US20020095225A1 - Mass flow controller automation method and related system - Google Patents
Mass flow controller automation method and related system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20020095225A1 US20020095225A1 US09/727,653 US72765300A US2002095225A1 US 20020095225 A1 US20020095225 A1 US 20020095225A1 US 72765300 A US72765300 A US 72765300A US 2002095225 A1 US2002095225 A1 US 2002095225A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- mfc
- controlling device
- automatically controlled
- parameters
- fuzzy
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D7/00—Control of flow
- G05D7/06—Control of flow characterised by the use of electric means
- G05D7/0617—Control of flow characterised by the use of electric means specially adapted for fluid materials
- G05D7/0629—Control of flow characterised by the use of electric means specially adapted for fluid materials characterised by the type of regulator means
- G05D7/0635—Control of flow characterised by the use of electric means specially adapted for fluid materials characterised by the type of regulator means by action on throttling means
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S706/00—Data processing: artificial intelligence
- Y10S706/902—Application using ai with detail of the ai system
- Y10S706/903—Control
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T137/00—Fluid handling
- Y10T137/0318—Processes
- Y10T137/0324—With control of flow by a condition or characteristic of a fluid
- Y10T137/0368—By speed of fluid
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T137/00—Fluid handling
- Y10T137/7722—Line condition change responsive valves
- Y10T137/7758—Pilot or servo controlled
- Y10T137/7761—Electrically actuated valve
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for enhancing the controlling function of a mass flow controller (MFC) controlling device and for automation thereof and further relates to a corresponding system.
- MFC mass flow controller
- a conventional MFC controlling device mostly uses a PI or PID controller.
- the controlling device works by manual adjusting with parameters that are set empirically, based on response signals of a measured gas flow which are combined.
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a manually adjusted PI controller of a conventional MFC controlling device.
- manually adjusted control parameters 3 are applied to the MFC controlling device.
- Response characteristics 4 of the MFC are measured, like rise time, settling time and overshoot.
- These steps are repeated until a judgment whether pressure values and gas flow rates have been completely settled 6 is done in the positive, which finishes the process.
- This conventional process has an inner and an outer loop, with parameters that often contradict each other and are difficult to harmonize. Therefore the conventional method of manual control parameters is difficult to perform, inefficient and slow, leaving the quality of produced articles hard to control.
- a conventional MFC controlling device has the following three grave disadvantages:
- MFC valve exhaust Basically, an MFC controlling device has to be adapted to pressures of 8-50 psi for regular operation.
- an MFC valve has characteristics which naturally vary with changes of working gas pressure and flow. Therefore, only after having passed through all kinds of pressure and flow values and through several measurement cycles, control parameters will arrive at suitable values. Occasionally, manual empirically based parameters take a lot of time and still do not find suitable values. Under economic constraints, often discarding the MFC state has to be considered, which is wasteful.
- Another object of the present invention is to provide a process for generating parameters in a mass flow controller controlling device which needs no manual adjusting, working automatically, so as to increase production rates and reduce costs.
- the present invention completely resolves the three disadvantages of conventional MFC controlling devices, offering as a main advantage a good economical effect of the MFC valve.
- FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the MFC controlling device automation method of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a conventional MFC controlling device using manually adjusted PI control.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of the automation system for the MFC controlling device of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a diagram of the open loop of the MFC system.
- FIG. 5 is a plot of the response signal in stages of the open loop of the MFC controlling device.
- FIG. 6 is a diagram of the model of the open loop of the MFC controlling device.
- FIG. 7 is a plot of the response of the MFC controlling device at a pressure of 50 psi and different flow rates, using various PI parameters.
- FIG. 8 is a diagram of the control system of the MFC controlling device.
- FIG. 9 is a functional diagram of the functions A 1 , B j and C k .
- FIG. 10 is a diagram of establishing of the fuzzy data table.
- FIG. 11 is a plot of a response measurement at a flow rate of 200 sccm, using the method of the present invention.
- FIG. 12 is a plot of a response measurement at a flow rate of 200 sccm, using a single PI controller.
- FIG. 13 is a plot of a response measurement at a flow rate of 200 sccm, using a single PI controller.
- FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the MFC controlling device automation method of the present invention.
- a given gas pressure 11 is converted to an input of a single-stage voltage to a valve-driving electric circuit 12 , so as to fix a valve at a degree of opening for a certain flow rate.
- a flow rate detector of the MFC controlling device gives out a flow rate signal.
- MFC open loop system model parameters 13 are calculated.
- control parameters 14 for an MFC PI controller are obtained. From there, by passing a judgment 15 at various gas pressure values and flow rates, performing the above steps automatically generates a set of different PI parameters.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of the automation system for the MFC controlling device of the present invention.
- a personal computer 21 controls via an RS 232 interface 22 or another connection an automatic electronic pressure regulator 23 for regulating a gas pressure source 24 .
- the personal computer 21 issues via the RS 232 interface 22 or another connection a single-stage voltage AA, which is input to an MFC valve-driving electric circuit 25 , controlling a voltage-driven valve 251 .
- a valve gate 252 at the voltage-driven valve 251 reacts accordingly with a proportional fixed degree of opening BB and a gas flow rate.
- a flow detecting device 253 changes in the flow rate are known and become input data of the valve-driving electric circuit 25 .
- Monitoring of the actual gas flow is performed by a flow controlling device 27 , mounted at a gas conduit 26 of the MFC controlling device and controlled by the personal computer 21 via the RS 232 interface 22 or another connection.
- the personal computer 21 uses these monitoring data and an identification technique, to calculate the MFC open loop system model parameters 13 .
- the personal computer 21 using a dominant pole-placement method as a calculating model, obtains required control parameters 14 for the MFC PI controller.
- the personal computer 21 automatically controls the electronic pressure regulator 23 to set a different gas pressure and a different voltage AB in a new step, controlling the voltage-driven valve 251 .
- the above steps of the flow are repeated.
- a circular process results, and various sets of PI control parameters at different flow rates and pressures are obtained.
- the personal computer 21 After having acquired all PI control parameters within a pressure range of 8-50 psi, the personal computer 21 calculates a more refined fuzzy rule data table 16 , based on these sets of PI control parameters and using the fuzzy rule technique. The data of this table are transmitted to the controlling device on the MFC valve-driving electric circuit 25 . Thus creating of the MFC controlling device is completed.
- the flow controlling device 27 is a standard flow controlling device, taking a flow value as a known standard, which is a base for correcting all system parameters, and serves as the main agent for collecting flow data for the personal computer 21 .
- the present invention uses the SMM method [1] for obtaining parameters.
- z ⁇ 1 is a delay work factor
- ⁇ is the delay time
- ⁇ 0 , ⁇ 1 , ⁇ 1 , ⁇ 2 are system model parameters.
- the delay time is directly obtained from measured signals, and the model parameters are calculated using the SMM method.
- FIG. 4 is an MFC open loop diagram 30 , comprising the MFC valve-driving electric circuit 25 , the valve gate 252 , a flow detector element 2531 , and a detector circuit 2532 .
- the system identification technique thereof is constituted by using an input signal x(n) shown in the Figure and a measurement output signal w(n) to calculate the delay time ⁇ and the system parameters ⁇ 0 , ⁇ 1 , ⁇ 1 , ⁇ 2 .
- FIG. 5 shows a typical response signal in stages of the MFC open loop.
- FIG. 6 is a diagram of a typical model of the MFC open loop. Actually measured signals give evidence of a time delay and of two stages, which are suitable for establishing the MFC open loop.
- G C (z) K P + K I ⁇ T S ⁇ ( 1 + Z - 1 ) 2 ⁇ ( 1 - Z - 1 )
- K P and K I are PI control parameters
- T S is the sample time.
- H(z) is the system model obtained by the system identification technique and the delay system.
- FIG. 7 shows the response of the MFC controlling device at a pressure of 50 psi and different flow rates, using various PI parameters. Shown therein are flow rate signals, measured at a pressure of 50 psi and flow rates of 20, 50, 100, 150 and 200 sccm and obtained by taking each of the open loop model parameters by the system identification technique and using the closed loop system formed by the determined PI controller parameters. From this FIG. it is known that, for the MFC control system determined by this method, the speed of response is high, the settling time is small, and there is no overshoot, fulfilling demands of industry.
- FIG. 8 shows the control system of the MFC controlling device. Due to different pressure values and flow rates, various PI control devices result. However, in practice, the large number of PI control devices actually obtained lead to difficulties and too high costs. Therefore, the present invention employs a fuzzy logic technique embodied in a fuzzy control device 40 to combine various control devices, so that response characteristics thereof approach the response of the many PI control devices. Thus the above problem is solved.
- FIG. 9 is a functional diagram of the functions A l , B j and C k .
- the present system from e(n), d(n), p(n) takes the functions shown in FIG. 9 to perform fuzzification.
- the fuzzy rule data table is taken to obtain by a center-of-gravity method an output value u(n). From this, by passing a weighting device 41 , a controller output value y(n) is evaluated.
- FIG. 10 is a diagram of establishing of the fuzzy data table. Establishing of the fuzzy data table is done by calculating the PI controller from different flow rates and pressure values. This method is shown in FIG. 10. The following calculation is used:
- e 1 is an error value
- d j is a difference of error values
- p k is the pressure value
- K P and K I are average values of PI parameters obtained by the dominant pole-placement method while the pressure value is p k and the response of the open loop system is e i , d j .
- the result u(n) of the fuzzy calculation is calculated using a center-of-gravity method, the functions A l , B j and C k which correspond to e(n), d(n), p(n) and the fuzzy rule data table.
- the controlling device output y(n) is obtained from u(n) by consulting the weighting device (see FIG. 8).
- FIG. 11 shows a response measurement at a flow rate of 200 sccm, using the method of the present invention.
- FIGS. 12 and 13 show a response measurement at a flow rate of 200 sccm, using a single PI controller. Comparing FIGS. 11 and 12 reveals that the PI control parameters of FIG. 12 generate a smooth response, but at low flow rates response is slow. The PI control parameters of FIG. 13 generate a fast response, but at high flow rates response is not smooth. Comparing FIGS. 11, 12 and 13 clearly shows the improved response behavior ensured by the controlling device of the present invention.
- the MFC controlling device brought forward by the present invention encompasses measurements of gas pressure. If, however, a gas pressure measuring apparatus is lacking, a similar fuzzy controlling device is usable. If values of relatively high gas pressures are used, then the steps of the present invention still result in a better controlling device than a pure single PI controller. Simply said, using the present invention will effectively enhance and improve the function and production rate of MFC controlling devices.
- the present invention mainly uses an identification technique and a dominant pole-placement method to determine control parameters, further employs fuzzy theory to combine control parameters, generating method and steps of an MFC controlling device.
- the mass flow controller controlling device automation method and related system of the present invention is easily realized, simply designed and effects an enhanced production rate. MFC measurement response capabilities are enlarged, cost is reduced, and production rates are raised.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Feedback Control In General (AREA)
Abstract
An MFC controlling device automation method and related system. The method mainly comprises the steps of automatically controlled algorithmic obtaining of MFC open loop system parameters by an identification technique; automatically controlled algorithmic determining of PI control parameters by a dominant pole-placement method; and automatically controlled calculating of a fuzzy logic rule table. The steps form an automatically controlled single closed loop. By performing said steps, multiple PI control parameter sets are obtainable fast and in an automatic way, and a calculation is done to form a refined fuzzy rule data table, so that a greatly enhanced MFC reaction function is attained.
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates to a method for enhancing the controlling function of a mass flow controller (MFC) controlling device and for automation thereof and further relates to a corresponding system.
- 2. Description of Related Art
- A conventional MFC controlling device mostly uses a PI or PID controller. The controlling device works by manual adjusting with parameters that are set empirically, based on response signals of a measured gas flow which are combined.
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a manually adjusted PI controller of a conventional MFC controlling device. At a given
pressure 1 and a givenflow rate 2, manually adjustedcontrol parameters 3 are applied to the MFC controlling device.Response characteristics 4 of the MFC are measured, like rise time, settling time and overshoot. Only after passing a judgment whether all parameters match a standard 5 in the positive, further conditions of the pressure and gas flow are determined, and equal manually adjustedcontrol parameters 3 are applied. These steps are repeated until a judgment whether pressure values and gas flow rates have been completely settled 6 is done in the positive, which finishes the process. This conventional process has an inner and an outer loop, with parameters that often contradict each other and are difficult to harmonize. Therefore the conventional method of manual control parameters is difficult to perform, inefficient and slow, leaving the quality of produced articles hard to control. To summarize, a conventional MFC controlling device has the following three grave disadvantages: - 1. When the conventional method of manual control parameters is applied to an MFC controlling device, manual measurements have to be performed repeatedly and adjustments need to be done in a complicated process. Therefore, appropriate adjusting of control parameters in a method using a conventional MFC controlling device requires a lot of time and effort. Simply said, a method using a conventional MFC controlling device is inefficient and not economical.
- 2. Generation of MFC valve exhaust: Basically, an MFC controlling device has to be adapted to pressures of 8-50 psi for regular operation. However, in practice, an MFC valve has characteristics which naturally vary with changes of working gas pressure and flow. Therefore, only after having passed through all kinds of pressure and flow values and through several measurement cycles, control parameters will arrive at suitable values. Occasionally, manual empirically based parameters take a lot of time and still do not find suitable values. Under economic constraints, often discarding the MFC state has to be considered, which is wasteful.
- 3. Poor capacity of the MFC controlling device: Since the MFC valve has changing characteristics under varying gas pressure and flow, using a manually control led MFC controlling device even at great effort often implies only one or two sets of PID control parameters. Therefore, the response characteristics of a manually controlled MFC controlling device in practice do not warrant generating and maintaining good controlling behavior under various working flows and pressures. For these reasons, the control characteristics of conventional MFC controlling devices need to be improved.
- It is an object of the present invention to provide a mass flow controller controlling device automation method and related system which combines an identification technique and fuzzy theory, so as to achieve an enhanced controlling function of the mass flow controller as well as an increased economical effect thereof.
- Another object of the present invention is to provide a process for generating parameters in a mass flow controller controlling device which needs no manual adjusting, working automatically, so as to increase production rates and reduce costs.
- By achieving the above objects, the present invention completely resolves the three disadvantages of conventional MFC controlling devices, offering as a main advantage a good economical effect of the MFC valve.
- The present invention can be more fully understood by reference to the following description and accompanying drawings.
- FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the MFC controlling device automation method of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a conventional MFC controlling device using manually adjusted PI control.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of the automation system for the MFC controlling device of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a diagram of the open loop of the MFC system.
- FIG. 5 is a plot of the response signal in stages of the open loop of the MFC controlling device.
- FIG. 6 is a diagram of the model of the open loop of the MFC controlling device.
- FIG. 7 is a plot of the response of the MFC controlling device at a pressure of 50 psi and different flow rates, using various PI parameters.
- FIG. 8 is a diagram of the control system of the MFC controlling device.
- FIG. 9 is a functional diagram of the functions A1, Bj and Ck.
- FIG. 10 is a diagram of establishing of the fuzzy data table.
- FIG. 11 is a plot of a response measurement at a flow rate of 200 sccm, using the method of the present invention.
- FIG. 12 is a plot of a response measurement at a flow rate of 200 sccm, using a single PI controller.
- FIG. 13 is a plot of a response measurement at a flow rate of 200 sccm, using a single PI controller.
- FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the MFC controlling device automation method of the present invention. A given
gas pressure 11 is converted to an input of a single-stage voltage to a valve-drivingelectric circuit 12, so as to fix a valve at a degree of opening for a certain flow rate. In a measurement, a flow rate detector of the MFC controlling device gives out a flow rate signal. Using an identification technique, MFC open loopsystem model parameters 13 are calculated. After that, using a dominant pole-placement method,control parameters 14 for an MFC PI controller are obtained. From there, by passing ajudgment 15 at various gas pressure values and flow rates, performing the above steps automatically generates a set of different PI parameters. After the judgment whether all measurements of gas pressure values and flow rates have been finished 15 is done in the positive, these control parameter values are calculated by a fuzzy theory technique to create a fuzzy rule data table 16. As shown in FIG. 1, the flow in the MFC controlling device automation method of the present invention has been improved, containing just a single closed loop. Moreover, the MFC controlling device works with a process that does mot require manual adjusting. Thus all processes are automatic. - FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of the automation system for the MFC controlling device of the present invention. A
personal computer 21 controls via anRS 232interface 22 or another connection an automaticelectronic pressure regulator 23 for regulating agas pressure source 24. Thepersonal computer 21 issues via theRS 232interface 22 or another connection a single-stage voltage AA, which is input to an MFC valve-drivingelectric circuit 25, controlling a voltage-drivenvalve 251. Avalve gate 252 at the voltage-drivenvalve 251 reacts accordingly with a proportional fixed degree of opening BB and a gas flow rate. By aflow detecting device 253, changes in the flow rate are known and become input data of the valve-drivingelectric circuit 25. Monitoring of the actual gas flow is performed by aflow controlling device 27, mounted at agas conduit 26 of the MFC controlling device and controlled by thepersonal computer 21 via theRS 232interface 22 or another connection. Thepersonal computer 21 uses these monitoring data and an identification technique, to calculate the MFC open loopsystem model parameters 13. After that, thepersonal computer 21, using a dominant pole-placement method as a calculating model, obtains requiredcontrol parameters 14 for the MFC PI controller. Then thepersonal computer 21 automatically controls theelectronic pressure regulator 23 to set a different gas pressure and a different voltage AB in a new step, controlling the voltage-drivenvalve 251. The above steps of the flow are repeated. Thus a circular process results, and various sets of PI control parameters at different flow rates and pressures are obtained. After having acquired all PI control parameters within a pressure range of 8-50 psi, thepersonal computer 21 calculates a more refined fuzzy rule data table 16, based on these sets of PI control parameters and using the fuzzy rule technique. The data of this table are transmitted to the controlling device on the MFC valve-drivingelectric circuit 25. Thus creating of the MFC controlling device is completed. Theflow controlling device 27 is a standard flow controlling device, taking a flow value as a known standard, which is a base for correcting all system parameters, and serves as the main agent for collecting flow data for thepersonal computer 21. - Obtaining the MFC model parameters is possible by utilizing various identification techniques. The present invention uses the SMM method [1] for obtaining parameters. The present invention employs a delay system forming two stages to establish a realistic response model of the MFC, with the following mathematical formula:
- where z−1 is a delay work factor, γ is the delay time, and α0, α1, β1, β2 are system model parameters. The delay time is directly obtained from measured signals, and the model parameters are calculated using the SMM method.
- FIG. 4 is an MFC open loop diagram30, comprising the MFC valve-driving
electric circuit 25, thevalve gate 252, aflow detector element 2531, and adetector circuit 2532. The system identification technique thereof is constituted by using an input signal x(n) shown in the Figure and a measurement output signal w(n) to calculate the delay time γ and the system parameters α0, α1, β1, β2. - FIG. 5 shows a typical response signal in stages of the MFC open loop. FIG. 6 is a diagram of a typical model of the MFC open loop. Actually measured signals give evidence of a time delay and of two stages, which are suitable for establishing the MFC open loop.
-
- where KP and KI, are PI control parameters, and TS is the sample time. A dominant pole-placement method determines the values of KP and KI, so as to place a pole Zd=r e±jθ as a zero of a closed-loop function. This yields
- 1+G C(z)H(z)Z=Zd=0
- where H(z) is the system model obtained by the system identification technique and the delay system. By determining the parameters KP and KI using this method, the poles of the MFC closed loop control system take the determined positions. Thus positions of dominant poles are chosen, so that the response characteristics are as required. Since the MFC open loop is subject to various pressure values and voltage values of different stages, the model parameters obtained by the system identification technique vary, as well. Therefore, the PI control parameters determined at equal poles will be not equal, too.
- FIG. 7 shows the response of the MFC controlling device at a pressure of 50 psi and different flow rates, using various PI parameters. Shown therein are flow rate signals, measured at a pressure of 50 psi and flow rates of 20, 50, 100, 150 and 200 sccm and obtained by taking each of the open loop model parameters by the system identification technique and using the closed loop system formed by the determined PI controller parameters. From this FIG. it is known that, for the MFC control system determined by this method, the speed of response is high, the settling time is small, and there is no overshoot, fulfilling demands of industry.
- FIG. 8 shows the control system of the MFC controlling device. Due to different pressure values and flow rates, various PI control devices result. However, in practice, the large number of PI control devices actually obtained lead to difficulties and too high costs. Therefore, the present invention employs a fuzzy logic technique embodied in a
fuzzy control device 40 to combine various control devices, so that response characteristics thereof approach the response of the many PI control devices. Thus the above problem is solved. - The present system first generates the difference of a determined flow rate s(n) and a measured flow rate x(n), yielding e(n)=d(n)−x(n), then the difference value d(n)=e(n)−e(n−1), and the measured pressure value p(n).
- FIG. 9 is a functional diagram of the functions Al, Bj and Ck. After obtaining the above values, the present system from e(n), d(n), p(n) takes the functions shown in FIG. 9 to perform fuzzification. Then, from the fuzzified output values Al, Bj and Ck the fuzzy rule data table is taken to obtain by a center-of-gravity method an output value u(n). From this, by passing a
weighting device 41, a controller output value y(n) is evaluated. - FIG. 10 is a diagram of establishing of the fuzzy data table. Establishing of the fuzzy data table is done by calculating the PI controller from different flow rates and pressure values. This method is shown in FIG. 10. The following calculation is used:
- g(i, j, k)=f(e 1 , d j , P k)=K P(e 1 , d j , p k)e 1 +K I(e 1 , d j , p k)d j
- where e1 is an error value, dj is a difference of error values, pk is the pressure value, and KP and KI are average values of PI parameters obtained by the dominant pole-placement method while the pressure value is pk and the response of the open loop system is ei, dj. The result u(n) of the fuzzy calculation is calculated using a center-of-gravity method, the functions Al, Bj and Ck which correspond to e(n), d(n), p(n) and the fuzzy rule data table. Finally, the controlling device output y(n) is obtained from u(n) by consulting the weighting device (see FIG. 8).
- For comparing results, FIG. 11 shows a response measurement at a flow rate of 200 sccm, using the method of the present invention. FIGS. 12 and 13 show a response measurement at a flow rate of 200 sccm, using a single PI controller. Comparing FIGS. 11 and 12 reveals that the PI control parameters of FIG. 12 generate a smooth response, but at low flow rates response is slow. The PI control parameters of FIG. 13 generate a fast response, but at high flow rates response is not smooth. Comparing FIGS. 11, 12 and13 clearly shows the improved response behavior ensured by the controlling device of the present invention.
- Basically, the MFC controlling device brought forward by the present invention encompasses measurements of gas pressure. If, however, a gas pressure measuring apparatus is lacking, a similar fuzzy controlling device is usable. If values of relatively high gas pressures are used, then the steps of the present invention still result in a better controlling device than a pure single PI controller. Simply said, using the present invention will effectively enhance and improve the function and production rate of MFC controlling devices.
- To sum up, the present invention mainly uses an identification technique and a dominant pole-placement method to determine control parameters, further employs fuzzy theory to combine control parameters, generating method and steps of an MFC controlling device. The mass flow controller controlling device automation method and related system of the present invention is easily realized, simply designed and effects an enhanced production rate. MFC measurement response capabilities are enlarged, cost is reduced, and production rates are raised.
Claims (9)
1. A controlling device automation method in an MFC, comprising the steps of:
a. automatically controlled determining of gas pressure;
b. automatically controlled feeding of a voltage in stages into a valve gate to drive an electric circuit;
c. automatically controlled algorithmic obtaining of MFC open loop system parameters by an identification technique;
d. automatically controlled algorithmic determining of PI control parameters by a dominant pole-placement method;
e. automatic decision control of automatic judging whether measurements of gas flow rates and pressure values to be done have been finished; and
f. automatically controlled calculating of a fuzzy logic rule table;
said steps forming an automatically controlled single closed loop;
wherein by performing said steps multiple PI control parameter sets are obtainable fast and in an automatic way, and a calculation is done to form a refined fuzzy rule data table, so that a greatly enhanced MFC reaction function is attained.
2. A controlling device automation method in a mass flow controller according to claim 1 , wherein said step of automatically controlled algorithmic obtaining of MFC open loop system parameters by an identification technique is performed using a mathematical identification technique as follows:
where γ is a delay time directly obtained by measurement, and α0, α1, β1, β2 are system model parameters obtained by mathematical calculation.
3. A controlling device automation method in a mass flow controller according to claim 1 , wherein said step of automatically controlled algorithmic determining of PI control parameters by a dominant pole-placement method involves a calculation given by
4. A controlling device automation method in a mass flow controller according to claim 1 , wherein said step of automatically controlled calculating of a fuzzy logic rule table uses a model given by
g(i, j, k)=f(e i , d j , P k)=K P(e i , d j , p k)e 1 +K I(e 1 , d j , p k)d j
5. A controlling device automation method in a mass flow controller according to claim 4 , wherein KP and KI in said model used by said step of automatically controlled calculating of a fuzzy logic rule table are average values of PI parameters obtained by a dominant pole-placement method, with a pressure value being Pk and open loop system responses being e1, dj.
6. A controlling device automation system in an MFC, comprising:
a computer;
an interface;
an automatic electronic pressure regulator, regulating an output of a gas pressure source, as controlled by said computer via said interface;
an MFC valve-driving electric circuit, controlled by said computer via said interface, with an electric circuit board regulating a degree of opening of a valve gate; and
a flow controlling device, controlled by said computer via said interface, performing data monitoring of actual gas flow, and constituted and assembled by a standard flow controlling device;
wherein said computer, based on each item of monitoring data and using an identification technique, calculates MFC open loop system parameters, furthermore, using a model based on a dominant pole-placement method, calculates PI control parameters and, after having obtained sets of PI control parameters, carrying into effect a fuzzy theory model, calculates a refined fuzzy rule data table, being able to transfer data of said fuzzy rule data table to an MFC controlling device system.
7. A controlling device automation system in an MFC according to claim 6 , wherein said computer is a personal computer.
8. A controlling device automation system in an MFC according to claim 6 , wherein said interface is an RS 232 interface.
9. A controlling device automation system in an MFC according to claim 6 , wherein said standard flow controlling device uses a known flow rate as a standard which serves as a base for correcting system parameters.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/727,653 US6439254B1 (en) | 2000-11-30 | 2000-11-30 | Mass flow controller automation method and related system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/727,653 US6439254B1 (en) | 2000-11-30 | 2000-11-30 | Mass flow controller automation method and related system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20020095225A1 true US20020095225A1 (en) | 2002-07-18 |
US6439254B1 US6439254B1 (en) | 2002-08-27 |
Family
ID=24923471
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/727,653 Expired - Fee Related US6439254B1 (en) | 2000-11-30 | 2000-11-30 | Mass flow controller automation method and related system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6439254B1 (en) |
Cited By (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050037148A1 (en) * | 2003-06-25 | 2005-02-17 | Frezza Michael E. | Gravity regulated method and apparatus for controlling application of a fluid |
US8770215B1 (en) * | 2011-07-20 | 2014-07-08 | Daniel T. Mudd | Low flow injector to deliver a low flow of gas to a remote location |
US9690301B2 (en) | 2012-09-10 | 2017-06-27 | Reno Technologies, Inc. | Pressure based mass flow controller |
US9958302B2 (en) | 2011-08-20 | 2018-05-01 | Reno Technologies, Inc. | Flow control system, method, and apparatus |
US10303189B2 (en) | 2016-06-30 | 2019-05-28 | Reno Technologies, Inc. | Flow control system, method, and apparatus |
US10663337B2 (en) | 2016-12-30 | 2020-05-26 | Ichor Systems, Inc. | Apparatus for controlling flow and method of calibrating same |
US10679880B2 (en) | 2016-09-27 | 2020-06-09 | Ichor Systems, Inc. | Method of achieving improved transient response in apparatus for controlling flow and system for accomplishing same |
US10838437B2 (en) | 2018-02-22 | 2020-11-17 | Ichor Systems, Inc. | Apparatus for splitting flow of process gas and method of operating same |
US11003198B2 (en) | 2011-08-20 | 2021-05-11 | Ichor Systems, Inc. | Controlled delivery of process gas using a remote pressure measurement device |
US11144075B2 (en) | 2016-06-30 | 2021-10-12 | Ichor Systems, Inc. | Flow control system, method, and apparatus |
US11899477B2 (en) | 2021-03-03 | 2024-02-13 | Ichor Systems, Inc. | Fluid flow control system comprising a manifold assembly |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8195312B2 (en) * | 2009-08-27 | 2012-06-05 | Hitachi Metals, Ltd | Multi-mode control loop with improved performance for mass flow controller |
US8265795B2 (en) * | 2009-11-05 | 2012-09-11 | Horiba Stec, Co., Ltd. | Mass flow controller |
US8321060B2 (en) * | 2010-04-27 | 2012-11-27 | Hitachi Metals, Ltd | Method and system of on-tool and on-site MFC optimization providing consistent response |
JP6027395B2 (en) * | 2012-10-29 | 2016-11-16 | 株式会社堀場エステック | Fluid control device |
CN103391015B (en) * | 2013-07-02 | 2015-10-28 | 中国西电电气股份有限公司 | A kind of variable parameter PI regulator parameter method of adjustment |
CN104571149B (en) * | 2014-06-12 | 2017-10-17 | 北京七星华创电子股份有限公司 | Mass flow control appts and control method for the integrated induction system of gas |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5895458A (en) * | 1989-08-31 | 1999-04-20 | Omron Corporation | Apparatus and method in which control rules can be changed during fuzzy reasoning operations and control system and method in which changeover is controlled by fuzzy reasoning |
JP2680459B2 (en) * | 1990-03-07 | 1997-11-19 | 株式会社東芝 | Hydraulic elevator control device |
US5410495A (en) * | 1993-07-20 | 1995-04-25 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Apparatus, systems, and methods for diagnosing anomalous mass flow controller operation |
US6289274B1 (en) * | 1999-08-13 | 2001-09-11 | United Technologies Corporation | Fuzzy logic based fuel flow selection system |
-
2000
- 2000-11-30 US US09/727,653 patent/US6439254B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050037148A1 (en) * | 2003-06-25 | 2005-02-17 | Frezza Michael E. | Gravity regulated method and apparatus for controlling application of a fluid |
US7014724B2 (en) | 2003-06-25 | 2006-03-21 | Lear Corporation | Gravity regulated method and apparatus for controlling application of a fluid |
US8770215B1 (en) * | 2011-07-20 | 2014-07-08 | Daniel T. Mudd | Low flow injector to deliver a low flow of gas to a remote location |
US10782165B2 (en) | 2011-08-20 | 2020-09-22 | Ichor Systems, Inc. | Flow control system, method, and apparatus |
US9958302B2 (en) | 2011-08-20 | 2018-05-01 | Reno Technologies, Inc. | Flow control system, method, and apparatus |
US11003198B2 (en) | 2011-08-20 | 2021-05-11 | Ichor Systems, Inc. | Controlled delivery of process gas using a remote pressure measurement device |
US9690301B2 (en) | 2012-09-10 | 2017-06-27 | Reno Technologies, Inc. | Pressure based mass flow controller |
US10303189B2 (en) | 2016-06-30 | 2019-05-28 | Reno Technologies, Inc. | Flow control system, method, and apparatus |
US10782710B2 (en) | 2016-06-30 | 2020-09-22 | Ichor Systems, Inc. | Flow control system, method, and apparatus |
US11144075B2 (en) | 2016-06-30 | 2021-10-12 | Ichor Systems, Inc. | Flow control system, method, and apparatus |
US11815920B2 (en) | 2016-06-30 | 2023-11-14 | Ichor Systems, Inc. | Flow control system, method, and apparatus |
US10679880B2 (en) | 2016-09-27 | 2020-06-09 | Ichor Systems, Inc. | Method of achieving improved transient response in apparatus for controlling flow and system for accomplishing same |
US11424148B2 (en) | 2016-09-27 | 2022-08-23 | Ichor Systems, Inc. | Method of achieving improved transient response in apparatus for controlling flow and system for accomplishing same |
US10663337B2 (en) | 2016-12-30 | 2020-05-26 | Ichor Systems, Inc. | Apparatus for controlling flow and method of calibrating same |
US10838437B2 (en) | 2018-02-22 | 2020-11-17 | Ichor Systems, Inc. | Apparatus for splitting flow of process gas and method of operating same |
US11899477B2 (en) | 2021-03-03 | 2024-02-13 | Ichor Systems, Inc. | Fluid flow control system comprising a manifold assembly |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6439254B1 (en) | 2002-08-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6439254B1 (en) | Mass flow controller automation method and related system | |
CN100371507C (en) | Control system and method for crystal isodiametric growth | |
EP0948124B1 (en) | Motor controller | |
CN1060915A (en) | The universal process control of using artificial neural networks | |
US20030199997A1 (en) | Scaling and parameterizing a controller | |
US7057366B1 (en) | Method for estimating load inertia and a system for controlling motor speed using inverse model | |
US10918014B2 (en) | Fertilization precision control method for water and fertilizer integrated equipment and control system thereof | |
US6711531B1 (en) | Temperature control simulation method and apparatus | |
CN108227476A (en) | A kind of control method of AGV trolleies | |
CN108071581A (en) | A kind of minitype piezoelectric pump inflation software control method and system | |
CN107228100B (en) | locator | |
CN105785760A (en) | Annealing furnace clean circulation water hardness automatic control system and method thereof | |
CN107191154B (en) | Wellhead back pressure regulating method and device | |
Collins et al. | Automated PI tuning for a weigh belt feeder via unfalsified control | |
JP2003005802A (en) | Controlling method and controller | |
US5432885A (en) | Recurrent fuzzy inference apparatus | |
CN209636313U (en) | CVD method prepares the pressure automatic control system during zinc sulphide | |
JP3800622B2 (en) | Process control method | |
JPH0934503A (en) | Adjustment method for pid controller | |
JPH10171504A (en) | Adjustment device for backlash system controller | |
JPH06131001A (en) | Controller | |
KR100571253B1 (en) | Gas flow contoller having interlock function | |
CN117804044A (en) | PID-based intelligent industrial air regulating method | |
US20060235559A1 (en) | "run-to-run control system and operating method of the same" | |
RU16959U1 (en) | ADAPTIVE CONTROL DEVICE |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE, TAIWAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HUANG, YUNG-JU;CHUNG, YUN-SHENG;WANG, HANN-TSONG;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:011361/0249 Effective date: 20001115 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20140827 |