US10799572B2

US10799572B2 - Consensus antigen constructs and vaccines made therefrom, and methods of using the same to treat malaria

Info

Publication number: US10799572B2
Application number: US13/876,148
Authority: US
Inventors: David B. Weiner; Bernadette Ferraro; Jian Yan; Niranjan Y. Sardesai
Original assignee: University of Pennsylvania Penn
Current assignee: University of Pennsylvania Penn
Priority date: 2010-09-27
Filing date: 2011-09-27
Publication date: 2020-10-13
Also published as: WO2012047679A8; EP2621540A4; KR20180096814A; WO2012047679A3; CN110195069A; CA2812789A1; CN103354750A; KR20130138790A; MX2013003470A; KR101891195B1; WO2012047679A2; US20130273112A1; EP2621540A2; AU2011312465A1; AU2011312465B2; MX355501B; JP6293485B2; JP2013543721A; BR112013007051A2

Abstract

Provided herein is consensus amino acid sequences of P. falciparum (P.f.) proteins and their encoding sequences, as well as expression constructs expressing the sequences. Also provided herein are methods for generating an immune response against P. falciparum using the expression constructs provided herein.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to and is a United States National Stage filing under 35 USC § 371 of International PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/053541, filed Sep. 27, 2011, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/386,973, filed Sep. 27, 2010, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to consensus antigenic malaria proteins and nucleic acid molecules which encode the same; improved malaria vaccines including such proteins and/or nucleic acid molecules; and methods for using the vaccines for inducing immune responses against malaria antigens and methods of preventing malaria infection and/or treating individuals infected with malaria.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Ser. No. 61/386,972 filed Sep. 27, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Malaria is a mosquito-borne infectious disease caused by a eukaryotic protist of the genus Plasmodium. It is widespread in tropical and subtropical regions, including parts of the Americas (22 countries), Asia, and Africa. Each year, there are more than 250 million cases of malaria, killing between one and three million people, the majority of whom are young children in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite efforts to reduce transmission and increase treatment, there has been little change in which areas are at risk of this disease since 1992. Indeed, if the prevalence of malaria stays on its present upwards course, the death rate could double in the next twenty years. Precise statistics are unknown because many cases occur in rural areas where people do not have access to hospitals or the means to afford health care. As a consequence, the majority of cases are undocumented.

Five species of the plasmodium parasite can infect humans: the most serious forms of the disease are caused by Plasmodium falciparum (also referred to herein as P. falciparum, P.f. and PF). P. falciparum is a protozoan parasite, one of the species of Plasmodium that cause malaria in humans. It is transmitted by the female Anopheles mosquito. P. falciparum is the most dangerous of these infections as P. falciparum (or malignant) malaria has the highest rates of complications and mortality. As of 2006 it accounted for 91% of all 247 million human malarial infections (98% in Africa) and 90% of the deaths.

A wide variety of antimalarial drugs are available to treat malaria. In the last 5 years, treatment of P. falciparum infections in endemic countries has been transformed by the use of combinations of drugs containing an artemisinin derivative. Severe malaria is treated with intravenous or intramuscular quinine or, increasingly, the artemisinin derivative artesunate. Several drugs are also available to prevent malaria in travellers to malaria-endemic countries (prophylaxis). Resistance has developed to several antimalarial drugs, most notably chloroquine.

Vaccines for malaria are under development, with no completely effective vaccine yet available. The first promising studies demonstrating the potential for a malaria vaccine were performed in 1967 by immunizing mice with live, radiation-attenuated sporozoites, providing protection to about 60% of the mice upon subsequent injection with normal, viable sporozoites. Since the 1970s, there has been a considerable effort to develop similar vaccination strategies within humans. However, the current most advanced malaria vaccine candidate confers only partial protection against clinical disease.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Nucleic acid molecules such as plasmids are provided which encode one or more of the P. falciparum immunogens CS; LSA1; TRAP; CelTOS; and Ama1. The immunogens may be full length or immunogenic fragments of full length proteins. The immunogens comprise consensus sequences and/or modifications for improved expression. Coding sequences are provided which provide high levels of expression when delivered in vivo.

Compositions comprising one or more of these nucleic acid molecules which collectively encode one, two, three, four or all five immunogens are provided. Such compositions may be useful as vaccines against malaria. Methods of immunizing mammals against malaria are provided which comprise administering one of more compositions as disclosed herein.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 relates to the consensus antigen sequence for P. falciparum circumsporozoite protein (PfConCS) (SEQ ID NO:2). FIG. 1 includes a table of homology between PfConCS (SEQ ID NO:2) and selected CS sequences from Genbank.

FIG. 2 relates to the consensus antigen sequence for P. falciparum liver stage antigen 1 protein (PfConLSA1) (SEQ ID NO:4). FIG. 2 includes a table of homology between PfConLSA1 and selected LSA1 sequences. The PfConLAS1 sequence shown is SEQ ID NO:28 which is SEQ ID NO:4 plus the IgE signal peptide at the N terminus in place of the LAS1 N terminal Methionione and the HA Tag at the LAS1 C terminal the IgE signal peptide and HA Tag.

FIG. 3 relates to the consensus antigen sequence for P. falciparum thrombospondin-related-anonymous protein (PfConTRAP) (SEQ ID NO:6). FIG. 3 includes a table of homology between PfConTRAP (SEQ ID NO:6) and selected TRAP sequences from Genbank.

FIG. 4 relates to the consensus antigen sequence for P. falciparum cell-traversal protein for ookinetes and sporozoites (PfConAg2 or PfConCelTOS) (SEQ ID NO:8). FIG. 4 homology between PfConCelTOS (SEQ ID NO:8) and a CelTOS sequence from Genbank. The PfConCelTOS sequence shown is SEQ ID NO:32 which is SEQ ID NO:8 plus the IgE signal peptide at the N terminus in place of the CelTOS N terminal Methionione and the HA Tag at the CelTOS C terminal the IgE signal peptide and HA Tag.

FIG. 5 is an image of a SDS-PAGE gel from a western blot analysis. The synthesized proteins were detected using an anti-HA antibody (the HA tag is contained in the C-terminus of the antigen sequences). pVAX1 was used as a negative control.

FIGS. 6A-6I include data from immunological analyses of immunized mice and its sera. P.f. consensus immunogen constructs used included nucleic acid sequences (SEQ ID NOs:25, 27, 29 and 31 which encode SEQ ID NOs:26, 28, 30 and 32 respectively, which correspond to SEQ ID NOs:2, 4, 6 and 8, respectively linked to the IgE signal peptide and HA Tag. FIG. 6A displays bar graphs that show cellular immunogenicity of the individual antigens (left panel) based on INF-γ ELISpot analysis, and the class of cellular response (CD4 or CD8) for CS and LSA1 (right panel). FIG. 6B includes graphs (CD8 top set; and CD4 bottom set) that show comparison of immunogenicity of reported platforms: PfConLSA1 (right graph) induces stronger cellular responses to dominant CD4+ and CD8+ T cell epitopes than Ad35 or Ad35/protein heterologous prime boost approaches (left 3 graphs). FIG. 6C includes graphs that show comparison of immunogenicity relative to other platforms: PfconCS (right graph) induced antigen specific IFN-γ slightly lower than Ad5 (left pair of graphs), but stronger than Ad35 and RTS,S. FIG. 6D display graphs that show images detailing the flow cytometry gating strategy. FIG. 6E include graphs that show the CD4+ T cell responses against the multiple antigen vaccine, showing that CS-specific responses are the predominant the CD4+ T cell response. FIG. 6F includes graphs that show the CD8+ T cell responses against the multiple antigen vaccine, showing that CS-specific and LSA-specific responses comprise most of the CD8+ T cell response. FIG. 6G displays graphs that show the CD8+ T cell responses of a single antigen vaccine and compares to a multiple antigen vaccine, showing that there is no significant change when delivering multiple antigens. FIG. 6H includes graphs that show humoral responses, which provide that both the single and multiple antigen vaccines induced strong antibody responses (average endpoint titers >100,000). FIG. 6I includes graphs that show that the LSA1 antibodies are associated with epitopes outside of the repeat region.

FIG. 7 is a plasmid map of expression construct pGX7001 (SEQ ID NO:37), which includes coding sequence of PfConAG2 (CelTOS) including the IgE signal peptide and HA Tag (SEQ ID NO:31 which encodes SEQ ID NO:32).

FIG. 8 displays a plasmid map of expression construct pGX7002 (SEQ ID NO:38), which includes encoding sequence of PfConCS including the IgE signal peptide and HA Tag (SEQ ID NO:25, which encodes SEQ ID NO:26).

FIG. 9 displays a plasmid map of expression construct pGX7004 (SEQ ID NO:39), which includes encoding sequence of PfConLSA1 including the IgE signal peptide and HA Tag (SEQ ID NO:27, which encodes SEQ ID NO:28).

FIG. 10 displays a plasmid map of expression construct pGX7005 (SEQ ID NO:40), which includes encoding sequence of PfConTRAP including the IgE signal peptide and HA Tag (SEQ ID NO:29, which encodes SEQ ID NO:30).

FIG. 11 displays a plasmid map of expression construct pGX7003 (SEQ ID NO:41), Plasmid pGX7003 includes coding sequence PfConCS-alt including the IgE signal peptide and HA Tag (SEQ ID NO:35, which encodes SEQ ID NO:36). The alternative consensus CS-alt full length consensus amino acid sequence (without signal peptide or HA Tag) is SEQ ID NO:12 which is encoded by SEQ ID NO:11.

FIGS. 12-25 include data from immunological analyses of immunized animals and their sera. The P.f. consensus immunogen constructs used included nucleic acid sequences encoding CS, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1 each including coding sequences that encode an IgE signal peptide and HA Tag. The nucleic acid sequences that were used which encoded CS, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1 were SEQ ID NOs:25, 27, 29, 31 and 33, respectively, which encode amino acid sequence SEQ ID NOs:26, 28, 30, 32 and 34 respectively. The portion of these nucleic acid sequences that encode full length CS, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1 without the signal peptide or HA Tag correspond to SEQ ID NOs:1, 3, 5, 7 and 9, respectively, which encode amino acid sequences SEQ ID NOs:2, 4, 6, 8 and 10, respectively.

FIG. 12 shows data comparing humoral responses from vaccines comprising single and multi-antigen constructs.

FIG. 13 shows data of CD4+ T cell responses induced by vaccines comprising multi-antigen constructs against each of the antigens encoded by constructs in the vaccine.

FIG. 14 shows data of CD8+ T cell responses induced by vaccines comprising multi-antigen constructs against each of the antigens encoded by constructs in the vaccine.

FIG. 15 shows data comparing immune responses evaluated by IFNγ ELISpot induced by administration of a vaccine encoding CS versus administration of a vaccine encoding CS in combination with a vaccines encoding TRAP, LSA1 and CelTOS.

FIG. 16 shows data comparing CS-specific in IFNγ responses induced by either delivering half of the total volume of the multi-antigen vaccine cocktail to one mouse hind limb and the other half into the contra-lateral mouse hind limb versus delivery of a CS vaccine into one mouse hind limb and a cocktail containing the LSA1, TRAP and CelTOS vaccines into the contra-lateral hind limb.

FIG. 17 shows data evaluating LSA1-specific IFNγ production by CD8+ hepatic lymphocytes in multi-antigen vaccinated mice.

FIG. 18A shows data from evaluation of AMA1-specific T cell responses induced by a vaccine construct encoding the AMA1 protein.

FIG. 18B shows data from evaluation of AMA1-specific seroconversion induced by a vaccine construct encoding the AMA1 protein.

FIG. 19 shows data comparing immune responses evaluated by IFNγ ELISpot induced by administration of multi antigen vaccine with or without a construct encoding the adjuvant IL-28B measured before and after the first and second immunizations. The left panel shows data as a bar graph of combined responses. The right panel shows data for responses against individual antigens separately.

FIG. 20 shows data comparing antigen-specific CD4+ T cell immune responses following the 2nd immunization (week 8) with either a multi-antigen vaccine with or without a construct encoding the adjuvant IL-28B delivered IM or a multi-antigen vaccine delivered ID. The left panel of FIG. 20 shows antigen specific IFNγ production data, the center panel shows antigen specific IL-2 production data and the right panel shows antigen-specific TNFα production data.

FIG. 21 shows data comparing antigen-specific CD8+ T cell immune responses following the 2nd immunization (week 8) with either a multi-antigen vaccine with or without a construct encoding the adjuvant IL-28B delivered IM or a multi-antigen vaccine delivered ID. The top left panel of FIG. 21 shows antigen specific IFNγ production data, the center panel shows antigen specific IL-2 production data and the right panel shows antigen-specific TNFα production data. The lower left panel of FIG. 21, shows data determining antigen specific granzyme B evaluations in CD8+ IFNγ+ T cells.

FIG. 22 shows data comparing antigen-specific sero-conversion for all antigens after second immunization with either a multi-antigen vaccine with or without a construct encoding the adjuvant IL-28B delivered IM or a multi-antigen vaccine delivered ID.

FIG. 23 shows data comparing antigen-specific immune responses evaluated by IFNγ ELISpot induced by administration of multi antigen vaccine without or in combination with various amounts of a construct encoding the adjuvant IL-28B. The left panel shows measured before and after the first and second immunizations. The left panel shows antigen-specific immune responses as a bar graph of combined responses; the right panel shows data for CS-specific immune responses.

FIG. 24 shows data comparing populations of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells following administration of multi antigen vaccine without or in combination with various amounts of a construct encoding the adjuvant IL-28B.

FIG. 25 shows data comparing CS-specific serocoversion populations of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells following administration of multi antigen vaccine without or in combination with various amounts of a construct encoding the adjuvant IL-28B.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In one aspect of the invention, it is desired that the consensus antigen provides for improved transcription and translation, including having one or more of the following: low GC content leader sequence to increase transcription; mRNA stability and codon optimization; eliminating to the extent possible cis-acting sequence motifs (i.e., internal TATA-boxes).

In some aspects of the invention, it is desired to generate a consensus antigen that generates a broad immune response across multiple strains, including having one or more of the following: incorporate all available full-length sequences; computer generate sequences that utilize the most commonly occurring amino acid at each position; and increase cross-reactivity between strains.

1. Definitions

The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting. As used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

For recitation of numeric ranges herein, each intervening number there between with the same degree of precision is explicitly contemplated. For example, for the range of 6-9, the numbers 7 and 8 are contemplated in addition to 6 and 9, and for the range 6.0-7.0, the numbers 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, and 7.0 are explicitly contemplated.

a. Adjuvant

“Adjuvant” as used herein may mean any molecule added to the DNA plasmid vaccines described herein to enhance antigenicity of the malaria (P.f.) antigen encoded by the DNA plasmids and encoding nucleic acid sequences described hereinafter.

b. Antibody

“Antibody” may mean an antibody of classes IgG, IgM, IgA, IgD or IgE, or fragments, fragments or derivatives thereof, including Fab, F(ab′)2, Fd, and single chain antibodies, diabodies, bispecific antibodies, bifunctional antibodies and derivatives thereof. The antibody may be an antibody isolated from the serum sample of mammal, a polyclonal antibody, affinity purified antibody, or mixtures thereof which exhibits sufficient binding specificity to a desired epitope or a sequence derived therefrom.

c. Coding Sequence

“Coding sequence” or “encoding nucleic acid” as used herein may mean refers to the nucleic acid (RNA or DNA molecule) that comprise a nucleotide sequence which encodes a protein. The coding sequence may further include initiation and termination signals operably linked to regulatory elements including a promoter and polyadenylation signal capable of directing expression in the cells of an individual or mammal to whom the nucleic acid is administered.

d. Complement

“Complement” or “complementary” as used herein may mean a nucleic acid may mean Watson-Crick (e.g., A-T/U and C-G) or Hoogsteen base pairing between nucleotides or nucleotide analogs of nucleic acid molecules.

e. Consensus or Consensus Sequence

“Consensus” or “consensus sequence” as used herein may mean a synthetic nucleic acid sequence, or corresponding polypeptide sequence, constructed based on analysis of an alignment of multiple subtypes of a particular malaria antigen, that can be used to induce broad immunity against multiple subtypes or serotypes of a particular malaria antigen. Consensus malaria antigens may include CS, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and AMA1 proteins. Nucleotide sequences that encode the consensus amino acid sequences are also provided including those designed for high levels of expression. Also, synthetic antigens such as fusion proteins may include consensus sequences (or consensus antigens).

f. Constant Current

“Constant current” as used herein to define a current that is received or experienced by a tissue, or cells defining said tissue, over the duration of an electrical pulse delivered to same tissue. The electrical pulse is delivered from the electroporation devices described herein. This current remains at a constant amperage in said tissue over the life of an electrical pulse because the electroporation device provided herein has a feedback element, preferably having instantaneous feedback. The feedback element can measure the resistance of the tissue (or cells) throughout the duration of the pulse and cause the electroporation device to alter its electrical energy output (e.g., increase voltage) so current in same tissue remains constant throughout the electrical pulse (on the order of microseconds), and from pulse to pulse. In some embodiments, the feedback element comprises a controller.

g. Current Feedback or Feedback

“Current feedback” or “feedback” as used herein may be used interchangeably and may mean the active response of the provided electroporation devices, which comprises measuring the current in tissue between electrodes and altering the energy output delivered by the EP device accordingly in order to maintain the current at a constant level. This constant level is preset by a user prior to initiation of a pulse sequence or electrical treatment. The feedback may be accomplished by the electroporation component, e.g., controller, of the electroporation device, as the electrical circuit therein is able to continuously monitor the current in tissue between electrodes and compare that monitored current (or current within tissue) to a preset current and continuously make energy-output adjustments to maintain the monitored current at preset levels. The feedback loop may be instantaneous as it is an analog closed-loop feedback.

h. Decentralized Current

“Decentralized current” as used herein may mean the pattern of electrical currents delivered from the various needle electrode arrays of the electroporation devices described herein, wherein the patterns minimize, or preferably eliminate, the occurrence of electroporation related heat stress on any area of tissue being electroporated.

i. Electroporation

“Electroporation,” “electro-permeabilization,” or “electro-kinetic enhancement” (“EP”) as used interchangeably herein may refer to the use of a transmembrane electric field pulse to induce microscopic pathways (pores) in a bio-membrane; their presence allows biomolecules such as plasmids, oligonucleotides, siRNA, drugs, ions, and water to pass from one side of the cellular membrane to the other.

j. Feedback Mechanism

“Feedback mechanism” as used herein may refer to a process performed by either software or hardware (or firmware), which process receives and compares the impedance of the desired tissue (before, during, and/or after the delivery of pulse of energy) with a present value, preferably current, and adjusts the pulse of energy delivered to achieve the preset value. A feedback mechanism may be performed by an analog closed loop circuit.

k. Fragment

“Fragment” may mean a polypeptide fragment of a malaria consensus immunogen that is capable of eliciting an immune response in a mammal against malaria by recognizing the particular malaria antigen. A fragment may comprise a fragments of a malaria consensus immunogen linked to a signal peptide such as an immunoglobulin signal peptide for example IgE signal peptide (SEQ ID NO:42) or IgG signal peptide.

A fragment of a PfCon consensus malaria immunogen such as PfConCS consensus malaria immunogen, or a fragment of PfConLAS1 consensus malaria immunogen, or a fragment of PfConTRAP consensus malaria immunogen, or a fragment of PfConCelTOS consensus malaria immunogen, or a fragment of PfConAMA1 consensus malaria immunogen, or a fragment of PfConCS-alt alternative consensus malaria immunogen may 90% or more, 91% or more, 92% or more, 93% or more, 94% or more, 95% or more, 96% or more, 97% or more, 98% or more, 99% or more percent of the length of the full length PfConCS Immunogen sequence (SEQ ID NO:2), the full length PfConLAS1 consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:4), or a fragment of the full length PfConTRAP consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:6), or a fragment of the full length PfConCelTOS consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:8), or a fragment of the full length PfConAMA1 consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:10), or a fragment of the full length PfConCS-alt (SEQ ID NO:12), respectively, as set forth herein. When calculating fragment size of P.f. consensus sequences which comprise a signal peptide or other added sequence (for examples proteins comprising P.f. consensus sequences such as SEQ ID NOs:14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34 and 36), the calculation is full length sequence Pf sequence portion only (SEQ ID NOs; 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 or 12). In some embodiments a fragment of one of the full length PfConCS Immunogen sequence (SEQ ID NO:2), the full length PfConLAS1 consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:4), or a fragment of the full length PfConTRAP consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:6), or a fragment of the full length PfConCelTOS consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:8), or a fragment of the full length PfConAMA1 consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:10), or a fragment of the full length PfConCS-alt (SEQ ID NO:12), respectively, comprises all but 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 amino acid residues of the N terminal sequence or all but 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 amino acid residues of the C terminal sequence or all but a combination of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 amino acid residues of the N terminal sequence and all but 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 amino acid residues of the C terminal sequence.

Fragments also refer to fragments of homologous variant amino acid sequences which are polypeptides that are 98% or more, or 99% or more homologous to the sequences of one of the full length PfConCS Immunogen sequence (SEQ ID NO:2), the full length PfConLAS1 consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:4), or a fragment of the full length PfConTRAP consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:6), or a fragment of the full length PfConCelTOS consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:8), or a fragment of the full length PfConAMA1 consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:10), or a fragment of the full length PfConCS-alt (SEQ ID NO:12), respectively. The fragments of homologous variant amino acid sequences are 90% or more, 91% or more, 92% or more, 93% or more, 94% or more, 95% or more, 96% or more, 97% or more, 98% or more, 99% or more percent of the length of the particular full length homologous variant amino acid sequences (polypeptides that are 98% or more, or 99% or more homologous to the full length PfConCS Immunogen sequence (SEQ ID NO:2), the full length PfConLAS1 consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:4), or a fragment of the full length PfConTRAP consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:6), or a fragment of the full length PfConCelTOS consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:8), or a fragment of the full length PfConAMA1 consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:10), or a fragment of the full length PfConCS-alt (SEQ ID NO:12), respectively) When calculating homology of a homologous variant amino acid sequences to a P.f. consensus immunogen sequence (SEQ ID NO:2, 4, 6, 8 or 10), calculations do not include any signal peptide or other added sequence linked to the amino acid sequences of the homologous variant amino acid sequences that correspond to a P.f. consensus immunogen sequence. When calculating the length of a fragment of a homologous variant amino acid sequence, the calculation is based upon the percentage of the full homologous variant amino acid sequences that correspond to a P.f. consensus immunogen sequence. In some embodiments a fragment of the full length homologous variant amino acid sequence comprises all but 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 amino acid residues of the N terminal sequence or all but 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 amino acid residues of the C terminal sequence or all but a combination of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 amino acid residues of the N terminal sequence and all but 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 amino acid residues of the C terminal sequence of the full length homologous variant amino acid sequences.

“Fragment” may also be a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a fragment of a full length PF consensus Immunogen as described above, or a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a fragment of a homologous variant amino acid sequences as described above. A fragment may be a nucleic acid sequence that is a fragment of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 or 11 and encodes a fragment of a full length PF consensus Immunogen as described above. A fragment may be a nucleic acid sequence that is a fragment of a homologous variant nucleic acid sequence. A homologous variant nucleic acid sequence is a nucleotide sequence that is 98% or more, or 99% or more homologous to SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 or 11 and encodes a protein that is 98% or more, or 99% or more homologous to SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 or 12. A fragment of a homologous variant nucleic acid sequence encodes a fragment of a homologous variant amino acid sequence. The fragment of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 or a homologous variant nucleic acid sequence may comprise coding sequences that encode a signal peptide, preferably a immunoglobulin signal peptide, preferable an IgE or IgG signal peptide. Calculations of percent homology between homologous variant nucleic acid sequence and consensus PF immunogen coding sequences (SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 or 11) do not include coding sequences for signal peptides or any other non-consensus full length PF immunogen coding sequences that may be linked to homologous variant nucleic acid sequence. Fragment size as a percentage of full length homologous variant nucleic acid sequence do not include coding sequences for signal peptides or any other non-consensus full length PF immunogen coding sequences that may be linked to homologous variant nucleic acid sequence or fragment thereof.

l. Homologous Variants

“Homologous variant amino acid sequences” may mean polypeptides that are 98% or more, or 99% or more homologous to the sequences of one of the full length PfConCS Immunogen sequence (SEQ ID NO:2), the full length PfConLAS1 consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:4), or a fragment of the full length PfConTRAP consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:6), or a fragment of the full length PfConCelTOS consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:8), or a fragment of the full length PfConAMA1 consensus malaria immunogen (SEQ ID NO:10), or a fragment of the full length PfConCS-alt (SEQ ID NO:12), respectively, and are capable of eliciting an immune response in a mammal against malaria by recognizing the particular malaria antigen. A homologous variant amino acid sequence may comprise be linked to a signal peptide such as an immunoglobulin signal peptide for example IgE signal peptide or IgG signal peptide. When calculating homology of a homologous variant amino acid sequences to a P.f. consensus immunogen sequence (SEQ ID NO:2, 4, 6, 8 or 10), calculations do not include any signal peptide or other added sequence linked to the amino acid sequences of the homologous variant amino acid sequences that correspond to a P.f. consensus immunogen sequence.

“Homologous variant nucleic acid sequence” refers to a nucleotide sequence that is 98% or more, or 99% or more homologous to SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 or 11 and encodes a protein that is 98% or more, or 99% or more homologous to SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 or 12 capable of eliciting an immune response in a mammal against malaria by recognizing the particular malaria antigen. A homologous variant nucleic acid sequence may comprise coding sequences that encode a signal peptide, preferably an immunoglobulin signal peptide, preferable an IgE or IgG signal peptide. Calculations of percent homology between homologous variant nucleic acid sequence and consensus PF immunogen coding sequences (SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 or 11) do not include coding sequences for signal peptides or any other non-consensus full length PF immunogen coding sequences that may be linked to homologous variant nucleic acid sequence. In some embodiments, homologous variant nucleic acid sequence encodes a protein comprising SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 or 12.

l. Identical

“Identical” or “identity” as used herein in the context of two or more nucleic acids or polypeptide sequences, may mean that the sequences have a specified percentage of residues that are the same over a specified region. The percentage may be calculated by optimally aligning the two sequences, comparing the two sequences over the specified region, determining the number of positions at which the identical residue occurs in both sequences to yield the number of matched positions, dividing the number of matched positions by the total number of positions in the specified region, and multiplying the result by 100 to yield the percentage of sequence identity. In cases where the two sequences are of different lengths or the alignment produces one or more staggered ends and the specified region of comparison includes only a single sequence, the residues of single sequence are included in the denominator but not the numerator of the calculation. When comparing DNA and RNA, thymine (T) and uracil (U) may be considered equivalent. Identity may be performed manually or by using a computer sequence algorithm such as BLAST or BLAST 2.0.

m. Impedance

“Impedance” as used herein may be used when discussing the feedback mechanism and can be converted to a current value according to Ohm's law, thus enabling comparisons with the preset current.

n. Immune Response

“Immune response” as used herein may mean the activation of a host's immune system, e.g., that of a mammal, in response to the introduction of malaria consensus antigen via the provided DNA plasmid vaccines. The immune response can be in the form of a cellular or humoral response, or both.

o. Nucleic Acid

“Nucleic acid” or “oligonucleotide” or “polynucleotide” as used herein may mean at least two nucleotides covalently linked together. The depiction of a single strand also defines the sequence of the complementary strand. Thus, a nucleic acid also encompasses the complementary strand of a depicted single strand. Many variants of a nucleic acid may be used for the same purpose as a given nucleic acid. Thus, a nucleic acid also encompasses substantially identical nucleic acids and complements thereof. A single strand provides a probe that may hybridize to a target sequence under stringent hybridization conditions. Thus, a nucleic acid also encompasses a probe that hybridizes under stringent hybridization conditions.

Nucleic acids may be single stranded or double stranded, or may contain portions of both double stranded and single stranded sequence. The nucleic acid may be DNA, both genomic and cDNA, RNA, or a hybrid, where the nucleic acid may contain combinations of deoxyribo- and ribo-nucleotides, and combinations of bases including uracil, adenine, thymine, cytosine, guanine, inosine, xanthine hypoxanthine, isocytosine and isoguanine. Nucleic acids may be obtained by chemical synthesis methods or by recombinant methods.

p. Operably Linked

“Operably linked” as used herein may mean that expression of a gene is under the control of a promoter with which it is spatially connected. A promoter may be positioned 5′ (upstream) or 3′ (downstream) of a gene under its control. The distance between the promoter and a gene may be approximately the same as the distance between that promoter and the gene it controls in the gene from which the promoter is derived. As is known in the art, variation in this distance may be accommodated without loss of promoter function.

q. Promoter

“Promoter” as used herein may mean a synthetic or naturally-derived molecule which is capable of conferring, activating or enhancing expression of a nucleic acid in a cell. A promoter may comprise one or more specific transcriptional regulatory sequences to further enhance expression and/or to alter the spatial expression and/or temporal expression of same. A promoter may also comprise distal enhancer or repressor elements, which can be located as much as several thousand base pairs from the start site of transcription. A promoter may be derived from sources including viral, bacterial, fungal, plants, insects, and animals. A promoter may regulate the expression of a gene component constitutively, or differentially with respect to cell, the tissue or organ in which expression occurs or, with respect to the developmental stage at which expression occurs, or in response to external stimuli such as physiological stresses, pathogens, metal ions, or inducing agents. Representative examples of promoters include the bacteriophage T7 promoter, bacteriophage T3 promoter, SP6 promoter, lac operator-promoter, tac promoter, SV40 late promoter, SV40 early promoter, RSV-LTR promoter, CMV IE promoter, SV40 early promoter or SV40 late promoter and the CMV IE promoter.

r. Stringent Hybridization Conditions

“Stringent hybridization conditions” as used herein may mean conditions under which a first nucleic acid sequence (e.g., probe) will hybridize to a second nucleic acid sequence (e.g., target), such as in a complex mixture of nucleic acids. Stringent conditions are sequence-dependent and will be different in different circumstances. Stringent conditions may be selected to be about 5-10° C. lower than the thermal melting point (T_m) for the specific sequence at a defined ionic strength pH. The T_mmay be the temperature (under defined ionic strength, pH, and nucleic concentration) at which 50% of the probes complementary to the target hybridize to the target sequence at equilibrium (as the target sequences are present in excess, at T_m, 50% of the probes are occupied at equilibrium). Stringent conditions may be those in which the salt concentration is less than about 1.0 M sodium ion, such as about 0.01-1.0 M sodium ion concentration (or other salts) at pH 7.0 to 8.3 and the temperature is at least about 30° C. for short probes (e.g., about 10-50 nucleotides) and at least about 60° C. for long probes (e.g., greater than about 50 nucleotides). Stringent conditions may also be achieved with the addition of destabilizing agents such as formamide. For selective or specific hybridization, a positive signal may be at least 2 to 10 times background hybridization. Exemplary stringent hybridization conditions include the following: 50% formamide, 5×SSC, and 1% SDS, incubating at 42° C., or, 5×SSC, 1% SDS, incubating at 65° C., with wash in 0.2×SSC, and 0.1% SDS at 65° C.

s. Substantially Complementary

“Substantially complementary” as used herein may mean that a first sequence is at least 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98% or 99% identical to the complement of a second sequence over a region of 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100 or more nucleotides or amino acids, or that the two sequences hybridize under stringent hybridization conditions.

t. Substantially Identical

“Substantially identical” as used herein may mean that a first and second sequence are at least 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98% or 99% identical over a region of 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100 or more nucleotides or amino acids, or with respect to nucleic acids, if the first sequence is substantially complementary to the complement of the second sequence.

u. Variant

“Variant” used herein with respect to a nucleic acid may mean (i) a portion or fragment of a referenced nucleotide sequence; (ii) the complement of a referenced nucleotide sequence or portion thereof; (iii) a nucleic acid that is substantially identical to a referenced nucleic acid or the complement thereof; or (iv) a nucleic acid that hybridizes under stringent conditions to the referenced nucleic acid, complement thereof, or a sequences substantially identical thereto.

“Variant” with respect to a peptide or polypeptide that differs in amino acid sequence by the insertion, deletion, or conservative substitution of amino acids, but retain at least one biological activity. Variant may also mean a protein with an amino acid sequence that is substantially identical to a referenced protein with an amino acid sequence that retains at least one biological activity. A conservative substitution of an amino acid, i.e., replacing an amino acid with a different amino acid of similar properties (e.g., hydrophilicity, degree and distribution of charged regions) is recognized in the art as typically involving a minor change. These minor changes can be identified, in part, by considering the hydropathic index of amino acids, as understood in the art. Kyte et al., J. Mol. Biol. 157:105-132 (1982). The hydropathic index of an amino acid is based on a consideration of its hydrophobicity and charge. It is known in the art that amino acids of similar hydropathic indexes can be substituted and still retain protein function. In one aspect, amino acids having hydropathic indexes of ±2 are substituted. The hydrophilicity of amino acids can also be used to reveal substitutions that would result in proteins retaining biological function. A consideration of the hydrophilicity of amino acids in the context of a peptide permits calculation of the greatest local average hydrophilicity of that peptide, a useful measure that has been reported to correlate well with antigenicity and immunogenicity. U.S. Pat. No. 4,554,101, incorporated fully herein by reference. Substitution of amino acids having similar hydrophilicity values can result in peptides retaining biological activity, for example immunogenicity, as is understood in the art. Substitutions may be performed with amino acids having hydrophilicity values within ±2 of each other. Both the hyrophobicity index and the hydrophilicity value of amino acids are influenced by the particular side chain of that amino acid. Consistent with that observation, amino acid substitutions that are compatible with biological function are understood to depend on the relative similarity of the amino acids, and particularly the side chains of those amino acids, as revealed by the hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity, charge, size, and other properties.

v. Vector

“Vector” used herein may mean a nucleic acid sequence containing an origin of replication. A vector may be a plasmid, bacteriophage, bacterial artificial chromosome or yeast artificial chromosome. A vector may be a DNA or RNA vector. A vector may be either a self-replicating extrachromosomal vector or a vector which integrates into a host genome.

2. P.f. Consensus Immunogens

Provided herein are consensus PF proteins, also referred to herein as “consensus PF immunogens”, which are consensus antigens capable of eliciting an immune response against PF. A total of six consensus sequences were prepared. Consensus PF proteins may comprising SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 or 12, a fragment thereof as described herein, a homologous variant amino acid sequence thereof as described herein, of a fragment of a homologous variant amino acid sequence as described herein. Consensus PF proteins may comprise a signal peptide such as an immunoglobulin signal peptide such as an IgE or IgG signal peptide. Embodiments in which a consensus PF proteins SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 or 12 further comprises an IgE signal peptide include SEQ ID NOs:14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34 and 36. Preferred embodiments include a signal peptide such as an IgE signal peptide. In each protein, the N terminal methionine of the PF consensus sequences is replaced with the signal peptide. In some embodiments, consensus PF proteins comprise other amino acid sequences such as an HA Tag. Embodiments in which a consensus PF proteins SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 or 12 further comprises an IgE signal peptide and an HA Tag include SEQ ID NOs: 26, 28, 30, 32, 34 and 36.

The Consensus CS consensus sequence was designed from a compilation of all full-length Circumsporozoite Protein sequences in the GenBank database (66 sequences total). The protein sequence for full length PfConCS leader sequence is SEQ ID NO:2. The percent homology of SEQ ID NO:2 to each of the contributing sequences is reported in FIG. 1. The median homology of SEQ ID NO:2 with all 66 Genbank sequences is 98.2% (97.0-99.8). “Consensus CS immunogens” refer to proteins comprise SEQ ID NO:2, fragments thereof as described herein, homologous amino acid sequences to SEQ ID NO:2 as described herein, and fragments thereof as described herein. Consensus CS immunogens may comprise a signal peptide such as an immunoglobulin signal peptide such as an IgE or IgG signal peptide and in some embodiments, may comprise an HA Tag. Consensus CS immunogens that comprise an IgE signal peptide include SEQ ID NOs: 14 and 26. SEQ ID NO:26 is a consensus CS immunogens that comprise an IgE signal peptide and an HA Tag.

LSA1 is a highly conserved antigen. The consensus sequence PfConLSA1 was designed based on the full-length Pf LSA1 sequence in the GenBank database. The protein sequence for full length PfConLSA is SEQ ID NO:4. FIG. 2 shows homology of SEQ ID NO:4 to full-length Pf LSA1 sequence in the GenBank database and LSA1-NRC, a recombinant protein vaccine candidate. SEQ ID NO:4 is 95% homologous to the full-length LSA1 sequence and 96% homologous to LSA-NRC. The PfConLAS1 sequence shown includes FIG. 2 in SEQ ID NO:28. The full-length LSA1 sequence contains multiple repeat regions in the center of the protein. PfConLSA1 contains only 8 of these repeat regions. The sequence alignment was minimized to include only a portion of the repeat region that is not contained in PfConLSA1 or LSA1-NRC. “Consensus LAS1 immunogens” refer to proteins comprise SEQ ID NO:4, fragments thereof as described herein, homologous amino acid sequences to SEQ ID NO:4 as described herein, and fragments thereof as described herein. Consensus LAS1 immunogens may comprise a signal peptide such as an immunoglobulin signal peptide such as an IgE or IgG signal peptide and in some embodiments, may comprise an HA Tag. Consensus LAS1 immunogens that comprise an IgE signal peptide include SEQ ID NOs: 16 and 28. SEQ ID NO:28 is a consensus CS immunogens that comprise an IgE signal peptide and an HA Tag.

The consensus sequence of TRAP, which is also referred to as SSP2, was designed from a compilation of all full-length Plasmodium falciparum TRAP/SSP2 sequences in the GenBank database (28 sequences total). Protein sequence for full length PfConTRAP/SSP2 is SEQ ID NO:6. The percent homology of SEQ ID NO:6 to each of the contributing sequences is reported in the table in FIG. 3. The median homology of SEQ ID NO:6 with all 28 Genbank sequences is 98.3% (93.0-99.1). “Consensus TRAP immunogens” refer to proteins comprise SEQ ID NO:6, fragments thereof as described herein, homologous amino acid sequences to SEQ ID NO:6 as described herein, and fragments thereof as described herein. Consensus TRAP immunogens may comprise a signal peptide such as an immunoglobulin signal peptide such as an IgE or IgG signal peptide and in some embodiments, may comprise an HA Tag. Consensus TRAP immunogens that comprise an IgE signal peptide include SEQ ID NOs: 18 and 30. SEQ ID NO:30 is a consensus TRAP immunogens that comprise an IgE signal peptide and an HA Tag.

CelTOS, which is also referred to as Ag2, is a highly conserved Plasmodium antigen. The consensus sequence PfConAg2 (PfConCelTOS), SEQ ID NO:8, was designed based on the full-length CelTOS sequence in the GenBank database identified in FIG. 4 with the addition of the novel leader sequence. The PfConCelTOS sequence shown includes FIG. 4 in SEQ ID NO:32. Consensus CelTOS immunogens refer to proteins comprise SEQ ID NO:8, fragments thereof as described herein, homologous amino acid sequences to SEQ ID NO:8 as described herein, and fragments thereof as described herein and comprise a signal peptide such as an immunoglobulin signal peptide such as an IgE or IgG signal peptide and in some embodiments, may comprise an HA Tag. Consensus CelTOS immunogens that comprise an IgE signal peptide include SEQ ID NOs: 20 and 32. SEQ ID NO:32 is a consensus CelTOS immunogens that comprise an IgE signal peptide and an HA Tag.

Ama1 is a highly conserved Plasmodium antigen. The consensus sequence PfConAma1, SEQ ID NO:10, was designed based on the full-length Ama1 sequence. Consensus Ama1 immunogens refer to proteins comprise SEQ ID NO:10, fragments thereof as described herein, homologous amino acid sequences to SEQ ID NO:10 as described herein, and fragments thereof as described herein and comprise a signal peptide such as an immunoglobulin signal peptide such as an IgE or IgG signal peptide and in some embodiments, may comprise an HA Tag. Consensus Ama1 immunogens that comprise an IgE signal peptide include SEQ ID NOs: 22 and 34. SEQ ID NO:34 is a consensus Ama1 immunogens that comprise an IgE signal peptide and an HA Tag.

An alternative Consensus CS consensus sequence, consensus CS-alt was designed. Protein sequence for PfConCS-alt is SEQ ID NO:12. ““Consensus CS-alt immunogens” refer to proteins comprise SEQ ID NO:12, fragments thereof as described herein, homologous amino acid sequences to SEQ ID NO:12 as described herein, and fragments thereof as described herein and may comprise a signal peptide such as an immunoglobulin signal peptide such as an IgE or IgG signal peptide and in some embodiments, may comprise an HA Tag. Consensus CS-alt immunogens that comprise an IgE signal peptide include SEQ ID NOs: 24 and 36. SEQ ID NO:36 is a consensus CS-alt immunogens that comprise an IgE signal peptide and an HA Tag.

In some embodiments, fusion proteins are provided which comprise a combination of two or more of the PF proteins set forth herein. For example, fusion proteins may comprise two or more of Consensus CS immunogen or ConCS-alt immunogen, ConLSA1 immunogen, ConTRAP immunogen, ConCelTOS immunogen and, ConAma1 immunogen linked directly adjacent to each other or linked with a spacer or one more amino acids in between. In some embodiments the fusion protein comprises two PF immunogens; in some embodiments the fusion protein comprises three PF immunogens, in some embodiments the fusion protein comprises four PF immunogens, and in some embodiments the fusion protein comprises five PF immunogens. Fusion proteins with two Consensus PF immunogens may comprise: CS or CS-alt and LSA1; CS or CS-alt and TRAP; CS or CS-alt and CelTOS; CS or CS-alt and Ama1; LSA1 and TRAP; LSA1 and CelTOS; LSA1 and Ama1; TRAP and CelTOS; TRAP and Ama1; or CelTOS and Ama1. Fusion proteins with three Consensus PF immunogens may comprise: CS or CS-alt, LSA1 and TRAP; CS or CS-alt, LSA1 and CelTOS; CS or CS-alt, LSA1 and Ama1; LSA1, TRAP and CelTOS; LSA1, TRAP and Ama1; or TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1. Fusion proteins with four Consensus PF immunogens may comprise: CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP and CelTOS; CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP and Ama1; CS or CS-alt, LSA1, CelTOS and Ama1; CS or CS-alt, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1; or LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1. Fusion proteins with five Consensus PF immunogens may comprise CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1. In some embodiments, the fusion proteins comprise a signal peptide linked to the N terminus. In some embodiments, the fusion proteins comprises multiple signal peptides linked to the N terminal of each Consensus PF immunogens. In some embodiments, a spacer may be included between PF immunogens of a fusion protein. In some embodiments, the spacer between PF immunogens of a fusion protein may be a proteolyic cleavage site. In some embodiments, the spacer may be a proteolyic cleavage site recognized by a protease found in cells to which the vaccine is intended to be administered and/or taken up. In some embodiments, a spacer may be included between PF immunogens of a fusion protein wherein the spacer is a proteolyic cleavage site recognized by a protease found in cells to which the vaccine is intended to be administered and/or taken up and the fusion proteins comprises multiple signal peptides linked to the N terminal of each Consensus PF immunogens such that upon cleavage the signal peptide of each Consensus PF immunogens translocates the Consensus PF immunogen to outside the cell.

3. Coding Sequences Encoding Consensus PF Immunogens

Provided herein are nucleic acid sequences that encode the consensus PF immunogens. Administration of nucleic acid molecules comprising the nucleic acid sequences when taken up and expressed by cells results in a broad immune response against PF. Coding sequences for each six consensus PF immunogens disclosed above were prepared. Coding sequences for consensus PF proteins may encode SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 or 12, a fragment thereof as described herein, a homologous variant amino acid sequence as described herein, or a fragment of a homologous variant amino acid sequence. In some embodiments, the coding sequences that SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 or 12 may be a homologous variant nucleic acid sequence. In some embodiments, the coding sequences that encode a fragment of SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 or 12 may be a fragment of a homologous variant nucleic acid sequence. Coding sequences for consensus PF proteins may comprise SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 or 11, fragments thereof as described herein, a homologous variant nucleic acid sequence thereof as described herein that encodes a homologous variant amino acid sequence as described herein, or a fragment of a homologous variant nucleic acid sequence that encodes a fragment of a homologous variant amino acid sequence. Coding sequences for consensus PF proteins may comprise coding sequences for a signal peptide such as an immunoglobulin signal peptide such as an IgE or IgG signal peptide. Coding sequences may encode embodiments in which a consensus PF proteins SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 or 12 comprise an IgE signal peptide: SEQ ID NOs:14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34 and 36. Coding sequences may encode consensus PF proteins SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 or 12 that comprise an IgE signal peptide and an HA Tag: SEQ ID NOs: 26, 28, 30, 32, 34 and 36. Coding sequences SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 or 11 which comprise coding sequence for an IgE signal peptide include SEQ ID NOs:13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33 and 35. Coding sequences SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 or 11 which comprise coding sequence for an IgE signal peptide and an HA Tag include SEQ ID NOs: 25, 27, 29, 31, 33 and 35. Coding sequences may encode fusion proteins provided herein. The coding sequences may comprise SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 or 11, fragments thereof as described herein, a homologous variant nucleic acid sequence thereof as described herein that encodes a homologous variant amino acid sequence as described herein, or a fragment of a homologous variant nucleic acid sequence that encodes a fragment of a homologous variant amino acid sequence.

4. Plasmid

Provided herein is a vector that is capable of expressing a malaria antigen in the cell of a mammal in a quantity effective to elicit an immune response in the mammal. The vector may comprise heterologous nucleic acid encoding the malaria antigen. The vector may be a plasmid. The plasmid may be useful for transfecting cells with nucleic acid encoding a malaria antigen, which the transformed host cell is cultured and maintained under conditions wherein expression of the malaria antigen takes place.

Plasmids may comprise DNA constructs which comprise one or more coding sequences encoding Consensus PF Immunogens as disclosed herein. The coding sequences encoding Consensus PF Immunogens as disclosed herein are preferable operably linked to regulatory elements.

In some embodiments, a plasmid has DNA constructs that include coding sequence for one Consensus PF Immunogen, i.e. a Consensus PF CS Immunogen, a Consensus PF LSA1 Immunogen, a Consensus PF TRAP Immunogen, a Consensus PF CelTOS Immunogen, a Consensus PF Ama1 Immunogen or a Consensus PF CS-alt Immunogen.

In some embodiments, a plasmid has DNA constructs that include coding sequence for multiple Consensus PF Immunogens. In plasmid has DNA constructs that include coding sequence for multiple Consensus PF Immunogens the constructs may be separate expression cassettes wherein each Consensus PF Immunogen comprises a separate set of regulatory elements or two or more coding sequences may be incorporated into a single expression cassette in which coding sequences are separated by an IRS sequence.

In some embodiments, a plasmid has DNA constructs that include coding sequence for two Consensus PF Immunogens. Such plasmids may comprise DNA constructs that include coding sequence for CS or CS-alt and LSA1; CS or CS-alt and TRAP; CS or CS-alt and CelTOS; CS or CS-alt and Ama1; LSA1 and TRAP; LSA1 and CelTOS; LSA1 and Ama1; TRAP and CelTOS; TRAP and Ama1; or CelTOS and Ama1.

In some embodiments, a plasmid has DNA constructs that include coding sequence for three Consensus PF Immunogens. Such plasmids may comprise DNA constructs that include coding sequence for CS or CS-alt, LSA1 and TRAP; CS or CS-alt, LSA1 and CelTOS; CS or CS-alt, LSA1 and Ama1; LSA1, TRAP and CelTOS; LSA1, TRAP and Ama1; or TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1.

In some embodiments, a plasmid has DNA constructs that include coding sequence for four Consensus PF Immunogens. Such plasmids may comprise DNA constructs that include coding sequence for CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP and CelTOS; CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP and Ama1; CS or CS-alt, LSA1, CelTOS and Ama1; CS or CS-alt, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1; or LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1.

In some embodiments, a plasmid has DNA constructs that include coding sequence for five Consensus PF Immunogens. Such plasmids may comprise DNA constructs that include coding sequence for CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1.

Plasmid may comprise an initiation codon, which may be upstream of the coding sequence, and a stop codon, which may be downstream of the coding sequence. The initiation and termination codon may be in frame with the coding sequence.

The plasmid may also comprise a promoter that is operably linked to the coding sequence The promoter operably linked to the coding sequence may be a promoter from simian virus 40 (SV40), a mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter, a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) promoter such as the bovine immunodeficiency virus (BIV) long terminal repeat (LTR) promoter, a Moloney virus promoter, an avian leukosis virus (ALV) promoter, a cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter such as the CMV immediate early promoter, Epstein Barr virus (EBV) promoter, or a Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) promoter. The promoter may also be a promoter from a human gene such as human actin, human myosin, human hemoglobin, human muscle creatine, or human metalothionein. The promoter may also be a tissue specific promoter, such as a muscle or skin specific promoter, natural or synthetic. Examples of such promoters are described in US patent application publication no. US20040175727, the contents of which are incorporated herein in its entirety.

The plasmid may also comprise a polyadenylation signal, which may be downstream of the coding sequence. The polyadenylation signal may be a SV40 polyadenylation signal, LTR polyadenylation signal, bovine growth hormone (bGH) polyadenylation signal, human growth hormone (hGH) polyadenylation signal, or human β-globin polyadenylation signal. The SV40 polyadenylation signal may be a polyadenylation signal from a pCEP4 plasmid (Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif.).

The plasmid may also comprise an enhancer upstream of the coding sequence. The enhancer may be human actin, human myosin, human hemoglobin, human muscle creatine or a viral enhancer such as one from CMV, FMDV, RSV or EBV. Polynucleotide function enhances are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,593,972, 5,962,428, and WO94/016737, the contents of each are fully incorporated by reference.

The plasmid may also comprise a mammalian origin of replication in order to maintain the plasmid extrachromosomally and produce multiple copies of the plasmid in a cell. The plasmid may be pVAX1, pCEP4 or pREP4 from Invitrogen (San Diego, Calif.), which may comprise the Epstein Barr virus origin of replication and nuclear antigen EBNA-1 coding region, which may produce high copy episomal replication without integration. The backbone of the plasmid may be pAV0242. The plasmid may be a replication defective adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) plasmid.

The plasmid may also comprise a regulatory sequence, which may be well suited for gene expression in a cell into which the plasmid is administered. The coding sequence may comprise a codon that may allow more efficient transcription of the coding sequence in the host cell.

The coding sequence may also comprise an Ig leader sequence. The leader sequence may be 5′ of the coding sequence. The consensus antigens encoded by this sequence may comprise an N-terminal Ig leader followed by a consensus antigen protein. The N-terminal Ig leader may be IgE or IgG.

The plasmid may be pSE420 (Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif.), which may be used for protein production in Escherichia coli (E. coli). The plasmid may also be pYES2 (Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif.), which may be used for protein production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains of yeast. The plasmid may also be of the MAXBAC™ complete baculovirus expression system (Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif.), which may be used for protein production in insect cells. The plasmid may also be pcDNA I or pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif.), which maybe used for protein production in mammalian cells such as Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells.

5. Compositions

Compositions are provided which comprise plasmids. The compositions may comprise a plurality of copies of a single nucleic acid molecule such a single plasmid, a plurality of copies of a two or more different nucleic acid molecules such as two or more different plasmids. For example a compositions may comprise plurality of one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine or ten or more different nucleic acid molecules. Such a compositions may comprise plurality of one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine or ten or more different plasmids. Compositions may comprise coding sequences for one or more of Consensus PF CS Immunogen, a Consensus PF LSA1 Immunogen, a Consensus PF TRAP Immunogen, a Consensus PF CelTOS Immunogen, a Consensus PF Ama1 Immunogen or a Consensus PF CS-alt Immunogen. Compositions may comprise nucleic acid molecules, such as plasmids, that collectively contain coding sequence for a single Consensus PF Immunogen, coding sequence for two Consensus PF Immunogens, coding sequence for three Consensus PF Immunogens, coding sequence for four Consensus PF Immunogen or coding sequence for five Consensus PF Immunogens Compositions comprising coding sequence two Consensus PF Immunogens may be on a single nucleic acid molecule such as a single plasmid or the compositions may comprise two different nucleic acid molecule such as two different plasmids wherein one nucleic acid molecule comprises the coding sequence one Consensus PF Immunogen and the other nucleic acid molecule comprises the coding sequence different Consensus PF Immunogen. Similarly, compositions comprising coding sequence three Consensus PF Immunogens may comprise a single nucleic acid molecule such as a single plasmid, two different nucleic acid molecules or three different nucleic acid molecules. Likewise, compositions comprising coding sequence four Consensus PF Immunogens may comprise a single nucleic acid molecule such as a single plasmid, two different nucleic acid molecules, three different nucleic acid molecules or four different nucleic acid molecule. Compositions comprising coding sequence five Consensus PF Immunogens may comprise a single nucleic acid molecule such as a single plasmid, two different nucleic acid molecules, three different nucleic acid molecules, four different nucleic acid molecules or five different nucleic acid molecules.

In some embodiments, a composition comprises a plurality single nucleic acid molecule encoding one Consensus PF Immunogen such as Consensus PF CS or CS-alt Immunogen, Consensus PF LAST Immunogen, Consensus PF TRAPImmunogen, Consensus PF CelTOS Immunogen or Consensus PF Ama1 immunogen. In some embodiments, a composition comprises a plurality single nucleic acid molecule, such a single plasmid encoding two Consensus PF Immunogens such as CS or CS-alt and LSA1; CS or CS-alt and TRAP; CS or CS-alt and CelTOS; CS or CS-alt and Ama1; LSA1 and TRAP; LSA1 and CelTOS; LSA1 and Ama1; TRAP and CelTOS; TRAP and Ama1; or CelTOS and Ama1. In some embodiments, a composition comprises a plurality single nucleic acid molecule, such a single plasmid encoding three Consensus PF Immunogens such as CS or CS-alt, LSA1 and TRAP; CS or CS-alt, LSA1 and CelTOS; CS or CS-alt, LSA1 and Ama1; LSA1, TRAP and CelTOS; LSA1, TRAP and Ama1; or TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1. In some embodiments, a composition comprises a plurality single nucleic acid molecule, such a single plasmid encoding four Consensus PF Immunogens: CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP and CelTOS; CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP and Ama1; CS or CS-alt, LSA1, CelTOS and Ama1; CS or CS-alt, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1; or LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1. In some embodiments, a composition comprises a plurality single nucleic acid molecule, such a single plasmid encoding five Consensus PF Immunogens: CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1

In some embodiments, a composition comprises a plurality two different nucleic acid molecules, such as two plasmids, each different nucleic acid molecule comprising a single different coding sequence for a different Consensus PF Immunogens wherein pairs of different nucleic acid molecule comprise CS or CS-alt and LSA1; CS or CS-alt and TRAP; CS or CS-alt and CelTOS; CS or CS-alt and Ama1; LSA1 and TRAP; LSA1 and CelTOS; LSA1 and Ama1; TRAP and CelTOS; TRAP and Ama1; or CelTOS and Ama1. Collectively, the two different plasmids encode two different Consensus PF immunogens.

In some embodiments, a composition comprises a plurality two different nucleic acid molecules, such as two plasmids, which collectively comprising coding sequence for three different Consensus PF Immunogens. In some embodiments: one nucleic acid molecule encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS, CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1 and the second encodes two Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1. Collectively, the two different plasmids encode three different Consensus PF immunogens.

In some embodiments, a composition comprises a plurality two different nucleic acid molecules, such as two plasmids, which collectively comprising coding sequence for four different Consensus PF Immunogens. In some embodiments: one nucleic acid molecule encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS, CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1 and the second encodes three Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1. In some embodiments: one nucleic acid molecule encodes two Consensus PF Immunogens selected from CS, CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1 and the second encodes two Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1. Collectively, the two different plasmids encode four different Consensus PF immunogens.

In some embodiments, a composition comprises a plurality two different nucleic acid molecules, such as two plasmids, which collectively comprising coding sequence for five different Consensus PF Immunogens. In some embodiments: one nucleic acid molecule encodes two Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS, CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1 and the second encodes three Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1. In some embodiments: one nucleic acid molecule encodes two Consensus PF Immunogens selected from CS, CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1 and the second encodes two Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1. Collectively, the two different plasmids encode five different Consensus PF immunogens.

In some embodiments, a composition comprises a plurality three different nucleic acid molecules, such as three plasmids, which collectively comprising coding sequence for three different Consensus PF Immunogens. In some embodiments: one nucleic acid molecule encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS, CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, the second encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, and the third encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1. Collectively, the three different plasmids encode three different Consensus PF immunogens.

In some embodiments, a composition comprises a plurality three different nucleic acid molecules, such as three plasmids, which collectively comprising coding sequence for four different Consensus PF Immunogens. In some embodiments: one nucleic acid molecule encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS, CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, the second encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, and the third encodes two Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1. Collectively, the three different plasmids encode four different Consensus PF immunogens.

In some embodiments, a composition comprises a plurality three different nucleic acid molecules, such as three plasmids, which collectively comprising coding sequence for five different Consensus PF Immunogens. In some embodiments: one nucleic acid molecule encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS, CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, the second encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, and the third encodes three Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1. In some embodiments: one nucleic acid molecule encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS, CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, the second encodes two Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, and the third encodes two Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1. Collectively, the three different plasmids encode five different Consensus PF immunogens.

In some embodiments, a composition comprises a plurality four different nucleic acid molecules, such as four plasmids, which collectively comprising coding sequence for four different Consensus PF Immunogens. In some embodiments: one nucleic acid molecule encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS, CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, the second encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, the third encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, and the fourth encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1. Collectively, the four different plasmids encode four different Consensus PF immunogens.

In some embodiments, a composition comprises a plurality four different nucleic acid molecules, such as four plasmids, which collectively comprising coding sequence for five different Consensus PF Immunogens. In some embodiments: one nucleic acid molecule encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS, CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, the second encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, the third encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, and the fourth encodes two Consensus PF Immunogens selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1. Collectively, the four different plasmids encode five different Consensus PF immunogens.

In some embodiments, a composition comprises a plurality five different nucleic acid molecules, such as four plasmids, which collectively comprising coding sequence for five different Consensus PF Immunogens. In some embodiments: one nucleic acid molecule encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS, CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, the second encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, the third encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, the fourth encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1, and the fifth encodes one Consensus PF Immunogen selected from CS or CS-alt, LSA1, TRAP, CelTOS and Ama1. Collectively, the five different plasmids encode five different Consensus PF immunogens.

In some embodiments, a composition further comprises coding sequence for IL-12, IL-15, IL-28B and/or RANTES. Coding sequence for IL-12, IL-15, IL-28B and/or RANTES may be included on one or more nucleic acid molecules that comprise coding sequence for one or more Consensus PF Immunogens. Coding sequence for IL-12, IL-15, IL-28B and/or RANTES may be included on a separate nucleic acid molecules such as a separate plasmid.

6. Vaccine

Provided herein is a vaccine capable of generating in a mammal an immune response against malaria. The vaccine may comprise each plasmid as discussed above. The vaccine may comprise a plurality of the plasmids, or combinations thereof. The vaccine may be provided to induce a therapeutic or prophylactic immune response.

Vaccines may be used to deliver one or more Consensus PF Immunogens selected from the group consisting of Consensus PF CS Immunogen, a Consensus PF LSA1 Immunogen, a Consensus PF TRAP Immunogen, a Consensus PF CelTOS Immunogen, a Consensus PF Ama1 Immunogen or a Consensus PF CS-alt Immunogen. In the case of delivery of multiple targets, vaccines may include multiple compositions or a single compositions. Plasmids may be used which encode multiple proteins on a single plasmid or compositions which comprise different plasmids that encode different proteins.

The vaccine may further comprise a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient. The pharmaceutically acceptable excipient may be functional molecules as vehicles, adjuvants, carriers, or diluents. The pharmaceutically acceptable excipient may be a transfection facilitating agent, which may include surface active agents, such as immune-stimulating complexes (ISCOMS), Freunds incomplete adjuvant, LPS analog including monophosphoryl lipid A, muramyl peptides, quinone analogs, vesicles such as squalene and squalene, hyaluronic acid, lipids, liposomes, calcium ions, viral proteins, polyanions, polycations, or nanoparticles, or other known transfection facilitating agents.

The transfection facilitating agent is a polyanion, polycation, including poly-L-glutamate (LGS), or lipid. The transfection facilitating agent is poly-L-glutamate, and more preferably, the poly-L-glutamate is present in the vaccine at a concentration less than 6 mg/ml. The transfection facilitating agent may also include surface active agents such as immune-stimulating complexes (ISCOMS), Freunds incomplete adjuvant, LPS analog including monophosphoryl lipid A, muramyl peptides, quinone analogs and vesicles such as squalene and squalene, and hyaluronic acid may also be used administered in conjunction with the genetic construct. In some embodiments, the DNA plasmid vaccines may also include a transfection facilitating agent such as lipids, liposomes, including lecithin liposomes or other liposomes known in the art, as a DNA-liposome mixture (see for example WO9324640), calcium ions, viral proteins, polyanions, polycations, or nanoparticles, or other known transfection facilitating agents. Preferably, the transfection facilitating agent is a polyanion, polycation, including poly-L-glutamate (LGS), or lipid. Concentration of the transfection agent in the vaccine is less than 4 mg/ml, less than 2 mg/ml, less than 1 mg/ml, less than 0.750 mg/ml, less than 0.500 mg/ml, less than 0.250 mg/ml, less than 0.100 mg/ml, less than 0.050 mg/ml, or less than 0.010 mg/ml.

The pharmaceutically acceptable excipient may be one or more adjuvants. An adjuvant may be other genes that are expressed from the same or from an alternative plasmid or are delivered as proteins in combination with the plasmid above in the vaccine. The one or more adjuvants may be proteins and/or nucleic acid molecules that encode proteins selected from the group consisting of: α-interferon (IFN-α), β-interferon (IFN-β), γ-interferon, platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), TNFα, TNFβ, GM-CSF, epidermal growth factor (EGF), cutaneous T cell-attracting chemokine (CTACK), epithelial thymus-expressed chemokine (TECK), mucosae-associated epithelial chemokine (MEC), IL-12, IL-15 including IL-15 having the signal sequence or coding sequence that encodes the signal sequence deleted and optionally including a different signal peptide such as that from IgE or coding sequence that encodes a difference signal peptide such as that from IgE, IL-28, MHC, CD80, CD86, IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-18, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, IL-8, L-selectin, P-selectin, E-selectin, CD34, GlyCAM-1, MadCAM-1, LFA-1, VLA-1, Mac-1, pl50.95, PECAM, ICAM-1, ICAM-2, ICAM-3, CD2, LFA-3, M-CSF, G-CSF, mutant forms of IL-18, CD40, CD40L, vascular growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, IL-7, nerve growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, Fas, TNF receptor, Flt, Apo-1, p55, WSL-1, DR3, TRAMP, Apo-3, AIR, LARD, NGRF, DR4, DR5, KILLER, TRAIL-R2, TRICK2, DR6, Caspase ICE, Fos, c-jun, Sp-1, Ap-1, Ap-2, p38, p65Rel, MyD88, IRAK, TRAF6, IkB, Inactive NIK, SAP K, SAP-1, AK, interferon response genes, NFkB, Bax, TRAIL, TRAILrec, TRAILrecDRC5, TRAIL-R3, TRAIL-R4, RANK, RANK LIGAND, Ox40, Ox40 LIGAND, NKG2D, MICA, MICB, NKG2A, NKG2B, NKG2C, NKG2E, NKG2F, TAP1, TAP2 and functional fragments thereof. or a combination thereof. In some embodiments adjuvant may be one or more proteins and/or nucleic acid molecules that encode proteins selected from the group consisting of: IL-12, IL-15, IL-28, CTACK, TECK, MEC or RANTES. Examples of IL-12 constructs and sequences are disclosed in PCT application no. PCT/US1997/019502 and corresponding U.S. application Ser. No. 08/956,865, which are each incorporated herein by reference. Examples of IL-15 constructs and sequences are disclosed in PCT application no. PCT/US04/18962 and corresponding U.S. application Ser. No. 10/560,650, and in PCT application no. PCT/US07/00886 and corresponding U.S. application Ser. No. 12/160,766, and in PCT application no. PCT/US10/048,827, which are each incorporated herein by reference. Examples of IL-28 constructs and sequences are disclosed in PCT application no. PCT/US09/039,648 and corresponding U.S. application Ser. No. 12/936,192, which are each incorporated herein by reference. Examples of RANTES and other constructs and sequences are disclosed in PCT application no. PCT/US1999/004332 and corresponding U.S. application Ser. No. and 09/622,452, which are each incorporated herein by reference. Other examples of RANTES constructs and sequences are disclosed in PCT application no. PCT/US11/024,098, which is incorporated herein by reference. Examples of RANTES and other constructs and sequences are disclosed in PCT application no. PCT/US1999/004332 and corresponding U.S. application Ser. No. 09/622,452, which are each incorporated herein by reference. Other examples of RANTES constructs and sequences are disclosed in PCT application no. PCT/US11/024,098, which is incorporated herein by reference. Examples of chemokines CTACK, TECK and MEC constructs and sequences are disclosed in PCT application no. PCT/US2005/042231 and corresponding U.S. application Ser. No. 11/719,646, which are each incorporated herein by reference. Examples of OX40 and other immunomodulators are disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/560,653, which is incorporated herein by reference. Examples of DR5 and other immunomodulators are disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/622,452, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The vaccine may further comprise a genetic vaccine facilitator agent as described in U.S. Ser. No. 021,579 filed Apr. 1, 1994, which is fully incorporated by reference.

The vaccine may comprise the consensus antigens and plasmids at quantities of from about 1 nanogram to 100 milligrams; about 1 microgram to about 10 milligrams; or preferably about 0.1 microgram to about 10 milligrams; or more preferably about 1 milligram to about 2 milligram. In some preferred embodiments, pharmaceutical compositions according to the present invention comprise about 5 nanogram to about 1000 micrograms of DNA. In some preferred embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions contain about 10 nanograms to about 800 micrograms of DNA. In some preferred embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions contain about 0.1 to about 500 micrograms of DNA. In some preferred embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions contain about 1 to about 350 micrograms of DNA. In some preferred embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions contain about 25 to about 250 micrograms, from about 100 to about 200 microgram, from about 1 nanogram to 100 milligrams; from about 1 microgram to about 10 milligrams; from about 0.1 microgram to about 10 milligrams; from about 1 milligram to about 2 milligram, from about 5 nanogram to about 1000 micrograms, from about 10 nanograms to about 800 micrograms, from about 0.1 to about 500 micrograms, from about 1 to about 350 micrograms, from about 25 to about 250 micrograms, from about 100 to about 200 microgram of the consensus antigen or plasmid thereof.

The vaccine may be formulated according to the mode of administration to be used. An injectable vaccine pharmaceutical composition may be sterile, pyrogen free and particulate free. An isotonic formulation or solution may be used. Additives for isotonicity may include sodium chloride, dextrose, mannitol, sorbitol, and lactose. The vaccine may comprise a vasoconstriction agent. The isotonic solutions may include phosphate buffered saline. Vaccine may further comprise stabilizers including gelatin and albumin. The stabilizing may allow the formulation to be stable at room or ambient temperature for extended periods of time such as LGS or polycations or polyanions to the vaccine formulation.

7. Methods of Delivery the Vaccine

Provided herein is a method for delivering the vaccine for providing genetic constructs and proteins of the consensus antigen which comprise epitopes that make them particular effective against immunogens of malaria against which an immune response can be induced. The method of delivering the vaccine or vaccination may be provided to induce a therapeutic and prophylactic immune response. The vaccination process may generate in the mammal an immune response against malaria. The vaccine may be delivered to an individual to modulate modulate the activity of the mammal's immune system and enhance the immune response. The delivery of the vaccine may be the transfection of the consensus antigen as a nucleic acid molecule that is expressed in the cell and delivered to the surface of the cell upon which the immune system recognized and induces a cellular, humoral, or cellular and humoral response. The delivery of the vaccine may be use to induce or elicit and immune response in mammals against malaria by administering to the mammals the vaccine as discussed above.

Upon delivery of the vaccine and plasmid into the cells of the mammal, the transfected cells will express and secrete consensus antigens for each of the plasmids injected from the vaccine. These proteins will be recognized as foreign by the immune system and antibodies will be made against them. These antibodies will be maintained by the immune system and allow for an effective response to subsequent malaria infections.

The vaccine may be administered to a mammal to elicit an immune response in a mammal. The mammal may be human, primate, non-human primate, cow, cattle, sheep, goat, antelope, bison, water buffalo, bison, bovids, deer, hedgehogs, elephants, llama, alpaca, mice, rats, and chicken.

a. Combination Treatments

The vaccine may be administered in combination with other proteins and/or genes encoding α-interferon, γ-interferon, platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), TNFα, TNFβ, GM-CSF, epidermal growth factor (EGF), cutaneous T cell-attracting chemokine (CTACK), epithelial thymus-expressed chemokine (TECK), mucosae-associated epithelial chemokine (MEC), IL-12, IL-15 including IL-15 having the signal sequence deleted and optionally including the different signal peptide such as the IgE signal peptide, MHC, CD80, CD86, IL-28, IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-18, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, IL-8, RANTES, L-selectin, P-selectin, E-selectin, CD34, GlyCAM-1, MadCAM-1, LFA-1, VLA-1, Mac-1, p150.95, PECAM, ICAM-1, ICAM-2, ICAM-3, CD2, LFA-3, M-CSF, G-CSF, mutant forms of IL-18, CD40, CD40L, vascular growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, IL-7, nerve growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, Fas, TNF receptor, Flt, Apo-1, p55, WSL-1, DR3, TRAMP, Apo-3, AIR, LARD, NGRF, DR4, DR5, KILLER, TRAIL-R2, TRICK2, DR6, Caspase ICE, Fos, c-jun, Sp-1, Ap-1, Ap-2, p38, p65Rel, MyD88, IRAK, TRAF6, IkB, Inactive NIK, SAP K, SAP-1, JNK, interferon response genes, NFkB, Bax, TRAIL, TRAILrec, TRAILrecDRC5, TRAIL-R3, TRAIL-R4, RANK, RANK LIGAND, Ox40, Ox40 LIGAND, NKG2D, MICA, MICB, NKG2A, NKG2B, NKG2C, NKG2E, NKG2F, TAP1, TAP2 and functional fragments thereof or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the vaccine is administered in combination with one or more of the following nucleic acid molecules and/or proteins: nucleic acid molecules selected from the group consisting of nucleic acid molecules comprising coding sequence that encode one or more of IL-12, IL-15, IL-28, CTACK, TECK, MEC and RANTES or functional fragments thereof, and proteins selected from the group consisting of: IL-12 protein, IL-15 protein, IL-28 protein, CTACK protein, TECK protein, MEC protein or RANTES protein or functional fragments thereof.

The vaccine may be administered by different routes including orally, parenterally, sublingually, transdermally, rectally, transmucosally, topically, via inhalation, via buccal administration, intrapleurally, intravenous, intraarterial, intraperitoneal, subcutaneous, intramuscular, intranasal intrathecal, and intraarticular or combinations thereof. For veterinary use, the composition may be administered as a suitably acceptable formulation in accordance with normal veterinary practice. The veterinarian can readily determine the dosing regimen and route of administration that is most appropriate for a particular animal. The vaccine may be administered by traditional syringes, needleless injection devices, “microprojectile bombardment gone guns”, or other physical methods such as electroporation (“EP”), “hydrodynamic method”, or ultrasound.

The plasmid of the vaccine may be delivered to the mammal by several well known technologies including DNA injection (also referred to as DNA vaccination) with and without in vivo electroporation, liposome mediated, nanoparticle facilitated, recombinant vectors such as recombinant adenovirus, recombinant adenovirus associated virus and recombinant vaccinia. The consensus antigen may be delivered via DNA injection and along with in vivo electroporation.

b. Electroporation

Administration of the vaccine via electroporation of the plasmids of the vaccine may be accomplished using electroporation devices that can be configured to deliver to a desired tissue of a mammal a pulse of energy effective to cause reversible pores to form in cell membranes, and preferable the pulse of energy is a constant current similar to a preset current input by a user. The electroporation device may comprise an electroporation component and an electrode assembly or handle assembly. The electroporation component may include and incorporate one or more of the various elements of the electroporation devices, including: controller, current waveform generator, impedance tester, waveform logger, input element, status reporting element, communication port, memory component, power source, and power switch. The electroporation may be accomplished using an in vivo electroporation device, for example CELLECTRA EP system (VGX Pharmaceuticals, Blue Bell, Pa.) or Elgen electroporator (Genetronics, San Diego, Calif.) to facilitate transfection of cells by the plasmid.

The electroporation component may function as one element of the electroporation devices, and the other elements are separate elements (or components) in communication with the electroporation component. The electroporation component may function as more than one element of the electroporation devices, which may be in communication with still other elements of the electroporation devices separate from the electroporation component. The elements of the electroporation devices existing as parts of one electromechanical or mechanical device may not limited as the elements can function as one device or as separate elements in communication with one another. The electroporation component may be capable of delivering the pulse of energy that produces the constant current in the desired tissue, and includes a feedback mechanism. The electrode assembly may include an electrode array having a plurality of electrodes in a spatial arrangement, wherein the electrode assembly receives the pulse of energy from the electroporation component and delivers same to the desired tissue through the electrodes. At least one of the plurality of electrodes is neutral during delivery of the pulse of energy and measures impedance in the desired tissue and communicates the impedance to the electroporation component. The feedback mechanism may receive the measured impedance and can adjust the pulse of energy delivered by the electroporation component to maintain the constant current.

A plurality of electrodes may deliver the pulse of energy in a decentralized pattern. The plurality of electrodes may deliver the pulse of energy in the decentralized pattern through the control of the electrodes under a programmed sequence, and the programmed sequence is input by a user to the electroporation component. The programmed sequence may comprise a plurality of pulses delivered in sequence, wherein each pulse of the plurality of pulses is delivered by at least two active electrodes with one neutral electrode that measures impedance, and wherein a subsequent pulse of the plurality of pulses is delivered by a different one of at least two active electrodes with one neutral electrode that measures impedance.

The feedback mechanism may be performed by either hardware or software. The feedback mechanism may be performed by an analog closed-loop circuit. The feedback occurs every 50 μs, 20 μs, 10 μs or 1 μs, but is preferably a real-time feedback or instantaneous (i.e., substantially instantaneous as determined by available techniques for determining response time). The neutral electrode may measure the impedance in the desired tissue and communicates the impedance to the feedback mechanism, and the feedback mechanism responds to the impedance and adjusts the pulse of energy to maintain the constant current at a value similar to the preset current. The feedback mechanism may maintain the constant current continuously and instantaneously during the delivery of the pulse of energy.

Examples of electroporation devices and electroporation methods that may facilitate delivery of the DNA vaccines of the present invention, include those described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,245,963 by Draghia-Akli, et al., U.S. Patent Pub. 2005/0052630 submitted by Smith, et al., the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Other electroporation devices and electroporation methods that may be used for facilitating delivery of the DNA vaccines include those provided in co-pending and co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/874,072, filed Oct. 17, 2007, which claims the benefit under 35 USC 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 60/852,149, filed Oct. 17, 2006, and 60/978,982, filed Oct. 10, 2007, all of which are hereby incorporated in their entirety.

U.S. Pat. No. 7,245,963 by Draghia-Akli, et al. describes modular electrode systems and their use for facilitating the introduction of a biomolecule into cells of a selected tissue in a body or plant. The modular electrode systems may comprise a plurality of needle electrodes; a hypodermic needle; an electrical connector that provides a conductive link from a programmable constant-current pulse controller to the plurality of needle electrodes; and a power source. An operator can grasp the plurality of needle electrodes that are mounted on a support structure and firmly insert them into the selected tissue in a body or plant. The biomolecules are then delivered via the hypodermic needle into the selected tissue. The programmable constant-current pulse controller is activated and constant-current electrical pulse is applied to the plurality of needle electrodes. The applied constant-current electrical pulse facilitates the introduction of the biomolecule into the cell between the plurality of electrodes. The entire content of U.S. Pat. No. 7,245,963 is hereby incorporated by reference.

U.S. Patent Pub. 2005/0052630 submitted by Smith, et al. describes an electroporation device which may be used to effectively facilitate the introduction of a biomolecule into cells of a selected tissue in a body or plant. The electroporation device comprises an electro-kinetic device (“EKD device”) whose operation is specified by software or firmware. The EKD device produces a series of programmable constant-current pulse patterns between electrodes in an array based on user control and input of the pulse parameters, and allows the storage and acquisition of current waveform data. The electroporation device also comprises a replaceable electrode disk having an array of needle electrodes, a central injection channel for an injection needle, and a removable guide disk. The entire content of U.S. Patent Pub. 2005/0052630 is hereby incorporated by reference.

The electrode arrays and methods described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,245,963 and U.S. Patent Pub. 2005/0052630 may be adapted for deep penetration into not only tissues such as muscle, but also other tissues or organs. Because of the configuration of the electrode array, the injection needle (to deliver the biomolecule of choice) is also inserted completely into the target organ, and the injection is administered perpendicular to the target issue, in the area that is pre-delineated by the electrodes The electrodes described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,245,963 and U.S. Patent Pub. 2005/005263 are preferably 20 mm long and 21 gauge.

Additionally, contemplated in some embodiments that incorporate electroporation devices and uses thereof, there are electroporation devices that are those described in the following patents: U.S. Pat. No. 5,273,525 issued Dec. 28, 1993, U.S. Pat. No. 6,110,161 issued Aug. 29, 2000, U.S. Pat. No. 6,261,281 issued Jul. 17, 2001, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,958,060 issued Oct. 25, 2005, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,939,862 issued Sep. 6, 2005. Furthermore, patents covering subject matter provided in U.S. Pat. No. 6,697,669 issued Feb. 24, 2004, which concerns delivery of DNA using any of a variety of devices, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,328,064 issued Feb. 5, 2008, drawn to method of injecting DNA are contemplated herein. The above-patents are incorporated by reference in their entirety.

c. Protein Boost

In some embodiments, Consensus PF immunogen may be delivered as protein as part of vaccine protocol. In some embodiments, subsequent to the initial immunization vaccination in which plasmid DNA compositions as disclosed herein are administered, protein immunogens are delivered as a boost. In some embodiments, boosts are combinations of plasmid DNA vaccine and protein. In some embodiments, multiple boosts are administered. In some embodiments, multiple boosts are administered wherein one or more boosts are protein administration and one or more boosts a DNA vaccine administration. Boosts employing viral vectors and/or killed or attenuated pathogen may also be employed. One or more vaccinations may be administered, independent with respect to all times other than the initial or most recent, within one day, one week, two weeks, three weeks, four weeks, six weeks, eight weeks, twelve weeks, six months, one year apart.

Proteins used in protein boosts may be produced by routine methods using the information disclosed herein and well known methodology. For example. recombinant vectors that include coding sequences for the proteins may be produced and used to generate large quantities of protein. Recombinant expression vectors that comprises a nucleotide sequence that encodes proteins of the invention can be produced routinely. As used herein, the term “recombinant expression vector” is meant to refer to a plasmid, phage, viral particle or other vector which, when introduced into an appropriate host, contains the necessary genetic elements to direct expression of a coding sequence. One having ordinary skill in the art can isolate or synthesize a nucleic acid molecule that encodes a protein of the invention and insert it into an expression vector using standard techniques and readily available starting materials. The coding sequence is operably linked to the necessary regulatory sequences. Expression vectors are well known and readily available. Examples of expression vectors include plasmids, phages, viral vectors and other nucleic acid molecules or nucleic acid molecule containing vehicles useful to transform host cells and facilitate expression of coding sequences. The recombinant expression vectors of the invention are useful for transforming hosts.

Host cells that comprise the recombinant expression vector can be used to produce the protein. Host cells for use in well known recombinant expression systems for production of proteins are well known and readily available. Examples of host cells include bacteria cells such as E. coli, yeast cells such as S. cerevisiae, insect cells such as S. frugiperda, non-human mammalian tissue culture cells chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and human tissue culture cells such as HeLa cells.

In some embodiments, for example, one having ordinary skill in the art can, using well known techniques, insert DNA molecules into a commercially available expression vector for use in well known expression systems. For example, the commercially available plasmid pSE420 (Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif.) may be used for production of a protein in E. coli. The commercially available plasmid pYES2 (Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif.) may, for example, be used for production in S. cerevisiae strains of yeast. The commercially available MAXBAC™ complete baculovirus expression system (Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif.) may, for example, be used for production in insect cells. The commercially available plasmid pcDNA I or pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif.) may, for example, be used for production in mammalian cells such as Chinese Hamster Ovary cells. One having ordinary skill in the art can use these commercial expression vectors and systems or others to produce proteins of the invention using routine techniques and readily available starting materials. (See e.g., Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning a Laboratory Manual, Second Ed. Cold Spring Harbor Press (1989) which is incorporated herein by reference.) Thus, the desired proteins can be prepared in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems, resulting in a spectrum of processed forms of the protein.

One having ordinary skill in the art may use other commercially available expression vectors and systems or produce vectors using well known methods and readily available starting materials. Expression systems containing the requisite control sequences, such as promoters and polyadenylation signals, and preferably enhancers, are readily available and known in the art for a variety of hosts. See e.g., Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning a Laboratory Manual, Second Ed. Cold Spring Harbor Press (1989).

The expression vector including the DNA that encodes a protein is used to transform the compatible host which is then cultured and maintained under conditions wherein expression of the foreign DNA takes place. The protein of the invention thus produced is recovered from the culture, either by lysing the cells or from the culture medium as appropriate and known to those in the art. One having ordinary skill in the art can, using well known techniques, isolate the protein of the invention that is produced using such expression systems. The methods of purifying proteins of the invention from natural sources using antibodies which specifically bind to such protein are routine as is the methods of generating such antibodies (See: Harlow, E. and Lane, E., Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, 1988, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press which is incorporated herein by reference). Such antibodies may be used to purifying proteins produced by recombinant DNA methodology or natural sources.

Examples of genetic constructs include coding sequences which encode a protein of the invention and which are operably linked to a promoter that is functional in the cell line into which the constructs are transfected. Examples of constitutive promoters include promoters from cytomegalovirus or SV40. Examples of inducible promoters include mouse mammary leukemia virus or metallothionein promoters. Those having ordinary skill in the art can readily produce genetic constructs useful for transfecting with cells with DNA that encodes proteins of the invention from readily available starting materials. Such gene constructs are useful for the production of proteins of the invention.

In addition to producing proteins of the invention by recombinant techniques, automated peptide synthesizers may also be employed to produce proteins of the invention. Such techniques are well known to those having ordinary skill in the art and are useful if derivatives which have substitutions not provided for in DNA-encoded protein production. For example, the proteins of the invention may be prepared by any of the following known techniques. Conveniently, the proteins of the invention may be prepared using the solid-phase synthetic technique initially described by Merrifield, in J. Am. Chem. Soc., 15:2149-2154 (1963) which is incorporated herein by reference. Other protein synthesis techniques may be found, for example, in M. Bodanszky et al., (1976) Peptide Synthesis, John Wiley & Sons, 2d Ed. which is incorporated herein by reference; Kent and Clark-Lewis in Synthetic Peptides in Biology and Medicine, p. 295-358, eds. Alitalo, K., et al. Science Publishers, (Amsterdam, 1985) which is incorporated herein by reference; as well as other reference works known to those skilled in the art. A summary of synthesis techniques may be found in J. Stuart and J. D. Young, Solid Phase Peptide Synthelia, Pierce Chemical Company, Rockford, Ill. (1984) which is incorporated herein by reference. Synthesis by solution methods may also be used, as described in The Proteins, Vol. II, 3d Ed., p. 105-237, Neurath, H. et al., Eds., Academic Press, New York, N.Y. (1976) which is incorporated herein by reference. Appropriate protective groups for use in such syntheses will be found in the above texts, as well as in J. F. W. McOmie, Protective Groups in Organic Chemistry, Plenum Press, New York, N.Y. (1973) which is incorporated herein by reference. In general, these synthetic methods involve the sequential addition of one or more amino acid residues or suitable protected amino acid residues to a growing peptide chain. Normally, either the amino or carboxyl group of the first amino acid residue is protected by a suitable, selectively-removable protecting group. A different, selectively removable protecting group is utilized for amino acids containing a reactive side group, such as lysine.

Proteins may be formulated for administration to a mammal by well known methods using readily available materials. One skilled in the art would readily comprehend the multitude of pharmaceutically acceptable media that may be used in the present invention. Suitable pharmaceutical carriers are described in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, A. Osol, a standard reference text in this field, which is incorporated herein by reference. Formulations for topical administration may include transdermal patches, ointments, lotions, creams, gels, drops, suppositories, sprays, liquids and powders. Conventional pharmaceutical carriers, aqueous, powder or oily bases, thickeners and the like may be necessary or desirable. Compositions for oral administration include powders or granules, suspensions or solutions in water or nonaqueous media, capsules, sachets or tablets. Thickeners, flavoring agents, diluents, emulsifiers, dispersing aids or binders may be desirable. Compositions for parenteral, intravenous, intrathecal or intraventricular administration may include sterile aqueous solutions which may also contain buffers, diluents and other suitable additives and are preferably sterile and pyrogen free. Pharmaceutical compositions which are suitable for intravenous administration according to the invention are sterile and pyrogen free. For parenteral administration, the peptides of the invention can be, for example, formulated as a solution, suspension, emulsion or lyophilized powder in association with a pharmaceutically acceptable parenteral vehicle. Examples of such vehicles are water, saline, Ringer's solution, dextrose solution, and 5% human serum albumin. Liposomes and nonaqueous vehicles such as fixed oils may also be used. The vehicle or lyophilized powder may contain additives that maintain isotonicity (e.g., sodium chloride, mannitol) and chemical stability (e.g., buffers and preservatives). The formulation is sterilized by commonly used techniques. For example, a parenteral composition suitable for administration by injection is prepared by dissolving 1.5% by weight of active ingredient in 0.9% sodium chloride solution.

The pharmaceutical compositions comprising protein according to the present invention may be administered as a single dose or in multiple doses. Dosage varies depending upon known factors such as the pharmacodynamic characteristics of the particular agent, and its mode and route of administration; age, health, and weight of the recipient; nature and extent of symptoms, kind of concurrent treatment, frequency of treatment, and the effect desired. Formulation of therapeutic compositions and their subsequent administration is believed to be within the skill of those in the art. Usually, the dosage of peptide can be about 1 micrograms to 1000 milligrams or more; 10 micrograms to 1000 milligrams; preferably 50 micrograms to 500 milligrams; more preferably 100 micrograms to 400 milligrams. In some embodiments, dosages are in the rage of 10-250 micrograms. In some embodiments, dosages are higher, for example 250 micrograms-1 milligram, or higher such as 1-50 milligrams. In some embodiments, dosages are higher still, for example 50-500 milligrams.

d. Method of Preparing DNA Plasmids

Provided herein is methods for preparing the DNA plasmids that comprise the DNA vaccines discussed herein. The DNA plasmids, after the final subcloning step into the mammalian expression plasmid, can be used to inoculate a cell culture in a large scale fermentation tank, using known methods in the art.

The DNA plasmids for use with the EP devices of the present invention can be formulated or manufactured using a combination of known devices and techniques, but preferably they are manufactured using an optimized plasmid manufacturing technique that is described in a licensed, co-pending U.S. provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 60/939,792, which was filed on May 23, 2007. In some examples, the DNA plasmids used in these studies can be formulated at concentrations greater than or equal to 10 mg/mL. The manufacturing techniques also include or incorporate various devices and protocols that are commonly known to those of ordinary skill in the art, in addition to those described in U.S. Ser. No. 60/939,792, including those described in a licensed patent, U.S. Pat. No. 7,238,522, which issued on Jul. 3, 2007. The above-referenced application and patent, U.S. Ser. No. 60/939,792 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,238,522, respectively, are hereby incorporated in their entirety.

EXAMPLES

The present invention is further illustrated in the following Examples. It should be understood that these Examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only. From the above discussion and these Examples, one skilled in the art can ascertain the essential characteristics of this invention, and without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, can make various changes and modifications of the invention to adapt it to various usages and conditions. Thus, various modifications of the invention in addition to those shown and described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims

Example 1—Preparing Expression Constructs

Vaccine candidates were developed based on identifying four important P.f. antigens: circumsporozoite protein (CS), liver stage antigen 1 (LSA1), thrombospondin-related-anonymous-protein (TRAP) and cell-traversal protein for ookinetes and sporozoites (CelTOS, or Ag2). Each antigen was designed based on consensus sequence with several modifications made in order to improve expression, including codon and RNA optimization.

Consensus CS

A consensus CS sequence was designed from full-length CS sequences in the GenBank database (66 sequences in total) disclosed in FIG. 1. The consensus CS sequence may optionally comprise a leader sequence such as an immunoglobulin signal peptide such as the IgE signal peptide. The consensus CS is set forth in SEQ ID NO:2. The coding sequence of the consensus CS set forth in SEQ ID NO:2 is set forth in SEQ ID NO:1. Consensus CS with an IgE leader sequence is set forth in SEQ ID NOs:14 and 26. Coding sequences of consensus CS with an IgE leader sequence in SEQ ID NOs:14 and 26 are set forth in SEQ ID NOs:13 and 25. The coding sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:25 cloned in pVAX to produce pGX7002 has the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:37.

Consensus Ag2 (or Consensus CelTOS)

A consensus CelTOS sequence, also referred to as the consensus Ag2 sequence, was designed from full-length CelTOS sequence in the GenBank database disclosed in FIG. 4. The consensus CelTOS is set forth in SEQ ID NO:8. A sequence encoding the consensus CelTOS designed for high level expression of SEQ ID NO:8 is set forth in SEQ ID NO:7. The consensus CelTOS sequence may optionally comprise a leader sequence such as an immunoglobulin signal peptide such as the IgE signal peptide. Consensus CelTOS with an IgE leader sequence are set forth in SEQ ID NOs:20 and 32. Sequence encoding consensus CelTOS with an IgE leader sequence designed for high level expression of SEQ ID NOs:20 and 32 are set forth in SEQ ID NOs:19 and 31. The coding sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:31 cloned in pVAX to produce pGX7001 has the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:39.

Consensus LSA1

A consensus LAS sequence was designed from full-length LAS1 sequences. FIG. 2 shows the degree of homology between SEQ ID NO:4 and the sequences. While the full length LSA1 sequence contains multiple repeat regions in the center of the protein, the consensus LSA1 (PfConLSA1) contains only 8 of these repeat regions. The consensus LAS1 is set forth in SEQ ID NO:4. The coding sequence of the consensus LAS1 in SEQ ID NO:4 is set forth in SEQ ID NO:3. The consensus LAS1 sequence may optionally comprise a leader sequence such as an immunoglobulin signal peptide such as the IgE signal peptide. Consensus LAS 1 with an IgE leader sequence are set forth in SEQ ID NOs:16 and 28. Coding sequences of consensus LAS1 with an IgE leader sequence in SEQ ID NOs:16 and 28 are set forth in SEQ ID NOs:15 and 27. The coding sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:27 cloned in pVAX to produce pGX7004 has the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:39.

Consensus TRAP (Consensus SSP2)

A consensus TRAP sequence, also referred to as the consensus SSP2 sequence, was designed from full-length TRAP sequences in the GenBank database (28 sequences in total) disclosed in FIG. 3. The consensus TRAP is set forth in SEQ ID NO:6. A sequence encoding the consensus TRAP designed for high level expression is set forth in SEQ ID NO:6 is set forth in SEQ ID NO:5. The consensus TRAP sequence may optionally comprise a leader sequence such as an immunoglobulin signal peptide such as the IgE signal peptide. Consensus TRAP with an IgE leader sequence are set forth in SEQ ID NOs:18 and 30. Sequences encoding consensus TRAP with an IgE leader sequence designed for high level expression of SEQ ID NOs:18 and 30 are set forth in SEQ ID NOs:17 and 29. The coding sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:29 cloned in pVAX to produce pGX7005 has the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:40.

Alternative Consensus CS (CS-alt)

An alternative consensus CS was generated having the sequence SEQ ID NO:12. The coding sequence of SEQ ID NO:12 is SEQ ID NO:11. The consensus CS-alt sequence may optionally comprise a leader sequence such as an immunoglobulin signal peptide such as the IgE signal peptide. Consensus CS-alt with an IgE leader sequence are set forth in SEQ ID NOs:22 and 34. Sequences encoding consensus CS-alt with an IgE leader sequence designed for high level expression of SEQ ID NOs:22 and 34 are set forth in SEQ ID NOs:21 and 33. The consensus sequence in SEQ ID NO:33 was inserted into an expression vector based on pVAX, and is shown in FIG. 11 as expression construct pGX7003 (SEQ ID NO:41).

Example 2—Expression of Consensus Antigens

The cloned expression constructs were then expressed with an in vitro translation assay, and protein expression was determined by western blot analysis. The plasmids were transfected into RD cells with lipofectamine. Twenty hours later, cells were harvested and total cell lysate was obtained. Protein was quantified and electrophoresed on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel. The sysnthesized proteins were detected using an anti-HA antibody (the HA tag is contained in the C-terminus of the antigen sequences). pVAX 1 was used as a negative control. The results are shown in FIG. 5.

Example 3—Immune Response in Vaccinated Mice

For cellular immunogenicity studies, 10 or 20 μg of each antigen-encoding plasmid was delivered to the tibialis anterior muscle of Balb/c mice by intramuscular injection followed by electroporation using the CELLECTRA adaptive constant current electroporation device (Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Blue Bell Pa.). Mice (n=5 per group) received 3 immunizations at

weeks

0, 3 and 6. Cellular and responses were assessed 1 week after the last immunization (week 5). ELISpots were carried out per manufacturers instructions (R&D Systems) using 96-well plates (Millipore). 2×10⁵splenocytes from each immunized mouse were added to each well of the plates and stimulated overnight at 37° C., 5% CO₂, in the presence of R10 (negative control), concanavalin A (positive control), or peptide pools specific to each antigen. Peptide pools are composed of 15-mer peptides spanning the entire protein, overlapping by 11 amino acids.

Cellular immunogenicity of the consensus antigens were determined by INF-γ ELISpot cellular immunogenicity analysis. Cellular immunogenicity of the individual consensus antigens is shown in FIG. 6A and the multiple antigen vaccine cocktail is shown in FIG. 6B. All vaccines induced a robust IFN-γ response as determined by ELISpot. The majority of CS- and LSA1-specific responses can be attributed to CD4+ and CD8+ dominant epitopes. Immunogenicity was compared with reported platforms including Ad35 or Ad35/protein boost, as results are shown in FIG. 6B. PfConLSA1 (right graph) induced stronger cellular responses to dominant CD4+ and CD8+ T cell epitopes than Ad35 or Ad35/protein heterologous prime boost approaches (left 3 graphs). Immunogenicity was compared with reported platforms including Ad5, Ad35 and RTS,S, as results are shown in FIG. 6C. PfconCS (right graph) induced antigen specific IFN gamma slightly lower than Ad5 (left pair of graphs), but stronger than Ad35 and RTS,S. Flow cytometry gating strategy was used and results were depicted in FIG. 6D. The multiple antigen vaccine was compared to decipher the details of the CD4+ T cell responses. The CD4+ T cell responses against the multiple antigen vaccine showed that CS-specific responses are the predominant CD4+ T cell response (FIG. 6E). The multiple antigen vaccine was compared to decipher the details of the CD8+ T cell responses. The CD8+ T cell responses against the multiple antigen vaccine showed that CS-specific and LSA-specific responses comprise most of the CD8+ T cell response (FIG. 6F). The CD8+ T cell responses were compared between a single antigen vaccine and a multiple antigen vaccine. The CD8+ T cell responses showed that there is no significant change when delivering multiple antigens (See FIG. 6G). Humoral responses were studied. Both the single and multiple antigen vaccines induced strong antibody responses (average endpoint titers >100,000) as shown in FIG. 6H. FIG. 6I displays graphs that show that the LSA1 antibodies are associated with epitopes outside of the repeat region. In one experiment, antibodies were shown to recognize cognate antigen in vivo. Each of the antigens were injected by hydrodynamic tail vein injection to allow for overexpression in the liver. Liver sections were then stained with sera from immunized mice (1:500) and all sections stained with the sera from each of the immunized mice (CS, LSA1, TRAP or CelTOS) showed antibody recognition of expressing cells (images not shown).

Example 4—Mouse Studies Using Multi-Antigen pDNA Vaccine Candidates Delivered Via In Vivo Electroporation

Initial Studies

Improved DNA vaccines for malaria through a multi-antigen vaccine approach are the subject of studies. A multi-antigen DNA vaccine candidate delivered by intramuscular injection and electroporation (EP), which targets the liver-stage of Plasmodium falciparum (P.f.) infection was assessed in initial mouse studies. This vaccine candidate incorporated four important liver-stage P.f. antigens: circumsporozoite protein (CS), liver stage antigen 1 (LSA1), thrombospondin-related-anonymous-protein (TRAP) and cell-traversal protein for ookinetes and sporozoites (CelTOS). The vaccine antigens were designed based on consensus sequences with several modifications to improve expression including codon and RNA optimization and the addition of a highly efficient IgE leader sequence.

Prior to immunogenicity studies in Balb/c mice, antigen expression was confirmed by in vitro translation, western blotting and immunohistochemistry. In mice, the vaccines elicited strong, antigen-specific cellular and humoral responses that were similar to, or surpassed, those induced by other vector systems. Specifically, interferon-gamma (IFNγ) spot forming cells per 10⁶splenocytes (SFU) were quantified by ELISpot: CS (1607±391), LSA1 (1908±821), TRAP (929±255) and CelTOS (477±160). Further, the CS and LSA1 vaccines, delivered alone or in combination with TRAP and CelTOS, induced potent CS-specific and LSA-specific seroconversion (IgG endpoint titers of >150,000), determined by ELISA.

Additional Mouse Studies

Current evidence supports that a malaria vaccine candidate that elicits both strong humoral and cellular responses to multiple liver-stage antigens may be able to confer protection to P.f. Thus, the end goal of this vaccine approach is to induce cellular and humoral responses to CS, LSA1, TRAP and CelTOS simultaneously. Several studies were carried out in the mouse model to further optimize vaccine design and delivery and to further characterize vaccine-induced immune responses.

Other studies have suggested combined delivery of a PfCS DNA vaccine with additional DNA-based malaria antigens can decrease CS-specific T cell responses (Sedegah M, et al., Gene Therapy, 2004, 11(5):448-56)6). For this reason, antigen-specific responses induced by this multi-antigen vaccine candidate, in which the CS, LSA1, TRAP and CelTOS DNA vaccines were delivered in a single dose, were first compared to responses induced by the individual vaccines. For these studies, Balb/c mice received three immunizations spaced three weeks apart (Day 0, Week 3 and Week 6) and immune responses were evaluated one week after the last vaccination (Week 7). Vaccines were given i.m. followed by EP using the CELLETRA™ adaptive constant current device (Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Blue Bell, Pa.). The dose of each vaccine given was the same for the single and multi-antigen vaccine approaches. Blood was drawn on

weeks

1, 3 and at the study endpoint for humoral analysis using ELISA. Cellular responses were determined by IFN-γ ELISpot and flow cytometry one week after the last immunization.

Optimization of Combined Delivery of Vaccine Antigens in the Mouse Model

To support future human clinical trials, studies were undertaken to further characterize the immunogenicity of the candidate antigens and develop multi-antigen formulations. In particular, two questioned were assessed: 1) whether the CS, LSA1, TRAP, and CelTOS antigens could be formulated together and 2) whether co-expression of multi-plasmid DNA antigens impacted the resulting immune potency of the formulation.

The two following approaches for developing a multi-component malaria vaccine were considered: (1) the physical combination of DNA plasmids expressing the four antigens individually followed by co-delivery of the multi-antigen formulation; and (2) cloning two or more antigens onto a single plasmid so that the antigens are translationally coupled and co-delivered by definition. Of the two approaches, option (1) was perceived to afford the greatest flexibility in terms of antigen combinations. The approach allowed the for interrogation of individual combinations for immune interference most easily, thus aiding in the selection antigen combinations for further development that are mutually compatible for expression and induction of cellular and humoral immune responses. This approach also allowed for experiments in which antigens could be “mixed and matched” depending on the clinical hypothesis tested (DNA EP alone vs. prime boost such as DNA-protein) as well as the desired immune responses (cellular vs. humoral) assessed. Data resulting from the pursuit of this strategy is included herein.

Option (2) was also considered viable and considered to have the benefit of reducing the number of plasmids required (because multiple antigens are combined in a single vector). However, a priori optimization might be time consuming because a number of independent factors affecting expression and immunogenicity of such a polycistronic construct. These include optimization of multiple promoters, relevant proteolytic cleavage sites, translation stop-restart sequences on the RNA level, and perhaps most critically, the ordering of the antigens relative to the promoter as well as the overall size of the construct. For large antigens (>1 kb DNA inserts), the need to optimize all of the above parameters in order to achieve optimal expression of each of the encoded antigens was possible in order to maximize the effectiveness of the vaccines. Consequently, while the latter approach is a viable alternative, it was not pursued in these experiments in order to provide the most efficient path toward establishing immunogenicity and efficacy data in humans. The final selection of the components and specific arrangements of antigens is more appropriately done later in the clinical development prior to undertaking large human clinical trials.

Antigen combinations were evaluated for possible interference in order to inform clinical trial design and support their further translation into the clinic.

Evaluation of Possible Antigen Competition-Humoral Immunogenicity

Single and multi-antigen vaccines induced high levels of CS- and LSA1-specific seroconversion. Completion of the production of recombinant proteins allowed for evaluation of humoral responses induced by the TRAP and CelTOS vaccines. Similar to CS and LSA1, both the single and multi-antigen vaccines induced high levels of TRAP- and CelTOS-specific seroconversion. For all antigens, there was a large boost in antibody titers with the second vaccination and, to a lesser extent, with the third vaccination (FIG. 12). Significantly, 100% of the vaccinated animals sero-converted after only 2 immunizations and endpoint titers for all antigens and both vaccine approaches were 100,000 after the third vaccination.

Evaluation of Possible Antigen Competition—Cellular Immunogenicity

Induction of antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell secretion of IFNγ, IL-2 and TNFα by the single antigen and multi-antigen vaccines were first assessed by ICS. This data is briefly summarized below.

Overall, the multi-antigen vaccine induced strong CD4+ T cells responses. Specifically, 0.01% of CD4+ T cells produced antigen-specific IFNγ, 2.45% of CD4+ T cells produced antigen-specific IL-2 and of 1.39% CD4+ T cells produced antigen-specific TNFα (FIG. 13). The level of antigen-specific CD4+ T cell secretion of IFNγ induced by the multi-antigen vaccine was comparable to that of the single antigen vaccines. Relative to the CS and LSA1 vaccines, the multi-antigen vaccine induced more robust antigen-specific CD4+ T cell production of IL-2, and the increase in CS-specific IL-2 secretion approached statistical significance (p=0.06). The only statistically significant decreases in antigen-specific responses observed for the multi-antigen vaccine were lower levels of CD4+ T cell TNFα production in response to CelTOS (p=0.01) and TRAP (p=0.01). Despite these decreases in CelTOS- and TRAP-specific TNFα production, there was a trend toward increasing CS-specific CD4+ T cell TNFα secretion and no change in the LSA-specific CD4+ TNFα responses.

The multi-antigen vaccine also induced robust antigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses. Specifically, 0.9% of CD8+ T cells produced antigen-specific IFNγ, 3.1% of CD8+ T cells produced antigen-specific IL-2 and of 1.51% CD8+ T cells produced antigen-specific TNFα (FIG. 14). Similar to the CD4+ T cell IFNγ responses, there were minimal differences in the magnitude of antigen-specific CD8+ T cell secretion of IFNγ between the multi-antigen and single antigen vaccine approaches. Interestingly, the percentage of CS- and LSA1-specific IL-2 and TNFα producing CD8+ T cells was markedly increased with the multi-antigen vaccine.

The presence of antigen competition, however, was more evident when the immunogenicity of the multi-antigen was evaluated by IFNγ ELISpot. Specifically, a 3.0-fold decrease in CS-specific IFNγ responses was observed when the CS vaccine was co-delivered with the LSA1, TRAP and CelTOS vaccines. The observed decrease in the magnitude of IFNγ production was not due to an increase in the total quantity of DNA being delivered (FIG. 15). It is believed that the apparently more pronounced decrease in CS-specific IFNγ responses observed using the ELISpot assay, compared to ICS, is most likely due to the greater sensitivity of the assay and not necessarily due to a significant decrease in the number of antigen-specific T-cells. Importantly, the decrease in CS-specific IFNγ production by ELISpot is representative of a decrease of only 0.005% of the total T cell population, which is similar to the decrease in the total population of CS-specific CD8+ T cell IFNγ production observed by ICS (0.004%).

Evaluation of Possible Antigen Competition—Summary

Taken together, the ICS and ELISA data suggest that in general, the antigens can be combined into a multi-antigen formulation without significant interference in the immune responses elicited.

Strategies to Increase CS-Specific Responses

Nevertheless, because CS specific responses are considered important to have in a malaria vaccine, two vaccine delivery approaches were evaluated in an effort to increase the magnitude of the CS-specific component of the total multi-antigen vaccine IFNγ response. In the first approach, half of the total volume of the multi-antigen vaccine cocktail was delivered to one mouse hind limb and the other half was delivered into the contra-lateral mouse hind limb (“split leg” delivery). In the second approach, the CS vaccine was delivered into one mouse hind limb and a cocktail containing the LSA1, TRAP and CelTOS vaccines was delivered into the contra-lateral hind limb. These approaches did not significantly impact the magnitude of CS-specific IFNγ production (FIG. 16). These data indicate the decrease CS-specific in IFNγ responses observed with the multi-antigen vaccine is most likely due to an unknown systemic mechanism and is not directly related to co-delivery of all four antigens into the same site.

Pairing Comparisons

Next, pair-wise effects were evaluated to determine if one antigen could modulate the induction of antigen-specific IFNγ responses to other vaccine antigens. A matrix approach was used to evaluate all possible two-antigen combinations and antigen-specific IFNγ production was determined by IFNγ ELISpot. The fold change in IFNγ production, relative to the single-antigen vaccine response, for each antigen pair is reported in Table 1. Of note, both CS vaccine response and LSA1 vaccine response decreased when co-delivered with the CelTOS vaccine.

TABLE 1

The fold change in IFNγ production, relative to
the single-antigen vaccine response, for each antigen pair.

Antigen 2

Response	Antigen	1	CS	LSA1	TRAP	CelTOS

CS	CS	1.0	−1.4	−1.1	−2.8
LSA	LSA1	1.2	1.0	−1.3	−2.9
TRAP	TRAP	1.4	−1.2	1.0	1.0
CelTOS	CelTOS	−1.5	−1.1	3.0	1.0

While t these findings are preliminary and changes in immunogenicity for the antigen combinations failed to reach statistical significance, it is important to note that all antigens and all antigen pairs yielded robust T-cell responses as noted previously. Thus, despite noted differences, the interference was observed in the context of high levels of baseline immune responses and was in general, not inferior to the induction of strong T-cell responses relative to other vaccine approaches.

All the data taken together suggests that a combined, four-antigen formulation can be tested in a clinical setting and that antigenic competition observed, if any, is incidental, limited in scope, and may not be generalizable beyond the results of this study.

LSA1-Specific IFNγ Production by CD8+ Hepatic Lymphocytes

In rodent models, CD8+ T cells have been implicated as the principal effector cells, and IFNγ as the critical effector molecule in the elimination of sporozoite-infected hepatocytes. For this reason, this vaccine candidate was evaluated to determine if it could induce antigen-specific IFNγ production by CD8+ hepatic lymphocytes. Hepatic lymphocytes were isolated from multi-antigen vaccinated mice. The liver was thoroughly perfused prior to isolation of hepatic lymphocytes to reduce or eliminate the presences of circulating T cells in the isolated hepatic lymphocyte population. Induction of LSA1-specific CD8+ T cell IFNγ secretion was measured by ICS. An average of 1.5% of hepatic CD8+ T cells produced LSA1-specific IFNγ (n=8) and no background was observed in naïve mice (n=3) (FIG. 17)

These data show that a DNA-based vaccine such as the multi-antigen candidate tested can induce antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in the liver, i.e. at the site where they are required to clear sporozoite-infected hepatocytes, following intramuscular immunization.

Summary

Investigation of the effect of combining antigens (single vs. multiple antigen combinations) demonstrated that CS, TRAP, LSA-1, and CelTOS may be combined into a four-plasmid, combination malaria vaccine.

Example 5—Development of a DNA Vaccine Comprising Coding Sequence of Antigen AMA1

More recently, other groups have reported promising data for vaccine approaches that incorporate the AMA1 antigen. vaccine construct encoding the AMA1 protein from the Pf 3D7 strain has been designed and is disclosed herein. Cellular and humoral immunogenicity was evaluated in mice (n=4 per group) for 3 doses of the vaccine (10 μg, 20 μg and 30 μg) according to the standard vaccination schedule (see Above). The vaccine induced robust AMA1-specific T cell responses (FIG. 18A) and seroconversion (FIG. 18B). Both cellular and humoral immune responses did not increase significantly with dose. Vaccines comprising CS, LSA1, TRAP and CelTOS vaccine and further comprising the AMA1 vaccine have been designed and used.

Example 6—Non-Human Primate Studies Using Multi-Antigen pDNA Vaccine Candidates Delivered Via In Vivo Electroporation

A study evaluating the quality and quantity of both cellular and humoral immune responses elicited by this multi-antigen malaria vaccine delivered by EP in the Indian rhesus macaque (macaca mulatta) NHP model is ongoing. In addition to testing the DNA vaccine alone, the effect of co-delivering IL-28B and incorporating a CS protein boost on vaccine-induced immune responses are being studied and functional assays are used in the evaluation the immunogenicity of this vaccine candidate and the impact of incorporation of an adjuvant and a heterologous prime-boost approach on cellular and humoral responses.

The NHP study was initiated. An additional group, serving as a control for another study (Group 5), was vaccinated earlier. These studies are currently in progress. The study groups and vaccination and bleed timeline are provided in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively.

TABLE 2

Study Groups

Group

Week

0	Week 6	Week 12	Week 24	DNA delivery

1	DNA	DNA	DNA	DNA	IM EP
2	DNA	DNA	DNA	Protein	IM EP
3	DNA	DNA	DNA	Protein	MID EP (3P)
4	DNA + IL-28	DNA + IL-28	DNA + IL-28	Protein	IM EP
5	DNA + IL-28	DNA + IL-28	DNA + IL-28	DNA + IL-28	MID EP (3P)
6	Ctrl DNA	Ctrl DNA	Ctrl DNA	Ctrl DNA	IM EP

DNA: 1.0 mg each: PfCS, PfLSA1, PfTRAP, PfCelTOS
DNA + IL-28:_ 1.0 mg each: PfCS, PfLSA1, PfTRAP, PfCelTOS and 0.5 mg macIL-28
Protein: Recombinant PfCS protein. 50 μg.

TABLE 3

Vaccination and Bleed Timeline
Week

−

2	0	2	4	6	8	10	12	14	16	18	20	22	25	27	29	32	33

	V			V			V						V
*B	B	B		B	B		B	B		B				B		B	B

B = blood draw,
V = vaccination

Summary of NHP Data Following the 2nd Immunization (Week 8)

Below are summaries of cellular and humoral immunogenicity data following through the 2nd vaccination of the on-going NHP study.

Cellular Immunogenicity

Overall, antigen-specific IFNγ responses boosted with the 2nd immunization for all 4 antigens and delivery approaches (FIG. 19, left panel). Following the 2nd immunization, the mean antigen-specific IFN (responses by IFN (ELISpot was slightly greater in the IM groups (n=10) (1350(1116 SFU, range 318-3842 SFU), compared to IM delivery with IL-28B (n=5) (1310(309 SFU, range 986-1540 SFU) and ID delivery (n=5) (402(288 SFU, range 132-760 SFU). Interestingly, c Co-delivery of IL-28B specifically increased the magnitude of the CSP-specific response (FIG. 19, right panel) and decreased the variability of the responses.

Cellular immunogenicity was also evaluated by flow cytometry and antigen-specific responses following the 2nd immunization (week 8) are reported in FIGS. 20 and 21. CD4+ T cell production of IFNγ was similar for the IM (0.22%) and IM+IL-28 (0.20%) delivery approaches. Minimal levels of antigen-specific CD4+ T cell secretion of IFNγ were observed for ID delivery (FIG. 20, left panel). Co-delivery with IL-28B increased antigen-specific CD4+ T cell production of IL-2 (0.49%) compared to IM delivery of the vaccine alone (0.20%) (FIG. 20, center panel). There was a robust CSP- and LSA1-specific response TNFα response in the CD4+ T cell compartment in all groups. Antigen-specific TNFα was highest in the IM group (3.2%) compared to IM+IL-28B (2.0%) and ID (1.9%) (FIG. 20, right panel).

IFNγ T cell reposes in the CD8+ T cell compartment follow a similar trend to the IFNγ ELISpot and the responses in the CD4+ T cell compartment. Overall, antigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses were more robust for IM delivery (with or without IL-28B) compared to ID delivery. Antigen-specific IFNγ production was greatest in the IM (0.44%) and IM+IL-28B (0.42%) groups compared to the ID group (0.15%) (FIG. 21, left panel). CSP-specific IFNγ production was higher with co-delivery of IL-28B (0.28%) compared to IM delivery of the vaccine without adjuvant (0.11%). The majority of CD8+IFNγ+ T cells were also granzyme B+ (FIG. 21, lower left panel): 1M, 0.35%; IM+IL-28B, 0.35%; ID, 0.11%). Antigen-specific CD8+ T cell production of IL-2 was more robust in the IM (0.48%) and IM+IL-28B (0.41%) groups compared to ID (0.24%) (FIG. 21, center panel). Similar to the CD4+ T cell compartment, there was a robust, albeit of lower magnitude, TNFα response in the CD8+ T cell compartment that was predominantly in response to the CSP and LSA1 antigens. Specifically, 0.58% 0.40% and 0.43% of CD8+ T cells produced TNFα in the IM, IM+IL-28 and ID groups, respectively.

Humoral Immunogenicity

High-levels of antigen-specific sero-conversion for all antigens were observed following after a single immunization that, overall, boosted with the 2nd immunization (FIG. 22). IgG antibody titers for all antigens was determined by ELISA and endpoint titers were calculated as described by Frey, A. et al. (J Immunol. Methods 1998; 221:35-41). Briefly, the endpoint titer is reported as the reciprocal of the last dilution that remained above the upper predication limit of a 95% confidence interval calculated from the mean of the naïve antibody titers. CSP and LSA1-specific seroconversion increased in all groups following the 2nd immunization. The mean TRAP and CelTOS endpoint titers increased for IM and ID delivery with the 2nd immunization, but the mean titers did not increase for the IM+IL-28B group. Although the TRAP- and CelTOS-specific levels of IgG did not increase overall with IL-28B, the consistency of the responses did increase.

Summary

The investigation of the immunogenicity of the vaccine antigens in non-human primates has demonstrated that the four antigen combination produces strong T-cell and humoral immune responses in NHP after only two vaccinations. The NHP data herein confirm the immunogenicity of the pDNA constructs targeting CS, LSA1, TRAP, and CelTOS in the primate model and support the previous data in the mouse model. As noted above, the pDNA antigens delivered by in vivo EP yield strong cellular and humoral responses. Relative immune responses resulting from differences in route of delivery (ID v IM) and the use of IL-28B cytokine were tested and showed ID delivery of the vaccine formulation leads to strong humoral immune responses. The impact of a further protein boost on the magnitude and quality of immune responses will be assessed.

Example 7—IL-28B Enhances Vaccine-Specific Cellular and Humoral Responses and Reduces Regulatory T Cell Populations

The effect of delivering a DNA vector encoding the cytokine gene adjuvant, IL-28 combined with delivery of the DNA vaccine was evaluated to determine if it increased the antigen-specific effector and memory T-Cell responses specific for the vaccine antigens. Current evidence suggests a malaria vaccine that induces a high-level of memory T cells may provide long-term protection. Delivery of a DNA vector encoding the IL-28B cytokine gene adjuvant (Morrow et al., Blood, 2009 113(23):5868-77) in conjunction with other DNA vaccines increased the overall immunogenicity and level of memory T cells while decreasing the level of regulatory T cells. IL-28B was demonstrated to drive the induction of antigen specific CD8+ T cells that exhibit phenotypes that are characteristic of CTLs.

The ability of IL-28B to enhance antigen-specific responses to this vaccine in the mouse model was explored. Co-delivery of 10 μg of IL-28B with the multi-antigen vaccine increased the total vaccine-specific IFNγ response 1.5-fold. IL-28B increased CS-specific and CelTOS-specific IFNγ production 2.5-fold and 2.0-fold, respectively (FIG. 23). A decrease in the population of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells followed a similar trend as the increase in the vaccine-specific IFNγ response (FIG. 24). IL-28B has been previously reported to have specifically augmented cellular immunogenicity, but did not affect humoral responses to two different vaccines. When co-delivered with this vaccine, IL-28B also increased CS-specific seroconversion (FIG. 25).

Investigation of the effects of cytokine adjuvant IL-28B in modulating and/or improving the immune potency of the candidate vaccine showed that co-delivery of IL-28B increased vaccine specific IFN-γ production, decreased the number of Tregs, and increased the CS-specific sero-conversion.

Example 8—DNA/Protein Prime-Boost Approach

CS protein is an important antigen and its ability to drive humoral responses may be associated with protection. In addition to testing CS protein boost in the NHP study, the immunogenicity and potential toxicity of the CS protein by itself was tested in mice.

Claims

The invention claimed is:

1. An immunogenic composition comprising a nucleic acid molecule that encodes at least one Plasmodium falciparum (P. falciparum) immunogen, wherein the immunogenic composition comprises a nucleic acid sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen TRAP; wherein the nucleic acid sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen TRAP comprises SEQ ID NO:5.

2. The immunogenic composition of claim 1 further comprising at least one nucleotide sequence encoding at least one additional P. falciparum immunogen selected from the group consisting of:

a) a nucleotide sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen circumsporozoite protein (CS), wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:1 and SEQ ID NO:11;

b) a nucleotide sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen liver stage antigen 1 (LSA1), wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises SEQ ID NO:3;

c) a nucleotide sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen cell-traversal protein for Plasmodium ookinetes and sporozoites (CelTOS), wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises SEQ ID NO:7; and

d) a nucleotide sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen Apical membrane antigen 1 (Ama1), wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises SEQ ID NO:9.

3. The immunogenic composition of claim 1 further comprising a nucleotide sequence that encodes IL-12, IL-15, IL-28B or RANTES.

4. The immunogenic composition of claim 1 wherein said nucleic acid molecule is incorporated into a plasmid.

5. The immunogenic composition of claim 4 further comprising at least one additional plasmid comprising at least one nucleotide sequence encoding at least one additional P. falciparum immunogen selected from the group consisting of:

a) a nucleotide sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen CS), wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:1 and SEQ ID NO:11;

b) a nucleotide sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen LSA1, wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises SEQ ID NO:3;

c) a nucleotide sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen CelTOS, wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises SEQ ID NO:7; and

d) a nucleotide sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises SEQ ID NO:9.

6. The immunogenic composition of claim 4 further comprising a nucleotide sequence that encodes IL-12, IL-15, IL-28B or RANTES.

7. The immunogenic composition of claim 4 further comprising one or more plasmids that collectively comprise one or more of

a) a nucleotide sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen CSC wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEP ID NO: 1 and SEP ID NO: 11:

b) a nucleotide sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen LSA1, wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises SEP ID NO:3;

c) a nucleotide sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen CelTOS, wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises SEP ID NO:7; and

d) a nucleotide sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen Ama1, wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises SEP ID NO:9.

8. The immunogenic of claim 4 further comprising one or more plasmids that collectively comprise two or more of

a) a nucleotide sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen CSC wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEP ID NO: 1 and SEP ID NO: 11;

b) a nucleotide sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen ISA 1, wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises SEP ID NO:3;

9. The immunogenic composition of claim 4 further comprising one or more plasmids that collectively comprise three of

10. The immunogenic composition of claim 4 further comprising one or more plasmids that collectively comprise

b) a nucleotide sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen LSA1, wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises SEP ID NO:3; and

c) a nucleotide sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen CelTOS, wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises SEP ID NO:7.

11. The immunogenic composition of claim 4 further comprising one or more plasmids that collectively comprise

12. The immunogenic composition of claim 4 comprising one plasmid.

13. The immunogenic composition of claim 4 comprising two, three, four or five plasmids.

14. The composition of claim 4, wherein the nucleic acid molecule comprises a nucleic acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:5 operably linked to a sequence encoding an IgE signal peptide, wherein the IgE signal peptide comprises an amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:42.

15. A nucleic acid molecule comprising nucleic acid sequences that encodes one or more P. falciparum immunogens, wherein the nucleic acid molecule comprises a nucleic acid sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen TRAP, wherein the nucleic acid sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen TRAP comprises SEQ ID NO:5.

16. A nucleic acid molecule of claim 15, wherein said nucleic acid molecule is a plasmid.

17. A nucleic acid molecule of claim 15, wherein said nucleic acid molecule further comprises one or more nucleotide sequence encoding at least one additional P. falciparum immunogen selected from the group consisting of:

d) a nucleotide sequence encoding P. falciparum immunogen Ama1, wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises SEQ ID NO:9.

18. The nucleic acid molecule of claim 15, wherein the nucleic acid molecule comprises a nucleic acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:5 operably linked to a sequence encoding an IgE signal peptide, wherein the IgE signal peptide comprises an amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:42.

19. The immunogenic composition of claim 1, wherein the nucleic acid molecule comprises a nucleic acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:5 operably linked to a sequence encoding an IgE signal peptide, wherein the IgE signal peptide comprises an amino acid sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:42.