NZ225971A - A composition comprising lysostaphin and synergistic agent and method for treating mastitis and other staphylococcal infections - Google Patents

A composition comprising lysostaphin and synergistic agent and method for treating mastitis and other staphylococcal infections

Info

Publication number
NZ225971A
NZ225971A NZ22597188A NZ22597188A NZ225971A NZ 225971 A NZ225971 A NZ 225971A NZ 22597188 A NZ22597188 A NZ 22597188A NZ 22597188 A NZ22597188 A NZ 22597188A NZ 225971 A NZ225971 A NZ 225971A
Authority
NZ
New Zealand
Prior art keywords
lysostaphin
composition according
agent
penicillin
lysozyme
Prior art date
Application number
NZ22597188A
Inventor
Peter Blackburn
June Polak
Original Assignee
New York Health Res Inst
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by New York Health Res Inst filed Critical New York Health Res Inst
Priority to NZ22597188A priority Critical patent/NZ225971A/en
Publication of NZ225971A publication Critical patent/NZ225971A/en

Links

Landscapes

  • Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)

Description

L 2 5 9 Priority Dats(s): Complete Specification Filed: idc.-.
Publication Data; JUM -fflf P.O. Journal, No: i NEW ZEALAND PATENTS ACT, 1953 No.
Date: COMPLETE SPECIFICATION A METHOD OF TREATING MASTITIS AMD OTHER STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS P/ We, l1"" PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, a corporation organised and existing under the laws of the State of New York, of 455 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016, United States ' of America hereby declare the invention for which fit we pray that a patent may be granted to r^e/us, and the method by which it is to be performed, to be particularly described in and by the following statement: - (followed by page lAi 26704-364/2622 22 5 9 7 1 BRUMBAUGH, GRAVES, DONOHUE & RAYMOND 30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZA NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10112 TO ALL WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Be it known that WE, PETER BLACKBURN and JUNE POLAK, citizens of the United Kingdom and the United States, residing in New York, County of New York, State of New York, and Brooklyn, County of Kings, State of New York, whose post 10 office addresses are 426 W. 44th Street, New York, New York 10036, and 57 Montague St., Brooklyn, New York 11201, respectively, have invented an improvement in METHOD OF TREATING MASTITIS AND OTHER STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS of which the following is a SPECIFICATION BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This application relates to the use of lysostaphin in the treatment and prevention of staphylococcal infection 20 and, in particular, to the treatment and prevention of staphylococcal bovine mastitis.
Lysostaphin is a bacteriocin secreted by a single known strain of Staohvlococcus simulans originally isolated t and named Staphylococcus staphylolvticus by Schindler and 25 Schuhardt. The production of lysostaphin by S. staphylolvticus has been described previously in U.S. Patent No. 3,278,378 issued October 11, 1966 and in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 51, pp. 414-421 (1964). The single organism S. staphylolvticus (NRRL B-2628) which 30 produced lysostaphin was recently identified as a biovar of 26704-364/2622 22 5 9 7 1 S. simulans by Sloan et al., Int. J. System. Bacteriol., Vol. 32, pp. 170-174 (1982). Since the name S. staphylolvticus is not on the Approved List of Bacterial Names, the organism producing lysostaphin has been redesig-5 nated as S. simulans.
Bacteriocins are proteins secreted by bacteria that kill and sometimes lyse related bacteria. For example, lysostaphin lyses and kills practically all known staphylococcal species but is inactive against bacteria of all 10 other genera. Lysostaphin, isolated from culture filtrates of S. simulans (NRRL B-2628) grown according to published references, is an endopeptidase which cleaves the polyglycine cross-links of the peptidoglycan found in the cell walls of staphylococci. In addition, cultures that produce lyso-15 staphin appear to be resistant to its activities while cultures grown under non-lysostaphin producing conditions are sensitive. 9 Previous studies have shown that lysostaphin can be produced by fermentation techniques wherein S. simulans is 20 grown in liquid culture. Such fermentation techniques are described in U.S. Patent No. 3,278,378 issued October 11, 1966 and in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 51, pp. 414-421 (1964). Various improvements in the • production of lysostaphin by fermentation techniques have 25 also been made as documented in U.S. Patents Nos. 3,398,056, issued August 20, 1968, and 3,594,284, issued July 20, 1971. The latter two references disclose improvements to culture medium and inoculation techniques whereby the production of lysostaphin by fermentation can be accelerated and improved. 30 Lysostaphin is produced by S. simulans during exponential 26704-364/2622 22 5 9 7 1 growth as an inactive precursor. The proenzyme is converted to active mature enzyme by protease produced by stationary phase cultures of S. simulans.
In addition, lysostaphin can be produced by recom-5 binant microorganisms, including strains of E. coli. Bacillus subtilis and B. sphaericus which express the lysostaphin gene. In contrast to the natural production, lysostaphin accumulates during exponential growth in the culture medium of recombinant lysostaphin producing strains as fully pro-10 cessed mature active enzyme and is free of staphylococcal immunogenic contaminants.
Bovine mastitis is a costly problem to the dairy industry, costing over $2 billion per year in the United States alone. The disease is estimated to affect 50 per cent 15 of American dairy cows to some degree, leading to unusable milk, decreased milk production, and, in cases of severe infection, the death of the animal.
Mastitis is caused by infection of the milk glands, principally by Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus 20 aaalactiae. and to a lesser degree by E. coli and other gram-negative bacteria or combinations thereof. Most streptococcal infections have proven to be effectively treatable using conventional antibiotic therapy. Staphylococcal • mastitis has, however, proven more difficult to cure. 25 Traditional prevention of bovine mastitis can involve a complex regimen of daily teat-dipping with a disinfectant solution, (See, J. S. McDonald, 6 Veterinary Clinics of North America Large Animal Practice 269 (1984)) and may, in some cases, involve antibiotic-containing teat 30 dips. Routine antibiotic therapy must be approached with 26704-364/2622 22 5 9 7 1 caution, however, to minimize selection for antibiotic resistant strains. When infection does occur, intramammary infusion of antibiotics is indicated. Antibiotic therapy of this kind can reduce the infection so that the milk produced is 5 saleable, but it generally does not lead to complete elimination of' the causative organism.
In the past, staphylococcal mastitis has shown a poor response to antibiotic therapy and a tendency for infections to recur and become chronic. Studies on mastitis have 10 indicated that part of the problem in treating mastitis is that a significant number of staphylococci remain viable in the mammary gland within phagocytic polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes (PMN). It is believed that the staphylococci within the PMN are protected from the effects of the anti-15 biotic, and, when lysis of the leukocyte occurs, the phago-cytized staphylococci may provide a renewed source of mastitis-producing staphylococcal regrowth.
Studies on the possible mechanism of antibiotic evasion of phagocytized staphylococci in mastitis treatment 20 show that lysostaphin had been rejected as a candidate for destroying phagocytized staphylococci. Craven et al., 29 Research in Veterinary Science 57 (1980); Craven et al., 21 Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 618 (1982); Craven • et al., 5 Como. Immun. Microbial. Infect. Pis. 447 (1982)) 25 Craven et al., 51 Journal of Dairy Research 513 (1984). In these experiments lysostaphin was used in vitro as a pretreatment to destroy extracellular staphylococci prior to exposing the phagocytized staphylococci to cloxacillin, gentamicin or lysostaphin. Craven et al.'s results strongly 30 suggest that lysostaphin would have no effect on mastitis 26704-364/2622 225971 since intracellular staphylococci were still viable after 20 .hours of incubation in a lysostaphin containing solution. 51 Journal of Dairy Research at 515-516, and Table 2.
Lysostaphin has also been reported to penetrate 5 human monocytes. Since monocytes are a different cell type than PMNs, this human model is not likely to be applicable to the treatment of bovine mastitis (van den Broek et al., 21 Scand. J. Immunol 189 (1985)) Lysostaphin has also been shown to be effective in 10 the treatment of staphylococcal renal abscesses in mice, particularly when used in sequence with the administration of methicillin. Dixon et al., 41 Yale J. Biol. Med. 62 (1968).
In man lysostaphin has also been used as a therapeutic agent for treatment of chronic nasal staphylococcal 15 infections (Quickel, Jr. et al., 22 Applied Microbiology 446 (1971)). In one case of a resistant staphylococcal infection, lysostaphin was given systemically (Stark et al., 291 Medical Intelligence 239 (1974)). In general, however, there has been great skepticism and reluctance in the medical and 20 veterinary communities concerning the systemic administration of lysostaphin. Lysostaphin was considered to be too highly immunogenic to have general use for anything but topical applications. ' SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It has now been found that lysostaphin can be used with surprising effectiveness to prevent and/or cure staphylococcal mastitis, even in its chronic form, without any adverse immunogenic effects. As a prophylactic, lysostaphin can be introduced as part of a daily teat-dipping regimen. 225971 Lysostaphin can be used alone but preferably, the teat-dip will include lysostaphin; other bacteriolytic agents such as mutanolysin, a bacteriocin produced by Streptococcus globisporus which is effective against streptococci; and 5 lysozyme, a muralytic enzyme which hydrolyzes the polysaccharide backbone of the peptidoglycan in the cell walls of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria. The formulation may also contain a chelating agent such as ethylenediamine tetraacetate (EDTA); and a mild surfactant 10 which has been found to potentiate the killing of the bacteria. Suitable mild surfactants include, inter alia, esters of polyoxyethylene sorbitan and fatty acids (Tween series), octylphenoxy polyethoxy ethanol (Triton-X series), n-Octyl-8-D-glucopyranoside, n-Octyl-8-D-thioglucopyranoside, 15 n-Decyl-B-D-glucopyranoside, n-Dodecyl-B-D-glucopyranoside, and biologically occurring surfactants, e.g., fatty acids, glycerides, monoglycerides, deoxycholate and esters of deoxycholate. spectrum teat dip, various components of the teat dip can be infused into the infected udder to eliminate the bacteria and cure mastitis, e.g., lysostaphin alone or with a mild surfactant which surprisingly potentiates the staphylocidal effect of lysostaphin more than 1000 times. Furthermore, 25 the combination of lysostaphin and penicillin also exhibits synergy such that a 1000 fold increase in the killing of staphylococci is observed in vitro. Therefore, a formulation for therapeutic infusion can also include penicillin, or a mild surfactant, with or without a chelating agent.
In addition to the prophylactic use of the broad- In penicillin containing formulations it is preferred that the penicillin be present in an amount from 0.1 Mg/ml^ to 10pg/ml. 22 5 9 7 1 26704-364/2622 Infusions of a therapeutally effective amount of lysostaphin, with or without surfactant, EDTA, penicillin or other potentiating agents, are used to achieve elimination of the staphylococcal infection. Preferably such infusions , 5 contain between 2 to 400mg lysostaphin when no potentiating agents are present. In combinations containing potentiating agents, the required effective doses of lysostaphin can be lowered (as a result of its synergistically enhanced activity) by as much as 1000-fold.
Synergistic bactericidal activity of lysostaphin and penicillin was observed even upon administration to penicillinase-positive S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus ("MRSA"). MRSA are usually resistant to multiple antibiotics and are particularly problematic, especially in 15 humans, as well as difficult to kill. The lysostaphin/ penicillin combination would be indicated for use in specific situations where grave MRSA infection cannot be controlled by conventional antibiotic (e.g. penicillin) therapy. In addition, penicillin and other similar acting substances may 20 also be useful together with lysostaphin as an agent against staphylococcal infection and contamination. - 225971 While the utility of the lysostaphin containing formulations according to the invention is illustrated using mastitis treatment, the enhanced effectiveness of the lysostaphin in these formulations makes them suitable for a number of other applications involving staphylococcal infection and contamination. Thus, the formulations could be used to control staphylococcal infections by incorporating them into wound dressings and medications, disinfectant scrubs, wipes or lotions, or in surgical implants. The formulations might also be used for cleaning of medical instruments, and of floors, walls, bedding and the like in circumstances where environmental disinfection is desired. Other potential uses Include use as a nasal infusion to reduce intra-nasal carriage of staphylococci, and food related uses such as treatment of meat, eggs, cheese and fish or food packaging and handling equipment. t BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING Figure 1 shows a chromatogram of lysostaphin produced by transformant B. sphaericus strain 00 containing the recombinant plasmid pBC16-lL which codes for lysostaphin. • 26704-364/2622 22 5 97 1 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Lysostaphin for use according to the claimed invention can be obtained from either natural or recombinant sources. Preferably, the lysostaphin is obtained from 5 Bacillus sphaericus strain 00 containing a recombinant "plasmid which directs the synthesis of lysostaphin, as this provides for both high levels of lysostaphin production substantially free from staphylococcal immunogenic contaminants and facile lysostaphin purification since the lyso-10 staphin accumulates directly in the growth medium. Bacillus sphaericus transformants containing the plasmid pBC16-lL have been found to be particularly suited for this purpose, although other strains are also useful as a source of lysostaphin. One method for obtaining lysostaphin from micro-15 organisms transformed by recombinant plasmids containing the gene which codes for lysostaphin is fully disclosed in U.S. patent application 034,464, filed April 10, 1987, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application 852,407. Both applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Method of Treatment Prophylactic treatments for bovine mastitis according to the invention involve the use of lysostaphin- » containing teat dips. Lysostaphin-containing teat dips provide effective prevention of bovine mastitis when used 25 before and after every milking. Preferably, the preventative regimen is used for all cows in the herd. The teat dips comprise about 1.0 ug/ml lysostaphin in an acceptable carrier. In addition, teat dips for use according to the invention may include about 1.0 ug/ml mutanolysin, about 30 10 ug/ml lysozyme, and a mild surfactant. Acceptable ^<isssw qspzf v 26704-364/2622 22 5 9 7 1 carriers are those which provide a buffered medium of approximately pH 8.0 and include aqueous buffers or hydrophilic ointment bases. For example non-ionic detergents, fatty acids or other mild surfactants, protein carriers, such as 5 serum albumin or gelatin, powdered cellulose and carmel can be used'as a carrier. The teat dip according to the invention may also advantageously include chelating agents, such as EDTA, colorants, and humectants, such as glycerol or sorbitol.
Mutanolysin is obtained from Streptomvces alobis- : porus. Lysozyme is obtained from chicken egg whites.
Intramammary infusion of lysostaphin can be used to effectively treat infected animals who have developed either chronic or acute staphylococcal bovine mastitis despite 15 prophylactic treatment. A single dose of from 2 to 400 mg lysostaphin per milk gland will eliminate the infection and cure staphylococcal mastitis in most instances. Additional doses of lysostaphin may be indicated where the infection is persistent. Doses significantly higher than 400 mg are not 20 recommended as they can lead to unwanted and potentially adverse side effects including transient swelling, tenderness, and reduced milk production. These effects are limited to the treated gland, however, so that higher doses to a single gland may be appropriate in severe and life-25 threatening situations. In life-threatening cases, the route of administration could also include sites other than the infected gland so as to achieve systemic delivery, i.e., intravenous, subcutaneous, or intramuscular, and rectal or oral administration of suitably encapsulated formulations in — FIMI^Wwi .11 V." ~ ' 26704-364/2622 22 597 1 which the lysostaphin is protected from inactivation in the gut.
It has also been found that infusion of a combination of•lysostaphin and penicillin is surprisingly much more 5 efficacious than lysostaphin alone because of an apparent synergistically enhanced bactericidal activity of this combination. In addition, it is believed that the therapeutic lysostaphin formulation may also include other agents which potentiate the bactericidal activity of lysostaphin, 10 for example, synthetic penicillins and other antibiotics, chelating agents, mild surfactants, (e.g., deoxycholate) and other membrane active agents which may facilitate penetration of lysostaphin to the site of infection. In formulations that include e.g., penicillin, the dosage of lysostaphin can 15 be decreased as a result of the potentiated bactericidal activity of lysostaphin. Since too high a dose of lysostaphin can induce unwanted and potentially adverse side-effects, this synergistic effect is significant not only for efficacy but also for avoidance of potential side effects. 20 Examples 1-4 In vitro experiments were conducted to determine the bactericidal activity of lysostaphin, mutanolysin, and lysozyme compositions toward S. aureus and other mastitis • pathogens. The protocol was as follows: Protocol for Viable Cell Assays a 1. Bacterial cells (generally 10 cells/ml) from an overnight plate (incubated at 37°C) were resuspended in Tris buffer (20mM Tris, pH 8). 2. 10 ul of bacterial cell suspension and 1 ml of 30 control and teat dip test formulation (i.e. milk, buffer, or UUEW " i. 26704-364/2622 22 59 7 1 buffered detergent etc., containing the lysostaphin compo' . sition) were combined. 3. The cells were incubated for various times at 37°C. 4. The bacterial suspensions were centrifuged for 2 minutes in benchtop microcentrifuge to pellet cells.
. The pellet was washed twice with 1.0 ml Phage buffer. 6. The cells were resuspended in 1.0 ml of Phage j buffer, serially diluted in Phage buffer as appropriate, and f j 100 ul were plated on GL agar fS. aureus, E. coli. Klebsiella j i pneumoniae.) or Trypticase Soy agar IS. aoalactiael. j 7. The plates were incubated overnight at 37°C and control and test plates were scored for colony forming units, (hereinafter CPU), to determine percent survival.
Composition of Phage buffer; j 50 mM Tris, pH 7.8; 1 mM MgSO^; 4 mM CaCl2; 100 mM NaCl; Gelatin, 1.0 g/1. (Phage buffer helps stabilize any protoplasts and spheroplasts that did not lyse during 20 treatment).
Composition of GL agar per liter: Difco casamino acids, 3.0 g; Difco yeast extract, 3.0 g; NaCl, 5.9 g; Na lactate (60% w/v), 3.3 ml; 25% (v/v) • glycerol, 4.0 ml; agar, 15 g; pH adjusted to 7.8.
Composition of Trypticase Soy agar per liter: Bacto Tryptone, 15 g; Bacto Soytone, 5 g; NaCl, g; agar, 15 g; pH adjusted to pH 7.3.
The results of in vitro experiments demonstrating the bactericidal efficacy of various lysostaphin therapeutic 30 formulations are presented in Tables IA-IC. The results are 26704-364/2622 22 5 9 7 1 presented as the percent survivals for S. aureus strains . Newbould 305, strain RM451, the penicillin resistant strains RN1753 (Penicillinase producer) and Col strain (methicillin resistant).
Table IA presents results for formulations con taining 1 ug/ml, 0.1 ug/ml, 0.01 ug/ml and 0.00 ug/ml (CNTRL) j lysostaphin. As can be seen from these results all levels of lysostaphin tested were effective to kill the organisms in j a buffer vehicle (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0). In a milk vehicle, 1 only 1 ug/ml and 0.1 ug/ml reduced bacterial survival. f j Table IB shows the effect of adding a mild non- ' i ionic surfactant, octylphenoxyl polyethoxy (10) ethanol, j * ;(Triton X-100), to the lysostaphin formulation. For example, ) ;j less than 0.001% of the cells survive exposure to 0.1 ug/ml j ;15 lysostaphin and 0.1% Triton X-100, while 2.2% and 7.7%, j respectively, survived exposure to each compound alone. Even j more surprising, less than 0.001% survival was observed for j ;0.01 ug/ml lysostaphin and 0.1% Triton X-100. j ;Table IC demonstrates the synergistic effect of [ ;I ;20 lysostaphin/penicillin combinations on three strains of i staphylococci. Depending on the doses of each, the combinations of lysostaphin plus penicillin can be 100 to 1000 times more effective than either lysostaphin or penicillin alone • ;with all three strains. ;25 Table ID demonstrates the effect of the combina- ! ;t i ;tion of lysostaphin and penicillin compared with their j sequential effect on S. aureus. S. aureus were suspended at 7 ;10 cells/ml in milk and incubated for the times indicated in the table with either lysostaphin and penicillin together or 30 sequentially. After incubation, samples were centrifuged to ;26704-364/2622 ;22 5 97 1 ;obtain cell pellets which were washed twice, resuspended in 1.0 ml Phage buffer, diluted and 100 ul plated on GL agar. Colony forming units (CFU) were scored after incubation overnight at 37°C to determine percent survival relative to appropriate controls. The lysostaphin/penicillin combination, exhibits a synergistically enhanced bactericidal activity against S. aureus which is at least 3 orders of magnitude greater than that seen when the two agents are added sequentially. ;26704-364/2622 ;22 5 97 1 ;TABLE IA The Effect of Lysostaphin On The ;Strain ;Vehicle ;Incubation Time ;% Survival ;S. aureus Newbould 305 ;Milk ;15' 2h l.OL 0.1L ;2.8 75.0 0.1 82.0 ;0.01L CNTRL ;100 100 100 100 ;RN451 ;Milk ;15« 2h ;<0.1 22 <0.01 41 ;100 100 ;100 100 ;Buffer ;2h nd 2.2 ;20 ;100 ;15 ;20 ;TABLE IB ;The Effect Of Non-Ionic Detergent On The Bactericidal Activity of Lysostaphin Toward S. aureus ;Strain Vehicle ;S. aureus RN451 ;Buffer ;+0.1% ;Triton ;Incubation Time ;% Survival ;O.IL 0.01L 0.1%T O.IL 0.01L CNTRL ;+0.1%T+0.1%T ;2h ;2.2 20 ;7.7 <0.001 <0.001 100 ;TABLE IC ;25 The Effect Of Penicillin On The Bactericidal ;Activity of Lysostaphin Toward S. aureus ;Incubation ;Strain Vehicle Time % Survival ;30 ;0.1L ;0.01L ;0.1P ;0.1L ;0.01L ;CNTRL ;+0.1P ;+0.1P ;S. aureus Milk ;30' ;19 ;100 ;76 ;2.8 ;45 ;100 ;RN451 ;2h ;26 ;100 ;17 ;<0.01 ;0.4 ;100 ;(10P) ;(10P) ;(10P) ;35 ;RN1753 Milk ;2h ;1.9 ;66 ;46 ;<0.01 ;14 ;100 ;penicillinase ;positive ;(10P) ;U0P) ;(10P) ;Col Milk ;2h ;1.0 ;100 ;67 ;<0.01 ;0.5 ;• ;40 ;methicillin ;resistant ;26704-364/2622 ;22 5 9 7 1 ;TABLE ID ;A Comparison of the Effect of the Combination of Lysostaphin and Penicillin Versus Their Sequential ;Effects on the Survival of Staphylcoccus aureus (Strain RN451) in milk at 37°C ;combo(2h) lspn(2h) pen(2h) Pen(2h)/ lspn(2h)/ ;lspn(0.5h) pen(0.5h) ;%survival 0.0005 23 25 0.3 10 ;lspn = lysostaphin; pen = penicillin ;26704-364/2622 ;22 5 97 1 ;In addition, assays for lysostaphin, mutanolysin, and lysozyme activities which measure the decrease in turbidity at 600 nm of suspensions of live S. aureus. S. aaalactiae. and E. coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae, respec-5 tively, indicated that chelating agents (e.g., EDTA) potentiate the lytic activity of each of the three bacteriolytic enzymes. ;The data indicate that lysostaphin is a rapidly acting, highly effective staphylocide, the bactericidal 10 activity of which is potentiated more than 1000 times by penicillin or the mild surfactant, Triton X-100. The inclusion of a chelating agent further potentiates the bactericidal activity of lysostaphin. It is also believed that synthetic penicillins and cell wall-active antibiotics will 15 potentiate the activity of lysostaphin. Lysostaphin is an effective staphylocide in milk, but in buffer the bactericidal activity of lysostaphin is approximately 10 times that observed in milk. ;Example 5 ;20 According to the general protocol described in ;Examples 1-4, further in vitro experiments were performed to evaluate the bactericidal activity of a lysostaphin composition comprising bacteriolytic enzymes, a non-ionic detergent, and buffered chelating agent. As shown in Table II a 25 formulation containing 1% Triton X-100, 0.1 ug/ml lysostaphin, 10 ug/ml lysozyme, and 5 mM EDTA in 20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, (AMBI Teat Dip-0.1) was extremely effective against a wide range of mastitis-causing pathogens, including S. aureus strain Newbould 305, S. eoidermidis. Streptococcus aaalactiae ;OPS'Wit sr. -r ;26704-364/2622 ;22 5 9 7 1 ;strain McDonald and strain C48, and clinical isolates of Streptococcus uberis, E. coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. ;26704-364/2622 ;22 5 9 7 1 ;TABLE II ;In Vitro Efficacy Of AMBI Teat Dip-1 Against Mastitis Pathogens ;Strain Viable Count ;5 Staphylococcus aureus 7.0 x 105 ;(Newbould 305) ;Staphylococcus aureus 5.7 x 10^ ;(RN451) ;Staphylococcus epidermidis 8.3 x 10^ 10 (PS) ;Streptococcus agalactiae 3.9 x 105 ;(McDonald) ;4 ;Streptococcus agalactiae 2.9 x 10 ;(C48) ;15 Streptococcus uberis 6.9 x 105 ;(PS) ;Escherichia coli 9.1 x 10 ;(PS) ;Klebsiella pneumoniae 9.6 x 105 ;20 (PS) ;% Survival <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <1.0 <1.0 ;9 ;26704-364/2622 ;V ;22 5 9 7 1 ;Example 6 ;Trials on cows were performed which demonstrated the efficacy of lysostaphin teat-dip compositions in vivo. ;The tests were performed generally according to Protocol A 5 of the National Mastitis Council. In general, teats were ;! ;.cleaned with a 1% iodine wash solution and dried with a j paper towel. Teats were then rinsed with alcohol and allowed j to air dry. All four teats per cow were next dipped in a ;8 1 ;10 cell/ml suspension of S. aureus strain Newbould 305 to j ;10 cover 1/2 the teat, and allowed to air dry for 30 minutes. f j ;Two teats (right fore and left rear) were then dipped in a j lysostaphin test teat dip formulation (10 ug/ml lysostaphin j j ;in 0.85% saline) to cover 2/3 of the teat, and allowed to air \ ;i dry for 30 minutes; the remaining two teats acted as non- j ;15 treated controls. Each teat was first swabbed with a moist | ;5 ;cotton swab and then washed with 10 ml of 0.85% sterile j saline solution; the wash was collected into a sterile 30 ml f a 1 ;tube. A 0.2 ml sample of the wash, and appropriate dilutions j thereof, were plated on blood agar in duplicate and incubated | ;i ;20 at 37°C for 24-48 hours, Colony forming units were deter- ;| ;mined and percent survival of S. aureus calculated relative to controls. ;Ten ug/ml solutions of lysostaphin in 0.85% saline' ;completely disinfected invading S. aureus from cow teat j ;| ;25 surfaces. Moreover, lysostaphin applied to teat surfaces j prior to exposure of teats to S. aureus suspensions had j sufficient residual activity on the teat surface to prevent i colonization of the teat. Residual activity could be enhanced by inclusion of a polymeric adsorbent and/or inert 30 carrier protein to reduce lysostaphin wash-off. ;4 ;26704-364/2622 ;22 5 9 7 1 ;Example 7 ;In accordance with the results from Example 6 and the data obtained in vitro, an enhanced teat dip formulation (AMBI Teat Dip 1.0) comprising 1.0 ug/ml lysostaphin, 5 10 ug/ml lysozyme, 1.0 % Triton X-100, and 5 mM EDTA in 20 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.0 was evaluated as a disinfectant against S. aureus strain Newbould 305. Teats were dipped in ;O ;10 cells/ml S. aureus strain Newbould 305, and allowed to air dry for 30 min. The treated teats were then dipped in 10 AMBI test teat dip-1.0 solution (1.0 ug/ml lysostaphin, ;10.0 ug/ml lysozyme, 1.0% Triton X-100, 5 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.0) and allowed to air dry for 30 min. Teats were swabbed with a moist cotton swab, and rinsed with 10 ml sterile 0.85% saline. The swab and rinse were plated sepa-15 rately on blood agar plates, incubated 24-48h and CFU determined. The results, shown in Table IIIA clearly demonstrate the efficacy of this preparation. At least a 3 fold order of magnitude reduction was observed in the numbers of S. aureus recovered from treated teats; 50% of treated teats were free 20 from invading S. aureus. ;Corresponding tests were performed in which teats were dipped in preparations containing 2 x 10^ cells/ml Streptococcus aoalactiae strain McDonald, and then allowed to air dry for thirty minutes. The results of these tests are 25 shown in Table IIIB. All of the treated teats were free of S. agalactiae. ;26704-364/2622 ;22 5 9 7 1 ;TABLE IIIA ;In Vivo Efficacy of AMBI Teat Dip-1.0 Against Staphylococcus aureus On Cow Teats ;CONTROL CFU's per ml ;CONTROL CFU's per ml ;Cow No. ;» i ;RH ;LH ;RF ;1 ;225 ;1,675 ;13 ;0 ;2 ;24,500 ;19,500 ;8 ;175 ;3 ;300 ;15,000 ;0 ;15 : ;4 ;78 ;155 ;0 ;150 ;5 ;50,500 ;18,750 ;5 ;8 ;6 ;44,250 ;65,500 ;0 ;0 ;7 ;75 ;43 ;35 ;3 ;8 ;175 ;1,150 ;0 ;0 ;9 ;68 ;58 ;0 ;5 ;10 ;550 ;300 ;0 ;0 ;Average ;12,072 ;12,213 ;6 ;36 ;Total Qtrs Negative ;0/10 ;0/10 ;6/10 ;4/10 ;26704-364/2622 ;22 5 9 7 1 ;TABLE 11 IB ;In Vivo Efficacy of Teat Dip-1.0 against Streptococcus aaalactiae (McDonald strain) on Cow Teats ;Cow. No. ;CONTROL ;TREATED ;5 ;CFU's per ml ;CFU's per ml ;LF ;RH ;LH ;RF ;1. ;5 ;15 ;0 ;0 ;2. ;53 ;360 ;0 ;0 ;3. ;115 ;48 ;0 ;0 ;10 ;4. ;150 ;10 ;0 ;0 ;5. ;13,750 ;1,200 ;0 ;0 ;6. ;16,250 ;725 ;0 ;0 ;7. ;95 . ;320 ;0 ;0 ;8. ;0 ;450 ;0 ;0 ;15 ;9. ;1,175 ;775 ;0 ;0 ;10. ;150 ;300 ;0 ;0 ;Average ;2,574 ;420 ;0 ;0 ;Total Qtrs ;20 ;negative: ;1/10 ;0/10 ;10/10 ;10/1( ;..i&OTCSBad ;26704-364/2622 ;22 5 9 7 1 ;Example 8 ;Guinea pig mammary glands were infected with 200-300 CFU of S. aureus strain Newbould 305. Three days postinfection, the glands were infused with a single dose of 5 lysostaphin dissolved in 200 ul 0.85% sterile saline. Milk samples were collected from the glands 6 hours after treatment and at 12 hour intervals thereafter for at least 5 days after treatment. 100 yl milk samples from treated and nontreated infected glands were plated on blood agar. After 10 24-48 hours incubation, the plates were counted to determine:; CFU. The single doses of lysostaphin which were sufficient to eliminate the infection did not produce adverse side effects and indicated that intramammary infusions of lysostaphin are effective against staphylococcal mastitis. At 125 15 ug/kg, glands were cleared of infection by the 6 hour post-treatment sample and remained clear throughout the study. ;« ;26704-364/2622 ;225971 ;TABLE IV ;Efficacy of Intramammary Infusion of Lysostaphin Toward Experimental STAPHYLOCOCCAL Mastitis in Guinea Pig ;Lysostaphin Dose uo/kg ZERO .1.0 5.0 25.0 62.5 125.0 ;Number of animals cleared of infection ;(0/10) (1/0) (1/2) (2/2) (1/1) (7/7) ;26704-364/2622 ;22 597 1 ;It can be seen from these examples that lysostaphin .is effective for treatment of staphylococcal mastitis and that its effect is greatly enhanced when used in combination with penicillin or with substances such as mild surfactants 5 and chelating agents. ;Production of Lysostaphin from Bacillus ;Lysostaphin for use according to the claimed invention can be obtained from either natural or recombinant sources. Preferably, the lysostaphin is obtained from cul-10 tures derived from Bacillus sphaericus strain 00 transformed by recombinant plasmids which direct lysostaphin synthesis as described in copending application Serial No. 034,464 filed April 10, 1987 which is a continuation-in-part of Serial No. 852,407 filed April 16, 1986. This method provides for both 15 high levels of lysostaphin production substantially free from staphyloccal immunogenic contaminants. Lysostaphin purification is facilitated since active lysostaphin accumulates directly in the growth medium. Using this method. Bacillus sphaericus 00 transformants containing plasmid pBC16-lL 20 (B. sphaericus 00/pBC16-lL) have been found to be particularly suited for the purpose, although other transformed Bacillus strains are also useful as a source of lysostaphin. ;The lysostaphin-producing organism is grown under * conditions conducive to the production of lysostaphin. The' 25 optimum conditions will vary from strain to strain; however, certain types of growth media and fermentation conditions are known to enhance lysostaphin production. In the case of the Bacillus sphaericus 00/pBC16-lL transformant, the preferred growth medium is VY broth (25g Veal Infusion + 5g 26704-364/2622 225971 Yeast Extract/liter) under well-aerated conditions (see Table V). 26704-364/2622 22 5 9 7 1 TABLE V Effect of Aeration on Lysostaphin Production bv the Bacillus Sphaericus 00/pBC 16-1L Transformant Stirring Speed Klett 100 rpm 200 rpm 200 rpm (Fluted) 320 rpm 250 21.8 36.2 .9 .0 350 40.1 68.9 45.3 45.0 400 88.5 62.7 102.8 71.4 - 450 n/a 86.4 52.3 135.9 O/N 64.4 31.3 37.6 57.5 Cultures (40 ml) in 300 ml Klett flasks were inoculated with 4 ml of overnight primary culture. Growth medium: VY broth containing 5 ug/ml erythromycin.
Samples were removed at times throughout growth. Super-natants were assayed for lysostaphin activity by turbi-dometric clearing of dead cell suspensions of S. aureus. Results are presented as ug lysostaphin per ml. $ 26704-364/2622 22 5 9 7 1 B. sphaericus 00/pBC16-lL transformant grown on VY medium produced and secreted approximately 130 mg lysostaphin per liter of culture medium, which is more than four times the amount produced by S. simulans under the best fermentation 5 conditions currently available. Lysostaphin accumulates in the growth medium with little or no degradation, even after prolonged incubation of cultures, and accounts for more than 80% of total extracellular protein.
Lysostaphin is isolated from the growth medium in 10 accordance with known fractional precipitation (salting out) procedures. Alternatively, a particularly effective purification is achieved by combining a precipitation and a chromatographic separation of the fermentation broth from cultures of the lysostaphin-producing B. sphaericus 15 00/pBC16-lL transformant.
Cells are removed from the fermentation broth, for example by centrifugation or ultrafiltration, and solid ammonium sulfate is added to the supernatant to 40-60%, preferably 50%, of saturation. After 1 hour at 4°C, the 20 lysostaphin-containing precipitate is recovered by centrifugation. Recovery at this step is greater than 80%.
The precipitate is redissolved in a minimum volume of 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.00, 50 mM NaCl) and dialyzed against 100 volumes of the same buffer. After 25 removal of any particulate material, the dialyzed solution is chromatographed on a cation exchange column (preferably Pharmacia FPLC Mono S) and eluted using a buffered gradient of increasing salt concentration from 0.05 to 0.25 M NaCl. Recovery of lysostaphin for the single chromatographic step 30 was more than 90%. Lysostaphin activity is associated with 26704-364/2622 22 5 9 7 1 two major peaks (Fig. 1). The later eluting peak of lysostaphin is comprised of non-covalent aggregates of the protein. These aggregates dissociate on dilution in buffer and under conditions of sodium dodecylsulfate polyacrylamide 5 gel electrophoresis.
Construction of the plasmid vector pBC16-lL which contains the gene coding for lysostaphin Lysostaphin-producing strains of Bacillus sphaericus can be produced using recombinant DNA techniques and prefer-10 ably those described in copending applications 852,407 and 034,464. Specifically, total S. simulans DNA is partially cleaved by the appropriate restriction endonuclease and DNA fragments so generated are then ligated to a linearized known vector (pUC8) with compatible ends, carrying an antibiotic 15 resistance marker and the lac Z' gene (i.e. S-galactosidase gene). The ligation mix is then transferred to E. coli (JM105) by transformation. Successful insertions of the lysostaphin gene into the plasmid can be found by selecting for transformants by growth on the appropriate antibiotic, 20 and then finding those with a lac Z' negative phenotype.
Lysostaphin production is detected by turbidometric clearing of a suspension of S. aureus either in solution format or as an overlay on agar plates. i Using various lysostaphin-producing E. coli JM105 25 transformants, restriction analysis and subcloning of the JM105 plasmid DNA showed that the DNA sequence coding for lysostaphin was localized to a 1.5 kbp Hpa II-Hind III DNA fragment. This fragment was visualized after electrophoresis by ethidium bromide staining and transferred to a nitro-30 cellulose filter strip. The strip was washed with NET buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 0.1 m EDTA, 0.02 M Tris, pH 8.0) and the 26704-364/2622 225971 transferred DNA was eluted by incubation of the strip in NET buffer containing 1 M NaCl for 1 hour at 65°C, Ethidium bromide was removed from the DNA by extraction with n-butanol. DNA, precipitated by addition of two volumes of cold 95% 5 ethanol to the aqueous phase, was collected by centrifuga-tion, washed with 80% ethanol and dissolved in TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). Recombinant plasmids capable of transforming B. subtilis as well as B. sphaericus to express lysostaphin were constructed using a derivative 10 of plasmid pBC16 (pBC16-l) as a cloning vector. pBC16 is a tetracycline resistant (Tetr) Bacillus plasmid, originally isolated from B. cereus (K. Bernhard, H. Schremph, and W. Goebel, 133 J. Bact. 897, 1978). Plasmids indistinguishable from pBC16 by restriction analysis and Southern Hybridi-15 zation were also found in soil isolates of B. subtilis and B. sphaericus (J. Polak and R.N. Novick, 7 Plasmid 152, 1982).
The pBC16 derivative (pBC16-l) used as the cloning vector was constructed by ligating the TaqlA fragment of 20 plasmid pE194 (B. Weisblum, M.Y. Graham, T. Gryczan, and D. Dubnau, 137 J. Bact. 635, 1979), an erythromycin resistant (ermr) plasmid from S. aureus, with a partial TaqI digest of plasmid pBC16 using T4 Ligase. After transfer of the liga- • tion mixture to B. subtilis by protoplast transformation 25 (S. Chang and S.N. Cohen, 168 Molec. Gen. Genet. Ill, 1979), clones that were resistant to both tetracycline and erythromycin were selected. One such clone was designated pBC16-l.
Restriction analysis revealed that pBC16-l contained all of the pBC16 TaqI fragments plus the TaqlA frag-30 ment of pE194 which contains the erythromycin resistance ■ -"Br«rr 11 in— ' 26704-364/2622 ^ 22 597 1 determinant. pBC16-l was then digested with the restriction endonuclease PvuII, thereby removing about 25% of the plasmid DNA including most of the tetracycline resistance determinant. The Pvu II-digested vector pBC16-l was treated with 5 calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase. The 1.5 Kbp DNA fragment which codes for lysostaphin was treated with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase. The 1.5 Kbp DNA fragment and plasmid DNA were then mixed and ligated using T4 ligase, and the ligation mixture was transferred to B. subtilis by 10 protoplast transformation. Transformants were resistant to erythromycin, sensitive to tetracycline, and produced lysostaphin as indicated by zones of clearing when grown on agar containing dead S. aureus cells. One such lysostaphin producing clone was picked and designated B. subtilis/pBC16-lL. 15 Plasmid pBC16-lL DNA extracted from the B. subtilis/pBC16-lL transformant was isolated after ultracentrifugation in an ethidium-bromide cesium chloride density gradient. Plasmid pBC16-lL DNA was transferred by protoplast transformation to various species of Bacillus, including B. sphaericus strain 20 00. Transformants were resistant to erythromycin and produced lysostaphin. The B. sphaericus 00/pBC16-lL transformant provides maximum production of lysostaphin and permit accumulation of intact, enzymically active product. • B. sphaericus strain 00 was originally isolated from soil 25 and is maintained in the culture collection (RN3106) of the Public Health Research Institute, New York, New York. B. sphaericus 00/pBC16-lL is maintained in the culture collection of the Public Health Research Institute, New York, New York and has been deposited with the American Type 30 Culture Collection under ATCC Accession No. 67398. 225971

Claims (5)

  1. WHAT WE CLAIM IS: 1. A composition suitable for killing staphylococci comprising lysostaphin and at least one agent which synergistically enhances bactericidal activity of lysostaphin selected from the group consisting of antibiotics, chelating agents, and membrane active agents in amounts sufficient to kill staphylococci.
  2. 2. A composition according to claim 1 wherein the antibiotic is penicillin or synthetic penicillin.
  3. 3. A composition according to claim 1 wherein the membrane active agent is a mild surfactant.
  4. 4. A composition according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the lysostaphin is present at a concentration of at least 0.01 ug/ml.
  5. 5. A composition according to claim 2 or claim 4, containinq penicillin in an amount effective to potentiate the killing effect of lysostaphin. 15 6. A composition according to claim 5, containing 0.1 ug/ml to 10.0 ug/ml penicillin. 7. A composition according to claim 3 or claim 4, containing, a mild surfactant in an amount effective to potentiate the killing effect of the lysostaphin. 20 8. A composition according to claim 7, containing 0.01% to 1.0% by weight of mild surfactant. 9. A composition according to claim I, containing an antibiotic and a membrane the killing effect of the 2251)71 10. A composition according to claim 9 wherein the antibiotic is penicillin and the membrane active agent is a mild surfactant. 11. A composition according to claim 10, containing 0,1% to 1.0% by weight of mild surfactant, 12. A composition according to claim 11,containing 0.1 ug/ml to 10.0 ug/ml penicillin. 5 13. A composition according to claim 1, further comprising mutanolysin and lysozyme. 14. A composition according to claim 1, wherein the lysostaphin is derived from a transformant microorganism containing a recombinant plasmid which codes for lysostaphin. 10 15. A composition according to claim 14, wherein the transformant microorganism contains plasmid pBC16-lL (ATCC deposit No. 67398). 16. A method of treating staphylococcal mastitis comprising administering to an infected gland of a non-human mammal, by intramammary infusion, a therapeutic agent comprisinq lysostaphin in an 15 acceptable carrier in an amount effective to eliminate the staphylococcal mastitis. 17. A method according to claim 16, wherein from 2 mg to 400 mg of lysostaphin is administered to a bovi^rae mammary gland. If*' 20 18. A method according to claim 17, wherein lysostaphin is produced by Bacillus sphaericus t/ai|gf^mants containing a recombinant plasmid which codes for lysostaphin.*" -*j 26704-364/2622 2$5971 19. a method according to claim 16, wherein the lysostaphin is produced by a transformant microorganism containing plasmid pBC16-lL (atcc deposit No. 67398). 20. A method according to claim 16, wherein the ! 5 therapeutic agent further comprises a mild surfactant in an j amount effective to potentiate the therapeutic effect of the | lysostaphin. | therapeutic agent further comprises at least one agent which 10 potentiates the bactericidal activity of lysostaphin selected from the group consisting of penicillin, synthetic penicillins, cell wall-active antibiotics, chelating agents and mild surfactants in an amount effective to synergistically enhance the therapeutic effect of the lysostaphin. 15 22. A method according to claim 21, wherein the therapeutic agent further comprises a mild surfactant in an amount effective to potentiate the therapeutic effect of the lysostaphin. 23. A method according to claim 16, wherein the 20 therapeutic agent further comprises at least one additional bacteriolytic agent. 24. A method according to claim 23, wherein the additional bacteriolytic agent is selected from the group consisting of mutanolysin and lysozyme. 21. A method according to claim 16, wherein the 26704-364/2622 Jft 225971 25. a method according to claim 20, wherein the therapeutic agent further comprises at least one additional bacteriolytic agent. 26. a method according to claim 25, wherein the 5 additional bacteriolytic agent is selected from the group consisting of mutanolysin and lysozyme. 27. A method according to claim 21, wherein the therapeutic agent further comprises at least one additional bacteriolytic agent. 10 28. A method according to claim 27, wherein the additional bacteriolytic agent is selected from the group consisting of mutanolysin and lysozyme. 29. A method according to claim 22, wherein the therapeutic agent further comprises at least one additional 15 bacteriolytic agent. 30. A method according to claim 29, wherein the additional bacteriolytic agent is selected from the group consisting of mutanolysin and lysozyme. 31. A method for preventing bovine mastitis 20 comprising dipping teats in a solution comprising substantially 0.01 ug/ml to 10.0 ug/ml lysostaphin in a suitable carrier, the dipping being done before and after each milking. 26704-364/2622 225971 32. A method for preventing bovine mastitis comprising dipping teats in a solution comprising substantially 0.01 ug/ml to 10.0 yg/ml lysostaphin in a suitable carrier, the dipping being done before or after each milking. 5 33. A method according to claim 31, wherein the solution further comprises mutanolysin and lysozyme. 34. A method according to claim 31, wherein the lysostaphin is produced by transformant Bacillus sphaericus containing a recombinant plasmid which codes for 10 lysostaphin. 35. A method according to claim 31, wherein the transformant Bacillus sphaericus contains plasmid pBC16-lL (ATCC deposit No. 67398). 36. A method according to claim 32, wherein the solution further comprises mutanolysin and lysozyme. IS 37. A method according to claim 32, wherein the lysostaphin is produced by transformant Bacillus sphaericus containing a recombinant plasmid which codes for lysostaphin. 38. A method according to claim 32, wherein the 20 transformant Bacillus sphaericus contains plasmid pBC16-lL (ATCC deposit No. 67398). -37- 2259 A composition suitable for killing staphylococci as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 15 substantially as herein described with reference to the Examples and/or the accompanying drawing. A method of treating staphylococcal mastitis as claimed in any one of claims 16 to 30 substantially as herein described with reference to the Examples and/or the accompanying drawing. A method for preventing bovine mastitis as claimed in any one of claims 31 to 38 substantially as herein descreibed with reference to the Examples and/or the accompanying drawings. plxsljc. health \ ro-^srri-rca-t e of- -rue <-ITN of- HfiUbci: authorised Agent A.J. PARK & SON Pen
NZ22597188A 1988-08-29 1988-08-29 A composition comprising lysostaphin and synergistic agent and method for treating mastitis and other staphylococcal infections NZ225971A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NZ22597188A NZ225971A (en) 1988-08-29 1988-08-29 A composition comprising lysostaphin and synergistic agent and method for treating mastitis and other staphylococcal infections

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NZ22597188A NZ225971A (en) 1988-08-29 1988-08-29 A composition comprising lysostaphin and synergistic agent and method for treating mastitis and other staphylococcal infections

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
NZ225971A true NZ225971A (en) 1991-06-25

Family

ID=19922569

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
NZ22597188A NZ225971A (en) 1988-08-29 1988-08-29 A composition comprising lysostaphin and synergistic agent and method for treating mastitis and other staphylococcal infections

Country Status (1)

Country Link
NZ (1) NZ225971A (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5760026A (en) Method for treating mastitis and other staphylococcal infections
EP0359873B1 (en) Method of treating mastitis and other staphylococcal infections
US8198231B2 (en) Compositions and methods for treatment of staphylococcal infection while suppressing formation of antibiotic-resistant strains
US20180333444A1 (en) Bacteriophage compositions and methods of use thereof
NZ518059A (en) Topical treatment of streptococcal infections using a lysin enzyme coded for by a C1 bacteriophage
CN105031628A (en) Compositions and methods for the treatment or the prevention oral infections by e. coli
US20060142183A1 (en) Method and composition for treatment and/or prevention of antibiotic-resistant microorganism infections
Quinn et al. Emergence of resistance to ceftazidime during therapy for Enterobacter cloacae infections
Petitclerc et al. Efficacy of a lactoferrin-penicillin combination to treat β-lactam-resistant Staphylococcus aureus mastitis
JPH0645553B2 (en) Method for treating mastitis and other staphylococcal infections and composition for treating the same
Johnson et al. Comparative efficacy of ciprofloxacin, azlocillin, and tobramycin alone and in combination in experimental Pseudomonas sepsis
US7063837B2 (en) Syrup composition containing phage associated lytic enzymes
US20040146490A1 (en) Antibacterial therapy for multi-drug resistant bacteria
CA1330758C (en) Method of treating mastitis and other staphylococcal infections
NZ225971A (en) A composition comprising lysostaphin and synergistic agent and method for treating mastitis and other staphylococcal infections
Ali et al. Extraction, purification and therapeutic use of bacteriophage endolysin against multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus: In vivo and in vitro study.
IE63009B1 (en) &#34;Method of treating mastitis and other staphylococcal infections&#34;
IL87686A (en) Compositions for treating staphylococcal infections and methods for treating bovine staphylococcal mastitis
DK175418B1 (en) Preparation for the treatment of mastitis and other staphylococcal infections
Pittet et al. Infective endocarditis and glycopeptides
PT88472B (en) METHODS FOR THE USE OF LYSOSPHINE IN THE TREATMENT OF BOVINE MASTITIS AND OTHER ESTAFILOCOCAL INFECTIONS
Yancey Jr et al. Efficacy of lincosaminide antibiotics in the treatment of experimental staphylococcal mastitis in lactating mice
JP2003519665A (en) Parenteral use of lytic enzymes associated with bacterial phage in therapeutic treatment of bacterial infections
Chambers et al. Efficacy of cefoperazone in combination with sulbactam in experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in rabbits
CN118308337A (en) Bacterial lyase LLysSA9.10 and application thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
RENW Renewal (renewal fees accepted)