SU576582A1 - Automated examination system - Google Patents

Description

one

The invention relates to the field of technical aids and can be used for adaptive machine control of students' knowledge.

One of the well-known automated classes for monitoring students' knowledge contains an information output unit, a logic unit, an input unit, a display unit, a unit for calculating the mutual correlation of questions and correct answers, and allows for adaptive control by correlating the number of questions and correct answers 1.

However, this device eliminates the active intervention of the student in the process of selecting the next dose of information, which reduces the activity and effectiveness of the control.

Another well-known automated class for controlling students' knowledge contains a memory unit, a central audiovisual node, a computing unit, a programmer, an information board, a control unit, an audiovisual node, an evaluation unit, an input unit, an indicator of the learner’s actions, and an individual control unit. by design and phased control 2.

However, this device adapts according to a predetermined algorithm, which eliminates the activation of the control and reduces its effectiveness.

2

Of the known automated classes, the most blnknm is the class for controlling knowledgeable schools, containing a software control unit connected through

the distributor and directly to the blocks of presentation of educational information, connected to the first inputs of the corresponding response analysis blocks, repeat the inputs of which are connected to the outputs of the corresponding

response input blocks, the output of each response analysis block through the corresponding evaluation block is connected to one of the first inputs of the display unit 3. This device implements adaptive control and is trained by compiling data on the progress of control in the GWM, on the basis of which the computer controls learning.

However, in the known device, despite the presence of a computer, the adaptation is carried out

but only by a predetermined algorithm, without additional stimulation of the activity; control This eliminates the active intervention of the participant himself in the process of selecting the next dose of information (the dose is determined by the algorithm) and reduces its activity, which in turn reduces the activity and effectiveness of the control.

The aim of the invention is to improve the effectiveness of monitoring knowledge by creating active learning tools.

The essence of creating an active learning situation is as follows. The student, who correctly answered the question, has the right to choose the next dose of information (voiros), which is given out to all students at once, that is, he takes on the role of leader in the group of respondents. The leader of the group is determined after answering each question, while the leader, in addition to the conventional points for the correct answer, going to the knowledge loop, also earns game points, on the basis of which upon completion of the work the winner among the group of leaders is determined. All information about the results of the game controller is displayed on the demo board. The creation of such a game (active learning) situation and control greatly optimizes the process itself and improves its effectiveness. Adaptation is realized by the presence of subroutines of varying degrees of complexity (students get a different number of conventional points depending on the complexity of the CTII subprogramme for correct answers), and by allowing the transition from a simple subprogram to a more complex one only after successful answers to the questions of a simple subprogramme. In this case, the number of possible subroutines, as well as the ratio of conditional and game points, can be changed by the teacher by adjusting the game algorithm.

The proposed device contains a priority block of students' answers and individual task selection blocks, the outputs of which are connected to the software control unit inputs, and inputs to one outputs of the student response priority block, the other outputs of which are connected to the corresponding input of the program control unit n with the second input of the indicator block, The inputs of the student priority response block are connected to the outputs of the response analysis blocks. In this case, the priority block of students' answers serves to determine the student who first correctly answered the questioner, that is, the leader on this issue, and the individual task selection block allows the leader to select the task.

The algorithm of the game control is selected as follows.

Coitrol starts with the simplest subroutine. The respondent iravilno ia first task gets odip conditional score for the moral response, which goes into the test scores, as well as one game score - as a leader. At the same time, this student has the right to choose the next task, and within the limits of the same simpler subprogram, if there are students who have incorrectly answered the questions. If the participants correctly answered the first question, then the task can be selected from the second more complex subprogram. The stimulus to the choice of questions from a more complex program is the fact that two points are counted for the question of the second subprogramme.

(with the right answer), and on the third subprogramme, the points go to the assessment of knowledge. If during the second assignment but the first subprogramme again receives students who do not respond to both the first and the second task, they are removed from further control as meaning unsatisfactory knowledge. In the future, the work cycle is repeated, taking into account the fact that for each pyrogram, the first incorrect answer from students gives only one more task of the same subroutine. In the case of two unsuccessful attempts, in the second subprogramme, students are also excluded from

control, as having a poor knowledge. If the student has gone through the first and second subprogrammes, then the grade is given to him upon completion of the response to the third program based on the number of conditional points obtained by the nm, and the ratio given by the teacher. At the same time, the system of “fines” is also provided for in the game control - if the leader incorrectly responds to the task he chooses, he “is fined

for one game point. Thus, upon completion of the students' answers to the number of questions asked by the teacher, all students and receive estimates, which are set according to a given ratio based on conditional

points received for answering questions.

In addition, the winner will be determined

there are students who have the largest number of times

leader and successfully answered questions.

The drawing shows the proposed automated class that implements the above control algorithm.

The teacher’s console 1 is connected to the student learning console 2 and the ip-unit 3, which is also connected to the student learning console. Blocks

the analysis of answers 4 is connected to the outputs of the input blocks of answers 5 and blocks and then educational information 6. At the same time, the outputs of the blocks for analyzing answers 4 are connected to the inputs of the assessment blocks 7, the outputs of which are connected

e inputs of the display unit 3 and with the inputs of the priority block of answers of students 8. The outputs of the block of priority of the answers of students 8 connect with the inputs of the display unit 3, the unit of individual task selection 9 and

block program control 10, the inputs of which are also connected to the outputs of the blocks of individual choice of tasks 9 and blocks of educational information 6, and the outputs are connected to the input of the distributor 11,

connected in turn to the inputs of blocks of pre-educational information 6.

The work of the automated class is as follows. The teacher 1 and the student learners 2 console will show questions on the first sub-program through the presentation of training information 6 and the students will begin to answer, entering the answers in the response input blocks 5. The analysis of the answers is carried out in the analysis blocks

of the answers 4. When the answers are moral

From the outputs of the response analysis blocks 4, they go to the assessment blocks 7, where the quality of the response is indicated and information about the students' knowledge is accumulated as a sum of conditional points (one score is recorded in the first subroutine for the correct answer to the first subroutine). Information about the conditional scores received for the answer, as well as the quality of the answer to the question from the outputs of the rating units 7 is fed to the inputs of the display unit 3. The signals from the outputs of the response analysis blocks 4 are also sent to the inputs of the student answers priority unit 8, where the student's remote control 2 from which the first was the correct answer. The unit for the individual choice of tasks 9 of this panel of the student 8 who is a student of the priority block of answers receives a signal permitting the choice of the task. The student, who works at this console, through the unit for individual selection of tasks 9, the program management unit 10, the distributor 11 and the unit for presenting educational information 6 selects the next question. In this case, if all students correctly answered the question, then the software control unit 10 permits the selection of the next task from the second subprogram, which is more complex. If there are students who incorrectly answer the questions, the program management unit 10 allows the selection of the next task only from the same first subprogram. The student, who is the first to correctly answer the question, besides the conventional score for the answer, one game point is recorded in the display unit from the priority block of student answers. When answering the second question, the work cycle is repeated. However, students who do not answer the questions of the first sub-program twice are excluded from further monitoring and are automatically rated as "2. Students who answer correctly at least one of the two questions of the first subprogramme continue their work. Students, who correctly answer the first to the second question of the first subprogram, also receive, in addition to the conditional score, which counts the marks, one game score. At the same time, the next question can be selected by the second subprogram, regardless of whether all students answered the second question of the first subprogram correctly (i.e., a maximum of two questions are asked in the first and second subprogrammes). In the following, the cycle of operation is repeated. Students who have twice failed to answer the questions of the second subprogramme are excluded from further control and are automatically rated as "2. Students who answered at least one of the second node correctly, continue to work.

In this case, for each correct answer in the second subprogram, two conditional points are recorded in the evaluation unit 7, and for the correct answer given by the first, an additional one game point in the display unit 3. The transition to the third more complex program is carried out similarly to the previously described one. For the correct answer on the third subprogramme, three conditional points are recorded in the rating unit 7, and the correct answer, given first, as before, is one game point - in the display unit 3. In this case, if you work on any subprogramme that chooses a question, answers pa him wrong, then he

"Is fined one game point, i.e., one game point is subtracted from the priority indication block of students 8 from the sum of its game points in display unit 3 by a signal. At the end of the control, that is, when

students answer the number of questions predetermined by the teacher; in all assessment blocks 7, grades will be given based on the sum of collected conventional points for a given ratio. In addition, there will be

dreams and results of competition - games under control. The winner will be the student with the highest number of game points. Taking into account that the information on the number of conditional and game points scored at any time is displayed in the display unit 3, then at any moment the entire group of students and the instructor see the real picture of the game control, i.e., both the leaders and the current results of all learning groups.

Thus, the proposed device allows optimization of the control process through the implementation of an adaptive program by creating active training situations, as well as activating the control process by detecting and thoroughly demonstrating the progress of the game control process - the implementation of active training situations. Ultimately, both optimization and activation

The process of knowledge control provides enhanced-ie its effectiveness, which in turn improves the quality of training.

Claims (3)

1. USSR author's certificate D 327510, M. C, G Q9B 7/00, 05.05.72. 2. USSR author's certificate number 393765, M. class. G 09B 7/00, 03/27/74. 3. USSR author's certificate jYo 419951, m. Cl. G 09B 7/00, 11.11.74.