RU2580059C1 - Expert-analytical information system for remote rating evaluation of regulatory acts and drafts thereof - Google Patents

Abstract

FIELD: information technology.

SUBSTANCE: invention relates to information technology, specifically to an expert-analytical information system for organisation of remote rating and completion of legal acts. System comprises integrated data transmission network decomposition server, at least one information storage unit and at least one remote automated workstation of registered user-expert, interaction between decomposition server, server for authentication of parties, server for description and processing problem fragments, server for description and processing of author fragments, server of rating and server for operation results forming is performed by means of a local area network built on Ethernet technology.

EFFECT: technical result is increased efficiency of system operation when generating regulatory documents.

9 cl, 1 dwg

Description

The invention relates to the field of information technology and computer technology, and in particular to an expert-analytical information system for remote rating assessment of regulatory legal acts and the completion of their projects with the participation of geographically remote experts.

A rating system is known from the prior art, comprising at least a server with a result evaluation unit, an analysis and processing unit, a result output unit connected via a data network to at least one data input device, characterized in that the result evaluation unit made at least in the form of series-connected calculation block using a transition matrix, a distribution block of the results obtained by the certification assessment parameters and an expert assessment block, and correctly the results obtained, moreover, one of the outputs of the expert evaluation and adjustment of the obtained results is connected to one of the inputs of the distribution of the obtained results according to the certification assessment parameters, and the analysis and processing of the results is made in the form of series-connected calculation unit using a generalized matrix and a common distribution unit assessment of knowledge on the parameters of certification assessment, expert assessment unit and correction of the final results, the input of which is connected to the output of the block p distribution of the general assessment of knowledge according to the parameters of the certification assessment and with the input of the output unit of results made in the form of the output of the results of the parameters of the certification assessment, and the input of the calculation unit using a generalized matrix is connected to the outputs of each distribution unit of the results obtained according to the parameters of the certification assessment (RU 77716 U1 IPC: G09B 7/00, published October 27, 2008).

A technical solution is known that relates to a device for making decisions in expert systems, which can be used to coordinate estimates and visual control in expert systems for collective use. The known solution comprises a group of input units for estimating the parameters of an object, a group of input units for inputting an expert’s competency ratings, a group of expert rank adjusters, a group of comparison units, an indication unit, two groups of switches, a control unit, a group of evaluation units. Three rank registers, a register of the number of evaluated parameters, a register of the total number of experts, a register of the actual number of experts, four switches, two groups of averaging blocks, two averaging blocks, and an estimation generation block (SU 1770961 A1, G06F 13/00, G06F 15 / 20, published on October 23, 1992).

A common drawback of these solutions is that the systems under consideration have a narrow specialization and cannot be used for the purpose of expert evaluation and finalization of draft normative legal acts.

The closest analogue of the claimed technical solution in its structure is a system for the analytical identification of problematic issues in the rules of legal regulation. The specified system for monitoring regulatory legal acts and law enforcement practice is designed to collect and analyze information on improving legislation and law enforcement practice. The system consists of a block for collecting and processing proposals for improving legislation received from specialists of legal departments, a block of data banks containing information on the findings of dissertation research, analytical materials, information on authorship, which allows you to quickly find a specialist in the development of the necessary regulatory legal act, block- a forum providing the opportunity for communication between specialists of legal departments for the exchange of information (RF patent No. 2479017, IPC12: G06F 17/30, published Ano 04/10/2013).

A disadvantage of the known system is that it is intended only for examination when making managerial decisions and does not provide for a procedure for evaluating a document, document fragments, the possibility of generating author versions of fragments, as well as their rating with the possibility of creating an improved version of the original document.

The technical result of the invention is the assembly of the resulting collective work document of several authors with information objects of a complex structure, in particular regulatory acts and draft regulatory acts. The specified result is achieved by creating an expert-analytical information system for remote rating assessment of legal acts and finalizing their projects with the participation of geographically remote experts.

The device and the design of the technological platform ensure the decomposition of the original version of the document, the visualization of internal and external relations, the collective construction of improved articles of the regulatory legal act and the creation ("assembly") of a single final document. After decomposition of the document into minimal semantic fragments, a two-stage system of work is provided. At the first stage, a description of the problems associated with the fragment of the document. At the second stage, there is a description of solutions to problems associated with a document fragment in the form of expert formulations of a document fragment that solve problems.

The object of automation is the process of collective editing and coordination of versions of structural elements (fragments) of regulatory documents by authorized users (participants). The system is a tool for collaborative work on a document that implements a many-to-many relationship, that is, several problems of one document fragment can be solved by one author’s version of the fragment, and, conversely, one problem of a document fragment can have several alternative solutions in the form of several author’s formulations of the document fragment .

The blocks that make up the system in the process of functioning exchange information on the basis of open data exchange formats, using the information interaction modules included in them. During the operation of the system, a list of important problems of the regulatory legal act or its draft is compiled; make decisions of the described problems of the normative legal act or its project; compose an improved text of a regulatory legal act or its draft; constitute a pool of productive participants 48.

In FIG. 1 shows a structural diagram of the claimed expert analytical system.

The expert-analytical information system for the formation of legal acts with a remote rating assessment by geographically remote users contains a data transmission network: a central decomposition server 26, at least one information storage unit and at least one remote workstation 10 of a registered expert user, the interaction between the decomposition server 26, the authentication server of the participants 20, the server describing and processing problems fragment ntov 22, descriptions and processing server copyright fragments 24, reference rating server 28 and the forming operation results server 29 is performed by a local area network based on Ethernet technology. Moreover, the decomposition server 26 contains a decomposition block of the original document into fragments 40 and is connected to the rating server 28 of the source and copyright versions of the fragments 40 through the storage unit of the initial fragments 32, a server for generating the result of work 29 of the final draft document. The participants authentication server 20 is connected to the participant information storage unit 36, and the expert user rating server 28 is connected through the participants information storage unit 26 to the participants authentication server 20. The source fragments storage unit 32 stores source documents 30 and copyright versions of document fragments, block storage of rating results 38 contains data on expert users and their ratings and data on individual ratings and fragment ratings. At the same time, access to the automated workstation of user 10 is carried out by any remote user who has authenticated with the system.

Additionally, the system contains an automated workplace of the head 12; the system contains an automated workplace of the facilitator 14; the system contains an automated workstation of the administrator 16; access to the workstation is carried out through a single computer network built using the Internet or Intranet technology.

The expert-analytical information system implements a method for the formation of a regulatory act with a remote rating from geographically remote experts, in which, using the claimed expert-analytical system, the following steps are carried out:

1) the source document 30 is entered into the decomposition server 26 and automated processing is performed to obtain a set of separate text fragments 40 separated by one of the most significant criteria;

2) the resulting text fragments 40 after decomposition are stored in the storage unit of the original fragments 32 along with the author's versions of the fragments;

3) process the individual assessments of expert users received from the storage unit of rating results 38 and generate a rating of fragments using the rating maintenance server 28, while the storage unit of source fragments 32 has two-way communication with the server for description and processing of copyright fragments 24, which in turn through block 34 storing problems, copyright fragments and their connections connected to the server maintaining the rating of 29 source and copyright fragments of the document;

4) save individual assessments of participants and ratings of fragments in the storage unit of rating results 38;

5) the participants authentication server 20 and the rating server 28 using the information storage unit for participants 36 generate data on individual ratings for each of the author’s versions of fragments from the block 34 for storing problems, copyright fragments and their relationships, and from the rating server 28 initial and copyright fragments to the storage unit of the results of rating 38 transmit information affecting the individual rating of participants;

6) after each rating set by the user, the rating of this user is adjusted taking into account indicators of significance of the rating for the final document, which can change its significance over time;

7) the output of the rating server 28 forms a rating of the source and copyright fragments, while the rating server 28 is connected to the entrance to the server for generating the result of work 29 to form the final draft document;

8) using the server generating the results of work 29 form the final improved draft document 42.

To ensure information exchange, the system units work as part of a single computer network built using the Internet / Intranet technology.

As the main means of communication between the blocks of the system, a local area network constructed using Ethernet technology is used.

TCP / IP (Transfer Control Protocol / Internet Protocol) is used as the basic protocol for network and internetworking interaction - the Internet protocol stack.

The claimed system provides:

- creating a unified environment for conducting public examination of regulatory acts on the Internet;

- improving the quality of normative acts due to the wider involvement of interested parties and, as a result, increasing the efficiency of the industry and the level of public support for the implemented decisions of the department;

- expanding the expert base of departments through the formation of a pool of “people's experts” from among the most constructive and productive participants in 48 expert systems.

Expert analytical system can be used:

a) in solving the tasks of various ministries and departments in the framework of their rule-making activities;

b) in solving the problems of developing strategic documents of large corporations;

c) in solving the problems of fixing and summarizing the consolidated opinion of civil society institutions;

d) in other scientific and technical developments in the field of social networking technologies and crowdsourcing systems.

The specified result is achieved by the fact that the claimed expert analytical system comprises a decomposition server 26, at least one storage unit of the source fragments 32 and at least one remote workstation 10 of the user 10 connected by a data network. In this case, the decomposition server 26 contains a decomposition unit of the source document for fragments. The server for maintaining the rating of 28 source and author versions of fragments is connected with the storage unit for the source fragments 32 and with the server for generating the results of work 29 in the form of a final draft document. At the same time, the rating maintenance server 28 contains a storage unit for rating results 38 for storing incoming source documents 30, ratings obtained by them, which provides an improved document 42, objectification of a document problem 44, fixing ideas for solving document problems 46, a list of productive participants 48 and users of the system . The participant authentication server 20 comprises a block for storing information about the participants and provides a graphical interface for accessing the expert-analytical system. Participant authentication server 20 provides a fixation of the activity of participants, calculation of the productivity of the proposals of participants and the formation of a rating of participants as experts. The information storage means includes a block for storing source fragments 32, a block for storing information about participants 36 and their ratings, a block for storing rating results 38, i.e. individual ratings and fragment ratings.

The system consists of the following mandatory components connected by a data network:

- decomposition server 26,

- at least one storage unit of the original fragments 32 of the documents, and

- at least one remote workstation 10 of the registered user - expert.

Expert analytical system contains:

1) server decomposition 26 of the original document into fragments 40,

2) server maintaining the rating of 28 source and copyright versions of fragments,

3) a server for generating the results of work 29 in the form of a final draft of document 42,

4) member authentication server 20.

For data storage, blocks of information storage are used:

1) a unit for storing source fragments 32 and copyright versions of document fragments,

2) a unit for storing information about participants 36 (experts),

3) block storage of rating results 38,

4) a unit for storing problems, copyright fragments and their connections 34.

Automated workplace of user 10 is a set of necessary tools to ensure the participation of any registered person in the network expert assessment procedure. In the usual case, the user's workstation 10 implies a personal computer with a minimum set of software installed on it (Microsoft Windows operating system and Internet Explorer Internet browser) and communication tools that allow receiving, entering and transmitting relevant information regarding the subject of the network expert procedure.

Depending on the specific situation and the requirements for the procedure, the expert-analytical system may additionally include the automated workstation of the administrator 16, manager 12 or facilitator 14, or any combination thereof.

As an expert in this system, any interested person who has been registered in this system and meets its mandatory requirements can take part in the established procedure. After successful authentication in the system from a remote computer, any registered user can take an equal part in the network procedure, evaluate the source documents 30 and the author’s versions of the document, independently create and publish in the open access of the system participants the author’s versions of the source fragments of the document.

The number of experts participating in the work of the system can be unlimited and essentially determined only by the technical capabilities of the system.

The decomposition server 26 of the source document is responsible for the automated primary processing of the source document with the aim of structural fragmentation based on logical and semantic relationships between individual text sections of the document. As an analyzed document in this system, a draft regulatory act is preferably considered.

The result of this decomposition of the document is its breakdown into fragments 40 and a visual representation of the individual fragments 40 and the structure of the document, as well as logical and other relationships between them. This form of presentation of information makes it easier for participants to study and evaluate each separate fragment of the document separately and assign it a specific rating.

Fragments 40 of the original document are stored in the storage unit of the original fragments 32 and copyright versions of the document. In this block of storage of source fragments 32, all source fragments 40 are stored, as well as all modified versions of fragments 40 proposed by the participants of the procedure themselves.

All information about participants and their ratings is stored in the participant information storage unit 36. This information is constantly updated and updated in connection with the appearance of new participants and the need to adjust the ratings of previously registered participants.

Member Authentication Server 20 generates a rating of participants, provides the ability to register new participants (experts), authorize previously registered participants, as well as automatically process data for each participant in order to determine its rating. The rating is determined by a combination of criteria, such as the number of ratings put, their quality indicators, such as validity, etc., the number of created author versions of fragments, rating of author versions created by a particular participant.

The server maintaining the rating of 28 source documents 30 and copyright fragments of the document provides the processing of individual ratings and ratings set by the participants in relation to the source fragment 40 or the author's version of the document. The initial estimates, as well as the results of mathematical processing of individual estimates, are stored in the storage unit for rating results 38 and the storage unit for problems, copyright fragments and their links 34. In turn, the information from the storage unit for rating results 38 is sent to the rating server 28 source documents 30 and copyright fragments to adjust ratings and highlight leading versions of document fragments by the number of points.

The versions of the fragments of documents that scored the most points as a result of individual assessments of participants are sent to the server for generating the results of work 29 (of the final draft of the document). The server for generating the results of work 29 compiles the final version of the draft document 42 from the versions of fragments 40 of the document with the highest number of points.

The work of the claimed expert analytical system as a whole is as follows.

The source document 30, for example, a bill, normative legal act, resolution, order, decree, instruction, etc., is entered into the decomposition server 26, where it undergoes automated processing and at the output is a set of individual fragments of 40 text, most often separated based on one of the most significant criteria.

Most often, such a criterion is the very structure of the text of the document, which is characteristic of a legal act (law, by-law, order, etc.). In this case, the following elements will act as fragments of 40 text: chapter, article of the act, paragraph, subparagraph, paragraph.

However, decomposition in any case takes into account the features of the document, its volume as a whole and the volume of its structural elements mentioned above. From the semantic point of view, it is assumed that the minimum semantic fragment 40 is a single rule of law of the document.

However, the claimed system implies the possibility of highlighting individual fragments 40 of the original document based on several criteria.

All information about the individual fragments 40 and their relationships among themselves is presented in graphical form, which facilitates navigation and provides work with the system using skills of working with an electronic computer at the user level. At the same time, the graphical representation and the logic of the system ensure the implementation of procedures enshrined in the current legislation, such as:

- public examination;

- public comment;

- assessment of regulatory impact;

- pedagogical expertise;

- anti-corruption expertise;

- enforcement monitoring.

In addition, it is important to focus on the fact that the method and system are designed to work not only with draft regulatory legal acts, but also with existing regulatory legal acts.

The following procedures are applicable to draft regulations:

- public examination;

- public comment;

- assessment of regulatory impact;

- pedagogical expertise;

- anti-corruption expertise.

The applicable law enforcement monitoring procedure is applicable.

All fragments after decomposition are stored in the storage unit for problems, copyright fragments and their relationships 34. The output from the decomposition server 26 is connected to the input to the storage unit for the source fragments 32 and copyright versions of document fragments.

In turn, the specified block storage of source fragments 32 is associated with a server maintaining a rating of 28 source and copyright fragments of the document. In the rating maintenance server 28, individual assessments of experts (participants) are processed and the rating of fragments received from the above information storage unit for participants 36 is generated.

Individual user ratings and fragment ratings are stored in the storage unit for rating results 38. The specified storage unit for rating results 38 also has two-way communication with the rating server 28 for exchanging information and periodically adjusting ratings.

The server for maintaining the rating of 28 source and copyright fragments through the block 34 for storing problems, copyright fragments and their connections is connected to the server for description and processing of problems of fragments 22 and to the server for description and processing of copyright fragments 24. Information is received from the server for description and processing of problems of fragments 22 in the form individual ratings and author versions of users, and from the rating maintenance server 28 source and copyright fragments, information affecting the individual rating is received in the storage unit for rating results 38 g users.

Member Authentication Server 20 has two-way communication with a unit for storing information about participants 36 and their ratings.

Thus, on the one hand, the rating of each expert user is determined by the quantity and quality of the ratings put by him and generated author versions of fragments. On the other hand, the rating of a particular fragment depends not only on the number of individual user ratings, but also on the rating of these users. Those. the higher the user’s rating, the higher his contribution to the rating of a particular fragment of the document. And vice versa, the higher the rating of a particular fragment, the higher will be the rating of the user - the author of this fragment.

An expert’s rating is adjusted after each rating he makes, taking into account the significance of this rating for the final document, which can change its significance over time. The same principle applies when an expert creates an author’s version of a document fragment. In this case, the number and nature of the changes made to the original fragment, the ratings of other participants in the author’s version, etc. are taken into account.

Thus, the system performs an individualized stepwise calculation of the rating of each expert user, and the most significant contribution to the rating is made by correctly substantiated and correct estimates, and an active contribution to the formation of author versions of fragments of the source document.

Users (experts) who have scored a certain number of points can be ranked at several levels, ranging from the "beginner" to the "expert". Users who scored the most points can be assigned to a group of experts who are involved on an ongoing basis in assessing the most important documents, analyzing difficult situations, etc.

The output from the server of maintaining the rating of 28 source and copyright fragments is connected with the input of the server for generating the results of work 29 and the final draft document 42. In the server for generating the results of work 29, the final procedure occurs, as a result of which the finished product is formed - the final improved document 42. In the preferred case, this the document is a draft regulatory act.

Claims (9)

1. An expert-analytical information system for the formation of legal acts with a remote rating assessment by geographically remote users, comprising a data transfer network: a decomposition server, at least one information storage unit and at least one remote workstation of a user registered in an expert -analytical system, while the interaction between the decomposition server, the participants authentication server, the description and processing server, etc. the problem of fragments, the server for description and processing of copyright fragments, the server for maintaining the rating and the server for generating the results of work is carried out using a local area network built using Ethernet technology, characterized in that the decomposition server contains a decomposition unit for the source document into fragments and is connected to the server for maintaining the rating of the source and author versions of fragments through the block for storing the source fragments, the server for generating the result of the work - the final draft of the document, the authentication server ation of participants associated with the storage of information on the participants, and conducting expert user ratings server unit is connected via a storage unit information about the participants with an authentication server of participants; the source fragments storage unit stores source documents and author versions of document fragments, the rating results storage unit contains data on expert users and their ratings and data on individual ratings and fragments ratings, access to the automated workstation of the expert user is carried out by any remote user who has authenticated in system.  2. The system of claim 1, wherein the system further comprises a manager's workstation connected to the authentication server of participants via a computer network built using the Internet or Intranet technology. 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the system further comprises a facilitator workstation through a computer network built using Internet or Intranet technology. 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the system further comprises an administrator's workstation through a computer network built using Internet or Intranet technology. 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the decomposition server is configured to extract individual fragments of the source document based on several criteria, while any user selects a document decomposition algorithm, as well as adjusts the parameters and depth level of the document decomposition. 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the decomposition server comprises a storage unit for the source fragments. 7. The system of claim 1, wherein said storage unit for source fragments is connected by a rating server for transmitting updated data for periodic rating adjustments. 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the reference server communicates with the participant authentication server through the participant information storage unit, and ratings of the participants are generated, which are stored in the rating results storage unit. 9. The system according to claim 1, in which the rating server is connected to the server for generating the results of work, through which the formation of the draft document is carried out.

Images