SE1451645A1 - Improved navigation for a robotic lawnmower - Google Patents

Description

15 20 25 30 their location (longitude, latitude, and altitude) to Within a few metres, or even centimetres, using signals transmitted along a line-of-sight by radio from satellites. Receivers calculate the precise time as Well as position and carrier phase, Which can be used as a reference for scienti?c experiments. A satellite navigation system With global coverage may be termed a global navigation satellite system or GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System).

Particularly good accuracy of GNSS systerns is obtained by using one or more fixed, land-based reference receivers, or beacons, in addition to the satellites. This is called differential GNSS. There are several DGNSS techniques, such as the classical DGNSS (or DGPS), the Real Time Kinematics (RTK) and the Wide Area RTK (WARTK).

The use of GNSS systems requires good reception of satellite signals to Work reliably. For a robotic laWnmoWer Which employs satellite navigation, the heterogeneous and compact nature of the typical Work area (i.e., the laWn in a garden) Will pose an additional challenge. If the satellite signals become blocked by buildings, roofs, sheds, trees, garden umbrellas, awnings, fo liage, etc, in or near the Work area, the robotic lawnmower may lose track and be momentarily prevented from continuing With satellite navigation-based operation in the Work area. For differential GNSS, the signal from a reference receiver or beacon may likewise be blocked by, for example, any of the obstacles mentioned above and/or by radio disturbances such as interference, multi-path propagation delay, etc.

If, because of a momentary situation as described above, the robotic laWnmoWer loses track of the GNSS signals and is therefore momentarily prevented from continuing With satellite navigation-based operation in the Work area, several problems may arise.

First, if the robotic laWnmoWer has no other navigation means, it Will have to suspend its current propulsion/movement and Wait until the satellite navigation receiver again receives the satellite signals suf?ciently Well to recalibrate its current position and resume its movement and satellite navigation-based operation in the Work area. It must be recalled that a robotic laWnmoWer is a device Which operates autonomously Without the direct assistance or control by a human user.

However, every time a robotic laWnmoWer is forced to suspend its operation and stop its movement momentarily and then resume the operation and movement after a short time, the electrical motor and mechanical drive line Will be subj ected to a certain stress. If such stops 10 15 20 25 occur frequently, which might be the case in a heterogeneous and compact garden, the accumulated wear and tear of critical parts of the robotic lawnmower Will be considerable, and a premature breakdown of any of these critical parts is at risk.

Moreover, repeated stops and resumptions of the robotic lawnmower movement will consume a small but not negligible additional amount of electric power, hence causing a penalty in battery power consumption and reducing the maximum operational duration until next recharging of the battery.

Should the robotic lawnmower only stop and keep cutting the grass, this will lead to increased wear of the lawn and will lead to tracks or spots being formed leaving the lawn unevenly cut.

In addition, a repeated habit of interrnittent stopping and restarting by the lawn- mower may be interpreted by the garden owner as a potential mal?lnction. As a result, the garden owner may arrive at an ill-founded decision to take the lawnmower out of operation and seek professional service assistance or raise a Warranty claim against the seller of the lawn- mower. It goes without saying that a lawnmower which is taken out of operation will leave the lawn unattended to and thus provide insufficient grass-cutting work performance.

In view of the problems and shortcomings indicated above, there is a need for an improved manner of operation for a robotic lawnmower in a heterogeneous and compact work 8163..

SUMMARY The inventors of the present invention have realized, after inventive and insightful reasoning, that it will not be necessary to stop an ongoing movement or propulsion of a robotic lawnmower when its satellite navigation device loses track of the satellite signals and needs recalibration. Instead, the robotic lawnmower can continue to be movably operated based on a deduced reckoning navigation sensor, wherein a deduced reckoning position estimate obtained by the deduced reckoning navigation sensor may be used to shorten the time for recalibration of the satellite navigation device, thereby allowing the robotic lawnmower to quickly regain track of the satellite signals and resume its satellite signal-based operation. 10 15 20 25 It is therefore an object of the teachings of this application to overcome one or more of the problems and shortcomings listed above by providing a robotic lawnmower for movable operation Within a Work area. The robotic lawnmower comprises a satellite navigation device, a deduced reckoning navigation sensor and a controller. The controller is configured to cause the robotic lawnmower to movably operate Within the Work area in a first operating mode, the first operating mode being based on positions determined from satellite signals received by the satellite navigation device, determine that a position cannot be reliably deterrnined based on satellite signals received by the satellite navigation device, and in response thereto cause the robotic lawnmower to movably operate Within the Work area in a second operating mode. In the second operating mode, the controller is configured to obtain a deduced reckoning position estimate by the deduced reckoning navigation device, define a search space using the deduced reckoning position estimate, recalibrate the satellite navigation device based on the defined search space, and, once the satellite navigation device has been recalibrated, cause the robotic lawnmower to again operate in the first operating mode.

It is also an object of the teachings of this application to overcome one or more of the problems and shortcomings listed above by providing a robotic Work tool system comprising a charging station and a robotic lawnmower according to the above.

It is a ?irther object of the teachings of this application to overcome one or more of the problems and shortcomings listed above by providing a method of controlling a robotic lawnmower for movable operation Within a Work area. The method comprises movably operating the robotic lawnmower Within the Work area in a first operating mode, the first operating mode being based on positions deterrnined from satellite signals received by a satellite navigation device, deterrnining that a position cannot be reliably deterrnined based on satellite signals received by the satellite navigation device, and, in response thereto, movably operating the robotic lawnmower Within the Work area. In the second operating mode, the method comprises obtaining a deduced reckoning position estimate by the deduced reckoning navigation device, defining a search space using the deduced reckoning position estimate, recalibrating the satellite navigation device based on the defined search space, and, once the satellite navigation device has been recalibrated, again operating the robotic lawnmower in the ?rst operating mode. 10 15 20 25 30 It is moreover an object of the teachings of this application to overcome one or more of the problems and shortcomings listed above by providing a computer readable storage medium encoded with instructions that, when executed on a processor, perform the method referred to above.

Using the teachings herein, a robotic lawnmower is thus provided which does not stop or discontinue its operation as it loses satellite reception. Furthermore, as the inventors have realized that for a robotic lawnmower operating in a garden, a minor deviation from an expected trajectory will mo st likely not have catastrophic consequences and an unsupervised continued operation relying on deduced reckoning may thus be used, unlike for example an unsupervised tractor used to plough a field in the vicinity of living arrangements. The robotic lawnmower may thus be arranged to continue operation according to the objects above thereby solving the problems for example listed in the background section.

Other features and advantages of the disclosed embodiments will appear from the following detailed disclosure, from the attached dependent claims as well as from the drawings.

Generally, all terms used in the claims are to be interpreted according to their ordinary meaning in the technical field, unless explicitly defined otherwise herein. All references to "a/an/the [element, device, component, means, step, etc]" are to be interpreted openly as referring to at least one instance of the element, device, component, means, step, etc., unless explicitly stated otherwise. The steps of any method disclosed herein do not have to be performed in the exact order disclosed, unless explicitly stated.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS The invention will be described in further detail under reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: F igmre l shows a schematic overview of a robotic lawnmower according to one embodiment of the teachings of this application; Figure 2A shows a schematic view of a robotic working tool system with a robotic lawnmower according to one embodiment of the teachings of this application; Figure 2B shows a schematic view of a robotic working tool system according to another embodiment of the teachings of this application; 10 15 20 25 30 Figure 3 shows a schematic view of a robotic working tool system in operation in a heterogeneous and compact work area according to one embodiment of the teachings of this application; Figure 4 shows a ?owchart for a general method of controlling a robotic lawnmower for movable operation within a work area, according to the teachings herein; Figure 5 shows a schematic view of a computer-readable medium according to the teachings herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION The disclosed embodiments will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which certain embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided by way of example so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.

Figure 1 shows a schematic overview of a robotic lawnmower 100 having a body 140 and a plurality of wheels 130. In the exemplary embodiment of figure 1 the robotic lawnmower 100 has 4 wheels 130, two front wheels 130” and the rear wheels 130”. At least some of the wheels 130 are drivably connected to at least one electric motor 150. It should be noted that even if the description herein is focussed on electric motors, combustion engines may alternatively be used possibly in combination with an electric motor.

In the example of figure 1, each of the rear wheels 130” is connected to a respective electric motor 150. This allows for driving the rear wheels 130” independently of one another which, for example, enables steep tuming.

The robotic lawnmower 100 also comprises a controller 110. The controller 110 may be implemented using instructions that enable hardware functionality, for example, by using executable computer program instructions in a general-purpose or special-purpose processor that may be stored on a computer readable storage medium (disk, memory etc) 120 to be executed by such a processor. The controller 110 is confrgured to read instructions from the 10 15 20 25 memory 120 and execute these instructions to control the operation of the robotic lawnmower 100 including, but not being limited to, the propulsion of the robotic lawnmower. The controller 110 may be implemented using any suitable, publically available processor or Programmable Logic Circuit (PLC). The memory 120 may be implemented using any commonly known technology for computer-readable memories such as ROM, RAM, SRAM, DRAM, FLASH, DDR, SDRAM or some other memory technology.

The robotic lawnmower 100 may further have at least one sensor 170; in the example of figure 1 there are two sensors 170, arranged to detect a magnetic field (not shown).

If present, the sensors 170 will be connected to the controller 110, and the controller 110 will be configured to process any signals received from the sensors 170. The sensor signals may be caused by the magnetic field caused by a control signal being transmitted through a boundary wire (for more details on charging stations, control signals and boundary wires, see the description below with reference to figure 2). This enables the controller 110 to determine whether the robotic lawnmower 100 is close to or crossing a boundary wire, or inside or outside an area enclosed by the boundary wire.

The robotic lawnmower 100 also comprises a work tool 160, which may be a grass cutting device, such as a rotating blade 160 driven by a cutter motor 165. The cutter motor 165 is connected to the controller 110 Which enables the controller 110 to control the operation of the cutter motor 165. The controller may also be configured to determine the load exerted on the rotating blade, by for example measure the power delivered to the cutter motor 165 or by measuring the axle torque exerted by the rotating blade. The robotic lawnmower 100 also has (at least) one battery 180 for providing power to the motors 150 and the cutter motor 165.

The robotic lawnmower 100 is also arranged with a satellite navigation device 190 which comprises a satellite signal receiver 191. In the disclosed embodiment, the satellite signal receiver 191 is a GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) satellite signal receiver, such as a GPS (Global Positioning System) satellite signal receiver. The satellite navigation device 190 is connected to the controller 110 for enabling the controller 110 to determine current positions for the robotic lawnmower 100 using the satellite navigation device 190 and to control the move- ments of the robotic lawnmower 100 based on the deterrnined positions. 10 15 20 25 30 The robotic lawnmower 100 further comprises at least one deduced reckoning navigation sensor 195 for providing signals for deduced reckoning navigation, also referred to as dead reckoning. Examples of such deduced reckoning navigation sensor(s) 195 are odometers and compasses.

The robotic lawnmower 100 may further be arranged with a wireless com- munication interface 197 for communicating with other devices, such as a server, a personal computer or smartphone, or the charging station. Examples of such wireless communication devices are BluetoothTM, Global System Mobile (GSM) and LTE (Long Term Evolution), to name a few.

In addition, the robotic lawnmower 100 may be arranged With collision sensor means for detecting when the robotic lawnmower 100 runs into an obstacle. The collision sensor means may be one or more separate sensors (such as accelerometers, pressure sensors or proximity sensors) arranged in or on the housing of the robotic lawnmower 100 and capable of detecting an impact caused by a collision between the robotic lawnmower 100 and an obstacle. Altematively, the collision sensor means may be implemented as a program routine run by the controller 110, being effective to detect a sudden decrease of the rotational speed of any of the drive wheels 130” and/or sudden increase in the drive current to the electric motor 150.

Figure 2A shows a schematic view of a robotic lawnmower system 200 in one embodiment. The schematic view is not to scale. The robotic lawnmower system 200 comprises a charging station 210 and a boundary wire 250 arranged to enclose a work area 205, in which the robotic lawnmower 100 is supposed to serve. The charging station 210 has a charger 220, in this embodiment coupled to two charging plates 230. The charging plates 230 are arranged to co-operate with corresponding charging plates (not shown) of the robotic lawnmower 100 for charging the battery 180 of the robotic lawnmower 100. The charging station 210 also has, or may be coupled to, a signal generator 240 for providing a control signal (not shown) to be transmitted through the boundary wire 250. The control signal preferably comprises a number of periodic current pulses. As is known in the art, the current pulses will generate a magnetic field around the boundary wire 250 which the sensors 170 of the robotic lawnmower 100 will detect.

As the robotic lawnmower 100 (or more accurately, the sensor 170) crosses the boundary wire 250 the direction of the magnetic field will change. The robotic lawnmower 100 will thus be 10 15 20 25 30 able to determine that the boundary wire has been crossed, and take appropriate action by controlling the driving of the rear wheels 130” to cause the robotic lawnmower 100 to turn a certain angular amount and return into the work area 205. For its operation within the work area 205, in the embodiment of figure 2A, the robotic lawnmower 100 mainly uses the satellite navigation device 190, supported by the deduced reckoning navigation sensor 195 as will be described in some more detail further below.

The use of more than one sensor 170 enables the controller 110 of the robotic lawnmower 100 to determine how the robotic lawnmower 100 is aligned with relation to the boundary wire 250 by comparing the sensor signals received from each sensor 170. This enables the robotic lawnmower to follow the boundary wire 250, for example when returning to the charging station 210 for charging. Optionally, the charging station 210 may have a guide cable 260 for enabling the robotic lawnmower to find the entrance of the charging station 210. In one embodiment the guide cable 260 is formed by a loop of the boundary wire 250. In one embodi- ment the guide wire 260 is used to generate a magnetic field for enabling the robotic lawnmower 100 to find the charging station without following a guide cable 260.

Figure 2B shows a schematic view of the robotic lawnmower system 200 in another embodiment. The schematic view is not to scale. In this embodiment, the boundary 250” of the work area 205 is not defined by a physical boundary wire. Instead, the robotic lawnmower 100 uses the satellite navigation device 190 and/or the deduced reckoning navigation sensor 195 to remain within the work area 205 by comparing the successive deterrnined positions of the robotic lawnmower 100 against a set of geographical coordinates defining the boundary 250” of the work area 205. This set of boundary defining positions may be stored in the memory 120, and/or included in a digital (virtual) map of the work area 205, as will be described in some more detail further below.

Figure 3 shows a schematic view of a robotic lawnmower system 200 where a problem with the prior art is illustrated. The schematic view is not to scale. Depicted is a schematic garden surrounding a house or other building. The garden has a lawn, the cutting of which is to be attended to by the robotic lawnmower system 200. The roof R of this house or building may block the satellite signals when the robotic lawnmower 100 is nearby, thereby preventing the satellite signal receiver 191 in the satellite navigation device 190 from receiving 10 15 20 25 30 10 satellite signals in sufficient numbers or quality to reliably determine, by the controller 110, a current position of the robotic lawnmower 100.

Furthermore, ?rst and second trees T1 and T2 may similarly cause momentary blocking of satellite signals, and so may a garden umbrella U, depending on the momentary location of the robotic lawnmower 100 within the work area 205. Also, a building B nearby may cause momentary satellite signal blocking when the robotic lawnmower is close to that building.

As a result of such momentary satellite signal blocking caused by obstacles R, T1, T2, U and B in or near the heterogeneous work area 250, the satellite navigation device 190 and controller 110 of the robotic lawnmower 100 will lose track and be momentarily prevented from continuing with satellite navigation-based operation in the work area 250.

The satellite signal-blocking obstacles R, T1, T2, U and B in figure 3 are merely examples; various other types of obstacles may cause similar problems, including but not limited to sheds, rocks, trees, awnings, foliage, etc, in or near the work area 250.

Figure 4 shows a ?owchart for a general method of operating the robotic lawn- mower 100 in a manner which solves, eliminates or at least mitigates the problems and shortcomings associated with the prior art. Generally Speaking, the method in figure 4 is based on the inventive understanding that for situations when the robotic lawnmower 100 is momentarily prevented from continuing with satellite navigation-based operation in the work area 250 because of a momentary loss of track of the satellite signals, instead of stopping the robotic lawnmower 100 to a halt and waiting until the satellite signals can be tracked again, the movement or propulsion of the robotic lawnmower 100 continues based on deduced reckoning navigation. The time it takes for the robotic lawnmower 100 to recalibrate and find track of the satellite signals again is reduced by de?ning a search space which is based on a deduced reckoning position estimate and which is therefore more accurate and limited than a corresponding search space that would have been based solely on the last known position obtained from the satellite signals. It is thus made possible for the robotic lawnmower 100 to quickly regain track of the satellite signals. As a result, the problems and shortcomings associated with repeated halts and restarting of lawnmower movement or propulsion, as were referred to in detail in the Background section, can be so lved, eliminated or at least mitigated.

The method shown in figure 4 will now be described in more detail. 10 15 20 25 30 11 In a first step 410, the controller 110 is configured to cause the robotic lawnmower 100 to movably operate within the work area 205 in a first operating mode. The first operating mode is based on positions deterrnined from satellite signals received by the satellite navigation device 190. The robotic lawnmower 100 is thus configured to utilize its satellite navigation device 190 to control its working operation. In one embodiment, the controller 110 deterrnines a mowing pattem based on one or more positions of the robotic lawnmower 100. The mowing pattem may be deterrnined as a direction or heading to be taken, or a circular pattem or other mowing pattem. Such mowing patterns are known to a skilled person and will not be discussed further herein.

Alternatively or additionally, the mowing pattem may be based on a digital or virtual map of the work area 205. To this end, the controller may be con?gured to store a map of the work area in the memory 120. The map may be a collection of geographical positions, for example indicating the boundaries of the work area 205, or it may be a more detailed virtual or digital map containing for instance information also about the location of the charging station 210, and/or about forbidden subareas (e.g. known obstacles) in the work area 205.

The map may have been configured by the user (e.g. the garden owner) upon installation or subsequent update of the robotic lawnmower system 200 by using a remote computer device, wherein the contents of the map may have been downloaded to the robotic lawnmower 100 over the wireless communication interface 197.

In one embodiment, the controller 110 may be configured to generate or update a map of the work area 205 on the fly as the robotic lawnmower 100 operates. For instance, obstacles in the work area 205 as detected by the aforementioned collision sensor means may be translated into small regions of the map where the work area 205 shall be avoided by the robotic lawnmower 100, whereas the boundary 205 of the work area 250 as detected by the magnetic sensors 170 may be translated into regions of the map which de?ne the limits of the work area 205, etc.

In a second step 420, the controller 110 is configured to determine that a position of the robotic lawnmower 100 cannot currently be reliably deterrnined based on satellite signals received by the satellite navigation device 190. It should be noted that the number of satellite signals needed to reliably determine the position of the robotic lawnmower 100 may differ 10 15 20 25 30 12 between different satellite signal receivers 191, as well as on the operation and safety issues of the robotic lawnmower 100. For example, if only the position is of interest, it may suf?ce to receive three reliable satellite signals to establish a reliable position, whereas if, for example, the amplitude or time is also of relevance, a fourth satellite signal may need to be reliably received.

In response to having deterrnined in step 420 that a position of the robotic lawnmower 100 cannot currently be reliably deterinined based on satellite signals, the controller 110 causes in a third step 430 the robotic lawnmower 100 to movably operate within the work area 205 in a second operating mode. Hence, the movement or propulsion of the robotic lawnmower 100 is not stopped when the mode changes from the first operating mode to the second operating mode, instead it continues to be movably operable by means of the electric motor 150 continuing with the propulsion of the drive wheels 130”, the robotic lawnmower 100 thereby continuing to move in the work area 205.

In the second operating mode, the deduced reckoning navigation sensor 195 is used. The deduced reckoning navigation sensor 195 may be adapted for detecting one or more of the following navigation parameters: position, speed, direction, tilt angle, and acceleration. For instance, the deduced reckoning navigation sensor 195 may comprise an odometer, a compass or an accelerometer.

As is well known per se, deduced reckoning (or dead reckoning) works so that the last known direction of the robotic lawnmower 100 is taken to be the current and assumed direction. By, for example, measuring the number of wheel tums (or rather the tum speed of the wheel axle and the elapsed time), a current position estimate can be deterrnined. If the robotic lawnmower 100 encounters the boundary 250/250°, the controller 110 may cause it to tum, and by counting the number of wheel tums, the new direction can be deterrnined. The controller 110 may thus control the operation of the robotic lawnmower 100 based on position estimates made available from the deduced reckoning.

While in the second operating mode, the controller 110 will attempt to recalibrate the satellite navigation device 190 to regain track of the satellite signals, so as to allow re-entry into the first operating mode when a reliable position can again be reliably determined based on satellite signals received by the satellite navigation device 190. The recalibration procedure generally involves the following Steps. 10 15 20 25 13 In a fourth step 440, the controller 110 uses the deduced reckoning navigation sensor 195 to obtain a deduced reckoning position estimate. In a fifth step 450, the controller 110 de?nes a search space using the deduced reckoning position estimate.

The de?ned search space is used in a sixth step 460 for recalibrating the satellite navigation device 190. Finally, once the satellite navigation device 190 has been recalibrated in step 460, the controller 110 causes in a seventh step 470 the robotic laWnmoWer 100 to again operate in the ?rst operating mode.

In one advantageous embodiment, the satellite navigation device 190 is a Global Navigation Satellite System device, such as a Global Positioning System device, and comprises a single-frequency carrier phase differential satellite signal receiver 191. The carrier phase differential satellite signal receiver 191 Will support very accurate navigation for the robotic laWnmoWer 100 With precision of the order of centimetres in the positions obtainable by the satellite navigation device 190. This is particularly advantageous for a heterogeneous and compact Work area 205 in the form of a typical garden.

The single-frequency carrier phase differential satellite signal receiver 191 Will provide a bene?t in terms of component cost efficiency, since a single-frequency carrier phase differential satellite signal receiver is much less expensive than a dual-frequency carrier phase differential satellite signal receiver. It is a general objective in the field of robotic laWnmoWers to facilitate a cost-ef?cient component choice.

For this advantageous embodiment, the recalibration step 460 for the satellite navigation device 190 involves resolving an integer Wavelength ambiguity for satellite signals received by the satellite navigation device 190. Since the satellite navigation device 190 lost track of the satellite signals in the preceding step 420, the satellite navigation device 190 needs to determine the distances to the satellites in order to regain accurate position deterrnination based on the satellite signals. In order to do this, the satellite navigation device 190 needs to know the exact number of integer Wavelengths to a certain satellite when the tracking of the satellite signal from that satellite starts. A priori, the exact number of integer Wavelengths is not known, i.e. there is initially an integer Wavelength ambiguity that needs to be resolved. When the integer Wavelength ambiguity has been resolved, the single-frequency carrier phase 10 15 20 25 30 14 differential satellite signal receiver 191 can then accurately track phase changes in the received satellite signal.

For a single-frequency carrier phase differential satellite signal receiver, a coarse search space for the integer Wavelength ambiguity resolution can be established based on an estimated starting position derived from a pseudo code in the received satellite signal. HoWever, the precision of the estimated starting position Will be rather poor, typically i 1 m. For a satellite signal Wavelength at 19 cm or 24 cm (1575 MHz and 1228 MHz), this Will mean that there are 10 possible integer Wavelength solutions for each satellite. With 10 available satellites, the total number of possible integer Wavelength solutions Will amount to 1010. To resolve an ambiguity among 1010 different solutions Will take considerable time, typically of the order of 10 minutes.

A ten-minute recalibration time is clearly improper for a robotic laWnmoWer.

The disclosed embodiment provides a substantial improvement to this situation by making use of the deduced reckoning position estimate obtained from the deduced reckoning navigation device 195 When de?ning the search space for the integer Wavelength ambiguity resolution. The search space obtained in this Way Will be substantially smaller than the coarse search space derived from the pseudo code in the received satellite signal. For instance, When the deduced reckoning position estimate has as precision of i 15 cm and the satellite signal Wavelength is 19 cm, this Will mean that there are only 3 possible integer Wavelength solutions for each satellite. With 10 available satellites, the total number of possible integer Wavelength solutions Will amount to 103. To resolve an ambiguity among 103 different solutions can be made quite quickly, typically of the order of 1-10 seconds. Such a short recalibration time is satisfactory for a robotic laWnmoWer, and a considerable reduction in the recalibration time has therefore been achieved.

As a result, therefore, it Will not be necessary to stop the movement or propulsion of the robotic laWnmoWer 100 When the satellite navigation device 190 loses track of the satellite signals and needs recalibration; instead the robotic lawnmower 100 can be movably operated in the second operating mode based on the deduced reckoning navigation sensor 195, Wherein a deduced reckoning position estimate obtained by the deduced reckoning navigation sensor 195 may be used to shorten the time for recalibration of the satellite navigation device 190. 10 15 20 25 30 15 In the light of the inventive understandings above, in one refined embodiment the controller 110 is therefore configured, in the second operating mode, to define the search space for recalibration of the satellite navigation device 190 by first obtaining a pseudo range position estimate from satellite signals received by the satellite navigation device 190, then deterrnining a coarse search space candidate from the pseudo range position estimate, and finally defining the search space by reducing a scope of the coarse search space candidate based on the deduced reckoning position estimate.

In another refined embodiment of the robotic lawnmower, the controller 110 is configured, in the second operating mode, to estimate whether the defined search space will allow integer wavelength ambiguity resolution within a threshold time, and, if so, continue in the second operation mode at least for the duration of the threshold time. Otherwise, the controller 110 will stop an ongoing propulsion of the robotic lawnmower 100.

In still another re?ned embodiment of the robotic lawnmower, the controller 110 is configured, in the second operating mode, to measure a duration of the second operation mode, determine whether a threshold time has been exceeded, and, if so, stop an ongoing propulsion of the robotic lawnmower 100.

Each of the latter two of these re?ned embodiments will be particularly suitable to serve a work area where it is not desired to let the robotic lawnmower 100 operate movably too long without satellite navigation. Such a work area may, for instance, be a garden containing fragile objects for which it is desired to avoid collision to a large extent. Still, thanks to the reduced recalibration time for the satellite navigation device 190, the robotic lawnmower 100 will often be capable of switching seamlessly between the first and second operation modes, since the recalibration time will not exceed the threshold time. The threshold time may therefore be set to a value which slightly exceed the normal reduced recalibration time as provided for by the present invention.

Figure 5 shows a schematic view of a computer-readable medium as described in the above. The computer-readable medium 50 is in this embodiment a data disc 50. In one embodiment the data disc 50 is a magnetic data storage disc. The data disc 50 is configured to carry instructions 51 that when loaded into a controller, such as a processor, execute a method or procedure according to the embodiments disclosed above. The data disc 50 is arranged to be 10 15 20 16 connected to or Within and read by a reading device 52, for loading the instructions into the controller. One such example of a reading device 52 in combination with one (or several) data disc(s) 50 is a hard drive. It should be noted that the computer-readable medium can also be other mediums such as compact discs, digital video discs, ?ash memories or other memory technologies commonly used. In such an embodiment the data disc 50 is one type of a tangible computer-readable medium 50.

The instructions 51 may also be downloaded to a computer data reading device 54, such as the controller 110 or other device capable of reading computer coded data on a computer-readable medium, by comprising the instructions 51 in a computer-readable signal 53 which is transmitted via a wireless (or Wired) interface (for example via the Intemet) to the computer data reading device 54 for loading the instructions 51 into a controller. ln such an embodiment the computer-readable signal 53 is one type of a non-tangible computer-readable medium 50.

The instructions may be stored in a memory (not shown explicitly in figure 5, but referenced 120 in figure 1) of the computer data reading device 54.

References to computer program, instructions, code etc. should be understood to encompass software for a programmable processor or firmware such as, for example, the programmable content of a hardware device whether instructions for a processor, or configuration settings for a fixed-function device, gate array or programmable logic device etc.

The invention has mainly been described above with reference to a few embodi- ments. However, as is readily appreciated by a person skilled in the art, other embodiments than the ones disclo sed above are equally possible Within the scope of the invention, as defined by the appended patent claims.

Claims (11)

1 P114240041 SE 1451645-4 FORBATTRAD NAVIGERING FOR EN ROBOTGRASKLIPPARE PATENTKRAV

1. Robotgrasklippare (100) for rorligt arbete inom ett arbetsomrade (205), varvid robotgrasklipparen innefattar: en satellitnavigationsanordning (190); en dodrakningsnavigationssensor (195); en styrenhet (110), varvid styrenheten är konfigurerad att: forma robotgrasklipparen (100) att rorligt arbeta inom arbetsomradet (205) i ett forsta driftlage, varvid det forsta driftlaget är baserat pa positioner faststallda av satellitsignaler mottagna av satellitnavigationsanordningen (190); faststalla att en position inte tillfOrlitligt kan faststallas baserat pa satellitsignaler mottagna av satellitnavigationsanordningen (190), och som svar darpa forma robotgrasklipparen (100) att rorligt arbeta inom arbetsomradet (205) i ett andra driftlage; varvid i det andra driftlaget: erhalla en dodrakningspositionsuppskattning av dodrakningsnavigationsanordningen (195); definiera en sokrymd genom att anvanda dodrakningspositionsuppskattningen; omkalibrera satellitnavigationsanordningen (190) baserat pa den definierade sokrymden; och nar satellitnavigationsanordningen (190) har omkalibrerats, forma robotgrasklipparen (100) att aterigen arbeta i det forsta driftlaget.

2. Robotgrasklippare enligt patentkrav 1, varvid satellitnavigationsanordningen (190) är en anordning for ett globaltnavigationssatellitsystem, sâ som en anordning for ett globalt positioneringssystem. 2

3. Robotgrdsklippare enligt patentkrav 2, varvid satellitnavigationsanordningen (190) innefattar en singelfrekvens-bdrvagsdifferentiell satellitsignalmottagare (191).

4. Robotgrdsklippare enligt patentkrav 3, varvid styrenheten (110) är konfigurerad att omkalibrera satellitnavigationsanordningen (190) baserat pa den definierade sokrymden genom att losa en tvetydighet hos en heltalsvaglangd for satellitsignaler mottagna av satellitnavigationsanordningen (190).

5. Robotgrdsklippare enligt nagotdera av foregaende patentkrav, varvid dadrakningsnavigationssensorn är anordnad att detektera en eller flera av foljande navigationsparametrar: position, hastighet, riktning, lutningsvinkel och acceleration.

6. Robotgrdsklippare enligt nagotdera av foregaende patentkrav, varvid styrenheten (110) är konfigurerad, i det andra driftldget, att definiera sokrymden genom att: erhalla en pseudoavstandspositionsuppskattning fran satellitsignaler mottagna av satellitnavigationsanordningen (190); faststalla en grov sOkrymdskandidat fran pseudoavstandspositionsuppskattningen; och definiera sokrymden genom att reducera ett omfang av den grova sokrymdskandidaten baserat pa dodraknings positionsuppskattningen.

7. Robotgrdsklippare enligt nagotdera av patentkraven 4 till 6, varvid styrenheten (110) är konfigurerad, i det andra driftldget, att: uppskatta om den definierade sokrymden tillater heltalsvaglangd tvetydighets losning inom en troskeltid; och i sa fall: fortsatta i det andra driftlaget atminstone for varaktigheten av troskeltiden; och om inte: stanna en pagaende framdrivning av- robotgrasklipparen (100). 3

8. Robotgrasklipp are enligt nagotdera av foregaende patentkrav, varvid styrenheten (110) vidare är konfigurerad att: mata en varaktighet av det andra driftlaget; faststalla om en troskeltid har overskridits; och i sa. fall: stanna en pagaende framdrivning av- robotgrasklipparen (100).

9. Robotverktygssystem (200) innefattande en laddningsstation (210) och en robotgrasklippare (100) cnligt nagotdcra av forcgdende krav.

10. Metod for styrning av en robotgrasklippare (100) for rorlig arbete inom ett arbetsomrade (205), varvid metoden innefattar: rorlig drivning (410) av robotgrasklipparen (100) inom arbetsomradet (205) i ett forsta driftlage, varvid det forsta driftlaget är baserat pa positioner faststallda av satellitsignaler mottagna av en satellitnavigationsanordning (190); faststallning (420) av att en position inte tillforlitligt kan faststallas baserat pa satellit signaler mottagna av- satellitnavigationsanordningen (190); och som svar darpa rorlig drivning (430) av robotgrasklipparen (100) inom arbetsomildet (205) i ett andra driftlage; varvid i det andra driftlaget, erliallning (440) av en dodrakningspositionsuppskattning av dodrakningsnavigationsanordningen (195); definiering (450) av en sokrymd genom att anvanda dodrakningspositionsuppskattningen; omkalibrering (460) av satellitnavigationsanordningen (190) baserat pa 25 den definierade sokrymden; och nar satellitnavigationsanordningen (190) har omkalibrerats, aterigen driva (470) robotgrasklipparen (100) i det forsta driftlaget.

11. Datorlasbart lagringsmedium (50) kodat med instruktioner (51) som, vid exekvering av en processor, utfor metoden enligt patentkrav 10. 2 2601 1/4 17 ...- --- - -- ..... ....•N. /\ /\ / / \• \...- .....- I 130' 1 1 ) 19 191 i 150 190 130"