US20040074621A1 - Method for reducing slime production and mixture making the same - Google Patents
Method for reducing slime production and mixture making the same Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040074621A1 US20040074621A1 US10/335,314 US33531402A US2004074621A1 US 20040074621 A1 US20040074621 A1 US 20040074621A1 US 33531402 A US33531402 A US 33531402A US 2004074621 A1 US2004074621 A1 US 2004074621A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- slime
- mixture
- antagonistic
- production
- dispersing agent
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
- D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D21H21/00—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties
- D21H21/02—Agents for preventing deposition on the paper mill equipment, e.g. pitch or slime control
- D21H21/04—Slime-control agents
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N1/00—Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
- C12N1/20—Bacteria; Culture media therefor
- C12N1/205—Bacterial isolates
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12R—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES C12C - C12Q, RELATING TO MICROORGANISMS
- C12R2001/00—Microorganisms ; Processes using microorganisms
- C12R2001/01—Bacteria or Actinomycetales ; using bacteria or Actinomycetales
- C12R2001/465—Streptomyces
- C12R2001/50—Streptomyces bikiniensis
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for reducing a production of a slime and a mixture making the same, and more particularly to a method and mixture for reducing a production of a slime by utilizing a dispersing agent and a benefit microorganism having an inhibition/killing ability.
- the waste pulp is always recycled.
- a starch and a coating in the waste paper provide an excellent nutrition source, it always believes that they are the main contaminating source for the microorganisms including bacteria and fungus.
- the papermaking factory usually adopts an airtight water cycle system.
- this condition also provides a favorable growth conditions for every kind of microorganism, e.g., temperature, pH, and nutrition. Consequently, a multiplicity and growth of the microorganism will be more intensified so as to cause a problem of an excess of microorganism. And a formation of the slime at the wet end is a very serious problem in the papermaking factory.
- a slime produced at the wet end during the papermaking process will cause the problems of foul smell, paper break and holey, and foxing. All these problems will seriously influence the paper quality and then cause a business trouble which will not only increase the cost owing to the indemnity, but also destroy the reputation.
- a method for reducing a production of a slime in a papermaking process includes steps of adding a dispersing agent into the slime to obtain a first mixture, mixing and culturing the mixture, adding an antagonistic into the first mixture to obtain a second mixture, mixing and culturing the second mixture for reducing the production of the slime, and re-adding the antagonistic into the mixed and cultured second mixture after a specific time period for further reducing the production of the slime.
- the slime is produced during the papermaking process.
- the antagonistic is Streptomyces bikiniensis.
- the antagonistic is amounted to 10 7 /mL after being cultivated for 24 hrs.
- the dispersing agent is selected from a group consisting of a Lignosulfonate (B100), a Di-alkyl sulfosuccinate (S100), a Nonionic surfactants (H40), a Polyethylene glycol (P100), a Nonionic surfactants (Bu200).
- B100 Lignosulfonate
- S100 Di-alkyl sulfosuccinate
- H40 Nonionic surfactants
- P100 Polyethylene glycol
- Bu200 Nonionic surfactants
- the specific time period is seven days.
- a method for reducing a production of a slime in a papermaking process includes steps of adding a dispersing agent into the slime to obtain a first mixture, mixing and culturing the first mixture, adding an antagonistic into the first mixture to obtain a second mixture, and mixing and culturing the second mixture for reducing the production of the slime.
- the slime is produced during the papermaking process.
- the antagonistic is Streptomyces bikiniensis.
- the antagonistic is amounted to 10 7 /mL after being cultivated for 24 hrs.
- the dispersing agent is selected from a group consisting of a Lignosulfonate (B100), a Di-alkyl sulfosuccinate (S100), a Nonionic surfactants (H40), a Polyethylene glycol (P100), a Nonionic surfactants (Bu200).
- B100 Lignosulfonate
- S100 Di-alkyl sulfosuccinate
- H40 Nonionic surfactants
- P100 Polyethylene glycol
- Bu200 Nonionic surfactants
- a mixture for reducing a production of a slime in a papermaking process include a dispersing agent, and an antagonistic, wherein the mixture and the slime are mixed and cultivated for reducing the production of the slime.
- the slime is produced during the papermaking process.
- the antagonistic is Streptomyces bikiniensis.
- the antagonistic is amounted to 10 7 /mL after being cultivated for 24 hrs.
- the dispersing agent is selected from a group consisting of a Lignosulfonate (B100), a Di-alkyl sulfosuccinate (S100), a Nonionic surfactants (H40), a Polyethylene glycol (P100), a Nonionic surfactants (Bu200).
- B100 Lignosulfonate
- S100 Di-alkyl sulfosuccinate
- H40 Nonionic surfactants
- P100 Polyethylene glycol
- Bu200 Nonionic surfactants
- [0038] 6 Incubate the culture isolated from the slime, the dispersing agent, and the antagonistic C5.
- the deposit amount is 74.6% when the dispersing agent is B100 (Lignosulfonate), the deposit amount is 49% when the dispersing agent is S100, the deposit amount is 46% when the dispersing agent is H40 (Nonionic surfactants), the deposit amount is 105% when the dispersing agent is P100 (Polyethylene glycol), and the deposit amount is 66.4% when the dispersing agent is Bu200 (Nonionic surfactants).
- these five groups show obvious reductions when compared to the contrast deposit 100%. According to the result, the addition of the antagonistic C5 is positive to inhibit/reduce the slime formation. Furthermore, no matter which dispersing agent is added with the antagonistic C5, after adding the antagonistic C5, the deposit amount can be further reduced actually. Thus, this experiment improves that the antagonistic owns the ability to reduce the slime production.
- the deposit amount is 29% after adding the antagonistic C5 and cultivating for 7 days. Compared to the contrast deposit 100% which is only added the culture isolated from slime, the difference is strictly obvious. However, the difference will be gradually reduced corresponding to the increase of the cultivation time (the deposit amount is 87% when Day 14). But, if another antagonistic C5 is added at Day 7, the deposition at Day 14 (after another 7 days) will be still remained as 28% which is obviously different from the contrast deposit 100%. According to the result, the periodical addition (7 days) of the antagonistic C5 is positive to inhibit/reduce the adhesion of the deposit.
- the mixture of the dispersing agent and the local antagonistic and the method utilizing the same according to the present invention can actually and efficiently reduce the production of the slime during the papermaking process, solve the problems caused by the slime, such as paper holey, foxing, and paper break, and further improve the quality of the paper.
- the method for reducing the slime production and the mixture making the same according to the present invention can substitute for the organic biocide and will not endanger the natural environment, so that it conforms to the standard of the environmental protection and the environmental consciousness.
- the present invention can easily improve the slime problem in the original papermaking process without increasing the production costs. Consequently, this is really an invention with creativity and industrial value.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Virology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
- Paper (AREA)
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
- Emulsifying, Dispersing, Foam-Producing Or Wetting Agents (AREA)
Abstract
A method for reducing a production of a slime in a papermaking process is provided. The method includes steps of adding a dispersing agent into the slime to obtain a first mixture, mixing and culturing the mixture, adding an antagonistic into the first mixture to obtain a second mixture, mixing and culturing the second mixture for reducing the production of the slime, and re-adding the antagonistic into the mixed and cultured second mixture after a specific time period for further reducing the production of the slime.
Description
- The present invention relates to a method for reducing a production of a slime and a mixture making the same, and more particularly to a method and mixture for reducing a production of a slime by utilizing a dispersing agent and a benefit microorganism having an inhibition/killing ability.
- During a papermaking process, the waste pulp is always recycled. However, because a starch and a coating in the waste paper provide an excellent nutrition source, it always believes that they are the main contaminating source for the microorganisms including bacteria and fungus. Otherwise, for reducing a consumption of the water, the papermaking factory usually adopts an airtight water cycle system. However, this condition also provides a favorable growth conditions for every kind of microorganism, e.g., temperature, pH, and nutrition. Consequently, a multiplicity and growth of the microorganism will be more intensified so as to cause a problem of an excess of microorganism. And a formation of the slime at the wet end is a very serious problem in the papermaking factory.
- A slime produced at the wet end during the papermaking process will cause the problems of foul smell, paper break and holey, and foxing. All these problems will seriously influence the paper quality and then cause a business trouble which will not only increase the cost owing to the indemnity, but also destroy the reputation.
- For preventing the production of the slime, most papermaking factories mainly utilize an organic biocide to reduce the amount of the slime producing microorganisms in the papermaking process and further reduce the slime production so as to solve the problems caused by the slime, e.g., paper holey, foxing, and paper break. However, because the chemical synthesized biocides all are potentially or immediately poisoned to the environment, human beings, and animals, and also because the environmental consciousness is promoted, the standards for how to use and dispose the harmful chemicals are stricter and stricter. Consequently, looking for a non-poisonous and unharmful natural preventing method is the most important challenge so far. And, a research of a mixture which utilizes a local screened antagonistic is one topic thereof.
- Because of the technical defects described above, the applicant keeps on carving unflaggingly to develop a “method for reducing slime production and mixture making the same” through wholehearted experience and research.
- It is therefore an object of the present invention to reduce the slime production during the papermaking process so as to solve the problems caused by slime.
- It is a further object of the present invention to add a benefit microorganism, which dose not cause the slime, into a system consisting white water and substances for preventing or reducing the production of slime.
- It is an additional object of the present invention to add a dispersing agent which has an ability of inhibiting the adhesion between the microorganism and the additives during the papermaking process so as to achieving the purpose of inhibiting or reducing a production of a slime.
- In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a method for reducing a production of a slime in a papermaking process includes steps of adding a dispersing agent into the slime to obtain a first mixture, mixing and culturing the mixture, adding an antagonistic into the first mixture to obtain a second mixture, mixing and culturing the second mixture for reducing the production of the slime, and re-adding the antagonistic into the mixed and cultured second mixture after a specific time period for further reducing the production of the slime.
- Preferably, the slime is produced during the papermaking process.
- Preferably, the antagonistic isStreptomyces bikiniensis.
- Preferably, the antagonistic is amounted to 107/mL after being cultivated for 24 hrs.
- Preferably, the dispersing agent is selected from a group consisting of a Lignosulfonate (B100), a Di-alkyl sulfosuccinate (S100), a Nonionic surfactants (H40), a Polyethylene glycol (P100), a Nonionic surfactants (Bu200).
- Preferably, the specific time period is seven days.
- In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method for reducing a production of a slime in a papermaking process includes steps of adding a dispersing agent into the slime to obtain a first mixture, mixing and culturing the first mixture, adding an antagonistic into the first mixture to obtain a second mixture, and mixing and culturing the second mixture for reducing the production of the slime.
- Preferably, the slime is produced during the papermaking process.
- Preferably, the antagonistic isStreptomyces bikiniensis.
- Preferably, the antagonistic is amounted to 107/mL after being cultivated for 24 hrs.
- Preferably, the dispersing agent is selected from a group consisting of a Lignosulfonate (B100), a Di-alkyl sulfosuccinate (S100), a Nonionic surfactants (H40), a Polyethylene glycol (P100), a Nonionic surfactants (Bu200).
- In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a mixture for reducing a production of a slime in a papermaking process include a dispersing agent, and an antagonistic, wherein the mixture and the slime are mixed and cultivated for reducing the production of the slime.
- Preferably, the slime is produced during the papermaking process.
- Preferably, the antagonistic isStreptomyces bikiniensis.
- Preferably, the antagonistic is amounted to 107/mL after being cultivated for 24 hrs.
- Preferably, the dispersing agent is selected from a group consisting of a Lignosulfonate (B100), a Di-alkyl sulfosuccinate (S100), a Nonionic surfactants (H40), a Polyethylene glycol (P100), a Nonionic surfactants (Bu200).
- The present invention may best be understood through the following descriptions with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
- The present invention will now be described more specifically with reference to the following embodiments. It is to be noted that the following descriptions of preferred embodiments of this invention are presented herein for purpose of illustration and description only; it is not intended to be exhaustive or to be limited to the precise form disclosed.
- The Effect of the Antagonistic and the Dispersing Agent on the Formation of the Deposit
- The experimental steps are described as follows:
- Cultures which are isolated from the slime are cultivated in a NB cultivation liquid for 21-24 hours. Then, 1 mL culture liquids of the isolated cultures are centrifuged in 15000 rpm for 1 min and the supernatants thereof are removed. All the isolated cultures are re-suspended by adding 1 mL sterile water, and then each re-suspended culture is inoculated into a flask which already contains sterile white water 100 mL and 3 g LBKP pulp. Later, different dispersing agents are added into different flasks of each kind of culture to obtain different mixtures. The mixtures are cultivated in an incubate shaker at 40° C. 70 rpm. After being mixture cultivated for 3 hours, 3 mL antagonistic C5 (Streptomyces bikiniensis) which has been amounted to 107/mL after being cultivated for 24 hours is added thereinto to obtain another mixture. The mixture are cultivated in the incubate shaker again at 40° C., 70 rpm. After 7 days, the production of the deposit is recorded.
- The whole experiment is separated into six groups.
- There are two contrast groups:
- 1: Only incubate the antagonistic C5 without incubating the culture isolated from the slime; and
- 2: Do not incubate any culture.
- There are four experimental group:
- 3: Only incubate the culture isolated from the slime without incubating the antagonistic C5;
- 4: Incubate both the culture isolated from the slime and the antagonistic C5;
- 5: Incubate the culture isolated from the slime and the dispersing agent; and
- 6: Incubate the culture isolated from the slime, the dispersing agent, and the antagonistic C5.
-
- Results:
- The experimental results of “The effect of the antagonistic and the dispersing agent on the formation of the deposit” are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1 The result of the effect of adding antagonistic and disperaing agent on the slime formation Deposit (%) of Process method the slime Culture isolated from slime 100.0 Isolated culture + dispersing agent B100 113.0 Isolated culture + dispersing agent S100 53.0 Isolated culture + dispersing agent H40 126.0 Isolated culture + dispersing agent P100 112.0 Isolated culture + dispersing agent Bu200 211.0 Isolated culture + Antagonistic C5 53.0 Isolated culture + dispersing agent B100 + Antagonistic C5 74.6 Isolated culture + dispersing agent S100 + Antagonistic C5 49.0 Isolated culture + dispersing agent H40 + Antagonistic C5 46.0 Isolated culture + dispersing agent P100 + Antagonistic C5 105.0 Isolated culture + dispersing agent Bu200 + Antagonistic C5 66.4 Antagonistic C5 24.7 The contrast group without any additives 12.0 - Please refer to Table 1 which shows the experimental results of Example 1. Firstly, let's focus on the groups that are only added dispersing agent. Obviously, in the result of adding dispersing agent S100 (Di-alkyl sulfosuccinate), the deposit amount is reduced to 53%. Compared to the contrast group (100%) which is only added the culture isolated from the slime, the deposit amount is significantly different, namely, the dispersing agent (S100) has a good dispersing ability for the formation of the slime.
- Moreover, in the groups which additionally add antagonistic C5 after adding the dispersing agent, the deposit amount is 74.6% when the dispersing agent is B100 (Lignosulfonate), the deposit amount is 49% when the dispersing agent is S100, the deposit amount is 46% when the dispersing agent is H40 (Nonionic surfactants), the deposit amount is 105% when the dispersing agent is P100 (Polyethylene glycol), and the deposit amount is 66.4% when the dispersing agent is Bu200 (Nonionic surfactants). As shown above, these five groups show obvious reductions when compared to the contrast deposit 100%. According to the result, the addition of the antagonistic C5 is positive to inhibit/reduce the slime formation. Furthermore, no matter which dispersing agent is added with the antagonistic C5, after adding the antagonistic C5, the deposit amount can be further reduced actually. Thus, this experiment improves that the antagonistic owns the ability to reduce the slime production.
- The Track Experiment of Periodically Adding the Antagonistic
- The experimental steps are described as follows:
- Cultures which are isolated from the slime are cultivated in a NB cultivation liquid for 21-24 hours. Then, 1 mL culture liquids of the isolated cultures are centrifuged in 15000 rpm for 1 min and the supernatants thereof are removed. All the isolated cultures are re-suspended by adding 1 mL sterile water, and then each re-suspended culture is inoculated into a flask which already contains sterile white water 100 mL and 3 g LBKP pulp. Later, different dispersing agents are added into different flasks of each kind of culture to obtain different mixtures. The mixtures are cultivated in an incubate shaker at 40° C. 70 rpm. After being mixture cultivated for 3 hours, 3 mL antagonistic C5 (Streptomyces bikiniensis) which has been amounted to 107/L after being cultivated for 24 hours is added thereinto to obtain another mixture. The mixture are cultivated in the incubate shaker again at 40° C. 70 rpm. After 7 days, the production of the deposit is recorded and simultaneously the antagonistic C5 is re-added thereinto. Then, the final deposit amount after another 7 days (total 14 days) is also recorded.
- The whole experiment is separated into four groups.
- There are two contrast groups:
- 1: Only incubate the antagonistic C5 without incubating the culture isolated from the slime; and
- 2: Do not incubate any culture.
- There are two experimental group:
- 3: Only incubate the culture isolated from the slime without incubating the antagonistic C5; and
- 4: Incubate both the culture isolated from the slime and the antagonistic C5.
-
- Results:
- The experimental results of “The track experiment of periodically adding the antagonistic” are shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2 The result of the track experiment of periodically adding the antagonistic Deposit % Deposit % Process method (Day 7) (Day 14) Culture isolated from slime 100.0 100.0 Culture isolated from slime + Antagonistic C5 29.0 87.0 Culture isolated from slime + Antagonistic 28.0 C5 (Day 7) + Antagonistic C5 Antagonistic C5 31.0 35.0 Contrast group without any additives 27.0 24.0 - Please refer to Table 2. In the group which contains the culture isolated from the slime, the deposit amount is 29% after adding the antagonistic C5 and cultivating for 7 days. Compared to the contrast deposit 100% which is only added the culture isolated from slime, the difference is strictly obvious. However, the difference will be gradually reduced corresponding to the increase of the cultivation time (the deposit amount is 87% when Day 14). But, if another antagonistic C5 is added at Day 7, the deposition at Day 14 (after another 7 days) will be still remained as 28% which is obviously different from the contrast deposit 100%. According to the result, the periodical addition (7 days) of the antagonistic C5 is positive to inhibit/reduce the adhesion of the deposit. Consequently, if it can utilize this method of adding the antagonistic C5 periodically to easily control the production of the slime, this will be a convenient and fast way for the industry. Furthermore, if take 7 days as a period, it will not be a highly concentrated time period, so that it will not consume too much labor and is really a practicable method.
- In view of the aforesaid, through the proving of the experiments, the mixture of the dispersing agent and the local antagonistic and the method utilizing the same according to the present invention can actually and efficiently reduce the production of the slime during the papermaking process, solve the problems caused by the slime, such as paper holey, foxing, and paper break, and further improve the quality of the paper. Moreover, the method for reducing the slime production and the mixture making the same according to the present invention can substitute for the organic biocide and will not endanger the natural environment, so that it conforms to the standard of the environmental protection and the environmental consciousness. More importantly, the present invention can easily improve the slime problem in the original papermaking process without increasing the production costs. Consequently, this is really an invention with creativity and industrial value.
- While the invention has been described in terms of what are presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention need not be limited to the disclosed embodiment. On the contrary, it is intended to cover various modifications and similiar arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims which are to be accorded with the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar structures. Therefore, the above description and illustration should not be taken as limiting the scope of the present invention which is defined by the appended claims.
Claims (16)
1. A method for reducing a production of a slime in a papermaking process, comprising steps of:
adding a dispersing agent into said slime to obtain a first mixture;
mixing and culturing said mixture;
adding an antagonistic into said first mixture to obtain a second mixture;
mixing and culturing said second mixture for reducing said production of said slime; and
re-adding said antagonistic into said mixed and cultured second mixture after a specific time period for further reducing said production of said slime.
2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said slime is produced during said papermaking process.
3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said antagonistic is Streptomyces bikiniensis.
4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said antagonistic is amounted to 107/mL after being cultivated for 24 hrs.
5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said dispersing agent is selected from a group consisting of a Lignosulfonate (B100), a Di-alkyl sulfosuccinate (S100), a Nonionic surfactants (H40), a Polyethylene glycol (P100), a Nonionic surfactants (Bu200).
6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said specific time period is seven days.
7. A method for reducing a production of a slime in a papermaking process, comprising steps of:
adding a dispersing agent into said slime to obtain a first mixture;
mixing and culturing said first mixture;
adding an antagonistic into said first mixture to obtain a second mixture; and
mixing and culturing said second mixture for reducing said production of said slime.
8. The method according to claim 7 , wherein said slime is produced during said papermaking process.
9. The method according to claim 7 , wherein said antagonistic is Streptomyces bikiniensis.
10. The method according to claim 7 , wherein said antagonistic is amounted to 107/mL after being cultivated for 24 hrs.
11. The method according to claim 7 , wherein said dispersing agent is selected from a group consisting of a Lignosulfonate (B100), a Di-alkyl sulfosuccinate (S100), a Nonionic surfactants (H40), a Polyethylene glycol (P100), a Nonionic surfactants (Bu200).
12. A mixture for reducing a production of a slime in a papermaking process, comprising:
a dispersing agent; and
an antagonistic,
wherein said mixture and said slime are mixed and cultivated for reducing said production of said slime.
13. The mixture according to claim 12 wherein said slime is produced during said papermaking process.
14. The mixture according to claim 12 , wherein said antagonistic is Streptomyces bikiniensis.
15. The mixture according to claim 12 , wherein said antagonistic is amounted to 107/mL after being cultivated for 24 hrs.
16. The mixture according to claim 12 , wherein said dispersing agent is selected from a group consisting of a Lignosulfonate (B100), a Di-alkyl sulfosuccinate (S100), a Nonionic surfactants (H40), a Polyethylene glycol (P100), a Nonionic surfactants (Bu200).
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/467,395 US7520960B2 (en) | 2002-10-18 | 2006-08-25 | Method for reducing slime production and mixture making the same |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
TW091124140A TWI297052B (en) | 2002-10-18 | 2002-10-18 | |
TW91124140 | 2002-10-18 |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/467,395 Continuation-In-Part US7520960B2 (en) | 2002-10-18 | 2006-08-25 | Method for reducing slime production and mixture making the same |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040074621A1 true US20040074621A1 (en) | 2004-04-22 |
Family
ID=32092018
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/335,314 Abandoned US20040074621A1 (en) | 2002-10-18 | 2002-12-31 | Method for reducing slime production and mixture making the same |
US11/467,395 Expired - Fee Related US7520960B2 (en) | 2002-10-18 | 2006-08-25 | Method for reducing slime production and mixture making the same |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/467,395 Expired - Fee Related US7520960B2 (en) | 2002-10-18 | 2006-08-25 | Method for reducing slime production and mixture making the same |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US20040074621A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP3875638B2 (en) |
TW (1) | TWI297052B (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060283568A1 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2006-12-21 | Yuen Foong Yu Paper Mfg. Co., Ltd. | Method for reducing slime production and mixture making the same |
Citations (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2046614A (en) * | 1935-12-04 | 1936-07-07 | Hinde & Dauch Paper Co | Method of preventing slime growth in paper making processes |
US2873249A (en) * | 1957-09-23 | 1959-02-10 | Schwartz Herbert | Method for inhibiting the formation and growth of slime in water systems |
US2881071A (en) * | 1957-07-12 | 1959-04-07 | Buckman Labor Inc | Processes for the control of slime-forming and other microorganisms and compositions for use therefor |
US3140974A (en) * | 1961-07-03 | 1964-07-14 | Buckman Labor Inc | Compositions and processes for the treatment of fourdrinier wire cloths of papermaking machines |
US3151020A (en) * | 1961-05-10 | 1964-09-29 | Nalco Chemical Co | Slime-controlled industrial process water system and process |
US3250667A (en) * | 1961-05-15 | 1966-05-10 | Shell Oil Co | Control of microorganisms with acrolein |
US3984390A (en) * | 1972-03-03 | 1976-10-05 | Zaidan Hojin Biseibutsu Kagaku Kenkyu Kai | Novel process for producing phleomycin group antibiotics |
US4049417A (en) * | 1975-04-28 | 1977-09-20 | Merck & Co., Inc. | Alicyclic alkylene polyamine microorganism and algae growth inhibitors |
US4119537A (en) * | 1977-04-29 | 1978-10-10 | Hershel Finkelstein | Method for slime control |
US4295932A (en) * | 1980-07-14 | 1981-10-20 | Naloc Chemical Company | Synergistic blend of biocides |
US4370199A (en) * | 1981-11-09 | 1983-01-25 | Westvaco Corporation | Enzymatic catalyzed biocide system |
US4673509A (en) * | 1983-08-26 | 1987-06-16 | Albright & Wilson Limited | Biocidal water treatment |
US4684469A (en) * | 1983-05-17 | 1987-08-04 | Ecolab Inc. | Two component biocidal process |
US4746511A (en) * | 1983-03-04 | 1988-05-24 | Chisato Maruyama | Lipopolysaccharide and process for preparation thereof |
US5242593A (en) * | 1988-12-09 | 1993-09-07 | Oberkofler Joerg | Method for reducing the build-up of slime and/or film in water circulation systems |
US5395530A (en) * | 1993-06-17 | 1995-03-07 | Nalco Chemical Company | Treatment of fresh waters to destroy filamentous bacteria |
US5416109A (en) * | 1994-01-19 | 1995-05-16 | Betz Laboratories, Inc. | Method and composition for controlling the growth of microorganisms |
US5611939A (en) * | 1995-12-06 | 1997-03-18 | Betzdearborn Inc. | Methods for inhibiting the production of slime in aqueous systems |
US5624575A (en) * | 1995-04-28 | 1997-04-29 | Nalco Chemical Company | Method for preventing microbial deposits in the papermaking process with ethylene oxide/propylene oxide copolymers |
US5695652A (en) * | 1995-12-06 | 1997-12-09 | Betzdearborn Inc. | Methods for inhibiting the production of slime in aqueous systems |
US5702605A (en) * | 1994-08-01 | 1997-12-30 | Sanyo Chemical Industries, Ltd. | Slime hydrolase producing bacterium and process for producing slime hydrolase |
US5989391A (en) * | 1995-04-27 | 1999-11-23 | Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd. | Reaction product of sulfonated amino resin and amino group-containing substance and papermaking process |
US6159999A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 2000-12-12 | Kurita Water Industries Ltd. | Antimicrobial and antiseptic methods using antimicrobial composition |
US6514458B1 (en) * | 2000-02-25 | 2003-02-04 | Ge Betz, Inc. | Method for removing microbes from surfaces |
US20030155090A1 (en) * | 2000-05-04 | 2003-08-21 | Anna Holmberg | Process for controlling microbial growth |
US20040084383A1 (en) * | 2002-10-30 | 2004-05-06 | Buckman Laboratories International, Inc. | Method to inhibit growth of microorganisms in aqueous systems and on substrates using a persulfate and a bromide |
US20040132095A1 (en) * | 2001-01-09 | 2004-07-08 | Taro Iizumi | Method of selecting antimicrobial agent and method of using the same |
Family Cites Families (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2564430A (en) * | 1946-03-30 | 1951-08-14 | Hamilton Lab Inc | Slime control |
US2771823A (en) * | 1950-07-28 | 1956-11-27 | Ohio Boxboard Co | Papermaking with closed water system |
US3052605A (en) * | 1955-06-22 | 1962-09-04 | Roussel Uclaf | Fungicidal compound and process of making same |
NL103060C (en) * | 1956-10-10 | |||
US3582463A (en) * | 1968-07-18 | 1971-06-01 | Vineland Chem Co | Method of inhibiting the growth of slime in paper mill water systems with dihal-opropionaldehydes and compositions therefor |
JPS4830395B1 (en) * | 1970-11-17 | 1973-09-19 | ||
US3931038A (en) * | 1973-07-31 | 1976-01-06 | Nalco Chemical Company | Scale and corrosion inhibition for cooling water systems |
GB2155919B (en) * | 1984-03-20 | 1987-12-02 | Dearborn Chemicals Ltd | A method of inhibiting corrosion in aqueous systems |
US4745132A (en) | 1986-07-31 | 1988-05-17 | Betz Laboratories, Inc. | Biocidal compositions and use thereof employing a synergistic mixture of n-alkyldimethyl benzyl ammonium halide and n-dodecylguanidine |
DE68901206D1 (en) * | 1988-04-18 | 1992-05-21 | Katayama Chemical Works Co | MICROBICIDES / MICROBISTATIC COMPOSITION FOR INDUSTRIAL USE. |
DE3841596A1 (en) | 1988-12-09 | 1990-06-13 | Joerg Dr Oberkofler | METHOD FOR REDUCING SLIME AND COATING IN PLANTS |
JPH05170602A (en) * | 1991-12-25 | 1993-07-09 | Katayama Chem Works Co Ltd | Slime-controlling agent and slime control method using the same |
US5238572A (en) * | 1993-01-25 | 1993-08-24 | Betz Laboratories, Inc. | Enzyme treatment for industrial slime control |
DE4421504C2 (en) * | 1994-06-20 | 1998-04-16 | Lumos Trading & Investments Co | Process for the preservation of aqueous solutions or dispersions, plant for carrying out the process and its use |
JPH1096194A (en) * | 1996-09-20 | 1998-04-14 | Asahi Denka Kogyo Kk | Slime-controlling agent for paper manufacturing |
US5874453A (en) * | 1997-07-11 | 1999-02-23 | Buckman Laboratories International, Inc. | Synergistic antimicrobial compositions containing a dimethylamide of a carboxylic acid with mixture of 2-(thiocyanomethylthio) benzothiazone and methylenebis (thiocyanate) |
JP4813678B2 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2011-11-09 | ソマール株式会社 | White water slime control method |
DE10035547A1 (en) | 2000-07-21 | 2002-01-31 | Voith Paper Patent Gmbh | To control slime in water extracted from a fiber suspension pulp, at a paper/cardboard production machine, the extracted water is divided into part-flows for at least one to be passed through an ultrasonic field |
MXPA03005679A (en) * | 2000-12-20 | 2004-04-21 | Lonza Ag | Feeder and method for preparing aqueous solutions containing high concentrations of solid oxidizers. |
JP3778019B2 (en) * | 2001-07-10 | 2006-05-24 | 栗田工業株式会社 | Slime control method in papermaking process |
JP2002205902A (en) * | 2001-01-09 | 2002-07-23 | Kurita Water Ind Ltd | Method for performing antibacterial treatment and method for monitoring anti-bacterial effect |
JP2003306893A (en) * | 2002-04-18 | 2003-10-31 | Sanyo Kako Kk | Slime controlling method for papermaking |
TWI297052B (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2008-05-21 | Yuen Foong Yu Paper Mfg Co Ltd | |
CN100408756C (en) * | 2002-10-21 | 2008-08-06 | 永丰馀造纸股份有限公司 | Method for reducing produced bacterial mud and mixture |
-
2002
- 2002-10-18 TW TW091124140A patent/TWI297052B/zh not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-12-31 US US10/335,314 patent/US20040074621A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2003
- 2003-01-20 JP JP2003010589A patent/JP3875638B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2006
- 2006-08-25 US US11/467,395 patent/US7520960B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2046614A (en) * | 1935-12-04 | 1936-07-07 | Hinde & Dauch Paper Co | Method of preventing slime growth in paper making processes |
US2881071A (en) * | 1957-07-12 | 1959-04-07 | Buckman Labor Inc | Processes for the control of slime-forming and other microorganisms and compositions for use therefor |
US2873249A (en) * | 1957-09-23 | 1959-02-10 | Schwartz Herbert | Method for inhibiting the formation and growth of slime in water systems |
US3151020A (en) * | 1961-05-10 | 1964-09-29 | Nalco Chemical Co | Slime-controlled industrial process water system and process |
US3250667A (en) * | 1961-05-15 | 1966-05-10 | Shell Oil Co | Control of microorganisms with acrolein |
US3140974A (en) * | 1961-07-03 | 1964-07-14 | Buckman Labor Inc | Compositions and processes for the treatment of fourdrinier wire cloths of papermaking machines |
US3984390A (en) * | 1972-03-03 | 1976-10-05 | Zaidan Hojin Biseibutsu Kagaku Kenkyu Kai | Novel process for producing phleomycin group antibiotics |
US4049417A (en) * | 1975-04-28 | 1977-09-20 | Merck & Co., Inc. | Alicyclic alkylene polyamine microorganism and algae growth inhibitors |
US4119537A (en) * | 1977-04-29 | 1978-10-10 | Hershel Finkelstein | Method for slime control |
US4295932A (en) * | 1980-07-14 | 1981-10-20 | Naloc Chemical Company | Synergistic blend of biocides |
US4370199A (en) * | 1981-11-09 | 1983-01-25 | Westvaco Corporation | Enzymatic catalyzed biocide system |
US4746511A (en) * | 1983-03-04 | 1988-05-24 | Chisato Maruyama | Lipopolysaccharide and process for preparation thereof |
US4684469A (en) * | 1983-05-17 | 1987-08-04 | Ecolab Inc. | Two component biocidal process |
US4673509A (en) * | 1983-08-26 | 1987-06-16 | Albright & Wilson Limited | Biocidal water treatment |
US5242593A (en) * | 1988-12-09 | 1993-09-07 | Oberkofler Joerg | Method for reducing the build-up of slime and/or film in water circulation systems |
US5395530A (en) * | 1993-06-17 | 1995-03-07 | Nalco Chemical Company | Treatment of fresh waters to destroy filamentous bacteria |
US5416109A (en) * | 1994-01-19 | 1995-05-16 | Betz Laboratories, Inc. | Method and composition for controlling the growth of microorganisms |
US5702605A (en) * | 1994-08-01 | 1997-12-30 | Sanyo Chemical Industries, Ltd. | Slime hydrolase producing bacterium and process for producing slime hydrolase |
US5989391A (en) * | 1995-04-27 | 1999-11-23 | Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd. | Reaction product of sulfonated amino resin and amino group-containing substance and papermaking process |
US5624575A (en) * | 1995-04-28 | 1997-04-29 | Nalco Chemical Company | Method for preventing microbial deposits in the papermaking process with ethylene oxide/propylene oxide copolymers |
US5695652A (en) * | 1995-12-06 | 1997-12-09 | Betzdearborn Inc. | Methods for inhibiting the production of slime in aqueous systems |
US5611939A (en) * | 1995-12-06 | 1997-03-18 | Betzdearborn Inc. | Methods for inhibiting the production of slime in aqueous systems |
US6159999A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 2000-12-12 | Kurita Water Industries Ltd. | Antimicrobial and antiseptic methods using antimicrobial composition |
US6514458B1 (en) * | 2000-02-25 | 2003-02-04 | Ge Betz, Inc. | Method for removing microbes from surfaces |
US20030155090A1 (en) * | 2000-05-04 | 2003-08-21 | Anna Holmberg | Process for controlling microbial growth |
US20040132095A1 (en) * | 2001-01-09 | 2004-07-08 | Taro Iizumi | Method of selecting antimicrobial agent and method of using the same |
US20040084383A1 (en) * | 2002-10-30 | 2004-05-06 | Buckman Laboratories International, Inc. | Method to inhibit growth of microorganisms in aqueous systems and on substrates using a persulfate and a bromide |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060283568A1 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2006-12-21 | Yuen Foong Yu Paper Mfg. Co., Ltd. | Method for reducing slime production and mixture making the same |
US7520960B2 (en) | 2002-10-18 | 2009-04-21 | Yuen Foong Yu Paper Mfg. Co. Ltd. | Method for reducing slime production and mixture making the same |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
TWI297052B (en) | 2008-05-21 |
US7520960B2 (en) | 2009-04-21 |
US20060283568A1 (en) | 2006-12-21 |
JP3875638B2 (en) | 2007-01-31 |
JP2004137650A (en) | 2004-05-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
KR920002770A (en) | How to protect plants from cultivars of Trichoderna or harzianum (T.h) and from biological inhibitors and pathogenic fungi, Botrytis cineraria and Shrerotonia sp. | |
Priyadharsini et al. | Diversity of soil allelopathic Actinobacteria in Tiruchirappalli district, Tamilnadu, India | |
Al-Dhabi et al. | Composting of vegetable waste using microbial consortium and biocontrol efficacy of Streptomyces Sp. Al-Dhabi 30 isolated from the Saudi Arabian environment for sustainable agriculture | |
CN106967631B (en) | Application of myxobacteria in preparation of medicine for predating and inhibiting plant pathogenic bacteria | |
Ishaq et al. | Isolation, identification and comparative study of fungal and bacterial strains found in organic and inorganic soils of different agricultural fields | |
JP4968816B2 (en) | Method for forming spores of Bacillus bacteria | |
Mohammad et al. | Development of compatible fungal mixed culture for composting process of oil palm industrial waste | |
US20040074621A1 (en) | Method for reducing slime production and mixture making the same | |
Rai et al. | Competitive saprophytic colonization of pigeon-pea substrate by Fusarium udum in relation to environmental factors, chemical treatments and microbial antagonism | |
CN100370018C (en) | Sectional oxygen supply fermentation technology of insect pathogenic nematode symbiotic bacteria and use of its fermented material | |
EP1413675A1 (en) | Method for reducing slime production and its composition | |
US20150368673A1 (en) | Production of trichoderma citrinoviride micropropagules as a biocontrol agent by means of an economical process | |
CN111394270A (en) | Nocardia gamboge and application thereof | |
JP2003081713A (en) | Antimicrobial agent composition | |
Thornton | Leeuwenhoek Lecture-The ecology of micro-organisms in soil | |
Ahmad et al. | Applications of endophytic Actinomycetes and their role in protection | |
EP1471789B1 (en) | Novel composition for early and profuse sporulation in fungi and a method thereof | |
CN102647910A (en) | Plant-rearing agent, plant disease resistance inducer, and plant disease control method | |
Ellatif et al. | New Approach to Control Sclerotium rolfsii Induced Sugar Beet Root Rots Disease by Trichoderma with Improved Sucrose Contents. | |
CN106381761A (en) | Special paper making compound sterilizing mildew inhibitor | |
EP0620707B1 (en) | A method to combat microbes | |
Dromph et al. | Reduction of viability of soil borne inoculum of common bunt (Tilletia tritici) by collembolans | |
CN102337317A (en) | Metarrhizium anisopliae preparation and application thereof in control of plant parasitic wireworms | |
Aripov et al. | Microorganisms of the extreme zones of the Southern Aral Sea Region | |
Abd-El-Moity | The use of Trichoderma spp. to control soilborne plant pathogens in Egypt |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: YUEN FOONG YU PAPER MFG CO., LTD., TAIWAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:WANG, JIHN-YUH;REEL/FRAME:013644/0950 Effective date: 20021227 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |