US20040155146A1 - Method of controlling a landing guide path of an aircraft - Google Patents

Method of controlling a landing guide path of an aircraft Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040155146A1
US20040155146A1 US10/713,160 US71316003A US2004155146A1 US 20040155146 A1 US20040155146 A1 US 20040155146A1 US 71316003 A US71316003 A US 71316003A US 2004155146 A1 US2004155146 A1 US 2004155146A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
aircraft
rotating
pivotable
control
wing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/713,160
Inventor
Susanne Wyrembek
Peter May
Klaus Muthreich
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Airbus Operations GmbH
Original Assignee
Airbus Operations GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Airbus Operations GmbH filed Critical Airbus Operations GmbH
Priority to US10/713,160 priority Critical patent/US20040155146A1/en
Assigned to AIRBUS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH reassignment AIRBUS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MAY, PETER, MUTHREICH, KLAUS, WYREMBEK, SUSANNE
Publication of US20040155146A1 publication Critical patent/US20040155146A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C9/00Adjustable control surfaces or members, e.g. rudders
    • B64C9/32Air braking surfaces
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C23/00Influencing air flow over aircraft surfaces, not otherwise provided for
    • B64C23/06Influencing air flow over aircraft surfaces, not otherwise provided for by generating vortices
    • B64C23/065Influencing air flow over aircraft surfaces, not otherwise provided for by generating vortices at the wing tips
    • B64C23/069Influencing air flow over aircraft surfaces, not otherwise provided for by generating vortices at the wing tips using one or more wing tip airfoil devices, e.g. winglets, splines, wing tip fences or raked wingtips
    • B64C23/076Influencing air flow over aircraft surfaces, not otherwise provided for by generating vortices at the wing tips using one or more wing tip airfoil devices, e.g. winglets, splines, wing tip fences or raked wingtips the wing tip airfoil devices comprising one or more separate moveable members thereon affecting the vortices, e.g. flaps
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C9/00Adjustable control surfaces or members, e.g. rudders
    • B64C9/32Air braking surfaces
    • B64C9/323Air braking surfaces associated with wings
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T50/00Aeronautics or air transport
    • Y02T50/10Drag reduction

Definitions

  • the invention relates to an arrangement of control elements and an associated method for controlling the landing approach of an aircraft by a controlled descent along a glide path.
  • This landing process is initiated already at a considerable distance and time out from the destination airport, by a controlled descent on the so-called glide path or glide slope. Since the gliding descent along the glide path takes up a substantial amount of the total time of the overall landing process, reducing the time required for this gliding descent will have a substantial impact on shortening the overall time required for the landing process, thereby reducing the total landing and take-off cycle time, and increasing the landing capacity per hour of the airport.
  • the descent of the aircraft along the glide path or glide slope is controlled by the relationship of lift and drag of the aircraft.
  • the coefficient of lift of the aircraft is dependent on the angle of attack or incidence of the aircraft as well as the incident flow velocity of the relative wind with respect to the aircraft.
  • Modem conventional aircraft use their typical control surfaces or control elements, such as flaps, rudder, spoilers, etc. and adjustments of the propulsion engine thrust, to control the descent of the aircraft along the glide path.
  • these conventional control elements can only achieve a variation of the lift and of the aerodynamic drag in a mutually coupled manner. In other words, any adjustment of the conventional control elements will simultaneously influence both the total lift and the total drag of the aircraft.
  • a device for controlling the landing approach of an aircraft including a respective pivotable control element arranged respectively at the outboard wingtip of each wing of the aircraft.
  • These pivotable control elements can be selectively pivoted to deflected positions, whereby the coefficient of lift of the aircraft is not influenced (i.e. remains essentially constant with no practically significant change), the coefficient of drag of the aircraft is altered, and the aerodynamic drag or flow resistance of the aircraft is increased. As a result, the glide path angle is made steeper, i.e. increased relative to the horizontal plane.
  • each pivotable control element is pivotally connected to a fixed plane or surface member, which in turn is rigidly connected to or a part of an aerodynamic component that is secured to the respective wingtip.
  • the aerodynamic component may, for example, be embodied as a wingtip fence or a winglet, which is additionally provided with the pivotable control element.
  • the pivot axis preferably extends perpendicularly to the major plane of the wing or parallel to the yaw axis of the aircraft.
  • the pivotal deflection of the inventive control elements achieves a fine adjustment that is superimposed on the basic aerodynamic configuration of the aircraft that is set by the control adjustments of the general control surfaces or control elements such as the flaps, spoilers, engine thrust adjustment, etc. Furthermore, by carrying out rapid fluctuating deflections with a time varying deflection angle or magnitude of the pivotable control elements, a rapid collapse of the wingtip vortices can be achieved.
  • the invention By making the gliding descent of the aircraft steeper and faster over a shorter horizontal distance along the glide path, the invention reduces the total time required for a landing process, and thereby increases the take-off and landing cycle time and throughput capacity of the airport. Moreover, the invention makes it possible to carry out a finely adjustable drag control of the aircraft with a large bandwidth or large range of control, while being essentially independent of the lift and other moments of the aircraft. The inventive control further makes it possible to reduce the flight noise of the aircraft, especially in the landing configuration.
  • the inventive pivotable control elements can be retrofitted onto previously existing aerodynamically effective components on the wingtips of an aircraft, having various forms and sizes, such as winglets, wingtip fences, or the like, for example.
  • the inventive control elements can be readily adapted to the optimized wingtip element configurations required for cruise flight and/or a take-off configuration, in connection with various structural embodiments of the wingtip fences, winglets, or the like.
  • the inventive pivotable control elements can be moved or pivoted in various different conventionally known ways using any conventionally known mechanisms, for example, by means of hydraulic, mechanical, electromechanical, or other actuators.
  • the aerodynamic effect of the inventive control elements can be determined by model tests and measurements in a wind tunnel, whereby the determined test data can be used as the basis for integrating the inventive control elements into the overall flight control system of the aircraft.
  • the pivoting deflection of the inventive control elements can be readily controlled from the general flight control system of the aircraft, e.g. including a flight control computer.
  • the movable control elements can be controlled in a symmetrical and synchronized manner to achieve the above described glide path control without any yaw effect, but alternatively can be deflected independently and/or asymmetrically on the two sides of the aircraft so as to achieve a yaw control.
  • This effect is especially advantageous in emergency situations such as an emergency descent of the aircraft and/or in the event of an engine failure, to support and supplement the other conventional control devices for maintaining the yaw control of the aircraft.
  • Appropriate actuation of the inventive pivotable control elements contributes to a rapid collapse of the trailing vortices of the wingtips of the aircraft. This is especially advantageous because then a shorter spacing (in time and distance) may be maintained between a respective aircraft taking off or landing and the next successive aircraft that can take-off or land, in view of the rapid collapse of the trailing vortices of the preceding aircraft. Thereby, a further increase of the take-off and landing rate can be achieved.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic perspective view of a first embodiment of an aerodynamic component including an inventive pivotable control element, to be mounted on the wingtip of an aircraft wing;
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic side view of the device according to FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic top plan view of a second embodiment of an aerodynamic component incorporating a pivotable control element according to the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic top plan view of an exemplary aircraft equipped with the inventive aerodynamic components on the wingtips thereof.
  • an aerodynamic component 1 is generally surfacially extending and aerodynamically contoured and is adapted to be connected to each respective outboard wingtip of a wing 17 of an aircraft 15 , as generally shown in FIG. 4.
  • the aerodynamic component 1 includes a main plane body 1 A that is rigid and adapted to be fixed to the wingtip of the aircraft wing 17 with the main plane body 1 A extending aerodynamically smoothly and continuously from the wingtip of the aircraft wing 17 and along the major plane of the wing 17 (e.g. the plane extending along both the leading edge and the trailing edge of the wing 17 ).
  • the aerodynamic component 1 further comprises a control surface member 2 that also has a generally surfacially extending or planar and aerodynamically contoured configuration.
  • the control surface member 2 is connected and smoothly transitions to the main plane body 1 A.
  • the plane of the control surface member 2 stands at a relatively steep angle (e.g. greater than 70°) and preferably perpendicularly relative to the plane of the main plane body 1 A.
  • the control surface member 2 extends along a plane that is parallel to the longitudinal axis and orthogonal to the pitch axis of the aircraft.
  • control surface member 2 has an elevation shape that generally comprises a delta or whale-tail shape, preferably with a further sweptback wing-like or fin-like portion that protrudes rearwardly from the delta-shaped portion.
  • the control surface member 2 may generally be configured as a so-called wingtip fence or a winglet, or any other conventionally known aerodynamic structure to be arranged on the wingtip of an aircraft wing.
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 To facilitate the mounting and connection of the aerodynamic component 1 on the wingtip of the aircraft wing, the particular embodiment shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, which has been tested in wind tunnel measurements, has a side wall or edge 4 that extends substantially vertically and perpendicularly relative to the upper and lower outer surfaces 3 of the aerodynamic component 1 , with a groove-shaped recess 5 let into this side wall 4 to reach into the main plane body 1 A of the aerodynamic component 1 .
  • the recess 5 is adapted to receive the surfacially shaped wingtip or a suitably shaped portion of the wingtip, of an aircraft wing 17 .
  • throughholes 6 are provided in the main plane body 1 A, such that threaded bolts or the like (not shown) can be insert through the throughholes 6 so as to mechanically secure the aerodynamic component 1 to the wingtip inserted in the recess 5 .
  • the control surface member 2 comprises two surface portions or plane members 2 A and 2 B, namely a fixed plane member 2 A and a movable or pivotable plane member 2 B, which represents the pivotable control element 2 B according to the invention.
  • the pivotable plane member or control element 2 B is pivotably connected to the fixed plane member 2 A by means of a pivot hinge or pivot joint 2 C, that provides a pivot axis 7 .
  • the fixed plane member 2 A is rigidly and fixedly secured to the main plane body 1 A of the aerodynamic component 1 , which is rigidly and fixedly secured to the wingtip as described above.
  • control element 2 B can be selectively deflected, either outboard or inboard, in an infinitely adjustable stepless manner, or in preselectable steps, to a maximum deflection angle ⁇ >0°.
  • the maximum angular deflection, as well as any selectable deflection steps in the angular range, are determined by wind tunnel measurements for a given application.
  • FIG. 3 shows a second example embodiment of an aerodynamic component 8 according to the invention.
  • This aerodynamic component 8 generally corresponds to the above described aerodynamic component 1 , except for the following differences.
  • the fixed plane member 2 A extends rearwardly only to the pivot joint or hinge 2 C, while the pivotable plane member 2 B extends forwardly only up to the pivot hinge 2 C.
  • a fixed plane member 10 A extends rearwardly from the pivot joint or hinge 10 C adjacently along a pivotable plane member 10 B.
  • the overall control surface member 10 is “split” along its longitudinal vertical center plane, to include the fixed plane member 10 A and the pivotable plane member 10 B extending adjacently along one another.
  • the pivotable plane member or control element 10 B is connected to the fixed plane member 10 A along the pivot hinge 10 C providing a pivot axis 11 allowing the pivotable plane member to pivot by the angle ⁇ .
  • the fixed plane member 10 A is the inboard member located closer to the wingtip
  • the pivotable plane member 10 B is the outboard member located farther away from the wingtip, and being outwardly pivotable about the pivot axis 11 by the variable or selectable deflection angle ⁇ .
  • the deflection angle can be infinitely continuously adjustable, or adjustable to preselected steps, whereby these deflection angles are determined by wind tunnel tests, for example.
  • the pivot axes 7 and 11 are preferably perpendicular to the major plane of the wing or parallel to the yaw axis of the aircraft.
  • the pivotable control elements 2 B, 10 B can be actuated independently of the other control surfaces of the aircraft, such as the spoilers, flaps, and the like, used for setting the basic landing configuration.
  • the respective pivotable control element 10 B may be pivotally deflected outwardly away from the aircraft, while the pivotable control element 2 B may be pivoted selectively either outwardly away from the aircraft or inwardly toward the aircraft, whereby the deflection of the control element 2 B, 10 B on the right wingtip is carried out symmetrically and in unison with the deflection of the corresponding control element 2 B, 10 B on the left wingtip for achieving a fine adjustment of the drag without inducing any yaw effect.
  • This is the control situation used for steepening the landing approach glide.
  • the left and right control elements 2 B, 10 B can be independently actuated by the aircraft flight control system, to purposely influence the yaw attitude of the aircraft in special situations.
  • FIG. 4 schematically shows the inventive aerodynamic components 1 respectively mounted on the outboard wingtips of the two wings 17 extending outwardly from the opposite sides of the fuselage 16 of the aircraft 15 .
  • the aircraft 15 further includes engines 18 , as well as flaps 19 and spoilers 20 provided on the wings 17 , whereby the control settings of these components establish the basic setting of the lift and drag for the landing glide configuration.
  • the fine adjustment of the drag achieved by the pivotal deflection of the inventive control elements 2 B is superimposed on the basic setting of the landing glide configuration.
  • a flight controller 21 including a flight control computer of the aircraft 15 is connected to provide control signals to actuators 22 that pivotally deflect the control elements 2 B responsive to the control signals provided by the flight controller 21 .

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • Aerodynamic Tests, Hydrodynamic Tests, Wind Tunnels, And Water Tanks (AREA)

Abstract

A method of controlling a landing guide path of an aircraft and a method of steeping a landing guide path of an aircraft include rotating a portion of an aerodynamic component to increase a drag without influencing a lift. A method of controlling a landing guide path of an aircraft including an aerodynamic component having a main portion and a control portion, the main portion connected to a wing of the aircraft, and the control portion including a fixed member connected to a pivotable member. The method includes rotating the pivotable member to increase a drag without influencing a lift.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §[0001] 119 to German Patent Application 101 60 315.0, filed on Dec. 7, 2001, and under 35 U.S.C. §120 to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/313,052, filed on Dec. 6, 2002, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
  • 1. FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0002]
  • The invention relates to an arrangement of control elements and an associated method for controlling the landing approach of an aircraft by a controlled descent along a glide path. [0003]
  • 2. DISCUSSION OF THE RELATED ART [0004]
  • A sharp increase in air traffic in recent years has led to a high utilization and partially an overloading of the air traffic capacity of many airports. Without expanding the physical runway facilities and the like of existing airports, or building new airports, a further increase in capacity can only be achieved by reducing the time required for the take-off and landing of each aircraft. Reducing the time required for the take-off of an aircraft basically requires an increase in the power of the aircraft, and is thus complicated and costly. Reducing the overall time required for the landing of an aircraft must consider that the landing process includes several phases, for example the gliding approach and descent along a glide path, flaring from the glide path to an essentially level final landing path, and finally floating or settling out to the touch down point, and then rolling out and braking along the runway. This landing process is initiated already at a considerable distance and time out from the destination airport, by a controlled descent on the so-called glide path or glide slope. Since the gliding descent along the glide path takes up a substantial amount of the total time of the overall landing process, reducing the time required for this gliding descent will have a substantial impact on shortening the overall time required for the landing process, thereby reducing the total landing and take-off cycle time, and increasing the landing capacity per hour of the airport. [0005]
  • The descent of the aircraft along the glide path or glide slope is controlled by the relationship of lift and drag of the aircraft. In this context, the coefficient of lift of the aircraft is dependent on the angle of attack or incidence of the aircraft as well as the incident flow velocity of the relative wind with respect to the aircraft. Modem conventional aircraft use their typical control surfaces or control elements, such as flaps, rudder, spoilers, etc. and adjustments of the propulsion engine thrust, to control the descent of the aircraft along the glide path. Unfortunately, these conventional control elements can only achieve a variation of the lift and of the aerodynamic drag in a mutually coupled manner. In other words, any adjustment of the conventional control elements will simultaneously influence both the total lift and the total drag of the aircraft. This means that an intended change of the glide path slope for a given angle of attack of the aircraft by means of a drag variation (e.g. by extending the flaps or deflecting the spoilers) will simultaneously cause a change of the lift. The resulting compound effects of any control adjustment are thus rather complex, and consequently require rather complex systems for controlling the adjustments of the control elements, and substantially limit the possibility of any further reductions in the time or distance required for the landing approach of the aircraft. [0006]
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In view of the above, it is an object of the invention to provide a device and a method for improving the control of a landing approach of an aircraft, and particularly for reducing the time and distance required for the descent and landing phase of the flight of an aircraft by achieving a steeper glide path. The invention further aims to avoid or overcome the disadvantages of the prior art, and to achieve additional advantages as apparent from the present specification. The attainment of these objects is, however, not a required limitation of the invention. [0007]
  • The above objects have been achieved according to the invention in a device for controlling the landing approach of an aircraft, including a respective pivotable control element arranged respectively at the outboard wingtip of each wing of the aircraft. These pivotable control elements can be selectively pivoted to deflected positions, whereby the coefficient of lift of the aircraft is not influenced (i.e. remains essentially constant with no practically significant change), the coefficient of drag of the aircraft is altered, and the aerodynamic drag or flow resistance of the aircraft is increased. As a result, the glide path angle is made steeper, i.e. increased relative to the horizontal plane. Preferably, each pivotable control element is pivotally connected to a fixed plane or surface member, which in turn is rigidly connected to or a part of an aerodynamic component that is secured to the respective wingtip. The aerodynamic component may, for example, be embodied as a wingtip fence or a winglet, which is additionally provided with the pivotable control element. The pivot axis preferably extends perpendicularly to the major plane of the wing or parallel to the yaw axis of the aircraft. [0008]
  • The above objects have further been achieved according to the invention in a method of operating the inventive device, whereby the respective pivotable control elements on the wingtips of the two wings of the aircraft are pivotally deflected, mirror symmetrically in unison, so as to increase the total coefficient of drag, without exerting a net yaw influence on the aircraft and without influencing the total coefficient of lift. Thus, the pivotal deflection of the inventive control elements simply introduces an increased drag to the overall aerodynamic configuration of the aircraft, which thereby achieves a faster descent along a steeper glide path in a simply and finely controllable manner. Particularly, the pivotal deflection of the inventive control elements achieves a fine adjustment that is superimposed on the basic aerodynamic configuration of the aircraft that is set by the control adjustments of the general control surfaces or control elements such as the flaps, spoilers, engine thrust adjustment, etc. Furthermore, by carrying out rapid fluctuating deflections with a time varying deflection angle or magnitude of the pivotable control elements, a rapid collapse of the wingtip vortices can be achieved. [0009]
  • By making the gliding descent of the aircraft steeper and faster over a shorter horizontal distance along the glide path, the invention reduces the total time required for a landing process, and thereby increases the take-off and landing cycle time and throughput capacity of the airport. Moreover, the invention makes it possible to carry out a finely adjustable drag control of the aircraft with a large bandwidth or large range of control, while being essentially independent of the lift and other moments of the aircraft. The inventive control further makes it possible to reduce the flight noise of the aircraft, especially in the landing configuration. [0010]
  • It is especially advantageous according to the invention, that the inventive pivotable control elements can be retrofitted onto previously existing aerodynamically effective components on the wingtips of an aircraft, having various forms and sizes, such as winglets, wingtip fences, or the like, for example. The inventive control elements can be readily adapted to the optimized wingtip element configurations required for cruise flight and/or a take-off configuration, in connection with various structural embodiments of the wingtip fences, winglets, or the like. Moreover, the inventive pivotable control elements can be moved or pivoted in various different conventionally known ways using any conventionally known mechanisms, for example, by means of hydraulic, mechanical, electromechanical, or other actuators. [0011]
  • The aerodynamic effect of the inventive control elements can be determined by model tests and measurements in a wind tunnel, whereby the determined test data can be used as the basis for integrating the inventive control elements into the overall flight control system of the aircraft. In other words, by providing the appropriate data that associates the control element deflection with the resulting aerodynamic effect thereof, the pivoting deflection of the inventive control elements can be readily controlled from the general flight control system of the aircraft, e.g. including a flight control computer. It is further advantageous, that the movable control elements can be controlled in a symmetrical and synchronized manner to achieve the above described glide path control without any yaw effect, but alternatively can be deflected independently and/or asymmetrically on the two sides of the aircraft so as to achieve a yaw control. This effect is especially advantageous in emergency situations such as an emergency descent of the aircraft and/or in the event of an engine failure, to support and supplement the other conventional control devices for maintaining the yaw control of the aircraft. [0012]
  • Appropriate actuation of the inventive pivotable control elements contributes to a rapid collapse of the trailing vortices of the wingtips of the aircraft. This is especially advantageous because then a shorter spacing (in time and distance) may be maintained between a respective aircraft taking off or landing and the next successive aircraft that can take-off or land, in view of the rapid collapse of the trailing vortices of the preceding aircraft. Thereby, a further increase of the take-off and landing rate can be achieved.[0013]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • In order that the invention may be clearly understood, it will now be described in connection with example embodiments thereof, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein: [0014]
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic perspective view of a first embodiment of an aerodynamic component including an inventive pivotable control element, to be mounted on the wingtip of an aircraft wing; [0015]
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic side view of the device according to FIG. 1; [0016]
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic top plan view of a second embodiment of an aerodynamic component incorporating a pivotable control element according to the invention; and [0017]
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic top plan view of an exemplary aircraft equipped with the inventive aerodynamic components on the wingtips thereof.[0018]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
  • As shown in FIG. 1, an [0019] aerodynamic component 1 according to the invention is generally surfacially extending and aerodynamically contoured and is adapted to be connected to each respective outboard wingtip of a wing 17 of an aircraft 15, as generally shown in FIG. 4. The aerodynamic component 1 includes a main plane body 1A that is rigid and adapted to be fixed to the wingtip of the aircraft wing 17 with the main plane body 1A extending aerodynamically smoothly and continuously from the wingtip of the aircraft wing 17 and along the major plane of the wing 17 (e.g. the plane extending along both the leading edge and the trailing edge of the wing 17).
  • The [0020] aerodynamic component 1 further comprises a control surface member 2 that also has a generally surfacially extending or planar and aerodynamically contoured configuration. The control surface member 2 is connected and smoothly transitions to the main plane body 1A. Preferably, the plane of the control surface member 2 stands at a relatively steep angle (e.g. greater than 70°) and preferably perpendicularly relative to the plane of the main plane body 1A. Thus, the control surface member 2 extends along a plane that is parallel to the longitudinal axis and orthogonal to the pitch axis of the aircraft.
  • As can be seen in the perspective view of FIG. 1, and especially in the side view of FIG. 2, the control surface member [0021] 2 has an elevation shape that generally comprises a delta or whale-tail shape, preferably with a further sweptback wing-like or fin-like portion that protrudes rearwardly from the delta-shaped portion. The control surface member 2 may generally be configured as a so-called wingtip fence or a winglet, or any other conventionally known aerodynamic structure to be arranged on the wingtip of an aircraft wing.
  • To facilitate the mounting and connection of the [0022] aerodynamic component 1 on the wingtip of the aircraft wing, the particular embodiment shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, which has been tested in wind tunnel measurements, has a side wall or edge 4 that extends substantially vertically and perpendicularly relative to the upper and lower outer surfaces 3 of the aerodynamic component 1, with a groove-shaped recess 5 let into this side wall 4 to reach into the main plane body 1A of the aerodynamic component 1. The recess 5 is adapted to receive the surfacially shaped wingtip or a suitably shaped portion of the wingtip, of an aircraft wing 17. Furthermore, throughholes 6 are provided in the main plane body 1A, such that threaded bolts or the like (not shown) can be insert through the throughholes 6 so as to mechanically secure the aerodynamic component 1 to the wingtip inserted in the recess 5. These features are merely exemplary, and can be readily adapted to various different configurations and forms of mechanical connection, as needed in any particular application, for mounting and securely fastening the aerodynamic component 1 on the wingtip of any given aircraft wing 17.
  • As shown particularly in the side view of FIG. 2, the control surface member [0023] 2 comprises two surface portions or plane members 2A and 2B, namely a fixed plane member 2A and a movable or pivotable plane member 2B, which represents the pivotable control element 2B according to the invention. The pivotable plane member or control element 2B is pivotably connected to the fixed plane member 2A by means of a pivot hinge or pivot joint 2C, that provides a pivot axis 7. In turn, the fixed plane member 2A is rigidly and fixedly secured to the main plane body 1A of the aerodynamic component 1, which is rigidly and fixedly secured to the wingtip as described above.
  • Not shown in the drawings are the actuator, linkage, and other mechanisms by which the pivotable plane member or control element [0024] 2B can be selectively pivotably deflected about the pivot axis 7 relative to the fixed plane member 2A. Any conventionally known actuators and linkages may be used in this regard, and may, for example, be housed internally within the aerodynamic component 1, or in the aircraft wing 17 itself, with merely an actuating linkage extending from the wing 17 into the aerodynamic component 1 for actuating the pivotable plane member or control element 2B. In a neutral non-deflected position extending parallel to the plane of the fixed plane member 2A, the pivotable plane member or control element 2B has a deflection angle δ=0°. From this neutral position, the control element 2B can be selectively deflected, either outboard or inboard, in an infinitely adjustable stepless manner, or in preselectable steps, to a maximum deflection angle δ>0°. Particularly, the maximum angular deflection, as well as any selectable deflection steps in the angular range, are determined by wind tunnel measurements for a given application.
  • FIG. 3 shows a second example embodiment of an [0025] aerodynamic component 8 according to the invention. This aerodynamic component 8 generally corresponds to the above described aerodynamic component 1, except for the following differences. In the embodiment of FIG. 2, the fixed plane member 2A extends rearwardly only to the pivot joint or hinge 2C, while the pivotable plane member 2B extends forwardly only up to the pivot hinge 2C. In contrast, in the embodiment of FIG. 3, a fixed plane member 10A extends rearwardly from the pivot joint or hinge 10C adjacently along a pivotable plane member 10B. Namely, the overall control surface member 10 is “split” along its longitudinal vertical center plane, to include the fixed plane member 10A and the pivotable plane member 10B extending adjacently along one another. The pivotable plane member or control element 10B is connected to the fixed plane member 10A along the pivot hinge 10C providing a pivot axis 11 allowing the pivotable plane member to pivot by the angle δ. In this embodiment, the fixed plane member 10A is the inboard member located closer to the wingtip, while the pivotable plane member 10B is the outboard member located farther away from the wingtip, and being outwardly pivotable about the pivot axis 11 by the variable or selectable deflection angle δ. As mentioned above in connection with FIGS. 1 and 2, the deflection angle can be infinitely continuously adjustable, or adjustable to preselected steps, whereby these deflection angles are determined by wind tunnel tests, for example.
  • To ensure that the aerodynamic effect of the deflection of the pivotable plane members [0026] 2B or 10B essentially only influences the overall coefficient of drag without significantly influencing the overall coefficient of lift of the aircraft 15, the pivot axes 7 and 11 are preferably perpendicular to the major plane of the wing or parallel to the yaw axis of the aircraft. Also, the pivotable control elements 2B, 10B can be actuated independently of the other control surfaces of the aircraft, such as the spoilers, flaps, and the like, used for setting the basic landing configuration.
  • The respective pivotable control element [0027] 10B may be pivotally deflected outwardly away from the aircraft, while the pivotable control element 2B may be pivoted selectively either outwardly away from the aircraft or inwardly toward the aircraft, whereby the deflection of the control element 2B, 10B on the right wingtip is carried out symmetrically and in unison with the deflection of the corresponding control element 2B, 10B on the left wingtip for achieving a fine adjustment of the drag without inducing any yaw effect. This is the control situation used for steepening the landing approach glide. Alternatively, the left and right control elements 2B, 10B can be independently actuated by the aircraft flight control system, to purposely influence the yaw attitude of the aircraft in special situations.
  • FIG. 4 schematically shows the inventive [0028] aerodynamic components 1 respectively mounted on the outboard wingtips of the two wings 17 extending outwardly from the opposite sides of the fuselage 16 of the aircraft 15. The aircraft 15 further includes engines 18, as well as flaps 19 and spoilers 20 provided on the wings 17, whereby the control settings of these components establish the basic setting of the lift and drag for the landing glide configuration. The fine adjustment of the drag achieved by the pivotal deflection of the inventive control elements 2B is superimposed on the basic setting of the landing glide configuration. A flight controller 21 including a flight control computer of the aircraft 15 is connected to provide control signals to actuators 22 that pivotally deflect the control elements 2B responsive to the control signals provided by the flight controller 21.
  • Although the invention has been described with reference to specific example embodiments, it will be appreciated that it is intended to cover all modifications and equivalents within the scope of the appended claims. It should also be understood that the present disclosure includes all possible combinations of any individual features recited in any of the appended claims. [0029]

Claims (16)

1. Method of controlling a landing guide path of an aircraft, comprising:
rotating a portion of an aerodynamic component to increase a drag without influencing a lift.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the aerodynamic component comprise a main body configured to be connected to a wing and a control member connected to the main body, and rotating comprises rotating a portion of the control member.
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the control member comprises a fixed member connected to the main body and a pivotable member connected to the fixed member, and rotating comprises rotating the pivotable member.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the control member further comprises a hinge member disposed between the fixed member and the pivotable member, and rotating comprises rotating the pivotable member relative to the fixed member via the hinge member.
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the pivotable member comprises a delta shape.
6. The method according to claim 4, wherein rotating comprises rotating the pivotable member about an axis perpendicular to a major plane of the wing.
7. The method according to claim 4, wherein rotating comprises rotating the pivotable member at least one of inwardly and outwardly.
8. The method according to claim 4, wherein rotating comprises rotating the pivotable member both of inwardly and outwardly.
9. Method of steepening a landing guide path of an aircraft, comprising:
rotating a portion of an aerodynamic component to increase a drag without influencing a lift.
10. The method according to claim 9, wherein the aerodynamic component comprise a main body configured to be connected to a wing and a control member connected to the main body, and rotating comprises rotating a portion of the control member.
11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the control member comprises a fixed member connected to the main body and a pivotable member connected to the fixed member, and rotating comprises rotating the pivotable member.
12. The method according to claim 11, wherein the control member further comprises a hinge member disposed between the fixed member and the pivotable member, and rotating comprises rotating the pivotable member relative to the fixed member via the hinge member.
13. Method of controlling a landing guide path of an aircraft including an aerodynamic component having a main portion and a control portion, the main portion connected to a wing of the aircraft, and the control portion including a fixed member connected to a pivotable member, the method comprising:
rotating the pivotable member to increase a drag without influencing a lift.
14. The method according to claim 13, wherein rotating comprises rotating the pivotable member perpendicular to a major plane of the wing.
15. The method according to claim 14, wherein rotating comprises rotating the pivotable member in at least one of inwardly and outwardly.
16. The method according to claim 15, wherein rotating comprises rotating the pivotable member both inwardly and outwardly.
US10/713,160 2001-12-07 2003-11-17 Method of controlling a landing guide path of an aircraft Abandoned US20040155146A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/713,160 US20040155146A1 (en) 2001-12-07 2003-11-17 Method of controlling a landing guide path of an aircraft

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE10160315A DE10160315A1 (en) 2001-12-07 2001-12-07 Device for the approach control of an aircraft
DE10160315.0 2001-12-07
US10/313,052 US7316371B2 (en) 2001-12-07 2002-12-06 Method and device for steepening a landing approach of an aircraft
US10/713,160 US20040155146A1 (en) 2001-12-07 2003-11-17 Method of controlling a landing guide path of an aircraft

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/313,052 Division US7316371B2 (en) 2001-12-07 2002-12-06 Method and device for steepening a landing approach of an aircraft

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040155146A1 true US20040155146A1 (en) 2004-08-12

Family

ID=7708488

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/313,052 Expired - Lifetime US7316371B2 (en) 2001-12-07 2002-12-06 Method and device for steepening a landing approach of an aircraft
US10/713,160 Abandoned US20040155146A1 (en) 2001-12-07 2003-11-17 Method of controlling a landing guide path of an aircraft
US10/713,161 Expired - Lifetime US7070148B2 (en) 2001-12-07 2003-11-17 Aerodynamic component for controlling a landing guide path of an aircraft

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/313,052 Expired - Lifetime US7316371B2 (en) 2001-12-07 2002-12-06 Method and device for steepening a landing approach of an aircraft

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/713,161 Expired - Lifetime US7070148B2 (en) 2001-12-07 2003-11-17 Aerodynamic component for controlling a landing guide path of an aircraft

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (3) US7316371B2 (en)
DE (1) DE10160315A1 (en)

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040169110A1 (en) * 2001-12-07 2004-09-02 Susanne Wyrembek Aerodynamic component for controlling a landing guide path of an aircraft
GB2444742A (en) * 2006-12-11 2008-06-18 Embraer Aeronautica Sa Aircraft flight decent control system
US20090039204A1 (en) * 2007-08-09 2009-02-12 The Boeing Company Wingtip Feathers, Including Forward Swept Feathers, and Associated Aircraft Systems and Methods
US20090084904A1 (en) * 2007-10-02 2009-04-02 The Boeing Company Wingtip Feathers, Including Paired, Fixed Feathers, and Associated Systems and Methods
US20090256029A1 (en) * 2008-04-15 2009-10-15 The Boeing Company Winglets with Recessed Surfaces, and Associated Systems and Methods
US20110024556A1 (en) * 2009-08-03 2011-02-03 Airbus Operations (S.A.S) Aircraft with yaw control by differential drag
US8936219B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2015-01-20 The Boeing Company Performance-enhancing winglet system and method
RU2588173C1 (en) * 2015-06-02 2016-06-27 Акционерное общество "Московский институт электромеханики и автоматики" (АО "МИЭА") Method for automatic control of longitudinal movement of aircraft landing
US9511850B2 (en) 2014-04-12 2016-12-06 The Boeing Company Wing tip device for an aircraft wing
US20220073193A1 (en) * 2010-07-14 2022-03-10 Airbus Operations Limited Wing tip device
US20230227149A1 (en) * 2013-12-04 2023-07-20 Tamarack Aerospace Group, Inc. Adjustable lift modification wingtip

Families Citing this family (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU2003280422A1 (en) * 2002-06-26 2004-01-19 Peter T. Mccarthy High efficiency tip vortex reversal and induced drag reduction
DE10302514B4 (en) 2003-01-23 2008-12-18 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Fluid-mechanically effective surface of a moving in a fluid device, in particular an aircraft, in particular wing of an aircraft
US7475848B2 (en) * 2003-11-11 2009-01-13 Morgenstern John M Wing employing leading edge flaps and winglets to achieve improved aerodynamic performance
US7234667B1 (en) * 2003-12-11 2007-06-26 Talmage Jr Robert N Modular aerospace plane
CA2568848C (en) * 2004-07-16 2013-06-25 Airbus France Method and device for improving maneuverability of an aircraft during approach phases before landing followed by flare-out
FR2873094B1 (en) * 2004-07-16 2008-01-18 Airbus France Sas METHOD AND DEVICE FOR IMPROVING THE MANEUVERABILITY OF AN AIRCRAFT AT APPROACH PHASES BEFORE LANDING AND ROUND
US9302766B2 (en) 2008-06-20 2016-04-05 Aviation Partners, Inc. Split blended winglet
US9381999B2 (en) 2008-06-20 2016-07-05 C. R. Bard, Inc. Wing tip with optimum loading
EP2423773B1 (en) * 2010-08-24 2014-06-25 The Boeing Company Four-dimensional guidance of an aircraft
EP3650337B1 (en) 2011-06-09 2020-11-25 Aviation Partners, Inc. The split blended winglet
US9452825B2 (en) 2013-04-19 2016-09-27 The Boeing Company Winglet attach fitting for attaching a split winglet to a wing
US9738375B2 (en) * 2013-12-05 2017-08-22 The Boeing Company One-piece composite bifurcated winglet
CN103995465B (en) * 2014-04-17 2017-04-19 中国航空工业集团公司沈阳飞机设计研究所 Transverse lateral guidance law design method
US11001378B2 (en) 2016-08-08 2021-05-11 Jetoptera, Inc. Configuration for vertical take-off and landing system for aerial vehicles
US10464668B2 (en) 2015-09-02 2019-11-05 Jetoptera, Inc. Configuration for vertical take-off and landing system for aerial vehicles
CN108137150B (en) 2015-09-02 2021-07-06 杰托普特拉股份有限公司 Fluid propulsion system
US20170253322A1 (en) * 2016-03-02 2017-09-07 Google Inc. Split Winglet Lateral Control
EP3269635A1 (en) * 2016-07-12 2018-01-17 The Aircraft Performance Company UG Airplane wing
JP7155174B2 (en) 2017-06-27 2022-10-18 ジェトプテラ、インコーポレイテッド Aircraft vertical take-off and landing system configuration
ES2905192T3 (en) * 2018-01-15 2022-04-07 The Aircraft Performance Company Gmbh airplane wing
GB2576929A (en) * 2018-09-07 2020-03-11 Airbus Operations Ltd A wing tip device
CN113955125B (en) * 2021-11-18 2023-12-19 杜同 Safety lifesaving system for aircraft

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1987050A (en) * 1933-02-23 1935-01-08 Burnelli Aircraft Ltd Tailless airplane
US2480040A (en) * 1943-12-06 1949-08-23 Wilbur A E Mitchell Aircraft control surfaces
US4457479A (en) * 1982-02-15 1984-07-03 Martine Daude Winglets for aircraft wing tips
US4714215A (en) * 1983-04-15 1987-12-22 British Aerospace Plc Aircraft wing and winglet arrangement
US4784353A (en) * 1983-03-02 1988-11-15 The Boeing Company Aircrafts tail section drag compensating for nose-down pitching moment
US5542625A (en) * 1993-03-26 1996-08-06 Grumman Aerospace Corporation Gull wing aircraft
US6076767A (en) * 1996-09-18 2000-06-20 Dowty Boulton Paul Limited Flight control surface actuation system
US20030106961A1 (en) * 2001-12-07 2003-06-12 Susanne Wyrembek Method and device for steepening a landing approach of an aircraft

Family Cites Families (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1914000A (en) * 1931-08-18 1933-06-13 Boeing Co Control flap and balance
US2194596A (en) * 1936-04-24 1940-03-26 Henter Mathias Airplane
US2158598A (en) * 1937-11-30 1939-05-16 Glenn L Martin Co Aircraft construction
US2418301A (en) * 1942-07-24 1947-04-01 Miles Aircraft Ltd Aircraft supporting surface
FR921155A (en) * 1945-10-31 1947-04-29 Orientable warping and steering flanges for aerodyne
US2649265A (en) * 1948-07-30 1953-08-18 Charles H Grant Airplane with stabilizing fins
US2553642A (en) * 1948-08-26 1951-05-22 Curtiss Wright Corp Aerodynamic brake and automatic control system for aircraft
US2697568A (en) * 1949-02-02 1954-12-21 Cons Vultee Aircraft Corp Aircraft rudder control
US2880575A (en) * 1952-11-28 1959-04-07 Curtiss Wright Corp Combined variable area nozzle and aerodynamic brake
US2816724A (en) * 1954-12-06 1957-12-17 Sperry Rand Corp Constant lift flight path controller
US2846165A (en) * 1956-06-25 1958-08-05 John A Axelson Aircraft control system
US3270988A (en) 1962-12-26 1966-09-06 Jr Clarence D Cone Minimum induced drag airfoil body
GB1151431A (en) * 1966-06-10 1969-05-07 Nat Res Dev Improvements in or relating to Aircraft Wings
US3438597A (en) * 1967-04-03 1969-04-15 Witold A Kasper Aircraft
DE2149956C3 (en) 1971-10-07 1974-03-28 Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm Gmbh, 8000 Muenchen High lift wing
US3831885A (en) * 1972-07-11 1974-08-27 W Kasper Aircraft wing with vortex generation
US4042197A (en) * 1975-09-29 1977-08-16 The Boeing Company Automatic controls for airplane take-off and landing modes
US4172574A (en) 1976-06-16 1979-10-30 National Research Development Corporation Fluid stream deflecting members for aircraft bodies or the like
GB1584348A (en) 1976-06-16 1981-02-11 Nat Res Dev Devices to reduce drag
US4598885A (en) 1979-03-05 1986-07-08 Waitzman Simon V Airplane airframe
GB2051706A (en) 1979-06-19 1981-01-21 British Aerospace Aircraft wings
US4466586A (en) * 1980-03-10 1984-08-21 The Boeing Company Directional control device for aircraft
US4477042A (en) 1981-01-19 1984-10-16 Griswold Ii Roger W Vortex alleviating wing tip
DE3242584A1 (en) 1982-11-18 1984-05-24 Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm GmbH, 8000 München ARRANGEMENT OF ADDITIONAL SURFACES AT THE TIPS OF AN WING
US4554543A (en) * 1983-03-08 1985-11-19 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Glide slope indicator system
US4595160A (en) 1983-05-18 1986-06-17 Jonathan Santos Wing tip airfoils
US4702441A (en) 1984-12-31 1987-10-27 The Boeing Company Aircraft wing stall control device and method
DE3621800A1 (en) 1986-06-28 1988-01-07 Riedelsheimer Hans Joachim PLANE
JPH01285492A (en) 1988-05-12 1989-11-16 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Wing tip vortex cancel blade
US5060889A (en) * 1989-05-01 1991-10-29 The Boeing Company Apparatus and methods for maintaining aircraft track angle during an asymmetric flight condition
US5156358A (en) * 1991-04-11 1992-10-20 Northrop Corporation Aircraft outboard control
GB9107766D0 (en) * 1991-04-12 1991-06-05 Short Brothers Plc A structural component
US5702071A (en) * 1995-06-07 1997-12-30 Sundstrand Corporation Deployable vortex turbine for dissipating or extracting energy from a lift induced vortex emanating from an aircraft
GB9600123D0 (en) 1996-01-04 1996-03-06 Westland Helicopters Aerofoil
US6161797A (en) * 1996-11-25 2000-12-19 Dugan Air Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for reducing airplane noise
US5988563A (en) * 1997-12-30 1999-11-23 Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation Articulating winglets
DE19926832B4 (en) 1999-06-12 2005-09-15 Airbus Deutschland Gmbh Subsonic aircraft preferably with swept-up wings
US6497600B1 (en) * 1999-10-05 2002-12-24 Alejandro Velasco Levy Automatic pilot system for model aircraft
US6394397B1 (en) * 2000-12-06 2002-05-28 The Boeing Company Lifting surface with active variable tip member and method for influencing lifting surface behavior therewith
US6547181B1 (en) * 2002-05-29 2003-04-15 The Boeing Company Ground effect wing having a variable sweep winglet

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1987050A (en) * 1933-02-23 1935-01-08 Burnelli Aircraft Ltd Tailless airplane
US2480040A (en) * 1943-12-06 1949-08-23 Wilbur A E Mitchell Aircraft control surfaces
US4457479A (en) * 1982-02-15 1984-07-03 Martine Daude Winglets for aircraft wing tips
US4784353A (en) * 1983-03-02 1988-11-15 The Boeing Company Aircrafts tail section drag compensating for nose-down pitching moment
US4714215A (en) * 1983-04-15 1987-12-22 British Aerospace Plc Aircraft wing and winglet arrangement
US5542625A (en) * 1993-03-26 1996-08-06 Grumman Aerospace Corporation Gull wing aircraft
US6076767A (en) * 1996-09-18 2000-06-20 Dowty Boulton Paul Limited Flight control surface actuation system
US20030106961A1 (en) * 2001-12-07 2003-06-12 Susanne Wyrembek Method and device for steepening a landing approach of an aircraft

Cited By (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7070148B2 (en) * 2001-12-07 2006-07-04 Airbus Deutschland Gmbh Aerodynamic component for controlling a landing guide path of an aircraft
US7316371B2 (en) 2001-12-07 2008-01-08 Airbus Deutschland Gmbh Method and device for steepening a landing approach of an aircraft
US20040169110A1 (en) * 2001-12-07 2004-09-02 Susanne Wyrembek Aerodynamic component for controlling a landing guide path of an aircraft
GB2444742A (en) * 2006-12-11 2008-06-18 Embraer Aeronautica Sa Aircraft flight decent control system
US9405295B2 (en) 2006-12-11 2016-08-02 Embraer S.A. Flight control system
US20100217460A1 (en) * 2006-12-11 2010-08-26 Polati De Souza Alvaro Vitor Flight control system
GB2444742B (en) * 2006-12-11 2011-06-08 Embraer Aeronautica Sa Flight Control System
US7900876B2 (en) 2007-08-09 2011-03-08 The Boeing Company Wingtip feathers, including forward swept feathers, and associated aircraft systems and methods
US20090039204A1 (en) * 2007-08-09 2009-02-12 The Boeing Company Wingtip Feathers, Including Forward Swept Feathers, and Associated Aircraft Systems and Methods
US20090084904A1 (en) * 2007-10-02 2009-04-02 The Boeing Company Wingtip Feathers, Including Paired, Fixed Feathers, and Associated Systems and Methods
US8128035B2 (en) 2008-04-15 2012-03-06 The Boeing Company Winglets with recessed surfaces, and associated systems and methods
US20090256029A1 (en) * 2008-04-15 2009-10-15 The Boeing Company Winglets with Recessed Surfaces, and Associated Systems and Methods
CN102089207A (en) * 2008-04-15 2011-06-08 波音公司 Winglets with recessed surfaces, and associated systems and methods
WO2009129023A1 (en) * 2008-04-15 2009-10-22 The Boeing Company Winglets with recessed surfaces, and associated systems and methods
US20110024556A1 (en) * 2009-08-03 2011-02-03 Airbus Operations (S.A.S) Aircraft with yaw control by differential drag
US8876044B2 (en) 2009-08-03 2014-11-04 Airbus Operations S.A.S. Aircraft with yaw control by differential drag
FR2948628A1 (en) * 2009-08-03 2011-02-04 Airbus Operations Sas AIRPLANE WITH LACET CONTROL BY DIFFERENTIAL TRAINING
US11851164B2 (en) * 2010-07-14 2023-12-26 Airbus Operations Limited Wing tip device
US20220073193A1 (en) * 2010-07-14 2022-03-10 Airbus Operations Limited Wing tip device
US9637226B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2017-05-02 The Boeing Company Split winglet system
US9463871B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2016-10-11 The Boeing Company Winglet system having upper and lower winglet
US9346537B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2016-05-24 The Boeing Company Winglet system
USD924119S1 (en) 2012-03-30 2021-07-06 The Boeing Company Split winglet
US9216817B1 (en) 2012-03-30 2015-12-22 The Boeing Company Winglet system and method
US8936219B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2015-01-20 The Boeing Company Performance-enhancing winglet system and method
US20230227149A1 (en) * 2013-12-04 2023-07-20 Tamarack Aerospace Group, Inc. Adjustable lift modification wingtip
US9511850B2 (en) 2014-04-12 2016-12-06 The Boeing Company Wing tip device for an aircraft wing
RU2588173C1 (en) * 2015-06-02 2016-06-27 Акционерное общество "Московский институт электромеханики и автоматики" (АО "МИЭА") Method for automatic control of longitudinal movement of aircraft landing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7316371B2 (en) 2008-01-08
US20030106961A1 (en) 2003-06-12
DE10160315A1 (en) 2003-11-13
US7070148B2 (en) 2006-07-04
US20040169110A1 (en) 2004-09-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7070148B2 (en) Aerodynamic component for controlling a landing guide path of an aircraft
US11440645B2 (en) Adjustable lift modification wingtip
US8651431B1 (en) Aircraft with movable winglets and method of control
US6227487B1 (en) Augmented wing tip drag flap
CA2315167C (en) Improved aileron for fixed wing aircraft
US5927656A (en) Wing leading edge flap and method therefor
US7475848B2 (en) Wing employing leading edge flaps and winglets to achieve improved aerodynamic performance
US5039032A (en) High taper wing tip extension
Spillman The use of variable camber to reduce drag, weight and costs of transport aircraft
EP2193079B1 (en) Oblique blended wing body aircraft
US8757538B2 (en) Aircraft having a variable geometry
US4354646A (en) Variable dihedral angle tail unit for supersonic aircraft
US5094411A (en) Control configured vortex flaps
CN100500511C (en) System and method for reducing airfoil vortices
US3415469A (en) Airplane
US4132375A (en) Vortex-lift roll-control device
US11084566B2 (en) Passively actuated fluid foil
US20050116116A1 (en) Wing employing leading edge flaps and winglets to achieve improved aerodynamic performance
US6935592B2 (en) Aircraft lift device for low sonic boom
WO1995011159A1 (en) Aircraft flight control system
Greff The development and design integration of a variable camber wing for long/medium range aircraft
US5020740A (en) Pitch control trimming system for canard design aircraft
EP0101644A2 (en) Variable sweep forward wing aircraft
RU2060912C1 (en) Method of improvement of aerodynamic characteristics of biplane wing
RU2561886C2 (en) Vtol aircraft lift increasing device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: AIRBUS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WYREMBEK, SUSANNE;MAY, PETER;MUTHREICH, KLAUS;REEL/FRAME:015260/0709

Effective date: 20040123

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION