TW201824044A - Operation plan creating apparatus, operation plan creating method, and program - Google Patents
Operation plan creating apparatus, operation plan creating method, and program Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- TW201824044A TW201824044A TW106136468A TW106136468A TW201824044A TW 201824044 A TW201824044 A TW 201824044A TW 106136468 A TW106136468 A TW 106136468A TW 106136468 A TW106136468 A TW 106136468A TW 201824044 A TW201824044 A TW 201824044A
- Authority
- TW
- Taiwan
- Prior art keywords
- operation plan
- generator
- period
- unit
- time
- Prior art date
Links
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
Abstract
Description
本發明之實施形態係關於一種運轉計畫擬訂裝置、運轉計畫擬訂方法及記憶媒體。Embodiments of the present invention relate to an operation plan formulation device, an operation plan formulation method, and a storage medium.
對於一般電氣工作者之發電部門等,制訂發電機之運轉計畫係重要業務之一。只要可擬定滿足所預測之電力需求且儘可能減少運轉之發電機般之運轉計畫,則可削減發電機運轉之成本。 然而,對於發電機之運轉,除電力需求外還受到多種制約。例如,於擬定期間為月單位之中長期運轉計畫之情形時,保管複數個發電機使用之燃料等之基地之庫存等亦成為制約。制約數越多,算出運轉計畫之處理之負荷越高,而有擬定運轉計畫越花費時間之問題。For the general electrician's power generation department, formulating a generator operation plan is one of the important tasks. As long as a generator-like operation plan that meets the predicted power demand and minimizes the number of operations can be drawn up, the cost of generator operation can be reduced. However, the operation of generators is subject to various constraints in addition to power requirements. For example, when the planned period is a monthly medium-to-long-term operation plan, the storage of bases and the like of fuel used by multiple generators is also a restriction. The greater the number of constraints, the higher the processing load for calculating the operation plan, and there is a problem that it takes more time to prepare the operation plan.
本發明之一實施形態係抑制發電機之運轉計畫之擬定所花費的時間。 本發明之一實施形態之運轉計畫擬定裝置係擬定表示單位時間之運轉狀態之發電機之運轉計畫的裝置,具備時段算出部、運轉計畫候選算出部、係數算出部、及運轉計畫擬定部。時段算出部係算出藉由連續之複數個上述單位時間而構成之時段。運轉計畫候選算出部係算出上述時段中之上述發電機之複數個運轉計畫候選。係數算出部係基於上述時段中之上述發電機之運轉計畫之初始解,而算出與上述運轉計畫候選對應之係數。運轉計畫擬定部係藉由解決上述係數至少用於目標函數或制約條件之最佳化問題,而將上述時段中上述複數個運轉計畫候選中之一者設為上述時段中之上述發電機之運轉計畫。 以下,一面參照圖式一面對本發明之實施形態進行說明。 (本發明之一實施形態) 圖1係表示本發明之一實施形態之運轉計畫擬定裝置之概略構成之一例的方塊圖。圖1所示之運轉計畫擬定裝置1具備記憶部(取得部)11、初始解算出部12、時段算出部13、運轉計畫候選算出部14、係數算出部15、及運轉計畫擬定部16。 運轉計畫擬定裝置1係基於預測之電力需求等制約條件(制約式)、與表示特定目的之目標函數,而擬定發電機之運轉計畫。擬定成之運轉計畫中以能夠滿足制約條件且達成特定目的之方式表示單位時間中之發電機之運轉狀態。 單位時間係運轉計畫中之最小之時間單位(期間)。於單位時間內,各發電機之運轉狀態被設定為唯一,不會變化。因而,於單位時間內,發電機或包含複數個發電機之1個群組之發電量為固定。因此,例如,於考慮30分鐘供應/需求平衡之情形時,可將單位時間設定為30分鐘。如此,單位時間亦可基於計算發電量之期間而定。 發電機之運轉狀態係設想為輸出電力之「運轉(ON)」、與不輸出電力之「停止(OFF)」之2種而說明。再者,亦可存在既非運轉亦非停止之運轉狀態。例如,亦可藉由將運轉區分成輸出發電機之最大輸出電力之「正常運轉」、與輸出發電機之最大輸出電力之數十%之「試運轉」,而將運轉狀態之種類設定為3個以上。相反,亦可將輸出電力但未輸出發電機之最大輸出電力之運轉狀態視為「停止」。例如,亦可將自啟動第1發電機至能夠輸出最大輸出電力為止視為停止,而於計算上,不將第1發電機之發電量加入總發電機之發電量。 特定目的亦可任意設定。例如,可以減少表示發電機或包含發電機之群組之運轉相關之費用的運轉成本為目的。亦可以運轉成本接近特定目標值為目的。特定目標值亦可任意設定。 對於擬定運轉計畫時受到之制約條件,可包含發電機單體相關之制約條件(單元制約條件)。亦可包含有含複數個發電機之1個群組相關之制約條件(群組制約條件)。單元制約條件表示發電機之停止時間、啟動停止曲線等發電機個別運轉相關之制約條件。群組制約條件表示群組整體之輸入輸出相關之制約條件。例如,考慮群組整體之發電量、群組整體之燃料使用量等。 群組被預先設定。例如,可將作為計畫擬定之對象之全部發電機設為1個群組。亦可將自同一氣體基地提供氣體之發電機設為1個群組。或者,亦可將對特定地域供給電力之發電機設為1個群組。又,亦可使1個發電機從屬於複數個群組。 再者,於本實施形態中,運轉計畫擬定裝置1設想擬定跨及複數個發電機之運轉計畫,亦可擬定1台發電機之運轉計畫。又,發電機之種類未特別限定。可為火力、水力、原子力發電機。亦可為利用風力、太陽能、地熱、生物能等自然能量之發電機。亦可為氫發電等發電機。又,各發電機之種類可相同亦可不同。 擬定之運轉計畫之整體期間之長度並未特別限定。可為小時或日單位,亦可為月單位程度之中長期。再者,與擬定小時或日單位之運轉計畫之情形相比,擬定月單位之運轉計畫之情形因受到之制約條件數變多,故擬定運轉計畫之時間變長。然而,本實施形態之運轉計畫擬定裝置1即便為中長期之運轉計畫,亦可抑制運轉計畫之擬定所花費之時間。詳細內容予以後述。 對運轉計畫擬定裝置1之構成要件進行說明。 記憶部(取得部)11係將用於運轉計畫之擬定之資訊作為資料取得並記憶。用於運轉計畫之擬定之資訊具有目標函數相關之資訊、及制約條件相關之資訊。例如,以減少運轉成本為目的之情形時,發電機之單位時間之運轉成本記憶於記憶部11。又,作為制約條件相關之資訊,將擬定之運轉計畫之期間中預測之電力需求記憶於記憶部11。電力需求係複數個發電機所提供之電力量,因而亦需要各發電機之每單位時間之發電量等資訊。因而,表示發電機之特性之資訊亦記憶於記憶部11。其後,將表示發電機之特性之資訊記述為發電機特性。又,例如,根據各發電機使用之燃料等物品之費用算出運轉成本之情形時,亦可將該物品之費用相關之資訊記憶於記憶部11。 再者,運轉計畫擬定裝置1亦可具有複數個記憶部。即,亦可藉由複數個記憶部構成記憶部11。例如,亦可於運轉計畫擬定裝置1存在複數個記憶部,且使各記憶部所記憶之資訊之種類不同。 記憶部11所記憶之資訊可由使用者預先記憶於記憶部11,亦可由運轉計畫擬定裝置1自外部裝置或系統取得而記憶。如圖1之例所示,運轉計畫擬定裝置1可自電力需求預測系統2取得電力需求,且自發電機特性取得系統3取得發電機特性,並自輸入輸出介面4取得輸入資訊。輸入資訊為使用者等輸入之資訊。輸入資訊被設想為目標函數及制約條件相關之資訊中在擬定運轉計畫之期間內值會變動般之資訊。例如,考慮為發電機之維護期間、燃料之費用等。 再者,如圖1之例所示,自外部裝置或系統取得資訊之情形時,運轉計畫擬定裝置1係藉由通信介面或設備介面等與外部裝置或系統直接或間接地連接,而能夠收發資料。收發IP(Internet Protocol,網際網路協定)位址等資料所需之資訊被預先記憶於記憶部11。 又,記憶部11亦可取得並記憶運轉計畫擬定裝置1之各構成要件之處理所得之結果。例如,記憶部11亦可記憶擬定之運轉計畫。又,記憶部11所記憶之資訊可被輸出至輸入輸出介面4,亦可被輸送至外部裝置或系統。 初始解算出部12算出運轉計畫之初始解。所謂運轉計畫之初始解係指未完全考慮各種制約條件,而基於該等制約條件之一部分設定之運轉計畫。 於本實施形態中,將制約條件之一部分設為電力需求。即,不考慮電力需求以外之制約,而將滿足電力需求且使運轉成本變為最小之運轉計畫作為初始解。該情形時,例如,初始解算出部12可藉由於各單位時間中,在滿足各單位時間之電力需求之前,按運轉成本由低至高之順序決定設為ON(使其運轉)之發電機,而算出初始解。又,亦可藉由解決使用所要考慮之制約條件中之一部分之最佳化問題,而算出初始解。 時段算出部13算出1個以上之時段。時段係擬定運轉計畫之期間之一部分,藉由連續之複數個單位時間而構成。擬定之運轉計畫成為各時段中運轉計畫之集合。時段之長度為單位時間之整數倍。例如,若單位時間為30分鐘,則時段為300分鐘、720分鐘等30分鐘之整數倍時間。 時段之長度只要為單位時間之整數倍,則亦可考慮運轉計畫擬定裝置1之處理負荷等而任意設定。時段之長度於各時段中可相同亦可不同。例如,可將各時段之長度統一為300分鐘,亦可將第1時段之長度設為300分鐘,但將第2時段之長度設為720分鐘。 時段亦可基於電力需求而設定。再者,亦可基於電力需求之值之範圍而設定,還可基於電力需求之曲線圖形狀等而設定。於曲線圖形狀之情形時,例如可將電力需求之曲線圖為極大之時點、與電力需求之曲線圖為極小之時點之間的期間設定為時段。 運轉計畫候選算出部14係算出各時段中各發電機之複數個運轉計畫候選。圖2係說明運轉計畫候選之圖。於圖2之上部示有時段。圖2之時段由10個單位時間構成。如上所述,針對時段內之各單位時間,決定各發電機之運轉狀態。 於圖2之中部,示出有該時段中示為單元u之發電機之運轉計畫之初始解。時段內之塗黑之單位時間表示單元u之運轉狀態為ON。時段內之塗白之單位時間表示單元u之運轉狀態為OFF。 於圖2之中部至下部示出有運轉計畫候選算出部14算出之運轉計畫候選。運轉計畫候選係改變相同時段之數個單位時間中之運轉狀態而算出。如圖2所示,各運轉計畫候選與相同時段之其他運轉計畫候選比較,單位時間之運轉狀態之任一者不同。 擬定之運轉計畫候選之數亦可考慮運轉計畫擬定裝置1之處理負荷等而任意設定。即,無須擬定能夠擬定之全部運轉計畫候選。 係數算出部15係基於初始解,而算出與運轉計畫候選對應之係數。將藉由係數算出部15算出之係數記述為最佳化用係數。最佳化係數表示初始解與運轉計畫候選之不同。例如,亦可基於初始解中各單位時間之運轉狀態與運轉計畫候選中各單位時間之運轉狀態不同之數,算出最佳化用係數。發電機之運轉狀態為2種之情形時,係數算出部15可由下式算出單元u中之最佳化用係數。 [數1]fm→n (m與n為表示運轉狀態之整數)表示於某個時段內,於初始解中運轉狀態為m但於運轉計畫候選中運轉狀態為n的單位時間之數。f1→0 表示於初始解中運轉狀態為「運轉」但於運轉計畫候選中為「停止」之單位時間之數。f0→1 表示於初始解中運轉狀態為「停止」但於運轉計畫候選中為「運轉」之單位時間之數。 αu 及βu 表示與單元u對應之正之常數。αu 及βu 可包含於發電機特性且記憶於記憶部11,亦可藉由係數算出部15算出。例如,αu 及βu 亦可設為單元u之運轉成本除以單元u之輸出電力值所得之值。 M表示與時段對應之常數。M係設為對應之時段包含之單位時間之數以上。例如,時段包含5個單位時間之情形時,M≧5。M只要由時段算出部13、運轉計畫候選算出部14、或係數算出部15算出即可。如此,基於初始解與運轉計畫候選之不同,算出最佳化用係數。 再者,於數1中,因將發電機之運轉狀態設想為2種,故示有f1→0 與f0→1 之兩者。於發電機之運轉狀態為3種以上之情形時,亦可為除f1→0 與f0→1 以外之fm→n 。 再者,於數1中,規定為f1→0 之數越多,最佳化用係數變得越小,f0→1 之數越多,最佳化用係數變得越大。其原因在於,為了減少運轉成本,停止之發電機變多,難以選擇發電機之運轉狀態為運轉之單位時間較初始解多之運轉計畫候選。如此,最佳化用係數係以容易選擇符合目的之運轉計畫候選之方式規定。 再者,係數算出部15亦可基於特定條件,變更擬定之最佳化用係數。例如,於存在與初始解相同之運轉計畫候選之情形時,亦可以選擇與初始解相同之運轉計畫候選之方式,變更對於與初始解相同之運轉計畫候選之最佳化用係數之值。例如,亦可將對於與初始解相同之運轉計畫候選之最佳化用係數之值設為負無限大(-∞)。 圖2之各運轉計畫候選之右側所示之式表示基於圖2所示之初始解藉由係數算出部15算出之與各運轉計畫候選對應的最佳化用係數。於上數第1個運轉計畫候選中,因單位時間之運轉狀態全為OFF,故f0→1 為0,該運轉計畫候選之最佳化用係數為-αu (M-f1→0 )。上數第3個之後之運轉計畫候選係f1→0 為0,各運轉計畫候選之最佳化用係數為βu f0→1 。再者,各運轉計畫候選中f0→1 之值不同。上數第2個運轉計畫候選因與初始解相同,故該運轉計畫候選之最佳化用係數設為-∞。 運轉計畫擬定部16係藉由解決基於所賦予之目標函數及制約條件之最佳化問題,而於各時段中將複數個運轉計畫候選中之1者判斷為適當,並將判斷為適當之運轉計畫候選設為該時段中之運轉計畫。藉由於各時段中設定運轉計畫,而擬定發電機之運轉計畫。具體而言,針對各發電機之各時段將運轉計畫候選逐個組合,各組合中之目標函數之值算出該組合中被判斷為最佳之組合。且,將被判斷為最佳之組合中所含之各運轉計畫候選設為各發電機之各時段中的運轉計畫。例如,若以減少運轉成本為目的,則將運轉成本相關之目標函數之值變為最小之組合判斷為最佳。 下式係表示目標函數與制約條件之一例之式。 [數2]數2之式(1)表示目標函數。該目標函數係指以減少複數個發電機之運轉成本之總和為目的。u∈U之U表示發電機(單元)之集合,u表示U所含之1個單元。b∈B之B表示時距(時段)之集合,b表示B所含之1個時距。s∈Sub 之Sub 表示單元u之時距b之運轉計畫候選之集合,s表示Sub 所含之1個運轉計畫候選。cubs 表示單元u之時距b之運轉計畫候選為s之情形時之運轉成本。其中,於本實施形態中,cubs 使用最佳化用係數。即,cubs 非運轉成本之絕對值,而以初始解之運轉成本之相對值表示。yubs 表示與單元u之時距b之運轉計畫候選為s之情形對應的值。 式(2)至式(5)表示制約條件。制約條件可為每單位時間之制約條件,亦可為跨及複數個時段之制約條件。又,可包含單元制約條件,亦可包含群組制約條件。 式(2)係表示yubs 可取之值為0或1之制約條件。即,yubs 為二值變數。此處,yubs 表示是否將單元u之時距b之運轉計畫候選s設為運轉計畫。將運轉計畫候選s設為單元u之時距b之運轉計畫之情形時,yubs 為1,未設為運轉計畫之情形時,yubs 為0。因此,於目標函數中,僅加上作為運轉計畫之運轉計畫候選中之運轉成本。 再者,可設想為運轉狀態為停止時未花費運轉成本,亦可設為即便運轉狀態為停止,亦因操作、管理等花費成本而花費運轉成本。 式(3)係表示yubs 之總和變為1之制約條件。如上所述,yubs 為0與1之2值,因而yubs 為1之運轉計畫候選顯示1個。式(4)係關於電力需求之制約條件,表示時格(單位時間)中之總發電機產生之發電量之總和為該時格所要求之電力需求以上。m∈M之M表示時格之集合,m表示M所含之1個時格。Bucket(m)係返回時格m所屬之時距b之函數。dubsm 表示設想於單元u之時距b之運轉計畫候選為s之情形時之時格m中輸出的輸出電力值(虛設輸出值)。Dem(m)表示時格m中所要求之電力需求。 式(5)係表示單元u之2個時距中之運轉計畫候選之組合未成為違規之組合的制約條件。Violation(u,b)係返回在單元u之時距b中,時格連接制約違規、停止時間違規、同時啟動限制等違規之運轉計畫候選之集合之組合的函數。違規之運轉計畫候選之集合之組合表示為(V、K)。例如,時距b中最後之時格雖為未輸出電力之運轉狀態,然下個時距b+1中最初之時格中恆定輸出之運轉狀態之運轉計畫候選之組合可設為違規。又,例如,於時距b中最後之時格之運轉狀態為運轉,下個時距b+1中最初之時格之運轉狀態為停止之情形時,亦可作為未滿特定停止時間而設為違規。 再者,於上述中,最佳化用係數被用於目標函數,但最佳化用係數亦可被用於制約條件。例如,於設為以減少剩餘電量(群組整體之發電量與群組整體所要求之電力需求之差)為目的且將運轉成本控制在特定範圍內之制約條件之情形時,最佳化用係數被用於制約條件。 如此,運轉計畫擬定部16係藉由解決最佳化用係數至少被用於目標函數或制約條件之最佳化問題,而將各時段中複數個運轉計畫候選中之一者設為各時段中之發電機之運轉計畫。最佳化問題可藉由泛用解算器等處理。因而,運轉計畫擬定部16可使用公知之解算器而實現。 若具有多個制約條件,並欲解決決定多個單位時間之各者所對應之運轉狀態之最佳化問題,則解算器之負荷變高,擬定運轉計畫之前之時間變長。然而,於本實施形態中,藉由使用考慮制約條件之一部分而算出之初始解,設為決定彙集單位時間而成之時段之各者所對應之運轉計畫候選之最佳化問題,而抑制運轉計畫擬定部16之負荷,抑制發電機之運轉計畫之擬定所花費之時間。 再者,運轉成本只要為發電機之運轉花費之費用即可,亦可包含發電機之運轉所需之物品、人、或服務相關之費用。發電機之運轉所需之物品可為燃料等發電機之動力源,亦可為動力源以外之冷卻水、觸媒等。動力源亦無特別限定。例如,可為化石燃料、木質燃料、核燃料。亦可為蓄積於水庫等之蓄水。亦可為氫發電使用之甲基環己烷等化學物質。又,可包含藉由使發電機運轉而產生之費用。例如,亦可包含為了除去因發電而產生之廢氣中所含之化學物質而使用之石灰石、液氨相關之費用。 再者,上述目標函數雖設為各發電機之運轉成本之總和,但亦可設為一部分之特定發電機之運轉成本之總和。例如,亦可考慮從屬於特定群組之發電機,而不考慮不從屬於特定群組之發電機之運轉成本。又,例如藉由對各發電機之運轉成本乘以加權係數後合計,而非僅合計各發電機之運轉成本,可使各發電機之間之重要程度不同。 於數2中,示有以減少運轉成本為目的之目標函數,亦可擬定基於其他成本之目標函數,還可擬定考慮複數個成本之目標函數。下式係表示目標函數與制約條件之另一例之式。 [數3]數3表示將運轉成本與超出成本之總和設為最小之目標函數。e∈E之E表示基地之集合,e表示E所含之1個基地。pem 係連續變數,表示時格m之基地e所保管之庫存之目標值、與執行運轉計畫之情形時之庫存之預測值的超出量。aem 表示有關超出量之係數。 超出量只要為表示預先設定之目標值、與執行運轉計畫之情形時之預測值之差者即可。於數3中,設為時格m之基地e所保管之庫存之超出量,但例如,亦可為燃料之消耗目標、與運轉計畫之燃料之消耗量的差量。超出成本表示該目標值與該預測值之超出之程度。於上述中,將對超出量pem 乘以與超出量pem 對應之aem 之量作為超出成本。 超出成本之算出方法並非限定於上述者,亦可任意設定。例如,亦可預先設定將超出量設為變數之電位函數,而設為由電位函數算出之值。電位函數亦可任意設定,例如,亦可設為燃料消耗量越接近燃料基地庫存制約之上下限值,超出成本越急劇增加般之3次函數、指數函數等。 再者,於目標函數基於複數個成本之情形時,亦可藉由對各成本乘以加權係數而非僅將各成本合計,而使各成本間之重要程度不同。 又,亦可進而追加制約條件。例如,亦可將各時格之電力量、儲存運轉所需物品之基地之基地庫存量、發電機或群組之燃料使用量、連接於發電機之氣體等燃料注入管之流量、供給或者使用電力或燃料之用戶之電力或燃料之使用量等之值可取之範圍即上限及下限作為制約條件。 關於此時使用之單元u中之時格m之輸出值,於選擇該運轉狀態之情形時輸出虛設輸出值,可由下述式算出。 [數4]使用該輸出值,可算出各時格之電力量、儲存運轉所需物品之基地之基地庫存量、發電機或群組之燃料使用量、連接於發電機之氣體等之燃料注入管之流量、供給或者使用電力或燃料之用戶之電力或燃料之使用量,故可將其可取之範圍追加為制約條件。 於使用了虛設輸出值之計算中,於例如將虛設輸出值作為單元之最大輸出值之情形時,實際有可能存在如下問題,即,雖該單元之輸出進而降低,但僅以較高之輸出進行計算,從而無法獲得滿足制約之計算結果。為了防止該問題,而使用各單元、各時距、各運轉狀態、各時格中最大輸出值與最小輸出值之2個值。例如,藉由對有關氣體使用量等之上限之制約條件使用虛設輸出為最小輸出之情形時計算出之值,對有關下限之制約條件使用虛設輸出為最大輸出之情形時計算出之值,可避免該問題。單元u中之時格m之最大輸出值可由下式計算。 [數5]單元u中之時格m之最小輸出值可由下式計算。 [數6]數5所示之附上線之dubsm 表示單元u、時距b、運轉計畫候選s之時格m中之最大輸出值。數6所示之附下線之dubsm 表示單元u、時距b、運轉計畫候選s之時格m中之最小輸出值。 其次,對由各構成要件進行之處理流程進行說明。 圖3係表示本實施形態之運轉計畫擬定裝置1之整體處理之概略流程圖之一例的圖。記憶部11取得算出所需之資訊,並記憶(S101)。記憶所需之資訊後,初始解算出部基於記憶部11所記憶之資訊算出初始解(S102)。又,時段算出部13基於記憶部11所記憶之資訊算出時段(S103),運轉計畫候選算出部14算出複數個各單元中各時段之運轉計畫候選(S104)。 係數算出部15對各運轉計畫候選算出最佳化用係數(S105)。於算出針對全部運轉計畫候選之最佳化用係數後,運轉計畫擬定部16自針對各單元之各時段選擇之運轉計畫候選之組合導出適當組合,並將適當之組合相關之運轉計畫候選作為各單元之各時段之運轉計畫,擬定全體之運轉計畫(S106)。 擬定之運轉計畫被輸送至記憶部11,記憶部11記憶取得之運轉計畫(S107)並結束處理。 再者,該流程圖係一例,只要可獲得必要之處理結果,則處理順序不限。例如,於圖3中,記述為S102之處理、與S103及S104之處理並行處理。然而,亦可於進行S102之處理後,進行S103與S104之處理。又,於初始解並非由初期結算部12算出,而由使用者輸入之情形時,無S102之處理。又,亦可為,各處理之處理結果逐次記憶於記憶部11,各構成要件參照記憶部11而取得處理結果。 如上所示,根據本實施形態,藉由算出各時段之各發電機之運轉計畫候選,且基於初始解算出與運轉計畫候選對應之最佳化用係數,並使用最佳化用係數解決最佳化問題,而擬定發電機運轉計畫。藉由自運轉計畫候選選擇各時段之運轉計畫,即便存在具有多個制約條件之最佳化問題,亦可抑制處理之負荷,縮短運轉計畫之擬定之前之時間。 再者,上述實施形態為一例,上述實施形態之構成要件之一部分亦可位於外部裝置。例如,上述實施形態具有初始解算出部12,但初始解算出部12亦可位於外部裝置。該情形時,記憶部11(取得部)亦可自外部裝置取得初始解,並傳輸至係數算出部15。又,初始解亦可於人為算出後,經由輸入輸出介面4而記憶於記憶部11。 又,計畫擬定裝置1亦可由可利用通信或電氣信號交接資料之複數個裝置構成。換言之,計畫擬定裝置1亦可為由複數個裝置構成之系統。例如,亦可分為進行運作計畫候選算出部14之前之處理之第1裝置、與接收運作狀態而擬定運轉計畫之第2裝置。 又,上述說明之實施形態中之各處理可藉由軟體(程式)實現。因而,上述說明之實施形態例如可藉由使用泛用之電腦裝置作為基本硬體,使搭載於電腦裝置之中央處理裝置(CPU:Central Processing Unit)等處理器執行程式而實現。 圖4係表示本實施形態之運轉計畫擬定裝置1之硬體構成之一例的方塊圖。運轉計畫擬定裝置1具備處理器51、主記憶裝置52、輔助記憶裝置53、網路介面54、設備介面55,可作為將其等經由匯流排56連接之電腦裝置5而實現。又,運轉計畫擬定裝置1亦可具備泛用之輸入裝置及輸出裝置,以實現輸入輸出介面4。 本實施形態中之運轉計畫擬定裝置1可藉由將由各裝置執行之程式預先安裝於電腦裝置5而實現,亦可藉由將程式記憶於CD-ROM(Compact Disc Read-Only Memory:唯讀光碟)等記憶媒體或經由網路發佈並適宜安裝於電腦裝置5而實現。 處理器51係包含電腦之控制裝置及運算裝置之電子電路。處理器51基於自電腦裝置5之內部構成之各裝置等輸入之資料或程式進行運算處理,並將運算結果或控制信號輸出至各裝置等。具體而言,處理器51執行電腦裝置5之OS(操作系統)或應用等,控制構成電腦裝置5之各裝置。 處理器51只要可進行上述處理則無特別限定。處理器51例如亦可為泛用目標處理器、中央處理裝置(CPU)、微處理器、數位信號處理器(DSP:Digital Signal Processing)、控制器、微控制器、狀態機等。又,處理器51亦可為面向特定用途之積體電路、現場可程式閘陣列(FPGA:Field-Programmable Gate Array)、可程式化邏輯電路(PLD:Programmable Logic Device)等。又,處理器51亦可由複數個處理裝置構成。例如,可為DSP及微處理器之組合,亦可為與DSP核協動之1個以上之微處理器。 主記憶裝置52係記憶處理器51執行之命令及各種資料等之記憶裝置,主記憶裝置52所記憶之資訊被處理器51直接讀取。輔助記憶裝置53係主記憶裝置52以外之記憶裝置。再者,記憶裝置係指可儲存電子資訊之任意電子零件。作為主記憶裝置52,主要使用RAM(Random Access Memory:隨機存取記憶體)、DRAM(Dynamic Random Acces Memory:動態隨機存取記憶體)、SRAM(Static Random Access Memory:靜態隨機存取記憶體)等用於暫時保存資訊之揮發性記憶體,但於本發明之實施形態中,主記憶裝置52並不限定於該等揮發性記憶體。作為主記憶裝置52及輔助記憶裝置53使用之記憶裝置可為揮發性記憶體,亦可為非揮發性記憶體。非揮發性記憶體具有可程式化唯讀記憶體(PROM:Programmable Read-Only Memory)、可抹除可程式化唯讀記憶體(EPROM:Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory)、電子可抹除可程式化唯讀記憶體(EEPROM:Electrically-Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory)、非揮發性隨機存取記憶體(NVRAM:Non-Volatile Random Access Memory)、快閃記憶體、MRAM(Magnetic Random Access Memory:磁阻隨機存取記憶體)等。又,亦可使用磁氣或光學之資料儲存裝置作為輔助記憶裝置53。作為資料儲存裝置,可使用影碟等磁碟、DVD(Digital Versatile Disk:數位多功能光碟)等光碟、USB (Universal Serial Bus:泛用串列匯流排)等快閃記憶體、及磁帶等。 再者,若處理器51對主記憶裝置52或輔助記憶裝置53直接或間接讀取或寫入資訊或者進行該等兩者,則記憶裝置可與處理器電氣通信。再者,主記憶裝置52亦可整合於處理器。於此情形時,主記憶裝置52亦可與處理器電氣通信。 網路介面54係用以利用無線或有線而連接於通信網路之介面。網路介面54只要使用適合現有之通信規格者即可。此處,僅示有1個網路介面54,但亦可搭載有複數個網路介面54。亦可藉由網路介面54,對經由通信網路6而通信連接之外部裝置7發送輸出結果等。外部裝置7可為外部記憶媒體,亦可為顯示裝置,還可為資料庫等儲存裝置。 設備介面55係與記錄輸出結果等之外部記憶媒體連接之USB等介面。外部記憶媒體可為HDD(Hard Disk Drive:硬碟機)、CD-R(Compact Disc-Recordable:可錄式光碟)、CD-RW(Compact Disc-Rewritable:可重寫光碟)、DVD-RAM(Digital Versatile Disc-Random Access Memory:數位多功能隨機存取光碟)、DVD-R(DVD-Recordable:數位多功能可錄式光碟)、SAN(Storage Area Network:儲存區域網路)等任意記錄媒體。亦可經由設備介面55而與儲存裝置等連接。 又,電腦裝置5之一部分或全部,即運轉計畫擬定裝置1之一部分或全部亦可由安裝有程式51等之半導體積體電路等專用電子電路(即硬體)構成。專用硬體亦可由與RAM、ROM(Read Only Memory:唯讀記憶體)等記憶裝置之組合而構成。 再者,於圖4中,示有1台電腦裝置,但亦可於複數個電腦裝置安裝軟體。亦可藉由使該複數個電腦裝置分別執行軟體之不同之一部分之處理,而算出處理結果。 雖然已描述特定實施例,但僅舉例而言來呈現此等實施例,且不意在限制本發明之範疇。事實上,本文中所描述之新穎裝置、方法及媒體可依各種其他形式體現;此外,可在不脫離本發明之精神的情況下對本文中所描述之裝置、方法及媒體作出各種省略、替換及變化。隨附申請專利範圍及其等等效物意在包含本發明之範疇及精神內之形式或變化。One embodiment of the present invention suppresses the time taken to formulate the operation plan of the generator. An operation plan preparing device according to an embodiment of the present invention is a device that prepares an operation plan of a generator indicating an operating state per unit time, and includes a time period calculation unit, an operation plan candidate calculation unit, a coefficient calculation unit, and an operation plan. Planning Department. The time period calculation unit calculates a time period composed of a plurality of consecutive unit times described above. The operation plan candidate calculation unit calculates a plurality of operation plan candidates of the generator in the above period. The coefficient calculation unit calculates a coefficient corresponding to the candidate of the operation plan based on the initial solution of the operation plan of the generator in the above period. The operation plan preparation unit solves the problem that the above coefficients are used for optimization of at least the objective function or the constraint conditions, and sets one of the plurality of operation plan candidates in the period as the generator in the period. Operation plan. Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. (Embodiment of the present invention) FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an example of a schematic configuration of an operation plan preparation device according to an embodiment of the present invention. The operation plan preparation device 1 shown in FIG. 1 includes a memory unit (acquisition unit) 11, an initial solution calculation unit 12, a time period calculation unit 13, an operation plan candidate calculation unit 14, a coefficient calculation unit 15, and an operation plan preparation unit. 16. The operation plan preparation device 1 prepares an operation plan of a generator based on constraints (restrictive expressions) such as predicted power demand, and an objective function representing a specific purpose. In the proposed operation plan, the operation state of the generator per unit time is expressed in a way that can satisfy the constraints and achieve a specific purpose. The unit time is the smallest time unit (period) in the operation plan. Within unit time, the running status of each generator is set to be unique and will not change. Therefore, in a unit time, the power generation amount of a generator or a group including a plurality of generators is fixed. Therefore, for example, when considering a 30-minute supply / demand balance situation, the unit time may be set to 30 minutes. As such, the unit time may also be determined based on the period during which the amount of power generation is calculated. The operation state of the generator is assumed to be two types: "operation (ON)" for outputting power and "OFF (off)" for outputting no power. Furthermore, there may be an operating state that is neither running nor stopped. For example, the type of operation state can be set to 3 by dividing the operation into "normal operation" of the maximum output power of the output generator and "test operation" of several tens% of the maximum output power of the output generator. More than. On the contrary, the operating state of the maximum output power that does not output the generator can be regarded as "stopped". For example, the first generator can be regarded as being stopped until the maximum output power can be output, and the power generated by the first generator is not added to the power generated by the total generator in calculation. The specific purpose can also be arbitrarily set. For example, it is possible to reduce the operating cost which represents the expenses related to the operation of the generator or the group including the generator. It is also possible to run the operation cost close to a specific target value. Specific target values can also be arbitrarily set. As for the constraints to be met in the preparation of the operation plan, the constraints related to the generator unit (unit constraints) may be included. Constraints (group constraints) related to one group with multiple generators can also be included. The unit constraint conditions indicate constraints related to the individual operation of the generator, such as the generator's stop time and start-stop curve. The group constraint indicates constraints related to the input and output of the group as a whole. For example, consider the power generation amount of the entire group, the fuel consumption amount of the group as a whole, and the like. The group is preset. For example, all the generators that are targeted for the plan can be grouped into one group. The generators supplying gas from the same gas base can also be grouped into one group. Alternatively, the generators that supply power to a specific area may be grouped into one group. In addition, one generator may be subordinate to a plurality of groups. In addition, in this embodiment, the operation plan preparation device 1 is supposed to prepare an operation plan across a plurality of generators, and may also prepare an operation plan for one generator. The type of the generator is not particularly limited. It can be a firepower, hydropower or atomic power generator. It can also be a generator using natural energy such as wind, solar energy, geothermal energy, and bioenergy. It can also be a generator such as hydrogen power generation. The types of the generators may be the same or different. The length of the overall period of the proposed operation plan is not particularly limited. It can be an hour or a day, and it can also be a medium or long-term month. In addition, compared with the case of preparing the operation plan of the hour or day unit, the situation of preparing the operation plan of the monthly unit is more affected by the number of constraints, so the time of preparing the operation plan becomes longer. However, even if the operation plan formulation device 1 of this embodiment is a medium-long-term operation plan, it can suppress the time taken to formulate the operation plan. Details will be described later. The constituent elements of the operation plan formulation device 1 will be described. The memory unit (acquisition unit) 11 acquires and memorizes the information prepared for the operation plan as data. The information prepared for the operation plan includes information related to the objective function and information related to the constraints. For example, when the purpose is to reduce the running cost, the running cost per unit time of the generator is stored in the memory unit 11. In addition, as the information related to the constraint conditions, the predicted power demand during the period of the planned operation plan is stored in the memory unit 11. The power demand is the amount of power provided by multiple generators, so it also needs information such as the amount of power generated by each generator per unit of time. Therefore, the information indicating the characteristics of the generator is also stored in the memory section 11. Thereafter, information indicating the characteristics of the generator is described as the characteristics of the generator. In addition, for example, when the running cost is calculated based on the cost of items such as fuel used by each generator, information related to the cost of the item may be stored in the memory section 11. Furthermore, the operation plan formulation device 1 may have a plurality of memory sections. That is, the memory unit 11 may be configured by a plurality of memory units. For example, there may be a plurality of memory sections in the operation plan drawing device 1, and the types of information stored in each memory section may be different. The information stored in the storage section 11 may be stored in the storage section 11 in advance by a user, or may be obtained from an external device or system by the operation plan formulation device 1 and memorized. As shown in the example of FIG. 1, the operation plan preparation device 1 can obtain the power demand from the power demand prediction system 2, the generator characteristics from the generator characteristic acquisition system 3, and the input information from the input / output interface 4. The input information is information input by users and the like. The input information is conceived to be information that changes in value during the period in which the operation plan is planned among the information related to the objective function and constraints. For example, consider the maintenance period of the generator and the cost of fuel. In addition, as shown in the example of FIG. 1, when information is obtained from an external device or system, the operation plan preparation device 1 can be directly or indirectly connected to the external device or system through a communication interface or a device interface, etc. Send and receive information. Information required for sending and receiving data such as an IP (Internet Protocol, Internet Protocol) address is stored in the memory section 11 in advance. In addition, the memory unit 11 can also obtain and memorize the results obtained by processing the constituent elements of the operation plan preparation device 1. For example, the memory unit 11 may also memorize a planned operation plan. In addition, the information stored in the memory section 11 can be output to the input / output interface 4 or can be transmitted to an external device or system. The initial solution calculation unit 12 calculates an initial solution of the operation plan. The so-called initial solution of the operation plan refers to the operation plan that is set based on a part of these constraints without fully considering various constraints. In this embodiment, a part of the constraint conditions is set as the power demand. That is, without considering constraints other than the power demand, an operation plan that satisfies the power demand and minimizes operating costs is taken as an initial solution. In this case, for example, the initial calculation unit 12 may determine the generators that are set to ON (make it run) in order from low to high running costs before the power demand of each unit time is satisfied in each unit time. And calculate the initial solution. In addition, the initial solution can also be calculated by solving the optimization problem of one of the constraints to be considered in use. The period calculation unit 13 calculates one or more periods. The time period is a part of the period in which the operation plan is drawn up, and is composed of a plurality of continuous unit times. The proposed operation plan becomes a collection of operation plans in each period. The length of the period is an integer multiple of the unit time. For example, if the unit time is 30 minutes, the time period is an integral multiple of 30 minutes, such as 300 minutes and 720 minutes. As long as the length of the time period is an integer multiple of the unit time, it can also be arbitrarily set in consideration of the processing load of the operation plan formulation device 1 and the like. The length of the time period can be the same or different in each time period. For example, the length of each period can be unified to 300 minutes, or the length of the first period can be set to 300 minutes, but the length of the second period can be set to 720 minutes. The time period can also be set based on power demand. Moreover, it can also be set based on the range of the value of power demand, and it can also be set based on the shape of the graph of power demand, etc. In the case of a graph shape, for example, a period between a time point when the graph of power demand is maximum and a time point when the graph of power demand is extremely small may be set as a period. The operation plan candidate calculation unit 14 calculates a plurality of operation plan candidates of each generator in each period. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating candidates for operation plans. A time period is shown in the upper part of FIG. 2. The period in FIG. 2 is composed of 10 unit times. As described above, for each unit time in the time period, the operating state of each generator is determined. In the middle of FIG. 2, the initial solution of the operation plan of the generator shown as unit u in this period is shown. The blackened unit time within the time period indicates that the operating state of the unit u is ON. The white unit time within the time period indicates that the operating state of the unit u is OFF. The operation plan candidates calculated by the operation plan candidate calculation unit 14 are shown in the middle to the lower part of FIG. 2. The candidate for the operation plan is calculated by changing the operation state in several unit times in the same period. As shown in FIG. 2, when comparing each operation plan candidate with other operation plan candidates in the same period, any one of the operation states of the unit time is different. The number of planned operation plan candidates can also be arbitrarily set in consideration of the processing load of the operation plan preparation device 1 and the like. That is, it is not necessary to prepare all the candidate candidates for the operation plan. The coefficient calculation unit 15 calculates a coefficient corresponding to the operation plan candidate based on the initial solution. The coefficient calculated by the coefficient calculation unit 15 is described as an optimization coefficient. The optimization coefficient indicates the difference between the initial solution and the candidate for the operation plan. For example, an optimization coefficient may be calculated based on the number of different operating states of each unit time in the initial solution and operating states of each unit time in the candidate for the operation plan. When there are two types of operation states of the generator, the coefficient calculation unit 15 can calculate an optimization coefficient in the unit u by the following formula. [Number 1] f m → n (m and n are integers representing the running status) represents the number of unit times in a certain period of time when the running status is m in the initial solution but the running status is n in the running plan candidate. f 1 → 0 represents the number of unit times in which the running state is "running" in the initial solution, but "stop" in the running plan candidate. f 0 → 1 represents the number of unit times in which the running state is "stopped" in the initial solution, but "run" in the running plan candidate. α u and β u represent positive constants corresponding to the unit u. α u and β u may be included in the generator characteristics and stored in the memory unit 11, or may be calculated by the coefficient calculation unit 15. For example, α u and β u can also be set as values obtained by dividing the running cost of the unit u by the output power value of the unit u. M represents a constant corresponding to the period. M is set to be equal to or greater than the unit time included in the corresponding period. For example, when the time period contains 5 unit times, M ≧ 5. M may be calculated by the time period calculation unit 13, the operation plan candidate calculation unit 14, or the coefficient calculation unit 15. In this way, an optimization coefficient is calculated based on the difference between the initial solution and the operation plan candidate. In addition, since the operation state of the generator is assumed to be two in the number 1, both f 1 → 0 and f 0 → 1 are shown. When the generator's running state is more than 3 kinds, it can also be f m → n except f 1 → 0 and f 0 → 1 . Further, in the number 1, the larger the number of f 1 → 0 is defined, the smaller the optimization coefficient becomes, and the larger the number of f 0 → 1 the larger the optimization coefficient becomes. The reason is that in order to reduce the running cost, more generators are stopped, and it is difficult to select a running plan candidate for which the unit's operating state is more than the initial solution. As described above, the optimization coefficient is specified in a manner that makes it easy to select candidate candidates for the operation plan. In addition, the coefficient calculation unit 15 may change the proposed optimization coefficient based on specific conditions. For example, when there is a candidate for the operation plan that is the same as the initial solution, the method of the candidate for the same operation plan as the initial solution may be selected, and the optimization coefficient of the candidate for the same operation plan as the initial solution may be changed. value. For example, the value of the optimization coefficient for the operation plan candidate that is the same as the initial solution may be set to negative infinity (-∞). The formula shown on the right side of each operation plan candidate in FIG. 2 represents an optimization coefficient corresponding to each operation plan candidate calculated by the coefficient calculation unit 15 based on the initial solution shown in FIG. 2. In the first candidate of the operation plan, since the operation status per unit time is all OFF, f 0 → 1 is 0, and the optimization coefficient of the operation plan candidate is -α u (Mf 1 → 0 ). The operation plan candidate system f 1 → 0 after the third from the top is 0, and the optimization coefficient of each operation plan candidate is β u f 0 → 1 . In addition, the value of f 0 → 1 differs among each operation plan candidate. The second running plan candidate from the top is the same as the initial solution, so the optimization coefficient of this running plan candidate is set to -∞. The operation plan preparation unit 16 judges one of a plurality of operation plan candidates as appropriate in each period by solving an optimization problem based on the given objective function and constraints. The candidate for the operation plan is set as the operation plan in the period. The operation plan of the generator is prepared by setting the operation plan in each period. Specifically, the operation plan candidates are combined one by one for each time period of each generator, and the value of the objective function in each combination is used to calculate the combination determined to be the best in the combination. And each operation plan candidate included in the combination determined to be the best is set as the operation plan in each time period of each generator. For example, for the purpose of reducing operating costs, the combination in which the value of the objective function related to operating costs is minimized is determined to be the best. The following formula is an example of an objective function and constraints. [Number 2] Equation (1) of the number 2 represents an objective function. The objective function is for the purpose of reducing the sum of the running costs of a plurality of generators. U ∈ U represents a set of generators (units), and u represents a unit included in U. B of b ∈ B represents a set of time intervals (periods), and b represents a time interval contained in B. S ub of s ∈ S ub represents a set of operation plan candidates of unit time interval b, and s represents one operation plan candidate included in S ub . c ubs represents the operating cost when the candidate for the operation plan of unit b at time interval b is s. However, in this embodiment, c ubs uses an optimization coefficient. That is, c ubs is the absolute value of non-running costs, and is expressed as the relative value of the running cost of the initial solution. y ubs represents a value corresponding to a case where the candidate for the operation plan of the time interval b of the unit u is s. The expressions (2) to (5) represent constraints. Constraints can be constraints per unit of time, or constraints across multiple periods. In addition, it may include unit constraints or group constraints. Equation (2) represents a constraint condition that y ubs can take a value of 0 or 1. That is, y ubs is a binary variable. Here, y ubs indicates whether or not the operation plan candidate s of the time interval b of the unit u is set as the operation plan. When the operation plan candidate s is set to the operation plan of the time interval b of the unit u, y ubs is 1, and when it is not set to the operation plan, y ubs is 0. Therefore, only the operation cost among the operation plan candidates as the operation plan is added to the objective function. In addition, it is conceivable that no running cost is incurred when the running state is stopped, and even if the running state is stopped, the running cost is consumed due to operation, management, and the like. Equation (3) represents a restriction condition that the sum of y ubs becomes 1. As described above, since y ubs has two values of 0 and 1, a running plan candidate with y ubs of one is displayed. Equation (4) is a constraint condition on the power demand, which indicates that the total amount of power generated by the total generator in the time grid (unit time) is more than the power demand required by the time grid. M of m ∈ M represents a set of time lattices, and m represents a time lattice contained in M. Bucket (m) is a function that returns the time interval b to which the time slot m belongs. d ubsm represents the output power value (dummy output value) output in the time slot m when the operation plan candidate for the time interval b of the unit u is s. Dem (m) represents the required power demand in time grid m. Equation (5) represents a constraint condition that the combination of the operation plan candidates in the two time intervals of the unit u has not become the illegal combination. Violation (u, b) is a function that returns a combination of candidate operation plan violations such as constraint violations, stop time violations, and simultaneous start restrictions in the time interval b of unit u. The combination of candidate sets of illegal operation plans is represented as (V, K). For example, although the last time slot in the time interval b is an operating state in which no power is output, the combination of candidates for the operation plan of the constant output operation state in the first time interval in the next time interval b + 1 may be set as a violation. In addition, for example, when the operation state of the last time division in the time interval b is operation, and the operation state of the first time division in the next time interval b + 1 is stopped, it can also be set as the specified stop time. For violation. Furthermore, in the above, the optimization coefficient is used for the objective function, but the optimization coefficient may also be used for the constraint condition. For example, when the conditions are set to reduce the remaining power (the difference between the total power generation amount of the group and the total power demand required by the group) and the operating cost is controlled within a specific range, the optimization Coefficients are used for constraints. In this way, the operation plan preparation unit 16 solves the optimization problem in which the optimization coefficient is used for at least the objective function or the constraints, and sets one of the plurality of operation plan candidates in each period as each Plan of generator operation during the period. The optimization problem can be handled by a general-purpose solver or the like. Therefore, the operation plan preparation unit 16 can be implemented using a known solver. If there are multiple constraints and it is desired to solve the problem of optimizing the operating state corresponding to each of the multiple unit times, the load on the solver becomes higher and the time before the operation plan is drawn becomes longer. However, in this embodiment, by using the initial solution calculated by considering a part of the constraint conditions, it is set as the optimization problem of the operation plan candidate corresponding to each of the periods determined by the aggregation of unit time, and suppressed The load of the operation plan formulation unit 16 suppresses the time taken to formulate the operation plan of the generator. In addition, the running cost may be the cost for the operation of the generator, and may also include the expenses related to the goods, people, or services required for the operation of the generator. The items required for the operation of the generator can be the power source of the generator such as fuel, or cooling water and catalyst other than the power source. The power source is also not particularly limited. For example, it can be fossil fuel, wood fuel, nuclear fuel. It may also be water stored in a reservoir or the like. Chemical substances such as methylcyclohexane used for hydrogen power generation can also be used. In addition, costs incurred by operating the generator may be included. For example, costs related to limestone and liquid ammonia used to remove chemical substances contained in exhaust gas generated by power generation may be included. In addition, although the above-mentioned objective function is set as the sum of the running costs of each generator, it can also be set as the sum of the running costs of a specific generator. For example, it is also possible to consider generators belonging to a specific group without considering the operating costs of generators not belonging to a specific group. In addition, for example, by multiplying the running cost of each generator by a weighting factor instead of just the running cost of each generator, the importance degree of each generator can be made different. In the number 2, an objective function is shown for the purpose of reducing operating costs, an objective function based on other costs can also be formulated, and an objective function considering multiple costs can also be formulated. The following formula is another example of the objective function and the constraints. [Number 3] The number 3 represents an objective function that minimizes the sum of the running cost and the excess cost. E of E ∈ E represents a set of bases, and e represents a base included in E. p em is a continuous variable that represents the excess of the target value of the inventory kept by the base e in the grid m and the predicted value of the inventory when the operation plan is executed. a em represents the coefficient on excess. The excess amount may be a difference between a preset target value and a predicted value when the operation plan is executed. In the number 3, the excess amount of the inventory kept by the base e in the time grid m is set, but it may be the difference between the fuel consumption target and the fuel consumption amount of the operation plan, for example. The excess cost indicates the extent to which the target value exceeds the predicted value. In the above, the excess cost p em is multiplied by the amount of a em corresponding to the excess amount p em as the excess cost. The calculation method of the excess cost is not limited to the above, and may be arbitrarily set. For example, a potential function in which the excess amount is a variable may be set in advance, and a value calculated from the potential function may be set. The potential function can also be arbitrarily set. For example, it can also be a third-order function, an exponential function, etc., as the fuel consumption amount approaches the upper and lower limits of the fuel base inventory constraints, and the cost increases sharply. Furthermore, when the objective function is based on a plurality of costs, the importance of each cost can be made different by multiplying each cost by a weighting coefficient instead of just adding up the costs. Furthermore, constraints may be further added. For example, the amount of electricity at each time, the amount of base stock at the base where items needed for operation are stored, the amount of fuel used by the generator or group, the flow rate of fuel injection pipes such as the gas connected to the generator, supply or use The upper limit and lower limit of the value of the power or fuel consumption amount of the user of the power or fuel can be taken as the constraint condition. Regarding the output value of the time slot m in the unit u used at this time, when the operating state is selected, a dummy output value is output, which can be calculated by the following formula. [Number 4] Using this output value, you can calculate the amount of electricity at each time, the amount of base inventory at the base where items needed for operation are stored, the amount of fuel used by the generator or group, the flow rate of the fuel injection pipe of the gas connected to the generator, The amount of electricity or fuel used by users who supply or use electricity or fuel can be added as a constraint. In the calculation using the dummy output value, for example, when the dummy output value is used as the maximum output value of the unit, there may actually be a problem that although the output of the unit is further reduced, only the higher output is used. Perform calculations so that calculation results that do not satisfy the constraints cannot be obtained. In order to prevent this problem, two values of the maximum output value and the minimum output value in each unit, each time interval, each operation state, and each time division are used. For example, by using the value calculated when the dummy output is the minimum output for the constraints on the upper limit of gas usage, etc., the value calculated when the dummy output is the maximum output for the constraints on the lower limit, the value can be avoided. problem. The maximum output value of the time slot m in the unit u can be calculated by the following formula. [Number 5] The minimum output value of the time slot m in the unit u can be calculated by the following formula. [Number 6] The line d ubsm shown by the number 5 indicates the maximum output value in the unit u, the time interval b, and the time slot m of the operation plan candidate s. The underlined dubsm shown by the number 6 represents the minimum output value in the unit u, the time interval b, and the time slot m of the operation plan candidate s. Next, the processing flow performed by each component will be described. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of a schematic flowchart of the overall processing of the operation plan preparation device 1 according to this embodiment. The storage unit 11 obtains information required for calculation and memorizes it (S101). After the required information is memorized, the initial solution calculation unit calculates an initial solution based on the information memorized by the memory unit 11 (S102). Further, the time period calculation unit 13 calculates a time period based on the information stored in the memory unit 11 (S103), and the operation plan candidate calculation unit 14 calculates an operation plan candidate for each time period among a plurality of units (S104). The coefficient calculation unit 15 calculates an optimization coefficient for each operation plan candidate (S105). After calculating the optimization coefficients for all the operation plan candidates, the operation plan preparation section 16 derives an appropriate combination from the combination of the operation plan candidates selected for each time period of each unit, and calculates the operation plan related to the appropriate combination. The drawing candidate is used as an operation plan for each period of each unit, and an overall operation plan is prepared (S106). The planned operation plan is transferred to the storage unit 11, and the storage unit 11 memorizes the obtained operation plan (S107) and ends the processing. In addition, the flowchart is an example, and the processing order is not limited as long as necessary processing results can be obtained. For example, in FIG. 3, the processing of S102 and the processing of S103 and S104 are described in parallel. However, it is also possible to perform the processing of S103 and S104 after the processing of S102. When the initial solution is not calculated by the initial settlement section 12, but is input by the user, there is no processing in S102. Alternatively, the processing results of each process may be sequentially stored in the storage unit 11, and each constituent element may obtain the processing results by referring to the storage unit 11. As shown above, according to this embodiment, the operation plan candidate of each generator in each period is calculated, and an optimization coefficient corresponding to the operation plan candidate is calculated based on the initial solution, and the optimization coefficient is used to solve the problem. Optimize the problem, and draw up a generator operation plan. By selecting the operation plan for each time period from the candidate of the operation plan, even if there is an optimization problem with multiple constraints, the processing load can be suppressed and the time before the operation plan is formulated can be shortened. In addition, the above embodiment is an example, and a part of the constituent elements of the above embodiment may be located in an external device. For example, the above-mentioned embodiment includes the initial solution calculation unit 12, but the initial solution calculation unit 12 may be located in an external device. In this case, the memory unit 11 (acquisition unit) may obtain an initial solution from an external device and transmit the initial solution to the coefficient calculation unit 15. The initial solution may be stored in the storage unit 11 through the input / output interface 4 after being artificially calculated. In addition, the plan formulation device 1 may be constituted by a plurality of devices capable of transferring data using communication or electrical signals. In other words, the plan formulation device 1 may be a system composed of a plurality of devices. For example, it may be divided into a first device that performs processing before the operation plan candidate calculation unit 14 and a second device that receives an operation state and prepares an operation plan. Each process in the embodiment described above can be realized by software (program). Therefore, the embodiment described above can be realized, for example, by using a general-purpose computer device as basic hardware and causing a processor such as a central processing unit (CPU: Central Processing Unit) mounted on the computer device to execute a program. FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing an example of a hardware configuration of the operation plan preparation device 1 of the present embodiment. The operation plan preparation device 1 includes a processor 51, a main memory device 52, an auxiliary memory device 53, a network interface 54, and a device interface 55, and can be implemented as a computer device 5 that connects these via a bus 56. In addition, the operation plan formulation device 1 may be provided with a general-purpose input device and an output device to realize the input-output interface 4. The operation plan drawing device 1 in this embodiment can be implemented by installing programs executed by each device in the computer device 5 in advance, or by storing the programs in a CD-ROM (Compact Disc Read-Only Memory: Read Only) It can be realized by a storage medium such as a CD-ROM) or distributed via a network and suitably installed in the computer device 5. The processor 51 is an electronic circuit including a computer control device and a computing device. The processor 51 performs arithmetic processing based on data or programs input from various devices and the like configured internally of the computer device 5, and outputs a calculation result or a control signal to each device and the like. Specifically, the processor 51 executes an OS (operating system), an application, or the like of the computer device 5 and controls each device constituting the computer device 5. The processor 51 is not particularly limited as long as it can perform the above processing. The processor 51 may be, for example, a general-purpose target processor, a central processing unit (CPU), a microprocessor, a digital signal processor (DSP), a controller, a microcontroller, a state machine, and the like. In addition, the processor 51 may be a specific-use integrated circuit, a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), a programmable logic circuit (PLD), or the like. The processor 51 may be constituted by a plurality of processing devices. For example, it can be a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, or it can be one or more microprocessors cooperating with the DSP core. The main memory device 52 is a memory device that stores commands and various data executed by the processor 51. The information stored in the main memory device 52 is directly read by the processor 51. The auxiliary memory device 53 is a memory device other than the main memory device 52. Furthermore, a memory device refers to any electronic component that can store electronic information. As the main memory device 52, RAM (Random Access Memory), DRAM (Dynamic Random Acces Memory), and SRAM (Static Random Access Memory) are mainly used. Such as a volatile memory for temporarily storing information, but in the embodiment of the present invention, the main memory device 52 is not limited to these volatile memories. The memory device used as the main memory device 52 and the auxiliary memory device 53 may be a volatile memory or a non-volatile memory. Non-volatile memory has Programmable Read-Only Memory (PROM), Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EPROM), Electronically Programmable Read Only Memory Read-only memory (EEPROM: Electrically-Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), non-volatile random access memory (NVRAM: Non-Volatile Random Access Memory), flash memory, MRAM (Magnetic Random Access Memory) Access memory) and so on. Also, a magnetic or optical data storage device may be used as the auxiliary memory device 53. As data storage devices, magnetic disks such as video disks, optical disks such as DVDs (Digital Versatile Disk), flash memories such as USB (Universal Serial Bus), and magnetic tapes can be used. Furthermore, if the processor 51 directly or indirectly reads or writes information to or from the main memory device 52 or the auxiliary memory device 53, or both, the memory device may be in electrical communication with the processor. Furthermore, the main memory device 52 may be integrated into the processor. In this case, the main memory device 52 may also be in electrical communication with the processor. The network interface 54 is an interface for connecting to a communication network by wireless or wired. The network interface 54 is only required to be suitable for existing communication standards. Although only one network interface 54 is shown here, a plurality of network interfaces 54 may be mounted. The network interface 54 may also be used to send output results and the like to the external device 7 which is communicatively connected via the communication network 6. The external device 7 may be an external storage medium, a display device, or a storage device such as a database. The device interface 55 is an interface such as a USB connected to an external storage medium for recording and outputting results. External storage media can be HDD (Hard Disk Drive), CD-R (Compact Disc-Recordable: CD-RW), CD-RW (Compact Disc-Rewritable), DVD-RAM ( Digital Versatile Disc-Random Access Memory: Any recording media such as DVD-R (DVD-Recordable) and SAN (Storage Area Network). It may also be connected to a storage device or the like via the device interface 55. In addition, a part or all of the computer device 5, that is, a part or all of the operation plan preparation device 1, may be composed of a dedicated electronic circuit (ie, hardware) such as a semiconductor integrated circuit on which the program 51 and the like are installed. The dedicated hardware may also be composed of a combination with a memory device such as a RAM or a ROM (Read Only Memory). Furthermore, in FIG. 4, one computer device is shown, but software may be installed on a plurality of computer devices. It is also possible to calculate the processing result by causing the plurality of computer devices to separately execute processing of a different part of the software. Although specific embodiments have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. In fact, the novel devices, methods, and media described herein may be embodied in various other forms; furthermore, various omissions and replacements may be made to the devices, methods, and media described herein without departing from the spirit of the present invention. And change. The scope of the accompanying patent applications and their equivalents are intended to cover forms or variations within the scope and spirit of the invention.
1‧‧‧運轉計畫擬定裝置1‧‧‧ Device for planning operation
2‧‧‧電力需求預測系統2‧‧‧ Electricity Demand Forecasting System
3‧‧‧發電機特性取得系統3‧‧‧Generator characteristics acquisition system
4‧‧‧輸入輸出介面4‧‧‧ input and output interface
5‧‧‧電腦裝置5‧‧‧Computer device
6‧‧‧通信網路6‧‧‧Communication Network
7‧‧‧外部裝置7‧‧‧ external device
11‧‧‧記憶部11‧‧‧Memory Department
12‧‧‧初始解算出部12‧‧‧ Initial Solution Division
13‧‧‧時段算出部13‧‧‧time calculation department
14‧‧‧運轉計畫候選算出部14‧‧‧ Operation plan candidate calculation unit
15‧‧‧係數算出部15‧‧‧ Coefficient calculation section
16‧‧‧運轉計畫擬定部16‧‧‧ Drafting Department
51‧‧‧處理器51‧‧‧ processor
52‧‧‧主記憶裝置52‧‧‧Master memory device
53‧‧‧輔助記憶裝置53‧‧‧ auxiliary memory device
54‧‧‧網路介面54‧‧‧Interface
55‧‧‧設備介面55‧‧‧device interface
56‧‧‧匯流排56‧‧‧Bus
S101~S107‧‧‧步驟S101 ~ S107‧‧‧step
圖1係表示本發明之一實施形態之運轉計畫擬定裝置之概略構成之一例的方塊圖。 圖2係說明運轉計畫候選之圖。 圖3係表示本實施形態之運轉計畫擬定裝置之整體處理之概略流程圖之一例的圖。 圖4係表示本實施形態之運轉計畫擬定裝置之硬體構成之一例的方塊圖。FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an example of a schematic configuration of an operation plan preparation device according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating candidates for operation plans. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of a schematic flowchart of the overall processing of the operation plan preparation device of the present embodiment. FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing an example of the hardware configuration of the operation plan preparation device of this embodiment.
Claims (7)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2016212044A JP6751006B2 (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2016-10-28 | Operation plan preparation device, operation plan preparation method and program |
JP??2016-212044 | 2016-10-28 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
TW201824044A true TW201824044A (en) | 2018-07-01 |
TWI652591B TWI652591B (en) | 2019-03-01 |
Family
ID=62114311
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
TW106136468A TWI652591B (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2017-10-24 | Operation plan preparation device, operation plan formulation method and memory medium |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP6751006B2 (en) |
AU (2) | AU2017248557A1 (en) |
TW (1) | TWI652591B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP7230913B2 (en) * | 2018-06-26 | 2023-03-01 | 株式会社Ihi | Energy system optimization program, energy system optimization method, and energy system optimization device |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP5412332B2 (en) * | 2010-03-05 | 2014-02-12 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Generator operation plan determination device, generator operation plan determination method, and generator operation plan determination program |
EP3016229B1 (en) * | 2013-06-27 | 2017-08-09 | Panasonic Corporation | Power adjustment device, power adjustment method, power adjustment system, power storage device, server, program |
-
2016
- 2016-10-28 JP JP2016212044A patent/JP6751006B2/en active Active
-
2017
- 2017-10-20 AU AU2017248557A patent/AU2017248557A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2017-10-24 TW TW106136468A patent/TWI652591B/en active
-
2020
- 2020-01-23 AU AU2020200492A patent/AU2020200492A1/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP6751006B2 (en) | 2020-09-02 |
AU2017248557A1 (en) | 2018-05-17 |
JP2018073118A (en) | 2018-05-10 |
TWI652591B (en) | 2019-03-01 |
AU2020200492A1 (en) | 2020-02-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Mohanta et al. | Deterministic and stochastic approach for safety and reliability optimization of captive power plant maintenance scheduling using GA/SA-based hybrid techniques: A comparison of results | |
Diaz et al. | The importance of time resolution, operational flexibility and risk aversion in quantifying the value of energy storage in long-term energy planning studies | |
Murage et al. | Contribution of pumped hydro storage to integration of wind power in Kenya: An optimal control approach | |
JP4946691B2 (en) | Equipment plan support apparatus, support method and program for electric and heat cogeneration system | |
Tejada-Arango et al. | Representation of storage operations in network-constrained optimization models for medium-and long-term operation | |
JP6582758B2 (en) | Power generation plan creation device, power generation plan creation program, and power generation plan creation method | |
JP2017174277A (en) | Operation planning calculation apparatus, operation planning calculation method, and operation planning calculation program | |
JP5178032B2 (en) | Generator output amount determination system, method and program | |
JP2016093016A (en) | Operation plan generating device, operation plan generation device and program | |
Olivares et al. | Representing energy price variability in long-and medium-term hydropower optimization | |
JP2015125643A (en) | Facility planning method, program and device for distributed energy system | |
JP2018173837A (en) | Prediction device, prediction system, prediction method and program | |
Tică et al. | Annual performance estimation of a multireservoir system including a pumped storage plant for the mean hydrological year | |
WO2024114018A1 (en) | Power-generation performance evaluation method and apparatus for wind generating set | |
Krishnan et al. | Building foresight in long-term infrastructure planning using end-effect mitigation models | |
TW201824044A (en) | Operation plan creating apparatus, operation plan creating method, and program | |
JP6668209B2 (en) | Plan creation device, plan creation method, program, data, and generator control device | |
TW201824043A (en) | Operation plan creating apparatus, operation plan creating method, and program | |
Helseth et al. | SOVN Model Implementation: method, functionality and details | |
CN115796357A (en) | Method and device for predicting raw material demand of power system | |
Warland et al. | Use of parallel processing in applications for hydro power scheduling–current status and future challenges | |
Bischoff et al. | Economic objectives, uncertainties and decision making in the energy sector | |
TWI716669B (en) | Operation plan preparation device, operation plan preparation method, and operation plan preparation program | |
JP2017173945A (en) | Contract power optimization device | |
JP2018013934A (en) | Power price prediction device |