US20010044850A1 - Method and apparatus for determining the order of streaming modules - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for determining the order of streaming modules Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20010044850A1
US20010044850A1 US09745646 US74564600A US2001044850A1 US 20010044850 A1 US20010044850 A1 US 20010044850A1 US 09745646 US09745646 US 09745646 US 74564600 A US74564600 A US 74564600A US 2001044850 A1 US2001044850 A1 US 2001044850A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
modules
module
client
streaming
application
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US09745646
Inventor
Uri Raz
Yehuda Volk
Shmuel Melamed
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Symantec Corp
Original Assignee
AppStream Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L65/00Network arrangements or protocols for real-time communications
    • H04L65/40Services or applications
    • H04L65/4069Services related to one way streaming
    • H04L65/4092Control of source by destination, e.g. user controlling streaming rate of server
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
    • G06F9/06Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
    • G06F9/44Arrangements for executing specific programs
    • G06F9/445Program loading or initiating
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L29/00Arrangements, apparatus, circuits or systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04L1/00 - H04L27/00 contains provisionally no documents
    • H04L29/02Communication control; Communication processing contains provisionally no documents
    • H04L29/06Communication control; Communication processing contains provisionally no documents characterised by a protocol
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L29/00Arrangements, apparatus, circuits or systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04L1/00 - H04L27/00 contains provisionally no documents
    • H04L29/02Communication control; Communication processing contains provisionally no documents
    • H04L29/06Communication control; Communication processing contains provisionally no documents characterised by a protocol
    • H04L29/0602Protocols characterised by their application
    • H04L29/06027Protocols for multimedia communication
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L65/00Network arrangements or protocols for real-time communications
    • H04L65/40Services or applications
    • H04L65/4069Services related to one way streaming
    • H04L65/4084Content on demand
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L65/00Network arrangements or protocols for real-time communications
    • H04L65/60Media handling, encoding, streaming or conversion
    • H04L65/607Stream encoding details
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications
    • H04L67/34Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications involving the movement of software or configuration parameters

Abstract

A method for determining an order in which to stream modules of an application from a server to a client, where the application uses modules in an execution-time dependent order, employs a predictive model to determine which module transitions are most likely to occur in the future in view of the clients present state in the application and then stream the modules to the client in the determined order. Different sets of transition weights can be used for clients falling into different categories, such as time of application use and age of the user at the client. Additional factors which can be used to select the order to stream the modules include cache utilization at the client and customized streaming orders specified by the user.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE(S) TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119 of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/177,736 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Determining Order of Streaming Modules”, filed on Jan. 21, 2000, the entire contents of which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference. The application is also a continuation-in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/120,575 entitled “Streaming Modules” and filed on Jul. 22, 1998.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    The present invention is related to a method and system for streaming modules from a server to a client and, more particularly, to an improved method and system for predicting the order in which to stream the modules to the client.
  • BACKGROUND
  • [0003]
    In a client-server environment, a client computers can communicate with a server to remotely access information stored at the server. The transfer of information between the server and client computer may be provided using standard protocols and software applications. For example, a hypertext markup language (HTML) browser application at a client computer can communicate over the public Internet using TCP/IP and hypertext transfer protocols (HTTP) to receive web pages from a HTTP server. Web pages may include formatted text as well as multimedia elements, such as embedded graphics and sounds. The multimedia elements may be downloaded by the client and presented to a user by a browser application or a “plug in” browser component. Example browser applications include Netscape Navigator 4.0® and Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0™.
  • [0004]
    Browser applications used at client computers can use plug-in software to receive audio and video information using a streaming data transmission protocol. A streaming protocol allows information to be presented by a client computer as it is being received. For example, full-motion video can be sent from a server to a client as a linear stream of frames. As each frame arrives at the client, it can be displayed to create a real-time full-motion video display. Audio and video streaming allows the client to present information without waiting for the entire stream to arrive at the client application. Audio and video streaming are provided by, for example, the RealAudio® and RealVideo™ applications from RealNetworks, Inc.
  • [0005]
    Browser applications may also make use of executable software applets to enhance the appearance of HTML-based web pages. Applets are software programs that are sent from the server to the client in response to a request from the client. In a typical applet use, HTML-based web pages include HTTP commands that cause a browser application to request an applet from a server and to begin execution of the applet. The applet may thereafter interact with a user to gather and process data, may communicate data across a network, and may display results on a computer output device. Applets may be constructed from a programming language which executes in a run-time environment provided by the browser application at the client computer. For example, the Java® programming language from Sun Microsystems, Inc., allows Java applets to be stored at a web server and attached to web pages for execution by a Java interpreter. Java Applets, may be formed from multiple Java Classes. Java Classes include executable Java code that can be downloaded from a server in response to a dynamically generated request to execute the class (a module execution request). If a Java Class is not available to a Java interpreter when an executing applet attempts to access functionality provided by the Class, the Java interpreter may dynamically retrieve the Class from a server. Other programming languages, such as Microsoft Visual Basic® or Microsoft Visual C++®, may also be used to create applet-like software modules, such as Microsoft ActiveX™ controls.
  • [0006]
    Downloadable applets can also be used to develop large and complex programs. For example, a complex financial program may be constructed from a collection of applets. In such a financial program, separate applets may be used to gather information from a user, compute payments, compute interest, and generate printed reports. As particular program functions are required by a user, the applets associated with the required functions can be retrieved from the server. However, as the size of a software application increases, delays associated with retrieving is modules over a network likewise increase and may be unacceptable to end-users. Consequently, an improvement in the transmission of software modules between computers is desirable.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0007]
    The invention includes methods and systems for streaming data modules between a first and a second computer. The modules may be streamed regardless of the existence of a “natural” order among the modules. For example, unlike streaming applications that rely on a natural linear ordering of data to determine the data stream contents, the disclosed streaming mechanism is not constrained to operate according to a linear data ordering. Instead, streamed data modules are selected using predetermined criteria that can be independent of the particular data content.
  • [0008]
    In an exemplary application, the disclosed streaming mechanism can provide user-dependent streaming of software modules. For example, a home banking application may include modules #1 through #5. A first banking application user may, based on the user's input choices at a menu screen, access the modules in the order 1-3-4-5 while a second user may access the modules in the order 2-4-1. For such a banking application, the predetermined criteria used to determine a streaming sequence may detail each user's module usage pattern. Predetermined criteria associated with the application's users may indicate a preferred streaming sequence 1-3-4-5 when the first user is accessing the banking application but may indicate the preferred sequence 2-4-1 when the second user is accessing the application. The streamed sequence may therefore conform to a historical user-dependent access pattern. Other types of predetermined criteria may also be used. The disclosed streaming mechanism may also be use to stream non-executable data such as hypertext markup language data, binary graphics, and text.
  • [0009]
    In general, in one aspect, the invention features a computer-implemented method of transmitting modules from a first computer to a second computer. At the first computer, a module set is formed by selecting a sequence of modules from a collection of available modules. Each of the selected modules are associated with an application executing at the second computer. The selected modules may be transparently streamed from the first computer to the second computer. The selection of modules is made in accordance with predetermined selection criteria and is independent of the second computer's execution environment.
  • [0010]
    Implementations of the invention may include one or more of the following features. A module may include non-executable data, such as hypertext markup language data, and/or program code. The selection criteria may be stored in a streaming control database. The streaming control database may include transition records associating weighted values with transitions between selected modules in the collection. Processing of transition record information, such as by using a path determination algorithm, may be used to determine the sequence of modules. The streaming control database may include list records each of which identifies a predetermined sequences of modules. Selection of modules may be made by selecting a list record. Selecting a sequence of modules may include sending data from the second computer to the first computer to identify each module in the sequence or to identify the status of the executing application. For example, data identifying the status may include a series of user input values.
  • [0011]
    Implementations may also include one or more of the following features. Streaming of the module set may be interrupted, a second sequence determined, and streaming of the second sequence may occur. The streaming of the module set may be interrupted by a request for a particular module that is sent from the second computer to the first computer. For example, a Java Applet may interrupt a stream of Java Classes by attempting to access a Java Class that has not already been streamed to the second computer. A sequence of modules may be streamed and stored at the second computer independent of the executing application. That is, the executing application need not initiate streaming and need not be aware of the streaming process. Streamed modules may be subsequently integrated with the application at the second computer by interconnecting logic in a streamed module with logic in the application.
  • [0012]
    Implementations may also include one or more of the following features. The application may include an interrupt statement. Execution of the interrupt statement may transfer control to an executor program. The executor program functions in the manner of a program code debugger by responding to the interrupt statement and preventing the permanent cessation (termination) of the executing application process. The executor program may thereafter integrate logic in a streamed module with the application's logic by replacing the interrupt statement (generally, as part of a block of replacement logic) with replacement logic from the streamed module. The application may thereafter continue executing, generally by executing replacement logic that has been substituted for the interrupt statement. The application may also include a stub procedure that can be replaced by logic in a streamed module. Replacement of the stub procedure may be direct, such as by removing the stub procedure code and replacing it with logic from a streamed module, or replacement may be operative, such as by creating a link to logic in a streamed module.
  • [0013]
    In general, in another aspect, the invention features a computer program residing on a computer-readable medium. The computer program includes instructions for causing a computer to access a collection of modules associated with an application, to access a database storing module selection criteria, to form a module set by selecting a sequence of modules from the collection in accordance with the module selection criteria, and to transparently stream the module set to a second computer. Implementations of program may also include instructions for causing the computer to retrieve a first module from the collection and to send the first module to the second computer.
  • [0014]
    In general, in another aspect, the invention features a computer program residing on a computer-readable medium. The program includes instructions for causing a computer to execute an application, to transparently receive a module associated with the executing application, to store the received module independent of the executing application, and to integrate the received module with the executing application.
  • [0015]
    In general, in another aspect, the invention features a system for transferring information modules between computers. The system includes a first computer and a second computer. The first computer includes means for executing an application, means for receiving a sequence of modules associated with the application while the application is executing, and means for integrating a first module in the received sequence with the application. The second computer includes means for storing a collection of modules associated with the application, means for selecting a sequence of modules from the collection, and means for transferring the selected sequences from the first computer to the second computer.
  • [0016]
    Implementations may include one or more of the following advantages. Delays experienced when downloading an applications, a code module, or a data modules can be can be reduced. Software and data modules can be predictively delivered to a client workstation according to a particular end user's requirements. The order in which modules are streamed from a server to a client can be dynamically determined. A collection of module delivery sequences can be associated with a particular application or user and the sequences can be dynamically updated. Module delivery sequences can be determined based on individual software usage patterns or stored statistic associated with module usage. Module streaming can be interrupted and altered during the execution of an application. Implementations may include additional or alternative advantages as will become clear from the description and claims that follow.
  • [0017]
    Various techniques can be used to select the particular order in which the modules should be streamed to a given client. The selection criterion can be stored in a streaming control database, which database can include transition records associating weighted values with transitions between selected modules. Weight values can be determined by a historical count of the number of times that modules were requested by all users. Alternatively, weight values for different subgroups of users can be determined by a historical count of the number of times that modules were requested by each subgroup.
  • [0018]
    Path determination algorithms can be used to predict a sequence of modules to stream using weight values. In certain instances, sets of modules will always be streamed if one module in the set is streamed. In these instances, all modules in the set are grouped together and sent to the client as a batch. Path determination algorithms can also factor in the size of the various modules and the size of the cache memory at a client computer to maximize use of the client's cache memory.
  • [0019]
    In addition to the use of path determination algorithms to determine module sequences, a user can self-select a specific module sequence for a given function to have streamed each time the user accesses the function. The user can also self-select a sequence of functions such that the modules supporting the various functions will be streamed in an order of the function sequence. Particular modules can also always be streamed to the client computer regardless of historical usage or user selection. Further, certain modules can be “tagged” by application owners, and a record of the number of times a tagged module is requested at the client and possibly the time used at the client be created.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
  • [0020]
    The foregoing and other features of the present invention will be more readily apparent from the following detailed description and drawings of illustrative embodiments of the invention in which:
  • [0021]
    [0021]FIG. 1 illustrates a computer network;
  • [0022]
    [0022]FIG. 2 illustrates computer software application modules;
  • [0023]
    [0023]FIG. 3 is a directed graph, according to the invention;
  • [0024]
    [0024]FIG. 4 illustrates a server and a client, according to the invention;
  • [0025]
    FIGS. 5A-5E illustrate application code components, according to the invention;
  • [0026]
    [0026]FIG. 6 shows sample edge weighting tables for the graph of FIG. 3;
  • [0027]
    [0027]FIGS. 7 and 8 are edge graph illustrations of a module-grouping procedure;
  • [0028]
    [0028]FIG. 9 is a sample table illustrating a user selected function and module streaming order; and
  • [0029]
    [0029]FIG. 10 is a sample table illustrating usage summaries for designated modules.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • [0030]
    Referring to FIG. 1, a wide area network 100 is shown. In the network 100, a client computer 101 can communicate with a server computer 102 by sending data over links 103 and 104 to a data network 130. The data network 130 may include multiple nodes 131-134 that can route data between the client 101 and the server 102. The client computer 101 may transmit and receive data using the TCP/IP, HTTP, and other protocols. For example, the client 101 may use the HTTP protocol to request web pages from the server 102.
  • [0031]
    Web pages and multimedia data sent from the server 102 to the client 101 may have a natural linear sequence associated with them. The natural sequence of video data may be the linear order of video frames while the natural sequence of text may be the order in which pages of text are arranged in a document. Data having a natural linear sequence can be streamed from a server to a client to minimize download delays. In a streaming system, while earlier items in a linear sequence are being processed and/or displayed, subsequent items may be downloaded to the client computer. When processing and/or display of an item is complete, processing or display of a fully received “streamed” item may quickly begin. Since receipt of a streamed item is fully or partially complete when the item is requested, a user or client application requesting the streamed item will perceive a reduced downloading delay. For example, if the first page of a document is retrieved by a user, the second page can be downloaded while the first page is being read. If the user continues reading at the second page of the document, that page will then be available at the client, such as in a cache area on a hard disk drive, and can be read without additional downloading delay.
  • [0032]
    Software execution may not follow a predictable natural linear order. Software may include jump statements, break statements, procedure calls, and other programming constructs that cause abrupt transfers of execution among sections of executing code. The execution path that is traversed during the processing of interrelated code modules (such as code segments, code classes, applets, procedures, and code libraries), will often be non-linear, user dependent, may change with each execution of the application program, and may change depending on the state of various data items. Although a natural order may be lacking, an advantageous order may be determined in which to stream modules. The order may be determined using criteria that is independent of the computer's internal architecture or internal operating system (execution environment) considerations.
  • [0033]
    Referring to FIG. 2, a software application 200 may include multiple modules “A” through “H.” Modules “A” through “H” may be Java Classes, C++ procedure libraries, or other code modules that can be stored at a server. Some of the modules “A” through “H” may also be stored at the client computer, such as in a hard disk drive cache or as part of a software library stored at the client computer. When a client computer begins execution of the application 200, a first module, such as module “A,” may be downloaded from the server and its execution at the client 410 may begin. As module “A” is being processed, the programming statements contained therein may branch to, for example, module “E.” If Module “E” is not already resident at the client, the execution of module “A” can be suspended, module “E” can be retrieved from the server, and then the execution of module “E” code may begin. In such a scenario, a user will experience a module download delay associated with retrieving module “E” from the server.
  • [0034]
    To minimize module download delays experienced by a user, module “E” may be transparently streamed from a server to the client computer. Transparent streaming allows future module use to be predicted and modules to be downloaded while other interrelated modules “A” are executing. Referring to FIG. 3, the execution order of application modules “A” through “H” may resemble a directed graph 300 rather than a linear sequence of modules. For example, as illustrated by the graph 300, after module “A” is executed, execution can continue at module “B”, “D,” or “E.” After module “B” is executed, execution can continue at module “C” or “G.” The execution path may subsequently flow to additional modules and may return to earlier executed modules.
  • [0035]
    Turning to FIG. 4, an exemplary software architecture 400 providing transparent streaming is shown. The software architecture 400 includes a streaming server 401 having a database 403 of stored software modules. The streaming server 401 can transparently transmit a stream of software modules 405 over a communications link to a client computer 410. The communication link may be an analog modem connection, a digital subscriber line connection, a local area network connection, or any other type of data connection between the server 401 and client 410.
  • [0036]
    During streaming of the modules, a network connection is opened to transmit data between the streaming server 401 and the client computer 410 and is preferably held open rather then opened and closed each time a module is transmitted. The client computer 410 can have a caching mechanism for caching streamed modules separate from a browser's cache. Software at the client computer 410 can monitor user activity at the client and transmit certain information back to the streaming server 401.
  • [0037]
    As particular software modules are being executed at the client 410, additional modules are sent from the server 401 to the client 410. In a dynamic streaming implementation, the order in which modules are streamed between the server and client may be altered based on the particular client computer 410 being served, based on the user of the client computer, and based on other dynamically determined factors.
  • [0038]
    The server 401 can use streaming control information 402 to determine the order in which to stream modules from the server 401 to the client 410. The streaming control information 402 can include, for example, a predicted execution flow between software modules such as that represented by the directed graph 300. As downloaded modules are executed by the client 410, the client may send control data 415 to the server 401 to dynamically update and alter the order in which modules are streamed from the server 401 to the client 410. Control data 415 may be used to request particular modules from the server 401, to send data regarding the current execution state of the application program, to detail the current inventory of modules residing in the client's local storage 411, and to report user input selections, program execution statistics, and other data derived regarding the client computer 410 and its executing software.
  • [0039]
    The sequence of modules sent in the stream 405 from the server 401 to the client 410 can be determined using a streaming control file 402. The streaming control file 402 includes data used by the server to predict modules that will be needed at the client 410. In a graph-based implementation, the control file 402 may represent modules as nodes of a directed graph. The control file 402 may also represent possible execution transitions between the modules as vertices (“edges”) interconnecting the nodes.
  • [0040]
    Referring to in the weighted graph implementation, the streaming control file 402 may include a list of vertices represent possible transitions between modules. For example, Table 1 list vertices representing all possible transitions between the modules “A” through “H” of graph 300 (FIG. 3). Each vertex in Table 1 includes a weight value indicating the relative likelihood that the particular transitions between modules will occur. In the example of Table 1, higher weight values indicate less likely transitions.
  • [0041]
    The server 401 may apply a shortest-path graph traversal algorithm (also known as a “least cost” algorithm) to determine a desirable module streaming sequence based on the currently executing module. Example shortest-path algorithms may be found in Telecommunications Networks: Protocols, Modeling and Analysis, Mocha Schwartz, Addison Wesley, 1987, §6. For example, the following table 1 shows the minimum path weight between module “A” and the remaining modules:
    TABLE 1
    Shortest Paths from Application Module “A”:
    Shortest
    Path
    From To Weight Path
    A B 1 A-B
    C 2 A-B-C
    D 7 A-D
    E 3 A-E
    F 9 A-D-F
    G 4 A-B-G
    H 5 A-E-H
  • [0042]
    Based on the weight values shown, the server 401 may determine that, during the execution of module “A”, the module streaming sequence “B,” “C,” “E,” “G,” “H, ”D, “F” is advantageous. If a particular module in a determined sequence is already present at the client 402, as may have been reported by control data 415, the server 401 may eliminate that module from the stream of modules 405. If, during the transmission of the sequence “B,” “C,” “E,” “G,” “H,” “D,” F, execution of module “A” completes and execution of another module begins, the server may interrupt the delivery of the sequence “B,” “C,” “E,” “G,” “H,” “D,”“F,” calculate a new sequence based on the now executing module, and resume streaming based on the newly calculated streaming sequence. For example, if execution transitions to module “B” from module “A,” control data 415 may be sent from the client 410 to the server 401 indicating that module “B” is the currently executing module. If module “B” is not already available at the client 410, the server 401 will complete delivery of module “B” to the client and determine a new module streaming sequence.
  • [0043]
    By applying a shortest-path routing algorithm to the edges of Table 310 in FIG. 3 based on module “B” as the starting point, the minimum path weights between module “B” and other modules of the graph 300 can be determined, as shown in Table 2, below:
    TABLE 2
    Shortest Paths from Module B
    Shortest
    Path
    From To Weight Path
    B C 1 B-C
    E 5 B-C-E
    G 3 B-G
    H 7 B-C-E-H
  • [0044]
    Based on the shortest path weights shown in Table 2, the server 401 may determine that module streaming sequence “C,” “G,” “E,” and “H” is advantageous.
  • [0045]
    Other algorithms may also be used to determine a module streaming sequence. For example, a weighted graph 300 may be used wherein heavier weighted edges indicate a preferred path among modules represented in the graph. In Table 3, higher assigned weight values indicate preferred transitions between modules. For example, edges (A,B), (A,D), and (A,E) are three possible transitions from module A. Since edge (A,B) has a higher weight value then edges (A,D) and (A,E) it is favored and therefore, given module “A” as a starting point, streaming of module “B” before modules “D” or “E” may be preferred. Edge weight values can be, for example, a historical count of the number of times that a particular module was requested by a client, the relative transmission time of the code module, or a value empirically determined by a system administrator and stored in a table 402 at the server 401. Other edge weight calculation methods may also be used.
    TABLE 3
    Preferred Path Table
    Edge Weight
    (A, B) 100 
    (A, D) 15
    (A, E) 35
    (B, C) 100 
    (B, G) 35
    (C, E) 50
    (C, G) 20
    (D, F) 50
    (E, H) 50
    (F, H) 100 
    (G, E) 35
    (G, H) 25
  • [0046]
    In an preferred-path (heavy weighted edge first) implementation, edges in the graph 300 having higher weight values are favored. The following exemplary algorithm may be used to determine a module streaming sequence in a preferred-path implementation:
  • [0047]
    1: Create two empty ordered sets:
  • [0048]
    i) A candidate set storing pairs (S,W) wherein “S” is a node identifier and “W” is a weight of an edge that may be traversed to reach node “S.”
  • [0049]
    ii) A stream set to store a determined stream of code modules.
  • [0050]
    2: Let Si be the starting node.
  • [0051]
    3: Append the node Si to the Stream Set and remove any pair (Si, W) from the candidate set.
  • [0052]
    4: For each node Sj that may be reached from node Si by an edge (Si, Sj) having weight Wj:
    {
    If Sj is not a member of the stream set then add the pair (Sj, Wj) to
    the candidate set.
    If Sj appears in more than one pair in the candidate set, remove all
    but the greatest-weight
    (Sj, W) pair from the candidate set.
    }
  • [0053]
     5: If the Candidate set is not empty
  • [0054]
    Select the greatest weight pair (Sk,Wk) from the candidate set.
  • [0055]
    Let Si=Sk
  • [0056]
    For example, as shown in Table 4, below, starting at node “A” and applying the foregoing algorithm the edges of Table 3 produces the stream set {A, B, C, E, H, G, D, F}:
    TABLE 4
    Calculation of Stream Set
    Iteration {Stream Set}/{Candidate Set}
    1 {A}/{(B, 100) (D, 15) (E, 35)}
    2 {A, B}/{(D, 15) (E, 35) (C, 100) (G, 35)}
    3 {A, B, C}/{(D, 15) (E, 35) (G, 35)}
    4 {A, B, C, E}/{(D, 15) (G, 35) (H, 50)}
    5 {A, B, C, E, H}/{(D, 15) (G, 35)}
    6 {A, B, C, E, H, G}/{(D, 15)}
    7 {A, B, C, E, H, G, D}/{(F, 50)}
    8 {A, B, C, E, H, G, D, F}/{}
  • [0057]
    Implementations may select alternative algorithms to calculate stream sets and the predictive streaming process can be dynamically updated should a user request a module that was not predicted and used to predict a new module sequence starting from the requested module.
  • [0058]
    Rather than use one table based on the historical count for all users to determine the weight value for each particular transition, multiple tables can be created based upon historical usage of different subcategories of users. In the preferred embodiment, tables are created based upon user age and time of usage. Depending on the application the modules are associated with, in alternative embodiments other subcategories of users can be used, such as user income, sex, etc. Referring to FIG. 6, sample table 600 shows a graph edge table for users under the age of 18, and table 610 shows a graph edge table for users during non-business hours after 6 PM. Tables 600 and 610 can be stored in the streaming control file 402, along with any other graph edge tables generated based on different subcategories of users. Prior to execution of an application by a user at a client, the user can be queried to enter relevant user demographics in order to determine which graph edge table in the streaming control file to use to determine the order of the modules to stream.
  • [0059]
    According to a further aspect of the invention, the edge weight tables stored in the control file can be analyzed to identify sets of modules which, if one module in the set is streamed, then all modules in the set are streamed. In particular, weight edges in the weight edge table can be analyzed to identify sequences of modules with identical weight values. These modules can then be always streamed together as a batch rather than individually. In the graph edge implementation, this can be viewed as a merging of nodes which lie along a branchless path.
  • [0060]
    Referring to FIG. 7, a graph edge table 710 for graph 700 is shown with weight values generated by a historical usage count. Weight edges in the weight edge table are analyzed to identify sequences of modules with identical weight values. The weight value from module A to B is 1, as is the weight value from module B to C. Since module B will never be streamed without being followed by module C, the nodes represented by modules B and C can be merged. Thus, rather than streaming modules B and C separately, if the path determination algorithm determines that module B should be streamed, then modules B and C are batched and sent together. Referring to FIG. 8, the resulting edge weight table 810 and graph 800 is shown.
  • [0061]
    In addition to the weight edge values, path determination algorithms can utilize the size of the cache memory at the client and the sizes of the modules as factors in determining which modules to stream, with the goal of the analysis to maximize use of the client's cache memory and minimizing streaming time. The size of the client cache can be transmitted to the streaming server at the beginning of each client-server interaction, such as the initiation of a streaming session.
  • [0062]
    For example, a path determination algorithm may determine that a first sequence of modules to stream, A-B-C-E-H, would occupy 80% of the client cache memory while a second sequence A-B-C-E-G, although less likely than path A-B-C-E-H, will occupy 95% of the cache memory if module G occupies 15% more of the cache memory more than module H. The sequence A-B-C-E-G can be streamed to the client to maximize the amount of cache memory occupied. Should the user later request module G after module E, the larger module G, which requires more time to stream than module H, is already present on the client. Should the user instead request module H after module E, the smaller size of module H will allow for faster on-demand streaming, and thus reduce the penalty of an incorrect streaming prediction.
  • [0063]
    In addition to using predictive algorithms based on historical usage patterns, the sequence of streamed modules can also be user defined at an individual level. Referring to FIG. 9, a table 900 uniquely associated with a particular user can be generated based on user selections which are used to identify the sequence of modules for each function in an application to be streamed based on a user's selections. In the preferred embodiment, table 900 is stored at the client and uploaded to the application server when the user accesses the server. In an alternative embodiment, table 900 can be stored in on the server, e.g., as a list record in the streaming control file
  • [0064]
    The user-selected streaming order can be generated during an interactive dialog between the client and server. For example, in one embodiment, a user at the client is given the option to enter a “Select Streaming Order” mode during which the user is instructed to perform a particular sequence of selections for a function that the user considers typical of the way in which the user anticipates behaving each time the user performs that particular function. A particular sequence of selections can be made for the modules associated with each function in the streaming application. The user selections can be used as default streaming settings each time the user logs on and attempts to perform a particular function. For users who may use functions in a streaming application in an a-typical manner, and thus in a way which is difficult to predict, these selections allow for faster streaming application of the application.
  • [0065]
    Even if a user has selected a preferred streaming order, if the user deviates from the default selected streaming order, the server can utilize other methods to determine a subsequent streaming order, such as prediction algorithms based on historical usage patterns. Predictive algorithms, such as historical usage patterns, can also be used to select streaming orders for functions that do not have a personalized streaming order associated with them for the respective user.
  • [0066]
    In addition to selecting the sequence of modules for each function, or alternatively, the user can select the order of the functions to be streamed. Referring to FIG. 9, the user has selected that the application functions be streamed in the order 2, 1, 3, and 4, based, for example., on the user's assessment of the sequence of functions they will use in the application. These selections can be stored in a suitable table 900 associated with the user. The next time that the user accesses the application on the server, the server will begin streaming modules corresponding to Function 2, in an order specified by the user, e.g., in Table 900, (modules A, G, C, and B), or, if no custom order is specified, in a ordering in accordance with the predictive algorithms. Should the user deviate from the default function order, for example, by selecting function 3 after function 2, the server can reset the streaming sequence and being streaming the module for function 3 in a sequence defined by the user (here sequence D, E, B, and M) or otherwise selected as appropriate.
  • [0067]
    According to a further aspect of the invention, particular modules can always be streamed from the server to the client regardless of historical usage or user selection. Such modules are typically associated with functions which are required for the application or for certain functionality of the application. For example, if a user password is required to access function 3 shown in FIG. 9, a security module S that interacts with the user to obtain the user password will always be streamed prior to modules D, E, B, and M regardless of whether the user selects module S during the Select Streaming Order mode. In another example, when the modules being streamed are particular HTML pages, an informational title page containing information about ownership rights to the page contents can always be streamed to the client prior to the streaming of any other pages.
  • [0068]
    Depending on the particular user and modules being streamed, a combination of the methods herein disclosed for determining the order of modules to stream may be utilized. For example, path determination prediction algorithms may be utilized for functions that users have not self-selected a streaming order As another example, mandatory streaming of certain modules may be combined with user self-selected streaming orders. Similarly, various methods can be balanced against each other to determine which is the most appropriate in a given situation. For example, the use of cache memory utilization and module size as streaming order determining factors can be balanced with the probabilities that the various paths will be traversed by the user. Even if a given sequence of modules provides full cache utilization at the client, if the streamed modules are highly unlikely to be used, cache utilization would not be an appropriate factor to wholly base streaming decisions. In contrast, if a high cache utilization sequence is only slightly less likely than an alternative sequence and the modules not in the cache-based sequence can be streamed quickly, then the cache utilization sequence could provide superior overall performance.
  • [0069]
    A multitude of combinations are possible, offering versatile functionality at both the client and server. The various prediction methods and factors can be used and combined using differing weights as appropriate. The weights to assign to each of the factors and predictive methods can vary and preferably can be dynamically adjusted in response to operating conditions and measures of prediction success rates to improve the overall streaming performance.
  • [0070]
    According to yet a further aspect of the invention, streaming server software can record time and usage of specially tagged modules streamed to the clients by gathering data received from the client computers regarding use of the tagged modules, such as the number of times they are streamed to clients and, with the use of appropriate client-side software, the amount of time the tagged modules are actually used by the client. Such information can be used to determine the popularity of various modules to increase the accuracy of the predictive streaming process. The information can also be valuable to application owners in determining which functions are most useful to the users and which functions might be omitted in future version without substantial concern. In addition, in the preferred embodiment, the information gathered can be used on a per-client basis to bill users based in accordance with the specific modules used and the amount of time each module is used.
  • [0071]
    For example, a word processing program, such as Microsoft Word, is comprised of many different modules. The module corresponding to the spell check function could be tagged as “Spell Check”. When the tagged module is streamed to a client or specifically requested, a request total can be incremented. In addition, client-side software can be configured to recognize the tags and both record its receipt as well as determining the length of time each particular tagged module is used. This information can subsequently be communicated to the streaming sever. FIG. 10, for example, shows a table 1000 which summarizes data gathered for various users over a given period for example several tagged modules in a word processing application. For each tag, the number of times the module was streamed to and requested at the client, and the length of time the module was used is recorded.
  • [0072]
    In the discussion above, streaming of applications was discussed with respect to streaming a sequence of separate application modules. Application streaming can also be used to stream subsections of an application or module. For example, subsections of compiled applications, such as applications written in C, C++, Fortran, Pascal, or Assembly language may be streamed from a server 401 to a client 410. Referring to FIG. 5A, an application 500 may include multiple code modules such as a main code module 501 and code libraries 510 and 515. The main module 501 contains program code that is executed when the application is started. The code libraries 510 and 515 may contain header data 511 and 516 as well as executable procedures 512-514 and 517-519 that are directly or indirectly called from the main module 501 and other library procedures.
  • [0073]
    In a Microsoft Windows 95/Microsoft Visual C++ implementation, the main code module 501 may contain a compiled C++ “main” procedure and the library modules 510 and 515 may be dynamic link libraries having compiled C++ object code procedures. Header data 511 and 516 may include symbolic names used by operating system link procedures to dynamically link libraries 510 and 515 with the main module 501. Header data may also indicate the location of each procedure within the library. In a jump table implementation, a calling procedure may access library procedures 512-514, 517-519 by jumping to a predetermined location in the header 511 or 516 and from there, accessing additional code and/or data resulting in a subsequent jump to the start of the procedure.
  • [0074]
    Data and procedures within an application's code modules and libraries may be many hundreds or thousands of bytes long. Prior to executing an application, a client may need to retrieve a lengthy set of modules and libraries. By reducing the size of the module and library set, the initial delay experienced prior to application execution can be reduced. In a streaming implementation of application 500, code within subsections of the application's code modules can be removed and replaced by shortened streaming “stub” procedures. The replacement of application code with streaming stub procedures may reduce module size and associated transmission delay. For example, referring to FIGS. 5A and 5B, the code library 510 may include a header 511 that is 4 kilobytes (Kbytes) in length and procedures 512-514 that are, respectively, 32 Kbytes, 16 Kbytes, and 8 Kbytes. Referring to FIGS. 5B and 5C, to reduce the size of the library 510, procedures code 512-514 may be removed from the library 510 and stored in a streaming code module database 403 at the server 401 (FIG. 4). The removed procedure code 512-514 may be replaced by “stub” procedures 522-524 resulting in reduced-size code library 530 that can be linked with application modules 501 and 515 in place of library 510. Header data 511 of library 530 can include updated jump or link information allowing stub procedures 522-524 to act as link-time substitutes for procedures 512-514.
  • [0075]
    A server 401 may provide a streaming-enabled version of application 500 to a client 410 by sending main module 501, library module 515, “streamed” library 530, and, in some implementations, a streaming support file 535 to the client 410 in response to a request for the application 500. The streaming support file 535 may include procedures accessed by the stubs 522-524 to facilitate code streaming between the server 401 and client 410. At the client 410, modules 501, 515, 530 and 535 can be linked and execution of the resulting application can begin. As the main module 501 and various called procedures are executed at the client 410, code modules stored in the database 403 can be streamed from the server 401 to the client 410. Data may be included in the stream 403 to identify stub procedures 522-524 associated with the streamed code modules. As the streamed modules are received at the client, they are integrated with the executing application.
  • [0076]
    In an appended module implementation, streamed code modules are integrated with the executing application by appending received modules to their corresponding library or code file. For example, referring to FIGS. 5C and 5D, as modules 512-514 are streamed from the server to the client, they are appended to the library file 530 thereby forming an augmented library file 540. As the modules 512-514 are streamed from the server 401 and appended to the file 530, header data 511 or stub data 522-524 is updated so that the now-appended modules are accessible from a calling procedure. For example, referring to FIG. 5D, an additional “jump” may be added between each stub procedure 522-524 and its associated appended module 512-514. Alternatively, header data 511 may be updated so that procedures 512-514 are accessible in place of stubs 522-524. In a stub-replacement implementation, stubs 522-524 are replaced by procedure modules 512-514 as the modules are received from the server 401. Stub replacement may require altering or rearranging the location of the remaining stubs or procedures within a code module or library as replacement code is received. Implementations may employ still other methods of integrating streamed code with executing applications and modules.
  • [0077]
    In some scenarios, removed code, such as procedure code 512-514 which, in the example given, was replaced by stubs 522-524, may be required (called by another procedure) before it is streamed from the server 401 and integrated with the module 530. In such a case, stub code 522-524 may access streaming functions in the streaming support library 535 to obtain the required procedure. To do so, the streaming support library 535 may send control data 415 to the server 401 to request the needed procedure. In response, the server 401 can halt the current module stream 405 and send the requested module. Upon receipt of the requested module, procedures in the streaming support library 535 may be used to integrate the received module with the application and to continue with the execution of the requested module. The server may thereafter determine a new module stream based on the requested module or other control data 415 that was received from the client.
  • [0078]
    Code modules may be reduced in size without the use of stub procedures. For example, referring again to FIGS. 4, 5A, 5B, and 5E, in a interrupt driven implementation, procedure code 512-514 may be removed from a code library 510 and stored in a database 403. Header information 511 as well as data indicating the size and location of removed procedure code 512-514 may then be transmitted to a client 410. The client 410 may construct a new library 550 by appending a series of interrupt statements in place of the removed procedure code 512-514. When the application 500 is executed, the code library 550 is substituted for the library 510 and execution of the program 500 may begin. As the program 500 executes, the removed procedure code 512-514 can be streamed to the client 410 and stored in a local database 411. If the application 500 attempts to execute procedure code 512-514 it may instead execute one of the interrupt statement that have replaced procedure code 512-514. The execution of the interrupt statement halts the execution of the program 500 and transfers control to a streaming executor program 416.
  • [0079]
    Executor 416 implements interface technology similar to that of a conventional run-time object code debugger thereby allowing the executor 416 to intercept and process the interrupt generated by the application 500. When the interrupt is intercepted by the executor 416, data provided to the executor 416 as part of the client execution platform (operating system) interrupt handling functionality can be used to identify the module 550 in which the interrupt was executed and the address of the interrupt code within the module. The executor 416 then determines whether procedure code 512-514 associated with the interrupt location has been received as part of the module stream 405 sent to the client. If the appropriate procedure code has been received, the executor 515 replaces the identified interrupt with the its corresponding code. For example, procedures 512-514 may be segmented into 4 Kilobyte code modules that are streamed to the client 410. When an interrupt statement is executed by the application 500, the executor 416 intercepts the interrupt, determines an appropriate 4 Kilobyte code block that includes the interrupt statement, and replaces the determined code block with a received code module. If the appropriate code module has not yet been received, an explicit request may be sent from the client 410 to the server 401 to retrieve the code module prior to its insertion in the library 550. The executor 416 may thereafter cause the application 500 to resume at the address of the encountered interrupt.
  • [0080]
    Implementations may also stream entire modules or libraries. For example, main code module 501 may be received from the server 401 and begin execution at the client 410 while code libraries 510 and 515 are streamed from the server 401 to the client 410. Integration of streamed modules with executing modules may be provided by client 410 dynamic module linking facilities. For example, delay import loading provided by Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 may be used to integrate streamed modules 510 and 515 with executing modules 501. Dynamic linking of streamed modules may be facilitated by storing the streamed modules on a local hard disk drive or other storage location accessible by client 410 link loading facilities. In an exemplary implementation, streaming is facilitated by altering client 410 operating system link facilities such that the link facility can send control data 415 to the server 401 to request a particular module if the module is has not already been streamed to the client 401.
  • [0081]
    In a protected-memory computer system, direct manipulation of executing application code and data may be restricted. In such systems, a “kernel” level processes or procedure may be required to support integration of streamed modules with executing application. In such a case, streaming support 535 may be pre-provisioned by installing support procedures at the client 410 prior to the client's request for the application 500.
  • [0082]
    Other methods of determining stream sets may be used. In a list-based implementation, the streaming control file may include predetermined list of module streaming sequences. For example, the streaming control file 402 may include a module streaming sequence list associated with a first user and a second module streaming sequence list associated with a second user. Control data 415 sent from the client 410 to the server 401 may identify the current user at the client 410. Once the user has been identified to the server, the server may stream software modules in accordance with the user's associated streaming sequence list. User-based streaming data may be advantageous where a user's past behavior can be used to anticipate the order of modules to be accessed by that user.
  • [0083]
    In graph-based streaming control file implementations, the weight of edges connecting nodes may be determined statically or dynamically and may be determined based on a collection of historical usage data. For example, in a programmer-controlled implementation, a software programmer estimate the likelihood that particular transitions between nodes will occur based on the programmer's knowledge of the software code and the expected application usage patterns. Alternatively, application profiling programs may be used to gather run-time execution data recording transitions between various applets, Classes or code modules and thereby determine the likelihood that particular transitions will occur. In a client-feedback implementation, control data 415 sent from the client 410 to the server 401 during module execution is used to build a statistical database of module usage and, based on that database, determine the module streaming order.
  • [0084]
    In a client-controlled streaming implementation, streaming control data 402 may be located at the client 410 and control data 415 sent from the client 410 to the server 401 may be used to sequentially request a stream of modules from the server. For example, while the client computer 410 is executing a first module, a background process may send control data 415 to a server to request additional modules that can be buffered on a hard disk 411 at the client computer 410. A client-controlled streaming implementation may used existing HTTP servers and HTTP protocols to send request from the client 410 to the server 401 and send software modules from the server 401 to the client 410. Furthermore, although streaming of software modules has been emphasized in the foregoing description, non-executable data, such as hypertext markup language, binary graphic files, and text, may be streamed as a collection of modules.
  • [0085]
    Implementations may include a “handshaking” procedure whereby, at the start of application execution, control data 415 is sent between the server 401 and the client 410. The handshaking data may include an inventory of application modules residing at the client and at the server. Such handshaking data allows both the client 410 and server 401 to determine their respective software module inventory and to optimize the stream of software modules based on that inventory information.
  • [0086]
    In a history-dependent implementation, a server or client can store data about a series of transitions between modules and calculate a new module stream based on a history of transitions. For example, referring to FIG. 3, if the module “G” was reached by the path A-B-G, then a server or client may determine that module “E” followed by “H” is to be streamed. On the other hand, if the module “G” was reached by the path A-B-C-G then the streaming sequence may include only the module “H.”
  • [0087]
    The invention may be implemented in computer hardware, firmware, software, digital electronic circuitry or in combinations of them. Apparatus of the invention may be implemented in a computer program product tangibly embodied in a machine-readable storage device for execution by a programmable processor; and method steps of the invention may be performed by a programmable processor executing a program of instructions to perform functions of the invention by operating on input data and generating output.
  • [0088]
    The invention may advantageously be implemented in one or more computer programs that are executable on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a data storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device. Each computer program may be implemented in a high-level procedural or object-oriented programming language, or in assembly or machine language if desired; and in any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language. Suitable processors include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory and/or a random access memory.
  • [0089]
    Storage devices suitable for tangibly embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, such as EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM disks. Any of the foregoing may be supplemented by, or incorporated in, specially-designed ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits).
  • [0090]
    While the present invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiment therein, variations in form and implementation can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims (20)

  1. 1. A method for determining an order in which to stream modules of an application from a server to a client configured to execute the application concurrently with module streaming, the application utilizing the modules in an execution-time dependent order, the method comprising the steps of:
    identifying potential execution transitions between modules;
    associating at least one weighted value with each transition indicating a likelihood relative to other transitions that the particular transitions between modules will occur;
    upon notice that the client is executing a particular module, determining a subsequent order of utilization of the modules by the application at the client with reference to the weighted values associated with identified transitions from the particular module; and
    indicating that modules should be streamed to the client in the determined order.
  2. 2. The method of
    claim 1
    , wherein:
    a plurality of weighted values are associated with each transition, each weight being further associated with a respective category; and
    the weighted values used during the determining step are selected in accordance with a specified category.
  3. 3. The method of
    claim 2
    , wherein the respective categories comprise user age and time of usage.
  4. 4. The method of
    claim 1
    , further comprising the steps of:
    identifying a sequence of module transitions having the same weighted transition values; and
    grouping the modules in the identified sequence of module transitions into a batch;
    wherein, when the determined order includes a particular module in the batch should be streamed, the step of indicating comprises indicating that all module in the batch should be streamed to the client.
  5. 5. The method of
    claim 1
    , wherein the determining step comprises determining the subsequent order of utilization of the modules with further reference to a projected client cache utilization and a cost to stream particular modules.
  6. 6. The method of
    claim 5
    , wherein the cost comprises a module size.
  7. 7. A method for determining an order in which to stream modules of an application from a server to a client executing the application concurrently with module streaming, the application utilizing the modules in an execution-time dependent order and comprising a plurality of functions, each function having at least one associated module, the method comprising the steps of:
    receiving from a user a customized streaming order for modules associated with a specific function;
    receiving notice that the user is executing a particular function;
    if the particular function has an associated customized streaming order for the user, indicating that modules associated with the particular function should be streamed to the client in the selected streaming order;
    otherwise, determining an alternative order of utilization of modules in the particular function; and
    indicating that modules should be streamed to the client in the determined order.
  8. 8. The method of
    claim 7
    , wherein the step of determining comprises predicting an order of usage of the modules in the particular function.
  9. 9. The method of
    claim 8
    , wherein the step of predicting an order is performed with use of a set of predefined weighted transition values between modules in the function.
  10. 10. The method of
    claim 7
    , wherein the step of determining comprises selecting a set of modules to maximize cache utilization at the client.
  11. 11. The method of
    claim 7
    , further comprising the steps of:
    receiving from a user a customized function streaming sequence; and
    indicating that modules should be streamed to the client in accordance with the customized function streaming sequence.
  12. 12. A system for streaming modules of an application from a server to a client executing the application concurrently with module streaming, the application utilizing the modules in an execution-time dependent order, the system comprising:
    a streaming sever connectable to a client via a network;
    a streaming code module database having the application module stored therein;
    a streaming control file database having a predictive data stored therein, the predictive data comprising potential execution transitions between modules and at least one weighted value with each transition indicating a likelihood relative to other transitions that the particular transitions between modules will occur;
    the streaming server being configured to:
    receive an indication from the client that the application is in a given state;
    determine an order of module utilization by the application at the client with reference to weighted values associated with model transitions for the application when in the given state; and
    stream modules the client in the determined order.
  13. 13. The system of
    claim 12
    , wherein:
    a plurality of weighted values are associated with each transition, each weight being further associated with a respective category;
    the streaming server being further configured to select weighted values for use during order determination in accordance with a specified category for the client.
  14. 14. The system of
    claim 13
    , wherein the respective categories comprise user age and time of usage.
  15. 15. The system of
    claim 12
    , wherein the streaming server is further configured to:
    identify a sequence of module transitions having the same weighted transition values;
    group the modules in the identified sequence of module transitions into a batch; and
    stream the grouped modules to the client in a batch.
  16. 16. The system of
    claim 12
    , wherein the streaming server is further configured to:
    project client cache utilization in response to client receipt of particular sets of modules; and
    determine an order of module utilization by the application at the client with further reference to the client cache utilization projections.
  17. 17. The system of
    claim 12
    , wherein the streaming server is further configured to:
    receive from a user a customized streaming order specifying at least one of a sequence of functions and a sequence of modules for a specific function and; and
    determine an order of module utilization by the application at the client with further reference to the customized streaming order.
  18. 18. A computer program residing on a computer readable medium for configuring a computer to determine an order in which to stream modules of an application from the computer to a client executing the application concurrently with module streaming, the application utilizing the modules in an execution-time dependent order, the computer program comprising computer code to configure the computer to:
    upon notice that the client is executing a particular module, determine a subsequent order of utilization of the modules by the application at the client with reference to predefined weighted transition values for potential execution transitions between modules by the application, the transition values indicating a likelihood relative to other transitions that the particular transition between modules will occur; and
    indicating that modules should be streamed to the client in the determined order.
  19. 19. The computer program product of
    claim 18
    , wherein a plurality of weighted values are associated with each transition, each weight being further associated with a respective category, the computer program further comprising code to configure the computer to selected weighted values to use in accordance with a specified category.
  20. 20. The computer program product of
    claim 18
    , the computer program further comprising code to:
    project client cache utilization in response to receipt by the client of a specific set of modules; and
    determine a subsequent order of utilization of the modules by the application at the client with further reference to the project client cache utilization.
US09745646 1998-07-22 2000-12-22 Method and apparatus for determining the order of streaming modules Abandoned US20010044850A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09120575 US6311221B1 (en) 1998-07-22 1998-07-22 Streaming modules
US17773600 true 2000-01-21 2000-01-21
US09745646 US20010044850A1 (en) 1998-07-22 2000-12-22 Method and apparatus for determining the order of streaming modules

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09745646 US20010044850A1 (en) 1998-07-22 2000-12-22 Method and apparatus for determining the order of streaming modules
PCT/US2001/001596 WO2001053940A3 (en) 2000-01-21 2001-01-17 Method and apparatus for determining the order of streaming modules
US10354947 US7606924B2 (en) 1998-07-22 2003-01-30 Method and apparatus for determining the order of streaming modules

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09120575 Continuation-In-Part US6311221B1 (en) 1998-07-22 1998-07-22 Streaming modules

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10354947 Continuation US7606924B2 (en) 1998-07-22 2003-01-30 Method and apparatus for determining the order of streaming modules

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20010044850A1 true true US20010044850A1 (en) 2001-11-22

Family

ID=26873592

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09745646 Abandoned US20010044850A1 (en) 1998-07-22 2000-12-22 Method and apparatus for determining the order of streaming modules
US10354947 Active 2021-05-18 US7606924B2 (en) 1998-07-22 2003-01-30 Method and apparatus for determining the order of streaming modules

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10354947 Active 2021-05-18 US7606924B2 (en) 1998-07-22 2003-01-30 Method and apparatus for determining the order of streaming modules

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (2) US20010044850A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2001053940A3 (en)

Cited By (82)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020042833A1 (en) * 1998-07-22 2002-04-11 Danny Hendler Streaming of archive files
US20020091763A1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2002-07-11 Shah Lacky Vasant Client-side performance optimization system for streamed applications
US20030009538A1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2003-01-09 Shah Lacky Vasant Network caching system for streamed applications
US20030009488A1 (en) * 2001-05-22 2003-01-09 Reuters America, Inc System and method of accelerating delivery of dynamic web pages over a network
US20030056112A1 (en) * 1997-06-16 2003-03-20 Jeffrey Vinson Method and apparatus to allow remotely located computer programs and/or data to be accessed on a local computer in a secure, time-limited manner, with persistent caching
US20030221112A1 (en) * 2001-12-12 2003-11-27 Ellis Richard Donald Method and system for granting access to system and content
EP1483663A1 (en) * 2001-12-12 2004-12-08 Valve Corporation Method and system for preloading resources
US20050094791A1 (en) * 2003-10-31 2005-05-05 Clark Edward A. Data stream association with call through employment of identifier within message associated with the call
US6918113B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2005-07-12 Endeavors Technology, Inc. Client installation and execution system for streamed applications
US6983315B1 (en) 2000-01-18 2006-01-03 Wrq, Inc. Applet embedded cross-platform caching
US20060047946A1 (en) * 2004-07-09 2006-03-02 Keith Robert O Jr Distributed operating system management
US20060070029A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing file-type associations to multiple applications
US20060075381A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-04-06 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for isolating execution of software applications
US20060074989A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-04-06 Laborczfalvi Lee G Method and apparatus for virtualizing object names
US20060106770A1 (en) * 2004-10-22 2006-05-18 Vries Jeffrey D System and method for predictive streaming
US7051315B2 (en) 2000-09-26 2006-05-23 Appstream, Inc. Network streaming of multi-application program code
US7062567B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2006-06-13 Endeavors Technology, Inc. Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US20060136389A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-06-22 Cover Clay H System and method for invocation of streaming application
US20060224545A1 (en) * 2005-03-04 2006-10-05 Keith Robert O Jr Computer hardware and software diagnostic and report system
US20060224544A1 (en) * 2005-03-04 2006-10-05 Keith Robert O Jr Pre-install compliance system
US7197570B2 (en) 1998-07-22 2007-03-27 Appstream Inc. System and method to send predicted application streamlets to a client device
US20070083620A1 (en) * 2005-10-07 2007-04-12 Pedersen Bradley J Methods for selecting between a predetermined number of execution methods for an application program
WO2007066993A1 (en) * 2005-12-08 2007-06-14 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Method and apparatus for providing software by functional units in a software streaming system
US20070254742A1 (en) * 2005-06-06 2007-11-01 Digital Interactive Streams, Inc. Gaming on demand system and methodology
US20070274315A1 (en) * 2006-05-24 2007-11-29 Keith Robert O System for and method of securing a network utilizing credentials
US20080256178A1 (en) * 2005-12-08 2008-10-16 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Instit Method and Apparatus for Providing Software by Functional Units in a Software Streaming System
US20090119644A1 (en) * 2007-11-07 2009-05-07 Endeavors Technologies, Inc. Deriving component statistics for a stream enabled application
US7673228B2 (en) 2005-03-30 2010-03-02 Microsoft Corporation Data-driven actions for network forms
US7673227B2 (en) 2000-06-21 2010-03-02 Microsoft Corporation User interface for integrated spreadsheets and word processing tables
US7676843B1 (en) 2004-05-27 2010-03-09 Microsoft Corporation Executing applications at appropriate trust levels
US7689929B2 (en) 2000-06-21 2010-03-30 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems of providing information to computer users
US7692636B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2010-04-06 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods for handwriting to a screen
US7712022B2 (en) 2004-11-15 2010-05-04 Microsoft Corporation Mutually exclusive options in electronic forms
US7721190B2 (en) 2004-11-16 2010-05-18 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems for server side form processing
US7725834B2 (en) 2005-03-04 2010-05-25 Microsoft Corporation Designer-created aspect for an electronic form template
US7735057B2 (en) 2003-05-16 2010-06-08 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for packaging and streaming installation software
US7743063B2 (en) * 2000-06-21 2010-06-22 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems for delivering software via a network
US7779034B2 (en) 2005-10-07 2010-08-17 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for accessing a remote file in a directory structure associated with an application program executing locally
US7818677B2 (en) 2000-06-21 2010-10-19 Microsoft Corporation Single window navigation methods and systems
US20100268842A1 (en) * 2007-12-18 2010-10-21 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute System and method for providing streaming-based portable application
US7865477B2 (en) 2003-03-28 2011-01-04 Microsoft Corporation System and method for real-time validation of structured data files
US7900134B2 (en) 2000-06-21 2011-03-01 Microsoft Corporation Authoring arbitrary XML documents using DHTML and XSLT
US7908339B2 (en) 2004-06-03 2011-03-15 Maxsp Corporation Transaction based virtual file system optimized for high-latency network connections
US7913159B2 (en) 2003-03-28 2011-03-22 Microsoft Corporation System and method for real-time validation of structured data files
US7925621B2 (en) 2003-03-24 2011-04-12 Microsoft Corporation Installing a solution
US7937651B2 (en) 2005-01-14 2011-05-03 Microsoft Corporation Structural editing operations for network forms
US7971139B2 (en) 2003-08-06 2011-06-28 Microsoft Corporation Correlation, association, or correspondence of electronic forms
US7979856B2 (en) 2000-06-21 2011-07-12 Microsoft Corporation Network-based software extensions
US8001459B2 (en) 2005-12-05 2011-08-16 Microsoft Corporation Enabling electronic documents for limited-capability computing devices
US8010515B2 (en) 2005-04-15 2011-08-30 Microsoft Corporation Query to an electronic form
US8024523B2 (en) 2007-11-07 2011-09-20 Endeavors Technologies, Inc. Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US8090797B2 (en) 2009-05-02 2012-01-03 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for launching applications into existing isolation environments
US8095679B1 (en) * 2008-03-19 2012-01-10 Symantec Corporation Predictive transmission of content for application streaming and network file systems
US8095940B2 (en) 2005-09-19 2012-01-10 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for locating and accessing resources
US8117552B2 (en) 2003-03-24 2012-02-14 Microsoft Corporation Incrementally designing electronic forms and hierarchical schemas
US8117559B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2012-02-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for virtualizing window information
US8131825B2 (en) 2005-10-07 2012-03-06 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and a system for responding locally to requests for file metadata associated with files stored remotely
US8171483B2 (en) 2007-10-20 2012-05-01 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for communicating between isolation environments
US8171479B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2012-05-01 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing an aggregate view of enumerated system resources from various isolation layers
US8200975B2 (en) 2005-06-29 2012-06-12 Microsoft Corporation Digital signatures for network forms
US8234238B2 (en) 2005-03-04 2012-07-31 Maxsp Corporation Computer hardware and software diagnostic and report system
US8261345B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2012-09-04 Endeavors Technologies, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US8359591B2 (en) 2004-11-13 2013-01-22 Streamtheory, Inc. Streaming from a media device
US8422833B2 (en) 2007-10-26 2013-04-16 Maxsp Corporation Method of and system for enhanced data storage
US8487879B2 (en) 2004-10-29 2013-07-16 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods for interacting with a computer through handwriting to a screen
US8589323B2 (en) 2005-03-04 2013-11-19 Maxsp Corporation Computer hardware and software diagnostic and report system incorporating an expert system and agents
US20140115096A1 (en) * 2012-10-23 2014-04-24 Microsoft Corporation Recommending content based on content access tracking
WO2014066413A1 (en) * 2012-10-23 2014-05-01 Microsoft Corporation Multiple buffering orders for digital content item
CN103841429A (en) * 2012-11-27 2014-06-04 国际商业机器公司 Non-chronological buffering of segments of media file
US8812613B2 (en) 2004-06-03 2014-08-19 Maxsp Corporation Virtual application manager
US8819072B1 (en) 2004-02-02 2014-08-26 Microsoft Corporation Promoting data from structured data files
US8831995B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2014-09-09 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Optimized server for streamed applications
US20140304364A1 (en) * 2013-04-05 2014-10-09 Clear Channel Management Services, Inc. Segmented WANcasting
US8892993B2 (en) 2003-08-01 2014-11-18 Microsoft Corporation Translation file
US8898319B2 (en) 2006-05-24 2014-11-25 Maxsp Corporation Applications and services as a bundle
US8918729B2 (en) 2003-03-24 2014-12-23 Microsoft Corporation Designing electronic forms
US8977764B1 (en) 2008-02-28 2015-03-10 Symantec Corporation Profiling application usage from application streaming
CN104838627A (en) * 2012-10-23 2015-08-12 微软技术许可有限责任公司 Buffer ordering based on content access tracking
US9357031B2 (en) 2004-06-03 2016-05-31 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Applications as a service
US9448858B2 (en) 2007-10-26 2016-09-20 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Environment manager
US9645900B2 (en) 2006-12-21 2017-05-09 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Warm standby appliance
US9716609B2 (en) 2005-03-23 2017-07-25 Numecent Holdings, Inc. System and method for tracking changes to files in streaming applications

Families Citing this family (35)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6574618B2 (en) * 1998-07-22 2003-06-03 Appstream, Inc. Method and system for executing network streamed application
EP1307831A4 (en) * 2000-07-11 2007-05-09 Yahoo Inc Online playback system with community bias
KR20010082553A (en) * 1999-11-24 2001-08-30 이리마지리 쇼우이치로 Information processor, file server, account managing system and account managing method
US6389467B1 (en) 2000-01-24 2002-05-14 Friskit, Inc. Streaming media search and continuous playback system of media resources located by multiple network addresses
JP4033619B2 (en) * 2000-05-26 2008-01-16 シャープ株式会社 The server device
EP2045744A1 (en) * 2003-08-06 2009-04-08 Panasonic Corporation Method, server, and client for reducing processing time in synchronous communication in a client-server distributed system
US7533370B2 (en) * 2003-10-28 2009-05-12 Exent Technologies, Ltd. Security features in on-line and off-line delivery of applications
US20060048136A1 (en) * 2004-08-25 2006-03-02 Vries Jeff D Interception-based resource detection system
KR100587532B1 (en) * 2004-12-07 2006-05-30 한국전자통신연구원 Apparatus and method for fabricating software application for streaming service and system and method for offering software streaming services with network fault tolerance
US20060218165A1 (en) * 2005-03-23 2006-09-28 Vries Jeffrey De Explicit overlay integration rules
US7953879B1 (en) * 2006-01-31 2011-05-31 Symantec Operating Corporation System and method for assigning symbolic names to data streams
KR100942695B1 (en) * 2006-12-04 2010-02-16 한국전자통신연구원 Client system and method for managing a software version thereof
GB0703537D0 (en) * 2007-02-23 2007-04-04 Trinity College Dublin File server system
US8239560B2 (en) * 2007-02-27 2012-08-07 National Tsing Hua University System and generation method of remote objects with network streaming ability
US8341612B2 (en) * 2007-05-16 2012-12-25 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for run-time statistics dependent program execution using source-coding
US7986702B1 (en) * 2007-11-29 2011-07-26 Bigband Networks Inc. Method and system for streaming multimedia transmissions
US7792934B2 (en) * 2008-01-02 2010-09-07 Citrix Systems International Gmbh Loading of server-stored user profile data
US8799494B1 (en) * 2008-02-04 2014-08-05 Symantec Corporation Application streaming proactive failover
US8584120B2 (en) * 2009-11-23 2013-11-12 Julian Michael Urbach Stream-based software application delivery and launching system
US8438122B1 (en) 2010-05-14 2013-05-07 Google Inc. Predictive analytic modeling platform
US8521664B1 (en) 2010-05-14 2013-08-27 Google Inc. Predictive analytical model matching
US8473431B1 (en) 2010-05-14 2013-06-25 Google Inc. Predictive analytic modeling platform
US8495625B1 (en) 2010-07-27 2013-07-23 Symantec Corporation Method and system for creation of streamed files on-demand
US9043782B2 (en) * 2010-12-28 2015-05-26 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Predictive software streaming
US8533222B2 (en) 2011-01-26 2013-09-10 Google Inc. Updateable predictive analytical modeling
US8595154B2 (en) 2011-01-26 2013-11-26 Google Inc. Dynamic predictive modeling platform
US8533224B2 (en) 2011-05-04 2013-09-10 Google Inc. Assessing accuracy of trained predictive models
US8229864B1 (en) 2011-05-06 2012-07-24 Google Inc. Predictive model application programming interface
US8209274B1 (en) 2011-05-09 2012-06-26 Google Inc. Predictive model importation
US8364613B1 (en) 2011-07-14 2013-01-29 Google Inc. Hosting predictive models
US8443013B1 (en) 2011-07-29 2013-05-14 Google Inc. Predictive analytical modeling for databases
US8694540B1 (en) 2011-09-01 2014-04-08 Google Inc. Predictive analytical model selection
US8370279B1 (en) 2011-09-29 2013-02-05 Google Inc. Normalization of predictive model scores
US8938745B2 (en) * 2011-11-08 2015-01-20 Sap Se Systems and methods for providing modular applications
US20170286122A1 (en) * 2016-04-01 2017-10-05 Intel Corporation Instruction, Circuits, and Logic for Graph Analytics Acceleration

Family Cites Families (121)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5163131A (en) 1989-09-08 1992-11-10 Auspex Systems, Inc. Parallel i/o network file server architecture
US5495610A (en) * 1989-11-30 1996-02-27 Seer Technologies, Inc. Software distribution system to build and distribute a software release
US5237460A (en) 1990-12-14 1993-08-17 Ceram, Inc. Storage of compressed data on random access storage devices
JP2521016B2 (en) * 1991-12-31 1996-07-31 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレイション Multimedia de - data processing system
US5555388A (en) 1992-08-20 1996-09-10 Borland International, Inc. Multi-user system and methods providing improved file management by reading
US5394534A (en) 1992-09-11 1995-02-28 International Business Machines Corporation Data compression/decompression and storage of compressed and uncompressed data on a same removable data storage medium
WO1994025913A3 (en) 1993-04-30 1994-12-22 Novadigm Inc Method and apparatus for enterprise desktop management
US5504886A (en) 1993-07-02 1996-04-02 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for applying user supplied relation definitions to application files for a relational database
US6101495A (en) 1994-11-16 2000-08-08 Hitachi, Ltd. Method of executing partition operations in a parallel database system
US5742806A (en) 1994-01-31 1998-04-21 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Apparatus and method for decomposing database queries for database management system including multiprocessor digital data processing system
EP0774186A4 (en) 1994-05-05 2005-07-20 Catapult Entertainment Inc Network architecture for real-time video games
US5581706A (en) 1994-06-30 1996-12-03 Rca Thomson Licensing Corporation Method forming an audio/video interactive data signal
US5668948A (en) * 1994-09-08 1997-09-16 International Business Machines Corporation Media streamer with control node enabling same isochronous streams to appear simultaneously at output ports or different streams to appear simultaneously at output ports
US5712976A (en) 1994-09-08 1998-01-27 International Business Machines Corporation Video data streamer for simultaneously conveying same one or different ones of data blocks stored in storage node to each of plurality of communication nodes
US5708796A (en) 1994-11-18 1998-01-13 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method of retrieving continuous and non-continuous media data from a file system
EP0724362B1 (en) 1995-01-30 2000-03-22 International Business Machines Corporation Priority controlled transmission of multimedia streams via a telecommunication line
JP3865775B2 (en) 1995-04-11 2007-01-10 キネテック インコーポレイテッド Identification data in a data processing system
US5802292A (en) * 1995-04-28 1998-09-01 Digital Equipment Corporation Method for predictive prefetching of information over a communications network
US5835749A (en) 1995-05-05 1998-11-10 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing dynamically linked libraries
US6044382A (en) 1995-05-19 2000-03-28 Cyber Fone Technologies, Inc. Data transaction assembly server
US6199082B1 (en) 1995-07-17 2001-03-06 Microsoft Corporation Method for delivering separate design and content in a multimedia publishing system
US5956509A (en) 1995-08-18 1999-09-21 Microsoft Corporation System and method for performing remote requests with an on-line service network
JP3751664B2 (en) * 1995-10-05 2006-03-01 富士通株式会社 Software registration system and method
US6047323A (en) 1995-10-19 2000-04-04 Hewlett-Packard Company Creation and migration of distributed streams in clusters of networked computers
US5761477A (en) 1995-12-04 1998-06-02 Microsoft Corporation Methods for safe and efficient implementations of virtual machines
US5765164A (en) 1995-12-21 1998-06-09 Intel Corporation Apparatus and method for management of discontinuous segments of multiple audio, video, and data streams
US6088524A (en) 1995-12-27 2000-07-11 Lucent Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for optimizing database queries involving aggregation predicates
CA2166254C (en) 1995-12-28 2000-02-01 Robert James Blainey Improving memory layout based on connectivity considerations
US5752005A (en) * 1996-01-22 1998-05-12 Microtest, Inc. Foreign file system establishing method which uses a native file system virtual device driver
US6199095B1 (en) 1996-01-29 2001-03-06 Compaq Computer Corporation System and method for achieving object method transparency in a multi-code execution environment
WO1997027553A1 (en) 1996-01-29 1997-07-31 Futuretense, Inc. Distributed electronic publishing system
US6058387A (en) 1996-01-30 2000-05-02 The University Of Chicago Dynamic information architecture system and method
US5754774A (en) 1996-02-15 1998-05-19 International Business Machine Corp. Client/server communication system
US5925100A (en) * 1996-03-21 1999-07-20 Sybase, Inc. Client/server system with methods for prefetching and managing semantic objects based on object-based prefetch primitive present in client's executing application
US5764235A (en) 1996-03-25 1998-06-09 Insight Development Corporation Computer implemented method and system for transmitting graphical images from server to client at user selectable resolution
US5768528A (en) 1996-05-24 1998-06-16 V-Cast, Inc. Client-server system for delivery of online information
US6173327B1 (en) * 1996-07-11 2001-01-09 Jeroen De Borst Object-oriented method and apparatus for information delivery
US5742768A (en) 1996-07-16 1998-04-21 Silicon Graphics, Inc. System and method for providing and displaying a web page having an embedded menu
US5809247A (en) * 1996-07-22 1998-09-15 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for guided touring of internet/intranet websites
US5919247A (en) 1996-07-24 1999-07-06 Marimba, Inc. Method for the distribution of code and data updates
US5958051A (en) 1996-11-27 1999-09-28 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Implementing digital signatures for data streams and data archives
US5894479A (en) 1996-12-10 1999-04-13 Intel Corporation Providing address resolution information for self registration of clients on power-up or dial-in
US5864870A (en) 1996-12-18 1999-01-26 Unisys Corp. Method for storing/retrieving files of various formats in an object database using a virtual multimedia file system
US5911776A (en) 1996-12-18 1999-06-15 Unisys Corporation Automatic format conversion system and publishing methodology for multi-user network
US5987513A (en) 1997-02-19 1999-11-16 Wipro Limited Network management using browser-based technology
US6139197A (en) 1997-03-04 2000-10-31 Seeitfirst.Com Method and system automatically forwarding snapshots created from a compressed digital video stream
US6128653A (en) 1997-03-17 2000-10-03 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for communication media commands and media data using the HTTP protocol
US6412004B1 (en) 1997-03-27 2002-06-25 Microsoft Corporation Metaserver for a multimedia distribution network
US5978788A (en) 1997-04-14 1999-11-02 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for generating multi-representations of a data cube
US5946697A (en) 1997-04-22 1999-08-31 Microsoft Corporation Rapid transfer of HTML files
JPH10301874A (en) * 1997-04-22 1998-11-13 Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> Remote operation method, server remotely operated from terminal through network and storage medium storing html file
US5892915A (en) 1997-04-25 1999-04-06 Emc Corporation System having client sending edit commands to server during transmission of continuous media from one clip in play list for editing the play list
US5878223A (en) 1997-05-07 1999-03-02 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for predictive caching of information pages
US5974129A (en) 1997-05-21 1999-10-26 Lucent Technologies Inc. Distributed virtual cache method for use in a database query control system
US6453334B1 (en) * 1997-06-16 2002-09-17 Streamtheory, Inc. Method and apparatus to allow remotely located computer programs and/or data to be accessed on a local computer in a secure, time-limited manner, with persistent caching
US5933644A (en) 1997-06-18 1999-08-03 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for conflict-based block reordering
US6604144B1 (en) * 1997-06-30 2003-08-05 Microsoft Corporation Data format for multimedia object storage, retrieval and transfer
US6065046A (en) * 1997-07-29 2000-05-16 Catharon Productions, Inc. Computerized system and associated method of optimally controlled storage and transfer of computer programs on a computer network
US6173291B1 (en) 1997-09-26 2001-01-09 Powerquest Corporation Method and apparatus for recovering data from damaged or corrupted file storage media
US6490620B1 (en) 1997-09-26 2002-12-03 Worldcom, Inc. Integrated proxy interface for web based broadband telecommunications management
US6085193A (en) 1997-09-29 2000-07-04 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for dynamically prefetching information via a server hierarchy
US6163805A (en) 1997-10-07 2000-12-19 Hewlett-Packard Company Distributed automated testing system
US6009410A (en) 1997-10-16 1999-12-28 At&T Corporation Method and system for presenting customized advertising to a user on the world wide web
US6813769B1 (en) * 1997-10-28 2004-11-02 Microsoft Corporation Server application components with control over state duration
US6631425B1 (en) * 1997-10-28 2003-10-07 Microsoft Corporation Just-in-time activation and as-soon-as-possible deactivation or server application components
US6393526B1 (en) 1997-10-28 2002-05-21 Cache Plan, Inc. Shared cache parsing and pre-fetch
US6122628A (en) 1997-10-31 2000-09-19 International Business Machines Corporation Multidimensional data clustering and dimension reduction for indexing and searching
US5966702A (en) 1997-10-31 1999-10-12 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for pre-processing and packaging class files
US6009429A (en) * 1997-11-13 1999-12-28 International Business Machines Corporation HTML guided web tour
US6029045A (en) 1997-12-09 2000-02-22 Cogent Technology, Inc. System and method for inserting local content into programming content
US6073129A (en) 1997-12-29 2000-06-06 Bull Hn Information Systems Inc. Method and apparatus for improving the performance of a database management system through a central cache mechanism
US6044403A (en) 1997-12-31 2000-03-28 At&T Corp Network server platform for internet, JAVA server and video application server
US6085226A (en) * 1998-01-15 2000-07-04 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for utility-directed prefetching of web pages into local cache using continual computation and user models
US6195622B1 (en) * 1998-01-15 2001-02-27 Microsoft Corporation Methods and apparatus for building attribute transition probability models for use in pre-fetching resources
US6023726A (en) 1998-01-20 2000-02-08 Netscape Communications Corporation User configurable prefetch control system for enabling client to prefetch documents from a network server
US6493434B1 (en) 1998-02-24 2002-12-10 At&T Corp. Update of web audio messages via audio user interface
US6959318B1 (en) * 1998-03-06 2005-10-25 Intel Corporation Method of proxy-assisted predictive pre-fetching with transcoding
US6173287B1 (en) 1998-03-11 2001-01-09 Digital Equipment Corporation Technique for ranking multimedia annotations of interest
US6205481B1 (en) 1998-03-17 2001-03-20 Infolibria, Inc. Protocol for distributing fresh content among networked cache servers
US6006265A (en) 1998-04-02 1999-12-21 Hotv, Inc. Hyperlinks resolution at and by a special network server in order to enable diverse sophisticated hyperlinking upon a digital network
US6148340A (en) 1998-04-30 2000-11-14 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for differencing container files
US6256635B1 (en) * 1998-05-08 2001-07-03 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for configuring a computer using scripting
US6572662B2 (en) * 1998-05-15 2003-06-03 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic customized web tours
US6102287A (en) 1998-05-15 2000-08-15 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for providing product survey information in an electronic payment system
US6253289B1 (en) * 1998-05-29 2001-06-26 Compaq Computer Corporation Maximizing sequential read streams while minimizing the impact on cache and other applications
US6381742B2 (en) 1998-06-19 2002-04-30 Microsoft Corporation Software package management
US6256623B1 (en) 1998-06-22 2001-07-03 Microsoft Corporation Network search access construct for accessing web-based search services
US6119082A (en) 1998-07-13 2000-09-12 Lockheed Martin Corporation Speech coding system and method including harmonic generator having an adaptive phase off-setter
US6108703A (en) 1998-07-14 2000-08-22 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Global hosting system
US6484311B2 (en) 1998-07-15 2002-11-19 Microsoft Corporation Coalescing properties, methods and events
US6311221B1 (en) 1998-07-22 2001-10-30 Appstream Inc. Streaming modules
US6357042B2 (en) 1998-09-16 2002-03-12 Anand Srinivasan Method and apparatus for multiplexing separately-authored metadata for insertion into a video data stream
US6230184B1 (en) 1998-10-19 2001-05-08 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for automatically optimizing execution of a computer program
US6374402B1 (en) 1998-11-16 2002-04-16 Into Networks, Inc. Method and apparatus for installation abstraction in a secure content delivery system
US6170008B1 (en) 1998-12-07 2001-01-02 Mediaone Group, Inc. On-the-fly trivial file transfer protocol
US6453354B1 (en) 1999-03-03 2002-09-17 Emc Corporation File server system using connection-oriented protocol and sharing data sets among data movers
US6499060B1 (en) 1999-03-12 2002-12-24 Microsoft Corporation Media coding for loss recovery with remotely predicted data units
US6272598B1 (en) 1999-03-22 2001-08-07 Hewlett-Packard Company Web cache performance by applying different replacement policies to the web cache
US6425125B1 (en) 1999-03-30 2002-07-23 Microsoft Corporation System and method for upgrading client software
US6408294B1 (en) 1999-03-31 2002-06-18 Verizon Laboratories Inc. Common term optimization
US6789252B1 (en) * 1999-04-15 2004-09-07 Miles D. Burke Building business objects and business software applications using dynamic object definitions of ingrediential objects
US6421777B1 (en) 1999-04-26 2002-07-16 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for managing boot images in a distributed data processing system
US6466980B1 (en) 1999-06-17 2002-10-15 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for capacity shaping in an internet environment
US6463508B1 (en) 1999-07-19 2002-10-08 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for caching a media stream
US6523027B1 (en) 1999-07-30 2003-02-18 Accenture Llp Interfacing servers in a Java based e-commerce architecture
US6282711B1 (en) 1999-08-10 2001-08-28 Hewlett-Packard Company Method for more efficiently installing software components from a remote server source
US6370573B1 (en) 1999-08-31 2002-04-09 Accenture Llp System, method and article of manufacture for managing an environment of a development architecture framework
US6427149B1 (en) 1999-09-09 2002-07-30 Herman Rodriguez Remote access of archived compressed data files
US6438630B1 (en) 1999-10-06 2002-08-20 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Scheduling storage accesses for multiple continuous media streams
US6546554B1 (en) * 2000-01-21 2003-04-08 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Browser-independent and automatic apparatus and method for receiving, installing and launching applications from a browser on a client computer
US7517551B2 (en) * 2000-05-12 2009-04-14 Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. Method of manufacturing a light-emitting device
US6535894B1 (en) 2000-06-01 2003-03-18 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Apparatus and method for incremental updating of archive files
US8831995B2 (en) * 2000-11-06 2014-09-09 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Optimized server for streamed applications
US20020083183A1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2002-06-27 Sanjay Pujare Conventionally coded application conversion system for streamed delivery and execution
US6959320B2 (en) * 2000-11-06 2005-10-25 Endeavors Technology, Inc. Client-side performance optimization system for streamed applications
US7062567B2 (en) * 2000-11-06 2006-06-13 Endeavors Technology, Inc. Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US20020087883A1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2002-07-04 Curt Wohlgemuth Anti-piracy system for remotely served computer applications
US6918113B2 (en) * 2000-11-06 2005-07-12 Endeavors Technology, Inc. Client installation and execution system for streamed applications
KR100408758B1 (en) * 2003-01-22 2003-11-26 Nexon Co Ltd Method for controlling user application program
US7735057B2 (en) * 2003-05-16 2010-06-08 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for packaging and streaming installation software
US9124653B2 (en) * 2004-09-03 2015-09-01 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for allowing sharing of streamable applications

Cited By (156)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030056112A1 (en) * 1997-06-16 2003-03-20 Jeffrey Vinson Method and apparatus to allow remotely located computer programs and/or data to be accessed on a local computer in a secure, time-limited manner, with persistent caching
US9094480B2 (en) 1997-06-16 2015-07-28 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Software streaming system and method
US8509230B2 (en) 1997-06-16 2013-08-13 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Software streaming system and method
US7096253B2 (en) 1997-06-16 2006-08-22 Stream Theory, Inc. Method and apparatus for streaming software
US7197570B2 (en) 1998-07-22 2007-03-27 Appstream Inc. System and method to send predicted application streamlets to a client device
US20020042833A1 (en) * 1998-07-22 2002-04-11 Danny Hendler Streaming of archive files
US20060047772A1 (en) * 2000-01-18 2006-03-02 Wrq, Inc. Applet embedded cross-platform caching
US8918487B2 (en) 2000-01-18 2014-12-23 Novell, Inc. Applet embedded cross-platform caching
US6983315B1 (en) 2000-01-18 2006-01-03 Wrq, Inc. Applet embedded cross-platform caching
US8332489B2 (en) 2000-01-18 2012-12-11 Attachmate Corporation Applet embedded cross-platform caching
US7979856B2 (en) 2000-06-21 2011-07-12 Microsoft Corporation Network-based software extensions
US8074217B2 (en) 2000-06-21 2011-12-06 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems for delivering software
US7900134B2 (en) 2000-06-21 2011-03-01 Microsoft Corporation Authoring arbitrary XML documents using DHTML and XSLT
US7779027B2 (en) 2000-06-21 2010-08-17 Microsoft Corporation Methods, systems, architectures and data structures for delivering software via a network
US7743063B2 (en) * 2000-06-21 2010-06-22 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems for delivering software via a network
US7818677B2 (en) 2000-06-21 2010-10-19 Microsoft Corporation Single window navigation methods and systems
US7673227B2 (en) 2000-06-21 2010-03-02 Microsoft Corporation User interface for integrated spreadsheets and word processing tables
US7689929B2 (en) 2000-06-21 2010-03-30 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems of providing information to computer users
US7051315B2 (en) 2000-09-26 2006-05-23 Appstream, Inc. Network streaming of multi-application program code
US7043524B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2006-05-09 Omnishift Technologies, Inc. Network caching system for streamed applications
US20020091763A1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2002-07-11 Shah Lacky Vasant Client-side performance optimization system for streamed applications
US20030009538A1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2003-01-09 Shah Lacky Vasant Network caching system for streamed applications
US9130953B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2015-09-08 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US7062567B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2006-06-13 Endeavors Technology, Inc. Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US6959320B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2005-10-25 Endeavors Technology, Inc. Client-side performance optimization system for streamed applications
US6918113B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2005-07-12 Endeavors Technology, Inc. Client installation and execution system for streamed applications
US9654548B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2017-05-16 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US8831995B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2014-09-09 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Optimized server for streamed applications
US8438298B2 (en) 2001-02-14 2013-05-07 Endeavors Technologies, Inc. Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US8893249B2 (en) 2001-02-14 2014-11-18 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US20030009488A1 (en) * 2001-05-22 2003-01-09 Reuters America, Inc System and method of accelerating delivery of dynamic web pages over a network
US7376653B2 (en) * 2001-05-22 2008-05-20 Reuters America, Inc. Creating dynamic web pages at a client browser
US8108687B2 (en) 2001-12-12 2012-01-31 Valve Corporation Method and system for granting access to system and content
US20030221112A1 (en) * 2001-12-12 2003-11-27 Ellis Richard Donald Method and system for granting access to system and content
US7895261B2 (en) 2001-12-12 2011-02-22 Valve Corporation Method and system for preloading resources
EP1483663A1 (en) * 2001-12-12 2004-12-08 Valve Corporation Method and system for preloading resources
EP1483663A4 (en) * 2001-12-12 2008-04-16 Valve Corp Method and system for preloading resources
US8661557B2 (en) 2001-12-12 2014-02-25 Valve Corporation Method and system for granting access to system and content
US20110145362A1 (en) * 2001-12-12 2011-06-16 Valve Llc Method and system for preloading resources
US8539038B2 (en) 2001-12-12 2013-09-17 Valve Corporation Method and system for preloading resources
US8117552B2 (en) 2003-03-24 2012-02-14 Microsoft Corporation Incrementally designing electronic forms and hierarchical schemas
US7925621B2 (en) 2003-03-24 2011-04-12 Microsoft Corporation Installing a solution
US8918729B2 (en) 2003-03-24 2014-12-23 Microsoft Corporation Designing electronic forms
US7865477B2 (en) 2003-03-28 2011-01-04 Microsoft Corporation System and method for real-time validation of structured data files
US7913159B2 (en) 2003-03-28 2011-03-22 Microsoft Corporation System and method for real-time validation of structured data files
US9229917B2 (en) 2003-03-28 2016-01-05 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Electronic form user interfaces
US7735057B2 (en) 2003-05-16 2010-06-08 Symantec Corporation Method and apparatus for packaging and streaming installation software
US9239821B2 (en) 2003-08-01 2016-01-19 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Translation file
US8892993B2 (en) 2003-08-01 2014-11-18 Microsoft Corporation Translation file
US7971139B2 (en) 2003-08-06 2011-06-28 Microsoft Corporation Correlation, association, or correspondence of electronic forms
US8429522B2 (en) 2003-08-06 2013-04-23 Microsoft Corporation Correlation, association, or correspondence of electronic forms
US9268760B2 (en) 2003-08-06 2016-02-23 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Correlation, association, or correspondence of electronic forms
US20050094791A1 (en) * 2003-10-31 2005-05-05 Clark Edward A. Data stream association with call through employment of identifier within message associated with the call
US7558871B2 (en) * 2003-10-31 2009-07-07 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Data stream association with call through employment of identifier within message associated with the call
US8819072B1 (en) 2004-02-02 2014-08-26 Microsoft Corporation Promoting data from structured data files
US7774620B1 (en) 2004-05-27 2010-08-10 Microsoft Corporation Executing applications at appropriate trust levels
US7676843B1 (en) 2004-05-27 2010-03-09 Microsoft Corporation Executing applications at appropriate trust levels
US9357031B2 (en) 2004-06-03 2016-05-31 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Applications as a service
US9569194B2 (en) 2004-06-03 2017-02-14 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Virtual application manager
US8812613B2 (en) 2004-06-03 2014-08-19 Maxsp Corporation Virtual application manager
US7908339B2 (en) 2004-06-03 2011-03-15 Maxsp Corporation Transaction based virtual file system optimized for high-latency network connections
US20060047946A1 (en) * 2004-07-09 2006-03-02 Keith Robert O Jr Distributed operating system management
US7664834B2 (en) 2004-07-09 2010-02-16 Maxsp Corporation Distributed operating system management
US20100125770A1 (en) * 2004-07-09 2010-05-20 Maxsp Corporation Distributed operating system management
US8171479B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2012-05-01 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing an aggregate view of enumerated system resources from various isolation layers
US20060074989A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-04-06 Laborczfalvi Lee G Method and apparatus for virtualizing object names
US7680758B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2010-03-16 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for isolating execution of software applications
US8302101B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2012-10-30 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for accessing, by application programs, resources provided by an operating system
US7692636B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2010-04-06 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods for handwriting to a screen
US7853947B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2010-12-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. System for virtualizing access to named system objects using rule action associated with request
US8117559B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2012-02-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for virtualizing window information
US8042120B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2011-10-18 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for moving processes between isolation environments
US8132176B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2012-03-06 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method for accessing, by application programs, resources residing inside an application isolation scope
US20070067255A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2007-03-22 Bissett Nicholas A Method and system for accessing resources
US7752600B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2010-07-06 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing file-type associations to multiple applications
US8352964B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2013-01-08 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for moving processes between isolation environments
US20060075381A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-04-06 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for isolating execution of software applications
US7676813B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2010-03-09 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for accessing resources
US20060070029A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing file-type associations to multiple applications
US20060106770A1 (en) * 2004-10-22 2006-05-18 Vries Jeffrey D System and method for predictive streaming
US8487879B2 (en) 2004-10-29 2013-07-16 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods for interacting with a computer through handwriting to a screen
US8359591B2 (en) 2004-11-13 2013-01-22 Streamtheory, Inc. Streaming from a media device
US8949820B2 (en) 2004-11-13 2015-02-03 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Streaming from a media device
US7712022B2 (en) 2004-11-15 2010-05-04 Microsoft Corporation Mutually exclusive options in electronic forms
US7721190B2 (en) 2004-11-16 2010-05-18 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems for server side form processing
US20060136389A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-06-22 Cover Clay H System and method for invocation of streaming application
US7937651B2 (en) 2005-01-14 2011-05-03 Microsoft Corporation Structural editing operations for network forms
US8589323B2 (en) 2005-03-04 2013-11-19 Maxsp Corporation Computer hardware and software diagnostic and report system incorporating an expert system and agents
US7624086B2 (en) 2005-03-04 2009-11-24 Maxsp Corporation Pre-install compliance system
US20060224545A1 (en) * 2005-03-04 2006-10-05 Keith Robert O Jr Computer hardware and software diagnostic and report system
US8234238B2 (en) 2005-03-04 2012-07-31 Maxsp Corporation Computer hardware and software diagnostic and report system
US7512584B2 (en) 2005-03-04 2009-03-31 Maxsp Corporation Computer hardware and software diagnostic and report system
US20060224544A1 (en) * 2005-03-04 2006-10-05 Keith Robert O Jr Pre-install compliance system
US7725834B2 (en) 2005-03-04 2010-05-25 Microsoft Corporation Designer-created aspect for an electronic form template
US9300752B2 (en) 2005-03-23 2016-03-29 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US9781007B2 (en) 2005-03-23 2017-10-03 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US8527706B2 (en) 2005-03-23 2013-09-03 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US8898391B2 (en) 2005-03-23 2014-11-25 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US9716609B2 (en) 2005-03-23 2017-07-25 Numecent Holdings, Inc. System and method for tracking changes to files in streaming applications
US7673228B2 (en) 2005-03-30 2010-03-02 Microsoft Corporation Data-driven actions for network forms
US8010515B2 (en) 2005-04-15 2011-08-30 Microsoft Corporation Query to an electronic form
US20070254742A1 (en) * 2005-06-06 2007-11-01 Digital Interactive Streams, Inc. Gaming on demand system and methodology
US8200975B2 (en) 2005-06-29 2012-06-12 Microsoft Corporation Digital signatures for network forms
US8095940B2 (en) 2005-09-19 2012-01-10 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for locating and accessing resources
US20070083620A1 (en) * 2005-10-07 2007-04-12 Pedersen Bradley J Methods for selecting between a predetermined number of execution methods for an application program
US7779034B2 (en) 2005-10-07 2010-08-17 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for accessing a remote file in a directory structure associated with an application program executing locally
US8131825B2 (en) 2005-10-07 2012-03-06 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and a system for responding locally to requests for file metadata associated with files stored remotely
US8001459B2 (en) 2005-12-05 2011-08-16 Microsoft Corporation Enabling electronic documents for limited-capability computing devices
US9210234B2 (en) 2005-12-05 2015-12-08 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Enabling electronic documents for limited-capability computing devices
US20080256178A1 (en) * 2005-12-08 2008-10-16 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Instit Method and Apparatus for Providing Software by Functional Units in a Software Streaming System
WO2007066993A1 (en) * 2005-12-08 2007-06-14 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Method and apparatus for providing software by functional units in a software streaming system
US9584480B2 (en) 2006-05-24 2017-02-28 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc System for and method of securing a network utilizing credentials
US20070274315A1 (en) * 2006-05-24 2007-11-29 Keith Robert O System for and method of securing a network utilizing credentials
US9160735B2 (en) 2006-05-24 2015-10-13 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc System for and method of securing a network utilizing credentials
US9893961B2 (en) 2006-05-24 2018-02-13 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Applications and services as a bundle
US8898319B2 (en) 2006-05-24 2014-11-25 Maxsp Corporation Applications and services as a bundle
US8811396B2 (en) 2006-05-24 2014-08-19 Maxsp Corporation System for and method of securing a network utilizing credentials
US9906418B2 (en) 2006-05-24 2018-02-27 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Applications and services as a bundle
US9054963B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2015-06-09 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US9825957B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2017-11-21 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US9699194B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2017-07-04 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US8261345B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2012-09-04 Endeavors Technologies, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US9380063B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2016-06-28 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US8752128B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2014-06-10 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US9054962B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2015-06-09 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US8782778B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2014-07-15 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US9571501B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2017-02-14 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US9645900B2 (en) 2006-12-21 2017-05-09 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Warm standby appliance
US9021494B2 (en) 2007-10-20 2015-04-28 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for communicating between isolation environments
US9009720B2 (en) 2007-10-20 2015-04-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for communicating between isolation environments
US9009721B2 (en) 2007-10-20 2015-04-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for communicating between isolation environments
US8171483B2 (en) 2007-10-20 2012-05-01 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for communicating between isolation environments
US8422833B2 (en) 2007-10-26 2013-04-16 Maxsp Corporation Method of and system for enhanced data storage
US9092374B2 (en) 2007-10-26 2015-07-28 Maxsp Corporation Method of and system for enhanced data storage
US9448858B2 (en) 2007-10-26 2016-09-20 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Environment manager
US20090119644A1 (en) * 2007-11-07 2009-05-07 Endeavors Technologies, Inc. Deriving component statistics for a stream enabled application
US9436578B2 (en) 2007-11-07 2016-09-06 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Deriving component statistics for a stream enabled application
US8661197B2 (en) 2007-11-07 2014-02-25 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US8024523B2 (en) 2007-11-07 2011-09-20 Endeavors Technologies, Inc. Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US8892738B2 (en) * 2007-11-07 2014-11-18 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Deriving component statistics for a stream enabled application
US20100268842A1 (en) * 2007-12-18 2010-10-21 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute System and method for providing streaming-based portable application
US8583816B2 (en) * 2007-12-18 2013-11-12 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute System for providing streaming-based portable application under selective conditions
US8977764B1 (en) 2008-02-28 2015-03-10 Symantec Corporation Profiling application usage from application streaming
US8095679B1 (en) * 2008-03-19 2012-01-10 Symantec Corporation Predictive transmission of content for application streaming and network file systems
US8090797B2 (en) 2009-05-02 2012-01-03 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for launching applications into existing isolation environments
US8326943B2 (en) 2009-05-02 2012-12-04 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for launching applications into existing isolation environments
CN104919449A (en) * 2012-10-23 2015-09-16 微软技术许可有限责任公司 Multiple buffering orders for digital content item
US20140115096A1 (en) * 2012-10-23 2014-04-24 Microsoft Corporation Recommending content based on content access tracking
US9300742B2 (en) 2012-10-23 2016-03-29 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Inc. Buffer ordering based on content access tracking
CN104838627A (en) * 2012-10-23 2015-08-12 微软技术许可有限责任公司 Buffer ordering based on content access tracking
CN104823424A (en) * 2012-10-23 2015-08-05 微软技术许可有限责任公司 Recommending content based on content access tracking
WO2014066413A1 (en) * 2012-10-23 2014-05-01 Microsoft Corporation Multiple buffering orders for digital content item
US9258353B2 (en) 2012-10-23 2016-02-09 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Multiple buffering orders for digital content item
CN103841429A (en) * 2012-11-27 2014-06-04 国际商业机器公司 Non-chronological buffering of segments of media file
US9781576B2 (en) * 2013-04-05 2017-10-03 Iheartmedia Management Services, Inc. Segmented WANcasting
US20140304364A1 (en) * 2013-04-05 2014-10-09 Clear Channel Management Services, Inc. Segmented WANcasting

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
US20030140160A1 (en) 2003-07-24 application
WO2001053940A2 (en) 2001-07-26 application
WO2001053940A3 (en) 2002-03-28 application
US7606924B2 (en) 2009-10-20 grant

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5577258A (en) Apparatus and method for preprocessing multimedia presentations to generate a delivery schedule
US6877007B1 (en) Method and apparatus for tracking a user&#39;s interaction with a resource supplied by a server computer
US6138155A (en) Method and apparatus for tracking client interaction with a network resource and creating client profiles and resource database
US5442771A (en) Method for storing data in an interactive computer network
US6154744A (en) System and method for optimized storage and retrieval of data on a distributed computer network
US6112240A (en) Web site client information tracker
US6286031B1 (en) Scalable multimedia distribution method using client pull to retrieve objects in a client-specific multimedia list
US6782003B1 (en) Data management system and method
US20030084439A1 (en) Incentive system for distributing software over a computer network
US6304904B1 (en) Method and apparatus for collecting page-level performance statistics from a network device
US7577751B2 (en) Software streaming system and method
US20020016736A1 (en) System and method for determining suitable breaks for inserting content
US20020143933A1 (en) Clickstream data collection technique
US20010051927A1 (en) Increasing web page browsing efficiency by periodically physically distributing memory media on which web page data are cached
US20050267798A1 (en) Auxiliary content delivery system
US20050066063A1 (en) Sparse caching for streaming media
US6584492B1 (en) Internet banner advertising process and apparatus having scalability
US20050010670A1 (en) Port proxy and system for server and client computers
US20090077163A1 (en) Approach for identifying and providing targeted content to a network client with reduced impact to the service provider
US20040049579A1 (en) Capacity-on-demand in distributed computing environments
US20040117455A1 (en) Parallel CDN-based content delivery
US20090216882A1 (en) Method and apparatus for internet traffic monitoring by third parties using monitoring implements transmitted via piggybacking http transactions
US6938047B2 (en) Methods, data structures, and systems for processing media data streams
US6714931B1 (en) Method and apparatus for forming user sessions and presenting internet data according to the user sessions
US6021439A (en) Internet quality-of-service method and system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: APPSTREAM, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:RAZ, URI;VOLK, YEHUDA;REEL/FRAME:013388/0602;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010227 TO 20010306

AS Assignment

Owner name: SYMANTEC CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:APPSTREAM, INC.;REEL/FRAME:021434/0370

Effective date: 20080801