NZ529252A - Reduced-bulk, enhanced-resilience, lower-drag netting - Google Patents
Reduced-bulk, enhanced-resilience, lower-drag nettingInfo
- Publication number
- NZ529252A NZ529252A NZ529252A NZ52925202A NZ529252A NZ 529252 A NZ529252 A NZ 529252A NZ 529252 A NZ529252 A NZ 529252A NZ 52925202 A NZ52925202 A NZ 52925202A NZ 529252 A NZ529252 A NZ 529252A
- Authority
- NZ
- New Zealand
- Prior art keywords
- twine
- netting
- basic
- shuttle
- twines
- Prior art date
Links
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 45
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 121
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 37
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 description 39
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 25
- 229920000785 ultra high molecular weight polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 24
- 239000004677 Nylon Substances 0.000 description 18
- 229920001778 nylon Polymers 0.000 description 18
- 241000251468 Actinopterygii Species 0.000 description 15
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 14
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 14
- 239000004698 Polyethylene Substances 0.000 description 10
- -1 polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 10
- 229920000573 polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 10
- 239000011162 core material Substances 0.000 description 9
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000009940 knitting Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000005470 impregnation Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000003534 oscillatory effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000002238 attenuated effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920000728 polyester Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010561 standard procedure Methods 0.000 description 2
- JOYRKODLDBILNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethyl urethane Chemical compound CCOC(N)=O JOYRKODLDBILNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000407429 Maja Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000124008 Mammalia Species 0.000 description 1
- 101150034459 Parpbp gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000004699 Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 208000027418 Wounds and injury Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000005299 abrasion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108010016828 adenylyl sulfate-ammonia adenylyltransferase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013013 elastic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002657 fibrous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 244000144980 herd Species 0.000 description 1
- 229920006253 high performance fiber Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 208000014674 injury Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000005304 joining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008188 pellet Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008447 perception Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002250 progressing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001902 propagating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003313 weakening effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D04—BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
- D04G—MAKING NETS BY KNOTTING OF FILAMENTARY MATERIAL; MAKING KNOTTED CARPETS OR TAPESTRIES; KNOTTING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D04G1/00—Making nets by knotting of filamentary material
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
- A01K73/00—Drawn nets
- A01K73/02—Trawling nets
- A01K73/04—Devices for spreading or positioning, e.g. control thereof
- A01K73/045—Devices for spreading or positioning, e.g. control thereof for lateral sheering, e.g. trawl boards
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
- A01K75/00—Accessories for fishing nets; Details of fishing nets, e.g. structure
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Animal Husbandry (AREA)
- Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
- Marine Sciences & Fisheries (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Textile Engineering (AREA)
- Vibration Prevention Devices (AREA)
Abstract
A method of making improved netting (15) that includes mesh cells (17) having pairs of mesh bars (26) fabricated from at least one continuous length of twine (11, 13), pairs of mesh bars (26) of each mesh cell (17) is connected at intersections therebetween, comprises the step of: forming separate sections of the improved netting with differing physical properties that attenuate vibration of the improved netting during field operations in which the netting moves through a water entrained environment.
Description
529252
WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787
RBnnOTiD-Bnr.TC r BNHANCBn-RTiSTXTTlNCW r T.OWTiP-nttAG WBTTTWf?
Technical Field
The present invention relates generally to the technical 5 field of netting and, more particularly, to netting useful for fishing.
ttankgronnrl art
Currently available fish netting exhibits ascertainable 10 properties for material cost, durability, and hydrodynamic drag, i.e. the netting's resistance to movement through water. For fishing trawlers, higher netting drag increases fuel consumption, and requires operating engines at higher speed which reduces engine life.
Manufacturers of conventional knotted netting try to achieve a uniform mesh throughout sheets of netting that are frequently referred to as netting panels. This uniformity includes uniformity of twines (i.e. all twines having identical physical characteristics), uniformity of mesh size, and 20 uniformity of mesh bar length. Manufacturers frequently advertise uniformity throughout a netting panel's twines and mesh sizes as a favorable netting characteristic.
Since conventional knotted netting is a commodity product with numerous manufacturers competing in offering their 25 products to the same group of potential purchasers, another desirable netting characteristic is that it have low manufacturing cost.
A significant operational characteristic of conventional knotted fish netting is that it fatigues during use. That is, 30 new conventional netting loses strength after being placed in service. It has also been observed that conventional knotted fish netting almost always fails in the same way. The first observation is that conventional knotted fish netting almost always breaks at the knot which couples together two intersect-35 ing twines, a basic twine and a shuttle twine. Furthermore, it has also been observed that, depending upon the specific types of twine used in making the conventional knotted fish
WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787
2
netting, almost always the same twine, i.e. the basic twine or the shuttle twine, breaks.
In an attempt to ensure a minimum netting strength after a specified interval of use and to thereby avoid fatigue 5 failure, newly manufactured conventional knotted netting must be much stronger initially than the minimum strength required at the end of the netting's service life. The additional material required so conventional netting avoids fatigue failure and thus guarantees a minimum strength after a 10 specified interval of use increases the netting's bulk which correspondingly increases the netting * s drag and the cost of manufacture. ;The bulk of conventional long lived knotted netting adversely affects midwater trawls and other fishing gear. A 15 conventional midwater trawl includes a front-end and mouth which includes wings that tend to herd fish toward the center of the trawl. The aft end of the trawl's front-end connects to a back end or mid-portion jacket of the trawl. A codend or brailer bag connects to the aft end of the back end and closes 20 the end of the trawl furthest from the front-end. ;It is highly desirable to have as much volume as possible in the back end of midwater trawls to increase fish flow and water velocity flow into the brailer bag or codend, while keeping open the mesh in the netting that forms the back end 25 of the trawl. Keeping open the mesh in netting forming the back end of the trawl also reduces bycatch, unintended catching of marine organisms. Bycatch increases if the drag of conventional netting collapses the back end of the trawl thereby preventing smaller marine organisms from passing 30 through the netting. ;A midwater trawl's back end is usually assembled from conventional machine-made knotted netting. When being towed through the water, conventional netting entrains a pressure wave in the water. The pressure wave created by the bulk of 35 back end's netting produces what is known colloquially as a bucket effect. This pressure wave produces competing forces which act on the netting both: ;WO 02/095107 ;3 ;PCT/US02/15787 ;1. to keep the back end of midwater trawls open thereby effectively operating analogously to a conventional sea anchor; and ;2. to significantly reduce the trawl's volume due to 5 tension in the trawl caused by the netting's drag. ;Another characteristic exhibited by currently available machine-made knotted netting is that it usually vibrates when towed through a water entrained environment similar to the flapping of a flag in the wind. The vibration experienced with 10 conventional machine-made knotted netting can descale fish if they pass through netting rather than being caught therein, particularly if the netting is vibrating. The problem of descaling is of particular concern for pelagic and semi-pelagic species of fish. ;15 In view of the considerations set forth above, it is clearly advantageous if netting exhibits the lowest possible drag for specified strength. Furthermore, it is highly desirable if netting, in addition to the preceding characteristics, also exhibits good: ;20 1. elongation thereby providing the netting with load sharing across a netting panel and shock absorbing• properties; and ;2. resistance to fatigue failure, i.e. netting which exhibits resilience and retains its strength better 25 throughout the netting's service life. ;Presently there exist three (3) subtly different types of conventional machine-made knotted netting. The subtle differences that occur among different machine-made knotted netting arise from the way in which netting machines knit the 30 knots that couple immediately adjacent pairs of twines to each other. A first difference is that: ;1. for two (2) types of machine-made knotted netting the same twine of a pair of immediately adjacent twines is always use for forming the same part of 35 the weavers knot, e.g. one twine of an immediately adjacent pair of twines always forms the bight while the other twine always forms the loop; and ;WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787 ;4 ;2. for a third type of machine-made knotted netting both twines are used alternatively, back and forth for forming respectively the bight and the loop. Within the first type of machine-made knotted netting described 5 above: ;1. in one (1) type of machine-made knotted netting the loop of the knot being always formed with the same twine also always turns in the same direction, i.e. always has clockwise or counter-clockwise; and 10 2. in a second type of this machine-made netting the knot's loop alternates direction between immediately adjacent pairs of knots, i.e. the direction clockwise or counter-clockwise for the loop alternates back and forth between immediately adjacent knots. 15 Those skilled in the art frequently refer to the two different rotations for the loop, i.e. clockwise or counter-clockwise, as being either a Z-type or an S-type weavers knot. The second type of machine-made netting identified above in which the loop alternates direction tends to counterbalance twist in the 20 twines and the finished netting, and also reduces weakening of the twines at knots. ;In addition to attempting to produce machine-made netting which doesn't twist-up, netting manufacturers also employ various techniques in attempting to improve fatigue resistance, 25 i.e. improve the resilience, of machine-made netting. One technique used to improve fatigue resistance is incorporating a larger sized knot, e.g. double knotting, at junctures between individual twines that form the cell bars of conventional knotted netting. The principle underlying the use of larger 30 sized knots is that intersecting twines forming larger knots have a larger bend radius which distributes load on the twines more uniformly across the twines entire cross-section. Thus, it is widely believed in the netting industry that one way to obtain a greater strength retention from a given twine used in 35 machine-knotted netting is to increase knot size, either by doubling the twines (i.e. two parallel twines in place of one), or by making a double knot. However, while it is widely believed that the larger the knot the stronger the netting, it ;WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787 ;5 ;is also widely believed that the larger the knot, the greater the netting's drag. Consequently, this particular solution for improving fatigue failure increases netting drag in order to provide netting that is stronger and exhibits resilience. ;5 Since fishing gear drag reduction is a significant factor in overall efficacy of a fishing operation, a decision to accept greater drag in portions of fishing gear in order to obtain greater resilience tend to be carefully balanced. Thus, the use of netting having larger sized knots is generally 10 disfavored throughout most of a trawl net. The use of enlarged knot netting tends to be confined to limited regions of trawl nets, particularly regions that regularly incur higher loads and abrasion. ;It is also a widely held belief among netting manufactur-15 ers that the greater the amount of material in the netting, for example the larger the twine diameter for a given twine density and material, that the netting must inevitably be stronger and more resilient to fatigue failure. Thus, a widely held belief is that, while smaller size twines and smaller knot sizes 20 produce lower drag netting, they also reduce the netting's strength and resilience. ;In view of the preceding considerations, due to an increasing demand for lower drag netting in the fishing industry, there presently exists a desire for knotted netting 25 that employs a reduced knot size and reduced amount of material while remaining just as strong or even stronger than a netting which employs a larger size knot and more material. ;The most widely adopted and generally viewed as most successful solutions to the preceding problems include the use 30 of expensive superfiber materials such as ultra high molecular weight polyethylene, identified by the trademarks Dyneema® and Spectra®. Spectra is a highly modified polyethylene fiber material developed by Honeywell, Inc. that is manufactured by Allied-Signal Inc. of Morristown, New Jersey. Dyneema, which 35 is similar to the Spectra fiber, is a high modulus polyethylene fiber made by DSM High Performance Fibers B.V. of Heerlen, Kingdom of Netherlands. An alternative solution to the use of superfiber materials is the use of high tenacity materials, ;WO 02/095107 ;6 ;PCT/US02/15787 ;specifically more concentrated, i.e. more drawn and thus higher tenacity, polyethylene materials. ;The Dyneema and Spectra materials, rather than providing comprehensive solutions to the preceding problems, have only 5 experienced limited use because they are substantially inelastic, and are significantly more expensive than other competing materials. Consequently, in many instances knotted netting made from Dyneema or Spectra material provide some but not all of the desirable netting characteristics summarized 10 above. Specifically, use of knotted netting made from Dyneema or Spectra material is usually limited to applications which require high strength and, in many cases, very low drag and fatigue resistance. However, due to the poor elongation characteristics of Dyneema or Spectra materials, and the 15 concurrent inability to distribute -unbalanced loads across a netting panel, trawl nets which incorporate sheets of machine-made knotted netting made from superf ibers sometimes experience fish net collapse as well as loads being borne by isolated sections of the panel which may break mesh cell bars. Dyneema, 20 Spectra and other superfiber materials are also not widely used in larger mesh sizes in, for example, the front-end of midwater trawls. One reason that superfiber materials are not used in larger mesh sizes is that they exhibit comparatively high drag when used for forming larger size mesh. ;25 Lastly, and significantly, netting made from superfiber materials are several times more expensive than comparable nettings made using other materials such as conventional polyethylene, nylon, polyester and so forth, and the high tenacity versions of such materials. The expense of netting 30 made from Dyneema, Spectra and other superfiber materials limits their accessibility even to fishermen in developed nations. Consequently, nettings made from such materials are all but economically inaccessible to fishermen in underdeveloped nations, which nations account for a large portion of 35 overall worldwide fish netting sales. ;Netting made from high tenacity materials, such as more concentrated polyethylene filaments, known as high tenacity polyethylene ("HTPE"), have been successful because they ;WO 02/095107 ;7 ;PCT/US02/15787 ;exhibit higher strength than netting made with conventional materials while also providing some elongation to thereby distribute load throughout a netting panel. However, the use of modern HTPE material either already is or appears soon to 5 be counter balanced by the fact that the relative strength of netting made from HTPE deteriorates relatively rapidly during the first twenty-four (24) hours of use. For example, commercial netting made from HTPE material available in 2001 looses sixteen percent (16%) of its initial strength during the 10 first 24 hours of use. Conversely, a comparable netting made using HTPE material available in 1999 looses only four percent (4%) of its initial strength during the same time interval. The rate at which netting made from the two materials loose strength continues to differ throughout the remainder of 15 netting's service life. ;HTPE material's lack of resilience severely compromises its use in standard netting. One example of this limitation is that HTPE material has not been widely favored in high wear applications, such as on bottom panels of trawls. The general 20 perception is that netting made from HTPE wears poorly. However, it appears that the rapid deterioration over time experienced with netting made from the more concentrated and thus more brittle HTPE materials is the primary reason that such netting exhibits poorer wear characteristics than those 25 of netting made from standarcj polyethylene material. ;In view of the preceding considerations, there exists a need for netting that exhibits low hydrodynamic drag, e.g. drag comparable to the drag of netting made from Dyneema or Spectra material, while also exhibiting the substantial elongation and 30 lower cost of netting made from conventional nylon or polyethylene materials. Further, due to the dramatically high costs of Dyneema netting, there remains a need for a netting construction which provides strength similar to or better than that of Dyneema or Spectra netting, particularly if it provides 35 significantly reduced material usage and cost. There also exists a need for a construction which permits netting made from HTPE materials to exhibit better resilience in comparison ;WO 02/095107 ;8 ;PCT/US02/15787 ;with netting made from HTPE materials using a conventional netting construction. ;n-iwnlosrn-e of Invention 5 DTC-pTWTTTnW.q ;COMPACT TWINE as used herein means a twine including: ;1. a core such as of: ;a. twisted, including loosely twisted filaments; 10 b. parallel filaments; or c. braided core;, and ;2. a sheath especially a braided sheath which surrounds the core. ;DIAMETER as used herein for a characteristic of twines 15 means a twine having any cross-sectional shape that has a cross-sectional area which equals the cross-sectional area of a twine having a circular cross-sectional shape with the stated diameter. ;MESH BAR as used herein means the sides of a mesh cell 20 excluding knots or other types of couplers used instead of knots. ;MESH CELL as used herein means the sides of a mesh and includes at least three sides and associated knots or equivalent couplers oriented in space. A quadratic mesh cell has 25 four sides with four knots or couplers, and is usually arranged to form a parallelogram (including rectangular and square), with diamond-shaped mesh (trawl mesh) being preferred. A triangular mesh cell has three sides and three knots or couplers. A hexagonal mesh cell has six sides and six knots 30 or couplers. ;MESH SIZE as used herein means the distance between knots or couplers that are located on opposite sides of a square mesh cell when the mesh cell is completely closed. Thus a measurement of mesh size as used herein is approximately equal to the 35 length of two mesh bars arranged end-to-end. ;TWINE as used herein means a strong string or cord that is woven or braided from materials such as synthetic or natural fibers, or any combination thereof. ;WO 02/095107 ;9 ;PCT/US02/15787 ;The present invention provides an improved netting construction. ;An object of the present invention is to provide a netting construction using conventional or high tenacity materials 5 which exhibits strength and drag characteristics that are comparable to or better than netting made from superfibers such as Dyneema or Spectra material. ;Another object of the present invention is to provide a netting construction using conventional or high tenacity 10 materials which exhibits strength that is comparable to or better than netting made from super fibers such as Dyneema or Spectra material, and which also exhibits substantial elongation. ;Another object of the present invention is to provide a 15 netting construction using conventional or high tenacity materials which exhibits strength that is comparable to or better than netting made from superfibers such as Dyneema or Spectra material, which reduces material cost, and is less expensive to manufacture. ;20 Another object of the present invention is to provide a lighter netting construction having a strength which equals that of a heavier conventional netting construction and also having a smaller knot size. ;Another object of the present invention is to provide a 25 netting construction having a strength which exceeds that of a conventional netting construction but which exhibits an equal or lesser drag. ;Another object of the present invention is to provide a netting construction which, when made from modern HTPE 30 materials, exhibit improved resilience. ;A further object of the present invention to provide a netting construction which exhibits reduced drag. ;A further object of the present invention to provide a netting construction which uses a smaller knot and less 35 material amount that is just as strong or even stronger compared to a netting employing a larger size knot and higher material weight. ;WO 02/095107 ;10 ;PCT/US02/15787 ;/ ;A further object of the present invention to provide netting which facilitates substantial increase in the volume of the back ends of midwater trawls. The above objects are to be read disjunctively with the object of at least providing 5 the public with a useful alternative. ;Briefly, netting in accordance with the present invention includes mesh bars which possess physical properties that vary, change or alternate along a series of collinear mesh bars. The non-homogeneous media obtained by arranging in this way mesh 10 bars having varying physical properties may be configured to dampen or attenuate vibrations in the netting such as harmonic oscillations (resonance) . Furthermore, twines may be chosen which, in addition to dampening or attenuating vibrations and/or harmonic oscillations, advantageously reduce the amount 15 of material required to make netting which is similar in strength to or stronger than conventional machine-made netting. ;In one aspect, the present invention is an improved method of making netting that includes mesh cells having pairs of mesh bars that are fabricated from continuous lengths of material 20 respectively of a basic twine and of a shuttle twine. Pairs of the mesh bars of each mesh cell are connected at intersections between the basic twine and shuttle twine. The improved method includes the step of selecting materials for at least one of the twines which have varying physical properties that 25 serve to attenuate vibration of the netting during field operations in which the netting moves relative to a water entrained environment. ;In - another aspect, the present invention is an improved netting that includes mesh cells having pairs of mesh bars 30 fabricated from continuous lengths of material respectively of a basic twine and of a shuttle- twine. Pairs of mesh bars included in the mesh cell are connected at intersections between the basic twine and shuttle twine. The improved netting includes materials for at least one of the twines which 35 have varying physical properties that "are selected to attenuate vibration of the netting during field operations in which the netting moves relative to a water entrained environment. ;Ah advantage of the present invention is that it permits constructing improved netting which has the same strength as conventional netting but uses less material. ;INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE*] OF N.Z. '
2 3 DEC im
11
Another advantage of the present invention is that it permits constructing improved netting which has the same strength as conventional netting but which exhibits lower hydrodynamic drag.
Another advantage of the present invention is that for the same initial strength, the improved netting looses less strength than conventional netting after equivalent intervals of use.
Another advantage of the present invention is that it 10 permits building midwater trawls having a much larger volume back end.
Another advantage of the present invention is that it reduces the possibility of injury to fish which escape from a trawl through mesh cell openings.
These and other features, objects and advantages will be understood or apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment as illustrated in the various drawing figures.
Brief Descrriptiem of Drawings
PIG. la is a plan view illustrating part of a netting panel in accordance with the present invention in which the loops of weavers knots all turn in the same direction;
FIG. lb is a plan view illustrating part of a netting 25 panel in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention in which the loops of weavers knots alternate turning direction between immediately adjacent knots;
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional elevational view of a flume tank apparatus used to measure hydrodynamic drag exhibited by 30 netting;
FIG. 2b is an elevational view of four (4) netting panels taken along the line 2b-2b in FIG. 2, that are arranged in a pyramid shape for measurement of the hydrodynamic drag exhibited by the netting forming the panels;
FIGs. 3 ia a table which compares drag and breaking strength between conventional 100 mm machine-made netting and 100 mm netting made in accordance with the present invention;
12
FIG. 4 is a table which compares drag and breaking strength between conventional 200 mm machine-made netting and 200 mm netting made in accordance with the present invention for angle of attack, angle of mesh opening and cone angle which 5 differ from those of FIG. 3; and
FIG. 5, is a table which compares drag and breaking strength between conventional 400 mm machine-made netting and 400 mm netting made in accordance with the present invention using two different types of materials for the netting's 10 twines.
Best. Mode fo^c..Carrying Out the Invention
FIGs. la and lb each respectively depict part of a machine-made netting panel in accordance with the present 15 invention that is referred to by the general reference character 15. The back end of trawls are usually assembled using panels 15 of netting of the type depicted in FIGs. la or lb.
The material for netting panels 15 depicted in FIGs. la 20 and lb is knit in a pattern that is identical to a knitting pattern used for conventional machine-made netting in which the same twine of a pari of immediately adjacent twines always forms the loop while the other twine of a pair always forms the bight. Consequently, conventional machines which are capable 25 of making either of the two (2) types of netting which possess the preceding characteristic may be used to knit netting in accordance with the present invention. However, netting in accordance with the present invention is preferably made using a conventional machine which between immediately adjacent knots 30 alternates the direction in which the loop of the weavers knot turns.
A conventional net knitting machine, not illustrated in any of the FIGs., knots or "knits" the netting panel 15 from spools of twine or product strands that are mounted on the 35 knitting machine. As explained in greater detail in Published Patent Cooperation Treaty ("PCT") international patent application WO 99/39572 ("the PCT patent application"), the knitting process for machine-made netting panel 15 may be
WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787
13
understood as progressing row-by-row, from top to bottom in FIGs. la and lb, each successive horizontal row being knit one after the other across the width of the netting panel 15. Knitting of the machine-made netting panel 15 proceeds at 5 approximately a right angle to the ultimate, preferred direction of water flow past the netting panel 15, indicated by a water flow vector (WV0M) arrow 18, when the netting panel 15 is incorporated into a trawl that is towed through a water entrained environment. The PCT patent application is hereby 10 incorporated by reference as though fully set forth here.
In accordance with the present invention, netting panels 15 are formed with alternating vertically oriented product strand rows identified herein respectively as shuttle twines 11 and as basic twines 13, In knitting machine-made netting 15 panel 15, a number of individual spools, perhaps as many as 100, concurrently feed twines 11, 13 in parallel while the net making machine knits together pairs of the twines 11, 13 forming weavers knots 20 where the twines 11, 13 intersect. The knitting process alternates back-and-forth horizontally 20 across the netting panel 15 to establish a zig-zag paths for the twines 11, 13. When viewed from the top of FIGs. la and lb in the direction that the netting panel 15 feeds from the knitting machine, between every immediately adjacent pair of shuttle twines 11 there is a basic twine 13, and between every 25 immediately adjacent pair of basic twines 13 there is a shuttle twine 11.
In the netting panel 15, the connected twines 11, 13 establish four-sided, diamond-shaped mesh cells 17, the sides of which are mesh bars 26. The twines 11, 13 each respectively 30 form two (2) of the four (4) intersecting mesh bars 26 of each mesh cell 17. As depicted in FIGs. la and lb, at each knot 20 in machine made netting the shuttle twine 11 does not cross over itself, while the basic twine 13 crosses over itself. More specifically, at each knot 20 pairs of mesh bars 26 formed 35 by the shuttle twine 11 exit from the knot 20 on the same side of the basic twines 13. Conversely, the basic twine 13 forming pairs of mesh bars 26 exit the knot 20 on opposite sides of the shuttle twine 11.
14
In conventional machine made netting, the physical properties of the shuttle twines 11 and the basic twines 13 are substantially identical. That is, in conventional machine-made netting the same twine made from the same material is used both 5 for the shuttle twines 11 and for the basic twines 13. The present invention departs from conventional netting manufacture by carefully selecting the basic twines 13 and the shuttle twines 11 to have varying physical properties which are particularly advantageous. Specifically, in accordance with 10 the present invention, the physical properties of the shuttle twines 11 and the basic twines 13 are selected to dampen and attenuate vibrations and/or harmonic oscillations of the netting panel 15 while moving through the water entrained environment. The physical properties of the shuttle twines 11 15 and the basic twines 13 may differ in various ways such as making the shuttle twines 11 and basic twines 13 from materials having differing mechanical properties, or the mechanical properties, e.g. diameter, of the shuttle twine 11 and basic twine 13 may differ if they are made from the same material. 20 Compared with equivalent-strength conventional netting made with twines 11, 13 having substantially identical physical properties, netting made in accordance with the present invention exhibits significantly less drag due to the dampening and attenuation of netting vibrations and/or harmonic oscilla-25 tions. The lesser vibration and/or harmonic oscillations exhibited by netting made in accordance with the present invention reduces the netting's drag because the energy which excites netting vibration and/or harmonic oscillation comes from energy expended in towing the netting through the water 30 entrained environment. Drag reductions for nettings properly made in accordance with the present invention can be so great that during flume tank testing nettings made from common fibers, such as nylon or polyethylene, have exhibited less drag that comparable strength conventional nettings made from 35 superfibers such as Spectra or Dyneema. Moreover, dampening and attenuation of vibrations, particularly resonant harmonic oscillations, lessens degradation during use of the material forming the twines 11, 13 thereby better preserving the
WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787
netting' s strength in comparison with conventional machine made netting.
Depending upon particular material (s) and structure (s) of the shuttle twines 11 and basic twines 13 used in making 5 netting in accordance with the present invention, the twines 11, 13 have a preferred relationship to each other. Specifically, if the twines 11, 13 depicted in FIGs. la and lb are made of the same nylon material, a conventional twisted twine shuttle twine 11 has a smaller diameter and/or material weight 10 compared to a conventional twisted twine basic twine 13. More specifically, for such netting the diameter of the shuttle twine 11 may be between ninety-one one-hundredths (0.91) and six tenths (0.6) times the diameter of the basic twine 13. Preferably the diameter of the shuttle twine 11 is between 15 seventy-five one-hundredths (0.75) and sixty-five one-hundredths (0.65) times the diameter of the basic twine 13.
When the same material is used for both twines twines 11, 13, regardless of the material used for the twines 11, 13, in general the smaller twine has a diameter that is between nine 20 tenths (0.9) and five tenths (0.5) that of the larger diameter twine, and preferably has a diameter that is between seventy-five one-hundredths (0.75) and sixty-five one-hundredths (0.65) that of the larger diameter twine.
Furthermore, for twines 11, 13 made from any particular 25 type of material, e.g. nylon or polyethylene, the diameter and/or material weight of the shuttle twine 11 may be less than the diameter and/or material weight of the basic twine 13 without lowering, and perhaps even increasing the netting's strength. Depending upon particular material and/or materials 30 used for the twines 11, 13, it is possible by carefully selecting and testing the twines 11, 13 to substantially maintain or even to improve both the breaking strength of new netting and its resilience, i.e. the netting's resistance to fatigue failure.
Netting that exhibits this improved performance may be made in accordance with the present invention using a "compact twine," i.e. a twine having a core of loosely twisted or parallel lay filaments that are enclosed within a braided
WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787
16
sheath. However, if the sheath of the compact twine encloses filaments made from a brittle material such as highly drawn polyethylene, particularly HTPE, then the basic twine 13 preferably has a diameter that is smaller than the diameter of 5 the shuttle twine 11.
Regarding the relationship of the relative diameters of twines 11, 13 for specific materials, for nylon materials suitable for fish netting, e.g. type - 6 (six) nylon, or type - 66 (sixty-six) nylon, the larger diameter twine is basic 10 twine 13 and the smaller diameter twine is the shuttle twine 11. The relationship between diameters and/or material weight of such twines 11, 13 is that described above. If a material quantitatively exhibits elasticity and recovery properties similar to the types of nylon described above, then the basic 15 twine 13 should have a relationship to the shuttle twine 11 similar to that described above for the two types of nylon.
Alternatively, if a "compact twine" is used for both the twines 11, 13 and the compact twine's filaments are made from a currently available HTPE, or from a material that exhibits 20 elasticity similar to or less than that of currently available HTPE, then the diameter of the basic twine 13 is smaller than that of the shuttle twine 11. The relationship between the weight, diameter and/or strength of the larger and smaller twines 11, 13 is as described above. Specifically, basic 25 twines 13 having a diameter which is between approximately sixty-five one-hundredths (0.65) and seventy-five one-hundredths (0.75), particularly seventy one-hundredths (0.70), that of the larger diameter shuttle twine 11 have proven rather advantageous for compact twines, with the range of diameters 30 and/or material weight as described above for HTPE.
A combination of a "compact twine" and a "non-compact twine" may be used advantageously in practicing the present invention. For twines 11, 13 having such differing constructions, the "compact twine" forming the basic twine 13 prefera-35 bly uses a core material that is less elastic than nylon, particularly a core material such as HTPE. Usually, for this particular combination of twines 11, 13 having different
17
constructions, the shuttle twine 11 is made using "non-compact twine."
An alternative embodiment of the present invention uses twines 11, 13 made from different materials, and the smaller 5 of the twines 11, 13 is weaker, i.e. has a lower rupture point when tested as a single twine, than the larger diameter twines 11, 13. In this particular embodiment, the ratio of the strength of smaller twine to the larger twine is preferably in a range between 0.5 : 1.0 to 0.9 : 1.0, with a range of from 10 0.5 : 1.0 to 0.68 : 1.0 being preferred.
In another embodiment, if the material of a smaller twine 11 or 13 differs from the material of a larger twine 11 or 13, and one of the twines 11, 13 is more elastic than the other, then generally regardless of diameter the basic twine 13 is 15 preferably less elastic than the shuttle twine 11.
In yet another embodiment, the material of shuttle twine 11 differs from the material of basic twine 13, one twine 11 or 13 being twisted and the other being braided (or including a braided cover or jacket, with, for example, a non-braided 20 core). For example, shuttle twine 11 may be a braided or twisted nylon material, and basic twine 13 may be a braided HTPE material with a core over braided by a jacket. In such an embodiment, the larger diameter twine forming the basic twine 13 is preferably made from HTPE material.
Varying properties for twines 11, 13 which may be exploited in practicing the present invention include:
1. different materials of filaments used in making the twines 11, 13/
2. different diameters for the twines 11, 13;
3. different basic constructions for the twines 11, 13,
e.g. a twisted construction for the shuttle twine 11 and a braided (compact twine) construction for the basic twine 13;
4. different elasticity of filaments used in making the 35 twines 11, 13;
. different densities of filaments used in making the twines 11, 13; .
WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787
18
6. different impregnation (bonding) of the twines used for the twines 11, 13 including spatially varying impregnation along a twine's length; and
7. a construction for at least one of several plaits or 5 substrands used for assembling the twines 11, 13
that differs from the a construction of other plaits or substrands thereof.
Spatially varying impregnation along a twine's length may be obtained by mechanically incorporating solid pellets of an 10 impregnation material among the plaits or substrands making up a twine during the twines assembly, and then heating the assembled twine so the impregnation material diffuses non-uniformly into the plaits or substrands forming the twine.
The construction of at least one of several plaits or 15 substrands used for assembling the twines 11, 13 that differ may be obtained by:
1. impregnating, i.e. bonding, one of the plaits differently, preferably more heavily, from the twine's other plaits; or 20 2. using a different density material for one of the plaits than for the twine's other plaits.
Twines in which the construction of at least one of several plaits differ appear to be particularly advantageous for mesh cells 17 of a size almost one (1) meter or longer. This 25 particular twine construction may also be applied advantageously for reducing vibration wherever fluid flows past a length of twine such as:
1. mooring lines for buoys, ships, oil drilling or refining platforms, antennas or fishing lines; or 30 2. paravane, seismic or other type of line that is towed through a water entrained environment.
What is essential in exploiting one or more of the ways for providing different physical properties listed above is that particular combinations for the twines 11, 13 be empiri-35 cally evaluated to establish that a combination of varying physical properties dampen and/or attenuate vibrations and/or harmonic oscillations of the twines 11, 13.
19
Tnflus-tyHal Appl i r.ahi 1 i-hv
Sal acting Twi tips 11 r 13
In fabricating netting in accordance with the present invention, first, one selects a particular conventional 5 machine-made netting to be replaced by a netting made in accordance with the present invention. For example, netting having 100 mm mesh cells 17 and that is made entirely of third generation HTPE braided 3.5 mm twines. Such a netting, made by Euronete, s.A. of Maia, Portugal, is sold commercially under 10 the brand name 11 Euro line Premium 3.5 mm."
Second, larger diameter and a smaller diameter twines must be selected. For the example set forth here the same twine as that used in the conventional machine-made netting to be replaced is chosen for the larger diameter twine. For the 15 present example that choice is a 3.5 mm third generation HTPE braided twine. Then several smaller diameter third generation HTPE braided twines are chosen having diameters which are between six-tenths (0.6) and eight-tenths (0.8) times the diameter of the larger twine. In the present example, several 20 HTPE braided twines having diameters between 2.1 mm and 2.8 mm are selected. Using an industry standard method, straight line breaking strength values are measured and recorded for twines of all selected diameters.
A factor which influences choosing diameters for the 25 twines 11, 13 is that for netting having 100 man mesh cells 17 the material forming the knots 20 constitutes a significant fraction of the total material used in the netting. Knotting of the basic twine 13 requires approximately three (3) times more material in the knots 20 than knotting the shuttle twine 30 11. Therefore, the total amount of material used in making a netting panel 15 will be less if a smaller diameter is chosen for the basic twine 13 than for the shuttle twine 11.
Third, after selecting and testing a set of twines, a number of individual mesh cells 17 are then assembled for 35 testing using combinations of the larger diameter twine with each of the smaller diameter twines. For each twine diameter pair, two different types of mesh cells 17 are made for testing, i.e. one mesh cell 17 in which the basic twine 13 is
WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787
the larger diameter twine and the shuttle twine 11 is the smaller diameter twine, and an opposite mesh cell 17 in which the shuttle twine 11 is the larger diameter twine and the basic twine 13 is the smaller diameter twine.
Fourth, using an industry standard method, samples of the conventional machine-made netting to be replaced and all the test mesh cells 17 assembled using different pairings of large and small diameter twines 11, 13 are tested for breaking strength. Preferably, the testing method used for all the mesh 10 cells 17 is the standard "4 leg 1 knot" method, with an initial angle of mesh opening set at twenty degrees (20°). To obtain reliable data for breaking strength for the various mesh cells 17, the same testing protocol is repetitively applied to a number of samples both for mesh cells 17 made with each larger 15 and smaller diameter twine pair, and for an equal number of samples of the conventional machine-made netting to. be replaced.
If any of the mesh cells 17 made with different diameter twines 11, 13 exhibits a breaking strength equal to that of the 20 conventional machine-made netting to be replaced, clearly that diameter pair for the twines 11, 13 is likely to be used in making the replacement netting in accordance with the present invention. However, because netting made in' accordance with the present invention exhibits greater resilience and retains 25 its strength better throughout the netting's service life, i.e. the netting resists fatigue failure better than conventional netting, replacement netting in accordance with the present invention is acceptable if the mesh cells 17 made with a particular pair of differing diameter twines 11, 13 exhibits 30 a breaking strength which is only 75% that of the conventional machine-made netting to be replaced.
For the preceding example, mesh cells 17 made with a combination of Euroline Premium 3.5 mm for the shuttle twine 11 and Euroline Premium 2.5 mm for the basic twine 13 exhibit 35 breaking strength equal to that of conventional machine-made netting in which Euroline Premium 3.5 mm forms both twines 11, 13. Euronete, S.A. reports a breaking strength value for Euroline Premium 2.5 mm netting that is approximately forty-
21
five percent (45%) less than the breaking strength reported for comparable Euroline Premium 3.5 mm netting. Consequently, obtaining a breaking strength for mesh cells 17 in which all the basic twines 13, i.e. one-half of the twines 11, 13, are 5 made from 2.5 mm diameter third generation HTPE braided twine which equals the breaking strength for mesh cells 17 in which all the twines 11, 13 are made from 3.5 mm third generation HTPE braided twines is surprising, and contradicts beliefs of netting manufacturers. The preceding observation regarding 10 breaking strength also indicates that it may 'be possible to further reduce the diameter of the basic twine 13 below 2.5 mm.
Trawl makers typically evaluate and purchase netting panels 15 based upon the breaking strength of a single unkotted twine of the type used for making the netting panel 15. This 15 method for estimating the breaking strength of netting panels 15 is based upon an understanding that netting panels 15 will exhibit a breaking strength that is approximately forty-four percent (44%) to fifty-five (55%) of the twine's straight line breaking strength. Since machine-made knotted netting almost 20 always breaks at the knots 20, it is believed that the forty-five (45%) to sixty-six. (66%) difference in breaking strength between the straight line breaking strength of un-knotted twine and that measured for twine in knotted netting results from knotting the twines 11, 13. Applying the preceding method to 25 evaluate the mesh cells 17 of this example made in accordance with the present invention, the breaking strength of the weaker twine, i.e. the Euroline Premium 2.5 mm twine, would be thought to determine the breaking strength of the final mesh cells 17. However, the experimental results reported above demonstrate 30 that such an evaluation would be erroneous. The experimental results reported above demonstrate that, despite the fact that fifty-percent (50%) of the netting's twines 11, 13 are made using the smaller diameter Euroline Premium 2.5 mm twine, for mesh cells 17 made with a smaller diameter but sufficiently 35 strong basic twine 13, the breaking strength of the Euroline Premium 3.5 mm shuttle twine 11 determines the breaking strength of the mesh cells 17.
WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787
22
In the preceding example, netting in accordance with the present invention having the same strength as the conventional machine-made netting advantageously:
1. reduces the material required to make the netting by 5 approximately thirteen and four tenths percent
(13.4%); and
2. exhibits greater resilience thereby retaining its strength better throughout the netting's service life.
Moreover, because netting made with differing diameter twines 11, 13 exhibits greater resilience, if a trawl used a netting panel 15 made with 3.5 mm diameter twines 11, 13 to provide a specified service life, that netting panel 15 could be advantageously replaced with netting of the present invention 15 made with differing diameter third generation HTPE braided twine twines 11, 13 both of which are smaller than 3.5 mm in diameter.
It is also noteworthy that mesh cells 17 made with a reversed combination of Euroline Premium 3.5 ram and 2.5 mm 20 diameter twines, i.e. where the 3.5 mm diameter twine formed the basic twine 13 and the 2.5 mm diameter twine formed the shuttle twine 11, exhibited considerably less breaking strength than the advantageous combination described above. The preceding result indicates that particular combinations of 25 twines 11, 13 having differing properties must be evaluated empirically to establish which one of the twines can be used advantageously for the shuttle twine 11, and which can be used advantageously for the basic twine 13.
Drag Tasting Panels 15
After establishing that mesh cells 17 made with a combination of Euroline Premium 3.5 mm for the shuttle twine 11 and Euroline Premium 2.5 mm for the basic twine 13 exhibit breaking strength equal to that of conventional machine-made 35 netting in which Euroline Premium 3.5 mm forms both twines 11, 13, netting panels 15 were assembled to investigate the hydrodynamic drag characteristics of such netting. Various methods are known and used for measuring drag exhibited by
23
netting panels 15 of differing construction. Some of these drag testing methods are performed in a flume tank. Other drag testing methods require assembling a small trawl, or section of a trawl, towing it behind a vessel, and recording tow speed 5 for netting panels 15 of differing construction. The methods for measuring drag by towing netting panels 15 of differing construction behind a vessel do not facilitate visually observing vibrations, such as harmonic oscillation, occurring in the netting panels 15.
FIG. 2 depicts a 2.0 m deep flume tank apparatus that is used to measure hydrodynamic drag exhibited by netting panels 15.
VsS
To measure hydrodynamic drag (RJ , as depicted in FIGs. 2 and 2b, netting panels 15 are fastened along 1.0 m long edges 15 of a square-shaped frame 32 and arranged to form faces of a four (4) panel pyramid 34. The frame 32 encompasses a base of the pyramid 34. Ends of X-shaped cables 36 connect respectively to four (4) corners of the frame 32. A cross-bar 38 is interposed between the intersection of the cables 3 6 and a 20 vertex 42 of the pyramid 34 which extends a distance D0 of approximately 1.6 m from the frame 32. Interposed in this way, the cross-bar 38 applies approximately fifty (50) kg of tension to the vertex 42 of the pyramid 34 to simulate force applied to the netting panels 15 if they were incorporated into a trawl 25 being towed through a water entrained environment. Arranged in this way, the netting panels 15 have substantially the same angles of mesh opening and cone angle, plus or minus two degrees (±2°). Due to differences in elongation properties and minute discrepancies in the sizes of individual meshes of the 3 0 netting, angles of mesh openings and cone angle provided by the apparatus depicted in FIG. 2 are substantially those that occur during use of netting in a trawl.
To measure hydrodynamic drag, the netting panels 15 arranged in the pyramid 34 are immersed in water flowing 35 through the flume tank 30. To obtain accurate hydrodynamic drag measurements, the pyramid 34 is made as large as possible to occupy the entire cross-sectional area of the flume tank 30 in which there exists parallel laminar water flow without
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE
HF N Z
2 3 DEC 2004
WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787
24
approaching too close to walls of the flume tank 30 where turbulent flow occurs.
Ends of four bridles 52 extending forward from the base of the pyramid 34 respectively interconnect between four (4) 5 corners of the frame 32 and a cable 54. The cable 54 extending forward of the pyramid 34 passes around a pulley 56 that is fixed with respect to the flume tank 30 at a distance D2 of approximately 3.0 m from the base of the pyramid 34. From the pulley 56, the cable 54 then slopes upward over a horizontal 10 distance D3 of approximately 6.0 m to a scale 58 that is also fixed with respect to the flume tank 30 above the surface of water flowing therein. Accurate digital weight scales such as used to weigh suspended items may be used for the scale 58. Arranged in this way, the scale 58:
l. restrains the pyramid 34 from moving with respect to the flume tank 30 as water flows from left to right in FIG. 2 as indicated the arrow 18 which represents the water flow vector V0; and
2. measures hydrodynamic drag produced by the pyramid 20 34.
Before attempting to measure the hydrodynamic drag of netting panels 15, the hydrodynamic drag of the frame 32 is measured without any netting panels 15 attached thereto. Measurements are taken for water velocities V0, in increments 25 that do not exceed one quarter meter per second (0.25 m/s) and are preferably smaller, over a range of velocities which it is anticipated the netting may be used.
After carefully measuring the drag of the frame 32, the netting panels 15 are attached to the frame 32 and hydrodynamic 30 drag of the pyramid 34 mounted thereon is measured over a range of velocities which it is anticipated the netting may operate. The hydrodynamic drag measurements obtained for the frame 32 without the netting panels 15 are subtracted from those measured for the pyramid 34 formed by the netting panels 15 to 35 obtain the hydrodynamic drag due to the netting panels 15.
As set forth in the table of FIG. 3, 100 mm mesh cells 17 of both constructions exhibit the same breaking strength plus or minus five kilograms (± 5.0 kg) . For testing in the flume
WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787
tank 30, the netting panels 15 have a measured angle of mesh opening (ab), illustrated in FIG. 2, of thirty degrees plus or minus one degree (30° ±1°), and a measured cone angle (ac), also illustrated in FIG. 2, of thirteen and one-half degrees 5 plus or minus one degree (13.5° ±1°). An angle of attack (aat) for the netting panels 15, calculated as aat = cos-1 [cos (ac) x cos(aj,)],
is thirty-three degrees plus or minus one degree (33° ±1°). For the test results reported in FIG. 3 the angle of attack 10 (aat) is larger than is realistic for design parameters used for the back end of pelagic (midwater) trawls. Nevertheless, the netting panel 15 made in accordance with the present invention exhibits substantially less drag than the comparable, conventional machine-made netting.
The 100 mm netting panels 15 made in accordance with the present invention have a projected area that is approximately eighty-five and seven-tenths percent (85.7%) of the projected area for the conventional machine-made netting panels 15 to be replaced. Because the projected are of the 100 mm netting 20 panels 15 made in accordance with the present invention is fourteen and three-tenths percent (14.3%) smaller than the projected area of the conventional machine-made netting panels 15, it can be inferred that the 100 mm netting panels 15 made as described above should exhibit fourteen and three-tenths 25 percent (14.3%) less drag when tested in the flume tank 30 merely because of the smaller projected area.
During testing in the flume tank 30 under the conditions summarized above, as recorded in FIG. 3 the 100 mm netting panels 15 made as described above with twines 11, 13 that have 30 different physical properties exhibited markedly less hydrodynamic drag than the conventional machine-made netting to be replaced. . For velocities of the water flow vector V0, indicated by the arrow 18, of 1.5 m/s and 1.75 m/s the hydrodynamic drag of the conventional machine-made netting panels 15 was 35 respectively fifteen percent (15%) and seventeen percent (17%) greater than the hydrodynamic drag of netting panels 15 made in accordance with the present invention. Only at a velocity for the water flow vector V0 of 2.0 m/s did the 100 mm netting
WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787
26
panels 15 made as described above exhibit a hydrodynamic drag reduction which would be anticipatable based upon a fourteen and three-tenths percent (14.3%) smaller projected area.
The table of FIG. 4 presents test results for netting 5 panels 15 assembled similar to the 100 mm example set forth above except for 200 mm mesh cells 17. Drag measurements made in the flume tank 30 and presented in FIG. 4 were performed under conditions that differed slightly from those for the 100 mm netting panels 15 set forth in FIG. 3. For the drag 10 measurements set forth in FIG. 4, the measured angle of mesh opening (ab) was twenty-seven degrees plus or minus one degree (27° ±1°), the measured cone angle (ae) was fourteen degrees plus or minus one degree (149 ±1°), and the calculated angle of attack (aat) was thirty degrees plus or minus one degree 15 (30° ±1°). For the test results summarized in FIG. 4, the angles of mesh opening (ab) and of attack (aat) and the cone angle (ac) represent one extreme of realistic design parameters used for the back end of pelagic (midwater) trawls.
The 200 mm netting panels 15 made in accordance with the 20 present invention use approximately eighty-six and six tenths percent (86.6%) of the material required for the conventional machine-made netting panels 15 to be replaced, and have a projected area that is approximately eighty-five and one-half percent' (85.5%) of the projected area of the conventional 25 netting panel 15. Because the projected area of the 100 mm netting panels 15 made in accordance with the present invention is fourteen and one-half percent (14.5%) smaller than the projected area of the conventional machine-made netting panels 15, it can be inferred that the 100 mm netting panels 15 made 30 as described above should exhibit fourteen and one-half percent (14.5%) less drag when tested in the flume tank 30 merely because of the smaller projected area.
During testing in the flume tank 30, the 200 mm netting panels 15 made as described above with twines 11, 13 having 35 different physical properties exhibited significantly less hydrodynamic drag than the conventional machine-made netting to be replaced for all velocities of the water flow vector V0. For 1.5 and 1.75 m/s velocities of the water flow vector V0 the
27
conventional machine-made netting panels 15 exhibited a twenty percent (20%) higher drag than the netting panels 15 made in accordance with the present invention, and for a 2.0 m/s velocity a thirty-one (31%) higher drag,
More Tgyanipl p-s of -hha Present Invention WTPTC and Wylon
In this example a urethane coated conventional twisted three strand nylon twine having a diameter of approximately 2.8 10 mm that is labeled as "40 denier" by the twine's manufacturer forms the shuttle twine 11. A HTPE twine having a non-braided core with a braided jacket, and having a diameter of 4.0 mm made by Euronete and labeled "Euroline 4 mm" forms the basic twine 13. The table of FIG. 5 summarize the hydrodynamic drag - 15 and breaking strength characteristics of netting panels 15 having 400 mm mesh cells 17 made with this combination of materials in comparison with conventional machine-made netting panels 15 made entirely from the Euroline 4 mm twine. As shown in FIG. 5, the breaking strength of mesh cells 17 in which 20 nylon and HTPE respectively form the twines 11, 13 equals if not exceeding that of mesh cells 17 made entirely from the Euroline 4 mm twine. The netting panels 15 made with the combination of nylon and HTPE twines 11, 13 use approximately twenty-two and one-half percent (22.5%) less material, and have 25 a projected area that is approximately eighty-three and six-tenths percent (83.6%) of the projected area for the conventional machine-made netting panels 15. It can therefore be inferred that when tested in the flume tank 30 the 400 mm mesh size netting panels 15 assembled as described above should 30 exhibit sixteen and four-tenths percent (16.4%) less drag compared with the conventional machine-made netting panels 15 merely because of the smaller projected area.
For drag measurements on 400 mm netting panels 15 set forth in FIG. 5 the measured angle of mesh opening (ab) was 35 twenty-seven degrees plus or minus two degrees (27° ±2°), the measured cone angle (ac) was twenty-three degrees plus or minus one degree (23° ±1°), and the calculated angle of attack (aat) was thirty-six degrees plus or minus one degree (36° ±1°).
28
During testing in the flume tank 30, the 400 mm netting panels 15 made as described above exhibited significantly less hydrodynamic drag than the conventional machine-made netting to be replaced for all velocities of the water flow vector V0.
For a 1.5 m/s velocity the conventional machine-made netting panels 15 exhibited a sixty-one percent (61%) higher drag than the netting panels 15 made in accordance with the present invention, for a 1.75 m/s velocity the conventional machine-made netting panels 15 exhibited a sixty-six (66%) higher drag, 10 and for a 2.0 m/s velocity a fifty-percent (50%) higher drag. Furthermore, tests conducted after several weeks of use showed a significantly greater breaking strength for the 400 mm mesh cells 17 made as described above compared with the conventional machine-made netting panels 15. Such results are extremely 15 favorable in that, as stated above, they satisfy a need long felt in the industry for netting made from less expensive materials that exhibits less drag than a comparable netting panel 15 made from a superfiber such as Dyneema.
Super-f i hp.rs
In manufacturing netting panels 15 in accordance with the present invention from essentially inelastic superfibers, i.e. less than 4% elastic elongation, for example from Dyneema, constructions and arrangements of the twines 11, 13 described 25 above are useful. Often, depending upon the mechanical elongation potential of the specific twine construction as contrasted to the filament used in making a twine, arrangements similar to that described for compact twines are preferred. Also, care should be taken in designing the netting to 30 determine which of the twines 11, 13 shall be reduced in weight and/or diameter while simultaneously retaining the breaking strength desired for mesh cells 17. Considering the high cost of Dyneema, reducing the amount of material required for a netting panel 15 responds to a long felt need in the industry. 35 For a particular diameter of the twines 11, 13, netting panels 15 made with superfibers, particularly non-elastic Dyneema material, usually exhibit remarkably large vibration and/or harmonic oscillation, and a correspondingly unanticipatedly
29
higher drag. Netting made in accordance with the present invention from such materials should have a markedly lower material cost, and exhibit significantly less drag.
If a desire exists for netting panels 15 which exhibit 5 very low drag in combination with elasticity, a superfiber twine 11 or 13, such as Dyneema, may, in accordance with the present invention, be combined with an elastic twine 11 or 13, for example a nylon twine, properly combining a non-elastic material such as polyester twines 11, 13 with nylon twines 11, 10 13, including high tenacity nylon, will also reduce material cost, and exhibit significantly reduced drag.
Vibrati onf Osni 11 ati on, Drag and Kesi' 1 ianna
During testing in the flume tank 30, the 100 mm, 200 mm 15 and 400 mm netting panels 15 for which data appears respectively in FIGs. 3-5 exhibited no vibration such as harmonic oscillation (resonance) for all tested velocity values of the water flow vector V0 indicated by the arrow 18. Conversely, all the conventional machine-made netting panels 15 to be 20 replaced exhibited vibration such as harmonic oscillation (resonance) during testing in the flume tank 30.
Vibrations, such as harmonic oscillations, can occur within a netting panel 15 in at least two distinctly different ways. First, individual mesh bars 26, or a series of collinear 25 and connected mesh bars 26, can vibrate or harmonically oscillate similar to a plucked taut string. For example in this particular mode of vibration or harmonic oscillation, knots 20 at opposite ends of one mesh bar 26, or of a series of more mesh bars 26, could remain relatively fixed while the 30 twine 11 or 13 between the two knots 20 vibrates or oscillates. In netting panels 15 made in accordance with the present invention, along series of collinear and connected mesh bars 26 the twines 11, 13 alternate. That is, except at the edges of the netting panel 15, shuttle twines 11 forming' individual 35 mesh bars 26 connect to opposite ends of a mesh bar 26 formed by the basic twine 13, and basic twines 13 forming individual mesh bars 26 connect to opposite ends of a mesh bar 26 formed by the shuttle twine 11. If physical properties of the twines
WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787
11, 13 are selected to differ appropriately in accordance with the present invention, then shuttle twines 11 connected to each end of the basic twines 13 can dampen or attenuate any tendency for the basic twine 13 in the netting panel 15 to vibrate or 5 harmonically oscillate. Correspondingly, basic twines 13 connected to each end of the shuttle twines 11 in the netting panel 15 can dampen or attenuate any tendency for the shuttle twine 11 in the netting panel 15 to vibrate or harmonically oscillate. Because energy needed to excite vibrations or 10 harmonic oscillations of individual mesh bars 26 or a series of collinear and connected mesh bars 26 first enters netting panels 15 through individual mesh bars 26, dampening or attenuating any tendency for mesh bars 26 to vibrate or harmonically oscillate removes such energy from netting panels 15 15.
A second way in which the netting panel 15 may vibrate or harmonically oscillate is for vibratory or oscillatory waves to propagate across the netting panel 15 analogous to a flag flapping in the wind. Removing energy from a netting panel 15 20 that excites vibrations or harmonic oscillations of individual mesh bars 26 or a series of collinear and connected mesh bars 26 inherently removes from the netting, panel 15 energy needed to excite vibratory or oscillatory waves that propagate across the netting panel 15.
Because the netting panel 15 must absorb energy that excites either or both of the two (2) preceding modes of vibrations or harmonic oscillations within the netting panel 15, when netting panels 15 are incorporated into a trawl the only source of driving energy is the vessel which tows the 30 trawl. Thus, if one considers two (2) trawls respectively assembled with different netting panels 15 the twines 11, 13 of which have the same projected area, one trawl in which netting panels 15 exhibit substantially reduced or no vibrations or harmonic oscillations while being towed, and the other 35 trawl in which netting panels 15 exhibit greater vibrations or harmonic oscillations, a trawl made with the second netting panels 15 will exhibit a more drag than a trawl made with the first netting panels 15 because of the energy which the second
WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787
31
netting panel 15 must absorb to excite the larger vibrations or harmonic oscillations of the netting panels 15.
Testing in the flume tank 30 can be performed only for relatively small netting panels 15. That is, the flume tank 5 30 can accommodate only a limited amount of netting compared to, the amount actually used in the netting panel 15 of a trawl. In comparison with netting panels 15 in a trawl, the small size of the netting panel 15 that can be tested in the flume tank 30 permits only shorter vibratory or oscillatory waves to 10 propagate through the experimental netting panels 15. Increasing the size of the netting panels 15 permits propagation of longer vibratory and/or oscillatory waves. If the structure of the netting panels 15 doesn • t inherently attenuate (dampen) vibrations or oscillations, peaks and valleys of 15 vibrations or oscillations propagating through netting panels 15 amplify any vibration or oscillation thereby exponentially increasing turbulence, and the hydrodynamic drag of the trawl resulting from the turbulence. Consequently, testing in the flume tank 30 does not fully demonstrate the hydrodynamic drag 20 characteristics of a netting panel 15, and the drag in real trawl applications is usually larger than that measured in the flume tank 30. Thus, a difference in hydrodynamic drag exhibited by trawls assembled respectively using netting panels 15 which inherently attenuate vibrations and/or harmonic 25 oscillations and using netting panels 15 that don't attenuate vibrations and/or harmonic oscillations tends to increase as the size of the netting panels 15 increase. Therefore, the difference in drag between netting panels 15 constructed in accordance with the present invention and conventional machine-30 made netting panels 15 increases when the improved netting panels 15 are used in real fishing gear applications.
In addition to reduced hydrodynamic drag, eliminating vibrations and/or harmonic oscillations in netting made in accordance with the present invention also increases the 35 netting's resilience. The energy present in the vibrations and/or harmonic oscillations exhibited by conventional machine-made netting has to be dissipated somewhere in the netting panel 15. Because the netting panel 15 is under tension when
WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787
32
incorporated into a trawl and towed through the water entrained environment the knots 20 joining mesh bars 26 to each other dissipate most or all of the energy present in the vibrations and/or harmonic oscillations. Dissipation of energy in the 5 knots 20 causes the material of the twines 11, 13 to degrade more rapidly than elsewhere in the netting panel 15. Dissipation of vibratory or oscillatory energy in the knots 20 and degradation of the material forming the knots 20 explains why conventional machine-made knotted netting almost always breaks 10 at the knots 20. This understanding of the failure mode for conventional machine-made knotted netting also explains why the improved netting of the present invention, because it vibrates and/or oscillates less than conventional netting, exhibits greater resilience, i.e. increased resistance to fatigue 15 failure.
If during testing in the flume tank 30 at any velocity for the water flow vector V0 experimental netting panels 15 made in accordance with the present invention exhibit vibrations, such as harmonic oscillations, that are similar to or exceed those 20 exhibited by a comparable, conventional machine-made netting panel 15, then the experimental sample being tested is unacceptable. When such vibrations and/or harmonic oscillations appear during testing in the flume tank 30, it becomes necessary to test other combinations of twines 11, 13 having 25 varying physical properties until finding a combination of twines 11, 13 that exhibits less vibration or harmonic oscillation for all anticipated velocities of the water flow vector V0.
Dasi gninq to -Reduce Vihrstions
To reduce as much as practicable drag properties of netting made in accordance with the present invention, for a particular mesh size it is important to empirically determine that the individual mesh bar 26, i.e. the portion of a twine 35 11 or 13 between knots 20, does not exhibit vibration and/or harmonic oscillation at intended water velocities of the water flow vector V0, indicated by the arrow 18. To accomplish this, various mesh sizes made of various experimental embodiments of
33
netting panels 15 must be tested in the flume tank 30 at various water velocities, e.g. at 1.5, 1.75 and 2.0 m/s. It appears that in general vibrations and/or harmonic oscillation occur in only one mesh bar 26, often the mesh bar 26 formed by 5 the shuttle twine 11. If such vibration and/or harmonic oscillation occurs in a mesh bar 26, the drag of the netting panels 15 generally increased approximately eleven percent (11%), or even to such an extent that the drag of the experimental netting panels 15 exceeds the drag of the comparable
conventional machine-made netting panels 15. One or more of the following techniques, either alone or in combination, may be used in an attempt to obtain a lower drag netting panel 15.
1. The ratio of the diameters and/or material weight is altered for twines 11, 13 making up the mesh bars 26
which exhibit vibration and/or harmonic oscillation may be changed so they become dampened or attenuated.
2. The proportionate amount of bonding and/or impregna-. tion in the twines 11, 13 may be altered, including
omitting bonding and/or impregnation, so vibration and/or harmonic oscillation are dampened or attenuated.
3. The materials of filaments used in making the twines 11, 13, including concentration (also known as
"draw") may be varied and/or altered for the twines
11, 13 so vibration and/or harmonic oscillation are dampened or attenuated.
4. Twines having differing constructions may be used for the twines 11, 13.
5. If suitable for the intended use of the netting, the ratio of the length of the mesh bars 26 and/or the exact mesh size may be altered, often minutely, so vibration and/or harmonic oscillation are dampened or attenuated.
In designing a netting panel 15 that reduces vibrations and/or harmonic oscillations it is important to configure the netting of the present invention so that the nodes of a wave travelling along a mesh bar 26, i.e. that point on the mesh bar 26 where
WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787
34
a wave of a vibration or harmonic oscillation has a zero amplitude, avoids:
1. where the mesh bar 26 meets the knot 20; and
2. any portion of the knot 20.
TTsing Tha TfleH-Hng
The common practice in the trawl industry for conventional machine-made netting is to orient netting panels 15 so the water flow vector-V0f indicated by the arrow 18, will generally 10 be in a direction perpendicular to the direction of the nettings manufacture. Various orientations for the netting are useful, but the main direction of tension (largest magnitude of load vectors) along the netting panel 15 is best taken in a direction generally along the arrow arrow 18, i.e. perpendic-15 ular to the direction of manufacture of the netting panel 15. This orientation with respect to the water flow vector V0 for the netting panels 15 causes water to flow past successive columns of the twines 11, 13 rather than along rows of the twines 11, 13. Netting made in accordance with the present 20 invention should be used with the same orientation for netting panels 15 as the orientation used for conventional netting because that orientation reduces sliding of the weavers knots 20. Thus, for use in trawls, it is advantageous if netting made in accordance with the present invention be oriented in 25 the trawl the direction indicated by the arrow 18 in FIGs. la and lb.
While thus far netting manufactured in accordance with the present invention has been described as being useful for the back end's of trawls, the characteristics exhibited by such 30 netting adapt it for advantageous use in other applications. In seines nets, bulky conventional netting slows descent of the seine net which produces billows in the netting that may unintentionally trap of marine organisms including mammals. Thus, seine nets can advantageously use netting which is 35 lighter and which allow the seine to descend more rapidly. Netting made in accordance with the present invention permits seine nets to descend more rapidly thereby reducing billows and bycatch in the seine net. Thus, the netting of the present
WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787
invention can be used advantageously in all different types of seine nets such as purse seines, and tuna seines, and even Danish seines. For use in Seines, particularly the falling sections of purse seines, the netting should be oriented the 5 same with respect to the water flow vector V0 as for trawls.
Moreover, netting in accordance with the present invention is useful not only in fishing nets, but is also useful in constructing barrier nets that prevent migrating or protected fish from migrating toward and near pump intakes such as occur 10 at various different types of power plants. Similarly, barrier nets for fish pens, particularly in high current areas, may advantageously exploit the improved netting's lesser amount of material, lower manufacturing cost, reduced drag which lower forces on mooring or towing systems, and longer life. Another 15 advantageous use for netting in accordance with the present invention is barrier nets such as those used at ballparks, particularly when replacing nets made of costly materials such as Dyneema. Barrier netting may also be made with knotless netting technology, especially when the twines are made from 20 different materials including chemical composition, and/or concentration. Also to increase service life of barrier netting in accordance with the present invention, conventional machine-made netting may, after manufacture, be coated with a bonding material in striped or patterned areas to attenuate 25 vibration.
Although the present invention has been described in terms of the presently preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that such disclosure is purely illustrative and is not to be interpreted as limiting. For example, different terms of art 30 may be used in place of those terms "Shuttle" or "Basic" used above, whether for twines, or in reference to a knotting machine or manufacturing process for knotted netting. Consequently, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, various alterations, modifications, and/or alterna-35 tive applications of the invention will, no doubt, be suggested to those skilled in the art after having read the preceding disclosure. Accordingly, it is intended that the following claims be interpreted as encompassing all alterations,
WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787
36
modifications, or alternative applications as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims (32)
1. A method of making improved netting that includes mesh cells having pairs of mesh bars fabricated from at least one continuous length of twine, pairs of mesh bars of each mesh cell being connected at intersections therebetween, the method comprising the step of: forming separate sections of the improved netting with differing physical properties that attenuate vibration of the improved netting during field operations in which the improved netting moves through a water entrained environment.
2. The method of making improved netting of claim 1: wherein the improved netting is fabricated from at least two continuous lengths of twine, respectively a basic twine and a shuttle twine, that connect to each others at intersections therebetween, and; wherein material for at least one of the twines has differing physical properties that attenuate vibration of the improved netting during field operations in which the improved netting moves through a water entrained environment.
3. The method of making improved netting of claim 1 or 2 wherein the differing physical properties include at least one physical characteristic which varies along the length of at least one of the twines.
4. The method of making improved netting of claim 3 wherein the at least one physical characteristic which varies along the length of at least one of the twines is the bonding thereof.
5. The method of making improved netting of claim 3 wherein at least one plait of several plaits making up at least one of the twines has a construction which differs from constructions of other plaits of the twine to provide the at AMENDED SHEET (ARTICLE 19) INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE f!F N.Z 2 3 DEC 2004 RECEIVED WO 02/095107 42 PCT/U S02/15787 least one physical characteristic which varies along the length of at least one of the twines.
6. The method of making improved netting of claim 1 or 2 wherein the differing physical property include differing physical characteristics respectively for the basic twine and for the shuttle twine.
7. The method of making improved netting of claim 6 wherein differing physical characteristics of the basic twine and shuttle twine include different materials respectively forming the basic twine and forming the shuttle twine.
8. The method of making improved netting of claim 6 wherein differing physical characteristics of the basic twine and shuttle twine include different diameters respectively for the basic twine and for the shuttle twine.
9. The method of making improved netting of claim 6 r wherein differing physical characteristics of the basic twine and shuttle twine include different basic construction respectively for the basic twine and for the shuttle twine.
10. The method of making improved netting of claim 6 wherein differing physical characteristics of the basic twine and shuttle twine include different elasticity respectively for the basic twine and for the shuttle twine.
11. The method of making improved netting df claim 6 wherein differing physical characteristics of the basic twine and shuttle twine include different densities for materials respectively forming the basic twine and forming the shuttle twine.
12. The method of making improved netting of claim 6 wherein differing physical characteristics of the basic twine and shuttle twine include different bonding respectively of the basic twine and of the shuttle twine. AMENDED SHEET (ARTICLE 19) INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF N.Z. 2 3 DEC 200^ RECEIVED WO 02/095107 43 PCT/US02/15787
13. The method of making improved netting of any of claims 1 to 12 wherein stripes of bonding material are applied to conventional netting to attenuate vibration thereof during field operations in which the improved netting moves through a water entrained environment.
14. the method of making improved netting of any of claims 1 to 12 wherein patterns of bonding material are applied to conventional netting to attenuate vibration thereof during field operations in which the improved netting moves through a water entrained environment.
15. The method of making improved netting of claim 13 or 14 further comprising the step of selecting the conventional netting to be knotless netting.
16. An improved netting that includes taesh cells having pairs of mesh bars fabricated from at least one continuous length of twine, pairs of mesh bars of each mesh cell being connected at intersections therebetween, the improved netting comprising: separate sections which have differing physical properties that attenuate vibration of the improved netting during field operations in which the improved netting moves through a water entrained environment.
17. The improved netting of claim 16: wherein the improved netting is fabricated from at least two continuous lengths of twine, respectively a basic twine and a shuttle twine, that connect to each others at intersections therebetween, and; wherein material for at least one of the twines has differing physical properties that attenuate vibration of the improved netting during field operations in which the improved netting moves through a water entrained environment. AMENDED SHEET (ARTICLE 19) INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF NZ WO 02/095107 44 PCT/US02/15787
18. The improved netting of claim 17 wherein the differing physical properties selected include at least one physical characteristic which varies along the length of at least one of the twines.
19. The improved netting of claim 18 wherein the at least one physical characteristic which varies along the length of at least one of the twines is the bonding thereof.
20. The improved netting of claim 18 wherein at least one plait of several plaits making up at least one of the twines has a construction which differs from constructions of other plaits of the twine which provides the at least one physical characteristic which varies along the length of at least one of the twines.
21. The improved netting of claim 17 wherein the differing physical property selected include differing physical characteristics respectively for the basic twine and for the shuttle twine.
22. The improved netting of claim 21 wherein differing physical characteristics of the basic twine and shuttle twine include different materials respectively forming the basic twine and forming the shuttle twine.
23. The improved netting of claim 21 wherein differing physical characteristics of the basic twine and shuttle twine include different diameters respectively for the basic twine and for the shuttle twine.
24. The improved netting of claim 21 wherein differing physical characteristics of the basic twine and shuttle twine include different basic construction respectively for the basic twine and for the shuttle twine.
25. The improved netting of claim 21 wherein differing physical characteristics of the basic twine and shuttle twine AMENDED SHEET (ARTICLE 19) WO 02/095107 PCT/US02/15787 45 include different elasticity respectively for the basic twine and for the shuttle twine.
26. The improved netting of claim 21 wherein differing physical characteristics of the basic twine and shuttle twine include different densities for materials respectively forming the basic twine and forming the shuttle twine.
27. The improved netting of claim 21 wherein differing physical characteristics of the basic twine and shuttle twine include different bonding respectively of the basic twine and of the shuttle twine.
28. The improved netting of any of claims 16 to 27. wherein stripes of bonding material applied to conventional netting attenuate vibration thereof during field operations in which the improved netting moves through a water entrained environment.
29. The improved netting of any of claims 16 to 27 wherein patterns of bonding material applied ." to conventional netting attenuate vibration thereof during field operations in which the improved netting moves through a water entrained environment.
30. The method of making improved netting of claim 28 or 29 wherein the conventional netting is knotless netting.
31. A method of making improved netting substantially as herein described with reference to the accompanying figures.
32. The improved netting substantially as herein described with reference to the accompanying figures. AMENDED SHEET (ARTICLE 19) INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF N.Z. 2 3 DEC 2004 RECEIVED
Applications Claiming Priority (7)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US29186701P | 2001-05-18 | 2001-05-18 | |
US29796501P | 2001-06-12 | 2001-06-12 | |
US29815201P | 2001-06-12 | 2001-06-12 | |
US30118501P | 2001-06-26 | 2001-06-26 | |
US30963601P | 2001-08-01 | 2001-08-01 | |
US36713402P | 2002-03-22 | 2002-03-22 | |
PCT/US2002/015787 WO2002095107A1 (en) | 2001-05-18 | 2002-05-07 | Reduced-bulk, enhanced-resilience, lower-drag netting |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
NZ529252A true NZ529252A (en) | 2005-03-24 |
Family
ID=27559610
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
NZ529252A NZ529252A (en) | 2001-05-18 | 2002-05-07 | Reduced-bulk, enhanced-resilience, lower-drag netting |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1402098A4 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2002309937A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2447483A1 (en) |
IS (1) | IS7023A (en) |
NO (1) | NO20035105D0 (en) |
NZ (1) | NZ529252A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2002095107A1 (en) |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3129632A (en) * | 1963-01-08 | 1964-04-21 | Robert J Starr | Net |
US4466331A (en) * | 1983-06-06 | 1984-08-21 | Redden Net Co., Inc. | Method of forming twisted multiple strand synthetic twine, twines produced thereby, and fishnets formed thereof |
US4619108A (en) * | 1985-04-19 | 1986-10-28 | Amikan Fishing Net Mfg. Co., Ltd. | Multiple strand twines comprising monofilaments and multiple filaments, and fishnets formed thereof |
DK1310167T3 (en) * | 1997-04-14 | 2006-01-02 | Otter Ultra Low Drag Ltd | Improved cell design for a trawling system and methods |
JP2002501763A (en) * | 1998-02-10 | 2002-01-22 | マートロール・インコーポレイテッド | Two-way manufacturable lift-generating mesh bar |
-
2002
- 2002-05-07 EP EP02736966A patent/EP1402098A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2002-05-07 AU AU2002309937A patent/AU2002309937A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-05-07 NZ NZ529252A patent/NZ529252A/en unknown
- 2002-05-07 CA CA002447483A patent/CA2447483A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-05-07 WO PCT/US2002/015787 patent/WO2002095107A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2003
- 2003-11-11 IS IS7023A patent/IS7023A/en unknown
- 2003-11-17 NO NO20035105A patent/NO20035105D0/en unknown
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2002095107A1 (en) | 2002-11-28 |
CA2447483A1 (en) | 2002-11-28 |
EP1402098A1 (en) | 2004-03-31 |
EP1402098A4 (en) | 2006-05-03 |
IS7023A (en) | 2003-11-11 |
NO20035105D0 (en) | 2003-11-17 |
WO2002095107A8 (en) | 2004-05-21 |
AU2002309937A1 (en) | 2002-12-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7316175B2 (en) | Reduced-bulk, enhanced-resilience, lower-drag netting | |
US20050160656A1 (en) | Self-spreading trawls having a high aspect ratio mouth opening | |
CA2234653C (en) | Trawl system cell design and methods | |
DK179746B1 (en) | Coverbraided rope for pelagic trawls | |
DK178676B1 (en) | Method for Forming a Coverbraided Lace Line | |
US6434879B1 (en) | Bi-directional, manufacturable, lift-generating mesh bar | |
JP2014528248A (en) | Aquaculture nets with multiple walls with different wire orientation directions | |
WO2006127701A2 (en) | Improved reduced-bulk, enhanced-resilience, lower-drag netting | |
US10301773B2 (en) | Coverbraided rope for pelagic trawls | |
NZ529252A (en) | Reduced-bulk, enhanced-resilience, lower-drag netting | |
RU2268328C2 (en) | Net with reduced bulk, enhanced elasticity, reduced hydrodynamic resistance | |
US20040251688A1 (en) | Stable, stronger, lower bulk and drag netting | |
KR101993196B1 (en) | Raschel knit net | |
JP3838402B2 (en) | Fishery braid | |
US20240032520A1 (en) | Rope for trawl nets with high-strength eye-splice | |
KR102032388B1 (en) | Net for Fish Congregating Device | |
JP3874957B2 (en) | Fishing gear using braid and fishing method using this fishing gear | |
JPS6225111Y2 (en) | ||
DeAlteris et al. | Practical twinework for fishermen and gear technologists | |
WO2011155847A1 (en) | Netting for use for farming of fish, method for production of the netting and use of same | |
JPS5842733B2 (en) | Guyomou | |
JPS61258059A (en) | Yarn making method for having new fiber distribution and interlacing property |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
ASS | Change of ownership |
Owner name: HOTNET, INC., US Free format text: OLD OWNER(S): SHERIF ADHAM SAFWAT; VALENTIN GAVRILOVICH PEREVOSHCHIKOV |
|
ASS | Change of ownership |
Owner name: CANDIS EHF., IS Free format text: OLD OWNER(S): HOTNET, INC. |
|
PSEA | Patent sealed | ||
RENW | Renewal (renewal fees accepted) |