TWI642023B - Empathy method - Google Patents

Abstract

An empathy method for evaluating a plurality of subjects, the empathy method comprising the steps of: selecting one of the plurality of question groups in a situation question bank through a decision unit, And transmitting a simulation question in the question group to the subjects, the simulation problem has a keyword; each test subject gives feedback information to the decision unit according to the simulation question; Whether the feedback information given by each subject includes at least one pair of keywords that should simulate the question, and if so, the adjudication unit provides the subject corresponding to the number of the keywords appearing in the feedback information. At least one mark of the quantity, if not, the decision unit does not provide any mark of the test subject; and counts the number of the mark obtained by each test subject.

Description

Empathy method

The present invention relates to an empathy method, and more particularly to an empathy method for teaching in a medical related field.

In recent years, the humanistic literacy of empathy and care has become more and more precious in a society that is increasingly emphasizing science and technology. The cultivation of the same abilities is also a key ability in the education of medical related fields. However, empathy is soft. Strength, not fixed steps or operations, how to promote the best learning of the same ability is a major challenge for the teaching staff, and there is no way to use the empathy as the main method in the teaching system. The systematic process has not been seen in the market.

Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an empathy method for assessing the subject's empathy traits.

The empathy method of the present invention is used to evaluate a plurality of subjects, and the empathy method comprises the following steps: (A) selecting one of a plurality of question groups in a situation question bank through a decision unit a group of questions and communicate a simulation question in the question group to the subjects, the simulation problem There are at least one corresponding keyword; (B) each subject is given a feedback information according to the simulation question; (C) the decision unit compares whether the feedback information given by each subject includes At least one pair of keywords that should simulate the problem, and if so, the awarding unit provides at least one mark corresponding to the number of the test subject according to the number of the keywords appearing in the feedback information, and if not, the adjudicating unit does not Providing any mark of the subject; and (D) counting the number of the mark obtained by each subject. .

In some implementations, each question group includes a first set of words, and a second set of words, the first set of words and the second set of words of each question set each having at least one of the keywords, and The keywords of the first set of words and the keywords of the second set of words are different from each other.

In some embodiments, in step (A), the adjudication unit also informs the subjects that the feedback information should be given by a self-centered angle or a person-centered angle.

In some implementations, the marker is divided into a first marker and a second marker, if one of the subjects gives the feedback information at a self-centered angle, and the feedback information includes at least one belonging to the first The keyword in the word set, the arbitrating unit assigns the first mark corresponding to the number of the test subject, and if one of the test subjects gives the feedback information at an angle centered on others, and the feedback information includes at least one For the keywords belonging to the second word set, the arbitrating unit assigns the second mark corresponding to the number of the subject.

In some embodiments, the adjudication unit evaluates the subject's empathy traits according to the ratio between the number of first markers obtained by each subject and the number of second markers.

An empathy teaching aid is applicable to a referee and a plurality of subjects, and the empathy teaching aid comprises a theme card group, a tag card group, a plurality of tag card boxes, and a keyword reference table. The theme card set includes a plurality of theme cards, each theme card has a front side, a reverse side, a simulation problem disposed on the front side, and a theme pattern disposed on the reverse side, each simulation question belongs to a situational question bank. One of the question groups, and for each of the testees to give the referee a feedback message; the mark card set includes a plurality of red mark cards, and a plurality of black mark cards; each mark card box includes The accommodating slot for accommodating the red tag cards and the black tag cards; the keyword reference table includes a plurality of keywords, each keyword corresponding to a simulation problem of one of the theme cards of the theme card group; The referee compares whether the feedback information given by each subject includes at least one pair of keywords that should simulate the question, and if so, the referee provides the subject according to the number of the keywords appearing in the feedback information. At least one of the red mark card or the black mark card corresponding to the quantity is used as a mark, and if not, the referee does not provide any of the red mark card or the black mark card of the test subject.

In some implementations, the empathy teaching aid further includes a plurality of supplementary cards, each of the supplementary cards having a writing portion for writing a simulation problem so that the supplementary card can be used together with the theme cards.

In some implementations, the empathy teaching aid further includes a plurality of hand cards, and the subject records the corresponding feedback information.

The effect of the empathy method of the present invention lies in: a method of assessing the empathy of the subject by an objective standard, and a teaching aid that can be used in conjunction with the method, except that the referee is treated by the same reason. The logical discussion responds to the evaluation of the subject's empathy, and allows the subject to experience the feeling of being treated in the same way and the feeling of being ununderstood, and to compare the way of thinking that is centered on others and self-centered. The difference is to reach the focus group and stimulate the effect of multiple dialogues.

S1‧‧‧ first step

S2‧‧‧ second step

S3‧‧‧ third step

S4‧‧‧ fourth step

1‧‧‧Themes deck

11‧‧‧ theme card

111‧‧‧ positive

112‧‧‧n

113‧‧‧Simulation issues

114‧‧‧ theme pattern

2‧‧‧Marking card group

21‧‧‧Red Mark Card

22‧‧‧Black Mark Card

3‧‧‧mark card box

31‧‧‧First accommodating slot

32‧‧‧Second accommodating slot

33‧‧‧ cover

4‧‧‧Keyword Reference Table

41‧‧‧ Keywords

5‧‧‧Supplement card

51‧‧‧ writing department

6‧‧‧Hand card

Other features and effects of the present invention will be apparent from the embodiments of the present invention, wherein: FIG. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of an embodiment of the method for measuring the same principle of the present invention; FIG. 2 is the same as the present invention. FIG. 3 is a front perspective view of one of the theme cards of the embodiment; and FIG. 4 is a reverse side view of the theme card of the embodiment.

Referring to FIG. 1, an embodiment of the empathy method of the present invention is used to measure a plurality of subjects, such as school-age children, adolescents, or professional caregivers. The assessment method consists of the following steps.

First step S1: selecting one of the plurality of question groups in a situation question bank through a decision unit, and transmitting a simulation question in the question group to the test subjects, and the decision unit also Inform the subjects that they should give a feedback from a self-centered perspective or a person-centered perspective. In this embodiment, the arbitration unit is a computer software; each simulation problem has at least one virtual character in a hypothetical situation, and the feedback information represents a response of each subject to the virtual character; Each question group includes a first set of words of a pair of question groups, and a second set of words of a pair of question groups, the first set of words and the second set of words each having at least one of the keywords, and the The keyword of the word set and the keyword of the second word set are different from each other; more specifically, the keyword in the first word set is more likely to appear when the feedback information is given to the self-centered angle. The word is used, and the keyword in the second word set is a word that is more likely to appear when the feedback information is given from the perspective of others.

The second step S2: each subject is given the feedback information according to the simulation question according to the simulation question. In the embodiment, the subjects give the feedback information by means of keyboard input.

a third step S3: the arbitrating unit compares at least one pair of keywords that should be simulated in the feedback information given by each subject, and if so, the arbitrating unit according to the keyword appearing in the feedback information Quantity, the subject is provided At least one mark corresponding to the quantity, if not, the adjudication unit does not provide any mark of the test subject; in this embodiment, the mark is divided into a first mark and a second mark, if one of the subjects is The self-centered angle gives the feedback information, and the feedback information includes at least one keyword belonging to the first word set, and the arbitrating unit allocates the first token corresponding to the number of the subject, and similarly, if One of the subjects gives the feedback information from the perspective of the center of the other person, and the feedback information includes at least one keyword belonging to the second word set, and the arbitrating unit assigns the second mark corresponding to the number of the corresponding subject .

Fourth step S4: counting the number of first marks or (and) the number of second marks obtained by each subject, in particular, if only one round of the first step S1 to the third step S3 is performed, each receiving The tester will only be assigned to one of the first mark or the second mark, however, the first step S1 to the third step S3 are performed two rounds or more, and the feedback information is given at a self-centered angle, respectively, and centered by others The angle of the feedback information is given at least once, and the same subject may be assigned an indefinite number of first marks and second marks, and the adjudicating unit may follow the number of the first marks and the second number obtained by each subject. The ratio between the number of markers is used to evaluate the subject's empathy traits. More specifically, the arbitrator unit can evaluate the ratio of the first marker and the second marker obtained by each subject. The subject is better at thinking from an egocentric perspective, or is better at thinking from the perspective of others.

Referring also to FIG. 2 to FIG. 4, one of the empathy teaching aids of the present invention is implemented. The example is applicable to a referee and a plurality of subjects, and the empathy teaching aid comprises a theme card group 1, a tag card group 2, a plurality of tag card boxes 3 (only two are shown in FIG. 2), a key The word reference table 4, a plurality of supplementary cards 5, and a plurality of hand cards 6.

The theme card set 1 includes a plurality of theme cards 11, each theme card 11 having a front surface 111, a reverse surface 112, a simulation problem 113 disposed on the front surface 111, and a theme pattern 114 disposed on the reverse surface 112. A simulation question 113 belongs to one of a plurality of question groups in a situation question bank, and is used by the subjects to give the referee a feedback message. In this embodiment, the theme card set 1 includes eight major themes, namely internal surgery, obstetrics, pediatrics, psychiatry, special units, cancer wards, internship experience and life experience, but not limited to the above list, and is also visible The requirements are expanded, and each theme card 11 belongs to one of the themes, that is, the simulation question 113 on the front side 111 of each theme card 11 and the theme pattern 114 on the back side correspond to the context of one of the themes, with life experience. The theme is an example. One of the simulation questions 113 of the theme card 11 is as follows: "There are a lot of subjects to be verbally reported recently, but I am not very good at small eloquence!", or in the case of psychiatry, The simulation problem 113 of a theme card 11 is as follows: "I just entered the hospital, and it was the first hospitalization. I don't know the patients here, and they are so strange and fierce. My mother has no time to work. Look at me, I didn't answer the call. I didn't even have a speech." You are the nursing student who cares for this case. How would you respond? 』.

In this embodiment, the tag card set 2 includes a plurality of red tag cards 21 and A plurality of black mark cards 22, and the red mark cards 21 and the black mark cards 22 are all in a heart shape.

In this embodiment, each of the tag cartridges 3 includes a first receiving slot 31 for the referee to place the red tag card 21 and the black tag card 22, and a red tag card 21 for the subject to place. And a second accommodating groove 32 of the black mark card 22 and a cover 33 operatively covering the second accommodating groove 32.

The keyword reference table 4 includes a plurality of keywords 41, each of which corresponds to a simulation question 113 of the theme card 11 of the theme card group 1, and each keyword 41 belongs to a first word set or a One of the second set of words.

Each of the supplementary cards 5 has a writing portion 51 for writing a simulation question 113 so that the supplementary card 5 can be used together with the theme cards 11. Each hand card 6 is used by the subjects to record corresponding feedback information.

In the present embodiment, the method of using the empathy teaching aid is as follows.

First, the referee selects any theme card 11 of any subject from the theme card set 1 and informs the subjects of the simulated question 113 on the theme card 11, for example, one of the judges selected The simulation question 113 on the theme card 11 is as follows: "In the acute psychiatric ward, Xiaoqian, who was just admitted to the hospital, said, "I am not sick, why am I locked here?" How do you respond to her? 』, and in the keyword reference table 4, the keywords corresponding to the first word set of the simulated question 113 include, for example, "don't care", "don't know", "not feeling sick" and "ill", but Should simulate problem 113 The keywords in the second set of words include "help", "grievance", "sadness", "may" and "whether". The referee informs the subjects of the simulated problem 113 and must also inform the recipients of the The tester should give a feedback from a self-centered perspective or a person-centered perspective.

Then, each subject gives the referee the feedback information according to the simulation question 113, in order to avoid the feedback information being changed with reference to other subjects, after receiving the simulation question 113, each subject is immediately The card 6 records the corresponding feedback information, and describes the feedback information to the referee according to the description of the hand card 6 to maintain fairness.

Then, the referee refers to Table 4 by the keyword, and compares whether the feedback information given by each subject includes at least one pair of keywords that should simulate the question 113. For example, for the simulation problem 113 exemplified above, the referee requires the subjects to give a feedback message at an autistic angle, and the subject A gives "I don't know, but the cockroach must be ill." For the information, the feedback information has two keywords belonging to the first word set ("I don't know" and "ill"), so the referee assigns two black mark cards 22 to the subject A. For example, for the same simulation question 113, the referee requires the testees to give a feedback message from the perspective of the center of the other person, and the tester B gives feedback information, "Do you feel aggrieved, need help?" The message has three keywords belonging to the second set of words ("help", "grievance" and "whether"), so the referee assigns three red mark cards 21 to the subject B.

Finally, the referee counts the number of first tokens obtained by each subject. Or the number of the second mark, in the embodiment, the red mark card 21 represents the first mark, and the black mark card 22 represents the second mark, in particular, the referee can follow each test The ratio between the number of the red marker card 21 and the black marker card 22 obtained is used to evaluate the subject's empathy traits. For example, the number of black marker cards 22 obtained by the subject A is greater than the red marker card. The number of 21, and the number of red mark cards 21 obtained by the subject B is smaller than the number of the black mark cards 22, it can be judged that the subject A is better at thinking at an autistic angle, and the subject B is better at Think from the perspective of someone else's center.

In summary, the new empathy teaching aids enable the referee to measure the empathy of the subject with an objective standard, and to experience the feeling of being treated in the same way and the feeling when not being understood, and also to be tested. People can compare the differences between others-centered and self-centered ways of thinking, and learn how to think in an empathetic way by winning the tag card, so it can achieve the purpose of this new type.

However, the above is only the embodiment of the present invention, and the scope of the invention is not limited thereto, and all the equivalent equivalent changes and modifications according to the scope of the patent application and the patent specification of the present invention are still The scope of the invention is covered.

Claims (2)

An empathy method is performed by a decision unit and is used to evaluate a plurality of subjects. The empathy method includes the following steps: (A) selecting from a plurality of question groups in a situation question bank One of the question groups conveys a simulation question included in the question group to the subjects, and indicates that the feedback information is given by a self-centered angle or a person-centered angle, and each question group further includes one a first set of words related to a self-centered perspective, and a second set of words related to a person-centered perspective, the first set of words and the second set of words of each question set each having at least one The keyword, and the keyword of the first word set and the keyword of the second word set are different from each other; (B) receiving a plurality of feedback information respectively from the subjects, the feedback information is respectively The subject is given according to the simulation question; (C) when it is determined that one of the feedback information includes at least one keyword belonging to the first word set, and the adjudicating unit indicates in step (A) that the self is When the angle of the center gives feedback information, the corresponding test is assigned Corresponding quantity of the first mark, when it is determined that one of the feedback information includes at least one keyword belonging to the second word set, and the adjudicating unit indicates in step (A) that the angle is centered on others When the information is fed back, the second mark corresponding to the corresponding subject is assigned; and (D) the number of the first mark and the second mark obtained by each subject is counted. The method for evaluating the empathy according to claim 1, wherein in the step (D), the adjudicating unit is in accordance with the number of the first tags and the second number obtained by each subject. The ratio between the number of markers measures the empathy of the subject.