RU2628031C1 - Method of estimation and analysis of flight technique using data of flight data recorders of parametric flight information - Google Patents

Abstract

FIELD: aviation.

SUBSTANCE: for the analysis of flight technique they formalize combat training courses in a certain way, develop and enter methodological exercise schemes into the database, develop flight tasks based on a formalized course and methodical schemes, develop identification models for various flight elements, read the recorded information from the flight data recorders, identify the flight elements, compare the identification results with the flight task data, and estimate the completeness and sequence of its implementation, evaluate individual flight elements and the flight as a whole, analyze the flight technique detecting violations of the flight element procedure, record the results in a statistic database, obtain generalized data on the flight proficiency of aviation crews.

EFFECT: reliability of the results of estimation and analysis of flight technique.

5 cl, 1 tbl, 3 dwg

Description

The invention relates to the field of aviation technology. The method is used for the automatic identification of elements performed by the crew in flight, as well as for the automatic assessment and analysis of piloting techniques when performing flight elements in order to identify violations of the methodology for their implementation and to determine the crew’s readiness to perform next flight tasks.

The closest analogue is a data preparation system for the analysis of piloting results - patent RU 2179744, cl. G08G 5/00, 2002. The method implemented in the known system includes interpreting flight tasks in the form of an ordered set of flight elements, each of which is a flight section and its corresponding parameters, reflecting the state of the model of the pilot-aircraft-medium system ; automatic detection of the beginning and end of flight sections; identification of sites with established and non-established piloting modes; identification of areas of entry and exit to the corresponding site; selection at the flight sites of a set of parameters whose values are given in the flight task; comparing the current values of the flight parameters with the set with the identification of deviations from the set values of the parameters; calculation of quantitative estimates for piloting areas, elements and flight as a whole with revealing characteristic piloting errors.

The identification of errors and the assessment of deviations only according to the standards of combat (flight) training courses (KBP), carried out by the method implemented in this system, does not provide for the identification of violations of the methodology for performing flight elements, which is the main task of the operational (inter-flight) analysis aimed at determining crew readiness to carry out the next flight mission, as well as to determine measures to eliminate identified violations, errors and deviations from the methodology for performing flight elements. In addition, a statistical analysis of the results of the automatic assessment of the performance of flight elements has not been implemented, which reduces the impact of the output assessment results on the quality indicators of flight training.

The objective of the present invention is the operational obtaining during the flight process immediately prior to the next flight of the crew reliable results of the assessment and analysis of the piloting technique when performing the elements in the previous flight by automating the processes of identifying flight elements, evaluating and analyzing them using a set of controlled parameters necessary to detect violations of the methodology performing flight elements and determining crew readiness for the next flight mission Nia.

The specified result is achieved by the fact that the method for evaluating and analyzing the piloting technique according to the data of on-board devices for recording parametric flight information includes formalizing flight training courses in the amount necessary for information and reference support and solving applied flight training problems by describing the subject area as a set of parameters, their meanings and dictionaries, with the use of which the course exercises are presented in a certain sequence of characteristics; development and input into the database of methodical schemes for exercises of the flight task; development of flight tasks using a formalized course and methodological exercises; development of identification models taking into account the peculiarities of the performance of flight elements in separate and continuous piloting options; reading registered information from the aircraft’s onboard registration device; processing of flight information with identification of flight elements and determination of values of controlled parameters at specific points and on sections of the flight path; comparison of the results of the identification of flight elements and the parameters of their implementation with the data of the flight mission; assessment of the completeness and sequence of the flight mission; assessment of the piloting technique of individual elements and flight stages according to the standards of the combat training course; assessment of exercises and flight in general; analysis of piloting techniques with identification of violations of the methodology for performing flight elements; recording the results of evaluation and analysis in a database and storing them as statistical material; analysis of statistics data with obtaining generalized data on flight training of crews of the aviation unit.

The method can be used to solve similar problems in flight simulators. The general scheme for solving problems of automated assessment and analysis is presented in FIG. one.

Moreover, the methodological schemes have a formalized part, including a list of stages, elements and the conditions for their implementation in the form of a list of parameters and values for each stage and element, and an informal part, containing various instructions and information to be used in the development of a flight mission. The development of identification models is carried out taking into account the determination of the beginning and completion of flight elements in the modes of horizontal flight, flight with a set and with a decrease in altitude, in a straight line and with a turn. Identification of flight elements is carried out according to the characteristic set of separate sections of the flight path that are characteristic of each element. The analysis of the piloting technique is carried out according to a certain set of private quality indicators with the identification of violations of the methodology for performing flight elements.

KBP formalization is carried out by the course designer in the amount necessary for the information and reference support of flight training (solving long-range planning tasks, flight planning, preparing flight crews for flights, developing flight tasks, solving objective control tasks, taking flight training results into account, etc.). Formalization of the course is carried out using a special program that provides a description of the subject area in the form of a set of parameters, their values and dictionaries, using which the exercises of the course are represented by a certain sequence of characteristics. Parameters can have numerical values, values in the form of concepts, values in the format of “date”, “time”, “angle”, etc. The content of dictionaries is formed by a set of parameters depending on the membership in the description object. The content of each exercise is recorded by a specific set of characteristics, the list of which, if necessary, can be expanded. The following list of characteristics is defined for formalizing KBP exercises: exercise number; informal presentation of textual content; type of training; elements and directions of training; the minimum number of flights established for the development of the exercise; total flight duration; the duration of the main part of the flight mission; type of exercise (flight for exercise: export, training, test, etc.); type of aircraft (combat, combat training, etc.); the required number of crews to perform a group flight; weather conditions; flight altitude; the area of the exercise (zone, route, firing range, tactical range, etc.); terrain characterization (plain, mountain, water surface); load limits; requirements for the level of preparation and training of crew members; organizational and methodological instructions; an indicator of the difficulty of the exercise; stages and elements of a flight mission; additional data (additional requirements and instructions that apply only to this exercise); algorithm for recording the results of the flight mission (hours, the number of flights by types and elements of types of flight training, data on inspections by types of flight training, data on breaks in flights by types and elements of types of flight training, data on the achieved level of flight training, etc. .). The contents of the characteristics are recorded in tabular form. The number of fields and rows in the tables has no limits. Data in the characteristic can be recorded with a sign of data ownership: aircraft type, flight number, class qualification of the pilot, flight conditions, flight altitude, etc. The characteristic can be recorded with the distribution of data according to the values of one attribute or several without restriction. In addition, the data in the characteristic can be recorded in the form of groups, each of which in the general case can be marked with the following features: “alternative data” (used for all characteristics); to record the list of stages and elements of the flight task: “the number of repetitions is not defined”, “the sequence of elements of the group is not defined”, “the element may be absent”. The need to use these signs is due to the ambiguity in the content of individual exercises of the course.

The structure of formalized KBP exercises can be represented as follows.

The general structure of the exercise:

1. Exercise Number

2. Name of exercise

3. The content of the KBP exercise in text form (copy)

4. Feature 1

5. Feature 2

……………

N. Characteristic N

Feature Structure

1. Parameters that determine the ownership of these characteristics.

2. Content specifications.

The structure of the data defining the ownership of the content of the characteristic

Parameter 1: Value 1.1.1, Value 1.1.2, ..., Value 1.1.a; Value 1.2.1, Value 1.2.2, ..., Value 1.2.b; ……………………………………………………………………………………… Value 1.A.1, Value 1.A.2, ..., Value 1.Ag; Parameter 2: Value 2.1.1, Value 2.1.2, ..., Value 2.1.d; Value 2.2.1, Value 2.2.2, ..., Value 2.2.е; ……………………………………………………………………………………… Value 2.Б.1, Value 2.Б.2, ..., Value 2.Б.ж; ……………………………………………………………………………………… Parameter N: Value N.1.1, Value N.1.2, ..., Value N.1.z; Value N.2.1, Value N.2.2, ..., Value N.2.and; ……………………………………………………………………………………… Value N.B.1, Value N.B.2, ..., Value N.B.k.

Content Characteristics:

Type 1

Value 1, Value 2, ..., Value n.

For example, for the “Type of Aircraft” characteristic, the values may be: a combat aircraft, a combat training aircraft, a training aircraft, i.e. exercise can be performed on any type of aircraft.

Type 2

Parameter 1: Value 1.1, Value 1.2, ..., Value 1.a;

Parameter 2: Value 2.1, Value 2.2, ..., Value 2.b;

………………………………………………………………………

Parameter Р: Value Р.1, Value Р.2, ..., Value Р.в.

For example, for the characteristic “Conditions of fulfillment” the content of the characteristic can be written in the following form:

- meteorological conditions for implementation: in the PMU (simple meteorological conditions), in the SMU (complex meteorological conditions) under the clouds;

- the height of the task: at extremely low altitude, at low altitude, at medium altitude;

- cloud cover in points no more than: 6;

- flight visibility not less than: 7000.

Type 3

This structure is focused on recording the characteristic “Accounting for the results of flight training”.

Concept 1.1, Concept 1.2: Concept 1.2.1, Concept 1.2.2, ..., Concept 1.2.g;

Concept 2.1, Concept 2.2: Concept 2.2.1, Concept 2.2.2, ..., Concept 2.2.d;

……………………………………………………………………………………………

Concept R.1, Concept R.2: Concept R.2.1, Concept R.2.2, ..., Concept R.2.e.

For example:

Concept 1.1 = “Flight Accounting for KBP Exercises”,

Concept 1.2 = “Name of the corresponding database partition”:

Concept 1.2.1 = “Exercise Number NNN”, Concept 1.2.2 = “Exercise Number XXX”, ..., Concept 1.2.d = “Exercise Number UUU”;

Concept 2.1 = “Accounting for flight interruptions by elements of types of flight training”,

Concept 2.2 = “Name of the corresponding database partition”:

Concept 2.2.1 = "ElVLP_1", Concept 2.2.2 = "ElVLP_2", ..., Concept 2.2.d = "ElVLP_N";

Concept 2.1 = “Accounting for flight interruptions for inspection by types of flight training”,

Concept 2.2 = “Name of the corresponding database partition”:

Concept 2.2.1 = “VLP_1”, Concept 2.2.2 = “VLP_2”, ..., Concept 2.2.G = “VLP_N”;

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Note:

ELVLP - an element of the type of flight training, VLP - a type of flight training.

Type 4

This structure is focused on recording the characteristic “Requirements for the level of flight training and training”.

Concept 1.1

Concept 1.2: Concept 1.2.1, Value 1.1.1, ..., Concept 1.2.z, Value 1.2.z;

Concept 2,

Concept 2.1: Concept 2.1.1, Value 2.1.1, ..., Concept 2.1.i, Value 2.1.i;

………………………………………………………………………………………………

Concept P.1,

Concept P.2: Concept P.2.1, Value P.2.1, ..., Concept P.2.k, Value P.2.k.

For example:

Concept 1.1 = “Have a minimum of plaque”,

Concept 1.2 = “Name of the corresponding database partition”:

Concept 1.2.1 = “Name of the type of plaque 1”, Value 1.2.1,

Concept 1.2.2 = “Name of type of plaque 2”, Value 1.2.2,

Concept 1.2.z = “Name of the type of plaque 3”, Value 1.2.z;

Concept 2.1 = "Have the number of flights on ELVL not less",

Concept 2.2 = “Name of the corresponding database partition”:

Concept 2.2.1 = "Name ELVLP_1", Value 2.2.1,

Concept 2.2.2 = "Name ELVLP_2", Value 2.2.2,

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Concept 2.2.z = "Name ELVLP_z", Value 2.2.z;

Concept 3.1 = “Do not have breaks in flights on ELVLP”,

Concept 3.2 = “Name of the corresponding database partition”:

Concept 3.2.1 = "Name ELVLP_1", Value 3.2.1,

Concept 3.2.2 = "Name ELVLP_2", Value 3.2.2,

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Concept 3.2.i = "Name ELVLP_i", Value 3.2.z;

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Type 5

The structure of the characteristic, presented in the form of a diagram, is focused on recording the stages and elements of the flight task.

Signs of ambiguity are used in those cases when various options for their implementation are allowed in the exercise regarding individual elements:

AL (sign of the availability of alternative data) - elements 1.1 and 1.2 of stage 1 are alternative, i.e. one of those marked with the number of group 1 is executed (there may be several such groups).

NP (sign of an unspecified sequence of execution) - elements 1.3 and 1.4 of group 1 and elements 1.6 and 1.7 of group 2 can be performed in any sequence.

NK (sign of an undetermined number of repetitions) - element 1.8 of stage 1 and element 2.2 of stage 2 can be performed repeatedly in accordance with the flight task.

MO (a sign indicating that when re-practicing the exercise, the element in the flight task may be absent) - in this example, element 1.9 of step 1.

When developing flight tasks for the upcoming flight shift, the ambiguities indicated in the exercise are eliminated.

One of the objectives of the course is its use in the development of methodological schemes of exercises, which are the main source of data in the development of flight tasks to be performed in the process of upcoming flights. This is due to the fact that the course indicates data common to all aviation units and units, without taking into account the peculiarities of organizing and conducting flights in specific conditions. In the methodological schemes, all the parameters of the performance of flight missions are specified, taking into account the conditions of flights in this aviation unit. The methodological scheme is developed in the form of a flight task without indicating belonging to a specific crew. The methodological scheme has a formalized part, including a list of stages and elements to be performed, as well as the conditions for their implementation in the form of a list of parameters and values for each stage and element. The non-formalized part of the methodological scheme contains various instructions and information to be used in the development of a flight task: a graphic flight scheme in the form of a sequence of symbols of elements with parameters and values for their fulfillment, conditions for the exercise, simulation result, flight safety requirements; assessment standards, etc.

The data of the methodological scheme, in turn, are used to develop a flight task to be performed in the process of upcoming flights. When developing a flight task, the list of exercises to be worked out in flight is indicated, the type of flight for each exercise (export, training, test, etc.), the list of elements to be performed in flight (s) is specified, the parameters of the elements are performed, the ambiguity in data, the date of the flight is recorded, the departure time and duration of the flight are assigned, the airspace elements that are allocated for the performance of this flight task (zone numbers are specified , route, training ground, etc.), the call sign of the crew commander (pilot), as well as the names of crew members (for example, an instructor) are recorded. The developed flight mission can be used as a standard one as a “template” for preparing a flight mission for execution during the upcoming flights. At the same time, without changing the content of the flight mission, a new flight date is recorded, the departure time and, if necessary, the flight duration are changed, the airspace elements that are allocated for the flight mission (zone, route, training ground, etc.) are specified if a flight task is being developed for another crew, another call sign of the crew commander (pilot), as well as other names of the crew members, are recorded. The development and input of flight mission parameters is performed using the special program “Flight Mission Development”. Entering the flight task parameters into the software database is a prerequisite for solving the problems of evaluating and analyzing piloting techniques in an automated mode. These operations are performed during the general and preliminary preparation for flights. In general, the preparation of a flight mission using this software corresponds to the established procedure for the development of flight tasks in aviation units. The software designed to formalize the course of combat (flight) training and development of flight missions is universal and can be used for its intended purpose for all types of aviation and aircraft types.

Before solving the problems of assessment and analysis, the flight information is first rewritten from its carrier into the database of the ground-based flight information processing device, and then an express analysis of flight information is performed in order to identify violations of the flight-operational limitations of the aircraft, failures and malfunctions of aircraft, and also violations of the rules of its operation. At the same time (in a single cycle), the identification of the flight elements is carried out, as well as the determination of the values of the controlled parameters at the control points and on sections of the flight path.

In this case, the identification of flight elements is understood as the definition of their type (turn on the afterburner, turn on the maximum, slide, coup, etc.), as well as the calculation of parameter values characterizing the actual (registered) conditions for their fulfillment, which are determined by the values of altitudes, speeds, angles of roll, pitch, course, glide, attack, overload, etc. Identification of flight elements is carried out according to the characteristic set of separate sections of the flight path characteristic for each element. The main principle of identification is that for each element the characteristic features, design parameters and possible limits of their change are determined, which together represent a unique description for each element, which allows to distinguish elements from each other. In the process of developing recognition modules, possible options for the implementation of flight elements were taken into account so that the probability of their identification was at least 0.95. The main difference between the recognition methods of this invention from the existing ones is a more accurate determination of the start and end time of the flight elements and their individual sections with a mean square error of not more than ± 1 s, which significantly increased the reliability of the output results of the assessment and analysis performed in automated mode. In developing the identification modules, the peculiarities of the flight elements in separate and continuous flight versions were taken into account, as well as the possibility of the beginning and completion of the flight elements in the horizontal flight mode, flight with climb and decrease, in a straight line and with a turn. During the operation of the identification module, the values of the monitored parameters are calculated: the physical values of the parameters recorded in flight (for example, altitude, speed, overload at the control point); deviations of the physical values of the parameters from those set by the flight task (for example: deviation of altitude and speed from the given values at the input and output), calculated values (for example: turning angle, dispersion, directional angle of the radio station, etc.). Values of controlled parameters are used in solving problems of assessment and analysis.

Evaluation of piloting techniques is carried out according to the standards of KBP. Course standards are entered into the database of the flight information processing device by the course designer in the process of formalizing it. First, the piloting technique is evaluated for each element performed by the crew in flight, using a two- or four-point system. Moreover, each element receives a rating of "offset" / "non-offset" or "excellent", "good", "satisfactory", "unsatisfactory". An item that is rated “fail” or “unsatisfactory” is considered not to be completed. Then, a comparison of the list of elements of the flight task to be performed is performed with the list of elements actually performed by the crew in flight, and an assessment is made of the two-point system in terms of completeness and sequence of the flight mission, as well as estimates for the stages of the flight, exercises and the flight as a whole for two or a four-point system. Evaluation of the piloting technique is carried out by a limited number of controlled parameters characterizing the overall result of the element. For example: the maximum bend in draft is estimated by the deviation of the height and speed of entry from the set values, the maximum deviation of the height and speed of flight from the actual values of the height and speed of entry, the deviation by the angle of rotation; Nesterov’s loop is estimated by the deviation from the specified altitude and flight speed at the input and output, the magnitude of the normal overload at the input, the maximum deviation of the angle of attack in the control section by the angle of attack, and the value of the deviation of the course angle at the output relative to the input. Evaluation by a limited list of monitored parameters does not provide a solution to one of the main objectives of objective control - identifying violations of the methodology for performing flight elements, determining the causes of unsatisfactory results of their implementation, determining the impact on flight safety of detected violations and deviations, determining the crew's readiness for the next flight mission.

In the present system, the solution of this problem is carried out in the module for the analysis of piloting techniques using a significantly larger number of monitored parameters, compared to the assessment, that detect violations of the methodology for performing flight elements (table 1).

As indicators of quality in the analysis are used:

- actual (recorded in flight) values of flight parameters;

- deviations of the actual values of the flight parameters from the values specified by the flight task (including those established by the manual for the flight operation of the aircraft and the methodology for performing flight elements);

- extreme, largest and smallest values in the areas of steady and unsteady flight modes;

- dispersion of parameters in the areas of the steady state flight mode;

- indicators of management coordination;

- the duration of the flight sections;

- the average value of the flight parameters and their deviations from the set values;

- the frequency (number) of discrete actions in certain sections (stages) of the flight path.

The list of controlled parameters for analysis is selected in such a way that the automated analysis algorithm is close to the instructor's work, which is especially important for controlling independent flights of flight personnel.

When compiling a list of controlled parameters for automated analysis, the requirements of the manual for the flight operation of the aircraft, the requirements of the methods for performing flight elements, and also the personal experience of the flight crew were taken into account.

The analysis is performed by comparing the values of the monitored parameters with the standards for classifying their values. The standards used in the analysis of the quality of performance of flight elements, in contrast to the standards of combat training courses, are developed separately for each type of aircraft and for each element, which ensures the reliability of the output analysis results necessary for flight training practice. The analysis module defines the standards of two levels. The first characterizes the ability of the pilot (crew) to pilot in the zone of optimal values of flight parameters. The standards of analysis of the first level are determined by a model of the following type:

Nx = m _x ± 1.0 * σ _x

The standards of the analysis of the second level can be represented by a model of the form:

Nx = m _x ± K * σ _x ,

where Nx is the standard value of the parameter;

m _x - assessment of mathematical expectation;

σ _x - estimate of the standard deviation;

K is a coefficient whose value is determined by the admissible probability of the values of the controlled parameter.

For example, if the range of admissible values of the controlled parameter includes all values whose probability (frequency) of registration does not exceed 0.85, the coefficient K will be 1.44. In this case, a violation of the methodology for executing an element with respect to parameter X will occur if the value of the controlled parameter goes beyond the standard value Nx. Each of these identified violations receives the status of the event - Si. In the general case, the cause of an unsatisfactory result of an element may be a certain combination of such events, which displays both the cause and the cause-effect relationship of the events. For example, the absence or insufficient duration of a straight dive site can be ascertained by the following message: “Absence (insufficient duration) of a straight dive site: underestimated the average angle of heel at the input, underestimated the angle of attack at the input, underestimated vertical overload at the output, premature height of the output from the dive. "

As a general characteristic of the level of flight training and the pilot's (crew )'s training in piloting technique, an integral quality indicator (IPC) is used, which is defined as the probability of an element, stage, exercise and flight performance in general in the region (zone) of optimal values of flight parameters:

For the element "X": IPKh = 1-ΣSx / ΣРх,

where ΣSx is the number of events when the values of the controlled parameters go beyond the values that define the optimal value zone (CAP) of this parameter on the numerical axis;

ΣРх - the total number of controlled parameters of this element.

Similarly, the values of the IPC for the stages, exercises and flight as a whole are determined.

The results of the assessment and analysis are displayed on the screen of the video terminal (display) in tabular form (Fig. 2, 3), and are also recorded in the database and stored as statistical material for the entire period of the pilot's flight operation.

In this invention, for the analysis of statistical data, the following functions are implemented:

- display on the video terminal screen in graphical form the values of the quality indicators of the flight mission (the values of the monitored parameters, their ratings according to the course standards, ratings and integral indicators of the quality of the elements, stages, exercises, flight as a whole);

- calculation and drawing on the graphs of values of quality indicators of trend lines characterizing the dynamics of changes in quality indicators (results of flight training);

- identification of violations of the methodology for performing flight elements characteristic of a given pilot (crew) in order to improve the methodology of flight training;

- improvement (correction) of the regulatory framework for assessment and analysis.

Thus, the method provides for the automation of the processes of identification, assessment and analysis of piloting techniques when performing elements performed by the crew in flight; operational solution of the problems of assessment and analysis during the flight process immediately before the next departure of the aircraft crew; increasing the reliability of the output results of identification, assessment and analysis by eliminating the human factor in the output of "manual" methods for monitoring the actions of flight personnel; identification of violations of the methodology for performing flight elements; recording and storing the results of assessment and analysis for the entire period of flight work of crew members in the form of statistical material; analysis of statistical data for the specified period of flight training to solve the following tasks: monitoring the dynamics of changes in the assessment and analysis of piloting techniques; the identification of violations of the methodology for performing flight elements that are most characteristic of a given pilot and, on this basis, improving the methodology of flight training; improving the regulatory framework for solving the problems of assessment and analysis; adaptation (adjustment) of the software and regulatory framework, depending on the characteristics of the organization of flight training in this aviation unit.

The data obtained in aggregate can be used for ranking flight crews, selecting crews with the most stable training skills, determining the level of flight training and other goals.

Claims (18)

1. A method for evaluating and analyzing piloting techniques according to on-board parametric flight information recording devices, including: - formalization of combat training courses in the amount necessary for information and reference support and solving applied problems of flight training, by describing the subject area in the form of a set of parameters, their values and dictionaries, using which the exercises of the course are represented by a certain sequence of characteristics; - development and input into the database of methodological schemes for exercises of the flight task; - the development of flight tasks using a formalized course and methodological exercises; - development of identification models taking into account the peculiarities of the performance of flight elements in separate and continuous piloting options; - reading registered information from the aircraft’s onboard registration device; - processing of flight information with identification of flight elements and determination of the values of controlled parameters at specific points and in sections of the flight path; - comparison of the results of the identification of the flight elements and the parameters of their implementation with the data of the flight task, - assessment of the completeness and sequence of the flight mission; - assessment of the piloting technique of individual elements and phases of flight according to the standards of the combat training course; - assessment of exercises and flight in general; - analysis of piloting techniques with identification of violations of the methodology for performing flight elements; - recording the results of the assessment and analysis in the database and their storage as statistical material; - analysis of statistics data with obtaining generalized data on flight training of crews of the aviation unit. 2. The method according to p. 1, characterized in that the methodological schemes have a formalized part, including a list of steps, elements and conditions for their implementation in the form of a list of parameters and values for each step and element, and an informal part containing various instructions and information to be use when developing a flight mission. 3. The method according to p. 1, characterized in that the development of identification models is carried out taking into account the determination of the beginning and completion of flight elements in the modes of horizontal flight, flight with a set and with a decrease in altitude, in a straight line and with a turn. 4. The method according to p. 1, characterized in that the identification of the flight elements is made according to the characteristic for each element of the set of individual sections of the flight path, different by the execution method. 5. The method according to p. 1, characterized in that the analysis of the piloting technique is carried out according to a specific set of private quality indicators with the identification of violations of the methodology for performing flight elements.

Images