TW201642186A - System and method for managing interactive content - Google Patents

Abstract

A system and method for managing a workbook in a learning environment where a first user receives a book in electronic form, completes the activity embedded in the book and submits the activity to a second user via a server. The second user can then provide feedback regarding the activity to the first user and all inputs can be done without requiring an internet connection.

Description

System and method for managing interactive content

The present invention relates to a system and method for managing interactive content, such as, but not limited to, a workbook in an e-learning environment.

The one-year mobile device (eg, smart phone and tablet) application proposed by Horizon Report 2011 mentions that all senior students are actually expected to carry mobile devices in developed countries. K-12 schools are also gradually seeing the potential of mobile devices and note that not only are these devices themselves less expensive than most laptop devices, they also require less infrastructure support. Conversely, in Singapore, the penetration rate of Personal Computer (PC) with at least one child in school is up to 100% due to the extensive and highly successful program of Singapore schools. Therefore, schools in Singapore and overseas are looking for ways to use this rapid application of mobile devices to provide a learning experience that will give their students a deeper understanding. At present, the learning management system in schools has begun to use the trend of rapid application of mobile devices; however, interesting evidence shows that the adoption of educators and students is not encouraging.

It is hoped that this trend will be due to the proliferation of portable computer devices, although not always connected to the Internet. Compared to printing and some extremely lightweight digital textbooks (with tablet or wisdom) The flat-panel representation of the weight of the type of phone, the tablet in the form of a tablet and smart phone is more portable than before and also increases the possibility of realizing rich content.

Many content providers offer solutions that provide online access and no specific device access requirements - but the limitation is that in order to access the content, the devices need to be connected to the Internet and the bandwidth must be sufficient. The consumption of richer content, such as video, is huge and often highly correlated with the formal education of the students for the first 10 years.

As a result, educators seek solutions that must allow offline access to more content and provide online opportunities when needed.

Student-centered learning has become the goal of many educators, emphasizing the attraction of students and helping them understand ideas, rather than traditionally focusing on hard-backed learning and thinking about information during exams. These are bold goals that challenge teachers to transform their teaching, monitoring, assessment, and method of rating their students. For many teachers, this involves too many changes, and there are too many risks to bear, because they believe that the current method of assessing the extent of the exam through the exam is not catching up.

Therefore, the general notion of many educators is to take tentative steps toward this big goal, possibly starting with content that attracts learners and is related to learners, and that the content is allowed to educate people regularly to check whether their learners are A system support that understands an idea or does not have to ban his/her learning experience.

The requirements for learning assessment or formative assessment respond to the needs of the learner to understand and then learn. As Paul Black (2003) and other authors put forward several key elements of formative assessment, they can provide feedback by playing scores and effective inquiry, which becomes part of the teacher's work in the short term. The feedback from the scores basically requires the teacher to provide feedback/opinions about the student's homework, not the final score.

But this process requires constant "back and forth" interaction between the teacher and the student, although not There is instant. Today, the state of learning resources means that teachers need to constantly collect student's workbooks, provide feedback, return homework books to students, re-collect students' workbooks to review their opinions, and repeat the process as necessary. Each time a student pays his/her homework book to a teacher, the student has no resources to refer to, causing the learning process to be discontinuous.

The existing Learning Management System (LMS) is considered to solve the problems surrounding this interaction. However, conversations with teachers and LMS providers in Singapore and Hong Kong have shown that many teachers are not keen on using LMS as part of their formal teaching work.

The possible situation of presenting the current state of the LMS is as follows: to review the student's homework via the LMS requires a stable Internet on a device, and after logging in, the teacher will locate the student, then the subject, and then assign Special work. In addition to the need for a stable Internet connection, accessing a student's homework is a cumbersome process. Public opinion examines the homework itself and scores. If you multiply the number of students in several classes, it will take a long time to access the homework to be reviewed and evaluated.

The world's broadband infrastructure is not able to catch up with the incredibly rich content that comes with computing devices that can consume rich content. Therefore, many teachers advocate that LMS implement very basic functions. As a result, the interaction between students and teachers has not changed significantly, and LMS is still unable to achieve its vision for schools, although they actually exist in all K-12 schools in Singapore and Hong Kong.

The democratization of knowledge is an ongoing trend; however, learner-oriented learning methods are unlikely to occupy the heaviest position in the foreseeable future. For example, the obvious reasons are: the currently accepted assessment model, Collective views of unauthorized learning, etc. Therefore, teachers still play a central role in student learning, and teachers continue to dominate and determine how learners learn, when to learn, and what to learn.

This means that any developed system must consider the role of educators in the educational value chain, making learning relevant, practical, and applicable.

An LMS that lets learners know when a teacher is online is not suitable for teachers who want his/her privacy to be respected. Especially when there is an immediate interaction between the teacher and the student in the formal classroom and any after-school corrections.

Therefore, the teacher still wants to be able to keep privacy when accessing his/her students' homework so that they can be reviewed when possible or convenient.

Such systems require periodic synchronization of access to information between homework from multiple different devices, with caution to omit any instant messaging functionality.

The present invention provides a system that satisfies the educator's access to the student's homework and hopes to at least partially retain the need to review the flexibility or privacy of the homework.

Unless expressly stated to the contrary, the words "including", "consisting of", and similar words are considered to be non-exhaustive; in other words, the meaning is "including, but not limited to."

A first advantage of the system according to the invention is that teachers are able to teach more effectively and increase their productivity by being able to quickly access the workbook. This ensures that teachers get quick feedback on student learning. A second advantage of the system according to the invention is that the system is a stand-alone operating system and can operate between various devices without the need for an internet or network. This ensures that both the teacher and the student can use the lesson book with ease and freedom. A third advantage of the system according to the present invention is that the input can be submitted from the student in the form of a digital workbook and submitted from the teacher. This ensures that feedback is captured quickly and efficiently between the teacher and the student. A fourth advantage of the system according to the invention is that the teacher is able to customize the content of the workbook. This ensures that students are learning at the right speed. A fifth advantage of the system according to the invention is that it complies with the teacher's current workflow. This ensures that the present invention enhances the current workflow and provides an interactive and portable environment for access on all computing devices anytime, anywhere.

According to a first aspect of the present invention, the present invention provides a system for managing interactive content, comprising: a first computing device configured to receive interactive content including at least one activity, the at least one activity required Submitting an input to a first user; a second computing device configured to allow a second user to submit an opinion regarding the input of the first user; and a server arranged to Receiving an input or an opinion of the first or second computing device when the data connection exists; wherein the first and second computing devices are configured to detect whether a data connection with the server exists and is detected When the data connection of the server exists, prompting the first or second user to perform: i. synchronizing any activity in the interactive content of the server in which the first and second computing devices respectively have access rights; And ii. synchronizing any activity within the interactive content entered or given by the first or second user, wherein the first user input is increased to Activities of interactive content and the interactive content as an e-book.

According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system for managing interactive content, comprising: a first computing device configured to receive interactive content including at least one activity, the at least one activity required Submitting an input to a first user; a second computing device configured to allow a second user to submit an opinion regarding the input of the first user; and a server arranged to Receiving an input or an opinion of the first or second computing device when the data connection exists; wherein the server is configured to detect whether a data connection with the first or second computing device exists and is detected When the data connection of the first or second computing device is present: i. synchronizing any activity in the interactive content of the server in which the first and second computing devices respectively have access rights; and ii. respectively inputting or giving advice by the first or second user Any activity within the interactive content is synchronized, wherein the input of the first user is added to the activity of the interactive content and the interactive content is an e-book.

Preferably, the second user's opinion is added to the activity that the first user's input has been added to the interactive content.

Preferably, the system is a learning management system and the first user is a student and the second user is a teacher or a teacher.

Preferably, the activity is dynamically embedded in the e-book.

Preferably, the system further includes a security token operable to allow the first user or the second user to log into the server.

Preferably, the login further comprises secure verification by means of a unique identifier and a passcode for the first and second users.

Preferably, the server sends a notification to the first computing device when the server receives the at least one active comment.

Preferably, the first computing device is operative to receive another input from the first user in response to the at least one active opinion.

Preferably, when the first user submits multiple versions of the input, the server merges the multiple versions of the inputs by utilizing all versions of the input associated with the activity.

Preferably, when the first user submits multiple versions of the input, the server merges the multiple versions of the inputs by discarding the earlier version of the input.

Preferably, the first user submits the plurality of versions of the input to the servo Multiple versions of the inputs are merged by discarding the same input version with a smaller file size.

Preferably, the second computing device is configured to receive a score accompanying the second user's opinion.

Preferably, when a data connection is present, the server is operative to receive an instruction from the second computing device to combine one or more interactive content in the server.

Preferably, the first computing device is configured to receive text, graphics, graphics, photos, or a combination of one or more of the above as input.

Preferably, the second computing device is configured to receive text, graphics, graphics, photos, or a combination of one or more of the above as an opinion.

According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for managing interactive content, comprising the steps of: receiving, at a first computing device, interactive content comprising at least one activity, the at least one activity requiring submission of a An input to a user; submitting at least one activity with input from the first user to a server; receiving at least one activity having input from the first user at a second computing device; The user creates an opinion in response to at least one activity having the opinion of the second user; wherein the server is arranged to receive an input/comment of the first or second computing device when the data connection is present, The first and second computing devices are further configured to detect whether a data connection with the server is present and prompt the first or second user to perform when a data connection with the server is detected: i. synchronizing any activity in the interactive content of the server in which the first and second computing devices respectively have access rights; and ii. respectively by the first or the first Any activity within the interactive content to give input or feedback from users to be synchronized, wherein the first user input will be added to the activities of the interactive content and the interactive content as an e-book.

According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for managing interactive content, comprising the steps of: receiving, at a first computing device, interactive content comprising at least one activity, the at least one activity requiring a first An input to the user; submitting at least one activity having input to the first user to a server (received at a server); receiving at least a second user device having at least one input of the first user An activity; creating an opinion by a second user in response to the at least one activity; and submitting, by the second user, at least one activity having the opinion to the server; wherein the server is configured to use Detecting whether a data connection with the first or second computing device exists and detecting that a data connection with the first or second computing device exists: i. the first and second of the server Any activity within the interactive content of the computing device having access rights respectively synchronized; and ii. any of the interactive content entered or given by the first or second user respectively The activity is synchronized, wherein the input of the first user is added to the activity of the interactive content and the interactive content is an e-book.

Preferably, the second user's opinion is added to the activity that the first user's input has been added to the interactive content.

Preferably, the method is adapted for use in a learning management system wherein the first user is a student and the second user is a teacher or mentor.

Preferably, the activity is dynamically embedded in the e-book.

Preferably, the method further comprises the step of confirming the first user or the second user for accessing the interactive content or uploading any input/comment activity.

Preferably, the confirming step further comprises performing security verification by using the unique identifier and the password for the first and second users.

Preferably, the server receives the advice of the at least one activity at the server. A notification is sent to the first computing device.

Preferably, the first computing device receives another input from the first user in response to the at least one active opinion.

Preferably, when the first user submits multiple versions of the input, the server merges the multiple versions of the inputs by utilizing all versions of the input associated with the activity.

Preferably, when the first user submits multiple versions of the input, the server merges the multiple versions of the inputs by discarding the earlier version of the input.

Preferably, when the first user submits multiple versions of the input, the server merges the multiple versions of the inputs by discarding the same input version with a smaller file size.

Preferably, the second computing device is configured to receive a score accompanying the second user's opinion.

Preferably, when a data connection is present, the server is operative to receive an instruction from the second computing device to combine one or more interactive content in the server.

Preferably, the first computing device is configured to receive text, graphics, graphics, photos, or a combination of one or more of the above as input.

Preferably, the second computing device is configured to receive text, graphics, graphics, photos, or a combination of one or more of the above as an opinion.

According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a mobile device, wherein a processor is installed, the processor comprising a software instruction in the form of a software application, and when accessed by a user, the software instructions The mobile device acts as the first or second computing device.

According to a sixth aspect of the present invention, the present invention provides a computer readable medium containing a software instruction which, when executed by a computer, implements the present invention by the computer The method proposed in the third or fourth point of view.

100‧‧‧ system

110‧‧‧Tabletop client device

120‧‧‧iOS client device

130‧‧‧Android client device

140‧‧‧Server

150‧‧‧Content

160‧‧‧Database Server

170‧‧‧Database

180‧‧‧Submit

190‧‧‧Reward list

The invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: FIG. 1 is a system architecture of an embodiment of the invention showing how various components of the system interact.

2 is a flow chart showing how a user uses the system when the application is launched, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

3 is a diagram of a state machine in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

4 is a flow chart showing an authentication process of the system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

Figure 5 is a process flow diagram showing the synchronization process of an embodiment of the present invention.

The invention is susceptible to other permutations and, therefore, the drawings are not to be construed as limiting the generality of the foregoing description of the invention.

Specific embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the drawings. The terminology used herein is for the purpose of the description of the particular embodiments, In addition, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains, unless otherwise defined.

In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the present invention provides a system 100 for managing interactive content. Further explicitly referring to FIG. 1, wherein the system operates in the context of an e-learning environment comprising a teacher and a plurality of students, the system comprising a resident in a first computing device (used by a student) and a second computing device (by a teacher) Use the application in ). The first and second computing devices can be a desktop client device 110, an iOS client device 120, or an Android client device 130 that interacts with a server 140, particularly a network server 140. Further, the network The server 140 may be a Representational State Transfer ("RESTful") API server 140.

A software application that is installed in the first and second computing devices is compatible with the API server 140. Among the contacts of the "RESTful" API server, these software applications are APIs that meet the same restrictions. The interaction between the software applications (verbally referred to as "apps" installed in the first computing device 110, 120, 130) and the backend system interacts with the RESTful API through the RESTful API server 140. These APIs are designed using standard RESTful interface vocabulary and the interactive data format is JavaScript Object Notation (JSON). The interaction between the application and the RESTful API is handled on the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) with Secure Socket Layer (SSL). The system's domain-proven SSL provides the highest data security level with 256-bit encryption.

In a news flow example in the API, in order to check in the system, it can be achieved through confirmation, for example, by creating a user name and password through the account creation period, which triggers an application from the application. To the login API of the web server 140 (in this case, the RESTful API server), which will return an access token to the application upon successful login, and then the application will notify the user of the success. Sign in. In this case and in the examples below, the user is usually a student; however, the teacher is also able to access the same content as the student. The user can request information from the web server through the application, and the web server will return the user information and the book list, and the application will present the information. After successful login, the user requests a list of libraries through the application, and the application presents the username and access token to the server, which will access the database through the database server 160. The information is retrieved from the 170 and passed back to the application. The user then checks and installs the application.

The user will also request multiple orders through the application, which will query the server and obtain the book list, and the information will be updated in the user interface. The user The book is also requested to be downloaded, and is referred to as the Book API application, which transmits the username, access token, and bookID to the server, which then retrieves the book content from the database. These books will be compressed using a file format such as the zip file format to save space. The contents of the books are then archived by the application.

In the case of new users, they can log in through the application and enter information for the application, such as the username, password, and teacher's email, to send to the server. This will be post back as user information and the app will notify the user that they have successfully logged in. For teachers, the login may use different confirmation methods to determine their identity. Alternatively, user logins for both the teacher and the student can also be created and managed at the back end of the system, transparent to all users, who will then be separately notified of their username and password.

In the case of an event submission, the user submits an activity through the application. This triggers the Submission API, which submits the username, access token, and activity data (for example, in a compressed format) to the server. The server will notify the application that the submission has been successfully submitted or failed, and this will be passed to the user to take further action if necessary. The user can also request a list of activities submitted through the application, and the information will be returned by the server and displayed by the application. Therefore, the server will track the submissions 180. In cases where multiple submissions for an activity are resolved, the system also tracks the date and time and version at which the submissions were created.

From the teacher's point of view, using the same application, a feedback list 190 can be requested and displayed via a Feedback API. The feedback is submitted by the user via an application that submits the username, access token, and activity profile to the server. The server will notify the application that the submission has been successfully submitted or failed, and this will be passed to the user to take further action if necessary. The user can also request an event submitted through the application List, and this information will be returned by the server and displayed by the application.

The system is not only related to the three types of client devices resident in the application as shown in the figures, but those skilled in the art will be able to ensure that the system can also be used in other types of client devices.

In this system, the interactive content is a textbook or a workbook to be accessed on a PC and a mobile device executing an iOS or Android operating system. Content elements that require input from the student (and submitted for review) are synchronized from the client device (eg, A student) to another client device (eg, a teacher) via a central server. And vice versa. When there is no synchronization, the user accesses the e-book in the client device (tablet or PC) with the latest sync input.

The flowchart shown in Figure 2 describes an exemplary embodiment of how a user can use the system when the application is launched. During the login process 210, the identity of the user is verified and the system also captures the type of account being accessed, which can be an administrative account, a student account, or a teacher account. This login process 210 can be performed by a username and by password, or by a security token inserted into the device executing the application. On the server side, teacher accounts and student accounts can be organized into groups for interaction purposes, enabling a teacher to target a particular student account (for example, physical) Direct communication.

After logging in, the user will see a program inventory 220, which displays a list of books that the user is currently subscribed to. The user can also manage the subscription through the screen and add a book by searching through the online bookstore through the name of the book, the ISBN number, or any other unique identifier, and the book can be downloaded as a result. . Books can also be automatically unsubscribed manually or after a period of time. Once downloaded, the book can be configured and used. For example, the user can set the name of the teacher for the event submission as appropriate. Both the teacher account and the student account can access the book screen 230, which allows the teacher account and the student account The user accesses the book. The contents of the book can be searched using a search function and the results displayed in a panel side by side with other panels, which include a content panel that allows the user to quickly browse the book, for example, by The number of chapters and names are displayed, and the user is allowed to jump to the paragraphs by selecting paragraphs. The content panel also allows the user to jump to the various activities to be completed in each paragraph. The panel can also display a soundboard and a whiteboard that allows for interaction between users, for example, a teacher to a student or a student to a teacher. The soundboard is primarily a function of commenting, which can be linked to the material of the book to be displayed and which can be dominated by the teacher. The whiteboard is a drawing board that allows the teacher to explain the concept to the student and can be performed when the device screen is projected into the classroom.

The contents of the book in conjunction with the book display various activities at the same time, and such activities are similar to the blocks that the user can input into the input activity 240 step. Various questions or prompts will be displayed before each square and the input will be in the form of text, graphics, graphics, or photos. The number of inputs can be set to a limit to prevent memory overload. The blocks are dynamic and the application allows new blocks to be created next to the existing blocks by moving the contents of the book. This ensures that the inputs correspond to activities designed for the book content, for example, corresponding to the chapters of the material being taught. Although it is theoretically possible to create an unlimited number of blocks; however, for practical purposes and memory management, the number of blocks created for each activity may still be limited. The user will be prompted or manually selected to perform this step, submitting one or more activity inputs via the user submission 250, and upon completion, the user will return to the book screen 230 or program inventory 220. The book screen 230 also provides a calendar function that will also be displayed in a panel and will alert the user to the completion deadline for each event, which can be set by a teacher account. The book screen 230 also presents a synchronization option that allows the user to work offline and synchronize the book or activity with updates from the server when an internet connection exists. Alternatively, this sync option can also be enabled or activated by the user submitting 250. Because the user can Submit at any time and include multiple events in each submission, so there may be overlaps between these versions. In the other case, when the user logs in with different devices and creates duplicate inputs without being synchronized to the existing version. In this case, the system prompts the user that multiple versions of an activity exist and merges the activities when the user selects the merge. There should be more than one answer for each activity, and the system will display the answers and archive them. Alternatively, the system can use the latest version and discard the earlier version, depending on the system or user preferences. This will be further illustrated in Figure 5.

Each submitted activity will have a corresponding feedback box that the teacher can use to provide feedback, and after the login process 210, the program inventory 220 will provide the teacher with additional options for reviewing the submission 260, which the teacher can view in the option. All activities submitted by the student and the addition of feedback 270 to add feedback for each submission. The feedback will be in the form of text, graphics, graphics, photos, or a combination of these. The teacher can then choose to add more feedback to other students or activities, or tap the submit button in the feedback submission 280, which will submit all the activities that have been created back to the server and sent to the corresponding individual student. The notice will be provided to the student via email, text message or at the next time the student logs in to inform the student that their activity has been reviewed for a corresponding feedback. When the student next accesses the application, the book screen 230 will then pass back the feedback to be viewed. Then, the student will review the feedback, display the feedback box immediately after the corresponding activity, and because the content of the book is dynamic, all other contents of the book will be moved to accommodate the feedback box, and the student can even Add additional input to the activity as necessary. Depending on the activity, the student can submit again, so that the teacher can start the feedback process again.

A state machine diagram of an embodiment of the invention is shown in Figure 3 and shows the status of an application or computer program executing within the system. The figure has a state corresponding to the processing flow described in conjunction with FIG. 2 (using the same integer symbol), for example, the login process 310, the city inventory is 320, And a book screen 330. The activity will include multiple answers, and each answer can be entered in the form of text, graphics, charts, photos, or a combination of these. Each answer will also include multiple entries and the activity will be submitted 350, automatically submitted or manually submitted later if there is no internet connection at that time. Then, each answer will have a teacher reviewing the corresponding feedback provided by the teacher after submitting 360, and will add and end the review 370 before submitting the feedback 380. As mentioned previously, the student will be notified of the feedback 390 and the various activities and feedbacks can thus be synchronized 395 automatically or manually. A soundboard panel 385 is also shown to emphasize how the comment function fits the rest of the system.

An example of such a system is shown in Figure 4 as a possible option for the user, which includes a verification process, and a description of the various conditions would correspond to the process flow in Figure 2. The user may be a general user 420 having a special license for the student 410 to access a particular material (and no other student access); or a general user 420 having a special permission for the teacher 430. For example, the general user 420 can read the search, subscribe, and read the book, and if the general user 420 can log in, the security credentials are thus stored. Similarly, student 410 has the same rights to access additional answering activities, submit such activities online or offline, and retrieve feedback from such activities. The teacher 430 also has the same rights as the user with additional access to retrieve the submissions (from the student's activities) and provide feedback to the activities by subscribing to the submission if necessary. The system retrieves these security credentials based on the selected work as necessary to ensure that the system is secure and that different users access the correct content.

Figure 5 further illustrates the synchronization process of the application. In this embodiment, the system checks the activity and the inputs and after extracting the list of file versions from the server and repository 510, the system checks if a regional version is stored in the computing device (which can For personal computers or mobile devices, such as tablets or smart phones). In the case where the server version is newer than the regional version, if a regional change has been made 520, the system will Two versions are displayed to merge the two versions, the server version is above the regional version, and the merged version is uploaded to the server as an update to ensure that the merged version will be used later. If no regional changes are made, the system will overwrite the regional version with the server version. The regional version may always be overwritten with the server version due to user preferences. If the server version and the regional version are both substantially the same version, then the system will check that no further action will be taken without any regional changes 540. If a regional change has been made, the system will further check if it is in the same device, and if so, the server version has priority and the changes (regional) are uploaded to the server 550. If not in the same device, the system will merge the two versions by displaying two versions, the server version is above the regional version, and upload the merged version as an update to ensure the merged version. Will be used later 560 (similar to 520). If the server version is older than the regional version, the system will use the server version and upload the changes 570 (similar to 550). Alternatively, instead of comparing the dates of the versions, the system can also use other criteria, such as comparing the file sizes of the versions and assigning higher priority to larger file sizes of the two versions.

The portability of learning content means that students and teachers can access the content in any mobile device anytime, anywhere. This is different from online content that requires a stable Internet connection and an appropriately sized bandwidth for acceptable content consumption. The system requires the Internet only for synchronization and update purposes, and is not required for content access.

This allows the teacher to improve the quality and form of the work to be given to the student, as the previously common and mediocre family work will now become active due to the integration of video, audio, and animation, which constitutes the student in his The foundation of every question that you try to accomplish in your homework. The system also features student input functions that were previously unavailable, such as chart analysis, mathematical function input, ... and more.

These features have deep teaching implications because teachers are now able to provide multimodal challenges to students and ask them to provide the same multimodal answers.

One of the possible scenarios of the present invention is described below: Device Dispersion: 1-to-1 Calculation

- Each student has the same device, or - in a bring-your-own device environment, each student has a different device (for example, a portable, Android-based phone, iPhone, iPad, or Android tablet).

During class: the instructor will project a copy of the system on a screen or interactive whiteboard and use the various interactive components in the system to teach. Sometimes, teachers can invite students to do the same exercises in their own devices and then discuss them and present their answers to other classmates for discussion.

At the end of the class, the instructor assigns exercises to the students as homework, reminding them to archive the answers and connecting their devices to the Internet at the end of each night if they are not completed.

After class:

- The two students decided to make homework after school on the train or bus:

. Student A began to do homework through the iPad. Because Student A's iPad does not have a mobile data plan, any of her input will be stored on the iPad until she goes home and connects to the wireless network at home. At this point, all her input will be synced to the cloud.

. Student B does the same homework in his Samsung Galaxy SIII because his smart phone has action data planning, so any of his input is automatically synced to the cloud.

The questions asked by the two students are very different, from the fact that they have to enter mathematical formulas to digitally draw a chart and even take pictures and upload them as part of the answers to certain questions.

After returning home, students A and B continue to do their homework on the PC, which displays the latest copy of the e-book synced from the cloud.

At the same time, the two students will notice that their teachers have added some comments on their previous homework assignments and decided to review the pages of the previous homework and the opinions of the teachers.

- Teacher: When a person is to meet someone after school on the train, the teacher decides to use her iPad Mini without action data planning to review the assignments previously assigned to the student. However, because she had synchronized her e-book on the school's wireless network just before she left school, the e-books collected by her iPad Mini should be up-to-date. She saw that most of the students had submitted partial input in their assigned assignments, except for the two students who had noted the mental note to be completed the next day.

When the teacher reviewed each of Student A's questions, she decided to launch the "Add New Opinions" feature to add new comments to each of Student A's answers. In some cases, she will “overlay her answer” on Student A, for example, to draw the correct curve in the provided chart space.

Once she has completed a review of a topic, she will decide whether to archive or archive her opinion and upload her opinion the next time she has an internet connection. This feedback feature allows the teacher to provide feedback to the student with the answers they have received, and the student will be notified of the feedback of the submitted answer the next time they log in. The student can then further correct the answer and submit as necessary, thus restarting the process.

During the meeting, the teacher noticed that there was a free wireless network available and connected her iPad Mini to the wireless network. Any of her input will be uploaded to the cloud and her student's latest input will be downloaded from the cloud to her iPad Mini.

When students and teachers return to the classroom the next time they go to class, the teacher can take any of her The student’s homework is projected on the screen and part of the answer is discussed with other classmates in the class.

The features of the system proposed by the present invention allow the teacher to enhance and correct their workflow in the following manner:

- Teachers no longer need to actually collect homework books and her students have no study materials. She can open the student's book and review it as long as she opens her homework book version.

- The workflow of the teacher section has not changed significantly, so it is very easy to adopt.

- The system is simple to use and friendly to teachers, thus minimizing the need for teachers to learn how to use the system.

- The system does not require complex Internet construction during class, so there is no technical difficulty in making mistakes or delays in each class.

- The system allows teachers to review and evaluate students' homework anytime, anywhere, regardless of the presence of mobile devices and Internet connections.

In the current system using printed homework paper, the teacher spends about a week (7 days) to send back a set of homework papers submitted by her students. In some cases where the teacher may be overworked for various reasons, the student may not have homework paper for more than 6 weeks. This can seriously reduce the learning productivity of students.

Let the system not remove the student's learning materials due to unstable Internet connections or the teacher must examine the student's input meaning that the student must access the learning resources. This is a unique argument of the system.

The rich media content as part of the learning resources is an important requirement for today's exploratory learning. Face-to-face interviews and field studies of teachers in regional schools have found that this content, such as precise implementation, can increase learning productivity by up to 200%, compared to teaching using current teaching methods, and students learn key concepts in half the time.

Currently, the most widely used homework paper is still in printed form. These questions may be Produced by the instructor itself, or by approved printed textbooks and homework publishers.

In order to solve the potential decline in learning productivity caused by the collection of workbooks to students, some publishers have begun to create homework books with perforated homework papers, which allows students to separate individual homework books from homework books. Submit it to the teacher for review. Although it is recommended, this method imposes two additional burdens on students and their teachers:

a. Increase the cost of the workbook because they are now more expensive to print and staple.

b. Students must properly file their homework papers and teachers must regularly check their files to ensure that they are all in the correct order. This will significantly reduce the productivity of teachers.

The deployment of the system eases the aforementioned burden on teachers and students. The incompatibility of its Internet and background data synchronization features also means that access to learning content is no longer subject to stable Internet connectivity, unlike Internet-based systems (eg, web browsers and LMS). The content provided is provided.

One embodiment of a system for managing a homework book in a learning environment has been described above. It is conceivable that those skilled in the art will be able and will be able to devise alternative embodiments of the invention within the scope of the invention. In particular, it should be understood that features of different embodiments may be combined to form one or more additional embodiments.

100‧‧‧ system

110‧‧‧Tabletop client device

120‧‧‧iOS client device

130‧‧‧Android client device

140‧‧‧Server

150‧‧‧Content

160‧‧‧Database Server

170‧‧‧Database

180‧‧‧Submit

190‧‧‧Reward list

Claims (34)

A system for managing interactive content, comprising: a first computing device configured to receive interactive content including at least one activity, the at least one activity requiring submission of a first user input; a second a computing device configured to allow a second user to submit an opinion regarding the input of the first user; and a server arranged to receive the first or second computing device when the data connection is present The input or the comment; wherein the first and second computing devices are configured to detect whether a data connection with the server exists, and prompt the first when a data connection with the server is detected to exist Or the second user performs: i. synchronizing any activity in the interactive content of the server in which the first and second computing devices respectively have access rights; and ii. respectively using the first or second use Any activity within the interactive content entered or given by the user is synchronized, wherein the input of the first user is added to the activity of the interactive content, and the interactive content is one E-book. A system for managing interactive content, comprising: a first computing device configured to receive interactive content including at least one activity, the at least one activity requiring submission of a first user input; a second a computing device configured to allow a second user to submit an opinion regarding the input of the first user; and a server arranged to receive the first or second computing device when the data connection is present Input or opinion; Wherein the server is configured to detect whether a data connection with the first or second computing device is present and when detecting a presence of a data connection with the first or second computing device: i. Any activity in the interactive content of the first and second computing devices having access rights respectively synchronized by the server; and ii. respectively within the interactive content input or given by the first or second user Any activity is synchronized, wherein the input of the first user is added to the activity of the interactive content, and the interactive content is an e-book. The system of claim 1 or 2, wherein the second user's opinion is added to the activity that the first user's input has been added to the interactive content. A system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the system is a learning management system and the first user is a student and the second user is a teacher or a teacher. According to the system of claim 3, wherein the activity is dynamically embedded in the e-book. The system of claim 1 or 2, further comprising a security token operable to cause the first user or the second user to log into the server. The system of claim 6 wherein the login further comprises security verification via a unique identifier and a passcode for the first and second users. A system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the server sends a notification to the first computing device when the server receives the advice of the at least one activity. The system of claim 8 wherein the first computing device is operative to receive another input from the first user in response to the at least one active opinion. The system of claim 1 or 2, wherein the first user submits the When multiple versions of the input are entered, the server merges multiple versions of the inputs by utilizing all versions of the input associated with the activity. The system of claim 1 or 2, wherein when the first user submits the plurality of versions of the input, the server merges the plurality of inputs by discarding the earlier version of the input version. The system of claim 1 or 2, wherein when the first user submits the plurality of versions of the input, the server merges the version by discarding the same input version having a smaller file size Wait for multiple versions of the input. The system of claim 1 or 2, wherein the second computing device is configured to receive a score accompanying the opinion of the second user. The system of claim 1 or 2, wherein when a data connection is present, the server is operative to receive from the second computing device to combine one or more interactions in the server The instruction of the content. The system of claim 1 or 2, wherein the first computing device is configured to receive text, graphics, graphics, photographs, or a combination of one or more of the above as input. The system of claim 1 or 2, wherein the second computing device is configured to receive text, graphics, graphics, photographs, or a combination of one or more of the above as an opinion. A method for managing interactive content, comprising the steps of: receiving, at a first computing device, interactive content including at least one activity, the at least one activity requiring submission of a first user input; submitting the first use At least one activity input by the user is provided to a server; and at least one activity having the input of the first user is received at a second computing device; Creating a comment by a second user in response to having the at least one activity; and submitting, by the second user, at least one activity having the opinion to the server; wherein the server is arranged to be used in the data Receiving an input or an opinion of the first or second computing device when the connection exists, the first and second computing devices are further configured to detect whether a data connection with the server exists and is detecting the servo Presenting the data connection of the device to the first or second user to: i. synchronize any activity in the interactive content of the server in which the first and second computing devices respectively have access rights; and ii Synchronizing any activity within the interactive content entered or given by the first or second user, wherein the input of the first user is added to the activity of the interactive content, and the interactive content For an e-book. A method for managing interactive content, comprising the steps of: receiving, at a first computing device, interactive content including at least one activity, the at least one activity requiring an input from a first user; submitting the first use At least one activity input by the user is provided to a server (received at a server); at least one activity having an input of the first user is received at a second computing device; responsive to the second user by the second user Creating an opinion for at least one activity; and submitting, by the second user, at least one activity having the opinion to the server; wherein the server is configured to detect the first or second computing device Whether the data connection exists and is detected when the data connection with the first or second computing device is detected: i. the first and second computing devices in the server respectively have access rights interaction Synchronizing any activity within the content; and ii. synchronizing any activity within the interactive content entered or given by the first or second user, wherein the first user's input is increased The activity to the interactive content, and the interactive content is an e-book. The method of claim 17 or 18, wherein the second user's opinion is added to the activity that the first user's input has been added to the interactive content. The method of claim 17 or 18, wherein the method is adapted to be used in a learning management system, wherein the first user is a student and the second user is a teacher or a mentor. The method of claim 19, wherein the activity is dynamically embedded in the e-book. The method of claim 17 or 18, further comprising the step of identifying a first user or a second user for accessing the interactive content or uploading any input/opinion activity. The method of claim 22, wherein the confirming step further comprises performing security verification via the unique identifier and the passcode for the first and second users. The method of claim 17 or 18, wherein the server sends a notification to the first computing device when the server receives the advice of the at least one activity. The method of claim 24, wherein the first computing device receives another input from the first user in response to the at least one active opinion. The method of claim 17 or 18, wherein when the first user submits the plurality of versions of the input, the server utilizes the input related to the activity There are versions that incorporate multiple versions of these inputs. The method of claim 17 or 18, wherein when the first user submits the plurality of versions of the input, the server merges the plurality of inputs by discarding the earlier version of the input version. The method of claim 17 or 18, wherein when the first user submits the plurality of versions of the input, the server merges the version by discarding the same input version having a smaller file size Wait for multiple versions of the input. The method of claim 17 or 18, wherein the second computing device is configured to receive a score accompanying the second user's opinion. The method of claim 17 or 18, wherein when a data connection is present, the server is operative to receive from the second computing device to combine one or more interactions in the server The instruction of the content. The method of claim 17 or 18, wherein the first computing device is configured to receive text, graphics, graphics, photographs, or a combination of one or more of the above as input. The method of claim 17 or 18, wherein the second computing device is configured to receive text, graphics, graphics, photographs, or a combination of one or more of the above as an opinion. A mobile device, wherein a processor is installed, the processor includes a software instruction in the form of a software application, and when accessed by a user, the software instructions cause the mobile device to function as in the first patent application scope The first or second computing device of item 2, 17 or 18. A computer readable medium containing a software instruction that, when executed by a computer, causes the computer to perform a method according to claim 17 or 18.