US1789131A - Refractory article and furnace lining made therefrom - Google Patents

Refractory article and furnace lining made therefrom Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US1789131A
US1789131A US181602A US18160227A US1789131A US 1789131 A US1789131 A US 1789131A US 181602 A US181602 A US 181602A US 18160227 A US18160227 A US 18160227A US 1789131 A US1789131 A US 1789131A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
permeability
refractory
furnace lining
faces
blocks
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US181602A
Inventor
Raymond C Benner
George J Easter
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unifrax 1 LLC
Original Assignee
Carborundum Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Carborundum Co filed Critical Carborundum Co
Priority to US181602A priority Critical patent/US1789131A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US1789131A publication Critical patent/US1789131A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B35/00Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products
    • C04B35/515Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products based on non-oxide ceramics
    • C04B35/52Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products based on non-oxide ceramics based on carbon, e.g. graphite
    • C04B35/528Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products based on non-oxide ceramics based on carbon, e.g. graphite obtained from carbonaceous particles with or without other non-organic components

Definitions

  • Patented 3m. 13, 1931 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE
  • the object of our invention is to provide refractory articles, which, while made from the same substances as in the past, offer greater resistance to the penetration of furnace gases, particularly at high temperatures and hence do not deteriorate so rapidly.
  • the permeability of a refractory brick may be decreased in two ways.
  • the first consists in closing the pores of the bricks by various means, such as those described in U. S. Patent #1,472,386,
  • the second way comprises the use of mulled grain, i. e., grain from which.
  • the grains. are of irregular apply air at a known pressure to one face of 5 a pressure is applied, i. e., the brick becomes.
  • our invention consists in pressing the block in such manner that the minimum permeability is in a direction perpendicular to that face of the block which is exposed in the furnace wall. This may be attained by pressing the piece from the face in question during the in the case of thic er ware, by pressing from both that face and the opposite one.
  • a furnace lining formed in this'way has a permeability'in: a direction parallel to the opposite faces of greatest area and perpendicular to. the longitudinal axis of theblocks of which it is composed, which'is less than.'75% of ular to the exposed pfocess of manufacture, or
  • a furnace lining comprised of refractory blocks which have been pressed in"a direction perpendicular to the plane of the exposed faces of the blocks.
  • furnace linings which consists in moulding and pressing refractory mass into a block with the pressure applied in a direction at right angles to the surface of the block adapted to'be exposed, then laying the blocks so that the'exposed faces of the blocks are perpendicular tosurfaces of the blocks which have been subjected to direct pressure' 3.
  • a furnace lining comprised of refractory blocks which have the lowest permeability in a direction perpendicular to the exposed faces of the blocks.
  • a furnace lining comprised of refractory blocks havingaermeability erpendic- V faces of the locks less than ;0% of the permeability parallel to said faces.
  • a furnace lining comprising refractory blocks having a permeability perpendicular use to the exposed. face thereof lower than the I permeabilityin a direction parallel to the exposed face and made at least in part of silicon carbide.
  • a furnace lining comprised of refractory blocks having a permeability perpendicular to their exposed surfaces less than 7 5.0%?
  • a furnace lining madeat least in part from blocks of an oxidizable material and having a permeability perpendicular to the exposed faces thereof lower than that in the direction parallel to said exposed faces.
  • a refractory wall made at least in part from blocks of an oxidizable material, said blocks having a permeability perpendicular to the exposed faces thereof less than 75.0% of-the permeability parallel to the said-exposed faces.
  • a refractory article composed of bonded grains and having the shape of a brick occursin which the minimum permeability in a direction parallel to the opposite faces of greatest area and perpendicular to .one
  • a refractory article composed of bonded grains of an oxidizable material and hav- 7 ing the Shape of a r k in which t hemini mum permeability occurs in a direction parallel to the opposite faces of greatest area and perpendicular to one of the other faces.
  • a refractory article composed of bonded grains of an oxidizable material and having the shape of a brick in which the permeability in a direction parallel to the opposite faces of greatest area and perpendicular to one of the other faces is less than 75% of the permeability in either of the mutually perpendicular directions.
  • a refractory article composed of bonded silicon carbide grains and having the shape of a brick in which the permeability in a direction parallel to the opposite faces of greatest area and perpendicular to one of the other faces is less than 75% of the permeability in either of the mutually perpendicular directions.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Furnace Housings, Linings, Walls, And Ceilings (AREA)

Description

Patented 3m. 13, 1931 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE,
RAYMOND c. IBENNEB AND GEORGE J. EASTER, or NIAGARA frALLs, rinw Your.
ASSIGNORS no man CARBORUNDUM comrm, or NIAGARA FALLS, NEW YORK, A
CORPORATION OF PENNSYLVANIA REFRACTORY ARTICLE AND FURNACE LINING MADE THE REFROH No Drawing.
dize or decompose under the influence of furnace gases, and a method for making same. We refer particularly to refractories containing graphite, carbon, silicon carbide, etc.
The object of our invention is to provide refractory articles, which, while made from the same substances as in the past, offer greater resistance to the penetration of furnace gases, particularly at high temperatures and hence do not deteriorate so rapidly.
It is evident that within the limits of the speed of the reaction between the furnace gas or slag and the active constituent of the refractory, the life of the refractory is dependent upon the number and size of the permeable pores, as they permit the penetration of slags and gases, which accelerate the 'destruction of the article. I
It'is recognized in the art that the permeability of a refractory brick may be decreased in two ways. The first consists in closing the pores of the bricks by various means, such as those described in U. S. Patent #1,472,386,
to E. B. Forse. This relief is, however, only..-
temporary and is lost as soon as the original facing glaze of the bricks is destroyed to even the entire article.
a slight extent. The second way comprises the use of mulled grain, i. e., grain from which.
the sharp corners have been removed, so that better packing of particles is achieved with consequentreduction in porosity throughout This method is described in copending application of F. J. Tone, Serial No. 455,716, filed May 26" 1930, for an improvement in low permeable refractory and method of making the same.
We have discovered that in spite of these precautions there is a markedpermeability in bricks as ordinarily made, particularly in the direction perpendicular to that in which ressure is applied informingthe piece. or instance, we have observed the Application filed April 6,
1927; Serial No. 181,602.
followin 'in representative cominercially made re actories (measurements being as described below) r For measuring the permeabilities above, we
the brick and allow it to escape only at the opposite face (the others being sealed by immersion in mercury). The air flow through the specimen is then measured by -a meter in the air line ahead of the brick. In order to compare the value of air flow in one direction with that in the other, it is 'of course necessary to reduce the values to a common basis. sult is secured by multiplying theobserved flow by the thickness and dividing the product by the area and pressure. In this way the permeability is expressed in terms of air flow through a unit cube under unit pressure.
The difiernce in permeability in difier- We have found that the desired reent directions is due to a sort of lamination of the brick. In cut and polished microscopic specimens this lamination is often discernible, particularly in used brick which bination of permanent and temporary bonds,
the plasticity being supplied by the bonds and water. The grains. are of irregular apply air at a known pressure to one face of 5 a pressure is applied, i. e., the brick becomes.
degree, having layers shapes and include many comparatively broad thin pieces. As pressure is applied to these irregular pieces they must either resist it rigidly or twist until they assume a position presenting a broad surface to resist the pressure (the situation being analogous to their arrangement if each were placed on a plate and allowed to come to rest under the influence of gravity). Of course most of them twist, displacing the more plastic bond material from their path and forcing it to flow into positions where there is the minimum pressure on it. In this way a relatively large proportion of broad flat faces become completely or partly perpendicular to the pressure and the corresponding narrow edges are parallel to the pressed face.
This results in the crystals approaching one another more-closely at their sides than in the direction parallel to that in which stratified to a certai in which crystals predominate'separated by layers in which bond predominates. Upon burning, the temporary bond is removed and the permanent bond usually shrinks slightly, thus leaving open pores. between grains. Since the bond occurs in strata it is only natural that the pores should thus be stratified also and greater permeability perpendicular to the direction of pressure results. A
, Heretofore this factor has not been known and brick are commonly pressed on the broad face. This makes the laminations parallel to the broad face and leaves the spaces between them open to entrance from theside or end of the brick which for reasons of structural stability is practically al ways the face exposed in the furnace. Thus the brick is placed so as to offer the greatest opportunity for its destruction by entrance of. slag or oxidizing gases.
Having thus described the underlying I phenomena of our invention and the method of measuring the factors involved, our invention consists in pressing the block in such manner that the minimum permeability is in a direction perpendicular to that face of the block which is exposed in the furnace wall. This may be attained by pressing the piece from the face in question during the in the case of thic er ware, by pressing from both that face and the opposite one.
The blocks are then laid in the furnace lining so that the exposed face-isa face which has been subjected to direct pressure in the forming of the blocks. A furnace lining formed in this'way has a permeability'in: a direction parallel to the opposite faces of greatest area and perpendicular to. the longitudinal axis of theblocks of which it is composed, which'is less than.'75% of ular to the exposed pfocess of manufacture, or
of the other faces.
the permeability in directions at right an gles thereto. y r
In this way advantage is taken of the structural nature of the blocks to give minimum permeability to the exposed surface of the furnace lining. This is of particular importance in a lining which is of an oxidizable nature, such as one formed at least wholly or in part of silicon carbide and a bonding agent.
We claim: a l I A 1. A furnace lining comprised of refractory blocks which have been pressed in"a direction perpendicular to the plane of the exposed faces of the blocks.
2. vA, method of making furnace linings which consists in moulding and pressing refractory mass into a block with the pressure applied in a direction at right angles to the surface of the block adapted to'be exposed, then laying the blocks so that the'exposed faces of the blocks are perpendicular tosurfaces of the blocks which have been subjected to direct pressure' 3. A furnace lining comprised of refractory blocks which have the lowest permeability in a direction perpendicular to the exposed faces of the blocks.
4; A furnace lining comprised of refractory blocks havingaermeability erpendic- V faces of the locks less than ;0% of the permeability parallel to said faces.
I 5. A furnace lining comprising refractory blocks having a permeability perpendicular use to the exposed. face thereof lower than the I permeabilityin a direction parallel to the exposed face and made at least in part of silicon carbide. c
6. A furnace lining comprised of refractory blocks having a permeability perpendicular to their exposed surfaces less than 7 5.0%?
of their permeability in a direction arallel to their exposed faces and made at east in part of sicilon carbide.
7 A furnace lining madeat least in part from blocks of an oxidizable material and having a permeability perpendicular to the exposed faces thereof lower than that in the direction parallel to said exposed faces.
8. A refractory wall made at least in part from blocks of an oxidizable material, said blocks having a permeability perpendicular to the exposed faces thereof less than 75.0% of-the permeability parallel to the said-exposed faces.
- -9. A refractory article composed of bonded grains and having the shape of a brick occursin which the minimum permeability in a direction parallel to the opposite faces of greatest area and perpendicular to .one
10. A refractory article composed of bonded grains of an oxidizable material and hav- 7 ing the Shape of a r k in which t hemini mum permeability occurs in a direction parallel to the opposite faces of greatest area and perpendicular to one of the other faces.
11. A refractory article composed of bonded grains of an oxidizable material and having the shape of a brick in which the permeability in a direction parallel to the opposite faces of greatest area and perpendicular to one of the other faces is less than 75% of the permeability in either of the mutually perpendicular directions.
12. A refractory article composed of bonded silicon carbide grains and having the shape of a brick in which the permeability in a direction parallel to the opposite faces of greatest area and perpendicular to one of the other faces is less than 75% of the permeability in either of the mutually perpendicular directions.
In testimony whereof we have hereunto set our hands.
' RAYMOND C. BENNER. GEORGE J. EASTER.
US181602A 1927-04-06 1927-04-06 Refractory article and furnace lining made therefrom Expired - Lifetime US1789131A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US181602A US1789131A (en) 1927-04-06 1927-04-06 Refractory article and furnace lining made therefrom

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US181602A US1789131A (en) 1927-04-06 1927-04-06 Refractory article and furnace lining made therefrom

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US1789131A true US1789131A (en) 1931-01-13

Family

ID=22664979

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US181602A Expired - Lifetime US1789131A (en) 1927-04-06 1927-04-06 Refractory article and furnace lining made therefrom

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US1789131A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3507929A (en) * 1966-11-30 1970-04-21 John Happel Decoking process for a pyrolysis reactor

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3507929A (en) * 1966-11-30 1970-04-21 John Happel Decoking process for a pyrolysis reactor

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
White et al. Particle packing and particle shape
Davidge Mechanical behaviour of ceramics
US2290877A (en) Porous abrading material and process of making the same
US1789131A (en) Refractory article and furnace lining made therefrom
US1081573A (en) Porous article.
US1823356A (en) Refractory article
US3199992A (en) Ceramic building units
Sánchez et al. Residual stresses in porcelain tiles. Measurement and process variables assessment
US3690904A (en) Ceramics produced from spodumene,petalite and clay
US2629161A (en) Method of making ceramic articles
US2007052A (en) Porous article of ceramic bonded granular material
US2007053A (en) Method of making porous articles of ceramic bonded granular material
US3060543A (en) Method of manufacturing composite refractory objects
US1614926A (en) Method of making laminated ceramic articles
US3676162A (en) Magnesite refractory materials
US2826505A (en) Porous media
McPhee An introduction to inorganic dielectrics
US2952554A (en) Basic refractory brick
KR102383312B1 (en) Refractory ceramic batches and methods for making refractory ceramic articles
Cisneros-Gonzalez et al. Processing and Sintering of a High Purity α-Al2O3 Powder
GB306216A (en) An improved composition of matter resistant to high temperatures, and method of manufacturing the same
US1650577A (en) Zirconia-faced refractory
SU769397A1 (en) Method of manufacturing specimen of facing sand
Kainarskii et al. Relationship between the slag resistance of refractories and their porosity
Kingery Implications of Sintering Theories with Regard to Process Controls