NZ717717B2 - Remote control device and controller - Google Patents
Remote control device and controller Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- NZ717717B2 NZ717717B2 NZ717717A NZ71771714A NZ717717B2 NZ 717717 B2 NZ717717 B2 NZ 717717B2 NZ 717717 A NZ717717 A NZ 717717A NZ 71771714 A NZ71771714 A NZ 71771714A NZ 717717 B2 NZ717717 B2 NZ 717717B2
- Authority
- NZ
- New Zealand
- Prior art keywords
- button
- held
- remote control
- control device
- time
- Prior art date
Links
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 53
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008054 signal transmission Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001994 activation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012190 activator Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011017 operating method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- NLZUEZXRPGMBCV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Butylhydroxytoluene Chemical compound CC1=CC(C(C)(C)C)=C(O)C(C(C)(C)C)=C1 NLZUEZXRPGMBCV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000282994 Cervidae Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000021183 entrée Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 231100001261 hazardous Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- KRTSDMXIXPKRQR-AATRIKPKSA-N monocrotophos Chemical compound CNC(=O)\C=C(/C)OP(=O)(OC)OC KRTSDMXIXPKRQR-AATRIKPKSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000008447 perception Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08C—TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS FOR MEASURED VALUES, CONTROL OR SIMILAR SIGNALS
- G08C17/00—Arrangements for transmitting signals characterised by the use of a wireless electrical link
- G08C17/02—Arrangements for transmitting signals characterised by the use of a wireless electrical link using a radio link
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08C—TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS FOR MEASURED VALUES, CONTROL OR SIMILAR SIGNALS
- G08C23/00—Non-electrical signal transmission systems, e.g. optical systems
- G08C23/04—Non-electrical signal transmission systems, e.g. optical systems using light waves, e.g. infrared
Abstract
The present invention relates to a remote control device (10), comprising one or more command buttons, each of which, when operated, directly or indirectly generates a command signal. The device includes a determination module (20) for determining a button-held-time parameter associated with the operation of a command button; and a transmitting module (16) that is configured to transmit the button-held-time parameter in association with the command signal. ration of a command button; and a transmitting module (16) that is configured to transmit the button-held-time parameter in association with the command signal.
Description
Remote control device and controller
Field of the invention
The invention relates to d Signet transmission, and more specifically to a,
remote control device that is suitable for transmitting command signals to a controller,
such as a. garage door controller. The invention also relates to a controller, such as a garage
door controller, that includes a receiver and processing means for processing command
s received from a remote control, device.
Background to the invention
Any discussion of documents acts. materials) devices, articles and the like in this
specification is included solely for the purpose of ing a context for the present
invention. It is not suggested or represented that any of these matters formed part. of the
prior art base or were common. general knowledge in: the ti eld relevant to the present
ion as it existed in Australia or elsewhere before the priority date of each claim of
this application.
Remote l devices for garage door controllers have been in use thr many
years. Such devices are lly handheld. units and e one or more buttons for
issuing ds and, in some cases, adjusting various controller settings. Remote control
devices further include processing circuitry for sensing button pushes. and a. transmitter for
generating a suitable transmission signal nlyan inferred signnL or alternatively a
radio frequency/j Bluetooth or WlFI signal) to communicate to the controller information
regarding the button pushed. The garage door controller includes a er that receives
the transmission signal and processes the button. information transmitted therein. The
controller‘s response to the button push is dependent both on the identity of the button
(where the device has a plurality of buttons). and the function assigned to the button, as
well as the controller's current mode of operation.
[0004'] For security (6331501133: signal transmissions from, remote control devices for garage
door controllers are encoded. with a unique code that identities the transmitter and permits
the transmitter to communicate withthe er. The er must be Specifically coded
before being used for the first time and then each time it is to he used with a new
transmitter. Atypical coding process involves placing the er in a ’code-set state', in.
which state the receiver accepts any transmission that it detects. A specified remote control
function is assigned to the transmitter button‘s unique code which is stored in the
controller‘s local memory as a ‘permitted’ transmitter; whose transmissions are to be
ed and actioned.
The et state is typically entered by pushing a button (or similar devicej on.
the receiver (for an. 'ttttended code set state“), or by pushing a, button on the remote. control
that has been assigned in a previous coding operation as activating a code set state (for a
'remote code set State').
When the receiver is in a code-set state (and thus receiving all detected
transmissions), there is a. risk of the receiver being unable to distinguish between
transmissions received from the intended transmitter (ie the transmitter being coded) and
those ed from a foreign transmitter that. is wholly unrelated to the coding operation.
The risk. is d in some receivers by imposing a requirement that two transmissions
must be detected before any action is taken in response to the receipt of the transmission.
Although this does reduce the iikelihoodof an imperfect coding ofa correct transtnitten it
does not eliminate the possibility of an incorrect transmitter being coded, should that
unintended transmitter be ed twice during the code setting period.
Coding, an ect transmitter to a receiver can be very inconveniene especially
when the transmitter cannot easily be deleted from the receiver’s mom 013’. In these
circumstances? it is usually necessary for the user to delete all transmitters from the.
receiver’s memory and to re-eode the correct transmitter or itters.
Transmitters that. are to be coded can be placed in a special state that allows a.
codeset transmission to be communicated. to the receiver. However, equipping remote
controls with the neces sary onality to enter the special state is not generally desirable,
clue to the requirements for additional circuitry for mode switches, indicators and power
control. It also requires additional steps to be undertaken by the user during the code set,
procedure. For these reasons, such measures are relatively rarely implemented.
it is known to use selected buttons on remote control. transmitters to e' a
receiver's output. The arrangement is often useda for example to turn on and of? remote
control lights or to turn 0N and OFF various modes of ion. Typically, the remote
l output s state in sequence. each time a transmitter button assigned to the
remote control fitnction is d, Hov‘vevera a problem arises when the user is unable to
determine the current state of the remote eontrol's output and thus does not know whether
the output is turned ON or OFF. The user is therefore unable to t the result of the
next press of the transmitter button. One solution is to assign ON and OFF commands to-
two ent buttons on the remote control: however the approach necessarily entails a
reduction in the number of devices that can be controlled, or the number of functions that
can be implemented.
Another limitation ofexisting remote control devices is their failure to allow a
user to communicate a clear intention to e a particular remote control function. For
example, in the context of a remote l device for a. garage door controller, it is.
nt that a user’s ion of the remote control to close the garage door should
require a greater demonstration of intent in comparison to other operations, such as to open
the garage door. This is because the censequences ofen accidental push of the remote
control button causing the door to close are potentially more hazardous to persons in the
vicinity of the door than the consequences of an unintended door opening,
[00.1 1] A r limitation of existing remote control devices is that they cease signal
transmissions as soon as the relevant button is released. Although some remote control
devices are configured to te a ission that is y underwayj. no indication
is sent to the receiver that the button has been ed. When the er processes
transmissions in a. way so as to generate an output that mimics the transmitter button press,
the receiver must allow for missed transmissions due to possible interference. Failing to
account for interference will result in the output turning off briefly when a. transmission is
not received and then on again when, reception is reinstated. A known method of
accounting for interference is to implement a timeout feature, whereby the receiver does
not turn the output offuntil no transmissions have been, received for a prescribed period?
referred to as a ”timeout period, However, timeouts have their own limitations. in that, in
the absence of interference, the receiver maintains an output for a. time longer than is
required.
United States Patent No. 6,795,0ll describes a remote control device fora
television with a ‘help‘ features that provides information about the button that has been
pushed. The. feature is triggered by holding clown the button for a very short period of
time, or alternatively for a longer than usual. period of time. In. these scenarios, instead of
the remote control actioning the pushed. button, the system communicates help infomiation
to the user, either from the remote l device itsetf or from the controlled device (eg.
displaying on the television screen).
The present invention aims to provide an alternative approach to addressing one
or more of the deficiencies of existing remote control devices, receivers and. control
systems discussod abo‘Ve.
Summary of the invention
In broad terms, the invention provides a remote control device, comprising one or
more command buttons, each h, when operated, directly or indirectly generates a
command signal, a nination module for determining a button-held parameter
associated with the ion of a d button, and a. transmitter module red to
transmit the button-held parameter in. association with the command signal. The button.—
held parameter may be representative of a time the button is held or pressed, or may be
representative of the state of the button (commonly, whether the button is being pressed or
not).
More ularly, according to a titer aspect of the present invention there is
provided a remote control device, comprising:
one or more command s, each of which, when operated, directly or indirectly
generates a command signal;
a. detemiination module for determining a ri—heldmtime parameter associated
with the operation Off} command button; and
a transmitter in odule that is configured to transmit the button—held—time parameter
in association with the command signal.
The remote control device ing to the invention includes means for
determining a button-held—time parameter associated with the operation of one or more of
the device‘s command button. Button~held~time parameters, such as the length of time that
a button is held antifor the number of times the button is pushed, during .a d time
interval, can be suitably determiner} by the detennination . The determination
module can be conveniently equipped. to make determinations- of other categories of
button—held-time parameter.
In this. specification and claims, the word ‘hutten‘ and 'buttnn press’
and similar are to be construed as embracing other forms of selective user centre-l
activaticn. Fer example, the n‘ may he a , joystick or other mechanical
Operator; Whose selective movement intn a. certain pcsition provides the required ‘prcssing‘,
the amount of time it is held in that icn indicating the ‘huttomheld—ti.me‘., Alternatively,
the ’burtcn‘ may be a virtual button on a control tcuch screen, and pressing that button may
invclve the user clicking that virtual button, with a helrl time indicated by the length (if
time the user holds his or her finger en the huttcn. Alternatively, the ‘buttcn' may be a
swipe field on a. touch screen, with the user swi ping his or her finger along the swipe field
providing the required 'pressing' cf the "button. Again, a held. time can be indicated, by the
length of time the user holds his 01' her finger 0n the swipe field.
The hutton-held-time parameter may be a value modified after a prescribed time
interval for which a button is held Preferably the value is a count, tially
incremented on regular intervals
The hutton-held—time parameter is transmitted in a er associated with a
controlled device (fer example a garage door controller), at which the parameter is used to
determine the command that the controlled device is to execute.
Embodiments of the invention in which the controlled device is a garage deer
Controller are at less risk of having an incurrect remote centre! coded thereto. This is due
to the ccntrcller being able to use the butten-held—time parameter to discern. a clear
intention on the part of a user of the remote central device to activate a critical ndw
such as a d to code the device to the ccntrnllen or to close the garage door that is
assueiated with the control} er.
Preferably the determination module is r configured to ine a button—
held inclicater indicating whether the ccmmand button has been released; In particularly
red embodiments, the transmitter is further cenfigured to rielay transmission of the
butten‘held‘time parameter on the basis of the state ofthe buttonaheld indicator. For
example, the transmitter module may be configured. only to transmit the button—held—time
parameter if the button—held indi cater indicates that the batten. has been released.
The bunch-held indicator may be a single hit; indicating either ‘butten held' er
‘buttcn clear‘.
The feature of the buttonaheld indicator provides accurate and timely information
to the receiver with respect to when a. button has been ed. The receiver is thus able. to
respond immediately upon receipt ofthe information. In the ah sence of the button—held
indicator, the receiver must be designed to rely on. failure to receive transmissions for a
prescribed time interval as the only tor th at the button had been released. As
discussed above, the lack of receipt. of a. transmission could actually be due to interference
thimally, the transmitter module is configured to continue itting s
for a period oftime after the button—held indicator indicates that the transmitter button has
been released.
According to a second aspect ot‘the present invention there is provided a
controller comprising:
a receiver module for receiving and decoding signals transmitted from a. remote
control. device, the signals including one or more commands and one or more
button—heldetitne parameters; and
an actuator module ,operativei-y connected to the receiver module the actuator
module being configured to implement selected functions on a lled
device wherein the on selections are in side on the basis of the received
cornmand(s) and button-held-ti n1 e—parameteris).
The received signals may further include a button-held indicator indicating
whether a command button of the remote control device used to generate the commandts)
has been released, the function selected by said actuator module being selected or modified
on the basis of the button—held tor,
Transmissions with an ultimate button—held—time parameter (ie, the ’maximum
time .reached' parameter; if the parameter is a regularly incremented count? this will be the
highest count value of a received sequence) may he received with and without the’button-
held indicator being set. This affords a check that the ultimate value received is indeed the
ultimate value intended, as ined, by the remote control device. This accounts for
receiver erence which may otherwise have interrupted the transmission.
According to r aspect ofthe present invention there is provided a controller
system compii sing, a remote l and a controller according to the first and second
aspects of the invention.
The present invention takes a wholly different approach to the remote control
System described in US 6391011. In particuian the activator module described in U S
6,795,011 is located in the transmitter, rather than the receiver The decision as to which
function is to be cemm‘anded is made by the transmitter and not by the receivers In
contrasg a controller according to the present invention receives command signals and
button-heId—time parameters and makes decisions concerning function selections on the
basis of both items of information.
Another distinction over the system bed in US 6,?95‘,Ol t arises from the
fact that the transmitter described in US 6,795,011 is unabie to generate transmissions
until it has determined whether a BUTTON or HELP function is required. This is because,
if issions were sent while a :8 UTTON/THELP determination Was ay, it would
result in the transmission of the BUTTON function until the HELP function was activated
after the required button hold time. in praotice, this would not prevent operation of the
BUTTUN ion, as the receiver would have to respond to all ons it es It .is
not able to Change its nse based on button hold time as it does not include a help
mode activator . The transmitter C1083 not send time information that progresses
from transmission to transmission, as. provided in accordance with the present invention
Even if the HELP function required a shorter triggering time, it wouid still not prevent
operation of the BUFFQN on ifeontinuous transmissions are generated, as lly
the HELP function would be activated by the reoeivertor transmitter) and their after’the
required button hold time, the BUTTON function would be activated.
Brief description of the drawings
Embodiments of the present. invention will now be described, by way of example
only, with reference to the anying drawings, in which:
Figure: 1 is a schematic iilustration ot‘a remote control deviee- according to an
embodiment of the t invention; and
Figure 2 is a schematic iilustration of a. garage door controiler ing to an.
embodirnent of the present invention.
Detailed description of the drawings
Turning to Figure 1,, a remote control device 10 is illustrated, for use in
transmitting commands to a garage door opener. The: operatiOns of temOte mntrol device
are directed by processor 1.] to execute a programmed operating procedure. Suitable
software rcutines for implementing the operating procedure are stored in devi (:6 memory
The exterior appearance of remote control device 10 is not illustrated, but can be
of any suitable form and incl udes a. plurality ol‘command buttons (not shown). The
s are pushed in order to Send commands to a garage door ller 5:0 (Figure '2)
such as to opem’cl-ose the garage door that is controlled by controller 50. As described in
greater detail. below, remote control device l0 is also selectively used to adjust various
settings of garage door controller 50.
Remote control device 10 includes circuitry 12. for detecting button pushes and
generating suitable signals that are indicative of the identity of the particular button that
was pushed. These button-identifying signals are provided to a transmitting module 16, at.
which the signals are modulated onto a suitable carrier signal for transmission in the form
of digital packets to ller 50. The carrier signal is, sent by way a transmitter '18 and
can be of any suitable form, including. infrared, radio frequency Bluetooth and WIFI.
Transmitting module 16' continues to generate and send command packets at regular
als (eg. 100nm intervals) while button circuitry 12 indicates that the button is pressed
(and beyond w as discussed below).
[003 5] itting module 16 executes encoding es to encode the signals in
acccrdance with signal received frcrn button .eireuitry ‘12? either before or after their
modulation onto the carrier.
Remote control device l0 includes a determination module 20 that. includes
suitable circuitry for detectingthe length of time that a button is pushed. This button—held
time parameter is ed in. memory 14 and ed to transmitting module 1.6 to enable
the parameter to be transmitted along with the button-identifying signal.
The transmitter therefore sends a —herldetime narsmeter within each of its
transmission data packets.
Determination module 20 causes the’buttonéheldetirne parameter to be initialised
in memory 1.4 to a value of 0 when the transmitter button is first d and button
try 12‘ activated The value of the parameter is then incremented at a suitable rate
until the transmitter button is released,»
As will. be clear to the skilled readers, the value ot‘the parameter may diverge from
the receiver 52's perception, of butten-held-time (being the time pened for which a. button-
identifying signal is ed). An equivalence of values assumes that the receiver receives
all transmissions from a transmitter. Howeven this does not always occur, fer example, in
circumstances (if marginal reception (for e due to interference), transmissions from
a itter may not be received by the receiver (fer example for the first one second of a
transmission). Consequently? the receiver .reception time ation will be 1 second less
than the actual time the button has been held (it; as recorded by timing circuitry of
detenriination module 20).
The unit oftime selected f0r recording the button ~11eld-time ter is System—
dependent, but it. can, be any suitable increment of time that changes front transmission to
transmission.
In additinn tn transmitting the button-held-tinie ter, transmitting module 16
transmits a button-held indicator (in the form of a status bit) which indicates Whether the
button which initiated the transmissions is being held.
Transmitting module it: continues tn generate transmissions whichinclude the
above information for a pericd of time after the button is released. These post—release
transmissions include:
- button-held indicator set to 'clear’ (lei indicating button has been released); and
- button-held-time parameter set to the maximum time d before the button was
released.
The. duration of post-release transmissions is system-dependent and can also be
modified based on the button—held—time parameter reached. These transmissiuns ensure
that the receiver determines that the user has ed the transmitter liuttcn, rather than the
er assuming that the button has been. released when it no longer receives
transmissions. This is turn provides a more accurate picture of the ion nf‘remcrte
control device 10, as an absence of transmissions may be due to receiver interference
rather than as a result of the button being released.
When a command is being send, ore. every time a packet is sent (fer
example every looms), the same data. is sent, except for an» changes in the button —l1eld-
time parameter and the buttoneheld indicator.
in a further embodiment, the invention may be implemented without the
transmission ot‘a button-held-time parameter, but including only the button-held indicator
(in addition to the command data and other payload).
Remote control device I G is ly equipped with a transmitter status indicator
LED 2’2 or other indicating meane. The operation of indicator LED 22 is under the control
of sor l1. LED indicator 22. is programmed to visually indicate to the user when the
button-held-time parameter reaches certain system-defined values. When such a value is
reached, receipt by controller 50 causes it to petition a modified response. Th ese Visual
indications allow the user of remote control device '10 to know (for example). that a. button
has been held for a ent length of time to plane controller SQ into a inodifi ed
ional state. An exampleofa visual indication performed by indicator LED 22 is the
LEI) commencing flashing after the button has been held for a predetermined period of
time.
[004?] ller 50 e 2') es a. receiver module 52 for receiving,
demodulating and decoding signal transmissions received from remote control device 10.
Controller 50 also includes a processor 54 for executing; suitable programmed operating
software routines that are stored. in a memory 56. The operating software of controller 50
controls, amongst other things, an actuator 58, that is- in turn operatively connected to a
garage door opener 60. The output of receiver 52/54 therefore determines whether actuator
58 is operated. The s ge door opener (it) and its, operation do not form part: of
the present. invention and will thus not be described further herein, Such devices are
known to the skilled reader.
Receiver module 52 monitors the received button—held—time parameter and
button—held indicator fields that are included in signal issions received from remote
control device 10) Received signal transmissions also include an indication of the
particular button on remote control device 10 that was piished. The receiver receives this
infonnation Within the transmitter button’s transmisaion data and modifies its response to
the transmitter button’s unique code (ie, its output) based upon the field contents and the
remote control function assigned to the transmitter button.
An example code setting ion that utilises remote control device 10 will now
be deseribed. During a. code- g operation, controller 50 will only accept remote centrol
devioe "l 0's unique code after the received aheld—time parameter reaches a specifi ed.
value (such as 2 seconds) and. the button Flield indicator indicates that. the button has been
released, It will be understood that such an operation greatly reduces the risk of
occurrence of an incon‘ect coding. This risk reduction arises from the fact that the -
held~time parameter provides a reliable indicator that the user has held the transmitter
button for the required time, and the button—held indicator indicates: that the button has
been released In this way, the use of the button—held indicator ensures that. the button has
ly been released, rather than interruption of reception between remote control device
and. controller 50 (6. due to interference) being incorrectly interpreted as indicating
button release.
Alternatively, or in addition, controller 50 can be red by way of suitable
software routines in memory 55 to implement the tbllowing onal thnctionality in,
order to improve the code g process:
° The first transmission received by controller 30 has a button-'held-time ter
that indicates the button has just been pressed This prevents a transmitter being
coded when the button was y pressed prior to the receiver being ready for
code setting: This is implemented. by ng that the first button—heldtime
parameter is a ecunt <‘ 2, ie. to confirm that the first packet "has been received.
a Each successive transmission received by controller 50 indicates: an adjusted
button-held—time parameter, such as an increased count (except for transmissions in
which the button-held indicator indicates that. the button has been ed), This
ensures that transmissions are being ted from a single continuous ion
of the transmitter button and not from multiple activations in which transmissions
containing a button —held indicator indicating the button has been released. are not
received.
- Transmissions are received for each of the possible button-held—tiine- parameter
values between the first received ission being received and the final
transmission required for coding. This ensures that the transmitter is generating the
correct buttonsheld-titne parameter values.
° Transmissions with the greatest button—held—time parameter value (highest count
value) are received with and Without the button-held tor being set“ in other
words a ‘clear‘ signal (button—held indicator indicating that the button has been
released) is received with a button—flteld~time parameter matching the previous
received value. This provides a check that the transmitter is generating valid bottom
held indicator states,
- The last received button-held—time parameter has incremented by at least two
counts since the first packet was received.
[0.051] In on, the code set method may require that transmissions are received from
two consecutive button presses before controller 50 will accept, remote control device 10‘s
unique code. This further reduces the risk of coding to an unwanted remote control .
This is achieved by checking ng serial numbers, matcihing button identity, and
incrementing rolling code counters. The first button press may be required to satisfy the
above transmission requirements, while the packets received from the second button press
may simply satisfy that the first button«held~tirne parameter is a count < 2, ie. to confirm
that the first packet has been received.
Remote control device 10 and controller 50 are particularly suited to performing
the ded’ code set procedure discussed above, which involves the user following;
prompts displayed on a status indicator 62 (such as atouch ), In the case of ‘.remote‘
code set procedures, where stems indicator 62 may not be observable by the user, the user
is nevertheless still able to determine when the ission has been accepted by
controller Si}, by observing the length of time the transmitter button has been held, or
through use ofLED status indicator ‘22.
Further, the button—held feature of this invention may be used when
using,r the transmitter during an installation phase in order to set door limits... When driving
the door to the ons that the ler is to set as the open and closed limits, the
reception of the a release state transmission is used as a positive indiCation to the garage
door comreller that the motor is to he stopped. This provides a more responsive system
than hitherto possible".
The required hutton—he’ld—time is a, configurable system g andmay » atleast
in part be denendent on Whether other hutton—held-time responses are ented.
Typically the required b‘utton—held—time is significantly greater than that required for
normal operation, but not so long as to be inconvenient to the user, However, overall, use
of remote control device 10 and receiver 530 permits a shorter'hold-time requirement that
would ise be achievable due to the reduced risk. ofcoding an incorrect transmitter.
As an exampl e, the concept inay he used. by a garage door owner
selecting ’Vaotttion Mode’ for their garage door opener, which. has the effect of g out
all but. one master itten so does not allow the opener to be operated until the owner
returns and {inactivates Valenti on Mode. A particular remote control button is coded to
switch the opener to Vacation Mode. with the receiver requiring reception of a d
signal and a button—held—time parameter corresponding to the relevant. button being held for
'2 s in order to enter \e’aeation Mode (to avoid rtent activation of this .
To deactivate Vacant-tn htl'ode, no such hutton.—held«tin1e ter is required, the user
Simply needs to press the relevant button.
Remote control device 10 and ller 50 can be conveniently used to address
the issue of toggle operation discussed above. Specifically, the issue can. he addressed by
controller 50 processing the .—held~time parameter and buttonrheld indicator and
performing a. modified. response based thereon Suitable processing steps and modified
responses include:
- Receiver 57254 compares the button-'held—time parameter to a predetermined value
(sue-h as 2‘ seconds). If the time is less than 2 seconds then the receiver outputis
turned 0N, otherwise if the button held time ter exceeds 2 secondsfl the
receiver output is turned OFF.
- As described above, except that receiver 52/54 does not operate its output until
either the hutton-held-tinie parameter reaches '2 seconds; in which ease it is turned
OFF, or if the button-held indicator indicates the button has been released and. the
button-held—time parameter is less than 2 seconds? then the output is turned ON
These processing steps and modified. responses can also be conveniently used to
activate or deactivate various modes of operation supported by controller St) or garage door
opener 60.
[005 8] Another advantageous use for remote control device It} and controller 50 is to
indicate a user’s desired intentimn for enampte, to entree eoetroller 50' to close a garage
door. In this scenario controller 50 can respond to an 'open‘ command from remote
control device 10 on receipt of any riate signal (is. any hutton-held-time parameter
associated with the assigned button), but does not respond to a *elose" command from
remote control device 10 until the button.—held-time parameter reaches a prescribed
minimum value (for example ‘2 seconds).
A modified form of this embodiment involves receiver 52/54 activating different
commands based on. the duration of the received button-iield-‘time parameter. As. an
e, when the door is in a part—open position, operation of a door command button for
less than a Specifi ed time (for e 2 seconds) opens the door; whereas operation for
greater than the specitied time” eioses the doori,
As the transmitting niodulelo generates transmissions after the button is reieased
with the button-held indicator clear (ie‘. the transmissions include the flag indicating that
the button has been released), receiver 52 is able to detect the button release without
having to rely on a timeout. feature (as required in the pri or art, which also has to
compensate for receiver interference), to turn. the output off.
Each transmission generated by transmitting module in es roiling code
encryption. to protect the ts of the transmitted packet. Also included within each
transmitted packet (in addition to the button-'held-time parameter and button—held
indicator) are:
' Unique seriai number of transmitting module 16
' ty of button being pressed
- Rolling code ce counter
' d
Other data items can be included as required, for security or other purposes.
Modifications: and improvements to the invention wiil be readily apparent to those
skilled in the art. Such modifications and improvements are intended to be within the. scope
of this invention
Further, it. is to be understood that, hout the description and claims of this
specification, if" and where the word ‘eomprise’ appears (and variations of the word, such as
*‘conipiising’ and ‘comprisefi; this is not intended to e other additives, componenta
integers or steps.
1002988077 15
Claims (12)
1. A remote control device, comprising: one or more command buttons, each of which, when operated, ly or indirectly generates a command signal; a determination module for determining the length of time a command button is held to provide a button-held-time parameter; and a itter module that is configured to transmit the -held-time parameter in association with the d signal.
2. A remote control device according to claim 1, wherein the button-held- time parameter held is a value modified after a prescribed time interval.
3. A remote control device according to claim 2, wherein the value is a count, sequentially incremented on regular als.
4. A remote control device according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the determination module is further configured to determine a button-held indicator indicating whether the command button has been released.
5. A remote l device according to claim 4, wherein the transmitter module is configured to it the button-held indicator in association with the command signal.
6. A remote control device ing to claim 4 or claim 5, wherein the transmitter module is further configured to delay transmission of the button-held-time parameter on the basis of the state of the button-held indicator.
7. A remote control device according to any one of claims 4 to 6, wherein the transmitter module is further configured only to transmit the button-held-time parameter if the button-held indicator tes that the command button has been released.
8. A remote control device according to any one of claims 4 to 7 wherein the buttonheld indicator is a single bit, indicating either ‘button-held’ or ‘button clear’. 1002988077 16
9. A remote control device according to any one of claims 4 to 8, wherein the transmitter module is further configured to continue transmitting signals for a period of time after the button- held tor indicates that the command button has been released.
10. A controller comprising: a receiver module for receiving and decoding signals transmitted from a remote control device, the signals including one or more commands and one or more button-held-time parameters, wherein the one or more button-held-time parameters identifies the length of time a command button is held; and an actuator module operatively connected to the receiver module, the actuator module being configured to implement selected functions on a lled device, wherein the function selections are made on the basis of the received command(s) and -held-time-parameter(s).
11. A controller according to claim 10, wherein the received signals further include a -held indicator ting whether a command button of the remote control device used to generate command(s) has been released, the on ed by said actuator module being selected or modified on the basis of the button-held indicator.
12. A controller system sing a remote control device according to any one of claims 1 to 9 and a controller according to claim 10 or claim 11, the two able to be communicatively coupled. 8 utton try Module 50
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2013903135 | 2013-08-19 | ||
AU2013903135A AU2013903135A0 (en) | 2013-08-19 | Command signal transmission | |
PCT/AU2014/050192 WO2015024074A1 (en) | 2013-08-19 | 2014-08-19 | Remote control device and controller |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
NZ717717A NZ717717A (en) | 2020-11-27 |
NZ717717B2 true NZ717717B2 (en) | 2021-03-02 |
Family
ID=
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8161613B2 (en) | Method and device for producing screw connections | |
US9403663B2 (en) | Managing remote control of an elevator system | |
KR20160123119A (en) | Remote parking control system and control method thereof | |
WO2006047538A3 (en) | Method and system for monitoring a vehicle | |
WO2006075533B1 (en) | Remote control method and system, vehicle with remote controllable function, and control server | |
US7980402B2 (en) | Radio remote control device for a working machine | |
US10062276B2 (en) | Remote control device and controller | |
EP3459827A1 (en) | Method and system for automated parking of a vehicle | |
EP2073184A2 (en) | An arbitration system and method for use with wireless remote control devices in a multiple video screen entertainment system | |
CN109286455B (en) | Communication method and communication system for preventing multi-machine interference | |
NZ717717B2 (en) | Remote control device and controller | |
US10970950B2 (en) | Systems and methods for activating a security action responsive to proximal detection and identification of a wireless device | |
AU2015100160A4 (en) | Remote control device and controller | |
US8933805B2 (en) | Adjustable touchless transmitter to wirelessly transmit a signal | |
US11158205B2 (en) | Systems, methods and devices for remote control locomotive training | |
WO2008070331A2 (en) | Configurable protocol identification device | |
CN104176643A (en) | Selecting method of main and secondary arm working conditions of crane, control device and crane | |
CN105172747B (en) | Door remote control system compensation method | |
US20180326975A1 (en) | Onboard automatic parking system for a vehicle | |
JPS61292431A (en) | Remote control circuit | |
JP2016019259A (en) | Remote operation system | |
US20160328935A1 (en) | Open Scattered Light Smoke Detector Together With A Mobile Communication Device For Such An Open Scattered Light Smoke Detector For The Reception Of Detector Data And For Transmitting Update Data | |
CN212478838U (en) | Intelligent lock with back locking monitoring function | |
KR101449274B1 (en) | Watchdog using effective channel and operating method thereof | |
US7248162B2 (en) | Temporary mute of alarm in wireless alert system |