TH33605B - Tamper proof model for secure data conveying - Google Patents

Abstract

The DC60 model provides evidence of hacking operations. For the safe conveying of information is included. to the confusing pattern (4) beneath the printed information. to make the printed data unreadable such The separation of the printed data and format is confusing. or the prohibition of other functions of such confusing forms. It will show evidence of hacking and will make it readable. In a better manner, the data will be printed on a layer (6) placed over the confusing pattern (4). The data will be able to be printed by a traditional printer and will not need to be manipulated in later of the format to keep such information secure. Form showing evidence of hacking For the safe conveying of information is included. to the confusing pattern (4) beneath the printed information. to make the printed data unreadable such The separation of the printed data and format is confusing. or prohibiting any other functionality of such confusing forms. It will show evidence of hacking and will make it readable. In a better manner, the data will be printed on a layer (6) placed over the confusing pattern (4). The data will be able to be printed by a traditional printer and will not need to be manipulated in later of the format to keep such information secure.

Claims (7)

1. The unique stealth proof layouts are: translucent top layer (6A, 6B, 6C, 6D, 6E, 6F, 6G), top surface layer. The translucent top has been optimized to receive data printed on the printer and the sheet is not transparent. The bottom light (2A, 2B, 14C, 14D, 2E, 14F, 14G) which supports the confusing path (4A) seen through. A translucent plate on top, a confusing path, was chosen in such a way that Information printed on The top surface of the translucent top layer cannot be read while the translucent top layer is not. The light below supports confusing paths. Below the information that is printed on the top surface of The top translucent layer, where the top translucent layer and the non-transparent layer below are bonded together. Together, and where the printed data is on the top surface of the top translucent layer. Will be able to read when The bonding between the top translucent layer and the torn translucent bottom layer, and the top translucent layer and the non-transparent layer below have been physically separated, separated. This physicality provides an indication that the safety of the data printed on the top surface of the The top translucent layer sheet has been violated. 2. The form shows evidence of stealth action pursuant to claim 1, where the sheet is not transparent. The bottom light is the base layer (2A, 2B, 2E). 3. The form shows evidence of stealth action pursuant to claim 1, where the sheet is not transparent. The bottom light has been coated or masked (14C, 14D, 14E, 14F, 14G), which can be scraped or peeled. Out from under the top translucent layer 4. The form shows evidence of stealth action pursuant to claim 2, where the layer plate portion Translucent above (6A) supporting the printed data. Can take out It gives an irreversible indication of the condition. 5. The form shows evidence of stealth action pursuant to claim 2, where the base layer portion (2A, 2B, 2E) under printed data. Can be taken out Irreversible indication 6. The form shows evidence of stealth action pursuant to claim 4 or 5, where the The release (16A, 16B, 16E) has been placed between the top translucent layer and the base layer to facilitate the physical separation of the top translucent layer and the base layer. 7. Evidence-of-hacking form pursuant to claim 1, where transparent sheets The top (6B) has been cut, notch or cut in that characteristic. Attempts to take information that have been printed Leave the top surface of the top translucent layer Will cause the top translucent layer to tear or split