TW201510905A - Strategic trading method - Google Patents

Strategic trading method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
TW201510905A
TW201510905A TW102131567A TW102131567A TW201510905A TW 201510905 A TW201510905 A TW 201510905A TW 102131567 A TW102131567 A TW 102131567A TW 102131567 A TW102131567 A TW 102131567A TW 201510905 A TW201510905 A TW 201510905A
Authority
TW
Taiwan
Prior art keywords
processor
price
weighting factors
intensity equation
facet
Prior art date
Application number
TW102131567A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
Han-Ming Hsieh
Original Assignee
Han-Ming Hsieh
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Han-Ming Hsieh filed Critical Han-Ming Hsieh
Priority to TW102131567A priority Critical patent/TW201510905A/en
Publication of TW201510905A publication Critical patent/TW201510905A/en

Links

Abstract

A strategic trading method includes using a processor to provide an initial intensity formula. The initial intensity formula includes a plurality of primary determinants and a plurality of weighting factors corresponding to the primary determinants. The strategic trading method further includes using the processor to optimize the weighting factors so as to generate an updated intensity formula according to previous trading data.

Description

策略交易方法 Strategic trading method

本發明係關於一種策略交易方法,尤指一種根據買進賣出的強度資訊提供投資建議的策略交易方法。 The present invention relates to a strategic trading method, and more particularly to a strategic trading method for providing investment advice based on the strength information of buying and selling.

在先前的策略交易方法中,例如市面上可見之投資輔助軟體的使用方法,已經存在以下功能:使用處理器搭配市場公開資料庫以自動化分析市場數據與相對應之多種統計線型,並於預先設定的預設條件滿足時,據以通知使用者。舉例來說,當一使用者使用一與股市交易公開資料庫連線的互動式投資輔助軟體時,該使用者可事先自行設定當一個或複數個預設條件滿足時,例如法人連續三日買超一特定個股時,命令該處理器發出一訊號至該使用者的行動裝置,通知該使用者預設條件已滿足。在先前技術之另一例子中,該使用者亦可設定當根據特定個股或大盤走勢相關統計數據得到的統計線型,與一典型線型相符合時,即由該處理器發出一提醒訊號至該使用者的行動裝置。例如:當特定個股之K線(Candlestick chart)線型與投資輔助軟體資料庫中儲存的經典K線分析教材「酒田戰法」中建議作多的「紅三兵」線型相同時,處理器可辨識出K線線型「紅三兵」已經發生,若使用者先前已設定「紅三兵」線型出現為預設條件,該處理器即會發出通知。又例如在先前技術中,使用者可針對一特定個股之股價予以監測,並於滿足事先指定的一個或複數個特定預設條件例如「連續五分鐘一路走高」或「跌停鎖住」發生時,處理器可辨識出該些條件的發生,並發出訊號至該使用者的行動裝置通知該使用者。以上先前技術之舉例雖以股市為例,但先前技術亦可協助 使用者掌握其他投資領域如匯市或期貨交易的價量變化與統計線型變化,並於該些變化滿足預設條件時,由處理器發出訊號通知該使用者。請參考第1圖,此為先前技術中,其預設條件之設定介面。由第1圖可見到,使用者可針對系統提供的各種條件,審視後點選「通知我」,後續即可在該條件滿足時,收到處理器發送之通知。 In the previous strategy trading methods, such as the use of the investment assistance software available on the market, the following functions have been used: using the processor and the market open database to automatically analyze the market data and corresponding multiple statistical line types, and pre-set The user is notified when the preset condition is met. For example, when a user uses an interactive investment assistance software that is connected to the stock market open database, the user can set in advance when one or more preset conditions are met, for example, the legal person buys for three consecutive days. When a specific number of shares are exceeded, the processor is instructed to send a signal to the user's mobile device to notify the user that the preset condition has been met. In another example of the prior art, the user can also set a statistical line type obtained according to statistical data related to a particular stock or market trend. When a typical line type is met, the processor sends a reminder signal to the use. The mobile device. For example, when the specific line of the Candlestick chart and the classic K-line analysis textbook stored in the investment assistance software database are the same as the recommended "Red Three Soldiers" line type, the processor can recognize The K-line type "Red Three Soldiers" has already occurred. If the user has previously set the "Red Three Soldiers" line type to appear as a preset condition, the processor will issue a notification. For another example, in the prior art, the user can monitor the stock price of a particular stock, and when one or a plurality of predetermined preset conditions specified in advance, such as "five minutes all the way up" or "downstop lock" occurs, The processor can recognize the occurrence of the conditions and send a signal to the user's mobile device to notify the user. The above examples of prior art use the stock market as an example, but the prior art can also assist The user grasps the price changes and statistical linear changes of other investment fields such as foreign exchange markets or futures trading, and when the changes meet the preset conditions, the processor sends a signal to notify the user. Please refer to FIG. 1 , which is a setting interface of preset conditions in the prior art. As can be seen from Figure 1, the user can select "Notify Me" after reviewing the various conditions provided by the system, and then receive a notification sent by the processor when the condition is met.

面對市場上繁雜的價量變化、各式線型變化與其他諸多投資決策需考量的因素,先前技術僅能逐一設定預設條件,再以處理器判斷預設條件是否發生。因此,先前技術僅能在各種預設條件發生時通知使用者,對於企圖對市場資訊作更細膩全盤考量的使用者,先前技術無法幫助使用者考量各種市場變化導致的綜合效應,顯得過於簡化與零碎。先前技術亦無法呈現投資決策時各項主決定構面,例如價格動能面、基本面、技術面、籌碼面、形勢面及/或壓力支撐面,對於投資結果的影響力與重要性。因此,先前技術作為輔助使用者監測市場的方法,有太過零碎及太過簡化的缺點。 In the face of the complicated price changes in the market, various linear changes and other factors that need to be considered in many investment decisions, the prior art can only set the preset conditions one by one, and then judge whether the preset conditions occur by the processor. Therefore, the prior art can only inform the user when various preset conditions occur. For users who attempt to make more detailed and comprehensive considerations of market information, the prior art cannot help the user to consider the comprehensive effects caused by various market changes, which is too simplified and Fragmented. The prior art is also unable to present the main decisions of the investment decision, such as price kinetic energy, fundamentals, technical, chip, situation and/or pressure support, the impact and importance of the investment results. Therefore, the prior art as a method of assisting the user in monitoring the market has the disadvantage of being too fragmentary and too simplistic.

本發明之一實施例揭露一種策略交易方法,包含使用一處理器提供一起始強度方程式以調整投資組合,該起始強度方程式包含複數個主決定構面及複數個對應之權重因數,以及使用該處理器根據先前交易資料最佳化該複數個權重因數以產生一已更新之強度方程式,據以調整投資組合。 An embodiment of the present invention discloses a policy transaction method, including using a processor to provide a starting strength equation for adjusting a portfolio, the starting strength equation including a plurality of main decision facets and a plurality of corresponding weight factors, and using the The processor optimizes the plurality of weighting factors based on previous transaction data to generate an updated intensity equation to adjust the portfolio.

201‧‧‧處理器 201‧‧‧ processor

202‧‧‧市場公開資料庫 202‧‧‧Market open database

203‧‧‧與處理器連結之資料庫 203‧‧‧Database linked to the processor

204‧‧‧手持式電子設備及/或一個人電腦 204‧‧‧Handheld electronic devices and/or one-person computers

401、402、403‧‧‧步驟 401, 402, 403‧‧ steps

第1圖為先前技術中,預設條件之設定介面。 Fig. 1 is a setting interface of a preset condition in the prior art.

第2圖為本發明之一實施例之設置方式的示意圖。 Fig. 2 is a schematic view showing the arrangement of an embodiment of the present invention.

第3圖為K線分析教材「酒田戰法」中的典型線型。 The third picture shows the typical line type in the K-line analysis textbook "The Law of the Wine Field".

第4圖為本發明之方法流程圖。 Figure 4 is a flow chart of the method of the present invention.

下文依本發明策略交易方法,特舉實施例配合所附圖式作詳細說明,但所提供之實施例並非用以限制本發明所涵蓋的範圍。 The following is a detailed description of the present invention in accordance with the present invention, and the embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.

請參考第2圖。第2圖為本發明之一實施例之設置方式的示意圖。如第2圖所示,本實施例包含一處理器201,一市場公開資料庫202,一與處理器連結之資料庫203以及一手持式電子設備及/或一個人電腦204。其中,處理器201可從市場公開資料庫202擷取複數個主決定構面對應之構面因素的資料,據以計算買進訊號強度I,並進一步根據買進訊號強度I提供調整投資組合之建議到使用者的手持式電子裝置及/或個人電腦204。與處理器連結之資料庫203則預存有特定模式的各種線型,作為處理器201比對之用。主決定購面可為價格動能面、基本面、技術面、籌碼面、形勢面、壓力支撐面等。每一主決定購面包含至少一構面因素,例如基本面即包含月營收成長率、每股盈餘成長率與毛利率成長率等構面因素。上述之根據買進訊號強度I提供調整投資組合之建議,可例如為根據買進訊號強度I,調整買進賣出策略、停利停損策略與資金運用策略。 Please refer to Figure 2. Fig. 2 is a schematic view showing the arrangement of an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 2, the embodiment includes a processor 201, a market disclosure database 202, a database 203 coupled to the processor, and a handheld electronic device and/or a personal computer 204. The processor 201 may retrieve the data of the face factor corresponding to the plurality of main decision facets from the market disclosure database 202, calculate the buy signal strength I, and further provide the adjusted investment portfolio according to the purchase signal strength I. It is recommended to the user's handheld electronic device and/or personal computer 204. The database 203 connected to the processor pre-stores various line types of a specific mode and is used as the processor 201 for comparison. The main decision to purchase the face can be the price kinetic energy surface, the fundamental surface, the technical surface, the chip surface, the situation surface, the pressure support surface and the like. Each main decision purchase contains at least one facet factor, for example, the fundamentals include face-to-face factors such as monthly revenue growth rate, earnings per share growth rate and gross profit margin growth rate. The above suggestions for adjusting the investment portfolio according to the buy signal strength I may, for example, adjust the buy and sell strategy, the stop loss stop strategy and the fund utilization strategy according to the buy signal strength I.

第2圖之實施例揭露一種策略交易方法,包含使用處理器201提供一起始強度方程式,該起始強度方程式包含複數個主決定構面及複數個對應之權重因數,以及使用處理器201根據先前交易資料最佳化該複數個權重因數以產生一已更新之強度方程式。該起始強度方程式如下式所示:;其中 The embodiment of FIG. 2 discloses a policy transaction method including providing a starting strength equation using a processor 201, the starting strength equation including a plurality of main decision facets and a plurality of corresponding weight factors, and using the processor 201 according to the previous The transaction data optimizes the plurality of weighting factors to produce an updated intensity equation. The initial intensity equation is as follows: ;among them

展開後可得 其中I表示買進訊號強度;X1至Xn各自表示第1至第n個主決定構面,其中n為正整數且n>1;Wa表示對應於Xa,即第a個主決定構面的權重因數,其中a為正整數且n≧a≧1;以及Xai即Xa1、Xa2、Xa3...表示第a個主決定構面包含的構面因素,由於每一個主決定構面包含的構面因素個數並不固定,因此算式中的Σ不設上限。 Available after expansion Wherein I represents the buy signal strength; X 1 to X n each represent the 1st to nth main decision facets, where n is a positive integer and n>1; W a represents a corresponding to X a , ie the a-th main decision The weighting factor of the facet, where a is a positive integer and n≧a≧1; and X ai ie X a1, X a2, X a3 ... represent the facet factor contained in the a-th main decision facet, since each The number of facet factors included in the main decision facet is not fixed, so There is no upper limit in the formula.

上式(A)中,買進訊號強度I為針對一投資項目,例如一特定個股,經加權計算後加總得到的總評分。買進訊號強度I的值越大,表示交易成功機率亦越高,因此也越建議買進該投資項目,此外,買進資金部位亦可隨之加碼放大。於計算起始時,買進訊號強度I有一預設起始值。 In the above formula (A), the buy signal strength I is a total score obtained by weighting the calculation for an investment item, such as a specific stock. The greater the value of the buy signal strength I, the higher the probability of successful trading, so the more it is recommended to buy the investment project, in addition, the purchase of funds can also be amplified. At the beginning of the calculation, the buy signal strength I has a preset starting value.

上式中,對應於第1至第n個主決定構面的權重因數W1至Wn於計算起始時,亦各自有一預設起始值。本發明係藉由權重因數Wa對第a個主決定構面Xa予以加權,據以調整與表示主決定構面Xa對於買進訊號強度I的影響力與重要程度。 In the above formula, the weighting factors W 1 to W n corresponding to the first to nth main decision surface planes also each have a preset starting value at the start of the calculation. In the present invention, the a-th main decision facet X a is weighted by the weighting factor W a to adjust and influence the influence and importance of the main decision facet X a on the buy signal strength I.

根據本發明之一實施例,將主決定構面係為股價動能面、基本面、技術面、籌碼面、形勢面、壓力支撐面時,說明如下: 股價能動面可由複數個構面因素組成,其可包含當日市值漲跌幅、u日市值漲跌幅、股價是否創當期新高及創新高的程度、股價是否創當期新低及創新低的程度、當日成交量為昨日成交量的幾倍、當日成交量為v日平均成交量的幾倍、當日盤中最大單筆成交量為昨日最大單筆成交量的幾倍以及當日預估成交量為w日成交量的幾倍,其中u、v及w係為可由使用者設定的正整數,且每個構面因素均可由市場公開資料庫202取得並轉換為一評分。 According to an embodiment of the present invention, when the main decision surface is the stock kinetic energy surface, the fundamental surface, the technical surface, the chip surface, the surface surface, and the pressure support surface, the description is as follows: The stock price can be composed of a plurality of facet factors, which can include the market value of the day, the market value of the day, the rise or fall of the market value, whether the stock price hits the current high and the high level of innovation, whether the stock price hits the current low and the low level of innovation. The trading volume of the day was several times of yesterday's trading volume, the trading volume of the day was several times of the average daily trading volume, the largest single trading volume of the day was several times of the largest single trading volume yesterday, and the estimated trading volume of the day was Several times the transaction volume of w, where u, v, and w are positive integers that can be set by the user, and each facet factor can be obtained by the market public database 202 and converted into a score.

舉例來說,若將主決定構面「股價能動面」設為X1,且將組成股價能動面的複數個構面因素中之一構面因素「當日成交量為v日平均成交量的幾倍」設為Y11(v),且對應於Y11(v)之評分設為X11,並可由使用者設定v之值,則處理器201可由市場公開資料庫202取得當日成交量與近v日平均成交量,計算當日成交量為近v日平均成交量的幾倍,並進一步將之轉換為一評分X11。例如,當使用者設定v=5時,Y11(5)=當日成交量÷近5日平均成交量,然後可根據預先儲存於處理器201或與處理器連結之資料庫203的內建對照表,將此結果轉換為一評分。該對照表可例如下列所示: For example, if the main decision facet "share price active face" is set to X 1 and one of the multiple facet factors that constitute the active face of the stock price is the face factor "the daily trading volume is the average daily trading volume of v. "Multiply" is set to Y 11 (v), and the score corresponding to Y 11 (v) is set to X 11 , and the value of v can be set by the user, and the processor 201 can obtain the daily transaction volume and the near market from the market disclosure database 202. v Average daily trading volume, calculate the daily trading volume as several times the average daily trading volume, and further convert it into a rating X 11 . For example, when the user sets v=5, Y 11 (5)=the current day volume is close to the average daily volume of 5 days, and then can be based on the built-in comparison stored in the processor 201 or the database 203 connected to the processor. Table, convert this result to a rating. The comparison table can be as follows, for example:

當Y11(5)=當日成交量÷近5日平均成交量=1.03時,查上表可知構面因素「當日成交量為v日平均成交量的幾倍」的評分X11為0分,其運算過程整理如下:欲考慮構面因素「當日成交量為v日平均成交量的幾倍」,由使用者設定v=5; →Y11(5)=當日成交量÷近5日平均成交量=1.03;→查表;→得X11=0;→將X11=0代回強度方程式(A)。 When Y 11 (5)=the daily trading volume is close to the average daily trading volume of 5.03, the table can be found that the facet factor “the daily trading volume is several times the average daily trading volume”, the score X 11 is 0 points. The calculation process is organized as follows: To consider the facet factor "the daily trading volume is several times the average daily trading volume", the user sets v=5; →Y 11 (5)=the daily trading volume is nearly 5 days average transaction Quantity = 1.03; → look up the table; → get X 11 =0; → return X 11 =0 to the intensity equation (A).

此評分係用以表示該構面因素代表的事件發生的程度與重要性。 This rating is used to indicate the extent and importance of the event represented by the facet factor.

又例如當Y11(5)=當日成交量÷近5日平均成交量=0.3時,查上表可知構面因素「當日成交量為v日平均成交量的幾倍」的評分X11為-1分,其運算過程整理如下:欲考慮構面因素「當日成交量為v日平均成交量的幾倍」,由使用者設定v=5;→Y11(5)=當日成交量÷近5日平均成交量=1.03;→查表;→得X11=-1;→將X11=-1代回強度方程式(A)。 For example, when Y 11 (5) = the daily trading volume is close to the average daily trading volume of 5 days = 0.3, the table can be found that the facet factor "the daily trading volume is several times the average daily trading volume" X 11 is - 1 point, the calculation process is organized as follows: To consider the facet factor "the daily trading volume is several times the average daily trading volume", the user sets v=5; →Y 11 (5)=the daily trading volume is close to 5 Daily average volume = 1.03; → look up the table; → get X 11 = -1; → return X 11 = -1 to the intensity equation (A).

此評分係用以表示該構面因素代表的事件發生的程度與重要性。同理,其餘構面因素亦可由是市場公開資料庫202擷取資訊後,再經由此計算過程與查表方式,分別得到相對應之評分,以代回強度方程式(A)。 This rating is used to indicate the extent and importance of the event represented by the facet factor. In the same way, the remaining facet factors can also be obtained by the market public database 202, and then the corresponding scores are obtained through the calculation process and the look-up table method, respectively, to replace the intensity equation (A).

基本面可由複數個構面因素組成,其可包含月營收成長、每股盈餘季成長、毛利率季成長以及股本回報率季成長,且每個構面因素均可由市場公開資料庫202取得並轉換為一評分。 The fundamentals may consist of a plurality of facet factors, which may include monthly revenue growth, earnings per share growth, gross margin quarterly growth, and equity return quarterly growth, and each facet factor may be obtained from the market disclosure database 202 and Convert to a rating.

舉例來說,若將主決定構面「基本面」設為X2,且將組成基本面的複數個構面因素中之一構面因素「每股盈餘季成長」設為Y21,並將對應於Y21之評分設為X21,則處理器201可由市場公開資料庫202取得一投資項目之本季每股盈餘與上季每股盈餘,計算後根據例如下表得到相對應之評分: For example, if the main decision facet "Fundamental Plane" is set to X 2 and one of the plurality of facet factors that constitute the fundamental face factor is "Year of earnings per share" is set to Y 21 and The score corresponding to Y 21 is set to X 21 , and the processor 201 can obtain the earnings per share of the investment project and the earnings per share of the previous quarter from the market disclosure database 202, and calculate the corresponding score according to, for example, the following table:

當Y21=每股盈餘季成長=本季每股盈餘÷上季每股盈餘-1=0.33時,查上表可知構面因素「每股盈餘季成長」的評分Y21為0.5分,其運算過程整理如下:欲考慮構面因素「每股盈餘季成長」;→Y21=本季每股盈餘÷上季每股盈餘-1=1.33-1=0.33;→查表;→得X21=0.5;→將X21=0.5代回強度方程式(A)。 When Y 21 = earnings per share growth = earnings per share for the quarter/previous quarter earnings per share -1.33, the table can be found that the facet factor "per share earnings growth" score of 21 is 0.5 points. The calculation process is organized as follows: To consider the facet factor "growth earnings per share"; → Y 21 = earnings per share for the quarter/previous quarter earnings per share -1 = 1.33-1 = 0.33; → check the table; → get X 21 =0.5;→Return X 21 =0.5 back to the intensity equation (A).

此評分係用以表示該構面因素代表的事件發生的程度與重要性。 This rating is used to indicate the extent and importance of the event represented by the facet factor.

又例如當Y21=每股盈餘季成長=本季每股盈餘÷上季每股盈餘-1=2.05-1=1.05時,查上表可知構面因素「每股盈餘季成長」的評分Y21為1分,其運算過程整理如下:欲考慮構面因素「每股盈餘季成長」;→Y21=本季每股盈餘÷上季每股盈餘-1=1.05;→查表;→得X21=1;→將X21=1代回強度方程式(A)。 For example, when Y 21 = earnings per share growth = earnings per share for the quarter/previous quarter earnings per share -1 = 2.05-1 = 1.05, check the table to see the face factor "growth earnings per share growth" rating Y 21 is 1 point, the operation process is organized as follows: To consider the facet factor "growth earnings per share"; → Y 21 = earnings per share this quarter, earnings per share -1 = 1.05; → check the table; X 21 =1; → return X 21 =1 to the intensity equation (A).

此評分係用以表示該構面因素代表的事件發生的程度與重要性。 同理,其餘構面因素亦可由市場公開資料庫202擷取資訊後,再經由此計算過程與查表方式,分別得到相對應之評分,以代回強度方程式(A)。 This rating is used to indicate the extent and importance of the event represented by the facet factor. Similarly, the remaining facet factors can also be retrieved from the market open database 202, and then the corresponding scores are obtained through the calculation process and the look-up table method, respectively, to replace the intensity equation (A).

技術面可由複數個構面因素組成,其可包含收盤均線多頭排列之線型判斷、KD線是否大於80%之線型判斷、KD線是否小於20%之線型判斷、寶塔線(tower)是否翻紅之線型判斷以及寶塔線是否翻黑之線型判斷,且每個構面因素均可由市場公開資料庫202取得並轉換為一評分。 The technical plane may be composed of a plurality of facet factors, which may include a line type judgment of a long-term average of the closing average, a line type judgment of whether the KD line is greater than 80%, a line type judgment of whether the KD line is less than 20%, and whether the tower line is reddish. The line type judgment and the line type judgment of whether the pagoda line is blacked out, and each facet factor can be obtained by the market public database 202 and converted into a score.

舉例來說,若將主決定構面「技術面」設為X3,且將組成技術面的複數個構面因素中之一構面因素「寶塔線是否翻紅」設為Y31,並將對應於Y31之評分設為X31,則處理器201可由市場公開資料庫202取得一投資項目之價格漲跌幅度與每日收盤價,分析後得到寶塔線線型根據例如下表得到相對應之評分: For example, if the main decision facet "technical face" is set to X 3 , and one of the plurality of facet factors that constitute the technical face, the facet factor "whether the pagoda line turns red" is set to Y 31 , and The score corresponding to Y 31 is set to X 31 , and the processor 201 can obtain the price fluctuation range and the daily closing price of an investment item from the market disclosure database 202, and obtain the corresponding pagoda line type according to the following table. score:

寶塔線係由每日收盤價與每日價格漲跌幅度統計產生,其係用以輔助使用者觀測價格趨勢,而非預估價格之最高/最低點。當股價由底部向上反轉,寶塔線的黑色棒線進入翻紅的狀態時,說明該投資項目之價格開始上漲,以一般情況而言,此時使用者可考慮適量買入。查上表可知構面因素「寶塔線是否翻紅」對應之評分Y31為1或0分,其運算過程整理如下:欲考慮構面因素「寶塔線是否翻紅」;→處理器201至市場公開資料庫202取得一投資項目之每日收盤價與價格漲跌幅度,統計後畫出寶塔線;→將已畫出之寶塔線線型,和與處理器連結之資料庫203中預先儲存的「寶塔線是否翻紅」線型相互比對,以得知寶塔線是否由黑翻紅; →查表;→若寶塔線由黑翻紅,則表示構面因素「寶塔線是否翻紅」之判斷為「是」,以Y31=1表示,且對應之評分X31=1;若寶塔線並未翻紅,則表示構面因素「寶塔線是否翻紅」之判斷為「否」,以Y31=0表示,且對應之評分X31=0;→將X31代回強度方程式(A)。 The pagoda line is generated by daily closing price and daily price fluctuations, which are used to assist users in observing price trends rather than estimating the highest/lowest point of the price. When the stock price reverses from the bottom up, the black bar line of the pagoda line enters a reddish state, indicating that the price of the investment project begins to rise. In general, the user can consider the right amount of purchase at this time. Check the table to see if the facet factor "whether the pagoda line turns red" corresponds to the score Y 31 is 1 or 0. The calculation process is as follows: To consider the facet factor "whether the pagoda line turns red"; → processor 201 to the market The public database 202 obtains the daily closing price and the price fluctuation of an investment project, and draws the pagoda line after the statistics; → the line type of the pagoda that has been drawn, and the pre-stored in the database 203 connected to the processor. Whether the pagoda line is red or not, the line types are compared with each other to know whether the pagoda line is turned red by black; → check the table; → if the pagoda line turns red from black, it means that the face factor “whether the pagoda line turns red” is judged as "Yes", indicated by Y 31 =1, and the corresponding score X 31 =1; if the pagoda line does not turn red, it means that the facet factor "whether the pagoda line turns red" is judged as "No" to Y 31 =0 indicates that the corresponding score X 31 =0; → returns X 31 back to the intensity equation (A).

此評分係用以表示該構面因素代表的事件發生的程度與重要性。同理,其餘構面因素亦可由是市場公開資料庫202擷取資訊後,再經由此計算過程與查表方式,分別得到相對應之評分,以代回強度方程式(A)。 This rating is used to indicate the extent and importance of the event represented by the facet factor. In the same way, the remaining facet factors can also be obtained by the market public database 202, and then the corresponding scores are obtained through the calculation process and the look-up table method, respectively, to replace the intensity equation (A).

籌碼面可由複數個構面因素組成,其可包含法人是否連續r日淨買超、法人是否連續s日淨賣超、法人持股比例是否大於p%以及法人持股比例是否小於q%,以一評分表示,其中r及s係為可由使用者設定的正整數,而p及q係為可由使用者設定的正數,其中0≦p<100且0<q≦100,且每個構面因素均可由市場公開資料庫202取得並轉換為一評分。 The chip surface may be composed of a plurality of facet factors, which may include whether the legal person has a net purchase over the continuous r day, whether the legal person has a net sales over the s day, whether the legal person's shareholding ratio is greater than p%, and whether the legal person's shareholding ratio is less than q%, A score indicates that r and s are positive integers that can be set by the user, and p and q are positive numbers that can be set by the user, where 0 ≦ p < 100 and 0 < q ≦ 100, and each face factor Both can be obtained by the market disclosure database 202 and converted into a rating.

舉例來說,若將主決定構面「籌碼面」設為X4,且將組成籌碼面的複數個構面因素中之一構面因素「法人是否連續r日淨買超」設為Y41(r),且對應於Y41(r)之評分設為X41,並可由使用者設定r之值,則處理器201可由市場公開資料庫202取得法人連續r日的買進與賣出情況,據以判斷構面因素「法人是否連續r日淨買超」是否發生,並進一步將之轉換為一評分X41。例如,當使用者設定r=3時,Y41(3)表示「法人是否連續3日淨買超」,然後可根據預先儲存於處理器201或與處理器連結之資料庫203的內建對照表,將此結果轉換為一評分。該對照表可例如下列所示: For example, if the main decision facet "chip face" is set to X 4 and one of the plurality of facet factors that make up the chip face, the face factor "whether the legal person is continuous r day net buy super" is set to Y 41 (r), and the score corresponding to Y 41 (r) is set to X 41 , and the value of r can be set by the user, the processor 201 can obtain the purchase and sale of the legal person for the continuous r day from the market disclosure database 202. According to the judgment of the facet factor "whether the legal person continues to buy the net for the continuous r day", and further convert it into a score X 41 . For example, when the user sets r=3, Y 41 (3) indicates “whether the legal person has a net purchase for 3 consecutive days”, and then can be based on the built-in comparison stored in the processor 201 or the database 203 connected to the processor. Table, convert this result to a rating. The comparison table can be as follows, for example:

當Y41(3)=法人是否連續3日淨買超,若構面因素「法人是否連續3日淨買超」已經發生,則Y41(3)=1且對應之評分X41為1分,其運算過程整理如下:欲考慮構面因素「法人是否連續r日淨買超」,由使用者設定r=3;→Y41(3)=法人是否連續3日淨買超→若法人已連續3日淨買超,則Y41(3)=1;→查表;→得X41=1;→將X41=1代回強度方程式(A)。 When Y 41 (3) = whether the legal person has bought the net for 3 consecutive days, if the face factor "whether the legal person has a net purchase of 3 consecutive days" has occurred, then Y 41 (3) = 1 and the corresponding score X 41 is 1 point. The calculation process is organized as follows: To consider the facet factor "Whether the legal person continuously buys the net on the r day", the user sets r=3; →Y 41 (3)=Whether the legal person has bought the net for 3 consecutive days → If the legal person has For the third consecutive day, the net purchase is over, then Y 41 (3) = 1; → look up the table; → get X 41 =1; → return X 41 =1 to the intensity equation (A).

此評分係用以表示該構面因素代表的事件發生的程度與重要性。同理,其餘構面因素亦可由市場公開資料庫202擷取資訊後,再經由此計算過程與查表方式,分別得到相對應之評分,以代回強度方程式(A)。 This rating is used to indicate the extent and importance of the event represented by the facet factor. Similarly, the remaining facet factors can also be retrieved from the market open database 202, and then the corresponding scores are obtained through the calculation process and the look-up table method, respectively, to replace the intensity equation (A).

形勢面可由複數個構面因素組成,其可包含族群類股強勢指標、全球類股強勢指標、趨勢線型判斷、K線線型判斷以及酒田線型判斷。其中族群類股強勢指標係一族群類股之漲幅相較於大盤漲幅之百分比,且全球類股強勢指標係一全球類股之漲幅相較於大盤漲幅之百分比。此外,趨勢線型判斷,K線線型判斷及酒田線型判斷,係將由市場公開資料庫202取得之資料加以統計後取得之趨勢線線型,K線線型及酒田線型,分別和與處理器連結之資料庫203內預存之特定模式的線型,互相比對,並判斷統計後取得之線型是否符合預存之特定模式的線型。每個構面因素均可由市場公開資料庫202取得並轉換為一評分。 The situation can be composed of a plurality of facet factors, which can include the strong indicators of ethnic stocks, the global stocks strong indicators, the trend line type judgment, the K line line judgment and the wine field line type judgment. Among them, the strong indicators of ethnic stocks are the percentage increase of the group stocks compared with the increase of the broader market, and the global stocks strong indicators are the percentage of the global stocks compared with the increase of the broader market. In addition, the trend line type judgment, the K line line type judgment and the wine field line type judgment are the trend line type, the K line line type and the wine field line type which are obtained by the statistics obtained by the market open database 202, respectively, and the database linked to the processor. The line patterns of the specific patterns pre-stored in 203 are compared with each other, and it is judged whether the line type obtained after the statistics conforms to the line type of the pre-stored specific mode. Each facet factor can be taken by the market disclosure database 202 and converted to a rating.

舉例來說,若將主決定構面「形勢面」設為X5,可將組成形勢面的複數個構面因素中之一構面因素「族群類股強勢指標」設為Y51,並將對應 於Y51之評分設為X51。由於族群類股強勢指標係為一族群類股之漲幅相較於大盤漲幅之百分比,故處理器201可由市場公開資料庫202取得該族群類股之漲幅與大盤漲幅後,計算出一族群類股強弱勢指標Y51,並進一步根據預先儲存於處理器201或與處理器連結之資料庫203的內建對照表將該族群類股強弱勢指標Y51轉換為一評分X51,該對照表可例如下列所示: For example, if the main decision facet "situation face" is set to X 5 , one of the plurality of facet factors that constitute the situation face, the "family stock strength indicator" can be set to Y 51 , and The score corresponding to Y 51 is set to X 51 . Since the strong indicator of the ethnic stocks is the percentage of the increase of the group stocks compared with the increase of the market, the processor 201 can obtain the increase of the ethnic group stocks and the market growth by the market open database 202, and calculate the group stocks. Inferior index Y 51, and further based on pre-stored in databases connected to the processor 201 or the processor of the group table built stocks index Y 51 Inferior converted to a score of 203 X 51, the table can be For example, the following is shown:

當Y51=族群類股強勢指標=族群類股漲幅÷大盤漲幅,Y51係用以比較一族群類股之漲跌幅相較於大盤之漲跌幅的強勢程度,其中Y51與X51之對應關係解釋如下:當族群類股漲幅>0且Y51≧1.2:表示族群類股漲幅與大盤漲幅皆為正值,即族群類股與大盤皆呈現上漲,且族群類股的漲幅更勝於大盤,故相對應之X51為1分;當族群類股漲幅>0且0.8≦Y51<1.2:表示族群類股漲幅與大盤漲幅皆為正值,即族群類股與大盤皆呈現上漲,且族群類股的漲幅與大盤差不多,故相對應之X51為0.5分;當族群類股漲幅>0且Y51<0.8:當0≦Y51<0.8表示族群類股漲幅為正值且大盤漲幅為正值,但族群類股的漲幅弱於大盤,故建議觀望,相對應之X51為0分,當Y51<0,表示族群類股漲幅為正值但大盤漲幅為負值,此時追高可能遭遇價格向下修正,故亦建議觀望,相對應之X51為0分; 當族群類股漲幅<0且Y51<0.8:當0≦Y51<0.8表示族群類股漲幅為負值且大盤漲幅為負值,但族群類股的跌幅弱於大盤,故建議觀望,相對應之X51為0分,當Y51<0,表示族群類股漲幅為負值但大盤漲幅為正值,此時族群類股之狀況不明,故亦建議觀望,相對應之X51為0分;當族群類股漲幅<0且0.8≦Y51<1.2:表示族群類股漲幅與大盤漲幅皆為負值,即族群類股與大盤皆呈現下跌,但族群類股之跌勢與大盤差不多,故相對應之X51為-0.5分;以及當族群類股漲幅<0且Y51≧1.2:表示族群類股漲幅與大盤漲幅皆為負值,即族群類股與大盤皆呈現下跌,但族群類股之跌勢更勝於大盤之跌勢,故相對應之X51為-1分。 When Y 51 = group stocks strong indicators = group stocks rose, the broader market gains, Y 51 is used to compare the rise and fall of a group of stocks compared to the strength of the broader market, including Y 51 and X 51 The corresponding relationship is explained as follows: When the group stocks increase by >0 and Y 51 ≧1.2: the increase of the group stocks and the market growth are positive, that is, the ethnic stocks and the broader market are both rising, and the stocks of the ethnic groups are more successful. In the broader market, the corresponding X 51 is 1 point; when the group stocks increase by >0 and 0.8≦Y 51 <1.2: the increase of the group stocks and the market growth are positive, that is, the ethnic group stocks and the broader market are rising. And the increase of ethnic stocks is similar to the broader market, so the corresponding X 51 is 0.5 points; when the ethnic stocks increase by >0 and Y 51 <0.8: when 0≦Y 51 <0.8 indicates that the stocks of the ethnic stocks are positive and The market's gains were positive, but the increase of ethnic stocks was weaker than the broader market. Therefore, it is recommended to wait and see. The corresponding X 51 is 0 points. When Y 51 <0, it means that the stocks of the ethnic groups are positive, but the market gains are negative. At this time, the high recovery may suffer downward price correction, hence recommended wait, the corresponding X 51 is 0; when group Stocks rose <0 and Y 51 <0.8: when 0 ≦ Y 51 <0.8 represents a sector group is negative and increases gains were negative, but the group underperform stocks decline, it is suggested wait, the corresponding X 51 is 0 points. When Y 51 <0, it means that the increase of the group stocks is negative, but the market growth is positive. At this time, the status of the ethnic stocks is unknown. Therefore, it is recommended to wait and see, and the corresponding X 51 is 0 points; When the group stocks rose by <0 and 0.8≦Y 51 <1.2: the growth of the group stocks and the broader market were negative, that is, the ethnic stocks and the broader market were both down, but the decline of the ethnic stocks was similar to the broader market, so The corresponding X 51 is -0.5 points; and when the group stocks increase by <0 and Y 51 ≧1.2: the increase of the group stocks and the broader market are negative, that is, the ethnic stocks and the broader market are both falling, but the ethnic groups The decline of the stock is better than the decline of the broader market, so the corresponding X 51 is -1 points.

以上評分X51係用以表示該構面因素代表的事件發生的程度與重要性,並將被代回強度方程式(A)。 The above score X 51 is used to indicate the extent and importance of the event represented by the facet factor and will be substituted for the intensity equation (A).

又例如,可將組成主決定構面「形勢面」X5的複數個構面因素中之另一構面因素「酒田線型判斷」設為Y53,並可將對應於Y53之評分設為X53。請參考第3圖,第3圖為知名經典K線(Candlestick chart)分析教材「酒田戰法」中建議投資人買進的「逆襲線」與「晨星」線型、建議投資人賣出的「夜星」線型及建議投資人觀望的「川字三黑」線型。本發明可由市場公開資料庫202取得一投資項目之K線線型後,以處理器201將該投資項目之K線線型與儲存於與處理器連接之資料庫203的酒田戰法線型資料比對,若比對後處理器201發現該投資項目實際發生的K線線型與「酒田戰法」中記載的典型K線線型相互符合,則處理器201會依照「酒田戰法」中對於不同典型K線線型對應的買進、賣出或觀望建議,根據例如下表,求得對應於構面因素「酒田線型判斷」的評分X53 For another example, the other facet factor of the plurality of facet factors constituting the main facet "face" X 5 may be set to Y 53 and the score corresponding to Y 53 may be set. X 53 . Please refer to Figure 3. Figure 3 shows the "Reverse Line" and "Morning Star" line types recommended by investors in the famous "Kalefield Warfare" textbook. The "Star" line type and the "Chuanzi Sanhe" line type that investors are advised to watch. After the invention obtains the K-line type of an investment project from the market disclosure database 202, the processor 201 compares the K-line type of the investment project with the winefield battle-type data stored in the database 203 connected to the processor. If the comparison K-stack 201 finds that the K-line type actually generated by the investment item matches the typical K-line type described in the "Wine Field Method", the processor 201 will follow the different typical K lines in the "Wine Field Method". For the buy, sell or wait-and-see suggestions corresponding to the line type, the score X 53 corresponding to the facet factor "Jiutian Line Type Judgment" is obtained according to, for example, the following table:

上表中,「夜星」、「晨星」、「逆襲線」及「川字三黑」均為「酒田戰法」中記載的典型K線線型。根據「酒田戰法」,當投資項目之K線線型與「夜星」相同時,建議賣出;當投資項目之K線線型與「晨星」或「逆襲線」相同時,建議買進;當投資項目之K線線型與「川字三黑」相同時,則建議觀望。故經過處理器201比對後,若投資項目之K線線型符合「夜星」,處理器201會將對應於構面因素「酒田線型判斷」Y53的評分X53設為-1分;若投資項目之K線線型符合「晨星」或「逆襲線」,則X53=1;若投資項目之K線線型符合「川字三黑」,則X53=0,除了上表中舉例的線型,「酒田戰法」還包含了許多不同的典型線型可供比對,並各自有相對應的買進、賣出或觀望建議,可供處理器201據以評分。以上評分X53係用以表示該構面因素代 表的事件發生的程度與重要性,並將被代回強度方程式(A)。同理,其餘構面因素亦可由市場公開資料庫202擷取資訊後,再經由此計算過程或資料庫比對過程與查表方式,分別得到相對應之評分,以代回強度方程式(A)。 In the above table, "Night Star", "Morning Star", "Counter Strike Line" and "Chuan Character Three Black" are typical K-line types described in "Wine Field Warfare". According to the "Wine Field Warfare Law", when the K-line type of the investment project is the same as "Night Star", it is recommended to sell; when the K-line type of the investment project is the same as "Morning Star" or "Reverse Line", it is recommended to buy; When the K-line type of the investment project is the same as "Chuanzi Sanhe", it is recommended to wait and see. So after comparing processor 201, if the K-line style of investment projects in line with "Evening Star", the processor 201 will correspond to the facets of factors, "Sakata line judge" X 53 Y 53 ratings points to -1; if If the K-line type of the investment project is in line with "Morning Star" or "Reverse Line", then X 53 =1; if the K-line type of the investment project is in accordance with "Chuanzi Sanhe", then X 53 =0, except for the line type exemplified in the above table. The "Winefield Warfare" also contains a number of different typical line types for comparison, and each has a corresponding buy, sell or wait-and-see advice for the processor 201 to score. The above score X 53 is used to indicate the extent and importance of the event represented by the facet factor and will be substituted for the intensity equation (A). Similarly, the remaining facet factors can also be retrieved from the market open database 202, and then the corresponding scores can be obtained through the calculation process or the database comparison process and the look-up table method to replace the intensity equation (A). .

壓力支撐面可由複數個構面因素組成,其可包含20日價量加權平均價(月平均價)條件判斷、60日價量加權平均價(季平均價)條件判斷、120日價量加權平均價(半年平均價)條件判斷、240日價量加權平均價(年平均價)條件判斷、壓力支撐強度指數,其中每個構面因素均可由市場公開資料庫202取得並轉換為一評分。 The pressure support surface may be composed of a plurality of facet factors, which may include a 20-day price-weighted average price (monthly average price) conditional judgment, a 60-day price-weighted average price (quarter average price) conditional judgment, and a 120-day price-weighted average Price (half-year average price) condition judgment, 240-day price-weighted average price (annual average price) condition judgment, pressure support strength index, each of which can be obtained by the market public database 202 and converted into a score.

舉例來說,若將主決定構面「壓力支撐面」設為X6,可將組成壓力支撐面的複數個構面因素中之一構面因素「20日價量加權平均價(月平均價)條件判斷」設為Y61,並將對應於Y61之評分設為X61。價量加權平均價係為一投資項目之價格以成交量加權後予以平均,求得之加權平均價格。例如,若一股票於一段時間內以20.5元成交10000股,且亦以20.8元成交5000股,則此例中該股票於該段時間的加權平均價係為(20.5×10000+20.8×5000)÷(10000+5000)=20.6元。將加權平均價於一固定時間如20日、60日、120日或240日後計算求得,即可得到計算之時往前考量20日、60日、120日或240日之價量加權平均價。以20日價量加權平均價為例,由於一個月的交易日約為20日,故20日價量加權平均價亦可稱之為月平均價,同理,60日價量加權平均價亦可稱之為季平均價,120日價量加權平均價亦可稱之為半年平均價,而240日價量加權平均價亦可稱之為年平均價。處理器201可由市場公開資料庫202取得先前交易資料後,求得每日更新之月平均價、季平均價、半年平均價及年平均價,並將其變動繪製為月均線、季均線、半年均線及年均線。由於此些均線係考量長時間的價量變化繪製而成,故其變化通常較為和緩,可作為價格的支撐面與壓力面之參考。該支撐面係指一下限,且 壓力面係指一上限。若投資項目之價格如股價漲破月均線時,表示股價已然漲破壓力面,故處理器201可根據內建之對照表將相對應之評分X61給予正分;反之,當投資項目之價格如股價跌破月均線時,表示股價已然跌破支撐面,故處理器201可根據內建之對照表將相對應之評分X61給予負分。該對照表可例如下列所示: For example, if the main control facet "pressure support surface" is set to X 6 , one of the plurality of facet factors that constitute the pressure support surface may be the 20-day price-weighted average price (monthly average price). "Conditional judgment" is set to Y 61 , and the score corresponding to Y 61 is set to X 61 . The price-weighted average price is the weighted average price obtained by averaging the price of an investment project weighted by the volume. For example, if a stock trades 10,000 shares at 20.5 yuan for a period of time and also trades 5,000 shares at 20.8 yuan, the weighted average price of the stock in this case is (20.5×10000+20.8×5000). ÷ (10000+5000) = 20.6 yuan. Calculate the weighted average price after a fixed time such as 20th, 60th, 120th or 240th, and you can get the weighted average price of the price on the 20th, 60th, 120th or 240th day. . Take the 20-day price-weighted average price as an example. Since the trading day of one month is about 20 days, the weighted average price of the 20-day price can also be called the monthly average price. Similarly, the weighted average price of the 60-day price is also It can be called the average price of the season. The weighted average price of the 120-day price can also be called the half-year average price, and the weighted average price of the 240-day price can also be called the annual average price. The processor 201 can obtain the monthly average price, the average daily price, the half-year average price, and the annual average price of the daily updated data from the market disclosure database 202, and draw the change into a monthly average, a daily average, and a half year. Moving average and annual average. Since these moving averages are drawn from long-term price changes, the changes are usually relatively gentle and can be used as a reference for the support and pressure surfaces of the price. The support surface refers to a lower limit and the pressure surface refers to an upper limit. If the price of the investment project, if the stock price rises above the monthly average, it means that the stock price has already risen to the pressure side, so the processor 201 can give the corresponding score X 61 a positive score according to the built-in comparison table; otherwise, when the price of the investment project If the stock price falls below the monthly average, it indicates that the stock price has fallen below the support level, so the processor 201 can give a negative score to the corresponding score X 61 according to the built-in comparison table. The comparison table can be as follows, for example:

以上評分X61係用以表示該構面因素代表的事件發生的程度與重要性,並將被代回強度方程式(A)。 The above score X 61 is used to indicate the extent and importance of the event represented by the facet factor and will be substituted back to the intensity equation (A).

又例如當主決定構面「壓力支撐面」被設為X6,可將組成壓力支撐面的複數個構面因素中之另一構面因素「壓力支撐強度指數」設為Y65,並將對應於Y65之評分設為X65。一般所述之支撐強度計算方式係如下:若 今日收盤價>昨日收盤價 Factors other facets and a plurality of facets, for example, when the main decision factors facets "support face pressure" is set to X 6, the support surface may be composed of a pressure in the "pressure support strength index" to Y 65, and The score corresponding to Y 65 is set to X 65 . Generally speaking, the support strength calculation method is as follows: If today's closing price>yesterday's closing price

則 今日支撐強度=今日收盤價-今日支撐點 Then today's support strength = today's closing price - today's support point

其中支撐點公式為:若 今日最低價<昨日收盤價,則 今日支撐點=今日最低價,若 今日最低價≧昨日收盤價,則 今日支撐點=昨日收盤價;另外,一般所述之壓力強度計算方式係如下:若 今日收盤價<昨日收盤價 The support point formula is: If today's lowest price < yesterday's closing price, today's support point = today's lowest price, if today's lowest price ≧ yesterday's closing price, then today's support point = yesterday's closing price; in addition, the general pressure intensity The calculation method is as follows: If today's closing price < yesterday's closing price

則 今日壓力強度=今日壓力點-今日收盤價 Then today's pressure intensity = today's pressure point - today's closing price

其中壓力點公式:若 今日最高價>昨日收盤價,則 今日壓力點=今日最高價;若 今日最高價≦昨日收盤價,則 今日壓力點=昨日收盤價。 The pressure point formula: If today's highest price > yesterday's closing price, today's pressure point = today's highest price; if today's highest price ≦ yesterday's closing price, then today's pressure point = yesterday's closing price.

因此,每日收盤後處理器201可根據市場公開資料庫202的資料,得到一特定項目之支撐強度與壓力強度,並根據例如下表給予相對應之評分X65 Therefore, after the daily closing, the processor 201 can obtain the support strength and the pressure intensity of a specific item according to the data of the market disclosure database 202, and give a corresponding score X 65 according to, for example, the following table:

當支撐強度大於壓力強度時,上漲力道較強,故較建議買進,而可將對應於Y65之評分X65設為1分,反之,當支撐強度小於壓力強度時,下跌力道較強,故可將Y65設為-1分。以上評分X65係用以表示該構面因素代表的事件發生的程度與重要性,並將被代回強度方程式(A)。同理,其餘構面因素亦可由市場公開資料庫202擷取資訊後,再經由計算過程與查表方式,分別得到相對應之評分,以代回強度方程式(A)。 When the pressure intensity greater than the intensity of the support, increase the strength of strong, it is recommended to buy more, and may correspond to the rates Y 65 X 65 min to 1, whereas when the pressure is less than the strength of the supporting strength, the strength of strong decline, Therefore, Y 65 can be set to -1 point. The above score X 65 is used to indicate the extent and importance of the event represented by the facet factor and will be substituted for the intensity equation (A). Similarly, the remaining facet factors can also be retrieved from the market open database 202, and then the corresponding scores are obtained through the calculation process and the look-up table method to replace the intensity equation (A).

根據本發明之一實施例,處理器201依據起始強度方程式(A),針對一投資項目例如一特定個股,以權重因數W1至Wn加權考量複數個主決定構面X1至Xn及相對應之複數個構面因素後,計算得到一起始買進訊號強度I。當買進訊號強度I大於一使用者預設之門檻買進訊號強度Ith時,處理器會發出詢問訊息至使用者之智慧型手機、股票機等手持式電子裝備或個人電腦,通知使用者或伺服器決定是否買進。 According to an embodiment of the present invention, the processor 201 weights the weighting factors W 1 to W n for a plurality of main decision surface planes X 1 to X n according to the initial intensity equation (A) for an investment item such as a specific stock. And corresponding to a plurality of facet factors, an initial buy signal strength I is calculated. When the buy signal strength I is greater than a user preset threshold buy signal strength I th , the processor will send an inquiry message to the user's smart phone, stock machine and other handheld electronic equipment or personal computer to notify the user. Or the server decides whether to buy.

相較於先前技術中,各個主決定構面X1至Xn及其對應之複數個構 面因素W1至Wn,僅以預設條件是否發生,作為觸發通知的條件,本發明除了以權重因數X1至Xn對各主決定構面加權以表示其影響力,還可以進一步最佳化該些權重因數W1至Wn,以使強度方程式(A)計算求得之買進訊號強度I經過考量先前交易紀錄之最佳化後,能更準確地代表一投資項目的可買程度。 Compared with the prior art, each of the main decision surface planes X 1 to X n and their corresponding plurality of facet factors W 1 to W n are only determined by a preset condition as a condition for triggering the notification, except that the present invention The weighting factors X 1 to X n weight each of the main decision surfaces to indicate their influence, and further optimize the weighting factors W 1 to W n so that the intensity equation (A) calculates the obtained buy signal. Intensity I, after considering the optimization of previous transaction records, more accurately represents the degree of buyability of an investment project.

根據本發明之一實施例,上述之最佳化該些權重因數W1至Wn,可為處理器201於一較長時段後,將該時段內由先前交易資料收集之對應於主決定構面之評分X1至Xn,並且使用已普遍應用於機器學習(machine learning)領域的貝氏最佳化程序(Bayesian Optimization Algorithm;BOA),據以最佳化強度方程式(A)中的複數個權重因數W1至Wn。其中,先前交易資料可為一較長時段中實際發生之先前交易資料,該較長時段的長度則可由使用者自行設定,例如可設定為一週,意即每隔一週處理器201可分析這一週的先前交易資料,以貝氏最佳化程序對權重因數W1至Wn執行最佳化,並得到一組最佳化之權重因素W1至Wn,據以更新該強度方程式(A)。進行上述之最佳化後,強度方程式(A)中的權重因數即被最佳化的權重因數取代,而強度方程式(A)也因此被最佳化為一已最佳化之強度方程式(A)。後續使用該已最佳化之強度方程式(A)計算出的買進訊號強度I,便能更加準確地反應良好的買進時機。根據本發明實施例,上述對權重因數W1至Wn執行貝氏最佳化程序的步驟可如以下簡述:步驟1:定義一起始強度方程式(A)為,其中主決定構面 ,其中a係為1至n的正整數,且權重因素Wa由使用者設定預設值;步驟2:處理器201由市場公開公開資料庫202取得公開資訊,據 以求得步驟1中的主決定構面Xa,並據以求得一起始之買進訊號強度I;步驟3:由使用者指定一段較長時期,例如一週或一個月,累積足夠之買進訊號強度I值以及與該些I值相對應之主決定構面Xa;步驟4:以貝氏網路(Baysian Network)將每個主決定構面Xa作為一節點,以考量各主決定構面Xa交互影響之條件機率,以本發明為例,欲求得之結果係為使對應於最佳買進時點的最大I值出現的機率最大的一組權重因素Wa,其中a係為1至n的正整數;步驟5:將步驟3中於該段較長時期累積之先前交易資料代入步驟4之貝氏網路後,由處理器201以例如馬可夫鏈蒙地卡羅演算法(Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm)予以分析: According to an embodiment of the present invention, the weighting factors W 1 to W n are optimized as described above, and the processor 201 may collect the previous transaction data for the time period corresponding to the main decision structure after a long period of time. The scores X 1 to X n and the Bayesian Optimization Algorithm (BOA), which has been commonly applied in the field of machine learning, is used to optimize the complex number in the intensity equation (A) Weight factors W 1 to W n . The previous transaction data may be the previous transaction data actually occurring in a long period of time, and the length of the longer period may be set by the user, for example, may be set to one week, that is, the processor 201 may analyze the week every other week. Previous transaction data, optimized by the Bayesian optimization procedure for the weighting factors W 1 to W n , and a set of optimized weighting factors W 1 to W n , according to which the intensity equation (A) is updated . After the above optimization, the weighting factor in the intensity equation (A) is replaced by the optimized weighting factor, and the strength equation (A) is thus optimized to an optimized intensity equation (A). ). Subsequent use of the purchased signal strength I calculated by the optimized intensity equation (A) can more accurately reflect good buying opportunities. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the step of performing the Bayesian optimization procedure on the weighting factors W 1 to W n may be as follows: Step 1: Define a starting strength equation (A) as , where the Lord decides the facet Where a is a positive integer from 1 to n, and the weighting factor W a is set by the user to a preset value; Step 2: The processor 201 obtains the public information from the market public disclosure database 202, thereby obtaining the information in step 1 The master decides the facet X a and obtains an initial buy signal strength I; step 3: the user specifies a longer period, such as one week or one month, to accumulate sufficient buy signal strength I value and The I values corresponding to the main decision facet X a ; Step 4: Bayesian network (Baysian Network) each main decision facet X a as a node to consider the interaction of each main decision surface X a The conditional probability, taking the present invention as an example, the result to be obtained is a set of weighting factors W a that maximize the probability of occurrence of the maximum I value corresponding to the best buying time point, where a is a positive integer of 1 to n Step 5: After substituting the previous transaction data accumulated in the third period in the segment into the Bayesian network of step 4, the processor 201 uses, for example, a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. To analyze:

其中:Markovblanket(馬可夫毯)係為一描述因果關係之網狀架構函數,其各節點係為一事件,在此用以將各主決定構面Wa代表的事件之間的因果關係互相連結;children係為一事件之結果事件,例如Ya係屬於以權重因素Wa為原因的結果事件;而parent則為一事件之原因事件,此演算法係用以求得對應於最大買進訊號強度I值有最高機率之一組權重因素Wa,其中a係為1至n的正整數;步驟6:由處理器201以步驟5所舉例之馬可夫鏈蒙地卡羅演算法抽樣出一組新的權重因素Wa,再以此組新的權重因素Wa,代回步驟5。如此以迴圈迭代,直到無法找到使對應於最佳買進時點的最大I值出現的機率更大的一組權重因素Wa,此即為終止條件,此時抽樣出的一組權重因素Wa 即為一組最佳化之權重因素W1至Wn。達到終止條件後,步驟6結束,進入步驟7。 Among them: Markovbket is a mesh structure function describing causality, and each node is an event, which is used to link the causal relationship between events represented by each main decision face W a ; Children are the result of an event, for example, Y a belongs to the result event with the weight factor W a as the cause; and parent is the event event of the event, which is used to determine the intensity corresponding to the maximum buy signal. The I value has one of the highest probability group weighting factors W a , where a is a positive integer from 1 to n; Step 6: A new set of new samples is sampled by the processor 201 using the Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm exemplified in step 5 the weighting factors Wa, then as a new set of weighting factors W a, generations back to step 5. So iterate in a loop until it is impossible to find a set of weighting factors W a that make the probability of the maximum I value corresponding to the best buying point appear, which is the termination condition, and a set of weighting factors W a is a set of optimized weighting factors W 1 to W n . After the termination condition is reached, step 6 ends and proceeds to step 7.

步驟7:將最佳化後的一組更新後之權重因素Wa,代回I=,即強度方程式(A),作為往後計算買進訊號強度I所用。 Step 7: Substitute a group of updated weighting factors W a and replace them with I= , that is, the intensity equation (A), used as the calculation of the buy signal strength I in the future.

以上所述之使用馬可夫鏈蒙地卡羅演算法執行貝氏最佳化程序以求得一組最佳化之權重因素W1至Wn僅為本發明一舉例說明而非用以限制本發明之範圍,亦可使用其他演算法求得一組最佳化之權重因素W1至Wn,然均需依循貝氏最佳化程序,亦即:將最佳化後的結果又代回最佳化演算法,如此迭代迴圈予以重複最佳化,直到無法求得更佳結果為止。如此可求得一組最佳化之權重因素W1至Wn,其根據先前交易資料可使最大值的買入強度I與歷史最佳買入點以最大的機率互相符合,此組最佳化之權重因素W1至Wn即為該次最佳化的最終結果,用以代回強度方程式(A),作為該次貝氏最佳化程序完成後,計算買進訊號強度I所使用。以上所述每隔一段較長時期以先前交易資料對權重因素W1至Wn執行貝氏最佳化程序乃是為了使強度方程式(A)能更加準確地反應真實的市場變化,以使其計算出的買進訊號強度I能以更高的機率對應於良好的買進點。 The weighting factors W 1 to W n described above using the Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm to perform a Bayesian optimization algorithm to obtain a set of optimizations are merely illustrative of the present invention and are not intended to limit the present invention. The scope of the algorithm can also be used to obtain a set of optimized weighting factors W 1 to W n , but all need to follow the Bayesian optimization procedure, that is, the optimized result is returned to the most The optimization algorithm, such an iteration loop, is repeated and optimized until a better result cannot be obtained. In this way, a set of optimized weighting factors W 1 to W n can be obtained, which can match the maximum buying strength I with the historical best buying point according to the previous transaction data. The weighting factors W 1 to W n are the final results of the sub-optimization, which are used to replace the intensity equation (A). After the completion of the Bayesian optimization procedure, the calculation of the buy signal strength I is used. The Bayesian optimization procedure is performed on the weighting factors W 1 to W n with the previous transaction data for a longer period of time as described above in order to make the intensity equation (A) more accurately reflect the real market change, so that The calculated buy signal strength I can correspond to a good buy point with a higher probability.

根據本發明之一實施例,上述之買進訊號強度I,除了可輔助使用者或伺服器判斷是否買進一投資項目,亦可作為投資比重的參考。例如依據買進訊號強度I值以決定買進金額可如下式所示:若Ith2>I≧Ith1則C=C1且C11%單日平均交易量;若Ith3>I≧Ith2則C=C2且C22%單日平均交易量;以及若I≧Ith3則C=C3且C33%單日平均交易量, 其中:I為買進訊號強度;C為一買進金額,以一使用者可設定之資金金額為計量單位;Ith1,Ith2與Ith3分別為一門檻買進訊號強度;C1,C2與C3分別為一資金數量,其中C3>C2>C1;以及α1,α2與α3分別為一使用者可設定之比例,且α321According to an embodiment of the present invention, the above-mentioned buy signal strength I can be used as a reference for the investment proportion, in addition to assisting the user or the server to determine whether to purchase an investment project. For example, according to the value of the purchase signal intensity I to determine the purchase amount, it can be expressed as follows: if I th2 >I≧I th1 then C=C 1 and C 11 % *the average daily trading volume; if I th3 > I ≧ I th2 then C = C 2 and C 2 = α 2 % * single-day average trading volume; and if I ≧ I th3 then C = C 3 and C 3 = α 3 % * single-day average trading volume, where: I is the buy signal strength; C is a purchase amount, which is a unit of measure that can be set by a user; I th1 , I th2 and I th3 are respectively a buy signal strength; C 1 , C 2 and C 3 is a quantity of funds, respectively, wherein C 3 > C 2 > C 1 ; and α 1 , α 2 and α 3 are respectively a user-definable ratio, and α 3 > α 2 > α 1 .

根據本發明之一實施例,上述之買進訊號強度I,除了可輔助使用者判斷是否買進一投資項目,亦可輔助使用者判斷是否賣出一投資項目。由上述可知,當一投資項目之買進訊號強度I值越大,則其越值得買進,同理可知,當一投資項目之買進訊號強度I值越小(如I為負值且其絕對值愈大),則其越值得賣出。處理器201可於買進訊號強度I小於一門檻賣出強度Ithsell時,發出通知至使用者的手持式電子設備及/或一個人電腦204,通知使用者或伺服器決定是否賣出。使用者亦可根據其需求,設定賣出時的停損或停利程度,其設定條件可如下列:單次停利百分比,其中使用者可設定單次賣出之一目標停利百分比;單次停損百分比,其中使用者可設定單次賣出之一目標停損百分比;k次停利百分比,其中使用者可設定k次賣出之一目標停利百分比,且次數k可由使用者設定,其中k為正整數且k≧1;以及浮動停損百分比,其中使用者可設定一目標停損百分比,並且以簡單移動平均線SMA(j)所示的最近j日之一收盤價均價,與先前買進該投資項目之購入成本,互相比較而得到建議賣出之通知,其中j可由使用者設定,j為正整數且j≧1。 According to an embodiment of the present invention, the above-mentioned purchase signal strength I can assist the user in judging whether to buy an investment item or not, and can assist the user in judging whether to sell an investment item. It can be seen from the above that when the value of the buy signal strength I of an investment project is larger, the more it is worth buying, the less obvious the value of the buy signal strength I of an investment project is as small (if I is negative and its The larger the absolute value, the more it is worth selling. When the processor 201 may be to buy signal intensity I is less than a threshold intensity sold I thsell, notification to the user of handheld electronic device and / or a personal computer 204, notifying the user to decide whether to sell or server. Users can also set the stop loss or stop profit at the time of sale according to their needs. The setting conditions can be as follows: the percentage of single stop, where the user can set the target stop percentage for a single sale; Percentage of stop loss, where the user can set a target stop loss percentage for a single sell; k stop percentage, where the user can set a target stop percentage for k sells, and the number k can be set by the user Where k is a positive integer and k≧1; and a floating stop loss percentage, where the user can set a target stop loss percentage and the average closing price of one of the most recent j days as indicated by the simple moving average SMA(j) And the purchase cost of the previously purchased investment item is compared with each other to obtain a recommendation to sell, wherein j can be set by the user, j is a positive integer and j ≧ 1.

舉例來說,若將一條件「浮動停損百分比」設為S1,則需參考最近j日簡單移動平均線SMA(j),其中簡單移動平均線SMA(j)係將一投資項目最近j日之收盤價平均後之價格連續繪製而成的一線圖,其中日數j可由使用者設定。使用者亦可自行設定投資項目之價格相較於先前買進價格之停損點 百分比c%的c值,其中0≦c≦100,也就是說當(投資項目之價格÷先前買進價格)≦(100-c)%時,即達到c%停損點。例如,若設j=5且設c=20,當買進訊號強度I≦門檻賣出強度Ithsell,且該投資項目之價格已跌破考量最近5日之移動平均線SMA(5),且此投資項目之價格相較購入價格已達20%停損點,則處理器201會發出通知至使用者的手持式電子設備及/或一個人電腦204供使用者或伺服器決定是否賣出。請參考下列表格: For example, if a condition "floating stop loss percentage" is set to S 1 , then the nearest j-day simple moving average SMA(j) should be referred to, where the simple moving average SMA(j) is the most recent investment item. The first-line chart drawn continuously by the average price of the daily closing price, wherein the number of days j can be set by the user. The user can also set the c value of the investment item's price compared to the previous purchase price's stop loss percentage c%, where 0≦c≦100, that is to say (the price of the investment item ÷ the previous purchase price) When ≦(100-c)%, the c% stop loss point is reached. For example, if j=5 and c=20, when the buy signal strength I sells the strength I thsell , and the price of the investment item has fallen below the moving average SMA (5) of the last 5 days, and If the price of the investment item has reached 20% stop loss compared to the purchase price, the processor 201 will issue a notification to the user's handheld electronic device and/or a personal computer 204 for the user or the server to decide whether to sell. Please refer to the following form:

同理,其餘判斷是否賣出之停損或停利條件亦可由處理器201從市場公開資料庫202擷取資訊後,再經由計算過程與查表方式,由處理器201發出通知供使用者或伺服器決定是否賣出。 Similarly, the remaining stop or stop condition for judging whether to sell or not may be obtained by the processor 201 from the market disclosure database 202, and then sent to the processor 201 for notification by the processor 201 or by means of a calculation process. The server decides whether to sell.

請參考第4圖。第4圖為本發明之方法流程圖,本發明揭露之策略交易方法,其步驟可如下所示:步驟401:處理器201中有一起始強度方程式(A),該起始強度方程式(A)包含複數個主決定構面X1至Xn及複數個對應之權重因數W1至Wn;步驟402:處理器201根據先前交易資料及貝式最佳化,最佳化該複數個權重因數W1至Wn以產生一已更新之強度方程式(A); 步驟403:處理器201根據該已更新之強度方程式(A)提供調整投資組合之建議。並於一段時間後,迭代執行步驟402。 Please refer to Figure 4. FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a method according to the present invention. The method for reporting a strategy according to the present invention may be as follows: Step 401: The processor 201 has an initial intensity equation (A), and the initial intensity equation (A) A plurality of main decision surface planes X 1 to X n and a plurality of corresponding weight factors W 1 to W n are included ; Step 402: The processor 201 optimizes the plurality of weight factors according to the previous transaction data and the Bayesian optimization. W 1 to W n to generate an updated intensity equation (A); Step 403: The processor 201 provides a recommendation to adjust the portfolio based on the updated intensity equation (A). And after a period of time, iteratively performs step 402.

其中步驟403中的「一段時間」,可由使用者自行設定例如為一週或一個月,而步驟402中的先前交易資料即為此段時間中,累積的先前交易資料。 The "period" in step 403 can be set by the user, for example, one week or one month, and the previous transaction data in step 402 is the accumulated transaction data in this period.

綜上所述,相較於先前技術僅能逐項設定於預設事件零星出現時通知使用者,本發明不僅可綜合考量影響投資策略的諸多主決定構面,更進一步以複數個對應於主決定構面的權重因數,分別加權考量了各主決定構面及其各自包含的構面因素對於買進訊號強度的重要性與影響力,據以提出買進賣出之投資建議給伺服器或使用者,並且可進一步建議投資金額與比重;除此之外,本發明亦可根據市場上真實發生的先前交易資料,以機器學習領域常用的貝氏最佳化程序,將據以計算出投資建議的強度方程式中的複數個權重因數予以最佳化,因此可定期或不定期地更新該強度方程式,以維持該強度方程式與真實市場的相聯性與計算的準確度,實以改善了先前技術中僅能於預設事件零星出現時通知使用者,因此沒能整合各樣投資資訊以提供投資建議及資產分配的缺點。 In summary, compared with the prior art, the user can only be notified on a case-by-case basis when the preset event is sporadically present, and the present invention can not only comprehensively consider many main decision-making faces affecting the investment strategy, but further corresponding to the plurality of main decision-making faces. Determining the weighting factors of the facets, respectively weighting the importance and influence of the main decision facets and their respective facet factors on the strength of the buy signal, so as to propose to buy or sell the investment advice to the server or Users, and can further recommend the investment amount and proportion; in addition, the present invention can also calculate the investment according to the Bayesian optimization procedure commonly used in the machine learning field according to the previous transaction data actually occurring on the market. The plurality of weighting factors in the proposed intensity equation are optimized, so the intensity equation can be updated periodically or irregularly to maintain the correlation between the intensity equation and the real market and the accuracy of the calculation, thereby improving the previous In technology, only users can be notified when sporadic events occur, so they cannot integrate various investment information to provide investment advice and asset allocation. Shortcomings.

雖然本發明已以實施例揭露如上,然其並非用以限定本發明,任何具有本發明所屬技術領域之通常知識者,在不脫離本發明之精神和範圍內,當可作各種更動與潤飾。 While the invention has been described above by way of example, it is not intended to limit the invention, and the invention may be variously modified and modified without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

401、402、403‧‧‧步驟 401, 402, 403‧‧ steps

Claims (11)

一種策略交易方法,包含:使用一處理器提供一起始強度方程式,該起始強度方程式包含複數個主決定構面及複數個對應之權重因數;及使用該處理器根據先前交易資料最佳化該複數個權重因數以產生一已更新之強度方程式。 A method of strategic trading, comprising: providing a starting intensity equation using a processor, the starting intensity equation comprising a plurality of main determining facets and a plurality of corresponding weighting factors; and using the processor to optimize the previous trading data A plurality of weighting factors are used to generate an updated intensity equation. 如請求項1所述之方法,另包含:根據該已更新之強度方程式調整投資組合。 The method of claim 1, further comprising: adjusting the portfolio according to the updated intensity equation. 如請求項2所述之方法,其中根據該已更新之強度方程式調整投資組合包含:根據該已更新之強度方程式增加或減少一投資項目之比重。 The method of claim 2, wherein adjusting the portfolio according to the updated intensity equation comprises: increasing or decreasing the proportion of an investment item based on the updated intensity equation. 如請求項1所述之方法,另包含:根據該已更新之強度方程式提供調整投資組合之建議。 The method of claim 1, further comprising: providing a proposal to adjust the portfolio based on the updated intensity equation. 如請求項4所述之方法,其中根據該已更新之強度方程式提供調整投資組合之建議包含:根據該已更新之強度方程式提供增加或減少一投資項目之比重的建議。 The method of claim 4, wherein the suggesting to provide an adjusted investment portfolio based on the updated intensity equation comprises: providing a recommendation to increase or decrease the proportion of an investment project based on the updated intensity equation. 如請求項4所述之方法,其中根據該已更新之強度方程式提供調整投資組合之建議包含:根據該已更新之強度方程式提供調整投資組合之建議至一手持式電子裝置及/或一個人電腦。 The method of claim 4, wherein the providing the adjusted portfolio based on the updated intensity equation comprises providing a proposal to adjust the portfolio to a handheld electronic device and/or a personal computer based on the updated intensity equation. 如請求項1所述之方法,其中每一主決定構面包含至少一構面因素。 The method of claim 1, wherein each of the main decision facets comprises at least one facet factor. 如請求項1所述之方法,其中該複數個主決定構面包含一價格動能面、一基本面、一技術面、一籌碼面、一形勢面及/或一壓力支撐面。 The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of main decision facets comprises a price kinetic energy surface, a fundamental surface, a technical surface, a chip surface, a surface surface, and/or a pressure support surface. 如請求項1所述之方法,其中使用該處理器根據先前交易資料最佳化該複數個權重因數係為:使用該處理器根據先前交易資料及一貝氏最佳化程序(Bayesian Optimization Algorithm;BOA)最佳化該複數個權重因數。 The method of claim 1, wherein the processor is used to optimize the plurality of weighting factors based on previous transaction data by using the processor according to previous transaction data and a Bayesian Optimization Algorithm; BOA) optimizes the plurality of weighting factors. 如請求項1所述之方法,其中使用該處理器根據先前交易資料最佳化該複數個權重因數係為:使用該處理器根據一預定時段之先前交易資料最佳化該複數個權重因數。 The method of claim 1, wherein the processor is used to optimize the plurality of weighting factors based on prior transaction data by using the processor to optimize the plurality of weighting factors based on previous transaction data for a predetermined time period. 如請求項1所述之方法,其中使用該處理器根據先前交易資料最佳化該複數個權重因數係為:使用該處理器於休市時間根據先前交易資料最佳化該複數個權重因數。 The method of claim 1, wherein the processor is used to optimize the plurality of weighting factors based on prior transaction data by using the processor to optimize the plurality of weighting factors based on prior transaction data at a rest time.
TW102131567A 2013-09-02 2013-09-02 Strategic trading method TW201510905A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW102131567A TW201510905A (en) 2013-09-02 2013-09-02 Strategic trading method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW102131567A TW201510905A (en) 2013-09-02 2013-09-02 Strategic trading method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
TW201510905A true TW201510905A (en) 2015-03-16

Family

ID=53186762

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
TW102131567A TW201510905A (en) 2013-09-02 2013-09-02 Strategic trading method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
TW (1) TW201510905A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TWI604401B (en) * 2016-03-16 2017-11-01 han-ming Xie Device and method for calculation and display of financial commodity support pressure price

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TWI604401B (en) * 2016-03-16 2017-11-01 han-ming Xie Device and method for calculation and display of financial commodity support pressure price

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Jackson et al. The performance of insolvency prediction and credit risk models in the UK: A comparative study
Han et al. Bidding wars for houses
TWI242724B (en) Methods and systems for optimizing return and present value
US8335736B2 (en) Computer system and method for determining optimal asset allocation
TW530236B (en) Cross correlation tool for automated portfolio descriptive statistics
CA2362444A1 (en) Methods and systems for finding value and reducing risk
EP1266318A2 (en) Methods and systems for quantifying cash flow recovery and risk
Audrino et al. Semi-parametric forecasts of the implied volatility surface using regression trees
JP6288662B1 (en) Performance prediction management system and method
JP6474184B1 (en) Stock price prediction support system and method
TW201510905A (en) Strategic trading method
Chen et al. Using a stochastic economic scenario generator to analyse uncertain superannuation and retirement outcomes
Fiedler Taking stock of insurer financial performance in the individual health insurance market through 2017
CN114943582A (en) Information recommendation method and system and recommendation server
Chen et al. Using a stochastic economic scenario generator to analyse uncertain superannuation and retirement outcomes
JP6381844B1 (en) Computer system, method, and program for accumulating assets whose value varies over time
JP7481862B2 (en) Information processing device, information processing method, and computer program
Khuman et al. Constant proportion portfolio insurance strategies under cumulative prospect theory with reference point adaptation
JP6729859B2 (en) Prediction management method
Guirguis et al. Asymmetry in regional real house prices
Koo et al. Novel utility-based life cycle models to optimise income in retirement in the presence of heterogeneous preferences
Eccleston Cost of living pressures on Tasmanian households: causes and options for reform
Lin et al. Discrete Choice Models with Ambiguity Aversion: Product Line Pricing and Competition
Zhu The Effects of Carbon Pricing and related Policy Uncertainty on the Australian Electricity Sector
Liu et al. Intraday dynamics of volatility and duration: Evidence from the Chinese stock market