US11839222B2 - Vegan potato emulsion - Google Patents

Vegan potato emulsion Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US11839222B2
US11839222B2 US16/871,072 US202016871072A US11839222B2 US 11839222 B2 US11839222 B2 US 11839222B2 US 202016871072 A US202016871072 A US 202016871072A US 11839222 B2 US11839222 B2 US 11839222B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
potato
vegan
oil
emulsion
protein
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
US16/871,072
Other versions
US20200323228A1 (en
Inventor
Eva Tornberg
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Veg Of Lund AB
Original Assignee
Veg Of Lund AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Veg Of Lund AB filed Critical Veg Of Lund AB
Assigned to VEG OF LUND AB reassignment VEG OF LUND AB ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TORNBERG, EVA
Publication of US20200323228A1 publication Critical patent/US20200323228A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US11839222B2 publication Critical patent/US11839222B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23C—DAIRY PRODUCTS, e.g. MILK, BUTTER OR CHEESE; MILK OR CHEESE SUBSTITUTES; MAKING THEREOF
    • A23C11/00—Milk substitutes, e.g. coffee whitener compositions
    • A23C11/02—Milk substitutes, e.g. coffee whitener compositions containing at least one non-milk component as source of fats or proteins
    • A23C11/10—Milk substitutes, e.g. coffee whitener compositions containing at least one non-milk component as source of fats or proteins containing or not lactose but no other milk components as source of fats, carbohydrates or proteins
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23C—DAIRY PRODUCTS, e.g. MILK, BUTTER OR CHEESE; MILK OR CHEESE SUBSTITUTES; MAKING THEREOF
    • A23C11/00—Milk substitutes, e.g. coffee whitener compositions
    • A23C11/02—Milk substitutes, e.g. coffee whitener compositions containing at least one non-milk component as source of fats or proteins
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23C—DAIRY PRODUCTS, e.g. MILK, BUTTER OR CHEESE; MILK OR CHEESE SUBSTITUTES; MAKING THEREOF
    • A23C11/00—Milk substitutes, e.g. coffee whitener compositions
    • A23C11/02—Milk substitutes, e.g. coffee whitener compositions containing at least one non-milk component as source of fats or proteins
    • A23C11/04—Milk substitutes, e.g. coffee whitener compositions containing at least one non-milk component as source of fats or proteins containing non-milk fats but no non-milk proteins
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23C—DAIRY PRODUCTS, e.g. MILK, BUTTER OR CHEESE; MILK OR CHEESE SUBSTITUTES; MAKING THEREOF
    • A23C11/00—Milk substitutes, e.g. coffee whitener compositions
    • A23C11/02—Milk substitutes, e.g. coffee whitener compositions containing at least one non-milk component as source of fats or proteins
    • A23C11/06—Milk substitutes, e.g. coffee whitener compositions containing at least one non-milk component as source of fats or proteins containing non-milk proteins
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23D—EDIBLE OILS OR FATS, e.g. MARGARINES, SHORTENINGS, COOKING OILS
    • A23D9/00—Other edible oils or fats, e.g. shortenings, cooking oils
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23J—PROTEIN COMPOSITIONS FOR FOODSTUFFS; WORKING-UP PROTEINS FOR FOODSTUFFS; PHOSPHATIDE COMPOSITIONS FOR FOODSTUFFS
    • A23J3/00—Working-up of proteins for foodstuffs
    • A23J3/14—Vegetable proteins
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23L—FOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L11/00—Pulses, i.e. fruits of leguminous plants, for production of food; Products from legumes; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L11/60—Drinks from legumes, e.g. lupine drinks
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23L—FOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L19/00—Products from fruits or vegetables; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L19/10—Products from fruits or vegetables; Preparation or treatment thereof of tuberous or like starch containing root crops
    • A23L19/12—Products from fruits or vegetables; Preparation or treatment thereof of tuberous or like starch containing root crops of potatoes
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23L—FOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L19/00—Products from fruits or vegetables; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L19/10—Products from fruits or vegetables; Preparation or treatment thereof of tuberous or like starch containing root crops
    • A23L19/12—Products from fruits or vegetables; Preparation or treatment thereof of tuberous or like starch containing root crops of potatoes
    • A23L19/14—Original non-roasted or non-fried potato pieces
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23L—FOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L19/00—Products from fruits or vegetables; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L19/10—Products from fruits or vegetables; Preparation or treatment thereof of tuberous or like starch containing root crops
    • A23L19/12—Products from fruits or vegetables; Preparation or treatment thereof of tuberous or like starch containing root crops of potatoes
    • A23L19/15—Unshaped dry products, e.g. powders, flakes, granules or agglomerates
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23L—FOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L2/00—Non-alcoholic beverages; Dry compositions or concentrates therefor; Their preparation
    • A23L2/52—Adding ingredients
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23L—FOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L29/00—Foods or foodstuffs containing additives; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L29/10—Foods or foodstuffs containing additives; Preparation or treatment thereof containing emulsifiers
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23L—FOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L29/00—Foods or foodstuffs containing additives; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L29/30—Foods or foodstuffs containing additives; Preparation or treatment thereof containing carbohydrate syrups; containing sugars; containing sugar alcohols, e.g. xylitol; containing starch hydrolysates, e.g. dextrin
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23L—FOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L35/00—Food or foodstuffs not provided for in groups A23L5/00 – A23L33/00; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L35/10—Emulsified foodstuffs
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23L—FOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L9/00—Puddings; Cream substitutes; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L9/20—Cream substitutes
    • A23L9/24—Cream substitutes containing non-milk fats and non-milk proteins, e.g. eggs or soybeans
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23P—SHAPING OR WORKING OF FOODSTUFFS, NOT FULLY COVERED BY A SINGLE OTHER SUBCLASS
    • A23P30/00—Shaping or working of foodstuffs characterised by the process or apparatus
    • A23P30/40—Foaming or whipping
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23V—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO FOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND LACTIC OR PROPIONIC ACID BACTERIA USED IN FOODSTUFFS OR FOOD PREPARATION
    • A23V2002/00—Food compositions, function of food ingredients or processes for food or foodstuffs
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23V—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO FOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND LACTIC OR PROPIONIC ACID BACTERIA USED IN FOODSTUFFS OR FOOD PREPARATION
    • A23V2250/00—Food ingredients
    • A23V2250/18—Lipids
    • A23V2250/184—Emulsifier
    • A23V2250/1842—Lecithin
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23V—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO FOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND LACTIC OR PROPIONIC ACID BACTERIA USED IN FOODSTUFFS OR FOOD PREPARATION
    • A23V2250/00—Food ingredients
    • A23V2250/54—Proteins
    • A23V2250/548—Vegetable protein
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23V—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO FOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND LACTIC OR PROPIONIC ACID BACTERIA USED IN FOODSTUFFS OR FOOD PREPARATION
    • A23V2250/00—Food ingredients
    • A23V2250/60—Sugars, e.g. mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-saccharides

Definitions

  • the potato emulsion is used as a vegan alternative to milk to consume as a drink as such or as a supplement in a coffee or a tea.
  • An advantage of using the potato emulsion of the invention is that it does not give rise to any “feathering” (aggregation of oil droplets and/or protein aggregation) and is whippable and upon combination with coffee or tea a portion thereof is provided as a stable foam on the top of the coffee or tea and a portion is remained in the coffee or tea, thus providing a vegan cappuccino, cafe latte or chailatte.
  • n i is the percentage of particles with diameter di.
  • This experiment is performed by having a tube connected to a crane with air and the flow is adjusted. Add 15 ml of the sample to a graduated cylinder and insert the tube with air supply to the bottom. Wait 15 s and then remove the tube. Measure the height of the foam (from the surface of the milk to the top of the foam) and then record how many seconds it takes for the foam to disappear.
  • the ingredients were mixed with a handmixer for 2 min.
  • the emulsion was then homogenized using a Tetra Pak homogenizer with a pressure of 150 bar or a valve homogenizer (Panda) at a pressure drop of 150-200 bar. All the samples were then pasteurized (90° C., 30 s)
  • a tank was filled with 60% of the water to be used. With vacuum the dry ingredients were sucked into the tank, wherein the bottom of the tank a mixer was placed. A water-based premix of the buffer system was introduced into the tank and thereafter a mixing of the ingredients was performed during 5 min. Then another premix of the oil and the lecithin was filled into the tank from the bottom and emulsification was done at a high speed during 5 min. Finally, the rest of the water was added and another emulsification was performed at the highest speed for 5 min. The emulsion was then pumped into the heating (UHT) plant. The emulsion was pre-heated to 95° C. in a plate heat exchanger and then steamed to 142° C. for 10 s. The temperature of the sample was flashed back to 80° C. with vacuum and valve homogenized at that temperature (170 bar/30 bar). The emulsion was then chilled with a heat exchanger down to 20° C.
  • UHT heating
  • the ingredients were potato base and oil, where after a potato protein, Solanic®200 from AVEBE, was added in two different concentrations, namely 0.5% and 1% added protein.
  • Solanic®300 may be used as a potato protein.
  • the amount of potato flakes was 5.8 gram (2.9%), water 182.2 grams (91.1%) and oil 12 gram (6%). All the samples were characterized with PSD measurements, sensory analysis, microscopic observations and foaming.
  • soybean lecithin was added via the oil, i.e. it was added in the oil phase instead of in the water phase, which was the case when using potato protein as the emulsifier.
  • the lecithin was added at two different levels, one with 3% of the 3% fat phase and the other with 6% of the 3% fat phase. Two batches were prepared for each level of soybean lecithin, out of which, one went through the valve homogenizer (150 bar) and the other was used as a control sample. All the four samples were then characterized.
  • lecithin Two samples were prepared with two different types of lecithin, namely deoiled rapeseed and deoiled sunflower lecithin, respectively added into the oil phase. The lecithin added mounted to 0.18% overall. Both the samples were then characterized. The ingredients were 2.9% potato flakes, 3% fructose, 0.18% lecithin, 3% rapeseed oil and 90.92% water.
  • the potato milks with 0.09 and 0.18% soy lecithin had a less appealing color compared to the rapeseed and sunflower lecithin. They also showed a separation after a day of storage. However, they had a little bit better taste than the other lecithins and they did not feather in the coffee.
  • lecithin Three samples were prepared with three different types of lecithin namely deoiled rapeseed, deoiled sunflower and deoiled soy lecithin, respectively, at a higher concentration of 0.5%.
  • the lecithins were added into the oil phase.
  • the rest of the ingredients (2.9% potato flakes, 3% fructose, 0.5% lecithin, 3% rapeseed oil and 90.65 water) were mixed into the water phase.
  • the potato emulsion with 0.5% Sunflower lecithin had the best taste among all the samples and tasted more like cow milk.
  • the emulsion with 0.5% soy lecithin also had a good taste and gave rise to no off taste.
  • the emulsion with 0.5% Rapeseed lecithin had somewhat off taste.
  • the D[3,2] is in the neighborhood of the oil droplet size of 0.5% potato protein stabilized emulsions.
  • the D[4,3] is in the same range for all the lecithins tried with potato flakes added and are probably mostly governed by the size of the starch granules originating from the potato flakes.
  • the potato emulsions obtained in this experiment were considered to be good enough to try them out in a real coffee shop where caffe lattes are made.
  • the potato emulsions in experiment 6 with three lecithin and protein as emulsifieres were added to the latte and it was found that the sunflower lecithin had the highest and the most stable foam followed by the rapeseed lecithin, while the soy lecithin showed the least foam height and stability.
  • taste it was found that potato emulsions with rapeseed and sunflower lecithin gave a better taste compared to soy lecithin.
  • Emulsion D[4,3] D[3,2] Appearance Taste pH 5.3 26,874 6,922 Look the same Good 6.90 as before 2 50,742 5,478 Look alike 5.3 Too thick, but 6.81 can be good in coffee 2a 56,601 6,304 Look alike 5.3 Tasteless, 6.93 relatively thick but creamy 2b 34,307 6,338 Perhaps Good taste, 6.90 somewhat lower darker than thickness but those above still creamy 2c 31,526 6,587 Perhaps Best taste, 6.92 somewhat least thick darker than those above
  • the industrially produced and UHT (ultra heat treated) potato emulsion should have a shelf life of 18 months with substantially remaining properties as described herein.

Abstract

A vegan, potato emulsion includes heat treated potato in an amount of 0.5-20% by weight. The emulsion further comprises at least one sugar in an amount of 0-5% by weight; at least one vegetable emulsifier in an amount of 0.09-1.0 by weight; at least one oil in an amount of 0.50-6% by weight; at least one added vegetable protein in an amount of 0.20-3% by weight; and water adding up to 100% by weight. The emulsion has an oil droplet size D[3,2] of 0.1-10 μm. The potato emulsion is whitish, and is whippable providing a foam.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
The present application is a bypass continuation of PCT Application No. PCT/SE2019/051192, filed Nov. 25, 2019, and claims priority to Swedish Patent Application No. 1851457-0, filed Nov. 26, 2018, the entire contents of both of which being incorporated herein by reference.
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is related to a vegan, potato emulsion comprising heat treated potato, sugar, a vegetable emulsifier, an oil and a vegetable protein, wherein the emulsion has an oil droplet size D[3,2] of 0.1-10 μm. The potato emulsion is whitish, and is whippable providing a foam. It can be used as an alternative to milk to consume as such or used as an additive in a drink such as coffee or tea.
BACKGROUND ART
Veganism is steadily growing throughout the world and means refraining from the use or consumption of animal products. Vegan food does not contain any animal-derived components, animal products or byproducts. Thus, vegan food only contains plant-based components.
Dietary vegans (or strict vegetarians) refrain from consuming animal products, not only meat but also eggs, dairy products and other animal-derived substances. This is a challenge and an opportunity for the food industry in preparing alternatives for certain existing animal derived food products and beverages. Dairy-products such as milk are not consumed by vegans. Alternatives to cow milk for consumption as such or as a supplement in different food products are desired by the vegan community. One field where dairy products usually are used are in drinks such as coffee or in tea. In addition, there is a growing trend of providing beverages, such as in a cappuccino or caffe latte, with a stable foam of milk on top of the drink product and another portion of the milk remaining in the drink product.
WO2010/043332 discloses a whipping agent comprising fat, protein and emulsifier. The protein used is sodium caseinate or whey protein powder, which are both dairy proteins. The whipping agent is non-vegan and is preferable presented as a powder. In addition, no potato is used.
WO2016/049577 discloses whippable food products comprising dietary fibre, protein, food starch, emulsifier, hydrocolloid, fat, and water.
Hydrocolloids are well known thickeners and gelling agents used in food formulations to improve shelf-life and quality. Also in this patent dairy proteins are suggested as emulsifiers, such as hydrolysed casein and Angel-type egg white.
WO2018/085323 discloses a pressurized composition, in a delivery system, comprising sugar, oil, milk protein concentrate, caseinate, stabilizer, emulsifier and buffering agent. The composition is non-vegan due to the presence of caseinate and milk protein concentrate.
PCT/SE2018/051007 discloses a potato based emulsion comprising vegetable oil, heat treated potato, fruit and vegetables and water, wherein oil drops in the emulsion have a diameter (D[3,2]) of less than 90 μm. The emulsion as disclosed in said patent document cannot be used as a substitute for milk.
There is still a need within the technical field to provide vegan beverages, as an alternative to milk, which are whippable and whitish and can be used as alternatives to milk as such or in coffee or tea, such as in a cappuccino, caffe latter or chailatte.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It has surprisingly been provided according to the present invention a vegan, potato emulsion which is an excellent substitute for milk. The potato emulsion has similar properties to milk and can be consumed as such or used as an additive in a drink such as tea of coffee.
The present invention is related to a vegan, potato emulsion comprising:
    • heat treated potato in an amount of 0.5-20% by weight;
    • at least one sugar in an amount of 0-5% by weight;
    • at least one vegetable emulsifier in an amount of 0.09-1.0% by weight;
    • at least one oil in an amount of 0.50-6% by weight;
    • at least one added vegetable protein in an amount of 0.20-3% by weight; and
    • water adding up to 100% by weight,
      wherein the emulsion has an oil droplet size D[3,2] of 0.1-10 μm.
FIGURES
No figures are provided herein although it is noted that FIG. 1 of parent PCT application PCT/SE2019/051192 is a color image showing potato emulsions using rapeseed, sunflower and soybean lecithins (with and without potato flakes) at concentrations of 0.18% together with 0.22% a potato protein as emulsifiers seen from the left to the right.
Definitions
By the term “heat treated potato” it is herein meant a source of potato being heated to above 95° C., such as to about 98-100° C. and 115-121° C.
By the term “vegetable oil” it is meant oil that is obtained from vegetabilic sources. The preferred sources are further described below.
By the term ‘source of potato’ and ‘potato’ it is herein meant potato in any form and from any origin. The potato may for example be in the form of potato flakes or as whole potato or in potato cubes. However, there is no limitations in the form of the potato.
By the term “potato flake” it is herein meant whitish flakes, where 30-65% of the flakes have a size of the non-limiting range of 1-3 mm.
By the term “potato cube” it is herein meant cubes of potato, or substantially cube formed potato, with about a non-limiting 10 mm side length.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
In particular, the present invention is related to a vegan, potato emulsion comprising:
    • heat treated potato in an amount of 0.5-20% by weight
    • at least one sugar in an amount of 0-5% by weight;
    • at least one vegetable emulsifier in an amount of 0.09-1.0% by weight;
    • at least one oil in an amount of 0.50-6% by weight;
    • at least one added vegetable protein in an amount of 0.20-3% by weight; and
    • water adding up to 100% by weight,
      wherein the emulsion has an oil droplet size D[3,2] of 0.1-10 μm.
The specific combination of technical features of the potato emulsion provides beneficial features such as avoidance of feathering, having a stable foam upon whipping of the potato emulsion as well as having a nice taste. Using potato is also beneficial from a sustainability perspective since it is the crop that gives the most food per cultivated area especially in Nordic countries. The emulsion of the present invention comprises a source of potato which has been heat treated before being added to the emulsion. The source of potato can be pretreated and provided in the form of potato flakes. It can also be provided in the form of whole potato and/or potato cubes which have been heat treated.
In an embodiment of the invention the heat-treated potato is chosen from potato flakes which have been heated to at least 100° C. or whole and/or potato cubes which have been pasteurized at at least 98° C., or have been autoclaved at about 115-121° C.;
It has been found that when potato flakes are chosen to be included in the emulsion the source of potato has been heated to at least 100° C. during evaporation. It has also been found that when the source of potato is in the form of whole potato and/or potato cubes they shall be either pasteurized at 98° C. for 25-30 min with a total heating time of 68 min. or heated by autoclaving at about 115-121° C. (pressure of 2 bar) for 32 min. with a total heating time of 55-60 min.
The source of potato is present in an amount of 0.5-20% by weight, for example 0.5-10% by weight. For example, the heat treated potato is present in an amount of 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 or 20% by weight.
The at least one sugar is selected from the group consisting of a monosaccharide such as glucose, fructose or galactose, a disaccharide such as sucrose, or maltose, and a polyol, i.e. a sugar alcohol such as mannitol, sorbitol, or xylitol. The invention is not limited to the specific sugar chosen. The sugar is present in an amount of 0-5% by weight, for instance 1-5% by weight, eg 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 by weight. The added sugar provides a sweet taste and conceals the taste of the potato which may be undesirable.
The at least one emulsifier is selected from vegetable lecithin, such as selected from the group consisting of rapeseed lecithin, sunflower lecithin, and soy lecithin, where especially deoiled rapeseed lecithin and deoiled sunflower and deoiled soy lecithin can be used. The at least one emulsifier may be added to the potato emulsion via the at least one oil. It will be understood that also different combinations of emulsifiers such as different lecithins can be chosen to be included in the emulsion. The at least one emulsifier is present in an amount of 0.09-1.0% by weight. The emulsifier may be present in an amount of 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4, 0.45, 0.5% by weight. The benefits of including an emulsifier is the avoidance of feathering and providing a stable foam upon whipping the emulsion.
The at least one oil is selected from the group consisting of rapeseed oil, olive oil, maize oil, sunflower oil, soybean oil, coconut oil, peanut oil, sesame oil, linseed oil, avocado oil, walnut oil, pistachio oil, and hazelnut oil. It will be understood that also different combinations of vegetable oils can be chosen to be included in the emulsion. The at least one oil is present in an amount of 0.5-6% by weight, e.g. 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5 or 6% by weight. The at least one added vegetable protein is selected from a potato protein, a pea protein, or soy protein or any other vegetable protein. The vegetable protein may be added in liquid form or added as a powder. The vegetable protein may be added via the water phase. It will be understood that also different combinations of vegetable proteins can be chosen to be included in the emulsion. Thus, the added protein is not from the potato source itself as used in the potation emulsion of the invention. The at least one added vegetable protein is present in an amount of 0.2-3% by weight, e.g. about 0.5, 0.7, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, or 3% by weight. The vegetable protein is acting as an emulsifier in the emulsion.
In an embodiment of the invention the potato emulsion additionally comprises of at least one pH regulating agent in order to increase the pH to typically 6.5 to 7.5, especially to 6.5 to 7.0. It is especially important to increase the pH of the potato emulsion when it is to be added to coffee, which normally has a pH value of 4.5-5.5. Any pH regulating agent ordinary for consumption may be used, examples of pH regulating agents are Na2HPO4—NaH2PO4 and K2HPO4—KH2PO4. These pH regulating agents (also named buffers herein) confer a lowered bitterness of the potato milk by itself and in a drink.
In an embodiment of the invention any other flavouring agent such as cocoa, may also be added to the potato emulsion, in addition to sugar, to conceal the potato flavour or to provide another taste of the potato emulsion.
The potato emulsion of the invention comprises oil droplets of a defined size. It has been found that the majority of the oil drops have a diameter D[3,2] of 0.2-10 μm, preferably a diameter within the interval of 0.2-5 μm, or 0.2-3 μm to provide a potato emulsion with whitish colour and with a good texture, which was experienced in the sensory evaluation as performed in the experiments. Furthermore, the oil droplets are not flocculated, which is important for the droplets not to cream. The industrial production of the potato emulsion as disclosed in the experimental part provides an emulsion having the majority of the oil drops in the range from 0.5-3 μm (D[3,2]). This industrially produced potato emulsion also has a whiter appearance, good foaming performance and a nice taste.
In an embodiment of the invention the potato emulsion is used as a vegan alternative to milk to consume as a drink as such or as a supplement in a coffee or a tea. An advantage of using the potato emulsion of the invention is that it does not give rise to any “feathering” (aggregation of oil droplets and/or protein aggregation) and is whippable and upon combination with coffee or tea a portion thereof is provided as a stable foam on the top of the coffee or tea and a portion is remained in the coffee or tea, thus providing a vegan cappuccino, cafe latte or chailatte.
EXAMPLES
By way of examples, and not limitation, the following examples identify a variety of beverage compositions pursuant to embodiments of the present invention.
A source of heat treated potato is included in the emulsion.
Description of Methods Used in the Patent Vegan Potato Milk
Determination of Particel Size Distribution (PSD)
The particle size distribution (PSD) of the emulsion droplets D[3,2] and the starch granules D[4,3] has been measured using a laser diffraction analyser (Malvern Mastersizer). The mean particle size can be calculated based on the volume or the area occupied by the particles, expressed as d43 (also written as D[4,3]) and d32 (also written as D[3,2] herein), respectively.
d 4 ⁢ 3 = ∑ i ⁢ n i ⁢ d i 4 / ∑ i ⁢ n i ⁢ d i 3 d 32 = ∑ i ⁢ n i ⁢ d i 3 / ∑ i ⁢ n i ⁢ d i 2
Where ni is the percentage of particles with diameter di.
Foaming Experiment
This experiment is performed by having a tube connected to a crane with air and the flow is adjusted. Add 15 ml of the sample to a graduated cylinder and insert the tube with air supply to the bottom. Wait 15 s and then remove the tube. Measure the height of the foam (from the surface of the milk to the top of the foam) and then record how many seconds it takes for the foam to disappear.
Another foaming test was worked out, where 130 ml of prepared potato emulsion was added into a nepresso machine, which is able to stir and heat on the same time and has been especially designed to foam ordinary milk to be used in coffee. Stirring with heat (read on-button) went on for 1 min. The foam was directly poured into a 400 ml beaker and the amount of foam was read off in ml from the beaker and subtracted from the original amount. This is the original foam height. The foam drainage was obtained by letting the foam stand for 5 min., where after the foam height is read off again. The foam drainage in ml/min is achieved by subtracting the foam height after 5 min. from the original foam height and this difference was divided with 5 min.
Emulsion Preparations in the Lab
The ingredients were mixed with a handmixer for 2 min. The emulsion was then homogenized using a Tetra Pak homogenizer with a pressure of 150 bar or a valve homogenizer (Panda) at a pressure drop of 150-200 bar. All the samples were then pasteurized (90° C., 30 s)
Emulsion Preparation in the Industry
A tank was filled with 60% of the water to be used. With vacuum the dry ingredients were sucked into the tank, wherein the bottom of the tank a mixer was placed. A water-based premix of the buffer system was introduced into the tank and thereafter a mixing of the ingredients was performed during 5 min. Then another premix of the oil and the lecithin was filled into the tank from the bottom and emulsification was done at a high speed during 5 min. Finally, the rest of the water was added and another emulsification was performed at the highest speed for 5 min. The emulsion was then pumped into the heating (UHT) plant. The emulsion was pre-heated to 95° C. in a plate heat exchanger and then steamed to 142° C. for 10 s. The temperature of the sample was flashed back to 80° C. with vacuum and valve homogenized at that temperature (170 bar/30 bar). The emulsion was then chilled with a heat exchanger down to 20° C.
Preparation of Source of Potato
Different sources of potatoes were prepared according to the same methodolgy as described in the patent application PCT/SE2018/051007.
Experiment 1—Potato Flakes and Protein
In the first experiment the ingredients were potato base and oil, where after a potato protein, Solanic®200 from AVEBE, was added in two different concentrations, namely 0.5% and 1% added protein. As an alternative, Solanic®300 may be used as a potato protein. The amount of potato flakes (Ecological Kebelco potato flakes) was 5.8 gram (2.9%), water 182.2 grams (91.1%) and oil 12 gram (6%). All the samples were characterized with PSD measurements, sensory analysis, microscopic observations and foaming.
In the sensory evaluation two milk-like emulsions were tested; one with 0.5% protein and 3% fat, and another one with 1% protein and 3% fat, respectively. The emulsion with the lowest protein concentration has an off-taste but manageable and gives a foam as well. For the latter emulsion, however, an intense off-taste and a more brownish milk color was observed but a good foaming occurred.
The results from the PSD measurements can be seen in Table 1, where the area weighted particle size D[3,2] is considered to mostly reflect the oil droplet size of the emulsion and the volume weighted average diameter D[4,3] mostly mirrors the starch granule size, respectively. Smaller oil droplets are achieved with the higher protein content, but still relatively small oil droplet sizes of 2.6 μm are achieved also with the lower protein concentration.
TABLE 1
The oil droplet size D[3,2] and starch granule size
D[4,3] of two different potato milks
D[3,2] D[4,3]
Sample (μm) (μm)
0.5% Protein 2.492 69.589
3% fat
0.5% Protein 2.810 48.978
3% fat
1% Protein 1.046 48.183
3% fat
1% Protein 1.865 63.682
3% fat
Experiment 2—without Potato Flakes
In order to see the influence of the potato base a potato emulsion without the potato flakes were made. Therefore, only water, oil and Solanic 200 protein were used in the emulsions. The potato protein consists of 90.5% protein and the required amount of the powder was then calculated accordingly to give 0.5%, 1% and 2% protein in the final samples, respectively. Each sample was then divided into 3 batches to add 1.5% of fructose in one, 3% sucrose in the second and the third was used as a control. All the 9 samples were characterized with PSD measurement, sensory analysis, microscopic observations and foaming.
In the sensory evaluation the potato milk with 0.5% potato protein added had the best, most whitish color out of all the potato milks studied in this experiment. It also had a manageable off-taste. To this milk also 1.5% fructose was added, but it did not achieve enough sweetness. Therefore 3% sucrose was added to this milk and a relatively good sweetness was achieved that covers the off-taste quite well.
For the potato milk with 1% potato protein added a somewhat brownish color was achieved and there was an off-taste. When 1.5% fructose was added to this milk not enough sweetness was obtained. However, with 3% sucrose added the taste could be characterized as good sweetness that covered the off-taste rather well but still the off-taste was noticeable.
For the potato milk with 2% potato protein added a very intense off-taste was experienced and the color was the most brownish compared to the rest. By adding 1.5% fructose not enough sweetness was achieved. Not even with 3% sucrose added not enough sweetness to cover the off-taste was obtained. The results from the PSD measurements can be seen in Table 2. Smaller oil droplets are achieved with the two highest protein concentrations of 1 and 2% having a D[3,2] of about 0.5 μm and both of them being substantially lower than the D[3,2] of 2.6 μm for the potato milk with 0.5% protein. The former oil droplet size is in the neighborhood of the one achieved with cow milk and vegetable oat milk which was also included as a comparison.
TABLE 2
The oil droplet size D[3,2] and starch granule size D[4,3]
of different milks without potato flakes.
D[3,2] D[4,3]
Sample (μm) (μm)
0.5% Protein 2.56 6.7
3% fat 2.43 6.0
1% Protein 0.47 1.5
3% fat 0.47 1.5
2% Protein 0.43 1.8
3% fat 0.47 6.6
Cow milk 0.20 6
Oat milk 0.21 3
The results of the foaming experiments are presented in Table 3 and it can be deduced from these results that the three potato emulsions without potato flakes do not reach the same high initial foam heights and are also less stable as the references and moreover they are worse than those potato emulsions with potato flakes. Evidently, the potato flakes used as potato base seem to contribute to both the foam height and stability.
TABLE 3
Foaming experiments with different potato emulsions and references
measuring initial foam height and the time it takes to disappear.
Sample Foam height (ml) Time to disappear (s)
Cow milk (3% fat) 25 20
Vegetable oat 27 50
milk(3% fat)
0.5% protein with 8 35
potato flakes(3% fat)
1% protein with potato 6 30
flakes (3% fat)
0.5% protein (3% fat) 4 13
without potato flakes
1% protein (3% fat) 3 10
without potato flakes
2% protein (3% fat) 5 15
without potato flakes
Example 3—Emulsifier of Vegetable Origin (Deoiled Soybean Lecithin)
In this experiment another emulsifier, deoiled soya lecithin, was used instead of potato protein. The ingredients were 2.9% potato flakes, 3% fructose and 0.09/0.18% soybean lecithin, 3% rapeseed oil and 91.01/90.02% water. The soybean lecithin was added via the oil, i.e. it was added in the oil phase instead of in the water phase, which was the case when using potato protein as the emulsifier. The lecithin was added at two different levels, one with 3% of the 3% fat phase and the other with 6% of the 3% fat phase. Two batches were prepared for each level of soybean lecithin, out of which, one went through the valve homogenizer (150 bar) and the other was used as a control sample. All the four samples were then characterized.
In the sensory evaluation of the four potato emulsions the soy lecithin did not give any off-taste, which was the case when using added potato protein as the emulsifier. Appearance wise, the color was great and the consistency was smooth when homogenized. There was, however, separation after 1 days' storage.
The results from the PSD measurements of the two potato emulsions with different amounts of deoiled soy lecithin added with and without valve homogenization (control) can be seen in Table 4. When valve homogenized the D[3,2] is around 12 μm that is smaller than only using potato flakes but larger when potato protein is added. That means that the potato protein is the most efficient emulsifier among the two emulsifiers compared, but it gives rise to more off-flavour than the soy lecithin. Using the valve homogenizer is crucial to obtain the smaller oil droplets as the D[3,2] for the control is as high as around 45 μm. There is no difference in oil droplet size at the two different concentrations of soy lecithin used.
TABLE 4
The oil droplet size D[3,2] and starch granule size
D[4,3] when using soy lecithin as emulsifier
Sample D[3,2] (μm) D[4,3] (μm)
0.09% Soy lecithin 12.74 71.44
added and valve
homogenised
0.09% Soy lecithin 13.14 73.96
added and valve
homogenised
0.09% Soy lecithin 45.51 163.25
added not valve
homogenized
0.09% Soy lecithin 49.58 164.57
added not valve
homogenized
0.18% Soy lecithin 12.90 77.68
added and valve
homogenised
0.18% Soy lecithin 12.70 71.07
added and valve
homogenised
0.18% Soy lecithin 45.21 157.92
added not valve
homogenized
0.18% Soy lecithin 41.49 164.19
added not valve
homogenized
Experiment 4—Deoiled Rapeseed and Deoiled Sunflower Lecithin
Two samples were prepared with two different types of lecithin, namely deoiled rapeseed and deoiled sunflower lecithin, respectively added into the oil phase. The lecithin added mounted to 0.18% overall. Both the samples were then characterized. The ingredients were 2.9% potato flakes, 3% fructose, 0.18% lecithin, 3% rapeseed oil and 90.92% water.
In the sensory evaluation of the potato emulsions with 0.18% Sunflower lecithin good whitish colour and consistency was obtained. It gave rise to somewhat off-taste and after a while there is some separation. But it did not feather when added into coffee.
For the potato milk with 0.18% Rapeseed lecithin the most appealing color overall, in milk and in coffee was achieved, but it also gave somewhat off-taste. There was a separation in the milk but the sample did not feather when added into coffee.
The potato milks with 0.09 and 0.18% soy lecithin had a less appealing color compared to the rapeseed and sunflower lecithin. They also showed a separation after a day of storage. However, they had a little bit better taste than the other lecithins and they did not feather in the coffee.
The results from the PSD measurements of the two potato emulsions with sunflower and rapeseed lecithin added can be seen in table 5. It is interesting to note that D[3,2] is about 7-8 μm for those type of lecithins and is smaller than the D[3,2] of around 12 μm that was observed for the soy lecithin stabilized emulsions. The D[4,3] is in the same range for all the lecithins tried and are probably mostly governed by the size of the starch granules originated from the potato flakes.
TABLE 5
The oil droplet size D[3,2] and starch granule size D[4,3]
when using rapeseed and sunflower oil lecithin as emulsifiers
Sample D[3,2] D[4,3]
0.18% Sunflower 8.075 69.908
lecithin added
0.18% Sunflower 8.384 74.249
lecithin added
0.18% rapeseed 7.113 64.851
lecithin added
0.18% rapeseed 7.595 77.188
lecithin added
The results of the foaming experiments for the two emulsions using sunflower and rapeseed lecithin as an emulsifier are collected in Table 6. Among the lecithins studied the rapeseed lecithin seems to give the best foam followed by soy lecithin and ultimately sunflower lecithin. The foaming behavior is similar or even better for the potato emulsion stabilised by 0.5% potato protein added.
TABLE 6
Foaming experiments with different potato emulsions when adding
sunflower, rapeseed and soy lecithin at 0.18% measuring initial
foam height and the time it takes to disappear.
Sample Foam height (ml) Time to disappear (s)
0.18% Sunflower 2 20
lecithin added
0.18% rapeseed 7 50
lecithin added
0.18% Soy lecithin 4 40
added
Experiment 5—Different Types of Lecithins
Three samples were prepared with three different types of lecithin namely deoiled rapeseed, deoiled sunflower and deoiled soy lecithin, respectively, at a higher concentration of 0.5%. The lecithins were added into the oil phase. The rest of the ingredients (2.9% potato flakes, 3% fructose, 0.5% lecithin, 3% rapeseed oil and 90.65 water) were mixed into the water phase.
In the sensory evaluation it was found that the increase in the lecithin concentration up to 0.5% gave a better whitish color to the samples, and they did not give rise to any odd off-taste overall. The samples felt thick during the tasting and some oiliness could be tasted as well.
The potato emulsion with 0.5% Sunflower lecithin had the best taste among all the samples and tasted more like cow milk. The emulsion with 0.5% soy lecithin also had a good taste and gave rise to no off taste. The emulsion with 0.5% Rapeseed lecithin had somewhat off taste.
TABLE 7
The oil droplet size D[3,2] and starch granule
size D[4,3] when using sunflower, rapeseed
and soy lecithin at a concentration of 0.5% as emulsifiers
Sample D[3,2] D[4,3]
0.5% Sunflower lecithin 6.133 74.891
6.218 74.587
0.5% Rapeseed lecithin 5.300 76.185
5.666 74.489
0.5% Soy lecithin 7.349 69.645
7.410 70.616
The results from the PSD measurements of the three potato emulsions with sunflower, rapeseed and soy lecithin added can be seen in table 7. It is interesting to note that the lowering of D[3,2] is relatively small to about 5-6 μm for the two first lecithin at this higher concentration, which was 7-8 μm at the lower concentration. But for the soy lecithin the lowering of the oil droplet size is more substantial going from a D[3,2] of around 12 μm at the lower concentration of 0.18% down to 7 μm at 0.5%. The D[4,3] is in the same range for all the lecithins tried and are probably mostly governed by the size of the starch granules originating from the potato flakes.
TABLE 8
Foaming experiments with different potato emulsions when adding
sunflower, rapeseed and soy lecithin at 0.5% measuring the
initial foam height and the time it takes to disappear.
Sample Foam height (ml) Time to disappear (s)
0.5% Sunflower 7 40
0.5% Rapeseed 6 65
0.5% Soy 8 45
The results of the foaming experiments for the three emulsions using sunflower, rapeseed and soy lecithin at a concentration of 0.5% as an emulsifier are collected in Table 8. Among the lecithins studied the rapeseed lecithin seems to give the most stable foam followed by soy lecithin and ultimately sunflower lecithin although they are rather similar. The higher concentration of 0.5% gives a somewhat higher foam height and stability compared to the lower concentration of 0.18% for all the lecithins investigated.
Experiment 6—Different Lecithins and Potato Protein
Three samples were prepared with three different types of lecithin namely deoiled rapeseed, deoiled sunflower and deoiled soy lecithin, respectively added in the oil. There was also a fourth sample made using soy lecithin with the same composition as the other samples (2.9% potato flakes, 3% fructose, 0.18% lecithin, 3% rapeseed oil, 0.22% solanic 200 and 90.7% water) except that the potato flakes were not included in this case. The amount of Solanic 200 was added in the water phase for all the samples and it was calculated to give an overall 0.22% protein content.
In the sensory evaluation all the samples were white in color and with a good texture. The presence of potato flakes gave a more satisfactory rich mouth feel. All the samples tasted well, without any off-taste despite using Solanic 200, probably due to the low concentration compared to the former samples. The sample without the potato flakes did not taste so great compared to the other three samples.
The results from the PSD measurements of the four potato emulsions with sunflower, rapeseed and soy lecithin (with and without potato flakes) at a concentration of 0.18% together with 0.22% potato protein as emulsifiers can be seen in table 9. It is interesting to note that there is a substantial lowering of D[3,2] compared to only using the lecithins now varying between 2-4 μm instead of about 7-8 μm for the two first lecithins and for the soy lecithin having a D[3,2] of around 12 μm at the lower concentration of 0.18%.
Moreover, the D[3,2] is in the neighborhood of the oil droplet size of 0.5% potato protein stabilized emulsions. These observations further substantiate the hypothesis of a complex formation between the protein and the lecithin at the interface of the oil globule. It is further interesting to observe that without potato flakes the oil droplets are smaller when using soy lecithin. That can depend on a lower viscosity of the continuous phase thereby making the emulsification procedure easier.
The D[4,3] is in the same range for all the lecithins tried with potato flakes added and are probably mostly governed by the size of the starch granules originating from the potato flakes.
TABLE 9
The oil droplet size D[3,2] and starch granule size
D[4,3] of a potato emulsion, when using sunflower,
rapeseed and soy lecithin (with and without potato flakes)
at a concentrations of 0.18% together with 0.22% potato
protein as emulsifiers. Two measurements of each sample.
Sample D[3,2] D[4,3]
0.18% Rapeseed + 2.902 63.581
0.22% potato protein 3.902 62.790
0.18% Sunflower + 2.888 67.795
0.22% potato protein 2.437 64.729
0.18% Soy + 4.745 69.943
0.22% potato protein 4.227 69.866
0.18% Soy without 2.563 19.640
potato flakes 2.635 10.267
0.22% potato protein
The results of the foaming experiments for the four emulsions using sunflower, rapeseed and soy lecithin (with and without potato flakes) at a concentrations of 0.18% together with 0.22% potato protein as emulsifiers are collected in Table 10. Among the lecithins studied the rapeseed and the sunflower lecithin seem to give the best foam followed by soy lecithin. The foam heights seen in Table 10 are the best and approaches those of cow milk and vegetable oat milk as seen in Table 3.
TABLE 10
Foaming experiments with different potato emulsions when
adding sunflower, rapeseed and soy lecithin (with and without
potato flakes) at a concentrations of 0.18% together with
0.22% potato protein as emulsifiers, measuring the initial
foam height and the time it takes to disappear.
Sample Foam height (ml) Time to disappear (s)
0.18% Rapeseed 13 58
lecithin + 0.22% protein
0.18% Sunflower 17 60
lecithin + 0.22% protein
0.18% Soy 10 54
lecithin + 0.22% protein
0.18% Soy 2 4
lecithin + 0.22% protein
without potato flakes
The pH of the emulsions have also been measured. The pH is even lower when the protein is added being around 5.7 as compared to 5.9 without the protein, but it is still lower than the pH of cow milk, which ranges from 6.4 to 6.8. The pH was adjusted to the pH of milk up to 7.0. Moreover, when added to coffee having a pH around 5 a buffer was added in the potato emulsion regulating for a higher pH of the coffee on potato emulsion milk addition, thereby reducing the experienced bitterness of coffee.
The potato emulsions obtained in this experiment were considered to be good enough to try them out in a real coffee shop where caffe lattes are made. The potato emulsions in experiment 6 with three lecithin and protein as emulsifieres were added to the latte and it was found that the sunflower lecithin had the highest and the most stable foam followed by the rapeseed lecithin, while the soy lecithin showed the least foam height and stability. With respect to taste it was found that potato emulsions with rapeseed and sunflower lecithin gave a better taste compared to soy lecithin.
Experiment 7—to Evaluate the Amount of Protein Solanic 300 Added and a Buffer System and if Lecithins can be Deleted
The following recipes were used, and five samples of 500 g were produced:
Emulsion Emulsion Emulsion Emulsion Emulsion
6 7 8 9 10
Content Content Content Content Content
Ingredient (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
Potato 3.08 3.08 3.08 3.08 3.2
flakes
Fructose 4 4 4 4 4
Sunflower — — 0.18 0.18 0.18
Lecithin
Rapeseed 3 3 3 3 3
oil
Solanic300 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6
Buffer 89.32 89.22 89.14 89.04 89.02
The appearance, taste and pH of the potato milks 6-10 can be seen in the table below and compared with an oat drink:
Emulsion Appearance Taste pH
6 More whitish a little bit salty 6.96
7 ″ Sweeter than 6 6.95
8 More greyish Sweeter than 6 6.99
and 7
9 ″ Sweeter than 6 7.00
and 7
10  ″ a little bit salty 7.01
Oat drink Most yellowish Little salty but 7.33
oat taste
dominates
There is still no problem with the pH of the different potato milks being around pH 7. When we left out the lecithin we got a somewhat more whitish appearance, which is good. The sweet salty taste is still there and it was preferable compared to the oat drink taste.
A caffe latte test was performed with regard to feathering and foam height in coffee. The results of this test can be seen in the Table below:
Foam
height after
Foam height 5 min;
from Drainage
Emulsion beginning (ml) (ml/min) Appearance Taste
6 275 − 250 − Clear Some
125 = 150 160 = 90; feathering saltiness
60/5 = 12
7 280 − 270 − Clear Some
100 = 180 160 = 110; feathering saltiness
70/5 = 14
8 300 − 275 − Smaller sweet
150 = 150 185 = 90; feathering
60/5 = 12
9 290 − 275 − Smaller sweet
120 = 170 175 = 100; feathering
70/5 = 14
10  275 − 250 − Smaller salty
110 = 165 165 = 85; feathering
80/5 = 16
Oat drink 350 − 320 − No feathering Bitter and
260 = 260 170 = 150; oat taste
110/5 = 22
Firstly, we can observe that the emulsions without lecithins (emulsion 6 and 7) had clear feathering compared to the ones with (emulsions 8-10), so this component cannot be deleted. Therefore, there was added more lecithin up to 0.4 and 0.5%, which was found optimal. There is also a tendency that emulsion 7 and 9 with the higher protein content of 0.7% gives a better foam height.
Experiment 8—Lowering of the Potato Content
In this series of experiments, we have lowered the potato content to 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0% potato flakes in the potato emulsions.
The following recipes were used, and five samples of 500 g were produced:
Emulsion Emulsion Emulsion Emulsion Emulsion
Ingredients 5.3 2 2a 2b 2c
Potato flakes 5 15.4 10 7.5 5
normal
Fructose 20 20 20 20 20
Lecithin 2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Rapeseed oil 7.5 15 15 15 15
Solanic 300 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Water 231 221.8 224.5 225.8 227
Buffer 231 221.8 224.5 225.8 227
Total 500 500 500 500 500
The oil droplet size distribution (D[4,3] and D3,2), appearance, taste and pH of the potato milks 5.3, 2, 2a, 2b and 2c can be seen in the table below:
Emulsion D[4,3] D[3,2] Appearance Taste pH
5.3 26,874 6,922 Look the same Good 6.90
as before
2 50,742 5,478 Look alike 5.3 Too thick, but 6.81
can be good in
coffee
2a 56,601 6,304 Look alike 5.3 Tasteless, 6.93
relatively thick
but creamy
2b 34,307 6,338 Perhaps Good taste, 6.90
somewhat lower
darker than thickness but
those above still creamy
2c 31,526 6,587 Perhaps Best taste, 6.92
somewhat least thick
darker than
those above
Both the viscosity and the potato taste were clearly diminished, when the potato flake content was lowered from 3.08 to 1.0%. For the potato milk with 3.0% oil a creamy milk but still with a low potato taste could be the choice, perhaps a content of 1.5% potato flake. It is also interesting to note that D[4,3] goes down with the lowering of the potato flake content, which could be expected as the potato granules contribute to the high D[4,3]. The D[3,2], however, does not change very much with the potato flake content.
Experiment 9—Comparison Between a Liquid and a Dried Protein as Well as Laboratory and Industrial Production of Vegan, Potato Emulsion
In the following experiments a comparison was made between a potato emulsion (herein sometimes referred to a potato milk) produced in the laboratory as well as produced industrially (2 tons). The recipes for the 1.5 and 3.0% potato milk, i.e. emulsion 5.3 and 2b, using the same recipe but exchanging the common potato protein Solanic 300 with a liquid one. These emulsions are then called emulsion 5.3 L and emulsion 2b L, respectively. With regard to the protein content there is a 4.78 times higher amount of the liquid protein compared to the powdered protein. This is due to the higher TS content in powder.
As a comparison 2 tons of potato milk 1.5 and 3.0% were produced industrially and the recipe can be seen in the 6th and 7th column in the table below (disclosed as potato-milk.Ind 1.5% and potatomilk.Ind.3.0%).
TABLE 11
Recipes of lab-made potato milks using a powdered and
liquid protein and industrially made potato milks
Emulsion 5.3 Emulsion 5.3 Emulsion 2b Emulsion 2b potato- potato-
Ingredients lab 1.5% liquid 1.5% lab 3.0% liquid 3.0% milk.Ind. 1.5% milk.Ind. 3.0%
Potato flakes 5 5 7.5 7.5 20.0 30.0
Fructose 20 20 20 20 80.0 80.0
Lecithin 2 2 2.5 2.5 8.0 10.0
Rapeseed oil 7.5 7.5 15 15 30.0 60.0
Solanic 300 3.5 3.5 14.0 14.0
Solanic 300 L 16.73 16.73
Water 458.15 444.92 447.76 434.53 1820.8 1779.4
Na2HPO4*2H2O 2.961 2.961 2.878 2.878
Na2HPO4*12H2O 23.8 23.2
NaH2PO4*H2O 0.893 0.893 0.864 0.864 3.6 3.5
Total 500 500 500 500 2000.2 2000.0

Characterisation of the Potato Emulsions
The appearance, taste and pH of the potato milks 5.3 lab, 5.3 liquid and 5.3 ind. and 2b lab, 2b liquid and 2b ind. can be seen in the table 12 below:
TABLE 12
D[3,2] D[4,3]
Emulsion Appearance Taste pH (μm) (μm)
5.3 lab yellowish Little bit better 6.86 6.35 33.39
taste than 5.3
liquid
5.3 Liquid yellowish More grainy and 6.65 7.76 32.82
less fresh
5.3 Ind. whiter More fresh taste, 6.90 0.56 4.45
sweeter, no
graininess
2b lab yellowish Some taste of oil 6.61 6.16 39.66
2b liquid yellowish Some off-taste of 6.84 5.62 35.49
metallic
2b Ind. whiter Fresher taste, no 6.87 1.57 8.26
taste of oil, more
creamy than the
1.5% potato milk
There is a striking difference in oil droplet size (D[3,2] and D[4,3]) between the industrially produced potato milk compared to the two emulsions made in the lab for both the low and the high fat content, where the industrially produced is so much better, having such small oil droplet sizes so it can be compared to milk. This is the main reason for the whiter appearance for the industrially produced potato milk. Even the pH is the highest and the taste is the freshest for the ind. produced. The smallest oil droplet size of D[3,2] equal to 0.56 μm is obtained for the ind. produced 1.5% potato milk. The two milks made in the lab. are more similar in behavior, where the liquid protein have a somewhat less pleasant taste.
Caffe Latte Test
A caffe latte test was performed for the prepared emulsions. The result can be seen in table 13 below:
TABLE 13
Foam
Foam height
height after 5
from min;
beginning Drainage pH in
Emulsion (ml) (ml/min) Appearance Taste coffee
5.3 lab 250 150 Some No after 6.68
100/5 = 20 feathering, taste
not so dense
foam
5.3 Liquid 220 150 Some No after 6.65
70/5 = 14 feathering, taste
not so dense
foam
5.3 Ind. 300 200 No So 6.65
100/5 = 20 feathering, good
very dense
foam, more
whitish foam
2b lab 200 130 Some No after 6.61
70/5 = 14 feathering taste
2b Liquid 200 140 Some No after 6.60
60/5 = 12 feathering taste
2b Ind. 270 150 No Best 6.56
120/5 = 24 feathering taste
almost
like milk
The initial foam height is very good 270-300 ml for the industrially produced potato milk, whereas the two lab-versions are slightly lower from 200 to 250 ml. The foam height after 5 min:s drainage is the highest for the industrially produced potato milks, especially for the 1.5% potato milk. The drainage in ml/min is above 20 for the industrially produced potato milks, which is more similar to real milk and oat drink and soy milk, whereas the lab-versions are below 20. With regard to these investigated properties there do not seem to be any differences between the liquid protein and the powdered one, which also seem to be the case with regard to appearance and taste. But the industrially produced potato milks gave rise to more dense foams and no feathering occurred. There was no difference in the pH of the coffees comparing all investigated samples.
Conclusively, this industrial production of the potato milks (potato emulsion) was very successful.
Shelf Life
The industrially produced and UHT (ultra heat treated) potato emulsion should have a shelf life of 18 months with substantially remaining properties as described herein.
Thus, according to the present invention a potato emulsion has been provided as an alternative to cow milk or any other vegetable drink having the ability to provide a stable foam which makes the potato emulsion suitable to be used as a vegan alternative to drink as such or added in beverages such as coffee and tea. The potato emulsion is additional whitish and the oil droplets in the emulsion are not flocculated.

Claims (13)

The invention claimed is:
1. A vegan potato emulsion, consisting of:
heat treated potato flakes in an amount of 0.5-5% by weight;
at least one sugar in an amount of 0-5% by weight;
at least one vegetable emulsifier in an amount of 0.09-1.0% by weight;
at least one vegetable oil selected from rapeseed oil, olive oil, maize oil, sunflower oil, soybean oil, peanut oil, sesame oil and linseed oil and avocado oil in an amount of 0.50-6% by weight;
at least one vegetable protein selected from a potato protein, a pea protein, and a soy protein in an amount of 0.20-3% by weight;
optionally a flavoring agent; and
water adding up to 100% by weight, wherein
the vegan potato emulsion has an oil droplet size D[3,2] of 0.1-10 μm,
the vegan potato emulsion is an alternative milk product, and
the at least one vegetable emulsifier is a vegetable lecithin.
2. The vegan potato emulsion according to claim 1, wherein the at least one sugar is selected from a monosaccharide, disaccharide and a polyol.
3. The vegan potato emulsion according to claim 1, wherein the vegetable lecithin is selected from rapeseed lecithin, sunflower lecithin, and soy lecithin.
4. The vegan potato emulsion according to claim 1, wherein the heat treated potato flakes are potato flakes which have been heated to at least 100° C.
5. The vegan potato emulsion according to claim 1, wherein the at least one vegetable emulsifier is added to the vegan potato emulsion via the at least one vegetable oil.
6. The vegan potato emulsion according to claim 1, wherein the at least one sugar is present in an amount of 0-3% by weight.
7. The vegan potato emulsion according to claim 1, wherein the at least one vegetable emulsifier is present in an amount of 0.09-0.5% by weight.
8. The vegan potato emulsion according to claim 1, wherein the at least one vegetable oil is present in an amount of 0.5-3% by weight.
9. The vegan potato emulsion according to claim 1, wherein the at least one vegetable protein is present in an amount of 0.2-1% by weight.
10. The vegan potato emulsion according to claim 1, wherein the oil droplet size D[3,2] of the vegan potato emulsion is 0.1-5 μm.
11. The vegan potato emulsion according to claim 1, wherein the flavoring agent is added to the vegan potato emulsion.
12. The vegan potato emulsion according to claim 1, wherein after being whipped, the vegan potato emulsion forms a foam, and-the foam maintains a stable foam height after five minutes.
13. The vegan potato emulsion according to claim 1, wherein the oil droplet size D[3,2] of the vegan potato emulsion is 0.5-3 μm.
US16/871,072 2018-11-26 2020-05-11 Vegan potato emulsion Active US11839222B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE1851457A SE542817C2 (en) 2018-11-26 2018-11-26 Vegan potato emulsion
SE1851457-0 2018-11-26
PCT/SE2019/051192 WO2020112009A1 (en) 2018-11-26 2019-11-25 Vegan potato emulsion

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/SE2019/051192 Continuation WO2020112009A1 (en) 2018-11-26 2019-11-25 Vegan potato emulsion

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20200323228A1 US20200323228A1 (en) 2020-10-15
US11839222B2 true US11839222B2 (en) 2023-12-12

Family

ID=70854372

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/871,072 Active US11839222B2 (en) 2018-11-26 2020-05-11 Vegan potato emulsion

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (1) US11839222B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3687298B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2022509796A (en)
KR (1) KR20210094602A (en)
CN (1) CN113038838A (en)
AU (1) AU2019386569A1 (en)
CA (1) CA3121145C (en)
ES (1) ES2955686T3 (en)
SE (1) SE542817C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2020112009A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020154614A1 (en) * 2019-01-24 2020-07-30 International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. Microencapsulation with potato proteins
CA3150533A1 (en) * 2019-09-27 2021-04-01 Darrin Dale WINGER Fry assessment system and method
US20230148651A1 (en) * 2020-10-23 2023-05-18 Pepsico, Inc. Beverage compositions comprising a printed image and methods of making the same
KR102453819B1 (en) * 2021-12-17 2022-10-12 강원대학교산학협력단 Method for manufacturing beverages using starch-containing crops
SE2250375A1 (en) * 2022-03-28 2023-09-19 Veg Of Lund Ab Vegan creams and ice creams

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000022939A2 (en) 1998-10-16 2000-04-27 Basic Vegetable Products, L.P. Starchy food-based fine particle fat substitute
SE1050965A1 (en) 2010-09-16 2012-01-24 Phenoliv Ab A stable vegetarian emulsion and a method of making this emulsion
US20120135125A1 (en) 2009-04-30 2012-05-31 Gerald Muschiolik Concentrated, creamy to solid and dry compositions of an oil-in-water emulsion, method for the production thereof and use thereof for producing improved foods in terms of sensory aspects and nutrition physiology
US20160050950A1 (en) 2013-04-30 2016-02-25 Nestec S.A. Creamer composition comprising plant protein microparticles
WO2016049577A1 (en) 2014-09-26 2016-03-31 Tate & Lyle Custom Ingredients Llc Whippable food products, whipped food products, and methods of making the same
US20170105437A1 (en) * 2015-10-16 2017-04-20 Rich Products Corporation Whipped Food Topping
WO2017211635A1 (en) 2016-06-07 2017-12-14 Unilever N.V. Process of preparing a foodstuff with water-dispersible powder containing dehulled pulse seed component
WO2018085323A1 (en) 2016-11-01 2018-05-11 The WhiteWave Foods Company Non-dairy creamer formulation
US20190116852A1 (en) * 2017-10-20 2019-04-25 Rich Products Corporation Plant-Based Culinary Creme

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB552561A (en) * 1941-08-08 1943-04-14 Walker S Dairies Ltd Improvements in emulsions suitable for ice cream or the like
MX2011004028A (en) 2008-10-17 2011-05-23 Cognis Ip Man Gmbh A whipping agent.
CA2749638C (en) * 2011-08-18 2014-10-21 Weili Li Egg substitute and method of producing same
BR102015030629A2 (en) * 2015-12-07 2018-09-04 Helena Orlandi Giunti Oliveira Eloisa optimized formulation of carob alternative milk without sugar, without sugar, without gluten, without soy and with and without fibers
CN106962942A (en) * 2017-04-19 2017-07-21 中国农业科学院农产品加工研究所 A kind of high stability potato class peptide emulsion and preparation method thereof

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000022939A2 (en) 1998-10-16 2000-04-27 Basic Vegetable Products, L.P. Starchy food-based fine particle fat substitute
US20120135125A1 (en) 2009-04-30 2012-05-31 Gerald Muschiolik Concentrated, creamy to solid and dry compositions of an oil-in-water emulsion, method for the production thereof and use thereof for producing improved foods in terms of sensory aspects and nutrition physiology
SE1050965A1 (en) 2010-09-16 2012-01-24 Phenoliv Ab A stable vegetarian emulsion and a method of making this emulsion
US20160050950A1 (en) 2013-04-30 2016-02-25 Nestec S.A. Creamer composition comprising plant protein microparticles
WO2016049577A1 (en) 2014-09-26 2016-03-31 Tate & Lyle Custom Ingredients Llc Whippable food products, whipped food products, and methods of making the same
US20170105437A1 (en) * 2015-10-16 2017-04-20 Rich Products Corporation Whipped Food Topping
WO2017211635A1 (en) 2016-06-07 2017-12-14 Unilever N.V. Process of preparing a foodstuff with water-dispersible powder containing dehulled pulse seed component
WO2018085323A1 (en) 2016-11-01 2018-05-11 The WhiteWave Foods Company Non-dairy creamer formulation
US20190116852A1 (en) * 2017-10-20 2019-04-25 Rich Products Corporation Plant-Based Culinary Creme

Non-Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Alfredsson, E. "The Manufacture of a Vegetarian Smoothie," Chemistry 240 hp, Linnaeus University, Department of Food Technology, School of Natural Sciences, 2010, pp. 1-53.
Fleming, A., Potato Milk, Go Dairy Free, 2007, https://www.godairyfree.org/recipes/milk-subs/potato-milk-vegan-gluten-free-soy-free. *
Leroux et al., Emulsion Stabilizing Properties of Pectin, Food Hydrocolloids, 17 (2003), pp. 455-462. *
Lotzkar et al., Pectin as an Emulsifying Agent, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 1943, vol. 35, No. 12, pp. 1294-1297. *
Monica, Homemade Vegan Coffee Creamer, Nov. 2, 2018, www.thehiddenveggies.com/coffe-creamer/. *
Notification of Transmittal of the international Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Jan. 7, 2020 for PCT/SE2019/051192 filed on Nov. 25, 2019, 14 pages.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3687298A1 (en) 2020-08-05
US20200323228A1 (en) 2020-10-15
SE542817C2 (en) 2020-07-14
WO2020112009A1 (en) 2020-06-04
JP2022509796A (en) 2022-01-24
CA3121145A1 (en) 2020-06-04
CA3121145C (en) 2023-08-29
CN113038838A (en) 2021-06-25
EP3687298A4 (en) 2021-08-11
SE1851457A1 (en) 2020-05-27
ES2955686T3 (en) 2023-12-05
EP3687298C0 (en) 2023-06-07
AU2019386569A1 (en) 2021-05-06
EP3687298B1 (en) 2023-06-07
KR20210094602A (en) 2021-07-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11839222B2 (en) Vegan potato emulsion
US20240065280A1 (en) Creamer composition
EP2323495B1 (en) Foaming composition
JP2001017106A (en) Foamable cappuccino creamer containing gasified carbohydrate
JP2014511708A (en) Creamer and manufacturing method thereof
JP2012528581A (en) Liquid whitener for beverage and method for producing the same
JP4508729B2 (en) Vegetable oil composition and beverage containing the same
JP6590574B2 (en) Foamable beverage, functionality improver for foamable beverage, method for improving functionality of foamable beverage, and method for producing foamable beverage
KR20140061091A (en) Creamy beverage composition and process for preparing the same
KR20180107103A (en) How to make creamer
JP6383070B1 (en) Method for producing coffee beverage
EP4057824B1 (en) Plant-based milk
KR101349247B1 (en) Pumpkin latte having excellent preference and the method for producing thereof
US20230147949A1 (en) Methods of making self-foaming non-dairy creamer compositions
WO2021037997A1 (en) Self-foaming, protein free creamer composition
CN111093380A (en) Novel foaming composition

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: VEG OF LUND AB, SWEDEN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TORNBERG, EVA;REEL/FRAME:052623/0619

Effective date: 20200424

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO SMALL (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: SMAL); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO MICRO (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: MICR); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE AFTER FINAL ACTION FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT RECEIVED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE