp | Methods for in situ monitoring and control of defect formation or healing |
Citations (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3449938A (en) * | 1967-08-03 | 1969-06-17 | Univ Utah | Method for separating and detecting fluid materials |
US3849275A (en) * | 1972-06-16 | 1974-11-19 | J Candor | Method and apparatus for removing and/or separating particles from fluid containing the same |
US4073712A (en) * | 1976-11-19 | 1978-02-14 | Electrostatic Equipment Company | Electrostatic water treatment |
US4214981A (en) * | 1978-10-23 | 1980-07-29 | University Of Utah | Steric field-flow fractionation |
US4440638A (en) * | 1982-02-16 | 1984-04-03 | U.T. Board Of Regents | Surface field-effect device for manipulation of charged species |
US4722787A (en) * | 1984-08-02 | 1988-02-02 | Commissariat A L'energie Atomique | Apparatus for contacting two immiscible liquids with the application of an electric field |
US5036365A (en) * | 1988-11-21 | 1991-07-30 | Benzion Landa | Field assisted filter and electrophotographic copying machine using the same |
US5039426A (en) * | 1988-05-17 | 1991-08-13 | University Of Utah | Process for continuous particle and polymer separation in split-flow thin cells using flow-dependent lift forces |
US5133844A (en) * | 1990-03-15 | 1992-07-28 | United States Department Of Energy | Method of electric field flow fractionation wherein the polarity of the electric field is periodically reversed |
US5234555A (en) * | 1991-02-05 | 1993-08-10 | Ibbott Jack Kenneth | Method and apparatus for ionizing fluids utilizing a capacitive effect |
US5240618A (en) * | 1992-02-03 | 1993-08-31 | University Of Utah Research Foundation | Electrical field-flow fractionation using redox couple added to carrier fluid |
US5480522A (en) * | 1994-01-04 | 1996-01-02 | Makiko Yoshida | Self-energizing fluid treatment apparatus employing external electrodes |
US6136171A (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2000-10-24 | The University Of Utah Research Foundation | Micromachined electrical field-flow fractionation system |
US6692627B1 (en) * | 2000-09-26 | 2004-02-17 | Boise State University | Electrical field flow fractionation (EFFF) using an electrically insulated flow channel |
-
2000
- 2000-09-26 US US09/676,301 patent/US6692627B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2004
- 2004-02-17 US US10/781,083 patent/US20040182708A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3449938A (en) * | 1967-08-03 | 1969-06-17 | Univ Utah | Method for separating and detecting fluid materials |
US3849275A (en) * | 1972-06-16 | 1974-11-19 | J Candor | Method and apparatus for removing and/or separating particles from fluid containing the same |
US4073712A (en) * | 1976-11-19 | 1978-02-14 | Electrostatic Equipment Company | Electrostatic water treatment |
US4214981A (en) * | 1978-10-23 | 1980-07-29 | University Of Utah | Steric field-flow fractionation |
US4440638A (en) * | 1982-02-16 | 1984-04-03 | U.T. Board Of Regents | Surface field-effect device for manipulation of charged species |
US4722787A (en) * | 1984-08-02 | 1988-02-02 | Commissariat A L'energie Atomique | Apparatus for contacting two immiscible liquids with the application of an electric field |
US5039426A (en) * | 1988-05-17 | 1991-08-13 | University Of Utah | Process for continuous particle and polymer separation in split-flow thin cells using flow-dependent lift forces |
US5036365A (en) * | 1988-11-21 | 1991-07-30 | Benzion Landa | Field assisted filter and electrophotographic copying machine using the same |
US5133844A (en) * | 1990-03-15 | 1992-07-28 | United States Department Of Energy | Method of electric field flow fractionation wherein the polarity of the electric field is periodically reversed |
US5234555A (en) * | 1991-02-05 | 1993-08-10 | Ibbott Jack Kenneth | Method and apparatus for ionizing fluids utilizing a capacitive effect |
US5240618A (en) * | 1992-02-03 | 1993-08-31 | University Of Utah Research Foundation | Electrical field-flow fractionation using redox couple added to carrier fluid |
US5480522A (en) * | 1994-01-04 | 1996-01-02 | Makiko Yoshida | Self-energizing fluid treatment apparatus employing external electrodes |
US6136171A (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2000-10-24 | The University Of Utah Research Foundation | Micromachined electrical field-flow fractionation system |
US6692627B1 (en) * | 2000-09-26 | 2004-02-17 | Boise State University | Electrical field flow fractionation (EFFF) using an electrically insulated flow channel |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080206802A1 (en) * | 2006-04-26 | 2008-08-28 | Fujitsu Limited | Microinjection device and microinjection method |
US20200408726A1 (en) * | 2019-06-25 | 2020-12-31 | Wyatt Technology Corporation | Sealing a field flow fractionator |
US11971392B2 (en) * | 2019-06-25 | 2024-04-30 | Wyatt Technology, Llc | Sealing structure for a field flow fractionator |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6692627B1 (en) | 2004-02-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6692627B1 (en) | Electrical field flow fractionation (EFFF) using an electrically insulated flow channel | |
Caldwell et al. | Electrical field-flow fractionation in particle separation. 1. Monodisperse standards | |
US5482608A (en) | Capillary electrophoresis flow control system | |
Knox | Terminology and nomenclature in capillary electroseparation systems | |
Stevens et al. | Electroosmotic propulsion of eluent through silica-based chromatographic media | |
Anand et al. | Bipolar electrode focusing: faradaic ion concentration polarization | |
US5240618A (en) | Electrical field-flow fractionation using redox couple added to carrier fluid | |
Müller et al. | A 3-D microelectrode system for handling and caging single cells and particles | |
Burgi | Large volume stacking of anions in capillary electrophoresis using an electroosmotic flow modifier as a pump | |
Riekkola et al. | Terminology for analytical capillary electromigration techniques (IUPAC Recommendations 2003) | |
US20060201868A1 (en) | Methods and devices for high-throughput dielectrophoretic concentration | |
WO2000016907A1 (en) | Micromachined electrical field-flow fractionation system | |
Tri et al. | Development of electrical field-flow fractionation | |
Pedersen-Bjergaard et al. | Electrical potential can drive liquid-liquid extraction for sample preparation in chromatography | |
Park et al. | Induced-charge electrokinetics, bipolar current, and concentration polarization in a microchannel–Nafion-membrane system | |
Tao et al. | Enhanced particle trapping performance of induced charge electroosmosis | |
Derjaguin et al. | Dependence of the floatability of antimonite on the value of zeta-potential | |
Vanifatova et al. | Separation of unmodified polystyrene nanosphere standards by capillary zone electrophoresis | |
US7597791B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for generating electric fields and flow distributions for rapidly separating molecules | |
JP2010517004A (en) | Stabilization and separation media for electrophoresis | |
Avranas et al. | Demulsification rate and zeta potential of O/W emulsions | |
Tasci et al. | Circuit modification in electrical field flow fractionation systems generating higher resolution separation of nanoparticles | |
Bodor et al. | Conductivity detection cell for capillary zone electrophoresis with a solution mediated contact of the separated constituents with the detection electrodes | |
Barany et al. | Study of nonlinear electrophoresis | |
Schimpf et al. | Separation of charged latex particles by electrical field-flow fractionation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY, IDAHO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:RUSSELL, DALE D., DR.;HILL, MICHAEL W., DR.;REEL/FRAME:017826/0043 Effective date: 20000908 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |