NZ723022B2 - Sheep nematode vaccine - Google Patents
Sheep nematode vaccine Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- NZ723022B2 NZ723022B2 NZ723022A NZ72302213A NZ723022B2 NZ 723022 B2 NZ723022 B2 NZ 723022B2 NZ 723022 A NZ723022 A NZ 723022A NZ 72302213 A NZ72302213 A NZ 72302213A NZ 723022 B2 NZ723022 B2 NZ 723022B2
- Authority
- NZ
- New Zealand
- Prior art keywords
- antigen
- jxt
- circumcincta
- sequence
- annotation
- Prior art date
Links
- 241000283898 Ovis Species 0.000 title claims description 112
- 229960005486 vaccines Drugs 0.000 title claims description 80
- 241000244206 Nematoda Species 0.000 title description 38
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 201
- 102000038129 antigens Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 201
- 108091007172 antigens Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 201
- 241000191771 Teladorsagia circumcincta Species 0.000 claims abstract description 87
- 230000028993 immune response Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 59
- 230000002163 immunogen Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 230000001419 dependent Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 101700002738 APY1 Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N calcium Chemical compound [Ca] OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 229910052791 calcium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 81
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 claims description 55
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims description 55
- 241000347415 Teladorsagia Species 0.000 claims description 42
- 201000009910 diseases by infectious agent Diseases 0.000 claims description 31
- 230000001681 protective Effects 0.000 claims description 27
- 239000002671 adjuvant Substances 0.000 claims description 24
- 230000000240 adjuvant Effects 0.000 claims description 24
- 230000003248 secreting Effects 0.000 claims description 23
- 238000002649 immunization Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 241000243794 Ostertagia ostertagi Species 0.000 claims description 17
- 241000243795 Ostertagia Species 0.000 claims description 13
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 claims description 11
- 241000223079 Illeis cincta Species 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000001131 transforming Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 102000005600 Cathepsins Human genes 0.000 claims description 10
- 108010084457 Cathepsins Proteins 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 229920001184 polypeptide Polymers 0.000 claims description 8
- 102100012644 MIF Human genes 0.000 claims description 7
- 108060004872 MIF Proteins 0.000 claims description 7
- 241000283707 Capra Species 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000003085 diluting agent Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000005012 migration Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000001747 exhibiting Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 235000018102 proteins Nutrition 0.000 description 39
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 31
- 102000004851 Immunoglobulin G Human genes 0.000 description 28
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 28
- 230000001058 adult Effects 0.000 description 24
- 244000045947 parasites Species 0.000 description 24
- 210000002966 Serum Anatomy 0.000 description 23
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 22
- 102000007312 Recombinant Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 21
- 108010033725 Recombinant Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 21
- 235000001014 amino acid Nutrition 0.000 description 19
- 102000004965 antibodies Human genes 0.000 description 18
- 108090001123 antibodies Proteins 0.000 description 18
- 210000004027 cells Anatomy 0.000 description 17
- 235000013601 eggs Nutrition 0.000 description 15
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 15
- 230000001603 reducing Effects 0.000 description 15
- 230000003053 immunization Effects 0.000 description 14
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 14
- 150000007523 nucleic acids Chemical class 0.000 description 14
- 238000006722 reduction reaction Methods 0.000 description 14
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 13
- 229920001405 Coding region Polymers 0.000 description 12
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 12
- 230000036039 immunity Effects 0.000 description 11
- 229920002676 Complementary DNA Polymers 0.000 description 10
- 206010061217 Infestation Diseases 0.000 description 10
- 239000002299 complementary DNA Substances 0.000 description 10
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 10
- XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N urea Chemical compound NC(N)=O XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- UZQJVUCHXGYFLQ-AYDHOLPZSA-N [(2S,3R,4S,5R,6R)-4-[(2S,3R,4S,5R,6R)-4-[(2R,3R,4S,5R,6R)-4-[(2S,3R,4S,5R,6R)-3,5-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-4-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxyoxan-2-yl]oxy-3,5-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxy-3,5-dihydroxy-6-(hy Chemical compound O([C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]([C@@H]1O)O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]([C@@H]1O)O[C@H]1CC[C@]2(C)[C@H]3CC=C4[C@@]([C@@]3(CC[C@H]2[C@@]1(C=O)C)C)(C)CC(O)[C@]1(CCC(CC14)(C)C)C(=O)O[C@H]1[C@@H]([C@@H](O[C@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](O[C@H]3[C@@H]([C@@H](O[C@H]4[C@@H]([C@@H](O[C@H]5[C@@H]([C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O5)O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O4)O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O3)O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1)O)[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O UZQJVUCHXGYFLQ-AYDHOLPZSA-N 0.000 description 9
- 230000000366 juvenile Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000001717 pathogenic Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000000392 somatic Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 210000004877 mucosa Anatomy 0.000 description 8
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 108020004707 nucleic acids Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 244000052769 pathogens Species 0.000 description 8
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 8
- 210000003165 Abomasum Anatomy 0.000 description 7
- 125000003275 alpha amino acid group Chemical group 0.000 description 7
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 7
- 230000001186 cumulative Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000002965 ELISA Methods 0.000 description 6
- 241000672609 Escherichia coli BL21 Species 0.000 description 6
- 210000003097 Mucus Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 230000000977 initiatory Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000001418 larval Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 108020004705 Codon Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 229920001850 Nucleic acid sequence Polymers 0.000 description 5
- 239000004202 carbamide Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000003071 parasitic Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000003752 polymerase chain reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000003826 tablet Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000002255 vaccination Methods 0.000 description 5
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 241000588724 Escherichia coli Species 0.000 description 4
- RAXXELZNTBOGNW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Imidazole Chemical compound C1=CNC=N1 RAXXELZNTBOGNW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000009004 PCR Kit Methods 0.000 description 4
- 102000004887 Transforming Growth Factor beta Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108090001012 Transforming Growth Factor beta Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 238000001042 affinity chromatography Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000002141 anti-parasite Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001580 bacterial Effects 0.000 description 4
- -1 boluses Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000002775 capsule Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000000534 elicitor Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000008363 phosphate buffer Substances 0.000 description 4
- DNIAPMSPPWPWGF-UHFFFAOYSA-N propylene glycol Chemical compound CC(O)CO DNIAPMSPPWPWGF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000002633 protecting Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000000575 proteomic Methods 0.000 description 4
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 4
- 101700028026 Ces1f Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 239000003155 DNA primer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 210000003608 Feces Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 241000235058 Komagataella pastoris Species 0.000 description 3
- 210000002540 Macrophages Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 241000283903 Ovis aries Species 0.000 description 3
- 230000000507 anthelmentic Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010367 cloning Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000034994 death Effects 0.000 description 3
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 239000003651 drinking water Substances 0.000 description 3
- 235000020188 drinking water Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 239000003937 drug carrier Substances 0.000 description 3
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 3
- PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N glycerine Chemical compound OCC(O)CO PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 235000014666 liquid concentrate Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 239000000314 lubricant Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002773 nucleotide Substances 0.000 description 3
- 125000003729 nucleotide group Chemical group 0.000 description 3
- 102000004196 processed proteins & peptides Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002829 reduced Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 3
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000003981 vehicle Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229920000160 (ribonucleotides)n+m Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000035533 AUC Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000004369 Blood Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 229940098773 Bovine Serum Albumin Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 108091003117 Bovine Serum Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 206010012735 Diarrhoea Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 210000001156 Gastric Mucosa Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000000987 Immune System Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 241000229754 Iva xanthiifolia Species 0.000 description 2
- 229940100662 Nasal Drops Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 229920001213 Polysorbate 20 Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 241000282849 Ruminantia Species 0.000 description 2
- 210000001744 T-Lymphocytes Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 229940035295 Ting Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 206010045240 Type I hypersensitivity Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 2
- 125000000539 amino acid group Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000111 anti-oxidant Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229960000070 antineoplastic Monoclonal antibodies Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000003963 antioxidant agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000006708 antioxidants Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000007864 aqueous solution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011230 binding agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 2
- UIIMBOGNXHQVGW-UHFFFAOYSA-M buffer Substances [Na+].OC([O-])=O UIIMBOGNXHQVGW-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 150000001720 carbohydrates Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 235000014633 carbohydrates Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000002596 correlated Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000875 corresponding Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003405 delayed action preparation Substances 0.000 description 2
- 201000008286 diarrhea Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002538 fungal Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002496 gastric Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000008187 granular material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002519 immonomodulatory Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002318 immunoblotting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007653 larval development Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000006166 lysate Substances 0.000 description 2
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000003278 mimic Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229960000060 monoclonal antibodies Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 108010045030 monoclonal antibodies Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000005614 monoclonal antibodies Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 238000000465 moulding Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000019198 oils Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000009304 pastoral farming Methods 0.000 description 2
- 108091008117 polyclonal antibodies Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 235000010486 polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000002335 preservative Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003755 preservative agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000010254 subcutaneous injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007929 subcutaneous injection Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000004083 survival Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001890 transfection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003612 virological Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003442 weekly Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004584 weight gain Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000019786 weight gain Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 101710006043 24 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229940036592 ANTHELMINTICS Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 101710034857 ATIC Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000282810 Ammotragus Species 0.000 description 1
- 229920002287 Amplicon Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 240000003291 Armoracia rusticana Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000011330 Armoracia rusticana Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 206010003664 Atrial septal defect Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102100015648 BACE2 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101700051947 BACE2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100005070 BCAT2 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101700076239 BCAT2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101700044940 BM86 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- AFYNADDZULBEJA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Bicinchoninic acid Chemical compound C1=CC=CC2=NC(C=3C=C(C4=CC=CC=C4N=3)C(=O)O)=CC(C(O)=O)=C21 AFYNADDZULBEJA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000212384 Bifora Species 0.000 description 1
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Carbonate dianion Chemical compound [O-]C([O-])=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 102000004176 Cathepsin F Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000610 Cathepsin F Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241001126268 Cooperia Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001126267 Cooperia oncophora Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000699800 Cricetinae Species 0.000 description 1
- CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N D-sucrose Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101700070526 DNMT1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010007730 EC 3.6.1.5 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000007347 EC 3.6.1.5 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 210000003979 Eosinophils Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- LVGKNOAMLMIIKO-QXMHVHEDSA-N Ethyl oleate Chemical compound CCCCCCCC\C=C/CCCCCCCC(=O)OCC LVGKNOAMLMIIKO-QXMHVHEDSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000002068 Glycopeptides Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010015899 Glycopeptides Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108090000288 Glycoproteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000003886 Glycoproteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101710015954 HVA1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000238631 Hexapoda Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010001336 Horseradish Peroxidase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000282619 Hylobates lar Species 0.000 description 1
- 108090001124 Immunoglobulin E Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000003000 Inclusion Bodies Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 101700065814 LEA2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101700021338 LEC Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101700077545 LECC Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101700028499 LECG Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101700063913 LECT Proteins 0.000 description 1
- GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-UUNJERMWSA-N Lactose Natural products O([C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)O[C@@H]1CO)[C@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](CO)O1 GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-UUNJERMWSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000019687 Lamb Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 210000000265 Leukocytes Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000002751 Lymph Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 101700022353 MEP1A Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101710033910 MT-I Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101700038420 MVP Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000000138 Mast Cells Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000007476 Maximum Likelihood Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108010090054 Membrane Glycoproteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000012750 Membrane Glycoproteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010063312 Metalloproteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000010750 Metalloproteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 210000003928 Nasal Cavity Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 241000498270 Necator americanus Species 0.000 description 1
- 101710003000 ORF1/ORF2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229920000272 Oligonucleotide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 241000283973 Oryctolagus cuniculus Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000007594 Oryza sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000007164 Oryza sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 101710034340 Os04g0173800 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010067720 Parasitic gastroenteritis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108010047320 Pepsinogen A Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000002202 Polyethylene glycol Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000220317 Rosa Species 0.000 description 1
- 229920000978 Start codon Polymers 0.000 description 1
- CZMRCDWAGMRECN-GDQSFJPYSA-N Sucrose Natural products O([C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](CO)O1)[C@@]1(CO)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CZMRCDWAGMRECN-GDQSFJPYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfuric acid Chemical compound OS(O)(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108060008443 TPPP Proteins 0.000 description 1
- QORWJWZARLRLPR-UHFFFAOYSA-H Tricalcium phosphate Chemical compound [Ca+2].[Ca+2].[Ca+2].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O.[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O QORWJWZARLRLPR-UHFFFAOYSA-H 0.000 description 1
- 241000243793 Trichostrongyloidea Species 0.000 description 1
- 210000002268 Wool Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K [O-]P([O-])([O-])=O Chemical compound [O-]P([O-])([O-])=O NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 1
- 239000004480 active ingredient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000443 aerosol Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001476 alcoholic Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003698 anagen phase Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000921 anthelmintic agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000845 anti-microbial Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000890 antigenic Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004599 antimicrobial Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000036528 appetite Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000019789 appetite Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000008365 aqueous carrier Substances 0.000 description 1
- 101700065210 asp1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000004166 bioassay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007622 bioinformatic analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012472 biological sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000389 calcium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001506 calcium phosphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000011010 calcium phosphates Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- BPKIGYQJPYCAOW-FFJTTWKXSA-I calcium;potassium;disodium;(2S)-2-hydroxypropanoate;dichloride;dihydroxide;hydrate Chemical compound O.[OH-].[OH-].[Na+].[Na+].[Cl-].[Cl-].[K+].[Ca+2].C[C@H](O)C([O-])=O BPKIGYQJPYCAOW-FFJTTWKXSA-I 0.000 description 1
- 238000004113 cell culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001413 cellular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002738 chelating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007891 compressed tablet Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000006071 cream Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012228 culture supernatant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006297 dehydration reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920003013 deoxyribonucleic acid Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000003599 detergent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008121 dextrose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002405 diagnostic procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002270 dispersing agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002552 dosage form Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002500 effect on skin Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004520 electroporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940093471 ethyl oleate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000003527 eukaryotic cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000011049 filling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 244000144992 flock Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000037406 food intake Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005194 fractionation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940074076 glycerol formal Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002209 hydrophobic Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000984 immunochemical Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000016784 immunoglobulin production Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004957 immunoregulator effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003308 immunostimulating Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001506 immunosuppresive Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002513 implantation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003701 inert diluent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011261 inert gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001802 infusion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007972 injectable composition Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007918 intramuscular administration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010255 intramuscular injection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007927 intramuscular injection Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001990 intravenous administration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003456 ion exchange resin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920003303 ion-exchange polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 125000001449 isopropyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C([H])(*)C([H])([H])[H] 0.000 description 1
- 230000006651 lactation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008101 lactose Substances 0.000 description 1
- GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-XLOQQCSPSA-N lactose Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](CO)O[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-XLOQQCSPSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101700036391 lecA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000002523 lectin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 101700001016 mbhA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000010946 mechanistic model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000520 microinjection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006011 modification reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007923 nasal drop Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001264 neutralization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012457 nonaqueous media Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000346 nonvolatile oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002674 ointment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004006 olive oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000008390 olive oil Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 101700003655 orf7 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 150000002895 organic esters Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000004806 packaging method and process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 101710027502 pagA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 201000001181 parasitic helminthiasis infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000007911 parenteral administration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000546 pharmaceutic aid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008194 pharmaceutical composition Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008024 pharmaceutical diluent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010452 phosphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002953 phosphate buffered saline Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920001223 polyethylene glycol Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000023 polynucleotide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000002157 polynucleotide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000014483 powder concentrate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 210000001236 prokaryotic cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000000644 propagated Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000004252 protein component Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000009566 rice Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007789 sealing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002415 sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 1
- PHPHRWZFQRLJIA-UZUGEDCSSA-M sodium;(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxane-2,3,4,5-tetrol;chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-].OC[C@H]1O[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O PHPHRWZFQRLJIA-UZUGEDCSSA-M 0.000 description 1
- KISFEBPWFCGRGN-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium;2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)ethyl sulfate Chemical compound [Na+].[O-]S(=O)(=O)OCCOC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl KISFEBPWFCGRGN-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 235000013322 soy milk Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007920 subcutaneous administration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000005720 sucrose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000011149 sulphuric acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000000576 supplementary Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004094 surface-active agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002562 thickening agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004448 titration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000699 topical Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012049 topical pharmaceutical composition Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003656 tris buffered saline Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004450 types of analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011534 wash buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004580 weight loss Effects 0.000 description 1
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-VFUOTHLCSA-N β-D-glucose Chemical compound OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-VFUOTHLCSA-N 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K2039/55—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies characterised by the host/recipient, e.g. newborn with maternal antibodies
- A61K2039/552—Veterinary vaccine
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K39/0003—Invertebrate antigens
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/435—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans
- C07K14/43504—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans from invertebrates
- C07K14/43536—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans from invertebrates from worms
- C07K14/4354—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans from invertebrates from worms from nematodes
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K16/00—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies
- C07K16/18—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans
Abstract
Discloses a method of raising an immune response in a non-human animal, the method comprising administering said animal Teladorsagia circumcincta antigen calcium-dependent apyrase-1 or an immunogenic fragment thereof.
Description
ation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
SHEEP NEMATODE VACCINE
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to nematode antigens capable of g host
immune responses. In particular, the invention provides vaccines for use in
protecting t and/or reducing instances of Teladorsagia infections.
OUND OF THE ION
Teladorsagia circumcincta (previously known as Ostertagia circumcincta) is
the major cause of parasitic gastroenteritis in small ruminants in ate regions.
This nematode is controlled primarily by anthelmintics; however resistance is
widespread and field es have often been found to be insensitive to a number of
different anthelmintic classes (Bartley et al., 2004; Wrigley et al., 2006). T.
cincta resides within the abomasum (or true stomach) of small nts and
primarily causes disease in animals during their first year of grazing. It is a major
cause of production losses, estimated to cost the UK sheep industry alone in excess
of £80 M per annum (Nieuwhof & Bishop, 2005). The associated clinical signs range
from suppressed appetite to diarrhoea, dehydration and death; however, the major
impact of teladorsagiosis is its effect on lamb productivity via a reduction in weight
gain (Gibson and Everett, 1976).
Protective immunity against challenge with T. circumcincta develops after
continual (‘trickle’) infection over a number of weeks (Seaton et al., 1989). The
degree of immunity that develops depends on a number of factors including, level of
parasite challenge, age of animal and its genotype (Singleton et al., 2011). In ewes
that have acquired immunity to T. cincta, resistance to the tes can lapse
around the time of ition and early lactation (Houdijk et al., 2005). In terms of
anti-parasite effects, the protective immune response has been shown to se
the establishment of larvae in the abomasal mucosa, slow larval development in the
gastric gland and to reduce the egg output of female worms in the abomasal lumen
(Balic et al., 2003; Seaton et al., 1989; Smith et al., 1985, 1986; Stear et al., 2004).
Experiments that demonstrated successful adoptive transfer between immune and
naive sheep using gastric lymph indicate the importance of local immune responses
in protective mechanisms against T. circumcincta (Smith et al., 1986). The precise
mechanisms remain to be defined, but roles for both immediate hypersensitivity
reactions and local antigen specific IgA have been highlighted (Smith et al., 1986;
1987). Furthermore, antigen-specific IgA responses have been correlated with
reductions in de length day et al., 2007; Smith et al. 2009), whereas IgE
responses have been correlated with a reduction in faecal egg counts in grazing
lambs (Huntley et al., 2001).
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
As sheep can acquire a protective immune response against T. circumcincta
in l and experimental circumstances, vaccination represents a possible
alternative for control.
Y OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is based upon the identification of a number of antigens
derived from species of the genus Teladorsagia, which can be used to raise immune
responses in animals – particularly those animals susceptible or predisposed to
infection by (or with) one or more Teladorsagia species. The antigens provided by
this invention may be exploited to provide compositions and es for raising
protective immune responses in animals – the protective immune responses serving
to , prevent, treat or eliminate Teladorsagia infections/infestations.
In a first aspect, the t invention es one or more Teladorsagia
antigen(s) or a fragment thereof, for use in g an immune response in an animal.
As stated, the inventors have discovered that the immune responses elicited
by the Teladorsagia antigens of this invention protect animals against
infection/infestation with nematode parasites belonging to the Teladorsagia genus.
An immune response which protects against infection/infestation by/with a pathogen
may be a referred to as a “protective response”. In the context of this ion, the
term “protective immune response” may e any immune response which
facilitates or effects a reduction in host pathogen burden – i.e. the number of
pathogenic organisms infecting a host. In other embodiments, and in the case of
animals infected with Teladorsagia tes, a protective immune response elicited
through use of the antigen(s) described herein may result in a reduction in the host
faecal egg count (FEC: , the number of parasite eggs per gramme (EPG) of
faeces – occurring as a result of suppression of egg output from female parasites in
the abomasal lumen) and/or a decrease in the numbers of parasitic larvae
ishing in the abomasal mucosa or a reduction in the numbers of adult worms
(male and/or female) residing in the abomasal lumen. A protective immune response
may also slow larval development.
One of skill would appreciate that any reduction in pathogen burden/FEC
achieved h use of the n(s) bed herein, may be compared to the
pathogen burden/FEC of an infected animal not exposed to (or administered) the
antigen(s) provided by this invention – such animals being devoid of (or lacking) a
protective immune response.
A second aspect of this invention provides a composition or vaccine
composition comprising one or more of the Teladorsagia antigens described herein,
for use in raising an immune response in an animal. In one embodiment, the immune
response is a protective response.
Additionally, or alternatively, the immune response raised in the animal may prevent
the occurrence of further (subsequent/secondary) Teladorsagia infections and may also
have an effect on the development or survival of co-infecting nematodes of other genera.
In a third aspect, the invention provides a composition or vaccine composition
comprising Teladorsagia cincta antigen calcium-dependent e-1 or an
immunogenic fragment thereof when used in g an immune response in a non-human
animal.
In a fourth aspect, the invention provides a vaccine ition comprising
Teladorsagia circumcincta antigen m-dependent apyrase-1, or an immunogenic
fragment thereof, and an adjuvant.
In a fifth aspect, the invention provides the use of one or more Teladorsagia antigens
or a fragment(s) thereof for the manufacture of a ment for use in the ent and/or
prevention of an infection/colonisation h a Teladorsagia pathogen.
In a sixth aspect, the invention provides a method of raising an anti-Teladorsagia
immune se in an animal, said method comprising the step of administering to an
animal, an amount of one or more Teladorsagia antigen(s) or fragment(s), sufficient to
induce an anti-Teladorsagia immune response.
ageously, the one or more Teladorsagia antigens (or fragments thereof) are
derived from Teladorsagia circumcincta an ovine parasite infecting the abomasum and
causing weight loss, diarrhoea and decreased wool production and, in some cases, death.
In a further aspect, the invention provides a method of raising an immune response
in a non-human animal, the method sing administering said animal a Teladorsagia
circumcincta antigen calcium-dependent apyrase-1 or an genic fragment thereof.
In a r aspect, the present invention provides for the use of Teladorsagia
circumcincta antigen calcium-dependent apyrase-1 or an immunogenic fragment thereof for
the manufacture of a medicament for raising a protective immune se against a
Teladorsagia infection in a non-human animal.
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
The term “antigen” may relate to, for example, Teladorsagia proteins and/or
peptides (including polypeptides and short peptide chains of one or more amino
acids), glycoproteins and/or glycopeptides. In addition, the term “antigen” may relate
to carbohydrate molecules. In one ment, antigens to be exploited in this
invention may be ns which are present on the surface of Teladorsagia cells
and/or exposed to the host (ovine) immune system during an infection. One of skill
will appreciate that the term “antigens” may also encompass Teladorsagia proteins,
polypeptides, peptides and/or carbohydrates which are otherwise known as
“immunogens”.
In one embodiment, the antigens provided by this invention are antigens,
which elicit host dy (for example, IgA and/or IgG) responses. In one
embodiment, the ns are derived from post-infective larval stages of
Teladorsagia species. The Teladorsagia antigens provided by this invention may
include those secreted or excreted by Teladorsagia larvae in the gastric gland milieu
during rapid growth phases within the mucosa or by adult worms in the abomasal
lumen. In one embodiment, the antigens are derived from third and/or fourth stage
Teladorsagia , but may also be secreted by adult stage parasites. Additionally
or atively, the Teladorsagia ns described herein may comprise pathogen
derived immunomodulatory nds.
In a further embodiment, the term “antigen” encompasses the exemplary T.
circumcincta (Tci) antigens listed as (i)-(ix) below:
(i) calcium-dependent e-1 (Tci-APY-1).
(ii) astacin-like metalloproteinase-1 (Tci-MEP-1).
(iii) excretory/secretory protein (unknown function: Tci-ES20).
(iv) cathepsin F-1 (Tci-CF-1).
(v) transforming growth protein 2-like protein (a TGFβ homologue: Tci-
TGH-2).
(vi) activation associated secretory protein (Tci-ASP-1).
(vii) macrophage migration inhibitory factor (Tci-MIF-1).
(viii) surface associated antigen (Tci-SAA-1).
(ix) a fragment, mutant, t or derivative of any of (i)-(viii).
An exemplary Tci-SAA-1 ce is deposited under the accession number
CAQ43040 and comprises the sequence given below as SEQ ID NO: 1.
SEQ ID NO: 1
mfcrvtvavl llavsahagf fddvsglasd vgdfftkqfn nvkdlfannq selekniqrv
kdllmaikek akmlepmand aqkktisevn dafg geak feqnkakwqd
ekgg lenvmklmnlk vmaal iapvilaftr
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
ed set by JXT
An exemplary Tci-MIF-1 sequence is deposited under the accession number
CBI68362 and comprises the ce given below as SEQ ID NO: 2.
SEQ ID NO: 2
Mpvfsfhtnv sadkvtpdll kqissvvari lhkpesyvcv hvvpdqqmif dgtdgpcgvg
vlksiggvgg sknnehakal falikdhlgi agnrmyiefi digaadiafn srtfa
An exemplary Tci-ASP-1 sequence is deposited under the accession number
CBJ15404 and comprises the sequence given below as SEQ ID NO: 3.
SEQ ID NO: 3
mftpigiavl ylalvtphak agfccpadld qtdearkill nfhnevrrdv lnlt
nvlg paknmykmdw dcnlekkale mispctvplp idtsipqnla qwllyrkmee
tevlekapws wviaslrnlk ndteadlynw kirtisniln wrntkvgcah kvcqfptgtn
mviscayggd klennevvwq kgptcecnay pdsyccnnlc dtkaaaalre epcksn
An ary H-2 sequence is deposited under the accession number
78 and comprises the sequence given below as SEQ ID NO: 4.
SEQ ID NO: 4
mrllnsmgmq eppnvdsidl spstieemle slgendkleq dqeektfima vdpsdgidpd
mlvarfpvsi ttmvrkvsra ylhvylhvse ivtv vvrerllngd tnpv
eiqrsgkavl plrasdverw wksepilgly vvamlngeni avhpqqdhha rhtmfmsvil
asdaksrgkr spsvcmpedq epgcclydli vdfqqigwkf iiaphkynay mcrgdcsvnh
thvtrsghtk vaktgiitrq datgnqgmcc hpaeydavrm iymngdnqvt marvpgmiar
kctcs
An exemplary -1 sequence is deposited under the accession number
ABA01328 and comprises the sequence given below as SEQ ID NO: 5.
SEQ ID NO: 5
llip hlfaatvkqq ysggvkplte dkkt kgsiefarlg qhispkdfga
wnhftsfier hdkvyrnese alkrfgifkr nleiirsaqe ndkgtaiygi nqfadlspee
fkkthlphtw kqpdhpnriv vdpk eplpesfdwr ehgavtkvkt eghcaacwaf
svtgniegqw flakkklvsl saqqlldcdv vdegcnggfp ldaykeivrm gglepedkyp
yeakaeqcrl vpsdiavyin gsvelphdee kmrawlvkkg pisigitvdd iqfykggvsr
pttcrlssmi hgallvgygv wiik wged rgen acrinrfpts
avvl
An exemplary Tci-APY-1 sequence is deposited under the accession number
CBW38507 and comprises the sequence given below as SEQ ID NO: 6.
SEQ ID NO: 6
mllyilslvl lidalppgyp dgkehgsrpt irslpdgste ykllivtdmd kdskagewtw
ravtregrlt lspdmahvsi awdensernl tssmnikgra melsdlsvfh nriltpddrt
gliseiknnk mipwvflnsg pgnttspfkc ewmtikddvl yvgghgnefr nkqgeivhrn
nlwiktvtpe gevtnvdwtd vfnnlrnavg isepgylthe avqwsekqgh wyflprkesk
tvyveeddek kgtdlliign pdldqfetkr igvlrpergy safdfipgtd dkiivalksk
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
tety vtvftidgei llddqkldgn ykfeglyfi
An exemplary Tci-MEP-1 sequence is given below as SEQ ID NO: 7.
SEQ ID NO: 7
mrlavlllvlvvsaqaglldkvkdffkggnfgektktatlskfkklfektgilslgnklaemrskvmkk
lelskakkaevdrklkeveermdntvenlkdtifeinavknvgeslfqsdilltkrqveevmdgveggr
pkrqafkdqnypnttwqqgvfyrfddsadyytrkvfemgtkqweeatcidfkedkekkaensiiliked
gcwsyvgqvggeqplslgdgceqvgiathelghalglfhtmsrydrddfitvvlenvvegfvdqyiket
pqtttnygftydygsimhygassashnnkptmvandtryqesmgsqiisfidksmindhynckadcpka
tsakcqnggfphprkcsecicpsgyggalcdqrptgcgqtlkakeskqflidklgfpsgvrdeftfcnh
wieapegkkielkinsishgyahdgcilggveiktsedqtrtgfrfcspndrntvlvsasnrvpiitfn
rsgqqqiileykvvs
An exemplary Tci-ES20 sequence is given below as SEQ ID NO: 8.
SEQ ID NO: 8
lilvsasvyvsvqgqgngdmkkvelymgyakkdmekvreflklkderltkllsdlfryldktt
fewmkdeatleqfiqtrgkfssalvhpdvqkrykdnrklwafryarlmnciggsdmgrataylpgvsvq
ekeetlryslklertcaytyfr
As such, one ment of this invention provides one or more of the T.
circumcincta antigens selected from the group consisting of (i)-(ix) above or
comprising one or more of the ces provided as SEQ ID NOS: 1-8 (or a
fragment thereof), for raising immune responses in animals – in particular ovine
animals such as sheep and goats.
Advantageously, the invention provides vaccine compositions sing one
or more of the antigens provided as (i)-(ix) above, or one or more antigens
comprising the sequences provided as SEQ ID NOS: 1-8 (or a fragment thereof), for
use in raising immune responses (for example protective immune responses) in
ovine animals.
SEQ ID NOS: 1-8 above (and any nts, variants or derivatives thereof),
may be regarded as reference sequences – against which the sequences of the
fragments, variants and derivatives described herein are compared. In other
embodiments, the reference sequences may be the wild-type sequences of any of
the ns given as (i)-(viii)
In on to the definition provided above, the term “antigen” also
encompasses fragments of any of the antigens described herein – this includes
fragments of the antigens listed as (i)-(viii) above and antigens encoded by
sequences comprising parts of SEQ ID NOS: 1-8. In particular, the term “antigen”
encompasses nic or immunogenic fragments or epitopes capable of eliciting an
immune response in an animal. Advantageously, the n fragments described
ation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
herein are capable of eliciting an immune response which is substantially identical or
similar to, an immune response elicited by the complete antigen from which the
fragment is derived. In one embodiment, the antigen fragments provided by this
ion are capable of providing protective immune responses against T.
circumcincta in ovine animals.
In other embodiments, the term “antigen” or “antigen fragment” may
encompass variants or derivatives of any of the antigen(s) bed herein – such
antigens being referred to as “variant” or ative” antigens. Again, it should be
understood that these terms include variants/derivatives of any of the ns given
as (i)-(ix) above or encoded by any of SEQ ID NOS: 1-8. Further, the skilled man
would understand that any variant or derivative antigen may elicit an immune
response in an ovine animal similar or substantially identical to an immune response
elicited by the corresponding complete or native antigen in the same host – such
variants/derivatives may be referred to as “immunogenic variants/derivatives”. An
immunogenic variant/derivative may comprise or be encoded by, a protein/peptide
sequence or nucleic acid or amino acid sequence which ses one or more
nucleobase and/or amino acid substitutions, inversions, additions and/or ons
relative to a reference sequence.
One of skill will appreciate that the term “substitution” may encompass one or
more conservative substitution(s). One of skill in this field will understand that the
term rvative substitution” is intended to embrace the act of replacing one or
more amino acids of a protein or peptide with an alternate amino acid with similar
ties and which does not ntially alter the physico-chemical properties
and/or structure or function of the native (or wild type) protein.
In the context of this invention, a variant/derivative n may comprise or
be encoded by a mutant sequence which when compared to a reference sequence
(such as for example a wild type sequence (including sequences encoding any of the
specific Teladorsagia antigens given as (i)-(viii) above) or sequences comprising
SEQ ID NOS: 1-8 (or fragments thereof) above), is found to contain one or more
amino acid/nucleotide substitutions, additions, deletions and/or inversions.
An antigen which may be regarded as a derivative may further se one
or more es of a fragment or t described herein optionally in combination
with one or more modifications to the structure of the antigen or one or more of the
amino acid residues thereof.
The fragments, mutants, variants and/or derivatives provided by this invention
may comprise anything from about 5 to about 10 residues (amino acids and/or
nucleic acids) of the complete amino acid or nucleic acid sequence (n) of (or
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
ation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
encoding) the complete wild-type or native Teladorsagia (for example T.
cincta) antigen, to about n-1 residues. In certain embodiments, the fragments,
variants and/or tives provided by this invention comprise at least about 10, 15,
, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300 residues – the upper limit (n-1)
depending upon the size (n) of the nucleic acid encoding the complete n or the
number (n) of amino acid residues comprising the primary ce of the antigen.
Additionally, or alternatively, the fragments, variants and/or derivatives
ed by this invention are at least 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%,
70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% homologous or cal to
the various reference sequences provided herein.
The degree of (or percentage) “homology” n two or more (amino acid
or nucleic acid) sequences may be determined by aligning two or more sequences
and determining the number of d residues which are identical or which are not
identical but which differ by redundant nucleotide substitutions (the redundant
nucleotide substitution having no effect upon the amino acid d by a particular
codon, or conservative amino acid substitutions.
A degree (or percentage) ity” between two or more (amino acid or
nucleic acid) sequences may also be determined by aligning the ces and
ascertaining the number of exact residue matches between the d sequences
and dividing this number by the number of total residues compared – multiplying the
resultant figure by 100 would yield the percentage identity between the sequences.
In one embodiment, the invention provides multi-component compositions
and vaccines for use in raising an immune response in an animal, the vaccine and/or
composition comprising, consisting or substantially consisting of, each of the
following T. circumcincta antigens:
(i) calcium-dependent apyrase-1 (Tci-APY-1);
(ii) astacin-like metalloproteinase-1 (Tci-MEP-1);
(iii) excretory/secretory protein wn on: Tci-ES20);
(iv) cathepsin F-1 (Tci-CF-1);
(v) transforming growth protein 2-like protein (a TGFβ homologue: Tci-
TGH-2);
(vi) activation associated secretory protein (Tci-ASP-1);
(vii) macrophage migration inhibitory factor (Tci-MIF-1); and
(viii) surface associated antigen (Tci-SAA-1).
In one embodiment, one or more of the T. circumcincta antigens provided as
(i)-(viii) above, is/are provided as a fragment or variant/derivative (as defined above).
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
The inventors have discovered that s (in particular sheep) administered
a vaccine composition sing eight separate T. circumcincta antigens (for
e, the antigens given as (i)-(viii) above) develop an immune response which
confers a level of protection which is far higher than that observed following exposure
to prior art es and vaccine compositions. For example, the vaccines provided
by this invention have been ed to reduce host FECs and luminal parasite
burdens by approximately %, 15%-85%, 20%-80%, 25%-75% or 30%-70%.
Without wishing to be bound by theory, the inventors hypothesise that the
success of the vaccines and vaccine compositions bed herein is due to the use
of antigens which elicit an immune response which mimics that occurring during a
natural infection and which serves to prevent or suppress nematode-derived
immunomodulation.
Antigens to be exploited in this ion may be obtained using inant
technology. In one embodiment, an expression vector sing one or more
nucleic acid sequences ng a T. circumcincta antigen (such as any of those
described herein) may be used to produce one or more recombinant T. circumcincta
antigens for use in raising immune responses in animals – particularly ovine animals.
Protocols for the recombinant preparation of any of the antigens provided by
this invention are bed herein – see for example section entitled “Production of
recombinant proteins for immunisation”. Nevertheless, one of skill will appreciate
that other methods (for example methods utilising different primers and vectors etc.)
may also be used.
In view of the above, the ion provides vectors, for example expression
vectors, comprising nucleic acid sequence(s) encoding one or more of the T.
circumcincta antigens described herein (or fragments thereof). By way of example,
the vectors provided by this invention may comprise plasmid sion systems
such as those known as pET, pPICZ, pSUMO and/or pGST. Vectors according to
this ion may otherwise be referred to as “nucleic acid constructs”.
In a further aspect, the present invention provides host cells transfected or
transformed with a vector as described herein. Eukaryotic or prokaryotic cells, such
as, for example plant, insect, mammalian, fungal and/or bacterial cells, may be
transfected with one or more of the vectors described herein. One of skill in this field
will be ar with the techniques used to introduce heterologous or foreign nucleic
acid sequences, such as expression vectors, into cells and these may include, for
example, heat-shock ent, use of one or more als (such as calcium
phosphate) to induce transformation/transfection, the use of viral carriers,
microinjection and/or techniques such as electroporation. Further information
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
ation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
regarding transformation/transfection techniques may be found in Current Protocols
in lar y, Ausuble, F.M., ea., John Wiley & Sons, N.Y. (1989) which is
orated herein by reference.
In one embodiment, the host cell is a bacterial cell such as, for e, an
Escherichia coli cell.
In view of the above, the present invention r provides a process for the
production of a inant Teladorsagia antigen d by any of the sequences
described herein (or an immunogenic fragment thereof), which recombinant antigen
(or immunogenic fragment thereof) is for use in raising an immune response in an
animal (for example an ovine), said method comprising the step of (a) transforming a
host cell with a nucleic acid sequence according to this invention (e.g. a nucleic acid
encoding a T. circumcincta antigen) or transfecting a host cell with a nucleic acid
construct of the invention; (b) culturing the cells obtained in (a) under conditions in
which expression of the nucleic acid (or rather a protein encoded thereby) takes
place; and (c) isolating the sed recombinant protein or peptide from the cell
culture and/or the culture supernatant.
Recombinant proteins/peptides produced according to the method described
above may be partially purified from the host cell before being used in a vaccine or
vaccine composition. Where the polypeptide is secreted from the host cell, the cells
may be separated from the media by centrifugation. In such a situation, the
supernatant, which contains the secreted polypeptide, may be used directly as a
vaccine, or in a vaccine composition. Alternatively, the polypeptide may be partially
purified from this supernatant, for example using affinity tography.
In one embodiment, the invention es a composition (for e a
vaccine composition) comprising, consisting or substantially consisting of, each of the
following inant T. circumcincta antigens:
(i) calcium-dependent apyrase-1 (Tci-APY-1);
(ii) astacin-like metalloproteinase-1 (Tci-MEP-1);
(iii) excretory/secretory protein (unknown on: Tci-ES20);
(iv) cathepsin F-1 (Tci-CF-1);
(v) transforming growth protein 2-like protein (a TGFβ homologue: Tci-
TGH-2);
(vi) activation associated secretory protein (Tci-ASP-1);
(vii) macrophage migration inhibitory factor (Tci-MIF-1); and
(viii) surface associated antigen (Tci-SAA-1);
for use in g an immune response in an animal (for example an ovine
species – including sheep and goats).
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
In one embodiment, any of the Teladorsagia antigens described herein may
be admixed with r component, such as another polypeptide and/or an
adjuvant, diluent or excipient. In one embodiment, the vaccine compositions
provided by this ion may comprise a QuilA adjuvant. Additionally, or
alternatively, vaccines or e itions provided by this invention may, for
example, contain viral, fungal, bacterial or other parasite antigens used to control
other es/infections or infestations. For example, the vaccine or vaccine
composition may be included within a multivalent vaccine, which includes antigens
against other ovine (for example, sheep) es.
In a still further , the present invention provides an ovine population, for
example a farmed population of sheep and/or goats, treated, vaccinated or
sed with a vaccine or composition described herein, said vaccine or
composition comprising one or more of the Teladorsagia antigens bed herein.
One of skill will appreciate that the vaccines described in this invention may
take the form of subunit-type vaccines whereby one or more Teladorsagia antigens
are used to inoculate an animal. Additionally or alternatively, the vaccine may
comprise a nucleic acid molecule (known as a DNA e) encoding one or more
antigens encoded by SEQ ID NOS: 1-8 above or an immunogenic nt f,
to be expressed by the cells of an animal to be vaccinated. In this way, constitutive
expression of Teladorsagia antigens in a vaccinated host (such as, for example a
vaccinated ovine subject (sheep or goat)) may elicit a constitutive protective immune
response.
The compositions, including the vaccine compositions, provided by this
invention may be formulated as sterile pharmaceutical compositions comprising one
or more of the antigens described herein and a pharmaceutical excipient, carrier or
diluent. These composition may be formulated for oral, topical (including dermal and
sublingual), parenteral (including subcutaneous, intradermal, intramuscular and
intravenous), transdermal and/or mucosal administration.
The (vaccine) compositions described herein, may comprise a te
dosage unit and may be prepared by any of the methods well known in the art of
pharmacy. Methods typically include the step of bringing into association one or
more of the T. circumcincta antigens described herein with liquid carriers or finely
divided solid rs or both.
Compositions (the term “composition” including a vaccine compositions),
suitable for oral administration n the r is a solid are most ably
presented as unit dose formulations such as boluses, capsules or tablets each
containing a predetermined amount of one or more of the Teladorsagia antigens of
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
this invention. A tablet may be made by compression or moulding, ally with
one or more accessory ingredients. Compressed tablets may be prepared by
compressing in a suitable machine an active compound (for example one or more T.
circumcincta n(s)) in a free-flowing form such as a powder or granules
optionally mixed with a binder, lubricant, inert diluent, lubricating agent, surfaceactive
agent or dispersing agent. Moulded tablets may be made by moulding an
active compound with an inert liquid diluent. Tablets may be optionally coated and, if
uncoated, may optionally be scored. Capsules may be prepared by filling an active
nd, either alone or in admixture with one or more accessory ingredients, into
the capsule shells and then sealing them in the usual manner. Cachets are
analogous to capsules wherein an active compound together with any accessory
ingredient(s) is sealed in a rice paper envelope. An active nd may also be
formulated as dispersible granules, which may for example be ded in water
before administration, or sprinkled on food. The es may be packaged, e.g., in
a sachet. Formulations suitable for oral administration wherein the carrier is a liquid
may be presented as a solution or a suspension in an aqueous or ueous
liquid, or as an oil-in-water liquid emulsion.
Compositions suitable for oral administration include controlled release
dosage forms, e.g., tablets wherein an active compound (for example one or more
Teladorsagia antigens) is formulated in an appropriate release-controlling matrix, or
is coated with a suitable release-controlling film. Such compositions may be
particularly convenient for prophylactic use.
Composition and vaccine compositions formulated for parenteral
administration include sterile ons or suspensions of an active compound (for
e one or more Teladorsagia antigens) in aqueous or oleaginous vehicles.
Injectable compositions and vaccines may be adapted for bolus injection or
uous infusion. Such ations are conveniently presented in unit dose or
multi-dose containers, which are sealed after introduction of the formulation until
required for use. atively, an active compound (for example one or more T.
circumcincta antigens) may be in powder form that is constituted with a suitable
vehicle, such as e, n-free water or PBS before use.
Compositions comprising one or more Teladorsagia antigens may also be
formulated as long-acting depot preparations, which may be administered by
intramuscular injection or by implantation, e.g., subcutaneously or intramuscularly.
Depot preparations may include, for e, suitable polymeric or hydrophobic
materials, or ion-exchange resins. They may also include preparations or adjuvants
known to enhance the affinity and/or longevity of an animal (for example ovine)
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
ed set by JXT
immune response, such as single or double emulsions of oil in water. Such longacting
compositions are particularly convenient for prophylactic use.
Compositions suitable (or formulated) for mucosal stration e
compositions comprising particles for aerosol dispersion, or dispensed in drinking
water. When dispensed such compositions should desirably have a particle diameter
in the range 10 to 200 microns to enable retention in, for example, the nasal cavity;
this may be achieved by, as appropriate, use of a powder of a suitable particle size or
choice of an appropriate valve. Other suitable itions include coarse powders
having a particle diameter in the range 20 to 500 microns, for administration by rapid
inhalation through the nasal passage from a container held close up to the nose, and
nasal drops comprising 0.2 to 5% w/v of an active compound in aqueous or oily
on or suspension.
It should be understood that in addition to the carrier ingredients mentioned
above, the various compositions described herein may include, an appropriate one or
more additional (pharmaceutically acceptable) carrier ients such as diluents,
buffers, ring agents, binders, surface active , thickeners, lubricants,
preservatives ding anti-oxidants) and the like, and substances included for the
purpose of rendering the formulation isotonic with the blood of the intended recipient.
Pharmaceutically acceptable carriers are well known to those skilled in the art
and include, but are not limited to, 0.1 M and preferably 0.05 M phosphate buffer or
0.8% saline. Additionally, pharmaceutically acceptable carriers may be aqueous or
non-aqueous solutions, suspensions, and emulsions. Examples of ueous
solvents are propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, ble oils such as olive oil,
and injectable organic esters such as ethyl oleate. Aqueous carriers include water,
alcoholic/aqueous solutions, emulsions or suspensions, including saline and ed
media. Parenteral vehicles include sodium chloride solution, Ringer's dextrose,
dextrose and sodium chloride, lactated Ringer's or fixed oils. Preservatives and other
additives may also be present, such as, for example, antimicrobials, antioxidants,
chelating agents, inert gases and the like.
Compositions le for topical formulation may be provided for example as
gels, creams or ointments.
Compositions for veterinary use may conveniently be in either powder or
liquid concentrate form. In accordance with standard veterinary formulation ce,
conventional soluble excipients, such as lactose or sucrose, may be
orated in the powders to improve their physical properties. Thus, particularly
suitable powders of this invention comprise 50 to 100% w/w and preferably 60 to
80% w/w of the active ingredient(s) (for example one or more T. circumcincta
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
ation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
antigens) and 0 to 50% w/w and preferably 20 to 40% w/w of conventional veterinary
ents. These powders may either be added to, for example, animal feed –
perhaps by way of an intermediate premix, or diluted in animal drinking water.
Liquid concentrates of this invention suitably contain one or more T.
circumcincta antigens and may optionally further include an acceptable watermiscible
solvent for veterinary use, for example polyethylene , propylene glycol,
glycerol, glycerol formal or such a solvent mixed with up to 30% v/v of ethanol. The
liquid concentrates may be administered to the drinking water of animals.
In general, a suitable dose of each the T. circumcincta ns provided by
this invention may be in the range of about 10 to about 100 µg protein per animal.
Furthermore, the one or more antigens bed herein may be administered on
about 2 to about 5 occasions over a period of about 1 to about 10 weeks or on an
annual boost basis. In one embodiment, each animal may be administered about 10,
, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95 or 100µg of each (or
a predetermined selection of) the one or more antigens described herein. As such,
where the vaccine comprises 8 antigens, the total protein content may range from
about 80µg to about 800µg. Furthermore, each animal may be stered the
antigen(s) on 2, 3, 4 or 5 ons over a 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 week period.
It should be understood that each animal may receive the same or a different dose of
the T. circumcincta antigen(s) on each administration occasion.
In one embodiment, a vaccine formulated for administration to sheep may
comprise approximately 50µg of each Teladorsagia (for example T. circumcincta)
antigen. As such, where the e comprises, for example, 8 T. circumcincta
antigens, the total n (antigen) content may be in the region of 400µg. Further,
the vaccine may be administered three times with a three week gap n each
administration.
In addition to providing T. circumcincta antigens for use in raising immune
responses in animals, the t invention may also provide polyclonal and/or
monoclonal antibodies (or antigen binding fragments thereof) that bind (or have
ty or specificity for) any of the Teladorsagia antigens provided by this invention.
Production and ion of polyclonal/monoclonal antibodies specific for
protein/peptide sequences is routine in the art, and further information can be found
in, for example “Basic s in Antibody production and characterisation” Howard
& Bethell, 2000, Taylor & Francis Ltd. Such antibodies may be used in diagnostic
procedures, to, for example detect or se T. circumcincta infection/infestations
in animal (for example ovine) species, as well as for passive immunisation.
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
ation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
The present invention further provides a vaccine for use in ting or
controlling T. circumcincta ion/infestation and associated diseases in ovine
hosts. The vaccine may be a polypeptide or polynucleotide vaccine.
The invention further provides a method for immunising an ovine t
against T. cincta infection/infestation and associated disease (for example
secondary infections etc.), said method comprising the step of administering a
vaccine of the invention to the ovine subject.
While this invention predominately concerns antigens derived from the
nematode organism T. cincta and their use in vaccine compositions for raising
immune responses in animals (particularly ovine animals), owing to a high degree of
homology between the T. circumcincta antigens described herein and specific
antigens from other, closely related, nematode species, the utility of the antigens
provided by this invention is not arily limited to raising immune responses
which are protective against Teladorsagia ions/infestations. In particular, the
antigens described herein exhibit significant homology/identity to certain antigens
derived from the bovine pathogen, agia ostertagi. Details of these antigens
and an indication of the level of identity exhibited between the disclosed T.
circumcinta antigens and certain related O. ostertagi antigens are given in the table
below.
Teladorsagia Accession Function* Closest % % O. ost
circumcincta number Ostertagia identity Cover- reference
Antigen ostertagi -age
homologue
A-1 CAQ43040 L3-enriched BQ098696.1a,b 94% 100% Unpublished
surface (aa1-
associated 162)
antigen
Tci-MIF-1 CBI68362 L3-enriched BQ457770.1a 99% 91% Unpublished
macrophage (aa11-
migration 115)
inhibitory
factor
Tci-ASP-1 CBJ15404 L4-enriched CAD23183.1 76% 97% Mol Biochem
activation- (aa5- tol
associated 235) 2003; 126,
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
secretory 201-208
protein
Tci-TGH-2 ACR27078 Transforming No significant hit - - -
growth in NCBI, EMBL
protein or e 4
2-like protein
Tci-CF-1 ABA01328 L4-enriched BQ457843.1a 73% 59% Unpublished
** Secreted (aa12-
cathepsin F 229)
Tci-ES20 Not yet Excretory/ CAC44259.1 35% 100% Mol Biochem
submitted* secretory (ES) (aa1- Parasitol
** protein 140) 2003; 126,
201-208
Tci-MEP-1 Not yet Astacin-like 95.2 69% 100% Parasitology
submitted* ES (aa1- 2002; 125,
** metalloprotein 498) 383-391
Tci-APY-1 CBW3850 L4-enriched ADG63133.1 92% 96% Parasitology
7 ES calcium- (aa12- 2011; 138,
activated 339) 333-343
apyrase
*Putative or inferred on
**Tci-CF-1 is highly polymorphic, the clone used for vaccine production had following amino acid
substitutions compared to hed ce. In each case the amino acid in the published sequence
is in italics, that in the vaccine isoform sequence is in normal font and the amino acid on in the
hed ce is in subscript: I44⇒T44, N101⇒D101, T129⇒A129, R137⇒Q137, R305⇒K305, L306⇒P306,
S307⇒Y307
*** Full length sequences not yet ted.
a From translated EST sequence
b with following caveat from authors: “WARNING: uent examination of these samples has
revealed the presence of an additional Trichostrongyloidea cattle nematode, Cooperia oncophora.
Sequences in this library may derive from either Ostertagia or Cooperia.”
In view of the above, it should be understood that the various aspects and
embodiments of this ion (as applying to T. circumcincta antigens and their use
in raising immune responses in animals, especially ovines) may further apply to one
or more of the O. ostertagi antigens described above.
Moreover, in view of the levels of ty exhibited between the T.
circumcincta antigens described herein and the O. ostertagi antigens identified
above, one or more of the T. circumcincta antigens described herein may be used to
raise immune responses in bovine subjects, the immune responses being protective
and serving to reduce, prevent, treat or eliminate Ostertagia (for example O.
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
ostertagi) infections/infestations. One of skill will appreciate that the T. circumcincta
antigens ed by this invention may be used individually or together (for e
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or all 8 of the T. circumcincta antigens) to raise immune responses in
bovine hosts.
Alternatively, the present invention may extend to the use of one or more (for
example 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or all 7) of the O. ostertagi antigens presented in the table
above, optionally in combination with one or more of the T. circumcincta antigens
described herein, for use in raising immune ses in bovine subjects. Again,
such immune responses may be protective against Ostertagia infections/infestations.
In one embodiment, this invention extends to compositions or vaccine
compositions sing one or more of the Ostertagia antigens bed above
optionally in combination with one or more the T. circumcincta antigens described
herein, for use in raising immune responses in bovine subjects.
The invention may further provide uses of one or more of the Ostertagia
antigens optionally in combination with one or more of the Teladorsagia antigens for
the manufacture of medicaments for use in the treatment and/or prevention of an
infection/colonisation by/with an agia pathogen in a bovine host. Similarly, the
invention may also embrace methods of raising stertagia responses in bovine
hosts, the methods comprising administering to a bovine subject, an amount of one
or more of the Ostertagia antigens described above, sufficient to induce an anti-
Ostertagia immune se.
One of skill will appreciate that references to the Ostertagia antigens
described above not only include antigens comprising or ting of the sequences
identified by the Accession numbers ted in the table above, but fragments
thereof – in particular, fragments which are capable of raising immune ses (for
example protective immune responses) in bovine animals (i.e. the fragments are
antigenic and/or immunogenic) as well as mutants, ts and/or derivatives
thereof. It should be understood that the definitions of fragments, mutants, variants
and/or derivatives provided in relation to the Teladorsagia antigens of this invention,
also apply to the Ostertagia antigens described above. As such, the agia
antigen fragments, variants and/or derivatives encompassed by this invention may
exhibit at least 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%,
90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% homology or identity to the various Ostertagia
sequences described above.
ED DESCRIPTION
The present invention will now be bed in detail with reference to the
following Figures which show:
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
Figure 1: Effects of immunization of sheep with recombinant antigens derived
from Teladorsagia circumcincta on faecal worm egg counts (FWEC) after nge
infection. Panels A and C: FWECs of sheep challenged with 2000 T. circumcincta
three times per week for 4 weeks following immunization with an 8-protein cocktail in
the context of Quil A (dashed line) or with Quil A only (solid line). Each data point
represents the arithmetic mean FWEC ± SEM. Panel A represents data from Trial 1;
Panel C ents data from Trial 2. Panels B and D show cumulative FWECs, for
each animal in each group in Trial 1 (Panel B) and Trial 2 (Panel D). “Imm”
represents sheep immunized with the 8-protein cocktail; “Con” represents those
administered with Quil A nt only. Note that, in panel D, for Groups 1 and 2 in
Trial 2, tive FWEC is calculated over 84 days, whereas for Groups 3 and 4
cumulative FWEC is calculated over 112 days. One er” animal in Group 1 of
Trial 2, sheep number 675J, is indicated.
Figure 2. Trial 1: Lumenal T. cincta burdens of sheep in Group 1 and
Group 2. Each data point ents the mean number (± SEM) of T. circumcincta
enumerated in lumenal ts of seven sheep in each group. Panel A depicts
counts categorised into developmental stage and the gender of the adult worms
harvested. Panel B depicts the counts as l burdens (all stages and genders).
“*” denotes a significant difference between the means (P < 0.05), “**” denotes a
highly significant difference between mean (P < 0.01).
Figure 3. Trial 1: Mucosal T. circumcincta s of sheep in Group 1 and
Group 2. Each data point represents the mean number (± SEM) of nematodes
harvested from the mucosal contents of seven sheep in each group. “*” denotes a
significant difference between the means (P < 0.05).
Figure 4: Effects of immunization of sheep with recombinant antigens derived
from Teladorsagia circumcincta on abomasal nematode burden after challenge
infection (Trial 1). Panels A-C represent the number of T. cincta enumerated in
the abomasum. Panel A depicts the total nematode burden, panel B the adult
nematode burden and panel C the juvenile nematode burden of each of seven sheep
in Group 1 (immunized) or Group 2 (control, adjuvant only). Horizontal bars represent
the mean value.
Figure 5: Weight gain of sheep in Group 1 and Group 2 from Day 0 to Day 84
of the experiment (Trial 1).
Figure 6: Effects of immunization of sheep with recombinant antigens derived
from Teladorsagia circumcincta on juvenile nematode burden distribution after
challenge infection (Trial 2; Group 1 and Group 2). Numbers of juvenile T.
circumcincta enumerated in the abomasal lumen and the abomasal mucosa of each
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
of these sheep are shown. “Imm” represents sheep immunized with the 8-protein
il; “Con” represents those immunized with Quil A adjuvant only.
Figure 7: Effects of zation of sheep with recombinant antigens derived
from Teladorsagia circumcincta on abomasal nematode burden after challenge
infection (Trial 2; Group 3 and Group 4). Data shown represent the total numbers of
T. circumcincta ated in the abomasum of each of seven sheep in Group 3
(immunized) or Group 4 (control, adjuvant only).
Figure 8: Serum antibody responses of sheep to the recombinant
ns used to immunize Group 1 in Trial 1. Each data point represents the
mean value derived from 7 sheep. Standard errors in panels A and B have
been omitted to aid interpretation. Panels A and B show serum antibody
responses for vaccinated sheep (Group 1). Panel A shows data for IgG, panel
B shows data for IgA. “Imm” represents dates on which sheep were
immunized; “Trick” represents the e infection; “PM” is the post mortem
date.
Figure 9: Serum antibody responses of sheep to the inant proteins
used to immunize Groups 1 and 3 in Trial 2. Each data point represents the mean
value derived from 14 sheep until day 84, after which each data point ents the
mean of 7 sheep necropsied later in the trial. Standard errors have been omitted to
aid interpretation. Panel A shows data for IgG, panel B shows data for IgA. “Imm”
represents dates on which sheep were immunized; “Trick” represents the trickle
infection; “PM” is the post-mortem date.
Figure 10: Serum antibody responses of sheep to L4 excretory/secretory
ts of Teladorsagia circumcincta. ‘Imm’ represents the days on which animals
were immunized with recombinant antigen cocktail (Immunized group) or adjuvant
only (Control group).
Figure 11: Immunoblots to investigate serum IgG (Panel A) and IgA (Panel B)
binding to components of somatic extracts and excretory/secretory ts of
Teladorsagia circumcincta. Lanes 1 and 5 contain L3 somatic extract, lanes 2 and 6
contain L4 somatic extract, lanes 3 and 7 contain L4 ES material and lanes 4 and 8
contain adult somatic extract. Blots were incubated with sera pooled from 7
immunized sheep (Lanes 1-4, sheep from Group 3, Trial 2) or non-immunized sheep
(Lanes 5-8, sheep from Group 4, Trial 2). Sera had been collected from the animals
on the date of the third immunization immediately prior to the initiation of trickle
infection. * represents molecular mass (kDa).
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
Figure 12: Serum IgG responses of control, adjuvant only recipients to
recombinant Tci-MEP-1 and Y-1. Each data point represents the mean value
(± SEM) derived from 7 (Trial 1, panel A) or 14 (Trial 2, Panel B) sheep until day 84,
after which each data point represents the mean of 7 sheep in Trial 2.
Figure 13: l antibody titres to the recombinant proteins used to
immunize sheep in Trial 1. Each bar represents the mean value derived from 7 sheep
(± SEM). Panel A shows data for IgG, panel B shows data for IgA. Asterisks indicate
mean values which are tically significantly higher than those for the remaining
antigens within the same treatment group.
Figure 14: Mucosal antibody titres to the recombinant proteins used to
immunize sheep in Trial 2. Each bar represents the mean value derived from 7 sheep
(± SEM). Panel A shows data for IgG, panel B shows data for IgA. Asterisks indicate
mean values which are statistically significantly higher than those for the remaining
antigens within that Group.
Figure 15: Mucosal antibody levels to the recombinant proteins used to
ze sheep in Trials 1 and 2. Panels A and B show data for IgG, panels C and D
show data for IgA. All graphs show correlation biplots y representing sheep
s) and their n-specific antibody responses (axes). The arrows indicate
directions of higher antigen-specific antibody response. The onal projection of
points onto each axis approximates the relative responses by sheep. The
correlations between responses to ic antigens are represented by the angle
between the corresponding vectors for each antigen. Open circles represent
immunized sheep, closed circles represent control, non-immunized sheep. In Trial 2
(Panels B and D), blue circles and pink circles represent Groups 1 and 3
(immunized) respectively. Green and orange circles represent control Group 2 and 4
respectively.
Materials and s
Production of recombinant proteins for immunisation
Eight recombinant proteins were used in combination to immunise 6 month-
old lambs. Details of these proteins are given in Table 1. Three proteins,
macrophage migration inhibitory factor-1 (Tci-MIF-1), calcium-dependent apyrase-1
(Tci-APY-1) and a TGFβ homologue (Tci-TGH-2) were ed e of their
putative immunoregulatory function (McSorley et al., 2009; Nisbet et al., 2010a;
Nisbet et al., 2011). The remaining five proteins were selected using a combined
immunoscreening/proteomics approach: cathepsin F-1 F-1), n-like
metalloproteinase-1 (Tci-MEP-1), a 20 kDa protein of unknown function (Tci-ES20)
and activation-associated secretory protein-1 (Tci-ASP-1) (Redmond et al., 2006;
ation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
Smith et al., 2009; Nisbet et al., 2010b). A final protein was chosen because of its
gy to known vaccine ate antigens of other parasitic nematodes. This
protein is known as surface-associated antigen (Tci-SAA-1, Nisbet et al., 2009).
Cloning and sequencing of the cDNA encoding Tci-SAA-1, Tci-MIF-1 and Y-1
and production of recombinant ns of each of these proteins in a bacterial
expression system have been described previously (Nisbet et al., 2009; Nisbet et al.,
2010a; Nisbet et al., 2011). Identical tion and purification parameters were
employed in the current study. For Tci-MEP-1, ucleotide primers for use in the
rapid ication of cDNA ends (RACE) were designed from the EST sequence
CB036707 and RACE performed using the SMART™ RACE kit (Clontech) according
to the manufacturer’s instructions, using total RNA extracted from L4 stage T.
circumcincta (prepared as described in Nisbet et al., 2008) as a template.
Amplification of the full coding sequence (CDS) of Tci-mep-1 was performed using
oligonucleotide primers incorporating the initiation and termination codons from the
contigs generated by 5’ and 3’ RACE, cDNA generated from L4 as template
(prepared as described in Redmond et al., 2006) and the Advantage® 2 PCR Kit
(Clontech) according to the cturer’s instructions. Following confirmatory
sequencing, oligonucleotide primers were designed to amplify the CDS of Tci-mep-1,
omitting the ce encoding the signal peptide (bases 1-48 of the CDS) and the
termination codon. Using these primers, plasmid containing the full-length CDS as a
template and the Advantage® 2 PCR Kit (Clontech), Tci-mep-1 was amplified and
sub-cloned into the expression vector pET SUMO (Invitrogen). The resulting plasmid
was used to transform Escherichia coli BL21-CodonPlus (DE3)-RIL competent cells
(Stratagene). Recombinant protein expression was d in the presence of 1 mM
isopropyl β-Dthiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). ble recombinant Tci-MEP-1 was
ed from inclusion bodies solubilised in 8M urea, ed by nickel column
affinity chromatography using HisTrap™ HP columns (GE Healthcare) and a stepwise
imidazole gradient in the presence of 8M urea in 20mM phosphate buffer, pH
7.6. Purified Tci-MEP-1 was then dialysed t 2M urea in 20mM phosphate
buffer, pH 7.6. The full CDS of the cDNA encoding Tci-TGH-2 (accession number
FJ410914) was ied by PCR using ucleotide primers incorporating the
initiation codon, but omitting the termination codon. Plasmid containing the full CDS
in a cloning vector was used as a template (kindly supplied by Prof Rick Maizels,
University of Edinburgh) and the Advantage® 2 PCR Kit (Clontech) was employed
according to the cturer’s instructions. Tci-tgh-2 was sub-cloned into the
expression vector pET SUMO (Invitrogen) and recombinant protein expression
performed as described above. Soluble recombinant Tci-TGH-2 was purified from
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
cell lysates by nickel column affinity chromatography using p™ HP columns
(GE Healthcare). Next, rTci-TGH-2 was eluted in 500 mM imidazole, 20mM
phosphate , pH 7.6 and then dialysed t 20mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.6
at RT for 3 hrs. Sub-cloning of the CDS of Tci-asp-1 (after removal of the bases
encoding the signal e) from a pET22b(+) vector (described in Nisbet et al.,
2010b) into pET SUMO, using the conditions outlined above for Tci-tgh-2, permitted
the expression of soluble recombinant Tci-ASP-1 which was sed and then
ed by nickel column affinity chromatography as described, above, for Tci-TGH-
2. For the expression of Tci-CF-1 protein, oligonucleotide primers were designed to
amplify the CDS of Tci-cf-1, omitting the ce encoding the signal peptide
(bases 1-42 of the CDS) and the termination codon. Using these primers, cDNA
generated from L4 as template (prepared as described in Redmond et al., 2006) and
the Advantage® 2 PCR Kit (Clontech), Tci-cf-1 was sub-cloned into the vector
pPICZαC (Invitrogen) and used to transform the yeastPichia pastoris [X-33 Mut+
strain (Invitrogen)] following linearisation with PmeI (New England Biolabs).
Recombinant protein expression was induced in the presence of 0.5% methanol, as
described in Nisbet et al. (2007) and soluble recombinant Tci-CF-1 was purified from
culture atant by nickel column affinity chromatography as bed above for
Tci-TGH-2. Tci-ES20, a homologue of a 20kDa ory/secretory (ES) n of
Ostertagia agi, was identified during an immunoscreening/proteomic analysis of
genic T. circumcincta ES molecules (Smith et al., 2009). The complete
coding sequence was determined by obtaining the putative full-length cDNA via
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification from a cDNA library. This SMART™
cDNA library was ucted [using T. circumcincta L4 (8 days post infection, dpi)
RNA] in λTriplEx2 by long-distance PCR following manufacturer’s instructions
(Clontech). It was packaged using Gigapack Gold III packaging t (Stratagene)
and amplified in E. coli XL1-Blue cells (Stratagene). A gene-specific oligonucleotide
primer (incorporating the putative termination codon identified from EST CB043664)
was used in conjunction with a vector-specific primer to amplify the Tci-es20 CDS
directly from a heat-denatured phage lysate preparation of the library. The resultant
amplicon was column-purified (QIAquick PCR purification kit, Qiagen) and ligated
into pGEM®-T ga). Constructs were transformed into E. coli JM109
(Promega), colonies with Tci-es20-containing plasmids were isolated and propagated
and the plasmids subjected to automated sequencing (Eurofins MWG operon). The
cDNA ng Tci-ES20 was then subcloned into the vector pPICZαC (Invitrogen)
and used to transform P. pastoris [X-33 (Mut+) strain (Invitrogen)] following
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
ation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
linearisation with PmeI (New England Biolabs). Recombinant protein expression and
purification were as described, above, for Tci-CF-1. Protein concentrations were
determined using the Pierce BCA™ (bicinchoninic acid) assay (Thermo Scientific)
with bovine serum albumin (BSA) standards and stability and integrity of each
recombinant protein were monitored using SDS-PAGE. Tci-MIF-1; Tci-APY-1; Tci-
SAA-1; Tci-CF-1; Tci-ES20 and Tci-MEP-1 were stored in solution at +4°C and Tci-
ASP-1 and Tci-TGH-2 were stored at -20°C.
Table 1
Table 1. Recombinant proteins used in Teladorsagia circumcincta vaccine trial
Name Accession on* Expression nce
number system
Tci-SAA-1 CAQ43040 L3-enriched (+) Nisbet et al.,
surface associated E. coli BL21 2009
antigen (DE3)-RIL
Tci-MIF-1 CBI68362 L3-enriched pET22b(+) Nisbet et al.,
macrophage E. coli BL21 2010a
migration inhibitory (DE3)-RIL
factor
Tci-ASP-1 CBJ15404 L4-enriched pET SUMO Nisbet et al.,
activation- E. coli BL21 2010b
associated (DE3)-RIL
ory protein
Tci-TGH-2 ACR27078 Transforming pET SUMO McSorley et
growth protein 2- E. coli BL21 al., 2010
like n (DE3)-RIL
Tci-CF-1 28** L4-enriched pPICZαC Redmond et
ed cathepsin Pichia pastoris al., 2006
F X33 strain
Tci-ES20 Not yet Excretory/secretory pPICZαC Smith et al.,
submitted*** (ES) protein Pichia pastoris 2009
X33 strain
Tci-MEP-1 Not yet Astacin-like ES pET SUMO Smith et al.,
submitted*** metalloproteinase E. coli BL21 2009
(DE3)-RIL
Tci-APY-1 CBW38507 L4-enriched ES pSUMO Nisbet et al.,
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
calcium-activated E. coli BL21 2011
e (DE3)-RIL
ive or inferred on
**Tci-CF-1 is highly polymorphic, the clone used for vaccine production had following
amino acid substitutions compared to hed sequence. In each case the amino
acid in the published sequence is in s, that in the vaccine isoform sequence is in
normal font and the amino acid position in the published sequence is in subscript:
I44⇒T44, N101⇒D101, T129⇒A129, R137⇒Q137, R305⇒K305, L306⇒P306, S307⇒Y307
*** Full length sequences not yet deposited. These molecules have been derived
from EST data in the public domain: Tci-ES20 based on 64, Tci-MEP-1
based on CB036707
Immunisation trial
en, Texel crossbred male/female sheep which had been raised in
conditions to minimise helminth infection risk, were housed in two groups of 7
animals in separate pens within the same building. The sheep were 204-206 days
old at the initiation of the ment. Faecal egg counts (FEC, Christie and n
1982), performed prior to initiation of the experiment, confirmed that all s had
negative FECs. Sheep in Group 1 were immunised by subcutaneous injection using
a 400 µg recombinant protein mix (incorporating 50 µg each Tci-ASP-1; Tci-MIF-1;
Tci-TGH-2; Tci-APY-1; Tci-SAA-1; Tci-CF-1; Tci-ES20; Tci-MEP-1 in PBS) plus 5 mg
total Quil A (Brenntag Biosector). Seven of the 8 recombinant proteins were PBS-
soluble and were stered as a mixture in a single injection with 2.5 mg Quil A.
Tci-MEP-1 was insoluble in PBS and was therefore formulated with 100 mM urea in
PBS plus 2.5 mg Quil A. The two preparations were injected subcutaneously, one
immediately following the other, at two sites on the neck of each sheep. Each sheep
received three immunisations of the recombinant protein mix with an interval of 3
weeks between each immunisation. Sheep in the control group (Group 2) each
received three immunisations with urea/PBS/Quil A only, at the same time as the
sheep in Group 1. On the day of the third immunisation, an oral trickle challenge was
initiated whereby each sheep in both groups was administered with 2000 T.
circumcincta L3. This was continued three times per week (Monday, Wednesday
and Friday) for 4 weeks. Blood samples were taken prior to each immunisation and
weekly samples taken from the day of the third immunisation onwards to determine
antigen-specific serum IgA and IgG responses and serum pepsinogen levels (Lawton
et al., 1996). FECs were performed tie and Jackson 1982) three times per
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
week y, Wednesday and ) from 14 days after the start of the trickle
challenge until the end of the experiment 5 weeks later. All sheep were weighed
weekly. For both groups, al swab samples were collected at post-mortem
(Smith et al., 2009) to determine levels of antigen-specific IgA and IgG antibody at
the abomasal mucosal surface. At necropsy, lumenal and mucosal nematode
burdens (adult and larval parasites) were enumerated ing standard techniques.
The percentage of stunted or “inhibited” larvae was determined, based on size, as
bed previously (Halliday et al., 2010). The experiment was performed under
the regulations of a UK Home Office Project Licence.
Trial 2
Twenty-eight, Texel crossbred male/female sheep were raised as described
for Trial 1 and were housed in four groups of 7 animals. The sheep were 172-178
days old and were not ing helminth eggs at the start of the experiment. Groups
1 and 3 were immunized by subcutaneous injection using the recombinant protein
mix exactly as described for Trial 1, with each sheep receiving three immunizations
with an interval of 3 weeks between each. Sheep in Groups 2 and 4 each received
three immunizations with BS/Quil A, at the same time as Groups 1 and 3. At
the final immunization, the oral trickle challenge commenced in all Groups and all
biological samples were obtained as described above, for Trial 1. Sheep in Groups 1
and 2 were euthanized 7 weeks after the start of the infection period (as for Trial 1)
and those in Groups 3 and 4 were euthanized 4 weeks later. For all groups, lumenal
and mucosal nematode burdens were enumerated as described for Trial 1. Trial 1
and Trial 2 were performed under the strict tions of a UK Home Office Project
Licence and the experimental design was ratified by the Moredun Research Institute
Experiments and Ethics Committee.
Measurement of dy responses to recombinant antigens
Following initial antibody:antigen titrations to ensure optimisation of the
que, antigen-specific antibody levels in serum and abomasal mucus s
were assessed by ELISA. High binding microtitre plates (Greiner Bio-One) were
coated overnight at 4°C with 50 µl antigen (5 μg ml-1 in 50 mM carbonate buffer, pH
9.6). Plates were washed six times with wash buffer [phosphate buffered saline
(PBS), 0.05% v/v Tween-20], then blocked with 5% soya milk powder in 0.5% (v/v)
Tween 20 in Tris Buffered Saline (TTBS), pH 7.4, for 1 h at room temperature. After
g, 50 µl abomasal mucus (diluted 1:4 in TTBS) from individual animals or 50 µl
serum [diluted at 1:10 (IgA) or 1:1000 (IgG) in TTBS], were added and incubated for
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
ionNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
1 h at room temperature. Wells were re-washed and 50 µl horseradish daseconjugated
polyclonal mouse anti sheep/goat IgG (A9452, Sigma) at 1:1000 or 50 µl
mouse anti-bovine/ovine IgA monoclonal dy (Serotec, MCA628) at 1:250 in
TTBS, were added for 1 h at room temperature. After a further wash, the IgG ELISA
was developed by the addition of 50 µl ylenediamine dihydrochloride substrate
(OPD, Sigma) to each well. After 15 min in darkness, the reaction was stopped by
addition of 25 µl 2.5M H2SO4 and OD values read at 490 nm. For the IgA ELISA, 50
µl horseradish peroxidase-conjugated polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse IgG (P0260,
DakoCytomation), at 1:1,000 were added for 1 h at room temperature prior to a final
wash and development with OPD as described above. Each sample was assayed in
triplicate. OD values were corrected against a reagent blank and all test plates had a
positive and negative serum control to account for plate to plate variation.
Measurement of antibody responses to native T. circumcincta antigens
Antigen-specific IgG levels in the sera of sheep which had been immunized
with the recombinant antigen il, or the non-immunized control sheep, were
assessed by ELISA. The native antigens used to coat ELISA plates were somatic
extracts of T. circumcincta L3, prepared as described previously (Nisbet et al., 2009),
along with L4 ES products, prepared as described in Smith et al., (2009). Antigen-
specific IgG levels were ed in all sera from s in Trial 1 and from four,
randomly selected, animals from Groups 1 and 2 of Trial 2. All experimental
ions were as described, above, for the determination of recombinant antigenspecific
IgG levels in serum by ELISA.
blotting of nematode somatic extracts
Somatic extracts of T. circumcincta L3, L4 and adult worms, prepared as
described previously (Nisbet et al., 2009), along with L4 ES products, prepared as
described in Smith et al., (2009), were subjected to blotting using serum,
collected on the date of the third (final) immunization immediately prior to the
initiation of trickle infection, from immunized or non-immunized sheep.
Immunoblotting, to determine serum IgG and IgA binding to ents of each
extract, was performed as described previously (Nisbet et al., 2009) using pools of
serum from 7 immunized (Group 3) and 7 non-immunized sheep (Group 4).
Statistical analysis
A generalised ve mixed modelling (GAMM) approach was adopted for
the analysis of longitudinal FEC data. A GAMM model on log(FEC+1) was specified
with Gaussian error structure and identity link function, with group as a fixed effect
and animal effects introduced as random. The model included separate smoothing
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
curves to model the nonlinear relationship of the response with time by group and
non-homogenous within-group variances were allowed. A first order autoregressive
residual correlation structure was incorporated. Serum and mucosal antibody
responses to individual antigens were modelled using linear mixed models (LMMs)
with group as a fixed effect and animal as a random effect. For serum antibody data,
ed measures over time were modelled by random intercept and slope LMMs
also including time and its interaction with group as a fixed effect. geneous
within-group variances were allowed in all cases. Linear contrasts were set up to
compare subsets of antigen-specific responses in abomasal mucus at post mortem.
In Trial 2, the 28 animals were housed in 4 separate groups (pens) of 7
animals for logistical reasons. Two groups (14 animals) were immunized (Group 1
and Group 3), and the other two (14 animals) were used as adjuvant-only controls
(Group 2 and Group 4). Pen effects between the two immunized groups (1 and 3)
and between the two adjuvant-only groups (2 and 4) were tested. No tically
significant pen effects were found for any of the above response types, so Groups 1
and 3 were combined and Groups 2 and 4 were combined for data modelling. For
analysis of worm burden data, generalised linear models (GLMs) were used. Data
overdispersion was detected and it was generally accounted for by specifying a
ve binomial error bution. Where necessary, overdispersion was
incorporated using n GLMs correcting the rd errors by specifying the
mean and variance relationship. de burdens were assessed at post mortem
in Groups 1 and 2 four weeks before those of Groups 3 and 4, so data were analysed
separately.
Model selection was based on the Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) and
likelihood ratio tests (LRT) (Akaike, 1974). The mixed models were fitted by residual
maximum likelihood (REML; Smouse and , 1972). Throughout the data
analysis some animal measurements were identified as rs. Their nce on
parameter estimates was considered in each case. The Cook’s distance with a 4/n
cut-off value was used to support decisions in relation to outlying values (Cook,
1977). Statistically significant terms were determined at the level of 0.05. All
statistical analyses were conducted using R n 2.13.
Results
FECs analysis
Trial 1: FEC data is shown in Figure 1A and B. Sheep in both immunised and
control groups began to excrete strongyle type eggs in their faeces from 16-19
days after the start of the trickle challenge. In both groups, FECs rose until 23 days
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
after the start of challenge. Thereafter, sheep in Group 1 ed substantially
fewer eggs than those in Group 2. By the end of the ment, at day 42 of the
trickle challenge, Group 1 sheep were producing a mean of 8.7 (± 5.5) eggs per
gramme (EPG) of faeces, whereas sheep in Group 2 were producing 107.6 (± 50.8)
EPG, representing a reduction of 92% in mean FEC at that time-point. REML
(GAMM) analysis identified an overall effect of treatment (immunization) (P = 0.003)
and time (P < 0.001), and a significant treatment × time interaction (P = 0.20). The
mean cumulative FECs for the on of the experiment, estimated by taking the
sum of all egg counts on each sampling date, were 252 (± 132) EPG in Group 1 and
890 (± 231) EPG in Group 2, representing an overall mean FEC ion of 72% in
the immunised versus the control group. FEC Mean cumulative FECs for the
duration of the challenge period, calculated using the area under the curve (AUC,
Taylor et al., 1997) technique were 595 (± 316) EPG in Group 1 and 1975 (± 532)
EPG in Group 2, representing an overall reduction of 70% in the immunized versus
the control (adjuvant only) group (Figure 1B).
In Trial 2, sheep began to excrete nematode eggs from 14-16 days after
challenge e 1C). At peak egg shedding, on day 86, mean FECs in the extant
immunized group (Group 3) were 251 ± 75 EPG, whereas in the control group
(Group 4) they were 908 ± 158 EPG, representing a 73% reduction in mean FEC.
Mean cumulative FECs, ated using the area under the curve (AUC, Taylor et
al., 1997) technique, in Trial 2 were 4998 (±) 2233 EPG in Group 1 (immunized) and
4127 (±) 803 EPG in Group 2 (adjuvant only, Figure 1D). The high mean FECs, and
associated SEM, in Group 1 were attributable to the influence of data from a single
outlier animal (sheep 675J, Figure 1D). Influence was ed using Cook’s
distance criterion (Cook, 1977): 675J was regarded as a “highly influential” case
(Cook’s distance = 0.3129 based on a LMM . For Groups 3 and 4, which were
necropsied 4 weeks after Groups 1 and 2, mean cumulative FECs were 7005 (±) 681
EPG in Group 3 (immunized) and 16727 (±) 2,699 EPG in Group 4 (control, adjuvant
only), enting an overall mean FEC reduction of 58% in the immunized versus
the control group (Figure 1D). GAMM analysis indicated a statistically-significant
effect of immunization (data from Groups 1 and 3 combined vs. Groups 2 and 4
combined as detailed in Materials and Methods) on FEC over the course of the
experiment (P = 0.0237).
Abomasal parasite burdens
Trial 1: inary analysis
Abomasal T. circumcincta enumerations were subdivided into lumenal and mucosal
burdens. Within the lumen, Group 1 sheep had significantly fewer adult male
ation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
04) and female T. circumcincta (P = 0.011, Figure 2A) than was ed in
the Group 2 sheep. There was no significant difference in parasite gender ratio
between the two groups. Taking all developmental stages and genders into account
(Figure 2B) Group 1 harboured significantly fewer luminal parasites than the sheep in
Group 2 (P = 0.0037) - sheep in Group 1 had 72% less nematodes in the abomasal
lumen than those in Group 2. Within the mucosa, the numbers of adult female
worms in Group 1 were significantly less than those observed in Group 2 (P = 0.016)
(Figure 3). There was no significant difference between the s of male worms
or larval stages enumerated in the mucosa in the two groups, although fewer male
worms were enumerated in Group 1 sheep and fewer larval stages in Group 2 sheep
(Figure 3).
Trial 1: supplementary analysis of total worms numbers (lumenal plus
mucosal)
Immunized sheep (Group 1) harboured 55% fewer T. circumcincta (total of adults
and larvae) at necropsy than control, nt only (Group 2) sheep (P = 0.011,
Figure 4A). Group 1 sheep had statistically-significantly lower mean adult de
burdens than sheep in Group 2 (75% reduction, P = 0.0066, Figure 4B). Comparison
of juvenile nematode s in the abomasum indicated no significant differences
between the two groups (Figure 4C). No significant differences were observed in the
length of worms recovered from the different groups (data not shown).
Liveweight gain
The average increase in weight from Day 0-Day 84 of sheep in Group 1 was
2.1 kg more than that observed in sheep in Group 2 (p = 0.10) (Figure 5).
Trial 2
Groups 1 and 2 (post mortem at day 84):
The total abomasal de burdens (adults and larvae) in immunized
sheep were not statistically significantly different to the l, adjuvant only group
(mean total nematode burdens: Group 1; 6843 ± 1144, Group 2; 6250 ± 966). When
adult nematode burdens and juvenile nematode burdens were analysed separately,
the adult nematode burdens in immunized sheep were not statistically significantly
different to the control, adjuvant only group. ison of the juvenile nematode
burdens indicated that zed sheep had fewer juvenile nematodes than control,
adjuvant only sheep in the abomasal lumen (Group 1: 50 ± 42; Group 2: 218 ± 81),
(Figure 6). Because of the preponderance of “zero” values in the counts from the
immunized sheep, statistical analysis using models was unreliable in this case.
Conversely, there were more juvenile stages in the abomasal mucosa of Group 1
than Group 2 (Group 1: 643 ± 198; Group 2: 114 ± 70; P=0.0367, Figure 6).
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
Groups 3 and 4 (post mortem at day 112):
sed sheep (Group 3) harboured 57% fewer T. circumcincta total
nematodes at necropsy than did the control, adjuvant only (Group 4) recipients (P =
0.0199, Figure 7). In both Groups 3 and 4, adult worms comprised 99% of the total
nematode burden and no significant difference in the s of juvenile stages was
observed between the two Groups.
Measurement of serum antibody ses to T. cincta antigens
In both trials, following tertiary immunization, serum IgG levels against all
recombinant proteins reached peak levels, which declined slowly thereafter (Figures
8A and 9A). Serum IgA levels peaked after secondary immunization and, for all
recombinants, with the exception of Tci-MIF-1, levels remained relatively constant
until the end of the experiment es 8B and 9B). Following immunization with the
recombinant antigens, sheep produced serum IgG, prior to parasite challenge, which
bound native L4 ES components (Figure 10). The nature of the immunoreactive
antigens in this ES material, and other T. cincta extracts, was investigated
further by immunoblotting: IgG bound to parasite ents, in somatic extracts of
L4 and adult T. circumcincta as well as L4 ES, of the expected size range for the
following vaccine components, Tci-CF-1 (23.9 kDa), Tci-APY-1 (38.6 kDa) and Tci-
MEP-1 (55.6 kDa) (Figure 11A). IgA also bound parasite components, in somatic
extracts of L4 and adult T. circumcincta and L4 ES, of the expected size range for the
vaccine components, Tci-CF-1, Y-1 (Adult only) and Tci-MEP-1 (Figure 11B).
In addition IgA bound an unknown parasite component of ca. 43 kDa in L3 c
extract.
In both Trials 1 and 2, from 14 days after initiation of challenge, control,
adjuvant only recipients ted serum IgG that bound recombinant Tci-MEP-1
and Tci-APY-1 (Figure 12). Antigen-specific serum IgA which bound to the
recombinant proteins was not observed in the control, adjuvant only recipients (data
not shown).
Measurement of antibody responses to recombinant antigens in
abomasal mucus
In Trial 1 and 2, mean recombinant antigen-specific mucosal IgG levels in abomasal
mucus of the immunized sheep were significantly higher than in the control, nt
only recipients for each protein (Figures 13A and 14A). In Trial 1, mean Tci-APY,
P, and Tci-CFspecific IgG levels were significantly higher than those
measured against the other five inants (P <0.0001), whereas in Trial 2, mean
Tci-MEPspecific IgG levels were icantly higher than responses to the
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
ation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
remaining antigens (Day 84 necropsy) while Tci-MEP and Tci-APYspecific IgG
levels were significantly higher at the Day 112 necropsy. A joint biplot representation
of animals and antigen-specific mucosal IgG responses (Figures 15A and 15B)
illustrates the relationships between treatments, between animals within groups, with
respect to IgG ses to the different antigens and l differences between
immunized and control, adjuvant only sheep.
Mucosal Tci-APY and Tci-MEPspecific IgA levels were significantly
higher than those directed t the other six recombinant antigens in Trial 1 and 2
(Figures 13B and 14B). The overall differences between zed sheep and
nt only recipients are represented in joint biplots of animals and antigenspecific
mucosal IgA responses in Figures 15C and 15D.
Discussion
Here, we demonstrated that sation of sheep with a cocktail of eight
recombinant T. circumcincta proteins results in significant levels of protection in
terms of FECs and parasite burdens when compared to challenge control sheep. As
far as we are aware, this is the first published report of successful vaccination t
this nematode species using a inant vaccine. Indeed, the levels of protection
are higher than observed in any other system using a recombinant vaccine against a
parasitic nematode in the definitive ruminant host. The level of protection achieved,
in terms of FEC and abomasal luminal burden, is similar to the highest reported
levels following ation with detergent extracts of T. circumcincta L3
(Wedrychowicz et al., 1992;1995). In those experiments immune anti-parasite
responses were variable, but parasite burdens were significantly d (by up to
72%) and FECs were reduced by more than 70%. The antigens that stimulated
protection in the previous trials (Wedrychowicz et al., 1992; 1995) were not
characterised in detail and their identity remains elusive.
Other attempts to protect sheep t T. circumcincta using native antigen
preparations, for example lectin-binding integral membrane glycoproteins, have not
been successful (Smith et al., 2001). This l lack of success in immunisation
against T. circumcincta is in contrast to the situation in other, closely related, parasitic
nematode species. For example, the closest homologues of Tci-ASP-1, the N-type
single domain ASPs, Oo-ASP-1 and Oo-ASP-2, are the principal components of an
riched native extract of adult Ostertagia ostertagi which has been used with
success in vaccination trials in cattle (Geldhof et al., 2002, 2004; Meyvis et al., 2007).
However, vaccination with a recombinant version of Oo-ASP-1 has failed to induce
either protective immunity or native-antigen specific antibodies in vaccinated calves
(Geldhof et al., 2008). This reflects the outcomes of many nematode vaccine trials
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
ed set by JXT
using recombinant versions of native proteins/complexes where the native molecules
show great promise, but where recombinant versions fail to induce protective
immunity (Geldhof et al., 2007). This atic” approach to antigen identification,
where protective native extracts are identified by an iterative process of fractionation
and vaccination and recombinant versions of single (or multiple e.g. see Cachat et
al., 2010) protective antigens are produced and tested in vivo, therefore appeared to
be of limited value for the development of a vaccine against T. circumcincta.
The approach to antigen identification described herein was ntially
different to the pragmatic approach, and followed a more ed approach by
attempting to mimic and exploit elements of the natural, successful immune response
to T. cincta in infected sheep. First, we identified potential vaccine candidate
molecules by immunochemical and proteomic analyses; this was done by screening
immunoblots of T. circumcincta ES material with IgA from infected, immune sheep
and ing these responses to those observed in infected, non-immune sheep or
non-infected sheep (Smith et al., 2009). We also identified a homologue of a known
protective antigen A-1 (Zhan et al., 2004)] using bioinformatic analysis of
stage-specific cDNA libraries (Nisbet et al., 2008; 2009). Finally, using a combination
of these technologies, we identified a suite of potentially suppressive
molecules produced by the parasite (McSorley et al., 2010, Nisbet et al., 2010a;
2011). We produced recombinant versions of each of these molecules, examined
that they were s of IgA present in mucus derived from immune sheep and then
combined them into a multi-component vaccine which aimed to e the host
immune system to d to potentially immunostimulatory molecules (Tci-CF-
1,Tci-MEP-1,Tci-ES20,Tci-ASP-1 and Tci-SAA-1) and to produce a possible
neutralising effect on putatively immunosuppressive components. The rationale
behind using a combination of recombinant molecules, as opposed to single
antigens, is as follows: previous ation trials using single recombinant n
preparations of homologues of some of the les described herein, in different
nematode/host models, have failed. In O. ostertagi, for example, the astacin-like
metalloproteinase MET-1, which shares >50% amino acid identity with Tci-MEP-1,
was selected by immunoscreening but failed to give any protection when used as a
single recombinant antigen in a vaccine trial (De Maere et al., 2005). Similarly,
recombinant Oo-ASP1, which shares >75% sequence identity with Tci-ASP-1 (Nisbet
et al., 2010b), has failed to induce protective immunity in vaccinated calves (Geldhof
et al., 2008) and a recombinant version of the Necator americanus orthologue of Tci-
SAA-1 (Na-SAA-1 , 71% amino acid ty) failed to induce icant protection
against L3 challenge in a hamster model (Xiao et al., 2008).
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
ation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
The ism of action of the vaccine used herein is not yet clear. These
nematodes are acquired by ingestion of L3 from e. Thereafter, the developing
parasites (L3 and L4) and adult worms reside in the host’s abomasum. Protective
immunity t T. circumcincta in sheep exposed to continuous field or
experimental trickle challenge has been associated with decreased larval
establishment (L3) and development (L3 and L4) in the mucosa and reduced egg
output from female worms in the lumen (Balic et al., 2003; Seaton et al., 1989; Smith
et al., 1985, 1986; Stear et al., 2004). In the current study, in Trial 2, adult worm
s in vaccinated and adjuvant only groups were similar at day 84, so it seems
unlikely that exclusion and expulsion of ng L3 or death/delayed development
of L4 worms was responsible for the observed reduction in adult parasite numbers at
day 112 of that trial. The reduction in the numbers of adult worms may therefore be
ed to either a direct effect anti-parasitic effect of the induced immune response
against the adult worms or a cumulative fitness-reducing effect throughout the life of
the worm, culminating in the lower level, or shorter duration, of adult survival.
The immune mechanisms responsible for the ed effects on the
parasites are likely to be complex: In naturally-acquired immunity to T. circumcincta
in sheep roles for immediate hypersensitivity reactions and for larval antigen-specific
IgA in gastric ions have been indicated (Smith et al., 1986; 1987; Stear et al.,
1995; 1999; Halliday et al., 2007; Smith et al. 2009). Cellular effectors of the immune
response, e.g. γδTCR+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, eosinophils, globular leukocytes and
mast cells may also play a role in immunity against T. circumcincta in naturally- or
experimentally-exposed sheep (e.g. Stear et al., 2002; 2009, Balic et al., 2003;
Halliday et al., 2010, Williams 2012).
In conclusion, we have developed a multi-component vaccine against T.
circumcincta which, in experimental circumstances, reduced mean FECs and mean
luminal parasite burdens by >70%. It should be noted that, according to Barnes et
al., (1995) it is not essential for a vaccine against parasitic nematodes to be 100%
effective in sheep, and antial benefits” can be gained by using a vaccine that is
60% ive in 80% of the flock, if the vaccine is based on the stimulation of al
immunity’. On this basis, the results of this study would clearly indicate that the
vaccine used here holds much potential. It is not yet clear whether all of the eight
recombinant protein components of the vaccine are required for this level of cy
and further work will seek to clarify this and also to confirm the anti-parasite effects of
the 8-protein cocktail vaccine.
References
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
Balic, A., Bowles, V.M., Liu, Y.S. & Meeusen, E.N. Local immune responses in
sensitized sheep ing challenge infection with Teladorsagia circumcincta.
te Immunol. 25, 371-381 (2003).
Barnes, E.H., Dobson, R.J. & Barger, I.A. Worm control and anthelmintic resistance:
adventures with a model. Parasitology Today 11, 56-63 (1995).
Bartley, D.J., Jackson, F., n, E. & Sargison, N. Characterisation of two triple
resistant field isolates of Teladorsagia from Scottish lowland sheep farms. Vet.
Parasitol. 123, 189-199 (2004).
, E., Newlands, G.F., Ekoja, S.E., ster, H., Smith, W.D. Attempts to
immunize sheep against Haemonchus contortus using a cocktail of recombinant
proteases d from the protective antigen, H-gal-GP. Parasite Immunol 32, 414-
419. .
ie, M. & Jackson, F. Specific identification of strongyle eggs in small samples of
sheep . Res Vet Sci 32, 113-117 (1982).
De Maere, V., Vercauteren, I., Geldhof, P., t, K., Vercruysse, J. & Claerebout,
E. Molecular analysis of astacin-like metalloproteases of Ostertagia ostertagi.
Parasitology 130, 89-98 (2005).
Geldhof, P., bout, E., Knox, D., Vercauteren, I., Looszova, A. & Vercruysse, J.
Vaccination of calves against Ostertagia ostertagi with cysteine proteinase enriched
n fractions. te Immunol. 24, 263-270 (2002).
Geldhof, P., Vercauteren, I., Vercruysse, J., Knox, D.P., Van Den Broeck, W. &
Claerebout, E. tion of the protective Ostertagia ostertagi ES-thiol antigens with
different adjuvantia. Parasite Immunol. 26, 37-43 (2004).
Geldhof, P., De Maere, V., Vercruysse, J. & Claerebout, E. Recombinant expression
systems: the obstacle to helminth vaccines? Trends Parasitol 23, 527-532 (2007).
Geldhof, P., Meyvis, Y., Vercruysse, J. & Claerebout E. Vaccine testing of a
recombinant activation-associated secreted protein (ASP1) from Ostertagia ostertagi.
Parasite Immunol. 30, 57-60 (2008).
Gibson T.E. & Everett, G. Effect of ent levels of intake of Ostertagia
circumcincta larvae on the faecal egg counts and weight gain of lambs. J Comp
Pathol. 86, 269-274 (1976).
Halliday, A.M., Routledge, C.M., Smith, S.K., Matthews, J.B. & Smith, W.D. Parasite
loss and inhibited development of Teladorsagia circumcincta in relation to the kinetics
of the local IgA response in sheep. Parasite Immunol. 29, 425-434 (2007).
Halliday, A.M., McAllister, H.C. & Smith, W.D. Kinetics of the local immune response
in the gastric lymph of lambs after y and challenge infection with Teladorsagia
circumcincta. Parasite Immunol 32, 81-90 (2010).
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
Houdijk, J.G., Kyriazakis, I., Jackson, F., Huntley, J.F. & Coop, R.L. Effects of protein
supply and reproductive status on local and systemic immune responses to
Teladorsagia circumcincta in sheep. Vet Parasitol 129 105-117 (2005).
Huntley, J.F., Redmond, J., Welfare, W., Brennan, G., Jackson, F., Kooyman, F. &
Vervelde, L. Studies on the immunoglobulin E responses to Teladorsagia
circumcincta in sheep: purification of a major high molecular weight allergen. Parasite
Immunol 23, 227-235 (2001).
Lawton, D.E., Reynolds, G.W., Hodgkinson, S.M., Pomroy, W.E. & Simpson, H.V.
Infection of sheep with adult and larval Ostertagia circumcincta: effects on abomasal
pH and serum gastrin and pepsinogen. Int J Parasitol 26, 1063-1074 (1996).
McSorley, H.J., Grainger, J.R., Harcus, Y.M., Murray, J., Nisbet, A.J., Knox, D.P. &
Maizels, R.M. Expression of highly conserved TGF-β family members in the
strongyloid nematodes Haemonchus contortus, osomoides polygyrus,
Nippostrongylus brasiliensis and Teladorsagia circumcincta. Parasitology 137, 159-
171 (2010).
Meyvis, Y., Geldhof, P., Gevaert, K., Timmerman, E., Vercruysse, J. & Claerebout, E.
ation against Ostertagia ostertagi with subfractions of the protective ES-thiol
fraction. Vet. Parasitol. 149, 239-45 (2007).
Nieuwhof, G.J. & Bishop, S.C. Costs of the major c diseases of sheep in
Great Britain and the ial benefits of ion in disease . Animal Sci.
81, 23-29 (2005).
Nisbet, A.J., MacKellar, A., McLean, K., Brennan, G.P. & Huntley, J.F. Eukaryotic
expression of recombinant Pso o 1, an en from Psoroptes ovis, and its
localization in the mite. Parasitology 134, 83-89 (2007).
, A.J., Redmond, D.L., ws, J.B., Watkins, C., Yaga, R., Jones, J.T., &
Knox, D.P. Stage-specific gene sion in Teladorsagia cincta (Nematoda:
Strongylida) infective larvae and early parasitic . Int J Parasitol 38, 829-338
(2008).
, A.J., Knox, D.P., McNair, C.M., Meikle, L.I., Smith, S.K., Wildblood, L.A. &
Matthews, J.B. Immune recognition of the surface associated antigen, Tc-SAA-1,
from infective larvae of Teladorsagia circumcincta. Parasite Immunol. 31, 32-40
(2009).
Nisbet, A.J., Bell, N.E.V., McNeilly, T.N., Knox, D.P., Maizels, R.M., Meikle, L.I.,
Wildblood, L.A. & Matthews, J.B. A macrophage migration inhibitory factor-like
tautomerase from Teladorsagia circumcincta (Nematoda: Strongylida). te
Immunol. 32, 503-511 (2010a).
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
Nisbet, A.J., Smith, S.K., Armstrong, S., Meikle, L.I., Wildblood, L.A., Beynon, R.J. &
Matthews, J.B. Teladorsagia circumcincta: Activation-associated secreted ns in
excretory/secretory products of fourth stage larvae are targets of early IgA responses
in infected sheep. Exp Parasitol 125, 329-337 (2010b).
Nisbet, A.J., Zarlenga, D.S., Knox, D.P., Meikle, L.I., Wildblood, L.A. & Matthews, J.B.
A calcium-activated apyrase from Teladorsagia circumcincta: an ory/secretory
antigen capable of modulating host immune ses? Parasite Immunol in press
(2011).
Redmond, D.L., Smith, S.K., Halliday, A., Smith, W.D., Jackson, F., Knox, D.P. &
Matthews, J.B. An immunogenic cathepsin F secreted by the tic stages of
Teladorsagia circumcincta. Int J Parasitol 36, 277-286 (2006).
Seaton, D.S., Jackson, F., Smith, W.D. & Angus, K.W. Development of immunity to
incoming radiolabelled larvae in lambs continuously infected with Ostertagia
circumcincta. Res. Vet. Sci. 46, 6 (1989).
ton, D.R., Stear, M.J. & Matthews, L. A mechanistic model of developing
immunity to Teladorsagia circumcincta infection in lambs. Parasitology DOI:
.1017/S0031182010001289 (2011).
Smith, S.K. Nisbet, A.J., Meikle, L., Inglis, N., Sales, J., Beynon, R.J. & Matthews,
J.B. Proteomic analysis of excretory/secretory ts released by Teladorsagia
circumcincta larvae early post-infection Parasite Immunol 31, 10-19 (2009).
Smith, W.D., Jackson, F., n, E. & Williams, J. Age immunity to Ostertagia
circumcincta: comparison of the local immune responses of 4 1/2- and 10-month-old
lambs. J. Comp. Pathol. 95, 235-245 .
Smith, W.D., Jackson, F., Jackson, E., Graham, R., Williams, J., Willadsen, S.M &
Fehilly, C.B. Transfer of immunity to Ostertagia cincta and IgA memory
between identical sheep by lymphocytes collected from gastric lymph. Res. Vet. Sci.
41, 300-306 (1986).
Smith, W.D,, Jackson, F., Graham, R., Jackson, E. & Williams, J. Mucosal IgA
production and lymph cell traffic following prolonged low level infections of Ostertagia
circumcincta in sheep. Res Vet Sci 43, 320-326 (1987).
Smith, W.D., Pettit, D. & Smith, S.K. Cross-protection studies with gut membrane
glycoproteins from Haemonchus contortus and rsagia circumcincta. Parasite
Immunol. 23, 203-211 (2001).
Stear, M.J., n, K., Innocent, G.T., Mitchell, S., Strain, S. & , S.C. The
onship between IgA activity against 4th-stage larvae and y-dependent
effects on the number of 4th-stage larvae of Teladorsagia circumcincta in naturally
infected sheep. tology 129, 363-369 (2004).
[Annotation] JXT
None set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
MigrationNone set by JXT
[Annotation] JXT
Unmarked set by JXT
Taylor SM, Kenny J, Edgar HW, Ellison S, Ferguson L (1997) Efficacy of moxidectin,
ivermectin and albendazole oral drenches for ssion of rturient rise in
ewe worm egg output and reduction of anthelmintic treatment for lambs. Vet Record
141: 0.
Wedrychowicz, H., Bairden, K., Tait, A. & Holmes, P.H. Immune responses of sheep
to surface antigens of infective larvae of Ostertagia circumcincta. Parasite Immunol,
14: 249-266 (1992).
Wedrychowicz, H., Bairden, K., Dunlop, E.M., Holmes, P.H. & Tait, A. Immune
response of lambs to vaccination with Ostertagia circumcincta surface ns
eliciting bile antibody responses. Int J Parasitol 25, 1111-1121 (1995).
Wrigley, J., McArthur, M., McKenna, P.B. & Mariadass, B. Resistance to a triple
combination of broad-spectrum anthelmintics in naturally-acquired Ostertagia
circumcincta infections in sheep. N. Z. Vet. J. 54, 47-49 (2006).
Xiao, S., Zhan, B., Xue, J., Goud, G.N., Loukas, A., Liu, Y., Williamson, A., Liu, S.,
, V. & Hotez, P. The evaluation of recombinant hookworm antigens as
vaccines in hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) challenged with human hookworm,
Necator americanus. Exp tol 118, 32-40 (2008).
Zhan, B., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Williamson, A. Loukas, A., Hawdon, J.M., Xue, H.C.,
Xiao, S.H. & Hotez, P.J. Ac-SAA-1, an immunodominant 16 kDa surface-associated
antigen of infective larvae and adults of stoma m. Int J Parasitol 34,
1037-1045 (2004).
Claims (16)
1. A method of raising an immune response in a non-human animal, the method sing administering said animal rsagia circumcincta antigen m-dependent apyrase-1 or an immunogenic fragment thereof.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises administering one or more T. circumcincta antigens selected from the group consisting of: (i) cathepsin F-1; (ii) excretory/secretory protein; (iii) transforming growth protein 2-like protein; (iv) activation associated ory protein; (v) macrophage migration inhibitory factor; (vi) surface associated antigen; and (vii) an immunogenic fragment of any of (i)-(vi).
3. A composition or vaccine composition comprising Teladorsagia cincta n calcium-dependent apyrase-1 or an immunogenic fragment thereof when used in raising an immune response in a non-human animal animal.
4. The composition or vaccine composition of claim 3, wherein the composition or vaccine composition further comprises one or more T. circumcincta antigen(s) selected from the group consisting of: (i) cathepsin F-1; (ii) excretory/secretory protein; (iii) transforming growth protein 2-like protein; (iv) activation associated secretory protein; (v) macrophage migration inhibitory factor; (vi) surface associated n; and (vii) an genic fragment of any of (i)-(vi).
5. The method, composition or vaccine composition of any preceding claim, wherein the Teladorsagia circumcincta antigen calcium-dependent e-1 ses a sequence exhibiting 70% identity to the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 6.
6. The method, ition or vaccine composition of any preceding claim, wherein the animal is an ovine , sheep or goat.
7. The method, composition or vaccine composition of any preceding claim, wherein the antigen(s) is/are recombinant antigens.
8. The method, composition or vaccine composition of any preceding claim, wherein the immune response is a protective immune response and/or the immune response reduces host T. cincta FECs and luminal T. circumcincta burdens.
9. The method, composition or vaccine composition of any preceding claim, wherein the antigen(s) are admixed with another vaccine, polypeptide, adjuvant, diluent or excipient.
10. The method, composition or e composition of any preceding claim, wherein the T. circumcincta antigen m-dependent apyrase-1 is an antigen having a sequence which is at least 70% identical to Ostertagia ostertagi antigen ADG63133.1.
11. The method, composition or vaccine composition of any one of claims 2-11, n: (i) surface ated n is an antigen having a sequence which is at least 70% identical to Ostertagia ostertagi antigen BQ098696.1; (ii) hage migration inhibitory factor is an antigen having a sequence which is at least 70% identical to Ostertagia ostertagi antigen 70.1; (iii) activation associated secretory protein is an antigen having a sequence which is at least 70% identical to Ostertagia ostertagi antigen CAD23183.1; (iv) cathepsin F-1 is an antigen having a sequence which is at least 70% identical to Ostertagia ostertagi antigen BQ457843.1; and/or (v) excretory/secretory protein is an antigen having a sequence which is at least 70% cal to Ostertagia ostertagi antigen CAC44259.1.
12. The , composition or vaccine of claim 10 or 11, wherein the immune response is raised in a bovine host.
13. A e composition comprising Teladorsagia circumcincta antigen mdependent apyrase-1, or an immunogenic fragment thereof, and an adjuvant.
14. The vaccine composition of claim 13, wherein the Teladorsagia circumcincta n calcium-dependent apyrase-1 comprises a sequence at least 70% identical to the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 6.
15. The vaccine composition of claim 13 or 14, further comprising one or more other Teladorsagia circumcincta ns selected from the group consisting of; (i) cathepsin F-1; (ii) excretory/secretory protein; (iii) transforming growth protein 2-like protein; (iv) tion associated secretory protein; (v) macrophage migration inhibitory factor; (vi) surface associated antigen; and (vii) an immunogenic fragment of any of i).
16. The vaccine composition of claims 13, 14 or 15, wherein: (i) calcium-dependent apyrase-1 is an antigen having a sequence which is at least 70% identical to Ostertagia ostertagi antigen ADG63133.1; (ii) surface associated antigen is an antigen having a sequence which is at least 70% identical to Ostertagia ostertagi antigen BQ098696.1; (iii) macrophage migration inhibitory factor is an antigen having a sequence which is at least 70% identical to Ostertagia ostertagi n BQ457770.1; (iv) activation associated secretory protein is an antigen having a sequence which is at least 70% identical to Ostertagia ostertagi antigen CAD23183.1; (v) cathepsin F-1 is an antigen having a sequence which is at least 70% identical to Ostertagia agi antigen 43.1; and/or (vi) excretory/secretory protein is an antigen having a sequence which is at least 70% cal to Ostertagia ostertagi antigen CAC44259.1. [Annotation] jyk None set by jyk [Annotation] jyk MigrationNone set by jyk [Annotation] jyk Unmarked set by jyk [Annotation] jyk None set by jyk [Annotation] jyk MigrationNone set by jyk [Annotation] jyk Unmarked set by jyk ......... -..... ......... CD T l 84 T "'"�'"' �''l'' .. 82 I '"l ''' ''-" ..,,. 79 � I \I"'., -.: "'' 77 \ � " 75 l .,/ l- , � immunisation 72 to first 1-· - 70 68 i \ ' • 65 , ,, 1 : \ . i $: 63 61 experiment relative 58 Day 42, begins 56 Day of 3rd nisation, trickle infection -200 150 50 O 1 2 � (LI E E l"a i.. C) ..... GJ c. V> C) C) (LI - (I) - c: 100 ::i: 0 u C) C) (LI � u (LI � u.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GBGB1202090.5A GB201202090D0 (en) | 2012-02-07 | 2012-02-07 | Vaccine |
GB1202090.5 | 2012-02-07 | ||
NZ629420A NZ629420A (en) | 2012-02-07 | 2013-02-04 | Sheep nematode vaccine |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
NZ723022A NZ723022A (en) | 2021-04-30 |
NZ723022B2 true NZ723022B2 (en) | 2021-08-03 |
Family
ID=
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Redmond et al. | Protection studies in sheep using affinity-purified and recombinant cysteine proteinases of adult Haemonchus contortus | |
US20070031411A1 (en) | Vaccine comprising a tick cement protein | |
Villa-Mancera et al. | Induction of immunity in sheep to Fasciola hepatica with mimotopes of cathepsin L selected from a phage display library | |
US10946077B2 (en) | Cooperia vaccine | |
AU2018201329B2 (en) | Sheep nematode vaccine | |
US8227584B2 (en) | Ostertagia vaccine | |
NZ723022B2 (en) | Sheep nematode vaccine | |
EP2512506B1 (en) | Parasite vaccine | |
WO2016147008A1 (en) | Ovine vaccine | |
EP2328610B1 (en) | Nematode vaccine | |
CA2172492A1 (en) | Protective antigens against parasites | |
JP4925236B2 (en) | Vaccine containing tick cement protein |