NZ252037A - Livestock improvement; growth rate of ruminants improved by simultaneous feeding of protected protein and protected lipid material - Google Patents

Livestock improvement; growth rate of ruminants improved by simultaneous feeding of protected protein and protected lipid material

Info

Publication number
NZ252037A
NZ252037A NZ252037A NZ25203793A NZ252037A NZ 252037 A NZ252037 A NZ 252037A NZ 252037 A NZ252037 A NZ 252037A NZ 25203793 A NZ25203793 A NZ 25203793A NZ 252037 A NZ252037 A NZ 252037A
Authority
NZ
New Zealand
Prior art keywords
protected
protein
lipid
hereinbefore defined
livestock
Prior art date
Application number
NZ252037A
Inventor
John Richard Ashes
Trevor William Scott
Original Assignee
Commw Scient Ind Res Org
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Commw Scient Ind Res Org filed Critical Commw Scient Ind Res Org
Publication of NZ252037A publication Critical patent/NZ252037A/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K50/00Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals
    • A23K50/10Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for ruminants
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K20/00Accessory food factors for animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K20/10Organic substances
    • A23K20/142Amino acids; Derivatives thereof
    • A23K20/147Polymeric derivatives, e.g. peptides or proteins
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K20/00Accessory food factors for animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K20/10Organic substances
    • A23K20/158Fatty acids; Fats; Products containing oils or fats
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K40/00Shaping or working-up of animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K40/30Shaping or working-up of animal feeding-stuffs by encapsulating; by coating
    • A23K40/35Making capsules specially adapted for ruminants

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Birds (AREA)
  • Fodder In General (AREA)
  • Feed For Specific Animals (AREA)

Description

New Zealand Paient Spedficaiion for Paient Number £52037 New Zealand No. International No. 252037 PCT/Atf93/00213 TO BE ENTERED AFTER ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLICATION Priority dates: H \ ® I Intemational fifing date: i\ \ Qassification: lPC4». t / lO, ^ § Publication date: 2 6 NOV 1996 Journal No.: I <-+ I O • NO DRAWINGS , NEW ZEALAND PATENTS ACT 1953 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION Title of invention; Feed conversion Name, address and nationality of ' applicant(s) as in international application form: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation of Limestone Avenue, Campbell, Act 2601, Australia (Av\ • 252037 1 Feed Conversion Technical Field This invention relates to techniques for improving the efficiency of feed conversion, growth and yield of meat from ruminant livestock.
Background Art The competitiveness of world beef markets is presenting producers with increasing pressures to achieve more efficient feed conversion by animals during the growing and rattening phases of their development. As dietary ingredients account for approximately 70% of the costs associated with feedlotting of ruminants, small increases in the efficiency of feed conversion, growth rate and meat yield can have significant effects on the overall economic profitability of feedlot operations. At the same time, there are wider market opportunities for producers who are able to manipulate carcass characteristics to meet various national preferences.
Hitherto, both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of beef production have generally been approached by providing carefully regulated diets based on traditional feedstuffs, and by the adoption of controlled management practices, such as feedlotting. It has, however, been recognised since the late 1960s that by feeding proteins or lipids which are protected from degradation in the rumen but available for absorption from the abomasum and lower digestive tract, it is possible to improve wool, meat or milk production, and to modify carcass fat composition, in particular to increase the unsaturated fatty acid content of the fat.
US Patent 3 507 662 concerns a feed supplement in which the protein content is primarily protected from rumen degradation by cross-linking with natural tannins. The specification includes examples showing that the protein is indeed, protected but there is no exemplification of body weight response.
US Patent 3 541 204 concerns the encapsulation of biologically active substances such as amino acids, vitamins and drugs with hydrogenated fats to protect them from rumen degradation. According to one example, finishing steers fed encapsulated methionine over a 10 week period exhibited weight gains which were of the order of 22% better than those of animals on an unprotected control diet. In another example involving growing/fattening steers, feeding encapsulated methionine over 30 days resulted in weight gains approximately 14% better than those of animals on the control diet.
Australian Patent 402 712 discloses a supplement in which the protein, by treatment with ar, aldehyde, is rendered insoluble in the rumen but soluble in the abomasum. The invention is particularly directed to increasing wool growth in sheep, however, one example indicates that sheep fed the supplement were likely to experience a 6 to 8% better body weight resE?ons^--than sheep fed an unsupplemented diet. wo 93/22936 2 0 3 PCT/AU93/002I3 2 Australian Patent 450 530 concerns a supplement in which the lipid component is encapsulated within aldehyde cross-linked protein to prevent reaction with rumen contents. The supplement is designed to permit modification (in particular to increase the unsaturation level) of ruminant meat and milk fat, and the feeding of high energy diets 5 without digestive disturbance. The patent does not reveal that the supplement has any effect on growth rate.
More recently, International Patent Application Publication W091/05482 describes a ruminant supplement in which a protective encapsulating medium is cross-linked using the Maillard browning reaction. The examples demonstrate higher polyunsaturate in the io fat of animals fed the supplement, but there is no reference to any effect on body weight.
The prior art, then, has focussed on the gains from feeding a protected protein or from feeding protected lipid, but has not considered the consequences when an animal has access to both such materials.
The present invention makes use of nutritional materials protected against rumen is degradation, but offers the possibility of achieving food conversion significantly in excess of that previously reported. Additionally, the invention offers considerable scope for modifying carcass fat/protein ratios to meet market requirements. It is based on the discovery that simultaneous feeding of controlled amounts of protected protein and protected lipid results in increases in feed conversion, growth rate and carcass yield, 20 which are greater than anything that might reasonably have been expected from past experiences of feeding such supplements independently, ie. there is a synergistic effect. Moreover the increases are of a magnitude which. will almost certainly prove economically attractive to the producer.
Brief Description of the Drawings 25 Figure 1 shows the relationship between body weight and the weight of carcass protein and fat for beef cattle. The period A is the period of maximum muscular development, that is, when weight gain derives mainly from protein production - often called the "growing phase". Following what is called the "breakpoint" (B), there is a period (C) of even greater growth rate which can be attributed to increasing fat 30 deposition, ie. a "fattening phase".
Disclosure of the Invention According to the broadest aspect of this invention there is provided a method of improving the growth rate and modifying the carcass quality of ruminant livestock, which comprises simultaneously feeding to the livestock, protected protein and protected lipid in 35 a ratio of substantially'3:1 "to 1:3.
According to another aspect of this invention there is provided a method of improving the growth rate and modifying the carcass quality of ruminant livestock, which 252037 3 comprises simultaneously feeding to the livestock, protected protein and protected lipid in ratios varying from about 3:1 to about 1:1 during the growing phase to about 1:1 to about 1:3 during the fattening phase.
According to another aspect of this invention there is provided a method of 5 improving the growth rate and modifying the carcass quality of ruminant livestock, which comprises simultaneously feeding to the livestock, protected protein and protected lipid in ratios substantially the same as the carcass protein/fat ratios indicated in Figure 1.
Definitions In this specification the term "simultaneous" is used to mean feeding within a period of about 24 hours, ie. to realise the benefits of the invention it is not essential that the intake of protected protein and protected lipid takes place at the same time, rather it is important that within a given 24 hour period the animals blood plasma is enriched with both protein and lipid constituents by absorption from the abomasum or lower digestive tract.
By "prorecicd" we mean treated so as not to be fully exposed to the aegradative action of the rumen environment, but available for absorption from the abomasum or lower digestive tract. As will be apparent from discussion of the prior art earlier in this specification, a range of techniques have been developed for achieving such protection. Suitable techniques should allow accurate control of the amount of cross-iinking that 20 occurs between the protein feedstuffs and the aldehyde; this may be achieved by varying the amount of aldehyde relative to the protein content and its amino acid composition, so that the protein is optimally "protected" from rumen degradation, but may be completely digested and absorbed from the small intestine. For the purposes of this invention the optimal degree of rumen protection lies in the range 50 to 70%, ie. 50 to 70% of the := protein content of the supplement will pass undegraded through the rumen. Likewise, dietary fats can be protected from ruminal metabolism by encapsulation in a matrix of cross-linked proteins, and here the preferred window of protection ranges from 65 % to 90%, especially 75% to 90% for fats derived from various sources; ie. 75% to 90% of the fats will pass undegraded through the rumen.
Best Modes of Carrying Out the invention In performance of this invention it is likely to be most practical to feed animals a supplement which combines a protected protein and a protected lipid. Typically these supplements will be fed at the rate of about 20% of the total feedlot ration, and the ratio of protected protein to protected lipid will vary depending upon the stage of grewth and fattening. An econcmically viable source of both protein and 1-ip-irf is likely to be oil seed (eg. cotton, sunflower, canola), however it is also feasible to use proteins and lipids derived from animal sources (eg. casein, tallow, lard) and this offers the' ^lfeMbillty to select - \ 1 2 5 2 0 3 7 PCT/AU93/00213 4 components of the protein-lipid mix according to the relative prices and availability of raw materials.
Regardless of whether the adopted diet involves the supply of protected protein and protected lipid separately or in combination, the invention is not to be construed as 5 requiring the continual, simultaneous feeding of protected protein and protected lipid throughout the growing and/or fattening phases. Clearly the benefits possible from practising this invention can be expected to be related to the continuity and period of feeding the protected materials, and to amounts fed, but other factors such as target markets and cattle specifications, eg. genotype, age, and physiological condition; the io environmental situation (temperature, humidity), should also be taken into account when deciding on the feeding regime to be adopted.
Thus, for the Australian markets, where there is a preference for lighter cattle, eg. having a body weight at slaughter of approximately 350kg to 400kg, the feeding of protected protein and protected lipid in the proportions of about 3:1 to about 1:1 for is approximately 90 to 100 days would be recommended for optimum feed conversion, growth rate and carcass yield. Whereas in some of the Asian markets, eg. Japan, where meat containing a higher amount of fat and reproducible organoleptic characteristics (eg. texture, flavour) is preferred, the better procedure would be to change the proportion of protected protein to protected lipid from about 1:1 to about 1:3 as the body weight of the 20 animal increases from 400kg to 700kg during a 150 day feedlot period. Hence, the invention embodies a practical feeding strategy with considerable flexibility to satisfy the various phases of growth and fattening.
Practice of this invention can be expected to offer economic benefits irrespective of the type of animal in question, however, a particular benefit will be observed with what 25 might be called "high weight" steers, ie. steers above about 400kg. In a trial (see Example IV) with Hereford cross steers of average weight 470kg, the feeding of protected protein/lipid supplements during the "fattening" phase resulted in about a 20% improvement in feed conversion, an increase in dressing percentage from 59.7 to 60.7. and, in the case of animals fed the high fat supplement (Group III), the fat content of the 30 carcass was increased by about 10%. ("Dressing percentage" is the ratio of hot dressed weight, fat removed, to final live weight reduced by 4% to allow for shrinkage).
The provision of protected feedstuffs in accordance with this invention, should not be seen as associated with any particular ration or dietary component, the invention does, however, offer unexpected additional benefits in certain circumstances. Thus (see 35 Example V) the carcasses of animals fed an oat concentrate ration together with protected protein/lipid supplements during the growing period had 15% less fat content than similar animals fed a barley concentrate and protected supplements, but without any significant reduction in average live weight gain or feed conversion. This can be commercially important because oats can cost up to SAU40.00 per tonne less than barley, and also 252037 PCT/AU93/00213 because of increasing market interest in low fat meat. Further, ionophores, such as monensin, are widely used in the feedlot industry to improve feed conversion. We have found (see Example VI) that the feeding of protected protein/lipid supplements in association with ionophores during the growing phase can effect dramatic (up to 40%) 5 decreases in carcass fat content-again without any deleterious affect in carcass weight.
The invention will now be described in greater detail by reference to specific examples.
Example 1: Preparation of Supplements (a) Protected Protein. : o Protected protein was prepared by spraying 37 % (W/V) formaldehyde at the rate of 0.7g formaldehyde per lOOg crude protein into a rapid mixing device containing milled sunflower seed meal (38% crude protein). This material was then transferred to sealed storage for 10 days to give a supplement 60% resistant to proteolysis in the rumen. (b) Protected Lipid.
:= Canola oilseed was coarsely comminuted in a hammer mill and mixed with ethoxyquin (150pprn on an oil basis). This material was then mixed with water to produce a slurry and, after emulsification of the oil and protein in a colloid sune mill, the caustic soda was added to solubilise the oilseed protein. The protein constituents of the homogenised oil seed were cross-linked with 37% (w/v) formaldehyde at the rate of 2.7g 20 formaldehyde per 100° crude portion to form a gel which was then dried in a pneumatic drier with an average hot air temperature of 300°C to complete the reaction and produce a protected lipid that was 85% resistant to metabolism in the rumen in vitro.
Example II: Fifty Hereford cross steers, average weight of 290kg, were assigned to 5 groups of 25 10 and fed the following barley based concentrate rations for 133 days. The results of the trial are shown in the following table: Group 1 Control (15% SSM) II % PSM III % PCS IV % PSM + 10% PCS V % PSM + 15% PCS Daily gain (kg) 1.32 1.26 1.32 1.32 1.28 Feed/gain (kg/kg) 7.55 7.67 7.03 6.84 6.99 Carcass traits Warm weight (kg) 247 247 252 257 257 Dressing percent 55.6 55.5 56.8 57.7 57.6 SSM = Sunflower seed meal (NOT protected) PSM = Protected sunflower seed meal PCS = Protected canola oil seed In groups IV and V the synergistic effects of feeding protected protein (15% of ration) and protected lipid (10 to 15% of ration) on warm carcass weight and dressing 252037 percent are clearly demonstrated. There was also a 9 to 10% improvement in feed conversion (feed gain), which was more pronounced in group IV, ie. where 15% protected protein and 10% protected lipid was fed.
Example HE: Two hundred Hereford steers, average weight of 280kg, were assigned to two groups of 100 and received the following barley based concentrate ration. The results are shown in the following table: ' I Control 15% SSM 0% Lipid Group Daily gain (kg) 1.35 ± 0.016 >1 % PSM %- Ii £id_ 1.49 ± 0.02 Carcass traits Warm weight (kg) 221.8 Dressins % I 228.7 55.66 57.04 SSM = Sunflower seed meal (NC7 protected) PSM = Protected sunflower seed meal io In this trial the synergistic effects of feeding protected protein (15% of ration) and protected lipid (10% of ration) on daily weight gain and dressing percentage are demonstrated; there was a 10% increase in average daily gain and a highly significant increase (P < 0.05) in meat yield.
Example IV: One hundred and sixty Hereford steers of average weight 470kg were assigned to three groups of 15 and fed a barley (55%)/Silage (8%) ration for 175 days. The results are shown in the following table: Group I Control 10% SSM 0% Lipid Daily sain (kg) 1.21 Feed/gain (kg/kg) Carcass traits Warm weight (kg) Dressing % Fat Depth (mm) CPS Site) SSM = Sunflower seed meal (NOT protected) PSM — Protested sunflower seed meal 20 PCS = Protected cotton seed (dehulled) The PS site is over the eighth rib. 11 % PSM 10% PCS 1.31 UI % PSM 15% PCS 1.36 Example V: One hundred and sixty Hereford steers of average weight 292kg were assigned to '.</ concentrates rations supplemented two groups of 80 and rec 2 8 NOV 1995 «eccivHD

Claims (20)

vo 93/22936 25 2037 PCT/AL'93/00213 with protected sunflower seed meal (PSM) 15%, and protected cotton seed lipid (PCS) The results are shown in the following table: Group 1 Oats + 15% PSM + 10% PCS II Barley + 15% PSM + 10% PCS Daily gain (kg) 1.47 1.57 Feed/gain (kg/kg) 5.9 5.7 Carcass traits Warm weight (kg) 210 217 Dressing % 55.0 56.1 Fat Depth (mm) 12.7 15.2 PSM = Protected sunflower seed meal PCS = Protected cotton seed lipid supplement Example VI: Twenty Hereford cross steers of average weight 218kg were assigned to two groups of 10 and received the following oat-based ration supplemented with protected cotton seed (10%) with ( + ) or without (-) 320mg/d monensin. The results are shown in the followins table: Group Monensin 1 Oats 11 Oats + 15% SSM + 15% PSM + 10% PCS + 10% PCS Daily gain (kg) - 1.31 1.59 + 1.44 1.38 1 Carcass traits Warm weight - 171 189 (ks) -r 180 170 Dressing % - 52.2 53.2 + 52.5 51.1 Fat Depth (mm) - 9.5 9.8 (P8 Site) + 10.3 4.8 10 SSM = Sunflower seed meal PSM = Protected seed meal PCS = Protected cotton seed lipid supplement Industrial Applicability The present invention makes use of nutritional materials protected against rumen is degradation, but offers the possibility of achieving food conversion significantly in excess of that previously reported. Additionally, the invention offers considerable scope for modifying carcass fat/protein ratios to meet market requirements. Practise of this invention can be expected to offer economic benefits irrespective of the type of animal in question, however, a particular benefit will be observed with what might be called "high 20 weight" steers, ie. steers above about 400kg. 2S2.0 3 1 WHAT)(/WE CLAIM IS; 8 Feed Conversion
1. A method of improving the growth rate and modifying the carcass quality of ruminant livestock, which comprises simultaneously (as hereinbefore defined) feeding to 5 the livestock, protected (as hereinbefore defined) protein and protected (as hereinbefore defined) lipid in a ratio of substantially 3:1 to 1:3'.
2. A method according to claim 1, v/herein the source of both protein and lipid is oil seed (eg. cotton, sunflower, canola). io
3. A method according to claim l, wherein the source of both protein and lipid is animal (eg. casein, tallow, lard).
4. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the degree of rumen protection (protein) lies in the range 30 to 70%.
5. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the degree of rumen is protection (dietary fats) ranges from 65 to 90%.
6. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the degree of rumen protection (dietary fats) ranges from 75 to 90%.
7. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the ratio of protected protein to protected fat is selected in accordance with the stage of growth and fattening of 20 the animals.
8. A method according to claim 7, wherein the protected protein and protected lipid are fed in the proportions of substantially 3:1 to 1:1 far substantially 90 to 100 days far limm feed conversion, growth rate and carcass yield.
9. A method according to claim 7, wherein the protected protein and protected 25 lipid are fed in the proportions of substantially 1:1 to 1:3 as the body weight o£ the animal increases frcm 400kg to 700kg during a 150 day feedlot period.
10. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein the animals are fed a supplement which combines a protected protein and a protected lipid.
11. A method according to claim 10, wherein the supplement is fed at the rate of 30 about 20% of the total feedlot ration
12. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the animals are fed an oat concentrate ration together with protected protein/lipid supplements during the growing period.
13. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein protected 35 protein/lipid supplements are fed in association with ionophores during the growing phase.
14. A method of improving the growth rate and modifying the carcass quality of ruminant livestock, which comprises simultaneously (as hereinbefore defined) '2.5 2 0 3 7 9 feeding to the livestock, protected (as hereinbefore defined) protein and protected (as hereinbefore defined) lipid in ratios substantially the same as the carcass protein/fat ratios as determined from Figure 1.
15. A method of improving the growth rate and modifying the carcass quality of ruminant livestock, which comprises simultaneously (as hereinbefore defined) feeding to the livestock, protected (as hereinbefore defined) protein and protected (as hereinbefore defined) lipid in ratios varying from substantially 3:1 to 1:1 during the growing phase to 1:1 to 1:3 during the fattening phase.
16. A synergistic composition for improving the growth rate and modifying the carcass quality of ruminant livestock, which comprises protected (as hereinbefore defined) protein and protected (as hereinbefore defined) lipid in a ratio of substantially 3:1 to 1:3.
17. Meat and/or other products of ruminant livestock fed in accordance with the method of any one of.claims 1 to 15.
18. A method of improving the growth rate and modifying the carcass quality of ruminant livestock, which comprises simultaneously (as hereinbefore defined) feeding to the livestock, protected (as hereinbefore defined) protein and protected (as hereinbefore defined) lipid in a ratio of substantially 3:1 to 1:3, substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to any one of Examples II to VI. 252037 10
19. A method of improving the growth rate and modifying the carcass quality of ruminant livestock, which comprises simultaneously (as hereinbefore defined) feeding to the livestock, protected (as hereinbefore defined) protein and protected (as hereinbefore defined) lipid in ratios varying from substantially "1 to 1:1 during the growing phase to 1:1 to 1:3 during the fattening phase, substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to any one of Examples II to VI.
20. A synergistic composition for improving the growth rate and modifying the carcass quality of ruminant livestock, which comprises protected fas hereinbefore defined) protein and protected (as hereinbefore defined) lipid in a ratio of substantially 3:1 to 1:3, substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to any one of the Examples.
NZ252037A 1992-05-11 1993-05-11 Livestock improvement; growth rate of ruminants improved by simultaneous feeding of protected protein and protected lipid material NZ252037A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AUPL237092 1992-05-11

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
NZ252037A true NZ252037A (en) 1996-11-26

Family

ID=3776156

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
NZ252037A NZ252037A (en) 1992-05-11 1993-05-11 Livestock improvement; growth rate of ruminants improved by simultaneous feeding of protected protein and protected lipid material

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0644721A4 (en)
JP (1) JPH07506489A (en)
CA (1) CA2135624A1 (en)
NZ (1) NZ252037A (en)
WO (1) WO1993022936A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA933256B (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE69526291D1 (en) 1994-08-04 2002-05-16 Canon Kk liquid crystal device
FR2752507B1 (en) * 1996-08-26 1998-10-30 Mouillet Michel BALANCED CATTLE FEEDING PROCESS
US10064907B2 (en) 2012-02-23 2018-09-04 Oligo Basics Agroindustrial Ltda. Process to improve feed efficiency and carcass characteristics of animals
US20130224320A1 (en) * 2012-02-23 2013-08-29 Joan Torrent Campmany Process to improve feed efficiency and carcass characteristics of animals

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4211795A (en) * 1965-02-03 1980-07-08 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique and Aussedat-Rey Animal feeds
NZ182247A (en) * 1976-03-08 1979-06-08 Blue Wing Corp Lipid containing feed supplements
AU2283277A (en) * 1976-03-08 1978-09-07 Blue Wing Corp Ruminant feed comprising lipid encapsulated in albumin
JPH0327256A (en) * 1989-06-23 1991-02-05 Kyokuto Internatl Corp Feed additive for cattle
WO1992017071A1 (en) * 1991-04-04 1992-10-15 Eighth Milieu Nominees Pty. Ltd. Method and apparatus relating to improvements in the manufacture of silage fodder

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2135624A1 (en) 1993-11-25
JPH07506489A (en) 1995-07-20
WO1993022936A1 (en) 1993-11-25
ZA933256B (en) 1993-11-29
EP0644721A1 (en) 1995-03-29
EP0644721A4 (en) 1995-05-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5219596A (en) Composition and method thereof for increasing milk production in dairy cattle
US5145695A (en) Composition and method thereof for increasing milk production in dairy cattle
Santos et al. Effects of rumen-undegradable protein on dairy cow performance: A 12-year literature review
US4175121A (en) Methionine hydroxy analog-containing feed for lactating cows
US6022566A (en) Method for increasing the feed intake, feed efficiency, daily gain and/or carcass grade in ruminants
US4737365A (en) Method of feeding cattle to improve protein utilization
US5525350A (en) Supplementation of protein diets with di- and tripeptides
Klemesrud et al. Complementary responses between feather meal and poultry by-product meal with or without ruminally protected methionine and lysine in growing calves
CA1263269A (en) Dry mixes of zinc salts with particulate proteinaceous feeds for ruminants
US4704287A (en) Protein-protected ruminant feeds
CA2261340C (en) Method for achieving the same milk component yield in ruminants fed a low crude protein diet
Klemesrud et al. Evaluation of feather meal as a source of sulfur amino acids for growing steers
US5705206A (en) Feed conversion
US5427802A (en) Process for enhancing the growth performance of edible meat-producing animals
NZ252037A (en) Livestock improvement; growth rate of ruminants improved by simultaneous feeding of protected protein and protected lipid material
US5202136A (en) Animal feed ration
CA2457931C (en) Ruminant feed compositions containing metals
AU659557B2 (en) A method of feeding ruminant livestock with protected protein and protected lipid
Ganai et al. Bypass nutrient technology with recent advances for enhancing animal production: A review
US20030129218A1 (en) Dietary supplement
EP1357805A1 (en) Nutritional composition for increasing milk protein in mammals
Umunna et al. Utilization of palm kernel meal by sheep
Kornegay et al. Evaluation of hydrolyzed hog hair meal as a protein source for swine
Rock et al. Escape protein for beef cows: I. Source and level in corn plant diets
Tibbetts Biopeptides in post-weaning diets for pigs: results to date.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
RENW Renewal (renewal fees accepted)
RENW Renewal (renewal fees accepted)
EXPY Patent expired