US20040041059A1 - Device for projectile control - Google Patents

Device for projectile control Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040041059A1
US20040041059A1 US10/235,019 US23501902A US2004041059A1 US 20040041059 A1 US20040041059 A1 US 20040041059A1 US 23501902 A US23501902 A US 23501902A US 2004041059 A1 US2004041059 A1 US 2004041059A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
projectile
set forth
housing unit
allows
stowed
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/235,019
Inventor
Kevin Kennedy
Richard Kretzschmar
Brian Smith
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US10/235,019 priority Critical patent/US20040041059A1/en
Publication of US20040041059A1 publication Critical patent/US20040041059A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42BEXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B10/00Means for influencing, e.g. improving, the aerodynamic properties of projectiles or missiles; Arrangements on projectiles or missiles for stabilising, steering, range-reducing, range-increasing or fall-retarding
    • F42B10/32Range-reducing or range-increasing arrangements; Fall-retarding means
    • F42B10/48Range-reducing, destabilising or braking arrangements, e.g. impact-braking arrangements; Fall-retarding means, e.g. balloons, rockets for braking or fall-retarding
    • F42B10/50Brake flaps, e.g. inflatable
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42BEXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B10/00Means for influencing, e.g. improving, the aerodynamic properties of projectiles or missiles; Arrangements on projectiles or missiles for stabilising, steering, range-reducing, range-increasing or fall-retarding
    • F42B10/02Stabilising arrangements
    • F42B10/14Stabilising arrangements using fins spread or deployed after launch, e.g. after leaving the barrel
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42BEXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B10/00Means for influencing, e.g. improving, the aerodynamic properties of projectiles or missiles; Arrangements on projectiles or missiles for stabilising, steering, range-reducing, range-increasing or fall-retarding
    • F42B10/60Steering arrangements
    • F42B10/62Steering by movement of flight surfaces
    • F42B10/64Steering by movement of flight surfaces of fins

Definitions

  • Projectiles are utilized in many fields for many purposes. While such purposes may be as diverse as games, scientific experiments, blowguns, and even vehicles, the most common use is probably as weapons of war.
  • the shapes of such projectiles are as varied as their purposes. Frequently, the projectile will have an elongated body with designated fore and aft ends. While there are clearly many exceptions to this general shape, a boomerang being one, the focus of this invention is on a device for controlling the flight of an elongated-shaped projectile. Such projectiles may travel at subsonic, transonic, and supersonic speeds.
  • Prior art is replete with methods for controlling the various flight parameters (e.g., speed, spin, pitch and yaw) of such projectiles.
  • Some examples include: pulse motors, variety of nozzle arrangements, aerodynamic shaping of the body of the projectile, and fixed and moveable fins (or other protrusions from the body of the projectile). These devices may be utilized at various locations upon the projectile.
  • the prior art references below contain a more detailed discussion of these prior control methods.
  • an aft section for attachment to a projectile is disclosed.
  • the primarily purposes are to reduce the speed of the projectile and to produce a stabilizing lift force during forward flight.
  • the aft section includes a conically shaped flared section and a flange.
  • the invention discloses a simple and effective device for controlling one or more of the flight parameters of a projectile: the speed, spin, pitch and yaw.
  • the simplest application requires only the inherent spin of the projectile to actuate a preset control feature.
  • the flight parameters of a projectile include speed, spin, pitch and yaw.
  • This invention discloses a novel approach to controlling these parameters by rotating or extruding a surface out from the body of the projectile in a plane normal to the length of the projectile.
  • the specific shape, thickness, and degree of surface exposure would be determined by the specific application and aerodynamic analysis.
  • FIG. 1 shows the preferred embodiment location of the device for a typical projectile.
  • FIG. 2 shows the single-rotating surface version of the device.
  • FIG. 3 shows a two-rotating-surfaces version of the device.
  • FIG. 4 shows a four-rotating-surfaces version of the device.
  • FIG. 5 shows a four-extruding-surfaces version of the device.
  • FIG. 1 shows a typical projectile 2 where the longer axis is generally in the direction of flight.
  • the projectiles normally are aerodynamically designed to minimize the resistance or drag effects of the medium through which such projectiles might travel.
  • Such projectiles may or may not have an initial spin direction or may change spin direction during flight.
  • These projectiles may be subsonic, transonic, or supersonic.
  • a housing unit 4 is positioned at the aft end of the projectile. This location of the housing unit 4 was chosen for the preferred embodiment and is not a limitation upon the claims.
  • the housing unit 4 conforms to the body of the projectile. It may be built in during production of the projectile or attached to an existing projectile by means known to those skilled in the art. The means for attaching the housing unit 4 also may be built in during production.
  • FIG. 2.A shows a single surface 6 in the stowed position.
  • FIG. 2.B. shows the single surface 6 in a rotated position.
  • the rotation is in the plane that lies normal to the length of the projectile. The rotation is to a position outside of the housing unit 4 and, therefore, outside of the body of the projectile.
  • This rotating version of the device is primarily designed for projectiles having a high rate of spin in a single direction during flight.
  • the means for rotating the single surface 6 is the spin of the projectile during flight. To effect this rotation the surface is attached to the housing unit 4 such that the surface rotates in a direction opposite the spin of the projectile 2 .
  • the device may be designed so that it may be attached to a projectile in two different configurations (This would allow the rotation of the surface to be opposite the known spin direction for that projectile.); the number of surfaces could be doubled with each pair of surfaces rotating in an opposite direction and actuated by only an opposite spin of the projectile; or the device itself might be produced in two different configurations.
  • the surface shape, thickness, and degree of rotation or extrusion will be functions of the desired application and aerodynamic analysis.
  • the surface may be rotated or extruded to a single position, a plurality of positions, or a continuum of positions between stowed and fully extended.
  • the rotation or extrusion may be for a very short duration (i.e., bang-bang actuation) or for a longer duration (to include the completion of the flight).
  • bang-bang actuation i.e., bang-bang actuation
  • a variety of components known to those skilled in the art may be used to accomplish the rotation or extrusion and the desired degree of control over rotation or extrusion.
  • Some options include electronic actuators, mechanical actuators, springs, and air flow though selected paths within the device.
  • the methods of rotation or extrusion and the method for control chosen for these embodiments are not a limitation upon the claims.
  • the location of the housing unit at the aft end of the projectile represents the preferred embodiment and does not limit the claims.
  • the claims do not specify a predetermined location.
  • FIG. 3.A shows two surfaces 8 and 10 in the stowed position.
  • FIG. 3.B. shows these surfaces 8 and 10 in a rotated position.
  • the surfaces 8 and 10 are attached to the housing unit 4 to allow for rotation in a direction opposite the spin of the projectile.
  • FIG. 4.A shows four surfaces 12 , 14 , 16 and 18 in the stowed position.
  • FIG. 4.B. shows these surfaces 12 , 14 , 16 and 18 in a rotated position.
  • the surfaces 12 , 14 , 16 and 18 are attached to the housing unit 4 to allow for rotation in a direction opposite the spin of the projectile.
  • FIG. 5.A shows four surfaces 20 , 22 , 24 , and 26 in a stowed position.
  • FIG. 5.B. shows one of the four surfaces 22 in an extruded position.
  • the number of surfaces in this embodiment is not a limitation upon the claims. Centrifugal force may be used to extrude the surface with another means employed for returning the surface to a stowed position.
  • Other embodiments may include a means for adjusting the shape of the surface and for altering the position of the surface outside a plane normal to the length of the projectile. The selection of these optional means will be based upon the desired application and aerodynamic analysis.

Abstract

A device for controlling one or more of the flight parameters of a projectile: speed, spin, pitch and yaw. The invention discloses a novel approach to controlling these parameters by rotating or extruding a surface out from the body of the projectile in a plane normal to the length of the projectile. The specific shape, thickness, and degree of surface exposure would be determined by the specific application and aerodynamic analysis.

Description

    DEDICATORY CLAUSE
  • [0001] The invention described herein may be manufactured, used and licensed by or for the Government for governmental purposes without the payment to us of any royalties thereon.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention [0002]
  • Projectiles are utilized in many fields for many purposes. While such purposes may be as diverse as games, scientific experiments, blowguns, and even vehicles, the most common use is probably as weapons of war. The shapes of such projectiles are as varied as their purposes. Frequently, the projectile will have an elongated body with designated fore and aft ends. While there are clearly many exceptions to this general shape, a boomerang being one, the focus of this invention is on a device for controlling the flight of an elongated-shaped projectile. Such projectiles may travel at subsonic, transonic, and supersonic speeds. [0003]
  • Prior art is replete with methods for controlling the various flight parameters (e.g., speed, spin, pitch and yaw) of such projectiles. Some examples include: pulse motors, variety of nozzle arrangements, aerodynamic shaping of the body of the projectile, and fixed and moveable fins (or other protrusions from the body of the projectile). These devices may be utilized at various locations upon the projectile. The prior art references below contain a more detailed discussion of these prior control methods. [0004]
  • For weapons of war, accurate control of a projectile has several advantages. It increases the likelihood of hitting the target and, thereby, reduces the number of projectiles required to accomplish the objective. This efficient use of projectiles can result in a more effective combat engagement when quantities of projectiles are limited and a cost savings by reducing the number of projectiles used for a given mission. A quick and accurate engagement of the target also may be beneficial, if not essential, for the survivability of the system or individual firing the projectile. The existence of a highly accurate and effective projectile also may have a psychological impact upon the enemy. [0005]
  • 2. Description of Prior Art [0006]
  • In U.S. Pat. No. 5,398,887 issued Mar. 21, 1995, a control system for use in missiles and other projectiles is disclosed. The system controls pitch, yaw, and roll by means of two opposing pairs of flaps configured in the aft end. The flaps initially conform to the exterior surface of the projectile, and when actuated each flap rotates about its leading edge. This invention does not directly address any adjustments to the speed of the projectile. [0007]
  • In U.S. Pat. No. 6,123,289 issued Sep. 26, 2000, an aft section for attachment to a projectile is disclosed. The primarily purposes are to reduce the speed of the projectile and to produce a stabilizing lift force during forward flight. The aft section includes a conically shaped flared section and a flange. [0008]
  • In U.S. Pat. No. 6,135,387 issued Oct. 24, 2000, a projectile guidance control system is disclosed. This system includes several foldout fins in the aft section and a plurality of rotating fins mounted pivotally in the fore section of the projectile. [0009]
  • Objective. [0010]
  • The invention discloses a simple and effective device for controlling one or more of the flight parameters of a projectile: the speed, spin, pitch and yaw. The simplest application requires only the inherent spin of the projectile to actuate a preset control feature. [0011]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The flight parameters of a projectile include speed, spin, pitch and yaw. This invention discloses a novel approach to controlling these parameters by rotating or extruding a surface out from the body of the projectile in a plane normal to the length of the projectile. The specific shape, thickness, and degree of surface exposure would be determined by the specific application and aerodynamic analysis.[0012]
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
  • FIG. 1 shows the preferred embodiment location of the device for a typical projectile. [0013]
  • FIG. 2 shows the single-rotating surface version of the device. [0014]
  • FIG. 3 shows a two-rotating-surfaces version of the device. [0015]
  • FIG. 4 shows a four-rotating-surfaces version of the device. [0016]
  • FIG. 5 shows a four-extruding-surfaces version of the device. [0017]
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • Referring now to the drawing wherein like numbers represent like parts in each of the several figures, FIG. 1 shows a [0018] typical projectile 2 where the longer axis is generally in the direction of flight. For obvious reasons the projectiles normally are aerodynamically designed to minimize the resistance or drag effects of the medium through which such projectiles might travel. Such projectiles may or may not have an initial spin direction or may change spin direction during flight. These projectiles may be subsonic, transonic, or supersonic. In the preferred embodiment a housing unit 4 is positioned at the aft end of the projectile. This location of the housing unit 4 was chosen for the preferred embodiment and is not a limitation upon the claims. The housing unit 4 conforms to the body of the projectile. It may be built in during production of the projectile or attached to an existing projectile by means known to those skilled in the art. The means for attaching the housing unit 4 also may be built in during production.
  • FIG. 2.A. shows a [0019] single surface 6 in the stowed position. FIG. 2.B. shows the single surface 6 in a rotated position. The rotation is in the plane that lies normal to the length of the projectile. The rotation is to a position outside of the housing unit 4 and, therefore, outside of the body of the projectile. This rotating version of the device is primarily designed for projectiles having a high rate of spin in a single direction during flight. The means for rotating the single surface 6 is the spin of the projectile during flight. To effect this rotation the surface is attached to the housing unit 4 such that the surface rotates in a direction opposite the spin of the projectile 2. Where the rotation is effected by the spin of the projectile, such spin must be consistent in one direction, and that direction must be known when integrating the device with the projectile. Alternatively, in a rotating version of the device the surface may be actuated by means other than the spin of the projectile. In such alternative embodiments having the surface attached for rotation in a direction opposite the spin of the projectile is desirable but not required. Such alternatives may be employed on projectiles with no spin. In FIGS. 2, 3, and 4 a point of rotation 28 is shown without implying any specific means for rotation.
  • Available options to address using a single device with projectiles having different directions of spin would include: the device may be designed so that it may be attached to a projectile in two different configurations (This would allow the rotation of the surface to be opposite the known spin direction for that projectile.); the number of surfaces could be doubled with each pair of surfaces rotating in an opposite direction and actuated by only an opposite spin of the projectile; or the device itself might be produced in two different configurations. [0020]
  • In this first embodiment as well as those following, the surface shape, thickness, and degree of rotation or extrusion will be functions of the desired application and aerodynamic analysis. The surface may be rotated or extruded to a single position, a plurality of positions, or a continuum of positions between stowed and fully extended. The rotation or extrusion may be for a very short duration (i.e., bang-bang actuation) or for a longer duration (to include the completion of the flight). A variety of components known to those skilled in the art may be used to accomplish the rotation or extrusion and the desired degree of control over rotation or extrusion. Some options include electronic actuators, mechanical actuators, springs, and air flow though selected paths within the device. The methods of rotation or extrusion and the method for control chosen for these embodiments are not a limitation upon the claims. The location of the housing unit at the aft end of the projectile represents the preferred embodiment and does not limit the claims. The claims do not specify a predetermined location. [0021]
  • Slower spin rates for a projectile will make an increased number of surfaces more desirable. The additional surfaces will accommodate the slower revolution frequency and impart the appropriate control authority in the desired manner. FIG. 3.A. shows two [0022] surfaces 8 and 10 in the stowed position. FIG. 3.B. shows these surfaces 8 and 10 in a rotated position. The surfaces 8 and 10 are attached to the housing unit 4 to allow for rotation in a direction opposite the spin of the projectile.
  • FIG. 4.A. shows four [0023] surfaces 12, 14, 16 and 18 in the stowed position. FIG. 4.B. shows these surfaces 12, 14, 16 and 18 in a rotated position. The surfaces 12, 14, 16 and 18 are attached to the housing unit 4 to allow for rotation in a direction opposite the spin of the projectile.
  • As an alternative embodiment the surface may be extruded radially from the housing unit. FIG. 5.A. shows four [0024] surfaces 20, 22, 24, and 26 in a stowed position. FIG. 5.B. shows one of the four surfaces 22 in an extruded position. The number of surfaces in this embodiment is not a limitation upon the claims. Centrifugal force may be used to extrude the surface with another means employed for returning the surface to a stowed position.
  • Other embodiments may include a means for adjusting the shape of the surface and for altering the position of the surface outside a plane normal to the length of the projectile. The selection of these optional means will be based upon the desired application and aerodynamic analysis. [0025]
  • Although several embodiments of the device have been illustrated, it is apparent that various modifications and other embodiments of the device may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the foregoing disclosure. Accordingly, the scope of the Device for Projectile Control should be limited only by the claims appended hereto. [0026]

Claims (14)

We claim:
1. A device for controlling the flight parameters of a projectile comprising:
a housing unit initially containing the components of the device;
a means for integrating the housing unit with the projectile;
at least one moveable aerodynamic surface incorporated within the housing unit; and
a means for rotating the surface from a stowed position inside the housing unit to an extended position outside the housing unit and outside the body of the projectile, with the rotation being in a plane normal to the long axis of the projectile.
2. The device as set forth in claim 1, wherein the means for rotating allows the surface to be selectively positioned in a plurality of positions between stowed and fully extended.
3. The device as set forth in claim 2, wherein the means for rotating allows for continuous adjustments to the position of the surface within the range of allowable movements.
4. The device as set forth in claim 1, wherein the means for rotating allows for the selection of any position on a continuum between stowed and fully extended.
5. The device as set forth in claim 4, wherein the means for rotating allows for continuous adjustments to the position of the surface within the range of allowable movements.
6. The device as set forth in claim 1, further comprising a means for altering the shape of the surface.
7. The device as set forth in claim 1, further comprising a means for adjusting the position of the surface such that the surface is outside a plane normal to the length of the projectile.
8. A device for controlling the flight parameters of a projectile comprising:
a housing unit initially containing the components of the device;
a means for integrating the housing unit with the projectile;
at least one moveable aerodynamic surface incorporated within the housing unit; and
a means for radially extruding the surface from a stowed position inside the housing unit to an extended position outside the housing unit and outside the body of the projectile, with the extrusion being in a plane normal to the long axis of the projectile.
9. The device as set forth in claim 8, wherein the means for extruding allows the surface to be selectively positioned in a plurality of positions between stowed and fully extended.
10. The device as set forth in claim 9, wherein the means for extruding allows for continuous adjustments to the position of the surface within the range of allowable movements.
11. The device as set forth in claim 8, wherein the means for extruding allows for the selection of any position on a continuum between stowed and fully extended.
12. The device as set forth in claim 11, wherein the means for extruding allows for continuous adjustments to the position of the surface within the range of allowable movements.
13. The device as set forth in claim 8, further comprising a means for altering the shape of the surface.
14. The device as set forth in claim 8, further comprising a means for adjusting the position of the surface such that the surface is outside a plane normal to the length of the projectile.
US10/235,019 2002-09-03 2002-09-03 Device for projectile control Abandoned US20040041059A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/235,019 US20040041059A1 (en) 2002-09-03 2002-09-03 Device for projectile control

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/235,019 US20040041059A1 (en) 2002-09-03 2002-09-03 Device for projectile control

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040041059A1 true US20040041059A1 (en) 2004-03-04

Family

ID=31977502

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/235,019 Abandoned US20040041059A1 (en) 2002-09-03 2002-09-03 Device for projectile control

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20040041059A1 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100237185A1 (en) * 2009-03-17 2010-09-23 Richard Dryer Projectile control device
US8026465B1 (en) * 2009-05-20 2011-09-27 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Guided fuse with variable incidence panels
US20140135155A1 (en) * 2012-11-13 2014-05-15 Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute Of Science And Technology Apparatus, method, and system for controlling boomerang
US8816261B1 (en) 2011-06-29 2014-08-26 Raytheon Company Bang-bang control using tangentially mounted surfaces
EP3460381A1 (en) * 2017-09-26 2019-03-27 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH Smoke-generating body
US10508892B1 (en) * 2016-08-15 2019-12-17 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Distributed fuze architecture for highly reliable submunitions
US11378367B2 (en) * 2017-11-28 2022-07-05 Bae Systems Bofors Ab Fuse with reversible airbrake

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3167016A (en) * 1956-07-30 1965-01-26 Dehavilland Aircraft Canada Rocket propelled missile
US4004514A (en) * 1976-01-20 1977-01-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Roll rate stabilized wrap around missile fins
US5108051A (en) * 1987-11-26 1992-04-28 L'etat Francais Represente Par Le Delegue General Pour L'armement Deployment mechanism of a projectile fin
US5582364A (en) * 1991-11-07 1996-12-10 Hughes Missile Systems Company Flyable folding fin
US6310335B1 (en) * 1998-11-30 2001-10-30 Giat Industries Translational braking device for a projectile during its trajectory
US6325325B1 (en) * 1999-04-16 2001-12-04 Giat Industries Device for translational braking of a projectile on its trajectory
US6352218B1 (en) * 1997-03-25 2002-03-05 Bofors Defence Aktiebolag Method and device for a fin-stabilized base-bleed shell
US6502785B1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2003-01-07 Lockheed Martin Corporation Three axis flap control system
US6502786B2 (en) * 2001-02-01 2003-01-07 United Defense, L.P. 2-D projectile trajectory corrector

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3167016A (en) * 1956-07-30 1965-01-26 Dehavilland Aircraft Canada Rocket propelled missile
US4004514A (en) * 1976-01-20 1977-01-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Roll rate stabilized wrap around missile fins
US5108051A (en) * 1987-11-26 1992-04-28 L'etat Francais Represente Par Le Delegue General Pour L'armement Deployment mechanism of a projectile fin
US5582364A (en) * 1991-11-07 1996-12-10 Hughes Missile Systems Company Flyable folding fin
US6352218B1 (en) * 1997-03-25 2002-03-05 Bofors Defence Aktiebolag Method and device for a fin-stabilized base-bleed shell
US6310335B1 (en) * 1998-11-30 2001-10-30 Giat Industries Translational braking device for a projectile during its trajectory
US6325325B1 (en) * 1999-04-16 2001-12-04 Giat Industries Device for translational braking of a projectile on its trajectory
US6502785B1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2003-01-07 Lockheed Martin Corporation Three axis flap control system
US6502786B2 (en) * 2001-02-01 2003-01-07 United Defense, L.P. 2-D projectile trajectory corrector

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100237185A1 (en) * 2009-03-17 2010-09-23 Richard Dryer Projectile control device
US8076623B2 (en) 2009-03-17 2011-12-13 Raytheon Company Projectile control device
US8026465B1 (en) * 2009-05-20 2011-09-27 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Guided fuse with variable incidence panels
US8816261B1 (en) 2011-06-29 2014-08-26 Raytheon Company Bang-bang control using tangentially mounted surfaces
US20140135155A1 (en) * 2012-11-13 2014-05-15 Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute Of Science And Technology Apparatus, method, and system for controlling boomerang
US9308425B2 (en) * 2012-11-13 2016-04-12 Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute Of Science And Technology Apparatus, method, and system for controlling boomerang
US10508892B1 (en) * 2016-08-15 2019-12-17 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Distributed fuze architecture for highly reliable submunitions
EP3460381A1 (en) * 2017-09-26 2019-03-27 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH Smoke-generating body
US11378367B2 (en) * 2017-11-28 2022-07-05 Bae Systems Bofors Ab Fuse with reversible airbrake

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6923404B1 (en) Apparatus and methods for variable sweep body conformal wing with application to projectiles, missiles, and unmanned air vehicles
EP2593746B1 (en) Aerodynamic flight termination system and method
EP1366339B1 (en) 2-d projectile trajectory corrector
US5467940A (en) Artillery rocket
US5143320A (en) Spoiler torque controlled supersonic missile
WO2008118159A3 (en) Spin stabilizer projectile trajectory control
EP2245416B1 (en) Control of projectiles or the like
EP2812646B1 (en) Brake panel for a detonator or a projectile
US5816531A (en) Range correction module for a spin stabilized projectile
US5826821A (en) Drag control module for range correction of a spin stabil
US4351503A (en) Stabilized projectiles
CN104089546A (en) Variable pneumatic layout structure for projectile body
SE438038B (en) SUBCALIBRIATE ARROW PROJECTIL
US20040041059A1 (en) Device for projectile control
EP2276998B1 (en) Apparatus for air brake retention and deployment
JP2000131000A (en) Mixed missile automatic pilot
US5050819A (en) Rotatable non-circular forebody flow controller
EP1087201B1 (en) Method and device for correcting the trajectory of a spinstabilised projectile
RU2343397C2 (en) Rocket missile
JPS62255800A (en) Missile for bore arm having specific rang and stable wing
JPH09166399A (en) Missile with non-cylindrical type propulsive section
US20240110771A1 (en) Despun wing control system for guided projectile maneuvers
RU2790656C1 (en) Supersonic guided missile
EP1328768B1 (en) Method and arrangement for extending the range of fire of a fin-stabilized artillery missile
RU2234667C1 (en) Missile

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION