US20040117896A1 - Load diversion method and apparatus for head protective devices - Google Patents
Load diversion method and apparatus for head protective devices Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040117896A1 US20040117896A1 US10/617,544 US61754403A US2004117896A1 US 20040117896 A1 US20040117896 A1 US 20040117896A1 US 61754403 A US61754403 A US 61754403A US 2004117896 A1 US2004117896 A1 US 2004117896A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- helmet
- layer
- displacement
- interface layer
- interface
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A42—HEADWEAR
- A42B—HATS; HEAD COVERINGS
- A42B3/00—Helmets; Helmet covers ; Other protective head coverings
- A42B3/04—Parts, details or accessories of helmets
- A42B3/06—Impact-absorbing shells, e.g. of crash helmets
- A42B3/062—Impact-absorbing shells, e.g. of crash helmets with reinforcing means
- A42B3/063—Impact-absorbing shells, e.g. of crash helmets with reinforcing means using layered structures
- A42B3/064—Impact-absorbing shells, e.g. of crash helmets with reinforcing means using layered structures with relative movement between layers
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A42—HEADWEAR
- A42B—HATS; HEAD COVERINGS
- A42B3/00—Helmets; Helmet covers ; Other protective head coverings
- A42B3/04—Parts, details or accessories of helmets
- A42B3/10—Linings
- A42B3/12—Cushioning devices
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to helmets and other head protective devices, and more particularly to methods and apparatus for lessening the transfer of oblique impact forces to an individual wearing such a device.
- Traumatic brain injury is the leading cause of death and long-term disability in the U.S.A. among people below 45 years of age. In the U.S. alone, each year over two million people sustain traumatic brain injury, with a financial impact of about $4 billion annually.
- TBI Traumatic brain injury
- a variety of task-specific helmets have been introduced. To date the use of helmets is no longer confined to high-risk occupational scenarios and motorcyclists, but appreciates wide-spread acceptance and even legal prescription for common recreational and sports activities, such as bicycling. Given the large number of helmets in use, even a small improvement in the protective effect of helmets will evoke a considerable benefit to the health status of the general population.
- Helmets are designed to protect the brain and skull during an impact. Conventional helmets perform this function by distributing and absorbing a portion of an impact's kinetic energy by deforming (elastically or inelastically) a compliant layer. Typically, a permanently attached outer shell distributes the impact load, and an interior-padding layer absorbs impact energy. For an activity such as bicycling, the capabilities of the shell and padding layer represent a compromise between the need to maximize energy absorption and minimize object penetration, practical and aesthetic limitations on weight and thickness, and other factors such as style, aerodynamics, head cooling, etc.
- FIG. 1 shows a traditional recreational sports hard shell helmet 20 in longitudinal cross-section.
- a padding layer 22 surrounds and is generally shaped to fit (usually with insert foam padding to adjust for a comfortable fit) the protected portion of the wearer's head.
- a helmet retention system e.g., straps 26 ) allows the user to attach the helmet securely to the head, usually with a chinstrap and increasingly with a suspended rear strap or member that aligns the helmet properly on the wearer's head.
- the helmet retention system usually attaches directly to outer shell 24 .
- FIG. 2 shows, in cross-section, a micro-shell helmet 27 , which has largely replaced the traditional hard shell helmet for most bicycle applications (primarily due to reduced weight).
- Helmet 27 uses a liner 22 manufactured from expanded polystyrene beads, designed to absorb kinetic energy upon impact.
- a tape strip (not shown) running along the lower edge of a plastic microshell 28 secures the plastic microshell to the exterior of liner 22 .
- a helmet retention system 26 generally attaches to and/or loops through holes in liner 22 .
- the plastic microshell may tear apart or split, and the underlying liner may crack or shatter as it absorbs energy. Consequently, microshell helmet manufacturers typically recommend replacement after a single crash, even if helmet integrity appears uncompromised.
- FIG. 3 illustrates a vented microshell helmet 30 in longitudinal cross-section.
- microshell 28 and liner 32 contain substantial shaped voids or ports (e.g., 34 ) that ostensibly function as vents to allow some airflow through the helmet.
- the remaining polystyrene struts 32 may be quite thick, in order to restore at least part of the structural integrity lost due to voids 34 .
- FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 show longitudinal cross-sections of three prior art recreational helmet designs
- FIGS. 4A and 4B contain cross-sections of a helmet according to an embodiment of the invention, shown respectively in longitudinal and transverse cross section;
- FIG. 5 shows construction and functional detail of the embodiment of FIGS. 4A and 4B;
- FIGS. 6 and 7 show construction and functional detail of another embodiment employing a different interface layer
- FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrate yet another embodiment of the invention, which incorporates air vents and uses an interface layer disposed near the outer helmet shell;
- FIGS. 9A and 9B depict an interface layer comprising a lamellar structure, respectively under no-load and tangential force conditions
- FIGS. 10A and 10B depict an interface layer comprising adjacent rigid shells, respectively under no-load and tangential force conditions
- FIGS. 11A, 11B, and 11 C depict an interface layer employing thin connecting members that pass through the interface layer, respectively under no-load, small tangential force, and large tangential force conditions;
- FIG. 12 illustrates one possible displacement response characteristic for a non-linear interface layer according to an embodiment of the invention
- FIG. 13 shows the construction of an embodiment wherein connecting members are disposed around the periphery of air vents in a helmet
- FIG. 14 demonstrates test results for a standard helmet and an embodiment of the invention when subjected to an oblique impact with a concrete surface.
- prior bicycle helmets are primarily designed to distribute and absorb impact loads by means of a padding layer underlying a generally dome-shaped semi-rigid shell. This design is effective in distributing a focused impact over a larger area of the cranium to reduce the risk of skull fractures. Given geometric constraints of the padding layer, however, its ability to absorb a significant amount of energy is limited. Subsequently, the remaining energy will be transformed into acceleration of the head, where the amount and duration of head acceleration directly correlates to the extent of traumatic brain injury. Therefore, the design of contemporary bicycle helmets may effectively reduce the incident of skull fractures, but falls short in protecting its user from the disabling consequences of traumatic brain injury.
- bicycle helmets are primarily designed to absorb impact loads by means of energy-absorbing and load-distributing layers.
- This design greatly increases the distance of the impact site (i.e., the semi-rigid outer shell) from the apparent rotation axis of the head around the neck, therefore providing an effective lever arm to transform the tangential component of an oblique impact to the helmet into an angular acceleration of the head. Since the brain is most susceptible to angular acceleration of the head, current helmet designs do not protect the head from closed-head traumatic brain injury due to angular acceleration, but may instead contribute to it.
- bicycle helmets are primarily designed to absorb impact loads by means of a padding layer underlying a generally dome-shaped semi-rigid shell.
- Traditional helmets for motorcycling, skateboarding, etc., see FIG. 1 employ a rigid, dome-shaped outer shell that tends to hold its shape and slide during impact.
- Modern bicycle helmets (see FIGS. 2 and 3) have a smooth, semi-rigid, non-continuous surface made of a considerably thin plastic layer. This thin shell primarily improves appearance and aerodynamics but is essentially unsuitable to bear or divert typical impact loads present during head impacts.
- the helmet surface in combination with an underlying foam core
- this congruency can lead to a prolonged impact duration, and the corresponding form lock between the impacting object and the helmet will cause an effective transfer of energy to the head instead of an effective energy diversion.
- the inefficacy of bicycle helmets to divert tangential impact energy may dramatically limit their ability to decrease the amount and magnitude of head acceleration.
- the use of contemporary helmets may therefore be ineffective to reduce the incidence of closed head traumatic brain injury, and may in fact increase the stresses to the cervical spine.
- the present invention provides a means of diverting and/or absorbing tangential impact energy before that energy is translated to the wearer's head and neck.
- FIGS. 4A and 4 B A first embodiment of the present invention is illustrated as helmet 40 of FIGS. 4A and 4 B, in longitudinal and transverse cross-section.
- Helmet 40 comprises an inner helmet layer (e.g., an energy-absorbing layer) 41 , a helmet retention system (e.g., straps 42 and foam padding inserts, not shown) to affix inner helmet layer 41 to a wearer's head, an outer helmet layer (the combination of energy-absorbing layer 43 and microshell 44 in this embodiment), and an interface layer 45 disposed between the inner and outer helmet layers.
- an inner helmet layer e.g., an energy-absorbing layer
- a helmet retention system e.g., straps 42 and foam padding inserts, not shown
- an outer helmet layer the combination of energy-absorbing layer 43 and microshell 44 in this embodiment
- an interface layer 45 disposed between the inner and outer helmet layers.
- the inside surface of energy-absorbing layer 43 forms a cavity with a spherical curvature.
- the exterior of energy-absorbing layer 41 has a spherical curvature with a slightly smaller radius than that of layer 43 .
- interface layer 45 is interposed between layers 41 and 43 and secured (e.g., by adhesive bonding) to the outer surface of layer 41 and the cavity surface of layer 43 .
- Interface layer 45 can provide, in essence, a spherical bearing of low/controlled friction to allow relative displacement between layers 41 and 43 under oblique impact conditions. Accordingly, assembled helmet 40 allows an inner helmet layer to remain affixed to a wearer's head, while allowing potentially large rotational displacement of outer layers 43 and 44 with respect to the inner layer (and the wearer's head) in response to an applied force.
- interface layer 45 consists of a distensible flexible envelope filled to a desired thickness with a viscous medium 52 .
- Viscous medium 52 can be, for example, a gel (e.g., silicone), a liquid (e.g., aqueous solutions, an oil, or other lubricant), and/or a filler comprising solid spherical particles.
- Segment 50 of the envelope is secured to the inner surface of outer helmet layer 43 ; segment 54 of the envelope is secured to the outer surface of inner helmet layer 41 .
- a “slack” section of the envelope can be left unattached, to readily permit some limited rotation, with any remaining rotation relying, for example, on distention of the envelope and/or partial separation of the envelope from the attached helmet layers.
- the slack section can also distend to displace portions of the viscous medium and absorb compression loads placed on the envelope.
- FIG. 5 depicts the application of an oblique force vector F to the outer helmet 44 .
- Force vector F can be decomposed into two component vectors, one (F norm ) normal to the helmet surface at the point of impact, and the other (F tang ) acting along the helmet surface.
- the magnitude of F tang will depend on the coefficient of friction between layer 44 and the striking object. It is noted, however, that large F norm values will generally cause substantial deformation of layers 43 , 44 when such use a traditional microshell construction, thereby increasing friction and F tang .
- envelope 45 In response to force vector F tang , envelope 45 allows a rotational displacement R of the outer helmet layers with respect to the inner helmet layers, absorbing and/or deflecting at least a portion of a rotational component that would otherwise be communicated to the wearer's head. At the same time, envelope 45 may absorb a portion of force vector F norm as viscous medium 52 pressurizes, forcing envelope 45 to distend along its periphery and allow some of viscous medium 52 to be displaced from between layers 41 and 43 .
- Geometric and constitutive properties of the envelope and viscous medium such as medium thickness and viscosity, the elastic modulus and area of unattached envelope at the helmet periphery, and the force required to separate the envelope from other helmet layers, can be adapted to meet specific shock-absorbing and shear-deflecting/absorbing properties for specific helmet applications.
- An additional advantage that can be achieved in at least some embodiments is improved absorption of force vector F norm due to the displacement of the impact site during impact.
- Materials such as foam will completely compress, or “bottom out”, near the impact site for some value of F norm .
- foam thickness typically one increases the foam thickness.
- the area of the inner layer directly under the impact site will generally be changing over the duration of the impact. This movement increases the area over which the inner foam layer is being compressed, thus potentially delaying and/or preventing bottoming out.
- FIG. 6 illustrates a second interface layer construction technique.
- interface layer 45 consists of a hyper-elastic gel that can be bonded to the inner surface of layer 43 and the outer surface of layer 41 to ensure helmet integrity during normal use.
- the gel allows rotational displacement—and potentially separation—of the outer helmet assembly with respect to the inner helmet assembly when a tangential impact force is applied to the outer helmet.
- layer 45 may act to absorb a portion of F norm and/or further distribute that force before it is applied to inner helmet layer 41 .
- Geometric and constitutive properties of interface layer 45 such as its thickness, viscosity, and/or elastic modulus can be adapted to meet specific shock-absorbing and shear-deflecting/absorbing properties for specific helmet applications.
- FIG. 7 illustrates the same helmet cross-section shown in FIG. 6, but with a different impact force vector F typical of a cyclist going over her handlebars and hitting the pavement headfirst.
- the resultant F tang vector causes the outer helmet assembly to rotate forward to partially shield the wearer's face.
- the helmet geometry can be designed to extend a portion of the outer helmet layers 43 , 44 down past the original edge of the helmet due to displacement upon impact, potentially providing increased facial protection in a crash.
- the outer helmet layer can generally be designed to act as an extended shield to protect areas of the head that would otherwise not be covered by a protective shell.
- FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrate another helmet embodiment 80 , respectively in transverse and longitudinal cross section, wherein an interface layer 84 is interposed between a rigid outer shell 85 and an energy-absorbing layer 81 , 82 .
- rigid outer shell 85 is constructed of a material such as glass-reinforced or carbon fiber-reinforced plastics/resin systems, polycarbonate, titanium, or perhaps high-density polyethylene.
- a microshell may tend to crack and tear upon impact, exposing the interface layer and allowing the impact surface to ablate the underlying interface layer. Depending on interface layer construction, this characteristic may or may not be tolerable—if not, a hard shell that resists deformation and tearing can be used.
- FIGS. 8A and 8B show other features that may be desirable in a particular application.
- helmet 80 incorporates air vents (e.g., 86 ), with the interface layer attached to support pillars 81 , 82 of the helmet.
- Helmet 80 also illustrates that the inner and outer helmet layers need not have coextensive head coverage (see hidden line 83 in FIG. 8B, showing the lower edge 83 of the interface layer 84 .
- a design may limit the extent of the interface to helmet areas that are most likely to strike the ground so as to cause rotational acceleration, e.g., the frontal helmet quadrants, provided that sufficient clearance is allowed for outer helmet assembly displacement upon impact.
- helmet 80 shows a tail appendage 87 attached to the outside of shell 85 .
- Tail appendage 87 can be used to impart aerodynamic or aesthetic qualities to the helmet without impeding the displacement function of interface layer 84 .
- Other constructs can have, for instance, part of shell 85 covering part of interface layer 84 and part of shell 85 covering part of tail appendage 87 , with tail appendage 87 attached directly to a part of interface layer 84 .
- FIG. 9A shows a section of a helmet with an outer helmet layer 90 , an inner helmet layer 92 , and an interface layer 94 disposed between layers 90 and 92 .
- Interface layer 94 comprises a lamellar structure of hyper-elastic columns 96 . Columns 96 buckle under an impact force to absorb impact energy.
- FIG. 9B application of a force F tang to one of the helmet layers results in a relative displacement d as columns 96 bend and stretch in response to the tangential force, thereby deflecting and partially absorbing the tangential force.
- the interface layer can also comprise multiple solid shell layers, as shown in FIG. 10A. Although such layers can be buried between energy-absorbing layers within the helmet, FIG. 10A shows an interface layer comprised of two solid shell layers 106 and 108 near the helmet exterior. Solid shell layer 106 attached to an outer helmet layer 100 . Solid shell layer 108 attaches to an inner helmet layer 102 . The solid shell layers can be designed to slide readily across each other in response to a force F tang applied to the outer helmet layer (see FIG. 10B), thereby deflecting the force instead of transmitting it to the inner helmet layer.
- Solid shell layers 106 and 108 can be constructed, for example, of materials that exhibit a low coefficient of friction, such as polyethylene or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and can further employ an intermediate lubricant to further reduce friction between layers 106 and 108 .
- PTFE polytetrafluoroethylene
- solid shell 106 can function alone as both outer shell 100 and as part of the displaceable interface of the helmet in some embodiments.
- Shells 106 and 108 can be held together initially in a fixed position, e.g., by peripheral tape or another connecting member (to be explained below) designed to shear upon impact, thereafter allowing free (or freer) motion between the two shells.
- FIG. 11A shows an interface layer construction with a primary interface medium 114 disposed between an outer helmet layer 110 and an inner helmet layer 112 .
- Intermittent connecting members 116 pass through primary interface medium 114 to join the inner and outer helmet layers.
- the connecting members 116 are depicted as integral to inner helmet layer 112 , but can, in the alternative: be integral to outer helmet layer 110 ; contain sections integral to both the inner and outer helmet layers that are engaged/connected during assembly; or be completely separate from the inner and outer helmet layers until connected during assembly.
- connecting members 116 substantially prevent displacement of the outer helmet layer with respect to the inner helmet layer under normal usage and handling, thereby imparting a unitary feel to the helmet.
- FIG. 11B illustrates the response of the interface layer 114 with connecting members 116 when a tangential force F tang less than a design shear force F S is applied to outer helmet layer 110 .
- a small displacement d is observed as connecting members 116 resist the propensity of interface layer 114 to displace.
- Connecting members 116 are designed to shear or otherwise disconnect, however, when a tangential force F tang exceeds the design shear force F S .
- the design shear force F S is preferably set low enough that connecting members 116 fail at tangential impact forces indicative of a crash—and lower than a force that would cause a potentially injurious head acceleration. As shown in FIG. 11C, once connecting members 116 fail, interface layer 114 can allow a relatively large displacement D.
- members 116 it may not be necessary that members 116 actually connect the inner and outer helmet layers.
- members 116 can substantially impede large displacements of a hyper-elastic layer by virtue of protruding through a portion of the layer's thickness and extending along the layer perpendicular to the direction in which displacement is to be constrained.
- FIG. 12 contains a graph 120 showing displacement of an outer layer 122 with respect to an inner layer 124 as a function of an applied tangential force F tang .
- a connecting/displacement-impeding member 128 within an interface layer 126 initially resists tangential forces less than F PEAK (shown for illustrative purposes at about 0.6 KN). Forces less than F PEAK cause a relatively small and temporary displacement, with the helmet elastically restoring itself to zero displacement once the force is removed. Once F PEAK is exceeded, however, member 128 fails, causing an inelastic change in the response characteristic of interface layer 126 , which can then move through relatively large displacements in response to tangential forces much smaller than F PEAK .
- Connecting members can take a variety of forms.
- FIG. 13 illustrates a cross-section of a vented helmet 130 .
- Helmet 130 contains connecting members 139 molded into an inner helmet layer 132 at the periphery of air vents and along the outer periphery of the inner helmet layer 132 where it joins the outer periphery of an outer helmet layer 135 .
- the outwardly facing surface of inner helmet layer 132 contains formed depressions, between connecting members 139 , into which an interface medium 138 can be inserted.
- Outer helmet layer 135 is subsequently positioned as shown and adhered to both interface medium 138 and connecting members 139 .
- cross-sectioned inner helmet support pillar 131 adheres to cross-sectioned outer helmet support pillar 134 , encapsulating a portion of interface medium 138 and forming one surface of an air vent and a lower helmet exterior surface.
- Cross-sectioned inner helmet support pillar 133 adheres to cross-sectioned outer helmet support pillar 136 , encapsulating another portion of interface medium 138 and forming two air vent surfaces. Similar construction can be used in the rest of the helmet.
- helmet 130 contains an encapsulated interface medium 138 and has the outward appearance of a prior art helmet. Under a large impact force, however, connecting members 139 readily fail, allowing the outer helmet assembly to rotate about the inner helmet assembly due to the previously described properties of interface medium 138 .
- FIG. 14 shows the results of a guided free-fall drop test comparing a standard bicycle helmet with the same helmet type equipped with a low-friction interface layer.
- One standard helmet was modified by attaching a distensible silicone-filled envelope to the outside of the outer helmet layer. A segment of an outer helmet layer from an identical helmet was then attached to the outside of the silicone-filled envelope, forming a low-friction interface (LFI) helmet.
- LFI low-friction interface
- Peak linear acceleration, peak angular acceleration, and neck moment were measured for the standard and LFI helmets.
- the inner assembly of the LFI helmet translated parallel to the surface of the anvil, inducing a backward rotation of the head around the neck joint.
- the standard helmet did not slide on the anvil surface, and therefore induced a head flexion moment.
- the head flexion moment further form-locked the standard helmet to the anvil, prevented sliding of the standard helmet.
- the LFI helmet exhibited an 87% smaller peak linear acceleration, a 68% lower peak angular acceleration, and a 74% decrease in neck moments.
- Helmet materials are widely selectable, depending on design.
- energy-absorbing layers can be constructed of polystyrene foam, expanded polystyrene foam, hexagonal honeycomb structures, and the like.
- Some outer shell materials are: titanium/titanium alloys; epoxies; fiberglass-epoxy composites; carbon-fiber-epoxy composites; polyethylene; polycarbonate; and fluoropolymers.
- Some potential interface layer materials are: silicon-based gels; hyper-elastic materials (e.g., rubber based on latex, silicon, or polyurethane); and sliding interface layer pairs of polyethylene, fluoropolymers, or polycarbonate.
- Some preferred embodiments utilize an interface layer with a spherical curvature, thus allowing rotational displacement of an outer helmet assembly in a plurality of axes of rotation.
- the helmet layers could contain features, such as longitudinal channels or ridges, that constrain displacement to fore-and-aft rotation. Or, particularly as the arc length of the interface decreases, it could depart significantly from a spherical curvature while still allowing considerable displacement.
- a displaceable outer helmet section that primarily protects the forward helmet quadrants could even employ a canted planar interface.
- the innermost layer in the described embodiments was an energy-absorbing layer, that layer can alternately be a hard layer, with the helmet retention system providing head cushioning.
Landscapes
- Helmets And Other Head Coverings (AREA)
Abstract
A load-diverting helmet contains an interface layer disposed between inner and outer helmet layers. The inner helmet layer is attached to a helmet retention system that can be used to hold the inner helmet layer to a wearer's head. When a tangential impact force is applied to the outer helmet layer, the interface layer allows the outer helmet layer to displace with respect to the inner helmet layer, thereby absorbing and/or diverting forces that would be transferred in a conventional helmet design to the wearer's head and neck as rotational acceleration.
Description
- This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/416,312, filed by Steven M. Madey on Oct. 4, 2002, and titled “Load Diversion Method and Apparatus for Head Protective Devices”, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
- This invention relates generally to helmets and other head protective devices, and more particularly to methods and apparatus for lessening the transfer of oblique impact forces to an individual wearing such a device.
- Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death and long-term disability in the U.S.A. among people below 45 years of age. In the U.S. alone, each year over two million people sustain traumatic brain injury, with a financial impact of about $4 billion annually. To alleviate the impact of TBI, a variety of task-specific helmets have been introduced. To date the use of helmets is no longer confined to high-risk occupational scenarios and motorcyclists, but appreciates wide-spread acceptance and even legal prescription for common recreational and sports activities, such as bicycling. Given the large number of helmets in use, even a small improvement in the protective effect of helmets will evoke a considerable benefit to the health status of the general population.
- Helmets are designed to protect the brain and skull during an impact. Conventional helmets perform this function by distributing and absorbing a portion of an impact's kinetic energy by deforming (elastically or inelastically) a compliant layer. Typically, a permanently attached outer shell distributes the impact load, and an interior-padding layer absorbs impact energy. For an activity such as bicycling, the capabilities of the shell and padding layer represent a compromise between the need to maximize energy absorption and minimize object penetration, practical and aesthetic limitations on weight and thickness, and other factors such as style, aerodynamics, head cooling, etc.
- FIG. 1 shows a traditional recreational sports
hard shell helmet 20 in longitudinal cross-section. Apadding layer 22 surrounds and is generally shaped to fit (usually with insert foam padding to adjust for a comfortable fit) the protected portion of the wearer's head. A hardouter shell 24 of glass-reinforced plastic, polycarbonate thermoplastics, or the like, is adhered to paddinglayer 22. A helmet retention system (e.g., straps 26) allows the user to attach the helmet securely to the head, usually with a chinstrap and increasingly with a suspended rear strap or member that aligns the helmet properly on the wearer's head. The helmet retention system usually attaches directly toouter shell 24. - FIG. 2 shows, in cross-section, a
micro-shell helmet 27, which has largely replaced the traditional hard shell helmet for most bicycle applications (primarily due to reduced weight). Helmet 27 uses aliner 22 manufactured from expanded polystyrene beads, designed to absorb kinetic energy upon impact. A tape strip (not shown) running along the lower edge of aplastic microshell 28 secures the plastic microshell to the exterior ofliner 22. Ahelmet retention system 26 generally attaches to and/or loops through holes inliner 22. Upon substantial impact, the plastic microshell may tear apart or split, and the underlying liner may crack or shatter as it absorbs energy. Consequently, microshell helmet manufacturers typically recommend replacement after a single crash, even if helmet integrity appears uncompromised. - Particularly with microshell helmet designs, large cross-section integrated vents have been incorporated into the helmet as a selling feature. FIG. 3 illustrates a vented
microshell helmet 30 in longitudinal cross-section. Although similar in construction tohelmet 27,microshell 28 andliner 32 contain substantial shaped voids or ports (e.g., 34) that ostensibly function as vents to allow some airflow through the helmet. Theremaining polystyrene struts 32 may be quite thick, in order to restore at least part of the structural integrity lost due tovoids 34. - The invention may be best understood by reading the disclosure with reference to the drawing, wherein:
- FIGS. 1, 2, and3 show longitudinal cross-sections of three prior art recreational helmet designs;
- FIGS. 4A and 4B contain cross-sections of a helmet according to an embodiment of the invention, shown respectively in longitudinal and transverse cross section;
- FIG. 5 shows construction and functional detail of the embodiment of FIGS. 4A and 4B;
- FIGS. 6 and 7 show construction and functional detail of another embodiment employing a different interface layer;
- FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrate yet another embodiment of the invention, which incorporates air vents and uses an interface layer disposed near the outer helmet shell;
- FIGS. 9A and 9B depict an interface layer comprising a lamellar structure, respectively under no-load and tangential force conditions;
- FIGS. 10A and 10B depict an interface layer comprising adjacent rigid shells, respectively under no-load and tangential force conditions;
- FIGS. 11A, 11B, and11C depict an interface layer employing thin connecting members that pass through the interface layer, respectively under no-load, small tangential force, and large tangential force conditions;
- FIG. 12 illustrates one possible displacement response characteristic for a non-linear interface layer according to an embodiment of the invention;
- FIG. 13 shows the construction of an embodiment wherein connecting members are disposed around the periphery of air vents in a helmet; and
- FIG. 14 demonstrates test results for a standard helmet and an embodiment of the invention when subjected to an oblique impact with a concrete surface.
- The increased use of bicycle helmets over the past decade does not seem to have reduced the incidence rate of traumatic brain injury per bicyclist, but has coincided with a 51% increase in the rate of head injuries per active cyclist. This phenomenon may only insufficiently be explained by a more aggressive riding attitude among bicyclists, based on a misleading sense of security provided by helmets. It is now recognized herein that this seeming incongruity may be accounted for, at least in part, by three specific deficiencies in the design of bicycle helmets.
- First, prior bicycle helmets are primarily designed to distribute and absorb impact loads by means of a padding layer underlying a generally dome-shaped semi-rigid shell. This design is effective in distributing a focused impact over a larger area of the cranium to reduce the risk of skull fractures. Given geometric constraints of the padding layer, however, its ability to absorb a significant amount of energy is limited. Subsequently, the remaining energy will be transformed into acceleration of the head, where the amount and duration of head acceleration directly correlates to the extent of traumatic brain injury. Therefore, the design of contemporary bicycle helmets may effectively reduce the incident of skull fractures, but falls short in protecting its user from the disabling consequences of traumatic brain injury.
- Second, bicycle helmets are primarily designed to absorb impact loads by means of energy-absorbing and load-distributing layers. This design greatly increases the distance of the impact site (i.e., the semi-rigid outer shell) from the apparent rotation axis of the head around the neck, therefore providing an effective lever arm to transform the tangential component of an oblique impact to the helmet into an angular acceleration of the head. Since the brain is most susceptible to angular acceleration of the head, current helmet designs do not protect the head from closed-head traumatic brain injury due to angular acceleration, but may instead contribute to it.
- Third, bicycle helmets are primarily designed to absorb impact loads by means of a padding layer underlying a generally dome-shaped semi-rigid shell. Traditional helmets (for motorcycling, skateboarding, etc., see FIG. 1) employ a rigid, dome-shaped outer shell that tends to hold its shape and slide during impact. Modern bicycle helmets (see FIGS. 2 and 3) have a smooth, semi-rigid, non-continuous surface made of a considerably thin plastic layer. This thin shell primarily improves appearance and aerodynamics but is essentially unsuitable to bear or divert typical impact loads present during head impacts. As a method for energy absorption, the helmet surface (in combination with an underlying foam core) will deform to congruency with the surface geometry of the impacting object. Instead of diverting an impacting object and its associated kinetic energy, this congruency can lead to a prolonged impact duration, and the corresponding form lock between the impacting object and the helmet will cause an effective transfer of energy to the head instead of an effective energy diversion.
- In summary, the inefficacy of bicycle helmets to divert tangential impact energy may dramatically limit their ability to decrease the amount and magnitude of head acceleration. The use of contemporary helmets may therefore be ineffective to reduce the incidence of closed head traumatic brain injury, and may in fact increase the stresses to the cervical spine. In contrast, the present invention provides a means of diverting and/or absorbing tangential impact energy before that energy is translated to the wearer's head and neck.
- A first embodiment of the present invention is illustrated as
helmet 40 of FIGS. 4A and 4B, in longitudinal and transverse cross-section.Helmet 40 comprises an inner helmet layer (e.g., an energy-absorbing layer) 41, a helmet retention system (e.g., straps 42 and foam padding inserts, not shown) to affixinner helmet layer 41 to a wearer's head, an outer helmet layer (the combination of energy-absorbinglayer 43 andmicroshell 44 in this embodiment), and aninterface layer 45 disposed between the inner and outer helmet layers. - The inside surface of energy-absorbing
layer 43 forms a cavity with a spherical curvature. Likewise, the exterior of energy-absorbinglayer 41 has a spherical curvature with a slightly smaller radius than that oflayer 43. During assembly,interface layer 45 is interposed betweenlayers layer 41 and the cavity surface oflayer 43. -
Interface layer 45 can provide, in essence, a spherical bearing of low/controlled friction to allow relative displacement betweenlayers helmet 40 allows an inner helmet layer to remain affixed to a wearer's head, while allowing potentially large rotational displacement ofouter layers - FIG. 5 illustrates further construction and operational details for this first embodiment. In this embodiment,
interface layer 45 consists of a distensible flexible envelope filled to a desired thickness with aviscous medium 52. Viscous medium 52 can be, for example, a gel (e.g., silicone), a liquid (e.g., aqueous solutions, an oil, or other lubricant), and/or a filler comprising solid spherical particles.Segment 50 of the envelope is secured to the inner surface ofouter helmet layer 43;segment 54 of the envelope is secured to the outer surface ofinner helmet layer 41. Along the bottom edge of the interface, a “slack” section of the envelope can be left unattached, to readily permit some limited rotation, with any remaining rotation relying, for example, on distention of the envelope and/or partial separation of the envelope from the attached helmet layers. The slack section can also distend to displace portions of the viscous medium and absorb compression loads placed on the envelope. - FIG. 5 depicts the application of an oblique force vector F to the
outer helmet 44. Force vector F can be decomposed into two component vectors, one (Fnorm) normal to the helmet surface at the point of impact, and the other (Ftang) acting along the helmet surface. The magnitude of Ftang will depend on the coefficient of friction betweenlayer 44 and the striking object. It is noted, however, that large Fnorm values will generally cause substantial deformation oflayers - In response to force vector Ftang,
envelope 45 allows a rotational displacement R of the outer helmet layers with respect to the inner helmet layers, absorbing and/or deflecting at least a portion of a rotational component that would otherwise be communicated to the wearer's head. At the same time,envelope 45 may absorb a portion of force vector Fnorm asviscous medium 52 pressurizes, forcingenvelope 45 to distend along its periphery and allow some of viscous medium 52 to be displaced from betweenlayers - An additional advantage that can be achieved in at least some embodiments is improved absorption of force vector Fnorm due to the displacement of the impact site during impact. Materials such as foam will completely compress, or “bottom out”, near the impact site for some value of Fnorm. To reduce this phenomenon in a prior art helmet, typically one increases the foam thickness. In an embodiment with a displaceable outer layer, however, the area of the inner layer directly under the impact site will generally be changing over the duration of the impact. This movement increases the area over which the inner foam layer is being compressed, thus potentially delaying and/or preventing bottoming out.
- FIG. 6 illustrates a second interface layer construction technique. In FIG. 6,
interface layer 45 consists of a hyper-elastic gel that can be bonded to the inner surface oflayer 43 and the outer surface oflayer 41 to ensure helmet integrity during normal use. The gel allows rotational displacement—and potentially separation—of the outer helmet assembly with respect to the inner helmet assembly when a tangential impact force is applied to the outer helmet. Further, depending on gel properties,layer 45 may act to absorb a portion of Fnorm and/or further distribute that force before it is applied toinner helmet layer 41. Geometric and constitutive properties ofinterface layer 45, such as its thickness, viscosity, and/or elastic modulus can be adapted to meet specific shock-absorbing and shear-deflecting/absorbing properties for specific helmet applications. - FIG. 7 illustrates the same helmet cross-section shown in FIG. 6, but with a different impact force vector F typical of a cyclist going over her handlebars and hitting the pavement headfirst. In FIG. 7, then, the resultant Ftang vector causes the outer helmet assembly to rotate forward to partially shield the wearer's face. Thus although not necessary in every embodiment, the helmet geometry can be designed to extend a portion of the outer helmet layers 43, 44 down past the original edge of the helmet due to displacement upon impact, potentially providing increased facial protection in a crash. Such a feature is not necessarily limited to forward rotation—with an appropriate design and a large displacement, the outer helmet layer can generally be designed to act as an extended shield to protect areas of the head that would otherwise not be covered by a protective shell.
- In the preceding embodiments, the interface layer was interposed between two, e.g., expanded polystyrene layers. FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrate another
helmet embodiment 80, respectively in transverse and longitudinal cross section, wherein aninterface layer 84 is interposed between a rigidouter shell 85 and an energy-absorbinglayer outer shell 85 is constructed of a material such as glass-reinforced or carbon fiber-reinforced plastics/resin systems, polycarbonate, titanium, or perhaps high-density polyethylene. Although such an embodiment can potentially use a microshell, a microshell may tend to crack and tear upon impact, exposing the interface layer and allowing the impact surface to ablate the underlying interface layer. Depending on interface layer construction, this characteristic may or may not be tolerable—if not, a hard shell that resists deformation and tearing can be used. - FIGS. 8A and 8B show other features that may be desirable in a particular application. For instance,
helmet 80 incorporates air vents (e.g., 86), with the interface layer attached to supportpillars Helmet 80 also illustrates that the inner and outer helmet layers need not have coextensive head coverage (see hiddenline 83 in FIG. 8B, showing thelower edge 83 of theinterface layer 84. In practice, a design may limit the extent of the interface to helmet areas that are most likely to strike the ground so as to cause rotational acceleration, e.g., the frontal helmet quadrants, provided that sufficient clearance is allowed for outer helmet assembly displacement upon impact. - Finally,
helmet 80 shows atail appendage 87 attached to the outside ofshell 85.Tail appendage 87 can be used to impart aerodynamic or aesthetic qualities to the helmet without impeding the displacement function ofinterface layer 84. Other constructs can have, for instance, part ofshell 85 covering part ofinterface layer 84 and part ofshell 85 covering part oftail appendage 87, withtail appendage 87 attached directly to a part ofinterface layer 84. - In addition to the filled envelope and hyper-elastic gel embodiments already described, other interface layer constructions are possible. FIG. 9A shows a section of a helmet with an
outer helmet layer 90, aninner helmet layer 92, and aninterface layer 94 disposed betweenlayers Interface layer 94 comprises a lamellar structure of hyper-elastic columns 96.Columns 96 buckle under an impact force to absorb impact energy. And as shown in FIG. 9B, application of a force Ftang to one of the helmet layers results in a relative displacement d ascolumns 96 bend and stretch in response to the tangential force, thereby deflecting and partially absorbing the tangential force. - The interface layer can also comprise multiple solid shell layers, as shown in FIG. 10A. Although such layers can be buried between energy-absorbing layers within the helmet, FIG. 10A shows an interface layer comprised of two
solid shell layers Solid shell layer 106 attached to anouter helmet layer 100.Solid shell layer 108 attaches to aninner helmet layer 102. The solid shell layers can be designed to slide readily across each other in response to a force Ftang applied to the outer helmet layer (see FIG. 10B), thereby deflecting the force instead of transmitting it to the inner helmet layer. Solid shell layers 106 and 108 can be constructed, for example, of materials that exhibit a low coefficient of friction, such as polyethylene or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and can further employ an intermediate lubricant to further reduce friction betweenlayers - Optionally,
solid shell 106 can function alone as bothouter shell 100 and as part of the displaceable interface of the helmet in some embodiments. -
Shells - With an interface layer that easily displaces in response to even slight tangential forces, for example, it may be desirable to restrict such displacement prior to an impact event. Accordingly, FIG. 11A shows an interface layer construction with a
primary interface medium 114 disposed between anouter helmet layer 110 and aninner helmet layer 112. Intermittent connectingmembers 116 pass throughprimary interface medium 114 to join the inner and outer helmet layers. The connectingmembers 116 are depicted as integral toinner helmet layer 112, but can, in the alternative: be integral toouter helmet layer 110; contain sections integral to both the inner and outer helmet layers that are engaged/connected during assembly; or be completely separate from the inner and outer helmet layers until connected during assembly. - Preferably, connecting
members 116 substantially prevent displacement of the outer helmet layer with respect to the inner helmet layer under normal usage and handling, thereby imparting a unitary feel to the helmet. For instance, FIG. 11B illustrates the response of theinterface layer 114 with connectingmembers 116 when a tangential force Ftang less than a design shear force FS is applied toouter helmet layer 110. A small displacement d is observed as connectingmembers 116 resist the propensity ofinterface layer 114 to displace. - Connecting
members 116 are designed to shear or otherwise disconnect, however, when a tangential force Ftang exceeds the design shear force FS. The design shear force FS is preferably set low enough that connectingmembers 116 fail at tangential impact forces indicative of a crash—and lower than a force that would cause a potentially injurious head acceleration. As shown in FIG. 11C, once connectingmembers 116 fail,interface layer 114 can allow a relatively large displacement D. - In some embodiments, it may not be necessary that
members 116 actually connect the inner and outer helmet layers. For instance,members 116 can substantially impede large displacements of a hyper-elastic layer by virtue of protruding through a portion of the layer's thickness and extending along the layer perpendicular to the direction in which displacement is to be constrained. - Another way to view an interface layer with connecting and/or displacement-impeding members is as an interface layer that responds non-linearly to tangential forces. FIG. 12 contains a
graph 120 showing displacement of anouter layer 122 with respect to aninner layer 124 as a function of an applied tangential force Ftang. A connecting/displacement-impeding member 128 within aninterface layer 126 initially resists tangential forces less than FPEAK (shown for illustrative purposes at about 0.6 KN). Forces less than FPEAK cause a relatively small and temporary displacement, with the helmet elastically restoring itself to zero displacement once the force is removed. Once FPEAK is exceeded, however, member 128 fails, causing an inelastic change in the response characteristic ofinterface layer 126, which can then move through relatively large displacements in response to tangential forces much smaller than FPEAK. - Connecting members can take a variety of forms. For instance, FIG. 13 illustrates a cross-section of a vented
helmet 130.Helmet 130 contains connectingmembers 139 molded into aninner helmet layer 132 at the periphery of air vents and along the outer periphery of theinner helmet layer 132 where it joins the outer periphery of anouter helmet layer 135. Accordingly, the outwardly facing surface ofinner helmet layer 132 contains formed depressions, between connectingmembers 139, into which aninterface medium 138 can be inserted.Outer helmet layer 135 is subsequently positioned as shown and adhered to bothinterface medium 138 and connectingmembers 139. Thus the cross-sectioned innerhelmet support pillar 131 adheres to cross-sectioned outerhelmet support pillar 134, encapsulating a portion ofinterface medium 138 and forming one surface of an air vent and a lower helmet exterior surface. Cross-sectioned innerhelmet support pillar 133 adheres to cross-sectioned outerhelmet support pillar 136, encapsulating another portion ofinterface medium 138 and forming two air vent surfaces. Similar construction can be used in the rest of the helmet. Thushelmet 130 contains an encapsulatedinterface medium 138 and has the outward appearance of a prior art helmet. Under a large impact force, however, connectingmembers 139 readily fail, allowing the outer helmet assembly to rotate about the inner helmet assembly due to the previously described properties ofinterface medium 138. - FIG. 14 shows the results of a guided free-fall drop test comparing a standard bicycle helmet with the same helmet type equipped with a low-friction interface layer. One standard helmet was modified by attaching a distensible silicone-filled envelope to the outside of the outer helmet layer. A segment of an outer helmet layer from an identical helmet was then attached to the outside of the silicone-filled envelope, forming a low-friction interface (LFI) helmet.
- Drop tests on the standard and modified helmets were then performed by attaching the helmets to a headform with a hinged “neck” joint and dropping each helmet onto a concrete anvil. The concrete anvil had a top surface angled at 30 degrees to horizontal to simulate an oblique impact that might occur in a bicycle crash where a rider is launched onto pavement.
- Peak linear acceleration, peak angular acceleration, and neck moment were measured for the standard and LFI helmets. Upon impact, the inner assembly of the LFI helmet translated parallel to the surface of the anvil, inducing a backward rotation of the head around the neck joint. The standard helmet did not slide on the anvil surface, and therefore induced a head flexion moment. The head flexion moment further form-locked the standard helmet to the anvil, prevented sliding of the standard helmet. Accordingly, compared to the standard helmet, the LFI helmet exhibited an 87% smaller peak linear acceleration, a 68% lower peak angular acceleration, and a 74% decrease in neck moments.
- Helmet materials are widely selectable, depending on design. By way of example, energy-absorbing layers can be constructed of polystyrene foam, expanded polystyrene foam, hexagonal honeycomb structures, and the like. Some outer shell materials are: titanium/titanium alloys; epoxies; fiberglass-epoxy composites; carbon-fiber-epoxy composites; polyethylene; polycarbonate; and fluoropolymers. Some potential interface layer materials are: silicon-based gels; hyper-elastic materials (e.g., rubber based on latex, silicon, or polyurethane); and sliding interface layer pairs of polyethylene, fluoropolymers, or polycarbonate. Those skilled in the art will recognize from the preceding disclosure the large number of potential combinations of these, as well as other materials not explicitly listed, that can be combined in an embodiment of the present invention.
- One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the concepts taught herein can be tailored to a particular application in many other advantageous ways, and that the embodiments presented are merely exemplary. Some preferred embodiments utilize an interface layer with a spherical curvature, thus allowing rotational displacement of an outer helmet assembly in a plurality of axes of rotation. Other arrangements are possible, however. For instance, the helmet layers could contain features, such as longitudinal channels or ridges, that constrain displacement to fore-and-aft rotation. Or, particularly as the arc length of the interface decreases, it could depart significantly from a spherical curvature while still allowing considerable displacement. A displaceable outer helmet section that primarily protects the forward helmet quadrants could even employ a canted planar interface. Although the innermost layer in the described embodiments was an energy-absorbing layer, that layer can alternately be a hard layer, with the helmet retention system providing head cushioning.
- Although the specification may refer to “an”, “one”, “another”, or “some” embodiment(s) in several locations, this does not necessarily mean that each such reference is to the same embodiment(s), or that the feature only applies to a single embodiment.
Claims (34)
1. A helmet comprising:
an inner helmet layer;
an outer helmet layer; and
an interface layer disposed between the inner and outer helmet layers, the interface layer allowing displacement of the outer helmet layer with respect to the inner helmet layer in response to a tangential impact force applied to the outer helmet layer.
2. The helmet of claim 1 , wherein the outer helmet layer comprises a hard shell, and wherein the inner helmet layer comprises an energy-absorbing layer.
3. The helmet of claim 1 , wherein the outer helmet layer comprises a first energy-absorbing layer and a microshell at least partially overlying the first energy-absorbing layer, and wherein the inner helmet layer comprises a second energy-absorbing layer.
4. The helmet of claim 1 , further comprising a helmet retention system to secure the inner helmet layer to a wearer's head.
5. The helmet of claim 1 , the helmet comprising features to constrain the allowable displacement to rotational displacement along a single axis of rotation.
6. The helmet of claim 1 , wherein the interface layer has a spherical curvature, such that the allowable displacement comprises rotational displacement in a plurality of axes of rotation.
7. The helmet of claim 6 , wherein the interface layer has a substantially uniform thickness.
8. The helmet of claim 1 , wherein the interface layer substantially fills a gap between the inner and outer helmet layers.
9. The helmet of claim 1 , further comprising a plurality of air vents passing through the inner and outer helmet layers to allow air movement between the exterior of the helmet and the interior of the helmet.
10. The helmet of claim 9 , wherein a connecting member joins the inner and outer helmet layers around the periphery of one or more of the air vents.
11. The helmet of claim 10 , wherein the connecting member substantially prevents displacement of the outer helmet layer with respect to the inner helmet layer, and fails when a tangential impact force indicative of a crash is applied to the outer helmet layer.
12. The helmet of claim 1 , wherein at least one connecting member joins the inner and outer helmet layers, substantially prevents displacement of the outer helmet layer with respect to the inner helmet layer, and fails when a tangential impact force indicative of a crash is applied to the outer helmet layer.
13. The helmet of claim 12 , wherein the connecting member is positioned around the periphery of the helmet.
14. The helmet of claim 1 , wherein the interface layer responds non-linearly to tangential forces, such that tangential forces less than a threshold force result in relatively small elastic displacements, and a tangential force larger than the threshold force causes an inelastic change in the interface layer after which tangential forces smaller than the threshold force cause relatively large displacements.
15. The helmet of claim 1 , wherein the interface layer comprises an envelope attached to the inner and outer helmet layers, the envelope containing a viscous medium.
16. The helmet of claim 1 , wherein the interface layer comprises a hyper-elastic structure.
17. The helmet of claim 16 , wherein the hyper-elastic structure comprises a formable gel.
18. The helmet of claim 16 , wherein the hyper-elastic structure comprises an elastomer-based lamellar structure.
19. The helmet of claim 1 , wherein the outer helmet layer comprises a first solid shell, and the interface layer comprises a second solid shell attached to the inner helmet layer and in contact with the first solid shell, such that allowed displacement occurs between the first and second solid shells.
20. The helmet of claim 19 , further comprising a lubricant disposed between the first and second solid shells.
21. The helmet of claim 1 , wherein the interface layer is adapted to at least partially dampen impact energy applied normal to the surface of the outer helmet layer.
22. The helmet of claim 1 , wherein the outer helmet layer has a front lower surface capable of extending, during a forward displacement, to provide additional facial protection to a wearer.
23. The helmet of claim 1 , wherein at least one displacement-impeding member protrudes into the interface layer from the inner or outer helmet layer, the at least one displacement-impeding member substantially impedes displacement of the outer helmet layer with respect to the inner helmet layer, and fails when a tangential impact force indicative of a crash is applied to the outer helmet layer
24. A method of head protection, comprising:
joining an inner helmet layer, an outer helmet layer, and an interposed interface layer that allows relative displacement between the inner and outer helmet layers; and
in response to a tangential impact force applied to the outer helmet layer, displacing the outer helmet layer with respect to the inner helmet layer.
25. The method of claim 24 , wherein displacing the outer helmet layer with respect to the inner helmet layer comprises responding to a tangential force less than a threshold force with a relatively small elastic displacement, and responding to a tangential force larger than the threshold force by inelastically changing the interface layer, after which tangential forces smaller than the threshold force cause relatively large displacements.
26. The method of claim 25 , wherein the interface layer comprises at least one connecting member connecting the outer and inner helmet layers, and wherein inelastically changing the interface layer comprises severing the connection formed by the connecting member.
27. The method of claim 24 , wherein the interface layer has a substantially spherical curvature, and wherein displacing the outer helmet layer with respect to the inner helmet layer comprises rotationally displacing the outer helmet layer with respect to the inner helmet layer.
28. The method of claim 24 , wherein the inner helmet layer comprises at least an energy-absorbing sublayer, the method further comprising absorbing normal impact forces applied to the outer helmet layer over an extended area of the inner helmet layer during the displacement of the outer layer.
29. A helmet comprising:
an inner helmet assembly having a first energy-absorbing layer and a helmet retention system to secure the first energy-absorbing layer to a wearer's head;
an outer helmet assembly having a second energy-absorbing layer; and
an interface layer disposed in a region of substantially spherical curvature between the inner and outer helmet assemblies, the interface layer allowing rotational displacement of the outer helmet assembly with respect to the inner helmet assembly in response to a tangential impact force applied to the outer helmet assembly.
30. The helmet of claim 29 , further comprising at least one connecting element to attach the inner and outer helmet assemblies and substantially impede rotational displacement between the two assemblies until the helmet is subjected to a significant impact force.
31. The helmet of claim 29 , further comprising at least one displacement-impeding element protruding from either the inner or outer helmet assembly into the interface layer and substantially impeding rotational displacement between the two assemblies until the helmet is subjected to a significant impact force.
32. A helmet comprising:
an inner helmet assembly having a first energy-absorbing layer and a helmet retention system to secure the first energy-absorbing layer to a wearer's head;
an outer helmet assembly having a rigid layer; and
an interface layer disposed in a region of substantially spherical curvature between the inner and outer helmet assemblies, the interface layer allowing rotational displacement of the outer helmet assembly with respect to the inner helmet assembly in response to a tangential impact force applied to the outer helmet assembly.
33. The helmet of claim 32 , further comprising at least one connecting element to attach the inner and outer helmet assemblies and substantially impede rotational displacement between the two assemblies until the helmet is subjected to a significant impact force.
34. The helmet of claim 32 , further comprising at least one displacement-impeding element protruding from either the inner or outer helmet assembly into the interface layer and substantially impeding rotational displacement between the two assemblies until the helmet is subjected to a significant impact force.
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/617,544 US20040117896A1 (en) | 2002-10-04 | 2003-07-10 | Load diversion method and apparatus for head protective devices |
PCT/US2003/031407 WO2004032659A1 (en) | 2002-10-04 | 2003-10-03 | Head protective devices |
AU2003279781A AU2003279781A1 (en) | 2002-10-04 | 2003-10-03 | Head protective devices |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US41631202P | 2002-10-04 | 2002-10-04 | |
US10/617,544 US20040117896A1 (en) | 2002-10-04 | 2003-07-10 | Load diversion method and apparatus for head protective devices |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040117896A1 true US20040117896A1 (en) | 2004-06-24 |
Family
ID=32096144
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/617,544 Abandoned US20040117896A1 (en) | 2002-10-04 | 2003-07-10 | Load diversion method and apparatus for head protective devices |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20040117896A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2003279781A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2004032659A1 (en) |
Cited By (91)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040168246A1 (en) * | 2001-07-09 | 2004-09-02 | Phillips Kenneth David | Protective headgear and protective armour and a method of modifying protective headgear and protective armour |
US20040250340A1 (en) * | 2003-02-05 | 2004-12-16 | Dennis Piper | Protective headguard |
WO2006005143A1 (en) * | 2004-07-13 | 2006-01-19 | K.U. Leuven Research & Development | Protective helmet |
US20060059606A1 (en) * | 2004-09-22 | 2006-03-23 | Xenith Athletics, Inc. | Multilayer air-cushion shell with energy-absorbing layer for use in the construction of protective headgear |
US20070190293A1 (en) * | 2006-02-16 | 2007-08-16 | Xenith, Inc. | Protective Structure and Method of Making Same |
US20070190292A1 (en) * | 2006-02-16 | 2007-08-16 | Ferrara Vincent R | Impact energy management method and system |
US20080028499A1 (en) * | 2006-08-04 | 2008-02-07 | Sport Maska Inc. | Protective shell construction and method |
US20080141429A1 (en) * | 2005-01-27 | 2008-06-19 | Georg Scharpenack | Helmet |
US20100088807A1 (en) * | 2008-10-15 | 2010-04-15 | Nanotech Ceramics Co., Ltd. | Lightweight helmet shell and method for manufacturing the same |
US20100101006A1 (en) * | 2008-10-29 | 2010-04-29 | Cleveland William K | Headguard with temple protecting scallop that does not cover the ears |
US20100103261A1 (en) * | 2008-10-23 | 2010-04-29 | James Michael Felt | Bicycle handlebar video system |
US20100115686A1 (en) * | 2007-02-20 | 2010-05-13 | Mips Ab | Apparatus at a protective helmet |
US20110047685A1 (en) * | 2006-02-16 | 2011-03-03 | Ferrara Vincent R | Impact energy management method and system |
US20110060260A1 (en) * | 2009-09-10 | 2011-03-10 | Drexel University | Cervical spine protection apparatus and methods of use |
US8042198B1 (en) | 2008-10-29 | 2011-10-25 | Full90 Sports, Inc. | Headguard with independently adjustable upper and lower bands |
WO2011139224A1 (en) | 2010-05-07 | 2011-11-10 | Mips Ab | Helmet with sliding facilitator arranged at energy absorbing layer |
US20120060251A1 (en) * | 2010-09-09 | 2012-03-15 | Oliver Schimpf | Protective helmet; Method for mitigating or preventing a head injury |
US8214928B1 (en) | 2008-10-29 | 2012-07-10 | Full90 Sports, Inc. | Headguard with an eccentric dimple for accommodating the occipital bone |
WO2012109381A1 (en) * | 2011-02-09 | 2012-08-16 | Innovation Dynamics LLC | Helmet omnidirectional energy management systems |
US20120208032A1 (en) * | 2011-02-14 | 2012-08-16 | Kinetica Inc. | Helmet designs utilizing an outer slip layer |
CN102811639A (en) * | 2010-01-13 | 2012-12-05 | 米帕斯公司 | Intermediate layer of friction decreasing material |
WO2013000095A1 (en) * | 2011-06-30 | 2013-01-03 | Simon Fraser University | Impact diverting mechanism |
US20130019385A1 (en) * | 2011-07-21 | 2013-01-24 | Brainguard Technologies, Inc. | Energy and impact transformer layer |
EP2550886A1 (en) * | 2011-07-27 | 2013-01-30 | Bauer Hockey Corp. | Sports helmet with rotational impact protection |
WO2013104073A1 (en) | 2012-01-12 | 2013-07-18 | University Of Ottawa | Head protection for reducing angular accelerations |
US20140090155A1 (en) * | 2011-05-05 | 2014-04-03 | James Michael Johnston | Systems and methods for attenuating rotational acceleration of the head |
US20140208486A1 (en) * | 2013-01-25 | 2014-07-31 | Wesley W.O. Krueger | Impact reduction helmet |
US8814150B2 (en) | 2011-12-14 | 2014-08-26 | Xenith, Llc | Shock absorbers for protective body gear |
US8950735B2 (en) | 2011-12-14 | 2015-02-10 | Xenith, Llc | Shock absorbers for protective body gear |
US9032558B2 (en) | 2011-05-23 | 2015-05-19 | Lionhead Helmet Intellectual Properties, Lp | Helmet system |
US20150230535A1 (en) * | 2014-02-15 | 2015-08-20 | Rex Medical, L.P. | Helmet with varying shock absorption |
US20150257472A1 (en) * | 2014-03-14 | 2015-09-17 | Charles Owen & Company (Bow) Limited | Helmet |
US20150264991A1 (en) * | 2014-03-24 | 2015-09-24 | Mark Frey | Concussive helmet |
US20150359288A1 (en) * | 2012-11-23 | 2015-12-17 | Poc Sweden Ab | Protection device for helmet |
JP2016037669A (en) * | 2014-08-05 | 2016-03-22 | 株式会社Shoei | helmet |
US20160113346A1 (en) * | 2014-10-28 | 2016-04-28 | Bell Sports, Inc. | In-Mold Rotation Helmet |
US9398782B2 (en) | 2010-04-23 | 2016-07-26 | Felt Racing, Llc | Aerodynamic bicycle helmet |
US20160242485A1 (en) * | 2015-02-25 | 2016-08-25 | Steven Christopher CARTON | Helmet |
US20160249702A1 (en) * | 2013-10-11 | 2016-09-01 | Pfanner Schutzbekleidung Gmbh | Protective helmet |
US20160302496A1 (en) * | 2014-01-06 | 2016-10-20 | Lisa Ferrara | Composite devices and methods for providing protection against traumatic tissue injury |
USD773742S1 (en) | 2015-03-10 | 2016-12-06 | Albert Williams | Helmet |
US9572389B2 (en) | 2011-02-14 | 2017-02-21 | Kineticshield, Inc. | Impact and explosive force minimization structures |
US9586125B2 (en) | 2012-10-30 | 2017-03-07 | Mioflex, Llc | Head and neck protection apparatus and methods |
US20170164678A1 (en) * | 2015-12-11 | 2017-06-15 | Bell Sports, Inc. | Protective helmet with multiple energy management liners |
US9683622B2 (en) | 2004-04-21 | 2017-06-20 | Xenith, Llc | Air venting, impact-absorbing compressible members |
US20170367427A1 (en) * | 2016-06-28 | 2017-12-28 | Peter G. MEADE | Zero impact head gear |
US9961952B2 (en) | 2015-08-17 | 2018-05-08 | Bauer Hockey, Llc | Helmet for impact protection |
US20180255862A1 (en) * | 2017-03-07 | 2018-09-13 | Chang-Hsien Ho | Multilayered floatable universal shock absorption system of safety helmet |
US10092057B2 (en) | 2014-08-01 | 2018-10-09 | Carter J. Kovarik | Helmet for reducing concussive forces during collision and facilitating rapid facemask removal |
US10092054B2 (en) | 2015-03-10 | 2018-10-09 | Albert Williams | Helmets or other protective headgear and related methods |
US20180303187A1 (en) * | 2016-03-02 | 2018-10-25 | Poc Sweden Ab | Comfort Padding and a Helmet Comprising The Comfort Padding |
WO2018211106A1 (en) | 2017-05-19 | 2018-11-22 | Mips Ab | Helmet |
US10172408B1 (en) * | 2014-05-08 | 2019-01-08 | John G. Kelly | Helmet to minimize directional and localized forces in the brain and other body parts by means of shape preservation |
EP3473122A1 (en) * | 2017-10-19 | 2019-04-24 | Trek Bicycle Corporation | Cycling helmet |
US10271604B2 (en) | 2016-11-22 | 2019-04-30 | Poc Sweden Ab | Comfort padding and a helmet comprising the comfort padding |
US10285466B2 (en) | 2010-07-22 | 2019-05-14 | Kranos Ip Corporation | Football helmet with shell section defined by a non-linear channel |
US10362829B2 (en) | 2013-12-06 | 2019-07-30 | Bell Sports, Inc. | Multi-layer helmet and method for making the same |
US10376011B2 (en) | 2012-06-18 | 2019-08-13 | Kranos Ip Corporation | Football helmet with raised plateau |
US10413009B2 (en) | 2014-02-15 | 2019-09-17 | Rex Medical, L.P. | Helmet with impact tracking |
CN110250634A (en) * | 2019-06-10 | 2019-09-20 | 中国三冶集团有限公司宁波分公司 | A kind of shock resistance safety cap |
US10477909B2 (en) | 2013-12-19 | 2019-11-19 | Bauer Hockey, Llc | Helmet for impact protection |
US10561192B2 (en) | 2011-02-09 | 2020-02-18 | 6D Helmets, Llc | Omnidirectional energy management systems and methods |
US10561193B2 (en) | 2007-04-16 | 2020-02-18 | Riddell, Inc. | Protective sports helmet |
US10582737B2 (en) | 2013-02-12 | 2020-03-10 | Riddell, Inc. | Football helmet with impact attenuation system |
WO2020115063A1 (en) | 2018-12-04 | 2020-06-11 | Mips Ab | Helmet |
US10779600B2 (en) | 2014-11-11 | 2020-09-22 | The Uab Research Foundation | Protective helmets having energy absorbing shells |
US10813402B2 (en) | 2015-03-23 | 2020-10-27 | University Of Washington | Protective helmets including non-linearly deforming elements |
US10834987B1 (en) * | 2012-07-11 | 2020-11-17 | Apex Biomedical Company, Llc | Protective liner for helmets and other articles |
EP3422887B1 (en) | 2016-03-04 | 2020-11-18 | Apex Biomedical Company LLC | Helmet with a protective liner |
US20200359727A1 (en) * | 2018-01-08 | 2020-11-19 | Mips Ab | Helmet |
CN112055549A (en) * | 2018-01-08 | 2020-12-08 | 米帕斯公司 | Helmet with a detachable head |
US10869520B1 (en) | 2019-11-07 | 2020-12-22 | Lionhead Helmet Intellectual Properties, Lp | Helmet |
US10874162B2 (en) | 2011-09-09 | 2020-12-29 | Riddell, Inc. | Protective sports helmet |
US10948898B1 (en) | 2013-01-18 | 2021-03-16 | Bell Sports, Inc. | System and method for custom forming a protective helmet for a customer's head |
US10966479B2 (en) | 2013-11-05 | 2021-04-06 | University Of Washington Through Its Center For Commercialization | Protective helmets with non-linearly deforming elements |
CN112839538A (en) * | 2018-10-16 | 2021-05-25 | 拉泽运动股份有限公司 | Helmet for impact protection |
USD927084S1 (en) | 2018-11-22 | 2021-08-03 | Riddell, Inc. | Pad member of an internal padding assembly of a protective sports helmet |
EP3554298B1 (en) | 2016-12-14 | 2021-08-25 | Mips AB | Helmet |
US11167198B2 (en) | 2018-11-21 | 2021-11-09 | Riddell, Inc. | Football helmet with components additively manufactured to manage impact forces |
US11178930B2 (en) | 2014-08-01 | 2021-11-23 | Carter J. Kovarik | Helmet for reducing concussive forces during collision and facilitating rapid facemask removal |
US11213736B2 (en) | 2016-07-20 | 2022-01-04 | Riddell, Inc. | System and methods for designing and manufacturing a bespoke protective sports helmet |
US11298913B2 (en) | 2015-06-02 | 2022-04-12 | Wavecel, Llc | Energy-absorbing structure with defined multi-phasic crush properties |
US11324273B2 (en) | 2011-02-09 | 2022-05-10 | 6D Helmets, Llc | Omnidirectional energy management systems and methods |
US11337481B2 (en) * | 2018-05-11 | 2022-05-24 | Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. | Helmet with foam layer having an array of holes |
US11399589B2 (en) | 2018-08-16 | 2022-08-02 | Riddell, Inc. | System and method for designing and manufacturing a protective helmet tailored to a selected group of helmet wearers |
US11464270B2 (en) | 2018-12-03 | 2022-10-11 | Brian Michael Coyle | Rotation damping helmet |
US11547166B1 (en) | 2022-02-11 | 2023-01-10 | Lionhead Helmet Intellectual Properties, Lp | Helmet |
US11641904B1 (en) | 2022-11-09 | 2023-05-09 | Lionhead Helmet Intellectual Properties, Lp | Helmet |
US11766083B2 (en) | 2019-03-25 | 2023-09-26 | Tianqi Technology Co (Ningbo) Ltd | Helmet |
US11766085B2 (en) | 2011-02-09 | 2023-09-26 | 6D Helmets, Llc | Omnidirectional energy management systems and methods |
US12022905B2 (en) | 2023-03-27 | 2024-07-02 | Bauer Hockey Llc | Helmet for impact protection |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10716352B2 (en) | 2011-07-21 | 2020-07-21 | Brainguard Technologies, Inc. | Visual and audio indicator of shear impact force on protective gear |
WO2013071916A1 (en) * | 2011-11-19 | 2013-05-23 | Oliver Schimpf | Protective helmet and a method for reducing or preventing a head injury |
GB201502104D0 (en) | 2015-02-09 | 2015-03-25 | Mips Ab | Material for forming apparel and apparel |
US10470513B2 (en) | 2016-03-01 | 2019-11-12 | Mips Ab | Helmet |
GB201603566D0 (en) * | 2016-03-01 | 2016-04-13 | Mips Ab | Helmet |
FR3058298B1 (en) | 2016-11-07 | 2019-01-25 | Universite De Strasbourg | SAFETY HELMET |
DE102017206897B4 (en) * | 2017-04-25 | 2021-02-04 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Protective helmet and method of manufacturing a protective helmet |
Citations (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4947A (en) * | 1847-02-01 | Apparatus for closing doors | ||
US10958A (en) * | 1854-05-23 | chase | ||
US11388A (en) * | 1854-07-25 | Platform-scale | ||
US17805A (en) * | 1857-07-14 | Carriages | ||
US3946441A (en) * | 1973-03-19 | 1976-03-30 | Johnson John R | Safety helmet |
US4012794A (en) * | 1975-08-13 | 1977-03-22 | Tetsuo Nomiyama | Impact-absorbing helmet |
US4038700A (en) * | 1975-06-12 | 1977-08-02 | Gyoery Kalman | Safety helmets for motorcyclists or the like |
US4064565A (en) * | 1976-05-13 | 1977-12-27 | Griffiths William S | Helmet structure |
US4307471A (en) * | 1976-12-20 | 1981-12-29 | Du Pont Canada Inc. | Protective helmet |
US4825476A (en) * | 1987-11-09 | 1989-05-02 | Andrews Donald L | Articulated head, neck and shoulder protective device |
US4972527A (en) * | 1989-08-24 | 1990-11-27 | Jack Bauman | Safety helmet with fin cushioning |
US5088130A (en) * | 1990-02-06 | 1992-02-18 | Chiarella Michele A | Protective helmet having internal reinforcing infrastructure |
US5123408A (en) * | 1991-09-18 | 1992-06-23 | Gaines Leonard F | Sports helmet braced for protection of the cervical spine |
US5148950A (en) * | 1991-09-16 | 1992-09-22 | Hosaka Dave K | Helmet and fluid reservoir apparatus |
US5333329A (en) * | 1993-01-06 | 1994-08-02 | Hong Jin Crown America | Ratchet system for motorcycle helmet shield |
US5361419A (en) * | 1991-09-12 | 1994-11-08 | Protector Development | Helmet with sound ducts |
US5394566A (en) * | 1993-12-14 | 1995-03-07 | Hong Jin Crown America, Inc. | Cold weather ventilation system for faceshield defogging |
US5581820A (en) * | 1992-01-08 | 1996-12-10 | Cartwright; Rudolph | Head impact force diversion system with transfer arm |
US5732414A (en) * | 1997-02-12 | 1998-03-31 | Creative Football Concepts, Inc. | Helmet having a readily removable and replaceable protective layer |
US5794270A (en) * | 1995-08-19 | 1998-08-18 | Howat; Jonathan Macdonald Prentice | Protective headwear |
US5815846A (en) * | 1996-11-27 | 1998-10-06 | Tecno-Fluidos, S.L. | Resistant helmet assembly |
US5956777A (en) * | 1998-07-22 | 1999-09-28 | Grand Slam Cards | Helmet |
US20010032351A1 (en) * | 2000-04-04 | 2001-10-25 | Kengo Nakayama | Helmet |
US6425141B1 (en) * | 1998-07-30 | 2002-07-30 | Cerebrix | Protective helmet |
US6536052B2 (en) * | 2000-12-04 | 2003-03-25 | Lucky Bell Plastic Factory Ltd. | Safety helmets with cellular textile composite structure as energy absorber |
US6560787B2 (en) * | 2000-08-31 | 2003-05-13 | Irma D. Mendoza | Safety helmet |
US6658671B1 (en) * | 1999-12-21 | 2003-12-09 | Neuroprevention Scandinavia Ab | Protective helmet |
US6676884B2 (en) * | 1999-10-26 | 2004-01-13 | Hong Jin Crown Corp., Ltd. | Dual-structure helmet and method of manufacturing the same |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB9423113D0 (en) * | 1994-11-16 | 1995-01-04 | Phillips Kenneth D | Protective headgear |
GB0116738D0 (en) * | 2001-07-09 | 2001-08-29 | Phillips Helmets Ltd | Protective headgear and protective armour and a method of modifying protective headgear and protective armour |
-
2003
- 2003-07-10 US US10/617,544 patent/US20040117896A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-10-03 AU AU2003279781A patent/AU2003279781A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-10-03 WO PCT/US2003/031407 patent/WO2004032659A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Patent Citations (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4947A (en) * | 1847-02-01 | Apparatus for closing doors | ||
US10958A (en) * | 1854-05-23 | chase | ||
US11388A (en) * | 1854-07-25 | Platform-scale | ||
US17805A (en) * | 1857-07-14 | Carriages | ||
US3946441A (en) * | 1973-03-19 | 1976-03-30 | Johnson John R | Safety helmet |
US4038700A (en) * | 1975-06-12 | 1977-08-02 | Gyoery Kalman | Safety helmets for motorcyclists or the like |
US4012794A (en) * | 1975-08-13 | 1977-03-22 | Tetsuo Nomiyama | Impact-absorbing helmet |
US4064565A (en) * | 1976-05-13 | 1977-12-27 | Griffiths William S | Helmet structure |
US4307471A (en) * | 1976-12-20 | 1981-12-29 | Du Pont Canada Inc. | Protective helmet |
US4825476A (en) * | 1987-11-09 | 1989-05-02 | Andrews Donald L | Articulated head, neck and shoulder protective device |
US4972527A (en) * | 1989-08-24 | 1990-11-27 | Jack Bauman | Safety helmet with fin cushioning |
US5088130A (en) * | 1990-02-06 | 1992-02-18 | Chiarella Michele A | Protective helmet having internal reinforcing infrastructure |
US5361419A (en) * | 1991-09-12 | 1994-11-08 | Protector Development | Helmet with sound ducts |
US5148950A (en) * | 1991-09-16 | 1992-09-22 | Hosaka Dave K | Helmet and fluid reservoir apparatus |
US5123408A (en) * | 1991-09-18 | 1992-06-23 | Gaines Leonard F | Sports helmet braced for protection of the cervical spine |
US5581820A (en) * | 1992-01-08 | 1996-12-10 | Cartwright; Rudolph | Head impact force diversion system with transfer arm |
US5333329A (en) * | 1993-01-06 | 1994-08-02 | Hong Jin Crown America | Ratchet system for motorcycle helmet shield |
US5394566A (en) * | 1993-12-14 | 1995-03-07 | Hong Jin Crown America, Inc. | Cold weather ventilation system for faceshield defogging |
US5794270A (en) * | 1995-08-19 | 1998-08-18 | Howat; Jonathan Macdonald Prentice | Protective headwear |
US5815846A (en) * | 1996-11-27 | 1998-10-06 | Tecno-Fluidos, S.L. | Resistant helmet assembly |
US5732414A (en) * | 1997-02-12 | 1998-03-31 | Creative Football Concepts, Inc. | Helmet having a readily removable and replaceable protective layer |
US5956777A (en) * | 1998-07-22 | 1999-09-28 | Grand Slam Cards | Helmet |
US6425141B1 (en) * | 1998-07-30 | 2002-07-30 | Cerebrix | Protective helmet |
US6676884B2 (en) * | 1999-10-26 | 2004-01-13 | Hong Jin Crown Corp., Ltd. | Dual-structure helmet and method of manufacturing the same |
US6658671B1 (en) * | 1999-12-21 | 2003-12-09 | Neuroprevention Scandinavia Ab | Protective helmet |
US20010032351A1 (en) * | 2000-04-04 | 2001-10-25 | Kengo Nakayama | Helmet |
US6560787B2 (en) * | 2000-08-31 | 2003-05-13 | Irma D. Mendoza | Safety helmet |
US6536052B2 (en) * | 2000-12-04 | 2003-03-25 | Lucky Bell Plastic Factory Ltd. | Safety helmets with cellular textile composite structure as energy absorber |
Cited By (197)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8615817B2 (en) * | 2001-07-09 | 2013-12-31 | Phillips Helmets Limited | Protective headgear and protective armour and a method of modifying protective headgear and protective armour |
US20040168246A1 (en) * | 2001-07-09 | 2004-09-02 | Phillips Kenneth David | Protective headgear and protective armour and a method of modifying protective headgear and protective armour |
US20040250340A1 (en) * | 2003-02-05 | 2004-12-16 | Dennis Piper | Protective headguard |
US9683622B2 (en) | 2004-04-21 | 2017-06-20 | Xenith, Llc | Air venting, impact-absorbing compressible members |
US20080066217A1 (en) * | 2004-07-13 | 2008-03-20 | Bart Depreitere | Protective Helmet |
WO2006005143A1 (en) * | 2004-07-13 | 2006-01-19 | K.U. Leuven Research & Development | Protective helmet |
US7930771B2 (en) | 2004-07-13 | 2011-04-26 | K.U. Leuven Research & Development | Protective helmet |
US20060059606A1 (en) * | 2004-09-22 | 2006-03-23 | Xenith Athletics, Inc. | Multilayer air-cushion shell with energy-absorbing layer for use in the construction of protective headgear |
US20080141429A1 (en) * | 2005-01-27 | 2008-06-19 | Georg Scharpenack | Helmet |
WO2006089234A3 (en) * | 2005-02-16 | 2006-11-23 | Ferrara Vincent R | Energy-absorbing liners and shape conforming layers for use with protective headgear |
WO2006089234A2 (en) * | 2005-02-16 | 2006-08-24 | Ferrara, Vincent, R. | Energy-absorbing liners and shape conforming layers for use with protective headgear |
EP1927294A2 (en) * | 2005-02-16 | 2008-06-04 | Vincent R. Ferrara | Energy-absorbing liners and shape conforming layers for use with protective headgear |
EP1927294A3 (en) * | 2005-02-16 | 2008-06-25 | Vincent R. Ferrara | Energy-absorbing liners for use with protective headgear |
US20080155735A1 (en) * | 2005-02-16 | 2008-07-03 | Xenith, Llc | Energy-Absorbing Liners and Shape Conforming Layers for Use with Pro-Tective Headgear |
US7774866B2 (en) | 2006-02-16 | 2010-08-17 | Xenith, Llc | Impact energy management method and system |
US8528119B2 (en) | 2006-02-16 | 2013-09-10 | Xenith Llc | Impact energy management method and system |
US7895681B2 (en) | 2006-02-16 | 2011-03-01 | Xenith, Llc | Protective structure and method of making same |
US20110047685A1 (en) * | 2006-02-16 | 2011-03-03 | Ferrara Vincent R | Impact energy management method and system |
US20070190293A1 (en) * | 2006-02-16 | 2007-08-16 | Xenith, Inc. | Protective Structure and Method of Making Same |
US20070190292A1 (en) * | 2006-02-16 | 2007-08-16 | Ferrara Vincent R | Impact energy management method and system |
US20080028499A1 (en) * | 2006-08-04 | 2008-02-07 | Sport Maska Inc. | Protective shell construction and method |
US8316512B2 (en) * | 2007-02-20 | 2012-11-27 | Mips Ab | Apparatus at a protective helmet |
US20100115686A1 (en) * | 2007-02-20 | 2010-05-13 | Mips Ab | Apparatus at a protective helmet |
US10561193B2 (en) | 2007-04-16 | 2020-02-18 | Riddell, Inc. | Protective sports helmet |
US20100088807A1 (en) * | 2008-10-15 | 2010-04-15 | Nanotech Ceramics Co., Ltd. | Lightweight helmet shell and method for manufacturing the same |
US8230527B2 (en) * | 2008-10-15 | 2012-07-31 | Nanotech Ceramics Co., Ltd | Lightweight helmet shell and method for manufacturing the same |
US20100103261A1 (en) * | 2008-10-23 | 2010-04-29 | James Michael Felt | Bicycle handlebar video system |
US9955125B2 (en) | 2008-10-23 | 2018-04-24 | Felt Racing, Llc | Bicycle handlebar video system |
US8214928B1 (en) | 2008-10-29 | 2012-07-10 | Full90 Sports, Inc. | Headguard with an eccentric dimple for accommodating the occipital bone |
US8042198B1 (en) | 2008-10-29 | 2011-10-25 | Full90 Sports, Inc. | Headguard with independently adjustable upper and lower bands |
US20100101006A1 (en) * | 2008-10-29 | 2010-04-29 | Cleveland William K | Headguard with temple protecting scallop that does not cover the ears |
US20110060260A1 (en) * | 2009-09-10 | 2011-03-10 | Drexel University | Cervical spine protection apparatus and methods of use |
US8528113B2 (en) * | 2009-09-10 | 2013-09-10 | Drexal University | Cervical spine protection apparatus and methods of use |
US8341770B2 (en) * | 2009-09-10 | 2013-01-01 | Drexel University | Cervical spine protection apparatus and methods of use |
US20130040524A1 (en) * | 2010-01-13 | 2013-02-14 | Mips Ab | Intermediate Layer of Friction Decreasing Material |
CN102811639A (en) * | 2010-01-13 | 2012-12-05 | 米帕斯公司 | Intermediate layer of friction decreasing material |
US9398782B2 (en) | 2010-04-23 | 2016-07-26 | Felt Racing, Llc | Aerodynamic bicycle helmet |
KR101937078B1 (en) * | 2010-05-07 | 2019-01-09 | 밉스 에이비 | Helmet with sliding facilitator arranged at energy absorbing layer |
CN105661730A (en) * | 2010-05-07 | 2016-06-15 | 米帕斯公司 | Helmet with sliding facilitator arranged at energy absorbing layer |
JP2016196727A (en) * | 2010-05-07 | 2016-11-24 | エムアイピーエス エービー | Helmet with sliding facilitator arranged at energy absorbing layer |
CN102905570A (en) * | 2010-05-07 | 2013-01-30 | 米帕斯公司 | Helmet with sliding facilitator arranged at energy absorbing layer |
JP2016196728A (en) * | 2010-05-07 | 2016-11-24 | エムアイピーエス エービー | Helmet with sliding facilitator arranged at energy absorbing layer |
KR101937080B1 (en) * | 2010-05-07 | 2019-01-09 | 밉스 에이비 | Helmet with sliding facilitator arranged at energy absorbing layer |
JP2013529263A (en) * | 2010-05-07 | 2013-07-18 | エムアイピーエス エービー | Helmet with sliding promotion part arranged in energy absorbing layer |
EP3092912A1 (en) * | 2010-05-07 | 2016-11-16 | Mips AB | Helmet with a sliding facilitator arranged at energy absorbing layer |
EP3527098A3 (en) * | 2010-05-07 | 2019-11-06 | Mips AB | Helmet with sliding facilitator |
US8578520B2 (en) | 2010-05-07 | 2013-11-12 | Mips Ab | Helmet |
EP2440082A4 (en) * | 2010-05-07 | 2012-05-09 | Mips Ab | Helmet with sliding facilitator arranged at energy absorbing layer |
WO2011139224A1 (en) | 2010-05-07 | 2011-11-10 | Mips Ab | Helmet with sliding facilitator arranged at energy absorbing layer |
KR101937079B1 (en) * | 2010-05-07 | 2019-01-09 | 밉스 에이비 | Helmet with sliding facilitator arranged at energy absorbing layer |
EP2440082A1 (en) * | 2010-05-07 | 2012-04-18 | Mips AB | Helmet with sliding facilitator arranged at energy absorbing layer |
US11291262B2 (en) | 2010-05-07 | 2022-04-05 | Mips Ab | Helmet with sliding facilitator arranged at energy absorbing layer |
JP2017160589A (en) * | 2010-05-07 | 2017-09-14 | エムアイピーエス エービー | Helmet with sliding facilitator arranged at energy absorbing layer |
EP3231306A1 (en) * | 2010-05-07 | 2017-10-18 | Mips AB | Helmet with sliding facilitator arranged at energy absorbing layer |
EP2896308A1 (en) * | 2010-05-07 | 2015-07-22 | Mips AB | Helmet with sliding facilitator arranged at energy absorbing layer |
KR101802490B1 (en) * | 2010-05-07 | 2017-11-28 | 밉스 에이비 | Helmet with sliding facilitator arranged at energy absorbing layer |
US10357075B2 (en) | 2010-07-22 | 2019-07-23 | Kranos Ip Corporation | Impact attenuation system for a protective helmet |
US10285466B2 (en) | 2010-07-22 | 2019-05-14 | Kranos Ip Corporation | Football helmet with shell section defined by a non-linear channel |
US10736372B2 (en) | 2010-07-22 | 2020-08-11 | Kanos Ip Corporation | Impact attenuation system for a protective helmet |
US10470516B2 (en) | 2010-07-22 | 2019-11-12 | Kranos Ip Corporation | Impact attenuation system for a protective helmet |
US10470514B2 (en) | 2010-07-22 | 2019-11-12 | Kranos Ip Corporation | Football helmet with movable shell segment |
US10470515B2 (en) | 2010-07-22 | 2019-11-12 | Kranos Ip Corporation | Football helmet with pressable front section |
US10448691B2 (en) | 2010-07-22 | 2019-10-22 | Kranos Ip Corporation | Football helmet with movable flexible section |
WO2012037927A1 (en) * | 2010-09-09 | 2012-03-29 | Oliver Schimpf | Safety helmet and method for minimizing or avoiding a head injury |
US20120060251A1 (en) * | 2010-09-09 | 2012-03-15 | Oliver Schimpf | Protective helmet; Method for mitigating or preventing a head injury |
EP2428129A3 (en) * | 2010-09-09 | 2012-03-21 | Oliver Schimpf | Protective helmet; method for preventing or reducing head injury |
US10980306B2 (en) | 2011-02-09 | 2021-04-20 | 6D Helmets, Llc | Helmet omnidirectional energy management systems |
US11324273B2 (en) | 2011-02-09 | 2022-05-10 | 6D Helmets, Llc | Omnidirectional energy management systems and methods |
CN103635112A (en) * | 2011-02-09 | 2014-03-12 | 6D头盔有限责任公司 | Helmet omnidirectional energy management system |
WO2012109381A1 (en) * | 2011-02-09 | 2012-08-16 | Innovation Dynamics LLC | Helmet omnidirectional energy management systems |
US10561192B2 (en) | 2011-02-09 | 2020-02-18 | 6D Helmets, Llc | Omnidirectional energy management systems and methods |
US11766085B2 (en) | 2011-02-09 | 2023-09-26 | 6D Helmets, Llc | Omnidirectional energy management systems and methods |
US8955169B2 (en) | 2011-02-09 | 2015-02-17 | 6D Helmets, Llc | Helmet omnidirectional energy management systems |
US9820525B2 (en) | 2011-02-09 | 2017-11-21 | 6D Helmets, Llc | Helmet omnidirectional energy management systems |
US9462847B2 (en) | 2011-02-14 | 2016-10-11 | Kineticshield, Inc. | Impact and explosive force minimization structures |
US9572389B2 (en) | 2011-02-14 | 2017-02-21 | Kineticshield, Inc. | Impact and explosive force minimization structures |
US20120208032A1 (en) * | 2011-02-14 | 2012-08-16 | Kinetica Inc. | Helmet designs utilizing an outer slip layer |
US8927088B2 (en) | 2011-02-14 | 2015-01-06 | Kineticshield, Inc. | Helmet designs utilizing foam structures having graded properties |
US20140090155A1 (en) * | 2011-05-05 | 2014-04-03 | James Michael Johnston | Systems and methods for attenuating rotational acceleration of the head |
US9554608B2 (en) | 2011-05-23 | 2017-01-31 | Lionhead Helmet Intellectual Properties, Lp | Helmet system |
US9119433B2 (en) | 2011-05-23 | 2015-09-01 | Lionhead Helmet Intellectual Properties, Lp | Helmet system |
US10130133B2 (en) | 2011-05-23 | 2018-11-20 | Lionhead Helmet Intellectual Properties, Lp | Helmet system |
US9560892B2 (en) | 2011-05-23 | 2017-02-07 | Lionhead Helmet Intellectual Properties, Lp | Helmet system |
US9462840B2 (en) | 2011-05-23 | 2016-10-11 | Lionhead Helmet Intellectual Properties, Lp | Helmet system |
US9468248B2 (en) | 2011-05-23 | 2016-10-18 | Lionhead Helmet Intellectual Properties, Lp | Helmet system |
US9032558B2 (en) | 2011-05-23 | 2015-05-19 | Lionhead Helmet Intellectual Properties, Lp | Helmet system |
AU2012276224B2 (en) * | 2011-06-30 | 2016-08-11 | Simon Fraser University | Impact diverting mechanism |
EP3673757A1 (en) * | 2011-06-30 | 2020-07-01 | Simon Fraser University | Impact diverting mechanism |
US9232824B2 (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2016-01-12 | Simon Fraser University | Impact diverting mechanism |
US10143255B2 (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2018-12-04 | Simon Fraser University | Impact diverting mechanism |
WO2013000095A1 (en) * | 2011-06-30 | 2013-01-03 | Simon Fraser University | Impact diverting mechanism |
US10238162B2 (en) * | 2011-07-21 | 2019-03-26 | Brainguard Technologies, Inc. | Energy and impact transformer layer |
US20130019385A1 (en) * | 2011-07-21 | 2013-01-24 | Brainguard Technologies, Inc. | Energy and impact transformer layer |
EP2742817A3 (en) * | 2011-07-27 | 2014-09-17 | Bauer Hockey Corp. | Sports helmet with rotational impact protection |
EP2550886A1 (en) * | 2011-07-27 | 2013-01-30 | Bauer Hockey Corp. | Sports helmet with rotational impact protection |
US10306941B2 (en) | 2011-07-27 | 2019-06-04 | Bauer Hockey, Llc | Sports helmet with rotational impact protection |
US10334904B2 (en) | 2011-07-27 | 2019-07-02 | Bauer Hockey, Llc | Sports helmet with rotational impact protection |
US11311067B2 (en) | 2011-09-09 | 2022-04-26 | Riddell, Inc. | Protective sports helmet |
US11503872B2 (en) | 2011-09-09 | 2022-11-22 | Riddell, Inc. | Protective sports helmet |
US10874162B2 (en) | 2011-09-09 | 2020-12-29 | Riddell, Inc. | Protective sports helmet |
US8950735B2 (en) | 2011-12-14 | 2015-02-10 | Xenith, Llc | Shock absorbers for protective body gear |
US8814150B2 (en) | 2011-12-14 | 2014-08-26 | Xenith, Llc | Shock absorbers for protective body gear |
CN104244754A (en) * | 2012-01-12 | 2014-12-24 | 渥太华大学 | Head protection for reducing angular accelerations |
WO2013104073A1 (en) | 2012-01-12 | 2013-07-18 | University Of Ottawa | Head protection for reducing angular accelerations |
EP2802229A4 (en) * | 2012-01-12 | 2015-12-09 | Univ Ottawa | Head protection for reducing angular accelerations |
US10376011B2 (en) | 2012-06-18 | 2019-08-13 | Kranos Ip Corporation | Football helmet with raised plateau |
US10834987B1 (en) * | 2012-07-11 | 2020-11-17 | Apex Biomedical Company, Llc | Protective liner for helmets and other articles |
US9586125B2 (en) | 2012-10-30 | 2017-03-07 | Mioflex, Llc | Head and neck protection apparatus and methods |
US20150359288A1 (en) * | 2012-11-23 | 2015-12-17 | Poc Sweden Ab | Protection device for helmet |
US11419383B2 (en) | 2013-01-18 | 2022-08-23 | Riddell, Inc. | System and method for custom forming a protective helmet for a customer's head |
US11889883B2 (en) | 2013-01-18 | 2024-02-06 | Bell Sports, Inc. | System and method for forming a protective helmet for a customer's head |
US10948898B1 (en) | 2013-01-18 | 2021-03-16 | Bell Sports, Inc. | System and method for custom forming a protective helmet for a customer's head |
US20140208486A1 (en) * | 2013-01-25 | 2014-07-31 | Wesley W.O. Krueger | Impact reduction helmet |
US10582737B2 (en) | 2013-02-12 | 2020-03-10 | Riddell, Inc. | Football helmet with impact attenuation system |
US11910859B2 (en) | 2013-02-12 | 2024-02-27 | Riddell, Inc. | Football helmet with impact attenuation system |
US20160249702A1 (en) * | 2013-10-11 | 2016-09-01 | Pfanner Schutzbekleidung Gmbh | Protective helmet |
US10966479B2 (en) | 2013-11-05 | 2021-04-06 | University Of Washington Through Its Center For Commercialization | Protective helmets with non-linearly deforming elements |
US11291263B2 (en) | 2013-12-06 | 2022-04-05 | Bell Sports, Inc. | Multi-layer helmet and method for making the same |
US10362829B2 (en) | 2013-12-06 | 2019-07-30 | Bell Sports, Inc. | Multi-layer helmet and method for making the same |
US11871809B2 (en) | 2013-12-06 | 2024-01-16 | Bell Sports, Inc. | Multi-layer helmet and method for making the same |
US11425951B2 (en) | 2013-12-19 | 2022-08-30 | Bauer Hockey Llc | Helmet for impact protection |
US10477909B2 (en) | 2013-12-19 | 2019-11-19 | Bauer Hockey, Llc | Helmet for impact protection |
EP3091863B1 (en) * | 2014-01-06 | 2022-03-23 | Lisa Ferrara | Composite devices for providing protection against traumatic tissue injury |
US20160302496A1 (en) * | 2014-01-06 | 2016-10-20 | Lisa Ferrara | Composite devices and methods for providing protection against traumatic tissue injury |
AU2015203945B2 (en) * | 2014-01-06 | 2019-11-14 | Lisa Ferrara | Composite devices and methods for providing protection against traumatic tissue injury |
US11311060B2 (en) * | 2014-01-06 | 2022-04-26 | Lisa Ferrara | Composite devices and methods for providing protection against traumatic tissue injury |
US11375763B2 (en) | 2014-02-15 | 2022-07-05 | Rex Medical, L.P. | Helmet with impact tracking |
US10413009B2 (en) | 2014-02-15 | 2019-09-17 | Rex Medical, L.P. | Helmet with impact tracking |
US10327496B2 (en) * | 2014-02-15 | 2019-06-25 | Rex Medical, L.P. | Helmet with varying shock absorption |
US20150230535A1 (en) * | 2014-02-15 | 2015-08-20 | Rex Medical, L.P. | Helmet with varying shock absorption |
US11213088B2 (en) | 2014-02-15 | 2022-01-04 | Rex Medical, L.P. | Helmet with varying shock absorption |
US10212981B2 (en) * | 2014-03-14 | 2019-02-26 | Charles Owen & Company (Bow) Limited | Helmet |
US20150257472A1 (en) * | 2014-03-14 | 2015-09-17 | Charles Owen & Company (Bow) Limited | Helmet |
US9975032B2 (en) * | 2014-03-24 | 2018-05-22 | Mark Frey | Concussive helmet |
US20150264991A1 (en) * | 2014-03-24 | 2015-09-24 | Mark Frey | Concussive helmet |
US10172408B1 (en) * | 2014-05-08 | 2019-01-08 | John G. Kelly | Helmet to minimize directional and localized forces in the brain and other body parts by means of shape preservation |
US10092057B2 (en) | 2014-08-01 | 2018-10-09 | Carter J. Kovarik | Helmet for reducing concussive forces during collision and facilitating rapid facemask removal |
US11178930B2 (en) | 2014-08-01 | 2021-11-23 | Carter J. Kovarik | Helmet for reducing concussive forces during collision and facilitating rapid facemask removal |
US11889880B2 (en) | 2014-08-01 | 2024-02-06 | Carter J. Kovarik | Helmet for reducing concussive forces during collision and facilitating rapid facemask removal |
JP2016037669A (en) * | 2014-08-05 | 2016-03-22 | 株式会社Shoei | helmet |
US11638457B2 (en) | 2014-10-28 | 2023-05-02 | Bell Sports, Inc. | Protective helmet |
US10721987B2 (en) * | 2014-10-28 | 2020-07-28 | Bell Sports, Inc. | Protective helmet |
US20160113346A1 (en) * | 2014-10-28 | 2016-04-28 | Bell Sports, Inc. | In-Mold Rotation Helmet |
US10779600B2 (en) | 2014-11-11 | 2020-09-22 | The Uab Research Foundation | Protective helmets having energy absorbing shells |
US20160242485A1 (en) * | 2015-02-25 | 2016-08-25 | Steven Christopher CARTON | Helmet |
US10092054B2 (en) | 2015-03-10 | 2018-10-09 | Albert Williams | Helmets or other protective headgear and related methods |
USD773742S1 (en) | 2015-03-10 | 2016-12-06 | Albert Williams | Helmet |
US10813402B2 (en) | 2015-03-23 | 2020-10-27 | University Of Washington | Protective helmets including non-linearly deforming elements |
US12017436B2 (en) | 2015-06-02 | 2024-06-25 | Wavecel, Llc | Energy-absorbing structure with defined multi-phasic crush properties |
US11298913B2 (en) | 2015-06-02 | 2022-04-12 | Wavecel, Llc | Energy-absorbing structure with defined multi-phasic crush properties |
USD964046S1 (en) | 2015-06-02 | 2022-09-20 | Wavecel, Llc | Energy absorbing lining material |
US11089833B2 (en) | 2015-08-17 | 2021-08-17 | Bauer Hockey Llc | Helmet for impact protection |
US9961952B2 (en) | 2015-08-17 | 2018-05-08 | Bauer Hockey, Llc | Helmet for impact protection |
US11638458B2 (en) | 2015-08-17 | 2023-05-02 | Bauer Hockey Llc | Helmet for impact protection |
US20200187583A1 (en) * | 2015-12-11 | 2020-06-18 | Bell Sports, Inc. | Protective helmet with multiple energy management liners |
EP3386327A4 (en) * | 2015-12-11 | 2019-07-31 | Bell Sports, Inc. | Protective helmet with multiple energy management liners |
US10463099B2 (en) * | 2015-12-11 | 2019-11-05 | Bell Sports, Inc. | Protective helmet with multiple energy management liners |
WO2017100775A1 (en) | 2015-12-11 | 2017-06-15 | Bell Sports, Inc. | Protective helmet with multiple energy management liners |
US20170164678A1 (en) * | 2015-12-11 | 2017-06-15 | Bell Sports, Inc. | Protective helmet with multiple energy management liners |
US20180303187A1 (en) * | 2016-03-02 | 2018-10-25 | Poc Sweden Ab | Comfort Padding and a Helmet Comprising The Comfort Padding |
EP3422887B1 (en) | 2016-03-04 | 2020-11-18 | Apex Biomedical Company LLC | Helmet with a protective liner |
US20170367427A1 (en) * | 2016-06-28 | 2017-12-28 | Peter G. MEADE | Zero impact head gear |
US10716351B2 (en) * | 2016-06-28 | 2020-07-21 | Peter G. MEADE | Zero impact head gear |
US11712615B2 (en) | 2016-07-20 | 2023-08-01 | Riddell, Inc. | System and method of assembling a protective sports helmet |
US11213736B2 (en) | 2016-07-20 | 2022-01-04 | Riddell, Inc. | System and methods for designing and manufacturing a bespoke protective sports helmet |
US10271604B2 (en) | 2016-11-22 | 2019-04-30 | Poc Sweden Ab | Comfort padding and a helmet comprising the comfort padding |
EP3554298B1 (en) | 2016-12-14 | 2021-08-25 | Mips AB | Helmet |
US10588372B2 (en) * | 2017-03-07 | 2020-03-17 | Chang-Hsien Ho | Multilayered floatable universal shock absorption system of safety helmet |
US20180255862A1 (en) * | 2017-03-07 | 2018-09-13 | Chang-Hsien Ho | Multilayered floatable universal shock absorption system of safety helmet |
US11678709B2 (en) | 2017-05-19 | 2023-06-20 | Mips Ab | Helmet |
WO2018211106A1 (en) | 2017-05-19 | 2018-11-22 | Mips Ab | Helmet |
TWI743362B (en) * | 2017-05-19 | 2021-10-21 | 瑞典商米帕斯公司 | Helmet |
CN110913714A (en) * | 2017-05-19 | 2020-03-24 | 米帕斯公司 | Helmet with a detachable head |
EP3624625B1 (en) | 2017-05-19 | 2022-03-09 | Mips AB | Helmet |
EP3473122A1 (en) * | 2017-10-19 | 2019-04-24 | Trek Bicycle Corporation | Cycling helmet |
EP3858179A1 (en) * | 2017-10-19 | 2021-08-04 | Trek Bicycle Corporation | Cycling helmet |
US10939720B2 (en) | 2017-10-19 | 2021-03-09 | Trek Bicycle Corporation | Cycling helmet |
US11944149B2 (en) | 2018-01-08 | 2024-04-02 | Mips Ab | Helmet |
US20200359727A1 (en) * | 2018-01-08 | 2020-11-19 | Mips Ab | Helmet |
CN112055549A (en) * | 2018-01-08 | 2020-12-08 | 米帕斯公司 | Helmet with a detachable head |
US11812810B2 (en) * | 2018-01-08 | 2023-11-14 | Mips Ab | Helmet |
US11337481B2 (en) * | 2018-05-11 | 2022-05-24 | Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. | Helmet with foam layer having an array of holes |
US11399589B2 (en) | 2018-08-16 | 2022-08-02 | Riddell, Inc. | System and method for designing and manufacturing a protective helmet tailored to a selected group of helmet wearers |
CN112839538A (en) * | 2018-10-16 | 2021-05-25 | 拉泽运动股份有限公司 | Helmet for impact protection |
US11167198B2 (en) | 2018-11-21 | 2021-11-09 | Riddell, Inc. | Football helmet with components additively manufactured to manage impact forces |
USD927084S1 (en) | 2018-11-22 | 2021-08-03 | Riddell, Inc. | Pad member of an internal padding assembly of a protective sports helmet |
US11464270B2 (en) | 2018-12-03 | 2022-10-11 | Brian Michael Coyle | Rotation damping helmet |
WO2020115063A1 (en) | 2018-12-04 | 2020-06-11 | Mips Ab | Helmet |
WO2020115157A1 (en) | 2018-12-04 | 2020-06-11 | Mips Ab | Helmet |
US11944150B2 (en) | 2018-12-04 | 2024-04-02 | Mips Ab | Helmet |
US11766083B2 (en) | 2019-03-25 | 2023-09-26 | Tianqi Technology Co (Ningbo) Ltd | Helmet |
CN110250634A (en) * | 2019-06-10 | 2019-09-20 | 中国三冶集团有限公司宁波分公司 | A kind of shock resistance safety cap |
US11696612B2 (en) | 2019-11-07 | 2023-07-11 | Lionhead Helmet Intellectual Properties, Lp | Helmet |
US10869520B1 (en) | 2019-11-07 | 2020-12-22 | Lionhead Helmet Intellectual Properties, Lp | Helmet |
US11547166B1 (en) | 2022-02-11 | 2023-01-10 | Lionhead Helmet Intellectual Properties, Lp | Helmet |
US11641904B1 (en) | 2022-11-09 | 2023-05-09 | Lionhead Helmet Intellectual Properties, Lp | Helmet |
US12022905B2 (en) | 2023-03-27 | 2024-07-02 | Bauer Hockey Llc | Helmet for impact protection |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2004032659A1 (en) | 2004-04-22 |
AU2003279781A1 (en) | 2004-05-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20040117896A1 (en) | Load diversion method and apparatus for head protective devices | |
US10980306B2 (en) | Helmet omnidirectional energy management systems | |
US9572391B2 (en) | Protective helmet and insert with concussion reduction features | |
JP6386012B2 (en) | Shock bypass mechanism | |
CN110913714B (en) | Helmet | |
US20090260133A1 (en) | Impact Absorbing Frame and Layered Structure System for Safety Helmets | |
US20040250340A1 (en) | Protective headguard | |
US20140109304A1 (en) | Intelligent protective gear bracing mechanism | |
CN111511239B (en) | Helmet with a detachable head | |
US11324273B2 (en) | Omnidirectional energy management systems and methods | |
US20210315307A1 (en) | A helmet for impact protection | |
US10448690B2 (en) | Systems for flexible facemask structures | |
US11882893B2 (en) | Impact attenuating helmet with inner and outer liner and securing attachment | |
US11766085B2 (en) | Omnidirectional energy management systems and methods | |
US20190159540A1 (en) | Outer padding assembly for biomechanics aware headgear | |
CA2772644C (en) | Protective helmet and insert with concussion reduction features | |
US20180092422A1 (en) | Biomechanics aware headgear | |
WO2006022680A1 (en) | Protective headguard | |
CN113242701A (en) | Helmet with a detachable head | |
TWI794854B (en) | Helmet | |
US20180338558A1 (en) | Helmet impact absorption system | |
WO2021122388A1 (en) | Connector | |
CN113993409B (en) | Protective helmet | |
WO2023072321A1 (en) | Helmet with a multi-directional suspension system and a procedure for assembling the helmet | |
US20180153242A1 (en) | Elastic shear protection in protective gear |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |