US20030015430A1 - Electrodeposition coating process in continuous electrodeposition coating plants - Google Patents

Electrodeposition coating process in continuous electrodeposition coating plants Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20030015430A1
US20030015430A1 US09/906,166 US90616601A US2003015430A1 US 20030015430 A1 US20030015430 A1 US 20030015430A1 US 90616601 A US90616601 A US 90616601A US 2003015430 A1 US2003015430 A1 US 2003015430A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
substrates
electrodeposition coating
edc
energized
immersed
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US09/906,166
Inventor
Ronald Frowein
Klausjoerg Klein
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
EIDP Inc
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US09/906,166 priority Critical patent/US20030015430A1/en
Assigned to E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY reassignment E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FROWEIN, RONALD, KLEIN, KLAUSJOERG
Priority to EP02012987A priority patent/EP1277855A1/en
Publication of US20030015430A1 publication Critical patent/US20030015430A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D13/00Electrophoretic coating characterised by the process
    • C25D13/22Servicing or operating apparatus or multistep processes

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for electrodeposition coating (EDC) electrically conductive substrates in continuous EDC plants.
  • EDC electrodeposition coating
  • the known electrodeposition coating process for coating electrically conductive substrates may be performed in batch or continuous plants.
  • Industrially manufactured substrates that are to be electrodeposition coated such as, automotive bodies, are virtually exclusively electrodeposition coated in continuous plants (c.f. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, volume A 18, pages 495 to 497).
  • Continuous EDC plants allow the EDC process to proceed continuously at high levels of productivity.
  • Such continuous plants are distinguished from batch plants in that the EDC tank has a large volume, for example, of the order of 100 to 500 cubic meters, and a large tank length, for example of the order of 10 to 30 meters and in that several substrates connected as deposition electrode are conveyed in a longitudinal direction at a constant belt speed simultaneously in a successive arrangement through the EDC tank and are electrocoated.
  • a substrate is being immersed at the beginning of the EDC tank, one or more substrates are passing in the immersed state through the central part of the EDC tank and a substrate is being removed from the bath at the end of the EDC tank. In this manner, each substrate passes through the EDC tank in a period, depending upon belt speed, of the order of a few, for example, 2 to 6 minutes.
  • the mechanism conveying the substrates comes to a standstill (belt shutdown) and the electrical power is switched off or a holding voltage of for example 100 to 300 V below the nominal deposition voltage is applied.
  • the holding voltage is intended to prevent the EDC layer that has already been deposited onto the immersed substrates from redissolving back into the EDC bath.
  • the holding voltage is here selected such that it gives rise to an equilibrium between redissolution and deposition of the EDC.
  • the present invention provides a process for electrodeposition coating electrically conductive substrates in continuous electrodeposition coating plants by conveying conductive substrates connected as deposition electrodes through an electrodeposition coating tank containing an electrocoating bath composition via a conveying means, wherein, in the event of a shutdown of the conveying means, all the substrates not in motion and immersed in the electrodeposition coating tank are, at the latest after a brief de-energized interruption, completely coated while ensuring at least the nominal deposition period at the nominal deposition voltage, and then the completely coated, still immersed substrates not in motion remain de-energized in the electrodeposition coating tank and when the conveying means has restarted, the substrates remain de-energized until reaching the end of the electrodeposition coating tank and are removed therefrom.
  • the phrase “at least the nominal deposition period” is used in the description and the claims.
  • the nominal deposition period is the period of time that is specified for a given substrate with a given EDC agent and given EDC parameters in order to achieve a desired nominal layer thickness of the EDC layer.
  • the nominal deposition period has a certain tolerance range with a minimum deposition period, below which the period must not fall, and a maximum deposition period. While the minimum deposition period is an absolute minimum, it is less problematic from a technical standpoint if the maximum deposition period is exceeded.
  • the “conveying means” used to transport substrates to be electrocoated through an EDC process may be a belt and hereinafter, for brevity, will be referred to as a “belt”.
  • the process according to the invention may be used with success both in anodic electrodeposition (AED) coating and in the more widespread, preferred cathodic electrodeposition (CED) coating process.
  • AED anodic electrodeposition
  • CED cathodic electrodeposition
  • the immersed substrates which, due to the associated belt shutdown, are not in motion and in the incompletely coated state are not left for an extended period in a de-energized state or only provided with a holding voltage.
  • the coating process for the substrates not in motion is taken to completion.
  • the nominal deposition voltage is reapplied. Reapplication of the nominal deposition voltage may proceed manually or automatically at the desired time, for example, by automatically recording the time that has elapsed since the beginning of a belt shutdown. It is convenient to ramp up the nominal deposition voltage with current limitation in order to avoid current peaks.
  • the nominal deposition voltage is simply applied without interruption until at least the nominal deposition period has been achieved.
  • the electrical power may be shut off manually or automatically, for example, by automatically recording the time that has elapsed since the beginning of a belt shutdown.
  • the nominal deposition voltage is or remains applied until at least the nominal deposition period at the nominal deposition voltage is achieved for each of the immersed substrates not in motion. To this end, the nominal deposition voltage for that substrate immersed in the immersion zone of the continuous EDC plant is applied at least until the intended nominal deposition period is achieved.
  • the nominal deposition period may, however, be exceeded by, for example, up to 100%, for example to offset any redissolution of previously deposited EDC.
  • the nominal deposition period is, for example, 3 minutes and if the first substrate located in the immersion zone has been connected as deposition electrode at the nominal deposition voltage for, for example, 1 minute prior to the belt shutdown, the nominal deposition voltage is or remains applied to the immersed substrates not in motion for approximately 2 minutes, so achieving the nominal deposition period in this manner.
  • the nominal deposition period for the other substrates also not in motion and in the immersed state that are located in the middle of the tank or in the removal zone is exceeded.
  • exceeding the nominal deposition period has no disadvantageous consequences upon the surface of the EDC layer; the EDC process is ultimately self-limiting due to the electrically insulating properties of the deposited EDC layer.
  • the EDC layer of the substrates for which the nominal deposition period has been exceeded has a somewhat greater layer thickness than intended. This is, however, not disadvantageous. Once at least the nominal deposition period for all the immersed substrates not in motion has been achieved in this manner, the electrical power is turned off.
  • the nominal deposition period is inevitably obtained as a result of the length of the EDC tank, the arrangement of the counter-electrodes and the belt speed at which the substrates to be coated pass through the EDC tank.
  • the nominal deposition period is, for example, 2 to 5 minutes, while the nominal deposition voltage is, for example, 200 to 500 V.
  • the substrates which have been completely ED coated while not in motion are conveyed in a de-energized state through the EDC tank, removed from the bath, rinsed in the conventional manner with EDC ultrafiltrate and/or deionized water and introduced into the curing process, in particular a baking process. Only once the last substrate, i.e. the substrate immersed at the immersion zone of the EDC tank during the belt shutdown, has been removed from the electrocoating bath the electrical power is turned back on for the purpose of ED coating of the following substrates. In this case too, it is convenient to ramp up the nominal deposition voltage with current limitation.
  • the nominal deposition period is not achieved for all the substrates following the substrates that have been conveyed through and removed from the EDC tank in the de-energized state. This is because the immediately following substrates were immersed into the EDC tank in the de-energized state and have passed through the EDC tank for a greater or lesser distance in the de-energized state before the electrical power was turned back on. In other words, in particular the EDC layer of the immediately following substrates may exhibit a lower thickness. It may accordingly be convenient, when the electrical power is turned back on, to halt the belt again for an appropriate period in order to achieve in this manner at least the nominal deposition period for the following substrates. Thereafter, the continuous EDC plant may be further operated under normal conditions without either turning off the electrical power or shutting down the belt.
  • the process according to the invention may be operated as above if the EDC material used is not excessively susceptible to redissolution. It is preferred to use EDC agents that have a low susceptibility to redissolution. For example, an EDC layer deposited to the nominal layer thickness should not be more than 25% redissolved by spending 20 minutes in the de-energized state in the EDC bath. Such a low level of redissolution is prior art for today's EDC agents, in particular for preferred CED coating agents.
  • Excessive redissolution of the deposited EDC layer from the substrate immersed in the EDC bath in the de-energized state may occur if the belt shutdown after completion of ED coating of the immersed substrates not in motion is of very long duration, for example longer than 60 minutes, and/or if an EDC agent which is highly susceptible to redissolution has been used. If, after completion of ED coating of the immersed substrates not in motion, excessive redissolution of the EDC layer has occurred, the substrates, after removal from the bath in the de-energized state, are treated exactly as described above, but are not baked. They are not scrap because, either after being stripped or still provided with the excessively thin, uncured EDC layer, they can be reintroduced into the EDC process together with uncoated new substrates.
  • the process according to the invention is particularly useful for ED coating of substrates having large proportions of horizontal surfaces or substrates to which stringent coating quality requirements are applied.
  • substrates are automotive bodies and parts thereof, metal furniture and agricultural machinery.
  • both the reworking and the scrap rates may be distinctly reduced by the process according to the invention.
  • the conditions prevailing in a continuous CED plant are replicated in a batch operated CED bath.
  • Examples 1 to 3 are Comparative Examples.
  • Examples 4 and 5 correspond to the process according to the invention.

Abstract

A process for electrodeposition coating electrically conductive substrates in continuous electrodeposition coating plants, wherein, in the event of a shutdown of the conveying means, conventionally a belt, all the substrates not in motion and immersed in the electrodeposition coating tank are, at the latest after a brief de-energized interruption, completely coated while ensuring at least the nominal deposition period at the nominal deposition voltage, and then the completely coated, still immersed substrates not in motion remain de-energized in the electrodeposition coating tank and, when the conveying means has restarted, the substrates remain de-energized until reaching the end of the electrodeposition coating tank and are removed therefrom.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a process for electrodeposition coating (EDC) electrically conductive substrates in continuous EDC plants. [0001]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The known electrodeposition coating process for coating electrically conductive substrates may be performed in batch or continuous plants. Industrially manufactured substrates that are to be electrodeposition coated, such as, automotive bodies, are virtually exclusively electrodeposition coated in continuous plants (c.f. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, volume A 18, pages 495 to 497). [0002]
  • Continuous EDC plants allow the EDC process to proceed continuously at high levels of productivity. Such continuous plants are distinguished from batch plants in that the EDC tank has a large volume, for example, of the order of 100 to 500 cubic meters, and a large tank length, for example of the order of 10 to 30 meters and in that several substrates connected as deposition electrode are conveyed in a longitudinal direction at a constant belt speed simultaneously in a successive arrangement through the EDC tank and are electrocoated. While a substrate is being immersed at the beginning of the EDC tank, one or more substrates are passing in the immersed state through the central part of the EDC tank and a substrate is being removed from the bath at the end of the EDC tank. In this manner, each substrate passes through the EDC tank in a period, depending upon belt speed, of the order of a few, for example, 2 to 6 minutes. [0003]
  • It is not unusual for the EDC process to be interrupted in such continuous plants. Such interruptions are scheduled, for example due to preassembly work or staff rest breaks, or unscheduled, for example, due to breakdowns in the conveying system or in the various supply systems for the EDC plant. [0004]
  • During such interruptions, the mechanism conveying the substrates comes to a standstill (belt shutdown) and the electrical power is switched off or a holding voltage of for example 100 to 300 V below the nominal deposition voltage is applied. The holding voltage is intended to prevent the EDC layer that has already been deposited onto the immersed substrates from redissolving back into the EDC bath. The holding voltage is here selected such that it gives rise to an equilibrium between redissolution and deposition of the EDC. Once the interruption is over, the coating process is continued as normal. In this manner, it is ensured that all the substrates to be electrodeposition (ED) coated receive the nominal quantity of electricity required for the coating thereof, irrespective of whether they have passed through the coating process with or without interruption. The ED coated substrates are then rinsed with EDC ultrafiltrate and/or deionized water and introduced into the curing process, in particular a baking process. [0005]
  • Especially if such interruptions of the EDC process are of relatively long duration, for example, longer than 5 minutes, coating defects within the cured EDC layer, in particular on horizontal surfaces, are often subsequently observed. Such coating defects must be removed laboriously by reworking operations, such as, sanding. The coating defects are often so severe that reworking is not economically viable or, in other words, the ED coated substrate has become scrap. [0006]
  • It has been observed that coating defects arising as a result of a belt shutdown in continuous EDC plants may be avoided if all substrates that are in an immersed state during a belt shutdown are, at the latest after a brief interruption of the continuous EDC process, completely coated at the nominal deposition voltage and then, once the belt has been restarted, the continuous EDC plant remains de-energized until the substrates completely coated in this manner are removed from the bath. [0007]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention provides a process for electrodeposition coating electrically conductive substrates in continuous electrodeposition coating plants by conveying conductive substrates connected as deposition electrodes through an electrodeposition coating tank containing an electrocoating bath composition via a conveying means, wherein, in the event of a shutdown of the conveying means, all the substrates not in motion and immersed in the electrodeposition coating tank are, at the latest after a brief de-energized interruption, completely coated while ensuring at least the nominal deposition period at the nominal deposition voltage, and then the completely coated, still immersed substrates not in motion remain de-energized in the electrodeposition coating tank and when the conveying means has restarted, the substrates remain de-energized until reaching the end of the electrodeposition coating tank and are removed therefrom. [0008]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
  • The phrase “at least the nominal deposition period” is used in the description and the claims. The nominal deposition period is the period of time that is specified for a given substrate with a given EDC agent and given EDC parameters in order to achieve a desired nominal layer thickness of the EDC layer. Obviously, the nominal deposition period has a certain tolerance range with a minimum deposition period, below which the period must not fall, and a maximum deposition period. While the minimum deposition period is an absolute minimum, it is less problematic from a technical standpoint if the maximum deposition period is exceeded. [0009]
  • The “conveying means” used to transport substrates to be electrocoated through an EDC process may be a belt and hereinafter, for brevity, will be referred to as a “belt”. [0010]
  • The process according to the invention may be used with success both in anodic electrodeposition (AED) coating and in the more widespread, preferred cathodic electrodeposition (CED) coating process. [0011]
  • In contrast with the prior art, in the process according to the invention, when the EDC process is interrupted, the immersed substrates, which, due to the associated belt shutdown, are not in motion and in the incompletely coated state are not left for an extended period in a de-energized state or only provided with a holding voltage. Instead, at the latest after a brief de-energized interruption, the coating process for the substrates not in motion is taken to completion. For example, at the latest after a 5 minute de-energized interruption, but preferably sooner, the nominal deposition voltage is reapplied. Reapplication of the nominal deposition voltage may proceed manually or automatically at the desired time, for example, by automatically recording the time that has elapsed since the beginning of a belt shutdown. It is convenient to ramp up the nominal deposition voltage with current limitation in order to avoid current peaks. [0012]
  • Particularly preferably, the nominal deposition voltage is simply applied without interruption until at least the nominal deposition period has been achieved. Once at least the nominal deposition period has been achieved, the electrical power may be shut off manually or automatically, for example, by automatically recording the time that has elapsed since the beginning of a belt shutdown. [0013]
  • The nominal deposition voltage is or remains applied until at least the nominal deposition period at the nominal deposition voltage is achieved for each of the immersed substrates not in motion. To this end, the nominal deposition voltage for that substrate immersed in the immersion zone of the continuous EDC plant is applied at least until the intended nominal deposition period is achieved. The nominal deposition period may, however, be exceeded by, for example, up to 100%, for example to offset any redissolution of previously deposited EDC. If the nominal deposition period is, for example, 3 minutes and if the first substrate located in the immersion zone has been connected as deposition electrode at the nominal deposition voltage for, for example, 1 minute prior to the belt shutdown, the nominal deposition voltage is or remains applied to the immersed substrates not in motion for approximately 2 minutes, so achieving the nominal deposition period in this manner. As a result of this procedure, the nominal deposition period for the other substrates also not in motion and in the immersed state that are located in the middle of the tank or in the removal zone is exceeded. However, exceeding the nominal deposition period has no disadvantageous consequences upon the surface of the EDC layer; the EDC process is ultimately self-limiting due to the electrically insulating properties of the deposited EDC layer. It may merely be the case that the EDC layer of the substrates for which the nominal deposition period has been exceeded has a somewhat greater layer thickness than intended. This is, however, not disadvantageous. Once at least the nominal deposition period for all the immersed substrates not in motion has been achieved in this manner, the electrical power is turned off. [0014]
  • During undisturbed operation of a continuous EDC plant, the nominal deposition period is inevitably obtained as a result of the length of the EDC tank, the arrangement of the counter-electrodes and the belt speed at which the substrates to be coated pass through the EDC tank. The nominal deposition period is, for example, 2 to 5 minutes, while the nominal deposition voltage is, for example, 200 to 500 V. [0015]
  • Once the interruption is over or the belt is restarted, the substrates which have been completely ED coated while not in motion are conveyed in a de-energized state through the EDC tank, removed from the bath, rinsed in the conventional manner with EDC ultrafiltrate and/or deionized water and introduced into the curing process, in particular a baking process. Only once the last substrate, i.e. the substrate immersed at the immersion zone of the EDC tank during the belt shutdown, has been removed from the electrocoating bath the electrical power is turned back on for the purpose of ED coating of the following substrates. In this case too, it is convenient to ramp up the nominal deposition voltage with current limitation. [0016]
  • The nominal deposition period is not achieved for all the substrates following the substrates that have been conveyed through and removed from the EDC tank in the de-energized state. This is because the immediately following substrates were immersed into the EDC tank in the de-energized state and have passed through the EDC tank for a greater or lesser distance in the de-energized state before the electrical power was turned back on. In other words, in particular the EDC layer of the immediately following substrates may exhibit a lower thickness. It may accordingly be convenient, when the electrical power is turned back on, to halt the belt again for an appropriate period in order to achieve in this manner at least the nominal deposition period for the following substrates. Thereafter, the continuous EDC plant may be further operated under normal conditions without either turning off the electrical power or shutting down the belt. [0017]
  • The process according to the invention may be operated as above if the EDC material used is not excessively susceptible to redissolution. It is preferred to use EDC agents that have a low susceptibility to redissolution. For example, an EDC layer deposited to the nominal layer thickness should not be more than 25% redissolved by spending 20 minutes in the de-energized state in the EDC bath. Such a low level of redissolution is prior art for today's EDC agents, in particular for preferred CED coating agents. [0018]
  • Excessive redissolution of the deposited EDC layer from the substrate immersed in the EDC bath in the de-energized state may occur if the belt shutdown after completion of ED coating of the immersed substrates not in motion is of very long duration, for example longer than 60 minutes, and/or if an EDC agent which is highly susceptible to redissolution has been used. If, after completion of ED coating of the immersed substrates not in motion, excessive redissolution of the EDC layer has occurred, the substrates, after removal from the bath in the de-energized state, are treated exactly as described above, but are not baked. They are not scrap because, either after being stripped or still provided with the excessively thin, uncured EDC layer, they can be reintroduced into the EDC process together with uncoated new substrates. [0019]
  • The process according to the invention is particularly useful for ED coating of substrates having large proportions of horizontal surfaces or substrates to which stringent coating quality requirements are applied. Examples of such substrates are automotive bodies and parts thereof, metal furniture and agricultural machinery. In comparison with prior art processes, both the reworking and the scrap rates may be distinctly reduced by the process according to the invention. In the Examples, the conditions prevailing in a continuous CED plant are replicated in a batch operated CED bath. [0020]
  • EXAMPLES
  • Metal test sheets bent into an L shape were coated in a CED coating bath with a solids content of 16 wt- % (Herberts Aqua-EC 3000, R 39855.1 from DuPont Performance Coatings GmbH & Co. KG) in accordance with the coating conditions stated in Table 1 at a bath temperature of 30° C. and a deposition voltage of 240 V, were then removed from the bath, rinsed with deionized water and baked for 25 minutes at 175° C. [0021]
    TABLE 1
    Coating result on
    Example Coating conditions horizontal surfaces
    1 1 min electrodeposition/30 min de- Not OK
    energized/2 min electrodeposition
    2 1 min electrodeposition/30 min at 30 V Not OK
    holding voltage/2 min electrodeposition
    3 30 min de-energized/3 min Not OK
    electrodeposition
    4 3 min electrodeposition/30 min de- OK
    energized
    5 1 min electrodeposition/2 min de- OK
    energized/2 min electrodeposition
  • Examples 1 to 3 are Comparative Examples. Examples 4 and 5 correspond to the process according to the invention. [0022]

Claims (4)

What is claimed is:
1. A process for electrodeposition coating electrically conductive substrates in continuous electrodeposition coating plants by conveying conductive substrates connected as deposition electrodes through an electrodeposition tank containing an electrocoating bath via a conveying means, wherein, in the event of a shutdown of the conveying means, all the substrates not in motion and immersed in the electrodeposition coating tank are, at the latest after a brief de-energized interruption, completely coated while ensuring at least the nominal deposition period at the nominal deposition voltage, and then the completely coated, still immersed substrates not in motion remain de-energized in the electrodeposition coating tank and, when the conveying means has restarted, the substrates remain de-energized until reaching the end of the electrodeposition coating tank and are removed therefrom.
2. The process according to claim 1, wherein the brief de-energized interruption is no longer than 5 minutes.
3. The process according to claim 1, wherein electrodeposition coating of the substrates not in motion and immersed in the electrocoating bath is taken to completion without interruption.
4. The process according to claim 1, wherein the electrically conductive substrates comprise substrates selected from the group consisting of automotive bodies, automotive body parts, metal furniture and agricultural machinery.
US09/906,166 2001-07-16 2001-07-16 Electrodeposition coating process in continuous electrodeposition coating plants Abandoned US20030015430A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/906,166 US20030015430A1 (en) 2001-07-16 2001-07-16 Electrodeposition coating process in continuous electrodeposition coating plants
EP02012987A EP1277855A1 (en) 2001-07-16 2002-06-12 Electrodeposition coating process in continuous electrodeposition coating plants

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/906,166 US20030015430A1 (en) 2001-07-16 2001-07-16 Electrodeposition coating process in continuous electrodeposition coating plants

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030015430A1 true US20030015430A1 (en) 2003-01-23

Family

ID=25422028

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/906,166 Abandoned US20030015430A1 (en) 2001-07-16 2001-07-16 Electrodeposition coating process in continuous electrodeposition coating plants

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20030015430A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1277855A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030126223A1 (en) * 2001-12-31 2003-07-03 Maxxan Systems, Inc. Buffer to buffer credit flow control for computer network
US20050232269A1 (en) * 2001-10-26 2005-10-20 Maxxan Systems, Inc. System, apparatus and method for address forwarding for a computer network

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5541953A (en) * 1978-09-18 1980-03-25 Mazda Motor Corp Current supplying method in cation type electrodeposition coating
JPS6024195B2 (en) * 1980-05-28 1985-06-11 マツダ株式会社 Cationic electrodeposition coating method

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050232269A1 (en) * 2001-10-26 2005-10-20 Maxxan Systems, Inc. System, apparatus and method for address forwarding for a computer network
US20030126223A1 (en) * 2001-12-31 2003-07-03 Maxxan Systems, Inc. Buffer to buffer credit flow control for computer network

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1277855A1 (en) 2003-01-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3328197A (en) Mechanical plating
EP2019154A1 (en) Electrolytic copper plating method, phosphorous copper anode for electrolytic copper plating method, and semiconductor wafer having low particle adhesion plated with said method and anode
EP0255268B1 (en) Method for electrodeposition coating
US20030015430A1 (en) Electrodeposition coating process in continuous electrodeposition coating plants
JPH0841679A (en) Electrogalvannealed steel sheet having excellent appearance
JPS63317699A (en) Pretreatment of metallic plating
KR102245912B1 (en) Method for decreasing particle in arc coating process and sputtering apparatus having coating by this method
KR101679407B1 (en) Electro deposition coating method and apparatus for stainless steel 304 sheet having excellent surface properties
JP6851548B2 (en) A method of electrodepositing a zinc-nickel alloy layer on at least the substrate to be treated
JP3293598B2 (en) Plating apparatus and method for preventing displacement precipitation
CN112342551A (en) Surface strengthening treatment process for automobile parts
JP2842700B2 (en) Pretreatment method for coating Al-based plate for automobile body
KR20140043199A (en) Apparatus for manufacuring non-melting positive electrode for electro galvanic process and metod for thereof
KR101679409B1 (en) Electro deposition coating method and apparatus for stainless steel 430 sheet having excellent surface properties
CN117448918A (en) Electrophoresis coloring process for aluminum profile
JPS61170595A (en) Manufacture of galvanized steel sheet
KR960004779B1 (en) Method for making a continuous zn-fe alloy electroplating steel plate
CN113279024A (en) Method for removing scratches on surface of aluminum alloy
KR20020071116A (en) Chrome plating gig
JPH05125591A (en) Formation of black oxide film on copper wire
KR20010036918A (en) Method for electroplating cold rolled steel
CN115725919A (en) Method for controlling zinc in acid-containing wastewater in workpiece hot galvanizing process
JPS6187898A (en) Coating method by electrodeposition
SU1514828A1 (en) Installation for chemical nickel-plating
JPH08225996A (en) Workpiece holder

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, DELAWARE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FROWEIN, RONALD;KLEIN, KLAUSJOERG;REEL/FRAME:012194/0895;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010730 TO 20010731

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION