TWI398646B - Method of testing and verification - Google Patents

Description

Test verification method

The present invention relates to a method of test verification, and more particularly to a method of test verification.

At present, in the process of testing the product, as the test method of the product changes and the test mode occurs, the corresponding debug program in the corresponding test standard, test project and test sequence, etc. Will also do the corresponding adjustments. However, because the debugger and the burn-in test program are integrated, the test debugger verification time takes half a day to one day, and then the burned test program is verified, and the burned test program is verified. The time is twenty-four hours, so the verification time will be very long, and the test process of the test product will be increased and the test time will be extended. If there is a problem during the verification process, the product needs to be re-verified. As a result, there are certain impacts on product development, test products, and mass production time points.

Please refer to FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 at the same time. Since there is only one test program in the old operation mode, the test is performed in step S11 to install the automatic debug software, and then the step S12 is to perform the debug program. After the test is passed, the burn-in test process of step S13 is performed, and the test process will take the test time. Extend (as in the step flow shown in Figure 1). In the second figure, the part for performing the debug program includes the steps from step S21 to step S26, and after the steps are completed, the burn-in test program of step S27 is executed. Further, such execution test programs one after another, it takes a considerable amount of time for the entire test time, and it has a bad influence on the cost-effectiveness of the product.

In view of the problems of the prior art, the inventors have proposed a method of test verification based on years of research and development and many practical experiences, as an implementation and basis for improving the above disadvantages.

In view of the above-mentioned problems of the prior art, one of the objects of the present invention is to provide a method for test verification to solve the problem that the test time is too long on a general production line.

Therefore, in order to achieve the above object, according to the method of test verification of the present invention, the main steps are as follows. First, an application is used to divide a test program into a debug program and a burn test program. Then, in the test environment, one of the control parameters of the burn test program is set, and finally, the debug program is executed and verified automatically. Machine test program to get a test result.

As described above, in accordance with the method of test verification of the present invention, it may have one or more of the following advantages:

(1) This verification method can improve the convenience of the verification method verification product by synchronously executing the debug program and the burn-in test program.

(2) This verification method can be performed by synchronously executing the debug program and the burn test program. This solves the problem that the old verification method takes too much time because it cannot be executed at the same time.

For a better understanding and understanding of the technical features and the efficacies of the present invention, the preferred embodiments and the detailed description are as follows.

S11~S13‧‧‧Step process

S21~S27‧‧‧Step process

S31~S34‧‧‧Step procedure

S41~S44‧‧‧Step procedure

S431~S435‧‧‧Step process

1 is a conventional verification flow chart 1; FIG. 2 is a conventional verification flow chart 2; FIG. 3 is a flow chart of a method for testing verification of the present invention; and FIG. 4 is a view of the present invention. A flow chart of the steps of an embodiment of the method of test verification.

The method of test verification according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. For the sake of understanding, the same components in the following embodiments are denoted by the same reference numerals.

Please refer to FIG. 3, which is a flow chart of the steps of the method for test verification of the present invention, and the steps are as follows. First, a debug program and a burn test program are provided (step S31), and then one of the burn test program control parameters is set in the test environment (step S32). Finally, the burn-in test program and the debug program are simultaneously executed and verified (step S33) to obtain a test result (step S34).

Since the burn-in test program only needs to set the conditions before the test, the test program can be tested in a specific operating environment and can be executed without human confirmation. Therefore, as long as the control parameters of the burning test part are set first, the burning test program can be executed and verified directly. Line and verify the part of the debugger. In this way, when testing the product, the execution results of the burning test program and the debug program can be verified simultaneously, and the verification time of the burning test program and the debug program can be effectively shortened.

In addition, by the method of test verification of the present invention, the general test process is divided into the following two test modes: the first one is the part of the debug test, which can be further divided into a function test (Function Test). And an RF test. In the Function Test, the main test items include component testing of memory test, audio module test, current module test and call module test. In the part of the RF test, the test is mainly for the network module. The test includes the wireless test (WiFi Test) and the General Packet Radio Service Test (GPRS Test). Antenna Test.

The second type is the Burn Test. It is mainly used for programs such as memory, Vibrator, and camera. It is used to test the burning machine and heat the product. The product is loaded with the actual operation to avoid product defects.

In the above test process, the test verification method of the present invention is divided into the part of the debug test and the part of the burn test, thereby effectively saving the time of product testing to increase the production capacity. In addition, the test items in the above mentioned test procedures can be adjusted according to the actual test items.

Please refer to FIG. 4, which is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of the method for test verification of the present invention. In the figure, in the verification process using the integrated test program, first, the burn-in test program and the debug program are installed (step S41), and then the test item and the burn-in test time are set (step S42).

Then, a test body is taken for this automated debugging process (step S43). In the automated debugging process, the test body must pass through the test memory to confirm the quality of the memory (step S431), test the audio module, and confirm whether the sound module is faulty (step S432). The test call module (step S433), the test current module (step S434), and the test network module, confirm whether the interface of the network module is faulty (step S435) and the like. When the test body performs the process of automatic debugging (step S43), the burn-in test program can be executed in synchronization (step S44).

To compare the old methods, such as the process shown in Figure 2, you must first perform the debugging process and then do the burning machine test. However, because the burn-in test time is much longer than the automated debug time. Therefore, in order to improve this deficiency, the flow in FIGS. 2 and 4 is compared. In the present invention, referring to FIG. 4, the flow of simultaneous debugging and burn-in testing is expressed. Therefore, when the test body is automatically debugged, the burn-in test program is also started. After the execution of the test program is completed, the automatic debugging is completed.

In this way, the time for automated debugging can be saved and the time for the entire test product can be reduced. In this way, the time control for verification code verification can be shortened within 24 hours, because the test time of the automated debug program can be determined within 24 hours (unless the verification code itself has a problem), Otherwise in the whole In the process of debugging, the time course can be effectively shortened by the method proposed by the present invention.

In addition, the test items listed in Figure 4 can be adjusted according to the actual test items, not the limited test items.

The above is intended to be illustrative only and not limiting. Any equivalent modifications or alterations to the spirit and scope of the invention are intended to be included in the scope of the appended claims.

S31~S34‧‧‧Step procedure

Claims (6)

A method for test verification, comprising the steps of: providing a debug program and a burn test program; setting a control parameter of the burn test program; and executing the burn test program and the debug program; wherein The time schedule executed by the debugger is included in the execution time of the burn test program. The method of test verification as described in claim 1, wherein the burn test program is executed in a specific environment. The method of test verification as described in claim 1 of the patent scope is more applicable to an automated test procedure. A method for test verification, which comprises the steps of: providing a debug program and a burn test program; setting a control parameter of the burn test program; executing the burn test program; and executing the debug program, During the execution of the burn test program, wherein the time program executed by the debug program is included in the execution time of the burn test program. The method of claim 4, wherein the burn test program is executed in a specific environment. A method for test verification, which comprises the following steps: setting an environmental parameter of a burn test program; Performing the burn-in test procedure; and performing a debug test procedure when the burn-in test program is performed; wherein the time-test of the debug test program is included in the time course of the burn-in test program.