SU903940A1

SU903940A1 - Device for examining operators

Info

Publication number: SU903940A1
Application number: SU782632942A
Authority: SU
Inventors: Анатолий Михайлович Карасев; Владимир Маркович Львов; Валентин Владимирович Павлюченко; Юрий Иванович Смирнов; Пинхус Яковлевич Шлаен
Original assignee: Войсковая часть 03444
Priority date: 1978-06-26
Filing date: 1978-06-26
Publication date: 1982-02-07

Description

Изобретение относится к техническим средствам контроля и может быть использовано для оценки уровня подготовки операторов.The invention relates to technical means of control and can be used to assess the level of training of operators.

Известно устройство для контроля уровня подготовки операторов, содержащее блок индикации оценок, блок ввода ответов оператора, блок выдачи информации, соединенный с блоком анализа [1 ]. „10A device for monitoring the level of training of operators, comprising a unit for indicating grades, a unit for inputting operator responses, an information output unit connected to an analysis unit [1]. "10

Недостатком известного устройства является низкая эффективность вследствие ограничения на количество предъ^ являемых задач.A disadvantage of the known device is the low efficiency due to the limitation on the number of tasks presented.

Цель изобретения - расширение функциональных возможностей устройства за счет снятия ограничений на количество предъявляемых задач.The purpose of the invention is the expansion of the functionality of the device by removing restrictions on the number of tasks.

Указанная цель достигается тем, что устройство имеет блок определения уровня подготовки оператора, входы которого связаны с выходами блока анализа, а выходы соединены со входами блока индикации оценок и блока вы2 дачи информации, причем выход блока ответов оператора связан со входом блока анализа.This goal is achieved by the fact that the device has a unit for determining the level of training of the operator, the inputs of which are connected to the outputs of the analysis unit, and the outputs are connected to the inputs of the evaluation indication unit and the information output unit2, and the output of the operator response unit is connected to the input of the analysis unit.

Кроме того, блок определения уровня подготовки оператора содержит накапливающие сумматоры, блоки сравнения, первый и второй блоки суммиро- ·. вания, датчик исходных условий контроля, блок умножения и элементы И, при этом выходы первого накапливающего сумматора связаны с первыми входами блоков сравнения, выходы, которых связаны со входами элемента И, а выходы датчика исходных условий контроля связаны с первыми входами первого и второго блоков суммирования, выходы которых соединены со вторыми входами блоков сравнения, выходы блока умножения соединены со вторыми входами первого и второго блоков суммирования, а входы связаны с выходами датчика исходных условий контроля и второго накапливающего сумматора,In addition, the unit for determining the level of training of the operator contains accumulative adders, comparison blocks, the first and second blocks summarized ·. a sensor, the initial control conditions, the multiplication unit and AND elements, while the outputs of the first accumulating adder are connected to the first inputs of the comparison units, the outputs that are connected to the inputs of the And element, and the outputs of the initial control sensor are connected with the first inputs of the first and second summing units the outputs of which are connected to the second inputs of the comparison blocks, the outputs of the multiplication block are connected to the second inputs of the first and second summing blocks, and the inputs are connected to the outputs of the sensor of the initial control conditions and the second accumulating adder,

На фиг. 1 представлена блок-схема устройства,' на фиг. 2 - схема определения уровня подготовки.In FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a device, 'in FIG. 2 - scheme for determining the level of training.

Блок 1 выдачи информации, выход которого соединен со входом блока 2 5 анализа, представляет собой дешифратор, второй вход которого подключен к выходу блока 3 ввода ответов (набор клавиш). Два выхода блока 2 соединены с двумя входами блока 4 опре- ^,0деления уровня подготовки, выходы которого подключены к двум входам .блока 5 индикации оценок. Испытуемый 6 получает информацию из блока 1 выдачи информации и воздействует на блок З*⁵ввода ответа операторов.The information output unit 1, the output of which is connected to the input of the analysis unit 2 5, is a decoder, the second input of which is connected to the output of the response input unit 3 (set of keys). Two outputs of block 2 are connected to two inputs of block 4 of determination ^{, 0 of} dividing the level of training, the outputs of which are connected to two inputs of block 5 of the grade display. Subject 6 receives information from block 1 of the issuance of information and acts on block 3 * ⁵ input response operators.

Блок 4 определения уровня подготовки для случая двубальной оценки состоит из первого накапливающего сумматора 7, выход которого подклю- 20 чен ко входу блока 8 умножения, на второй вход которого поступает сигнал с выхода датчика 9 исходных условий, представляющего три калиброванных делителя напряжения. Выход бло- ²³ка 8 умножения и соответствующие выходы датчика 9 исходных условий подсоединены ко входам блоков 10 и 11 суммирования. Выходы блоков 10 и 11 суммирования подключены к первым вхо-30 дам блоков 12 и 13 сравнения, вторые входы которых подключены к выходу второго накапливающего сумматора 14. Выходы схем сравнения подключены ко входам элемента И 15. 35Block 4 for determining the level of preparation for the case of a two-point estimate consists of the first accumulating adder 7, the output of which is connected to the input of the multiplication unit 8, the second input of which receives a signal from the output of the initial condition sensor 9, which represents three calibrated voltage dividers. Bloch Yield ²³ 8 Single and multiplying respective outputs baseline sensor 9 are connected to the inputs of blocks 10 and 11 of summation. The outputs of the summing blocks 10 and 11 are connected to the first 30 inputs of the comparison blocks 12 and 13, the second inputs of which are connected to the output of the second accumulating adder 14. The outputs of the comparison circuits are connected to the inputs of the And element 15. 35

Устройство работает следующим образом.The device operates as follows.

Испытуемому 6 через блок 1 предъявления информации дается для решения задача, после решения которой он <о вводит ответы через блок 3 ввода в блок 2 анализа, который вырабатывает сигнал о введенном ответе и его ошибочности для блока 4 определения уровня подготовки, который выдает си гнала о сдаче или несдаче на блок 5 индикации.Test 6 through the block 1 of the presentation of information is given to solve the problem, after solving which he <o enters the answers through the block 3 input in block 2 analysis, which generates a signal about the entered answer and its error for block 4 determining the level of preparation, which gives a signal about delivery or non-delivery to the display unit 5.

Рассмотрим работу устройства для случая двухбальной оценки уровня подготовки. JQConsider the operation of the device for the case of a two-point assessment of the level of training. Jq

В этом случае в устройстве проводится проверка соотношений m А. + А.· η ° m Аз+ А_о< ηIn this case, the device checks the relations m A. + A. · η ° m Az + A _o <η

ЕиР’-Еии-г) 55 _А ΒΜί-Ν-Ενιά _д ей н-рп-еи d-p₂) enEPid-p^i-RntP^H-p^' при этом - максимальная доля ошибок для оценки Сдал;EiR'-Eii-d) 55 _A ΒΜί-Ν-Ενιά _d s n-p-eu dp ₂₎ enEPid-p ^ i-RntP ^ Hp ^ ' wherein - the maximum error rate for evaluation Passed;

Pg, - минимальная доля ошибок для оценки Не сдал)Pg, - the minimum proportion of errors for the assessment. Not passed)

- наибольшая вероятность, что действительно не- успевающий ученик оценен как неуспевающий',- the greatest likelihood that a truly underperforming student is rated as underperforming ',

- наибольшая вероятность, что действительно неподготовленный ученик оценен как подготовленный .- The greatest likelihood that a truly unprepared student is rated as prepared.

Значения коэффициентов величины А_о, А., А„ рассчитываются по формуле иThe values of the coefficients of the quantities A _about , A., A „are calculated by the formula and

Ί задаются экспериментатором посредством датчика 9 исходных условий контроля. .Ί are set by the experimenter through the sensor 9 of the initial control conditions. .

Величина η равна количеству предъявляемых задач й ее значение формируется на выходе первого накапливающего суммтора 7 и поступает на первый вход блока 8 умножения. На второй вход блока 8 поступает сигнал о величине А_о с датчика 9 исходных условий контроля. Сигнал, равный А_о· п, поступает на первые входы блоков 10 и 11 суммирования. На второй вход блока 19 поступает сигнал с блока 8 умножения, равный А^, а на второй вход блока 11 сумми^ованиявеличина Ag. С выхода блока 10 суммирования сигнал, равный А^ + Α_ο·η, поступает на первый вход блока 12 сравнения, а с выхода блока 11 суммирования сигнал, равный А^_+ Α^·η, поступает на первый вход блока 13 сравнения. На вторые входы блоков 12 и 13 поступает сигнал, равный количеству ошибочных решений, и формируемый на выходе второго накапливающего<сумматора 14. Блоки 12 и 13 сравнения осуществляют проверку приведенных выше неравенств.' ГТри этом могут быть*два исхода: либо выполняется одно из неравенств, либо не выполняются оба неравенства. В первом случае соответствующая схема сравнения вырабатывает сигнал, поступающий в блок 5 индикации оценок. Если это сигнал с блока 12, то блок 5 индуцирует оценку Сдал, а если с блока - то..Не сдал. Во втором случае блоки 12 и 13 вырабатывают сигналы, поступающие на входы элемента И 15» который, в свою очередь, вырабатыва5The value of η is equal to the number of tasks presented and its value is formed at the output of the first accumulating adder 7 and is supplied to the first input of the multiplication unit 8. The second input of block 8 receives a signal about the value of A _about from the sensor 9 of the initial control conditions. A signal equal to A _about · p is supplied to the first inputs of the summing blocks 10 and 11. The second input of block 19 receives a signal from the multiplication block 8, equal to A ^, and the second value of the summing block of the block 11 receives the value Ag. From the output of summing unit 10, a signal equal to A ^ + Α _ο · η is supplied to the first input of comparison unit 12, and from the output of summing unit 11, a signal equal to A ^ _ + Α ^ · η is supplied to the first input of comparison unit 13. The second inputs of blocks 12 and 13 receive a signal equal to the number of erroneous decisions and generated at the output of the second accumulating <adder 14. The comparison blocks 12 and 13 verify the inequalities given above. ' THREE there can be * two outcomes: either one of the inequalities holds, or both inequalities fail. In the first case, the corresponding comparison circuit generates a signal entering the evaluation indication unit 5. If it is a signal from block 12, then block 5 induces an assessment of Passed, and if it is from a block, then .. Do not pass. In the second case, the blocks 12 and 13 generate signals arriving at the inputs of the element And 15 "which, in turn, produces

II

90j ет сигнал о продолжении испытаний для блока 1.90j gives a signal to continue testing for block 1.

Для случая {-бальной оценки в датчике 9 исходных условий задаются (1+1) исходных условий контроля и ί блок 4 определения уровня подготовки состоит не из 2-х цепочек (фиг.2), а из £ цепочек, т.е. содержит t блоков сумматоров и V блоков сравнения.For the case of a {-point assessment in the sensor 9 of the initial conditions, (1 + 1) initial conditions of control are set and ί block 4 of determining the level of preparation does not consist of 2 chains (Fig. 2), but of £ chains, i.e. contains t adder blocks and V comparison blocks.

Предлагаемое изобретение обладает большой эффективностью определения уровня подготовки и простой схемы, количество элементов которой не заI висит от количества предложенных за1 ‘ дач.The present invention is highly effective in determining the level of training and a simple scheme, the number of elements of which does not depend on the number of proposed tasks.

Claims

The invention relates to technical means of control and can be used to assess the level of training of operators. A device for monitoring the level of training of operators is known, which contains a rating indication unit, an input unit for operator responses, an information output unit connected to an analysis unit 1 J. A disadvantage of the known device is low efficiency due to the limitation on the number of tasks presented. The purpose of the invention is the expansion of the functional capabilities of the devices. And due to the removal of restrictions on the number of tasks presented. This goal is achieved in that the device has an operator training level determination unit, the inputs of which are connected to the outputs of the analysis unit, and the outputs are connected to the inputs of the assessment indication unit and the information output unit, and the output of the operator response unit is connected to the input of the analysis unit. In addition, the block for determining the level of operator preparation contains accumulative adders, comparison blocks, the first and second blocks summed. The monitor, the baseline sensor, the multiplier and the AND elements, while the outputs of the first accumulating adder are associated with the first cares of the comparison blocks, the outputs that are connected with the inputs of the AND element, and the outputs of the sensor of the baseline monitoring conditions are associated with the first inputs of the first and the second summation blocks, the outputs of which are connected to the second inputs of the comparison units, the outputs of the multiplication unit are connected to the second inputs of the first and second summation blocks, and the inputs are connected to the outputs of the baseline sensor controls and second of the accumulator. 3 FIG. 1 is a block diagram of the device; FIG. 2 - a scheme for determining the level of training. The information output unit 1, the output of which is connected to the input of the analysis unit 2, is a decoder, the second input of which is connected to the output of the response input unit 3 (a set of keys). The two outputs of block 2 are connected to two inputs of the training level determination unit k, and whose inputs are connected to two inputs, the evaluation indication unit 5, the Test1 | th receives information from the information output unit 1 and acts on the input block of the operator’s response. The block C for determining the level of preparation for the case of double-bed evaluation consists of the first accumulating adder 7, the output of which is connected to the input of the multiplication unit 8, the second input of which receives a signal from the output of the sensor 9 of initial conditions representing the three calibrated voltage dividers. The output of the multiplication unit 8 and the corresponding outputs of the sensor 9 of the reference conditions are connected to the inputs of the units 10 and 11 of the sum. The outputs of the summation blocks 10 and 11 are connected to the first inputs of the comparison blocks 12 and 13, the second inputs of which are connected to the output in the ry accumulating adder. the strokes of the comparison circuits are connected to the inputs of the element AND 15 The device operates as follows. Subject 6 is given a task through the information presentation block 1 to solve a problem, after which he enters the answers via the input block 3 into the analysis block 2, which generates a signal about the entered answer and its inaccuracy for the block j of determination of the level of training, which gives the change signal or failure on the display unit. Consider the operation of the device for the case of a two-point estimate of the level of cooking. In this case, the device is carried out in the following way: the relations m: Ai + Ap е eu1} e-2-2) eGRAU-ROS-eU GR M-RgU lev (-l -) - EvTA 2L-ev.,) 3-enWH -pL) 3i B 0 evi n-ro-eu cH-Pi) eyiCPa (lP,) - EntPi (1-P2) with P, the maximum fraction of errors for estimating Pgi — r is the minimum fraction of errors for estimating Not passing the CL - the greatest likelihood that a student who does not succeed is rated as poor; p) —the greatest probability that a really unprepared student is rated as prepared. The values of the coefficients A, A, A 2 are calculated by the formula and are set by the experimenter by means of the sensor 9 control conditions. . The value of n is equal to the number of tasks presented and its value is formed at the output of the first accumulating summator 7 and is fed to the first input of the multiplication unit 8. The second input of block 8 receives a signal about the value of A from sensor 9 of the reference conditions of the control. A signal equal to AQ p is fed to the first inputs of summation blocks 10 and 11. The second input of block 10 receives the signal from block 8 multiplying, equal to A., and the second input of block 11 with sums of value A. The output of block 10 summation, the signal equal to A, +, goes to the first input of block 12, and with the output of the summation unit 11, a signal equal to, is fed to the first input of the comparison unit 13. The second inputs of blocks 12 and 13 receive a signal equal to the number of erroneous decisions and formed at the output of the second accumulating accumulator 1A. Comparisons 12 and 13 verify the above inequalities. In this case, there can be two outcomes: either one of the inequalities is satisfied, or both inequalities are not satisfied. In the first case, the corresponding comparison circuit generates a signal to the evaluation indication unit 5. If it is a signal from block 12, then block 5 induces a rating Pass, and if from a block it is., I did not pass. In the second case, the blocks 12 and 13 generate signals arriving at the inputs of the element 15 and the second one, in turn, generates a signal to continue the test for block 1. For the case of the final estimate, in the sensor 9 the initial conditions are set (. + 1) The baseline control conditions and the preparation level determination unit k consist not of 2 chains (figure 2, but of 2 chains, i.e. contains t blocks of adders and 2 comparison units. The present invention has a high efficiency of determination of preparation level and circuit idle time, elements which does not depend from the number of proposed tasks. Claim 1. A device for controlling the level of operator training, containing a rating indication unit, an input unit for operator responses, an information output unit connected to an analysis unit, different from the fact that, in order to expand the functionality of the device due to the removal of restrictions on the number of tasks to be performed, it has an operator level determination unit, the inputs of which are connected to the outputs of the analysis unit, and the outputs are connected to the inputs of the rating indication unit and the unit issuing information, the output of the operator response input block being associated with the input of the analysis block.

2. The device according to claim 1, characterized in that the block for determining the level of operator training contains accumulating adders. Comparison units, the first and second summation units, the baseline sensor controls, the multiplication unit and the element; nty, while the outputs of the first accumulating adder are connected to the first inputs of the block. the reference control conditions are associated with the first inputs of the first and second summation units, the outputs of which are connected to the second inputs of the comparison units, the outputs, the multiplication unit are connected to the second inputs of the first and second summation units, and the inputs are associated with the outputs of the sensor baseline control and the second accumulator adder. Sources of information taken into account during the examination 1. USSR Author's Certificate No. A19951, cl. G 09 B, 1971.